►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment January 23, 2019
Description
Description
A
Let's
get
started
then,
good
evening:
everyone
welcome
to
the
Board
of
Adjustment
meeting
of
January
23rd
2019,
let's
be
sure
in
silence
our
cell
phones
and
other
technologies.
If
you
would-
and
let's
begin
with
our
quasi-judicial
announcement
swearing
in
to
the
speakers
from
our
legal
counsel,
please.
B
D
E
F
A
A
B
Where
the
Board
of
Adjustment
acts
in
a
quasi-judicial,
rather
than
a
legislative
capacity
out
of
quasi
judicial
hearing,
it
is
not
the
board's
function
to
make
law,
but
rather
to
apply
law
that
has
already
been
established
in
a
quasi
judicial
hearing.
The
board
is
required
by
law
to
make
findings
of
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
apply
those
findings
of
fact
to
previously
established
criteria
contained
in
the
Code
of
Ordinances
in
order
to
make
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
it.
B
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
at
this
hearing
that
the
law
considers
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues.
If
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
met
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
the
find
in
favor
of
the
applicant.
By
the
same
token,
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
against
the
applicant.
A
A
A
B
B
A
B
A
A
A
So
if
anybody
has
is
under
medication
or
has
to
catch
a
flight
somewhere
or
have
sick
children
at
home,
please
you
could
raise
your
hand
now
or
pass
a
note
to
either
our
secretary
miss
you
others
or
the
staff
on
this
side
and
we'll
see
what
we
can
do
about
moving
things
around
if
necessary,
but
seeing
no
objections
to
the
order
of
the
agenda.
Let's
proceed
with
number
four:
this
is
application
or
18
150,
its
1834
Lillian
Avenue
in
Oakley
village.
Let's
have
the
staff
presentation.
Please.
D
I
A
J
K
A
A
I
This
is
request
for
a
waiver
to
construct
the
required
sidewalk
for
a
single-family
residence.
The
residence
is
currently
under
construction
on
a
corner
line
and
that
permit
includes
the
installation
of
a
sidewalk
along
Grandview
Drive,
the
front
of
the
property
and
along
Forest
Heights
Drive
on
the
side
of
the
property.
I
The
request
is
being.
It
was
submitted
for
the
purpose
of
retaining
some
hard
work.
Hardwood
trees
live
oak
trees,
as
the
applicant
stated
that
exist
on
the
right-of-way.
Those
trees
are
on
Grandview
Drive.
There
are
no
trees
existing
along
the
right-of-way
of
Forest
Heights
Drive.
There
are
existing
sidewalks
in
the
subdivision
and
all
of
the
Lots
on
the
rest
of
this
block
that
this
home
is
being
built
on
are
vacant.
So
there
is
an
opportunity
for
connecting
future
sidewalks.
I
What
I'll
do
is
just
there's
a
special
set
of
criteria
for
out
sidewalks
and
I'll
go
through
just
the
highlights
of
those
basically
site
visit
did
confirm
that
the
trees
do
appear
to
present
an
impediment
to
up
citing
a
sidewalk
or
routing
the
sidewalk
through
those
trees
on
Grandview
Drive,
Forest,
Heights,
Drive,
again
as
devoid
of
trees,
and
could
accommodate
a
silent
sidewalk.
The
presence
of
the
trees
is
not
something
that's
been
self
created
by
the
applicant.
I
I
This
was
publicly
noticed
and
staff
has
not
received
and
he
written
responses
to
those
notices
and
those
are
the
basic
findings
of
the
basic
findings
of
facts
as
I
just
done.
Relayed
and
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
the
request
for
Grandview
Drive
only
so
that
would
be
approval
subject
to
the
following
conditions.
That
would
be
that
the
hardwood
and
palm
trees
that
exist
in
the
right
of
on
Grandview
Drive,
be
retained
and
maintained,
and
at
the
applicant
would
need
to
submit
a
plan
revision
showing
just
the
sidewalk
on
Forest
Heights
Drive.
D
J
J
J
I
This
neighborhood
in
subdivision
in
Grandview
Drive,
it's
not
a
busy
street.
It's
it's,
not
a
thoroughfare,
so
so,
just
to
let
me
complete
that
thought.
The
idea
that
there
might
be
a
short
absence
of
a
sidewalk
in
front
of
this
house
is
not
a
is
not
in
and
of
itself
in
staffs
mind
a
reason
to
grant
the
waiver
for
the
rest
of
that
side
of
the
street
or
for
the
other
Street.
J
A
L
A
J
J
M
L
M
I
M
I
H
B
A
J
L
A
A
M
M
M
A
L
B
I
just
like
to
remind
the
board
that
the
of
number
four
and
the
criteria
that
says
the
Board
of
Adjustment
shall
not
consider
the
non
presence
of
other
sidewalks
in
the
neighborhood
as
justification
to
grant
the
waiver.
So
it
just
has
to
meet
one
of
the
first
or
both
of
the
first
two
one
and
two
and
then
one
of
the
following
three.
If.
J
B
M
And
in
looking
at
the
criteria,
as
counsel
has
counseled
the
criteria
for
the
variance
where
it
must
meet
both
of
the
criteria,
this
is
on
page
2,
section
3
points,
1,
&,
2,
so
Grand
View
does
meet
this
criteria.
Force
Heights
does
not
talking
about
the
frontage,
because
if
what
we're
understanding
the.
L
H
G
A
A
J
N
That
better,
okay,
there's
a
the
site,
it's
a
two-lane
road
with
a
median
in
the
middle,
and
it
travels
east
on
the
side
of
the
road
that
he's
building
homes
on
and
west
on
the
other
side
of
the
road.
So
what
happens
on
a
normal
day
when
people
are
trying
to
drive
down
that
road
and
I
have
a
couple
pictures
just
because
the
things
that
happened
there
are
normal
people
are
trying
to
walk
on
the
side
of
the
road.
There's
no
place
for
them
to
go.
Kids
are
riding
a
bike
on
that
road.
N
There's
no
place
for
them
to
go,
there's
no
sidewalk.
So
what
happens?
Is
the
median
has
different
things
that
the
city
has
put
in
over
the
years
for
the
water
situation
there,
where
there's
metal
pipes
that
are
standing
up
for
I?
Believe
it's
aerated
things
there
in
the
middle
of
that
median
there's
various
trees,
but
there
is
no
place
for
them
to
go
so
it
without
any
sidewalks.
