![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/Z3SlXkhrV-M/mqdefault.webp)
►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board April 12, 2018
Description
Description
B
D
A
H
J
K
L
L
H
E
H
Hey
I
will
now
read
the
the
Code
Enforcement
Board
hearing
procedure.
It
is
the
intention
of
this
board
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
the
citizens
of
Tarpon
Springs
by
providing
an
equitable,
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
various
codes
within
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs.
Any
aggrieved
party
may
appeal
a
final
administrative
order
of
this
board
to
the
circuit
court.
Such
appeals
shall
be
filled
within
30
days
of
the
execution
of
the
order
to
be
appealed.
H
Florida
statute
to
86.0
1:05
requires
any
party
appealing
a
decision
of
this
board
to
have
a
record
of
the
proceedings
to
support
such
an
appeal.
The
procedure
of
the
board
is
as
follows:
first,
the
city
presents
as
witnesses
and
exhibits,
after
which
the
alleged
violator
is
able
to
ask
the
city's
witnesses
any
specific
questions
regarding
their
testimony.
Secondly,
the
alleged
violator
is
allowed
to
make
a
presentation
and
present
his
or
her
witnesses
and
exhibits.
H
Then
the
city
can
question
the
alleged
violators
of
witnesses
after
both
rounds
of
testimony
both
in
the
part
of
the
city
and
the
part
of
the
alleged
violator.
Each
party
is
asked
to
give
a
closing
argument
first
by
the
city
and
then
by
the
alleged
violator
after
those
three
steps
are
taken.
This
board
will
close
the
public
hearing
portion
of
the
case
to
discuss
it
and
take
appropriate
action.
Before
we
begin
the
public
hearings,
we
will
ask
all
potential
witnesses.
Please
stand
up
and
be
sworn
in
by
the
Secretary
of
the
board.
H
E
H
H
I
I
H
M
No
I
don't,
but
I
would
like
to
have
the
closing
with
it,
because
I
finished
the
documents
that
was.
M
C
C
Is
17-8
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
seven,
zero
eight,
the
property
address
is
a
14
Lincoln
Avenue
property
owner
listed
is
Alfreda,
Ingram
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
all
of
the
photographs
to
include
inspection
photographs
that
I've
taken
to
the
structure
and
the
property
exhibit
number
two
are
all
of
my
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
or
any
administrative
Docs
to
include
case
summary,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collectors.
Database
information
and
any
emails
exhibit
number
four.
F
C
C
All
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
via
certified
mail
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and,
madam
chairman,
if
you
would,
please
accept
all
the
exhibits
into
the
record,
which
I
believe
in
this
case
this
case
originally
started
earlier
in
2017,
but
we
had
some
internal
issues
with
addressing
and
things
like
that,
so
that
case
was
closed
out.
We
opened
a
new
case
with
the
proper
addressing
with
the
city
in
November
of
2017.
C
C
November
20th,
we
mail,
the
the
Notice
of
Violation,
both
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
to
the
property
owner
listed
on
March
7th.
We
did
have
some
conversation
in
between
there
with
the
property
owner
and
needing
some
time
to
work
things
out,
so
we
extended
it
to
March
7th.
So
we
went
about
four
months
conducted
the
re-inspection,
the
house
issue
still
hadn't
been
addressed
at
that
point.
Time
is
still
in
very
poor
condition
and
it
appears
unstable,
there's
still
trash
and
debris
on
the
property.
The
property
is
occupied,
but
not
by
the
owner.
C
It's
occupied
by
another
person,
and
we
didn't
at
that
point
in
time,
have
the
record
of
who
that
was
so.
Our
notices
all
went
to
the
property
owner
on
March
27th
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin.
At
this
point
in
time,
I
went
with
the
city's
temporary
building
official.
We
had
a
change
in
in
the
city
where
we
lost
our
building
inspector,
so
I
we're
kind
of
in
limbo.
