►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board January 11, 2018
Description
Description
A
C
B
D
Carlene,
haven't
we
sick
blessings
on
the
tasks
before
us
bless
our
efforts
with
clear
insight,
our
deliberations
with
wisdom,
our
work
with
clarity
and
accuracy
and
our
decisions
with
impartiality.
We
gather
to
make
decisions
for
our
community.
May
we
use
only
our
best
skills
in
judgment,
keeping
ourselves
impartial
and
neutral,
as
we
consider
the
merits
and
pitfalls
of
each
matter
that
is
placed
before
us.
This
we
pray,
amen,
I,
pledge
allegiance
to
the
flag
of
the
United
States
of
America
and
to
the
Republic
for
which
it
stands.
One
nation
under
God,
indivisible.
A
Effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
various
codes
within
the
city
of
tarpon
springs.
Any
aggrieved
party
may
appeal
a
final
administrative
order
of
this
board
to
the
circuit
court.
Such
appeals
shall
be
filed
within
30
days
of
the
execution
of
the
order
to
be
appealed.
Florida
statues
to
86.0
1:05
requires
any
party
appealing
a
decision
of
this
board
to
have
a
record
of
the
proceedings
to
support
such
an
appeal.
The
procedure
the
board
is
as
follows.
A
First,
the
city
presents
its
what
and
exhibits
after
which
the
alleged
violator
is
able
to
ask
the
city's
witnesses
any
specific
questions
regarding
their
testimony.
Secondly,
the
alleged
violator
is
allowed
to
make
a
presentation
and
present
his
or
her
witnesses
and
exhibits.
Then
the
city
can
question
that
the
alleged
violators
witnesses,
after
both
rounds
of
testimony
both
on
the
part
of
the
city
and
the
part
of
the
alleged
violator
each
part,
is
asked
to
give
a
closing
argument
first
by
the
city
and
then
by
the
alleged
violator
after
those
three
steps
are
taken.
A
This
board
will
close
the
public
hearing
portion
of
the
case
to
discuss
it
and
take
appropriate
action
before
we
begin.
The
public
hearings
we
will
have
all
potential
witnesses,
stand
up
and
be
sworn
in
by
the
Secretary
of
the
board.
So
if
there's
anyone
going
to
speak,
would
you
please
stand
and
raise
your
right
hand.
A
A
F
G
Is
case
17-0,
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
four
six
five,
four
thirty
one
Grand
Boulevard,
Stavros,
sallykaus,
I'm,
Shannon
Berg,
currently
employed
by
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
on,
is
a
certified
arborist
license
number
FL,
nine
two
two
one:
a
I'm,
also
an
F
NGO,
a
certified
horticultural
professionals
license
number
H,
nine,
seven,
eight
four
zero.
Two,
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
were
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what
being
presented.
G
G
Make
sure
we
got
that
straight
I
need
to
fix
my
case
number.
Seventeen
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero.
Four
five
six!
Thank
you.
A
call
came
in
to
the
office
July
27th
2017
stating
trees
are
overgrown
and
blocking
the
line
of
sight
at
the
stop
sign.
I
was
unable
to
inspect
until
August
4th
upon
inspection
confirmed
the
complaint.
The
required
white
right-of-way
lines
were
blocked
by
three
overgrown
trees.
G
I
marked
out
visibility,
triangle
and
orange
paint
for
the
point
of
reference
tree
number
one
was
a
camper,
was
in
severe
decline,
dead,
hollow
limbs
next
to
the
roadway,
a
large
codominant
trunk
originating
2.5
feet
above
the
ground
which
were
weakly
attached
and
hazardous
to
persons
and
property
tree
number.
Two
was
a
cedar
in
good
condition,
has
several
lower
branches
blocking
the
view
tree
number
three
had
overgrown
into
the
camper
at
low
limbs
blocking
view
at
the
time
to
bring
them
to
compliance
tree
number
one
needed
a
full
removal
due
to
its
hazardous
condition.
G
They
obtained
a
permit
17
to
zero
to
seven
for
removal
on
August
18th
of
2017
on
September
1st
2017
Elaine
Ferris
called
on
behalf
of
Stavrou
sallykaus
Norma.
She
and
others
would
be
addressing
the
yard
issue,
as
well
as
the
camphor
tree,
but
needed
a
two-week
extension.
An
extension
extension
was
granted
by
another
City
arborist
Greg
Dobbins
on
October
6
2017,
a
rien
spec
ssin
occurred,
and
the
trunk
of
the
camphor
was
measured
at
five
feet.
High.
The
trunk
is
still
blocking
the
visibility
and
the
property
was
not
in
compliance.
G
A
phone
call
was
placed
a
homeowner
and
the
homeowner
was
granted
another
extension
because
he
claimed
he
could
not
get
a
company
to
remove
the
stump.
Due
to
the
hurricane
Erma
on
December
18
2017,
a
rien
spec
ssin
was
conducted,
the
trunk
was
not
removed.
The
tree
was
trying
to
regrow,
which
again
was
blocking
line-of-sight
property
was
still
out
of
compliance,
On,
January,
10th
2018,
every
inspection
was
conducted
and
the
trunk
had
grown
more
sprouts
and
the
property
was
currently
out
of
compliance
and
the
trunk
still
needs
removal.
That's
the
end
of
my
testimony.
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
I
I
D
Madam
chair
there's
an
objection
to
this
line
of
testimony,
and
so
you
need
to
decide
whether
or
not
you're
going
to
allow
this
line
of
testimony
to
continue
on.
And
if
you
are,
you
would
overrule
the
objection.
If
it's
you're
not
going
to
allow
that
line
of
testimony,
the
harassment
aspect
that
I'm
assuming
that
they're
dealing
with,
then
you
would
sustain
the
objection
and
then.
E
J
D
E
D
I
I
E
D
J
I
J
D
D
I
I
At
the
same
time,
the
person
by
whom
they
are
being
harassed
has
created
conditions
on
their
properties
that
are
untenable
and
have
not
been
addressed.
What
we
are
asking
is
simply
a
fair
and
balanced
addressing
of
issues
brought
before
the
city
and
assurance
that
citizens
are
treated
fairly
and
without
discrimination.
A
I
This
is,
he
was
already
been
forced
to
pay
for
a
permit
which
he
could
not
afford.
Now
they
wanted
him
to
take
out
a
tree
which
I
invite
you
all
to
go
stand
and
look
at
the
property
is
not
a
hazard
as
far
as
view
goes,
it
has
been
there
since,
before
my
childhood,
like
I,
said
there
are
no
records
of
incidents
being
caused
because
of
the
existence
of
this
tree.
It
would
be
incredibly
expensive
to
have
the
tree
pulled
out
and
a
shame
to
take
out
a
tree.
I
You
know
of
such
aged
and
venerable
growth,
which
is
obviously
healthy,
and
you
know,
and
not
dead
or
dangerous.
That's
this
one
single
issue.
The
other
issue
is
that,
besides
this,
this
poor
gentleman
is
being
fine
to
death
for
by
the
city.
He
cannot
possibly
afford
these
fines
and
that
issue
at
hand
is
being
caused
by
another
complaint
that
the
city
chose
not
to
address.
