►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board March 8, 2018
Description
Description
A
C
D
E
F
Early
fathers
sit
down
your
blessing
on
this
meeting
of
the
code
enforcement
board
if
the
board
members
of
clear
sense
of
duty
and
lead
them
to
a
faithful
discharge
of
the
same
direct
them
in
their
deliberations
at
this
meeting,
so
that
all
things
may
be
done
to
the
glory
of
the
name
and
the
welfare
of
the
people
of
Tarpon
Springs.
Yes,
we
pray.
C
Hey
I'm
now
gonna
read
the
procedures
of
the
code
enforcement
board.
It
is
the
intention
of
this
board
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
the
citizens
of
Tarpon
Springs
by
providing
an
equitable,
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
various
codes
within
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs.
Any
aggrieved
party
may
appeal
the
final
administrative
order
of
this
board
to
the
circuit
court.
Such
appeals
shall
be
filed
within
30
days
of
the
execution
of
the
order
to
be
appealed.
C
Florida
statures,
2,
8,
6,
0,
1
0
5,
requires
any
party
appealing
a
decision
of
this
board
to
have
a
record
of
the
proceedings
to
support
such
an
appeal.
The
procedure
of
the
board
is
as
follows.
First,
the
city
presents
its
witnesses
and
exhibits,
after
which
the
alleged
violator
is
able
to
ask
the
city's
witnesses
any
specific
questions
regarding
their
testimony.
Secondly,
the
alleged
violator
is
allowed
to
make
the
presentation
and
present
his
or
her
witnesses
and
exhibits.
C
Then
the
city
can
question
the
alleged
violators
witnesses
after
both
rounds
of
testimony
both
on
the
part
of
the
city
and
the
part
of
the
alleged
violator.
Each
party
is
asked
to
give
a
closing
argument
first
by
the
city
and
then
by
the
alleged
violator
after
those
three
steps
are
taken.
This
board
will
close
the
public
hearing
portion
of
the
case
to
discuss
it
and
take
appropriate
action.
Before
we
begin
the
public
hearings,
we
will
ask,
we
will
have
all
potential
witnesses,
stand
up
and
be
sworn
in
by
the
Secretary
of
the
board.
B
C
C
G
Case
17-8,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
six,
two
nine
mainsail
drive
I
am
Shannon
Brewer,
currently
employed
by
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
I'm
an
is
a
certified
arborist
license
number
FL
nine
two
one,
a
Mawson,
FN
GL
is
certified.
Horticultural
professional
license
number
H,
nine,
seven,
eight
four
zero.
Two,
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
were
given
it
to
the
violator,
are
exact
copies
of,
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
G
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
the
tax
collector
databases
all
Nov
sand,
n,
o
itches
are
sent
certified
return
receipt
in
first-class
mail.
Please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence
after
Hurricane
Emma.
It
was
observed
by
homeowners
of
did.
You
want
to
hold
on
a
sec.
C
G
After
Hurricane
Emma,
it
was
observed
by
the
homeowners
of
1071
mainsail
that
several
trees
were
pushed
towards
the
homes
which
were
1063
1071
and
1079
mainsail
I
inspected
right
after
the
storm,
the
city
waved
permits
and
had
a
grace
period
to
allow
property
owners
to
have
a
chance
to
self
help.
The
owners
of
this
property
did
not
take
that
opportunity.
The
next
inspection
was
October
20th
2017,
the
Norfolk
Island
pines,
which
are
on
the
city's
terpenes
exotic
and
invasive
list,
are
located
behind.
G
1071
were
observed
to
have
soil
weakness
and
were
still
in
a
very
wet
area.
The
base
of
the
trunk
has
a
large
Bend,
which
could
be
a
weak
point
for
a
very
large
canopy.
The
courtesy
letter
was
10
sent
out
10
20
2017,
because
the
homes
are
located
in
west
winds.
Community
I
also
sent
a
letter
to
the
HOA
in
hopes
that
they
would
be
able
to
resolve
the
issue.
Unfortunately,
they
were
not
associated
with
the
owners,
but
they
did
give
me
a
quick
claim
and
returned
all
their
documents
to
the
office.
G
G
Notice
of
Violation,
who
was
sent
12
18
17
inspection
was
on
202
18.
Again
there
was
no
change
on
213
of
18.
The
LOH
was
mailed
certified
in
first
class
on
February
24th,
the
sign
posted
an
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed.
The
final
inspection
was
March
7th.
The
pines
are
still
in
property
and
have
started
to
correct
themselves
with
the
direction
of
the
Sun.
The
ground
water
is
gone,
but
the
property
is
still
out
of
compliance
and
there's
been
no
contact
with
the
homeowner
or
the
property
owner.
G
G
C
H
C
I
I
E
G
C
J
I
E
E
I
K
C
G
You
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
the
tax
collector
databases,
all
enemies
and
NHS
are
sent
certified
return
receipt.
First-Class
mail,
please
accept
all
of
the
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
G
During
Hurricane
Emma,
it
was
noticed
that
the
Australian
pine
trees
were
leaning
over
the
road
more
than
before,
but
before
the
storm
I
had
marked
these
trees
for
FEMA
to
remove.
But
since
the
trees
originated
from
private
property,
the
removal
was
denied.
The
city
of
Tarpon
gave
the
owners
of
private
property
a
grace
period
till
November
to
correct
the
hazard,
and
the
owners
of
this
property
did
not
take
corrective
measures.
G
G
The
Nov
was
sent
to
the
owner
of
record
as
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
letters
were
returned
and
the
registered
agent
had
refused
a
certified
nov
2015
18
Planning
and
Zoning
Department
with
the
builders
who
are
in
charge
of
the
proposed
project
and
told
him
that
they
had
to
resolve
all
code
enforcement
issues.
Before
proceeding
ground
work
began
to
remove
Brazilian,
peppers
and
debris.
This
work
removing
large
amounts
of
soil
from
one
side
of
the
tree,
which
is
opposite
of
the
roadway
February,
2nd
irie
inspected
the
site.
G
The
work
had
stopped,
the
trees
are
still
on
property
and
over
the
road
making
hazardous
conditions
for
all
the
motorists
on
February
13th,
the
NO
H
was
mailed
certified
in
first
class
February
24th,
the
sign
posted,
an
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed.
Contact
was
finally
made
by
the
owners
to
the
code
enforcement
department
on
March,
2nd
I'm.
The
owner
was
emailed
all
the
documents
and
they
were
notified
and
they
changed
the
address
with
the
property
appraiser.
G
M
Property
is
on
the
corner
of
alternate
19
and
mirrors,
just
south
of
Ace
Hardware,
there's
a
pending
sale
on
it,
but
that
hasn't
occurred.
Yet
the
Brazilian
pepper
trees
were
removed
because
of
my
case
that
I
had
stemming
from
a
couple
of
years
ago
right.
So
all
that
work
was
done
and
then
the
the
work
with
the
hurricane.
You
know
it
caused
some
issues,
so
there
was
a
parallel
case
going.
It
was
unrelated
to
Shannon's
case
for
cleaning
up
the
property
and
debris.
That's
the
work.
M
A
G
They
had
started
to
grow
over
the
road
before
the
storm
and
I
have
when
I
was
doing
with
the
FEMA
case.
