►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment February 27, 2019
Description
Description
C
C
D
This
is
a
quasi-judicial
proceeding
where
the
Board
of
Adjustment
acts
in
a
quasi-judicial
rather
than
a
legislative
capacity,
add
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
It
is
not
the
board's
function
to
make
law,
but
rather
to
apply
law
that
has
already
been
established
in
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
The
board
is
required
by
law
to
make
findings
of
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
apply
those
findings
of
fact
to
previously
established
criteria
contained
in
the
Code
of
Ordinances,
in
order
to
make
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
it.
D
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
at
this
hearing
that
the
law
considers
competence,
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues.
If
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
met
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
in
favor
of
the
applicant.
By
the
same
token,
if
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
against
the
applicant.
D
F
Yes,
this
is
a
variance
to
reduce
the
distance
required
between
a
proposed
pool
edge
of
a
proposed
pool
and
a
screen
enclosure.
This
is
Ana
single-family,
residential,
our
78th
district
and
the
subject.
Property
currently
has
a
rear
yard
of
twenty
point
three
feet
and
a
ten
foot
drainage
utility
easement.
Within
that
twenty
feet,
the
proposed
pool
is
essentially
a
basically
designed
as
kind
of
almost
a
lap
pool
design,
narrow
design.
F
The
widest
width
is
six
point
seven
feet
and
there
is
a
requirement
for
a
three
foot:
separation
36
inch
separation
in
the
code
between
the
edge
of
the
pool
water
and
the
screen
enclosure.
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
distance
between
those
basically
zero.
So
in
order
to
accommodate
this
pool,
he's
designed
a
kind
of
a
narrow
pool
and
would
put
the
screen
enclosure
over
that,
the
code
does
require
that
the
pool
will
be
enclosed
by
a
cage
or
some
type
of
barrier.
So
that
is
the
proposal.
F
The
screen,
enclosure
and
the
pool
must
be
built
outside
the
easement.
So
that
is
the
the
limitation
on
this
property.
I
won't
go
through
the
review
criteria
in
detail.
If
you
have
any
questions,
we
can
talk
about
those.
Basically,
the
house
complies
with
the
district
and
with
the
setbacks,
including
the
rear
yard
setback,
and
the
applicant
has
proposed
a
downscaled
pool
designed
to
accommodate
the
reasonable
you
pool
use
without
encroaching
into
the
easement.
The
special
circumstances
of
the
property,
which
is
the
presence
of
the
easement,
have
not
been
self
created
by
the
applicant.
F
Granting
of
rates
would
not
confer
special
privileges
on
to
the
applicant
pools
and
screening
closures
are
a
common
feature
in
this
zoning
district.
In
addition,
the
pool
actually
exceeds
the
pool
setbacks.
It's
just
the
the
limitation
on
having
it
in
the
easement.
That
is
the
issue,
and
the
proposed
screen
enclosure
will
not
adversely
affect
the
adjacent
properties,
but
for
that
reason,
he's
maintaining
sufficient
setbacks
for
those
properties,
so
there
won't
be
any
effect
on
properties,
any
difference
in
the
thin,
a
pool
in
a
rear
yard
of
any
residents.
F
G
Yeah
we're
looking
to
possibly
start
construction
on
this
the
end
of
the
summer,
so
I
wanted
to
get
this
taken
care
of
and
add
it
away
it's
just
a
because
of
the
thin
design
of
our
backyard
I've
designed
a
lap
pool
the
original
design
is
probably
going
to
be
a
little
bit
shorter.
It's
the
same
width,
so
it's
just
gonna
be
a
little
bit
shorter.
It's
not
gonna,
go
the
full
length
of
the
house.
G
It'll
probably
go
a
little
bit
about
15
feet
shorter,
it's
not
going
to
be
as
long
as
I
anticipated,
but
the
width
is
I
still
need.
The
very
I
would
need
the
variance
to
be
able
to
to
do
that,
because
if
we
have
to
put
the
screen,
if
you
have
to
have
that
three
foot,
then
the
pool
would
only
be
like
four
feet
wide
and
it
just
it
wouldn't
wouldn't
be
worth
it.
You
know.
