►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board July 12, 2018
Description
Description
A
B
D
E
B
Will
now
read
the
code
enforcement
board
hearing
procedures?
It
is
the
intention
of
this
board
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
the
citizens
of
Tarpon
Springs
by
providing
an
equitable,
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
various
codes
within
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs.
Any
aggrieved
party
may
appeal
a
final
administrative
order
of
this
board
to
the
circuit
court.
Such
an
appeal
shall
be
filed
within
30
days
of
the
execution
of
the
order
to
be
appealed.
B
Florida
statute,
two
eight
six:
zero
one:
zero
five
requires
any
party
appealing
a
decision
of
this
board
to
have
a
record
of
the
proceedings
to
support
such
an
appeal.
The
procedure
of
this
board
is
as
follows.
First,
the
city
presents
its
witnesses
and
exhibitions
exhibits,
after
which
the
alleged
violator
is
able
to
ask
the
city's
witnesses
any
specific
questions
regarding
their
testimony.
B
Secondly,
the
alleged
violator
is
allowed
to
make
a
presentation
and
present
his
or
her
witnesses
and
exhibits
this
then
the
city
can
question
the
alleged
violators
witnesses
after
both
rounds
of
testimony
both
on
the
part
of
the
city
and
the
part
of
the
alleged
violator.
Each
party
is
asked
to
give
a
closing
argument
first
by
the
city
and
then
by
the
alleged
violator
after
those
three
steps
are
taken.
This
board
will
close
the
public
hearing
portion
of
the
case
to
discuss
it
and
take
appropriate
action.
B
B
G
H
All
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
are
accepted,
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
and
mean
by
Dallas
County
property,
appraisers
and
tax
collectors.
All
Nov
sand
and
OHS
are
sent
certified
return,
receipt
and
first-class
mail.
Please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
record,
as
advised
just.
F
E
H
F
B
F
A
site
inspector,
obviously
you're
you're,
the
one
who
has
precipitated
this
being
a
code
violation
or
that
be
a
fair
statement.
Yes,
okay
in
your,
your
violation
basically
indicated
that
they
had
put
Phil
on
the
property
that
a
correct
statement:
correct,
okay
and
you
cited
them
for
bringing
Phil
onto
the
property
without
a
permit.
H
F
Okay
in
the
code
yeah
you
your
as
a
code
enforcement
or
whether
it's
you're
an
officer
are
in
charge
of
enforcing
our
codes.
Do
you
know
what
constitutes
Phil?
For
example,
if
I
have
flower
beds
at
my
house
and
I
bring
in
a
truckload
of
dirt
to
fill
in
my
flower
beds?
Would
that
constitute
Phil
yeah.
H
F
D
H
F
H
H
F
F
F
F
E
F
H
F
B
D
F
E
E
kotis
is
asking
the
board
to
find
that
there
has
been
no
showing
of
a
violation
and
based
upon
that
you
should
rule
without
him
ever
having
to
put
on
any
type
of
evidence.
So,
madam
chair,
you
were
the
person
that
makes
it
determination.
It's
not
done
by
a
motion.
It
is
done
by
your
finding
so
that
you
make
that
decision
as
to
whether
or
not
the
city
has
put
on
sufficient
evidence
to
move
the
case
forward.
E
B
E
E
Number
one
site
plan
approval
number
two
building
permit
approval
number
three
approval
of
a
drainage
plan
by
the
City
Engineer
and
number
four
permits
from
other
affected
agencies
or
jurisdictions.
I've
only
read
the
highlighted
portions
that
had
been
tendered
in
evidence,
but
there
is
obviously
it's
a
little
bit
longer
than
that
in
the
code.
Mike.
Is
there
anything
else?
You
wanted
me
to
read:
okay,.
D
E
Shall
conform
to
the
following
requirements
and
it
lists
eight
subparagraphs
I'm
not
going
to
read
that
since
that
doesn't
by
paragraph
D
and
the
review
and
granting
of
administrative
approval
for
an
excavation
permit.
The
city
engineer
may
request
compliance
with
any
of
the
items
under
paragraph
B
above
and
subparagraph
II.
The
only
one
left
the
encroachment
upon
any
associated
wetland
shall
require
compliance
with
the
wetlands
protection
provisions
of
this
code.
So
I
think
I've
read
the
pertinent
portions
of
the
code.
So
madam
chair
then
occurred
the
Code
section
and
we
have
mr.
E
kusuda
says
motion
at
this
point
for
a
directed
verdict,
which
basically
is
he's
arguing
that
the
city
has
not
put
on
sufficient
of
evidence
for
a
case
that
he
would
have
to
refute
by
way
of
putting
on
additional
testimony
and
evidence.
So
you
have
to
make
that
determination
where
you're
going
to
grant
the
motion
or
denying.
H
B
F
F
F
J
If
you
people
could
see
what
the
situation
is
and
what
we
have
done,
I,
don't
think
there'd
be
any
issue
here.
I
mean
we
removed,
perhaps
six
to
seven
yards
and
added
to
that
perhaps
four
to
five
yards.
On
top
of
that,
that's
all
we
did.
We
didn't
change
any
elevation
to
speak
of
I
have
pitches
here
of
where
the
original
elevation
was
because
there's
a
wall,
then
it
was
painted
and
you
can
see
where
they
painted
and
we
stayed
below
that
actually.
E
J
F
F
E
F
F
F
F
F
F
J
F
D
J
F
J
F
J
J
A
A
E
J
I
J
E
B
B
H
The
permit
was
granted,
it
was
brought
up
to
the
it
was
issued,
I
mean
submitted
and
everything
and
I
was
brought
up
to
the
city
attorney
because
it's
a
shared
driveway
and
in
the
shared
agreement
in
there
you
have
a
copy
of
it
in
the
exhibit.
But
it's
a
shared
driveway
and
that's
why
it
was.
It
needs
both
party
residents
to
approve
it
and.
E
F
F
F
M
E
F
M
M
N
M
M
B
B
B
F
I
do
think.
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I.
Guess
my
concern
is
there's
this
a
slippery
slope?
Okay,
the
code.
If
you
look
at
the
section
of
the
field-
and
it
says,
fill
excavation
yet
there's
no
definition
of
what
fill
or
excavation
is
the
burden
is
on
the
city,
not
on
my
client,
to
determine
whether
or
not
there's
a
violation,
it's
the
city's
job.
F
To
show
that
there's
a
violation
and
and
as
a
Trier
of
fact,
that
an
arbiter
of
this
particular
case
you
have
the
ability
to
say
you
know
what
there's
not
enough
information
here.
The
code
doesn't
speak
to
what
the
violation
is.
Fill
anybody
here,
who's
working
in
their
yard.
Besides,
based
on
the
testimony
of
the
city,
adding
a
bucket
of
dirt
you'd
have
to
run
to
the
city,
get
a
permit.
If
you
put
a
shovel
in
the
ground,
you
have
to
come
to
the
city
to
get
a
permit.
F
I,
don't
think
that's
what
the
code
is
intended
for.
You
saw
the
pictures.
Their
intent
was
to
an
existing
space
to
landscape
an
existing
space
as
an
entrance
to
their
property.
It's
not
putting
up
a
building.
It's
not
excavating
a
mountain,
it's
adding
plant
material
with
dirt
that
is
conducive
to
supporting
plant
material,
no
more,
no
less.
They
took
out
the
bat
they
brought
in
the
good
okay
and
again,
this
is
a
slippery
slope
to
find
a
violation
for
somebody
who
just
brought
some
dirt
in
I.
F
B
I
A
O
D
E
G
I'm
currently
employed
at
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
as
an
arborist.
My
license
number
is
FL
nine,
two,
two
one,
a
I'm,
also
an
F
ng
L,
a
certified
for
a
professional
license,
number
H,
nine,
seven,
eight,
four
zero.
Two,
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
are
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
Pinellas,
County
property
appraiser
and
the
tax
collector
databases
all
on
Ovie's
and
Noa
ch's
were
sent
certified
return,
receipt
and
first-class
mail.
G
This
is
to
establish
the
case
in
the
record.
My
case
came
from
the
building
department,
tied
together
with
the
site
work.
A
tree
was
removed
without
a
permit
during
the
site,
work
and
because
of
the
root
ball
and
all
of
the
debris
being
removed.
I
could
not
get
an
accurate
size,
but
a
tree
was
removed.
I
went
to
the
Google
and
I
saw
that
in
2016
there
was
a
camp
for
tree
of
substantial
size
located
in
that
triangle,
piece
of
property
that
they
were
real
and
scaping
on.
G
Then
I
had
sent
them
the
Notice
of
Violation
on
the
March
9th
then
I
read
on
April
4th.
The
after-the-fact
permit
was
not
obtained
for
the
tree
removal
without
a
permit.
We
mailed
out
the
NIH
on
April
5th
irie
inspected
on
the
16th
of
April,
because
that's
when
the
permit
was
then
obtained
and
the
deferrals
and
you
see
for
the
CBE
notice
and
because
they
are
in
currently
in
compliance.
We
are
here
to
establish
the
case.
D
G
F
F
J
F
E
G
J
G
They
are
in
compliance,
yes,
but
they
did
remove
a
substantial
large
camphor
tree
without
a
permit
under
city
ordinance.
