►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board June 14, 2018
Description
Description
A
C
D
E
F
In
heaven,
we
seek
blessings
on
the
tasks
before
us
bless
our
efforts
with
clear
insight
and
our
deliberations
with
wisdom,
our
work
with
clarity
and
accuracy.
In
our
decisions
with
impartiality,
we
gather
to
make
decisions
for
our
community.
May
we
use
only
our
best
skills
and
judgment,
keeping
ourselves
impartial
and
neutral,
as
we
consider
the
merits
and
pitfalls
of
each
matter
that
is
placed
before
us.
This
we
pray,
amen.
F
A
This
is
the
intention
of
this
board
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
the
citizens
of
Tarpon
Springs
by
providing
an
equitable,
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
various
codes
within
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs.
Any
agreed
party
may
appeal
a
final
administrative
order
of
this
board
to
the
circuit
court.
Such
a
few
shall
be
filed
within
30
days
of
the
execution
of
the
order
to
be
appealed.
A
Florida
statute
to
86.0
1:05
requires
any
party
appealing
a
decision
of
this
board
to
have
a
record
of
the
proceedings
to
support
such
an
appeal.
The
procedure
of
this
board
is
as
follows.
First,
the
city
presents
us
witnesses
and
exhibits,
after
which
the
alleged
violator
is
able
to
ask
the
city's
witnesses
any
specific
questions
regarding
their
testimony.
Secondly,
the
alleged
violator
is
allowed
to
make
a
presentation
and
present
his
or
her
witnesses
and
exhibits.
A
Then
the
city
can
question
the
alleged
buyer
leaders
witnesses
after
both
rounds
of
testimony
both
on
the
part
of
the
city
and
the
part
of
the
alleged
violator.
Each
party
is
asked
to
give
a
closing
argument
first
by
the
city
and
then
by
the
alleged
violator
after
those
three
steps
are
taken.
This
board
will
close
the
public
hearing
portion
of
the
case
to
discuss
it
and
take
appropriate
action.
B
A
G
My
name
is
John
Joplin
I
am
I'm.
The
CEO
of
the
practice
in
which
occupies
651,
East
tarpon
Avenue
I,
do
not
the
owner
could
not
be
present,
but
I
do
operate
his
businesses,
so
he
asked
me
to
attend
and
I
am
aware
of
all
the
at
the
current
I
believe
everything.
That's
actually
transpired.
I
just
recently
joined
him
about
seven
weeks
ago.
So
I
know
this
is
an
old
complaint
so
for
that
I
do
apologize
and
hope
that
we
can
come
to
a
resolution
for
the
issues.
G
H
This
case
started
back
in
November
of
2017,
exhibit
number
one
or
going
before
the
board,
or
all
of
my
exhibits,
including
my
photographs,
exhibit
number
two
or
all
my
notices
to
include
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice
of
hearings
and
exhibit
number
three
are
my
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case?
Summary
property
to
appraiser
and
tax
collector
database
records
and
any
emails
and
exhibit
number
four?
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign?
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
the
board?
H
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
the
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations
and
notice.
The
hearings
are
sent
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail,
and
madam
chairman
I
believe
you
already
did,
but
please
accept
all
those
records
into
evidence
as
evident
as
I
stated,
the
case
started
back
in
November
2017.
There
was,
there
was
numerous
complaints.
There
was
an
issue
with
the
fence
falling
down:
Brazilian
pepper
trees.
H
As
we
progressed
through,
we
had
numerous
emails
and
conversations
with
a
lady
by
the
name
of
Renee
Callie,
who
my
understanding
is
no
longer
works.
There
I
believe
their
representative
here.
If
you
want
to
explain
that,
but
she's
no
longer
there
we
went
through
the
process.
I
conducted
numerous
inspections,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
first
mail.
November
of
2017
December
19th
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin.
There
was
no
change
at
that
point
in
time.
We
scheduled
it
for
a
notice
of
hearing
to
go
to
this
board.
H
H
At
that
point,
in
time
a
good
portion
of
the
fence
was
repaired,
but
there's
still
a
large
section
missing.
So
it's,
instead
of
it
being
a
whole
fence,
it's
like
two
sections
or
missing
of
the
fence
and
the
only
other
violation
was
still
the
building
and
no
permits
being
issued
for
the
addition
on
the
western
side.
At
that
point,
in
time
and
amended,
Notice
of
Violation
was
sent
certified
first
class
conducted
another
Rhian
spec
ssin
April
26,
the
2018.
H
There
was
some
fence
work
done
and
that's
when
we
also
went
through
and
started
confirming
the
permits
and
there
were
no
building
permits,
pulled
or
anything
at
that
point
in
time
for
the
structure.
I
posted
the
property
on
April
28
conducted
a
final
inspection,
May
9th,
and
there
was
no
change.
We
received
a
phone
call
from
Julie,
letting
us
know
that
Renee
Kelly
was
no
longer
working
for
the
company.
This
was
on
June
11th.
We
received
that
phone
call
and
the
new
person
Julie
be
handling
the
code
enforcement
case.
H
She
was
out
of
town
and
someone
would
be
present
in
her
place
and
he's
here.
We
did
get
back
all
of
our
notice
of
violations.
Final
Notice
of
Violation,
amended
Notice
of
Violation
and
the
notice
of
hearings
returned
to
us
signed
and,
like
I
stated,
we
had
multiple
emails
and
phone
calls
as
of
right
now,
the
only
thing
before
this
board
is
just
finishing
off
those
couple
of
sections
of
the
fence,
because
it's
not
a
complete
fence
and
then
dealing
with
the
structure
on
the
western
side.
We
have
no
evidence
that
it
was
ever
permitted.
H
It
basically
abuts
the
fence
to
the
property
to
the
west.
There's
no
setbacks
at
all
with
that.
So
before
the
board
is
a
violation
of
36.0
3,
which
is
fences
and
walls
and
hedges,
which
basically
stage
you
have
to
have
a
complete
fence,
6-1,
which
is
the
building
code,
was
adopted
and
under
that
105.1,
which
requires
a
building
permit
for
additions.
So
the
only
three
violations,
the
two
were
connected:
six
one
and
105
go
together
and
that's
all
I
have
before
the
board
at
this
time.
G
I
do
have
I,
have
one
question
so
and
I
completely
understand
and
viewed
the
property
with
regards
to
be
the
addition,
so
I
know
we're
gonna
get
that
I
can
get
to
that
in
a
moment.
But
I
have
a
question
around
the
fence,
because
I
was
under
the
impression
that
the
fence
was
completely
replaced.
So
if
I
did
not
notice
the
section
that
was
missing
more
than
happy
to
resolve
that
issue,
I,
just
don't
I'm,
not
sure
where
we're
we're
talking
about
it's.
H
The
same
side,
and
if
you,
the
last
picture
that
you
were
given,
which
was
dated
November,
this
was
after
I,
was
all
torn
down.
It's
along
that
western
side.
If
you
come
into
the
parking
lot
off
of
you'll,
see,
there's
just
no
fence
over
like
two
sections,
but
we
were
told
it's
because
there
was
a
tree
there,
but
there
was
a
fence
there
before.
So
that's
that's
it
for
the
fence.
And,
yes,
it
was
a
new
fence
that
was
put
up
all
along
her,
except
for
those
two
sections
who
said
yeah.
A
G
G
From
what
I
understand
so
I
don't
know:
what's
happened
over
the
years
with
regards
to
the
permitting,
but
the
the
owner
of
the
property
has
given
me
the
go-ahead
to
remove,
remove
the
structure,
I
believe
that
it's
probably
in
everybody's
best
interest,
the
city's
and
ours
as
well,
because
I
found
that
we
have
some
problems
with
vagrancy
back
there
and
an
issue.
So
this
would
make
a
clear
line
of
sight
from
the
street
all
the
way
to
the
back
of
the
of
the
property
line.
A
I
D
C
H
45
just
to
give
them
the
ability
to
get
the
permits
and
everything
like
that,
and
then
look
at
$100
a
day
since
they've
taken
over
in
the
last
five
days.
We've
had
more
movement
on
it,
since
we
did
since
November
so
I
think
it's
reasonable
to
give
them
a
little
extra
time
to
make
sure
the
permitting
and
all
occurs.
A
A
I
A
J
D
K
L
F
Germany
go
ahead
and
summarize
what
has
happened?
The
board
has
found
the
property
owner
in
violation.
Was
that
those
three
code,
sections
6-1
105.1,
is
in
the
building
code
and
30
6.03
regarding
fences,
property
owner
has
until
July
26
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance.
When
that
occurs,
you
can
contact
officer,
gasps
and
he'll,
come
out
and
do
an
inspection
that
doesn't
mean
you
have
to
wait
until
then.
He'll
inspect
any
any
time
that
it's
it's
complete.
Should
you
see
the
property
owner
failed
to
bring
the
property
in
compliance
by
July
26?
E
G
H
K
M
A
H
This
case
started
back
in
February
of
this
year,
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
or
all
the
photographs
to
include
the
inspection.
Photographs
exhibit
number
two
or
all
of
my
notices
to
include
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
the
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
consists
of
the
administrative
Docs
to
include
the
case.
Summary.
The
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
database
records
and
any
emails
exhibit
number
four
is
an
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
H
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
his
daughter
are
exact,
copies
of,
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
Well,
notices
were
mailed,
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
All
my
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
both
certified
mail
and
first-class
mail,
and
madam
chairman,
have
you
already
stated,
but
please
accept
all
these
documents
into
evidence.
A
H
I
stated
the
case
started:
February
22nd,
2018
part
of
the
case
started
because
the
fire
department
had
responded
out
there
I
believe
on
a
medical
call
before
that
it
might
have
been
in
January
sent
me
some
photographs
of
inside
the
house.
There's
exposed
wiring
I
have
not
been
inside
the
house.
