![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/QErHiZG-_Yg/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustments 12-15-2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
Yes,
thank
you.
This
is
a
quasi-judicial
proceeding
with
a
board
of
adjustment
acts
in
a
quasi-judicial,
rather
than
a
legislative
capacity
at
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
It
is
not
the
board's
function
to
make
law,
but
rather
to
apply
law
that
has
already
been
established
in
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
The
board
is
required
by
law
to
make
findings
of
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
apply
those
findings
of
fact
to
previously
established
criteria
contained
in
the
code
of
ordinances
in
order
to
make
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
it.
C
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
at
this
hearing
that
the
law
considers
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues.
If
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
met
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinances,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
in
favor
of
the
applicant.
By
the
same
token,
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinances,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
against
the
applicant.
C
C
A
D
Okay,
ale
keen
the
senior
planner
planning
and
zoning
the
subject:
property
is
located
on
the
south
side
of
connecticut
street
or
connecticut
road.
This
property,
as
well
as
all
surrounding
property,
is
located
within
the
r-100
single-family
residential
zoning
district.
There
are
some
multi-family
zoning
off
to
the
northwest
of
the
site.
D
This
is
a
look
at
the
site
plan.
The
existing
home
footprint
is
the
darker
blue
line
on
the
screen.
The
proposed
edition
is
the
area
shaded
in
orange.
Again,
this
property
is
zoned
r
100,
the
minimum
rear
yard
setback
is
30
feet.
The
applicants
are
proposing
the
new
addition
to
be
approximately
just
over
24
feet
from
the
rear
yard.
The
black
dotted
line
on
the
screen
represents
the
30
foot,
rear
yard
setback.
D
D
D
This
property,
like
many
properties
that
you
guys
see,
is
a
legally
non-conforming
lot
of
record.
It
was
plotted
back
in
1957
prior
to
the
current
land
development
code,
going
into
effect.
It
is
non-conforming
in
both
lot
area
and
lot
depth.
The
minimum
or
the
required
lot
area
for
r100
is
ten
thousand
square
feet.
This
property
is
just
under
seven
thousand
square
feet,
an
area
the
minimum
lot
depth
for
the
r
100
district
is
100
feet,
and
this
property
is
only
92.5
feet
in
depth.
D
E
Have
we
received
any
feedback
from
any
residents.
F
Yes,
I
have
a
question
on
page
four,
not
okay,
page
four,
I'm
sorry
page
404,
applica
signature
and
whether
it
should
be
notarized
or
not.
I
don't
know
if
you're
familiar
with,
should
it
be
not
that
it
should
be
completed.
It's
only
the
signature
there.
D
F
G
D
G
Well,
my
question
would
be:
are
other
homes
on
that
street
similar
size
to
what
they're
either
asking
for
or
what
they
have
right
now.
D
I
would
say
yes
based
off
of
the
aerial
photography
that
we
have.
This
is
photography
from.
I
believe
2020
is
this
aerial,
so
it's
pretty
recent.
You
can
kind
of
see
it's
hard
to
see
from
from
your
distance.
There
are
some
properties
that
have
structures
that
are
encroaching
now.
These
may
be
pool
screening,
enclosures
or
other
accessory
structures.
They
may
not
necessarily
be
connected
to
the
home,
but
there
are
areas
that
have
structures
in
the
back.
This
one
is
one
I
can
see
offhand
this
property
here
has
a
structure
that
encroaches
and
or
a
pool.
A
D
You
know
I
didn't
look
at
every
individual
lot
for
that,
but
based
off
of
the
depth,
I
would
say
that
pretty
much
all
of
them
are
non-conforming
in
terms
of
depth.
Some
may
be
wider,
or
than
the
subject
property
that
make
it
a
larger
area,
but
they
generally
seem
to
be
about,
especially
on
the
same
side
of
the
street
as
this
property
right.
A
G
Well,
that's
why
I'm
asking
this
question,
because
in
number
four
criteria
you
can
read
that
it
has
no
variance
be
granted
that
extends
to
the
applicant,
a
use
of
property,
that's
not
commonly
enjoyed
by
other
persons
in
similar
circumstances.
So
my
question
back
to
staff
is:
are
they
all
like
that.
D
Well,
like
I
said,
I
can't
say
that
they
are
all
like
that.
There
are
situations
where
there
are
structures
or
other
extensions
that
encroach
into
the
rear
yard.