It
is
required
that
anything
over
four
inches
and
you
can
see
in
my
google
photo
that
is
a
substantial
sized
tree.
Obviously,
a
normal,
reasonable
individual
would
conclude
that
that
is
over
four
inches.
They
recorded
a
permit,
they
did
not
obtain
it.
They
are
in
violation.
B
F
We
can't
deny
that
we
remove
the
tree
and
ignorance
is
not
an
excuse,
but
you
know,
as
the
code
changes
I
would
I
would
you
know
again
I'm
not
trying
to
throw
mr.
Lucas
under
the
bus.
But
you
know
my
clients
rely
on
the
contractor
to
make
sure
that
that
the
the
ordinances
are
complied
with
and
they
did
in
fact
comply
once
it
was
brought
to
their
attention.
B
I
Based
on
the
testimony
evidence,
facts
presented
in
the
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violation,
section,
130
3.04
of
the
Code
of
Ordinances
of
the
city
of
tarpon
springs
was
in
force.
In
effect,
at
the
time
of
the
notice
of
violation
of
respondents
were
in
violation
of
said,
code
sections.
However,
they
are
now
in
compliance.
Second,.
O
E
You
want
me
to
summarize
so
Mike
I
know
you
probably
already
know
this,
but
your
clients
are
here
so
I'm,
just
gonna
say
it
out
loud.
Your
clients
have
been
found
in
violation
of
section
130
3.04.
Should
they
be
found
in
violation
of
this
code
section
again
within
a
five-year
period
of
time
they
would
be
considered
to
repeat
violators
and
they
would
be
fined
from
the
date
that
the
tree
was
was
removed,
so
they
just
need
to
be
on
the
the
proactive
approach
next
time
they
need
to
take
a
tree
down.
Thank
you.
B
P
B
Q
Afternoon,
as
stated,
this
was
a
repeat
violator
case,
the
current
case
number
18
8
0
0,
0,
0,
3,
9
1,
the
address
a
1701
Mandalay
Drive,
it's
a
vacant
lot.
The
property
owner
listed
is
the
estate
of
Miss
Irene
Miller,
the
repeat
violator
cases
from
a
16
K
16
8,
0,
0,
0,
0,
3,
5
1
in
that
case,
were
violations
of
city
code,
8,
48-52,
12,
1
and
130
302
exhibit
number
1
going
before
the
board
are
all
the
photographs
to
include
the
inspections.
Q
All
of
the
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
or
exhibit
number
2
exhibit
number
3,
or
my
administrative
Docs,
including
the
case
summary
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records,
as
well
as
any
emails
associated
with
this
case,
exhibit
number
four:
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign?
An
exhibit
number
five
is
the
affidavit
of
cost.
Q
For
this
case,
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
are
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
this
board,
and
all
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice,
violations
notice.
The
hearings
percent
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and,
madam
chairman,
if
you
would
please
accept
all
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Yes,.
B
Q
Case
started
on
June
8
this
year,
my
initial
inspection,
the
Lots
overgrown.
It
was
previously
mowed
and
established
as
I
stated
under
the
previous
case
in
2016.
The
vines
are
once
again
growing
into
the
trees
causing
potential
damage
to
them.
Trees
along
the
western
side
are
encroaching
onto
the
neighbor's
property.
They
happen
to
be
Brazilian,
pepper,
trees
on
that
same
day,
June,
8
2018.
Q
The
reason
for
the
repeat,
violator
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
certified
as
well
as
first
class
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin
after
we
were
notified
that
the
property
was
in
compliance,
June,
22nd,
On,
June,
28th
I
did
post
the
property
for
this
code
board
and
we
did
get
the
repeat:
violator
notice
of
hearing
returned
to
us
unsigned.
We
did
have
contact
I,
believe
our
clerk
had
contact
with
the
lady
that
is
here
actually
from
the
maintenance
manager,
Joe.
F
Q
Was
aware
of
the
notice,
as
I
stated
earlier,
the
previous
case
were
violations
of
8
48-52
and
1
302,
which
are
the
same
violations
that
occurred
this
time.
8
40
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property,
8
52,
which
has
to
do
with
the
nuisance
conditions,
which
specifically
deal
with
an
overgrown
lot
and
130
302
has
to
deal
with
the
maintenance
of
the
trees,
particularly
the
vines
climbing
up
into
the
causing
damage
to
the
regular
trees
and,
as
stated,
it
was
in
violation
for
a
period
of
14
days.
As
of
right.
A
B
P
Have
been
looking
after
this
property
for
42
years
and
roughly
about
15
years
ago,
the
man
I
have
no
neighbors
at
all
around
this
property,
except
one
man
on
the
west
side.
He
wanted
the
property.
He
wanted
me
to
sell
it
to
him.
I
told
him,
no,
that
it
was
in
our
family
and
we
wanted
to
keep
it.
That
was
it
from
that
day
forward.
This
man
calls
cold
enforcement
on
me
all
the
time
now.
I
have
a
launch
service.
This
code
enforcement
told
me
every
six
weeks.
P
This
does
look
quite
heavy,
but
my
lawn
man
was
there
on
the
10th,
so
the
guy
next
door
calls
two
days
before
it's
to
be
mowed
and
I
know
exactly
what
he
was
looking
at.
If
you
look
at
the
last
picture,
you
see
that
little
bit
of
Brazilian
pepper
hanging
over
on
his
lawn.
That's
why
he
calls
he
calls
all
the
time.
I'll
give
you
one
example:
there's
many
I
have
many
examples.
P
P
We
go
out
there
and
here
along
the
west
side
on
the
other
side
of
the
fence,
is
piles
of
Refuge,
piles
and
I
said
to
myself
any
other
time
which
has
been
many
times.
People
come
and
drive
up
to
this
lot
and
dump
their
yard
goods.
Why
did
somebody
walk
all
the
way
back
and
carry
this
stuff
back
there
and
throw
it
I
stood
there
I'm,
not
an
arborist
and
I'm,
not
a
code
enforcement
but
I
looked
at
it.
I
looked
up
the
guy
next
door,
hadn't
cleared
his
whole
yard,
cut
his
molé
Kabylia
there.
P
The
bulk
of
Illya
were
layin.
He
cleared
his
queen
and
palms
I,
don't
have
any
Queen
on
palms
or
bow
kabylia
on
my
lot.
There
they
are.
There
was
tons
a
Bahia
grass,
and
you
can
see
it
right
here
in
this
last
picture.
That's
what
he
has
in
his
yard.
All
he
did
was
walk
up
and
throw
it
over
the
fence,
and
then
he
called
code
enforcement
and
code
enforcement.
Told
me
I
couldn't
put
that
stuff.
P
There
I
had
to
pay
two
hundred
and
fifteen
dollars
for
someone
to
go
and
pick
it
up
and
take
it
away
when
I
was
here
in
16,
I
paid
eighteen
hundred
dollars
for
them
to
cut
down
the
Brazilian
pepper,
which
you
couldn't
see
is
not
I,
see
a
lot
of
Brazilian
pepper
in
Tarpon
and
the
vines.
The
vines
are
growing
on
palm
trees,
I
don't
see
them
strangling
anything,
but
suddenly
their
killer
behind
I
paid
$1600.
For
that
to
be
cleared
up
this
now.
This
does
look
rough
here.
P
I
have
to
admit,
but
I
just
paid
five
hundred
and
forty
dollars
this
last
time
for
them
to
go
out
and
cut
that
Brazilian
pepper.
Now
my
lawn
guy
is,
he
works.
He
doesn't
work
anymore,
he's
retired,
but
I
got
his
name
from
enforcement.
He
knows
everything
that
has
to
be
done,
and
you
know
what
he
says
to
me:
you're
being
singled
out.
You
know
that
he
says
I
don't
have
to
do
that
on
my
other
Lots,
but
yours
has
to
be
pristine.
P
I
said
I
know
it's
the
guy
next
door,
so
he
went
to
the
guy
next
door
and
said:
here's
my
card
take
it.
He
says.
If
you
have
any
problems,
call
me
I'll
come
right
out
and
I'll
fix
whatever
needs
to
be
fixed,
quit
torturing
this
woman
next
door
and
the
guy
had
slammed
the
door
in
his
face,
and
that
was
just
a
cup
and
then
I
know
that
it
was
quite
a
few
days.
But
if
within
two
days
it
was
mowed
and
edged
okay
and
then
that
same
day
I
got
with
mr.
P
Bernardo
and
we
went
and
started
calling
now.
You
know
you
call
on
guys
in
the
summer
and
you
know
what
they
say
to
you
were
packed.
I
I
call
that
very
day
and-
and
we
found
someone,
but
he
could
not
start
for
three
days
and
then
he
came
out
and
worked
on
it
for
three
days
and
then
mr.
Bernardo
went
out
and
made
sure
that
was
in
compliance,
I'm
not
trying
to
get
away
with
anything
I'm.
Just
saying
I
don't
have
a
chance
here.
I
just
I,
try
I,
keep
it
up.
P
I've
spent
within
these
last
two
years,
that's
$3,200.
On
a
vacant
lot
I've
tried
to
talk
to
the
man
next
door
or
he
will
not.
You
will
not
speak
to
me,
so
this
is
what
I've
decided
to
do,
even
though
this
property
has
been
in
our
family
for
65
years,
I
went
today
with
a
lawyer
and
I'm
going
to
start
now.
