►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board November 9, 2017
Description
Description
A
B
C
A
A
B
Every
father
sit
down
your
blessing
on
this
meeting
of
the
code
enforcement
board
if
the
board
members
a
clear
sense
of
duty
and
lead
them
to
a
faithful
discharge
of
the
same
jerk
them
in
their
deliberations.
At
this
meeting
so
to
all,
things
may
be
done
to
the
glory
of
the
name
and
the
welfare
of
the
people
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
this
we
pray,
amen,
I,
pledge
allegiance
to
the
flag
of
the
United
States.
B
Remember
that
our
former
chairman,
Karl
Damascus,
was
termed
out
that
was
his
last
meeting
last
month,
and
so
we
need
to
elect
a
new
chairman.
The
vice
chairman
right
now
was
sitting
in
the
seat
handling
the
meeting,
but
as
soon
as
the
chairman
is
appointed,
we'll
change
seats.
So
the
way
this
works
in
it
could
be
a
nomination
from
the
floor
and
once
that
nomination
is
made,
if
there
are
no
other
nominations
there
were,
there
will
be
a
vote
on
that
nomination.
B
C
B
D
B
F
D
A
F
D
B
G
B
B
C
Is
the
intention
of
this
board
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
the
citizens
of
Tarpon
Springs
by
providing
an
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
various
codes
within
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs?
Any
aggrieved
party
may
appeal
a
final
administrative
order
of
this
board
to
the
circuit
court.
Such
appeals
shall
be
filled
within
30
days
of
the
execution
of
the
order
to
be
appealed.
Florida
Statutes
286
that
0
1
0
5
requires
any
party
appealing
a
decision
of
this
board
to
have
a
record
of
proceedings
to
support
such
appeal.
C
The
procedure
of
this
board
is
as
follows:
first,
the
city
its
witnesses
and
exhibits,
after
which
the
the
alleged
violator
is
able
to
ask
the
city's
witnesses
any
specific
questions
regarding
their
testimony.
Secondly,
the
alleged
violator
is
allowed
to
make
a
presentation
and
present
his
or
her
witnesses
and
exhibits.
Then
the
city
can
question
the
alleged
violators
witnesses
after
both
browns
of
testimony
both
on
the
part
of
the
city
and
the
part
of
the
alleged
violator.
C
B
H
I'm
Shannon,
currently
employed
by
the
city
of
Turpan
Springs
I'm,
an
is
a
certified
arborist
license
number
FL,
nine
two
two
one:
a
I'm,
also
an
F
NGO,
a
certified
horticultural
professionals
license
number
eight,
nine,
seven,
eight
four
zero,
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
the
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser,
and
the
tax
collector
databases
all
on
Ovie's
and
n
OHS
are
sent
I'd
return
receipt.
B
H
In
the
roadway
on
the
north
side
of
the
property,
a
large
hollow
limb
and
a
hollow
trunk,
significant
amount
of
limbs
fell
in
the
storm
debris.
The
debris
is
impeding
sidewalk
use
on
the
north
and
east
side
of
the
property.
Trying
to
bury
trees
on
the
south
side
are
falling
apart
and
one
is
leaving
leaning
over
the
fence
into
a
neighbor's
yard.
Tryna
berries
have
weak
wood
and
are
poisonous,
and
any
animal
and
child
who
eats
the
berries
can
go
into
cardiac
arrest.
They
are
currently
on
the
city's
exotic
and
invasive
list.
H
A
large
stump
is
left
from
a
previously
fallen
tree,
which
is
now
trying
to
regrow
on
the
south
side
of
the
property.
A
Chinaberry
behind
it
and
next
to
the
house,
has
soil
weakness
due
to
both
trees
growing
in
each
other's
fruit
plate
hanging
over
the
sidewalk
or
limbs,
which
the
industry
calls
hangers.
These
are
limbs
over.
Two
inches
in
diameter
still
hung
up
in
the
tree
and
are
unable
to
fall
on
their
own
hangers
in
these
trees
are
between
3
and
4
inches
in
diameter.
H
The
hangers
are
roughly
10
feet
above
sidewalk
and
they
could
fall
at
any
time
on
the
north
side
is
a
dead
hollow
tree
that
has
insect
damage.
Severe
structural
damage
has
cracked
at
the
base
and
is
leaning
on
to
another
dead
tree.
These
are
both
next
to
the
sidewalk,
could
easily
snap
at
any
moment
and
could
potentially
fall
on
the
sidewalk.
A
5-foot
tall
stump
from
a
previously
broken
tree,
is
located
on
the
north
side.
H
Next
to
the
sidewalk,
the
structural
integrity
has
been
compromised
by
insect
and
decay
as
a
bonus
of
ball
raised
area,
making
it
even
more
dangerous
to
fetch
grants.
I've
included
pictures
of
a
close-up
of
a
trunk.
This
is
indicative
of
most
of
the
trees
on
the
property.
It
is
difficult
to
see
in
some
pictures
because
of
vines,
small
pepper,
trees
and
suckers
that
are
covering
accounts.
After
making
the
level
one,
visual
inspection
I
concluded
that
all
the
trees
are
hazardous
to
persons
and
property.
H
The
property
is
not
Mayan
city
ordinance,
one
3302
on
10:23
20,
the
no.8
repeat,
violator,
mailed,
certified
first
bus
on
10:28
sign
posted
affidavit
of
posting
sign
on
1106
17
was
the
final
inspection.
The
mail
returned
green
card
at
first
class
and
a
weight
returned
undeliverable
unable
to
forward.
I
H
H
I
A
J
A
B
K
B
Don't
go
on
private
property,
take
trees
down,
so
you
can
go
through
the
process
of
finishing
out
this
and
if
you
feel
the
need-
and
if
there
is
a
request
before
the
city
to
abate
it,
you
can
make
a
recommendation
to
that.
You
can't
order
the
city
to
do
it,
but
let's
finish
the
case
on
the
repeat
violator
first,
so
you
have
them.
You
have
a
four
motion
in
your
red
folder
for
repeat
violations.
B
The
testimony
that
you've
heard
so
far
is
is
that
the
inspection
original
inspection
took
places
of
October
20th
2017,
that's
important
for
you
to
know
for
your
motion.
The
affidavit
of
prosecution
of
cost
has
been
testified,
220
dollars
and
50
cents.
That's
important
for
your
motion
and
also
the
code
violation.
That's
been
cited:
130
3.02,
that's
ortant,
for
your
motion,
since
this
is
a
repeat
violation:
there's
no
need
to
give
them
a
compliance
date.
B
C
E
H
E
L
F
B
A
A
F
B
The
purpose
of
it
is
is
to
force
compliance
once
this
lady
gets
the
order
in
the
mail.
If
you
find
the
violation
she'll
understand
that
that
fine
is
beginning
to
run
at
twenty-five
dollars
a
day
and
will
continue
until
she
brings
it
into
compliance
if
she
fails
to
bring
it
into
compliance.
The
city
after
a
90-day
period
of
time
can
foreclose
that
lien
have
it
put
up
for
judicial
sale,
have
the
property
purchased
by
someone
who
has
an
interest
in
the
property
and
get
it
into
compliance?
B
F
B
Sent
to
who
the
state
requires
the
Senate
to,
and
that
is,
as
the
address
listed
at
the
tax
collectors
office,
and
you
remember
now,
you've
heard
testimony
that
the
taxes
are
being
paid.
So
hopefully
the
tax
bill
and
the
letter
go
to
the
same
place
and
so
hopefully
she'll
understand
the
significance
of
the
code
enforcement.
Lien
and
she'll
do
something
so.
A
B
L
I
G
E
F
F
B
They
both
run
at
the
same
time,
so
you've
got
him
running
on
different
tracks
at
$200
of
these,
so
she,
for
example,
in
the
case
of
2015,
it
was
for
one
oak
tree
in
the
bottom
left
corner
of
the
property.
She
goes
and
cuts
that
tree
down
and
cleans
it
all
up.
She'd
be
in
compliance
with
that
one,
but
the
rest
of
them
did
them
incited
today
for
$200
a
day
that
will
continue
to
run
so
she
can
bring
either
one
of
them
into
compliance,
and
it
could,
you
know,
alter
what
the
dollar
amounts.
D
E
E
E
D
B
Mrs.
Wade
had
a
suggestion,
or
she
had
discussion
relative
to
abating
having
the
city
of
Beit
this
issue.
There
could
be
a
recommendation
made
by
emotion
for
from
this
board,
asked
the
city
to
abate
those,
and
that
may
be
helpful
and
convincing
the
administration,
and
maybe
even
the
City
Commission,
to
authorize
the
abatement.
So
you
can
do
that
under
Chapter
162.
You
have
that
authority
to
make
a
recommendation.
You
cannot
order
the
city
to
do
it.
I
would.
J
C
B
B
I
Officer
Steve
Gaston
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs,
Police,
Department,
Code,
Enforcement
been
so
employed
for
two
years.
This
is
case:
17-8,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
538,
the
property
address
is
131
five
East
Boyer
Street
property
owner
listed
as
a
Jeffrey
Esposito,
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
is
going
to
be.
All
of
my
photographs
include
my
inspections.
Both
the
initials
and
the
finals
that
was
done
today
exhibit
number
two
are
all
of
my
notices,
including
the
Notice
of
Violation,
in
the
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
or
my
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case.
I
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
emails
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
database.
I
Know
just
continue
on
then.
Okay
on
August
26th,
we
received
a
complaint
from
the
city
regarding
the
property
at
1315
he's
Boyer
Street.
My
initial
inspection
was
conducted
on
that
date.
At
the
time
the
lot
was
overgrown.
The
house
is
in
very
poor
conditions,
dilapidated
had
windows,
broken
sides
of
the
roof
were
coming
up,
the
soffits
were
in
bad
shape.
There
were
trees
actually
growing
in
and
out
of
the
structure.
I
On
September
1st
of
this
year
we
mailed
a
Notice
of
Violation
certified
and
first
class
to
the
property
owner
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
Chinon
October
4th.
Basically,
there
was
no
change
at
that
time
and
it
was
put
on
the
code
board
agenda
on
October
4th.
The
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
certified
and
first
class
on
October
28th
I
posted
the
sign
and
completed
an
affidavit
of
posting,
and
earlier
today,
I
completed
the
final
inspection
should
be
noted.