When,
when
we
were
looking
at
this
criteria
too,
we
were
looking
at,
although,
yes,
this
is
encroaching
into
the
30
foot,
rear
yard
setback,
they're
still
over
24
feet
from
the
structure
to
the
rear
property
line,
and
then
the
stairway
still
is
about
14
and
a
half
little
over
14.5
feet
from
the
rear
property
line
as
well.
D
So
we
didn't
believe
that
they
created
any
sort
of
burden
or
negative
impact
on
surrounding
properties.
It
still
has
significant
separation
in
that
respect.
The
other
criteria
that
staff
really
looked
at
was
we
have
this
minimum
net
floor
area,
which
typically
planning
staff
does
not
like
that.
It's
kind
of
a
challenging
criteria
sometimes-
and
in
this
case
this
is
a
home
that
doesn't
conform
with
the
minimum
square
footage
that
is
required
for
that
district,
and
when
you
look
at
the
buildable
footprint,
essentially
anywhere
that
this
home
is
extended,
will
likely
impact
a
setback,
that's
required.
D
D
This
is
kind
of
a
rare
instance.
The
minimum
net
floor
area
comes
into
play.
G
Well,
here's
let
me
try
it
this
way,
because
I
had
asked
my
on
my
first
question
whether
the
existing
home
is
like
the
others,
or
is
it
with
the
addition,
like
the
others,
and
you
said
yes,
so
I
didn't
know
which
one
you
were
going
to
and
why
I'm
asking
that
question
is
because
we
have
to
determine
according
to
findings
of
fact,
do
you
also
determine
it
by
findings?
A
fact.
D
Yeah,
absolutely
that's
what
we
have
in
your
staff
report.
We
have
our
provisional
findings
and
your
staff
report
about
how
staff
interpreted
this.
What
I
will
point
out.
Yes,
we
look
at
the
immediate
area.
We
also
look
at
this
property
in
comparison
to
other
properties
in
the
same
zoning
district,
which
is
how
the
criteria
is
written
so
elsewhere
in
the
city
where
we
have
the
r
100
district.
D
G
D
Yeah,
and
so
so
what
I
can
say
is
say
someone
does
come
in,
they
obviously
have
to
go
through
the
same
process.
We
would
be
able
to
then
look
at
their
net
floor
area
and
use
that
same
justification
criteria
towards
them.
But
you
have
to
look
at
everything
separately
and,
like
I
said,
we
have
to
look
at
an
immediate
area,
but
we
have
to
consider
the
entire
district
as
a
whole
from.
H
G
D
And-
and
I
would
say
from
staff's
perspective
based
off
of
our
analysis-
we
we
do
not
believe
it
provides
a
special
privilege,
so
we
did
believe
that
that
criteria
was
met.
But
again
the
board
is
the
one
that
listens
to
both
our
staff
analysis,
as
well
as
the
testimony
of
the
applicant
to
make
their
decisions
and
members
of
the
public.
A
H
E
So
I
I
I
see,
the
city
staff
had
noted
that
it
was
planted
in,
I
want
to
say
19
yeah
1957.
E
E
And
another
question
because
I
see
that
the
the
stairwell
that
you
were
looking
for,
the
other
yard
encroachment
variants
that
you
were
requesting.
Is
this
edition
a?
Is
the
house
like
elevated
on
stilts?
Is
it
a
second
story.
E
A
So
I'm
going
to
ask
our
attorney
nancy.
Sorry,
I
don't
recall
your
last
name,
meyer,
meyer,
okay,
mrs
meyer,
will
we
be
taking
these
separately?
Are
we
voting
on
them
as
one
item.
E
If
I
could
ask
that
mr
burris's
motion
is
that
for
approval
of
the
rear
yard
setback.
A
H
G
G
A
J
D
Please,
okay,
the
property
is
a
protected
address,
so
we're
just
going
to
show
the
general
location
of
this
subject:
property.
It's
located
on
the
east
side
of
us
19,
it's
near
anderson
park.
This
area
has
an
r
70
zoning
designation.
The
park
is
under
the
land
conservation,
zoning
designation.
D
D
D
D
The
land
development
code
states
that
the
board
of
adjustments
may
not
grant
a
sidewalk
waiver
unless
one
or
more
of
the
four
criteria
are
met
which
is
shown
up
here,
and
those
include
that
the
existing
right-of-way
is
of
insufficient
width.
The
existing
right-of-way
is
unimproved
or
not
are
not
paved.
D
There
is
a
technical
and
practicality
to
the
construction
of
the
sidewalk,
and
it
also
further
states
that
the
non-presence
of
other
sidewalks
within
the
area
may
not
be
a
consideration
by
the
board.
