►
From YouTube: Planning Commission - April 28, 2021
Description
Planning Commission Meeting - April 28, 2021
https://www.slc.gov/planning/
https://www.slc.gov/planning/planning-commission-agendas-minutes/
A
C
C
You'll
find
this
link
if
you're
still
new
to
joining
an
electronic
meeting
or
a
virtual
meeting,
you
can
view
our
step-by-step
instructions
for
joining
the
virtual
meeting,
just
go
ahead
and
follow
along.
We
hope
they're
they're
helpful
if
you'd
like
to
send
in
comments
or
you
need
help,
you
have
to
leave
this
meeting
early
and
you
need
us
to
read
something
into
the
record.
C
We
are
monitoring
our
email
address
throughout
the
entire
meeting,
so
please
email
us
at
planning
dot
comments
at
slcgov.com
for
those
that
are
in
the
attendee
list.
We
have
a
number
of
folks
and
we
have
all
kinds
of
floating
panels
that
we're
managing
aubry.
Can
you
go
to
the
next
screen
if
you're
waiting
in
that
attendee
list,
you
get
two
minutes
to
speak.
C
If
you
could
raise
your
hand,
it
would
really
help
us
and
on
the
screen.
Aubry
is
sharing
this
tiny
little
hand.
I
keep
saying
I
wish
webex
would
make
it
bigger
in
your
lower
right
hand
corner.
Please
just
click
on
that
tiny
little
hand
and
we'll
see
a
little
hand
up
after
you
speak.
If
you
could
click
on
that
hand
again
so
the
hand
goes
down
and
we
know
that
you're
done
and
you
that
would
be.
That
would
really
help
us
out
on
our
end
and
make
the
meeting
move
by
smoother.
C
C
C
D
C
D
D
A
All
right,
so
I'm
going
to
call
for
a
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent
agenda,
which
includes
number
one.
The
time
extension
request
for
rose
park,
buddhist
temple,
conditional
use
at
approximately
1185
west
1000
north
case
number,
pln
pcm
2020-007
number
two,
the
approval
of
minutes
for
april
14th
and
number
three:
the
petition
to
modify
the
design
language
in
the
design
review
section
to
clarify
when
design
review
is
used.
H
B
I
I
A
J
J
Okay,
so
this
project
was
previously
heard
by
planning
commission
on
february
10th
of
this
year.
During
this
meeting,
a
recommendation
of
approval
was
forwarded
to
city
council
with
a
vote
of
4-2-1
for
in
approval
for
the
recommendation
of
approval
to
city
council.
This
project
is
required
to
return
to
the
planning
commission
to
open
a
new
public
hearing
and
recommendation
and
make
a
new
recommendation
to
the
city
council.
As
there
was
an
error
in
the
previous
planning
commission
public
hearing
notice
process.
J
Nothing
has
changed
on
this
project,
since
the
planning
commission
heard
the
application
on
february
10th
during
the
re-notice
staff
has
re-noticed
the
project
properly
and
during
the
no
re-notice
period
staff
received
one
new
public
comment
that
is
included
in
the
planning
commission's
dropbox
files.
Planning
staff
is
recommending
that
the
planning
commission
for
the
a
recommendation
of
approval
to
city
council
for
the
master
plan
and
zoning
map
amendments
and
just
to
kind
of
jog.
Your
memory
from
when
you
previously
heard
this
on
february
10th.
J
The
applicant
is
magic
karate
with
nextup
group
who's,
the
property
owner
the
and
he's
requesting
an
amendment
to
the
master
plan's
future
land
use
map
and
the
zoning
map
for
the
property
located
at
461
south
400
ease.
The
proposal
is
to
amend
the
master
plan
and
reason
the
property.
The
amendments
proposed
are
for
redevelopment
of
the
site
which
would
accommodate
residential
retail
and
live
work
units
and
would
eliminate
the
parking
structures
which
front
500.
South
400,
east
and
denver
street
staff
has
found
that
these
amendments
meet
the
intent
of
the
master
plan.
J
Currently,
the
property
is
located
in
the
rmu,
45
district
or
residential
mixed
use.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
rezone
the
site
to
tsa
unc
or
transit
station
area
urban
neighborhood
core
zoning
district.
The
proposal
also
includes
an
amendment
to
the
central
community
master
plan's
future
land
use
map
from
residential
office,
mixed
use
to
high-density
transit-oriented
development,
so.
A
J
J
C
A
I
A
Yeah,
I
also
want
to
say
one
thing
first,
which
is
to
remind
people
that
I
actually
I
didn't,
have
a
vote
because
I'm
a
pair,
but
I
am
opposed
to
this
project
based
on
on
the
fact
that
all
along
the
500
south
there
is
a
15-foot
setback
that
makes
it
a
tree-lined
boulevard,
and
this
would
do
away
with
that.
15-Foot
setback
and
that's
also
part
of
what
the
comment
to
the
to
us
was
about
as
well,
so
just
to
insert
that
in
there.
D
D
Based
on
the
information
from
the
staff
reporter,
the
planning
commission
recommend
the
city
council
approve
the
proposed
master
plan
amendment
as
presented
in
petition
pln
pcm
2020
00804.
This
should
move
the
planet.
Commission
recommended
the
city
council
approve
the
proposed
zoning
map
amendment
as
presented
in
plm
pcm
20206.
A
A
I
A
A
J
J
J
This
project
again
is
required
to
return
to
the
planning
commission
and
to
open
a
new
public
hearing
and
for
a
new
recommendation
to
the
city
council
due
to
an
error
in
the
notification
and
again
nothing's
changed
on
this
project.
Since
the
planning
commission
heard
the
application
on
january
13th,
no
new
comments
were
received
during
the
re-notification
process
of
this
public
hearing
and
staff
is
recommending
the
planning
commission
for
a
recommendation
of
approval
to
city
council
for
the
master
plan
and
zoning
map
amendments.
J
J
The
proposal
would
rezone
the
properties
located
at
the
above
stated
address
from
residential
office
to
residential
mixed
use.
The
proposal
would
also
include
an
amendment
to
the
central
community
master
plan's
future
land
use
map
from
residential
office.
Mixed
use
to
high
mixed
use
and
staff
has
found
that
amending
these
sites
from
residential
office,
mixed
use
to
high
mixed
use
is
appropriate
in
the
master
plan.
J
The
proposed
amendments
are
to
allow
for
retail
services
on
the
site.
Last
year,
the
applicant
applied
for
a
business
license
for
retail
services
on
the
site,
but
was
denied
because
retail
services
is
not
permitted
in
the
current
sony
district
r
o
the
rmu
permits
both
retail
services
and
retail
goods
types
of
uses.
F
Yes,
so
I'm
mariel's
assistant-
and
basically
we
just
want
to
be
able
to
accommodate
retail
space
in
our
two
buildings
that
we
own
there,
because
currently
it's
single
office
space
and
the
future
of
office
space
is
kind
of
up
in
the
air.
So
just
we
we
want
to
be
able
to
allow
for
tenants
to
be
able
to
do
retail
if
they
would
like.
A
B
A
A
O
I
C
A
K
K
So
this
is
for
vital
nine
keith,
warburton
novel
nine
is
a
property
owner,
joe
colosimo.
Of
course,
my
brother's
development
is
the
applicant
they're,
requesting
approval
of
plan
development
and
design
review
for
a
three-story
30-unit
apartment
building
located
approximately
1045
north
900
west,
at
least
20
percent
of
the
units
are
proposed
for
residents
with
incomes
added
below
80
of
the
area.
Median
income
and
planning
is
recommending.
The
commission
approve
the
project
with
some
conditions.
K
The
proposed
apartment
complex
will
sit
on
this.
Approximately
34
000
square
foot
vacant
lot
located
next
to
the
old
salt
city,
inn
motel.
The
lot
has
a
number
of
unique
issues,
including
its
shape
and
the
proximity
to
the
I-15
right-of-way
and
its
double
law
frontage
and
the
dual
zoning
of
the
lot.
K
Here's
a
diagram
of
the
current
zoning
and
a
site
plan
is
well
behind
that
it
sits
within
both
the
rmf
35,
moderate
density,
multi-family,
residential
district
on
the
north
and
the
cb
community
community
business
district
on
the
south.
The
proposed
structure
will
sit
mostly
within
the
cb
district
and
with
only
three
units
within
the
rmf
35
section,
because
the
property
butts
both
900
west.