That's
part
of
the
reason
why
they
denied
me,
but
with
the
storm
and
then
again
with
the
work
because
they
removed
it's
really
close
to
the
root
base.
Where
they've
they've
done
this
excavation,
they
can
remove
the
pepper
trees
and
it's
pulled
soil,
it's
pulled
roots
and
that's
when
they
started
to
go
even
more
and
being
next
to
all
19
anybody.
That's
on
that
road.
This
is
definitely
a
hazard
to
them.
Right
now,.
C
H
E
C
I
G
And
they're
going
to
need
30
days
before
they
can
do
this
in
order
to
remove
a
tree
like
this
they're
going
to
have
to
actually
shut
down
the
road
they're
gonna,
it's
called
maintenance
of
traffic
or
MOT.
They
have
to
put
all
of
those
ducks
in
a
row
before
that
can
happen,
so
they
definitely
need
30
days.
But
after
that,
because
of
the
hazard,
I,
say
$200
a
day.
D
E
E
D
M
F
M
C
F
L
L
M
It's
a
list
of
property
owners,
cows,
Catherine
Bower,
the
estate
of
the
exhibit
number
one
or
all
of
my
photographs,
including
my
inspections
that
are
going
around
exhibit
number
two
or
all
of
my
notices,
including
the
Notice
of
Violation
in
the
notice
of
hearing,
exhibit
number
three
or
any
administrative
Docs,
including
my
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
emails
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
M
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
All
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail.
Madam
chairman,
if
you
would,
please
accept
all
these
exhibits,
which
I
think
you
already
have
into
the
record
as
evidence.
K
M
Case
initially
started:
December
30th
of
2017
got
a
citizen
complaint
about
a
large
amount
of
trash
and
debris,
especially
under
the
carport
area
of
the
property
On
January
2nd
of
2018.
We
mailed
out
a
Notice
of
Violation
certified
in
first
class
January
25th
of
2018
and
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin.
Basically,
there
was
no
change
at
that
time.
We
sent
a
final
Notice
of
Violation
via
first-class
and
certified
mail.
M
M
We've
had
phone
calls
with
the
owner,
and
obviously
they
came
down
here.
They
were
a
little
bit
surprised
about
the
degree
of
which
the
violations
I
explained
to
him
a
little
bit
about
my
purpose
of
establishing
it,
because
we've
had
some
other
issues
with
the
property
unrelated
to
them
as
owners,
but
with
the
tenants.
L
D
Quick,
he
moved
it
based
on
the
testimony
evidence,
facts
presented
in
the
law
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violation,
sections
8,
22,
8
48-52,
the
Code
of
Ordinances,
the
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs
weren't,
full
force.
In
effect,
at
the
time
of
the
Notice
of
Violation,
the
respondents
were
in
violation
of
said,
code
sections.
However,
they
are
now
in
compliant.
E
I
F
Okay,
mr.
Bauer
and
miss
Meeker,
the
code
enforcement
board
has
found
the
property
owner
to
be
in
violation
of
those
code
sections
you're.
Now
in
compliance,
should
the
property
go
into
non-compliance
again
within
the
next
five
year
period
of
time,
you'll
be
considered
a
repeat
violator.
Fines
will
start
immediately
upon
the
inspection
when
the
violation
is
found.
So
it's
really
really
important
to
make
sure
that
it
doesn't
happen
again
within
at
least
the
next
five
years.
All
right
thank.
K
C
B
B
J
C
M
You
this
is
case
number
seventeen,
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
six,
four
seven
property
address,
608,
North
Avenue,
mr.
Robert
and
Entering
win
right
night
for
the
property
owners
listed
a
record
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
all
of
my
photographs
to
include
the
inspections.
All
exhibit
number
two
are
my
notices,
including
the
Notice
of
Violation,
and
the
notice
of
hearings
exhibit
number
three
or
any
administrative
Docs
to
include
a
case
summary.
The
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
emails
in
exhibit
number
four.
M
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
of
my
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
or
exact
copies
of,
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
notices
were
mailed.
The
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
County
property
appraiser
and
tax,
collector
databases
and
all
my
notice.
The
violation
and
notice
hearings
were
sent
via
certified
mail
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and,
madam
chairman,
if
you
would,
please
accept
all
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
M
My
initial
inspection
was
October
26th
of
2017,
while
I
was
conducting
inspections
in
the
area
observed
numerous
violations.
At
this
address,
there's
a
white.
There
was
a
white
Honda
back
then
it
appeared.
Inoperative
had
tires
on.
It
appears
as
if
it's
being
and
not
being
driving,
they're,
driven
or
drivable.
The
structure
in
front
of
the
house
had
no
permit
obtained,
for
it
was
a
combination
of
storage
and
a
carport.
There's
a
utility
trailer
parked
out
front,
not
in
the
rear
yard
or
the
inside
side
yard
or
the
driveway.
M
There
was
tires
trash
and
other
debris
being
stored
in
front
of
the
residents
and
the
trash
cans
were
being
stored
in
front
of
the
building
on
December
19th
of
2017.
We
mailed
the
Notice
of
Violation
for
your
first
class
and
certified
mail
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin
on
February
19th
of
this
year,
and
at
the
time
there
were
no
changes
on
February
20th.
M
The
notice
adhering
was
mailed
first-class
and
certified
mail
on
February
24th
I
posted
a
sign
with
an
affidavit
of
posting
I
conducted
a
final
inspection
on
the
seventh,
and
at
that
time
there
was.
There
was
some
changes.
The
vehicle
the
white
Honda
was
in
compliance.
It
was
no
longer
there.
The
trailer
had
been
moved
into
the
driveway,
so
I
complied
those
violations.
Basically,
and
the
trash
cans
were
taken
care
of.
Basically,
the
violations
that
were
still
before
the
board
is
there
still.
M
Some
debris
on
the
property
was
kind
of
primarily
in
the
rear
and
the
carport
still
there
and
I
confirmed
with
the
city
that
no
permit
had
been
pulled
for
that
carport.
As
of
yet
which
was
one
of
the
issues,
since
it's
already
established
it
needed
to
have
a
building
permit
pulled
for
it
to
be
put
up,
so
it
either
needs
to
be
taken
down
or
a
permanent
needs
to
be
obtained,
and
neither
of
those
things
had
occurred
as
of
the
seven
so
before
the
board.
M
What
I
have
is
just
the
trash,
that's
on
the
property,
primarily
our
front,
had
been
cleaned
up,
but
I
talked
to
miss
Wynn
right
yesterday
on
the
phone
and
explained
to
her
there's
some
items
in
the
back
yard
that
need
to
be
cleaned
up.
You
can
see
him
in
some
of
the
last
photographs.
It
was
like
a
truck
topper
and
just
some
other
couple
of
tires
and
things
like
that.
M
So
there's
eight
20,
eight
forty
of
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property,
8
52,
which
are
the
nuisance,
prohibitions
against
debris
and
such
and
then
six
one
is
where
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
has
adopted
the
building
code,
which
is
the
violation
for
the
carport
or
the
structure.
That's
out
front
in
the
photographs,
and
that's
all
I
have
at
this
time.
Okay,.