What
I'm
saying
is
that
it's
not
fair
to
address
the
concerns
of
one
citizen
and
not
another
it.
I
It
comes
across,
as
you
know,
as
preferential
treatment
or
harassment,
and
it's
I
I
know
that
that's
not
the
intention
of
anyone
here.
It
wouldn't
be
the
intention
of
anyone
faring
decent
and
we're
simply
seeking
fair
and
decent
treatment
for
mr.
Celicas
and
for
his
neighbors,
who
have
been
harassed,
who
have
had
their
property
damaged
and
have
not
had
their
concerns
addressed.
I
G
D
Can
get
into
that
in
the
discussion
portion
when
the
motion
is
made
at
this
point?
It's
do
you
have
any
questions
of
any
any
person
that
has
testified
and
if
you
don't
have
any
questions
of
who
was
testifying,
then
we
will
allow
them
to
present
rebuttal
or
they
can
give
their
summary
of
the
case.
And
then
once
a
motion
is
made
I'll
try
to
help
you
with
answer
that
question.
G
I
D
G
D
I
The
stop
sign
that
was
placed
on
mr.
selita's
property
as
a
matter
of
necessity,
because
there's
no
city
property
available
there
they've
already
taken
what
they
were
able
to
of
his
yard.
Whenever
you
are,
are
heading
east,
on
Hope
Street
approaching
the
stop
sign,
the
stop
sign
is
in
front
several
feet
in
front
of
that
tree.
So
how
is
the
tree
blocking.
G
G
G
D
So
far
the
chairman
has
allowed
you
a
lot
of
leeway.
She's
first
asked
you
whether
you
had
any
cross-examination.
You
said
no
she's
allowed
to
open
a
back
up
to
house
a
couple
more
questions.
If
you
any
other
questions
that
are
relevant
to
this
case,
not
any
other
traffic
case
any
other.
With
this
case.
I
I
G
Understand
the
visibility
triangle
and
it's
defined
and
now
but
you
don't
know,
okay
from
the
apex
of
the
corner.
You
measure
30
feet
to
30
feet
that
beside
a
inside
be
of
a
triangle
alongside
see
which
would
be
the
hypotenuse.
Everything
towards
the
corner
is
actually
has
to
be
within
six
inches.
Ask.
I
M
E
Wait
a
minute:
this
has
everything
to
do
with
it
because
they
hurt
their
mother
has
been
after
me
to
take
my
property
and
use
it
as
a
parking
lot
for
the
shrine.
She
is
a
caretaker.
Not
the
owner
is
in
the
family,
trust
and
she
was
telling
my
neighbors
and
everybody
would
listen
everybody
that
she
was
using
code
enforcement,
the
police
powers
of
code
enforcement
to
code
enforcement
and
take
it
and
use
it
in
a
parking
lot.
E
Now
that
the
city
I,
have
it
right
here,
they're
going
to
they're
having
a
meeting
to
get
a
an
approval,
a
code,
they
get
approval
to
build
a
multifamily
unit
on
a
big
lot
that
she
is
now
using
as
a
parking
area.
So
that
means
that
when
they
develop
that
big
old
Park
is
big
a
lot,
then
my
property
becomes
prime
for
their
parking
lot
for
st.
Michael's
I'm,
not
and
now
against.
Saint
Michael's
I
love
the
people
that
come
there
and
pray.
But
she's
been
doing
this
over
the
years.
D
Midst
of
the
mayor
summary,
you
need
to
summarize
your
case.
The
testimony
has
been
closed,
and
so
you
need
to
summarize
your
case,
and
it
would
be
something
a
long
line
of.
We
believe
that
we've
provided
sufficient
of
evidence
to
show
that
there
is
no,
in
fact,
no
violation
of
the
city
code.
Section
37
point
zero
zero,
and
these
are
the
reasons
why
and
you're
asking
the
board
to
find
non-violation.
D
C
Make
a
motion
based
on
the
testimony,
evidence
and
facts
presented
in
the
law,
but
at
the
time
the
alleged
violations
sections
thirty-seven
point:
zero,
zero
and
133
point
zero.
Two
of
the
Code
of
Ordinances
for
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
was
enforced
in
effect
and
the
respondents
were
in
violation,
they're.
A
D
Here:
here's
where
I
wanted
to
jump
in
and
talk
to
you
about
the
photographs,
mrs.
dad
said
a
question
about
the
photographs
and
obviously
that's
one
of
the
harder
decisions
that
you
have.
You
have
to
weigh
the
evidence
that
you
see
you
have
to
give
whatever
weight
that
you
want
that
you
think
is
more
probative.
In
other
words,
if
you
believe
the
photographs
that
are
being
presented
by
the
respondent
as
being
more
accurate,
then
the
photos
being
presented
by
the
city
you
can
give
that
more
weight.
D
But
you
know
if
you're
asking
you
know
whether
or
not
because
they're
at
different
angles
and
so
forth,
then
you
need
to
take
that
into
consideration
when
you're
making
your
motion
really
what
it
boils
down
to
is.
Is
that
and
I'll
read
this
Code
section
to
you
so
that
everybody
understands
the
actual
code
section
that's
being
cited,
because
it's
dealing
with
feet
the
number
of
feet
from
the
corner.
It
says:
30,
7.00
parrentes,
is
on
every
corner
lot.
D
The
triangle
formed
by
the
required
right-of-way
lines
and
the
line
drawn
between
two
points
along
the
required
right-of-way
lines.
A
distance
of
30
feet
from
the
intersection
of
said
lines
shall
be
kept.
Free
of
obstructions,
such
as
lateral
vision,
is
kept
clear
between
three
and
eight
feet
above
grade
so
you're
going
to
go
back
30
feet
each
direction,
you're
gonna
join
the
line.
If
there's
anything
in
that
triangle,
that
would
block
or
obscure
view,
then
you
are
to
find
a
violation.
D
Is
another
portion
of
the
code,
the
same
code,
dealings
with
driveways?
It's
a
little
bit
different
and
smaller.
It's
15
feet
and
not
30
feet,
because
it's
not
an
intersection.
It's
a
driveway,
so
I'm
not
going
to
read
the
rest
of
that.
But
let
me
read
to
you
the
other
Code
section.
That's
been
cited,
one
thirty
three
point:
oh
two,
one.
D
Subparagraph
a
says:
the
terms
and
provisions
of
the
section
shall
apply
to
real
property
within
the
limits
of
the
city,
so
paragraph
B
says
owners
of
private
property
responsible
for
the
maintenance
of
trees
and
private
property
and
in
a
budding
rights-of-way
unless
otherwise
provided
in
Section.
One
thirty,
three
point:
zero:
zero.
Three
one.
D
One
3300
through
130
310,
so
paragraph
C,
says
trees
shall
be
maintained
by
the
owner
tenant
or
their
agent
in
good
condition.
So
as
to
present
a
healthy
neat
and
orderly
appearance,
all
plant
material
shall
be
maintained,
free
of
physical
damage
or
injury
arising
from
the
lack
of
water,
chemical
exposure,
insects,
disease
blight
or
other
cause.
D
Subparagraph
D,
except
for
those
tree
species
listed
as
exempt
or
following
a
declared
state
of
emergency
in
which
trees
become
damaged
in
such
a
way
that
topping
our
excessive
pruning
by
or
at
the
direction
of
a
government
agency
becomes
necessary.