Staff
does
believe
that
criteria.
One
and
three
are
met
with
this
request,
which
is
insufficient
right-of-way
with,
and
the
technical
and
practicality.
D
This
is
the
looking
at
that
site
plan
again.
I've
added
a
few
features
here
for
you
again,
the
red
shaded
areas
are
where
the
sidewalks
would
be
required.
The
black
line
on
here
is
the
current
edge
of
pavement
of
the
two
adjacent
roads.
As
you
can
see,
they
kind
of
go
near
or
close
up
to
the
property
line,
which
is
the
yellow
line
here
on
this
on
the
screen.
D
Those
widths
vary
between
three
and
about
seven
to
eight
feet.
At
its
widest
points
on
both
front
edges
again,
the
lane
development
code
would
require
a
minimum
four
foot
wide
sidewalk
for
construction,
and,
if
that
was
to
be
built
on
this
particular
situation,
additional
right-of-way
would
be
necessary.
D
Additionally,
there's
some
existing
vegetation
or
trees,
which
are
kind
of
hard
to
see,
but
there's
two
trees
here.
The
green
triangles
that
are
existing
within
the
right
of
way,
there's
also
a
utility
pole
over
here
and
a
few
water
meters
that
present
some
additional
challenges
to
constructing
a
sidewalk
at
this
location.
D
D
In
addition
to
the
four
criteria
that
you
just
reviewed,
there
are
two
others
that
you
need
to
consider
with
a
sidewalk
waiver.
These
are
two
that
you
see
for
most
variances,
but
those
include
that
the
requested
variance
arises
out
of
physical
surroundings,
shape
topographical
conditions
or
other
physical
or
environmental
conditions,
unique
to
the
specific
property,
and
the
second
is
the
conditions
or
special
circumstances
peculiar
to
the
property
are
not
self-created,
and
with
that
I'm
happy
to
answer
questions.
D
E
D
Yes,
okay,
so
the
black
line
here
edge
of
pavement.
So
this
is
where
the
existing
streets
are
so
from
this
point
out,
the
yellow
line
represents
the
property
line,
so
that's
your
private
property
in
between
the
private
property
and
while
property
across
the
street,
but
in
between
the
property
line
and
the
edge
of
pavement
is
where
a
sidewalk
would
have
to
be
constructed.
D
That's
in
the
public
right-of-way,
because
sidewalks
will
be
a
public
infrastructure.
So
basically,
at
this
point
here
at
its
narrowest,
I
believe
it's
about
three
feet
and
it
goes
down
to
approximately
seven
eight
feet
at
its
widest
point
and
it's
pretty
similar,
I
believe,
about
three
and
a
half
or
so
feet
here
and
widest
point.
I
believe,
eight
or
so
feet
down
here.
D
E
F
A
F
K
F
F
D
F
A
Okay,
so
I
just
wanted
to
double
check.
You
notified
the
neighbors
and
did
anyone
respond.
D
A
A
Please
state
your
name
and
I
guess,
omit
your
address.
L
A
L
So
a
couple
of
things
to
mention
that
I
didn't
that
we
didn't
put
on
our
information,
but
well
I
mentioned
it,
but
there's
a
slope
from
for
about
13
feet
to
eight.
L
L
All
these
things
would
be
on
this
on
the
city
and
the
right
of
way
isn't
sufficient,
because
it's
not
defined
by
edge.
Most
of
that
asphalt
is
crumbling.
We'd
have
to
have
public
works,
come
and
define
the
edge
of
the
road.
So
it's
an
implication
for
the
city
too.
It's
not
just
our
criteria
becomes
a
liability
for
everybody
and
that's
why
I
thought
it
was
so
important
that
we
talk
about
it.
A
You
any
questions
for
the
applicant.
Yes,
mr
eisner.
A
D
It
comes
about
right
at
the
corner
of
the
property,
so
this
this
lot
as
well.
Several
lots
in
the
north
are
actually
unplotted
lots,
so
they
weren't
established
in
any
sort
of
formal
subdivision
process,
which
is
sometimes
typical.
You
don't
see
it
a
lot
around
here
in
tarpon,
but
elsewhere,
where
I've
worked.
It's
it's
pretty
common
to
have
property,
that's
very
close
to
the
roadway
or
or
whatnot
that
sometimes
causes
issues.
A
That's
not
an
issue
for
the
city
or
the
applicant.
A
E
F
B
F
A
I
E
In
public
anita
produce,
yeah.