C
G
H
C
C
C
A
A
G
G
A
A
A
B
F
This
is
a
state
request.
Further
needs
to
allow
a
third
driveway
access
for
a
single-family
home
residence.
That's
under
construction.
This
is
the
section
you
probably
haven't
seen
lately.
It
is
in
driveway
access
management
stating
that
the
the
uses
listed
there
on
page
one
and
can
have
a
circular
drive
or
a
second
drive.
So
two
driveway
access
points.
The
applicant
is
looking
to
do
have
one
driveway
as
permitted
with
the
house
under
construction
and
also
a
circular
driveway,
which
will
create
three
access
points.
This
is
in
the
are
100
single-family
residential
district.
F
The
home
is
located
on
well,
the
home
under
construction
is
located
on
golf
road
and
the
issued
permit
is
say:
family
residence
with
garage,
carport
and
single
driveway.
Access
to
tarpon
Drive,
the
front
of
the
home
is
oriented
to
golf
road,
so
the
the
driveway
currently
goes
in
from
the
side
yard
of
the
residence.
The
applicant
would
like
to
install
a
circular
driveway
at
the
front
of
the
home.
One
go
through
so
with
the
permitted
access
point.
The
circular
driveway
would
create
three
total
access
points.
F
The
applicant
has
stated
basically
in
the
application
that,
because
of
the
traffic
volume
and
speed
on
golf
road
that
she
would
like
to
have
a
way
for
people
to
pull
into
the
front
and
pull
back
out
without
backing
into
traffic,
without
going
through
all
the
review
criteria,
you
can
go
over
any
questions.
You
have
on
that.
I'll
go
right
to
the
findings
of
fact.
F
Basically,
the
the
property
is
already
permitted
with
a
sufficient
driveway
of
the
maximum
allowable
width
of
28
feet,
so
there
were
no
special
circumstances
peculiar
to
the
property
that
would
warrant
granting
of
a
third
access
point
on
golf
road
or
just
with
the
project.
Little
littoral
enforcement
of
the
code
would
not
deny
the
applicant
reasonable
use
of
the
property,
since
there
was
already
a
permitted
driveway
of
the
28
foot
width.
F
So
more
than
enough
to
comment
to
accommodate
the
required
parking
and
access
for
single-family
residence,
granting
of
the
variance
would
confer
on
the
applicant
a
special
privilege
not
allowed
for
other
properties
in
the
r100
district
and
really
in
accordance
with
this
section
of
code,
really
any
other
single-family
properties
in
the
city,
since
they
do
not
have
the
option
of
adding
a
third
driveway.
Granting
of
the
variance
would
presumably
not
substantially
diminish
property
values.
F
This
is
a
dr.
Rudolph
rude,
but
I
don't
see
the
addition
of
two
access
points
to
go
through
as
overly
impacting
traffic
I
mean
you've
got
tarp
and
drive.
Then
you'd
add
two
more
access
points
along
there,
but
there
are
other
single-family
residences
with
driveways
on
golf
roads.
So
I,
don't
I,
think
it'd
be
a
de
minimis
impact
as
far
as
adding
an
extra
curb
cut
so
that
one
I
didn't
have
an
issue
with
the
request
does
not
meet
all
of
the
review
criteria
in
the
code.
J
J
Sorry
yeah,
my
name
is
bond
Dartmouth
D,
school
ENS,
I'm
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
the
owner
of
the
property,
Andriana
Katsopolis,
and
the
address
of
this
property
is
11th
harp
and
drive
alright.
So
where
was
I
okay
yeah,
so
we're
requesting
the
variance
in
accordance
with
section
215
of
the
code,
so
the
first
criteria
about
the
need
of
the
variance
arising
out
of
you
know
some
kind
of
unique
condition.
J
J
Not
only
is
it
busy
by
itself,
but
you
have
Jimi's
neighborhood
restaurant,
which
I'm
sure
everybody
here
is
aware
of,
and
Speedway
right
across
the
street
from
this
property.
On
top
of
that,
you
have
two
schools
right.
On
the
same
Road
I
mean
traffic
can
be
at
a
standstill
sometime
on
this
road
during
the
day.
