►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustments 10-20-21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
C
D
Is
a
quasi-judicial
proceeding
where
the
board
of
adjustment
acts
in
a
quasi-judicial
rather
than
a
legislative
capacity
at
a
quasi-judicial
hearing,
it
is
not
the
board's
function
to
make
law,
but
rather
to
apply
law
that
has
already
been
established
in
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
The
board
is
required
by
law
to
make
findings
of
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
applied
those
findings
of
fact
to
previously
established
criteria
contained
in
the
code
of
ordinances
in
order
to
make
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
it.
D
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
at
this
hearing
that
the
law
considers
competence,
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues.
If
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
met
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
in
favor
of
the
applicant.
By
the
same
token,
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
the
criteria
contained
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
against
the
applicant.
D
D
E
D
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
and
thank
you
all
for
your
patience
as
we
worked
through
this
as
our
chair
is
detained.
So
our
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
number
three
application
number
21-120,
which
is
a
variance
to
reduce
the
required
side,
yard
setback
at
zero
live
oak
street.
South
side
of
east
lake
live
oak
street
between
north
distant
avenue
and
north
gross
avenue.
So
if
we
can
start
with
the
report
from
our
staff,
please.
F
F
F
earlier
this
year.
The
applicant
was
before
the
board
requesting
two
items.
One
was
a
determination
to
determine
whether
or
not
the
lot
was
illegal
non-performing
lot
of
record.
The
board
did
approve
that
request.
They
were
also
asking
for
a
reduced
side
yard
setback
to
reduce
the
side
yards
to
five
feet.
The
board
denied
that
request.
F
F
G
I
think
I
asked
you
this
question
and
on
the
last
variance
I
would
ask
the
same
question
again:
is
there
a
certain
amount
of
size
that
you
would
deny
or
is
it.
F
F
This
lot
is
20
feet,
narrower
than
typically
required
in
this
district,
so
the
setbacks
of
our
current
land
development
code
are
based
on
minimum
lot
sizes.
So
this
is
one
that
doesn't
meet
those
standards.
What
is
proposed
is
not
necessarily
out
of
character
with
other
structures
in
the
same
zoning
district
and
in
the
surrounding
area.
So
for
this
particular
case,
staff
did
believe
that
the
criteria
was
met.
F
G
I
understand
that
that
was
the
size
back
then.
My
question
then,
is
of
other
lots
this
size.
What
are
the
widths
of
those
houses.
F
That
I
can't
necessarily
answer
that
question.
I'd
have
to
look
at
other
40-foot
wide
lots.
I
will
say
that
we
have
had
several
cases
since
I've
been
staffing,
the
board
that
we've
had
40-foot
wide
lots
that
have
been
requesting
side
setbacks.
But
again
you
have
to
look
at
each
case
at
a
case-by-case
basis,
right.
F
E
A
I
do
have
a
question
pardon
my
lack
of
geography
at
this
moment
on
this
map.
Here
it
would
be
the
bottom
left
corner
where
you
see
see
that
that
quadrant
under
the
I'm
sorry,
the
very
bottom
left.
Yes,
those
two
areas
there
flanking
where
it
looks
like
there
are
some
similar
shaped
lots
are
any
of
those
developed
or
are
those
vacant.
So.
F
F
A
And
it
does
see
this
image
and
there
was
the
other
one
in
the
packet
that
the
ones
along
north
distance
do
seem
to
be
developed.
Yes,.
F
E
F
Yes,
they
asked
for
five
feet.
They
went
back
and
revised
their
plans,
they're
asking
for
a
lesser
variance,
so
they're
able
to
come
back
and
reapply
so
they're
going
for
five
and
a
half
applicant.
F
G
F
A
F
G
I
have
more
questions,
I
don't
know
if
this
is
for
the
applicant
or
for
you,
but
I
presume
there's
got
to
be
an
air
conditioning
compressor
there
correct
a
unit.
You
would.
G
F
C
F
Yes,
yes,
on
this
set
plan,
whoops.
F
There
you
go
so
they
are
only
required
to
be
a
minimum
of
20
feet
from
the
rear
property
line.
Right
now
this
looks
like
it's
just
the
back
of
the
home.