C
We
got
a
contract
building
official
he's
the
only
person
that
can
that
can
conduct
these
type
of
building
inspections
and
he
became
available
to
us
on
March
27th
I
went
out
with
one
of
the
other
city
building
inspectors.
Keith
Meade.
We
conducted
an
inspection
of
building
the
building
official
immediately
tagged.
The
building
is
unsafe
and
condemned
it
on
the
spot.
That
notice
is
included
in
the
record.
The
red
notice,
that's
included,
was
signed
by
mr.
Wilcox
and
at
that
point
in
time
no
one
else
was
allowed
inside
of
the
house
due
to
the
condition.
C
Basically,
what
they
explained
to
me
is
the
front
of
the
house
actually
fell
off
the
foundation.
You
can
see
in
some
of
the
pictures
of
the
south
side
of
the
house
where
there's
a
change
in
the
angle
of
the
the
trim.
That's
not
architectural,
it's
because
it's
fallen
down
and
it's
at
risk
of
collapsing.
The
front
has
about
a
six
inch
angular
gap
in
it
where
the
frame
is
different
than
the
door,
because
the
building
has
changed
direction
more
or
less.
So.
C
For
that
reason
we
brought
it
before
to
get
it
condemned,
so
nobody
would
have
any
issues
inside
of
the
house
at
that.
As
I
stated
it
was,
it
was
posted
on
the
27th
of
2018
of
March
on
March
31st.
We
posted
the
property
and
an
affidavit
of
the
posting
was
completed
on
April
11th
I
conducted
the
final
inspection
and
there's
the
the
trash
and
debris
had
been
cleaned
off
the
front
porch
as
there
they're
attempting
I've
met
with
miss
Ingram
a
couple
of
times
and
they're
working
on,
but
they
also
have
a
side
legal
process.
C
That's
occurring,
that's
kind
of
muddying
the
water.
With
this
whole
thing
and
if
she
wants
to
get
into
explaining
it,
the
long
and
short
of
it
is
the
occupant
of
the
house
is
they
attempted
to
a
victim.
The
eviction
was
stayed
by
the
court
and
they
have
some
other
further
hearings
going
on
are
deeming
it
unsafe,
more
or
less
for
lack
of
a
better
term
evicted
the
tenant,
because
nobody
could
occupy
the
structure
she's
working
on
attempting
to
get
it
demolished.
C
She's
been
working
with
the
city
to
try
to
comply,
but
she
has
this
side
issue
of
the
occupants
and
I
believe
they
may
be.
The
occupants
are
actually
here
today,
so
basically
before
the
board.
I
have
a
case
of
8
40,
which
is
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property,
which
the
sub
of
838
doesn't
allow.
You
have
a
dilapidated
structure
or
unfit
for
human
habitation
as
well
as
8
52,
which
is
covering
the
debris
and
maintenance
of
that
property
and
a
lot
of
its
been
done,
but
there's
still
some.
C
They
can't
get
it
all
cleaned
up
because
of
the
occupancy
issue.
So
those
two
are
before
the
board
right
now:
8:40
and
8:50.
Just
for
the
record,
we,
as
I
stated
we
had
had
contact
with
the
owner.
Our
green
cards
were
returned
signs,
so
they
are
in
the
file
and
at
that
at
this
point,
I
have
nothing
further.
C
I
mean
there's
not
supposed
to
be.
It's
posted
I
believe
it's
partially
boarded
up
to
than
anybody
from
going
in.
There
had
some
conversation
on
the
side
beforehand,
with
somebody
who's
helping
out
the
occupants
they're
trying
to
get
some
time
to
get
into
the
house
to
get
her
belongings
out,
but
I
can't
be
the
person
that
allows
that
so.
O
First
and
first
of
all
good
afternoon,
my
name
is
NaN
Tijeras
and
that's
my
mother.
The
questionnaire
hamster
guess
due
to
the
violations
and
also
the
allegations,
is
anything
being
addressed
and
completed
since
then,
like
these
pictures
from
2017,
we
no
clean
not
sold
so
many
times
that
this
is
comical
just
to
look
at
these
pictures
from
a
year
later.