C
K
N
M
To
come
into
compliance
for
the
last
things
that
you
have
is
basically
clean
up
the
backyard
which
is
just
trash
clean
up,
and
then
you
have
two
choices
for
the
carport:
that's
tear
it
down
completely,
remove
it
dispose
of
it
or
obtain
a
building
permit
through
developmental
services
across
the
hall.
Those
are
really
the
only
two
options
that
are
available
to
that
structure.
Okay,.
N
N
N
M
N
M
C
M
Not
actually,
let
me
ask
you
one
question
what
I
had
talked
to
miss
Wynn
right
yesterday
and
she
had
talked
to
me
about
a
time
frame.
Never
did
she
mention
anything
about
the
insurance
company
did,
do
you
have
some
sort
of
a
time
frame
or
what
your
plan
is
with
the
structure?
I,
don't
think
the
big
issue
correct.
N
N
N
J
N
M
N
M
House
was
built
in
1973
there,
there
were
no
County
permits,
pulled
for
it
and
I
checked
with
the
city,
and
there
was
no
remodeling
or
structural
permits
for
that
carport.
So
the
answer
your
question
is
no
there.
It
was
never
permitted
when
it
was
originally
built
and
since
it
was
never
permitted,
I
can't
tell
you
when
it
was
originally
built,
but
I
can
tell
you
I've
worked
here
for
20
years
and
it
wasn't
there
about
ten
years
ago,
so
it'd
been
built
within
the
last
ten
years.
M
F
The
answer
is,
is
that
you
can't
have
something
grandfathered
in
unless
it
was
legal
to
begin
with.
It's
the
testimony
you've
heard
so
far,
as
is
that
it's
not
legal
to
begin
with,
because
it
was
never
permitted.
Therefore,
it
can
never
obtain
grandfather
status,
so
so
it
needs
to
either
come
down
or
permit
needs
to
be
obtained.
N
N
N
N
M
N
C
M
H
E
J
E
C
M
When
I
spoke
to
miss
Wynn
right
yesterday,
I
in
speaking
with
her
and
I,
don't
know
she
just
didn't
communicate
with
mr.
Wynn
right,
we
came
up
with
I.
Would
respectfully
ask
the
board
for
21
days
with
a
fine
of
$50
a
day.
Now,
if
mr.
I
don't
know
if
it's
appropriate
or
not,
he
hasn't
given
us
a
definitive
date.
The
insurance
company
hasn't
provided
one.
So
unless
something
changes
in
that
I
would
still
probably
say
the
21
days
and
I
can
always
deal
with
it.
E
E
E
C
F
N
F
I
C
M
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
all
my
photographs,
singing
exhibits
were
given
to
the
violator
are
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
database
and
I'll
notice,
violation
and
notice.
Hearings
are
sent
via
certified
mail
and
return
receipt
requested,
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and
madam
chairman,
I,
assume
you've
already
accepted
all
those
into
the
record
as
evidence.
My
case
started:
January
2nd
2018.
M
It
was
originally
got
a
complaint
about
chickens
in
the
yard
went
out
and
conducted.
My
inspection
saw
that
there
was
a
large
quantity
of
chairs
tables
appliances,
some
old
equipment
and
I
Birbal
machinery
in
old
and
poor
condition,
an
unused
recreational
vehicle,
and
at
least
one
rooster
that
I
saw
roaming
around
January
2nd.
We
mailed
out
the
Notice
of
Violation
via
certified
mail
and
first-class
mail
on
February
19th
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin.
The
rooster
had
been
taken
care
of
he's
no
longer
there,
so
that
violation
was
taken
off
the
board.
M
The
recreational
vehicle
still
is
there
and
it
does
it's
covered
with
mold
there's
trees
over
growing
it.
It
actually
looked
like
it's
being
partially
used
to
storage,
because
through
the
front
windshield
I
could
see
like
a
lawn
chair
in
the
front
windshield,
and
if
it's
operable
I
would
it
would
be
interesting
at
best
and
at
that
time
there
was
still
some
debris
out
in
front
of
the
house.
The
trash
cans
were
still
out
in
front
on
February
20th.
M
Primarily
the
front
of
the
house
had
been
cleaned
up,
but
the
RV
still
there
still
covered
with
mold,
as
you
can
see
in
the
pictures
and
the
chair
is
still
in
the
front
windshield.
So
basically,
at
this
point
in
time,
what's
before,
the
board
is
a
consideration
of
8
40,
which
is
a
duty
maintained,
private
property,
as
well
as
the
850
which
are
the
nuisance,
prohibition
underneath
the
RV
and
some
of
the
pictures.
It
looks
like
they're
using
a
little
bit
of
storage,
there's
some
debris
underneath
there
too.
M
So
at
this
point
in
time,
as
I
stated,
the
the
front
yard
is
primarily
cleared
up,
but
the
only
thing
before
the
board
is
a
consideration
of
8
52,
one
thing
about
8
52:
it
defines
debris
as
abandoned,
inoperative
or
unusable
material
equipment
or
machinery
or
other
material
equipment
or
machinery
which
is
stored
externally.
This
includes,
but
is
not
limited
to
discarded
household
items
inoperative
or
abandoned
machinery,
motor
vehicles,
boats,
trailers
or
household
appliances.
M
It
goes
on
to
mention
an
myriad
of
other
things
under
the
definition
of
debris
and
the
RV
was
classified
as
such
under
that
the
fact
whether
or
not
it
has
registration
is
unknown.
Apparently
mr.
van
Wagner
states
that
it
is
registered,
but
we're
not
going
forward
with
a
violation
of
42.00,
which
is
recreational
vehicles.
This
is
classifying
it
as
unused
the
machinery
being
stored
on
the
property
and,
as
you
can
see
by
the
pictures,
mold
grows
on
stationary
objects.
So
that's
all
I
have
at
this
time.
Hey.
I
I
I
I
That's
the
only
thing
I
really
have
to
say:
I
was
under
the
impression
at
that
time
on,
the
I
was
basically
in
compliance
other
than
getting
a
tag
which
I
have
done
and
I
have
sent
in
the
copies
of
the
registration
of
the
new.
The
new
tag
for
the
RV
and
well
I.
Had
my
ex-wife
move
all
of
the
items
out
of
the
RV.
C
K
C
M
I
J
M
J
I
H
C
M
K
E
E
F
G
M
I
F
C
M
M
M
C
M
This
is
case
number
our
case
number
18:
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero.
Five
three,
the
property
address,
is
215
West,
lemon
Street,
I'm
officer,
Gaston
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs
Police,
Department
code
enforcement
been
so
employed
since
2016
exhibit
number
one
or
all
of
my
photographs,
including
the
inspections,
exhibit
number
two
are
all
my
notices
to
include
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
the
notice
of
hearing
the
exhibit
number
three
are
my
administrative
Docs
to
include
my
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
emails
exhibit
number
four.
M
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy?
The
sign
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
ever
given
to
the
violator
are
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
the
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
database.
M
All
notice,
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
to
be
a
certified
mail
return.
Receipt
requested,
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and
madam
chairman
I,
believe
you've
already
accepted
these,
but
please
do
so
for
the
record
on
January
30th,
the
2018
I
conducted
my
initial
inspection,
which
was
called
in
by
two
different
complainants.