It
really
puts
people
in
jeopardy
not
to
be
safe.
That
road
also
gets
very
heavily
flooded
on
both
the
top
of
it
and
the
bottom
of
it.
N
So
over
the
years
it's
been
when
we
fix
the
road
we're
going
to
continue
with
sidewalks,
because
they're
needed
from
the
city
side
of
it
that
they're
going
to
when
that
gets
in
the
slot
to
repair
the
brick
road
which
I
know
is
another
scenario
and
I'm
not
trying
to
intertwine
the
two
but
I.
Think
if
you
see
on
a
daily
basis,
what
happens?
N
There's
people
that
walk
their
dogs
it
or,
on
a
probably
every
day,
there's
two
women
that
ride
wheelchairs
down
there,
a
remote
those
little
remote
cars
that
scooters,
I,
guess
or
and
walk
their
dogs
down
with
it.
They
have
no
place
to
go.
They
literally
and
I
literally
took
a
picture
once
I
found
out.
This
was
going
to
go
on
because
I'm
driving
down
the
road
and
here
she's
coming
right
for
walking.
N
It
would
be
up
the
street
and
I'm
driving
south
and
then
the
car
behind
me
is
totally
going
on
the
other
side
of
the
road
in
the
opposite
direction.
Just
to
be
able
to
travel
on
that
road,
so
without
sidewalks
it
really
puts
the
normal
people.
They
use
that
road
and
I
beg
to
differ
with
you.
I
think
that
road
is
very
used.
There's
a
lot
of
people
that
live
back
there
lot
of
people
that
live
back
on
the
water.
There's
a
I,
don't
know
if
it's
an
ALC
or
something
that
is
now
back.
N
They
are
where
they
have
nurses
and
doctors
going
back
there.
All
the
time
and
people
out
there
walking
and
it
really
does
need
to
be
have
sidewalks
there
if
it
is
a
the
problem
with
the
trees,
maybe
it's
something
that
we
need
to
move
the
trees
and
put
more
trees,
there's
plenty
of
trees
out
there
and
there.
Actually,
if
you
look
they're,
encroaching
the
road,
so
is
it
something
that
we
remove
the
trees
and
make
it
safer
for
everybody
else
in
the
community?
Or
is
it
something
that
we're
just
gonna
say?
N
Okay,
let's
not
do
it.
It's
a
new
development
I
believe
all
new
developments
need
them
and
I
believe
there
needs
to
be
a
right
away,
so
people
have
the
ability
to
pull
over
with
a
car
or
the
other.
People
who
are
walking
need
a
place
to
be
able
to
move
to
to
get
by
so
whether
or
not
that
helps
you
I'm,
not
sure.
I
do
have
some
pictures
if
you
want
them
or
we
want
to
see
what
happens
there.
Welcome
to
you.
A
A
N
N
Honestly,
one
of
the
hardest
places
when
you're
right
in
that
section,
because
the
other
trees
are
definitely
set
back
further
off
the
road
and
there's
bushes
that
make
it
difficult,
but
not
the
trees.
That
is
probably
the
most
difficult
place
on
either
side
of
the
road
going
in
either
direction.
So.
N
The
trees
where
they
are
with
the
trees,
where
they
are
I
think
they
would
have
to
go.
You
would
still
be
on
your
easement
of
the
you
know
the
town's
easement
or
seven
feet
or
whatever
back
you
could
still
get
a
sidewalk
in
there
to
have
people
be
able
to
get
off.
The
road
I
would
believe,
but
I
haven't
measured
it
or
anything,
because.
N
N
One
of
the
first
pictures
that
I
have
here
is
just
showing
where
some
of
the
where
the
street
actually
ends
it's
an
old
road,
brick
road
where
it
has
the
cement
and
the
bricks
you'll
see
where
they've
placed
there,
even
where
they've
placed
their
stakes
in
the
ground.
The
builders
doesn't
allow
for
somebody
to
get
by
there
and
literally
where
this
person
is
riding
on
her
scooter.
You'll
see
it.
It's
right
doesn't
allow
her
to
go
anywhere
so
I'm
just
gonna
leave
these
and
you
guys
can
have
them.
I
hope
that
helped
could.
A
A
N
F
A
K
P
Name
is
Christine
Warwick
and
I
live
at
1607
Lonesome
Pine
Lane,
which
is
the
street
back
south
of
Grandview
and
my
property.
My
two
Lots
back
up
to
mr.
Cooper's
development
here,
and
so
it
is,
if
you've
been
to
that
neighborhood.
You
know
I've
lived
there
26
years.
You
know
that
it's
an
older
neighborhood
has
lots
of
people
who
walk
and
walk
their
dogs.
Take
their
kids
for
walks
there,
and
this
is
a
small
development
that
mr.
Cooper's
making
there
and
it
it
would
be
good
to
have
sidewalks
there.
P
Grand
View
is
a
really
dangerous
Street
because
of
one
thing
the
median
and
that
bricks
are
uneven
on
both
sides
for
the
whole
road
and
even
though
there
are
sidewalks
on
the
opposite
side
of
the
street,
that's
quite
a
distance
with
the
two
lanes
and
the
median
there
away
from
where
they
are
and
to
have
one
house
have
sidewalks
the
next
one,
not
and
then
mr.
Cooper
is
saying
that
the
rest
of
the
development
would
have
sidewalks.
J
I
When
I
was
out
there,
this
is
what
I
saw.
This
is
a
corner
lot
on
a
block
that
has
no
houses
except
the
one.
That's
under
construction,
the
city,
the
city
has
a
sidewalk
policy,
because
the
city
considers
sidewalks
important
I've
learned
that
the
city
considers
sidewalks
important
and
they
consider
trees
to
be
important.
So
when
I
looked
at
this,
that
was
in
my
mind
what
I
saw
was
people
walking
up
and
down
the
green
view?
I
was
there
very
early
in
the
morning,
so
there
wasn't
a
lot
of
traffic.
I
know.
I
There's
traffic
through
the
neighborhood,
all
I'm
saying.
Is
it's
not
a
collector?
It's
not
a
busy
high
speed
street.
It's
a
brick
street.
So
it's
not
easy
to
navigate
at
a
high
speed.
So
you've
got
a
mix
of
things
going
on
there.
People
could
walk
through
you.
You
could
easily
put
a
path
through
those
trees.
You
could
probably
put
a
two
or
three
foot
sidewalk
through.
I
What
I
could
not
come
to?