B
The
neighborhood
did
oppose
the
vacation,
they
did
support
the
variants,
but
the
second
one
should
be
changed
to
variance
not
vacation.
A
B
F
F
C
My
understanding
was
this
was
an
opportunity
for
you
to
throw
out
ideas
and
discuss
those
ideas
and
if
there's
a
consensus
about
any
of
those
ideas,
I
will
take
them
back
to
mr
jello
and
they
will
move
forward
with
any
preparations
or
resolutions,
if
necessary
or
her
to
return
and
discuss
it
further
with
you.
E
F
It's
no
it's
more
than
two
four
pages.
F
F
Ida
made
a
conduct
of
meetings
and
the
order
of
business
shall
be
as
follows:
a
roll
call,
they
have
us,
be
reading
and
approval
of
minutes
of
prior
meeting
that
should
move
down
the
line.
Since
that's
the
last
item,
we,
yes
and
instead
on
b.
I
don't
know
if
from
the
legal
side,
if
we
have
to
put
the
quasi-judicial
announcement,
since
this
is
the
conduct
of
meetings
and
this
schedule,
that
we.
A
A
I
mean
we're
gonna
discuss
this,
but
I
mean
to
me:
it
makes
sense
to
put
it
in
there,
since
it's
number
two
on
the
hit
parade
every
single
meeting,
but
you
guys
we
gotta.
We
have
to
agree
and
again
this
was
puzzling,
so
we
can
have
a
consensus
if
you
could
help
explain
that.
C
C
C
A
So,
let's
go
to
the
first
thing
that
mr
burris
brought
up
the
quasi-judicial
announcement
swearing
of
speakers.
Do
we
have
consensus
on
adding
that
to
our
rules
of
procedure.
G
F
A
A
A
F
A
Okay,
so
what
what
we
do
is
we
we
announce
the
case.
Then
we
go
to
the
city
staff
and
they
state
their
case.
But
then
we
ask
the
city
questions,
correct
right,
which
isn't
listed
and
then
the
applicant
can
make
their
presentation
and
then
we
would
ask
questions
of
them
before
we
go
to
public
comment.
Do
you
want
to
put
that
in
writing?
Everyone.
A
Right
and
miss
meyer,
do
you
understand
what
we're
getting
at.
G
I
Yes,
but
I
undersea
just
where
it
says
his
agent
or
attorney,
I
would
make
that
gender-neutral
language.
I
agree.
A
C
A
So
can
we
add
that
somewhere
higher
on
the
list,
perhaps.
A
H
C
C
A
F
F
F
Unless
you
want
to
make
it
a
one
or
two.
C
A
I
Yes,
I
actually
have
several
things
and
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
I'm
needing
our
legal
counsel
to
figure
out
if
they're
even
supposed
to
be
here.
You
know
we
have
been
operating.
I
You
know
when
this
was
originally
written.
There
were
not,
there
were
not
alternates,
and
so,
when
I
came
into
being,
I
started
as
an
alternate
and
was
given
voice,
not
vote.
You
know
as
an
alternate.
I
could
ask
questions
that
type
of
thing.
We
now
have
two
alternates
there's
nowhere
in
this
document
throughout
various
items,
anywhere
that
it
talks
about
alternates
so
and.
I
Right
but
there
are
segments
that
if
that
change
was
made,
there
needs
to
be
some
reflection
of
it
here,
because
it
it
mentions,
for
example,
in
number
six:
a
quorum,
a
quorum.
Shell
consists
of
three
members
and
then,
if
the
alternates
were,
then
you
could
say
three
members
and
or
alternates
for
the
call
to
order,
because
right
now
it's
we're
kind
of
out
of
compliance.
If
you
take
the
letter
of
this,
when
we
have
been
substituting
alternates
in
and
where
they
become
member
for
that
night,.
C
C
E
So
is
there
a
necessity
to
have
language
in
these
rules
of
procedure
that
clarify
those
roles
of
the
alternate?
I
will.
I
C
C
C
C
C
C
A
C
A
recommendation
right,
I
would
I
would
let
me
let
me
discuss
it
with
her
and
circle
back
with
you
next
month
or
whenever
it's
appropriate
and
and.
I
D
I
did
I
tried
to
do
a
little
bit
of
research
on
this
and
it's
not
too
too
intuitive
actually,
but
within
section
226
of
the
land
development
code,
talking
specifically
about
board
of
adjustments,
it
basically
states
that
your
terms
are
periods
of
three
years.
