![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/jpVXZC3aKmI/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustments January 26, 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
C
D
A
A
D
A
Okay,
that's
great,
and
so
we
go
to
our
legal
counsel
for
quasi
judicial
announcements,
swearing
in
the
speakers.
This.
D
Is
a
quasi-judicial
proceeding
where
the
board
of
adjustment
acts
in
a
quasi-judicial
rather
than
a
legislative
capacity
at
a
quasi-judicial
hearing,
it
is
not
the
board's
function
to
make
law,
but
rather
to
apply
law
that
has
already
been
established
in
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
The
board
is
required
by
law
to
make
findings
of
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
apply
those
findings
of
fact
to
previously
established
criteria
containing
the
code
of
ordinances
in
order
to
make
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
it.
D
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
at
this
hearing
that
the
law
considers
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues.
If
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
met
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
in
favor
of
the
applicant.
By
the
same
token,
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
against
the
applicant.
D
Are
there
any
members
of
the
board
wishing
to
disclose
any
ex
parte
communications
or
conflicts
of
interest
this
evening,
seeing
none
anyone
wishing
to
speak
this
evening?
If
you
could
please
stand
and
raise
your
right
hand
to
be
sworn
in,
do
you
swear
or
affirm
that
the
testimony
you
are
about
to
give
is
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth.
I.
G
A
Okay,
item
number:
four
application:
number
21-179
has
been
deferred
to
february
23
2020,
and
that
is
the
variance
to
decrease
the
side
setbacks
and
allow
an
increase
in
length
for
a
dock
location,
1460,
keystone
ridge
circle.
So
if
anybody
was
here
for
that
that
one's
deferred
item
number
five
application
number
21-166
variants
to
reduce
the
required
side,
yard
setback,
location,
436,
penn,
street
south
side
of
penn
street
between
north
gross
avenue
and
north
levis
avenue
we're
going
to
go
to
the
city
for
presentation.
H
All
right
alley:
key
planning
and
zoning-
this
property
again
is
located
on
the
south
side
of
penn
street.
It's
outlined
here
on
the
screen
in
red
this
site,
as
well
as
the
majority
of
the
neighborhood,
is
in
the
r-70a
single-family
residential
zoning
district.
H
H
The
applicants
are
here
today
requesting
a
variance
to
reduce
the
required
side,
yard
setback
for
the
west
side
of
the
property,
and
this
is
to
allow
for
a
setback
of
6.9
feet.
The
required
side
setback
is
seven
and
a
half
feet.
They
are
looking
to
construct
an
addition
and
a
covered
porch
on
the
backside
of
the
existing
home.
The
proposed
setback
does
match
the
existing
setback
of
the
house
before
jumping
into
the
request.
That's
before
you
tonight,
I
wanted
to
spend
a
little
bit
of
time
talking
about
the
history
of
this
site.
H
This
property
is
a
legal
non-conforming
lot
of
record.
It
was
plotted
in
19
and
all
of
1911
prior
to
the
current
land
development
code.
The
r-70a
district
requires
a
minimum
lot
width
of
60
feet.
This
site
is
only
50
feet,
which
is
what
makes
it
non-conforming
when
we
were
researching
this
application.
H
H
H
The
appropriate
building
permit
was
issued.
The
such
mistake
could
not
have
been
avoided
by
the
application
or
normal
construction
or
business
practices,
and
such
cases
proven
before
the
board
with
confident
substantial
evidence.
So
staff
is
the
one
that
is
requesting
the
board
to
consider
the
after
the
fact
variance.
H
Moving
back
to
the
current
request
by
the
applicant,
they
are
looking
to
do
an
addition
on
the
back
side
of
the
home.
It's
in
the
area
shown
here
in
blue
I'm
looking
to
do
an
addition,
as
well
as
a
porch
and
because
the
porch
is
covered.
It
is
required
to
meet
the
setbacks
of
the
primary
structure,
they're,
requesting
the
setback
to
be
6.9
feet
from
the
west
property
line,
and
they
would
meet
the
required
rear
setback
which
is
20
feet.
H
Just
zooming
back
out
looking
at
the
neighborhood
again,
this
is
an
older
neighborhood
within
the
city.
There
are
several
lots
in
the
same
size
and
configuration
smaller.
Setbacks
is
prevalent
throughout
this
neighborhood
and
one
consideration
as
well
is:
there
is
property,
that's
undeveloped,
to
the
south,
but
this
is
the
city's
property
where
they
are
working
on
the
stormwater
project.
So
it's
unlikely
that
it'll
be
developed
in
the
future.
H
Well,
so
it
depends
so
if
this
was
if
this
pre
at
the
home
was
constructed
pre-dating
the
current
code,
we
typically
would
consider
it
to
be
a
legally
non-conforming
structure
being
that
we
found
that
the
home
was
constructed
in
2003
that
put
a
red
flag
in
our
mind,
just
to
look
to
see
what
we
could
find,
we
pulled
the
permit.
Well,
we
pulled
the
permit
to
see
that
was
issued,
but
there's
no
documentation,
no
plans
to
follow.