I
The
property's
been
mowed,
it
looks
like
there's
been
some
minor
modifications
to
structure
I
can't
be
for
sure,
but
primarily
the
property
was
mowed,
but,
as
you
can
see
from
the
latter
pictures
that
were
taken
today,
it's
still
in
very
poor
condition
and
is
a
hazard,
has
some
broken
windows
out
front
and
again
the
soffits
and
the
roofer
in
very
poor
condition.
I'd
like
at
this
point
in
time
for
and
up
until
today,
this
is
the
first
contact
I've
had
with
the
owner,
I
and
Ed
in
contact
with
him.
I
Both
my
notice
of
hearing
green
card
were
returned
signed
by
the
owner
and
I'd
like
the
board
to
find
the
property
in
violation
of
8
40,
which
is
maintaining
a
nuisance
property
and
the
nuisance
prohibitions
dealing
with
the
overgrown
lot
and
such
that
again
are
in
compliance
as
of
now.
The
overgrown
lot
is.
G
I
Time,
but
it's
basically
the
first
time
it's
been
cited
for
the
dilapidated
structure
I've
been
out
there
before,
but
I
was
kind
of
new
and
learning
my
way
around.
So
it
had
been.
It
had
been
back
in
2015
when
I
started
and
it
was
they
were
840
cases,
but
they
were
wrapped
in
with
maintaining
just
the
lot
and
cleaning
the
trash
and
debris
up,
and
the
structure
really
wasn't
addressed.
It's
been
in
that
basic
condition.
For
the
last
couple
of
years
that
I've
been
dealing
with
it.
B
B
B
C
M
G
M
Welcome
the
the
pictures,
also
don't
depict
all
the
things
that
I
did
do
to
bring
it
into
compliance
and,
unfortunately,
had
I
had
these
pictures
when
the
stuff
was
sent
out,
not
just
all
the
legal.
It
would
be
a
lot
easier
to
understand
what
all
that
needs
to
be
come
into.
Compliance
I,
like
I,
say
I
did
a
number
of
things
to
the
home
just
as
far
as
cleaning
it
up.
M
So
some
of
these
pictures
don't
show
what
I
did
do.
I
did
obviously
clean
up
the
yard.
You
could
see
that
piles
in
the
in
the
front
I
cleaned
the
sidewalk.
I
edged
the
sidewalk.
All
the
way
around
the
house
was
trimmed.
The
trees
were
trimmed
as
far
as
the
window
I
put
blinds
up
temporary
blind.
So
at
least
it's
not
opened
to
just
see
through
the
house.
Somebody
stole
the
back
French
door
on
the
house,
it's
a
double
French
doors,
and
that's
why
it
was.
M
It
was
open.
They
somebody
had
broken
into
the
home
and
that
I
wasn't
aware
of.
Like
I
said
one
of
the
French
doors
was
stole
and
there
was
a
window.
The
way
of
the
in
the
in
the
one
back
area
that
had
a
board
on
it
and
that
was
blown
out
so
I,
don't
know
if
kids
had
got
in
there
or
I
don't
know.
But
I
have
since
I
put
a
piece
of
plywood
over
the
door.
I
put
a
plywood
piece
of
wood
back
to
cover
up
the
opening.
M
As
far
as
the
plywood
on
the
east
side
of
the
building
presently
I
know,
it
needs
to
have
siding
on
it,
but
at
least
I
put
a
coat
of
primer
on
it.
So
at
least
it's
cleaned
up
the
property
a
little
bit
in
regard
to
the
roof.
I
I
have
I'm
in
the
process
and,
unfortunately,
with
this
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
setback
to
sell
the
property.
The
person
that
it's,
a
local
neighbor
that
lives
in
the
in
the
neighborhood
that
wants
to
buy
the
property
and
demolish
the
property
and
build
a
new
home.
M
So
with
that,
it
didn't
make
a
whole
lot
of
sense
to
try
and
put
a
bandaid
on
the
the
fascia
of
the
roof.
If
the
house
is
going
to
be
taken
down.
So,
if,
if
at
all
possible,
if
I
could
get
a
have
a
little
bit
of
leniency
here
in
time,
whether
I
could
ask
for
another
two
months
to
buy
that
time,
I
will
have
the
property
sold
and
and
like
I
say,
if
I,
if
I
need
to
have
him,
come
in
to
to
also
express
his
wishes
that
he
is
going
to
do
that.
M
A
M
A
A
M
I
say
I
know,
I,
know
the
gentleman,
so
it's
I
just
said:
I
need
to
take
care
of
the
city
before
I.
I
didn't
want
to
put
this
on
anybody
else.
It's
not
right
because
it
it's
something
else.
That's
pending
on
the
sale,
so
I
wanted
to
take
care
of
this
before
I
had
a
contract
with
him.
It
wouldn't
wouldn't
need
to
go
through
a
you
know,
realtor
or
anything.
It
would
just
be
two
people,
you
know
just
making
a
sale
of
the
property
are.
J
M
Mean
I
mean
I'm,
gonna
sell
the
property,
it's
I
know
it's
it's
it's
beyond
repair
at
this
point,
yes
and
so
I
guess.
Unfortunately
it
is
coming
around
the
holidays.
I.
If
you
could
just
give
me
some
leniency,
it
will
definitely
be
sold.
It's
just
and
then
I
mean
he.
The
gentleman
that's
gonna
purchase
it
he's
downsizing
and
I
was
actually
the
other
day
there
over
the
weekend
again
doing
some
work
and
he
came
by
again
and
said:
I'm
praying
for
this
property.
M
I
I
had
a
case
in
2016
too
and
2015
that
I've
seen
the
property,
and
it's
basically
been
in
that
condition,
I'm
familiar
with
it
even
prior
to
that.
Just
before
I
was
in
code
enforcement
just
being
with
the
police
department,
I
knew
about
the
property
and
just
for
the
record,
mr.
Esposito
purchased
it
in
2004
the
county
record.
I
Correct
one
additional
thing
to
is
the
ordinance
8
40
has
a
couple
of
caveats,
and
one
of
them
is,
you
can't
have
a
boarded
up
structure,
so
boarding
up
windows
does
not
make
it
become
compliant.
The
international
property
maintenance
code
and
the
building
code
require
actual
windows
and
doors
the
roof
to
be
intact.
The
soffits
be
intact,
there's
a
whole
section
that
goes
along
with
that.
M
Just
that,
if
you
would
give
me
a
little
bit
of
leniency
to
comply
as
far
as
the
the
building
like
I
said,
the
lot
has
been
cleaned
so
therefore,
I
can
pursue
selling
the
property
and
therefore
it
would
be
better
better.
The
the
city,
as
well
as
the
the
community
they're
having
a
house
it's
up
to
date,.
C
J
F
A
D
B
J
J
J
G
C
A
J
B
N
B
N
B
I
This
is
case:
17-8
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
five
four
four,
the
address
is
5:09
Ashland
Avenue
the
owners
listed
as
euros
bandage.
We
are
aware
that
he
is
deceased.
We
have
no
other
information
as
far
as
a
trust
or
an
estate,
or
anything
like
that.
So
moving
forward
exhibit
number
one
which
is
going
to
be
presented.
Is
all
my
photographs,
including
my
inspections,
exhibit
number
two
are
all
my
notices
to
include
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice.
I
A
hearing
exhibit
number
three
or
my
administrative
Docs
have
included
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
emails.
An
exhibit
number
four
is
an
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign,
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits.
Well,
we
didn't
give
them
to
a
violator,
so
we
can
skip
that
line.
All
of
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
databases
all
my
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice.
I
C
I
Yes,
on
August
29th
I
received
a
citizen
complaint
regarding
the
property
being
overgrown,
primarily
in
the
rear
on
August
30th
of
2017
I
conducted
the
initial
inspection
and
found
that
property
was
overgrown
primarily
in
the
rear.
The
house
appears
to
be
vacant
and
there
were
some
Brazilian
pepper
trees
on
the
property
on
September
7th.
We
mailed
the
Notice
of
Violation
certified
in
first
class,
then.
Obviously
we
had
the
hurricane
on
September
23rd
of
2017
I
conducted
a
reinfection.
I
There
basically
was
no
change,
although
there
was
a
tree
that
had
now
fallen
partially
on
the
side
of
the
house
from
the
hurricane,
and
at
that
time
we
sent
another
Notice
of
Violation.
That
was
basically
amended
to
add
the
the
new
issue
of
the
tree
on
the
house
post
hurricane
with
two
weeks
to
comply
for
that
and
that
occurred
on
September
25th
on
October
12th
and
conducted
another
Rhian
spec
ssin.
There
was
no
change
and
at
this
point
in
time,
sending
it
to
the
code
board.
I
This
was
about
the
time
we
came
to
the
realization
that
the
property
owner
was
deceased.
I
had
actually
talked
to
Peter,
who
was
up
here
earlier
and
found
out.
He
was
deceased
and
we
had
no
other
contact
information
for
an
estate
or
trust
on
October
12th.
The
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
certified
in
first-class
October.
28Th
posted
the
sign
with
the
affidavit
of
posting
being
completed
and
I
conducted
a
final
inspection,
and
there
was
no
change
for
my
last
inspection.
All
the
mail
returned
marked
deceased
unable
to
find
under
Pinellas,
County,
Clerk
or
circuit
courts.
I
So
we
got
no
contact
with
the
owner
either
at
this
point
in
time,
I'd
like
the
city
to
find
the
property
in
violation
of
130
303,
which
is
the
true
exemptions
that
require
any
property
that
has
a
certificate
of
occupancy,
issued
that
it
forever
maintains
no
Brazilian
pepper
trees
on
the
property.
The
second
one
is
8
40,
which
is
a
duty
to
maintain
private
property
and
the
last
one
is
8
52,
which
requires
a
lot
maintenance.
The
lawn
mowing
trimming
and
edging,
as
required
some
additional
information.
I
I
B
We're
breaking
this
down
a
couple
of
months
ago.
We
served
breaking
it
down
so
that
you
determine
whether
or
not
there's
a
violation,
and
then
after
that
motion
finding
a
violation.
Then
you
would
normally
hear
from
officer
cows
and
determine
whether
or
not
he
has
a
recommendation
as
to
the
compliance
date
in
the
fine.
So
that's
why
he's
saying
not
as
of
yet
right
now
we're
trying
to
do
in
two
separate
steps.