J
Beyond
that,
there's
a
lot
of
kids
on
the
sidewalks,
all
the
time
and
adults
exercising
and
things
of
that
nature.
So
the
you
know
the
unique
condition
here
is
that
there's
a
lot
of
traffic
more
traffic,
probably
than
anywhere
else
in
Tarpon
Springs.
When
you
talk
about
roads
on
you
know
on
that
side
of
town
outside
of
alternate
nineteen
stuff,
like
that.
J
Something
I
think
we
need
to
correct.
Is
that
they're
still
going
to
be
a
driveway
into
on
Golf
Road,
whether
it's
circular
or
not?
Okay,
and
that
has
already
been
approved?
We
actually
had
to
resubmit
a
plan
with
a
without
a
circular
driveway
and
that's
how
we
ended
up
getting
approved.
So
whether
or
not
we
get
the
circular
driveway
there's
going
to
be
a
driveway
place.
There.
J
Now
the
second
criteria
is
that
the
special
special
circumstance
particular
to
the
property
were
not
self
created
and
obviously
you
know
mr.
solace
had
no
hand
in
the
placement
of
the
two
businesses
there
or
the
schools
on
that
street
and
she
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
amount
of
traffic
that's
on
that
street.
So
it's
definitely
not
a
self
created
condition
and
it's
definitely
unique
to
the
property.
J
So
the
next
one
is
littoral
enforcement
and
that
it
would
deny
the
applicant
reasonable
use
of
the
property.
To
that
we
say
that
you
know
bottom
line.
This
is
the
safest
way
to
do
it.
You
know
if
you're
gonna
have
you
know
her
mother
and
her
family
are
gonna,
be
coming
to
her
house
all
the
time
they're
gonna
be
pulling
in
that
driveway.
If
they're
gonna
be
backing
out
all
the
time,
it's
much
more
dangerous
than
if
they
could
just
pull
around
and
pull
out
facing
forward,
see
the
traffic
coming.
J
J
Criteria,
for
is
that
granting
the
variance
will
not
confer
a
special
privilege.
We
feel
that
it
definitely
doesn't
because
number
one
the
benefit
of
granting
this
easement
is,
or
this
variance
is
going
to
confer
a
privilege
on
everyone
who
uses
golf
road,
all
the
kids
that
are
walking
up
and
down
that
sidewalk
everyone
who's.
There
is
going
to
be
safer
if
people
are
pulling
out
of
that
driveway
headfirst
instead
of
backing
out
and
finally,
the
fifth
one
is
diminishment
of
property
values.
They
already
have
said
that
they
don't
believe.
J
That's
the
case,
something
that
I
think
you
know
as
an
issue
that
was
mentioned.
Is
that
there's
a
20
foot
requirement
and
that
you
know
that
the
easternmost
portion
of
the
circular
driveway
may,
you
know,
be
20
within
20
feet
of
the
intersection
thereof,
carp
and
driving
golf
road,
but
I
actually
have
to
plant
here
and
it's
it's
30
feet
or
more
away
from
with
the
circular
driveway.
J
J
Ordinance
number
six,
so
it's
section
1
sections
107
through
199
of
the
Pinellas
County
land
development
code
and
part
1
P
of
that
code,
state
that-
and
this
is
talking
about
accesses
of
driveways
to
county
roads,
which
golf
road
is
a
county
road,
and
that
says
that
when
you
have
a
frontage
of
50
feet
or
less
you're
limited
to
one
driveway,
not
more
than
two
driveways
shall
be
permitted
for
any
property
fronting
on
the
same
Road.
So
I
think
another
important
part
of
this
that
we
need
to
remember.
J
This
is
a
corner
lot:
okay
and
contrary
to
what
the
analysis
from
the
city
you
know,
surmised
is
that
this
is
a
non-conforming
lot.
It's
not
a
conforming
lot,
and
the
reason
is
is
because,
if
you
look
at
the
the
front
and
rear
setbacks
are
placed
on
the
south
and
north
end
of
the
lot.
So
the
front
setback
is
on
Gulf
Road.
Okay,
that
frontage
on
Gulf
Road
is
105
feet
and
then
it's
92
feet
deep.