M
There
were
three
vehicles
on
the
property
which
are
either
unregistered
inoperable
or
combination
of
both.
At
the
time
there
was
a
Nissan
pickup
truck
perk
to
the
west
side
of
the
house.
With
expired,
Florida
tag,
Jay
John,
743
KZ.
It
expired
in
2016
I,
believe
it
was
vehicle.
Number
two
was
at
an
El
Camino
had
the
tailgate
down,
the
tags
were
not
visible
and
the
hood
was
partially
open.
The
vehicle
number
three
was
another
tan,
El
Camino
parked.
Next
to
it.
M
Also
with
the
tailgate
down
the
tags
were
not
visible
and
there
was
grass
growing
up
around
underneath
of
it.
There
was
also
a
utility
trailer
being
used
for
storage
on
the
property.
That's
part
of
a
different
case
and
at
that
point
in
time,
referencing
back
to
case
number
16,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
six
zero,
where
Harry
cleared
a
kiss
and
the
address
a
215
West
Lemon
Street
was
established
by
this
board
as
a
repeat
violator
for
Section
4000,
which
is
abandoned,
inoperable
vehicles
on
February
5th
of
2018.
M
The
notice
of
hearing
for
a
repeat
violator
was
mailed
via
certified
mail
and
first-class
mail.
On
February
15th
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin
and
found
that
the
vehicles
were
in
compliance.
They
had
contacted
us
on
the
12th,
but
I
wasn't
able
to
go
out
there
for
three
more
days,
so
their
compliance
date
was
the
12th
based
on
their
phone
call.
So
February
12th
was
when
they
did
come
into
compliance
as
you're
initially
stated,
madam
chairman,
and
on
February
24th.
They
posted
the
property
and
the
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed.
M
We
did
get
a
notice
of
hearing
for
the
repeat:
violator
was
returned
to
the
office
unclaimed.
We
have
had
contact
with
the
well
property
owners
representatives,
Anna,
and/or,
Chrissie
Cletus,
so
before
the
board.
Right
now
is
a
violation
of
the
repeat
violation
for
40.00,
which
are
parking
or
storage
of
abandoned
vehicles,
the
Nissan,
the
tan
El
Camino
and
the
second
El
Camino
and,
as
I
stated,
they
all
became
in
compliance
on
February
12th
for
a
total
of
13
days
and
that's
what's
before
the
board.
Now
I.
P
O
M
Read
you
the
definition.
If
you
want
but
city
ordinance,
4000
states
is
the
definition
of
an
abandoned
vehicle,
which
is
the
ordinance
you're
cited
under
also
also
includes
expired
tags.
So
you
have
two
factors
there,
as
it
stated
in
the
notice.
There's
two
things
that
need
to
be
done:
they
need
to
be
both
operable,
drivable,
runs
and
drives
and
have
current
registration.
So
the
Nissan
pickup
truck
I
checked
it.
It
was
expired
in
2016,
so
it
met
the
conditions
of
abandoned
vehicle.
M
We
could
take
those
two
vehicles
completely
off
the
board
and
we
still
have
a
violation
with
the
pickup
truck
expired
in
2016,
so
nobody's,
given
us
any
evidence
that
the
two
el
Caminos
have
current
registration,
they're
now
gone
so
you're
in
compliance
nobody's
presented
me
with
any
evidence
that
they
drove
nobody
called
me
out
to
the
site
to
say:
here's
the
tags.
Let
me
start
it
up
and
drive
it
around
the
block.
Otherwise
we
wouldn't
have
the
issue
with
the
two
El
Caminos.
Is
that
what
you're
contending?
Well
sorry
we're
going
ahead?
P
O
O
O
M
O
O
M
C
M
K
O
It's
slated
when
I
asked
her
about
car
covers
that
if
they
are
operable
there
is
not
a
specific
ordinance
related
to
car
covers.
However,
if
the
inspector
is
aware
of
a
violation
that
and
then
it
is
covered,
then
that
will
not
bring
the
violation
into
compliance
again.
Going
back
to
it's
operable.
If
you
come
to
the
house,
I
can
drive
it
okay,
okay,
so
we
can
leave
it
at
that
I.
Just
it
just
needs
to
be
defined.
C
Q
O
The
one
on
the
first
page,
with
a
the
tag,
the
truck
in
question
that
has
the
material
in
the
back.
So
when,
when
he
passed
away,
we
needed
a
little
time.
There
was
a
lot
of
cleanup
and
moving
around.
He
was
also
a
car
collector.
The
el
Caminos
that
you
see
are
collector
cars.
The
reason
that
they're
there
at
the
time
is
because
we're
refurbishing
them
when
the
Caminos
left,
we
had
them
repainted,
and
then
we
brought
back.
O
O
We
own
a
business,
we
do
property
maintenance,
the
items
in
the
trailer
are
part
of
that
and
we
have
two
trucks
and
that
is
used
for
our
maintenance
man
and
my
brother
I,
like
I,
said
when
I
covered
the
truck
was
only
to
have
it
covered,
while
one
truck
was
being
utilized
and
the
other
is
not.
My
mom
has
a
hard
time
selling
it.
Because
again
it's
my
father.
K
P
Right
now
it
is
operable
and
it's
tag
and
ensure
all
the
carts
El
Caminos
are
gone,
so
we
have
complied
with
everything
I
think
at
the
time
my
father
passed
away.
We
we
kind
of
adopted
other
properties
that
we
had
to
take
care
of
and
I
believe
we
came
in
front.
So
it's
been
a
long
process.
You
know,
we've
done
everything
I
think
we're
later
on
on
the
agenda.
Again,
we've
been
doing
a
lot,
we're
not
one
of
those
families
that
aren't
trying
to
comply.
As
for.
O
My
my
thing
was
that
I'm
we'll
discuss
it
later,
but
we
are
using
the
vehicles.
Okay,
the
the
el
Caminos
were
classic
my
brother
even
had
him
tagged,
El
Nino
and
the
fact
is
is
they
gave
us
more
trouble
than
they're
worth
so
he
has
a
truck
now.
He
uses
my
dad's
truck
and
were
in
compliance.
I
think
that,
but
the
fact
that
calling
my
mom
and
repeat
offenders
violator
is
something
that
take
a
offense
to
that,
because
you
know
I
I.
C
Q
Q
Q
C
O
So
Miss
Archer
and
bored
the
reason
she's
bringing
this
up.
When
we
made
our
several
visits
to
the
code
offices
in
order
to
comply,
they
made
it
very
clear
that,
if
officer
Gaston
is
how
does
it
has
a
fine
and
is
at
your
property,
and
he
finds
you
in
violation
if
he
drives
by
and
let's
say
your
neighbor
or
something
in
the
surroundings
on
his
route,
let's
say
next
door
behind
you
diagonal
whatever
he
is
to
write
them
up
as
well.
O
F
C
F
F
M
Like
I
said,
I
couldn't
see
the
tags
on
the
El
Caminos
we've
had
no
discussion.
Whether
or
not
one
of
my
questions
was
going
to
be.
Were
they
registered
and
do
they
have
that
registration?
They
were
moved
when
they
called
on
the
12th
and
asked
me
to
do
the
reason.
