►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustments April 28, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
go
to
the
quasi
judicial
announcement.
Our
attorney
shall
drop
some
knowledge
upon
us.
B
This
is
a
quasi-judicial
proceeding
where
the
board
of
adjustment
acts
in
a
quasi-judicial
rather
than
a
legislative
capacity
at
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
It
is
not
the
board's
function
to
make
law,
but
rather
to
apply
law
that
has
already
been
established
in
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
The
board
is
required
by
law
to
make
findings
of
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
apply
those
findings
of
fact
to
previously
established
criteria
containing
the
code
of
ordinances
in
order
to
make
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
it.
B
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
at
this
hearing
that
the
law
considers
confidence
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues.
If
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
met
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
in
favor
of
the
applicant.
By
the
same
token,
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence,
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance.
B
B
Are
there
any
members
of
the
board
wishing
wishing
to
disclose
any
expertise,
communications
or
conflicts
of
interest
this
evening,
seeing
none
anyone
wishing
to
speak
this
evening?
If
you
could,
please
stand
to
be
sworn
in,
raise
your
right
hand
for
me:
do
you
do
you
swear
or
from
that
the
testimony
you're
about
to
give
is
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing,
but
the
truth.
A
D
A
F
F
F
The
applicants
are
here
today
requesting
variance
approval
to
allow
a
non-conforming
lot
of
record,
which
is
lot
three
shown
here
on
the
drawing
that
is
under
common
ownership
with
the
adjacent
property,
which
is
lots
four
and
five
to
be
buildable
a
little
bit
of
a
site.
History
for
these
properties
lots
three
four
and
five
were
all
originally
plotted
back
in
1914
as
part
of
the
orange
heights
subdivision
in
1954,
a
new
land
development
code
went
into
effect,
placing
these
properties
in
the
r1a
zoning
district.
F
This
district
required
a
minimum
lot
width
of
60
feet
lot.
3
became
legally
non-conforming
at
this
time
because
its
width
is
only
54
feet
in
width
in
1959,
the
existing
home
on
lots,
four
and
five
was
constructed,
and
then
in
1990
our
current
land
development
code
went
into
effect.
They
are
now
in
the
r-70
zoning
district
and
again
the
minimum
lot
width
is
still
60
feet,
so
these
lots
are
still
considered
non-conforming
or
lot
three
is
non-conforming.
F
One
thing
to
note
is
lot:
3
does
meet
the
minimum
lot
area
as
well
as
lot
depth.
Just
not
the
lot
width
in
2015
lots,
3,
4
and
5
were
sold
and
placed
into
common
ownership,
which
is
resulting
in
the
variance
requests
before
you
today,
and
that
is
to
determine
whether
or
not
lot
three
is
buildable
as
a
non-conforming
lot
of
record
and
the
applicants
are
looking
to
purchase
the
property
and
construct
a
single
family
home.
F
This
is
an
overview
of
your
review
standards
and
we
had
this
similar
variance
a
couple
months
ago
and
just
as
a
reminder,
this
is
a
different
set
of
review
criteria.
It's
shown
here
on
the
screen
as
well
as
outlined
in
your
staff
report.
With
that,
I
will
answer
any
questions.
G
On
hold
on,
I
do
have
a
question
so
in
looking
at
the
review
standards
with
standard
number
one
where
it
states
that
the
lot
consists
of
at
least
one
entire
lot
of
record,
so
the
definition
of
entities-
I
don't
know
if
this
is
a
staff
or
council
question
entire
lot
of
record.
Knowing
that
it's
a
non-conforming
lot
is
a
non-conforming
lot
still
considered
an
entire
lot
of
record.
F
Yes,
and
in
this
instance
yes
lot
three,
this
was
the
original
configuration
dimensions
that
was
originally
plotted
back
in
1914,
so
it
is
one
single
lot.
Thank
you.
F
A
And
the
neighbors
on
either
side
have
not
contacted
the
city
either
way.
F
I
have
not
received
any
calls.
A
So
if
you
would
like
to
give
a
presentation,
sir,
this
would
be
your
time.
No,
I
think
we've
covered
everything
I
was
just
here
in
case
of
questions
popped
up.
B
H
G
Well,
I
would
like
to
say
that
it
is
refreshing
that
we
have
an
application
for
someone
who
is
a
prospective
property
owner
looking
to
see
what
they
can
do
with
the
piece
of
property
before
purchasing
the
property
and
then
realizing,
oh
geez,
all
right,
I
I'm
in
a
bit
of
a
pickle
to
say
the
least
and
then
they're
in
front
of
this
board
saying
I
bought
this
property.