The
conclusion
is
that
you
can
put
a
city
standard
four
foot
sidewalk
through
those
trees
if
it
ends
at
the
corner
and
picks
up
again
on
the
other
side
which
I
judged
just
when
I
was
out
there.
The
rest
of
those
Lots
on
green
view
on
that
block
could
accommodate
a
sidewalk.
In
my
opinion,
it
might
look
just
join
it,
but
I
think
it
would
be
ok,
because
the
function
was
the
overriding
consideration
for
me
rather
than
how
it
looks
so
that
I
hope
that
answers
first.
J
J
B
So,
from
a
legal
perspective,
the
city
policies
you
have
to
have
sidewalks
unless
you
apply
for
a
sidewalk
waiver
and
the
evidence
demonstrated
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
you
meet
the
criteria
to
be
granted
a
waiver,
and
that
is
why
the
applicant
is
here
this
evening.
So
if
you
feel
that
the
evidence,
the
competent
substantial
evidence
does
not
meet
the
criteria
to
grant
a
waiver
which
I
believe
the
application
has
been
amended
to
just
be
a
waiver
for
Grandview,
then
if
you
feel
it
does
not
meet
it,
then
you
can
make
a
motion
to
deny.
B
F
F
F
I
There's
a
couple
considerations,
one
is:
will
it
fit?
Two
is
if
something
does
fit?
What
do
you
have
to
do
to
put
it
in
and
will
the
trees
be
able
to,
you
know,
incur
any
damage
either
short-term
or
long-term
I.
Don't
know
the
answers
to
all
those
because
I'm
not
an
arborist
and
I'm,
not
a
sidewalk
engineer,
but
the
criteria
talks
about
physical
impediments
practicality,
the
applicant
is
asked
to
be
able
to
save
the
trees.
The
trees
are
on
City
right-of-way,
so
they're.
I
B
The
criteria
you
can
make
a
motion
with
conditions,
but
the
criteria
that
is
to
be
considered
is
based
on
strict
application
of
the
requirement,
whether
they
get
the
waiver
or
they
don't
get
the
waiver.
So
not
a
flexible
application
thing.
We
require
a
four-foot
sidewalk,
but
we
think
a
tooth,
but
sidewalk
could
fit
so
we're
gonna
do
that
it
has
to
be
strict
application.
G
A
great
question
and
I
don't
know
what
skin
kind
of
like
Mike
I'm,
not
sure
who
to
ask
the
existing
seven
lots
that
are
kind
of
in
that
little
block,
bordered
by
Forest,
Heights,
Grandview
and
sunshine.
Those
are
currently
undeveloped.
How
many
other
undeveloped
Lots,
because
we're
talking
about
street
and
traffic
when
there
could
be
at
least
seven
more
families
and
perhaps
even
more
ten,
more
families,
eventually
using
that,
and
you
would
be
in
perpetuity
granting
a
sidewalk
waiver
that
might
be
needed
down.
G
The
road
I
mean
trees
last
a
long
time,
but
you
know
it
the
better
good
could
be
for
the
or
the
long
range
development
is
to
stick
to
the
city
standards
and,
unfortunately,
perhaps
lose
some
trees,
maybe
maybe
not,
who
knows
but
and
I.
Think
the
the
applicant
mentioned
that
the
other
Lots
two
three
four
and
five
would
be
able
to
put
sidewalk
in.
So
you
have
like
whole
bunch
of
people
that
could
and
I'm
not
entirely
sure
he
wants.
I
Other
option
could
be
that
the
condition
could
could
be
worded
that
the
applicant
or,
if
it's
denied,
that
that
you
ask
that
the
applicant
design
a
sidewalk
to
save
some
trees
and
we
as
staff,
would
would
carry
that
direction
and
ask
the
applicant
to
save
as
many
trees
as
possible.
I,
don't
think
all
the
trees
have
to
come
down
for
the
four
city
standard.
Is
that
a
sidewalk
border,
the
property
line
within
one
foot
of
the
property?
Look,
so
that's!
That's
the
standard
location.
H
D
B
And
I
just
want
to
clarify
something
that
I
said:
I
know
when
you
guys
do
variances
that
you
can
put
conditions
on
it.
This
is
because
this
is
a
waiver
there's
nothing
in
this
section
of
code.
That
says
that
you
can
put
a
condition
on
this,
because
it's
not
a
variance
or
either
waiving
the
you're
either
waiving
the
requirement
to
have
a
sidewalk
or
not
waiving
the
requirement
to
have
a
sidewalk.
So,
typically,
when
you
get
a
variance
request,
you
can
put
conditions
on
it
on
this.
H
H
Grandview
Drive
only
is
outlined
and
subject
to
the
following
conditions:
all
existing
hardwood
and
palm
trees
at
least
eight
existing
trees
in
the
right-of-way
of
Grandview
Drive
shall
remain
and
may
not
be
removed.
They
shall
be
properly
maintained
by
the
property
owner,
as
required
by
the
city
of
Tarpon.
Springs
Code
of
Ordinances
to
the
applicant
shall
submit
a
plan
revision
to
building
permit
application
number
eighteen,
seven
ten,
showing
the
sidewalk
on
Forest
Heights
Drive
to
terminate
at
the
property
corner.
So
when
we
were
to
make
it
a
motion,
would
we
add
those
conditions
or
not?
H
I
B
Board
doesn't
have
the
ability
to
make
conditions
it's
because
it's
because
this
is
not
a
variance.
This
is
a
sidewalk
waiver.
We've
had
a
couple
of
these
very
recently,
but
because
it's
not
a
variance
and
it's
a
waiver.
The
code
specifically
doesn't
allow
for
a
condition
where,
as
your
variance
criteria
does
allow
for
emotion
with
conditions
so.
F
All
the
trees
have
to
be
taken
out.
Does
one
have
to
be
taken
out?
You
know
again,
we
speak
about
the
brand.
You
know
that
the
tree
trunks
possibly
causing
issues
with
the
sidewalk
I,
don't
know
how
far
the
tree
trunks
off
in
the
sidewalk
it's
an
issue
in
many
places
where
they'll
you
know
cut
into
a
branch
or
a
tree
trunk
and
reap
or
they'll
a
lot
of
things.
They
people
will
shave
sidewalks,
but
I'm
listening
also
to
residents
speak
of
you
know
and
I'm.