It's
been
in
existence.
Since
then
we
didn't
find
a
variance,
it's
likely.
H
H
It's
not
no,
it's
not
based
off
of
time.
It's
basically
the
current
ordinance
went
into
effect.
I
believe
in
1990.,
so
anything
that.
C
G
I
was
just
gonna
ask
sometimes
with
the
applications
we
see
when
the
person
actually
purchased
the
property.
When
I
I
didn't
see
that
2000.
I
I
F
F
J
H
So
well
so
initially
the
applicant
applied
for
a
building
permit
for
the
addition.
It
was
brought
to
their
attention
at
that
time
that
the
addition
did
not
meet
the
setback,
so
they
went
through
the
variance
process
when
we
received
the
variance
application.
That's
when
I
was
looking
to
see,
I
typically
always
look
to
see
when
the
home
was
constructed
when
the
lot
was
planted
to
look
at
the
legal
non-conforming
status
and
when
I
saw
those
in
2003.
That's
when
we
wanted
to
look
at
the
permit
and
try
to
get
that
information.
J
So
this
is
my
question
and
this
is
not
just
for
informative.
We've
had
situation
come
before
our
board
where
a
a
structure
was
built
and
they
were
instructed
to
remove
that
structure
coming
before
the
board
and
we
kind
of
gave
the
variance
for
that.
So
I'm
asking
a
very
important
question.
I
know
this
is
going
to
sound
a
little
bit
silly,
but
I
wanted
to
ask
I
mean
we
wouldn't
be
asking
someone
to
take
apart
a
house
or
move,
but
yet
we
wound
up
doing
that
to
somebody
else
in
the
past.
H
So
yes,
so
I
can't,
I
obviously
cannot
speak
to
that
specific
situation,
but
in
this
case
like
I
said,
we
feel
that
these
circumstances
that
are
outlined
in
the
code
for
and
after
the
fact
variance
is
very
specific.
The
board
of
adjustments
says
you
know
if
someone
constructs
something
without
a
permit
or
anything
like
that,
they
cannot
come
for
a
variance
relief.
They
have
to
remove
it
in
order
to
go
to
reconstruct
it
unless
these
circumstances
exist.
H
So
one
was
you
know
at
the
time
that
this
is
discovered,
it's
economically
impractical,
to
correct
the
issue,
so
we
think
it's
economically
impactful
to
tear
the
house
down
the
building
permit
was
issued
and
we
do
believe
that
there
is
substantial
evidence
that
it
was
constructed
legally.
There
must
have
just
been
a
mistake
at
the
time
that
the
plans
were
reviewed
or
surveyed,
or
something
like
that
so,
depending
on
the
situation
depending
on
these
circumstances,
is
you
know
what
we
would
apply
to
so.
J
So
I
understand
I
understand
what
yeah
this
is
more,
so
this
is
not
really
so
much
with
this
case.
It's
just
informative,
so
for
arguments
say,
could
this
have
happened
where
the
final
permit
went
for
the
final
and
they
didn't
see
that
or
didn't
consider
it
or,
and
it
was
all
passed
because
otherwise,
how
could
you
lose
the
information.
H
H
F
J
E
So,
thank
you
very
much
because
we,
as
said
we
don't
get
a
lot
of
these,
I'm
glad
you're
helping
the
applicant
rectify
this
situation.
Maybe
you
know
who
knows
maybe
the
slab
was
poured
a
little
off
and
which
I
think
we
did
have
an
application.
A
E
Ago,
where
a
slab
was
poured
a
little
off
and
it.
E
In
front
of
us,
so
I
just
for
future
knowledge
if
we
do
get
these
again.
So
these
points
a
b,
c
d,
well
d,
of
course,
is
that
the
board
approves
they
have
to
meet
all
of
those
criterias.
It's
not
one
of
those
ores.
I
would
say
it's
all.
I.
H
D
E
H
I
Sometimes,
when
you
guys
would
have
somebody
have
to
take
down
a
structure,
typically,
it's
because
it's
a
new
construction
and
then
they
catch
it
after
the
fact,
and
they
just
didn't
do
it
right
and
there
was
no
permit
that
was
approved
in
this
case.
This
was
years
ago,
somebody
just
missed
it.
Yeah.
E
D
A
I
Did
an
excellent
job.
My
name
is
matt
selby,
I'm
the
contractor
of
record
on
this
doing
the
room
addition
from
spf
construction
and
she
went
over
everything
that
I
possibly
was
going
to
go
over
already.
So
I
really
don't
have
too
much
to
add.
Thank
you
very
much
for
that.
Okay,.
A
J
C
A
A
H
Right
this
is
a
look
at
the
subject:
property
it's
located
in
the
nature's
preserve
residential
plan
development.
It's
the
orange
part
or
red
parcel
outlined
on
the
screen.
This
particular
piece
of
property
is
also
surrounded
by
a
very
large
land
conservation
area.