G
I
didn't
know,
or
I
looked
around
and
thought
everyone
else
has
this
garage
or
shed,
or
what
have
you
so
thank
you
for
your
proactive
approach
to
this.
So
in
giving
it,
as
the
board
knows,
I
am
a
fan
of
small
houses
and
love
me.
An
old
shotgun
style
house
so
are
giving
these
setbacks
and
my
lack
of
math
skills
54
minus
15,
because
that
would
be
the
side
setbacks
help
me
folks.
What
is
that?
It's.
E
H
G
H
It's
going
to
be
a
stretch,
I
did
put
a
footprint
in
the
presentation
package
and
again
that's
one
thing.
I
was
asking
for
possibly
a
variance
because
I
thought
it
was
r100
and
then
and
then
I
was
wanting
to
go
to
r70
with
the
seven
and
a
half
and
I
figured
I
could
work
with
that.
It's
just
going
to
be
a
a
deep
house
right,
narrow
house,
yeah.
H
No,
I
haven't
the
property
of
a
home
that
sits
on
lots,
one
and
two
that
just
sold
so
the
previous
owner
that
owned
the
home
then
bought
the
lot
three
making
it.
You
know
common
ownership,
I
know
who
he
is.
He
knows
who
I
am,
but
we
haven't
spoken
directly.
We've
spoken
to
the
realtor
and
that's
where
I
said,
listen
cause.
You
know,
I
know
how
things
work
in
tarpon.
Oh
sure,
you
can
build
on
that
and
I
said:
listen,
let's
wait
a
minute
here.
H
Let's
push
it
back
because
I
was
ready
to
close
and
then
I
did
my
research
and
saw
that
you
know
the
the
common
ownership
at
first.
They
were
telling
me
no,
it
wasn't
because
of
the
family
ownership
previous,
even
though
it
was
the
same
last
name.
It
was
different
family
members
that
owned
it
bought
one
two
and
then
a
different
family
member
on
lot
three.
But
when
this
current
owner
bought
it,
he
conformed
it
and
that's
why
I'm
here.
G
It
because
to
clarify
you
know
we
are
here
to
determine
if
this
is
a
buildable
lot,
not
whether
or
not
you
are
building
a
39.
You
know
you
know
home
with
certain
setbacks.
So
maybe
this
is
a
staff
clarification
just
for
a
point
of
record.
If
our
applicant
purchased
this,
you
know
we
say
we
vote.
Yes,
this
is
a
buildable
lot.
You
purchase
your
property,
you
get
your
plans
and
realize.
Oh
now
I
need
a
foot
on
the
east
side
or
the
left
side.
G
A
B
So
the
criteria
are
listed
in
the
staff
report
on
pages
two
and
three,
where
it
says
that
this
is
for
variances
for
non-conforming
lots
of
record
to
allow
non-conforming
lot
of
record
to
be
built
upon.
You
have
to
have.
B
A
E
H
F
Runs
with
the
land
so
well,
the
variances
for
the
property
itself
doesn't
have
anything
to
do
with
the
ownership.
Oh
okay,
so
yeah.
So
when
you
you
know,
when
you
were
ready
to
go
build,
we
would
look
make
sure
that
it
has
the
the
approval
which
it
does
and
then
you'd
be
okay.
Okay,
so
I
can
proceed.
A
F
Have
two
things
this
time?
The
first
thing
you
may
have
noticed
that
we
left
some
applications
on
your
in
front
of
you
today.
What
we've
been
working
on
the
last
couple
months
are
basically
going
through
our
variance
applications
to
better
clarify,
as
well
as
take
some
of
the
comments
that
we've
received
at
the
board,
to
make
applicants
more
aware
of
how
variances
are
reviewed.
So
this
is
just
a
look
at
the
application,
and
the
biggest
thing
that
we
have
done
is
add
the
actual
decision
criteria
to
the
application.
F
We
are
asking
applicants
to
answer
those
criteria
granted
it
you
know,
you're
gonna
get
what
they
provide,
but
at
least
it's
reinforcing
that
this
is
based
off
of
criteria.
So
we
just
want
to
bring
that
to
your
attention
that
we
made
these
adjustments.
We
made
one
application
for
a
typical
variant
and
then
we
also
made
a
separate
one
for
variances.
Please
not
conforming
a
lot
of
records
too
so
you'll
see
some
upcoming
variances
may
have
the
new
application.