All
of
my
photographs
have
been
taken
from
the
right
away
either
to
the
west
or
to
the
east
side
of
the
property,
but
basically
there's
large
holes
in
the
roof.
The
structure
has
never
been
completed
and
it's
in
very
poor,
dilapidated
condition.
H
H
H
March
27th
of
this
year,
the
final
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed
certified
in
first-class
I
conducted
another
inspection
on
April
25th.
There
was
no
change
as
a
state
of
the
property
needs
to
be
brought
up
to
current
code
standards
and
or
demolished,
while
not
and
or
but
or
demolished,
and
at
that
point
in
time
we
sent
the
notice
of
hearing
on
May
1st
of
this
year.
H
Violations
before
the
board
right
now
are
8
40,
which
is
duty
maintained,
private
property,
which
also
covers
8
38
41,
which
are
the
nuisance
conditions,
one
of
which
covers
specifically
having
a
dilapidated
structure.
That's
dangerous
or
an
attractive
nuisance.
130
302
is
applicability
and
maintenance
of
the
brought
of
trees
on
the
property
which
affect
the
Brazilian,
pepper,
trees,
8
50
as
nuisance
prohibitions,
which
has
to
do
with
debris
and
overgrown
lawn
and
things
like
that
and,
lastly,
36.0
3,
which
are
fences,
walls
and
hedges.
H
If
you
saw
in
some
of
the
beginning
photographs,
there's
a
kind
of
a
concrete
wall
out
front
that
there
it
was
leaning,
it
was
in
poor
condition
and
it
occurred
to
be
unsafe
and
need
to
be
brought
up
to
current
standards
and
there's
also
a
wooden
fence
behind
it.
That's
leaning
over
as
well
that's
the
purpose
or
the
reason
behind
the
violation
at
36.0
3.
So
at
this
point
in
time,
we've
had
contact,
I
haven't
had
any
contact
with
the
owner.
H
H
H
I
know
there
was
a
previous
call
that
we
had
a
previous
case
on
this
and
some
things
were
done
to
it,
but
then
it
was
brought
to
our
attention
again.
So
that's
the
reason
why
and
then,
like
I,
said,
she's
called
our
office
a
couple
of
times,
I
believe
it
yeah,
it
was
so
that's
the
only
contact
we've
had
and
that's
all
that's
before
the
board.
Right
now
is
the
8
48-52
130,
302
and
36.0
340.
A
A
M
H
M
M
M
My
family
and
I
we
are
going
to
address
the
problems
at
710,
North
Avenue,
all
right.
If
the
property
is
up
for
sale,
that's
not
our
intent
to
sell
the
property,
we'll
continue
to
clean
the
property
and
bring
things
up
to
where
it
needs
to
be
to
be
presentable.
There
is
no
argument
that
there's
things
that
needs
to
be
done
with
the
property,
we're
asking
for
six
to
eight
months
to
get
that
done
as
far
as
the
building
we'll
try
to
bring
that
up
to
code
as
much
as
possible.
M
If
we
find
that
we
cannot
meet
that
will
have
to
tear
it
down
we're
working
with
limited
funds.
I
have
a
home
of
my
own
that
have
to
keep
up.
So
we
have
to
get
these
funds
up
to
do
this
work.
So
we
can,
please
have
six
to
eight
months
to
continue
with
the
cleaning
bringing
the
property
up
to
where
it
needs
to
be,
and
it
give
us
time
to
sell
the
property.
I
M
A
M
M
I
M
D
C
A
A
C
A
I
Want
to
penalize
the
family
further
I'm
just
concerned
with
the
condition
of
the
structure
and
that
he's
lived
there
with
no
roof,
and
it
still
has
no
roof
and
I'm
thinking,
critters
and
everything
else
is
going
to
be
in
and
out
of
there
and
they
might
eat
a
little
bit
of
an
I,
don't
mean
it
as
a
penalizing
but
I
am
concerned.
This
has
obviously
been
this
way
for
a
long
time.
Nothing
happening
to
it.
I.
E
F
Okay,
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
summarize
mrs.
Moore.
The
property
owner
has
been
found
in
violation
of
the
four
Code
section
site
at
eight
Tests
48-52,
130,
3.02
and
36
0.03.
You
have
until
December
14th
of
this
year
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance.
If
it's
not
brought
into
compliance
by
that
date,
$25
a
day
finally
begin
to
be
assessed.
Once
the
property
is
in
compliance,
you
can
contact
officer,
gas
and
he'll.
Do
an
inspection
of
the
property
you'll
get
a
written
finding
that
will
be
issued
by
the
board?
F
It
will
be
sent
to
the
address
where
the
property
owner
listed
at
the
property
appraisers
address.
So
if
you're
checking
mail
there
make
sure
you
check
the
mail
quickly
and
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks,
make
sure
that
that
mail
doesn't
disappear,
but
that's
where
it
needs
to
be
sent.
If
you
have
any
other
questions,
you
can
talk
to
officer
gas
and
after
the
meeting
today
or
you
can
call
his
office
tomorrow.
You
understand
all
that.
Yes,.
N
Name
is
Curtis,
Archie
crossed
a
relationship
to
the
property
brought
to
my
parents
and
the
last
few
years
of
my
mom's
life.
It
was
changed
over
to
me,
so
I
can
make
sure
that
different
things
were
packed.
Some
different
things
were
done.
So
if
something
happened,
it
would
already
be
just
way.
Do
you
have.
N
A
J
H
All
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
derived
from
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
I'll
notice,
violations,
a
notice
of
hearing
or
sent
both
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and
as
you
already
have,
but
please
accept
all
these
documents
and
evidence
case
initially
started
March
3rd.
This
is
a
double
lot.
It's
got
a
structure
on
one
and
then
basically
just
an
empty
lot
to
the
west
side.
The
house
is
in
very
poor
condition.
The
roof
is
caving
in
and
falling
apart.
H
The
doors
were
unsecured,
there's
debris,
that's
been
dumped
on
the
property.
There
are
empty
barrels,
collecting
water
and
breeding
insects
on
the
property,
there's
a
pile
of
trash
and
debris
in
the
middle
of
the
vacant.
Lot
to
the
west
of
the
house
on
March
5th,
we
sent
a
Notice
of
Violation
via
certified
mail.
First-Class
mail
on
April
26
conducted
a
inspection.
H
Basically,
there
was
no
change
and
we
checked
the
city
records
and
no
permits
have
been
pulled
for
the
property
on
May
1st,
the
final
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed
via
certified
mail
as
first
as
well
as
first-class
mail
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin
on
May
19th.
There
was
no
change
at
that
point.
In
time
was
scheduled
for
Code
Board
may
21st
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
certified,
as
well
as
first-class
on
June,
2nd
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
of
posting
on
June
11th.
We
received
an
email
requesting
an
extension.
H
We
explained
that
after
we'd
already
been
to
this
stage,
the
extensions
more
or
less
up
to
the
board
lesser
than
me
on
June
13th,
they
conducted
a
final
inspection
I
believe
some
of
the
trash
and
debris
has
been
cleaned
up
on
the
property,
but
basically
the
structure
is
still
there.
It's
still
in
poor
condition,
nothing's
been
done
to
it,
and
so
consequently,
between
that
and
there
is
a
fence
or
the
wall.
H
That's
out
in
front
of
it,
if
you
look
in
one
of
the
very
first
picture,
there's
a
little
white,
basically
a
knee
wall,
but
it's
got
some
significant
issues,
so
it
falls
under
the
ordinance
at
3603,
fences,
walls
and
hedges
that
that
wall
needs
to
be
brought
up
or
demolished
or
whatever
is
necessary
to
bring
it
into
compliance.
We
have
that
contact
with
the
owner
and
obviously
she's
here
she
did
send
an
email,
as
we
stated
requesting
some
time.
A
H
Not
a
structural
engineer
and
therefore
I
really
don't
want
I
sent
it.
It
appears
to
be
dilapidated,
in
my
opinion
and
depending
on,
if
folks
get
a
structural
engineer
and
the
structural
engineer
says:
there's
no
saving
it
then,
as
I've
done
with
other
cases,
it
should
be
demolished
because
there's
really
no
other
choice.
So
no
I
can't
give
an
opinion
I'm,
not
qualified.
I
A
A
N
I
know
you
mentioned
about
different
one's
going
to
breed
the
first
two
or
the
first
one,
not
they're
talking
about
the
conditioner
brand
at
the
current
I'm
cold,
but
the
debris
barrels
they
have
been
removed.
Of
course,
the
second
letter
that
said
I
was
I
was
in
north
Florida,
Hospital
and
I'm
still
undergoing
testing,
but
I
never
put
the
barrels
on
it,
but
they
have
BAM.
N
H
N
N
N
N
N
H
N
Okay,
I
was
one
of
the
thing
when
the
first
one
came
immediately
after
that
I
went
to
the
hospital,
so
that
was
one
and
I
told
someone
to
check
into
doing
that.
They
didn't
fall
through
so
I.
One
of
the
items
will
be.
This
I
will
be
taking
care
of
was
getting
someone
getting
alone
to
get
someone
to
do
it
and
also
like
he
said,
a
structural
engineer
to
check
to
see
if
this
can
be
done
and
if
it
can
I
will
get
alone
and
do
it.
N
However,
that
part,
like
the
larger
part,
that's
not
done,
but
one
was
returned
and
reason
was
returned
because
between
being
in
the
hospital
and
not
being
able
to
drive
or
walk
anything
based
on
North
Florida
Hospital,
a
lot
of
things
change
with
me,
I
mean
I,
saw
some
property
in
order
to
take
care
of
some
things.
That
was
supposed
to
the
next
thing.
But
then,
when
this
came
rolled
in
there
was
no.
N
That
was
not
me
there
to
even
try
to
talk
to
someone
to
get
someone
to
give
me
some
input
on
whether
this
can
be
Savage.
But
this
is
also
home.
That's
over
50
years
old,
I
live
also
in
a
historic
area.
