►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustments 2-23-22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
E
B
F
This
is
a
quasi-judicial
proceeding
where
the
board
of
adjustment
acts
in
a
quasi-judicial
rather
than
a
legislative
capacity
at
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
It
is
not
the
board's
function
to
make
law,
but
rather
to
apply
law
that
has
already
been
established
in
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
The
board
is
required
by
law
to
make
findings
of
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
apply
those
findings
of
fact
to
previously
established
criteria
contained
in
the
code
of
ordinances
in
order
to
make
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
it.
F
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
at
this
hearing
that
the
law
considers
competence,
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues.
If
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
met
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinances,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
defined
in
favor
of
the
applicant.
By
the
same
token,
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinances,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
defined
against
the
applicant.
F
D
F
B
G
Okay
alley
keen
senior
planner
the
subject:
property
is
located
off
of
keystone
ridge
circle.
It's
outlined
here
on
the
screen
in
red
this
property,
as
well
as
all
the
other
properties
within
that
same
neighborhood,
are
located
in
the
r-70a
zoning
district,
which
is
a
single-family.
Zoning
district
to
the
north
of
the
site
is
the
r-100
zone,
which
is
also
a
single-family
district,
and
the
property
is
off
of
lake
tarpon.
G
G
The
ordinance
requires
that
a
private
dock
cannot
extend
from
the
mean
high
water
line
further
than
half
the
width
of
the
property's
waterfront.
This
property
has
approximately
22
feet
of
water
frontage.
They
would
be
allowed
11
feet
for
a
dock
length.
They
are
proposing
to
have
a
maximum
length
of
55
feet.
G
The
land
development
code
also
states
that
private
docks
and
boat
lifts
shall
be
located
within
the
center
one
third
of
the
waterfront,
so
they
are
proposing
to
have
a
one
foot
setback
from
the
adjacent
property
lines,
whereas
they'd
be
required
to
have
a
seven
foot
setback
in
order
to
be
within
the
center
one.
Third,
this
section
of
the
code
also
allows
doc
dimensional
standards
to
be
waived.
G
G
G
A
G
On
this,
there
is
not
a
dock
for
this
property.
You
might
be
referring
to
the
dock
that
you
see
on
the
survey,
but
that
is
for
the
adjacent
property.
D
B
C
B
H
H
I
think
I
know
there's
not
a
specified
time
limit
in
in
these
hearings,
but
I
just
wanted
to
let
you
know
that
I
do
have
two
witnesses
to
testify.
So.
H
Yes
ma'am,
so
thank
you
well
good
evening,
and
I
know
docs
are
everybody's
favorite
cases,
especially
when
there's
not
neighbor
support.
So
we
appreciate
the
time
that
you're
going
to
have
to
hear
hear
this
application
just
going
through
the
facts,
and
ms
kane
has
been
wonderful
over
the
past
several
months,
working
with
the
applicant
on
this
application.
There
is
a
very
unique
set
of
facts
that
begin
with
the
shape
of
the
lot
and
are
contributed
to
by
the
fact
of
both
of
you
have
pointed
out.
H
The
neighbor
to
the
south
dock
appears
to
cross
the
extended
property
lines,
and
is
the
reason
for
well
contributes
to
the
difficult
situation
that
we
have
here.
So
I
wanted
to
walk
through
some
of
the
facts
that
we
have
here.
This
is
the
subdivision,
as
it's
located
on
lake
tarpon,
I've
put
a
star
where
the
tomlin's
home
is,
and
I've
put
a
square
where
the
proposed
dock
is
to
be
located.
H
I
thought
this
gave
a
good
visual
that
you
can
see
that
the
property
to
the
south,
which
is
lot
nine,
the
hunt,
property
and
the
property
to
the
north,
both
have
docks
that
are
closest
to
the
tomlins
property
lines
and
create
a
very
even
smaller
area,
practically
from
a
navigational
standpoint
as
to
where
these
docs,
this
doc
could
be
located.
H
I
think
it's
important
to
look
at
the
history
of
this
subdivision
in
2010.
This
was
unplanted
and
undeveloped,
and
the
dock
to
the
north
I'll
refer
to
as
the
wolf
dock.
This
is
ms
wolfstock.
She
did
send
correspondence
to
you
all
objecting
to
the
proposed
boat,
lift
as
she
has
talked
to
the
tomlins
quite
often
over
the
past
few
months
in
this
process
and
just
expressed
her
disappointment
with
any
boat
traffic
on
lake
tarpon,
and
she
didn't
want
to
see
any
additional
boat
traffic
on
lake
tarpon.
H
H
H
H
H
As
you
know,
from
your
code,
the
length
is
actually
dictated
by
the
lot
width
at
water's
edge
and
50
percent.
I
didn't
go
through
and
measure
each
particular
one
to
know,
but
this
was
permitted
by
the
subdivider
of
the
property,
and
so
it's
our
understanding
that,
because
it
was
all
internal
to
the
subdivision,
all
the
sign
offs
were
granted
because
it
was
one
subdivider
who
was
granting
each
of
those
sign
offs.
H
As
part
of
the
criteria
in
your
code
there's
a
clear
physical
constraint,
the
hunt
dock,
which
is
the
southern
neighbor,
is
located
within
the
extended
property
lines,
there's
a
very
narrow
and
subsequent
to
our
application.
It
was
determined
by
the
surveyor
that
mr
tomlin
and
his
and
his
wife
do
own
tract
b,
which
pick
up
an
additional
minimum
of
five
feet,
and
so
the
width
instead
of
22
feet,
is
actually
about
27
28
feet.