To
the
south
and
1100
north
to
the
north,
each
end
of
the
property
is
considered
a
front
yard.
You
can
see
these
blue
are
front
lot
lines.
K
K
Let's
see
here
just
some
quick
photos
to
give
you
an
idea
of
the
adjacent
right-of-way.
This
is
looking
into
the
900
west
right
away
from
the
subject
property,
and
this
is
looking
to
1100
north
on
the
subject
property
and
that
alley
back.
There
is
a
private
alley
that
serves
the
houses
on
victoria
way.
K
The
first
set
of
requests
are
for
design
review
because
the
proposed
building
will
have
a
gross
floor
area
larger
than
fifteen
thousand
square
feet
section.
Twenty
one,
a
twenty
six,
zero,
three
zero
dot
e
requires
that
the
proposal
meets
additional
design
standards,
along
with
the
base,
design,
review
standards
that
are
in
the
staff
report
and
in
full
analysis
of
those
standards
are
found
in
the
report.
K
K
For
plan
development,
there
are
three
requests.
The
first
one
is
from
for
modifications
to
three
sections
of
the
code.
The
first
one
is
for
21a24130.c,
which
requires
a
minimum
lot
width
of
80
feet
in
the
rmf
35
district.
However,
the
part
of
the
property
that
lets
1100
north,
which
is
zoned
rmf
35,
is
only
51
feet
wide
and
does
not
meet
that
requirement.
K
Then
21a
48110.e,
which
requires
landscaping
along
property
lines
adjacent
to
interstate
highways.
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
waiver
for
the
property
section
separated
from
the
freeway
by
concrete
barriers
and
then
finally
21a44110.e2c,
which
prohibits
parking
for
non-single-family
uses
from
backing
into
an
alley.
The
applicant
would
like
some
of
the
parking
to
back
into
that
alley
and
they're
making
improvements
on
that
as
well.
K
K
There
were
some
public
comments
for
this
request,
and
I've
received
a
few
more
that
I've
put
in
your
dropbox
folder,
since
the
staff
report
was
published,
and
one
thing
I
want
to
bring
up
is
many
concerns
were
primarily
centered
around
future
tenants
of
the
project.
So
I
wanted
to
emphasize
a
few
things
about
this
project.
K
K
As
far
as
its
proximity
to
1100
north,
both
the
capitol
hill
and
rose
park
community
council
said
wanted
the
building
to
be
located
closer
to
that
right
of
way.
However,
there
are
easements
to
prevent
construction
closer
to
1100
north
the
building
height
concerns.
This
building
is
30
feet,
which
is
allowed
by
right
in
the
seabee
district
and
adjacent
residential
districts.
The
rmf
35
district
allows
buildings
up
to
35
feet
as
far
as
parking
goes,
the
applicant
plans
to
pave
the
adjacent
alley.
K
K
There
has
not
been
a
light
plan
proposed,
so
staff
is
recommending
as
a
condition
that
adequate
lighting
be
included
before
building
permanent
approval,
an
adequate
lighting
plan
being
be
provided,
and
we
recommend
lighting
that
limits
glare
with
proximity
with
it,
while
promoting
a
sense
of
safety,
bollards
and
downward-facing
pedestrian
scale.
Light
poles
are
two
options
that
would
be
adequate
and
we're
almost
done
here
are
just
some
photos
of
the
property.
K
K
K
K
B
K
K
I
K
Q
D
K
D
K
Q
Q
So
phil
properties,
their
their
goal,
is
to
provide
affordable
housing.
As
you
know,
solid
county
is
experiencing
an
affordable
housing
crisis
and
bill
9
provides
an
immediate
solution
of
affordable
housing.
Bill
properties
works
closely
with
utah
community
action,
the
gail
miller
foundation,
the
road
home
veterans
affair
and
several
other
organizations.
Q
Each
tenant
goes
to
a
specific
specific
evaluation
catered
to
their
unique
circumstance
before
they
can
become
residents
of
avil
property.
More
specifically,
they
are
provided
with
a
case
manager
who
insists
on
an
ongoing
basis
potential
talents.
Men
include
wounded
vets,
individuals,
fleeing
abuse
and
people
who
have
fallen
on
financial
hard
times.
Safety
and
security
are
top
priorities
for
management.
On-Site
24-hour
a
day
management,
security
cameras
and
strict
tenant
policies,
ensure
a
safe
community
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
project.
Q
As
aaron
mentioned,
it's
a
0.78
acre
remnant
parcel
from
the
I-15
construction
of
1962.,
two
parcels
with
two
different
zonings
rmf
35,
and
a
cb
zone
planning
takes
both
zonings
into
consideration.
As
aaron
mentioned
a
lot,
a
lot
line
adjustment
will
need
to
happen
combining
the
south
hotel
parcel
with
the
new
project
area.
Q
Q
So
the
site
plan
that
aaron
talked
about.
You
can
see
that
the
orange
is
the
rmf
35
and
the
green
is
the
cb
zone.
We
barely.
We
barely
have
we're
allotted
three
units
in
the
rmf
35
zone
and
we
barely
have
you
know
a
third
of
three
units,
so
we
equates
to
about
one
unit,
so
we've
pushed
the
building
to
the
south
to
try
to
mitigate
the
effect
on
the
neighbors
and
try
to
get
mostly
in
the
cb
zone.
So
the
planned
development
elements
of
the
ville
nine.
Q
Q
Low
low
impact
lighting
for
the
trail
on
the
walkway
parking
is
buffered
from
the
adjacent
neighbors
and
garbage
and
recycling
will
be
screened
and
placed
with
minimal
impact.
The
next
couple
slides
here
are
just
the
elevation
so
you're
looking
at
the
new
construction
building
there,
the
next
slide
shows
the
existing
hotel.
The
top
picture
is
the
existing
hotel
on
the
left
and
the
new
building
on
the
right,
and
then
the
bottom
picture
is
kind
of
a
cross
shot
going
across
the
face
of
the
existing
hotel
and
to
the
new
constructed
building.
Q
And
then
the
next
picture
is
a
bird's
eye
view
of
both
buildings
together
and
then,
as
aaron
mentioned,
the
four,
the
four
waivers,
the
first
one
is
the
scenic
landscaping
setback
in
my
mind,
we
kind
of
front
the
frontage
road,
the
900
west,
frontage
road
and
the
the
area
that
really
abuts.
The
freeway
has
a
has
a
12
foot,
sound
wall.
So
if
you'll
notice
down
below
where
the
green
space
is
that
kind
of
abuts,
the
frontage
road
and
the
red
line
to
the
right
is
really
the
freeway.
What
about
the
freeway?
Q
And
so
we
feel
like
we're
landscaping
the
area
that
people
can
really
see.
This
site
plan
has
changed
because
we've
moved
our
dumpster
from
this
location
from
that
location.
We've
moved
it
across
the
way
and
don't
have
it
so
front
and
center
we've
moved
our
meter
base
and
our
transformers
back
into
the
project
so
that
they're
also
not
so
front
and
center.
Q
The
rmf
requires
an
80
foot
frontage
and
we
have
51
feet
that
fronts
onto
1100
north
and
we've
really
used
the
rmf
piece
as
as
landscaping
and
parking
and
have
pushed
our
units
to
the
cb
zone.
As
you
can
see,
and
then
the
last
one
is
parking
into
the
alley,
I
was
under
the
impression
if
we
changed
them
to
a
45
degree
parking,
we
would
meet
the
parking
standard,
and
so
we've
done
that.
Q
A
Point:
okay,
hearing,
no
questions,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
open
up
the
public
hearing
and
do
we
and
if
you
would
like
to
speak,
please
use
the
little
hand
and
I'm
going
to
ask
for
representatives
of
the
community
councils
who
will
have
five
minutes
to
speak.
There's
two
community
councils
involved
here.
I
believe.
P
P
I
realize
there
are
many
things
that
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
cannot
do,
but
on
record
I
want
these
comments
recorded
for
posterity
as
a
former
planning
and
zoning
commissioner,
I'm
concerned
what
is
happening
here
in
my
years
as
a
commissioner.
I've
never
seen
this
number
of
what
I
feel
are
consequential
exemptions
and
exceptions
presented
or
even
considered
at
a
commission
meeting.
P
This
is
an
attempt
to
shoehorn
an
inappropriately
planned
use
of
land
into
this
area,
to
the
detriment
of
those
homeowners
and
residents
living
in
the
immediate
proximity,
especially
considering
the
proximity
to
the
high
pressure.