If
you
go
to
the
administrative
section,
which
is
article
two
of
the
city
code,
it
says
that
a
member
cannot
serve
more
than
ten
consecutive
years
for
any
appointed
board.
So
you
got
to
kind
of
do
a
road
map
and
to
get
there.
K
A
Joanne
this
is
this
would
be
part
of
my
suggestion,
then,
is
that
we
create
a
packet
that
has
this
information
and-
and
I
really
appreciated
that
erica
put
in
the
various
things
that
we
can
actually
do
right.
A
We
know
the
criteria
for
the
ordinances,
because
we
get
that
every
month
right,
we
don't
always
get
sidewalk
variants,
which
is
a
whole
separate
set
right,
and
we
this
board
as
we're
all
sitting
on,
haven't
heard
an
appeal
yet
so
I
would
like
for
either
you
or
our
attorney
or
both
of
you
to
explain
to
this
board
how
the
appeal
process
works
and
how
it
would
be
presented
actually
want.
A
D
D
Has
different
criteria
for
different
decisions?
Yes,
so
let
me
pull
up
that
information
about
appeals.
A
And
while
you're
doing
that,
I'm
going
to
read
from
what
she
wrote,
the
city's
code
of
ordinances
through
its
land
development
code
grants
the
board
of
adjustment,
the
authority
to
one
hear
and
decide
appeals
of
errors
in
administrative
orders,
requirements,
decisions
or
determinations
made
by
an
administrated
official
interpreting
the
city's
code.
Now,
my
understanding
of
that
is
these
are
decisions
that
were
made
into
the
board
of
commissioners
right
and
when
they
have
granted
administrative
orders.
G
A
F
I
A
I
Under
12
quasi-judicial
hearings,
we
use
the
term
in
here
secretary,
but
it's
always
been
our
legal
counsel.
Is
that
the
same
thing
or
is
that
should
does
that
need
to
be
changed,
or
I
don't
know
who
our
secretary
is.
I
I
Public
comment
was
here:
it
was
on
one
of
the
fence,
things
I
think,
where
some
neighbors
came,
and
so
they
were
making
it
a
a
lesser
than
was
required,
but
they're
they
said
if
we
had
received
in
public
note.
If
we
had
received
in
this
public
notice
that
they
were
going
to
do
a
lesser.
What
was
come,
we
wouldn't
have
shown
up
like
they
had
come
because
they
thought
it
was
going
to
be
a
more
restrictive,
but
they
changed
what
they
were
requesting.
So
then
I
just
got.
I
just
was
wondering:
is
this
really
necessary?
I
D
So
yeah
I
was
just
gonna.
I
believe
that
this
is
kind
of
poorly
worded
with
what
it
means.
A
particular
case
that
I
remember
since
I've
been
here,
there
was
an
applicant
that
was
asking
for
a
lesser
or
a
reduced
side.
Setback
for
a
pool,
they
asked
for,
say
I
think,
was
like
five
feet
and
the
board
was
like.
I
think
you
can
do
this
without
having
that
big
of
an
encroachment,
so
they
like
change
it
to
seven
feet.
D
So
the
whole
thing
comes
back
to
noticing
if
we
notice
that
someone
is
asking
for
a
10
foot
reduction
or
whatever,
that
is
the
threshold
if
they
try
to
do
something
lesser
than
that
and
they
amend
it
either.
At
the
hearing
prior
to
the
hearing,
that's
okay!
As
long
as
we
notice,
I
guess
worst
case
scenario,
if
that,
if
that
helps
so
I
think
the
wording
maybe
is
a
little
off
on
this.
D
F
For
a
pull
it
may
work,
but
if
it's
an
extension
in
a
house-
and
they
need
another
foot
and
as
it's
explained
here
from
seven
to
six-
that's
an
extenuating
circumstance
and
that's
why
we're
here?
Aren't
we
if
it's
a
pool,
I
can
understand
that.
But
if
it's
a
question
of
a
structure
itself,
the
house
itself,
then
we're
threading
into
rough
waters.
Here,
try
to
change
one
thing
and
leave
the
other
out,
then
it
it
ties
our
hands
to
do
anything
else.
D
Yeah-
and
I
think
this
provision,
like
I
said
the
main
reason
it's
here
is,
if
someone's
asking
so
they
ask
for
one
request
and
then
they
make
it
like.
I
said
less
than
what
that
request
is
for
that's
what
that's
in
there,
for
you
just
can't
do
more
than
what
your
request
is
unless
it's
properly
noticed.