D
F
It's
kind
of
hard
to
have
people,
you
know,
walk
a
certain
distance
and
then
cross
the
street
to
walk
again
on
the
sidewalk
and
then
walk
back
on
the
other
side
of
the
street
to
walk
again
on
the
sidewalk
and
we're
in
a
situation
where
there's
another
six
or
seven
homes
about
to
be
built.
That
don't
have
this
issue
so
I
kind
of
think.
We're
making
a
pie
a
mosh,
mosh.
A
F
L
This
house
is
located
on
lot
number
one
block,
7
and
half
a
lot
number
two.
What
you
are
looking
at
right
is
an
old,
outdated,
plat,
the
actual
wats
themselves,
which
we
reconfigure
it
because
we
found
that
at
the
time
since
they,
rather
they
were
out
of
conformity
with
wise
and
smaller.
So,
basically,
there
will
not
be
7
Lots
in
part
7,
but
I
should
be
5
or
4,
so
we
increase
the
size
of
each
one
them
so
long
grande
you
there
would
be
this
lot
led
to
others.
L
F
I
I
F
L
K
F
We
don't
have
any
description
of
what's
going
to
be
built
on
Lots
F
at
two
and
three,
a
lot
for
which
could
be
four
and
a
half
of
five
I.
Don't
know,
what's
gonna
be
there,
but
my
point
is
you
can't
have
or
you
shouldn't
have
people
on
sidewalk,
ten,
eleven
and
twelve
then
having
to
cross
the
street
and
still
not
having
a
sidewalk,
because
thirteen
fourteen
has
no
sidewalk
and
its
existing
I.
F
L
I
would
assume
there
would
be
some
sort
of
sidewalks.
It
could
be
configurated
between
those
trees
like,
depending
on
the
width,
the
sidewalk
from
one
inch
up
to
four
feet,
because
those
are
very
large
oak
trees
right
to
paint
on
the
artist
and
the
root
line.
It
is
possible
there
could
be
some
sort
of
configuration
to
there
well.
E
J
D
F
Roadway
I
know
what
this
is
like.
We
have
many
roadways
here
in
Tarpon
that
look
like
that.
I
go
down
lemon
or
orange,
or
you
know
my
cars
shops
go
bad,
I
know
what
they're
dealing
with
and
I
understand.
People
drive
slow,
but
you
still
have
people
that
are
in
the
middle
of
a
street,
walking
their
dogs
or
walking
with
their
kids
and
whatnot
and
I'd
hate
to
be
making
a
decision.
You
know
in
a
negative
way
regarding
safety
of
human
beings,
rather
than
whether
you
could
move
a
sidewalk
I
totally.
L
Expected
and
totally
understand
that
concern.
Is
it
possible
to
do
that?
Well
on
grand
new
drive,
which
is
a
double
Boulevard
Street,
in
which
I
talks
the
neighbors
out
there
daily
for
less
six
years?
Is
that
is
not
the
concern
of
the
sidewalk
in
this
80-foot
section?
It's
basically
concerning
the
road
itself,
but-
and
there
are
sidewalks
on
other
sides
of
it,
but
I
totally
understand
do.
L
L
J
D
I
I
M
Sidewalk
options
on
Grandview
and
I,
you
know
respecting
what
you're
saying
you're,
not
a
sidewalk
engineer,
but
are
the
city
requirements
for
sidewalks
that
they
must
be
I,
believe
there's
the
reference
of
four
feet.
Is
that
a
set
in
stone
thing
or
is
it
that's
the
standard?
However,
if
there
are
things
such
as
trees
and
irregular
shapes
goes,
have
the
potential
to
be
adjusted
to
meet
the
topographical
nature
of
the
area,
yeah.
I
This
sidewalk
waiver
were
not
granted
I.
Believe
city
staff
would
work
with
mr.
Cooper
to
be
able
to
put
some
type
of
sidewalk
in
it.
If
trees
have
to
come
out,
they
have
to
come
out.
If
there's
an
opportunity
to
reduce
the
width,
then
then
we
can
do
that.
That's
that's
really!
A
public
works
question
I,
don't
know
for
required
to
have
1/4
foot,
4
or
any
kind
of
disabled
type.
I
Access,
I
know
minimum
path
widths,
for
example,
downtown
44,
inches
or
42
inches
for
required
minimum
width
for
walking
and
disabled
access,
I'm,
not
sure
that
carries
to
a
local
street,
but
staff
would
work
with
the
applicant
if
this
waiver
were
denied
to
be
able
to
fit
a
sidewalk
in
with
the
least
amount
of
tree
damage.
I
can
promise
you
that
thank.
M
A
B
O
Ma'am,
so
the
width
of
the
sidewalk,
the
four-foot
requirement,
that's
dictated
by
a
by
a
DA,
so
whatever
the
minimum,
a
da
requirement
is
which
it
would
be
something
that
we
would
work
with
Public
Works
to
determine
and
with
the
building
official
to
determine
based
on
that
would
be
the
minimum
that
we
can
allow.
Now,
that
is
not
to
say
that
4
feet
is
going
to
be.
O
That
is
going
to
be
that
distance,
because
we
have
the
majority
of
the
ones
down
down
town
or
at
42
inches
that
is
creeped
up
from
36
generally,
it's
based
on
the
the
width
of
a
wheelchair,
passing
a
pedestrian
in
that
space,
and
that's
really
what
that
limitation
is
based
on
and
where
that
limitation
is
coming
from.
Does
that
help?
Okay?
Thank
you.
It's.
O
A
I
A
Feet
and
further
to
the
west
is
50
feet,
I
believe
so
it's
a
very
narrow
right
away
for
a
collector
street
I
think
they're
required
to
be
80
feet
and,
in
addition,
the
road
is
divided.
There's
a
old
road,
brick
road,
which
we've
all
seen.
It's
got
this
median
in
the
middle,
so
there's
not
much
room
for
sidewalks
on
either
side.
However,
there
is
partial
sidewalks
in
segments
on
the
other
side
of
the
street.
A
Once
the
oak
trees
are
removed,
it
would
take
years
to
replace
and
I
would
urge
that
this
be
deferred
until
we
can
come
up
with
a
unified
plan.
I
think
the
city
needs
to
get
involved
in
and
fix
this
tree.
The
street
is
in
pretty
bad
shape.
I
think
we
can
all
recognize
that
and
it
needs
a
sidewalk
for
the
people
that
are
biking
and
walking.