It
shall
be
unlawful
for
any
person
to
cut
down
damage
top
poison
or,
in
any
other
manner,
destroy
or
cause
destroyed
a
tree,
regardless
of
condition
with
a
DBH.
That's
diameter
at
breast
height
of
4
inches
or
more
without
a
permit,
not
more
than
one-third
of
the
tree.
D
D
A
A
D
The
testimony
that
you've
received
so
far
is
is
that
there
was
a
complaint.
The
code
enforcement
department
went
out
there
and
found
that
there's
a
violation
of
the
code,
because
this
tree
exists
in
the
visibility
triangle,
it's
greater
than
six
inches
and
width.
It
does
not
have
a
clear
view
through
it,
and
so
it's
a
violation
of
the
code,
so
you
know
I
asked
for
it
growing.
You
know.
Obviously
you
know
that's
the
purpose
of
this
code
section.
D
N
B
A
A
E
A
E
E
E
E
D
E
B
I
D
B
N
C
F
A
A
E
D
A
F
L
Officer
Steve,
Goss
and
city
of
Turpan
Springs
Police
Department
code
enforcement
have
been
so
employed
since
2015
I'll
be
presenting
before
the
board.
A
number
of
exhibits
exhibit
number
1
is
all
the
photographs
to
include
my
inspection,
photographs,
pre
and
post
all
the
notices
to
include
the
Notice
of
Violation
to
notice
a
hearing,
all
my
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
in
my
officer.
L
Any
emails
that
were
exchanged
between
myself
and
the
responded
dog
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign
all
of
my
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
well
the
violator
wasn't
here,
but
they
would
have
been
exact
copies
if
she
was
so
all
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collectors.
Databases.
L
Initial
inspection
on
this
property,
and
and
just
so
the
board
understands
this
property
is
currently
in
compliance.
So
it's
here
strictly
to
be
established,
started
out
on
May
20th
of
2017.
A
lot
was
overgrown.
We
found
through
research
of
a
2012
case.
The
salaat
is
over
ten
thousand
square
feet,
but
in
2012
it
was
completely
cleared
and
bush
hog.
So
consequently,
the
requirement
under
852
is
that
property
be
continually
maintained
in
that
manner,
and
the
30
15
15
rule
no
longer
applies
to
this
property.
Irie
inspected
it
I'm.
L
Sorry,
first
off
about
May
22nd,
we
sent
an
Nov
to
the
property
owner.
They
requested
a
two-week
extension
which
we
did
grant
Irene
spected
the
property
on
July
1st,
and
there
was
no
change.
We
gave
them
for
whatever
reason
they
had
a
significant
period
of
time
from
July
1st
to
December,
where
I
conducted
the
next
rien
spec,
ssin
and
observed
the
property
was
still
not
in
compliance.
L
There
was
a
flurry
mails
and
conversation
between
myself
and
the
property
owner,
mainly
regarding
the
30
15
15
rule
with
the
property
and
bush
hogging
in
and
so
and
so
forth.
We
did
have
one
issue
that
was
brought
up
during
that
long
time
frame
was
the
gopher
tortoise
issue,
but
that
was
taken
care
of
in
a
moot
point
on
December
22nd,
we
mailed
the
amended
Notice
of
Violation
and
n
o
H,
the
amended
Nov
stemmed
from
a
tree
that
had
fallen
on
the
property
during
the
storm.
L
So
we
had
to
amend
that
to
get
that
tree
taken
care
of
as
well
on
December
29th,
I
posted
the
property
and
an
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed
on
January
10th
that
conducted
a
final
inspection
and
the
entire
lot
had
been
cleared
so
before
the
board.
I
would
like
to
have
them
consider
violation
of
8,
40
and
8
52,
and
also
130
302,
that
were
in
violation
at
the
time,
but
as
I
stated
they're
currently
in
compliance
and
I'd
simply
like
to
have
this
property
established.
H
L
C
N
A
A
A
L
You
kay
seventeen
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
588
property
address,
1403,
Glen,
Dovercourt,
Sara
Stillman
is
the
property
owner
here,
as
previously
stated
I
for
exhibits
before
the
board.
My
photographs,
including
my
inspections,
exhibit
number
two
are
all
my
notices,
including
a
notice
violation
and
notice
of
hearings
in
exhibit
number
three
years.
My
administrative
documents
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
emails.
L
Affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
sign
is
Exhibit
number
for
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
were
given
to
the
violator
copies
of,
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
the
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
according
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
database.
Madam
chairman,
if
you
would,
please
exhibit
accept
all
the
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
L
The
initial
inspection
on
this
property
started
on
October
3rd
2017.
It's
a
white
Cadillac
and
a
red
Chevy
in
the
driveway.
The
Cadillac
had
no
tags
and
does
not
appear
to
be
operative.
The
red
Chevy
had
expired
tags,
I
left
a
door
hanger
initially
with
ten
days
to
comply
on
October
14th.
The
Cadillac
had
current
tags,
the
red
Chevy's
now
under
cover,
which
is
not
allowed
under
the
code,
sent
a
notice
of
violation
at
that
time
and
it
was
sent
via
certified
mail
in
first
class
return.
Receipt
requested
on
November
1st
I
conducted
a
reinfection.
L
The
car
cover
on
one
vehicle
as
I
stated
it,
so
it
still
wasn't
in
compliance
at
that
time.
November
2nd.
The
final
Nov
was
mailed
certified
mail
and
first
class
return
receipt
on
October
18th
I
conducted
another
reinfection
I.
Don't
briefly
touch
on
this,
but
it's
not
for
the
board
to
consider,
because
this
also
this
is
another
case
that
is
up
to
be
established.
It's
currently
in
compliance.
L
There
was
a
fence
added,
so
I
had
to
do
another
amended
Nov
and
some
things
for
a
fence,
but
that
fence
been
taken
care
of
so
that
occurred
on
November
18th
on
November
20th.
The
final
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed
certified
return
receipt
in
first
class
I
conducted
another
inspection,
December
9th
the
inoperative
vehicle
was
still
on
the
property
at
that
point,
sent
to
notice
a
violation
for
January's
code
board,
December
11th,
that
Notice
of
Hearing
was
mailed.
L
L
All
of
my
certified
mail
was
returned,
unsigned
I
actually
haven't
had
any
contact
with
Sarah,
but
I've
been
in
contact
with
I
assume
your
significant
other
via
email
and
most
of
the
most
of
the
issues
were
taking
care
of
the
email.
The
only
thing
that's
before
the
board
right
now
for
them
to
consider
is
40.00,
which
is
the
vehicle
and
have
them
established
for
any
future.
Violations
of
having
inoperable
vehicles
or
unregistered
vehicles
on
the
property
and
I
have
nothing
further.
At
this
time.
O
O
F
O
Was
actually
brought
in
and
that's
when
he
thought
it
was
still
the
red
car
it
was
not.