Gas
line
based
on
previous
documentation
provided
by
the
developer,
has
also
not
been
represented
as
accurately
or
as
good
of
faith
as
we
would
like
with
respect
to
the
risk
of
what
may
be
its
primary
use.
This
seems
clearly
intended
to
serve
as
a
transitional
housing
facility
in
line
with
the
current
use
of
the
salt
city
motel.
P
This
represents
a
risk
to
the
community
and
has
not
been
fully
vetted
as
part
of
this
process
to
ensure
that
the
use
is
transparent
to
the
community
and
the
risks
are
adequately
identified
and
addressed.
This
would
not
happen
in
other
parts
of
the
city,
but
once
again,
the
west
side
gets
to
absorb
a
development
that
is
neither
appropriate
for
location
nor
safe
enough,
given
its
potential
intended
use
minimally.
This
should
be
more
clearly
explained
that
the
current
cb
zoning
permits
a
large
residential
support,
use
and
other
support
facility
types.
P
It
must
be
given
this
more
adequately
considered,
reviewed
and
more
accurately
presented
in
terms
of
its
intended
use
unfortunate
that
the
safety
can't
be
considered
as
part
of
this
process,
because
it
is
integral
to
the
development
of
the
space.
The
community
deserves
this
information,
along
with
an
evaluation
of
the
inherent
risk
imposed
by
those
being
housed
to
do
anything,
less
seems
deceptive
and
we
believe
had
seemed
deceptive
from
the
beginning.
P
Having
visited
this
property
and
evaluated
all
the
potential
ingress
and
egress,
this
complex
will
create
an
access
nightmare
not
only
for
residents
of
the
apartments
but
for
residents
in
emergency
vehicles.
The
current
situation
has
cars
parked
on
both
sides
of
the
very
narrow
road
that
allows
passage
of
only
one
car.
This
works
in
residential
areas
of
single
family
home.
This
just
doesn't
cut
it
here.
P
The
other
ingress
egress
is
difficult
to
envision,
given
the
current
configuration
of
both
the
existing
ninth
west
right
away,
which
is
hardly
maintained
as
such
now
and
the
alley
between
the
apartment
complexes
on
top
all
of
these
appear
to
even
the
most
uninitiated
as
accidents
and
issues
waiting
to
happen.
In
summary,
saying
that
the
city
leadership
promised
equity
for
west
side
residents.
To
me,
this
means
doing
it
better
and
more
rigorously
than
years
past,
all
the
way
from
the
owners
and
developers
to
the
community
and
us
commissioners.
I
appreciate
your
time.
E
Thank
you
very
much.
I
am
kevin
park.
I'm
chair
of
the
rose
park
community
council
and
we
have
outlined
many
of
our
concerns
in
the
letter
that
we
presented
and
we
are
in
line
with
the
same
concerns
that
capitol
hill
had,
but
I
want
to
also
discuss
the
danger
and
kind
of
in
line
with
what
richard
said
that
this
unit
poses
to
the
community.
As
far
as
traffic
concerns,
let
me
say
that,
as
a
community
council,
we
were
overjoyed
when
we
heard
that
this
motel
had
been
sold.
E
We
have
had
drugs
and
crime
and
prostitution
there.
This
is
a
main
thoroughfare,
a
main
walking
route
from
kids
that
live
in
the
apartments
on
ninth
west
to
rose
park
elementary
and
they've
had
to
walk
by
the
drug
dealers
and
the
prostitutes
and
the
johns
and
everything
for
years.
And
if
you
look
at
the
police
records
of
all
of
the
calls
that
have
occurred,
you
can
see
why
we
were
excited
when
it's
withhold,
but
we
do
feel
that
a
30-unit
three-story
building
the
only
three-story
building
in
the
area
will
pose
unnecessary
risks.
E
We
feel
that
this
unit
is
too
much
too
big
for
the
space
that
is
being
put
in,
and
while
we
welcome
any
efforts
in
our
community
for
affordable
housing,
we
are
opposed
to
this
because
of
the
changes
required
and,
quite
honestly,
we
do
not
feel
that
the
developer
or
the
owner
has
acted
in
good
faith.
This
is
being
promoted
as
as
affordable
housing,
but
they
have
provided
letters
which
have
been
promoted
added
to
the
commission.
E
A
C
F
F
F
It
I
think
that
it
needs
a
lot
more
community
input.
We
are
also
very
concerned
with
the
fact
that
there
are
only
one
parking
unit
per
per
unit
residential
unit,
and
that
creates
an
issue
for
people
that
want
to
come
visit.
Where
are
they
going
to
be?
We
have
a
city-owned
park
and
ride
lot.
That's
across
the
street
on
100,
north
and
900
west
that
could
potentially
be
used
for
that
and
that
that's
that's
not
what
the
use
is
for.
C
P
You
with
the
rose
part
brown
berets.
I
echo
some
of
the
comments
that
were
just
made
just
barely
about
the
narrowness
of
the
street.
It
is
very
tight,
there's
a
lot
of
families,
just
right
next
to
the
property
that
they're
living
in
duplexes
and
and
stuff,
but
I
just
want
some
clarification
from
the
from
the
developer
or
the
property
owner,
so
you
say
that
20
percent
of
units
will
be
affordable.
P
20
units
of
35
units
is
only
about
6
units
or
7
units,
meaning
that
7
out
of
35
units
is
affordable.
According
to
y'all,
we
see
that
you
guys
start
your
affordability
rate
from
80
ami
to
down
below
what
guarantee
do
we
have
that?
You
won't
just
choose
folks
from
80
to
50
ami,
because
folks,
who
are
at
risk
and
most
vulnerable,
are
families
between
10
up
to
50
ami,
a
lot
of
our
families
in
rose
park
are
between
10
to
50
ami.
P
So,
with
this
project,
we
we
we
suggest
that
you
start
your
affordability
at
450,
ami
and
below
the
other
24
units
in
the
apartment.
Are
they
going
to
be
market
rate?
If
so,
this
is
another
gentrification
project
in
the
community,
that
is
wolf
and
cheap,
cheap
clothing,
because
you
proposed
this
for
low-income
families
at
the
beginning,
and
only
seven
out
of
35
is
of
units
of
being
affordable
of
being
affordable
is
not
enough.
So
just
calling
something
affordable
is
not
affordable
at
all
and
please
plan
a
commission
meeting.
P
C
C
R
Yes,
hi.
Can
you
hear
me
okay
perfectly.
Thank
you
okay,
good
evening,
my
name
is
david
shearer,
I'm
the
chair
of
the
capitol
hill
neighborhood
council.
Although
this
project
lies
slightly
outside
our
boundaries,
the
planning
division
notified
us
of
the
project
and
requested
our
input,
the
same
processes
for
projects
that
are
within
our
boundaries.
We
want
to
thank
the
planners
for
seeking
our
input
on
this
project,
which
we
believe
will
impact
parts
of
our
neighborhood.
R
You
have
our
letter
stating
our
concerns.
To
summarize,
we
can
support
this
project
only
if
the
following
conditions
are
met.
Number
one
with
respect
to
the
applicant's
request
for
exceptions
to
rev
design,
review
criteria,
b1
and
b2,
the
applicant
should
compensate
for
placing
the
building
35
feet
farther
from
the
street
than
required
by
first
enhancing
the
building's
visibility
from
the
street.
The
building,
as
designed,
has
no
identifiable
entrance.
The
side
of
the
building
facing
the
street
is
exactly
that.
R
R
Second,
improving
the
safety
of
the
adjacent
section
of
one
of
1100
north
with
new
pavement,
sidewalks
and
street
lighting.
One
of
the
effects
of
having
buildings
close
to
the
street
is
enhancing
the
safety
of
the
street
since
the
site's
configuration
forces
the
building
to
be
set
far
back
from
the
street,
it's
reasonable
to
require
the
applicant
to
take
other
measures
to
improve
its
safety
number
two.
The
project
does
not
satisfy
section
b
of
section
21a
point
55
of
the
cloning
ordinance
compatibility
with
surrounding
buildings.
R
R
Number
three:
the
alley
which
the
applicant
seeks
to
use
for
parking
access
is
narrow,
unpaved
has
no
curb
or
gutter
has
no
lighting,
and
it
also
has
a
sharp
90
degree
turn
that
makes
it
dangerous
for
two-way
traffic.