This
house
was
from
the
historic
area
when
I
talk
about
on
the
sponge
I
stared.
This
way
this
house
was
taken
from
and
took
to
that
location.
However,
when
you
say
well,
they
can
be
saved
or
not
like.
N
He
said,
I'm,
not
a
structural
engineer,
so
I
don't
know,
but
I
did
talk
to
one
of
the
city.
It
used
to
be
City,
I,
guess
employees
that
does
inspections.
You
said
various
things
comply
with
that
and
also
someone
that
does
homes
that
do
older
homes
like
50
60
70
on
up,
and
you
said
that
the
conditions
are
based
on
a
lot
of
things.
N
You
know
what
somebody
professional
or
go
check
it
out
and
also
how
much
money
you
have
to
invest
and
well
then
I
get
along
how
much
it's
going
to
cost
me
to
bring
it
up
if
it's
able
to
be
brought
up.
I
say
that
to
say
that
there's
the
reason
why
I
asked
for
an
additional
time
was
when
I
was
talking
to
Nathan
self
was
talking
about
the
estimated
time
and
I
also
asked
the
one
that
was
doing
older
homes
and
tarpon
springs
in
a
historical
area
and
other
areas.
N
That
said
a
minimum
of
time,
minimum
to
do
an
older
home
if
it's
done
properly
would
vary
from
six
months
on
up
so
I
changed
it
from
the
original
date
that
you're,
seeing
at
three
months
at
least
six
months.
So
if
they
do
say
it's
sellable,
I'll
have
a
chance
to
do
that
and
it
will
pull
the
permits
and
everything
and
you
know
get
alone
and
do
that.
It
was
my
goal
to
save
it.
If
possible.
You
know,
but
I
I
don't
have
any
of
those
credentials
like
also
Gaskin
to
make
that
decision.
N
But
I
will
inquire,
but
someone
that
has
that
expertise
to
check
it
out
and
see
what
can
be
done
because,
just
like
that
home,
there
are
a
lot
of
homes
in
Tarpon,
Springs
I,
know
on
the
thirtieth
of
smut.
Tarpon
springs
got
a
award
for
historical
being
a
historical
town
less
than
25,000,
so,
based
on
that,
supposedly
we
honor
not
just
like
elderly
people.
We
honor
historical
homes
if
possible,
so
if
it
can
be
saved,
I
would
like
it
to
be
saved.
N
It's
not
it's
a
different
story,
but
because
we're
this
kind
of
City
and
I've
been
here
most
of
my
life
that
we
honor
historical
house,
at
least
in
the
historical
district,
maybe
not
all
over
time,
but
you
do
honor
that
that
if
it
can
be
saved
and
it
is
feasible
amount
when
I
get
along
that,
I
would
like
it
to
be
safe.
If
it's
not
I,
understand
that
also,
but
I
would
like
the
opportunity
to
investigate
whether
that
is
possible
and
not
just
say,
based
on
the
way
it
look.
N
I
know
you
see
some
pictures
that
well
this
dilapidated.
It's
like
saying
in
reference
to
a
person.
That's
older
and
one
area
is
old
and
one
it's
honorable
elderly
same
thing
when
a
home,
some
are
old
that
can
be
saved
and
some
cannot
and
based
on
the
report
of
what
they
consider
historical
one
of
the
requirements.
50
years
and
older.
This
home
is
50
years
plus
older.
N
However,
I
would
like
those
things
to
be
in
consideration
that,
because
this
is
the
type
of
city
we
are
that
we
be
y'all,
be
given
the
time
to
investigate
whether
that
is
possible,
save
it.
So
that's
why
I
asked
for
additional
time
in
six
months
and
if
they
say
it
can
that
home
will
be
a
force
brought
up
to
code.
N
It
is
not
anyone
living
in
it
now,
I'm,
also
into
the
point
of
making
sure
that
you
saying,
like
the
doors
secure
because
the
older
home
and
like
a
lot
of
homes
in
Tarpon
that
are
older,
they're,
either
open,
porch
or
they're
closed
imports.
This
was
a
open
port
was
closed
in
and
the
inside
is
the
actual
door
like
my
neighbor's
door.
N
So
when
the
part
that
might
be
like
unsecure
it's
not
going
into
the
home,
but
because
there
are
people
that
do
I
realize
going
to
homes,
there's
also
been
on
board
put
on
so
until
I
can
get
someone
to
go
out
and
do
these
things
about
investigating
nobody.
Hopefully
you
know
there
are
people.
That'll,
pull
stuff
down
will
be
deterred
from
going
into
that
home.
N
He
gave
two
options
that
demolished
or
brought
up
the
court,
and
so
since
I'm
guessing
you
gave
that
that's
another
reason
why
I
think
I
should
be
allowed
I
my
family
be
allowed
to
see
if
it
can
be
saved
because
that's
an
option.
You
know
not
just
to
go
out
and
say:
oh,
this
is
all
we
get
rid
of
it.
It's
a
possibility
of
being
brought
up
the
court.
Then
we
will
try
to
do
that.
A
N
The
new
one
is
asking
for
six
months
to
do.
Do
that
things
that
need
to
be
in
need
to
make
sure
that's
done
and
the
one
paper
you
have
officer
asking
where
it's
returned.
It
was
returned
because
I
was
ill
out.
I
was
unable
to
even
leave
during
that
time.
Driver
leave
and
stuff
so
I
didn't
get
that.
That
was
one
means
of
because
I
do
answer,
respond
to.
E
N
A
J
H
In
a
store
district
I
don't
believe
it
is
because
I
had
another
property
close
by
there,
but
unfortunately,
I
can't
confirm
that
I
did
email,
Karen
lemons,
to
see
if
it's
either
contributing
structure
or
if
it's
in
historic
district
and
based
on
the
National
Park
Service.
That
area
does
not
appear
to
be
in
a
historic
district,
so
the
chances
of
being
at
historic
property
is
probably
slim
to
none
with
that
being
said,
I
don't
have
anything
else
to
add.
N
L
N
I
A
D
D
C
B
N
A
N
O
N
A
A
D
C
C
D
As
I
was
in
the
last
one
and
I
didn't
hear
a
call
for
discussion,
I'm
a
little
concerned
that
these
vacant
properties
I've
got
a
burden.
Our
Police
Department
was
flushing
out
almost
people
etc
and
the
danger
of
these
buildings
just
by
the
photographs
I'm
looking
at,
which
is
why
I
asked
the
officer
on
the
last
one
and
I
understand
he's
not
a
structural
engineer
to
me
just
photographs.
These
things
don't
look
safe
and
it
would
be
a
real
tragedy
if
we
had
an
accident
in
one
of
these
and
somebody
died.
D
I
D
Have
to
find
out
if
the
structure
is
even
repairable,
it
may
not
be
so.
That's
gonna
cost
money
to
get
some
expert
to
decide
if
it's
repairable,
so
that
the
old
expression
talk
is
cheap,
but
time
goes
very
fast
when
you're
trying
to
make
these
things
happen
and
I
don't
want
to
see
her
back
here
in
nine
months
with
three
months
worth
of
$100
a
day.
Five
I
don't
like
that
either
that's
not
fair
either,
but
we
have
to
spur
somebody
to
move
and
a
few
bucks
a
month,
a.
K
K
D
D
E
E
F
8
22
8,
48,
52
and
36
point
O
3.
You
have
until
December
14th
to
bring
the
property
completely
into
compliance.
Should
you
fail
to
bring
the
property
and
compliance
by
that
date,
you'll
be
paying
at
$100
a
day?
Fine
you'll
get
a
written
order.
It
will
come
to
you
at
the
address
listed
by
the
property
appraiser
and
that
should
be
received
in
10
to
14
days.
If
you
have
any
other
questions,
you
can
ask
officer
gas
and
after
the
meeting
today
or
call
his
office
tomorrow,
yeah.
N
I
know
Alma
said
something,
but
can
I
say
one
thing
as
a
citizen
of
Tarpon,
Springs
and
I
just
make
one
comment:
I
think
that's
very
fair,
unfair
for
you
to
judge
me
and
say
that
I
would
just
be
saying
something
and
not
put
sores
on
I
told
my
attempt
to
get
somebody
official
and
if
they
say
it's
not
I
will
have
it
demolished,
but
they
say
it's
to
save
and
I
have
and
I
get
alone
to
do
it.
I
need
to
do
that.
I!
N
N
N
A
B
P
A
A
P
A
H
You
case
number
18,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
one.
Four
seven,
the
property
address,
1400
Ventnor,
Avenue
property
owners
listed
as
wesley
and
dorothy
king
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
all
of
my
notices
to
include
my
inspections,
exhibit
number
two
or
all
of
my
notices
to
include
to
notice
a
violation.
A
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
administrative
documents
include
the
case:
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
emails
as
if
at
number,
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
H
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property.
Owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
All
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearing
are
sent
via
sir
I'd
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail
man.
H
Madam
chairman,
as
you
already
have,
please
accept
things
into
the
record
case
started
March
6,
the
2018
was
my
initial
inspection
got
a
complaint
from
neighbour
property,
had
numerous
violations,
large
amount
of
debris
towards
the
rear,
including
tree
debris
and
other
items,
trash
cans
in
public
view.
They
were
at
the
time
there
were
two
vehicles
which
appear
either
an
operative
one
has
crashed
damaged,
the
other
one
was
covered
with
leaves
and
unknown.
If
tags
are
on
either
of
them,
they
were
both
backed
in
sidewalk,
basically
was
invisible
and
covered
with
debris
at
the
time.
H
Basically
tree
debris,
the
trees
were
not
providing
minimum
clearances,
as
required
14
feet
above
the
street
10
feet
above
the
sidewalk
on
March
6,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed
to
the
property
owner
on
March
20th.
An
email
was
received
from
the
daughter
requesting
an
extension.