For
example,
if
you
don't
find
any
violation,
you
don't
need
to
go
to
the
next
step.
C
G
J
C
I
G
O
I
P
B
P
P
I
You
exhibit
number
one
go
and
board
with
all
my
photographs
to
include
my
inspections.
Exhibit
number
two
or
all
the
notices
to
include
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice
of
hearings
exhibit
number
three
of
the
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case
summary
and
the
property,
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
emails
received
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
are
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board.
I
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
databases.
All
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
certified
mail
and
first-class
mail.
And,
madam
chairman,
if
you
would,
please
accept
all
the
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
L
I
On
August
30th
of
this
year
received
a
complaint.
It
was
a
the
complaint
started
out
because
of
a
call
to
the
police
department.
That
I
responded
his
back
up
on
for
disturbance,
and
it
was
a
an
issue
between
mr.
Cazares
and
one
of
his
sons
having
a
verbal
dispute
over
some
items
in
the
house
during
our
investigation
through
that
I
discovered
numerous
code
violations,
while
I
was
there
up
to
and
including
some
major
issues
with
the
fencing,
as
you
can
see
in
the
photographs.
I
What
basically
stemmed
the
call
to
us
was
a
large
amount
of
property
being
stored
in
the
garage
area
of
the
house.
That's
what
the
argument
between
mr.
Cazares
and
his
son
was,
but,
as
mr.
Kaiser
allowed
me
to
inspect
the
property,
we
found
that
he
was
storing
large
amount
of
equipment
and
debris
on
the
property
found
a
white
van
parked
around
back.
That
has
no
tags.
It's
not
currently
registered
and
isn't
a
violation.
He
has
a
boat
that
hasn't
been
used
since
approximately
2007
sore
on
the
property.
I
So
it's
unused
equipment,
I
had
a
large
amount
of
debris
and
things
like
that
stored
around
the
boat
out
back
and
as
I
stated
earlier.
The
fence
on
both
the
east
side
and
the
west
side
was
in
significant
disrepair.
As
you
can
see
in
the
photographs
up
to
the
point.
On
the
west
side,
it
was
leaning
over
probably
in
the
area
of
20
to
30
degrees
into
the
neighbor's
property,
so
he
was
cited
for
those
at
that
time.
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin
on
September
30th
and
basically
he's
not
in
compliance.
I
The
vein
in
the
boat,
we're
still
on
the
property
fence,
had
not
been
repaired,
replaced
or
removed,
as
required.
I
was
unable
to
look
inside
the
fenced
area,
because
I
wasn't
invited
in
at
that
point
on
October,
2nd
and
Notice
of
Violation
and
a
notice
of
hearing
were
mailed
and
certified
first
class.
My
initial
warnings
to
mr.
Cazares
were
face
to
face,
so
there
was
no
paperwork
at
that
time.
I
I
asked
him
to
take
care
of
the
issues
and
they
weren't
on
September
I'm,
sorry,
October,
28th,
I
posted
a
property
and
signed
an
affidavit
of
posting
on
October
9th.
Today
I
can
did
my
final
inspection
earlier
and
they're,
not
in
compliance.
The
fence
has
numerous
posts.
Put
up,
I
checked
with
the
city
prior
to
no
permits
were
pulled
for
any
defense
work.
There
was
a
number
of
posts
along
the
west
side
of
the
property
on
the
outside
of
the
fence,
which
would
being
the
neighbor's
property
were
actually
sunk
into
concrete.
I
That
does
require
a
fencing
permit
and,
as
I
stated,
I
checked
prior,
and
there
was
no
permit
pulled
for
the
fence
work.
Also,
you
can
still
see
even
with
the
posts
that
were
attempted
to
be
put
up
for
support.
The
fence
is
still
leaning.
It's
gonna
be
one
of
the
pictures
that
comes
around
that
was
taken
earlier
today.
I
Again,
the
van
is
still
there.
The
boat
is
still
there.
There
was
still
some
debris
inside
the
Western
fence
area.
One
of
his
sons
did
allow
me
on
the
property
and
I
noted
some.
Some
of
the
trash
and
debris
been
cleaned
up,
but
it's
still
not
in
compliance.
So
at
this
point
in
time,
I
would
like
the
board
to
find
him
a
violation
of
city
ordinance,
3603,
which
deals
with
fences,
walls
and
hedges,
not
being
dilapidated
and
being
in
good
condition.
I
P
P
P
I
P
P
P
L
P
I
P
Crazy
is
there
it's
in
the
picture?
Listen,
let
me
ask
you
something:
I
don't
want
to
make
any
father,
you
know,
don't
ask
don't
tell
me,
you
know
that
you
see
at
rest
today
because
the
property
I
called
yesterday
I
went
yesterday
to
the
police
station
and
I
asked
for
you
and
I
was
talking
to
the
officer.
I
said:
where
is
mr.
gates?
P
He
says
it's
not
here
is
not
going
to
be
come
to
9:30
plus
then
I
call
and
I
talked
to
your
secretary,
berry
and
then
I
said:
listen
I'm
done
when
I
call
it
done.
I'm
done.
I
know
my
wall.
I
know
it
mighty
job.
I
know
what
I
have
to
do
whatever
he
was
previous.
You
send
me.
I
took
care
of
it
now
you're
talking
about
a
continuously
trash.
P
C
P
L
P
You
tell
me
no,
that
board
over
here,
I'm
gonna
have
to
have
the
ball
personally
to
come
over.
There.
I
will
call
them
to
come
see.
The
fence
is
not
the
way
professionals
they
finish
it.
I
know.
Everybody
went
to
the
tornado.
He
going
by
Yerma
eatery
dan
Poulter
conspiracy,
nut
Plus
from
here
to
Miami,
and
my
friends
were
still
up
and
now
re-enforced
with
a
ten-foot
post,
4x4
four
feet
down
cement
without
a
permit
government
I
don't
need
a
parametric
for
a
post.
P
P
There's
already
28
years
old,
those
previous
and
they're,
going
to
be
another
28
plus
ears
that
work
I
did
four
feet
down:
4
by
4,
which
is
4
by
4
PT
pressure,
turret
cleaning,
okay,
let's
cement
that
big
of
a
hole.
Those
fans
didn't
go
nowhere
and
can
you
experience
we
could
be,
but
a
professional
experience,
no
they're,
not
so
the
fence
is
done.
Nothing
can
do
only
paint
it
whatever
color
I
chose
white
purple.
Whatever
that's
the
fence,
the
body
can
come
and
visit
himself.
They're,
not
gonna.
P
B
P
B
Gonna
need
to
do
if
you
don't
understand
what
you
need
to
do.
If
the
Board
finds
you
in
violation,
you
can
talk
to
officer
gas
and
after
this
meeting
or
you
can
call
him
and
he
can
schedule
an
appointment
with
you
to
come
out
to
your
house
and
tell
you
exactly
what
needs
to
be
done.
Do
you
have
any
other
state
I.
B
O
B
P
P
P
B
B
C
I
J
J
J
E
J
N
D
C
D
B
It
summarized
okay,
so
the
case
has
been
completed.
The
board
found
you
in
violation
of
sections
8,
48,
22,
8,
48-52
and
30
6.03,
as
cited
in
the
Notice
of
Violation
to
you,
you've
been
given
until
November
the
30th
to
bring
it
into
compliance.
Should
you
fail
to
bring
into
compliance
by
that
period
of
time?
There'll
be
a
$50
a
day?
Fine,
if
you
don't
understand
what
you
need
to
do,
to
bring
it
into
compliance,
as
I
mentioned
before
contact
mr.
B
P
I
speak
English
very
well.
57
years,
I
speak
English
and
before
it
matter
of
fact,
he
born
what
is
the
problem
more
to
the
East
aagama
the
wall?
It
cannot
be
done
any
more
to
the
wall.
The
wall
is
done
over.
It's
done.
You
can
come
anybody
besides
him
to
check
the
wall,
send
professional,
send
you
know
people
they
do
nothing
but
offense.
P
P
P
I
We'll
talk
after
this,
but
you're
done
for
now.
Okay,
remember
what
you
say:
next
is
public
record
and
I'm
telling
you
you're
done.
You
can
step
up
and
leave
we'll
discuss
this
at
another
time.
If
you
have
a
question
about
that,
I'll
make
arrangements
for
your
transport
out
of
here.
Do
you
have
any
question
about
that?
Please
challenge
me
on
it,
but
you're
done
you've
been
told
you're
done.
It's.
I
I
I
Moving
forward
with
the
case
September
26th
of
this
year,
they
received
a
complaint
as
I
stated
from
Miss
Archer
regarding
this
was
post
herma.
The
fence
around
this
property
was
significantly
damaged,
which
in
turn
exposed
the
pool.
That's
inside
the
property
which
is
full
of
water.
The
property
is
lived
in.
I
As
I
stated,
part
of
the
fence
is
torn
down,
but
the
tenant
actually
emailed
us
a
copy
of
the
work
order
from
the
company
that
was
September
27th
I
mailed
out
the
Notice
of
Violation,
a
certified
in
first
class
on
September
28th
October
14th
conducted
re-inspection
with
no
change.
It's
still,
basically
in
the
state,
but
picture
show
sent
out
a
notice
of
hearing
the
next
day
or
I'm.
Sorry,
seventeenth,
first
class
and
return
receipt
requested,
I
posted
the
sign
on
October,
28th
and
then
earlier
today
about
9:20
this
morning.
I
I
conducted
another
inspection
and
it
is,
as
it
sits,
I've
had
no
contact
with
the
owner.
We
did
get
a
green
card
returned
unsigned
and
the
tenants,
because
we
also
mailed
them
a
copy
as
well.
They
we
did
get
their
green
cards
back
and
the
property
manager
we
did
get
their
green
cards
back
and
they
notice
a
hearing
from
the
property
manager
was
also
returned
sign
other
than
that
it
had
no
contact
with
the
property
owner
and
at
this
time,
I'd
like
the
board
to
find
the
property
in
violation
of
8
40.
I
The
duty
maintained
private
property,
which
exclusively
discusses
the
security
pools
in
the
maintenance
of
your
pool,
3603
fences,
walls
and
hedges,
which
is
fairly
obvious,
defenses
in
poor
condition
and
then
36.0,
which
requires
in
the
city
ordinance
that
swimming
pools
have
an
enclosure
which
would
be
that
fence.