Based
on
that,
it's
not
it's
still
a
variance,
so
it.
H
You
can
see
where
it
says,
39.33,
that
is,
the
property
line
of
the
water's
edge
in
the
triangular
part,
if
there
were
an
11
or
even
15
foot
dock
constructed
from
the
water's
edge,
which
is
permitted
by
your
code,
it
wouldn't
even
pass
the
edge
that
is
shown
there.
That
is
the
v
shape,
and
so
there
is
a
concern
that
the
55
feet
from
the
water's
edge.
You
can
see
where
it's
measured
from
that
dotted
line,
but
the
11
to
15
feet
there
would
be
constrained,
there's
also
significant
vegetation
there
in
that
area.
H
H
H
H
The
literal
enforcement
of
the
dock
provisions
would
provide
a
dock
that
doesn't
cross
the
actual
land
and
enter
navigational
water,
and
it
would
never
actually
or
reach
the
property
in
the
water
and
not
having
a
landing
to
even
allow
for
non-motorized
vessels
is
inconsistent
with
the
fact
that
you
can
see
several
boat
houses
and
boat
lifts
that
exist
all
along
lake
tarpon.
In
this
area.
H
With
respect
to
the
side
setback
variants,
after
talking
with
staff,
in
further
conversations
with
miss
wolf
the
applicant
has
proposed
and
before
you
tonight,
we
have
adjusted
plans
that
we
can
pass
out,
modifying
the
request
for
the
side,
setback
variants
and
removing
the
boat
lift
itself,
and
so,
instead
of
a
one
foot
on
either
side,
it
would
be
approximately
four
feet
and
approximately
six
feet.
So
that
would
be
something
that
you
all
could
approve.
It
was
within
your
purview.
H
We
spoke
to
the
staff
today
and
who
conferred
with
the
city
attorney,
because
it's
a
less
lesser
request
than
was
previously
asked
for
the
tomlins
are
trying
to
be
good
neighbors.
They
simply
are
looking
for
the
same
benefits
that
their
neighbors
have.
They
have
this
very
awkward
situation
of
their
property
line,
trying
to
find
a
place
to
navigate
with
the
existing
dock
to
the
south
and
the
existing
dock
to
the
north.
H
Again,
the
evidence
presented
with
respect
to
the
side
setback,
the
width
of
the
land
at
water's
edge,
creates
limited
setbacks
of
nine
feet
where
you
would
end
up
without
any
type
of
platform
or
observation
deck
at
the
terminus
of
the
dock.
The
southern
dock
is
located
on
the
tomlins
riparian
area,
which
creates
the
need
to
angle
the
dock,
some
to
the
north
and
locate
this
platform.
H
Accordingly,
the
existence
of
the
property
was
not
created
by
the
applicant,
but
was
a
plat
approved
by
the
city,
and
the
literal
enforcement
of
the
dock
provisions
would
provide
a
dock
without
an
observation
area.
Kayak
launch
or
other
benefits
surrounding
the
other
property
owners
in
the
lake
tarpon.
H
This
is
a
copy
of
the
revised
site
plan
which
shows
the
four
foot
and
six
foot.
I
don't
know
if
you
all.
Yes,
you
all
have
it
before
you.
So
I
know
it's
difficult
with
such
a
long
parcel
to
get
on
one
piece
of
paper
for
you
to
see.
So
we
tried
to
zoom
in
on
that,
for
you.
B
Here,
so
why
don't
we
open
things
up
to
questions
based
on
this
presentation
first
and
then
we'll
have
mr
tomlin.
H
I
I
I
No
right
after
that,
one
that
one
okay.
I
think
that
one
yeah
on
this
it
says
1456,
keystone,
ridge,
hunt
original
permit
actual
doc,
not
constructed
as
such,
see
below.
I
just
didn't
hear
you
mention
that,
and
could
I
just
get
clarification
on
what
that
was
to
mean.
H
I
I
A
B
Yes,
so
I
I
believe,
mr
hunt,
so
what
we'll
do
is
there
will
be
a
point
in
the
evening
where
we
can
have
others
such
as
yourself
come
up
and
present
and
at
that
time
just
make
sure
that
you
have
been
sworn
in
if
you
haven't
already
okay
yeah.
So
so
we
certainly
will
be
addressing
that
at
that
point.
So,
right
now
we're
going
through
the
process
where
the
applicant
is
making
their
presentation
and
we're
asking
questions.
B
D
Thank
you.
I'm
still
need
some
clarification,
because
I
have
a
letter
that
states
there's
a
doc
present
there
and
from
the
aerial
views
it
shows
a
doc
there.
So
I
need
to
clarify
first
before
we
go
any
further:
whether
there
is
a
dock
there
or
not,.
D
D
H
I
think
she's,
referring
to
the
fact
that
the
terminus
of
the
lot
nine
doc
crosses
the
extended
property
line.
So
and
I
don't
want
to
step
on
miss
kings.
This
might
be
better
answered
by
her,
but
the
doc
code
prescribes
the
instant
parcel
and
when
the
doc's
leaving
the
instant
parcel
and
where
it
should
ends
up,
your
doc
should
end
up
within
the
extended
property
lines
of
the
parcel
which
is
what's
shown.
H
H
H
D
It's
it's.
You
know
what
it
is.
We
have
information
from
staff,
we
have
information
from
you,
we
have
information
from
other
owners
and
it
kind
of
I
I
need
to
still
set
up
clarity
before
we
even
could
get
into
it.
Just
it
makes
it
a
little
bit
of
a
mishmash
so.