We
extended
the
rien
spectrum
for
one
week
to
give
them
some
time
to
come
into
compliance
at
their
request.
March
29th
I
conducted
a
reaction.
Basically,
there
was
no
change
or
significant
change
and
I
sent
the
final
Notice
of
Violation
on
March
29th.
The
final
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed.
H
Certified
as
well
as
returned
as
well
as
first
class
April
11th
received
a
phone
call.
We
moved
the
deadline
to
April
28th
and
also
provided
them
with
some
phone
numbers
to
a
senior
assistance
center
to
try
to
get
some
help
through
those
means.
On
May
9th
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin.
There
was
no
significant
change
at
that
point.
In
time
we
decided
to
send
it
to
code
board
on
May
10th.
H
The
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
first
class,
as
well
as
a
return
receipt,
June,
2nd
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
of
posting
on
June
7th
received
an
email
from
the
daughter
requesting
a
win
the
date
and
time
of
this
hearing.
So
we
have
had
some
contact
with
the
owners
of
Representatives
in
the
owner.
The
final
Notice
of
Violation
was
returned
to
our
office
signed.
H
P
P
P
24
hours
a
day
and
I
gathered
a
lot
of
materials
from
plumbing
to
like
to
go
to
construction
and
stuff,
because
after
buying
time
and
over
the
years
it
collected
and
I
was
able
to
maintain
that
eight
or
nine
years
ago
my
wife
has
become
real
ill
and
she
used
to
do
all
the
house
playing
the
cooking
and
shopping
and
everything
and
she
can't
do
anything
anymore.
She's
losing
her
memory.
E
P
I'm
trying
to
get
this
done
and
financially
we
make
thirteen
hundred
and
some
dollars
a
month
between
the
both
of
us
on
Social
Security
I
had
to
have
a
tree
taking
down
and
I
was
bothered
for
a
night
and
it
cleared
the
side
above
the
sidewalk
and
still
that
cost
five
hundred
dollars.
I
had
to
borrow
that
because
the
funds
are
available
and
everything
is
these
is
done
now
and
I'm
progressing
further
forward.
P
L
O
L
H
A
I
C
A
D
D
H
L
P
N
P
What
I
can
myself
and
I
borrowed
money?
I
had
a
tree,
take
it
down
it
cost
$500
didn't
clear.
The
sidewalk
and
I
had
to
borrow
that
money
and
it's
hard
to
hire
people
I've
called
people
to
come.
Do
stuff
and
people
don't
want
to
work.
They
don't
they
want
more
money
than
I
can
even
stay,
but
I'm
get
it
done
I'm
trying
to
get
it
done.
J
H
C
D
C
A
F
So
the
motion
carries
so
mr.
king
you've
been
given
60
days,
in
other
words,
August
14th,
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance.
Should
you
fail
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
that
you'll
suffer
$100
a
day?
Fine
you'll
get
that
written
order
in
the
mail
it'll
be
sent
to
you
at
your
home,
address
where
the
property
appraiser
sends
the
tax
bills
and
so
forth.
So
if
you
have
any
questions
about
what
you
need
to
do,
please
contact
officer,
gas
and
after
the
meeting
today
or
contact
his
office
tomorrow,
all
right.
Thank
you.
We're
done.
A
O
A
A
A
H
This
is
case
number
18,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero.
Two
forty
one
the
address
is
eighty
West
Park
Street
Konstantinos
Karros
is
the
property
owner,
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
or
any
photographs
or
website
screenshots.
If
you
will
related
to
the
case,
all
the
notices
to
include
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
or
exhibit
number
two
tip
number
three
consists
of
administrative
documents
to
include
a
case
summary
property
to
praiser
and
tax
collector
database
records,
and
any
emails
exhibit
number
four.
H
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign,
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
the
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
database,
all
the
notice
of
violations
and
notice.
The
hearings
are
sent
via
certified
mail
return,
receipt
requested
and
first-class
mail.
And,
madam
chairman,
please
accept
all
these
into
the
record.
H
I'm
officer,
Steve
gas
and
city
of
Turpan
Springs
Police
Department
code
enforcement.
This
case
started
April
17th
of
2018
originally
got
a
complaint
about
the
property
being
used
as
a
short-term
rental,
renting
out
the
house
for
a
period
of
time.
Less
than
six
weeks,
the
property
is
zoned
in
the
city
as
r60,
which
basically
classifies
it
to
have.
The
requirements
are
sixty
and
are.
Seventy
are
one
in
two
family
residential
districts.
H
Only
it
also
has
a
few
conditional
uses
for
the
board,
which
consists
of
community
residential
homes,
congregate
care
facilities,
up
to
20
residents,
day
care,
centers
day
care,
homes,
family
care
homes
within
a
thousand
feet
of
a
pre-existing
family
care,
home,
home
occupations,
light
utility
service,
schools
of
special
education
and
family
dwellings
and
then
single-family
semi-detached
in
the
r70
zone.
As
we
stated,
this
property
is,
they
are
sixty.
H
Usage
you
also
carry
on
to
a
tourist
home
is
a
transient
resident
shall
mean
a
visitor
to
the
community
who
did
not,
who
does
not
use
the
dwelling
as
a
principal
residence.
It
was
neither
gainfully
employed
in
the
community
nor
a
student
currently
enrolled
in
the
school
located
in
the
community
or
who
resides
in
the
dwelling
for
six
weeks
or
less
there.
H
We
basically
sent
an
email
via
an
Airbnb
website
requesting
to
rent
the
property
for
a
period
of
time.
Less
than
six
weeks,
we
received
a
confirmation
that
we
would
be
able
to
do
that.
We
then
had
some
conversations
with
the
owner
on
April
30th
I
received
a
phone
call
or
our
office
received
a
phone
call
from
Dino.
He
explained
that
he's
concerned
about
bookings.
H
The
prior
bookings
need
to
be
cancelled
to
fall
into
compliance,
and
that,
as
of
this
time,
has
not
yet
occurred
to
the
best
of
my
knowledge,
we
haven't
heard
any
confirmation
from
mister
from
the
property
owner
that
he
has
cancelled
all
of
his
reservation.
So
at
this
point,
I
still
can't
put
the
property
in
compliance
on
May
2nd.
The
Notice
of
Hearing
was
mailed
first-class,
as
well
as
a
return
receipt
on
May
31st.
As
when
we
received
the
phone
call
requesting
the
extension
to
the
August
Code
board.
H
H
Believe
on
June
11th,
he
had
a
conversation
with
major
trill
and
they
discussed
some
items
that
I
wasn't
necessarily
privy
to,
but
it
didn't
necessarily
change
my
case.
So
we
have
had
contact
with
the
owner
via
phone
calls
and
emails.
We
did
get
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice
of
hearing
returned
signed
by
the
owner
and
before
the
board.
Right
now
is
a
violation
of
25.0
3,
which
is
our
sixty.
Seventy
one
and
two
family
residential
and
that's
what
I
explained
is
the
property
is
zoned
a
certain
way.
H
So
it
has
certain
uses,
conditional
uses
and
permitted
uses
and
basically,
if
you
use
the
property
for
something
that's
not
defined,
then
it's
in
violation
of
that
zoning
code
following
under
that
is,
we
add
to
4100,
which
defines
the
tourist
home,
but
that
whole
section
also
has
a
myriad
of
other
definitions,
including
what
a
single-family
home
is,
and
basically
it's
not
being
used
for
its
intended
purpose
for
the
zoning
and
that's
what's
before
the
board.
At
this
time,.
O
I
wanted
to
talk
about
the
letter
of
the
ordinance
and
the
spirit
of
the
ordinance,
because
the
spirit
of
the
ordinance
is
also
mentioned
in
the
ordinance
itself
and
an
officer
gazans
communication
with
me.
I
do
not
dispute
anything.
He
said
he
presented
it
extremely
accurately.
It's
exactly
what
what
happened.
O
There
is
a
bit
of
a
timeline
and
I'm
hoping
you'll
bear
with
me,
because
I
think
it's
it's
all
relevant
I
discovered
this
town
22
years
ago
and
I
absolutely
fell
in
love
with
it.
To
this
day
it
remains
not
my
favorite
place
in
Florida
my
favorite
place
in
the
entire
universe.
I
would
take
my
house
literally
over
a
villa
in
the
French
Riviera
or
a
mansion
in
the
Hamptons.
That's
how
much
I
love
this
town
and
I
particularly
wanted
a
house
that
was
a
two
family
house
that
was
walking
distance
from
the
Sponge
Docks.
O
My
wife
and
I
have
two
children.
We
have
my
mom
who
is
in
her
80s
and
she
doesn't
drive.
We
live
down
here
part
of
the
year,
both
my
wife
and
I
work
here,
I'm
a
part-time
faculty
for
st.
Petersburg
College.
My
wife
also
works
down
here,
as
I
mentioned,
it
was
our
intent
to
buy
a
two-family
house
so
that
we
could
live
here
for
the
rest
of
our
lives.
We
wanted
one
unit
to
be
for
my
mother
because
she
doesn't
Drive,
she's
elderly.
She
can
walk
to
the
church.
O
She
can
walk
to
the
food
market
and
still
have
her
privacy.
We
I'm
not
an
expert
on
the
classifications.
We
asked
our
realtor
and
you
please
get
us
a
two
family
home
for
that
purpose,
because
we
are
not
yet
able
to
move
your
year
round,
even
though
that
could
actually
change
any
month
now,
I
had
a
I
had
a
full-time
job
interview
on
Monday.
So
hopefully,
if
all
goes
well,
this
will
all
be
a
moot
point
because
we'll
just
move
into
the
house
forever,
but
realistically
it
could
be
within
two
months.
O
O
We
stay
for
six
weeks
at
a
time
longer,
and
we
couldn't
very
well
tell
year-round
tenants.
Well,
you
have
to
leave
now
or
we're
here.