That's
the
really.
The
question
on
hand
is
on
like
the
attempt
to
complete
the
allegations
in
the
violations.
I.
C
Stated
that
and
actually
closed
out
822,
which
is
the
accumulation
of
trash
so
yeah,
absolutely
you
guys
have
done
a
ton
of
work.
I've
talked
to
the
city
about
making
sure
you
were
able
to
get
the
spring
cleanup,
so
you
could
get
all
those
items
you
brought
out
to
the
curb
picked
up.
So
yeah
and
I
stated
that
you
guys
have
worked
on
it,
but
the
issue
still
remains
compliance,
he's
kind
of
on
or
off.
If
you
will
there's.
O
O
C
Meters
being
put
back
in,
we
have
to
deal
with
some
things
internally
within
the
city.
The
meter
was
put
back
in,
but
it's
locked
out,
but
that
gives
you
guys
the
ability
to
have
trash
pickup
so
that
part's
been
taken
care
of
mainly
because
you
guys
took,
went
through
the
effort
of
cleaning
it
up
and
we're
kind
of
stonewalled
by
not
having
the
ability
of
trash
on.
O
O
H
N
C
Well,
I
explained
to
the
board
that
you
have
a
legal
process
going
on
and
one
of
those
things
would
be
a
time
frame
if
the
board
has
to
go
through
their
process
to
determine
if
those
violations
still
exist.
That's
the
first
thing,
they're
gonna
do
and
then
based
on
that.
There's
conversation
about
a
time
frame
and
things
like
that.
Okay,.
C
O
C
C
H
J
O
M
I
gotta
be
coming
mr.
tacker,
really
Mike
tiger.
Really
he
he
been
in
the
hospital.
I
called
him.
He
will.
He
said
him
a
week
or
two
for
him
that
he
had
heart
surgery,
so
we
gonna
be
going
to
court,
and
the
Court
did
have
not
been
said
on
my
record.
I
helped
the
judge
name
on
there
and
everything
and
I
guess
he
can
give
you
more
information.
M
M
N
M
M
O
H
H
J
H
K
J
C
On
it
in
like
I
said,
but
this
court
issue
that's
going
on
between
them.
They
go
back
to
court
in
20
days.
The
house
right
now
is
not
occupied,
so
the
building
engineer
said
he's
not
concerned
about
it
falling
on
a
neighboring
house
or
anything
like
that.
So,
based
on,
we
know
how
fast
the
court
system
works.
Sometimes
probably
60
days
is
reasonable.
Beyond
that
point,
they're
working
on
it
$50
a
day,
I
think
is
reasonable.
At
this
point,.
H
D
D
E
So
mrs.
Ingram
I
want
to
explain
to
you
what
has
just
happened
so
that
you
understand
the
process.
So
the
code
enforcement
board
has
found
a
violation
of
sections
8,
40
and
8
52.
You
have
until
June
11th
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance.
Should
you
fail
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
by
June
11th?
Then
there
is
going
to
be
a
$25
a
day,
fine
assessed
for
every
day
that
it
remains
in
non-compliance.
E
My
suggestion
to
you
is:
is
that
you
keep
in
contact
with
officer
gas
and
let
him
know
how
things
are
going
and
if
the
compliance
state
needs
to
be
extended,
and
they
have
no
objection,
then
then
he'll
bring
it
back.
The
case
back
otherwise
you'll
be
back
at
this
code
enforcement
board
to
discuss
the
non-compliance
aspect
of
it.
Probably
at
the
July
meeting.
H
G
C
Be
all
of
the
photographs
to
include
my
inspections,
exhibit
number
2
or
all
of
my
notices,
including
the
notice
of
violations
and
noticing
hearing
exhibit
number
3
or
any
administrative
documents,
including
a
summary.