H
The
applicants
again
are
here
requesting
a
variance
approval
for
a
new
pool
screen
enclosure,
they're
looking
for
reduction
in
the
side
setback
requirement,
as
well
as
the
separation
distance
between
the
enclosure
and
the
water's
edge
they're,
proposing
to
construct
this
pull
screen
enclosure
over
a
new
pool.
That's
currently
under
construction.
H
This
is
just
a
zoom
out
of
the
subject:
property
with
the
site
plan.
The
pool
screen
enclosure
is
the
blue
line
on
the
screen,
which
is
kind
of
hard
to
see
right
around
here,
oops
zooming
into
the
site
plan.
This
is
a
look
at
the
proposed
pool
configuration
again.
The
screen
enclosure
is
the
light
blue
line
along
this
side.
Here,
the
land
development
code
requires
a
minimum
size
setback
for
a
screening
closure
of
eight
feet.
H
They
are
proposing
a
setback
of
5.75
feet,
which
is
the
purple
shaded
area,
and
then
the
code
also
requires
a
minimum
separation.
Distance
between
the
water's
edge
and
the
screen
enclosure
of
three
feet:
they
do
meet
the
three
feet
over
on
this
side
as
well
as
over
here,
but
they
are
requesting
a
reduction
to
one
and
a
half
feet
along
the
rear.
H
One
thing
to
note
about
this
property
is:
there
is
an
existing
10
foot,
wide
drainage
and
utility
easement
along
the
rear
of
the
property?
Typically,
a
pool
screen
enclosure
could
be
up
to
five
feet
from
the
rear
property
line.
However,
it
does
specifically
say
that
has
to
be
outside
of
an
easement,
which
is
why
they
are
pushed
the
10
feet
away
from
the
rear
property
line.
H
H
Planning
staff
when
they
reviewed
the
permit
did
provide
an
advisory
comment
back
to
the
applicant,
stating
that,
based
on
the
current
configuration
that
a
screening
closure
would
not
meet
the
requirements
the
applicant
has
since
then
applied
for
the
permit
for
the
enclosure
and
is
now
before
you
guys
today
for
the
variance
request.
A
K
Okay,
so
when
we
had
first
originally
put
in
for
the
permit,
it
was
a
different
design,
so
it
was
like
just
a
square
pool
which
still
had
the
same
outline
for
the
deck,
and
we
did
not
note
that
there
was
any
screen
enclosure
issues
at
the
time
and
we
had
put
on
the
application
that
there
was
a
screen
footer,
because
we
usually
put
a
footer
down
just
in
case.
They
do
want
to
put
a
screen
later
on.
K
Then
we
change
that
the
customer
changed
the
design
as
we
were
going
to
build
the
pool
after
it
already
came
out
of
permitting.
So
we
put
in
for
a
revision,
and
this
is
a
design
that
he
wanted
to
go
with,
and
the
deck
never
changed,
though
so
we're
still
going
to
put
the
screen
footer.
And
then
it
was
noted
that,
on
the
permit
that
came
out
that
screen
enclosure
would
not
be
allowed
on
this
property.
We
are
pool
builder.
K
K
So
right
now
it's
just
in
the
stages
of
putting
us
the
screen
footer
down
and
if
the
variants
could
be
approved
to
go
to
the
where
the
house
is
which
is
in
the
side,
setback
the
edge
of
the
house,
then
we
don't
have
to
get
two
variances
for
the
within
one
foot
of
the
pool
we
would
be
able
to
meet
the
we
would
be
able
to,
on
the
left
side,
be
able
to
go
all
the
way
out
to
where
the
house
is
instead
of
trying
to
butt
up
against
the
pool
on
that
side
too,
trying
to
maximize
deck
space
with
the
house
and
screen
enclosures
due
to
mosquitoes.
K
The
customer
would
really
would
like
to
put
a
screen
enclosure
up,
because
it's
on
a
nature
area
and
the
mosquitoes
are
kind
of
a
problem.
There.
C
K
This
was
a
design
that
we
originally
had.
It
was
a
square
or
a
rectangle,
and
it
was
the
exact
same
like
position.
They
just
tried
to
maximize
the
space
by
making
more
when
this
is
the
design
that
the
customer
had
approved
and
we
put
through
permitting
and
that
this
was
the
result,
and
we
didn't
realize
from
the
first
time
that
we
had
to
have
that
we
couldn't
do
the
screen
enclosure.
There
would
be
a
future
issue
until
the
second
revision
came
out.
F
F
K
K
We
can
apply
for
screen
enclosure
permit,
so
the
the
screen
enclosure
permit
that
she's
saying
somebody
else
had
applied
for
it.
Not
not
our
company.
K
K
K
We
as
they
were
doing,
that
is
when
I
applied
for
the
variance
when
we
got
the
second
permit
back.
That
said,
the
screen
enclosure
so.
K
C
K
F
K
F
J
L
A
Wouldn't
come
back
on
me,
you
know,
come
on
up
and
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record,
and
you.
A
D
Your
right
hand,
do
you
swear
from
the
testimony
you're
about
to
give
us
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth.
I.