We're
gonna
have
to
sell
it.
I
can't
I.
Can't
I
can't
do
this
anymore.
P
D
B
Q
I
have
four
active
cases
on
your
street
right
now,
so
you're
far
from
being
singled
out
and
I
have
currently
175
active
cases
in
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs.
So
with
that
being
said,
she's
had
numerous
priors
before
all
the
way
back
to
1999.
So
it's
not
by
any
stretch
of
the
imagination,
a
new
thing.
The
lot
was
grossly
overgrown.
As
she
stated
it
was
pretty
significant
for
what
it's
worth
the
gentleman
that
complained
doesn't
live
next
door.
He
lives
farther
down
the
street
so
just
to
there's
not
a
single
hangout
issue.
Q
She
is
right
on
the
corner,
but
that
property
is
very
noticeable
because
of
that
there
is
a
couple
more
houses
being
built
on
that
same
street.
So
people
are
very
well
aware
of.
What's
going
on
with
it,
and
that's
probably
what's
precipitated
the
complaints
within
the
last
couple
of
years,
so
I
get
her
position
and
her
understanding.
But
the
fact
is
the
the
lot
was
grossly
overgrown.
As
we
all
are
aware,
it
grows
pretty
fast
down
here.
B
P
As
being
singled
out
in
I've,
been
here
41
years
and
I
can
tell
you
that
I
have
been
taken
called
and
gone
to
have
to
straighten
out
that
lot.
But
yet,
when
I
go
down
the
road
there
were
two
monstrosity
x'
at
the
end
of
the
road
where
they
had
all
the
building
material
left.
The
grass
was
up
to
the
windows.
There
were
no
windows,
all
the
insulation
was
flapping
in
the
wind,
and
that
was
four
years.
But
I
had
to
have
my
light
mode
now.
I,
don't
give
anybody
any
heat.
P
You
you
caught,
you
write
me
and
I
go
and
I
take
care
of
everything.
I
have
someone
that
comes
every
six
weeks.
Like
you
told
me,
you
told
me:
have
him
come
every
six
weeks
to
mow
and
I
did
and
I
and
you're
saying
to
me
it's
somebody
down
the
street.
Well,
why
would
somebody
down
the
street
be
worried
about
that?
O
O
L
C
E
E
Although
the
board
had
the
opportunity
to
find
up
to
five
hundred
dollars
a
day
for
each
one
of
those
days
that
it
was
in
violation,
the
board
has
fined
twenty
dollars
a
day
for
14
days,
a
total
fine
of
three
hundred
and
eighty
dollars
the
city.
The
city
has
also
been
awarded
its
prosecution
cost
of
seventy
six
dollars
and
fifty
cents.
You
can
pay
that
directly
to
the
City
Clerk's
office.
You'll
receive
an
order
within
about
ten
days,
it'll
be
mailed
to
the
address
listed
by
the
tax,
collector
and
property
appraiser's
office.
B
B
B
D
Q
Objections,
thank
you.
This
is
a
repeat
violator
case
has
stayed.
It
was
a
one-day
violation
and
I'll
explain
why
it's
only
one
day
here,
in
my
case
the
previous
case
was
17-8:
zero,
zero,
zero
0-5
3,
which
deals
with
appendix
B
the
smart
code.
Chapter
6
outdoor
displays
same
thing
before
this
board
under
case
18:
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
three
nine
six,
the
address
being
seven
fifteen
dodecanese
Boulevard
the
owner,
stated
previously
exhibit
number
one.
Q
All
the
photos
to
include
my
inspections
exhibit
number
two
are
all
notices
include
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
Notice
of
Hearing
exhibit
number
three
or
administrative
docks,
the
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records,
and
any
emails
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five?
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs
amount
of
Chairman
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
this
board?
Q
And
all
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
All
those
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
both
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail,
and
please
accept
all
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Q
City
tarpon
springs
has
smart
code
which
deals
with
the
outdoor
display,
particularly
in
the
sponge
dock
area.
There's
a
significant
number
of
requirements,
I
believe
there
was
some
paperwork
that
went
around
through
the
board,
what
it
basically
states
is
and
what
the
violation
was
here
is
you
can't
have
any
items
hanging
on
the
outside
of
buildings?
You
can't
have
items
on
racks
in
the
doorways,
particularly
or
partially
blocking
those
doorways.
The
racks
must
be.
It
says,
greater
than
thirty
six
inches
in
height.
That's
the
type
of
graphical
error.
Q
It
should
be
less
than
36
inches
in
height
in
front
of
the
business
there's
some
requirements
that
go
with
the
Americans
with
Disabilities
Act
that
you
can't
have
anything
within
18
inches
of
the
door.
There's
some
requirements
that
also
go
along
with
the
national
fire
code,
in
particular
on
this
particular
property.
Sorry
about
that
this
particular
property
on
June
9th,
when
I
inspected
it
for
outdoor
display
violations
on
Sponge,
Docks
I
did
discover
items
hanging
on
the
outside
of
the
building.
Q
There
were
items
on
racks
in
the
doorway
partially
blocking
them,
and
there
were
racks
that
were
greater
than
36
in
high
36
inches
in
height.
You
can
see
that
in
the
photographs,
because
these
are
businesses
technically
they're
in
compliance
every
night-
they
take
all
these
displays
inside.
So
it's
not
the
same
as
mowing
your
yard
or
anything
like
that.
So
it's
an
interesting
kind
of
a
case.
I
never
had
an
opportunity.
I
did
go
back
a
couple
of
times
and
then
ever
saw
them
in
violation
of
ginn
other
than
that
one
day.
Q
So
it's
simply
before
the
board
for
a
one-day
violation.
They
were
already
established
under
another
case
they're.
Currently
in
compliance
moving
forward,
On
June
14th,
the
repeat,
violator
notice,
the
hearing
was
mailed
certified
in
first
class,
as
I
stated
on
June
27th
I
specifically
conducted
an
inspection
and
they
were
in
compliance
during
the
day
and,
needless
to
say,
conduct
these
during
business
hours.
Q
So
after
hours,
they're
always
gonna
be
in
compliance,
didn't
get
any
return
mail
and
we
did
have
some
phone
calls
in
office,
but
as
visits
from
tenants
and
the
owners,
as
stated,
the
violation
is
appendix
B
chapter
6,
the
the
outdoor
display
definition
under
the
city's,
a
smart
code
and,
as
I
also
stated
there
currently
well,
it
could
be
in
compliance
as
of
today,
but
they
were
in
my
last
inspection
and
I
have
nothing
further.
At
this
point
or.
B
K
As
was
stated
myself,
my
uncle
and
our
cousin
are
have
all
gone
to
code
enforcement.
About
this
hearing.
I
was
told.
The
best
course
of
action
was
to
show
up
at
this
meeting
and
sort
of
explain
a
situation
that
are
the
property
is
listed
as
an
established
violator
I
only
got
involved
in
managing
my
mother's
interest
in
the
building
in
April
because
of
some
health
concerns.
On
her
part,
the
building
is
jointly
owned
by
Joyce
Pappas,
Ted
Franzese
and
my
mother
for
Nitze
Mian.
K
It's
considered
a
single
lot
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser,
but
the
there
are
two
mailing
addresses
there
that
are
operated
as
separate
businesses,
713
and
715
Dodecanese,
but
according
to
Pinellas
County.
That
is
one
lot
and
the
single
lot
or
the
combined
lot
is
considered
a
established
repeat
violator
for
the
past
three
years.
The
same
tenant
was
renting
7:13
and
715,
but
as
of
May
1st
of
this
year,
that
tenant
is
now
only
operating
their
business
and
seven
at
7:13
Dodecanese
and
we
have
a
new
tenant.
K
Mr.
Franzese
and
I
have
met
with
our
tenant
at
located
715
in
light
of
getting
this
notice
and
have
given
him
copies
of
all
of
the
code
enforcement
regulations,
and
he's
explained
that
to
all
of
his
employees
at
this
point
I'm
just
here
today
to
clarify
that
the
business
operating
at
7:15
has
only
been
in
existence
since
May
1st,
and
this
citation
hearing
is
the
first
one
that's
been
given
to
that
entity.
K
Unfortunately,
just
the
way
the
County
Clare
classifies,
the
building
the
current
tenant
is
labeled
as
a
repeat
violator
for
the
prior
tenant
that
he
obviously
had
no
control
over
their
actions.
But,
as
I
said
he's,
we've
give
him
copies
of
all
the
regulations
and
he
said
he'll,
you
know,
comply
with
everything
moving
forward
and
not
put
any
racks
in
the
doorways
or
anything
outside
above
36
inches.
R
K
Q
Quick,
as
he
stated
it
is
one
parcel.
You
know
the
the
city
sites
owners.
We
don't
particularly
cite
the
tenants,
so
that's
one
reason
why
the
notice
goes
to
the
owners.
We
dealt
with
this
property
as
he
stated
a
couple
of
years
ago,
and
we
had
some
weird
issues
with
it
because
of
the
fact
that
there
is
one
parcel
with
two
addresses,
so
it's
the
parcel
as
the
whole.