The
red
part
was
the
65,
the
paola
that
was
brought
in
and
then
that
one
was
taken
back
out
and
now
we
actually
do
have
a
shop
in
clearwater
that
you
know
as
far
as
that
and
I,
don't
think
a
your
problem
and
the
trailers
brought
in
it
would
just
literally
be
for
an
overnight
if
you
purchase
a
car
and
if
you
first
short,
safe,
I,
really
don't
want
to
be
put
in
as
a
repeat
offender.
O
So
we're
not
repeat
offenders,
I,
loved
Harvin,
Springs
I,
don't
want
our
neighborhood
to
look
trashy
and
we
were
just
waiting
for
the
shop
to
open
up.
We
have
a
shop
now
it's
in
Clearwater,
they
did
not
be
a
problem
and
I
would
hate
to
get
a
ticket
just
for
something
silly.
Since
now
we
shouldn't
have
any
more
problems.
The
fence
was
put
up
to
try
to
like
remedy
this
solution,
and
it
was
a
misunderstanding
with
that
too.
We
didn't
know
that
we
couldn't,
you
know,
do
that
now.
O
Obviously
he
contacted
you
fix
that
we
everything
we
really
tried
to
fix.
As
soon
as
he's
had
a
problem
with
you,
he's
talked
to
you
he's
trying
to
fix
it.
We've
got
in
our
cars
tag.
Obviously,
cars
are
his
hobby.
Like
I
said
we,
we
moved
here
to
raise
our
kids
here.
We
love
it
and
that's
pretty
much
it
I.
Just
we
were
not
repeat
offenders,
it
should
be.
Everything
should
be
from
here
on
out
all.
H
O
A
A
A
D
K
D
A
C
N
C
A
D
A
D
Submit
Stillman
I'm,
just
gonna
summarize
what's
happened
here.
The
board
has
found
that
you
have
been
in
violation
of
the
code
40.00
in
the
past.
If
you
are
in
fact
found
to
be
in
violation
of
40.00
again
at
any
time
within
the
next
five
years,
it's
going
to
be
considered
a
repeat
violation.
It's
a
very,
very
important
that
you
don't
allow
any
inoperable
or
unlicensed
cars
out
there
on
that
property
to
make
that
a
violation
again,
the
reason
being
is:
there's
a
fine
up
to
$500
a
day
for
each
day
that
that
exists.
D
O
D
O
D
O
O
O
D
Q
D
F
L
You
case
number
17,
8,
0,
0,
0,
6,
1
0,
the
property
address
1673,
Seabreeze
Drive
at
for
exhibits,
as
as
noted
in
the
previous
cases,
my
photographs,
including
my
inspections
or
exhibit
number
one,
exhibit
number
two
of
my
notices,
including
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
Notice
of
Hearing,
exhibit
number
three
administrative
docks
case,
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records.
Any
males
exhibit
number
four.
The
affidavit
of
posting,
a
copy
of
the
sign.
L
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
were
presented,
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
mine
that
are
being
presented
to
the
board
and
all
my
notices
were
mailed,
the
property
owner
of
record
based
on
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
database,
and
please
accept
all
these
and
the
record
is
evidence.
Madam
chairman
yeah,
the
initial
inspection
on
this
property
was
October
12th.
There
was
some
significant
damage
to
this
property
after
the
hurricane,
presumably
because
the
garage
door
was
ok
right
of
the
hurricane,
so
we
all
kind
of
guessed.
L
It
was
the
hurricane,
as
you
can
see
in
the
photographs
that
are
going
around
there's
some
significant,
basically
the
whole
garage
door
on
this.
It's
a
rather
large
garage,
we're
kind
of
just
caved
in.
There
were
some
issues
with
the
soffit
and
a
couple
other
things
structurally
with
it.
We
sent
Notice
of
Violation
on
October
16th
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin.
There
was
no
change
on
November
1st
on
November
3rd
final
Nov
was
mailed
with
certified
mail
and
first-class
return.
L
Receipt
I
conducted
another
inspection
on
October
18th
we've
been
in
conversation
with
numerous
people
regarding
this
property,
and
it
sounds
like
largely
because
it's
a
bad.
They
have
to
go
to
bids
and
there's
some
things
like
that
and
there's
also
some
ownership
change,
possibly
progressing.
As
once
we're
dealt
with
this
so
long
story
short,
we
received
some
emails.
I
did.
The
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
on
November
20th
conducted
a
inspection,
December
27th
still
not
in
compliance,
was
I
stated.
We've
had
some
e-mails
back
and
forth
with
the
property.
L
Final
inspection
I
posted
the
sign
on
December
29th,
On,
January
10th.
It
still
wasn't
in
compliance.
We
had
received
a
letter
from
the
folks.
It
was
January
3rd
and
we
had
already
started
to
notice
the
hearing
process.
Long
short
of
it,
as
the
attorney
stated,
he
had
no
objections
to
it.
They
basically
wanted
some
more
time
to
just
finish
it
up
and
bring
it
into
compliance.
I
brought
it
before
the
board,
just
in
case
something
else
happens
to
it
so
that
it
could
still
be
dealt
with
in
a
timely
manner.
L
A
Q
I
said
earlier:
I
don't
disagree
with
officer
gassings
rendition
of
the
facts.
I
have
no
objection
to
the
establishment
of
the
violation
upon
his
inspection,
so
the
board
can
get
through
that
part
of
it
officer,
gaston's,
correct,
On,
January
3rd.
We
did
email
and
send
a
letter
to
the
board
requesting
extension
you'll,
see
officer,
Gaston
was
kind
enough
to
include
an
exhibit
3
that
he
provided
to
the
board.
Q
The
email,
the
letter
and
and
attached
to
the
letter
word
bid
summaries
that
we
had
put
out
in
order
to
get
the
work
done
on
the
property,
because,
as
we
are,
the
owners
of
the
property
Wells
Fargo
Bank,
we
can't
sell
it
ourselves,
which
we
intend
to
do
until
it's
in
compliance.
So
we
have
as
much
motivation
to
do
so
as
a
city
would
to
have
it
be
in
compliance.
Q
What
we're
looking
at
right
now
is
it
explained
in
the
letter
as
we're
waiting
for
the
labor
and
materials
and
obviously
the
insurance
company
to
approve
the
bid
so
that
we
can
get
the
work
done
were
simply
requesting
a
45-day
extension
of
that
time.
In
order
to
get
all
of
that
together
and
get
the
work
done
and
up
to
compliance,
I
discussed
this
with
officer,
gues
and
I.
Don't
know
how
he
feels
about
it
right
now,.
Q
Was
something
at
that
time?
We
were
thinking
about
and
I
know
he
hasn't
been
sworn,
but
there's
also
a
listing
agent
here
who
appeared
on
behalf
of
one
of
the
bank's
vendors
that
would
be
working.
What
the
bank
calls
REO,
essentially
that
that
means
that
they're
going
to
take
the
property
and
sell
it
that
can't
be
accomplished
at
this
time,
because
we
need
to
make
sure
it's
brought
up
to
compliance
first,
we
were
hoping
it
was
going
to
be
by
the
15.
D
Q
P
Name
is
Darin
Bolden
I
am
a
realtor
the
listing
agent.
My
brokerage
is
Allison
James
estates
and
homes.
This
property
is
under
contract.
There
has
been
a
many
attempts
to
reach
settlement,
however,
due
to
the
complications
that
the
damages
caused
by
Hurricane
Emma,
a
settlement
has
been
delayed
multiple
time.