I
went
out
on
the
15th,
the
el
Caminos
were
gone
and
the
tags
were
occurring
on
the
Nissan
so
that
put
them
into
compliance.
M
What
seems
to
escape
is
that
there's
more
than
one
aspect,
there's
operable
and
currently
registered,
so
you
have
to
have
both
those
conditions.
It's
not
one
or
the
other
so
and
the
expired
tags
brought
it
under
the
definition
of
abandoned
vehicle
I
couldn't
determine
the
validity
of
the
tags
on
the
two
El
Caminos,
because
the
license
plate
bracket
is
in
the
back
of
the
tailgate.
So
when
you
lay
it
down,
I
can't
see
it.
The
El
Camino
was
the
case
that
established
this.
M
That
was
the
vehicle
that
was
in
violation
that
established
her
in
the
2016
case.
But
again,
like
I,
said
nobody
presented
any
evidence
about
it
being
operable,
and
nobody
presented
me
anything
about
that.
It
had
current
tags
at
the
time,
so
you
know
that's
all
I
can
tell
you.
Is
those
two
conditions
have
to
be
met
under
this
ordinance.
M
C
C
M
M
M
As
we
stated,
this
was
a
repeat
violator
case
back
in
2016,
most
miss
Gladys
was
here.
She
wasn't
fine,
because
she
was
in
compliance.
We
established
the
property
for
the
vehicles,
I'm
completely
understanding
of
the
situation
if
the
family's
been
through,
but
they
were
notified
that
they're
not
allowed
to
have
vehicles
that
met
those
conditions.
I
got
the
complaint
originally
about
an
unrelated
issue
on
the
property
and
then
I
got
a
complaint
about
the
vehicles
from
another
source
and
then
I
investigated
both
of
those
and
the
tags
were
were
in
fact,
expired.
M
C
C
H
M
D
H
C
D
E
J
B
D
F
Summarizing,
okay,
so
wherever
mr.
Lucas
win
I'll,
just
explain
it
to
you,
then.
So
the
code
enforcement
board
has
found
the
property
in
repeat:
violation:
Oh
Code,
section
40.00
from
January
30th
to
February
12th
of
2018.
The
board
assessed
a
$25
a
day.
Fine.
In
addition
to
that,
the
board
awarded
seventy
six
dollars
and
fifty
cents
for
a
prosecution
cost
for
the
city.
An
order
will
be
issued
within
ten
days
and
it
will
be
sent
to
mrs.
Clara
Cosette
at
the
address
listed
with
a
tax-collector,
give
any
questions.
I.
M
M
You
officer
Steve
Gaston
city,
Tarpon,
Springs,
Police,
Department,
code
enforcement.
This
is
case
17-8,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
seven
thirty
four,
the
property
address
is
thirteen.
Thirty
Belcher
Drive.
As
you
stated,
the
us,
a
federal
National
Mortgage
Association,
currently
owns
the
property.
It
recently
had
gone
through
a
change.
M
We
didn't
give
any
of
the
violator.
So
that's
a
good
point.
All
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases
and
all
my
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice.
Hearings
are
sent
via
certified
mail
return.
Receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and,
madam
chairman,
you
would
accept
those
exhibits
into
the
record
for
evidence.
Please.
M
This
case
started
out:
December
6th
of
2017,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed
certified
in
first
class.
There
was
a
change
of
ownership.
I
had
a
previous
case
on
it
that
I
had
started
and
I
can't
remember
if
it
came
to
the
code
board
or
not
if
it
had
gotten
that
far
but
because
of
the
change
in
ownership.
I
started
in
a
new
case,
and
here
we
are
with
this
new
case
at
that
time,
with
the
neighbors
permission
who
lives
to
the
south
I
inspected,
I
was
able
to
see
the
rear
yard
of
the
property.
M
Take
some
photographs,
the
pools,
green
and,
as
I
stated,
that's
visible
from
the
neighbor's
yard
to
the
south.
The
lawns
overgrown
needs
to
be
mowed,
trimmed
an
edge.
There
was
some
sort
of
a
fluid
draining
from
the
house
which
was
going
down
the
driveway
and
across
the
sidewalk
into
the
storms
into
the
storm
drain.
I,
don't
know
what
it
is
and
I
wasn't
going
to
test
what
it
is,
but
it's
a
fluid
and
it's
coming
from
the
house.
M
The
backyard
is
just
loaded
with
lines
that
are
suffocating
than
the
other
natural
trees
that
are
there
there's
also
a
white
Chevy
Avalanche,
which
has
expired
tags,
it's
on
a
jack
stand
and
it
has
algae
growing
on
it
or
mold
or
as
green
stuff
growing
on
it.
I
conducted
a
Rhian
spec
shown
on
January
13th
still
non-compliance.
M
Basically,
nothing's
changed
with
the
property
On
January
16th,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
certified
mail
in
first-class
mail,
February
24th,
we
posted
the
property
and
I
signed
the
affidavit
or
it
conducted
the
Rhian
spec
ssin
on
the
seventh
there's,
no
change,
it's
not
in
compliance.
There's
haven't
had
any
contact
with
the
owner.
We've
talked
to
a
real
it
company
and
they're,
going
through
some
issues.
I
guess
with
trying
to
get
the
residents
out.
I,
don't
know
what
those
issues
are,
but
and
then
they
can
continue
work
on
the
house,
but
again
have
it.
M
We
haven't
had
any
conversation
with
the
owners
per
se
so
before
the
board.
Right
now
is
a
violation
of
one
33.0,
which
is
the
applicability
and
maintenance
of
trees
which
has
to
do
with
the
vines
killing
off
the
the
good
trees.
If
you
will
in
the
back
8
40,
which
is
a
duty
to
maintain
private
property
which
deals
with
the
dilapidated
structure,
the
siding
falling
off
and
such
also
maintaining
that
pool
in
the
back
8
52
has
to
do
with
the
debris.
M
40.000
operable
vehicle
by
nature
of
the
fact
has
expired
tags,
which
is
a
white
truck
9
one
of
the
international
property
maintenance
code,
which
also
deals
with
the
pool
it's
in
conjunction
with
a
dashboarding,
and
they
were
keeping
the
trash
cans
out
in
front
of
the
house
in
front
of
the
garage
and
they
were
still
when
I
conducted
the
last
inspection,
which
is
a
violation
of
8
16.
So
that's
what's
before
the
board.
At
this
time,.
B
K
D
Move
based
on
the
testimony,
evidence
and
facts
presented
in
law
that
time
of
the
alleged
violation
sections
they
16
8,
4,
th,
52,
one:
three:
three:
zero:
two:
four:
zero
point:
zero:
zero,
nine
point:
one
sections
of
the
Code
of
Ordinances,
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
with
its
enforcement
effect;
the
respondent
was
in
violation
era.
Second,.
C
K
K
B
C
M
I
stated
I,
don't
know
what
what
was
going
on
with
the
situation.
The
house,
with
the
limited
communications
I,
would
probably
recommend
there's
a
significant
amount
of
work
that
needs
to
be
done
on
that
house
probably
30
days,
but
I
would
like
to
thirty
days
and
largely
because
try
to
motivate
them
a
little
bit.