Q
Luckily,
at
that
time,
when
it
was
established,
it
was
a
problem
with
both
of
the
mailing
addresses
I
one
parcel
so,
but
it
was
the
owners
that
were
cited
and,
as
you
can
appreciate,
it's
the
repeat
violator
as
the
owner,
not
the
tenant,
and
it
was
just
for
the
one
day
because
I
stated
I
never
had
an
opportunity
to
go
back
down
there
and
go
any
further
with
that.
So
that's
all
I
have.
O
Of
city
code,
a
ppb
:
CH
6
of
the
tarpon
spring
city
code
of
from
the
initial
date
of
inspection,
69
2018
until
610
2018
and
a
fine
of
$10
per
day
for
one
day
or
a
total
fine
of
$10.
In
addition,
I
move
the
city
be
awarded
seventy
six
dollars
and
fifty
cents
for
the
cost
that
occurred
on
prosecuting
a
case.
My.
L
C
O
O
C
E
Em
right,
okay,
so
the
property's
been
found
in
repeat
violation.
Again,
the
board
has
found
and
fined
ten
dollars
for
the
one
day
of
the
violation.
The
board
is
also
awarded
the
city,
yet
it's
outfit
its
prosecution
cost
of
seventy
six
dollars
and
fifty
cents.
The
total
do
is
eighty
six
dollars
and
fifty
cents
and
the
order
from
the
board
will
be
issued
within
the
ten
next
ten
days,
it'll
be
provided
to
the
property
owners
listed
on
the
text,
clickers
roll.
You
have
any
questions,
you
can
contact
officer,
gas
and
after
the
meeting
today,
if.
D
R
D
D
R
R
E
S
C
L
S
Q
You
this
will
be
the
second
of
the
three
sidewalk
display
cases
that
you
guys
are
gonna
hear
today
so
case
number
18,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
three
93
793
dodecanese
Boulevard,
the
property
address
is
listed
as
the
owner
being
a
George
I.
Believe
it's
velocity,
il
L
IAS
big
exhibit
number
one
before
the
border.
All
my
photographs
include.
The
inspections
exhibit
number
two
is
the
notices,
my
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice.
Our
hearing
exhibit
number
three
administrative
docks:
the
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
database
records
and
any
emails
zip.
Q
A
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign,
all
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what
was
presented
to
this
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
based
on
the
Pinellas,
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
database.
Q
All
my
notice
of
violations,
our
notice
of
hearing
or
centos
certified
mail
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail,
and
madam
chairman
I
believe
you
already
have,
but
please
accept
all
these
into
the
record
as
evident
it's
very
similar
to
the
previous
case,
so
I
I
can
go
into.
We
have
a
significant
number
of
ordinance
under
appendix
B
chapter
six,
dealing
with
the
outdoor
display
of
merchandise.
As
I
stated
before,
there's
some
requirements
on
June
8th.
They
conducted
the
initial
inspection
on
a
neighboring
property
while
checking
for
violate
a
violation.
Q
Violations
of
the
outdoor
display,
I
found
numerous
at
this
particular
address.
There
were
numerous
items
hanging
on
the
door:
there's
racks
of
clothing,
greater
than
36
inches
in
height
in
front
of
the
store,
their
displays
less
than
18
inches
from
the
sides
of
the
door
there
and
then
the
displays.
As
I
already
stated,
I
spoke
to
the
clerk
at
the
time
and
the
items
hanging
on
the
door
were
removed.
On
June
13th,
we
sent
the
Notice
of
Violation
no
notice
of
hearing.
Q
Regardless
we
were
going
to
establish
this
property,
whether
there
was
compliance
or
not
again,
they
come
into
compliance
every
night
when
they
close
up
shop
and
take
everything
inside
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin
on
June
27,
and
at
that
time
the
property
was
in
compliance.
I'd
conducted
another
inspection
on
July
11th
and
the
property
was
still
in
compliance.
We
have
had
some
contact
with
the
owners
and
I
believe
the
tenants
were
here
in
the
past.
Q
With
that
being
said,
the
one
particular
tenant
I
believe
Gloria's
here
I've
had
ad
nauseum
conversations
about
her
outdoor
displays,
she's
well
aware
of
these
ordinances,
and
this
is
a
significant
issue
that
obviously
I'm
here
on
three
cases,
we've
gone
back
and
forth
numerous
times
about
this.
This
is
no
mystery
to
her
I've,
provided
this
packet
of
paperwork
to
her
no
less
and
her
tenants
no
less
than
ten
times
so.
Q
O
I
make
it
just
a
brief
statement.
I
probably
was
downtown
that
same
day
and
you
couldn't
hardly
walk
down
the
sidewalk.
There
was
so
many
displays
outside
and
I
think
that's
another
issue
if
somebody
makes
a
misstep
and
that
curb
is
a
little
high
right
along
there
and
the
cars
they're
supposed
to
be
going
five
miles
an
hour
but
they're
not
no
I
think
this
is
a
good
thing
to
look.
I
love
our
Sponge
Docks
I.
Don't
want
to
hurt
them,
but
I
think
this
is
a
good
thing.
B
B
Q
The
door
from
the
doors
18
inches
and
the
reference
is
basically
the
door
frame.
You
give
them
a
little
bit
of
added,
there's
all
kinds
of
different
construction
of
doors,
but
basically
it's
that
opening
that
somebody
can
walk
through
the
18
inches
is
related
to
the
national
fire
code.
It
has
to
do
with
being
able
to
egress
the
building
in
case
there's
a
fire.
Q
If
there's
things
inside
that
or
near
that
entryway
they
can
get
tangled
up
in
it
and
can
cause
an
issue
and
that's
why
that
falls
under
NFPA,
the
National
Fire,
Prevention,
Association,
I,
think
and
then
there's
also
a
DA
issues.
We
didn't
have
any
ad
a
particular
things.
Those
deal
with
how
much
sidewalk
you
have
and
size
of
doorways
and
things
like
that
as
well
for
handicapped
access,
but
that's
the
reason
behind
the
18
inches
from
the
doorway.
What.
Q
T
You
know
he
came
by
and
and
I
did
order
back,
because
it's
extremely
low
and
I
didn't
have
any
in
my
possession
at
the
time
and
I
ordered
them
all
and
soon
as
I
could
I
got
him
up.
These
are
the
fees
are
not
the
bright
pictures
now
I
have
all
new,
so
it
actually
took
away
one
that
he
didn't
even
ask
me
to
take
away.
T
So
it
wouldn't
make
that
point
of
where
to
go
by
very
easy,
so
I
actually
really
narrowed
it
down
way
more
than
I
even
had
to
so
I
was
trying
to
come
in
compliance.
I
just
had
to
order
certain
things
to
get
him
out,
so
they
I
got
him
out
as
soon
as
I
got
and
I
did
talk
to
him
last
week.
I
saw
him
and
I
asked
him
to
come
by.
Those
I
had
gotten
it
all
up,
and
so
I
wasn't
like
I
was
completely
ignoring
it.
I
took
everything
off
the
doors.
S
I
Move
based
on
the
testimony
evidence
facts
presented
in
the
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violation,
sections
City
Code
appendix
B,
chapter
6
of
the
code
of
ordinance
of
the
city
of
tarpon
springs
were
in
force.
In
effect,
at
the
time
of
the
Notice
of
Violation,
the
respondents
were
in
violation
of
said,
code
sections.
However,
they
are
now
in
compliance.
C
L
C
E
Yummy
summarize
so
the
board
has
found
the
property
owner
in
in
violation
of
appendix
b
chapter
6
of
the
city
code
that
has
now
been
established.
As
a
violation
said,
another
violation
occur
by
the
same
property
owner
within
a
five
year
period
of
time,
they'll
be
considered
a
repeat
violator
and
could
be
fined
up
to
$500
a
day
from
the
date
of
the
inspection
where
the
violation
is
found.
So
it's
critically
important
to
remain
in
compliance.
E
B
B
Q
You
k
17-8
0,
0,
0,
0,
781
455,
you
starp,
and
avenues
of
property
dress,
as
you
stayed
at
4:55
tarpon
Avenue
LLC
is
the
property
owner
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
border.
All
my
photographs
include.
The
inspections
exhibit
number
two.
My
notices
to
include
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
or
the
administrative
docks
include
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
tax,
collector
records
and
any
emails
related
to
this
case.
Q
Hafidh
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
signer
Exhibit
number
for
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
you
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
this
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
database.
All
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail,
and
please
accept
all
these
exhibits
into
the
record.
As
you
already
asked
as
evidence,
this
case
started
out
in
December
of
last
year.
Q
December
29th
2017
originally
got
a
citizen
complaint
about
the
house
being
vacant.
The
lot
was
overgrown
trash
and
debris,
particularly
on
the
north
side
and
the
end
of
the
drive
under
the
carport
trash
cans
in
public
view.
Construction
material
around
the
north
side
of
the
building
there
was
a
remodel
permit,
was
applied
for
in
July
of
2016
just
kind
of
quickly
quickly
give
you
what
the
basis
of
this
case
is
going
to
end
up
with
is
going
to
kind
of
deal
with
that
unfinished
property.
Q
Most
of
the
rest
of
it
came
into
compliance
as
we
moved
along.
But
that's
what
started
my
case
out.