A
G
If
I
can
just
interject
to
provide
maybe
a
little
bit
of
clarity,
you
can't
the
aerial
is
very
confusing
and
misleading.
That's
why
this
survey
is
really
important.
There
is
not
an
existing
dock
on
the
tomlins
property
or
for
the
tomlins
property
aerials.
Sometimes,
and
property
line
layers
are
not
exactly
lined
up,
so
they'll
look
skewed,
which
is
what
you're
seeing
here,
but
for
clarification.
There
is
no
doc
on
the
tomlins
property.
That's
what
they're
requesting
to
build
one
there
now.
C
And
if
I
may
mike
and
chair
my
question
earlier-
and
it's
even
more
blatant
now
is,
there
seems
to
be
these
docks
that
we're
talking
about
are
extremely
close
together,
but
the
distance
between
the
wolf
dock,
the
northern
dock
and
then
the
very
next
dock
is
way
way
far
away.
Now.
Is
that
just
because
of
this
aerial
view
I
mean
that's
the
greatest
distance
on
this
entire
picture
is
between
the
wolf
dock
and
this
little
tiny
one
way
way
north
of
it.
Why.
G
And
if
you
see
it's
kind
of
hard
to
see,
but
the
property
line
for
mrs
wolf's
property
is
that
entire
distance,
so
she
has
a
dock,
it's
just
towards
the
south.
Typically,
the
code
requires
a
dock
to
be
constructed
within
the
center
one.
Third,
so
you
take
the
waterfront
frontage
divide
it
by
three.
That
gives
you
that
footprint.
That
isn't
always
the
case
where
you
can
get
sign
off
from
neighbors
at
the
time
it's
being
permitted
that
can
allow
it
to
be
adjusted.
G
I
don't
know
the
permitting
history
of
that
dock,
so
I
don't
know
the
distances
or
whatnot,
but
that's
why
sometimes
you'll
see
it
not
necessarily
in
the
exact
center.
C
F
B
And
I
believe
we
were
still
having
mr
eisner.
D
Presenter,
thank
you
chair.
Certainly.
My
second
question
correct
me:
if
I'm
wrong,
did
you
say
you
were
now
only
looking
to
build
a
dock
and
not
a
boat
lift,
so
this
has
changed.
H
D
Okay,
that's
very
different.
Do
we
have
to
amend
this.
B
And
can
we
get
clarification,
then,
on
that
verbal
amendment,
which
I
believe
you
had
stated,
there
were
amendments
that
were
increasing
the
distance
between
the
hunt,
dock
and
the
wolf
property
line
step
in
every
time
anytime.
I'm
saying
something
incorrect
here,
as
well
as
the
removal
of
the
lift.
B
The
the
large
that
was
just
passed
out
to
us
yeah.
D
So
my
next
question
would
be:
do
you
know
the
depths
of
the
water
that,
because
that
hasn't
been
made
aware
of
for
any
of
us
at
what
point
and
why
I
asked
that
question.
So
you
understand
where
I'm
going
with
this
we're
kind
of
limited
to
the
size
of
the
property
according
to
how
far
out
the
dock
could
be,
and
it's
fine
and
dandy
that
the
other
docks
are
out
whatever
45
feet
50
feet.
D
B
Rolling
down
the
line
and
circle
back
again,
mr
boris,
not
at
this
time
mr
orbowski.
H
K
Good
evening,
yes,
so
I
just
wanted
to.
K
My
name
is
anthony
price
address.
3051
autumn
drive
palm
arbor
florida
34683,
I'm
with
price
spring
construction.
Thank
you,
and
so
basically,
when
we
started
out
on
this
road,
we
had
a
pretty
elaborate
dock
design
in
the
beginning,
with
boat
lifts,
pretty
good
sized
dock,
and
then
once
we
started
digging
to
start
doing
drawings,
we
realized
that
space
that
we
had
was
very
minor,
not
a
lot
of
room
for
what
we
wanted
to
do.
K
So
once
we
started
working
going
through
this
design,
it
was
just
really
difficult
to
find
a
way
to
make
a
dock
boat,
lift
roof
everything
fit
into
the
area
we
had.
So
we
started
scaling
back
things:
pull
the
roof
off,
try
to
design
the
dock,
to
where
we
could
still
put
it
on
the
property
not
impede
on
mr
hunt's
navigation
not
deal
with
mrs
wolf's
navigation
and
still
give
him
a
workable
boat,
lift
that
he
could
come
into
and
not
disrupt
anybody.
K
K
K
I
didn't
pull
the
tarpon
springs
permit,
but
I'm
sure
there's
one
for
tarpon,
so
caitlyn
back
on
12
720
approved
this
drawing,
and
you
know
they
were
allowed
to
construct
the
extension
to
the
dock
and
and
build
their
roof
and
and
with
the
with
the
idea
that
it
was
10
foot
off
the
property
line.
So
when
we
first
started
going
through
this,
we
thought.
Oh,
we've
got
10
foot
from
the
property
line
from
his
dock.
We're
going
to
be
really
far
away
well,
once
everything
started
going
through.
K
We
realized
that
his
dock
crossed
over
so
mr
tomlin
and
I
decided
to
remove
the
boat
lift
so
that
we
could
give
some
space
to
mr
hunt
so
that
his
dock
wasn't
going
to
be
right
on
his
walk
out,
since
it
is
just
a
dock.
It's
the
water
depth.
At
the
end
of
the
docks
three
feet.
Deep,
the
water's
edge
goes
from
one
to
two
to
three.
So
within
10
to
20
feet,
it
gains
a
foot.
So
he's
got
three
feet
of
water
at
the
end
of
the
dock.