It's
already
used
by
three
apartment
buildings
for
parking
access.
The
applicant
should
be
required
to
pave
the
alley,
build,
curb
and
gutter,
provide
storm
drainage
and
install
street
lighting
to
enhance
the
security
of
all
the
residents
that
use
the
alley.
R
I'd
like
to
also
call
your
attention
to
a
broader
issue.
Although
the
application
is
for
multi-family
housing,
it's
become
clear
to
us
that
this
will
not
be
a
typical
apartment.
Building
the
developer
plans
to
house
people
exiting
homelessness
there.
Let
me
be
really
clear:
our
council
isn't
very
much
in
favor
of
providing
affordable
housing
for
folks
exiting
homelessness
in
our
neighborhood.
R
R
It's
only
for
our
own
efforts
that
we
discovered
the
true
nature
of
this
project.
The
city
did
nothing
to
alert
us
to
it.
Trying
to
pass
off
a
traditional
transitional
housing
project
as
just
another
apartment
building
is
perhaps
not
the
best
way
for
the
city
government
to
gain
greater
community
acceptance
of
such
projects.
We
want
to
support
these
projects,
but
we
need
more
information
and
more
time
for
discussion
in
order
to
do
so.
R
R
A
C
B
B
What
is
your,
what
is
your
feed
or
your
your
response
to
the
issue
of
having
like
a
more
clear
entrance,
although
I
don't
really
know
what
that
means
in
this
particular
project
or
enhancing
the
building
visibility,
which
I
also
find
interesting.
We
want
to
enhance
this
building
visible,
but
we
don't
want
it
too
big
because
it
stands
out.
So
how
are
you
going
to
manage
those
two
things
is
I
I'd
like
to
hear.
Q
That's
an
interesting
question.
I
mean
I,
I
think
he
was
trying
to
maybe
talk
about
orienting,
the
building
more
towards
the
street.
We
could
look
at
changing
the
entrance
to
the
building
to
be
more
in
the
middle
of
the
building.
We
we
currently
have
the
entrances
on
the
end
secured
entrance,
and
so
we
could.
B
Which
we
also
hear
is
a
big
problem,
so
I
think
the
entrances
I
personally
think
they're
fine
where
they
are.
I
just,
I
think
part
of
you
know
addressing
some
of
the
conflicting
comments
we
get
is
a
better
understanding
of
how
how
it's,
how
it's
managed
like
how
I
am
sick,
so
my
brain
is
like
foggy,
but
how
how
the
project
is
manifesting
on
paper.
So
thank
you
for
that.
D
D
D
Are
those
is
that
are
there
lots
of
sign
at
all
differently
to
avoid
people
who
are
looking
for
parking
stalls
to
come
in?
One
spot
then
drive
all
the
way
around
to
the
neighborhood
and
come
back
to
look
on
the
other
side.
I
mean.
Are
you
whether
you're
signing
lots
or
how
are
you
preventing
that
kind
of
traffic
traffic
from
just
kind
of
constantly
circulating,
trying
to
find
a
parking
spot.
Q
A
Q
A
Goes
for
that
lower
facade
right
there
that
you're
looking
at
it's
it
just
seems
like
a
hole
in
the
wall
rather
than
something
that
you
know
might
have
a
covering
over
it
or
might
have
it's
a
more
sense
of
grandeur.
It's
just
basically
going
into
a
stairwell,
and
so
that
doesn't
really
say
entrance
to
you
know
an
apartment
building
here
to
me.
Q
A
A
I
would
like
to
erase
the
issue
that's
been
raised
about
that
people
have
talked
about
about
the
type
of
people
that
are
planned
for
this,
and
you
yourself
said
something
about
on-site
management
and
so
forth,
and
is
there
going
to
be
like
a
manager's
apartment?
I
mean
how
is
that
on-site
management.
Q
So
mr
warburton
commits
one
unit
to
an
on-site
manager
that
lives
on
the
premise
and
is
there
24
hours
a
day
as
a
as
a
paid
employee
part
of
their
compensation
is
the
is
the
rent
of
the
department
and
he
pays
them
a
salary
and
they're
there.
They
have
a
presence
there
24
hours
a
day.
So
that's
how
that's
what
we
mean
by
on-site
management.
A
I
Q
About
that,
oh
I
I
think
what's
happened
is,
as
mr
warburton
owns
the
hotel
and
he's
stopped
renting
it
by
the
hour
and
he's
renting
it.
You
know
a
more
traditional
apartment,
style
rental
and
he
rents
them
at
30
days
at
a
minimum
and
12
months
at
a
maximum
with
renewed
with
renewable
ability,
and
I
think
maybe
the
hotel
might
have
caused
some
confusion
on
on
that
aspect
of
it.
A
I
2020-00923
and
zero
zero
zero
nine
eight
nope
can't
even
do
that.
P,
l
and
p
l,
n,
p
c
m.
Twenty
twenty
one
dash:
zero,
zero,
zero,
nine
eight
with
the
conditions
that
are
listed
in
the
staff
report,
and
that
includes
the
adequate
lighting
for
the
proposed
pedestrian
pathway
before
the
building
permit
is
approved
that
the
alley
be
paved
as
part
of
this
project
and
that
the
design
improves
the
entrance
making
it
more
prominent.
I
A
B
A
I
A
E
E
E
E
Towing
storage,
that
kind
of
thing
it's
a
site
context,
just
a
quick
overview
of
the
site
plan
and
a
little
bit
more
and
proposed
landscaping
would
be
trees
that
are
required
along
the
400
west
frontage
and
then
there's
perimeter
landscaping
on
the
other
sides
of
the
building
a
little
bit
of
contextual
pictures.
The
top
picture
is
the
property
itself.
Subject:
property
there's
a
couple
small
buildings
on
it
that
have
been
used
for
towing
and
other
related
activities.
E
I
I
like
to
include
a
slide
like
this,
because
I
think
sometimes,
when
a
proposal
comes
to
the
planning
commission,
the
context
gets
lost
of
the
applicant
has
been
making
changes
to
approve
it.
So
you're
seeing
kind
of
the
final
proposed
version,
but
there
have
been
other
iterations
of
it
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
the
commission
is
aware
of
that.
So
through
the
design
process,
as
we've
been
working
with
the
applicant,
they
added
ground
floor
transparency
and
glass.
E
It
only
includes
a
standard
for
one
entrance
for
street
pacing
facade
and
to
have
some
lighting,
so
it
doesn't
really
define
the
standard.
So
we've
been
working
with
the
applicant
to
again
get
what
we
saw
was
sufficient
glass
to
meet
that
intent
of
pedestrian
interaction
and
that
street
level
presence.
M
I
would
thank
you,
madam
chair
and
planning
commission.
I
want
to
reiterate
david's
comments.
We
have
been
working
with
him
and
and
other
staff
members
and
and
feel
really
positive
about
where
we've
come.
I
just
want
to
mention
a
few
team
members
who
are
on
with
me
today:
amy
ward,
josh,
hart
and
jory
and
jory.
M
May
I
may
want
him
to
jump
in
at
some
point
so
if
he
has
the
ability
to,
I
would
appreciate
that
I
think
david
did
a
great
job
of
giving
an
introduction
to
the
site,
so
I
won't
repeat
too
much
of
what
he
had
gone
over.
I
just
wanted
to
point
out.
You
know
this
is
a
class,
a
type
constructed
building,
including
glass,
brick,
wood,
stucco,
fiber,
composite
sidings.
M
We
exceed
our
parking
again,
that's
important
to
us,
so
we
we
don't
want
to
inundate
the
existing
streets,
not
that
there's
very
many
people
on
there
now,
but
you
know
that
area
is
growing,
quick
and
and
one
of
the
reasons
why
we
chose
that
spot.
I
think
it's
a
great
location
and
we're
excited
for
the
future
growth
around
it.
M
Some
of
the
amenities
for
our
building
will
include
on-site
leasing
management
office
out
outdoor
courtyard
workout
room.
As
david
mentioned,
the
outdoor
deck
will
be
actually
on
the
on
the
podium
parking
right
above
the
top
level
of
the
parking
deck.
It
includes
seating
areas
possible
fire
pits,
gathering
areas
stuff
like
that,
just
for
the
the
residents
to
kind
of
get
out
and
and
get
to
enjoy
the
area
again.