So
that's
why
we
decided
to
rent
it
seasonally
when
I
first
looked
at
this
restriction,
because
my
mother
and
I
first
bought
a
co-op
and
the
Green
Dolphin,
and
this
is
why
this
is
relevant
because
I
wasn't
married
yet
so
we
just
had
a
small
place,
it
specifically
states.
Clearly
you
may
not
rent
this
to
anyone
for
less
than
90
days,
so
it
was
crystal
clear.
O
So
keeping
that
in
mind,
I,
inquired
and
I
came
across
ordinance,
2503
I
thought
because
it
applied
to
single-family
detached
dwellings
regarding
the
tourist
home
definition
that
Officer
gassin
mentioned
I
thought.
Well,
hey.
My
house
is
a
two-family.
This
doesn't
apply
to
me
as
officer
get,
and-
and
this
is
why,
when
officer
guess
and
explained
to
me
in
his
return
email,
he
said
well,
you
may
be
using
as
a
two-family,
but
it's
legally
classified
as
a
one-family
I
understood
that
I
apologized
and
that's
when
I
said
I'm
immediately
going
into
compliance.
O
O
If
that
and
August
11th
is
the
last
day
so
I
assured
officer
Gaston
and
this
board
that
if
you
just
let
me
keep
these
guests
and
I'm
not
doing
it
as
a
moneymaker
I,
just
don't
want
to
mess
up
their
vacations
they're.
Certainly
innocence
in
all
this
I
booked.
These
long
before
I
had
any
dream
that
I
was
violating
any
ordinance,
and
the
only
thing
I
didn't
want
to
do
is
go
back
to
these
people
and
say
sorry,
you
have
no
place
to
stay
so
I
would
only
I.
O
Might
my
initial
request
was
only
to
ask
that
you
please
allow
me
to
extend
until
then
just
to
clear
up
those,
and,
unlike
some
of
the
other
folks
here,
who
were
talking
about
maintaining
their
property
and
can
I
get
it
fixed
on
time
or
not?
This
is
already
fixed.
It's
already
permanently
taken
care
from
that
point.
However,
since
that
time,
I
did
a
lot
of
research
regarding
this
ordinance.
I
still
cannot,
for
the
life
of
me
understand
how
I'm
violating
the
ordinance
and
I'll
tell
you
why?
O
If
you
think
for
a
moment
about
your
own
house-
and
let's
say
you
live
in
your
own
house
and
let's
say
that
you
rent
it
out
only
one
weekend
a
year,
let's
say
epiphany
thrust
dive,
I,
don't
think
you
would
consider
the
primary
use
of
your
house
to
be
renting
it
out
to
people
that
would
be
an
incidental
use.
I,
don't
think
if
you
rented
it
out
that
weekend
and
Superbowl
weekend,
it
would
be
that
either.
O
So
my
point
is:
if
you
look
at
the
definition
of
a
tourist
home,
it
says
a
single-family
detached
dwelling
which
now
I
accept
I,
have
legally
I
understand
that
now
whose
primary
use
is
to
rent
to
transients,
meaning
people
6
weeks
or
less.
The
reason
I
do
not
believe
with
all
due
respect
that
I
am
using
my
property
as
a
tourist
poem
is
because
a
I
have
a
year-round
tenant.
B.
We
live
in
the
house
ourselves
C.
We
rent
the
house
for
about
25%
of
the
year.
O
26
I
counted
how
many
days
of
the
year
we
rented
last
year
was
exactly
a
hundred
and
one
days
I.
Think
27
percent
this
year
is
a
lot
less
because
it's
you
know
not
even
half
the
years
up
and
so
I
couldn't
understand
how
the
primary
use
was
that,
as
contrasted
with,
let's
say
the
green
dolphin,
which
says
you
can't
rent
to
anyone
for
90
days
officer
Gasson
is
correct.
I
did
try
to
find
the
definition.
I've
been
writing
to
everyone.
I
written
to
the
commissioners.
O
I
got
a
response
from
the
city
manager,
who
also
told
me
you're
not
allowed
to
do
short-term.
Rentals
and
again
I'm
trying
to
figure
out,
but
where
does
it
say
that?
And
at
that
time
he
had
major
trill
contact
me
and
major
trill
was
kind
enough
to
get
back
to
me
and
we
did
speak
on
the
phone
as
officer
gas
and
mansion.
What
major
trill
told
me
was
that
it
doesn't
matter
if
the
language
is
messed
up
in
defining
a
tourist
home,
because
it
is
not
one
of
the
permitted
uses
listed
now.
O
N
O
How
to
pick
and
choose
and
say
well,
this
use
isn't
so
my
position
is
that
number
one:
it's
not
a
tourist
home,
because
its
primary
use
is
not
to
rent
the
transience
and
number
two
that,
even
if
it
were
a
tourist
home,
the
ordinance
doesn't
clearly
state.
You
may
not
use
this
property
as
a
tourist
home
and
the
fact
that
there
are
other
permitted
uses
available,
such
as
renting
it,
which
is
not
specifically
and
enumerated,
which
suggests
to
me
that
not
everything
it
can
be
used
for
is
a
specifically
enumerated.
O
One
of
the
problems
is
that
it
discriminates
against
motor
tourists.
Now
this
does
not
affect
me,
because
my
tourists
are
usually
flying
in
tourists,
but
I
could
imagine
it
would
be
fraught
with
problems
and
I
say
this
as
a
as
a
friend
in
a
friendly
way
that
if
some
motor
tourists
filed
a
discrimination,
lawsuit
and
said
why
do
you
have
a
specially
motor
tourists
in
there?
Why
would
you
discriminate
against
me
if
I
drove
in
from
Georgia,
rather
than
flew
in
from
Chicago,
that
in
itself
could
be
a
Fourteenth
Amendment
defect?
O
Another
problem
is
the
spirit
of
the
ordinance
to
which
I
want
to
speak,
which
is
to
promote
a
community
environment.
The
zone
is
directly
down
the
middle
of
the
street.
I
say
this
literally
from
where
you
sit
is
approximately
how
far
the
houses
are
on
that
very
narrow
street
west
art
street
and
all
the
houses
on
the
other
side
of
the
street.
They
can
do
whatever
they
want.
This
side
cannot
so
I
thought
it
was
odd
how
the
street
was
zoned
down
the
middle
of
the
block.
O
If
the
intention
is
to
promote
a
community
atmosphere
and
finally
to
the
spirit
of
the
ordinance,
that's
exactly
what
I've
been
doing.
A
lot
of
the
people
here
mentioned
disarray,
falling
down
properties
when
we
bought
the
house.
It
was
like
that
I
don't
know.
If
you
know
the
house,
it
was
like
that
we
put
a
lot
of
money
into
it
and,
like
I
said
we
are
not
wealthy.
O
We
took
out
a
loan
to
do
all
the
repairs
that
needed
to
be
done
structurally
paint
jobs
inside
and
out
landscaping,
and
we
furnished
the
house
and
we
made
it
beyond
up
to
code.
We
made
it
attractive
so
that
we
could
get
people
in
the
house.
I
asked
my
tenant
and
my
neighbors
to
come
because
they
know
the
story
better
because
they
live
it.
Marylyn
our
tenant
is
part
of
the
community
she's
very
much
involved
very
friendly
with
the
neighbors.
Our
next-door
neighbors
have
become
our
good
friends.
In
the
time
that
we
have
rented.
O
There
has
not
been
a
single
complaint
to
the
police
about
any
disorderly
conduct.
We
have
only
rented
to
the
highest
quality
people
from
websites
that
already
have
excellent
reviews,
as
our
neighbors
can
tell
you,
we
had
some
shady
characters
on
the
block.
I
saw
it
for
myself:
we've
had
vagrants
on
the
block.
We've
had
drug
use
rampant
in
the
town.
As
you
know,
nothing
that
I
brought
into
the
community
even
closely
resembled
that
I
brought
people
who
were
quiet.
They
knew
they
couldn't
have
parties,
they
spent
money
in
the
community.
They
were
respectful.
O
It
was
not
a
traffic
issue
like
the
person
who
wanted
to
put
up
a
big
development.
This
was
one
car
for
one
car,
even
either
were
here
or
they're
here.
So
it
did
not
create
a
problem
and
basically,
as
our
neighbors
have
told
us,
it
has
helped
that
come.
It
has
helped
the
block.
It
has
helped
promote
that
camaraderie.
Now.
H
O
O
The
very
quick
analogy,
if
you
will
bear
with
me
if
I
go
to
an
outdoor
restaurant,
where
smoking
is
loud
and
somebody's
sitting
next
to
me
about
to
have
dinner,
I'm,
not
gonna,
light
up
just
because
I
can
I'm
gonna
be
considerate,
so
the
only
point
I
was
trying
to
make
with
that
is.
If
there
had
been
problems,
I
would
have
stopped
this
immediately,
but
it
is
to
the
spirit
of
the
ordinance
which
speaks
to
which
speaks
to
that.
O
If
you
would,
please
explain
to
me
in
what
way
I
have
violated
this
ordinance
and
as
I
have
pledged
if
I
have
indeed
violated
this
ordinance,
and
you
explain
to
me
how
I
will
absolutely
not
rent
to
anyone
for
less
than
six
weeks
again,
meaning
for
compensation.
I've
already
stopped.
My
last
one
is
August
11
I
ask
that
if
I
am
found
in
violation
of
this
ordinance,
you
please
extend
it
to
that
time
and
I
assure
you
that
there
will
be
no
further
issues
after
that.
Thank
you.
The.
O
Okay,
thank
you,
I
I,
would
not
be
asked.
I
would
not
be
asking
for
exemption.
I
would
be
asking
for
time
to
come
into
compliance
only
because
I
had
no
idea.
I
was
breaking
the
law
if
I
am
indeed
doing
so
before
this
happened
and
I
also
have
the
lives
of
other
people
involved
that
are
totally
innocence
is
so
it
would
just
be
a
request,
as
the
other
individuals
have
gotten
to
to
come
into
full
compliance.