K
You
know,
I,
I
think,
he's
being
reasonable
with
with
where
we're
putting
the
dock,
how
small
it
is
it's
not
going
to
impede
on
any
visual
sites.
Mr
hunt
and
mr
tomlin's
houses
are
pretty
high
on
grade.
K
So
if
you
were
to
look
out
you're
pretty
much
going
to
see
mr
hunt's
roof
bow
lift
dock
and
mr
tomlins
is
going
to
be
in
front
of
it
closer
to
the
shoreline
where
the
big
trees
are.
I
mean
pretty
much
the
only
way
you'll
see
his
dock
is.
If
you
walk
down
the
walkway
of
mr
hunt's
walkway,
miss
wolf's
property
is
full
of
foliage,
so
it
would
be
pretty
hard
for
her
to
see
it
as
well,
unless
she's
out
towards
her
dock
area.
K
So
we
were
hoping
that,
with
the
concessions
that
we
were
making,
we
would
try
to
help
everybody
and
everybody
and
try
to
make
everyone
happy.
But
then
we
received
the
letter
that
the
hunts
didn't
want
to
sign
off
on
the
property.
So
now
we're
we're
where
we're
at
now
with
trying
to
get
a
variance
for
this.
B
K
Correct
so
we'll
prob,
if
the
water
height
is
three
foot
high,
we'll
probably
be
a
couple
feet
higher
than
that
with
top
of
dock,
so
that
our
framing
is
out
of
the
water
so
that
it
doesn't,
the
water
doesn't
rot
out
any
framing
materials.
K
K
I
would
imagine
top
of
dock
from
from
ground
level
would
be
three
to
four
feet,
but
once
it's
out
in
the
water,
it's
not
going
to
be
any
taller
railing
height,
won't
be
any
higher
than
what
mr
hunts
is
to
try
and
keep
with
the
uniformity
of
the
docks
that
are
already
in
place.
K
B
K
B
K
B
As
noted,
I
believe
in
one
of
the
earlier
powerpoint
slides,
probably
about
number
12
ish
okay,
so
so
I
don't
want
to
monopolize
this
if
we
have
any
questions
of
the
board
if
we
want
to
maybe
start
at
the
other
end,
mr
boris,
any
questions,
no,
I
don't
understand
what.
C
C
But
if
you
were
held
to
the
letter
of
the
law,
it
would
not
be
adequate,
it
would
be.
I'm.
D
K
So
right,
right
there
is,
is
land,
so
we've
got
zero
feet
there.
Then
we
went
out
ten.
We
got
about
a
foot
twenty
about
a
foot
and
a
half
two
feet
three
feet
right
in
here
three
feet,
but
we,
but
we
measured
so
we
met.
We
walked
along
here
closer
to
his
dock,
because
there
was
more
like
ground
area
here.
So
we
didn't.
Actually
we
didn't
walk
exactly
right
here,
but
we
were
like
within
six
feet
of
it,
but
that's
the
that's
the
depths
we
were
getting
through
here.
K
K
B
To
here,
no
sir,
from
there
to
there,
yes,
sir.
B
K
K
Draw
a
straight
line
here:
do
they
take
it
from
here?
Do
they
say
your
doc
can
go
beat
this
point,
then
it
has
to
follow
this
funky
shape.
It's
all.
You
know
julie
from
wonder
nap
if,
if
she
was
in
a
good
mood,
she'd
say
one
thing
but
yeah,
that's
what
we're
asking
for
is
55
feet
which,
which
helps
I
mean
you
know,
for
a
boat.
We
needed
it
to
if
to
put
a
lift
in
with
putting
it
all
on
the
on
the
property
lines.
K
J
K
E
Quick
question:
if
the
duck
for
lot
nine
was
within
the
southwestern
boundary
line
on
this
one
that
you
have
here,
yes,
and
it
wasn't
encroaching
on
lot
number
nine,
as
the
extension
is
presented,
would
that
have
given
you
any
more
room
to
go
out
further.
E
B
Okay-
and
I
I
do
have
a
question-
there
was
a
notation
here
that
these
docs
price
slide.
B
K
H
This
is
the
site
plan
that
was
approved.
That
shows
each
of
them,
but
the
county
through
its
water
and
navigation
system,
requires
you
to
permit
one
dock
per
one
person
correct.
So
there
are
five
permits
that
were
issued
for
five
of
the
six
docs,
so
this
lot
was
the
only
one
where
a
permit
was
not
submitted.
So
it
was.
The
site
plan
approved
the
dock
configuration
here,
but
it
did
not
receive
a
water
nav
permit.
K
I'm
only
guessing
that
the
miss
wolf
from
what,
from
the
little
bit
we've
talked
she's,
very
nice,
very
sweet.
I
think
there
was
some
issues
with
maybe
the
developer
at
the
time,
and
maybe
the
developer
couldn't
put
the
doc
in
without
her
signature.
Maybe
even
then
I'm
not
I'm
only
speculating.
I
don't
know.
D
Well,
I
asked
the
question
because
we
have
a
a
letter
here
that
says
from
the
hunts
that
it
was
never
intended
to
be
a
you
know,
a
dock
there
that
it
was
not.
So
I
mean
that's
why
I'm
asking
the
question
we
can
go
to
the
public
if.
D
K
B
K
B
So
if
we
could-
because
I
believe
we
do
have
people
present
here
who
can
help
address
some
of
these
questions
and
concerns
in
addition
to
what
they
presented
in
writing.
So
if
you
have
not,
if
you
want
to
speak
on
this
application
and
have
not
yet
been
sworn
in,
if
you
can,
please
stand
and
raise
your
right
hand,
and
the
attorney
can
swear
you
in
sort.