I
would
go
$250
a
day,
especially
because
of
the
pool
issue
in
the
back
and
as
I
stated
before,
not
necessarily
a
fault
of
their
own,
but
the
change
of
ownership.
M
H
B
M
Case
number
17:
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
591
500
East
Oakwood.
As
you
stated,
it's
owned
by
good
spirit,
music
ministries,
I'm
officer,
Steve,
Gaston,
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs,
Police,
Department
code
enforcement
exhibit
number
one
or
all
the
photographs
to
include
the
inspections
exhibit
number
two
are
all
my
notices,
including
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
Notice
of
Hearing,
seven
number,
three
administrative
Docs,
my
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax,
collector
records
and
any
emails
and
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
M
All
my
notices
were
made
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
database.
All
my
notice
of
violations,
a
notice
of
hearings
were
sent,
be
a
certified
mail
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and
madam
chairman,
if
he
would
accept
all
the
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Yes,.
C
M
Case
started
in
October
5th
of
2017.
In
reality,
it
actually
started
earlier
than
that
and
I'll
explain
what
happened
with
the
situation
then,
shortly
after
the
hurricane,
this
building
suffered
some
pretty
significant
damage.
It
already
wasn't
in
very
good
shape
from
the
prior
inspect
from
the
prior
case
got
a
complaint
by
the
neighbor
that
the
the
roof
is
coming
off.
Upon
my
inspection,
you
can
clearly
see
sections
of
the
roof
are
coming
off.
It's
in
very
poor
condition.
The
the
foundation
is
starting
to
fall
apart
below
it.
M
The
doors
are
there's
issues
with
basically
all
four
sides
of
this
building,
and
it's
a
it's
basically
a
hazard.
It's
not
an
occupied
residence.
It's
not
a
residence
at
all.
It
was
I
think
many
years
ago
at
church
we
did
confirm
two
factors
with
it.
It
is
not
a
historical
building
and
it's
not
within
the
historic
preservation
area,
but
it
is
a
significant
it's
in
significantly
bad
shape
and
extremely
dilapidated.
M
You
can
see
through
the
photograph
there
pretty
demonstrative,
of
how
bad
this
building
is
on
January,
2nd
of
2018,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed
certified
and
first-class
conducted,
a
rien
spec
ssin
on
february
7th.
The
only
addition
as
more
windows
were
broken,
I
think
they're
all
now
broken
on
February
12th,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
first-class
and
certified
mail,
Jan
February,
24th,
I
posted
the
property
and
the
affidavit
posting
was
completed
on
March
7th
conducted
the
final
inspection
still
non-compliance
I.
M
Had
it
a
couple
of
pictures,
if
you
notice
the
date
in
the
lower
right
corner,
some
of
them
were
from
the
7th.
All
that
basically
shows
is
there's
a
couple
more
windows
working
out.
We
did
get
the
Notice
of
Violation
returned
to
us
signed
and
we
did
have
some
contact
through
an
attorney
owner
stated.
He
sold
the
property,
but
the
deed
wasn't
completed
correctly,
so
the
property
owner
still
shows
magic
ministries.
M
M
Somehow
it
came
back
to
me
and
I
decided
to
go
this
route
and
present
it
to
the
board
under
violation
for
8
40,
which
is
the
duty
maintain
property
8.
Some
of
the
definitions
that
are
included
in
8
40
include
8,
39
and
8
41,
which
specifically
stayed
dilapidated
structures
unfit
for
human
habitation
or
in
poor
condition,
and
that's
where
this
violation
falls
under
that
city,
ordinance
of
8
40.
C
M
It
goes
on
after
that,
but
that's
the
applicable
part
of
8
40
that
I
used
the
neighbor
that
called
this
in
actually
short
because
during
the
hurricane
it
had
been
hit
by
some,
not
personally,
but
as
his
structure
had
been
hit
by
some
of
the
roofing
material.
That's
what
prompted
his
case
that
we
did
in
October.
So
that's
all
I
have
at
this
time.
E
C
M
Typically
demolishing
permits
and
those
kind
of
permits
take
about
60
days,
so
I
think
a
reasonable
time
is
60
days.
One
of
those
two
things
to
occur:
either
they
begin
the
reconstruction
of
the
building
or
the
building
they
at
best
at
least
pull
the
permits
for
demolition
and
start
the
demolition
process
within
that
60
day
time
period
or
my
recommendation,
because,
as
this
building's
not
getting
better,
it's
rapidly
declining
$250
a
day.
H
H
C
M
Should
be
able
to
yeah,
especially
demolition
permitted
and
as
far
as
a
building
permit
goes
they
can.
They
can
certainly
start
the
application
process.
They
could
have
started
it
today
and
then
hire
a
contractor
and
then
the
revisions
and
things
like
that
will
go
through
if
they
do
all
that
and
then
they
fall
through.
Basically,
the
repeat,
violator
and
I
bring
them
back
before
the
board
after
a
period
of
time.
E
I
M
Thank
you
case
number
I'm
officer,
Steve
Gaston
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs
Police,
Department
code
enforcement
case
number,
18,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
one
property
address,
651,
River,
Village
Drive.
This
is
a
in
River
Village
mobile
home
park,
prodigy
property,
&,
Investments
LLC
care
of
Carrie
Underwood,
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
border.
M
All
of
my
photographs,
including
my
inspections,
all
of
my
notices
to
include
the
Notice
of
Violation,
a
notice
of
hearing
or
exhibit
number
two
exhibit
number
three
administrative
docks,
including
a
case
summary
property,
appraiser
tax,
collector
records
and
any
emails
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
derived
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
my
notice,
violations
and
notice.
C
M
Case
started,
my
initial
complaint
was
on
December,
30th
and
I
had
to
make
it
an
eighteen
case
because
of
a
computer
issue,
but
on
December
30th
I
conducted
it.
There
was
trash
I
conducted,
my
initial
inspection,
there's
trash
on
property.
There's
wood
along
the
west
side
of
the
house,
there's
a
couch
out
front
at
the
time
one
of
the
violations
where
there
was
numerous
cats.
That's
been
taken
care
of,
so
the
cat
issues
off
the
board.
February
2nd
of
2018,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mail
via
certified
mail
and
first-class
mail.
M
January
31st
of
2018
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin.
Some
of
the
wood
in
the
trash
can
and
there's
still
some
trash
and
debris
under
the
carport
and
on
the
east
side
of
the
house.
At
that
point,
I
sent
a
final
Notice
of
Violation,
which
was
sent
out
on
the
6th
of
February
via
first-class
and
return
receipt
requested.
January
22nd
conducted
another
inspection.
Some
of
the
wood
that's
in
the
trash
was
in
the
trash,
can
there's
still
trash
and
debris
under
the
car
under
the
carport.
Basically,
no,
no
change,
and
on
that
date
February
22nd.
M
We
mailed
out
the
notice
of
hearing
on
February
24th,
the
sign
was
posted
and
an
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed.
I
conducted
my
final
inspection
on
March
6.
There
were
some
lot
in
compliance,
but
the
interesting
thing
was
there
was
a
new
group
of
debris
and
trash,
so
the
previous
debris
and
trash
apparently
got
taken
care
of,
and
now
they've
added,
some
new
different
debris
and
trash.