J
L
L
I
apologize
so
there's
a
door
right
in
the
middle
of
our
property,
so
with
the
square
pool
it
was
going
to
be
very
close
to
the
pool
when
you
came
on
or
whenever
you
came
out
of
the
back
door
to
actually
enter
the
area.
So
we
tried
to
make
that
inset
there.
So
whenever
you
came
out,
you
weren't
basically
falling
in
the
pool.
So
that
was
the
reason
why
we
changed
the
shape
and
why
it's
to
that
side.
J
So
one
of
the
things
I
wanted
to
ask
you
was
how
come
when
you
designed
this-
you
didn't
come
before
the
planning
and
zoning
to
get
approval
on
everything
all
at
once.
L
So
that,
to
be
honest
with
you
is
something
we
were
leaving
at
a
pool
company
we
were,
and
that
was
same
with
tonight.
We
decided
okay,
we'll
let
you
guys
deal
with
it.
You
know.
J
Right
but
but
that
also
makes
it
so
that
your
discussion
should
be
between
you,
two,
not
us,
so
your
disagreement
with
the
pool
company,
I'm
sure
if
I
ask
the
pool
company
they're
going
to
point
at
you
and
if
I
ask
you
you're
going
to
point
at
the
pool
company,
but
we're
not
involved
in
that
what
you're
asking
us
to
do
is
to
break
the
the
rules
and
regulations
of
what's
allowed
and
what's
not
allowed,
you
know
it's
like
somebody
decides
to
go,
build
a
house
and
then
decides
afterwards
finds
out
if
it's
legal
or
not,
and
that's
very
difficult
for
then
for
us
to
do
I
mean
I
can
understand
if
if
there
was
an
error
made
in
in
measuring
or
you
know,
I
understand
what
you
were
saying
with
your
footer-
I
had
a
pool
put
in
and
the
footer
was
put
in
the
wrong
spot.
J
I
had
to
pay
to
have
that
footer
done
correctly.
I
I
don't
know
how
to
help
you
so.
L
I
J
J
L
We
didn't
know
who
was
going
to
go
for
the
screen
enclosure.
We
didn't
know
if
it
was
all
under
one
contract
or
if
they
were
going
to
sub-contract
it
out,
which
sounds
like
what's
happened,
but
you
know
it
was
always
from
the
original
contract
that
we
as
the
homeowners
signed
because,
like
as
she
had
said,
we
have
really
bad
no
seems
over
there.
So
we
said
we
weren't
going
to
do
a
pool
unless
we
could
do
a
screen
enclosure.
L
J
J
So
that's,
okay,
we'll
allow
the
pool
to
be
put
closer
to
the
footing
because
we
don't
want
them
to
be
bit
by
no
seems
I
mean
if
you
understand
where
I'm
coming
from,
I
just
I
find
it
hard
to
be
able
to
understand.
I
understand
how
the
problem
came
about,
but
you
are
our
board,
especially
myself.
I
don't
know
how
I
can
help
you
with
that.
This
is
not
something
that
was
our
doing
or
can
help
you.
I
I
don't
know.
That's.
J
Just
wanted
one
more
thing:
when
you
change
the
the
size
of
the
pool,
did
you
not
have
a
discussion,
then,
whether
it
was
going
to
be
legal
or
not.
J
No,
that's
that's
difference
for
that's
not
what
I'm
asking
I'm
asking
when
you
make
a
change,
you
have
to
see.
If
it's
a
legal
change,
I
mean
you
could
be
building
a
2,
000
square
foot
house
and
decide.
Okay,
we
want
to
make
it
a
3,
000
square
foot
house,
but
you've
got
to
bring
that
up
to
staff.
To
see
is
that
legal
to
put
on
that
property?
D
Mr
chair,
can
I
make
a
clarifying,
could
ask
a
clarifying
question
please
so
I
know
there
was
a
lot
of
talk
and
perhaps
I'm
just
missing
something.
There
was
a
lot
of
talk
about
changing
the
shape
of
the
pool
understanding
that
part
of
the
pool
in
this
construction
with
the
contract
between
these
folks
is
to
put
the
footers
in
for
an
enclosure.
D
However,
it's
not
the
shape
of
the
pool
or
where
the
pool
is
located.
That
is
the
the
subject
of
the
variants.
It's
the
the
pool
enclosure
where
it
will
be
located
based
on
the
footers
that
they
are
going
to
put
in
so
again,
the
pool
is,
can
be
there
and
is
properly
permitted
in
the
shape
that
it
is
and
in
the
location
that
it
is.
The
issue
is
whether
or
not
they
can
have
a
screened
enclosure
around
the
pool,
so
the
pools
understanding
the
pool
is
tangentially
the
issue.
D
I
just
want
to
make
sure
for
clarity
of
the
record
that
we're
not
discussing
that
the
pool
is
at
issue
here.
It's
the
footers
and
the
actual
enclosure.
That's
going
to
encroach
the
other
thing
too.
I
want
to
bring
to
the
attention-
and
I
don't
see
it
addressed
in
the
packet
anywhere,
and
perhaps
this
is
something
the
contractor
can
speak
to,
but
with
reducing
the
setback,
the
rear
setback
between
the
pool,
the
water's
edge
and
the
enclosure.