H
2503
is
a
zoning
ordinance
and
it
basically
establishes
that
the
certain
things
based
on
zoned
districts
that
you
can
do
with
your
property.
We've
all
seen
commercial
districts,
you,
you
can't
put
a
7-eleven
in
a
residential
district.
You
know
it's
not
allowed.
The
city
says
these
are
the
certain
things
you
can
do
they
go
on
and,
as
Dino
brought
up
definitions
of
single-family
detached
units,
this
is
an
inclusive
ordinance
and
what
that
means
is.
If
it's
not
specifically
mentioned
you
can't
do
it.
H
He
talks
about
some
other
things
that
I'll
get
into
in
my
summary,
but
it's
a
very
long
ordinance
and
I
mean
they're
very
specific
about
what
you
can
do
with
your
property
and
this
particular
one
is
zoned
r60,
which
is
primarily
residential,
which
means
it's
not
mixed
fused.
You
can't
have
a
business
and
a
residence.
You
can't
have
an
apartment
complex,
because
it's
not
zoned
the
right
way.
You
can't
have
an
industrial.
You
can't
have
a
ranch
because
they're
not
that
type
of
property
they're
not
allowed.
H
So
if
somebody
decided
to
put
animals
in
their
backyard,
there
were
farm
animals,
it's
not
allowed
in
the
ordinance.
Nowhere
in
the
ordinance
does
it
say
it's
an
allowed
use
or
a
conditional
use.
So
therefore,
it's
not
permitted.
It
would
be
extremely
hard
to
try
to
write
an
ordinance.
That
said:
well,
here's
all
the
other
things.
You
know
what
I
mean
right
at
the
opposite,
so
it's
easier
to
write.
This
is
what
you
can
do,
not
mention
all
the
stuff.
You
can't
do.
Does
that
make
sense
I
that
kind
of
helped
and.
H
A
O
Sorry
I
would
just
like
to
point
out
one
of
the
things
that
doesn't
mention
you
can
specifically
do
is
rent
or
six
weeks
or
more,
which
there
doesn't
seem
to
be
at
this
agreement
that
you
can
do
and
that
is
existing
within
the
ordinance.
So,
again,
I
respectfully
point
out
that
if
anyone
is
allowed
to
have
a
tenant
for
six
weeks
or
more,
which
is
not
a
permitted,
you
stated
why
would
this
be
different?
Secondly,
regarding
the
variance
I
believe
that
I
checked
into
that
I
believe
variances
are
only
given
or
physical
conditions
of
property.
O
A
E
O
O
O
E
H
Very
quickly,
just
for
the
board,
it
is
a
the
ordinance
is
you
know
it
has
a
lot
to
it,
but
there's
a
couple
of
things:
we
talked
about
the
definition
of
a
single-family
detached.
It
means
one-family
dwelling
attached
to
another
one
family
dwelling
by
a
common
vertical
wall
and
each
dwelling
located
on
a
separate
lot.
H
So
that's
not
the
case
with
this,
because
it's
not
on
a
separate
lot
and
he's
denying
that
there's
a
separating
wall,
so
this
becomes
a
single-family
attached
to
one
family
dwelling
on
a
single,
a
detached
by
two
or
more
family
dwellings.
In
common
vertical
walls,
it's
a
single
family,
home
I.
Don't
think
anybody
hasn't
necessarily
an
argument
about
that
with
that
being
said,
it's
up
for
the
purpose
of
determining
whether
or
not
a
dwelling
unit
is
being
used
as
a
single-family
dwelling
unit.
H
It
shall
be
presumed
that
the
use
of
such
dwelling
by
a
family
for
a
period
of
time
less
than
six
months
other
than
by
the
owner,
is
not
a
single
family
usage
and
in
this
nature,
of
a
it's
prohibited
transient
usage,
except
where
otherwise
expressly
authorized
by
this
code
visits
by
guests.
While
the
owners
occupying
the
unit
should
be
presumed
to
be
a
transient
use,
transia
nom
accommodation
uses,
which
is
a
specific
it
would
have
to
be
allowed.
H
You
will
see
this
in,
and
zoning
for
commercial
properties
say
hotels
or
motels,
where
it'll
say
transient,
accommodate
juice
is
allowed.
This
ordinance
doesn't
allow
it
the
tourist
home.
It's
it's
not
allowed.
So
there's
nothing
in
the
ordinance
that
has
any
provisions
for
allowing
you
to
rent
your
house
out
when
it's
a
single-family
home
it
would
have
to
be
included
in
that
ordinance
and
not
necessarily
saying
well.
H
You
can't
do
this
this
this
and
this
or
interpret
it
so
because
it
doesn't
state
that
you
can
do
it
implies
that
it
is
not
allowed
it's
not
a
conditional
use
or
a
permitted
use.
So
that's
what
we're
here
present
for
it's!
It's
a
single-family
home,
that's
also
being
used
more
or
less
in
some
regards
as
a
commercial
structure,
because
it's
making
money
by
renting
it
out
for
a
period
of
time
and
that's
not
an
allowed
or
permitted
use.
So
that's,
basically,
all
I
have
as
far
as
the
spirit
of
the
law.
H
H
And
I'll
have
one
last
thing
we
didn't
he
initially
touched
on.
We
got
a
complaint
about,
so
it
wasn't
I,
don't
go
seeking
out
air
B&B
complaints,
they're
brought
to
us
because
otherwise
I'd
be
spending
my
whole
day
trying
to
find
people
that
would
rent
me
out.
So
there
was
a
complaint
generated
by
it.
A
H
One
aspect
when
you
rent
a
house
a
single-family
home
for
less
than
six
weeks.
Yes,
so
it's
not
a
permitted
use
transient
accommodation
use
is
a
facility
can't
containing
one
or
more
transient
accommodation
units
the
occupy
occupy,
Z
of
which
occurs
or
is
offered
or
advertised
as
being
available
for
a
term
of
less
than
one
month
more
than
three
times
in
any
consecutive
12-month
period,
but
again,
that's
transient,
accommodation
use
which
also
isn't
allowed
so
more
or
less.
It's
saying
that
when
you
rent
out
your
single-family
home,
it's
not
an
allowed
use.
H
So
I'm
saying
before
the
board
that
he's
violating
the
2503
for
an
r60
home
by
using
it
for
something
that
it's
not
permitted
to
be
used
for
that's
kind
of
the
long
and
short
of
it,
and
then
we
throw
in
the
definitions
to
kind
of
understand
that
it's
not
defined
tourist
home
is
not
defined
as
an
allowable
use.
Transient
accommodation
use
is
not
defined
as
an
allowable
use.
It's.
D
O
At
the
very
least,
I
think
that
if
the
ordinance
were
written
in
a
crystal
clear
manner,
people
like
me
never
would
have
done
anything
that
would
have
caused
this
notice
and
would
have
caused
us
to
all
be
here
today.
So
that
would
be
my
other
recommendation
and
you
have
all
my
previous
points
and
so
I
won't
reiterate
them,
and,
and
only
that
yes,
I
did
receive
compensation,
which
is
what
I
know.
I
can't
do
under
what
officer
Gaston
how
he
interpreted
the
the
ordinance.
It
was
never
meant
to
be
a
moneymaker.
It
never
was
all.
I
B
F
D
H
This
is
it's
a
matter
of
contacting
your
your
renter
and
advising
them,
or
whatever
reasons
you
need
to
cancel
their
reservation.
I
personally
feel
that
we
have
to
do
this.
It
should
be
done
sooner
than
later,
so
a
shorter
period
of
time
would
be
probably
more
recommended.
I'll
leave
that
up
to
the
board
as
far
as
what
that
time
period
is,
but
with
that
being
said,
it'll
be
give
him
more
time
to
come
into
compliance
by
cancelling
any
forthcoming
reservations.
A
O
O
Kramer's
point
earlier
about
spurring
people
to
act
best
I
will
state
for
the
record.
You
can
find
me
a
thousand
dollars
a
day
if
you
like,
because
I
am
that
confident.
I
am
NOT
gonna
violate
anything.
If
I
do
anything,
I'm
gonna,
do
it
out
in
the
open,
I'm
gonna
write
to
you.
First
and
tell
you
so
I
pledge
that,
if
you
just
give
me
until
August
11,
so
we
don't
ruin
these
people's
lives
and
mine
in
terms
of
the
negative
consequences
of
bad
reviews,
not
to
mention
possible
breach
of
contract.
O
A
I
D
C
E
C
Q
C
A
D
C
D
D
J
E
A
Totally
against
this
I
just
think
we're
not
helping
this
gentleman
at
all
he's
and
explaining
himself
and
he's
trying
to
make
it
right,
and
we
need
to
give
him
some
time
to
call
to
call
these
people.
You
know
you
can't
call
them
overnight.
I
mean
they
might
not
be
at
home
and
I
just
we
need
to
be
a
little
lenient
as
a
board
and
help
them
out
in
some
way.
C
I
I
D
Believe
me,
I've,
been
there
20
years,
but
people
don't
want
to
do
that.
They
want
to
take
a
shot
at
something
without
figuring
out
of
it's
right.
It's
like
all
the
stuff
we
run
into
what
people
cutting
trees,
you're,
not
supposed
to
cut
boy.
Please
go!
Ask
the
arborist
a
very
simple
thing
to
do.
Saves
you
a
lot
of
money.
I,
don't
know
I'm
kind
of
with.
Let's
do
it
right
now,
I'm,
sorry
to
burden
him
with
making
a
bunch
of
phone
calls,
but
he
could
first
call
a
holiday
in
down
the
street.
K
K
A
D
I
D
D
D
B
F
No
problem,
so
the
board
has
found
you're
in
violation
of
sections
20,
5.03
and
section
241
point
zero-zero,
giving
you
until
june
21st
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance.