So
technically,
it's
still
in
violation
have
no
contact
with
the
owner
and
we
got
none
of
our
mail
back
of
our
return
receipts.
M
Madam
chairman,
if
I
could
add
one
quick
thing?
Yes,
that
just
told
me
that
we
just
talked
to
the
property
owner
and
he's
working
on
evicting
his
tenants,
but
he's
he
was
aware
of
the
violations
but
he's
working
on
trying
to
the
victim
so
that
she
just
inform
me
that
so
I
have
had.
We
have
had
some
contact
with
the
owner.
C
H
E
C
L
E
M
M
Historic,
no,
but,
historically
speaking
what
happens
when
you
evict
somebody,
they
decided
to
leave
all
their
stuff
out
front.
So
then,
he's
gonna
need
a
little
bit
of
time
to
clean
that
up.
So
if
he
does
the
eviction
they
bail,
they
dump
all
their
stuff
out
front.
It
gives
them
a
little
bit
of
time
to
clean
that
up
that
good
tenants
will
usually
take
their
stuff
questionable
tenants,
leave
their
stuff
behind.
E
C
C
M
You
officer
Steve
gas
and
city
turban,
Springs
Police,
Department,
Code
Enforcement.
This
is
a
repeat
violator
case.
The
original
case
was
17-8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
two
four
four:
four
violation
of
8
4
t
+
8
52.
This
current
case
is
18:
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
eight
six,
the
property
address
is
17
or
722.
Merlin's
Court
in
the
Hamlet's,
the
property's
owned
by
a
James
Bower,
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
border.
All
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two
are
all
the
notices
to
include
the
Notice
of
Violation
notice.
M
M
All
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
database.
All
the
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
were
sent.
Both
certified
mail
return,
receipt
requested
as
well
as
first
class
mail
and,
madam
chairman,
if
you
would
please
accept
all
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
M
This
case
started
on
February
16th,
based
on
a
citizen
complaint
about
the
yard
being
overgrown.
It
needs
to
be
mowed,
trimmed
and
edged.
I
conducted
my
inspection
and
found
that
the
yard
was
in
fact,
overgrown
needs
to
be
mowed
pyramid
edged
on
February
16th.
The
repeat,
violator
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
certified
mail
in
first
class
on
February,
21st
or
24th
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit.
M
The
notice
of
hearing
for
the
repeat
violator
green
card
was
returned
unsigned
and
we've
had
no
contact
with
the
owner
currently
either
in
violation
of
a
warty
duty
maintained,
private
property
and
8
52.
As
I
stated
earlier,
the
prior
case
was
17
to
44
that
the
board
heard
around
April
of
2017.
The
reason
why
this
case
was
established
as
prior
to
that
we
had
no
less
than
probably
nine
complaints
for
the
same
type
of
problem.
That's
why
I
established
it
this
exact
reason.
E
E
M
E
Respondent
was
in
violation
of
section
8,
40
and
8
52
of
the
Turpin
Spring
City
cold
from
February
16th
until
from
February
16th
2018.
Until
such
time
as
the
property
is
bought
into
compliance,
a
fine
of
$100
a
day
shall
be
imposed
until
compliance
has
met.
In
addition,
I
move
the
city
be
awarded
seventy
six
dollars
and
fifty
cents
for
the
costs
incurred
in
prosecuting
the
case.
C
K
E
K
M
You
officer
Steve
gas
and
city
Tarpon,
Springs
Police
Department,
Code
Enforcement.
This
is
a
repeat
violator
case,
as
you
stated
from
February
22nd.
It's
still
currently
not
in
compliance
the
originating
case
that
prompted
it
to
become
or
established
as
a
repeat
violator,
17-8,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
four
eight
six,
which
was
for
a
violation
of
8
4
t
+,
8
52
current
cases,
18
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
nine
nine.
As
you
stated,
the
property
address,
7-eleven
South
distant
Avenue,
the
property
owner
mr.
M
Charles
burrows
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
all
of
my
photos.
My
inspection
photos
exhibit
number
two.
My
notices,
including
the
repeat,
violent,
repeat,
violator
notice
of
hearing
tip
number
three
or
my
administrative
Docs,
the
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
emails
received
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
exhibit
number
five?
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs?
All
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
derived
from
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
database.
M
M
This
case
started
on
February
22nd
2018
received
a
citizen
complaint
about
the
property
having
two
old
tractors
being
stored
on
the
residential
property
old
tires
trash
and
debris
being
kept
on
the
property
up
to
and
including
old
lawnmowers
tires
other
unused
equipment.
Siding
is
kind
of
coming
off
of
the
house.
A
couple
of
the
pictures
and
the
rear
porch
has
collapsed.
M
On
the
back
of
the
house
on
February
22nd,
the
repeat,
violator
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
certified
mail
and
first
class
on
February
24th.
The
property
was
posted,
we
did
get
the
notice
of
hearing
returned
signed
by
the
owner
and
we
have
had
phone
contact
with
mr.
Burroughs
and
before
the
board
is
a
violation
or
a
repeat
violation
of
8
40,
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property
as
well
as
8
52,
which
deals
with
nuisance
prohibitions.
K
M
M
Burroughs
is
currently
in
fine
status
on
one
of
his
properties,
a
couple
doors
down
a
fairly
significant
amount.
We
just
had
510
triplet,
which
this
board
found
him
$25
per
day,
he's
still
working
on
getting
compliance.
He
toured
that
building
down
his
previous
find
was
$25
per
day.
I
I,
don't
think
we
can
motivate
mr.
Burroughs
he
attempts
to,
but
he's
83
years
old,
I
think
I'm,
sorry
89.
M
He
usually
reminds
us
that
when
we
talked
to
him
and
like
I
stated
before
I
think
he's
just
simply
starting
to
get
there
getting
ahead
of
him
and
I,
don't
know.
$25
a
day
seems
reasonable.
I
mean
I,
don't
think
it's
gonna
make
any
different.
The
fines
knocking
him
motivate
him.
It's
just
is
what
it
is
so
to
speak,
but
unfortunately,
this
property
is
in
pretty
bad
shape.
Also,
okay,.
J
E
M
E
E
C
F
C
C
E
K
C
E
E
D
B
E
E
E
K
C
C
F
E
E
C
K
K
C
E
F
I
E
F
F
C
D
F
Madam
chair,
before
we
go
ahead
and
read
these
next
two
cases,
I
want
to
go
ahead
and
read
the
rule
of
procedure.
That
applies
for
fine
reduction
cases.
This
is
not
a.
This
is
not
for
rehearing
on
either.
One
of
these,
even
though
one
reports
to
try
to
do
that.
Your
rule,
rule
5,
section
4,
reads
as
follows:
after
a
fine
has
been
imposed
by
the
board
and
within
60
days
after
the
violation
is
brought
into
compliance,
a
violator
may
petition
for
reconsideration
of
a
fine.
F
The
petition
must
be
in
writing
signed
by
the
violator
and
include
a
copy
of
the
affidavit
of
compliance
executed
by
the
code
inspector.
The
petition
must
include
conclusive
evidence
showing
extreme
or
undue
hardship
and
the
payment
of
the
fine
or
preventing
the
violator
to
come
into
compliance
within
a
time
period
established
by
the
board's
order.
