►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board December 14, 2017
Description
Description
C
D
E
A
I
will
now
read
the
the
board
hearing
procedure.
It
is
the
intent
it
is.
The
intention
of
this
board
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
the
citizens
of
Tarpon
Springs
by
providing
an
equitable,
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
various
codes
within
the
city
of
tarpon
springs.
Any
agreed
party
may
appeal
a
final
administrative
order
by
this
board
to
the
circuit
court.
Such
appeal
shall
be
filed
within
30
days
of
the
execution
of
the
order
to
be
appealed.
A
Florida
statute
to
86.0
1:05
requires
any
party
appealing
a
decision
of
this
board
to
have
a
record
of
the
proceedings
to
support
such
an
appeal.
The
procedure
of
this
board
is
as
follows.
First,
the
city
presents
its
witnesses
and
exhibits
exhibits,
after
which
the
alleged
lehder
is
able
to
ask
the
city's
witnesses
any
specific
questions
regarding
their
testimony.
Secondly,
the
alleged
violator
is
allowed
to
make
a
presentation
and
present
his
or
her
witnesses
and
exhibits.
A
Then
the
city
can
question
the
alleged
violators
witnesses
after
both
rounds
of
testimony
both
on
the
part
of
the
city
and
the
part
of
the
alleged
violator.
Each
party
is
asked
to
give
a
closing
argument
first
by
the
city
and
then
by
the
alleged
violator
after
those
three
steps
are
taken.
This
board
will
close
the
public
hearing
portion
of
the
case
to
discuss
it
and
take
appropriate
action.
A
A
E
E
E
A
E
E
A
F
Is
an
affidavit
and
on
compliance
and
there's
also
an
affidavit
of
compliance
being
followed
up
on
this,
so
on
the
date
prescribed
by
the
board.
He
was
not
in
compliance
Irene
spected
a
couple
days
later
and
he
was
in
compliance
and
that
affidavit
will
be
submitted
before
the
board
here
in
the
next
set
of
business.
H
F
H
F
G
F
H
E
What
you're,
considering
right
now
is
exclusively
non
compliance
officer.
Gaston
has
testified
that
on
the
date
of
mandated
compliance,
the
property
was
not
yet
in
compliance,
and
so
on
this,
the
city
is
asking
for
a
finding
that
the
property
was
not
in
compliance
on
the
date
specified
by
the
board.
F
I
A
E
E
Sir
I'm,
sorry,
sir
just
one
moment
it
is,
it
is
a
process
and
I'm
sure
that's
frustrating,
but
just
to
go
through
the
process.
So
everybody
has
the
same
same
due
process
here.
Officer
Gaston's.
Testimony
is
that
on
the
date
that
there
that
this
boards
previously
ordered
you
be
in
compliance,
you
were
not
in
compliance,
yet
he
has
testified
that
after
that
date,
you
came
into
compliance,
and
so
in
this
hearing,
I
believe
he's
stating
we
both
have
an
affidavit
of
non-compliance
and
an
affidavit
of
compliance.
That
is
the
affidavit
of
compliance
today
or
at.
E
I
I
E
It
sounds
like
you,
don't
have
a
question
for
him
about
what
he
said
at
this
point.
So
at
this
point,
sir,
now
you
can
present
anything.
You
want
this
board
to
hear
about
your
about
your
part
of
your
property,
either
your
properties,
compliance
on
the
date
were
previously
required.
So
now
you
can
say
whatever
you
want
this
board
to
hear.
I
Any
three
buckets
paint
in
the
small
amount
of
shingles
and
the
two
slabs
of
granite
move
it.
How
do
you
know?
I
have
to
move
that
to
the
tip
buck
is
paying
more
at
the
same
thing
same
out,
call
back
Nara
later
you
know
the
lady,
the
Secretary
says
mister,
you
know
he's
not
here
he
was
off
three
o'clock.
I
was
and
then
he
said,
two
ministers
go
get
a
permit
when
I
got
a
permit.
Okay
post
supposed
to
be
per
me,
ni
I
think
there
is
the
permit
right
here.
I
A
F
Quickly,
the
the
board
ordered
November
30th
and
went
out.
He
wasn't
in
compliance.
I
met
with
him
on
the
5th
of
December.