The
current
settlement
date
is
scheduled
for
the
15th.
However,
there
are
some
delays
due
to
the
breakaway
wall
and
garage
door.
It
is
oversized
on
a
special
order.
You
will
see
some
of.
P
Buyer
has
agreed
to
many
extensions
of
the
contract
and
the
buyer
is
well
aware
of
the
violations.
The
buyer
has
retained
legal
counsel,
who
was
also
well
aware
of
the
violations.
Any
correspondences
that
have
transpired
between
the
seller,
the
board
code
enforcement
have
all
been
included
in
the
buyer,
is
well
aware
of
the
situation.
He'll.
F
P
A
N
C
A
D
B
B
B
D
N
O
A
Q
H
N
N
A
L
Case
number
17-8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
six,
twenty
four
the
address
is
311
Hope,
Street,
Anthony
and
Nicholas
chriskiss
I
have
four
exhibits,
exhibit
number
one
are
all
my
photographs,
including
my
inspection.
Seven
number
two
are
my
notices.
Nov
10
is
exhibit
number
three.
Is
the
administrative
docks
to
include
my
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
database
and
any
officer
emails
exhibit
number
four?
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign?
L
L
This
case
started
out
on
October
19th
of
this
of
2017
I
was
conducting
an
inspection
on
a
neighboring
property
when
I
noticed
violations
of
this
property,
which
were
significantly
overgrown
yard.
The
front
knee
your
rear
yard
are
overgrown
in
need
of
maintenance.
I
left
the
door
hanger
initially
with
ten
days
to
comply
on
November
1st
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin
and
found
there
was
no
change
to
the
property
on
November,
2nd
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed.
L
L
It
almost
appears
that
it
is
occupied.
You
know,
I,
when
I
went
and
put
the
door
hanger
up.
There
was
furniture
inside
of
it,
but
on
every
contact,
there's
never
been
anybody
there
and
I
have
no
other
information
as
far
as
if
there
is
somebody
living
there
or
not
to
the
point
where
there's
no
newspapers
out
front,
there's
no
mail.
So
that's
why
I
say
it
appears
that
it
may
be
occupied.
A
L
H
A
A
H
R
N
B
C
B
A
L
H
N
C
N
C
L
There's
me
before
exhibits
as
usual,
exhibit
number
one
or
all
my
photographs,
including
the
inspections
6
7
number
2.
My
notices,
noticeable
Asian
notice
hearings
exhibit
number
3
or
my
administrative
Docs,
to
include
the
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
websites
and
there's
not
any
officer
emails
because
I've
had
no
contact
with
anybody
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
via
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
in
tax
collectors
database.
L
L
The
rear
door
was
open,
so
the
building
wasn't
secured
and
the
building
is
leaning
to
the
north
I
mean,
and
you
can
just
tell
that
it's
listing
for
lack
of
a
better
term
and
it
does
not
appear
to
be
unfit
or
it
appears
to
be
unfit
for
human
habitation
and
it's
in
significant
structural
decline
on
November
I'm,
sorry,
October,
26th
of
2017.
We
mailed
the
Notice
of
Violation
via
certified
mail
return,
receipt
requested
as
well
as
first
class
and
on
November
11th
I
conducted
re-inspection.
L
The
lot
had
been
mowed,
but
it
appears
some
more
windows
were
broken
and
the
building
was
still
unsecured
and
the
front
door
now
was
open
and
unsecured
I
did
not
go
inside
the
building
due
to
the
I.
Just
didn't
it
wasn't.
Structurally
sound
I
didn't
feel
comfortable
going
inside
of
it
on
December
9th
of
2017.
L
The
light
had
been
mowed.
There's
still
some
debris
down
trees
and
obviously
the
structure
hadn't
been
touched.
It's
still
unsecured
and
as
an
attractive
hazard.
The
structure
appears
unstable,
uninhabitable
and
elapid
ated
on
December
11th
notice.
That
hearing
was
mailed
first-class
and
certified
mail
return,
receipt
on
December,
29th,
opposed
to
the
property
and
signed
an
affidavit
of
posting
and
I
conducted
a
final
inspection
yesterday
and
the
house
is
still
there
and
it's
still
barely
standing
and
it
does
not
appear
fit
for
human
habitation.
It's
an
extremely
poor
condition,
but.
L
L
L
P
L
Well,
there
were
prior
cases
and
I
didn't
get
into
the
notes
of
them,
and
thirteen
ten
and
nine
but,
like
I,
said
I
didn't
get
into
the
notes
of
what
was
actually
about
them.
But,
as
you
can
appreciate
in
an
occupied
structure,
they'll
be
living
and
it
can
go
into
decline
fairly
quickly,
especially
an
older
one.
I
imagine
this
house
is
probably
40s
or
was
built
probably
prior
to
1940
it's
one
of
the
older
structures
in
town,
but
that's
just
a
guess.
So.
A
C
F
A
L
Ma'am
as
I
stated,
and
they
think
I
kind
of
cover
in
my
testimony,
I
believe
the
the
property's
an
attractive
hazard
needs
to
be
dealt
with
fairly
rapidly.
We
started
the
case
out:
October
21st,
so
they've
had
some
time,
they're,
obviously
getting
notices,
otherwise
they
wouldn't
mow
the
yard,
and
at
that
point,
I'd
like
to
request
the
board,
basically
given
14
days,
which
would
be
January
23rd
and
a
fine
of
150
dollars
a
day.
A
H
N
O
L
Madam
chairman,
we're
gonna
change
the
order
just
a
little
bit,
because
we
have
some
people
here.
The
case
number
9,
which
is
204,
lady
or
and
number
10,
which
is
also
a
vacant
lot
on
Lakeview
we're
gonna
push
those
out
towards
the
end.
If
you
don't
mind
because
nobody's
here
for
him,
which
would
put
us
going
forward
with
106
East
Lime
Street,
which
the
gentleman's
walking
up
right
now.
S
S
S
S
A
L
You
this
is
case:
17-8,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
seven
o
for
one
o
60s
Lime
Street,
Pollin,
Tina,
baccala,
pulao
they've
been
out
of
compliance.
Is
there
it's
a
repeat
violator
case
referencing
back
to
case
number
17,
two
four
codes:
eight
twenty
eight
48-52
I,
initially
conducted
the
let's
see
I'm.
Sorry,
let
me
take
care
of
my
exhibits.
First
exhibit
number
one
or
all
of
my
photographs
to
include
the
inspections,
exhibit
number
two.
L
My
notices,
including
the
repeat,
violator
notice
of
hearing
and
exhibit
number
three
or
administrative
documentation,
emails,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
posting
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five?
Is
the
prosecution
cost?
Regarding
this
case
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
the
board?
L
This
case
started
as
I
was
stating
earlier.
November
17th
was
when
I
conducted
the
initial
inspection,
the
100
block
of
Lime
Street
have
had
numerous
complaints
on
and
I
specifically
was
looking
at
a
property
across
the
street,
which
was
the
complaint
and
I
observed
violations
on
106
TS,
Lime
Street.
It's
an
unoccupied
structure,
it's
a
double
lot.