So,
at
this
point,
I
have
nothing
further.
C
G
C
Accuse
myself
voting,
but
one
thing
I
just
don't
understand
when
we
see
an
open
pool
like
that.
This
really
scares
me
that
something
can't
be
done
to
it
right
away
with
children
around
being.
You
know
the
proper
to
be
in
close
to
schools,
little
kids
running
around
and
all
that
I
don't
know.
If
there's
anything
can
be
done,
it's
a
shame
that
it
can't
be.
You
know
it's
been
exposed
for
a
long
long
time
now.
B
Chair
I
just
wanted
you
to
remind
you
that,
pursuant
to
that
that
notice
that
you've,
just
given
to
the
board
that
you're
going
to
abstain
from
vote,
you
have
15
days
from
today's
hearing
to
go
ahead
and
fill
out
that
abstention
form.
The
City
Clerk's
office
will
have
that,
for
you
make
sure
you
do
that
within
15
days,
and
the
clerk
can
help
you
out
with
that.
J
J
C
G
I
G
B
J
C
I
Mam
17-8
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
five,
nine
for
the
address
nine
sixty
sunrise
drive
property
owners
listed
as
a
catherine
ami,
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
or
photographs
to
include
my
inspections,
exhibit
number
two
or
all
my
notices
to
include
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
administrative
docks
to
include
the
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
emails
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
I
All
of
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
database.
All
the
notice
of
violations
to
notice
the
hearings
were
sent
certified
mail
as
well
as
first
class
mail
and,
madam
chairman,
once
they
come
around.
Please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
record.
I
This
case
started
on
October
5th
of
this
year.
I.
It
was
a
complaint
that
I
generated
because
I
was
doing
inspections
on
the
on
the
street
and
in
the
as
I
was
doing
it
at
the
end
of
the
cul-de-sac.
I
made
a
u-turn,
they
have
a
tree
out
front
that
was
about
six
feet
off
of
the
roadway
and
then
at
that
point
in
time,
I
noticed
the
roof
had
tarps
on
it.
I
I
looked
back
in
my
prior
cases
earlier
this
year,
I'd
actually
put
a
case
in
for
the
roof,
having
issues
and
referred
it
over
to
the
building
department
and
I
didn't
know
what
the
status
of
it
was
with
the
building
department.
So
I
went
and
generated
another
case
today
to
have
it
looked
at
by
this
board
and
at
that
point
in
time,
as
I
stated,
there
were
tarps
all
over
the
roof
and
the
tree
was
below
the
14
foot
required
limit
or
NFPA,
which
is
a
National
Fire
Prevention
Association
fire.
I
The
fire
marshal
basically
regulates
how
high
trees
can
be
above
the
roadway
under
the
fire
prevention,
fire
prevention
Act.
At
that
point,
in
time
we
mailed
a
Notice
of
Violation
on
the
5th
of
October
on
October
21st
I
conducted
a
reinfection.
The
tree
trimming
had
been
done
and
she
had
some
debris
issues
in
the
yard,
but
they
were
all
cleaned
up.
I
So
that's
the
reason
why,
at
this
point
in
time,
852
is
aim
compliance
she's
no
longer
in
violation
of
that
on
October
23rd,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
certified
and
first
class
October
28th
I
post
a
design
with
the
affidavit
of
posting
being
completed,
and
earlier
this
morning,
I
conducted
the
final
inspection
as
I
stated:
852
s
in
compliance,
but
there's
still
tarps
over
the
roof,
which
under
8
40,
is
kind
of
a
dilapidated
structure
without
a
roof
intact.
I
did
have
some
conversation
with
Miss
Amy,
probably
about
noon.
I
She
was
asking
about
the
the
board
hearing
she
explained
to
me,
especially
she
had
a
small
leak
and
then
the
storm
came
through,
which
became
a
larger
leak.
She's
filed
her
FEMA
paperwork
two
weeks
ago,
so
she's
working
on
that
aspect
of
it
to
try
to
get
in
any
compliance.
As
I
stated,
I
spoke
to
her
and
we
also
received
the
green
card
for
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
Notice
of
Hearing.
I
E
I
G
G
I
I
E
J
F
I
G
G
O
C
Q
I
My
discussions
with
miss
miss
with
Miss
Amy.
She
requested
60
days.
We
kind
of
went
down
the
timeline
with
what's
going
on
with
FEMA.
She
did
file
it
late,
but
she
did
file
it
they.
Basically
the
information
she
was
giving
me
sounds
consistent
with
somebody
who
has
I
has
filed
the
request,
so
she
asked
for
60
days.
She's
got
a
line,
a
roof
contractor
they
take
care
of
it,
which
is.
We
can
probably
appreciate
right
now,
is
not
exactly
a
fast
process.
G
J
J
J
I
This
is
case:
17-8
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
five.
Eighty
five-
it
is
a
repeat
violator
case.
The
previous
case
was
case,
15-5
thirty-two,
which
was
in
violation
of
8
40
and
8
52
at
the
time,
the
starting
date
for
out
of
compliance
'is
the
date
of
my
initial
inspection,
which
would
be
October
4th
10
4
of
this
year,
basically
exhibit
number
1
that's
going
around
or
all
of
my
photos
to
include
my
inspections.
I
I
All
the
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
database.
All
notice
of
violations
and
notice
hearings
are
sent
certified
mail
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and,
madam
chairman,
if
you
would,
please
accept
all
the
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence
once
they've
made
their
way.
I
I
There
is
a
repeat,
as
I
stated,
the
repeat
violator
case
under
15
532
and
at
that
point
in
time
we
sent
the
repeat
violator
notice,
hearing
the
property
owner
listed
October
4th
that
notice
was
mailed,
October
28th
I
posted
the
property
in
an
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed,
October
31st,
the
repeat,
violator
notice,
adhering
to
a
different
address.
When
the
clerk
we
found
out,
there
was
a
change
in
the
address
of
a
property
owner,
so.
I
Of
hearing
to
the
property
owner
on
October
31st
and
it
was
updated
in
the
tax
collectors
database
on
ten
I'm,
sorry
November
hurt
so
a
couple
days.
Afterwards,
I
got
updated,
we
didn't
get
any
return
mail,
but
we
did
get
a
United
States,
Postal,
Service
tracking
number
and
we've
had
no
contact
with
the
owner
and
at
this
point
in
time,
I'd
like
the
board
to
find
that
they
are
in
violation
and
continuing
to
be
in
violation
as
a
repeat
violator
of
8
40
and
8
52.
G
L
I
E
G
L
G
I
G
B
I
I
The
period
from
October,
seventh
to
October,
22nd
or
fifteen
days
was
what
it
was
determined
to
be
out
of
compliance
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
all
of
my
photographs
to
include
the
inspections
exhibit
number
two
or
all
of
my
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
or
administrative
docks
to
include
the
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
emails
received.
Sibbett
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five.
I
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs
all
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board?
All
the
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
database,
only
Notice
of
Violation
notice,
Hearings
percent
certified
return,
receipt
and
first-class
mail.
And,
madam
chairman,
please
accept
all
the
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence
once
they've
made
their
way.
I
As
you
can
see
in
the
photographs
on
October
12,
we
received
a
message
from
the
property
owner
stating
they're
ready
for
a
Rhian
spec
shinai
conductor,
reinfection
on
October
17th
and
found
there
were
still
numerous
items
being
stored
on
the
porch.
There's,
a
utility
trailer
full
of
items
being
stored
on
the
property
and
I
spoke
to
a
female.
I
Basically,
outside
advisor
the
issues
on
October
22nd,
we
received
a
message:
the
property
was
ready
for
rien
spec
ssin
I
did
conduct
the
reinfection
on
October
24th,
but
due
the
fact
that
they
called
me
on
October
22nd,
we
honored
that
date
of
October
22nd
as
their
compliance
date
and
found
the
property
to
be
in
compliance
on
that
date.
I
did
post
the
property
on
October
28th
and
we
did
get
a
green
card
for
the
notice
of
hearing
returned
by
the
owner.
I
G
G
A
B
The
way
the
law
works
is
is
that
once
they've
been
found
in
violation
the
second
time
around,
they
don't
get
any
special
notice,
they're
deemed
to
be
in
violation
at
the
time
when
the
inspection
takes
place.
Once
you
find
that
violation
and
it'll
continue
to
run
until
such
time,
they
come
into
compliance
and
that's
the
reason
why
it's
coming
as
a
repeat
violation,
which
is
a
little
bit
different
than
an
initial
violation.
B
B
There's
no
other
questions.
Sir,
do
you
have
any
questions
of
officer
gas
and
you
have
the
opportunity
to
ask
him
any
questions
based
upon
the
testimony
that
he
just
gave
now?
Sir
okay,
now
it's
your
opportunity
to
make
your
presentation
to
the
board
anything
that
you
wanted
to
add
or
tell
the
board
that
they
should
be
aware
of.
R
No
I
got
the
mail
on
the
12th,
and
that's
when
I
knew
about
any
of
this
is
on
the
12th
and
I
took
care
of
it
on
the
12th.
Then,
when
I
called
to
have
him
come
back?
That's
when
he
saw
my
trailer,
which
I've
known
that
five
months
ago,
a
my
recycling
bin
sitting
on
the
front
porch,
then
that
couldn't
be
there.
They
would
have
been
taken
care
of
five
months
ago.
I
C
R
About
my
recycling
bins
and
the
trailer
it
would
have
been
taken
care
of
five
months
ago,
but
at
the
time
nobody
said
anything
when
I
was
in
compliance
the
first
time
nobody
said
nothing
about
their
cycling,
bins
that
were
on
the
front
porch,
which
I
didn't
know
that
you
couldn't
have
them
on
your
front
porch.
They
said
garbage
cans,
those
got
moved
if
they
just
said
their
recycling
bins,
they
would
have
got
moved
and
they
would
see
my
trailer
when
I
was
in
compliance.
The
first
time
saying
it
couldn't
be
there
heard
stuff
in
there.
R
Q
I
I
stated,
as
I
stated,
the
the
fact
that
the
trash
container
is
not
just
the
only
item
he
had.
He
had
a
few
violations.
I
was,
he
was
established
for
previously
the
grass
was
overgrown
and,
as
mr.
Trask
pointed
out,
he's
a
repeat
violator
based
on
that
other
case.
So
the
fact
that
he
received
notice
on
the
12th
doesn't
negate
the
fact
that
I
inspected
it
on
the
previous
date.