So
if
someone
said
I'm
asking
for
a
five
foot
setback
and
we
notice
it
for
a
five
put
foot
setback,
they
come
in
a
monday
application
and
say
I
actually
want
a
two
foot
setback.
D
E
C
C
A
E
I'm
piggybacking
on
miss
rich,
her
very
wise
correction
of
our
gender
neutral
language
on
point
13.
I
believe
it
was.
I
could
be
wrong
whatever
point.
It
was,
however,
that
that
did
get
me
to
looking
closer
at
the
document
and
we
regularly
refer
to
chairman,
and
vice
chairman
I
don't
know
what
the
standard
is
for
other
boards
within
the
city.
If
we
just
wanted
to
make
that
chair.
E
A
Yeah
something
like
that
and
shoulders
so
ali.
If
there
are
no
further
questions
about
this,
could
we
move
on
to
the
appeals.
D
So,
for
a
little
clarity,
so
when
you
see
appeals
for
the
board
of
adjustment
purview,
what
that
gives
you
basically
authority
to
do
is
to
review
an
appeal
of
an
administrative
decision.
So,
for
example,
if
the
city
staff
interpreted
a
code
one
way
an
applicant
can
appeal
that
interpretation
and
that
appeal
comes
before
the
board,
an
appeal
of
say,
a
decision
that
you
guys
made
goes
to
the
circuit
court.
So
those
are
the
only
appeals
that
you
guys
review.
So
you
wouldn't
necessarily
appeal
other
decisions
or
whatnot,
but
yes,
so
you're.
D
D
Right
so
I'm
trying
to
think
of
a
what
would
be
an
example,
so
I
can
think
of
an
example
that
something
actually
didn't
come
before
your
your
board.
It
was
something
that
went
before
the
planning
and
zoning
board.
This
past
monday,
an
applicant
was
requesting
conditional
use
approval
for
an
alternative,
dimensional
plan
staff
interpreted
that
provision
that
allows
that
request
to
be
specific
to
a
certain
reason,
so
for
a
unique
residential
project.
D
It
says:
okay,
so
the
board
and
determining
whether
the
administrative
official's
decision
was
correct
can
only
consider
the
specific
code
provision
considered
by
the
administrative
official
and
the
papers,
documents
and
maps
provided
to
the
administrative
official.
Before
making
his
decision,
the
board
shall
not
consider
the
fairness
of
the
application
or
specific
code
provision
in
deciding
the
appeal.
That's
all
that
it
says.
Let
me.
A
A
So
if
we
rule
over
a
mistake
that
we
believe
that
the
city
had
made,
then
the
original
applicant
could
take
it
to
court
yeah.
That's
my
understanding.
H
H
H
D
D
C
Yeah,
the
language
used
is
administrative
official,
so
whatever
department
that
may
fall
in
for
a
decision
that
would
be
under
your
purview,
I
don't
know
all
the
departments,
so
I
can't
you
know,
try
to
say
it
would
be
this
one,
this
one
and
this
one,
but
the
the
wording
is
administrative
official,
so
any
administrative
city
official
making
that
decision.
That
would
be
something
under
the
purview
of
what
you
guys
would
would
hear.
They
could
appeal
that
to
you
and.
C
That's
what
would
be
appealed
correct
right,
the
the
administrative
official
would
make
their
decision,
I'm
assuming
obviously
say
no,
because
why
would
you
appeal
a
yes
and
then
it
would
come
to
you
if
they,
if
they
did
the
proper
notice
within
that
60-day
period
and
then,
as
was
already
read,
it
tells
you
exactly
what
you
can
consider
and
make
that
determination.
C
A
G
G
G
C
A
C
Is
how
realistic
is
that
you
know
you
jump
back
in
the
car
and
you
start
talking
and
it's
the
appearance
of
it
who
wants
to
fight
that
battle?
You
know.
Oh,
I
saw
them,
they
denied
my
application
and
I
saw
them
at
my
house
together
and
you
know
so
that
it's
it's
discouraged
and
and
the
inspection
trips
are
discouraged
because
of
what
you
just
said,
you're
supposed
to
make
your
decisions
based
on
the
facts
presented
here
under
oath
and
applying
those
to
the
criteria.
C
So
if
you
go
there,
you
may
see
something
or
hear
something
or
talk
to
someone
that
gives
you
information.
That's
not
presented
here
that
that
you
know
affects
your
decision-making
process,
but
you
are
correct.
It
doesn't
say
that
it's
discouraged
it
makes
it.