The
Pinellas,
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
database
information
and
any
emails
exhibit
number
4
is
an
affidavit
of
the
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
C
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
database.
All
my
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice
of
hearings
were
mailed.
Both
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and
madam
chairman,
if
you
would
please
accept,
accept
all
the
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
C
The
30th
this
year
was
my
nation.
It
was
sparked
by
a
citizen
kabuto
a
trailer
out
front.
It
was
partially
on
the
sidewalk
at
that
point
in
time
left
a
door
hanger
for
the
property
owner
to
move
the
boat
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin
on
February
7th.
The
boat
was
still
there
and
at
that
point
in
time,
I
observed
some
other
violations:
large
Brazilian
pepper
tree
in
the
front
yard,
on
the
south
side
of
the
house,
trash
and
debris
being
stored
in
front
of
the
fence
on
the
south
side.
Three.
C
At
that
point,
we
issued
a
Notice
of
Violation
via
certified
mail
and
first-class
mail
to
the
property
owner
on
that
was
on
February
12th
On
February
23rd
I
conducted
another
inspection
of
the
property
observed
that
the
boat
was
gone,
but
the
rest
of
the
violations
still
remained
on
February
23rd,
we
issued
a
final
Notice
of
Violation.
Both
certified
mail
return,
receipt
requested
as
well
as
first-class
mail
on
March
14th
I
conducted
another
rien,
spec
ssin.
There
was
no
change
at
that
point.
We
decided
to
put
it
before
the
board.
C
The
interesting
thing
was:
is
I
found
out.
The
boat
had
been
moved
to
the
alley
because
of
another
complaint
down.
The
street
I
ended
up
going
down
the
alley
and
found
there
was
a
large
amount
of
debris
in
the
back
yard
that
was
visible
from
the
alley.
You'll
see
in
some
of
the
photographs
of
the
back
door,
a
bunch
of
trash
up
against
it.
There's
been
some
work
done
on
that
some
of
the
trash
has
gone
down,
but
I
inspected
it
yesterday
and
there
was
still
some
trash
back.
C
C
We
did
finally
have
some
contact
with
the
owner's
son
I
think
just
a
few
days
ago.
Prior
to
that,
we
hadn't
had
any
our
Notice
of
Violation
was
returned
to
us
unsigned.
So,
at
this
point
before
the
board,
I
have
a
violation
of
city
ordinance,
130
303,
which
is
a
tree
exemption.
Basically,
it
states
that
any
property
that
has
a
certificate
of
occupancy
issued
shall
forever
maintain
the
and
prevent
any
regrowth
of
Brazilian
pepper
trees
on
the
property.
This
house
is
an
occupied
residence,
so
therefore
it
has
a
certificate
of
occupancy
issued
by
the
city.
C
So
therefore,
he's
required
to
not
have
any
Brazilian
trees
on
the
property.
The
next
violation
is
822,
which
is
the
accumulation
of
trash
that
basically
is
kind
of
self-explanatory
and
seeing
the
photographs
there's
trash
on
the
property
that
needs
to
be
cleaned
up.
8
40
is
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property.
Generally
speaking
as
a
public
nuisance,
when
you
have
trash
and
debris
and
other
things
on
your
property
and
8
52
is
the
nuisance.
Prohibition
simply
requires
you
to
pick
up
anything.
That's
defined.
C
It's
debris
which
can
be
unused
equipment
tires,
various
a
myriad
of
things
defined
in
the
ordinance.
In
a
nutshell.
That
requires
you
to
clean
up
your
property
and
keep
it
clean.
So
those
are
the
three
violations
before
the
board.
I
stated.
Initially,
there
was
a
boat
violation,
but
the
boat
had
been
taken
care
of,
so
it's
not
before
the
board
and
that's
all
I
have
at
this
point.
C
H
C
H
G
My
mom
she
she
you
know,
we've
had
that
house
for
about
a
hundred
years,
basically
throughout
our
family
and
my
brother
and
my
two
younger
sisters,
my
two
younger
sisters
are
helping
my
mom.