I
That's
why
our
starting
date
for
the
vial
is
the
seventh,
because
that's
when
I
found
it
and
as
he
even
stated
when
I
questioned
him,
he
was
aware
that
the
fines
could
begin
without
notice.
So
the
fact
that
he
received
notice
five
days
after
it
is
a
moot
point.
It's
we're
notifying
him
of
this
hearing,
which
is
illegal
or
legally
obligated
to
do
we're,
not
notifying
him
of
the
requirement
who
fixed
the
violation.
Just
that
he's
got
a
hearing
because
of
the
violation
and
that's
all
I
have.
C
J
B
F
F
B
C
A
A
D
J
D
B
Okay,
sir
you've
been
found
in
violation
of
sections
8
16
8008
52
of
the
city
code.
Although
you're
in
compliance
now
you've
been
fined,
$75
15
days
of
$5
a
day,
you've
also
have
been
found
to
be
responsible
for
the
prosecution
of
the
code
enforcement
case.
That's
$82.50
any
other
questions
of
us.
No.
R
B
R
B
R
R
C
B
S
D
C
B
S
B
The
next
one
is
kin:
can
you
hand
that
to
officer
gassen,
let
him
take
a
look
at
it
and
then
officer
if
you
could
pass
that
down
from
the
city
clerk
so
that
the
Chairman
and
I
can
look
at
that,
while
he's
doing
that,
I
just
wanted
to
board
is
so.
This
is.
This
is
what
we
call
a
motion
for
continuance
in
the
legal
field.
B
G
B
You
gets
passed
down,
we're
gonna,
go
ahead
and
take
a
look
at
it
together,
so
I'm,
just
gonna
read
it
out
loud
so
that
everybody
can
hear
it.
At
the
same
time,
it's
dated
November,
the
9th
it's
from
attorney
Jerry
Theo,
falafel
Asst.
It's
directed
to
the
code
enforcement
ward
of
Tarpon
Springs,
City
Hall,
the
reverences
Olympic
Investments
Group
LLC,
underneath
that
s's
location
has
a
:
218,
North
Pinellas,
Avenue,
Tarpon,
Springs
Florida,
three,
four,
six,
eight
nine!
Then
it
says
to
whom
it
may
concern.
B
Please
be
advised
that
we
are
representing
Olympic
Investments
Group
LLC.
With
regard
to
the
above
reference
matter
due
to
conflicts
on
my
calendar,
I'm
unable
to
be
present
for
today's
hearing,
November
9
2017,
it
would
be
appreciated
if
he
would
reschedule
this
hearing
for
the
next
code
board
hearing
and
provide
her
office
with
hearing
notice.
Please
contact
me
if
you
have
any
questions
and
it
lists
his
phone
number.
Thank
you
for
your
cooperation
assistance
in
this
matter
and
it's
signed
very
truly
yours,
George,
Jerry,
Theophilus,
so
I.
B
B
B
And
that
is
correct
under
Rule
four
section
4
of
the
rules
of
procedure.
It
reads:
the
chair
shall
have
the
authority
to
decide
all
points
of
order
and
run
all
hearings.
This
Authority
shall
include
the
duty
to
decide
all
objections
and
other
evidentiary
matters
that
may
arise
during
the
hearing.
Any
ruling
by
the
chair
may
be
reversed
by
a
majority
vote
of
the
board.
So
you've
heard
the
presentation
by
mr.
C
S
Am
not
served,
the
attorney
has
all
the
exhibits
and
all
the
records
and
just
to
make
it
clear
that
he
was
in
court
today.
He
was
prepared
to
come
today.
He
was
in
Pasco
and
he
was
in
Pinellas
and
he
just
couldn't
get
back
here
in
time
for
the
for
the
code
board.
So
he
was
prepared
to
come,
so
it
isn't
a
last-minute
and
he
ordered.
S
B
S
B
C
I
Right,
thank
you
case
number
17
8
0,
0,
0,
0,
6,
0
4.
The
property
address
is
218
North,
Pinellas
Avenue.
This
is
an
interesting
case
because
it
deals
with
mr.
Pat
mr.
Pat's
elitists
and
his
companies
and
his
wife
that
owned
numerous
properties
in
the
city,
so
he's
a
repeat
violator
under
two
different
cases,
one
of
them
being
a
case.
It
was
heard
last
month
before
the
board,
also
when
mr.
Pat
soleus
didn't
have
his
attorney
present
for
that
one
either.
The
first
case
is
case,
16
387,
which
is
the
address
1401
burnt
oak.
I
That
was
where
8
40
was
found
and
established.
Under
that
case,
there
were
two
other
violations
as
well,
but
they're
not
applicable
to
this
case.
The
second
one
is
17
569,
which
is
385
Whitcomb
Boulevard,
which
was
another
840
and
852,
and
that
case
was
heard
by
this
board
last
month,
and
there
is
another
case
regarding
40.00,
which
is
201
North,
Pinellas,
Avenue
and
I
will
have
to
get
you
the
case
number
in
just
a
second.
I
I
B
B
It's
a
separate
legal
entity
so
for
the
and
for
the
purposes
of
this
hearing,
then
you
need
to
treat
it
since
it
was
not
because
remember
the
repeat,
violation:
it
requires
the
same
violator
within
the
same
code
in
the
five-year
period
of
time.
So
if
it
was
mr.
Pat's
Letus
and
his
individual
capacity
that
was
here
before
and
cited,
it's
not
the
same
as
Olympic
Investments
Group
LLC,
even
though
he
may
have
been
a
manager
or
maybe
still
be
a
manager.
So
we
need
to
treat
them
then
as
initial
violations
and
not
repeat
moving.
I
Forward,
that's
fine,
then
making
that
easy.
Then
it's
case
17-8
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
six,
zero
for
the
property
owner,
Olympic
Investments,
Group,
LLC,
218,
North,
Pinellas
Avenue,
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
all
the
photographs
to
include
the
inspections
exhibit
number
two
all
are
the
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearings
exhibit
number
three.
The
admin
Docs,
including
the
case
summer,
D
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign?
Exhibit
number
five?
O
B
B
S
S
B
I
Sir
I,
when
I
pulled
up
I,
took
some
photographs
from
the
sidewalk,
and
there
was
a
gentleman
coming
out
asked
her
your
resident.
He
said
yes,
I
said:
do
you
mind
if
I
come
on
the
property?
It's
an
apartment
complex
with
a
public
parking
lot.
I
walked
into
that
public
parking
lot
after
one
of
the
tenants
gave
me
permission
to
be
on
the
property
and
I
took
some
of
the
photographs.
A
number
of
the
photographs
were
taken
from
the
street.
I
Primarily
the
photographs
that
were
taken
today
that
are
entered
into
evidence
were
all
taken
from
the
right
away
and
none
of
which
were
because
there
wasn't
a
resident
there
for
me
to
ask
to
go
onto
the
property
at
the
time
again,
as
I
stated
last
month,
I
have
a
good
camera
and
zooms
in
fairly
well.
So
it's
easy
for
me
to
take
pictures
from
the
right
away
and
that's
not
trespassing
in
the
state
of
Florida.
Okay,.
B
B
Okay,
so,
madam
chair,
you
need
to
make
it
a
decision
as
to
whether
or
not
you
want
to
receive
those
documents
into
evidence
over
the
objection
of
mr.pat,
selita's
or
you're,
going
to
sustain
his
objection
and
not
allow
any
of
these
pieces
of
evidence
and
I.
Think
that
he's
just
at
this
point
just
arguing
that
it's
the
photographs
that
he
is
objecting
to
so
I
would
think
that
other
than
the
photographs
there's
no
objection.
You
should
to
receive
into
evidence,
exhibits
two
three
four
and
five
and
then
ask
for
exhibit
one.
B
C
B
S
I
O
B
I
This
complaint
came
in
on
October
6
2017.
It
was
called
in
with
a
the
address
next
door,
but
the
description
of
the
issuer
boats,
the
inoperable
vehicles
that
were
on
the
property.
It
was
fairly
obvious
at
that
point
in
time
that
it
wasn't
the
address
to
the
South
that
it
was
218
North
Pinellas
the
address
in
question
over
here
before
there
are
two
boats
on
the
property
which
appear
inoperable
and
ones
being
stored
on
concrete
blocks.
A
lot
was
overgrown.
I
There
was
a
red
Jaguar
and
a
green,
possibly
a
Plymouth,
on
a
lot
which
appeared
inoperable
and
without
current
tags
notice,
adhering
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed
on
October
9th
2017
on
November
1st
conducted
re-inspection,
the
Jaguar
and
green
car
both
have
covers
on
them,
which
is
not
permissible
under
the
code.
Furthermore,
that
discussion
had
actually
come
up
between
this
code
board.
Mr.
Pat's
elitism
a
couple
of
years
ago,
where,
under
the
code
you're
required
to
have
it
any
fully
enclosed
structure
and
car
covers,
do
not
satisfy
that
requirement.
I
October
28th
posted
the
property
and
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed,
conducted
final
inspection,
as
I
stated
today.
At
about
nine
o'clock
this
morning,
all
of
those
photographs
were
taken
from
the
right
away,
both
to
the
directly
to
the
west
side
from
the
sidewalk.
So
that's,
why
there's
a
limited
number
of
those
photographs
because
I
couldn't
see
the
back
area.
I
took
one
photograph
from
the
sidewalk
to
the
property
to
the
north,
which
shows
the
back
of
the
boat,
which
was
on
the
north
side.
I
You
could
tell
from
the
street
that
the
property
has
been
mowed
and
mostly
maintained
so
before
the
board.
Right
now
appears
to
be
the
violation
of
40.00
which
deals
with
the
red
Jaguar,
the
green
car
under
the
cover,
and
then
the
issue
with
the
boats
under
8
52,
which,
as
the
definition
I
gave
in
a
previous
case,
they're,
not
operable,
and
they
appear
to
be
just
basically
unused
equipment.
L
I
Those
are
the
only
violations
other
than
going
along
with
a
40
which
falls
under
852,
but
those
are
in
compliance,
so
two
violations
of
40.00,
one
violation
of
8
52
and
that's
all
I-
have
for
the
board
at
this
time.
I
will
add
one
more
thing,
though,
that
we
did
get
the
UPS
tracking
number
and
we
did
not
get
any
return
documents
signed
back
and
which
is
typical
with
a
typical
mr.