It's
also
just
showing
the
parking
area
underneath
it,
but
that
right
there,
I
believe,
is
about
46
feet
back,
so
potentially
they
could
put
another
20
or
so
feet
on
the
back,
if
so
desired.
Okay,.
A
A
If
you
could,
please
state
your
your
name,
panteles.
H
Master
vasilis
58
west
center
street.
Thank
you.
I
can
answer
the
air
condition.
That's
going
to
be
elevated,
you
know
so
there's
going
to
be
five
and
a
half
feet
on
the
side.
A
So
is
that
elevated,
I'm
jumping
in
your
inquiry,
they're
elevated
like
at
that
second
story
level.
H
C
Yes,
I
do
on
the
plan
that
you
show
that
you
have
a
front
porch.
H
H
C
G
H
I
it
would
be
a
very
difficult
to
to
fit
with
the
seven
and
a
half
right.
H
Zero
lot
lines,
one
on
safford
being
built
right
now:
they're
a
foot
and
a
half
away
from
the
houses.
G
I
kind
of
have
to
deal
with
yours
as
it
comes
before
this
board
and
my
decision
not
for
anything
else.
I
don't
know
who
was
to
approve
that
or
what
the
area
is
or
anything
like
that,
but
when
you
do
buy
a
40-foot
property,
you
have
to
be
understanding
that
you
may
have
to
build
within
the
setbacks.
That's
all
I'm
saying
correct
the
next
one.
You
wrote
no
special
privilege.
The
variance
will
allow
for
use
of
the.
G
I
don't
know
what
this
is.
That
will
complement
the
area.
I
didn't
understand
what
you
meant
by
that.
G
G
The
question
was:
granting
the
variants
will
not
confer
any
special
privilege,
that's
not
allowed
for
other
lands,
buildings
or
structures
in
the
same
zoning
district.
That's
why
I
asked
staff
if
there
were
other
areas
within
that
zone,
that
there
were
other
smaller
properties
like
this
that
had
buildings
that
we,
you
know
the
size
you
were
looking
at,
because
there's
lighting,
there's
ventilation,
there's
maintenance!
G
There's
a
fire
happens.
You
don't
want
to
have
your
fire
touched,
the
house
next
to
it
or
the
house
next
to
it,
touch
your
house
there's
your
overhang
from
your
roof
line.
You're
going
to
displace
water
and
water
needs
to
be
controlled
and
staying
on
your
property
not
going
to
other
properties.
There's
so
many
reasons
for
why
they
have
setbacks,
and
I
can
read
them
all
to
you,
but
I'm
sure
you
know
this
and
it
makes
it
very
difficult
with
you.
G
You
know
we
would
we
we've
denied
your
setback
prior
and
now
you're,
you
know
giving
back.
Let's
say
six
inches
five
inches!
Something
like
that.
I
I
don't
understand
how
you
can
write
that
with
other.
You
know.
Do
you
do
you
know
of
any
properties?
In
your
vicinity
that
have
that
particular
circumstance.
G
With
with
the
on
a
40-foot
wide
that
they're
building
with
the
setbacks
that
you're
building
now
I
understand
it's
happened
in
places
in
tarpon
springs,
we
have
lots
of
different,
you
know
setbacks,
but
we
have
to
worry
about
yours
and
this
question
pertains
to
the
area.
I
believe
it's
70a.
G
G
H
H
G
E
E
A
I
D
I
I
do
think
that
it
would
be
advantageous
for
the
neighborhood
to
have
a
lovely
house
there,
and
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
that
I,
as
almost
the
only
person
touching
his
property,
I'm
the
only
one.
The
other
piece
belongs
to.
Who
knows
what
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
it
at
all.
So
if
that
changes
anything
and.
A
I
A
I
G
A
G
I
just
wanted
to
explain
something
to
you,
the
variance
should
we
decide
to
give
it
stays
with
the
property
forever,
and
you
I
mean
respectfully,
you
won't
be
there
forever.
So
I
understand
you
can
agree
to
it
right
now,
but
in
the
future,
if
there
was
a
new
homeowner,
they
would
be
kind
of
stuck
with
that.