D
Even
if
you
were
granted
the
variance.
I
want
to
make
sure,
though,
that
there
is
have
you
reviewed
chapter
515
florida
statutes
and
made
sure
that
all
the
safety
and
barrier
requirements
are
being
met,
because
I
believe
there
is
a
three-foot
requirement
between
our
18-inch
requirement
between
the
water's
edge
and
any
safety
fence.
So
even
if
this
board
were
to
approve
that,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
wasting
everyone's
time
and
that
you've
considered
that
as
well.
K
D
F
D
K
Yes,
okay,
that's
kind
of
where
we're
at.
Can
I
please?
Okay?
So
once
we
first
permitted
the
pool
the
deck,
never
changed,
so
the
first
set
of
plans.
There
was
no
call
out
that
our
like
a
screen,
footer
where
the
footer
was
never
changed.
Did
you
get?
Did
you
get
the
permit
back?
Yes,
okay!
So
then,
when
we
just
changed
the
design,
and
then
we
got
the
note
back,
that
said
that
we
couldn't
do
a
screen
right.
That
was
our
red.
That
was
like
wait.
What.
G
G
E
Or
did
the
pool
you
know,
because
I
I'm
thinking
the
same
way
that
miss
rich
is
the
original
rectangular
pool
you
had
the
approved
permit.
Everything
was
fine.
Here's
where
the
decking
footer
is
and
then
three
feet,
that's
where
your
rectangular
pool
was
being
built
and
then
so
stop
me
if,
when
I,
if
I
mess
up
here
so
then
you
change
to
this
kidney
shape
pool,
so
this
kidney
shape
pool
did
that
then
get
pushed
a
foot
and
a
half
in
towards
the
back
which
then,
even
though
the
footer
was
still
approved.
E
Now
you
have
encroached
in
that
three
foot
requirement,
so
it
was
the
pool
shape
then
pushed
it
too
far
in
and
at
that
point
was
that
when
the
city
staff
put
that
advisory
comment
saying
halt,
please
be
advised.
Yes,
your
pool
is
approved.
However,
you
are
not
going
to
have
the
three
feet
necessary
when
you
get
to
the
screening
process.
F
E
K
E
But
the
city
did
make
an
advisory
comment
on
that
right.
You
know
the
kidney
pool
permit
that
they
said
yes,
you're
approved
for
the
pool,
however,
red
alert
you're
going
to
be
in
out
of
compliance
on
the
three-foot
setback.
If
you
go
to
screen,
that
was
that
information
then
communicated
to
your
client
to
the
homeowner.
K
I
guess
I'm
not
sure
where
I
don't
know
what
communication
was
relayed
to
him
before
the,
because
we
were
in
the
process
of
trying
to
to
get
it
into
the
ground.
While
we
were
going
through
the
permitting,
because
we
had
already
had
the
permit
and
then
we
would
put
put
the
revision
through.
So
that
is
something.
L
That
we
didn't
know
there
was
gonna,
be
a
change
to
the
actual
screen
enclosure
like
we
still
thought
it
was
going
by
the
contract.
This
is
what
it
originally
was,
so
we
thought
we
were
going
to
still
get
it.
I
mean
yeah.
Obviously
we
wouldn't
have
thought
that
it
was.
I
don't
even
remember
what
the
original
distance
was
between
the
rectangle
pool.
L
C
Yes,
on
my
original
question,
with
the
square
pool,
you
said
you
had
the
photo
for
the
screen:
enclosure.
C
K
K
H
I
jump
in
real,
quick
just
to
give
a
little
clarification
on
the
permitting
process.
I
just
so
provide
a
little
clarity.
So
first,
I
want
to
say
that
it
is
very,
very
common
for
pools
and
enclosures
to
be
permitted
separately,
not
always
together
when
we
notice
something
on
a
permit,
such
as
we
did
on
this
revision
that
doesn't
have
a
screen
closure.
They
can
pour
a
footer.
Footers
are
at
great
improvements.
They
don't
have
setback
requirements
except
from
the
rear.
H
It's
five
feet,
so
that's:
okay,
whether
it's
a
footer
for
something
or
nothing
in
the
future.
It's
okay!
When
we
see
something
that
comes
in
without
the
enclosure
and
it's
a
pool,
it's
very
common
people
are
going
to
want
an
enclosure
being
in
florida.
So
we
try
to
put
an
advisory
comment
if
it's
not
going
to
meet
the
standards,
because
at
that
time
there
might
be
an
opportunity
to
revise
the
layout
of
the
pool
or
configuration
to
accommodate
it
now
as
far
as
the
revision.
H
So
yes,
that's
also
common
people
come
in
with
one
layout
of
a
pool
or
anything,
and
then
they
start
going
through
the
process.
A
permit.
May
have
been
issued
and
then
they
want
to
revise
it.
They
go
through.
They
have
to
revise
that
permit,
which
is
what
happened
here.