Pat
Solis
had
no
contact
with
them.
L
S
S
Gassin,
could
you
please
describe
location
of
one
of
the
boats
or
let
me
just
state
something
in
please
if
it's
correct
you're,
not
one
of
the
boats,
which
is
on
a
trailer,
is
parked
behind
the
apartment
building
which
this
property,
which
2:18
is
it's
an
apartment.
Building
cannot
be
seen
from
the
street
in
any
manner.
Unless
you
go
to
the
back
yard
of
the
apartment
building
and
then
you
can
see
it
you've
taken
photographs
of
that
boat
and
you
show
vines
growing
on
that
boat.
How
could
you
do
that
without
trespassing
on
the
property
previously.
I
I
S
S
So
you
can
ask
anybody
and
they
can
give
you
permission
to
walk
into
an
apartment,
so
there
was
a
attendant
there
and
the
the
owner.
Wasn't
there
and
an
occupant?
Was
there
a
visitor
and
you
knocked
on
the
door,
and
you
asked
them
if
you
could
come
in,
they
were
the
owners
and
they
told
you
no
I'm
visiting
and
you
asked
them
if
they
could
come
in
you're
telling
me
that
you're
authorized
going
through
that
apartment,
I'd.
I
Have
a
very
short
career
in
law
enforcement
if
we
weren't
allowed
into
people's
apartments
without
asking
owners
as
most
owners
of
apartment
complexes,
aren't
there
their
tenants
they're,
not
owners.
So
the
fact
is:
I
asked
him.
Are
you
a
tenant
here?
He
stated
yes,
I'm,
not
gonna,
cross-examine
him
as
as
to
the
way
or
the
whites
said.
Do
you
have
any
problem
with
me
coming
on
this
property?
I
Taking
some
pictures,
no
problem,
and
it
was
done
and,
like
I
said,
25
years
of
law
enforcement,
we
don't
ask
owners
of
buildings,
especially
apartment
buildings,
and
hunting
down
and
find
them.
So
we
can
do
our
job.
So
no
I
I
can't
give
you
the
statute
under
901.
I.
Think
is
the
trespassing
statute,
but
I'd
have
to
look
it
up.
You.
S
I
O
S
Again,
you
asked
somebody:
I've
got
video
video
cameras,
showing
you
pulled
up
into
the
property
in
your
car.
You
got
out
of
the
car
and
you
didn't
ask
anybody
anything
and
you
immediately
went
to
the
back
of
the
lot
and
started
taking
pictures.
I
can
provide
that
video
okay
to
impeach
your
testimony,
sir,
about.
S
B
That's
ëletÃs,
yes,
sir
okay,
questions
do
you
have
any
other
questions
of
the
officer
gasps
and
we
need
to
move
along
any
other
questions.
You
can
you
know
this
routine
you're
gonna
have
your
opportunity
to
tell
us
whatever
you
want
to
tell
us
about
whether
he,
whatever
he
did
right
or
wrong
the
question
I.
S
I
L
I
S
I
I
O
B
Petts
ëletÃs
questions.
You
have
your
opportunity
to
speak
in
a
little
bit,
but
can
you
ask
your
cross-examination
then
you'll
put
on
your
case
and
make
whatever
motions
or
things
that
you
want
to
say
at
that
time
we're
trying
to
get
through
cross-examination?
You
have
any
other
cross-examination
of
officer
Gaston!
Please!
Yes,.
I
I
I
S
S
I
I
I
I
was
standing
at
the
corner
on
the
street
and
the
interesting
thing
about
this
I
specifically
did
this
because
I
figured
you
would
try
to
raise
this
argument
again.
So
I
specifically
took
all
of
my
photographs
today,
because
I
did
not
have
someone
that
gave
me
consent
to
go
on
the
property
today.
I
specifically
took
them
from
the
sidewalk
on
Pinellas
Avenue
on
the
east
side
of
the
road
they
and
I
have
a
zoom
camera
and
I.
Don't
I
can't
change
that
story.
The
answer.
S
I
I
B
S
S
B
S
B
Okay,
thank
you
so
now,
madam
chair
I'm,
sorry
I
had
tried
trying
to
keep
some
direction
here,
any
other
questions
of
the
board
for
officer
gasps,
and
now
that
you've
heard
the
cross-examination,
if
not
mr.
Pat's
elitist.
Now
is
your
time
to
present
whatever
evidence
that
you'd
like
to
present
to
the
board
about
the
case.
S
Well,
first
of
all
that
you
didn't
allow
this
continue,
so
my
attorney
could
represent
me
appropriately.
I
wasn't
prepared
to
represent
myself
today
and
it
wasn't
a
repeat
violation
as
as
was
pointed
out,
so
there
was
no
rush
in
fines
or
anything
else
to
allow
this
to
go
to
the
next
board.
Hearing
where
I
could
be
properly
represented.
B
B
I
Was
a
prior
code
enforcement
officer
and
it's
not
what's
defined
in
the
code
which
he
actually
even
included
with
his
evidence.
It
was
what
Cindy
Sandra
did
at
the
time,
and
there
was
a
particular
set
of
reasons
why
that
was
permitted
during
that
time
frame.
I
have
no
objection
to
it,
but
there
is
a
reason
why
that
was
stated
by
inspector
sander,
not
by
me.
Okay,.
B
S
S
S
S
If,
in
fact,
I
have
to
remove
those
boats,
I
have
to
find
a
place
for
him
I.
Think
after
you
give
me
they're
not
easy
to
find
a
home
for,
if
you
give
me
two
months,
I'll
have
all
that
done
and
keep
in
mind
that
they're
behind
the
apartment
building,
so
at
least
the
one
is
and
the
other
ones
on
the
other
address.
L
I
Right
in
regards
to
one
boat
and
the
red
Jaguar
I'll
remove
those
violation
from
the
board
four
out
of
consideration,
even
in
the
aerial
image
boat
in
the
car
appear
to
be
there
on
the
property
of
to
ten
North
Pinellas
Avenue,
so
they're
there
they're
not
on
to
18.
The
property
line
goes
right
down
a
little.
I
I
According
to
Pinellas
County
property
appraisers,
you
can
clearly
see
it
on
2:18
North
Pinellas,
so,
regardless
of
any
of
the
other
photographs,
the
boats
on
a
satellite
image
that
was
taken
and
posted
in
public
record.
So
basically,
at
this
point,
mr.
Pat's
elitists
has
had
discussions
with
this
board.
He
brought
the
issue
of
car
covers
up
two
years
ago
in
2015,
when
we
had
the
issue
at
201,
North
Pinellas
Avenue,
which,
as
a
matter
of
fact,
I
think
had
three
or
four
cars,
and
he
brought
the
same
argument
forward
about
the
car
covers.
I
The
discussion
was
brought
up
about
a
completely
enclosed
structure,
so
the
fact
that
he
produced
the
letter
from
2013
from
Cindy
santur,
where
she
allowed
him
to
do.
That
is
a
moot
point.
The
ordinance
doesn't
allow
that
it's
not
an
ordinance,
and
that
was
a
exception
she
made.
So,
regarding
that,
so
basically
at
this
point
you
can
clearly
see
from
the
photograph,
even
if
you
do
not
consider
any
of
the
ones
that
were
taken
in
October.
Q
I
In
this
satellite
image
seems
to
be
covered
by
trees,
so
it
would
be
under
850
to
the
green
car
which
a
photograph
was
taken
from
the
parking
I'm.
Sorry
from
the
parking
lot
and
from
the
with
the
car
cover
on
it
is
on
the
property
at
218.
So
I'd
like
the
board
to
consider
right
now,
violation
of
4000
and
a
violation
of
852
or
the
property
of
218
North
panelist,
and
will
open
a
case
on
210
North
Pinellas
that
hopefully
we
can
go
forward
with
another
interesting
point
with
mr.
I
Pat's
elitists
that
he
brought
up
at
the
last
code
board
and
alluded
to
today
about
me
contacting
him.
The
boat
and
the
green
Jaguar
were
contacted
through
Jerry
T
had
a
phone
conversation.
I
say
you
ask
Harry
to
get
rid
of
the
boat
and
B
Jaguar,
and
this
occurred.
I,
don't
know
the
exact
dates,
but
it's
been
more
than
a
year
ago
the
photographs
online
show
the
car
and
the
boat
so
60
days
or
something
that's
been
there
for
a
large
number
of
years,
we're
playing
with
semantics,
and
things
like
that
here.
O
S
O
J
B
B
J
E
E
C
I
L
L
C
J
J
D
J
D
B
O
S
C
I
17-8,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
six,
zero
six,
the
address
is
425
Wayfarer
Court,
this
property
owners.
Realist
is,
and
it's
though,
system
Maria,
Pappa
gnosis-
this
will
repeat
violator
case
stemming
from
case
16
169,
which
was
at
4:25
way
for
air
court,
a
violation
of
8
40
and
8
52.
Currently,
this
property
is
still
out
of
compliance
and
the
starting
date
was
October.
I
12Th
of
this
year
exhibit
number
1
going
before
the
board
are
all
the
photographs,
including
the
inspections,
exhibit
number
2,
or
all
of
my
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
hear
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
3
years.
My
administrative
Docs
to
include
the
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
records.
The
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign
exhibit
number
five
is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs.
All
the
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
database.
C
I
Case
began
on
October
October
9th
of
this
year,
stemming
from
a
citizen
complaint
October
12th.
They
conducted
the
first
inspection.
The
citizen
complaint
was
regarding
a
tree
that
had
fallen
post-storm
onto
their
onto
their
property.
I
noticed
there's
a
tree
on
the
north
side
of
the
building,
that's
fallen
from
Irma
there's
a
couple
other
broken
trees
and
damaged
trees
on
the
property
that
I
could
see.
Those
trees
need
to
be
cleared.
The
FEMA
cleanup
had
already
occurred
on
the
street
by
the
time.
I
I
did
the
inspection
it
had
picked
up
the
debris
from
the
rest
of
the
houses
and
part
of
that
tree
on
that
neighbor's
on
that
property
is
on
the
neighbors
fence,
damaging
it.
Currently,
on
October
12th
of
this
year,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
certified
and
return
receipt
requested,
October
28th
the
sign
was
posted
and
an
affidavit
of
posting
was
completed.