The
r100
requirement
is
75
by
a
hundred
feet
deep.
J
J
Also
I've
noticed
at
least
one
other
property,
specifically
5:09,
Whitcomb
Boulevard.
That
property
has
five
access
points.
He's
got
a
circular
driveway
in
the
front
and
down
the
wall.
That's
on
Bayou
Ave,
there's
three
more
openings
in
that
fence.
You
know
to
get
into
the
property,
so
that
looks
like
five
access
points
on
a
single
corner
lot
and
which.
A
I
F
I
So
then,
I'll
go
back
and
ask
you
these
questions,
as
you
were
going
through
the
variance
of
the
criteria.
Yes,
I
had
pretty
much
the
opposite
of
what
you
had
said.
The
fifth
criteria
I
agree
with
you:
it's
not
going
to
change
property
values,
but
as
far
as
the
first
floor,
I
I
am
not
convinced
of
any
of
those
of
what
you
described
to
put
a
circular
driveway
on
a
busy
street
to
me
a
suicide,
they
should
be
using
the
side,
the
side
entrance.
You
know
the
side,
driveway.
Of
course,
I.
Don't
understand
why.
J
You
would
the
front
of
the
house
is
on
golf
road.
That's
that's
the
front
setback
I
understand
and
there's
going
to
be
a
driveway
there,
because
it's
the
front
of
the
house,
you
know
and
it
just
that's
where
the
front
door
to
the
house
is
going
to
be
so
you
know
it
really
doesn't
make
sense
to
have
a
front
door
and
not
have
a
driveway.
J
You
know,
and
the
fact
is
I
think
you
know
that
there
is
a
condition
there.
That's
not
self-inflicted!
That
is
unique
in
that
I
mean
you,
you
know
Jimmy's
neighborhood,
a
restaurant
and
the
gas
station
there
how
much
traffic
is
in
and
out
of
that
place
all
day
long,
and
this
is
directly
across
the
street
from
it.
Now
you
have
to
realize
it's
not
down
the
street
from
it
or
up
the
street
from
it
you're
looking
directly
across
the
street.
You
know
I.
I
Know
the
house
well
I
know
the
area
because
I
believe
your
client
came
in
front
of
our
board
yes
or
variants
prior
to
about
a
carport.
So
I.
Remember
that
just
to
give
you
an
eye
and
and
the
another
answer,
this
house,
you're
speaking
about
on,
would
come
I,
don't
know
how
they
got
their
thing
done,
but
it
we're
not
in
any
position
to
utilize
another
location
as
a
telltale.
They
could
have
sixteen
driveways
and
it
wouldn't
change
our
opinion.
It
wouldn't
be.
We
wouldn't
be
allowed
to
change
our
opinion
by
that
I
realize.
I
I
have
to
answer
your
I
have
to
answer
your.
What
you're
giving
me
is
facts
because
you've
been
denied
by
staff
and
it's
your
job
to
convince
us
that
it's
not
only
necessary,
but
that
you
pass
all
the
criteria
and
that's
where
I
was
sitting
listening
to
you
and
trying
to
understand
your
definitions
of
how
this
passes
the
criteria
when,
in
my
opinion,
it
doesn't
so
that's
all
the
other
homes
on
that
block
have
the
same
exact
situation
with
Jimmy's.
They
all
don't
have
circular
driveways
they
all
back
out
into
it.
I
I
know
what
it's
like
there
in
the
high
school
and
they
you
know
the
elementary
school
and
Jimmy's
and
all
that
stuff.
I
know
what
it
is
I
personally
wouldn't
if
I
had
a
choice
and
I
was
putting
in
a
house,
and
it's
just
my
personal
comment:
I
would
be
only
having
a
driveway
on
the
side
of
the
house
on
Tarpon.
Whatever
this
is
top
and
drive
and
I
wouldn't
put
I
would
agree
with
you.
I
wouldn't
put
a
circular
driveway
or
any
driveway
in
front
of
the
house.
I
I
put
a
sidewalk,
yes,
I
would
put
a
entrance
to
my
house,
but
I
would
be
entering
on
the
side.