The
building
code
requires
a
new
permit
if
no
works
being
done
within
the
last
six
months,
and
the
property
cannot
be
left
in
a
state
of
partial
construction
on
December
29th,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed
certified
as
well
as
first
class
January
5th.
We
got
another
complaint
about
it
being
overgrown,
but
that
was
still
an
ongoing
case.
Q
January
17th
they
conducted
a
reinfection.
The
rear
of
the
house
was
still
in
a
partial
state
of
construction,
as
you
can
see
in
the
photographs
from
that
permit
from
2016
at
that
time.
In
January
the
lawn
had
been
mowed,
but
there
was
still
some
debris
under
the
carport
near
the
end
of
that
driveway
on
the
north
side,
fence
material
and
paint
buckets,
etc,
sent
a
final
Notice
of
Violation
January
of
this
year,
first
class
return
received
on
April,
2nd.
Q
The
building
department
recommended
postponement
of
the
inspection
until
she
was
able
to
come
down
over
the
summer
to
deal
with
the
expired
permit.
We
had
actually
scheduled
this
case
for
a
previous
one
and
at
the
last
minute,
rescheduled
it
to
try
to
worked
through
the
issues
with
getting
the
that
addition,
legal
or
lack
of
a
better
term.
So
on
May
3rd
through
June
8th.
Apparently,
several
different
contractors
went
to
the
building
department
to
look
at
plans.
Apparently
the
owner
plans
on
correcting
the
foundation
and
then
the
porch.
Q
So
the
scope
of
the
project
sounded
like
it
got
larger
I
conducted
my
Rhian
spec
Chinon,
June
13th.
There
was
basically
the
only
thing
at
that
point
in
time
was
the
unfinished
structure
it
had
been
mowed.
The
debris
and
trash
had
been
cleaned
up,
so
we're
dealing
with
the
the
partial
state
of
construction,
which
falls
under
city
code,
8
40
and
its
particular
definitions.
That
say
no
structure
can
be
dilapidated
or
in
a
partial
state
of
construction.
There's
no
building
code
issues
per
se
before
this
board.
Q
It
is
strictly
the
partial
construction
under
840,
so
I
then
posted
the
property
on
June
28th.
After
sending
a
notice
of
hearing
on
June,
18th
and
I
did
conduct
a
final
inspection
yesterday,
determined
there
was
still
no
permit
issued.
The
building
is
still
partially
constructed
with
the
Tyvek
surround
it,
and
it's
not
cited
and
finished.
We've
had
phone
calls
and
some
other
conversations
with
the
owner.
As
I
stated
she's
been
in
his
ability,
representatives
have
been
into
the
building
department.
Q
Try
to
solve
this
issue
there
are
violations
listed
listed,
is
the
accumulation
of
trash
and
the
nuisance
prohibitions,
but
I'd
put
before
the
board
that
they're
in
compliance.
So
right
now,
I
have
8
40,
which
are
includes
those
subsequent
definitions
that
deal
with
the
dilapidated
structure
and
that's
all
or
I'm.
Sorry,
the
partially
constructed
building
that
you
saw
in
the
photographs,
which
is
that
addition
on
the
backside.
So
that's
the
only
thing
I
have
before
the
board
is
the
fact
that
structures.
B
Q
Know
prior
to
Vicky's
rousseau
leaving
she
was
kind
of
spearheading
that
whole
thing
and
then
it
just
seemed
to
get
to
some
weird
stalemate
and
then
finally,
you
know
with
her
leaving
we
didn't
know
where
else
to
go.
We
hadn't,
you
know
numerous
contractors
had
come
in
and
I
don't
I,
don't
understand
the
reason
why
it
hasn't
got
any
farther.
So
that's
why
I
just
simply
brought
the
case
before
the
board
and
we've
now
been
able
to
present
a
person
that
might
be
able
to
answer
that
question.
For
you.
B
U
He
has
asked
one
question
about
the
construction
why
it
has
not
been
done
and
that's
what
we're
asking
to
why
it
has
not
been
done.
We're
dealing
with
a
lot
of
contractors.
I
snapchatted
from
my
phone
conversations
where
they
just
say:
they're
gonna
come
they
don't
come
they're
gonna
spend
up
to
fall,
so
they
don't
send
the
proposal.
I've
heard
all
excuses.
You
have
children,
a
specter
in
the
hospital
they're,
this
they're
that
and
I
understand,
but
it's
not
that
we're
not
doing
anything.
U
O
U
Than
anyone
we
wanted
to
start
the
back
porch,
it
wasn't
level
we
wanted
to
level
the
floor
and
then
the
contractor
started
the
job.
He
did
everything
he
legal
illegal,
without
plans
without
permits.
Without
anything,
we
were
down
to
the
building
department
asked
in
them.
Has
there
been
a
permit
pulled
out?
Have
there
been
plans
submitted?
No
so
now,
on
top
of
that,
we
get
reported
in
December
2017
by
the
previous
owner
that
owned
that
home
and
that's
not
right
for
us
either,
because
you
know
we
buy
a
home,
it's
a
beautiful
home.
U
It's
all
rotted
everything,
electable
windows,
floors,
termite
it
and
destroyed,
and
now
we're
here
like
it's
like
I'm,
trying
to
find
out
what
we've
done
wrong
and
we
want
to
get
the
Sun
because
it
was
our
idea
to
knock
it
down.
But
that's
what
happened?
Heavenly
foundation
was
hired
and
the
guy
didn't
do
what
he
had
to
do
and
now
we're
trying
to
where
the
contract
is.
For
someone
to
finally
get
the
job
and
finish
so
I
don't
know.
A
U
U
Q
U
U
U
U
There
was
not
a
permit
and
there
were
not
planned,
he
might
have
submitted
the
permit.
But
after
because
I
remember,
Anthony
had
came
out,
he
was
pressuring
the
director
the
winning
side
for
Anthony
and
he
came
out
and
he
told
me,
I
have
a
lot
of
pressure
from
your
contractor
and
I
came
down
here
to
see
myself
what's
happening
and
I
told
them.
The
job
is
not
good
and
for
him
not
and
that's
where
we
have.
U
U
B
O
O
Unfortunately,
for
her,
our
economy
is
pretty
good
right
now.
Construction
business
is
very
good.
Everybody
I
know
when
that
business
is
busy
and
the
key
is
finding
someone
with
a
license
who
can
get
a
permit,
as
we
went
through
a
few
cases
ago
here
about
permitting
she's
got
a
rock
and
a
hard
place
here.
Trying
to
find
a
contractor
I
happen
to
know
a
GC
I
will
ask
him
I.
U
O
L
C
Q
Almost
wish
I'd
like
to
ask
her
but
I
think
under
the
circumstances,
there's
been
a
lot
going
on
since
December
I
think
we're
at
the
point
where
at
best
we
should
probably
be
at
60
days
and
she
needs
to
make
the
decision
of
whether
demolishing
it
if
she
demolishes
it
she's
in
compliance.
If
that
asked,
if
that
addition
is
removed
from
the
house,
then
she's
in
compliance,
which
sounds
like
maybe
her
intent
anyway.
So
I
think
60
days
is
probably
reasonable
for
that.
Beyond
that
hundred
dollars
a
day.
B
U
B
I
O
E
So
ma'am
I
want
to
go
ahead
and
summarize
what
the
board
has
done.
The
board
has
found
the
property
owner
in
violation
of
city
code,
section
8,
40
property
owner
has
been
given
until
October
11
2018
to
come
into
compliance
to
the
property
not
be
brought
into
compliance
by
that
date
of
$50
a
day.
Fine
we'll
begin
to
run
it's
very
important
for
you
to
get
compliance
on
the
property
before
that
time.
E
B
B
V
V
Q
You,
as
stated
this,
a
repeat
violator
case,
started
on
June
16th
still
presently
occurring.
There's
two
prior
actually,
three
prior
repeat
violator
case
numbers
associated
with
this.
The
first
one
is
case:
number
16,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
two
eight
seven,
which
were
violations
of
eight
twenty,
two
and
eight
forty
that's
trash
and
failure
to
maintain
private
property.
The
second
repeat:
violator
case
there
was
a
a
17-8:
zero:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
five,
six,
also
822
and
eight
forty.
Q
At
that
time
there
was
a
$75
a
day,
fine
rendered
under
that
case
number,
then
under
case
number,
17-8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
six,
three
two
also
eight
twenty
to
eight
forty
and
eight.
Fifty
two
and
a
fine
was
rendered
four
hundred
dollars
a
day
on
that
one.
Those
two
prior
cases
were
brought
into
compliance,
but
none
of
the
fines
have
been
paid
yet
on
those
two
prior
cases
moving
forward,
as
stated
the
case
is
518
a
slime
street.
Q
It's
a
it's
a
I
think
it's
a
three
Plex
apartment
unit
owned
by
five
eighteen
he's
like
a
lime
street
land
trust
hand,
weaned
and
he'll
are
Co.
Llc
exhibit
number
one
or
all
the
photographs
to
include
the
inspections
exhibit
number
two
or
my
notices
include
the
Nov
and
NIH
the
Notice
of
Violation,
a
notice
of
hearing
administrative
docks
to
include
the
case,
summary
property,
appraiser
and
Tax
Collector
databases
or
exhibit
number
three.
It's
a
bit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five?