I
cannot
speak
to
the
original,
drawing
whether
or
not
the
separation
distance
was
an
issue
at
that
time.
It
may
have
not
been.
There
may
have
been
three
feet
so
that
comet,
maybe
wasn't
provided
from
the
side
setback
again.
H
The
decking
can
be
at
that
point
on
that
permit
for
the
pool
it
doesn't
have
the
screen
enclosure
location.
So
we
don't
necessarily
know
you
know
they
could
push
it
in
or
whatnot.
So
we
typically
try
to
put
an
advisory
comment
on
there
to
prevent
potential
issues,
but
I
just
want
you
to
be
aware
that,
yes,
it's
very
common
for
these
to
be
separate
permits
and
to
come
in
at
later
times.
Miss.
A
H
A
J
Allie,
when
they,
when
a
pool
is
put
in
and
a
change
is
made,
should
it
be
requested,
the
change
prior
to
digging
or
after
digging.
H
H
J
Well,
my
question,
then:
is
they
had
the
permit
to
do
this
square
pool
the
homeowner
decided
to
change
the
shape,
which
is
fine
and
dandy?
The
shape
is
was,
then
you
have
to
put
in
a
permit
to
get
approval
for
the
new
shape
which
they
did
right.
So
when
that
did
did
that
cross
your
desk.
L
So
we
did
it
doug
before
we
changed
it
like
we
didn't,
have
it
dug
as
a
rectangle,
if
that's
what
we're
going
for
it
was
originally
dug
and
put
in
this
way
like
this
is
how
we
we
told
them
literally
a
week
or
two
after
we
did
the
original
plan.
I
don't
even
think
we
made
it
that
far
into
it,
but
we
wanted
to
change
the
kidney
shape
and
it
was
never
pulled
as
a
rectangle.
L
J
I'm
trying
to
follow
the
bouncing
ball
and
I'm
losing
the
ball
somewhere.
The
ball,
I'm
hearing
from
allie
that
she
asked
to
have
a
footing.
A
footing
has
to
be
the
the
cage
has
to
be
three
feet
from
the
pool
edge.
A
A
I
don't
get
that.
It
seems
to
me
that
the
city,
every
single
time
a
pool
was
built,
would
have
the
conversation
of.
Is
this
going
to
have
a
screened
enclosure
or
not?
It
seemed
like
you,
wouldn't
even
go
anywhere
towards
giving
anything
to
anybody.
That's
building
a
pool
without
asking
that
question,
because,
as
you
said,
it's
very
common
and
it's
not
like
they
were
trying
to
hide
it
or
add
that
as
an
after
thought,
it
was
in
their
minds
to
do
so.
H
So
that's
that's
exactly
why
when
I'm
reviewing
parents,
I
give
advisory
comments
because,
especially
with
pools,
because
it's
expected
that
eventually,
if
it's
not
this
homeowner
a
future,
one
will
want
an
enclosure.
So
we
try
to
bring
it
out,
but
I
will
also
say
that
when
we
do
have
a
permit,
we're
reviewing
the
permit
that
is
before
us.
We
can't
necessarily
review
something:
that's
not
a
part
of
the
permit,
so
I
just
try
to
put
advisory
comments
that
may
potentially
trigger
something.
If
there's
a
future
change,
yeah.
A
H
What
it
is
didn't.
G
It
up,
but
my
my
question
is
you
know
if,
if
you
had
the
permit
and
the
advisory
comments,
were
there
you
know
again,
I'm
going
back
to
mr
eisner.
That's
really
going
to
be
a
dispute
between
you
guys
if
you,
if
the
pool
company
didn't
communicate
with
the
owner
that
hey
we,
we
now
have
a
red
flag
before
we
start
putting
this
in,
so
that
he
could
make
a
decision
either
move
it.
L
C
E
You
you
opted
so
then,
when
you
made
the
shape
change,
which
then
would
make
it
less
than
the
three
foot.
Yes
and
you
were
notified
that
hey
you're
gonna,
be
under
the
three
foot
in
this
advisory
comment
had
notified
it,
so
you
opted
to
then
apply
for
a
variance,
as
opposed
to
going
to
the
homeowner
saying
we
have
an
issue
here.
E
L
J
We're
missing
one
key
factor:
the
person
that
did
the
digging
is
not
here.
Okay,
and
without
having
that
person
to
question
we
lose
what
I
call
the
bouncing
ball.
So
you
say
you,
you
did
what
you
had
to
do.
You've
said
you
did
what
you
had
to
do.
Staff
says
they
did
what
they
had
to
do,
but
we
don't
have
the
person
here
to
provide
evidence
of
when
they
were
digging.
Was
it
before
the
notification?
Was
it
after
the
notification?
J
So
I
have
a
question:
is
every
pool?
Does
it
have
a
footing
around
every
pool.
J
Understand
and
it's
there
for
the
to
support
the
cage.
I
realized
that
was
this
always
a
footing
permit.
H
J
My
thinking
is
the
minute
there's
a
footing
on
any
pool.
There
should
be
a
notification
that
immediately
goes
with
that
footing.