Now
she
has
dementia
really
bad
now
and
it's
turning
Alzheimer's,
so
she's
not
living
there.
Now
and
basically,
we
been
trying
to
get
the
house
fixed
up
inside
I
mean
with
the
kitchen
was
remodeled
not
too
long
ago,
and
it's
like
we
don't
know
what
to
do
with
the
stuff.
G
You
know,
and
basically
you
know
we-
my
sisters
have
been
going
in
there
figuring
out.
You
know
what
to
do
with
it
and
long
story
short.
We
just
need
to
get
another
dumpster
there.
You
know
to
get
rid
of
the
Romanian,
so
we've
already
had
two
dumpsters
there
already
and
we
just
I
mean
I
work,
16
hours
a
day
every
day,
I'm,
never
there
and
my
brother
and
sisters
both
work
in
between
them.
Taking
care
of
my
mom.
G
We
just
haven't
had
time
so
I
just
need
just
a
little
bit
more
time
and
my
sister
had
said
that
they're
having
a
spring
cleanup,
I
guess
at
the
end
of
this
month.
So
you
know
that
may
help
us
too.
So
we
can
get
some
of
this
stuff
out
to
the
curb
as
well
but
other
than
that.
It's
just
been
about
time.
It's
not
that
you
know
we're
happy
about
it
either.
G
Well,
when
is
the
spring
cleanup
the
end
of
this
month,
April
22nd,
but
the
end
of
the
month
would
be
fine.
I
mean
I
already
have
someone
to
cut
the
tree,
they
were
gonna
come
out
and
it
was
raining
all
day,
so
they
had
to
reschedule
but
they're
gonna
take
out
the
tree.
For
me,
the
pepper
tree
completely
and
then
I
guess
does
it
have
to
be
stump
ground
to
you
got
to
just.
H
C
H
H
B
K
H
I
B
K
L
K
J
H
I
H
C
You
officer
Steve
gas
and
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs
Police
Department
code
enforcement.
This
is
case
17-8,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
seven,
sixty
three,
the
property
address,
535,
you
soak
Wood
Street,
the
list
of
property
owners,
generous
McNeil,
going
before
the
board
exhibit
number
one
or
all
my
photographs,
including
my
inspections,
exhibit
number
two
or
all
of
my
notices
to
include
Notice
of
Violation
and
Notice
of
Hearing.
We.
H
M
C
Continuing
on,
as
I
stated,
exhibit
number
two
roll
or
my
notices
to
include
a
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice.
Your
hearing
exhibit
number
three
or
my
administrative
Docs
to
include
any
emails.
A
copy
copy
of
the
case,
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
and
exhibit
number
four-
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign,
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
they
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
C
All
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations
and
notice.
The
hearings
are
sent
via
certified
return
receipt
panel
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and,
madam
chairman,
if
you
would
please
accept
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
C
This
case
started
on
December
16th
of
2017
I
was
conducting
an
inspection
on
some
neighboring
property
and
discovered
numerous
violations
on
this
property.
At
the
time
there
were
two
vehicles
parked
on
the
property
which
appear
inoperative
or
may
have
expired.
Registration
I
was
unable
to
see
him
based
on
the
way
they
were
parked.
L
C
Sidewalk
along
the
east
side
had
been
covered
up
with
some
tree
debris
needed
to
be
cleaned
off.
The
art
has
numerous
appliances
in
it.
There
was
some
other
debris
stored
on
the
property,
an
old
gym
equipment,
fence
pieces.
Things
like
that
trash
cans
were
in
front
of
the
house
in
the
front
yard
in
plain
view,
and
not
stored
properly.
C
Sorry
I
was
sent
on
the
6th
of
February
on
February
23rd
I
conducted
another
inspection,
and
there
is
basically
no
change
at
that
point
in
time
and
at
that
point
determined
to
go
to
the
code
enforcement
board.