B
Thank
you
all
right,
so
if
either
of
you,
I
don't
know
who
wants
to
go
first.
B
Thank
you
miss
wolfe,
so
we
do
have
the
the
emails
that
you
have
submitted,
but
we
wanted
to
give
you
an
opportunity
to
to
address
any
concerns
you
may
have
with
this
application
and
also
for
the
the
board
to
ask
questions.
If
you
may.
J
Okay,
first
have
to
confess
that
public
speaking
is
not
my
forte
and
I
am
shaking
and
I'll
do
the
best
I
can
to
be
coherent.
J
J
J
J
I
I
There's
some
additional
room
put
between
the
dock
and
your
property
is.
Is
that
something
that
you're
comfortable
with
the
new
plans?
Have
you
seen
as
presented
tonight.
E
J
J
I
don't
think
I
said
obstructing
my
view.
I
said
it
will
be
in
my
view,
but
so
a
deck
is
something
that
you
don't
like
to
see
there.
I
I'd
like
to
address
you,
wouldn't
it
make
more
sense
to
be
able
to
build
a
nice
sized
dock
where
it
belongs
right
now,
my
waterfront,
I
didn't
get
out
there
to
take
a
picture
today,
because
I
wanted
someone
else
with
me
because
I'm
afraid
of
alligators,
but
it
is
washing
out
from
the
boat
traffic.
J
That's
now
there
underneath
the
edge
of
my
property
so
that
I'm
afraid
to
walk
on
the
last
couple
feet
of
land,
because
I'm
not
sure
how
far
in
it
goes
when
the
water
was
down
a
while
back.
It
looked
like
it
was
pretty
far
under
there.
So
anything
that
encourages
more
boats
to
be
pulling
in
and
out
of,
there
will
only
make
that
situation
worse.
D
F
A
J
D
Your
letter
that
you
wrote
your
email,
it
says
that
there
is
a
doc
at
tomlinson's.
Is
there
a
doc
there.
J
J
D
Let
me
rephrase
that,
are
you
saying
that
the
hunts
dock
is
on
the
tomlinson's
property
line?
Yes,.
D
J
J
D
D
Know
I
understand
that,
but
it
that's
what's
making
the
issue
right
now
or
at
least
making
the
issue
for
us
it's
making
it
a
hard
decision
for
us,
because
everybody
should
have
an
equal
share,
whether
they
you
know
to
be
able
to
use
their
boat.
That's
the
only
question,
I'm
saying
so.
When
I
look
at
yours,
your
property
and
your
dock,
I
don't
think
it
could
be
any
further
north
than
it
is
it's
on
the
northern.
The
most
northern
part
of
your.
L
J
I'm
not
sure
what
you're
looking
at,
because
my
dock.
When
I
look
out
from
the
center
of
my
house,
I
see
my
dock
where
I
enter.
The
dock
is
about
10
foot
in
from
the
property
line,
maybe
even
more,
but
it's
certainly
not
right
up
against
the
property
line,
but
the
the
dock.
D
See
what
happens
is
a
lot
of
these
lines.
They're
all
there's
no
organization
to
these
property
lines,
they're
about
as
crooked
as
could
be,
and
you
know
things
are
built
at
different
times.
I
mean
I
I'm
listening
to
your
neighbor.
Explain
that
they're
willing
to
remove
part
of
the
dock,
but
you're
you're
kind
of
saying
that
they
shouldn't
have
any
any
dock
to
use
or
they
should
use
their
neighbor's
dock.
J
I'm
saying
that
they
should
negotiate
with
the
neighbor
to
build
a
dock
like
they
want
in
between
the
two
houses
take
over
the
neighbor's
dock.
Let
him
have
that
dock.
I
don't
know
I'm
not
a
lawyer
right,
but
I
don't
know
that
he
should
be
able
to
impinge
upon
my
future
use
of
my
property
by
putting
something
right
up
against
my
property.
B
Something
that
I,
if
I
may
ask
this,
might
be
a
question
for
ms
keane,
the
walkway
of
the
proposed
dock.
You
know
coming
from
the
home
down
to
the
property
so
that
that
walkway
itself
can
we
get
clarification
either
from
miss
keene
or
maybe
the
applicant
as
to
where
that
sits
on
that
22
foot
of
property.
How
far
is
that
from
the
northern
edge,
which.
G
G
G
J
B
J
B
G
I'll
just
highlight
this
corner
here
with
the
original
proposal.
It
was
this
corner
to
the
extended
property
line.
Was
one
foot
with
the
revision?
It's
now
four
feet
from
this
corner
to
the
extended
property
line,
this
piece
here,
the
walkway-
it
has
not
changed,
but
this
is
the
distance
that
changed
if
that
helps,
provide
a
little
clarity.
B
J
B
B
Like
it
as
as
it
is,
when
you
look
at
the
survey,
that
is
the
hunt's
property,
even
though
it's
it's
it's,
the
eyes
can
be
deceiving.
J
F
F
B
F
H
L
Tomlin
1460,
keystone
ridge
circle
tarpon
springs.
Thank
you.
So
a
lot
of
information
tonight
and
I
have
this-
has
become
a
part-time
job.
It's
I've
learned
a
lot.
It's
it's!
It's
definitely
interesting.
I
I
work
for
a
a
corrections
company.
I
have
built
prisons
with
less
hoops
to
go
through
it.
It's
a
very
interesting
process,
but
thank
you
for
your
time
and
consideration.
L
We
we
purchased
this
property
with
the
understanding
or
the
hope
that
we
had.