The
board
Secretary's
to
schedule
the
petition
to
be
considered
in
the
board
shall
make
its
determination,
based
solely
upon
the
written
petition.
The
board
may
request
information
from
the
code
inspector.
F
The
board
secretary
shall
notify
the
violator
by
regular
mail
of
the
determination
made
by
the
board
no
petition
for
the
reduction
of
a
fine
will
be
considered
prior
to
the
board's
acceptance
of
an
affidavit
of
compliance.
Under
no
circumstances
may
the
amount
of
the
fine
be
reduced
below
the
costs
of
the
action.
Under
no
circumstances
may
the
amount
of
the
fine
be
reduced
once
a
foreclosure
action
is
instituted.
Additionally,
under
no
circumstances
may
the
amount
of
the
fine
for
a
repeat
violation
be
reduced.
F
You're
not
you're,
not
taking
any
testimony
for
anyone,
so
we
just
need
to
make
sure
everybody's
had
the
opportunity
to
read
the
petition
for
reduction
of
fine.
There
is
a
packet
of
material
along
with
some
photographs,
some
additional
exhibits
that
are
attached
to
the
petition.
You
are
to
consider
the
petition
itself
and
anything:
that's
been
attached.
It's
all
considered
one
document,
even
though
there
are
lots
of
things
attached
to
it
and
you're
to
determine
whether
or
not
that
you're
gonna
grant.
That
request.
F
C
C
C
D
E
J
D
F
J
C
E
E
D
B
F
J
J
F
Q
Been
living
in
Tarpon
Springs
since
1960
and
I
worked
for
the
government
in
Washington
DC
in
the
biggest
department,
so
I'm
not
a
little.
Nobody
and
I'm
not
trash
like
you
call
me
a
double
offender
in
a
very
offended
about
that.
I
have
a
copy
when
I
first
came
the
first
time,
I
gave
copies
of
other
people
with
the
worst
situation
that
y'all
file
from
against
me.
Q
You
didn't
do
anything
about
it,
yeah
a
year
later
and
still
the
same
I
and
all
these
pictures
that
I
have
is
from
my
house
to
this
city
hall
and
I.
Don't
understand
why
the
cutting
force
that
has
to
have
somebody
a
citizen
to
call
in
order
to
find
an
offense
look
at
this
I
didn't
I'm,
not
gonna,
call
anybody
on
it
worse
than
mine,
you're,
a
cars
license
plate
junk
and
all
this
in
this
area.
Q
Q
F
F
Q
O
Reason
we're
bringing
that
up
is
like
I
mentioned
before.
If
there's
a
code
violation
on
a
property,
I
was
told
that
if
the
patrolman
is
out
surveilling
the
property
and
he
notices
and
recognizes
an
offense
of
violation,
a
code,
a
code
violation,
he
is
to
enter
it
into
the
system.
We
are
talking
about
his
daily
route
from
his
the
Tarpon
PD
to
the
City
Hall
to
Lemon
Street.
O
He
has
not
written
one
other
than
ours
and
I'll
bring
up
one
more
thing:
I
want
to
bring
up
on
February
22nd
I
I
called
a
city
code
violation
on
February,
22nd
I,
don't
have
a
hearing
from
me:
I'll
get
it.
It
is
property
owned
by
the
city
of
tarpon
rings.
Okay,
it
has
building
material,
a
fallen,
shed,
concrete
blocks.
You
guys
call
it
debris:
okay
and
an
overgrowth
of
pepper
trees,
overgrowth.
It
was
not
entered
into
the
system
and
it
and
it
wasn't
an
oversight.
O
O
I
drove
by
I
have
a
picture
I
drove
by
to
see
if
they
complied
and
they
had
not,
they
had
not
yet
complied,
and
yet
they
called
it
in
on
February
22nd
I
spoke
to
miss
Beth.
They
reported
it.
I
drove
by
before
I
came
to
this
meeting
to
see
if
that
phone
call
got
to
the
city
and
there
they
had
complied
and
they
had
not.
Not
only
did
my
request
not
get
in,
they
didn't
comply,
they
didn't
follow
the
rules
and
it's
in
the
city's
property,
but
yet
they
get
a
waiver.
Q
O
Here's
the
city
property:
this
is
the
parcel
I'm
talking
about
every
I'll
show
it
to
mr.
Gaston,
since
I
turned
it
in
on
February
22nd.
This
is
the
parcel
okay.
I
can
give
you
the
part.
These
are
the
pepper,
trees,
okay,
two
parcels
so
I'm,
just
saying
I'm
going
to
submit
this
again.
I
just
wanted
to
bring
it
to
your
attention
that
it
seems
like
it's
selective
code
enforcement
and
when
I'm,
when
we're
told
that
when
he's
surveilling
the
area
and
he
notices
a
violation,
he
is
to
write
it
down.
O
Q
O
Block
a
year
ago-
and
it's
not
entered
so
that's
where
I'm
saying
there,
it
can't
be
selective
I
mean
I-
wanted
to
bring
this
to
the
to
the
code
enforcement
board,
because
it
is
an
open
panel
I'm
going
to
pursue
this
on
another
angle
as
on
another
note,
as
his
duty
of
action
of
how
his
employment,
how
he
does
his
job.
That's
another
story,
but
I
wanted
to
bring
your
attention
that
there's
some
cracks
and
one
being
this
big
biggest
one
and
I
think
I.
O
P
P
F
O
F
F
O
F
O
F
F
F
Q
O
O
F
Property
and
to
answer
your
question:
the
city
has
to
comply
with
the
codes
just
like
every
other
property
owner.
There
should
not
be
an
exception
in
this
code.
Enforcement
board
won't
give
the
city
an
exception,
so
you've
got
to
understand
that
you've
obviously
have
found
what
you
consider
a
violation,
and
it
probably
needs
to
be
addressed.
But
we
don't
that's
not
a
case
before
this
code
enforce.
F
F
E
A
board
member
I
want
to
say
that
everybody
on
this
board
is
a
volunteer.
We
all
live
in
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
like
you
do
and
we're
all
volunteers.
We
don't
get
paid
to
do
this.
We
give
our
time
once
a
month
today,
it's
five
or
six
hours,
we're
all
volunteers,
we're
here
for
the
same
reason,
you
are
we're
here
to
help
the
city.
O
P
P
K
R
Major
harvest,
Police
Department
everything
that's
been
called
in,
has
been
entered
the
question
about
the
city.
Some
of
them
don't
have
numbers
to
put
in
it
was
before
before,
and
I
was
unaware
of
it
that
they
would
call
the
city
say:
hey
take
care
of
this.
They
were
still
required
to
take
care
of
it.
R
Now,
if
there
is
a
number
I've
advised
him,
because
it
came
to
my
attention
that
has
to
be
entered
if
it
has
a
number
of
address
to
enter
so
that
way
it
will
be
taken
care
of
because
it
needs
to
be
done
with
equity.
So
that's
taken
care
of
already.
She
has
a
problem
with
performance.
Obviously
I'm
over
top
of
code
enforcement
and
she's
been
advised.
She
can
deal
with
me
on
complaints
in
that
reference
to
that.