A
I,
don't
know
that
they
need
it
on
both
sides
of
the
street,
on
Riverside
Drive,
for
example,
which
is
a
heavily
pedestrian
traffic
street
I,
live
on
Riverside
Drive
and
there's
a
sidewalk
only
on
one
side
and
that
on
the
other,
and
you
got
to
go
from
one
side
of
the
other
in
one
spot.
But
people
do
it
and
it's
not
a
problem,
but
to
have
it
on
both
sides
of
the
street
is
I,
don't
think
necessary,
especially
when
the
right-of-way
is
so
narrow.
A
The
other
example
if
I
live
on
an
enclosed
rive,
which
is
a
very
narrow
right-of-way
and
there
is
no
aside
or
welcomed
people,
would
ever
imagine
having
a
sidewalk
on
this
tree.
We
walk
in
the
street
and
we
have
for
40
years,
and
people
are
very
comfortable
walking
in
the
street
in
an
area
where
there's
very
little
traffic
and
the
one
we're
talking
about
here-
Forest
Heights,
Drive,
there's.
No,
it's
a
dead-end
road.
D
A
I
think
it's
very
correct,
very
comfortable
with
that
atmosphere,
a
lot
of
trees
and
a
lot
of
hills
and
to
have
sidewalks
where
the
trees
are
I.
I,
don't
know,
is
a
good
idea.
I,
don't
I
think
it
would
be
harmful
to
the
atmosphere
for
a
very
pretty
subdivision,
but
it
does
need
help,
but
I
think
it
should
be
an
a
unified
basis
and,
as
mr.
A
Burris
said,
work
on
this
sunset
and
Riverside
lady
requested
a
waiver
back
30
or
35
years
ago,
and
the
Board
of
Commissioners
denied
it
and
it's
been
sitting
there
for
40
years
a
dead-end
sidewalk
never
been
used,
and
it
just
seems
kind
of
silly
when
there's
a
sidewalk
on
the
other
side,
and
you
don't
need
sidewalks
on
both
sides.
I,
don't
know
what
the
answer
is.
I
would
urge
the
city
to
fix
the
problem,
no
not
on
a
haphazard
case-by-case
basis,
but
to
do
it
at
one
time,
like
mr.
A
Eisner
said
not
in
a
hodgepodge
type
operation.
Oh,
but
that's
my
thoughts
and
I
guess
I'll
going
to
vote
in
the
minority
I
would
recommend
a
waiver
on
both
sides,
but
the
applicant
that
just
asked
for
a
waiver
on
one
side.
So
that's
the
application,
as
it
sits,
is
just
a
waiver
on
on
Grandview
he
what
he's
willing
to
put
in
the
sidewalk
and
Forest
Heights
Drive.
So
that's
my
thoughts
about
the
motion.
Are
we
ready
Oh.
H
Saw
pictures
of
the
road
flooded,
it's
only
gonna
get
worse.
When
you
put
more
pavement
there,
that's
a
fact,
so
you
put
more
sidewalks
there.
It's
gonna
flood
worse,
but
people
do
need
a
safe
place
to
traverse
through
town.
So
how
do
you
weigh
that?
One
hundred
two
hundred
three
hundred
year
old
trees,
not
gonna,
get
those
back
quickly
with
pavement,
but
as
mr.
cleanser
said,
if
the
trees
die
and
you
put
a
little
two-foot
thing
through
there,
then
what
are
you?
Gonna
have
okay.
So
this
is
a.
H
A
F
I've
heard
comments
made
about
the
trees
being
100
and
200
years
old,
and
nobody
made
a
comment
about
really
removing
any
treat.
The
whole
comment
was
what
can
fit
between
the
trees
without
disturbing
them
and
giving
safe
passage
for
tarp
and
residents.
I
was
not
in
favor
of
taking
a
tree
down
at
all.
Unless
there
was
possibly
a
small
tree,
you
know
I
again,
don't
have
the
variables
in
this
I.
Don't
know
the
size
right,
I,
don't
know
the
size.
F
M
A
B
A
A
C
M
B
A
I
This
is
an
application
for
451
East,
lemon
Street
property,
to
authorize
an
adjustment
to
the
impervious
surface
ratio
from
the
maximum
allowable
ratio
to
0.82
a
proposed
ratio
of
zero
point,
nine
one,
six
for
light
industrial
project,
that's
currently
under
construction.
This
is
located
in
the
city
city's
special
area
plan
district,
the
impervious
surface
ratio
is
Rita's
son
codified.
Basically,
in
that
special
area
plan
in
the
downtown
gateway
character
district
that
this
property
is
in.
So
it's
in
the
transect
infill
code,
it's
in
the
residential
plus
industrial
slash
office
transect.
I
I
So
he
came
in
to
revise
the
building
permit
to
include
asphalt.
It
changed
the
pavers
to
asphalt.
That's
when
the
impervious
surface
ratio
discrepancy.
What
was
noted,
this
change
would
not
affect
the
drainage
system.
That
was
the
first
thing
that
the
really
the
overriding
concern
that
staff
looked
at
the
city's
stormwater
engineer
and
the
applicants
engineer
have
both
analyzed
the
project
and
confirmed
that
the
drainage
system
will
handle
this
change
and
was
designed
as
though
the
project
were
already
all
impervious.
I
It's
a
little
bit
of
a
nuance:
the
difference
that
the
staff
recognized
the
paver
surface
to
satisfy
the
special
area
plan,
impervious
surface
ratio,
but
the
stormwater
was
designed
as
though
that
surface
was
a
solid
asphalt
surface.
So
that's
the
difference.
So
there's
quite
an
extensive
staff
analysis,
because
there's
nine
criteria
for
is
our
ratio
is
our
adjustments.
I
I
I'll
summarize
just
via
the
finding
of
fact,
and
then,
if
we
want
to
go
through
the
detail,
we
can
do
that
so
the
property
size
and
the
special
area
plan
requirements
present
the
hardship
with
respect
to
the
strict
compliance
with
the
is
our
standard
by
limiting
the
capacity
of
the
permitted
light
industrial
business
to
accommodate,
to
its
full
extent,
that
the
light
industrial
tenants
that
could
occupy
this
building,
the
hardship
is
not
self
imposed
by
the
applicant.
The
adjustment
will
not
interfere
with
the
rights
or
injure
the
rights
of
affected
property
owners.
I
The
adjustment
is
in
harmony
with
the
countywide
rules,
city,
comprehensive
plan
and
special
area
plan.
The
adjustment
is
the
minimum
necessary
to
reasonably
accommodate
the
use,
so
it
provides
that
more
substantial
surface.