F
Some
older
ones
may
still
be
trickling
through,
but
we've
transitioned
over
to
this
one
and
then
the
second
thing
I
wanted
to
mention.
F
I
don't
know
if
some
of
you
may
be
aware
of
this,
but
not
all
of
you,
but
we
wanted
to
tell
you
that
we
now
have
a
new
public
engagement
site
that
we
put
up
for
the
city.
It's
called
connect.
Tarpon
springs.
I
was
just
going
to
show
you
the
main
home
page
right
now,
just
so
you
guys
can
see,
but
this
is
a
way
where
we
can
put.
Oh,
of
course,
I
didn't
have
the
right
page,
open.
F
We've
put
up
a
couple
pages
just
about
some
upcoming
items
that
we're
going
to
be
looking
at
and
then
we've
added
a
developer-led
project
section
where
for
some,
some
big
items
that
are
coming
before
the
board
that
the
public
has
interest
in
or
you
can
just
put
some
information
up
on
the
web,
so
they
can
easily
get
some
information.
So
I
just
want
to
bring
this
to
your
attention.
It's
connect,
tarpon
springs.com.
F
It
does
require
registration
to
participate.
However,
it's
very
quick
couple
questions
and
it's
super
helpful.
We've
had
a
lot
of
great
feedback
already.
I
know
on
the
manatee
village
project
we've
received
over
100
comments,
which
is
which
is
excellent,
so
I
want
to
just
bring
it
to
your
attention.
If
you
were
not
aware,
that's.
A
Fantastic,
I
already
can
envision
a
before
you
buy
in
target
springs
and
then
list
this
man's
story,
because
that's
well,
hang
on
miss
rich,
had
a
question.
First.
D
Yeah,
it's
a
great
website.
I've
logged
on
the
only
thing
is
a
password
now
I
have
to
always
remember
another
password.
D
D
F
F
We
help
them
in
that
we
could
we
total
it
up
for
them.
Initially,
when
applicants
provide
an
application
to
us,
they
may
just
pay
for
the
initial
variance
cost
up
front,
but
we
also
will
give
them
the
total
for
the
advertising
as
well,
so
they
just
work
with
us.
Okay,
we
make
sure
we
get
it.
D
E
A
E
So,
following
up
with
what
mrs
rice
just
said,
why
is
it
like
that
it
has
to
be
chosen
the
checkoffs,
because
that
could
be
taken
as
confusing,
because
you
know
it's
it's
like
a
chinese
menu
here,
where
you
could
just
check
off
what
you
want
or
what
you
don't
want.
There
should
be
one
set
fee
or
there
shouldn't
be
any
sort
of
boxes,
because
it
gives
the
impression
that
you
can
choose.
F
So
this
is
really
just
kind
of
a
checklist
for
for
you
to
know
what
you
need
to
provide
to
have
a
complete
application.
So
if
you
have
all
this
information,
then
you
have
a
complete
application.
I
think
kim
did
you
want
to
say
something.
Those
are.
C
C
F
Really,
the
intent,
I
mean
we're
not
going
to
process
an
application
that
we
don't
have
the
proper
fees
acquired
for,
but
this
again
is
just
trying
to
put
out
the
information.
This
is
what
you
need
to
have
in
order
for
an
application
to
be
considered
complete,
and
it's
just
it's,
for
you
know
a
mental
checkbox
for
for
the
applicants.
E
C
Well,
no,
if
you
live
in
an
area
where
there's
a
lot
of
houses
around
you
and
it's
not
it's
very
dense,
you're
gonna
have
a
lot
more
postcards
going
out.
500
feet
around
you
right.
If
you
live
in
an
area
where
you're
half
on
the
water,
you
may
only
have
you
know
a
few,
so
it's
it's
not
really
possible
to
give
them
just
one
single
amount.
E
No
I'm
just
asking
is
there,
could
there
be
a
line
for
the
total,
not
the
total
in
there?
Yet,
because
I
understand
that
77
cents
for
each
postcard.
But
could
you
have
a
you
know
a
subtotal
or
a
total?
You
know
line
that
doesn't
have
a
price
in
it,
so
that
once
you're
done
choosing
one
from
column
a
and
two
from
column
b,
you
can
have
a
total
on
now.
F
We
could
add
a
total
line
in
there
as
well.
I
don't
think
we
necessarily
initially
thought
of
this
as
a
way
to
track
the
fees
and
the
amount
and
the
cost.