I
don't
want
to
hit
too
many
of
things
that
david
already
hit
on.
M
We
we
touched
up
the
front
the
request
for
the
the
additional
17
feet.
Again,
it
is
really
comes
down
to
a
water
table
issue
in
the
area.
We
got
back
our
geotech
report.
This
is
a
similar
condition
to
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
remember
us
or
not,
but
we
also
have
another
site
in
your
city
and
we're
facing
the
same.
We
face
the
same
situation
there.
M
So
there's
a
water
table
we're
trying
to
raise
that
building
up
out
of
the
ground
and
keep
the
additional
parking
that
we
crave
and
that's
why
we're
requesting
it?
The
we
have
a
design,
that's
60
feet
that
would
meet
the
existing
code.
That
has
the
same
amount
of
units,
so
I
don't
want
you
to
think
we're
we're
asking
for
additional
heights
to
get
additional
density,
that
that
wasn't
the
intent.
We
don't
need
the
additional
height
for
that
again.
M
O
Yeah,
I
really
don't
think,
there's
much
to
add
wrong
camera
on
top
of
my
camera.
I
don't
think
it's
much
to
add.
I
think
we're
right
where
you
guys
want
to
be
the
the
staff
has
been
amazing.
I
always
tell
people
that
staff
and
good
design
makes
design
better.
I
think
they've
made
what
we're
doing
better,
and
so
we're
really
excited
what
we're
doing,
and
it's
made
a
great
project.
So
any
questions
I
can
answer
you
guys
are
glad
to
answer.
I
have
the
revit
model.
I
can
pull
up
and
walk
you
around
the
building.
A
M
O
H
C
O
M
M
E
O
E
O
M
C
O
M
A
M
M
A
I
I
I
O
That
elevations,
that
the
elevation
is
not
correct.
That's
an
older
elevation!
We
have
a
new
elevations,
okay,
rendering
what
we've
done
is.
We've
pulled
the
glass
up,
so
you'll
have
glass,
above
all
the
corners
and
made
that
storefront
glass,
and
then
we
made
the
punches
into
the
garage
larger.
So
that's
a
previous
elevation.
O
So
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
we're
trying
to
pull
the
wood
down
from
the
upper
tower,
carry
the
stone
the
stone
down
from
the
corners
and
then
we've
created
these
entrances
yeah.
That's
that's
better
to
look
at.
So
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
trying
to
have
this
piece
of
the
wood
come
down
from
the
lobbies
and
then
carry
the
stone
down
the
corners
and
then
have
the
the
gray
stucco
come
down
so
that
it
engages
the
street.
I
Okay,
okay,
I
guess
just
looking
at
it.
I
just
feel
like
this.
The
human
scale
of
it
is
just
you
know.
I
I
think
some
of
the
meaning
behind
some
of
these
changes
is
to
try
to
break
up
the
mass
of
the
building,
but
I
I
feel
that
wrapping
like
each
tower
in
a
different
material
above
the
awning
that
kind
of
goes
across
the
whole
section
to
me.
I
O
We
had
the
whole
base
was
all
one
color
and
the
staff
really
felt
like
having
the
materials
pulled
down
and
relate
more
to
the
tower
was
a
better
solution
and
we
agreed
with
them.
I
think
it
gives
more
diversity
and
a
more
a
more
human
scale
to
it,
and
so,
by
pulling
the
towers
down,
we
thought
that
made
more
sense.
I
I
I
You
know
multi-family,
obviously
so
by
breaking
this
up
into
lots
of
little
chunks.
It
really
just
it.
I
think
it's
distracting
and
it
just
kind
of
takes
away
from
the
architecture,
because
I
think
the
layout's
really
good.
I
think
the
form
is
good.
I
think
the
massing
is
a
good
scale.
It's
just
the
way
that
it's
broken
up
into
all
these
different
material
changes
is
just
it's
a
lot.
It's
it's
very
busy
and
overwhelming,
but
I
I
would
do
the
opposite.
Where
you
had
the
ground
floor.
Originally
is
one
material.
I
M
A
A
A
O
O
I
M
A
A
A
C
F
F
Okay,
thank
you.
So
again,
market
rate
is
not
affordable.
It
is
not
I'm
not
understanding.
Why
are
we
petitioning
for
these
new
developments
coming
into
the
city
when
there
is
a
homeless
crisis
happening
right
now
and
if
it's
a
market
rate
again
it
is
not
affordable,
it
is
not.
These
buildings
are
displacing,
are
inherently
displacing
a
lot
of
people
in
this
community
and
we
are
bearing
the
grunt
of
it.
F
I
I
understand
that
everyone's
really
excited
about
these
gyms,
these
these
fancy
things,
but
people
are
dying
on
the
streets
right
now
and
I
think
it's
super
irresponsible
that
these
are
coming
in
and
people
are
not
even
addressing
what
the
real
concern
is.
The
master
plan
itself
is
inherently
incorrect
either
when
this
master
plan
was
created,
it
did
not
take
into
consideration
a
lot
of
the
things
that
low
income
and
people
that
are
facing
homelessness
that
are
are
going
through
right
now.
F
So
to
use
that
as
a
basis
guideline
to
to
say,
we
are
following
the
master
plan,
I
think
is
incredibly
irresponsible
as
well,
and
I
am
urging
the
city
plan
the
planning
commission
to
reconsider
this
project
and
free
to
consider
all
projects
that
come
to
the
table
that
are
market
rate
and
have
no
avoid
affordable
units
at
all.
Thank
you.
B
A
A
I
D
Comment
just
about
the
approval
and
the
materials,
and
things
like
that.
I
just
wanted
on
the
record
that
the
the
code
does
not
give
the
planning
staff
much
discretion
of
any
if
any,
to
change
materials
on
an
approved
elevation
during
design
review.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that
is
very,
very
clear
to
everybody
that
we
need
to
follow
what
was
approved
and
we
can.
We
can
allow
some
change
in
color
and
things
like
that,
but
any
other
material
change
would
have
to
come
back
to
the
planning
commission.
A
A
I
A
C
A
A
N
B
N
N
A
N
So
the
subject
property
is
currently
red:
moose
coffee
company,
the
property
received
conditional
use
approval
in
2009
for
a
drive-through
associated
with
the
coffee
shop
just
for
site
history.
The
property
is
currently
under
civil
enforcement
for
outdoor
dining
within
without
a
special
exception.
The
outdoor
dining
that
was
under
enforcement
is
highlighted
in
blue
right.
There,
on
the
screen
under
mayor
met,
aaron
mendenhall's
proclamation
to
allow
outdoor
dining
in
required
yards
and
the
public
way.
N
Due
to
the
covet
19
pandemic,
the
outdoor
dining
area
was
moved
to
in
front
of
the
restaurant,
which
is
shown
in
orange.
Approximately
in
orange,
the
tables
in
their
current
location
in
front
of
the
restaurant
are
allowed
without
a
special
exception
until
the
mayor's
proclamation
expires,
and
I
just
wanted
to
provide
this
as
context,
because
some
of
the
public
comments
dealt
with
the
prior
location
and
the
existing
location
of
outdoor
timing.
N
So
here's
a
photo
of
the
prior
location
under
civil
enforcement
outdoor
dining
is
not
allowed
in
this
location
because
it
is
in
the
seven-foot
landscape
buffer.
The
landscape
buffer
is
required
when
a
condition,
neighborhood
commercial
use
of
that's
a
residential
use
and
the
concrete
that
is
shown
in
this
area.
This
photo
will
need
to
be
removed
to
comply
with
the
landscape
buffer
code,
which
requires
live
plant
materials.
N
N
So
this
site
plan
illustrates
the
requested
area
for
outdoor
dining,
under
this
special
exception,
which
is
proposed
on
both
sides
of
the
entrance
to
the
coffee
shop
and
is
within
the
buildable
area,
and
I've
highlighted
that
in
red
for
you,
the
area
proposed
for
outdoor
dining
is
approximately
475
square
feet
in
size
and
is
11
feet.
8
inches,
deep
13
tables
and
38
chairs
are
proposed.
N
N
Staff
has
received
several
comments
which
are
located
in
attachment
f
of
the
staff
report,
and
additional
comments
were
uploaded
to
your
dropbox
account.
Approximately
most
of
the
comments
were
from
from
affected
neighbor
to
the
north.