There
is
still
paver
surface
remaining
in
the
project,
but
this
was
the
minimum
needed
to
accommodate
the
use.
I
Also
just
reiterate
that
the
footprint
of
the
project
has
not
changed.
The
adjustment
will
not
confer
a
special
privilege
upon
the
applicant,
so
all
the
other
requirements
are
still
being
met.
The
stormwater
open
space
landscaping
all
those
types
of
things
granting
the
adjustment
would
not
constitute
an
amendment
to
any
of
the
city's
codes
and
a
future
land
use
map.
Amendment
is
not
an
appropriate
remedy
for
this
application
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
an
adjustment
to
the
impervious
impervious
surface
ratio
from
zero
point:
eight:
zero
to
zero
point:
nine
one:
six:
are
there
any
questions?
I
E
Good
evening,
Jordan
suits
of
46
West,
lemon
Street,
tarpon
springs
and
I
appreciate
your
time.
I.
As
pointed
out
by
the
staff,
there
will
be
no
additional
coverage
and
what
was
approved
by
the
regulatory
agencies
as
well
as
reviewed
by
the
city
and
by
my
private
engineer,
the
same
areas
will
be
covered.
One
other
thing
that
I
wanted
to
point
out
is
because
the
city
does
not
have
a
drainage
plan.
E
I've
taken
it
on
myself
to
get
this
approved,
had
built
a
drainage
plan
underneath
the
drive
parking
area
and
which
has
been
approved,
and
there
was
concerns
brought
up
by
my
paving
contractors
as
well
as
engineers,
that
with
pavers,
which
tend
to
be
more
maintenance
and
due
will
start
to
fail
over
time,
whereas
fault
would
be
less
likely
to
do
so
could
start
to
damage
the
drainage
field
that
is
built
underneath
the
drive.
So,
unfortunately,
the
town
does
not
have
a
drainage
plan
in
downtown
tarpon
springs,
but
that
take
it
on
myself
to
create
one.
A
M
Have
a
question
and
thank
you
for
I
was
noting
that
of
youcan't
seeming
to
I'm
no
engineer,
but
I
was
raised
by
a
civil
engineer,
so
I've
born
as
a
child
by
a
lot
of
these
details
like
to
appreciate
you
taking
that,
above
and
beyond
approach
to
the
drainage
on
your
letter
from
Ozona
engineering,
you
it
referenced
that
you
have
a
slotted
diameter
18,
it
says,
thought
I'm,
assuming
it's
an
inches
diameter
pipe.
The.
D
M
E
No,
it's
kind
of
a
neat
system
that
I
built
two
concrete
cells
on
the
north
and
side
side
of
the
drive
parking
lot
and
I
actually
went
through
the
expense
of,
but
to
make
the
build
and
I'm
really
trying
to
enhance
the
buildin
and
I'm
really
under
this
project
of
enhance
in
the
neighborhood.
So
I
have
the
pipes
coming
from
the
roof
underground
and
they
dump
into
these
cells
the
cells
when
they
fill
up
above
about
three
feet
and
they're
quite
volume
in
each
one
they
pop
off
into
a
pipe.
E
That's
I've
got
rock
all
around
it,
so
it'll
become
a
drain
field.
After
so
it
was,
it
wasn't
cheap,
but
I
think
it's
gonna.
They
all
feel
as
though
it's
gonna
work,
fine
and
I
think
that
the
asphalt
will
not
affect
nobody
will
see.
It
they'll
still
be,
as
pointed
out
by
the
staff,
the
front
which
I've
enhanced
I'm
going
through
the
expense
of,
instead
of
it
just
being
a
metal
bill.
E
E
I
flipped
the
building
around
originally
I
had
the
building
where
the
parking
lot
was
going
to
be
facing
the
west
side
and
I
had
talked
to
the
property
owner
next
door
that
plans
to
build
her
home
there
some
day
and
she
was
sensitive
to
light
and
all
that
so
I
flipped,
the
building
around,
which
wasn't
my
first
choice,
but
that
way
she
won't
be
affected
by
the
flood
lighting
or
cars
pulling
right
up.
That
would
be
flooding
right
into
it.
So
that's
been
a
project.
M
J
G
E
I
didn't
explore
concrete,
but
I
think
concrete.
It
has
its
issues
too,
though.
I
thought
asphalt
was
the
more
common
thing
and
if
you
looked
around
I
think
99.9%
of
anywhere
and
Tampa
Bay
is
gonna,
be
asphalt.
If
not
program
that
stopped
it
turned
out
to
be
the
best
solution
to
keep
the
maintenance
down.
I
have
pavers
in
my
driveway,
which
doesn't
have
Federal
Express
trucks
running
in
it
or
anything
else.
E
E
A
D
D
A
A
I
This
is
a
request
to
authorize
variance
to
the
front
yard
setback
in
a
variance
to
the
required
size,
side,
street
yard
setback
and
to
allow
construction
of
a
single-family
residence
on
a
non-conforming
lot.
This
is
on
the
corner
of
Hope
and
whispers
stream.
The
applicant
is
requesting
this
variance,
reducing
the
front
setback
from
20
feet
to
10
feet
and
reducing
the
side
street
setback
from
seven
and
a
half
feet
to
5
feet.
This
slot
is
a
non-conforming
run.
I
I
Summarizing
the
staff
analysis
with
the
findings,
the
lot
was
created
prior
to
the
effective
date
of
the
code
of
the
current
ordinance,
and
a
lot
was
not
created
in
violation
of
any
previous
zoning
ordinance.
The
lot
was
not
combined
with
the
neighboring
a
lot
it
was
never
combined,
so
it
was
not
combined
to
do
any.
Have
anything
neat
setbacks,
but
it
has
always
been
a
a
lot
of
record
by
itself.
The
condition
on
the
property
for
which
the
variance
is
requested
is
related
to
the
physical
configuration
of
the
lot
and
small
size.
I
Strict
application
of
the
dimensional
standards
would
severely
limit
development
on
the
subject
property
it's
already
limited,
so
that
would
limit
it
further
and
granting
events
allowing
these
reductions
of
setbacks
would
not
impact
the
surrounding
properties
and
is
in
keeping
with
the
within
neighborhood
pattern.
It
is
a
fairly
densely
I
guess
some
covered
and
developed
neighborhood
lots
of
older
non-conforming
properties,
so
it
it
would
be
in
character
with
the
immediate
area.