We
have
other
ways
to
do
that,
but
that's
something
we
can
add
that
in
to
make
it
clear
for
the
applicants
or
or
instead
of
having
check
boxes,
we
can
change
those
bullet
points
to
be
solid.
Just
so
it
shows
these
are
the
items
you
need,
as
opposed
to,
like
you
said,
act
as
a
menu.
E
Well,
if
there
was
bullet
points,
it
would
be
a
lot
less
misleading.
That's
the!
I
think,
the
real
thing
with
that
and
my
other
my
other
question
I
had
for
you
was
this
website-
is
that
open
to
people
outside
of
tarpon
as
well?
Yes,.
F
So
so
part
of
the
registration,
one
of
the
questions
asks:
what
is
your
connection
to
tarpon?
You
can
say
you
live
here,
you
visit,
you
work,
you're,
a
seasonal
resident,
and
we
have
you
choose
that
so
every
time
we
have
feedback
provided
we
can
get
numbers
on
the
percentage
of
people
that
live
in
tarpon
springs,
and
these
are
the
answers
we
got.
You
know
percentage
of
people
that
maybe
work,
and
this
is
the
answers
that
we
received.
So
we
do
ask
that
question,
but
it
is
open
to
anyone
in
the
public.
E
Well
then,
I
also
want
to
tell
you
I
thank
you
for
and
kim
for
also
for
putting
this
together,
because
the
the
less
confusion,
the
applicants
have
the
easier
it
is
for
us,
yeah.
F
Yeah,
we
definitely
wanted
to
just
you
know,
really
try
to
reiterate
criteria,
because
sometimes
it's
hard
to
understand
and
again
you
know
someone
reading
the
criteria
may
have
an
answer
that
doesn't
necessarily
suffice
it,
but
at
least
puts
it
in
in
front
of
them
that
this
is
what
you're
going
to
be
looking
at.
So
that
was
kind
of
the
goal
and
we're.
G
Well,
I
would
just
like
to
echo
the
sentiments
of
others.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
think
this
is
going
to
be
a
great
service
for
our
residents,
who
are
looking
to
submit
applications.
So
it's
more
of
a
full
disclosure
of
this.
This
is
the
criteria
that
is
being
looked
at,
so
they
had
the
opportunity
to
present
a
very
clear
and
thorough
application.
G
So
thank
you
very
much
for
this.
I
know
for
us.
It
looks
like
a
you
know,
little
piece
of
paper,
but
I
can
definitely
appreciate.
There's
some.
You
know
hours
behind
it.
So
thank
you
all
very
much
and,
as
miss
rich
said,
I
have
perused
through
the
connect
tarpon
website.
I
think
it
is
it's
just
it's
great.
It's
very
informative.
G
I
like
reading
about
the
projects
that
are
happening
and
I
really
appreciate
seeing
the
feedback
from
my
you
know,
fellow
residents
so
kudos
to
y'all
for
doing
that,
and
I
do
appreciate
that
you're
looking
at
seeing
who
is
coming
to
the
site,
like
mr
eisner
was
saying,
because
someone
who
might
be
a
seasonal
resident
could
have
a
very
different
perspective
than
someone
who
is
full-time
or
maybe
you
know
commutes
into
work,
so
great
job.
So
much.
F
D
F
If
we
appreciate
that,
because
we
have
noticed
when
we
share
something
on
facebook,
we
get
such
a
boost
in
visits
to
site
registrations
input
and
then
would
others
share
the
posts
that
they
see.
I
think
the
manatee
village,
when
I
haven't
checked
it
recently,
but
I
believe
it
was
shared
10
different
times
the
day
that
that
was
posted
on
facebook.
We
had
over
a
thousand
or
almost
a
thousand
site
visits,
and
we
got
so
many
registrations,
which
is
great,
so
share,
share
share.
If
you
see-
and
you
like
it,
congratulations.
D
The
manatee
village
one
is
once
people
know
what
you're
talking
about
they're
very
interested
in
sharing,
but
a
lot
of
people
don't
know,
associate
that
name
with
that
location
right.
So
there's
a
little
bit.
You
know
unless
you've
been
at
the
meeting
or
hear
the
presentation
when
we're
sharing
it.
I've
had
a
lot
of
people
say
manatee
like
they're
thinking,
like
you
mean
at
the
bayou
yeah,
you
know
it's
like
no,
a
little
further
down
the.
F
Oh
another
thing
I
wanted
to
say
is:
next
month
we
have
several
cases
on
the
docket.
So
just
before
warning
you
there's,
I
believe,
five
variants
applications
so
good.