G
G
G
That
is,
is
too
large
for
this
particular
lot
and
that's
just
a
reality
that
at
least
I
see
so
I
I
hope
I
was
able
to
at
least
clarify
because,
like
I
said
I
I
I
would
love
to
be
able
to
do
whatever
somebody
wants,
but
I
have
to
also
stay
within
the
guidelines
and,
as
I
read
these
guidelines,
there's
just
a
lot
of
no's
in
here
so
but
thank
you.
C
C
More
question
for
the
applicant
on
the
main
level
living
area:
you
have
1250
square
feet
on
the
upper
level.
You
have
eight
forty
five
and
total
is
living
area
which
is
relevant
now
on
the
lower
level
you
have
1710
is
the
lower
level
wider
and
longer.
C
H
Part,
yes,
I'm
sorry!
The
downstairs
is
a
little
longer.
Yes,
the
upstairs
has
set
back
a
little
bit
and
and
to
clarify
the
neighbors
houses
are
all
about
80
feet
away
from
this
property,
because
I'm
it's
her
rear
property.
Her
house
is
80
feet
from
the
lot,
not
they're
all
backyards
to
this
lot.
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Is
on
your
east
side,
this
side
is
the
backyards
of
everybody
on
distant
and
the
west
side
is
a
lot.
A
I
H
H
A
G
G
A
C
C
B
B
F
The
only
comment
I
have
is
I
know.
Last
month
we
discussed
having
a
discussion
about
the
rules
of
procedure.
F
A
You
and
that
I
have
during
that,
will
we
be
able
to
have
our
alternates
actively
participate
in
that
discussion?
How
does
that
work?
Yes,
okay,
fantastic!
A
A
G
This
is
for
staff
ali.
Yes,
is
it
possible?
I
can't
produce
the
evidence
to
the
board.
Would
you
be
able
to
copy
the
board
in
on
all
the
reasons
of
why
we
have
setbacks.
F
I
can
look
through
the
land
development
code
and
basically
pull.
We
have
definitions
and
different
standards,
I'll
see
if
there's
intent,
language
behind
it.
G
I'm
okay
with
you
just
even
google.
The
reason
why
we
have
setbacks
per
se
because
it
would
help
in
the
decision-making
I
think
of
when
we
have
people,
because
that's
we
get
mostly,
and
there
should
be.
At
least
you
know
a
protocol
of
what
reasons
a
setback
is.
D
D
So
I
I
again
like
I
said
I
don't
have
a
problem
if
you
want
for
education
purposes,
however,
I
I
disagree
that
the
intent
behind
why
the
setbacks
are
there
period
or
why
setbacks
are
a
thing
I
mean
in
in
some
lots.
There
are
no
setbacks.
There's
zero
lot
lines.
So
then,
what's
the
intent
of
the
zero
lot
line,
so
I
disagree
that
that
has
anything
to
do
with
whether
or
not
the
criteria
are
met.
With
the
evidence
presented
at
a
hearing.
G
My
reasoning
is
for
learning
and
my
other
reason
is
every.
I
agree
with
you
that
there
are
different
lot
lines
and
setbacks
and
there
are
some
zero
setbacks,
and
in
that
case
we
would
not
be
utilizing
this
particular.
But
in
this
particular
case
and
in
a
lot
of
the
cases
that
we
do
have
it's
pertinent.
D
And-
and
still
I
I
still
maintain,
I
disagree
that
the
intent
behind
why
the
setback
is,
there
doesn't
have
anything
to
do
with
your
criteria
so
again
for
educational
purposes.
I
defer
to
staff,
but
from
a
legal
perspective
I
don't,
I
don't
think
it
bears
on
on
whether
not
an
application
meets
the
criteria.
F
E
Still
having
the.
F
So
our
our
december
november
meeting
so
as
of
right
now,
I
do
not
believe
we
have
any
applications
that
are
filed
for
that
date.
I'm
not
positive
if
the
filing
deadline
has
passed,
but
right
now
we
have
nothing
on
december
1st
agenda.
We
do
have
items
on
the
15th,
so
we
might
be
able
to
not
have
one
we'll.
E
Let
you
guys
when
would
we
know
for
sure?
No,
the
first
is
oh.
F
We
can
once
we
have
that
filing
deadline.
We
can
probably
let
you
know
that
there
were
no
applications.
That
would
be.
I
A
Okay,
so
if
no
other
staff
comments
or
board
comments,
then
we
may
adjourn
at
7
38.