Unfortunately,
the
eastern
side,
of
where
the
structure
is
seems
to
be
the
local
dumping
ground
for
a
large
amount
of
trash.
I
agree.
It's
an
ongoing
problem
that
Paul's
having
he's
given
trespass
authorization
to
the
city.
L
Unfortunately,
we're
just
unable
to
catch
anybody
in
the
act
of
doing
it,
but
he
does
continue
to
suffer
and
definitely
want
to
call
it
the
benefits,
but
unfortunately
they're
using
his
property
significantly
to
dump
on,
and
that
was
the
nature
of
the
complaint.
He
had
a
prior
complaint
as
I
stated
earlier
in
2017,
where
the
property
was
established
for
those
basic
violations,
the
lot
was
covered
in
trash
and
debris
and
the
shed
on
the
rear
properties
in
poor
condition.
We
had
some
discussion
about
the
boarding
up
of
the
windows
and
I
had
actually
recommended.
L
He
do
that
to
try
to
keep
the
the
transient
population
from
occupying
the
structure.
Unfortunately,
for
him
he
still
has
people
tearing
off
the
boarding
up
on
on
the
property
in
that
area.
November
17th,
the
repeat,
violator
notice
of
hearing,
was
male
first
class
and
certified
mail.
December
29th
I
posted
the
property.
We
did
get
back
the
NIH
signed
and
obviously
pulse
here,
so
he's
aware
of
it,
and
so
at
this
point
in
time
before
the
board,
as
I
stated,
is
a
repeat
violator.
A
S
I
mean,
as
he
says,
officers
guessin
that
had
mentioned
it's.
It's
definitely
been
a
trouble
spot
for
myself
through
the
years
even
prior
to
officer
gassings
involvement,
I've
owned
the
property
you
buy
over
ten
years
and
our
intentions
initially
was
to
put
our
office
there.
We
started
reconstructing
the
structure,
bringing
it
up
the
code
and
everything
went
through.
You
know
we
securing
structurally
and
then
the
market
of
course
fell
and
then
the
neighborhood
I
mean
we've
been
fighting
training.
You
know
people
living
in
the
home
constantly
we've
hit
people
out,
we've
called
the
police.
S
We've
had
constant
dumping
on
the
site,
so
this
is
the
first
time
I've
been
in
front
of
the
board.
We've
always
been
in
compliant,
we've
been
noticed,
we've
gotten
to
compliant
several
times,
and
you
know
obviously
I
guess
requesting
leniency.
At
this
point
we
will
clean
it
up,
we'll
bring
it
back
into
compliance,
but
it's
just
been
an
ongoing
battle
on
that
Street.
S
It's
probably
never
a
time
that
we
go
by
there
and
they
were
kicking
somebody
out
of
that
and
they're
breaking
it
for
the
house
and
they're
dumping
stuff
there
and
I
think
there's
some
local
person,
that's
in
the
garbage
business
and
has
created
a
site.
We
will
bring
into
compliance
and
we're
just
requesting
leniency
from
the
board
and
and
we
hope
to
bring
that
building
and
maybe
put
our
office.
There.
I
mean
I've
been
in
the
area
since
1980
and
I'm
actually
planning
on
staying.
So
that's
about
it.
Mr.
S
We
recently
prior
to
or
actually
just
after
he
noticed
us
is
when
we
went
back
out
there.
It
must
have
accumulated
this
recently
on
the
site.
So
unless
oh
yeah,
it's
been
I
mean
we've
the
last
time
when
we
went
to
compliance,
we
pulled
out
to
30-yard
dumpster
load,
I
spent
thousands
of
dollars
to
remove
debris
and
I.
Guess.
S
A
A
L
He
he
was
simply
established,
he's
never
been
before
the
board
he's
always
been
extremely
cooperative,
he's
already
I.
There
was
also
a
little
bit
of
misunderstanding,
although
it
is
what
it
is,
because
I
got
an
email,
I
believe
from
Joan
who's
from
the
company
said.
Can
we
get
some
more
time
just
to
get
somebody
to
clean
out
I?
Don't
think
they
understood
that
it
was
a
repeat
violator
and
his
fines
were
going
daily.
I
was
gonna.
L
So
that's
already
going
to
be
a
sizable
chunk,
whatever
the
board
decides,
but
I
do
believe.
He'll
once
again
invest
probably
a
couple
thousand
dollars
to
clean
it
up,
because
that's
probably
what
it's
going
to
take
and
we're
gonna
and
and
then
he'll
get
the
idea
that
we
really
got
a
unfortunately
babysit
this
property.
S
Okay,
I
mean
officer,
guess
and
suggested
we
put
a
fence
up
and
he's
not
the
only
one.
The
prior
code
enforcement
people
asked
us
to
do
that
as
well,
and
we
did
do
that
and
then
the
fence
was
driven
over
and
knocked
down.
I
mean
we've,
you
know
and
we're
willing
to
do
whatever
officer,
guess
and
suggest
that
we
do
to
reduce
the
impact.
Until
we
do.
You
know
redevelop
site,
we've
tried
everything
and
again
I'm
open
to
any
suggestion,
because
and
the
people
living
in
theirs
is
the
concern.
H
L
A
L
You
know,
like
I,
said
he's
already
60
days
into
it.
$10
a
day
already
puts
him
in
the
neighborhood
$600
for
a
fine
and
I
think
you
know
he's
going
to
get
it
done,
but
you
know
that
would
just
be
my
recommendation.
It's
also
his
first
time
he's
here,
he's
trying
so
I
do
think
it
for
that
matter.
You
know
like
$10
a
day
for
what
he's
already
incurred
is
reasonable.
A
F
H
L
H
N
M
L
H
H
L
G
A
L
L
L
My
photos
to
include
the
inspection
or
exhibit
number
1
exhibit
number
2,
or
all
the
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
3
or
my
administrative
Docs,
including
the
case
summary
property,
appraiser
tax
collectors
database
and
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
those
being
presented
to
the
board.
L
L
L
December
14th,
the
property
was
in
compliance,
December,
29th,
I
posted
the
property,
I
did
get
a
green
card
returned
unsigned,
but
I
have
talked
to
Nick
a
couple
of
times
and
there
was
some
interesting
circumstances
behind
this
property.
He
has
a
lawn
service,
take
care
of
it
and
accidentally
moved
the
wrong
lot.
So
he
was
kind
enough
to
mow
a
neighbor's
property
instead
of
his
own
and
that's
what
consequently
stemmed
the
violation
which
occurred
because
I
was
inspecting
26
case
history
as
the
nature
of
the
complaint.
T
As
officer
Gaston
said,
we
actually
owned
the
lot
right
next
door
to
it
and
the
one
was
mowed,
but
they
mowed
the
one
that
we
owned
and
somebody
else's
lot.
Instead
of
the
one
that
got
the
violation,
though
it
was,
it
was
an
oversight
and
I
didn't
the
last
time.
As
far
as
the
repeat
offender
situation
is
concerned,
the
last
time
I
appeared
here.
I
was
told
about
the
repeat
offender,
but
I
thought
it
was
her
property
not
like
whatever
you
own,
in
your
name
and
but
as
officer
Gaston
can
testify.