If
it's
not
in
compliance
by
that
date,
at
$200
a
day,
fine
will
be
instituted.
It'll
be
you'll,
receive
a
written
order
at
the
address
listed
at
the
property
appraiser.
If
you
have
any
questions
about
what
has
happened
today,
you
can
contact
code
enforcement
tomorrow
or
miss
or
gas
and
our
officer
gas
and
after
the
meeting
today.
Okay,
thank.
E
A
H
Case
number
18
8,
0,
0
0
to
45
in
our
system.
It's
West,
Live
Oak.
This
is
the
property.
That's
on
the
northwest
corner
of
Pinellas
and
Live
Oak.
It's
a
parking
lot
going
before,
and
tarpon
restaurant
services,
LLC's
list
of
property
owner
exhibit
number
1
going
before
the
board
are
all
the
photographs
to
include
the
inspections.
All
my
notices
to
include
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice,
a
hearing
or
exhibit
number
2
7
/
3
is
the
administrative
Docs
included
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
emails
or
exhibit
number
four.
H
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
all
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
All
knows.
The
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and
ma'am.
If
you
would,
please
accept
all
these
exhibits
into
the
record.
H
Officer
Steve
Gaston
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs,
Police,
Department
Code
Enforcement
case
started.
April
13th
2018
I
received
a
complaint
from
one
of
our
police
officers
regarding
a
large
palm
tree
growing
in
the
visibility
triangle
making
it
unsafe
for
eastbound
vehicles
on
Live
Oak.
They
can't
see
the
southbound
vehicles
because
the
violation
of
the
visibility
triangle
I
went
out.
I
conducted
my
inspection
and
it
was
indeed
within
the
30.
H
Basically,
it
was
I
kind
of
asked
for
the
tree
to
be
removed
because
I
did
have
the
same
exact
case
last
year,
same
exact
tree
and
so
we're
visiting
it
again
and
asked
for
the
tree
to
be
removed.
But
in
this
particular
case
it
was
trim
back
so
as
of
right.
Now
it
is
in
compliance.
So
what
I
have
before
the
board
is
I'm
requesting
to
have
this
property
established?
Because
the
tree
is
still
there
and
I?
Have
the
terribly
odd
feeling
I'll
be
investigating
this
again
next
year?
H
H
We
we
had
some
phone
conversations
with
the
owner,
or
at
least
that
possibly
the
tenant
of
the
property.
He
was
curious
as
to
why
he
was
going
to
code
board
that
was
explained
to
him
on
June,
2nd,
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
of
posting
June
13th
I
made
my
final
inspection
and
the
trees
still
there
so
I'm
bringing
it
forward
before
the
board.
As
he
stated,
we've
had
some
contact
with
the
representatives
of
the
property
we
did
get
our
Notice
of
Violation
return
signed.
Our
notice
adhering
was
returned
unsigned.
A
I
Move
based
on
the
testimony
evidence
facts
presented
in
the
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violation,
section
37
point
oo
of
the
Code
of
Ordinances
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
was
in
full
force.
In
effect,
at
the
time
of
the
Notice
of
Violation,
the
respondents
were
in
violation
of
said,
code
sections.
However,
they
are
now
in
compliance.
D
A
R
A
R
H
A
B
A
H
You
exhibit
number
one
is:
are
all
my
photographs
include,
the
inspection
exhibit
number
two.
My
notices,
including
notice
violation,
noticing
hearing,
exhibit
number
three.
Our
administrative
documents
case,
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax,
collector
records
and
any
emails.
My
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five
is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs.
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented.
D
H
The
board,
although
I
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
All
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
via
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and
madam
chairman,
if
you
would
please
accept
these
into
the
record,
conducted
my
initial
inspection
on
the
property
on
May
16th,
based
on
a
complaint,
we
had
a
law
enforcement
complaint
out
at
the
property.
There
were
some
people
there
being
disorderly
and
our
officers
were
sent
out.
There
I
think
a
couple
of
times.
H
H
A
hearing
were
both
to
return
to
us
signed,
as
I
stated,
we
had
contact,
I
haven't
had
contact
with
the
lady
here,
but
I
did
speak
to
your
brother
right.
Yes,
I
spoke
to
the
brother
I
emailed
him.
I
talked
to
him
on
the
phone.
They
made
some
significant
steps,
I
mean
they
he
came.
He
took
care
of
it
as
fast
as
he
possibly
could.
H
He
kicked
out
the
people
that
were
in
the
house
they
got
the
place,
boarded
up
secured,
made
a
pretty
good
effort,
actually
some
of
the
better
effort
from
somebody
that
drove
down
from
Indiana
to
take
care
of
it
as
fast
as
possible.
So
basically,
the
accumulation
of
trash
and
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property
were
the
only
two
violations
and,
as
I
stated,
it
was
just
the
16th
17th
and
18th.
They
were
in
in
violation
those
three
days.
H
A
R
R
The
owners
of
the
homeowners
association
would
not
allow
us
to
close
up
that
property.
They
told
us
it
was
unsightly
and
that
we
cannot
do
that.
So
the
situation
was,
we
said,
ok,
anyone
that's
here
has
to
be
gone
on
May
1st
one
of
those
people
was
my
son
and
he
is
no
longer
here.
In
fact,
I
don't
know
where
he
is
I
wish.
I
did
so
we
shut
the
power
and
the
and
everything
off
or
we
we
actually
had
to
come
down
and
shut
the
power
off.
R
My
brother
did
that
when
he
was
hearing
and
have
the
police
removed
the
people
that
were
there,
and
it
was
never
our
intention
for
the
property
to
be
like
this.
When
my
mother
was
alive,
she
was
a
free
spirit
and
she
would
have
anybody
could
come
and
stay
at
her
house.
It's
been
a
problem
in
my
life
for
40
years
and
I
apologize
that
it
got
to
this
point.
It
won't
happen
again.
We
did
get
permission
and
help
from
the
police
and
officer
and
to
allow
us
to
close
that
property
up.
R
I
did
check
on
it.
Today,
myself
before
I
came
here
to
make
sure
that
it
was
still
secure.
It
is
still
secure.
There
is
no
one
there.
The
doors
are
still
secured,
so
I
don't
see
this
as
being
a
problem
again
and
as
soon
as
we
can
get
through
probate
and
get
this
property
flipped
or
destroyed
I
will
be
the
better
for
it
and
I
I
just
apologize.
R
A
R
I
H
I
E
I
D
D
L
R
F
That,
in
a
repeat
violation
case,
this
board
can
order
a
fine
up
to
$500
per
day.
They
have
found
you
in
violation,
again
repeat
violation
for
three
days.
They
have
assessed
no
fine,
but
you
will
be
obligated
to
pay
the
prosecution
costs
of
seventy
six
dollars
and
fifty
cents.
You
can
make
that
check
payable
to
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
and
you
can
either
talk
contact
code
enforcement,
Department
of
the
City
Clerk's
office
and
they'll
help
you
get
that
to
the
right
location,
okay,.
E
H
All
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
such
the
collector,
all
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
and
map
term.
Please
accept
these
in
the
director's
evidence.
H
For
awhile
23
West
Park
Street
is
the
sponge
factory
directly
across
the
street,
from
the
Greek
community
center.
Basically,
the
300
block
of
North
Pinellas,
it's
on
the
west
side
of
the
road.
It's
in
pretty
poor
condition.
You
can
see
from
the
photographs
the
sidings
falling
off.
Some
of
the
supporting
structures
are
at
an
angle
that
most
buildings
aren't
supposed
to
be
at
I
got
called
out
to
do
an
inspection
on
it.
As
I
stated,
I
found
numerous
pieces
of
siding
missing.
H
The
structure
was
unsecured,
roof
has
issues,
the
walls
have
issues
the
foundation
has
issues,
and
at
that
point,
in
time
we
wrote
it
up.
We've
received
an
additional
complaint
since
then
about
the
possibility
of
some
homeless
folks
living
inside
of
it
at
the
time
it
was
the
beginning
of
the
year
and
it
was
still
cold
and
we
had
information
that
they
may
have
been
lighting.
Fires
inside
the
building,
I
I
have
not
been
inside
the
building,
so
all
of
my
assessments
are
from
the
outside
and
I
never
saw
anybody
coming
out
of
the
building.
H
Moving
forward.
As
I
stated
that
started
December
of
last
year,
it
was
vacant
and
posted
for
sale.
At
the
time
the
sale
had
occurred
and
the
new
property
owners
or
krk
we
sent
the
Notice
of
Violation
on
December
18th
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin
february
7th.
There
was
no
change.
We
sent
the
notice
of
hearing
December,
I'm,
sorry
February
12th
of
2018.
The
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
certified
as
well
as
first
class
February
23rd.
We
got
a
deferral
and
and
mailed
it
to
them.
We
decided
to
hold
off
the
code
board
for
rental.
H
He
didn't,
have
any
direct
fire
code
violation
so
I.
Just
that
was
a
moot
point.
We
then,
on
June,
1st,
were
contacted
by
a
Steve
McKendree,
who
was
here
previously
he's
looking
at
buying
the
building
and
getting
it
up
to
the
codes
that
are
required.
This
is
a
it's
a
contributing
historic
structure.
It
itself
is
not
a
historic
structure,
but
it's
contributing,
so
it
has
a
different
set
of
rules
under
the
building
code
that
regular
buildings
newer
buildings
don't
have
to
meet
mr.
H
McAndrews,
pretty
used
to
bringing
these
buildings
back
and
refurbishing
them
and
bringing
him
back
to
life
he's
not
done
the
sale.
Yet
the
sale
is
actually
going
to
occur.
Robably
in
about
two
weeks,
like
I,
said
he
was
here
earlier
and
we
explained
to
him
what
was
going
on.
I
did
conduct
my
I'm
sorry,
I
posted
the
property
on
June,
2nd
and
I
conducted
my
final
inspection
on
June
13th.