Q
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs
all
my
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
or
exact
copies
of,
what's
being
presented
to
this
board?
All
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
based
on
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases
sent
via
first-class
and
return
receipt
requested.
And,
madam
chairman,
if
you
would
please
accept
all
these
exhibits
in
his
record
as
evidence.
Q
We
did
get
back
the
notice
of
hearing
from
the
registered
agent
and
we
have
had
phone
contact
with
the
management
company
and
currently
before
the
board
violations
of
8
22
accumulation
of
trash,
8
52,
the
nuisance
prohibitions
was
their
deal
with
debris
and
things
like
that
and
then
just
8
40,
which
is
the
requirement
to
maintain
private
property
and
I,
have
nothing
further.
At
this
point,
madam
chairman,.
I
Q
Q
I
B
O
V
I
do
have
an
invoice
dated
July
6
2018
for
the
contractor
that
cleaning
the
property
on
that
date,
though
it
was
in
compliance
on
that
day.
I,
don't
know
what
happens
from
day
to
day.
It
is
a
problem.
Property
I,
don't
feel
like
I
feel,
like
I'm,
the
victim
I
wish,
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
code
enforcement,
police
department,
solid
waste,
could
go
after
the
true
perpetrators,
the
dumpers
rather
than
me,
the
don't
be
in
some
jurisdictions.
V
The
solid
waste
will
even
paint
the
garbage
to
follow
the
trail
to
see
where
it
begins
and
where
it
goes
from
there,
and
you
know
often
there
are
many
objects
within
the
debris
that
show
other
addresses
from
which
the
garbage
has
worked.
Its
way
to
the
present
location
and
I've
tried
to
come
up
with
a
solution.
The
only
thing
I
can
think
of
this
security
camera
on
the
property
to
try
to
catch
the
perpetrators,
but
anyway,
I
do
have
an
invoice
dated
July
6
I
can
provide
a
copy
of
that.
V
Then
I
just
received
a
copy
of
another
invoice.
It's
on
my
phone
because
I
got
it
on
the
way
here
and
it
is
dated
July
6.
So
presumably
the
property
was
on
compliance
on
July
6.
Oh
wait!
A
minute,
I
think
I
repeated
the
name
of
the
day,
I'm
sorry
May
3rd,
which
predates
the
recitation
of
June
6
code
enforcement.
June
6
ication
followed
this
property
being
cleaned
on
May
3rd
and
then
again
it
was
cleaned
on
July
6
and
we
we
found
out
the
problem
tenant
there
in
our
unit.
V
C
was
the
perpetrator
and
we
have,
since.
As
of
June
30th
of
2018,
we
sent
them
at
least
non-renew
non
renewal
notice
and
they
have
a
deadline
of
July
31st
18
to
leave
the
property
which
they'll
probably
dump
again
when
they
leave,
they
will
leave
a
lot
of
debris
behind
and
we'll
have
to
take
care
of
it,
but
they
are
the
most
recent
perpetrators
of
what's
going
on
there.
So
I
can
provide
you
with
that
invoice.
V
V
V
Q
V
Q
Q
Yeah
briefly,
this
property
is
is
even
as
the
property
owner
stated,
a
problem
property.
It
is
a
significant
problem:
property
in
the
city,
this
owner
and
ween
has
24
prior
code
enforcement
cases,
as
I
stated
earlier,
the
two
that
were
complied
with,
but
are
in
fine
status
as
owing
fines,
or
just
from
last
year,
2
in
16
2
and
15
14
2
and
11
2
and
8
7
5,
going
back
on
and
on
and
on.
You
guys
saw
the
photographs.
Q
It's
the
owner's
responsibility
to
take
care
of
the
tenants,
I'm
not
going
to
get
into
discussing
how
you
manage
your
property,
but
ultimately
we're
here,
because
the
owners
aren't
taking
care
of
their
property,
whether
their
tenants
or
what
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
on
sites
owners
doesn't
cite
tenants
in
these
particular
cases.
So
it
is
upon
the
owner
and
the
fact
that
management
company's
supposed
to
do
acts
or
whatever.
Ultimately,
it's
the
owner's
responsibility
to
take
care
of
these
properties,
and
that
obviously
isn't
being
done
in
this
case.
B
V
I'd
like
to
go
out
there
myself
now
and
see
if,
in
fact,
the
last
time
that
it
was
supposed
to
be
taken
care
of
July
6,
that
the
property
is
still
clean.
If
there's
more
debris
there
I
understand,
there
was
even
the
out
there
on
July
6
that
was
removed.
I
need
to
drive
by
to
see
what
status
is
today.
E
I
O
O
E
There
is
a
fine
running
on
the
property
beginning
on
June,
the
sixth
and
it's
going
to
continue
running
on
the
property
at
$250
a
day
until
the
property
is
brought
into
compliance
with
a
3-sided,
Code
sections,
822,
840
and
852.
The
city
has
also
been
awarded
prosecution,
cost
of
seventy-six
dollars
and
fifty
cents.
The
order
will
be
entered
and
will
be
provided
to
the
proper
in
or
listed
by.
E
The
tax
collector's
office
within
ten
days-
and
it's
my
advice
to
you
is-
is
to
get
the
property
into
compliance
as
quickly
as
possible
code
enforcement,
so
they
can
come
out
and
do
an
inspection
of
your
property.
If
you
have
any
questions,
you
can
contact
the
code
enforcement
Department
tomorrow
or
sometime
after
it's
in
compliance.
V
B
L
Q
18
8
0
0,
0,
0,
7,
5,
1145,
River,
Edge,
Drive,
Branden
and
David
Smith
collapse,
the
less
appear,
the
owners
of
this
property
exhibit
number
1
are
all
the
photographs
to
include
the
inspections.
All
my
notices
to
include
the
Notice
of
Violation
notice
of
hearing
or
exhibit
number
2
david
number.
Three
administrative
docks,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign.
Q
Only
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
database,
all
notice
of
violations,
a
notice
of
hearing
are
sent
both
first-class
and
certified
return
receipt
requested.
And,
madam
chairman,
please
accept
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evident
this
case
started
on
May
10th
of
this
year
got
a
phone
call
from
the
HOA
regarding
a
gray,
Dodge
van
parked
in
the
driveway
there's.
Q
Confirmed
that
the
VIN
number
listed
1
B
4
GP
4
for
our
6
TB
4
5
9
1
1
4
did
not
have
a
Florida
tag
listed
and
it
was
not
listed
at
that
property
that
property
is
vacant
and
that
property
also
is
currently
in
fine
status.
Tour
on
daily
fines
for
a
completely
unrelated
reason
to
a
vehicle.
I
applied
a
10-day
sticker
at
that
point
in
time
on
made
and
that
occurred
on
May
10th
on
May
24th
I
went
back
conducted
inspection,
the
vehicle
still
in
the
driveway.
Q
At
that
point,
in
time
we
issued
a
notice,
a
violation
via
certified
mail
and
first
class
to
the
property
owner
of
record
June
9th
conducted
another
reinfection,
the
vehicle
still
in
the
driveway
on
June
12th,
the
Notice
of
Hearing
was
mailed
certified
in
first
class
on
June
28th
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
of
posting
July
11th
I
conducted
a
final
inspection
and
the
vehicles.
Still
there
we
did
get
back.
Q
I
B
B
L
B
I
I
O
B
Q
18
8
0
0
0
0,
9
7.
The
address
is
438
Riverside,
Drive,
John
and
Stella
Merritt
of
the
list
of
property
owners.
This
case
is
before
the
board
to
be
established.
It's
currently
in
compliance
exhibit
number
1
in
the
photographs
to
include
my
inspections,
my
notices
and
Notice
of
Violation,
a
notice
of
hearings,
our
exhibit
number
2,
exhibit
number
three
administrative
docs
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
related
emails
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
Q
All
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
property
or
the
Pinellas
County
Tax,
Collector
and
property
appraiser.
All
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
via
certified
mail
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
and
madam
chairman,
if
you
would
please
accept
the
exhibits
into
the
record,
as
evidence
case
started,
May
8,
my
initial
inspection
was,
as
you
can
see,
in
the
photographs
that
went
around
there's
a
boat
park
between
the
houses
on
the
east
side.
It's
less
than
two
feet
from
the
property
line.
Q
There
was
a
change
of
name
on
the
property.
One
of
them
is
still
kind
of
the
same,
but
we
decided
that
not
to
use
the
repeat
violator
case
and
just
basically
start
a
new
city
code.
42.00
parking,
our
recreational
vehicles
and
residential
areas
does
allow
you
to
park
in
what's
considered
the
inside
side
yard,
which
is
on
the
side
of
a
house
as
long
as
it's
on
the
front
of
the
house.
Q
But
with
that
being
said,
you
can't
park
within
two
feet
of
the
property
line
along
the
side
of
the
house
and,
as
you
can
see
in
the
photograph,
it's
almost
touching.
The
neighbor's
house
I
had
received
a
previous
call
from
the
neighbor
complaining
about
this
previously
and
when
I
got
out
there,
it
wasn't
an
issue
in
that
neighborhood.
It
showed
me
their
survey
and
and
at
that
point
time,
I
was
able
to
determine
it.
You
can't
see
it
in
the
photograph,
but
there's
a
dividing
fence
and
it's
about
three
feet
over
the
side.