I
This
was
publicly
noticed
and
there
were
no
responses
received
to
the
note
received
to
those
notices.
Staff
recommends
approval
of
the
variance
for
relief
from
the
minimum
front
yard,
setback,
minimum
side,
street
setback
and
approval
of
construction
of
a
single-family
residence
on
a
non-conforming
lot
of
record.
Are
there
any
questions?
Thank.
A
Q
M
D
A
N
A
C
D
I
The
subject
site
is
a
non-conforming
a
lot
of
record.
The
r100
District
requires
a
75-foot
with
the
slot
is
at
70
foot
width
similar
to
several
little
hot
sand,
sea
breeze
that
that
you
all
have
seen
this
application
was
publicly
noticed
and
there
were
no
responses
received
to
those
to
the
notices
and
just
summarizing.
In
the
findings
of
fact,
the
applicant
is
requesting
to
build
the
garage
reconfigured,
the
driveway,
to
a
side
loading
garage,
and
this
would
be
to
accommodate
septic
leach
field
proposed
to
be
relocated
from
the
rear
yard
to
the
front
yard.
I
A
lot
of
non-conforming
a
lot
of
record
as
it
does
not
meet
the
75
foot
minimum
lot
width
a
lot
was
created
prior
to
the
effective
date
at
the
of
the
current
ordinance
and
was
not
created
in
violation
of
any
previous
zoning
ordinance.
The
conditions
of
the
lot
are
not
self
created
or
the
result
of
an
action
by
the
applicant.
I
Strict
application
of
the
dimensional
standards
would
limit
additional
development
on
a
subject
property
and
prevent
relocation
of
the
septic
leach
field
and
granting
the
variance
would
allow
allowing
the
reduction
in
setbacks
is
in
keeping
with
the
existing
development
pattern
in
the
neighborhood,
which
has
several
older
homes,
some
of
which
are
close
to
the
street
and
several
of
which
do
have
non-conforming
side
setbacks.
Staff
recommends
approval
of
the
variance
for
relief
from
the
minimum
front
yard
and
then
a
minimum
total
side
yard
setback
requirements.
Are
there
any
questions.
D
R
A
D
M
F
R
K
R
I
R
R
R
R
M
A
A
A
A
I
This
is
a
request
to
reduce
the
required
rear
yard
setback
by
two
feet
to
accommodate
a
screen
room,
and
this
is
at
the
townhomes
at
Brittany.
Park
subdivision
addresses
937,
ossi
corn,
and
this
isn't
a
planned
development
district.
The
request
is
to
construct
a
screen
room
with
a
with
a
solid
roof
over
an
existing
seven
point.
Two
foot
by
fifteen
point:
eight
foot,
wood
deck.
I
But
just
to
summarize,
this
was
something
that
was
originally
approved
as
a
townhome
condominium
that
went
to
feast,
simple
townhomes
and
the
these
were
built
with
the
decks
on
the
back
all
at
7.2
feet
wide.
As
far
as
we
can
tell
the
the
applicant
is
requesting
to
basically
enclose
that
deck
with
a
screen
room.
I
I
This
was
properly
noticed
and
there
were
no
responses
received
to
the
notices
and
I'll
go
ahead
and
summarize
the
analysis
with
the
findings
of
fact.
The
decks
and
his
development
were
installed
by
the
original
builder
and
the
special
circumstances.
With
this
development
we're
not
self
created
or
resulting
from
the
action
by
the
applicant.
The
requested
variance
is
the
minimum
necessary
to
screen
in
the
deck
as
constructed,
and
the
variance
will
not
confer
a
special
privilege
on
these
owners
over
any
owners
that
possess
the
same
dimensional
restrictions.
I
I
will
say
that
the
reason
for
that
is
there's
a
couple
of
things.
There
is
common
area
behind
this,
this
deck,
so
it
doesn't,
it
doesn't
border
another
living
unit
or
something
like
that.
There
are
other
screen
rooms
that
were
approved,
and
this
is
something
where
it
could
be
an
appropriate
really
develop
a
wide
variance
if
the
developers
wanted
to
propose
that
or
if
the
the
Association
wanted
to
propose
that
it
may
be
a
candidate
for
that
type
of
thing.
So
this
these
are
just
coming
in
one
by
one.
I
At
this
point,
printing,
the
variants
will
not
adversely
impact
surrounding
properties
and
isn't
keeping
with
the
existing
neighborhood
development
pattern
and
the
character
of
this
development
staff
recommends
approval
of
the
variance
for
relief
from
the
minimum
rear
yard
setback
requirements.
Are
there
any
questions?
Thank.
S
Hello,
my
name
is
Craig
Boyle
owner
of
boils
aluminum
and
screening.
We
were
contracted
by
mrs.
Teresa
Ignacio
to
build
a
screened
covered,
screened
patio,
basically
going
to
the
property.
We
noticed
that
there
were
multiple
other
you
know,
screen
rooms
with
covered
composite
panel,
roofs
located
there.
We
did
kind
of
look
into
the
permitting
on
it
also
and
and
had
seen
that
they
were
permitted
structures.
So,
therefore,
we
didn't
see
any
any
problem
with.
You
know
proceeding
to
actually
build
it
as
we
got
further
down
in
the
process.
I
think
we
submitted
the
application.
S
October
went
through
the
line
and
got
rejected,
and
then
it
came
back
and
then
come
to
find
out
that
the
setbacks
are.
You
know
what
they,
what
they
are,
which
leaves
us
two
feet
short
in
order
to
actually
build
on
the
existing
deck.
So
we
don't
look
to
modify
the
deck
in
any
way.
We
just
want
to
build
the
screen
room
on
that
deck.
A
J
J
S
B
That
staffs
analysis,
as
we
talked
about
that
is
staffs
analysis.
I,
have
told
you
and
I
will
tell
you
again
today
that
what's
happened
at
other
properties,
it
doesn't
make
a
difference.
So
just
because
it's
in
staffs
analysis
doesn't
make
it
relevant
for
you
to
consider
and
I
would
advise
that
you
not
consider
that.
J
B
A
D
A
D
A
C
D
A
I
D
I
Reduce
the
front
yard
setback
from
25
feet
to
15
feet
to
allow
the
construction
of
a
single-family
residence
with
a
detached
garage.
The
plan
shows
2014,
square-foot,
single-family
residence
proposed
and
a
detached
garage,
the
size
of
which
is
not
given,
and
that
detached
garage
is
proposed
for
the
front
of
the
house.