Actually
I
met
with
him
the
day
before
that
I
told
him
what
he
need
to
do:
rien
spectated,
he
was
in
compliance
on
the
5th
December.
That's
going
to
be
the
affidavit
of
compliance
submitted
to
the
board
in
a
little
bit,
so
we
were
basically
out
of
compliance
4
or
5
days.
E
E
I
I
H
Move
based
on
the
testimony
evidence
facts
presented
in
the
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violation,
sections
8,
22,
8,
48-52
and
36
point.
Oh
three
of
the
Code
of
Ordinances
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
was
in
full
force
and
effect
at
the
time
of
the
Notice
of
Violation.
The
respondents
were,
in
violation
of
said,
Code
sections.
A
H
E
The
board
has
found
this
body
has
found
that
you
were
not
in
compliance
on
November
30th,
which
the
dole
board
previously
ordered
you
to
come
in
compliance
by
your
property.
Will
there
is
another
part
of
today's
hearing
where
the
board
is
considering
whether
you
came
into
compliance
a
few
days
later,
but
this
board
has
just
found
that
you
were
not
in
compliance
on
the
date
required
and
so
an
order
will
be
issued
as
to
that
finding.
So
what
you're
telling
me
a.
I
Little
bucket
in
the
first
lap
you
know
granted,
but
to
my
knowledge,
to
anybody
Natalie.
Is
that
what
you
find
me
not
compliant,
which
is
ID
compliant
the
30
the
book
in
the
car?
It
was
the
issue
and
I
moved
it.
The
30
and
I
pulled
the
30,
the
mr.
Gaston's
off
fishing.
The
lady
says,
is
not
available
to
next
week.
Aye
sir.
E
I
E
I
E
A
F
G
H
E
F
K
A
E
A
A
J
E
A
E
I
would
I
would
remind
this
board
that
fine
reductions
are
in
writing
under
Rule
5
section
4.
You
have
written
submission
in
your
packet
materials.
There's
no
need
for
testimony
on
these
and
the
board,
if
you
feel
it
necessary,
then
ask
the
owner
a
question,
but
their
response
should
be
limited
in
scope
to
an
hour,
direct
response
to
the
question
and
no
additional
narrative.
This
is
in
a
situation
for
clarity
again
where
you
have
already
found.
H
A
H
H
E
C
H
E
E
A
E
The
owner
or
applicant
present
today,
okay,
if
you
have
any
questions
of
them,
that
you
can
come
down
to
answer
those
questions,
but
your
anything
you
say
will
be
limited
to
direct
responses
to
questions.
Does
this
board
have
any
questions
for
the
individuals
present
on
behalf
of
the
applicant?
Yes,
okay,
what
that
would
one
of
the
point
or
both
of
you
please
come
down
and.
E
H
H
F
E
Why
we
have
this
phase?
You
cannot
consider
a
reduction
to
fine
until
a
property
is
in
compliance,
so
this
is
purely
they've
come
into
compliance.
A
fine
has
been
assessed.
They've
petitioned
that
the
fine
be
reduced.
You've
moved
did
that
be
that
that
fine
be
changed
from
whatever
it's
specified
amount
to
$0.
If
you
have
any
questions,
if
this
body
has
any
questions
that
will
assist
you
in
voting
on
that
motion,
you
can
certainly
ask.
B
E
A
E
E
A
A
B
K
B
E
A
E
As
we
continue
on
this
I'd
like
to
clarify
this,
is
this
body
has
already
already
voted
not
to
impose
a
fine
on
this
property,
but
you
did
award
prosecution
costs
of
a
hundred
and
sixty
three
dollars
plus
a
satisfaction
fee
of
ten
dollars
at
one
hundred
and
seventy
three
dollars.
This
is
a
bit
unorthodox,
typically
you're,
considering
fine
reductions
in
this
case
they're
asking
you
to
now
waive
the
cost
that
you
vote.
Firm,
ative
lee
voted
to
impose.
E
E
H
E
E
K
E
E
F
H
F
J
E
They're,
if
they're
well,
the
staff
has
passed
that
this
board
consider
imposing
a
new
procedural
requirement.
That
public
comment
be
limited
to
four
minutes
per
speaker.