H
There
was
no
change
and,
as
we
stated,
we
had
been
getting
emails
back
and
forth
with
the
building
department,
with
the
code
enforcement
with
the
owner
and
also
the
prospective
new
owner.
So
right
now,
before
the
board,
the
only
violation
is
8
40,
which
is
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property
which,
as
I
stated
before
8
38
May
41
talk
about
dilapidated,
unsafe
structures.
H
And/Or,
if
it
needed
to
be
demolished
or
if
it
could
be
refurbished,
the
city
would
like,
obviously
to
see
a
be
refurbish
because
it
is
a
contributing
and
it's
one
of
now
I
guess
the
only
sponge
factories
left
in
the
city,
mr.
McHenry,
as
I,
stated
he's
in
the
process
of
buying
it
or
he
wants
to
buy
it,
and
you
know
we'll
discuss
that
after
you
guys
find
there's
a
violation
or
not.
So
that's
all
I
have
for
the
board
at
this
point
in
time.
Hey.
A
I
D
A
H
After
speaking
with
mr.
McHenry
they're,
closing
tentatively
right
now
scheduled
for
June
28th,
so
I'd
like
to
give
them
enough
time,
probably
45
days,
just
to
make
sure
in
case
something
gets
hung
up,
that
they
can
do.
The
closing,
obviously,
what's
going
to
occur,
is
once
the
closing
happens.
This
case
will
be
closed
because
they're
no
longer
the
property
owners,
the
new
property
owners
I'm
more
than
likely
open
a
new
case,
but
we've
had
a
lot
of
discussion
and
about
timelines
and
I
have
the
feeling
that
well
actually
I'm
pretty
confident
with
mr.
H
McKenzie
that
he's
going
to
get
it
taken
care
of.
He
sat
there
for
40
years,
like
this.
That
he'll
be
able
to
bring
it
up.
So
the
fine
issue,
the
sales
going
to
go
through
so
I
mean
a
hundred
dollars,
is
reasonable
for
a
fine
but
just
the
45
days.
So
they
can
take
care
of
the
closing
and
the
legalities
I.
I
D
H
Kc
teenage
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
eight
nine
at
624,
North
Avenue.
As
you
stated,
the
owner,
MNS,
f
ii,
w1
LLC,
tip
number
one
or
all
the
photographs
include
the
inspection.
All
my
notices
to
include
the
notice
violation,
notice
of
hearing
or
exhibit
number
two
seven
number:
three
administrative
docks
case:
summary
property,
appraiser
tax,
collector
records
and
any
emails.
Civil
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
My
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
H
H
19Th
this
case
started
was
basically
conducting
inspections
in
the
area.
There
is
a
large
Pepper
Tree
on
the
developed
property
on
the
east
side
of
the
fence
line.
The
tree
was
extending
over
the
sidewalk.
If
it
was
a
normal
tree,
it
would
have
to
be
trimmed
back,
10
feet
and
14
feet
above
the
roadway.
But
since
it's
a
pepper
tree
on
a
property
that
has
a
certificate
of
occupancy
and
needed
to
be
removed
and
any
regrowth
prevented
at
the
time
there
was
an
older
white
car
on
the
property
with
that
since
been
removed.
H
So
that's
not
before
the
board.
We
mailed
a
Notice
of
Violation
on
March
26
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin
on
April
14th.
There
was
no
change.
We
sent
a
final
Notice
of
Violation
at
that
time
via
certified
mail
as
well
as
first
class
on
May
7th.
We
received
a
phone
call
stating
the
property
was
ready
for
a
rien
spec
ssin
I
conducted
the
rien,
spec
ssin
and
the
vehicle
was
gone
and
they
trimmed
the
pepper
tree
in
compliance
with
the
14
and
10-foot
rule,
but
they
didn't
remove
it
so
I.
H
We
advised
them
of
that.
We
conducted
I
conducted
another
inspection
on
June,
1st
and
there's
it's.
The
pepper.
Trees
are
still
there
along
the
Western
property
line
and,
as
I
stated,
they'd
been
treated
to
him,
but
they
hadn't
been
removed,
sent
a
notice
of
hearing
on
June
1st
first
class
and
return
receipt.
I
posted
the
property
on
June,
2nd
I
conducted
a
final
inspection
yesterday
and
the
tree
is
still
on
the
property.
H
We
did
have
some
conversations.
Initially,
they
were
pretty
responsive,
we'll
take
care
of
it
right
away
and
now
they've
kind
of
disappeared.
It
sounds
like
it's
a
management
company
type
of
a
situation.
One
of
the
last
conversations
we
had
was
that
Duke
Energy
needs
to
take
care
of
it
because
the
tree
is
growing
up
into
potentially
the
powerlines,
so
I
don't
know
what
the
status
of
that
is
now
I
guess
the
last
time
Duke
cancelled
them
and
we've
heard
nothing
further
from
the
property
owner.
A
C
D
C
A
H
H
I
A
J
D
D
D
E
H
Case
number
18,
0,
0
0
to
49,
stated
to
address
11:49
captain's
way
and
the
property
owner
is
a
Katherine
Clark.
This
property's,
before
the
board,
to
be
established.
It's
currently
in
compliance
at
this
moment
exhibit
number
1
are
all
the
photos
to
include
inspections
and
some
screenshots
exhibit
number
2
are
all
my
notices
to
include
the
notice
violation?
H
A
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
3
is
administrative
documents
case
summary
property,
appraiser
tax,
collector
records
emails
and
actually
got
a
compliance
form
signed
by
the
owner,
because
the
HOA
was
also
involved
in
the
property
as
well
and
exhibit
number
4
is
an
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
my
notices
were
mailed.
H
H
We
couldn't
find
anything
specific,
just
the
fact
that
there
was
somebody
with
Wisconsin
tags
doesn't
necessarily
mean
you're,
renting
your
property
out,
so
we
didn't
have
anything
further,
but
we
decided
to
go
ahead
and
establish
the
property.
So
we
sent
a
notice
of
hearing
on
May,
8th
and
on
June
2nd,
a
sign
was
posted
and
the
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed.
I
conducted
the
final
inspection.
Basically,
we
jumped
on
the
internet
and
make
sure
that
the
bookings
have
been
removed
and
we're
gonna
bring
it
before
the
board
to
be
established.
H
We
also,
as
I
stated,
we'd
received
a
letter
from
the
HOA
showing
because
the
HOA
started
an
individual
case
on
the
property
because
they
don't
allow
it
for
the
Association
rules.
So
they
got
a
compliance
letter
and
we
attached
that
to
the
record.
The
Notice
of
Violation
and
the
notice
of
hearing
were
returned
to
us.
Unclaimed
and
we've
had
absolutely
no
contact
with
the
owner.
H
So
before
the
board
is
a
violation
of
city
ordinance,
78
0
1,
which
is
the
zoning
for
a
residential,
planned
development
community
and
then
again,
2
4100,
which
is
the
definition
of
a
tourist
home
and
that's
all
I
have
for
the
board
and,
as
I
stated
they're
in
compliance.
I
just
want
to
establish
the
property
to
prevent
future
violations.
H
Best,
we
can,
you
know,
unfortunately,
Airbnb
and
the
other
rentals
you
can't
put
in
an
address.
So
what
you
have
to
do
is
you
got
to
kind
of
search
around
and
they
have
to
know
what
the
house
looks
like
and
then
I
got
to
go,
hunt
it
down
and
see
if
it's
the
same
house
and
a
little
matchy-matchy
thing,
so
we
haven't
found
any
listings
that
match.
So
that's
where
we're
at.
A
I
A
F
I
I
E
B
H
You
18
8,
0,
0,
0,
74,
333
s,
Harrison
property
owners,
Janine
Williams,
exhibit
number
one
go
for
the
board
of
the
photographs
exhibit
number
two
are
all
my
notices
to
include
the
notice
violation.
Notice
of
hearing
have
a
number
three
year:
administrative
documents
case,
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records,
an
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
consists
of
Exhibit
number
for
all.
My
notice
was
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
database.
H
This
case
started
out
around
April
28
received
a
complaint
about
trash
on
the
property
when
I
was
expecting
inspecting
some
other
properties
around
there.
I
also
observed
the
violations
yard
time
had
old
appliances
and
trash
and
debris
in
it.
This
was
the
third
time
this
year,
I'd
been
out
there
for
this
or
these
violations.
So
we
issued
a
notice,
the
violation
and
a
notice
of
hearing.
We
were
going
to
establish
the
property
regardless
or
bring
it
to
code
board,
regardless
of
whether
it
was
in
compliance
or
not.
H
On
May
17th
I
conducted
a
reinfection
and
there
actually
it
accumulated
more
trash
and
debris.
I
posted
the
property
on
June,
2nd
on
June
13th.
It
was
in
compliance,
they
had
cleaned
the
property
up,
but,
as
I
stated,
I'd
like
to
establish
the
property
to
hopefully
prevent
any
future
violations,
we
did
get
a
notice
of
hearing
returned
signed
by
the
owner
and
I've
had
no
contact
with
the
owner.
A
I
Based
on
the
testimony
evidence,
facts
presented
in
the
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violation,
sections
8,
20,
8,
40
and
8
52
of
the
Code
of
Ordinances
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
were
in
full
force.
In
effect,
at
the
time
of
the
Notice
of
Violation,
the
respondents
were
in
violation
of
said,
code
sections.
However,
they
are
now
in
compliant.
D
A
D
F
Okay,
I'm
just
gonna,
make
a
note
in
the
audience:
there's
no
there's
no
public
in
the
audience
for
when
you
consider
these
affidavits
of
non-compliance,
so
you
don't
need
to
receive
any
additional
testimony,
so
we
just
need
separate
motions
on
all
these
ones
that
have
cost.
So
you
just
do
your
normal
motion
of
acceptance
of
the
affidavit
non-compliance
and
they
determine
whether
or
not
you
want
to
award
those
prosecution
costs.