Although
one
comment
was
received,
it
was
in
your
stock
report
in
support
of
the
proposal
and
three
additional
comments
were
received
after
the
publishing
of
the
staff
report
in
support
of
the
proposal,
staff
also
received
a
comment
from
the
east
liberty
community
organization,
which
was
included
in
your
dropbox
account.
N
So
public
comments
centered
around
three
specific
things,
primarily
so
public
activity
on
out
public
activity
outdoors
on
smaller
properties
can
have
an
impact
on
affecting
property
owners.
The
subject
property
does
about
residential
uses
to
the
north
and
the
east,
and,
as
mentioned,
the
most
impacted
by
the
proposed
outdoor
dining
is
the
property
directly
to
the
north.
The
above
residential
property
to
the
north
is
approximately
20
feet
from
the
proposed
outdoor
dining
area.
There
is
a
six
foot
chain
link
fence
with
slats
on
the
north
property
line
between
the
two
properties.
N
It
might
have
been
confusing
in
your
staff
report
and
I
apologize.
It
is
not
intended
that
the
trees
would
be
removed
or
the
blend
saving
would
be
removed.
Just
that
the
concrete
needs
to
be
removed
to
comply
with
code
staff
believes
that
this,
along
with
the
fence
surrounding
the
outdoor
dining
area,
will
prevent
patrons
from
moving
tables
closer
to
the
property
line,
which
has
been
an
issue
with
the
current
location
of
the
tables.
N
N
Additional
comments
were
received
regarding
dogs,
dogs
are
generally
prohibited
in
salt
lake
county
restaurants,
but
may
be
allowed
on
outdoor
patios
with
a
permit
from
the
salt
lake
county
health
department.
If
the
applicant
wishes
to
allow
dogs
on
the
patio,
they
will
need
to
apply
with
the
health
department
and
provide
a
safety
plan
and
pay
a
yearly
fee.
N
S
So
the
main
reason
for
doing
this
patio
is
to
one
I
want
to
help
the
tenant,
because
it's
a
big
deal
for
him.
Outdoor
dining
for
these
businesses
are
a
big
part
of
their
business.
But
for
me
it's
more
for
the
community
and
I'm
trying
to
do
something,
that's
unique
and
that
people
can
use
I'm
trying
to
do
it
in
a
way.
That's
why
I
brought
robin
because
he's
got
good
taste
and
I
thought
we
could
do
it
in
a
way
that
would
make
it
look
nice
and
tight
into
the
the
neighborhood.
S
So
my
big
goal
really
is
just
to
have
this
business
for
the
community.
There's
no
benefit
for
me,
but
I
do
like
the
idea
of
having
it
there
and
I
have
friends,
and
I
have
people
that
live
in
the
neighborhood
that
use
that
business
and
tell
me
how
much
they
love
it.
So,
I'm
again
I'm
trying
to
do
it
a
tasteful
way.
S
I've
also
tried
to
take
into
consideration
the
neighbor's
concern
and
I
do
understand
what
he's
had
to
live
with
the
patio
right
next
to
him,
and
I
tried
to
redesign
the
patio
with
rob
to
make
sure
it
fit
as
best
we
could
and
take
his
concerns
into
consideration.
The
only
reason
I
haven't
taken
out
the
concrete
was,
I
thought
it
would
be
more
efficient
to
do
the
project
all
at
once,
so
that
definitely
is
going
to
get
landscaped
out
with
the
proper
bushes
and
they'll
be.
He
was
concerned
about
people
sitting
on
grass.
S
S
So
the
other
thing
I
had
to
keep
in
mind
was
the
drive
through,
because
I
couldn't
put
the
pattern
in
an
area
where
people
would
be
crossing
across
the
drive-through
to
get
to
a
patio
area.
So
after
looking
everything
and
reviewing
with
rob
that
just
seemed
to
seem
the
best
place,
most
efficient
use
and
also
creating
enough
space
so
that
it
helps
the
business
with
their
customers.
S
S
But
the
one
of
the
drawings
I
have
done
that
rob
did
has
the
it
kind
of
shows
the
detail
where
the
tables
are
and
where
the
I
also
wanted
to
create
a
landscape
between
the.
So
that's
in
those
plans
where
it
shows
where
the
bushes
would
be
between
the
so
the
parking
lot
wouldn't
have
a
patio
going
right
to
the
parking
lot.
It
would
have
lands
between.
B
B
It
is,
I
see
it,
but
it's
hard
for
me
to
visualize,
then
exactly
how
the
definition
is
going
to
work
and
how
it's
going
to
flow
with
the
building.
So
it's
not
just
like
sitting
on
asphalt
like
it
is
now
I
don't.
I
don't
get
a
good
understanding
and
I
think
sometimes
people
in
the
neighborhood
and
I
actually
live
within
walking
distance
of
red
moose.
I
remember
it
when
it
was
the
swedish
bakery.
That's
how
long
I've
been
around,
but
I
think
it's
helpful
for
us
too
to
see
a
better
rendering.
S
In
the
middle
of
the
patio,
so
patio
would
have
approximately
probably
a
six
to
eight
inch
step
up.
Rob
can
explain
it
better
than
me
and
that
between
the
two
patios,
which
is
the
entrance
to
the
building,
would
have
a
handicap
wrap
that
could
have
the
right
angle
so
that
the
it
would
be
stepped
up,
and
the
first
thing
you
would
see
from
the
parking
lot
would
be
the
curb
for
the
landscaping.
S
S
A
S
A
B
Okay,
I
had
I
had
one
more
follow-up,
mr
plum.
Okay,
bob.
I
guess
we
are
neighbors
somehow
so
bob
it
is
it's
a
great
building
and
and
I've
loved
it
being
there
for
20
plus
years.
I've
been
around,
and
I-
and
this
is
an
aesthetic-
is
that
the
type
of
fencing
or
screen
you
would
put
up
would
basically
erase
these
beautiful
windows.
B
So
if
there
is
a
way
in
which
you
can
either
emulate
that
architectural
feature
in
in
the
fencing
or
see
through
it,
so
that
we
don't
hide
that,
I
think
visually
that'll
be
something
very
pleasant
to
the
neighborhood
and
I'm
obviously
delving
into
my
new
chef.
It
was
just
a
comment.
I
wanted
you
to
consider.
S
So
just
so,
you
have
an
idea.
What
I
have
in
mind
would
be
more
of
a
rail,
not
a
solid
fence.
The
rail
would
be
open
and
then
the
so
the
aesthetics
would
be
from
the
parking
lot
and
from
ninth
east
to
17th
south
you're,
going
to
see
the
plants
in
the
landscape
area
between
the
curb
the
landscape
curve
and
the
patio
which
is
like
I
said
about
two
well
rob
knows,
I
think
it's
more
like
it
could
be
three
feet.
It's
fairly
big.
S
I
B
B
A
C
L
L
L
L
L
Any
concern
about
it,
asking
people
to
keep
it
down
or
whatever
so
the
business
owner
has
has
never
done
anything
that,
with
the
smoking,
the
dogs,
the
noise
anything
like
that,
the
employees
are
in
the
same
boat,
they
come
out
there
and
pet.
The
dogs
that
are
out
there,
they
yell
out
the
orders
foul
language,
we've
seen
them
smoking
and
vaping
out
there
and
recently
they
they
go
out
there
and
observe
and
interact
with
the
customers
that
are
sitting
in
the
buffer
zone.
L
A
L
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
We've
asked
people
to
keep
it
down,
which
is
a
simple
request.
We've
been
told
to
be
quiet,
it's
public
property
we've
been
told
that
city
ordinance
says
that
they
can
be
as
loud
as
they
want.
That's
just
a
very
basic
thing.
What
we've
been
told
remember
that
it's
a
cn
it's
not
just
a
c.
L
G
G
I
think
that
is
a
very
big
another
scene.
It
is
the
the
return
it
opened
from
6
30
to
6.
that
mean.
Is
they
decided
to
get
a
four
very
early
in
the
morning
official
in
the
summer?
That
I
mean
I
supposed
to
be
awake
at
the
time
of
the
morning
because
they
decided
to
come
and
fill
it
up
the
place
they
are
serving
a
seat.
This
is
a
lot.
G
G
F
And
I
am
just
right
down
the
street
from
the
red
moose.
I
just
want
to
say
it's
a
little
gem
in
the
neighborhood
during
covid.
It
was
one
of
the
few
places
that
were
open,
even
if
you
just
walked
up
to
the
window.