So
in
my
opinion,
and
that's
what
you
know,
you're
coming
in
front
of
this
board,
asking
our
opinion
you're
trying
to
convince
us
to
change
or
agree
with
you,
this
denial
is,
is
incorrect
and,
like
I
said,
I
went
through
each
and
every
one
of
these
criteria.
If.
J
C
I
Your
definition
that
it's
unique
because
Jimmy's
is
across
the
street
is
not
my
definition
of
what
unique
is
I
mean
you
can
have
a
down
the
block.
You
could
sit
there
and
say
that
the
house
is
Bill
is
unique
because
it's
across
from
top
and
I.
We
could
have
people
come
up
here
and
say:
well,
it's
unique
because
the
person
across
the
street
backs
up
with
a
big
truck
it's
unit,
but
that
doesn't
mean
that
that's
the
definition
that
we're
gonna
go
by
as
a.
D
A
city
ordinance
it's
based
on
case
law
and
previous
jurisprudence
through
the
courts
and
and
I
think
to
kind
of
aid.
The
conversation
the
last
part
of
that
says
it's
unique
and
which
do
not
apply
generally
to
property
located
in
the
same
zoning
district.
So
if
there's
other
properties
next
to
that
property
that
doesn't
necessarily
make
those
businesses
unique
to
that
property,
which.
I
Is
what
I
said
to
you
earlier?
They
all
on
that
block
had
the
same
exact
situation.
It's
not
unique
that
Jimmy's
doesn't
have
a
40-foot
track
the
trail
of
backing
into
your
driveway
per
se.
You
know
if
that
was
the
case.
If
there
was
a
path
mall,
you
know
a
winn-dixie
or
something
that
was
backing
a
40-foot
tractor-trailer
in
that
would
be
a
little
unique.
You
know
this
is
just
because
it's
Jimmy's
and
I
know
you
know
they're
busy
with
food.
That's
not
really.
D
As
well
and
to
clarify
maybe
a
little
bit
more
specific
to
the
law,
it's
unique
to
the
physical
property,
not
necess,
Sara
Lee,
to
the
children
walking
or
to
the
busyness
of
the
road,
but
actually
unique
to
the
property.
So
what
this
mostly
has
to
deal
with
is
properties
that
are
not
square
shape.
Properties
that
are
pie
shaped
that
go
in
in
the
back
or
in
in
the
front
that
there
is
not
it's
not
a
regular
size
law,
it's
something
that
would
be
very
unique
to
the
promontory.
C
D
D
J
C
C
J
Mean
the
Lots
non-conforming
that's
and
it
was,
and
it
was
called
conforming
by
the
city
and
that's
a
mistake,
because
it's
a
non-conforming
lot
the
front
of
the
lot,
the
the
setbacks.
So
what
do
we
go
by
to
decide
what
the
front
of
the
lot
is?
The
setbacks,
or
do
we
go
by
the
address?
Is
there
some
kind
of
a
rule
on
that.
F
F
This
is
addressed
right
now
at
on
tarpon
Drive,
the
owner
and-
and
it
is
a
conforming
lot
if
the
front
yard
were
tarpon
Drive,
but
the
city
allows
applicants
to
choose
which
Street
is
the
front
yard.
This
applicant
chose
Gulf
Road,
so
that
is
the
front.
That's
where
the
front
yard
setback
is
measured,
as
he
mentioned,
the
rear
yard
is,
is
where
the
carport
is
an
tarpon
Drive,
it's
the
side
yard.
That
was
the
choice
of
the
applicant.
F
I
F
F
J
Just
meets
the
distance,
a
is,
if
you
look
at
the
at
the
property
appraisers
website,
and
you
look
at
the
dimensions
of
the
lot.
It's
always
width
depth
on
every
property,
look
at
the
width
and
depth
on
the
property
appraisers
website
of
this
law,
it's
105
by
92.
That
means
that
the
depth
is
8
foot
short
of
being
conforming
for
our
100
and
that's
actually
connected
to
what
I
gave
you.
F
A
F
J
Yeah,
because,
because
when
she
submitted
two
plans
after
after
she
got
the
variance
for
the
rear
setback,
there
was
always
going
to
be
a
circular
driveway
on
Golf
Road.