A
A
L
What
we're
here,
for
so
none
were
he
he
was
established
on
another
property
that
was
in
compliance
and
then,
as
we
stated,
you
know
if
the
board
was
to
ask
me
a
recommendation.
I
would
throw
out
basically
the
same
as
with
Paul
would
be
$10
a
day.
This
was
an
oversight
on
his
wasn't,
even
necessarily
his
fault
other
and
his
landscaper
might
need
some
retraining.
But
it's
beyond
the
point.
L
B
F
N
N
A
F
O
L
This
is
case
number
17,
a
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
seven,
five
zero.
It
is
a
vacant
lot
across
from
801
Sunset,
its
parcel
number
one
1
2
7
1,
5,
8,
7,
7,
8,
6,
0-1-6-0,
0,
3,
0,
so
repeat
violator
case
stemming
from
case
number
16
2
69
on
the
same
property,
4
8,
22,
8,
48,
52
and
12
1.
Those
are
the
violations.
At
that
time,
the
property
was
out
of
compliance
from
December
9th
to
December
22nd
for
a
total
of
13
days.
It
is
currently
in
compliance.
L
The
exhibits
going
before
the
board
are
exhibited,
we're
on
all
my
photographs
to
include
the
inspections.
All
my
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
the
repeat
notice
of
hearing
is
exhibit
number
2
tip
number
3
are
my
administrative
Docs,
including
any
emails
case?
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
number
four?
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign?
The
exhibit
number
five
is
the
prosecution
costs.
L
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
are
an
exact
copy
of
what
was
being
presented
to
the
board,
and
all
of
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property.
Owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
and
madam
chairman
I,
think
you've
already
stated.
But
please
accept
these
into
the
record.
As
evidence
case
started
from
a
citizen
complaint
on
December
9th
of
2017,
it
had
debris
on
it
from
a
fallen
tree.
L
You
can
see
in
the
photographs
that
were
going
around
because
of
the
hurricane
or
a
large
tree
had
fallen
in
the
lung
a
lot
and
there
was
a
large
pile
of
tree
debris.
The
notice
of
hearing
repeat
violator
was
mailed
certified
mail
in
first
class
to
the
owner
on
December
11th,
December
22nd,
the
owner
left
a
message
made
an
office
visit
stating
the
property
was
ready
for
Rhian
spec
ssin,
which
I
did
conduct
the
22nd,
and
it
was
in
compliance
at
that
time.
Posted
the
property
on
December,
29th
and
I.
L
A
M
M
L
It
helps
the
board
I
didn't
bring
it
up
his
crew
that
took
the
tree
down
or
cleaned
it
up.
They
broke
the
city
sidewalk,
so
he
also
now
has
to
pay
to
repair
the
city.
Sidewalk
I
didn't
bring
him
before
the
board
as
a
case,
but
that's
what
that's
what
he's
talking
about
when
he's
talking
about
the
permit?
Just
so,
you
guys
understand.
L
H
H
L
A
N
B
N
D
Yes,
sir,
you've
been
found
in
violation
of
code
sections,
8-14
8
52
for
the
time
period
of
December
9
to
December
22nd,
a
total
of
13
days.
You've
been
fined
$5
a
day
for
total
of
$65
for
the
fine
addition
to
that
there
are
prosecution
costs
that
have
been
awarded.
So
your
total
fine
is
going
to
be
a
hundred
and
$26.50.
D
L
A
A
L
Thank
You
mam,
k,
17-8
0,
0,
0,
6,
3,
9,
204,
Lakeview
Drive
is
the
address.
It
is
a
vacant
lot
parcel
number
17,
27
16,
3,
1
3
5
6
0
0,
2,
0,
0,
2
0
owned
by
an
LLC,
referred
to
as
bel
air
reserve
holdings.
There
will
be
4
exhibits
going
before
the
board
exhibit
number
one
of
the
photographs
is
a
vacant
lot
exhibit
number
2.
L
Are
all
my
notices
to
include
Notice
of
Violation,
a
notice
of
hearing
7,
number
3
or
my
administrative
docs
case
summary
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
a
phat
exhibit
number
four?
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign?
All
of
my
notices
were
mailed
the
property
owner
of
record
based
on
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
database.
And,
madam
chairman,
please
accept
all
my
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence
25th
of
2017.
This
lot
is
less
than
10,000
square.
L
Feet
needs
to
be
mowed
and
the
debris
needs
to
be
cleaned
up.
The
lot
was
overgrown
with
debris
on
it.
The
lot
is
enjoined
by
another
vacant
lot
with
the
same
owner,
which
happens
to
be
the
next
case,
we'll
be
talking
about
November
25th,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed.
Certified
mail
return
receipt
requested
as
well
as
first
class.
This
property
has
a
downed
tree
on
it,
which
was
the
result
of
the
debris
for
it
and
it's
right
next
to
a
residence.
L
So
the
debris
that
I
inspected
on
October
25th
was
the
the
large
tree
and
you
can
see
in
the
photographs
that
the
pictures,
because
of
where
the
property
is
I'm
kind
of
showing
you
a
long
view
of
the
tree.
But
it's
a
significant
I,
think
it's
a
pine
tree
and
it's
probably
about
40
feet
long
and
it's
partially
uprooted
the
western
end
you're.
Looking
at
the
eastern
end
of
the
tree
and
unfortunately
you
can't
really
tell
how
long
it
is,
but
I
couldn't
get
you
a
better
perspective
because
there's
another
piece
property
there.
L
Moving
forward
on
October
I'm,
sorry,
December
18th,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed.
Certified
mail
return
receipt
in
1st
class
October
29th
I
posted
the
property
I
conducted
a
final
inspection
on
the
property.
Yesterday.
It
was
not
in
compliance,
and
the
tree
was
still
on
the
property
mail
that
was
returned
was
the
Nov
was
returned
unsigned.
The
final
Notice
of
Violation
and
in
the
notice
of
hearing
were
returned
signed
had
some
email
contact
with
a
representative
Torrey
Cooper
from
the
company.
He
stated.
L
We
gave
him
some
extensions
because
post-storm
his
tree
crew
was
in
Texas
and
some
other
things,
so
we
kind
of
extended
that's
what
the
final
Notice
of
Violation
was
for.
He
had
an
email
exchange
with
me
this
past
week
that
he
was
gonna,
have
it
cleaned
up
again
and
unfortunately
the
tree
still
remains,
and
there
was
another
little
bit
of
debris
on
the
next
property
that
we'll
talk
about.
He
was
able
to
on
a
third
property,
and
it's
not
relevant
to
this
case,
but
just
so.
L
The
board
understands
in
a
much
more
significant
amount
of
tree
debris
that
was
able
to
be
cleaned
up
on
a
case.
That's
in
compliance
that
not
before
the
board
so
I'm,
just
a
little
confused
on
the
time
thing.
So
I
decided
to
go
ahead
and
bring
the
case
before
the
board
and
handle
it.
This
body
decide
how
to
handle
it
best,
but
that's
all
I
have
at
this
time.
H
L
A
N
N
C
J
F
A
L
My
Nov
and
NO
H's
exhibit
number
three
administrative
docks,
including
case
summary
emails,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records.
An
affidavit
number
four
or
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
posted
sign.
All
of
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
based
on
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
website.