I
think
we
should
support
more
businesses
like
this,
so
salt
lake
can
continue
to
be
a
walkable
neighborhood
and
not
a
place
for
those
to
have
to
drive,
for
example,
for
those
of
us
that
live
on
17th,
we
have
to
walk
to
21st
or
walk
to
9th
and
9th.
F
There
is
a
restaurant
on
the
other
side
on
the
other
corner.
That
also
seems
to
have
a
patio
it's
closed
off
by
a
fence.
I've
also
been
home
for
the
last
year
and
it
is
loud.
My
upsurf
neighbor
practices,
the
saxophone.
I
understand
the
challenges
of
the
last
year
have
brought
to
us
working
from
home
of
noise,
and
I
I
just
want
to
point
that
out
that
maybe
regular
times
we
are
noticing
now
more
noise
than
we
usually
do.
Thank
you
for
the
time.
That's
all
I
wanted
to
say.
K
I
thank
you
for
letting
me
speak.
I've
been
a
long
time
customer
at
the
red
moose.
I
think
it
is
a
special
little
gem
in
the
city.
I
fully
support
them.
I've
been
outside
many
many
times
out
there.
I
have
never
personally
felt
the
noise
level
has
been
loud
or
extremely
disruptive.
I
think
it's
a
wonderful
community
place.
I
think
this
would
be
a
great
addition
to
the
sugar
house
neighborhood
and
I
I
really
would
like
to
to
see
them,
expand
it
and
open
it
up
outdoor
a
little
bit
more.
F
This
is
katie
missheri,
I'm
I
live
just
around
the
corner
in
sugar
house
as
well,
and
I've
been
coming
to
the
mooch
since
it
opened,
and
I
again
I,
like
other
people,
have
said.
I
just
think
it's
a
gem
in
the
community,
especially
this
year
with
covid
them
being
there.
It
was
a
place.
You
could
go,
see.
Friends,
colleagues,
you
know
I
take
my
baby
there
and
just
anywhere
really
in
sugar
house.
That
I
think,
has
patio
seating
and
it
can
enhance.
F
The
community
like
the
moose
does
is,
is
is
gonna
what
is
going
to
be?
What
is
going
to
make
our
city
grow
in
the
way
that
we
want
it
to
grow
and
how
we
can
have
these
like
little
communities
with
unique
places,
because
the
red
moose
is
definitely
just
unique
to
salt
lake,
so
anything
that
we
can
do
to
support
them.
I
think,
is
great.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
J
I
J
I
T
Hi,
it's
actually
my
name's
matthew,
jensen,
I
own
the
red
moose.
I
just
wanted
to
respond.
I
I
have
tried
to
work
with
my
neighbor
and
I
try
to
do
everything
I
can
to
to
please
him
and
everything.
I
know
a
big
part
of
the
problem
is
at
night,
the
homeless
situation,
and
I
I've
called
the
police
many
times
with
people
being
over
there.
You
know,
I
can't
we
close
at
six
o'clock.
T
You
know
we
don't
play
music
out
there,
we're
not
loud.
It's
a
coffee
shop,
people
out
there
having
friendly
conversations.
I
don't
I
don't
know
really
what
else
I
can
do.
I've
tried
to
work
with
him.
I
actually
told
him
that
I
would
pay
for
half
his
windows
to
make
him
double
pain.
It's
only
been
ever
since
this
time
of
covid
that
everybody's
everyone
this
this
the
hardest
year
that
anyone's
ever
had
you
know.
T
I
mean
that
that
that
really
has
transpired
into
all
of
this
and
we're
just
trying
to
get
through
this
we're
all
trying
to
get
through
this,
and
you
know
the
reason
I
love
owning
the
moose
and
having
it
is.
Is
the
community
is
having
that
there
and-
and
I
think,
having
a
you
know,
we
don't
even
have
seating
inside
right
now
because
of
covet.
We
haven't
had
it
since
march
and
having
out
we
and
now
we've
had
our
limited
our
outdoor
seating
and
we
just
want
to
grow
our
small
business.
T
I
D
D
D
The
landscape
buffer
that
we're
proposing
from
east
to
west
so
from
the
edge
of
the
patio
going
west
to
the
curb
is,
is
five
feet.
I
I
heard
there
was
discussion
about
the
the
tables
and
the
chairs
and
the
orientation
there.
While
there
are
more
tables
in
in
this
proposal,
I
believe
the
way
we're
orienting
them
starting
from
the
north
and
so
half
of
them
on
the
north
side
of
the
entry
and
half
of
them
on
the
south.
D
I
C
F
I'm
unmuting,
you,
hello,
I'm
sydney,
stansfield,
I've
been
going
to
the
moose
for
more
than
about
six
years.
I
just
wanted
to
say
I
think
patio
spaces
at
restaurants
and
cafes
are
extremely
like
enjoyable
and
valuable
to
a
place,
a
neighborhood,
and
so
I
fully
support
this,
and
I'm
also
a
resident
of
sugarhouse,
and
just
a
bit
of
noise
is
just
something
that
comes
along
with
living
in
a
city.
So
thank
you.
I
S
We
would
want
to
run
this
rail
or
fence
from
the
building
wrapping
around
the
patio
so
that
it
would
discourage
anybody
from
leaving
that
area
to
go
into
the
landsat
land.
What
do
you
call
it?
The
landscape
buffer?
So
that's
really
what
that
would
be
about
is
trying
to
keep
people,
and
then
the
distance
would
be
more
than
what
the
requirement
would
be
for
the
landscape
zone.
So
I
was
again
trying
to
just
create
an
area
to
keep
people
out
of
the
landscape
zone.
If
that
makes
sense.
A
B
B
I
think
I
think
community
businesses
are
really
wonderful
for
the
masses
and
can
be
challenging
for
those
who
live
next
door
to
them,
but
noise
ordinances
are
actually
controlled
by
salt
lake
county
health
department
and
the
city
follows
what
what
their
ordinance
is,
because
they
have
to
so.
It's
10
p.m,
to
7
a.m
or
the
quiet
times,
but
during
the
day
they
still
have
to
follow
the
noise
ordinances
related
to
decibels
that
the
county
sets.
B
I
I
A
I
A
A
B
F
F
This
is
for
a
detached
accessory
dwelling
unit
in
an
existing
outbuilding.
It
was
originally
a
detached
garage
which
was
then
converted
to
a
hobby
shop.
The
hobby
shop
is
no
longer
in
use
and
they
are
looking
to
have
it
converted
to
an
accessory
dwelling
unit.
Instead,
staff
has
looked
at
the
submittal
materials
and
compared
them
with
the
standards
of
approval
adopted
in
the
ordinances,
and
we
find
that
they
they
do
comply.
So
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
this
request.
F
Just
to
orient
everybody.
The
subject
property
is
outlined
in
yellow
here
to
the
east.
There
is
a
little
bit
of
hillside
that
goes
up
to
north
campus
drive
on
the
university
of
utah
property
down
at
the
bottom
of
the
map.
We
have
south
temple
that
ends
up
at
wolcott
street
after
this
roundabout
and
2nd
avenue.
Is
that
top
street
at
the
northernmost
portion
of
this
photograph?
F
So
going
into
the
request
details
for
this
detached
accessory
dwelling
unit,
it
is
625
square
feet
in
size.
As
you
know,
a
maximum
size
for
detached
adus
is
650
square
feet,
so
it
does
comply
with
that
standard.
Maximum
height
allowed
for
the
building
is
17
feet.
This
comes
in
at
16,
so
it
complies
with
that
standard
and
in
the
r1
5000
zone,
where
this
property
is
located,
there
is
a
40
percent
lot
coverage
allowed.
This
comes
in
at
twenty
six
point:
eight
percent.
F
F
F
As
part
of
the
public
process,
we
did
send
out
an
early
notification
to
the
property
owners
and
we
did
send
out
a
public
hearing
notice.
We
posted
signs
on
the
property
as
well
at
the
beginning
of
the
notification
process.
We
also
reached
out
to
both
the
greater
avenues
and
the
federal
heights
community
councils,
both
of
them
got
in
contact
with
staff.
F
G
I
I
A
I
I
I
I
I
A
H
H
H
H
H
Closer
in
on
the
site
and
then
to
the
site
plans
on
the
left,
the
primary
site
plan-
and
you
can
see
with
the
yellow
area,
the
yellow
arrow.