J
I'll
make
a
motion:
okay,
I,
move
the
based
on
testimony
evidence,
facts
presented
in
law
that
the
respondent
was
a
violation
of
section
8,
40
and
8.
52
of
the
tarpon
springs
code
from
10
12
2017
such
time
until
such
time
as
the
property's
broad
compliance
will
find
a
$50
per
day
shall
be
imposed
until
compliance
is
met.
D
K
K
B
Hang
on
a
second,
we
need
to
deal
with
the
evidence
first.
So
your.
What
is
your
legal
objection
to
the
evidence?
You
may
may
not
agree
with
the
documents,
but
I
want
to
know
what
your
legal
objection
is,
for
example,
relevance,
authenticity,
something
like
that.
Do
you
own
any
of
those
legal
objections.
K
B
B
C
I
Right
case
number
17:
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero.
Six
one
eight
is
a
thirty
nine
West
Oakwood
Street
v-necks,
a
group
LLC
is
the
property
owner,
sir
repeat
violator.
Four,
eight
forty
only
there's
other
violations
on
this
property,
but
a
dashboard.
He
was
established
under
case
17
481
at
199,
Grande
Boulevard,
which
is
also
owned
by
the
nexi
group,
LLC,
basically
for
the
one
violation
of
8
40
that
I'll
be
discussing
it's
out
of
compliance
from
October
18th
to
the
current
date.
I
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign
all
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property.
Owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
the
tax,
collector
databases,
I'll
notice,
a
violation
and
the
notice
earings
percent
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail.
And,
madam
chairman,
please
accept
all
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence
once
they've
made
their
own.
I
This
case
started
on
October
18th,
as
I
stated,
based
on
a
citizen
complaint
from
a
neighbor
regarding
the
property
at
39,
West
oak,
wood
being
overgrown
front
and
rear
trees
are
encroaching
onto
the
sidewalk
out
front.
There
was
a
pile
of
debris
in
the
rear.
There
was
also
a
blue
Camaro.
With
expired.
Tags
expired
in
2016,
while
I
was
there.
Mary
came
on
scene
I
advised
her.
I
We
had
a
discussion
about
the
repeat
violator
status
from
199
grand,
which
was
a
code
board
case
that
I
think
was
her
class
month
last
month
or
the
prior
month.
I
advised
her
we're
gonna,
be
sending
her
the
the
notice
of
violation
and
the
notice
of
hearing,
and
she
you
know
she
had
ten
days
to
get
rid
of
the
car
out
back,
which
she
did
very
expeditiously
was
gone
within
a
few
days,
so
that
that
violation
is
not
before
the
board
at
this
time,
other
to
be
other
than
to
be
established.
But
it
is
in.
Q
I
Stated
I
spoke
to
Mary
about
her
violations.
She
stated
she
was
going
to
cut
the
grass
that
day
and
advised
her
that,
because
of
eight
forty
being
on
the
other
property
that
the
daily
fines
had
begun
at
that
point,
on
October
18th,
the
notice
of
violation,
notice
of
hearing
and
the
repeat
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
certified
and
first
class
received
a
phone
call
stating
the
property
was
ready
for
inspection
on
the
18th.
It
would
be
ready
on
the
19th
on
the
20th.
I
They
conducted
a
rien,
spec,
ssin,
they're,
still
trash
on
the
property
and
unused
equipment.
There's
a
gym.
There
was
a
gym
out
front.
The
grass
was
overgrown
in
the
rear
and
the
east
side
of
the
property.
There
was
also
an
old
pallet
thrown
up
on
top
of
the
grass
on
the
south
side
of
the
property.
On
October
25th
Mary
made
a
visit
into
the
office.
She
was
shown
pictures
of
the
property
by
the
by
the
clerk
October
28th.
I
They
posted
the
property
and
an
affidavit
was
signed
on
November
8th
Mary
came
into
the
office
again
to
let
us
know
she
will
take
care
of
the
workout
bench
from
the
front
view,
and
the
property
should
be
ready
for
inspection.
I
did
can
conduct
a
rien
spec
ssin
today.
It
should
be
noted
that
basically,
all
the
stuff
has
stacked
out
on
the
curb
and
we're
in
a
kind
of
an
interesting
situation
at
the
fall.
I
Cleanup
is
took
her
this
sunday,
so
she
was
advised
by
the
office
that
if
all
those
things
were
picked
up,
she
would
be
in
compliance,
but
as
of
today,
they're
still
out
there
and
I
don't
know
what
may
or
may
not
be
picked
up
by
the
fall
cleanup.
Also
around
back
there's
a
pile
of
yard
waste
fall,
cleanup
doesn't
pick
up
yard
waste
and
the
FEMA
cleanups
already
occurred
in
that
area,
so
that
pile
of
yard
waste
in
the
back
appears
to
still
be
in
violation
as
well.
It's.
C
K
I
I
conducted
the
final
inspection
so
based
under
the
840,
which
is
a
repeat
violator
and
852,
which
tags
along
with
that
852
is
a
new
case
to
be
established.
The
40.00
is
to
be
established,
but
it
is
in
compliance
that
car
is
gone
and
there's
no
other
issues
with
it.
But
I
would
like
the
board
to
consider
the
violation
of
8
40
as
a
repeat
violator,
and
it's
still
not
in
compliance
as
of
this
date.
That's
stemming
from
the
previous
case,
I
mentioned,
8,
52
and
40.00
r1
is
in
compliance.
I
The
40.00
and
the
other
one
8
52
is
not
in
compliance
as
of
yet
it's
dependent
upon
that
pickup,
but
hopefully
will
occur,
and
then
the
debris
in
the
backyard,
regardless
of
if
it's
the
neighbors
debris
it's
on
her
property.
So
unfortunately
it
doesn't
need
to
be
cleaned
up
by
by
marrying
her
and
whatever
means
she
finds
necessary
to
do
it,
and
at
this
point,
I
have
nothing
further.
C
K
K
K
B
K
B
K
I
K
B
K
The
next
question
is
this:
lady,
that
Kelly,
the
next-door
neighbor.
That
reported
me,
here's
a
picture
of
her
unlicensed
car
that
same
day,
because
the
grass
was
a
little
high
and
my
my
my
gardener
Tom
Bailey
was
very
sick
and
he
couldn't
do
it
and
I
pulled
up
behind
you
that
day,
when
you
were
there,
with
with
a
new
gardener,
Levi
a
Jamaican
fellow
that
I
was
kind
of.
It
was
kind
enough
to
help
me
well
had
all
the
equipment,
and
we
did
it
the
same
day
at
the
apartment.
K
It's
immaculate,
except
for
the
things
that
were
the
city,
has
to
take
on
dump
day.
You
know
and
that
that
workbench
I
had
a
tenant
inside
who
had
a
bad
back
and
he
wanted
to
work
on
it.
But
you
said
it
couldn't
be
on
the
patio
they
told
me
to
have
to
be
poured
sit
back.
So
what
we
did?
He
didn't
want
it
anymore,
so
we
put
it
for
them
to
take
it,
which
is
a
shame.
I
wish.
Somebody
could
use
a
Salvation
Army
or
someone
takes
is.
L
K
K
K
Q
I
I
I
I
K
K
Am
NOT
a
repeat
violator,
because
when
he
came
to
199
Grande
Boulevard
this
guy
Zeek
McAfee
I,
don't
know
how
to
pronounce
his
name
was
gone.
He
was
not
there
he's
out
and
it's
been
rented
I
told
you.
The
little
manager
at
dock
mat
Daniels
at
a
Wendy's,
a
very
nice
young
man,
I
rented
a
house
to
off
of
54
before,
and
he
wanted
to
be
closer
to
tarpon
because
they
transferred
him
here.
I'm.
K
K
B
It
keeps
that's,
not
an
issue
today,
we're
trying
to
get
through
ten
more
cases
here
today,
so
we're
trying
to
keep
you
on
track
here.
So
if
you
have
any
other
defenses
or
any
other
documents
or
anything
else
that
you
want
the
board
to
hear
before
they
close
the
public
hearing
anything
else,
you
want
us
here
what.
B
O
B
So
if
you
feel
that
you
don't
need
the
summary
or
this
you
can
move
forward
with-
and
let
me
just
tell
you
there
is
a
this-
is
kind
of
a
split
decision
here.
Split
motion.
Let
me
just
put
it
that
way:
you'll
need
more
than
one
motion,
because
there
has
been
alleged
that
there
is
a
repeat
violation
of
section,
8,
40
and
then
the
violations
of
8's,
52
and
40.00.
Those
are
different
violations,
their
initial
violations.
B
G
I
First
set
of
pictures,
October,
18
and
then
October
20th,
some
additional
ones.
I
didn't
take
any
pictures
from
today
because,
as
I
stated,
there's
the
one
pile
of
debris
which
you
can
see
in
the
October
pictures,
that's
still
out
back,
which
missing
axes
testified
as
partially
hers,
personal
your
neighbors.
I
G
J
C
C
K
B
J
C
J
J
C
B
So
you've
been
found
in
violation
of
section
8
40
of
the
city
code.
You
you
are
now
occurring
a
fine
at
$50
a
day
starting
October
18th.
You
will
also
have
been
found
to
be
required
to
pay
the
prosecution
of
that
particular
case
at
128
dollars.
So
it's
very
important.
You
get
the
property
into
compliance
of
that
code,
section
8
40
as
soon
as
possible.
As
for
code
sections,
8
52
and
40.00
you've
been
given
until
November
15
2017
to
bring
into
compliance.
Should
you
fail
to
bring
into
compliance
by
that
time?
B
Maybe
a
$25
a
day?
Fine,
if
you
don't
understand
what
has
happened
here
today,
you
can
talk
to
the
officer
gassen
after
the
hearing
or
sometime
tomorrow
or
next
week,
and
he
can
explain
it
to
you.
You
will
be
getting
an
order
that
will
be
issued
by
the
city,
clerk
and
you'll,
get
that
in
about
10
days.
K
K
K
K
K
B
C
I
You
this
is
a
case:
17-8,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
six,
three
two
property
address:
518
East,
Lime
Street
and
wine,
or
Hill
Arco
LOC,
or
the
property
owners,
a
small
apartment,
complex
and
a
500
block
of
East
Lime
Street.