February
26,
the
Notice
of
Hearing,
was
mailed
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
and
on
March
31st,
I
posted
the
property
and
an
affidavit
was
post
name
was
signed,
I
did
conduct
another
inspection
yesterday,
I
also
drove
by
again
the
property.
C
This
morning
we
had
gotten
information
that
one
Chevy
truck
on
the
property
had
been
legally
registered.
I
can't
determine
if
it's
operable,
but
at
that
point
in
time,
I
complied
that
that
one
violation
of
40.00
there's
still
a
car
parked
in
the
backyard
behind
the
house.
Conveniently
a
piece
of
fence
material
was
placed
up
on
it
so
that
it
was
less
visible
from
the
street,
but
it's
still
clearly
visible.
C
No
registrations
been
presented
and
there's
been
nothing
presented
to
code
enforcement
to
determine
if
the
vehicles
either
operable
or
registered
one
of
the
photographs
you'll
notice
there
was
a
washing
machine
that
was
right
in
front
of
one
of
the
doors.
That's
now
on
the
west
side
of
the
house,
it's
been
moved
there.
The
refrigerator
is
gone
from.
What
I
can
see
the
old
gym
equipment
is
still
there
when
I
drove
by
the
trash
cans
we're
still
there.
C
M
No
well,
yes,
I
do
the
gray
car
is
not
registered
and
it
was
blocked
from
offense,
but
the
fence
came
down
on
hurricane
Irma,
so
I
brought
fencing
to
enclose
the,
but
when
I
talked
to
the
lady
at
the
coda
forced
me,
she
said
I
needed
a
permit,
so
I
didn't
come
up
here
for
a
permit,
because
I
didn't
know.
This
was
going
down
the.
M
C
M
H
B
M
M
Not
as
as
time
to
scrape
with
this,
but
also
due
to
my
health
I
have
extra
expenses
that
I
have
to
pay
every
week,
so
I
didn't
have
access
to
have
someone
me
to
clear
everything
so
and
then
I
just
cleared
some
stuff
Saturday
and
also
Saturday
I
ended
up
in
the
hospital.
So
that's
why
I
say
I'm
trying
to
get
through
the
therapy
and
basically
I
need
more
time
because
beans
that
I
ended
up
in
the
hospital.
That's
a
factor
that
affected
my
health.
M
M
H
M
Well,
when
I
got
the
complaint
about
the
garbage
can
I
was
I
was
really
shocked
because
I
was
like
wow.
This
is
a
new
organ.
Cuz
I've
been
here
24
years
and
my
garbage
being
slide
out
front.
They
get
put
to
the
road,
my
stepfather
he
takes
them
in
and
I
was
like.
Is
this
a
new
ordinance
where
the
new
year
that's
for
24
years?
J
K
B
K
K
J
C
B
O
B
K
F
K
L
H
L
B
I
P
I
C
Alright,
the
the
case
before
the
board-
just
so
you
understand,
is
here
to
be
established.
Its
case
18
8,
0,
0,
0,
0,
1,
0
8.
The
address
is
595
Peninsula
avenues.
Maria
Cazares
is
a
listed
property
owner,
a
mobster
Steve
Gaston
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
code
enforcement
been
so
employed
since
2015.
What's
matter
the
name,
Mariya
Coolio's,
sorry
Coolio's
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
all
the
photographs
to
include
my
inspections,
also
a
copy
of
the
police
report
that
was
written
by
detective
Chris
Walken
arey.
G
A
C
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
and,
as
I
stated,
exhibit
number
five
is
a
copy,
the
sheriff's
report
from
detective
logon
area,
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
they
were
given
to
the
violator
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
of
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
based
on
Pinellas,
County,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
All
the
notice
of
violations
and
noticing
hearings
were
sent.
C
This
my
aspect
of
this
case
started
on
February
20th
22nd.