And,
madam
chairman,
please
accept
all
my
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
L
This
started
on
October
25th,
as
I
stated
earlier
with
the
previous
case,
the
the
at
the
time.
The
lot
was
overgrown
and
had
some
debris
on
it.
On
October
25th,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed.
Certified
mail
return
receipt
first
class
I
conducted
a
Rhian
spectrin
on
November
28th,
and
it
was
still
not
in
compliance
and
November
28th.
We
gave
him
a
little
bit
extra
time
sent
him
a
final
Notice
of
Violation
certified
and
first
class
return.
Receipt
requested,
December
16th
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin
and
the
tree
debris
was
still
on
the
property
there.
L
It's
a
small
amount
of
debris,
as
you
can
see
in
the
photograph,
not
even
a
pickup
truck
load
fold,
but
it's
right
on
the
corner
across
the
street.
From
a
couple
of
houses
on
December
18th,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
first
class
return,
receipt
requested
and
certified
December
29th
I
posted
the
property
on
January
10th
of
2018
conducted
a
final
inspection
and
a
small
pile
of
debris
is
still
on
the
property.
L
As
I
stated
with
the
previous
case,
I
have
had
some
email
contact
with
him,
for
whatever
reason
he
was
able
to
get
a
large
amount
of
debris
off
the
other
property,
but
not
this
one.
So
we
are
here
on
that
debris
on
the
property
and
I
have
nothing
further
other
than
just
ask
the
board
to
consider
a
violation
of
city
ordinance,
8
52,.
H
N
C
A
H
L
L
U
F
L
An
affidavit
and
on
compliance
for
5/10
Triplett,
the
when
I
conducted
the
final
inspection.
The
property
was
not
in
compliance
and
violation
of
city
code,
8,
48-52,
6
1,
which
regards
to
the
building
code,
and
that
was
on
the
board's
order
was
as
of
December
12th
of
2017
and,
as
I
stated,
he
was
not
in
compliance
and
I,
also
a
place
before
the
board,
a
affidavit,
a
prosecution
costs
in
the
amount
of
one
hundred
and
forty
eight
dollars.
Regarding
this
case,
and
that's
all
I,
have
it.
U
U
U
Don't
I
really
don't
know,
I
really
don't
know
about.
The
trouble
is
the
asbestos
again
a
contractor
come
in
there,
I
gotta
put
all
this
stuff
on
the
outside
to
do
the
asbestos
and
there's
a
contractor
there
that
him
he
could
instead
of
putting
it
on
the
outside,
he
could
put
it
in
trailers
one
time
if
he
got
permission
to
do
it.
I
don't
do.
D
R
My
name
is
George
Kontos,
actually
I'm
here
for
my
son
on
the
roofing
company.
My
son
knows
the
construction
company,
so
mr.
Barris
approach
has
honored
to
give
him
an
estimate.
If
the
building
can
be
repaired,
if
he
can't
be
repaired,
he
wants
to
demolish
it.
So
the
problem
is
gonna.
Take
it
anywhere
from
30
to
60
days.
If
we
finish
to
be
demolished,
maybe
by
60
days
probably
about
time,
you
know
I
get
permits
and
all
that
stuff.
Now
we
can
give
him
a
price
on
it.
If
it's
fixable,
so
he
can
fix
it.
R
U
R
D
D
At
this
point,
your
options
are
find
them
in
compliance
except
the
Afra
date
of
non-compliance
or
if
you
want
to
extend
the
compliance
date,
you
have
the
option
to
do
that
too,
and
you
know
we
they
don't
have
a
form
motion
for
you
to
do
that,
but
it
would
be
a
motion
just
to
extend
the
compliance
date
to
it,
whatever
date
certain.
That
is,
if
he
wanted
to
do
that.
Obviously
you
keep
the
pressure
on
to
get
it
done.
H
D
D
L
Just
and
I'm
not
exactly
sure
how
it
falls
in
there.
Mr.
burrows
has
numerous
properties
within
the
city
he's
currently
in
fine
status,
on
715
South
distance,
to
the
tune
of
about
a
hundred
and
thirty-four
thousand
dollars
for
that
property.
This
is
another
property.
That's
in
significant
disrepair,
I
understand
that
he
had
gotten
a
quote
somewhere
in
the
neighborhood
of
about
fifteen
thousand
dollars
to
tear
that
building
down.
He
also
was
potentially
looking
at
turning
ownership
over
to
some
other
parties,
but
that's
just
something
for
the
board
to
consider
he
is
in
non-compliance.
L
U
K
U
R
A
N
F
F
D
N
D
So,
mr.
burrows,
can
you
hear
me
I'm
down
here?
Okay,
so
the
property
has
been
found
to
be
in
non-compliance.
The
fine
is
running
you.
You
need
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
as
quickly
as
possible
to
keep
the
fine
from
getting
any
higher
okay
once
the
property
is
in
compliance.
You
can
contact
officer
Gaston
to
tell
him
that
it's
in
compliance.
H
U
D
These
are
the
types
of
sir
sir
mr.
Conte,
if
you
could
just
get
with
the
respondent
after
the
meeting,
and
let
him
understand
because
obviously
he's
not
hearing
correctly,
he
needs
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
as
soon
as
possible,
whether
you
do
it
or
somebody
else
does.
If
he
doesn't,
the
fine
will
begin
to
run.
If
you
don't
understand,
or
he
does
not
understand
what
needs
to
be
done,
you
can
contact
offer
officer
gousen
tomorrow
or
sometime
after
that
and
get
the
full
details
of
what
needs
to
be
done
all
right.
R
L
D
R
R
U
A
A
A
N
U
N
C
L
The
property
changed
ownership
on
May,
23rd
and
the
case
should
have
been
closed
in
a
new
case
should
have
been
opened.
It
slips
through
the
cracks.
So,
unfortunately,
this
board
ruled
on
a
case
that
they
weren't
the
owner
of
the
property
anymore.
So
we're
asking
for
that
board
order
under
K
17,
8,
0,
0,
0,
0,
2,
3
0
will
be
quashed
because
it's
not
effective
because
the
ownership
changed.
D
N
H
A
D
L
D
Thank
you.
So
the
request
is
to
reduce
to
eliminate
that
and
I
want
to
read
to
you
a
portion
of
your
board
rules.
You
weren't
here
the
other
day
you
would
have
heard
me,
I
would
read
it.
No
petition
of
reduction
of
fines
will
be
considered
prior
to
the
board's
acceptance
of
an
affidavit
of
compliance
under
no
circumstances
made
the
amount
of
the
fine
be
reduced
below
the
costs
of
the
action.
D
That's
the
force,
that's
important
under
no
circumstances
may
the
amount
of
the
fine
be
reduced
once
a
foreclosure
is
instituted.
Additionally,
under
no
circumstances
may
the
amount
of
the
fine
for
repeat
violation
be
reduced.
Your
rule
specifically
provides
then
under
no
circumstances
may
the
amount
of
the
fine
be
reduced
below
the
cost
of
the
action.
So
at
this
point,
you've
got
a
request
to
reduce
the
cost,
really
reduce
this
below
the
cost
of
the
action,
and
so
the
motion
right
now
is
to
that.
Presumably
based
upon
the
rule
right.