You
know
per
the
plans
until
she
submitted
them
and
that's
when
she
found
out
that
hey.
You
know
this
isn't
allowed,
or
you
need
a
variance
for
this,
and
at
that
point
she
went
back
and
had
to
pay
to
get
new
plans
drawn
with
just
you
know
these
guys
charge
for
everything.
J
You
know
right
just
a
a
straight
driveway
or
traditional
driveway,
I
guess
you
would
call
it
and
that
was
approved,
so
so
the
driveway
is
gonna,
be
there
and
we're
just
trying
to
make
it
as
safe
as
possible.
That's
what
it
comes
down
to
you.
You
know
that
that's
all
this
is
about
safety.
Her
mom
is
older.
She's
gonna
keep
getting
older.
She
has
a
big
Greek
family,
that's
gonna,
be
coming
by
the
house
all
the
time.
J
A
lot
of
older
women
and
men
and
they're
gonna
be
backing
out
of
that
driveway
now
and
and
their
chances
of
getting
in
an
accident
backing
out
versus
going
out
forward.
Are
probably
you
know
much
greater
and
that's
that's
the
sole
reason
for
the
circular
driveway
in
front.
It's
a
safety
issue
and
I
will
point
out
that
the
vision
and
mission
of
the
city
of
Carbon
both
mentioned
safety
for
for
the
citizens.
If.
I
You're
referring
to
safety,
you
know
what
happens
like
this
is
just
me
speaking
now.
A
driveway
just
becomes
a
parking
lot,
so
nobody
actually
goes
in
and
pulls
out.
It
becomes
people
pull
in
from
both
angles,
both
sides,
so
you
just
have
two
people
backing
out
as
far
as
I'm
concerned,
so
I'm,
just
letting
you
know.
If
that's
what
you're
going
to
say
here,
I'm.
F
I
K
For
my
clarity,
if
they
chose,
if
I
heard
correctly,
if
they
chose
to
forego
the
driveway
access
on
Tarpon
row-
and
they
didn't
do
that,
even
though
they
submitted
and
it
was
approved
since
they're
addressing
on
golf
road,
they
could
then
request
to
have
this
circular
on
golf
road.
If
they
four
went
the
tarpon
Drive.
Is
that
correct?
They
would
have
to
resubmit
the
circular
without
the.
F
F
K
F
J
F
A
A
F
I
A
H
D
I
F
I
D
I
A
I
H
F
I
I
F
I
I'm
to
understand
I
just
got
to
clarify
this:
yes,
I'm,
sorry
that
didn't
laboring
this
issue,
so
for
a
single
property
you're
allowed
to
28
foot
openings,
but
for
a
single
property,
you're
not
allowed
three
openings,
but
if
they
did
away
with
one
they
could
have
to
in
this
in
this
place,
it
just
doesn't
make
sense.
I
know.
E
F
J
A
A
J
A
A
J
And-
and
it
just
I
think
that
this
could
shed
a
little
bit
of
light,
though
whether
it
overrides
it
or
not,
it
states
in
the
county
ordinance
that
you
have
not
more
than
two
driveways
for
any
one
property
fronting
the
same
road,
so
the
county
ordinance
actually
says
you
could
have
two
driveways
on
either
front.
Okay,
so
and
I
really
feel
that
you
know
the
city
ordinance
probably
was
taken.
You
know
from
this.
D
D
C
E
A
A
D
J
You
wanna
one
thing:
I
will
say,
though,
I
know
that
the
county-
okay,
when,
when
the
county
owns
the
road,
for
instance
Whitcomb
Boulevard
around
the
Bayou,
the
county,
has
they
take
care
of
all
of
the
mangroves
and
everything
they're
on
the
side
of
the
road
day.
It's
run
by
the
county.
The
this
is
a
county
road
and
we're
talking
about
access
points
on
to
a
County
Road
and
that's
exactly
what
the
county
ordinance
addresses
and
and
I
just
want
it
on
the
record.
J
C
J
It
was
one
thing
another
thing
I
want
to
mention
is
we
went
through
a
lot
of
applications
for
variances
and
we
had
a
really
difficult
time
finding
any
for
this
specific
type
of
variance
three,
a
third
access
point,
even
though
we
saw
that
and
I
know
you
guys
said
it
doesn't
matter,
but
you
know,
and
I
and
I
looked
into
that
property
extensively.