The
initial
inspection
was
conducted
by
nature,
the
fact
I'm
a
member
of
the
Tarpon
Springs
Police
Department
SWAT
team,
and
we
executed
a
search
warrant
via
the
Pinellas
County
and
at
heart
and
narcotics
detectives
for
drug
trafficking.
At
the
address
of
595
Peninsula.
That
search
warrant
was
executed
by
our
SWAT
team
in
Pinellas
County
Narcotics
Task
Force,
there
was
a
large
amount
of
narcotics
seized
from
the
residence
and
the
residence
was
being
used
to
package
and
sell
drugs.
C
C
At
the
time
both
the
sons
were
charged
with
multiple
charges,
felonies
and
misdemeanors
relating
to
the
activities
in
the
residence
on
February
22nd
of
this
year.
The
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
were
mailed
certified
in
first
class
on
February
27th.
We
got
a
deferral
from
Jerry
requesting
a
different
court
date
or
a
hearing
date
to
today,
because
he
had
some
other
obligations
on
March
31st,
I
posted
the
property
and
an
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed
on
April
11th
basically
was
my
final.
C
My
final
inspection,
but
as
I
stated
there
at
this
point
in
time,
in
compliance,
they
haven't
had
any
other
drug
sales
or
search
warrants
at
the
house.
So
I've
had
that
before
the
board
to
be
established
for
a
violation
of
8
40,
which
encompasses
city,
ordinance,
definition
838,
which
talks
about
nuisances
and
those
nuisances
include
specifically
any
criminal
act
committed
on
the
premises
or
allowing
said
criminal
acts
to
occur.
C
The
Sheriff's
Office
report
that
was
written
by
mr.
Orr
detective
wall
canary
he
outlines
his
case
fairly
thoroughly
and
especially
what
was
retrieved
from
the
house.
But
inside
of
that
report
he
does
have
conversation
with
Miss
Coolio's
regarding
the
drugs
inside
the
house
and
her
knowledge
of
them
also
her.
C
It
required
us
on
the
SWAT
team
to
be
basically
dressed
in
hazardous
materials
gear
because
of
the
danger
of
fentanyl
trafficking
and
an
N
feta
means
he
had
29.4
grams
and
possession
of
cocaine.
4
grams
muhuali
mu
gross
was
charged
with
felony
possession
of
marijuana,
approximately
90
grams
possession
of
cocaine,
9
grams
possession
of
MDMA
8
grams
in
a
violation
of
the
of
an
injunction
by
possessing
a
firearm
in
the
house,
there's
also
pending
charges
for
possession
of
fentanyl
possession
of
psychedelic,
mushrooms
and
possession
of
steroids.
C
These
items
were
sent
to
the
Pinellas
County
forensic
lab
for
analysis.
So,
as
I
stated
under
838
nuisance,
property
injuries
are
in
dangerous.
The
comfort,
repose
health
and
safety
of
others
I
think
that's
fairly
clear.
We
had
numerous
complaints
about
this
property
and
people
wandering
around
the
neighborhood
around
there,
after
allegedly
purchasing
drugs
from
the
property.
That's
what
basically
created
the
nexus
for
the
search
warrant
that
was
executed
and
the
drugs
and
items
were
found
inside
the
house.
So
that's
at
this
time
all
I
have.
H
C
So
that's
840
encompasses
838,
which
is
another
set
of
definitions
and
841,
which
is
just
one
of
a
myriad
of
conditions.
I
just
read
the
one.
That's
basically
applicable
of
this
in
similarity
when
we
talk
about
a
dilapidated
structure,
I
use
a
40,
but
841
has
a
separate
definition
that
talks
about
dilapidated
structures.
So
that's
where
I'm
driving
at
840
is
the
proactive,
a
better
term.
The
charging
ordinance
which
encompasses
the
the
two
defined
ordinances
of
838
841.
H
Q
C
On
my
training
and
experience
and
being
inside
of
the
house,
it
I
would
be
led
to
agree
with
that
conclusion
by
the
the
numerous
bottles
that
were
in
there
and
as
I
stated
I.