You
know
lake
access
during
our
first
submission.
It
was
pointed
out
to
us
that
yeah
you
may
have
access,
but
there
are
guidelines
that
that
provide
what
that
access
looks
like
the
version
you
have
in
front
of
you
now
is
the
fifth
survey
that
I
have
commissioned.
We
have
had
boat
lifts
on
the
north
on
the
south
on
the
east.
We
now
have
it
without
boat
lifts.
We
we've
tried
everything
possible
to
make
this
amenable
to
the
neighbors.
L
Miss
wolf
to
her
credit,
has
been
communicative
open.
When
mr
price
was
over
doing
one
of
the
layouts,
I
mean
we
stood
out
there
and
talked
for
a
while.
It's
it's
been
a
process
where
okay,
I
was
always
raised
to
be
neighborly,
and
I
I
think
I've
given
a
lot
back
on
this,
not
that
I
was
entitled
to
any
of
the
things
that
I
gave
back,
but
they
were
requests.
L
You
wouldn't
fit
two
adirondacks,
because
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
walk
around
them,
so
we're
trying
to
figure
that
out
to
mr
hunt's
defense-
and
I
don't
know
this
for
sure
he
I
mean
he
can
certainly
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
when
he
purchased
the
property
part
of
that
walkway.
Was
there
his
whatever
he
added
with
that
additional
piece
that
was
signed
off
by
the
previous
owners
to
my
property
was
built
by
the
previous
owner
to
his
property?
Is
my
understanding
that
that's
from
the
the
two
young,
ladies
that
we
purchased
from
again?
L
I
don't
have
that
in
writing
in
front
of
me,
but
that's
what
I
understand.
Does
he
cross
over
into
the
riparian
rights?
Yes,
every
drawing
says
so,
which
is
why
I
have
dropped
back,
which
is
why
I
have
now
eliminated.
I
mean
you
bought
this
house
to
get
a
boat
and
and
to
be
on
the
water.
I
I'm
now
relegated
to
kayaks
and
paddle
boards
in
a
lake
that,
as
miss
wolfe
pointed
out,
is
gator
friendly.
So
that's
I'm
not
beat,
but
but
that's
that's
that's
what
we're
trying
to
do.
L
I
mean
we're
really
trying
to
make
sure
that
that
we
take
everybody's
into
consideration
that
we
are,
I
mean,
we've
cleared
some
land.
I
I've
done
everything
that
I
could
to
comply.
I
brought
in
an
eco-friendly
arborist.
I
worked
with
the
city's
arborist
to
remove
trees.
We
didn't
use
fossil
fuels,
we
used,
you
know
peanut
oils
and
biodegradable
stuff
to
cut
down
trees.
We've
we've
been
very
careful
about
everything.
L
I
guess
mr
hunt's
wife
girlfriend
I
I
don't
know
who
miss
malatin
is
that
I
was
going
to
obstruct
their
view
to
the
lake
when
his
entire
dock
is
built.
In
my
riparian
rights
was
almost
laughable,
so
I
I
just
I
I've
got
to
say
that
out
loud
because
it's
not
at
me
since
I
read
it,
but.
B
And
we
understand
and
that's
where,
like
as
the
attorney
said,
you
know
we're
here
to
look
at
your
application
and
I
do
appreciate
and
and
respect
your
attention
to
detail
of
trying
to
you
know
be
neighborly
and
and
utilize.
Your
your
thanks
and
appreciate
your
the
application
that
you
presented
where
you
are
explaining
the
modifications
you've
made
today.
L
There
is
a
tree
line
and
a
shed
that
miss
wolf
has
that
will
shield
her
from
seeing
that
that
that
walkway
out,
we
have
stepped
back
off
of
mr
hunt's
walkway,
even
where
it
crosses
over
into
my
riparian
rights
to
make
sure
that
he
has
sufficient
room.
We
had
initially
put
a
boat
lift.
Next
to
his,
we
moved
it.
We
put
it
on
the
other
side
with
miss
wolves
knew
that
we
were
too
close
to
her
line,
tried
putting
it
out
on
the
point
and
really
to
today
I
I
called
the
surveyor.
L
We
had
a
conversation
at
6
30
this
morning
and
I
said
to
me,
if
ever
just
redraw,
this
take
out
all
boat
lifts.
Give
me
somewhere
to
sit,
give
me
somewhere
to
launch
a
kayak.
Let
me
have
access
to
the
water,
let's
just
get
peace
in
the
valley
and
try
and
get
something
done,
and
that
that
that
was
the
goal
for
tonight
I
mean:
that's,
that's
really
what
I've
tried
to
do.
You
know
I.
L
Exactly
I'm
not
concerned
with
ours,
so
you
know
I
I
think
the
length,
I'm
sure
if
you
look
the
oddly
shaped
triangle
that
point
there
are
two
large
trees
on
that
point.
If
I
only
came
out
the
11
feet
that
I'm
allowed,
I
would
be
butting
up
against
the
trees.
I
wouldn't
be
center
one
third
anyway,
because
I'd
be
cheating
because
of
the
the
odd-shaped
triangle
there
and
we'd
only
be
at
a
foot
water
depth.
L
So
you
know
the
reason
we
came
out
to
where
we
did
was
to
try
and
have
water
depth.
The
original
length
of
that
was
the
hopes
for
a
boat
dock.
You
know
we
we've
now
said:
okay,
let's
just
get
something
approved
so
that
we
can
have
access
to
this
somewhere
going
forward
and
that
that
that's
really
the
goal.
I
mean,
I'm
not
I'm
not.
Holding
again
like.