5:09,
Whitcomb
and
I
couldn't
find
an
application
for
those,
and
he
has
three
interest
points
on
one
side
of
the
road
and
two
on
the
other.
J
That's
five
total
and
I
couldn't
find
an
application
for
that.
For
the
life
of
me,
you
know
and
I
looked
and
I
looked
and
I
looked
my
even
had
mr.
sapa.
Let's
look
a
little
bit,
you
know,
cuz
I
couldn't
I
was
busy
and
we
weren't
able
to
find
anything
and
we
went
through
I.
Think
all
of
2016
in
all
of
2017
applications.
A
F
If
you'd
like
to
request
any
records,
the
city
clerk
has
a
records
request
form
you
would
just
fill
that
form
out
put
the
address,
put
the
request
and
they
will
send
it
to
all
the
departments
that
could
look
through
our
records.
You
know,
I,
don't
know
how
old
the
house
is
when
it
was
permitted.
You
know
those
are
the
types
of
things
you
would
get
back
any
records.
We
had
on
bad
actress.
J
J
J
Has
to
meet
all
of
the,
but
for
that
for
that
criteria.
So
it's
a
corner
lot
and
it
has
odd
dimension.
Okay,
it
has
105
feet
of
street
frontage
on
golf
road,
which
is
supposed
to
be
the
front
of
the
house
and
then
only
has
92
on
on
tarpon
Drive,
which
is
supposed
to
be
the
side
of
the
house
which
would
make
it
non-conforming
by
definition,
because
r100
zoning
calls
for
75
by
a
hundred.
This
is
105
by
92,
but.
H
Then,
by
that
argument,
when
you
look
at
criterion
number
two
that
were
the
conditions,
are
special
circumstances
peculiar
to
the
property,
have
not
been
self
created
or
not
resulted
from
an
action
by
the
applicant
or
with
prior
knowledge
or
approval
of
the
applicant.
The
applicant
knowingly
put
in
to
change
the
configuration
of
the
frontage
of
the
home,
which
then
by
what
you're
saying,
makes
it
non-conforming.
I
J
J
You
know
I,
don't
know
if
she
would
have
reconsidered,
but
I
think
the
because
of
the
way
that
the
lot
is
shaped
and
where
it
is
the
most
logical
place
for
the
garage
was
on
the
back
of
the
house
there
with
the
carport
where,
where
she
put
it-
and
you
know
that,
creates
a
situation
where
you
know
the
front
of
the
house-
the
garage
isn't
there.
So
you
need
a
driveway
there
and
there
I
was.
I
J
Mean
that's,
that's
all
we
have
you
know
and
I,
just
I
wonder
if
I
don't
know
I
don't
know.
If
we
should
really
draw
it
or
you
could
come
back,
but
I
don't
see
anything
changing
I
mean
we
might
as
well
just
let
him
vote
and
then,
if
we
want
to
feel
that
we
can
appeal
it
I
think
that's
the
best
way
to
go.
A
H
A
H
F
This
is
an
application
to
reduce
the
required
sight,
yard
setback
from
seven
and
a
half
feet
to
5
feet.
This
is
in
a
single-family
residential
district
are
100,
and
the
applicant
would
like
to
reduce
the
setback
required
for
a
detached
garage
in
the
rear
yard
of
the
property.
The
Lots.
The
lot
is
a
conforming
lot
actually
exceeds
the
district
standards,
and
the
written
application
does
not
provide
a
rationale
for
the
reduction.
The
outlook
in
this
year
and
I'm
sure
he'll
address
that
there
don't
appear
to
be
any
any
physical
characteristics
of
the
lot.
F
We
feel
like
the
seven
and
a
half
feet
is
designed
to
mitigate
impacts
to
the
neighbor,
to
the
neighboring
properties,
for
a
garage
structure
in
the
rear
that
that
would
be
the
minimum
to
mitigate
those
impacts.
So
we
have
found
that
there
are
no
special
conditions
or
special
circumstances
associated
with
the
property
that
would
warrant
granting
the
variance
the
condition
on
the
property
is
not
related
to
the
again.