The
repeat
violator
stems
from
two
cases:
16
287,
which
was
a
violation
of
8
22
and
age
40
and
17
56,
which
was
eight
twenty
two
and
eight
forty
two
prior
cases,
the
photographs
going
around
our
exhibit
number
one.
All
of
my
notices,
including
my
notice
of
hearing
or
exhibit
number
two.
I
The
administrative
documents
include
the
case,
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records.
Our
exhibit
number
three,
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign
or
exhibit
number
four
exhibit
number
five
is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs.
All
of
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector.
All
my
notice
violations
are
notice.
A
hearing
were
sent
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail,
and
then,
madam
chairman,
please
accept
the
exhibits
into
the
record
once
they
make
their
round.
C
I
I
On
November
23rd,
the
Notice
of
Hearing
Notice
of
Violation
and
the
notice
of
hearing
for
repeat
violator
were
mailed
first
class
and
return
receipt
posted
the
property
on
October
28th
on
November
6
Dianne
from
the
property
management
called
stating
it
was
ready
for
inspection.
I
conducted
a
final
inspection
on
it
today
and
found
that
the
property
is
still
not
in
compliance.
The
mail
was,
we
didn't
get
any
return.
Green
cards
the
address
or
the
green
card
address
to
the
owner
was
eventually
returned
sign
for
the
notice
of
hearing.
C
J
Couple
motions
here,
one
on
the
one
on
the
new
violation:
I'll
start
that
new,
based
on
testimony
evidence,
facts
presented
in
the
law
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violation
of
section
8
52
of
the
code
orange
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
was
in
force
in
aspect.
In
effect,
the
respondents
was
in
violation
they're,
all.
J
E
D
J
C
J
J
G
B
G
J
J
D
I
Madam
chairman
may
I
make
you
aware,
there's
apparently
a
six
o'clock
meeting
in
here,
but
we
have.
What
we
have
left
is
the
affidavit
of
compliance
and
non-compliance.
This,
and
then
we
have
one
issue
that
we
are
definitely
gonna
have
to
hear
this
month,
which
is
that
foreclosure
issue.
It's
solely
your
choice,
if
you
think
we
can
get
through
all
of
them
or
we
can
postpone
them
the
affidavits
until
next
month
and
just
my.
B
B
O
B
B
F
B
B
C
T
T
T
T
B
G
I
C
C
D
D
J
A
D
C
C
E
E
D
J
J
C
J
D
B
C
J
J
C
D
D
J
J
D
J
B
Next
yeah,
we
have
the
last
item-
item
number
24,
foreclosure
of
code
enforcement,
leaning
at
1717,
Mandalay
Drive,
and
there
is
a
memo
in
the
packet
that
you've
received.
Although
you
haven't
seen
one
of
these
in
a
long
time,
the
city
wants
to
move
forward,
they're
asking
for
your
authority
to
foreclose
this
property.
As
you
know,
under
the
Florida
Statute
chapter
1
62,
the
city
has
to
wait
90
days
after
recording
of
a
code
violation
before
you
can
bring
a
foreclosure
action
in
this
particular
case.
B
The
city
has
waited
well
longer
than
the
90
days
under
the
statute
and
under
the
city's
code
they
have
to
come
to
you.
Are
they
asked
for
your
authority
to
foreclose
the
lien?
They
will
then
ultimately
go
to
the
City
Commission
for
their
authority
to
foreclose
the
lien,
and
even
though
you
haven't
seen
one
of
these
recently
I
can
tell
you
that
I
handle
lots
and
lots
of
these
for
other
cities.
It's
a
matter
of
standard
course
for
the
city
to
move
forward
on
this.
It's
not
out
of
the
ordinary.
B
In
fact,
when
I
was
at
code
enforcement
in
Dunedin
yesterday,
we
did
eight
of
these,
so
it
happens
quite
often
it's
just
that
city
has
at
its
wit's
end
on
this
particular
property.
As
noted
in
the
in
the
memorandum
that
you've
received
from
the
police
department,
so
they're
asking
for
your
authority
to
foreclose.
So
what
you
would
need
to
do
is
either
to
have
a
motion
to
approve
that
foreclosure.
B
No,
that's
not
going
to
happen
today.
Ma'am
today
is
for
the
board
to
determine
whether
or
not
they're
going
to
move
forward
with
authority
to
foreclose
they're,
not
going
to
hear
your
case
all
over
again
and
they're
not
going
to
hear
your
defenses,
and
this
is
not
your
opportunity
to
address
that
with
the
with
this
board.
Now
is
the
opportunity
for
the
city
to
get
before
this
board.
It's
the
only
way
that
they
can
do
that
because
of
the
Sunshine
Law.
B
I
D
D
B
U
Major
troll
I
talked
to
city
manager.
They
said
they
would
never
for
closed
the
property,
because
in
that
nine
year
turn
he
never
foreclosed
a
property.
If
somebody
doesn't
know
the
situation
that
shouldn't
be
foreclosed
as
they
should,
let
me
have
a
chance
to
correct
any
information.
I
bring
all
my
evidence.
My
this.
B
U
When
I
know
about
it,
in
July,
17
I
came
here
in
August,
7
and
I
start
to
work
very
hard.
Daily
I
meet
more
than
50
architect,
a
structure,
engineer
generation
company,
including
landscaping
and
nursery
and
I.
Do
everything
I
can
to
try
to
work
with
the
city,
but
every
plan
I
submit
they
they
disagreed.
They
said
the
grass
is
over
ground,
they
say:
I
have
some
tiling
there,
but
the
piling
never
been
the
issue.
My
mother
owned
the
property
since
2006.
U
B
U
U
No
I
came
to
the
city.
I
came,
I
came
August
7
when
I
arrived
city
of
tobon
spring
I
know
about
the
situation
in
July
17,
because
I
never
received
any
communication.
So
I
tried
to
set
up
the
meeting
to
meet
with
a
captain
chief
coaching.
He
said
that
he's
not
going
to
meet
with
me
until
the
the
whole
board
member
do
my
favorite.
U
They
said
you
need
to
go
there
to
explain
to
them
why
you
didn't
receive
any
communication,
and
he
said
if
the
kolbar
member
in
your
favor
I
would
meet
with
you
that
was
August
8th
immediately.
I
went
to
the
top
to
the
city
manager
and
the
city
manager
he's
very
good
person.
He's
the
only
person
willing
to
listen
my
size,
the
story
he
even
mentioned
in
his
nine-year
term,
working
in
the
pub
and
spring
he
never
ever
foreclosed
any
property
except
one.
So
he
even
tell
me
if
you
doesn't
know,
you'd,
never
receive
any
communication.
U
U
U
B
B
If
you
get
to
some
point
with
the
city
and
want
to
come
to
a
resolution
of
your
issues
with
the
city,
you
can
do
that,
but
that's
not
what
this
board
is
going
to
decide
today,
they're
going
to
decide
whether
or
not
that
they're
going
move
forward
with
the
foreclosure,
because
after
all
this
time
you
have
not
brought
the
property
or
your
mother
has
not
brought
the
property
in
compliance.
So
I'm
gonna!
Stop
you
right!
There
I!
Let.
G
B
B
Okay,
so,
madam
chairman,
at
this
point,
I'm
going
to
suggest
to
you
that
you
consider
the
memo
that
has
been
proposed
to
you
by
Officer
gousen.
If
you
have
additional
questions
of
officer,
gassen
or
major
trill,
major
trill
is
here
as
well
today,
but
otherwise
the
motion
would
be
either
to
approve
the
foreclosure
process
or
or
not
I
hope.
B
C
B
D
B
B
F
B
That's
a
very,
very
good
question
know
what
what
it
means
is
is
that
at
this
point,
if
the
motion
is
approved,
it
will
go
to
the
City
Commission
and
the
City
Commission
will
make
a
decision
whether
or
not
that
the
foreclosure
action
will
actually
be
filed.
It's
a
lawsuit,
it's
filed
in
the
circuit
court
and
it's
basically
like
a
mortgage
foreclosure
action.
B
The
owner
of
the
property,
will
be
served
with
the
lawsuit
and
she'll
have
20
days
in
which
to
respond
and
raise
any
defenses
that
she
has
once
it
goes
through
its
complete
process,
and
it
goes
to
trial
or
summary
judgment.
Hearing
an
order
will
be
entered
by
the
circuit
court
judge
basically
saying
that
the
property
owner
needs
to
pay
all
of
the
outstanding
fines
on
the
property,
and
if
she
fails
to
pay
it,
then
the
property
was
sold
at
a
judicial
sale.
It
used
to
be
that
those
sales
took
place
on
the
courthouse
steps.
B
Now
it's
all
done
by
electronically
on
the
internet,
and
so
they
would
take
bids
over
the
internet
before
for
that
property.
If,
if
nobody
bids
on
it
more
than
likely,
the
city
will
bid
on
the
property
they'll
take
ownership
of
it,
they'll
bring
the
property
into
compliance,
and
then
it
will
probably
be
sold
as
surplus
property,
but
any
third
party
can
buy
the
property
at
the
judicial
sale.
B
If
someone
else
purchases
it
and
one
of
the
first
things
that
will
happen
is,
is
that
you'll
see
an
immediate
case
being
opened
by
the
code
enforcement
department,
alleging
the
same
violations
so
that
that
owner
will
be
forced
to
bring
this
property
into
compliance?
So
those
are
that's
kind
of
the
process
that
it
goes
through
and
the
process
will
take
about
six
months
from
beginning
to
end.
B
O
B
U
Manager
told
me
I
should
come
here
and
tell
why
the
co
enforcement
proper
told
me
I
should
come
here
and
explain
the
whole
situation
and
the
board
member
will
hear
my
sighs
the
story.
My
mother
is
complied
the
grass-eating
cut
the
first
day
when
I
came
here.
I
meet
the
city
manager
in
10
August
and
the
grass
card
I
have
pictured.
Before
and
after
heard.
B
B
D
B
So
miss
Marsh,
you
understand
at
this
point.
The
board
has
made
a
decision
to
move
it
to
the
next
step.
It
will
go
to
the
City
Commission
for
consideration
for
authority
to
foreclose
on
the
code
enforcement
lien.
My
advice
to
you
is
is
to
continue
to
work,
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
as
quickly
as
possible.
So
and
then,
once
you
do
that
you
can
contact
either
major
trill
or
officer
gassin
to
tell
them
that
you're
in
compliance
and
then
that
will
probably
stop
what
is
happening
right
now.
The.