I
said
what
happened
with
mr
huntstock
prior
to
him
and
with
his
extension
and
where
that
crosses
over
I'm
not
taking
that
on
here.
L
Right
it's
there
and
you
know
a
shared
dock.
I
mean
at
some
point.
I
assume
we'll
have
to
draw
something
up
because-
and
I
don't
know
this
for
a
fact-
I
haven't
asked
the
attorney
yet,
but
if
his
doc
and
his
boat
are
on
my
riparian
rights,
do
I
have
any
any
responsibility.
Should
something
happen
and.
L
Else
for
another
day
in
another
group,
so
you
know
look,
I
I've
tried
to
be
neighborly,
I've
tried
to
be
eco-friendly
and,
and
I've
tried
to
be
compliant
with
the
county.
I've
I've
amended
this
and
moved
this
to
to
do
whatever
I
could
to
make
this.
You
know
something
where,
when
my
kids
come
home
from
college,
they
can
go
out
and
you
know
we
can
paddle
around.
I
was
looking
forward
to
going
out
and
waterboarding
with
them.
That's
not
going
to
happen
on
lake
tarpon.
B
D
L
D
It's
just
it's
not
easy,
because
there
were
preliminary
docs
built
whenever
you
have
an
inside
corner
like
this,
where
you
have
lines
overlapping
we've
had
these
before,
where
you
know
a
situation
where
you
just
sometimes
have
to
bend
the
the
the
rule
in
order
to
accommodate
you
know
it's
not
a
thing
of
beauty
or
we
we
can't
have
we
don't
vote
on
blocking
views
or
anything
like
that.
It's
is
it
feasible.
Is
it
not
feasible
to
give
you
use
of
your?
You
know
your
water
rights
right.
H
H
So
I
I
think,
interestingly
enough,
your
questions
and
even
mrs
wolf's
testimony
go
straight
to
the
core
of
the
criteria
in
your
code.
Is
this
a
unique
property?
Is
it
different
than
other
properties
in
the
zoning
district?
H
Would
it
deny
the
reasonable
use
of
the
property
as
compared
to
other
properties
in
the
zoning
district,
if
it
weren't
granted?
Those
are
the
criteria
in
the
code
and
in
each
of
the
testimony
before
you,
with
the
exception
of
the
original
staff
report,
speaks
to
why
those
criteria
are
met
through
this
application.
H
H
This
owner
has
sought
a
doc
he's
reduced
the
scope
of
his
request
significantly
to
be
the
minimum
request
necessary
for
the
reasonable
use
of
his
access
to
the
water
and
and
how
he
can
navigate
the
existence
of
the
hunt
doc
while
not
before
you
today
certainly
complicates
the
matter
and
creates
another
reason
why
the
setbacks
it
kind
of
is
what
it
is
it
creates.
You
know
you
can
see
why
this
is
such
a
unique
situation
with
a
very
narrow
lot
with
a
doc
and
miss
wolfstock.
H
We
just
checked
the
permit
not
as
built,
but
the
permit
from
1999
when
the
dock
was
rebuilt,
is
21
feet
from
her
property
line
from
the
south
property
line,
the
edge
of
the
dock
so,
and
that
was
without
that
was
the
boardwalk,
not
the
boat
left
there.
G
So,
no,
I
don't
have
any
official
addendums
to
staff
report.
As
you
know,
when
we
prepare
these,
we
prepare
them
based
off
the
materials
that
are
available
at
that
time.
There
is
opportunity,
like
the
applicant,
did
tonight
to
revise
that
and
provide
that
evidence
at
the
hearing.
G
What
I
will
say
is
you
know.
Part
of
our
findings
were
basically
stating
that,
yes,
you
know
reasonable
use
of
a
waterfront
property
is
to
take
advantage
of
the
waterfront.
However,
staff
did
believe
that
it
could
be
reduced
in
size
in
order
to
be
maybe
just
an
observation.
Deck
remove
a
boat
lift,
so
those
were
suggestions
for
from
staff
the
time,
but
I
won't
necessarily
amend
it
to
have
a
recommendation
just
because
we
haven't
done
our
full
analysis.
G
Yes,
but
I
haven't
done,
I
haven't
done
the
full
report
and
analysis
from
a
staff
perspective,
but
no
I
I
won't
rattle
off
new
findings
for
the
hearing.
So,
like
I
said,
we
prepare
our
staff
report
based
off
the
materials
available
at
the
time
of
the
application,
but
once
the
applicant
receives
the
recommendation,
they
have
the
opportunity
to
make
any
sort
of
amendments
within
the
confines
of
the
variance
request
to
to
work
with
the
board.
So
that's
what
they
chose
to
do.
B
D
I'm
happy
to
open
this
up.
I
just
feel
that
it's
it's
everybody's
right
to
have
access
as
far
as
to
have
a
lookout.
Point
is
nice,
but
you
know
you:
you
have
to
have
access
for
to
be
fair
to
everybody
else
that
has
a
boat
access.
I
don't
know
how
these
other
docks
got
there.
D
We
we
have
a
lot
of
people
that
build
things
and
then
add
things
on
afterwards
that
we,
you
know
that
we
don't
know,
and
we
don't
know
whether
they
took
out
a
permit
for
it
or
not,
but
that
shouldn't
stop
this
applicant
from
having
use
of
of
his
right.
So
that's
what
I'd
like
to
say.
E
I'd
like
to
add
a
comment,
mr
verse.
The
existence
of
the
board
of
adjustments
is
exactly
for
situations
like
this
and
what
mr
eisner
said.
Things
are
built
in
the
past.