That
says,
if
you're
going
to
provide
a
cage
at
any
later
date
or
before
during
after
whenever
you
would
have
to
have
these
scheduled
sizes
around
the
pool.
That
is
what
we
do.
I
know
yes,
I
need
to
clarify
that.
So
you
don't
know
if
that
was
done
on
the
first
permit,
that
was
square,
correct.
J
E
To
go
back,
I
also
don't
know
if
the
first
permit
of
the
square
pool
necessitated
right
a
note.
H
J
J
Correct,
I
understand
that
and
that's
why
I'm
asking
you
these
questions
to
clarify,
because
I
know
the
answer
to
this,
but
I
need
you
to
give
the
findings
a
fact
for
everybody
up
here.
That's
on
the
board
and
that's
why
I'm
coming
back
to
you
and
when
I
ask
you
these
questions,
there's
a
missing
link.
Well,.
J
A
A
E
Well,
while
y'all
are
looking
that
up,
I
have
a
question.
This
is
one
of
these
situations
where
the
attorney
might
scold
us,
but.
E
And
do
this
so
because
I
you
know
particularly
concerned
about
you
know
the
the
rear
you
know
because,
as
you
all
hear,
I
keep
going
back
to
that
because
this
is
a
that's:
a
safety
concern
of
only
having
18
inches
as
opposed
to
the
three
feet,
and
I
understood
stan
that
the
footer
is
already
there.
If
you
did
go
and
ex,
if
you,
you
know,
constructed
an
additional
footer
which
of
course
would
be
18
inches
into
that
10-foot
drainage
and
utility
easement,
it's
almost
like.
D
D
However,
it
is
the
applicant's
burden
to
prove
by
competent,
substantial
evidence
whether
or
not
they
meet
the
criteria
in
order
to
get
the
variance
that
is
before
you,
so
that
would
be
a
completely
different
application,
and-
and
so
at
this
point,
we
just
need
to
see
if
there's
enough
evidence
to
support
the
criterion
either
granting
the
variance
or
denying
the
variance
as
requested
and
keep
in
mind.
There
are
two
variances
and
I'll
defer
to
the
applicant,
but
it
seems
to
me
since
they've
already
dug
it.
D
J
But
even
if
we
get
the
permit,
it
doesn't
show
yes
or
no.
Whether
the
staff
said
that
you
need
to
have
the
three
feet
or
not.
It.
H
F
H
This
one
was
issued
well.
My
comment
was
issued
in
september,
but
there
was
a
comment
on
there
that
said
that
a
full
screen
closure
was
required
to
have
a
minimum
eight
foot
set
setback
and
a
minimum
five
foot
rear
setback
plus
outside
any
easement
and
a
minimum
three
foot
setback
between
the
enclosure
on
the
water's
edge
on
all
sides.
Please
be
advised
that,
based
on
the
proposed
layout
of
the
pool
and
decking
a
pool
screen
enclosure
would
not
meet
the
minimum
requirements
and
would
not
be
permitted.
H
I
mean
yes
and
and
again
they
have
a
permit
that
is
approved
to
put
in
a
pool,
so
there's
no
they're
not
in
trouble
for
digging
in
the
pool.
I
just.
K
And
when
I
went
to
the
the
first
meeting
with
the
planning
team
you
had
mentioned
that
you
would
hope
like
this
is
a
silly
like
nobody
else
has
this
screen
enclosure
rule
with
the
three
foot
only
tarpon
springs
does
yeah.
K
A
L
L
H
So
so
the
code
does
specifically
say
that
it
has
to
be
outside
of
the
drainage
or
any
easement.
Essentially
I
don't
know
if
you
can
ask
a
variance
of
that,
because
typically
we
wouldn't
allow
for
permanent
structures
within
an
easement
area.
H
Really,
the
only
thing
that's
typically
allowed
into
easement
is
like
a
fence,
because
it's
something
that
you
can
typically
remove.
I
would
probably
have
to
look
at
the
code
and
see
if
there's
anything
specific.
Regarding
that
before
I
give
an
answer-
and
I
can-
and
I
can
follow
up
with
you
guys
and.
H
H
Yeah
right
now,
both
of
those
are
our
issues
right
now
we
have
to.
I.
H
Yeah,
there
definitely
is
no
with
how
it's
currently
laid
out,
there's
not
a
path
forward
without
any
sort
of
variance
type
approval.
If
there's
a
way
that
we
can
maybe
look
at
it
to
see.
If
there's
a
different
way
to
approach
it,
we
can.
We
can
look,
but
I
don't
know
with
that
one,
because
you
need
at
least
eight
feet
on
the
side.
You
have
an
extra
eight
inches,
because
you
have
that
three
foot,
that's
not
going
to
get
you
to
where
it
needs
to
be.
It's
close.
H
I'd
have
to
do
math
you're
still,
maybe
what
like
half
a
foot
foot
away,
so
we
could
also
look
at.
There
is
a
provision
in
the
code
for
a
diminished
variance.
However,
that's
only
allows
administrative
waivers
if
something
is
five
percent
or
less
of
a
difference.