Q
I've
had
no
no
testimony
or
nobody's
presented
anything
to
me
that
the
the
other
property
owner
to
the
east
or
to
the
right
side
and
the
picture
has
given
them
consent.
So,
at
this
point
in
time,
I
went
ahead
and
wrote
the
violation
of
to
be
established.
As
I
stated,
we've
had
some
significant
problems
with
the
way
boats
have
been
parked
on
that
property
in
the
past,
but
because
of
that
ownership
change,
it's
not
a
repeat
violator
case.
Q
Q
We
we
sent
a
repeat
violinist
here,
a
repeat
violator
notice,
a
hearing,
but
then
we
discovered
we
backed
that
off
and
just
did
it
strictly
as
a
notice
of
violation
and
a
notice
of
hearing
which
was
mailed
later
on
June
12th
I
did
conduct
a
reinfection
on
June
28th
and
that's
when
the
boat
I
had
noticed
that
it
had
been
removed
and,
as
I
stated,
I
was
still
gonna.
Bring
it
before
this
board
to
be
established
on
June
28th
I,
also
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit.
Q
We
did
get
a
notice
of
violation
and
a
notice
of
hearing
returned
to
us
signed
by
the
property
owner.
We've
had
no
contact
other
than
those
returned
green
cards
from
the
property
owner.
So
what's
before
the
board
right
now
is
a
violation
of
city
code,
42.00
parking
or
recreational
vehicles
and,
as
I
stated
they're
currently
in
compliance
just
to
be
established.
B
L
On
the
testimony
evidence,
facts
presented
in
the
law
at
the
time
the
alleged
violation,
sections
42.00
of
the
code
coordinate
to
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
we're
in
full
force.
In
effect,
at
the
time
of
the
Notice
of
Violation,
the
respondents
were
in
violation
of
said.
Sex
coaches,
however,
are
now
in
comply.
O
L
C
Q
My
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
based
on
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
database,
all
notice
of
violations
and
notice.
The
hearings
are
sent
via
certified
mail
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
and
madam
chairman,
please
accept
these
into
the
record.
Q
Seven
eleven
North
distant
Avenue
started
out
again
as
a
police
complaint.
We
had
I
believe
a
couple
of
arrest
warrants
out
of
there,
some
drug
activity
and
some
other
things
at
that
point.
In
time,
I
conducted
my
inspection
on
June,
2nd,
there's
trash
and
debris
all
over.
The
property
tires
items
covered
up
with
tarps,
outside
storage,
shopping,
carts,
piles
of
tree
debris,
old,
fencing,
unregistered
vehicle
in
the
front
yard
yards
not
being
maintained.
It's
overgrown
the
trash
cans
or
left
curbside
invisible
to
the
public
on
June
7th,
to
notice
a
violation
notice.
Q
Her
hearing
was
mailed
certified
as
well
as
first
class
on
June
28th.
They
posted
the
property
because
my
intent
was
regardless
of
its
state,
based
on
the
significant
number
of
priors
I
was
going
to
establish
this
property,
regardless
of
compliance
on
July
7th
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin,
as
well
as
July
11th,
the
property
still
not
mowed,
particularly
on
the
north
side.
A
lot
of
the
trash
I'd
been
cleaned
up.
The
vehicles
been
removed,
apparently
the
owner
advised
us.
Q
They
evict
at
all
of
the
tenants,
so
I
believe
as
of
right
now,
I
think
there's
only
one
person
living
in
it.
There
is
still
a
pile
of
debris
in
the
backyard.
The
last
photograph
going
around
of
from
exhibit
number
one
shows
it's
gonna,
be
through
the
chain-link
fence.
When
you
see
it,
it's
a
pile
of
debris
and
some
other
trash
piled
up
behind
the
house.
Q
I
don't
have
a
picture
showing
what
you're
looking
at
is
to
the
east
so
to
the
left
is
the
north
side
of
the
house
and
to
the
rights
the
south
side.
The
south
side
is
still
grossly
overgrown
when
I
did
the
inspection
looking
at
it
from
the
street,
which
is
distant
so
they're,
not
in
compliance
as
of
right
now,
four
sections
8
22.
D
Q
I
O
I
C
Q
There
are
21
prior
cases
at
the
draw
at
this
address
spanning
18
years
since
2013
there's
seven
prior
cases.
The
majority
of
them
have
to
deal
with
accumulation
of
trash
and
offenses
and
vehicles.
So,
based
on
that-
and
you
know
the
we
started
this
case
in
June
I
would
I
would
say
they
did
evict
them,
but
I
would
give
them
30
days
and
$150
a
day.
I.
I
Q
Thank
you
exhibit
number
one
arm.
Sorry
case
number
18,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
three
nine
four
address,
765
dodecanese,
Boulevard,
dn,
asketh
and
associates.
This
is
another
outdoor
display
case.
It
would
be
the
last
one
for
today
exhibit
number
one
are
all
my
photographs
to
include
the
inspections,
my
notices,
Notice
of
Violation,
a
notice
of
hearing
or
exhibit
number
two
exhibit
number
three.
The
administrative
docks
case,
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records.
Q
Any
emails
related
to
this
case,
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign,
our
exhibit
number
for
my
notices,
roll
mail,
the
property,
appraiser
or
property
owner
of
record
based
on
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector.
All
notices,
violation
and
notice
hearings
are
sent
certified
mail
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
and,
madam
chairman,
please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence
as
I
as
I
stated
and
I
can
refresh
everybody's
memory,
but
I
think
we
have
a
pretty
good
grasp
on
the
outdoor
display.
Q
Now
June
9th
I
was
conducting
inspections
down
on
the
Sponge
Docks.
There
were
numerous
items
hanging
on
the
door,
racks
of
clothing,
greater
than
36
inches.
In
height
in
front
of
the
store,
there
were
displays
less
than
18
inches
from
the
side
of
the
door,
and
at
that
point
in
time,
we
on
June
14th
I,
issued
the
notice
of
violation
you
can
see
in
the
photograph.
This
particular
one
is
not
that
bad.
Primarily
they
had
the
items
hanging
from
the
door.
This
is
this.
Q
One
is
interesting
because
it
has
sliding
glass
doors,
and
this
is
why
I
was
talking
about
it's
kind
of
hard
there's,
not
a
strict
definition.
It
just
says
from
the
doorway.
So
what
I
base
the
18
inches
on
was,
if
you
had
those
doors
fully
extended
to
their
open
position.
That
would
be
the
doorway
in
this
particular
case.
They
were
partially
closed.
They
actually
expanded
those
out
for
me
and
they
took
off
the
items
that
were
hanging
from
the
door
handles
and
she
cleaned
the
property
up
at
that
time.
Q
So
she
was
basically
in
in
violation
for
about
an
hour
after
I.
Had
the
discussion
but
I've
had
this
discussion
with
this
property.
Previously,
on
June
27th
I
conducted
the
Rhian
spec
ssin
advised
her
I
actually
met
with
the
tenant
advised
her
I
was
still
going
to
have
this
property
established
and
she
was
in
compliance.
On,
June
28th,
they
posted
the
property
and,
as
I
stated,
I
had
contact
with
the
tenant,
not
particularly
the
owner.
Q
I
Q
These
next
three
cases
they're
all
neighboring
properties
that
are
vacant,
lots
along
Burton
place,
which
is
down
by
tarpon
turtle.
So
there
should
be
a
little
bit
of
repetitive,
but
when
you
look
at
the
photographs,
they're
kind
of
taken
of
all
three
properties
at
the
same
time,
so
I
just
wanted
to
let
the
board
kind
of
understand.
Q
When
you
look
at
the
next
two
photographs,
they're
mysteriously
the
same
as
the
other
ones,
so
it
kind
of
encompassed
all
three
properties,
all
three
Lots
land,
this
particular
lot
eighty-four
Burton
place
is
owned
by
David
and
Rebecca
Rebecca
Mitchell.
It's
a
vacant
lot
on
Burton
Place
exhibit
number
one
or
all
my
photo.
My
photographs
to
include
the
inspection,
my
notices,
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
or
exhibit
two
administrative
documents,
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting.
Q
All
the
notices
were
mailed
the
property
owner
of
record
based
on
Pinellas,
County,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
the
notice
of
violations,
a
notice
of
hearing
or
sent
certified
mail
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class,
and
please
accept
them
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Madam
chairman,
yes,
this
is
before
the
board
to
be
established.
Currently
it
is
in
compliance
as
I
stated.
It's
a
vacant
lot
over
on
Burton
Place,
which
is
a
street
that
runs
north
and
south
north
of
the
tarpon
turtle
right
by
the
lake.
Q
I
got
a
complaint
about
all
three
of
the
properties
being
overgrown
upon
my
inspection.
It
was
overgrown.
It
was
greater
than
12
inches
in
violation
of
city
code,
eight
52
at
that
point
in
time,
based
on
some
priors,
we
determined
we
were
gonna,
establish
this
property
so
and
moving
forward.
Hopefully,
they'll
take
care
of
it
themselves
on
June,
28th
I'd
conducted
a
reinfection
and
the
whole
property
which
happens
to
be
greater
than
10,000
square
feet
was
completely
mowed.