They
have
been
missed,
for
whatever
reason
computer
was
down,
nobody
picked
it
up
whatever
the
case
was
so
we
are
at
this
point
now.
E
E
C
B
B
Is
there
are
peculiarities
with
the
way
things
are,
are
platted
and
are
are
laid
out
and
circumstances
that
happen
with
adjoining
properties
such
as
you
know
how
mr
hunt's
deck
doc
became?
You
know
came
to
be
that
are
beyond
the
control
of
the
applicant
and
the
purview
of
this
board,
and
I
respect
and
appreciate
the
applicant's
efforts
and
willingness
to
make
this,
as
least
obtrusive
as
possible,
with,
while
still
maintaining
exercising
his
rights
to
access
the
property
on
the
water.
B
Yes,
yes,
because
thank
you.
Thank
you.
I've
even
written
that
down
mr
ibowski,
you
made
the
original
motion.
Would
that
be
the
motion
as
amended,
which
is
to
grant
the
variance
with
the
55
foot
length
that.
A
E
C
C
B
G
G
I
may
have
also
put
on
my
calendar
incorrectly,
so
let's
just
take
a
step
back.
Okay,
yes,
the
march
meeting
day
is
march
30th.
B
It
is
okay,
okay,
all
right!
Well,
thank
you
for
that
clarification
and
bringing
that
up.
Mr
boris,
okay,
so
the
next
item,
we
have
approval
of
minutes.
We
have
three
sets
of
minutes
our
october
20th
ones,
which
we
had
deferred
because
I
remember
there
was
a
correction.
Miss
rich
wisely
brought
up
regarding
mr
urbowsky's
presence
or
not,
and
the
december
15th
and
the
january
26th.
If
we
wanted
to
have
an
approval,
a
motion
to
approve
or
deny
as
a
group
or
if
you
want
to
separate
any
out.
B
D
C
E
B
G
Stole
my
thunder
no
so
one
I
just
wanted
to
thank
everyone
that
was
able
to
join
us
at
our
comprehensive
plan
workshop
that
we
had.
Oh,
I
don't
know
it
feels
like
an
eternity
ago
now,
but
I
just
want
to
thank
you
guys
for
participating
and
we'll
keep
you
up
to
date
on
any
future
participation
that
we'll
have
for
that
project,
and
I
know
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting
we
introduced
you
to
caroline
lanford,
but
I
wanted
to
publicly
introduce
her
to
the
board
she's
our
new-ish
planner.
G
C
Well,
I
do.
I
have
actually
a
couple
of
questions,
so
we
just
had
an
election
and
we're
having
an
election.
So
it's
like
we're
rotating
the
the
furniture
on
the
titanic
over
here.
So
assuming
our
two
new
president,
our
chair
and
vice
chair,
get
elected
to
the
commission.
C
G
So
correct
me:
if
I'm
wrong,
so
the
clerk's
office
is
the
one
that's
in
charge
of
going
through
the
appointments
and
the
boards
and
everything
like
that.
But
we
do
have
miss
simon
as
an
alternate
that
would
give
us
four
members.
So
we
could
theoretically
conduct
a
meeting
with
my
correct.
We
would
have
a
quorum
quorum.
G
So
if
everyone,
if,
if
the
three
viewer
and
present
and
as
well
as
simon,
we
could
conduct
a
hearing,
but
yes,
we
would
have
to
get
new
members.
G
We
would
probably
have
to
do
the
election
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting,
because
we
wouldn't
have
anyone
to
share
it.
I
don't
know
how
that
would
work.
That's.
B
All
right,
caroline,
welcome,
delayed,
welcome
and
thank
you
all
so
much
for
all
of
the
hard
work
that
y'all
are
doing
on
these
community
forums
and
the
first
fridays.
I
know
you're
sacrificing
a
lot
of
your
nights
and
weekend
times
to
engage
the
community,
and
please
know
it
does
not
go
unnoticed.
It's
greatly
appreciated
and
who
would
have
thought
that
the
you
know
pnz
department
would
be
so
creative
and
energetic
I
mean
y'all
are
out
there
just
really
having
fun
with
folks
and
people
are
enjoying
it.
So.
C
G
C
G
So
as
as
it
was
noted
by
the
applicant,
they
had
the
site
plan.
Approval
that
assumed
a
doc
would
be
on
each
of
the
properties
that
had
water
frontage,
but
you
have
to
just
like.
If
you
plot
lots
and
you
build
your
house,
you
still
have
to
get
a
separate
permit
for
the
individual
house,
regardless
of
we
knew.
There
was
gonna,
be
a
house
there,
so
you'd
have
to
get
permits
individually.
For
that,
so
it
would
be
reviewed.
G
All
dock
permits
go
to,
city,
determined,
springs
for
review
and
then
they're
also
general
pinellas
county
pinellas
county
has
jurisdiction
over
the
waterway.
They
specifically
do
look
at
waterway
navigation
a
lot
of
times
we'll
get
revisions
say
we
approve
a
permit.
It
meets
our
code,
but
sometimes
we'll
get
bumped
back
by
the
county,
saying
nope.
It
needs
to
be
in
a
different
spot
because
you
can't
navigate
the
water.
G
So
I
would
assume
that
if
they
had
proposed
a
boat
or
a
dock,
that
was
you
know,
11
feet
at
length
and
it
wasn't
deep
enough
and
they
had
a
boat
lift.
The
county
would
probably
be
like
this
doesn't
make
sense.
I
don't
think
that
that
means
that
they
have
to
go
dredge.
I
think
that
they
would
be
like
you
need
to
get
a
variance.
I.