The
proposed
distance
from
the
property
line
along
900
west,
which
is
considered
the
front
property
line
to
the
proposed
building,
is
approximately
70
feet,
perhaps
a
little
bit
less.
H
H
H
H
D
H
Yeah,
the
bottom
right
is
the
image
of
the
canopy
just
to
give
you
a
sense
of
of
the
height
there
and
what
that
would
be
would
look
like
just
to
kind
of
summarize
the
public
comments
I've
received.
There
is
a
an
email
comment
attached
to
the
your
staff
report.
On
the
last
page,
a
citizen
did
express
objection
to
the
proposal
concerned
about
the
distance
and
the
how
that
contributes
to
increased
car
speed
along
the
street.
H
This
project
was
also
presented
to
the
glendale
community
council.
They
had
no
comments
or
input
on
it,
so
getting
to
staff's
review
and
recommendation
again
two
applications.
The
conditional
use
is
for
the
gas
station
staff
recommends
that
the
conditioning
is
be
approved,
with
the
condition
that
the
individual
individual
lots
be
consolidated.
H
H
H
D
H
I
I
looked
a
little
bit
into
that
or
tried
to
understand
that
it's
probably
most
likely
because
of
the
residential
development
that
is
north
of
this
area
and
tb
is
kind
of
a
kind
of
a
transition
zoning
from
industrial
on
the
south
to
the
residential
on
the
north.
That's
probably
why
this
was
zoned
cb.
B
Casey,
what
is
an
example
of
an
urban
oriented
gas
station?
I
mean
I
I've
been
trying
to
think
about
what
that
would.
Even
what
an
example
of
that
is,
because
I
think
all
of
our
gas
stations
are
oriented
have
the
same
type
of
flow,
because
you
mentioned
earth
suburban
oriented
and
I'm
just
wondering
what
what
the
hell.
If
there's
an
example
that
we
could
look
at
of
something
different.
H
H
H
H
A
O
Okay,
so
again,
good
evening,
commissioners,
my
name
is
russell
spews
with
borax
engineering
representing
7-eleven,
and
we
appreciate
your
time
this
evening
and
we
would
also
like
to
thank
casey
stewart
for
his
assistance
throughout
this
process.
It's
been
a
process
that
I
kind
of
came
in
the
middle
of,
and
I
really
appreciate
his
efforts
in
moving
this
forward.
O
Tonight
we
are
asking
for
approval
for
the
conditional
use,
permit
and
design
review
for
a
rebuild
of
the
7-eleven
located
at
the
northwest
corner
of
1700,
south
and
900
west
in
casey,
when,
when
you
were
exactly
right
when,
when
somebody
said
900
east,
I
I
thought
we
were
talking
about
our
my
address.
I
thought
I
was
up
on
I'm
ready
to
go,
but
it
wasn't
mine.
O
The
plaza
also
offers
an
enhanced
buffer
from
the
roadway,
including
multiple
benches
tables,
and
not
shown
which
I've
talked
to
casey,
about
which
we
are
going
to
include
an
outdoor
bike
rack
to
also
accompany
our
proposed
indoor
bike.
Rack
now
and
as
you
can
see,
this
was
one
of
the
slides
that
casey
had
presented
before,
where
we
have
the
enhanced
walkway,
that's
coming
from
the
existing
sidewalk
area.
This
would
be
the
retention
pond
area
and
its
proximity
to
our
building
and
another
view.
O
Now,
keeping
in
mind
the
design
constraints
of
the
stormwater
facility,
building
placement
with
site
visibility
to
our
customers
and
fuel
dispensers
are
important
in
site
design
with
two
principal
features
aiding
in
that
process:
safety
and
convenience
having
an
unobstructed
line
of
sight
to
our
customers
while
providing
convenience
drives
our
business
convenience
is
the
state
of
being
able
to
proceed
with
something
with
little
effort
or
difficulty
7-eleven,
as
well
as
other
industry
leaders
provide
convenience
to
their
customers
and
the
moment
it
becomes
less
convenient
and
or
less
safe.
Desirability
decreases
this.
O
There
truly
is
an
art
to
the
science
of
the
convenience
store
industry,
and
I
know
that
this
was
also
provided
in
your
backup.
These
are
just
some
of
the
elevations
for
the
upgrades
to
the
store,
as
casey
had
mentioned
in
the
side
elevations,
and
with
that
I'm
here
to
answer
any
additional
questions.
So
thank.
A
D
O
You
know
we
did
not
explore
that.
Like
I
said
I
came
into
this
project,
probably
about
three
quarters
of
the
way
through
the
the
process,
so
it
was
already
presented
to
casey
and
to
staff
as
they
went
through
this.
So
I
I
really
couldn't
speak
to
that
to
say
that
there
were
if
there
were
options
that
were
put
on
the
table,
but
I
I
not
aware
of
those.
O
A
O
A
O
A
A
B
I
think
casey
brought
up
some
very
good
points
of
you
know
alternate
things
to
consider
beyond
strict
interpretation
of
the
design
code.
I
feel
like
if
this
corner
ever
does
develop
into
something
other
than
a
gas
station,
that
that
would
be
when
it
seems
appropriate
to
enforce
the
design
standards
that
are
closer
up
to
the
street,
but
yeah
the
history
of
this
site
being
a
gas
station
and
the
way
we
orient
them
seems
like
this
is
appropriate
and
casey.
B
A
A
Anyone
else
I
mean
if
we
do
a
an
urban
area,
an
intense
urban
area
doesn't
develop
on
its
own.
It's
done
one
project
at
a
time,
and
so
this
project
would
be
the
first
and
then
another
one
and
then
another
one
and
another
one.
So
that
is
how
it
happens.
So
if
you
approve
this,
it's
probably
going
to
be
this
way.
This
corner
is
still
going
to
be
this
way
until
we
don't
have
gas
stations
anymore,
which
we
don't
know
when
that.
A
I
Yeah
myself,
I'm
not,
you
know
drastically
opposed
to
the
proposal.
I
think
it's
you
know
a
rendering
that
they
put
some
thought
into
and
I
do
like
also
like
you
mentioned
those
amenities
as
well.
I
I
drive
by
that
area.
It's
close
to
the
area
that
I
drive
by
and
you
know
I
know
where
the
711
is
right.
Now
it's
very
visible
from
the
street.
I
D
Did
you
explore
any,
I
mean
there's
something
we
could
do,
maybe
to
that
side,
the
building
that
deems
that
more
of
an
entrance
I
mean,
still
got
the
big
step
back.
I
don't
I
just.
I
think
I
think
this
we're
coming
through
as
a
different
type
of
project
like
a
reason
of
some
kind.
We
probably
would
be
approving
it,
and
so
I
I'm
inclined
to
seem
to
support
it.
I
guess,
but
a
strict
reading
of
the
code
is
hard
to
figure
out
how
it
fits
exactly.
B
D
A
B
I
H
C
B
D
O
Correct,
but
I
think
we
also
need
to
look
at
the
neighborhood
as
well
as
how
it
has
developed
if
it
is
a
pedestrian
oriented
neighborhood,
and
I
don't
think,
based
on
what
casey
had
mentioned,
where
the
other
corners
are
all
zoned
different.
And
when
you
look
at
that
overall
aerial,
you
can
kind
of
see
that
there
really
hasn't
been
anything
in
that
general
area
that
has
developed
with
that
kind
of
that
urban
core.
Where
you
have
those
buildings,
but
the
design.
D
Stand
the
design
standard
here
is
not
does
not
reference,
how
it
compares
to
other
or
other
other
buildings,
it
strictly
references
how
it's
oriented
towards
the
sidewalk,
and
so
my
question
here
is
I'm
trying
to
help.
You
is
what
can
we
do
to
that
patio
and
maybe
the
side
of
the
building
as
conditions
of
approval?
That
would
allow
you
to
to
do
this,
and
maybe
is
it?
Are
we
allowed
to
put
signage
up?
D
D
I
mean:
is
there
a
way
that
this
patio
goes
directly?
I
don't
know
how
that
retention,
pond
kind
of
sits
there,
but
it
goes
directly
towards
that
door.
That's
on
the
side.
You
know,
there's
a
path
that
more
directly
leads
into
that
door.
So
if
you
actually,
the
patio
is
almost
like
a
front
patio
like
you
would
like.
Maybe
you
move
this
whole
paddy
to
the
side
of
the
building.
You
have
it
like
a
like.