A
E
A
K
A
We
do
okay,
so
we're
confirmed
for
january.
Yes,
does
anyone
have
any
other
suggestions
for
this
quote
unquote
packet,
because
I
do
love
the
stuff
that
you
provided
for
setbacks,
and
I
think
that
would
be
a
great
addition
to
one
of
the
other
things
for
new
members
or
whatever,
to
have
a
to
have
all
the
criteria
of
the
various
things
we
can
vote
on
a
list
of
the
things
that
we
can
that
we
can
vote
on.
I.
E
Not
only
procedures
like
we
reviewed
today
what
caused
the
quasi-judicial
process?
E
Sunshine,
of
course-
and
you
know
the
rule-
the
rules
of
procedure
when
it
comes
to
as
far
as
the
criteria
that
we're
looking
at
helping
us
explain
that
so.
A
A
E
And
that's
where
you
know,
I
think,
there's
those
a
handful
that
are
regular
features
and
there
there
was
one
I
mean
in
the
six
years.
I
think
I've
been
on
the
the
board
that
has
appeared
once
and
erica
did
a
fantastic
job,
saying:
hey
here's
something
y'all
have
not
seen
you
know.
Probably
ever.
Let
me
explain
this
so
that
was
great.
E
C
F
A
F
Yes,
this
memorandum,
that
we
got
with
the
package,
the
one
thing.
H
F
C
A
C
She
erica
wrote
that
as
she's.
I
D
So
it
depends
on
the
situation,
so
I
know
the
one
that
you're
all
referring
to
recently
for
projects
that
are
within
a
like
preliminary
or
a
planned
development
district.
There's
a
different
section
of
the
land
development
code.
That
has
something
that's
called
a
waiver
wave
different
than
your
sidewalk
waiver,
but
the
waiver
section
allows
you,
through
the
plan
development
process,
to
seek
different
deviations
from
sections
of
the
code.
So
if
a
project
is
coming
forward,
that's
a
plan.
Development
district
project
can.
D
So
plan
development
is,
we
have
different
zoning
districts
that
are
planned
development,
so
we
have
a
residential
plan,
development,
a
commercial
plan
development
and,
I
believe,
industrial
plant
development.
Most
often
we
see
residential
plan
developments.
I
would
say
a
lot
of
subdivisions
around
the
city.
A
lot
of
different
multi-family
developments
are
falling
within
that
residential
plan
development
district.
D
So
there's
a
different
set
of
you
know
dimensional
standards
and
criteria
for
that,
and
within
that
particular
section,
it
gives
you
the
opportunity
to
request
waivers
through
that
process.
Plan
developments
go
to
the
planning
and
zoning
board
for
approval,
as
well
as
board
of
commissioners.
So
the
waivers
are
sought
through.
A
D
A
E
I
D
So
so
yeah,
so
that
likely-
and
don't
quote
me
on
the
particular
districts,
because
I'm
not
familiar
I'm
only
vaguely
familiar
with
the
case-
was
probably
within
a
regular
zoning
district.
So
say
our
highway
business,
commercial
district
that
we
have
in
there.
It's
just
processed
like
any
other
variants.
If
you
deviate
from
the
code
any
sort
of
dimensional
criteria.
So
that's
probably
why
it
came
before
you.
If.
D
A
D
There
are
a
lot
of
moving
parts
and
we
have
lots
of
different
boards
that
have
lots
of
different
purviews.
So
so
yes,
and
that's
something
that
even
as
a
staff
person
you
have,
it
takes
a
lot
of
time
to
figure
out
what
goes
where
and
when
it
goes.
Where
and
how
many
readings
it
has
and.
A
D
So
I
will
say
you
know
so
so
I've
worked
in
other
jurisdictions,
different
states,
different
areas
within
florida
as
well,
and
they
all
have
these
types
of
varying
boards.
Generally,
there
is
a
zoning
appeals
board
which
is
board
of
adjustments,
there's
also
a
plan
commission
or
a
local
planning
agency,
and
they
have
different
purviews
and
certain
applications
go
before
certain
boards
and
certain
go
before
the
other,
even
though
sometimes
there's
similarities
to
what
the
request
may
be.
D
So
acaria
is
it's
in
a
special
area,
it's
its
own
little
special
area
plan.
I
don't
know
the
history
of
the
approval
process
for
that
being
that
again,
that's
not
a
plan.
Development.
I
G
D
I
wouldn't
say:
that's
easily
done
the
residential
plan,
development
or
commercial
plan
development,
industrial
plant
development,
those
districts
there's
different
intents
and
situations
where
they
apply.