Q
I
posted
the
property
also
on
June
28th
I,
have
no
contact
with
the
owner
and
have
not
gotten
any
of
the
mail
back.
So
what's
before
the
board.
Right
now
is
a
violation
of
8
52,
the
basically
the
lot
mowing
requirements
and,
as
I
stated,
is
currently
in
compliance
and
have
nothing
further.
Madam
chair,
any.
L
I'm
is
based
on
the
testimony
evidence
facts
presented
in
the
law
at
the
time
the
alleged
violations
section,
8
52,
the
Code
of
Ordinances
of
the
city
of
tarpon
springs,
wasn't
full
effective
force.
In
effect,
at
the
time
of
the
Notice
of
Violation,
the
respondents
were
in
violation
of
stead
code.
However,
they
are
now
in
compliance.
O
O
Q
Case
number
18
8
0,
0,
0,
403,
1458,
Meyer
Lane,
my
early
investments,
LLC's
property
owner
again.
This
is
the
middle
of
the
three
lots
along
burton
place,
but
it's
got
a
Myra
Lane
addressing
exhibit
number
one
of
the
photographs,
exhibit
number
two
Notice
of
Violation:
a
notice
of
hearing
administrative
docks,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
or
exhibit
number
three,
an
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy.
The
sign
is
Exhibit
number
for
all.
Q
My
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
all
my
notice,
the
violations,
a
notice
of
hearing
or
sent
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
I'm
Adam
Turman.
Please
accept
these
into
the
record.
Yes,
June
14th.
Q
2002
was
overgrown
again
establishing
this
one,
based
on
some
priors
On
June
18th,
the
Notice
of
Violation
notice
to
hearing
were
mailed
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
June
28th
conducted
the
reinfection
again
this
Lots
greater
than
ten
thousand
square
feet,
and
it
was
completely
mode
June
28th.
They
posted
the
property
and
signed.
The
affidavit
of
posting,
have
had
no
contact
with
the
owner
and
none
of
our
mail
was
received
in
the
office
as
I
stated.
B
B
L
Based
on
the
testimony
evidence,
facts
presented
in
the
law
that,
at
the
time,
the
alleged
violations,
sections
8
52
of
the
Code
of
Ordinances,
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
wasn't
full
force.
In
effect,
at
the
time
of
the
Notice
of
Violation,
the
respondents
were
in
violation
of
Safeco
section,
however
they're
now
in
compliant.
C
Q
8
0
0,
0,
0
404,
the
property
address
a
60
Burton
place,
Meier
Lane
Investments
LLC
is
the
property
owner
tip
number
1
again
in
photographs
include
the
inspection,
my
notice
of
violation
and
notice
interior
exhibit
number
2
tip
number
3
or
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
as
well.
As
case
summary,
an
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
my
notices
are
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
Pinellas,
County,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
Q
All
the
notice
of
violations
and
notice
hearings
are
sent
via
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and,
madam
chairman,
please
accept
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence
again.
This
is
the
last
of
the
three
properties
along
Burton
place
on
June
14th
conducting
the
inspection.
The
lot
was
overgrown
in
violation
of
city
ordinance,
8
52
by
nature.
Q
The
fact
that
it's
greater
than
12
inches
in
height
the
property
is
greater
than
10,000
square
feet
on
June
18th,
no
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
were
mailed
certified,
as
well
as
first-class
conducted,
the
reinfection
and
posted
the
property
on
June,
8th
I'm.
Sorry,
June
28th
and
again
this
greater
than
10,000
square
foot
property
was
completely
mode,
no
contact
with
the
owner,
no
mail
returned,
and
currently
the
property,
as
stated
is
in
compliance
of
city
ordinance,
age
52,
but
I
would
like
to
establish
this
case
due
to
priors
and
I
have
nothing
further
any.
I
I
move
based
on
the
testimony
evidence
facts
presented
in
the
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violation,
section,
8
52
of
the
Code
of
Ordinances
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
was
enforced
in
an
effect
at
the
time
of
the
Notice
of
Violation,
and
respondents
were
in
violation
of
said,
code
sections.
However,
they
are
now
in
complying.
L
Q
D
Q
Eight:
zero,
zero,
zero,
four
twenty
four:
it's
a
vacant
lot:
east
of
523
West,
Cedar
City
as
an
assignment
address
to
the
parcel
which
is
parcel
number
twelve.
Twenty,
seven,
fifteen,
seven,
thirty,
six,
seven:
four:
zero:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
seven,
zero:
it
was
a
repeat
violator
from
a
case
in
2017,
which
was
case
a
17-8,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
four
sixty
eight,
which
was
a
violation
of
city
code,
sections,
8,
40
and
852.
Q
At
that
time,
this
board
had
assessed
a
fine
of
$100
a
day
to
be
in
compliance
and
they
currently
are
in
compliance,
but
they
hadn't
paid
their
fines
as
of
yet
or
fees
as
of
yet
this
case
started
out.
I'm
sorry
exhibit
number
one
or
all
my
photographs
include
the
inspections.
All
my
notices,
violation
of
ERISA
hearings
are
exhibit
number
two
administrative
docs
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
emails
or
exhibit
number
three
tip.
Number
four:
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five?
Q
Is
the
affidavit
securing
costs?
All
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property.
Appraiser
and
tax
collector,
all
my
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
first
class,
and
when
you
please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Yes,
this
case
started
out
on
June
27th,
based
on
a
neighbor
complained
and
a
lot
being
overgrown
and
not
being
maintained.
Q
Sorry,
we
sent
the
repeat
violator
notice
of
hearing
and
on
June
28th
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin
on
July
12,
and
it
was
in
compliance
and
we
had
received
a
phone
call
from
the
owner
stating
it
was
in
that
they
had
got
it
in
compliance
on
July
10th.
So,
although
my
inspection
was
on
July
12th
we're
back
dating
it
to
the
time
they
stated,
they
had
taken
care
of
it,
which
was
July
10th.
Q
Previously
they
were
fined
$100
a
day,
and
it
appears
that
they
simply
hadn't
paid
their
affidavit,
their
affidavit
of
costs,
but
the
city
clerk
would
have
to
confirm
that
at
a
later
time,
but
that
our
records
only
indicate
that
they
didn't
end
up
with
a
running
daily
fine,
but
the
board
had
ordered
it
gave
him
a
period
of
time
to
comply
and
they
came
into
compliance
before
any
fines
were
assessed.
But
they
just
had
the
affidavit
of
prosecution.
Currently.
B
I
B
B
I
O
B
B
O
B
E
D
E
O
L
N
E
Q
C
Q
Based
on
my
hourly
rate,
there
were
two
inspections
conducted:
that's
a
cost
of
two
at
twenty
nine
dollars
an
hour.
So
that's
fifty
eight
dollars
for
the
two
inspections,
the
clerical
time,
preparing
the
case
and
everything
that
hourly
rates
$15
an
hour
they're
approximately
three
hours
spent
preparing
everything
related
to
all
the
notices
and
everything
which
totaled
for
$45
the
notice
of
violations.
Q
There's
a
three
dollar
charge
for
those.
The
notice
of
hearing
is
four
dollars
and
fifty
cents.
Basically
that's
the
amount
of
the
paperwork
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
There's
materials.
It
costs
approximately
eight
dollars
to
send
two
mail
items
via
certified
mail
return,
receipt
which
were
legally
required
to
do.
That
was
done
three
times
for
a
total
cost
of
twenty
four
dollars
and
our
signs
that
are
put
in
the
yard
they're
five
dollars.
So
there
was
a
cost
of
$5
all
told
that
adds
up
to
one
hundred
and
forty
two
dollars.
Q
E
L
C
B
C
C
C
L
C
C
O
O
O
E
Okay,
so,
sir,
you
understand
that
this
this
is
being
done
totally
by
the
written
petition.
If
the
board
has
any
questions
for
you,
they'll
ask
you
step
forward.
You
can
come
down
here
to
save
time
if
you
want,
if
they
have
any
questions,
but
otherwise
they're
going
to
make
their
decision
based
solely
upon
the
written
petition.
C
N
C
C
O
L
C
B
E
I
I
E
B
O
E
O
E
B
Q
Q
Notice
of
hearings
that
deal
specifically
with
solicitors
on
the
Sponge
Docks
in
the
past.
What
would
happen
is
I'd,
write
them
a
notice
to
appear
into
Circuit
Court
and
they
would
be
heard
by
a
district
court
judge.
We
would
prefer
to
have
those
cases
heard
by
this
board
and
kept
within
the
city.
So,
with
the
help
of
the
City
Attorney's
Office,
we've
created
a
notice
of
hearing.
What,
basically
will
happen?
Is
a
person
will
be
issued
this
notice,
a
hearing
for
a
particular
violation,
solicitation
and
they'll
be
given
a
hearing
date
and
they'll.
Q
They
will
come
down
here
and
you
will
hear
that
case.
I
just
wanted
to.
Let
you
guys
know
that
this
will
probably
be
occurring
in
the
near
future,
probably
within
the
next
couple
of
months,
and
it
is
different
than
what
we've
done
in
the
past
with
notices,
and
then
that
brings
up
one
question
I
just
have
for
mr.
Trask
is:
do
we
have
to
post
the
notices
at
City
Hall
for
the
solicitors
on
the
Sponge
Docks,
for
that,
when.