Is
that
correct,
correct?
Okay,
in
that
case,
it's
now
up
to
this
board
to
consider
whether
or
not
it
wishes
to
do
so.
It
could
change
that.
You
can
change
that
in
your
discussion,
if
you
think
that's
too
little
or
too
much
time,
but
the
staff
from
a
bottom
up,
if
you
will
request,
is
ask
that
you
consider
an
amendment
to
your
procedures.
E
F
Yeah,
it
would
be
the
public
comments.
Section
typically
is
like
we're
entertaining
right
now,
after
the
case
has
been
heard,
it's
not
so
much
limiting,
because
the
board
can
already
limit
the
scope
of
time
during
the
question
and
answer
period
of
the
case
itself.
So
this
is
the
public
comment
part
so.
E
It
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
procedure
when
you
are
in
the
midst
of
considering
a
case.
So
if
someone
for
some
reason
needs
a
lot
or
a
little
bit
of
time
to
present
that
why
they
are
in
compliance
or
why
they
came
into
compliance
when
they
did
that's
not
what
this
is
about.
This
is
just
for
the
open
comments
at
the
end
of
the
meeting
which
we
would
have
just
had
had.
Somebody
spoken
up.
D
J
D
E
You
can
put
rules
of
procedure
for
testimony.
I
would
suggest
that
at
present,
with
the
request
before
you
being
limited
to
public
comment
that
that
be
the
only
issue
you
consider
to
the
extent
the
board
member
was
looking
in
my
direction
as
a
municipal
attorney
represents
multiple
boards.
This
is
whether
or
not
is
enough
is
subjective,
but
I
can
tell
you.
This
is
a
customary
time
limit,
often
placed
on
open
public
comment.
A
G
K
A
E
F
One
other
discussion
item
for
the
board,
which
was
initially
we
had
attempted
to
schedule
some
training,
since
we
do
have
some
new
board
members.
Obviously
we
have
a
new
chairperson
and
we
were
unable
to
this
month
because
mr.
Trask
was
unavailable
so
I'd
like
to
ask
the
board
to
consider
possibly
maybe
adding
a
date
or
some
other
way
of
of
having
a
couple
hours
or
we
can
do
some
training
when
mr.
A
E
E
No,
she
was,
she
was
making
the
distinction
between
a
time
limit
during
open
public
comment
and
a
time
limit
during
a
presentation
of
a
case
in
chief.
So
when
public
comment
is
just
for
the
open,
I
just
want
to
talk
about
something
or
talk
about
an
issue
I
think
you
haven't
considered
today.
The
board
member
is
proposing
that
we
can
set
this
board
is,
is
asking
about
setting
a
discussion
at
some
point
for
discussing
when
somebody's
presenting
their
case,
that
they
can't
go
beyond
a
certain
time
limit?
And
this.
E
I'm
going
to
say
a
few
things
on
that
one:
it
is
not
without
precedent
to
do
that.
However,
given
that
one
I'm,
not
your
typical
board
attorney,
this
is
a
new
issue
presented
today.
I
would
recommend
that
if
you
consider
that
issue,
you
coordinate
with
staff
on
raising
it
at
a
later
meeting,
especially
as
you
consider
the
issue
of
training,
it
may
inform
your
decisions
on
that.
So
that's.
H
F
Just
I
would
need
some
direction
from
the
board
it's
moving
forward.
Would
you
want
to
do
it
during
a
regularly
scheduled
board
meeting,
or
my
suggestion
would
be
is
if
we
can
get
a
consensus,
maybe
an
additional
date,
that's
outside
of
there,
because
our
you
can
see
our
board
meetings
are
fairly
the.
A
A
E
Okay,
so
the
staff
is
simply
asking
that
that
the
general
consensus
seems
to
be
to
have
a
training.
The
only
request
staff
was
making.
That
is
that
it
that
training
happened
at
a
separate
meeting,
a
special
session
for
that
purpose,
so
as
not
to
put
too
much
business
into
one
day
and
to
make
that
the
focal
point
of
the
meeting
staff
has
recommended
that
we
find
an
additional
date
during
one
of
the
months
after
the
new
year
for
staff
to
go
or
for
the
board
and
staff
to
engage
in
that
training.