They
have
to
go
through
rezoning
process.
Site
plans
approval
so
there
it's
not
necessarily
an
easy
step
to
do
it.
It's
another.
It's
just
a
different
process.
E
D
A
That
in
as
well,
I
ran
into
an
attorney
last
night
in
court
about
the
various,
the
delineation
of
county
roads
versus
city
roads.
So.
D
Count
there
were
county
roads.
Actually,
let
me
take
a
let
me
take
a
stab
at
that
one.
So
yes,
there's
county
roads
or
city
roads
that
go
all
throughout
the
jurisdiction
and
whatnot.
If
the
property
is
in
the
city's
jurisdiction,
it
is
bound
by
the
land
development
code
regulations.
The
land
development
code
does
have
driveway
standards
in
there
in
terms
of
width
and
different.
You
know
setbacks.
C
C
A
Well,
that
that
ought
to
be
that
ought
to
be
done.
Okay,
mr
burst.
F
D
Code
yeah
code
enforcement
is
always
the
first
step
and
then
what
code
enforcement
does
is
then
reach
out
to
the
various
departments
to
do
research.
So
if,
for
example,
what
they
did
was
like
a
condition,
a
condition
of
an
approval,
so
they
got
like
a
variance
and
then
we
put
a
condition
on
that
approval.
We
can
go
back
to
that
and
then
go
through
the
process
as
to
how
to
rectify
that.
A
We
had
to
prove
something
on
peninsula:
it
was
a
very
odd-shaped
lot
and
then
the
guy
came
back
and
asked
for
an
extension.
We
gave
him
the
extension,
then
he
came
back
and
asked
to
start
the
whole
thing
over
again
and
that
got
approved
as
well.
It's
what
I
think
it's
way
past
his
deadline
again,
okay,
what
does
he
just
have
to
start
from
scratch?.
G
G
I
G
C
A
So
we
have,
we
have
an
election
in
january.
That's
right.
F
I
I
A
G
D
H
E
D
D
I
It'd
be
good
to
know,
though,
before
we
elect
officers.
D
So
first
I
sent
an
email
out
earlier
today,
just
with
our
2022
calendar,
our
meeting
dates.
So
that's
on
there.
If
you
have
any
questions,
let
us
know
we
tried
to
stagger
them
a
little
bit
to
not
have
multiple
night
meetings
in
a
week,
but
that
is
out
for
you,
the
second
item,
and
we
can
talk
about
this
next
month
as
well.
I
did
provide
a
memo
about
setbacks,
as
requested
by
mr
eisner.
D
I
The
one
final
thing
in
our
that
I
didn't
bring
up
earlier
in
our
rules
relates
to
that
under
meetings
that
I
forgot
to
mention
before
I
put
on
here
shouldn't
there
be
flexibility,
because
the
meetings
say
that
we're
always
going
to
be
held
on
the
fourth
wednesday
of
the
month
at
seven,
and
I
thought
why
does
it
say
that
and
then
you
were
talking
about
the
calendar.
So
if
we
accept
your
calendar,
then
it's
not
in
compliance
with
this,
and
I
would
like
to
have
that
flexibility.
A
C
Of
the
month
at
7
pm,
unless
there
is
no
cause
for
a
meeting
which
that's
fine,
obviously
the
the
purpose
is
to
make
sure
there's
proper
notice,
for
whatever
is
going
to
be
coming
before.
I
B
G
A
Wild
so
oh
and
joe
larocca,
god
love
him
all
right.
So
anything
else.
C
E
A
A
D
Going
to
be
one
more
one,
tiny
little
staff
comment.
That's
my
last
one.
I
just
wanted
to
make
the
board
aware
that
we
are
officially
getting
ready
to
kick
off
our
comprehensive
plan,
update
project.
D
We
will
be
holding
likely
in
february
and
april
some
workshops
where
we're
inviting
all
of
our
appointed
board
members,
so
you'll
have
an
opportunity
to
participate
in
that
process
and
learn
more
about
the
process.
So
we
want
to
make
you
aware
that
that
is
upcoming
and
we're
pretty
excited
about
it.
We
will
be
launching
a
new
page
right
now,
there's
a
comprehensive
update
page
on
our
connect,
tarpon
springs
site,
but
we're
working
on
updating
that
to
have
more
information
and,
like
I
said,
you'll,
be
part
of
the
process.
So.
J
E
Sent
just
one
each
dates.