The
physical
condition
of
the
lot
and
a
lot
conforms
with
the
r100
zoning
district
standards
actually
exceeds
those
standards.
F
Granting
of
the
requested
variance
would
allow
the
yard
the
garage
to
be
in
located
in
that
side,
yard
setback,
and
that
is
not
an
option
enjoyed
by
other
persons
in
the
these
similar
circumstances,
residences
that
are
permitted
to
have
a
detached
garage
in
the
rear
yard,
and
we
feel
that
the
proposed
variance
is
not
in
keeping
with
the
purpose
of
that
setback
limitation
impacts
on
the
adjoining
properties
in
the
neighborhood.
So
in
summary,
the
request
does
not
meet
the
review.
F
F
F
I
F
L
F
L
L
L
We
were
gonna,
build
a
shed
and
then,
like
I,
said,
we've
been
arrested,
75.
Never
so
like
everybody
else,
you
have
a
lot
of
stuff
and
then
we
were
gonna
start
it
out.
As
a
shed
and
I
said
a
shed
at
200
square
feet,
you
can
buy
them
at
Home,
Depot
anywhere
else
drop
them
plop
them
right
there
any
way
you
want
or
you
can.
But
that
was
my
misunderstanding
that
you
could
put
them
together.
L
F
L
L
H
L
We
just
seem
to
make
more
sense.
If
you
excuse
me,
if
you
head
to
five
point,
if
five
is
good
for
one
side
it
to
me,
five
should
be
good
for
the
other
side,
five
foot,
you
can
walk
around
it.
Why
do
you
want
to
give
it
like
it's
my
backyard,
there's
nothing
else
there.
My
neighbor
has
nothing
else.
There
there'll
be
no
window
in
the
back
that
for
any
light
pollution
or
anything
else,
it's
going
to
bother
anybody
and.
H
L
See
that
was
walking.
That's
when
the
lady
drew
it
up
in
this
miss
Cathy
talked
to
miss
pett
and
I
said
you
know,
misunderstanding
something,
but
then
that's
why
we're
advised
to
ashford
advisement
before
we
went
in
for
a
permit.
Well,
they
tell
us
go
for
both
and
when
I
went
to
talk
to
Laney,
she
said
come
over
here.
Wait
like
so
we've
been
here.
275,
there's
nothing
else
there
it's
built
up!
There's
no
roads,
there's
no
easement
I'm!
You
know.
What's
the
other
thing.
L
A
I
You
have
to
come
in
front
of
us
and
be
able
to
give
us
a
reason
for
us
to
look
at
our
criterion
criteria
and
say
he's
bringing
a
point
to
us
that
we
didn't
hear
or
have
in
our
back
pocket
before.
Okay
and
without
that,
I
feel
for
you.
But
I
don't
have
my
first
question
that
I
put
on
here
was
which
you
answered.
When
was
why
do
you
need
that
extra
30
inches?
You
have
the
room
to
move
it
over.
You
know
and
begin
conform
with
the
width
without
going
for
a
variance
well.
L
L
L
After
I'd
have
to
shift
that
whole
structure,
everything
again
like
I,
said
this
is
expensive,
help
you
get
so
you'd
have
to
slide
it
two
and
a
half
foot
forward
and
then
port
another
two
and
a
half
foot
front
on
the
front.
In
order
for
this
thing
to
remain
the
same
size
build
on
the
existing
slab.
I
simply
put
it
up
and
it
looks
great
see.
I
L
L
H
L
A
A
A
L
A
A
H
And
and
like
we
said,
you
know
we
we
completely
understand
and
as
homeowners
who
you
know
have
yeah,
we
are,
you
know
weekend
warriors
on
these
projects.
Like
you
know,
we,
you
know
it's
sympathized,
but
you
know,
as
our
council
has
stated,
you
know
we
do
have
to
you
know
we
are
here
to
follow
these,
and
one
of
the
things
that
we
have
learned
is
that
you
know
you
had
mentioned
your
brother-in-law's,
your
neighbor,
and
you
know
you
know
y'all's
been
here.
You
know,
since.