The
lot
conforms
to
the
minimum
district
standards
for
lot
size,
width
and
depth,
but
it
is
not
a
standard
rectangle.
I
I
I
So
I
was
not
convinced
with
the
proposed
design.
I
could
not
determine
that
this
was
the
minimum
variance
needed
for
a
proprietary
Don,
this
property,
the
home.
As
far
as
it
goes
is
in
character
with
the
rest
of
the
neighborhood
and
the
other
homes
being
built
by
the
applicant
overall
and
of
course,
the
use
is
obviously
in
conformance
and
in
character,
but
the
rest
of
the
neighborhood
is
a
single-family
with
with
a
garage,
but
basically
to
summarize
staff
analysis
with
the
findings.
I
The
lot
does
meet
the
minimum
district
standards,
but
is
configured
at
an
angle
relative
to
the
street.
So
it
is
an
unusual
shape.
The
conditions
and
special
circumstances
associated
with
the
variance
had
not
been
self
created.
As
far
as
the
lot
goes,
the
strict
application
of
the
dimensional
standards
may
limit
additional
development,
but
the
applicant
has
not
demonstrated
that
the
requested
variances
the
minimum
needed
to
overcome
really
any
impediment
to
providing
for
reasonable
use
of
the
property.
I
Greening
of
the
variance
would
not
confer
a
special
privilege
with
respect
to
the
use
of
the
property
of
a
single-family
residence,
but
most
of
the
residences
are
really
overall
meet
that
front
setback.
So
there
is
a
consideration
here
of
a
special
privilege
for
this
lot,
without
further
evidence.
In
my
mind
that
this
was
the
minimum
needed
to
to
be
able
to
build
this
project
allowing
a
reduction
of
the
front
yard
setback
has
not
been
shown
to
be
consistent
with
that
Neighborhood
Development
pattern.
I
L
If
we
look
at
the
application
at
face,
I
need
to
explain
some
extenuating
circumstance
that
occurred.
This
is
an
application
for
an
attached
garage,
not
detached
garage.
If
you
look
at
the
application
itself
and
the
drawings
there
are
two
drawings
there.
One
says
the
attached
garage
once
or
the
detached
garage
we
modify
it
for
an
attached
garage
can.
L
A
I
I
L
A
M
H
I
M
L
I
address
the
applicants
intention.
The
intention
was
was
two
because
that
site
itself
is
so
complicated
too,
but
a
building
on.
Yes,
we
originally
submitted
the
detached
drawing,
as
you
can
see
out
front
here,
and
then
we
attached
the
garage.
We
could
actually
attach
it
three
feet
closer
to
the
building
right,
which
would
be
the
maximum
density
that
you
could
actually
squeeze
the
house
together
right,
which
would
not
required
the
sidewalk
between
them,
which
is
which
we're
totally
flexible
that,
but
we
tried
to
comply
with
what
the
city
requested,
but
I
said
detached
or
attached.
L
It
wasn't
that
wasn't
our
intention
right.
It
was
to
get
into
that
small
space,
the
building
pad
itself
the
issue
of
the
issue
with
a
lot
itself,
as
staff
has
me:
it's
it's
not
perpendicular
to
the
street.
It's
not
it's
not
parallel
with
the
street.
The
lie
itself,
so
it's
actually
skews
on
a
tremendous
angle
and
if
you
look
at
actual
property
lines
itself,
you'll
find
out
that
on
one
side
for
the
front,
it's
81
foot
the
north's
101
feet,
the
South's
125
feet
and
the
back
270
feet.
L
L
L
So
our
request
was,
with
the
final
one,
was
actually
have
the
garage
attached
or
detached,
which
not
that's,
either
way
he's
fine
with
us,
so
we
would
take
out
that
little
walkway
between
them
and
actually
push
the
lot
back.
The
actual
garage
against
the
house
I
think
the
important
thing
that
should
be
noted
is
that
on
sunshine,
Drive
that
light
it's
located
is
if
you'll
see
the
lot
to
the
north,
which
is
Sharon
Barry's,
which
under
construction,
that
is
a
15
foot
setback
from
the
center
from
the
property
line.
L
L
I
I
I
L
L
A
L
L
L
I
B
B
J
L
L
H
L
This
garage
is
actually
to
scale
the
same
as
the
garage
on
a
rendering,
but
it
was
put
so
what
we
can
do
is
push
that
into
this
space
here,
which
is
a
walk
lick
into
that
slot,
which
would
be
three
feet
closer,
which
should
actually
they
just
give
you
the
same
elevation,
and
it
would-
and
it
would
take
this
dotted
line.
It
would
push
this
designated
line
back
here.
Three
feet
put
it
closer
to
the
house,
so
the
house
would
actually
be
totally
attached
so.
J
H
B
B
R
D
M
G
L
G
G
M
L
L
A
B
A
M
A
Well,
I
think
it's
a
good
idea,
myself,
I
can't
imagine
having
your
garage
outs
get
a
go.
Let's
say
it's
raining
or
you're
worried
about
security
and
you
got
to
go
outside
to
get
into
your
garage
or
into
your
house,
not
a
good
idea,
but
that's
not
my
car.
So
any
discussion
again.
None
ready
for
a
motion
all
ready
for
a
roll
call.
Please
miss.
K
D
B
J
A
A
A
B
J
H
B
D
H
T
Joanne
rich,
I
live
one
0:05
lake
Avoca
place
in
the
point:
Alexis
community,
my
parents,
retired
to
tarpon
springs
about
30
years
ago
and
now
they're
in
their
late
80s,
so
I
moved
full-time
to
partly
care
for
them,
but
I've
been
here
a
year
and
a
half
and
I'm
an
employee
at
the
juvenile
Welfare
Board
of
Pinellas
County,
as
the
faith-based
community
coordinator
in
the
county,
and
so
some
days,
I'm
in
st.
Pete
some
days,
I'm
in
Tarpon,
but
I
have
a
wonderful
privilege
of
working
with
the
county
in
that
way.
T
T
A
That's
right:
yes,
we
have
peaceful
meetings.
Thank
you
very
much
for
offering
your
services
at
our
city
into
this
board.
Look
forward
to
having
you
giving
us
your
opinions.
All
right,
then
board
comments.
I
just
signed
three
orders
tonight
and
we're
gonna
get
those
emailed
to
the
board
for
your
review
as
before,
pretty
non-controversial
I.
Think.