I
don't
think
that
that's
going
to
be
close
enough,
so
I
don't
know
if
that
would
be
able
to
apply
if
they
pushed
it
in
the
the
screen.
D
G
A
E
A
We
won't
I'll
remove.
E
A
A
G
E
You
I
agree
was
feeling
that
the
same
way,
I
was
particularly
pleased
with
the
way
that
item
number
11
came
through.
I,
like
the
very
clear
example
of
the
amending
of
the
application
and
good
erica's
colleague,
was
wonderfully
patient
and
knowledgeable
for
us.
D
E
And
just
I
know
we
also
had
discussion.
Miss
rich
did
a
great
job,
bringing
up
the
gender
neutral
language
and
referring
to
chairperson
and
chair
members.
We
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
were
consistent
with
other
resolutions
across
the
city.
So
I
was
just
curious
if
others
were
falling
in
that
path
or
maybe
we're
trailblazers
which
we'd
love
to
be.
D
A
So
I
have
a
comment
under
variances.
We
just
did
one
variance
after
the
fact
right.
That's
not
included
on
this
right.
The
review
criteria
by
application
type.
A
D
A
A
H
So
what
I
will
say
is
when
I
was
looking
for
the
criteria.
I
wasn't,
it
wasn't
registering
in
my
mind
that
was
criteria,
so
I
did
do
an
extensive
search
for
the
code
and
I
believe
I
captured
everything
else.
D
And
so
that
you
know,
the
mayor
has
contacted
the
city
attorney
and
tom,
and
I
have
been
working
on
it.
I
am
going
to
be
giving
you
guys
a
bound
packet
of
your
enabling
ordinances,
any
appropriate
charter
provisions
or
other
ordinances
that
are
applicable
to
the
board,
as
well
as
those
provisions
that
ali
has
put
together
in
that
memo,
including
the
other
one
yeah.
D
Actual
copies
of
the
ordinances,
a
summary
I'll
have
that
memo
of
when
to
amend
it,
I'll
put
that
memo
in
there
as
well,
and
then
any
statutory
references
that
you
guys
are
needing
and
it
will
be
bound
and
laminated
so
that
you
have
that
anytime,
that
you
come
to
the
meeting.
It'll
have
the
sunshine
stuff
in
there,
it'll
have
chapter
112
on
ethics,
and
so
it
can
be
an
easy
reference
for
you.
I
know.
That's
come
up
quite
a
few
times.
D
D
A
D
H
F
H
Added,
yes,
not
your
start
date,
so
I
asked
them
to
put
at
one
of
the
start
dates,
but
they
put
the
number
of
years
that
you
have
served.
So
that's
the
highlighted
line.
So
that
gives
you
an
idea
of
how
many
years
you've
been
on
it.
So
then
you
can
just
work
backwards.
H
H
I
could
just
jump
back
when
we
were
talking
about
our
rules
of
procedure.
We've
been
talking
with
staff
as
well
as
our
other
boards
and
our
city
attorneys
and
everyone
else
that
helps
us
out
putting
on
these
meetings
and
we
wanted
to
bring
to
the
board
tonight,
since
you
guys
are
looking
at
changing
your
rules
and
procedures.
If
you
would
be
interested
in
potentially
having
a
meeting
start
time
of
6
30
pm
as
opposed
to
7
pm.
H
A
G
D
H
D
G
H
I
did
so.
The
one
thing
I
wanted
to
mention
is
you
guys
should
have
received
an
invite.
I
don't
remember
if
it
was
last
week
or
the
week
before,
but
we
have
a
upcoming
meeting
for
all
of
our
appointed
board
members
in
response
to
our
comprehensive
plan
update.
So
I
just
want
to
give
a
reminder
that
we'd
love
to
have
anyone
there
to
participate,
provide
your
feedback.
H
It
is
wednesday,
not
this
a
week
from
today
on
the
second
from
six
to
nine
pm,
and
it
is
at
the
sbc
tarpon
springs
campus
in
their
community
room
in
the
library,
so.
H
Is
that
so
it's
in
the
oh
fa,
it's
in
the
fa
building,
that's
true,
which
is
the
the
library
building.
I
believe
yes,.
E
It's
where
the
you
walk
in
the
library's
on
I'm
like
I
worked
there.
Where
was
it
right
or
left
where
the
library
and
leiparatner
are
in
the
same
building
outs
kind
of
in
that
big
lobby
area?
There's
a
couple
public
meeting
rooms,
yeah.
H
No,
this
is
this
is
for
the
comprehensive
plan,
not
the
strategic
plan,
gotcha,
it's
a
different
project
and
we've
invited
all
of
our
appointed
boards,
so
there'll
be
a
makeup
of
all
different
people
there
right
so
please
join
us
and
then
other
than
that
you
saw
the
additional
materials
that
we
provided.
This
is
just
based
off
the
notes
that
I
I
made
from
last
meeting.
If
you
have
any
questions
about
them,
feel
free
to
ask
or
reach
out
to
me
at
another
time
and
that's
all.
I
have.