Don't
have
any
personal
knowledge
of
them
being
sold
other
than
that
transfer
that
knowledge
through
fellow
police
officers.
When.
C
Were
prescription
bottles
or
they
were,
they
were
empty
prescription
bottles.
Many
of
them
didn't
have
labels
on
them
anymore,
but
again,
I
did
a
very
cursory
search
of
the
interior
of
the
house.
The
pictures
that
are
included
with
this
were
provided
by
the
Pinellas
County
Sheriff's
Office
I
did
walk
through
the
house,
but
we
were
not.
I
was
not
part
of
the
search
team
other
than
four
people
and.
C
Q
C
Q
K
C
C
Q
Q
C
Q
Q
C
Being
inside
of
the
house
being
inside
of
the
house,
hearing
police
calls
come
out
for
people
from
the
area.
The
nuisance
aspect
of
it
is
in
dangers
or
injures
the
comfort,
repose
health
and
safety
of
others.
The
fact
that
we
executed
a
search
warrant
in
hazmat
gear
into
the
house,
all
by
itself,
if
fentanyl
spellin
fell
in
the
front
yard,
would
definitely
be
hazardous
to
the
people
around
it.
That
potentials
existed
by
the
nature
of
the
fact
eight
grams
of
it
were
returned
out
of
the
house
and.
Q
C
C
There's
a
comma
and
an
or
which
changes
it,
the
comma
and
or
or
through
the
violation
of
any
law
of
the
state
county
city,
adversely
affect
ordinary,
responsible
and
reasonably
behaved
persons
in
the
enjoyment
of
use
their
property.
So
there's
two
aspect
to
the
or
from
mike
grammatical
experience,
basically
changes
the
context
of
it
and
there
were
repeated
part
or
committing
the
violation
of
any
law.
So.
C
K
Q
C
C
C
C
C
C
L
C
C
C
C
H
Q
P
Q
P
P
Me
Holly's,
disabled
and
22
years
old.
He
has
a
broken
femur
and
is
not
only
the
broken
femur,
but
his
body
post
is
to
Assad
the
every
single
day
that
he
gets
up.
We
don't
know
how
he's
gonna
be
stopped.
Vomiting
he's
trying
now
he's
hospitalized
a
hundred
times.
His
bones
is
like
from
2002.
The
accident
is
not
healing
properly,
you
know
it
takes
prescription
medicine
and
you
know
I
hear
he
has
his
stain
in
my
master
bedroom
because
he
has
them
his
femurs
is
his
penny.
P
It
is
rotten
his
his
bomb
lag
and
it's
only
position
that
he
can
see
so
I
gave
him
this
room
because
he
has
his
own
bathroom.
You
know
to
be
easier
for
him,
but
he's
disabled
all
these
years.
You
know
he's
no
harm
to
nobody
and
he
does
not
use
any
drugs.
He's
very,
very
against
you
know,
have
you
dropped
and
everything
you
know,
but
his
his
prescription,
his
fever,
is
not
healing
properly
still
not
fully
recovered.
My
son.
P
Q
P
Times
and
she's
gonna,
you
know
when
he
gets
up
in
the
morning
he's
gonna
get
up.
You
know,
then
you
know
he's
gonna,
take
care
of
the
dogs.
Do
some
yard
work?
You
know
they
take
his
saagara
that
he's
gonna
go
lay
down.
He
can't
build
his
leg
more
than
two
hours
a
day
straight,
every
two
hours
he
has
to
lay
down
because
the
the
bone
is
bothering
him
a
lot.
P
The
rod
is
bothering
him
a
lot
and
his
old
body
also
developed
after
the
accident
and
from
the
stress,
especially
after
the
source,
warm
they
came
into
the
house
and
he
heard
that
what
they
charged
him,
the
poor
kid
went
crazy,
crying
to
say:
I,
don't
do
this,
why
they
did
it
they
set
me
up.
His
whole
body
is
covered
with
psoriasis,
a
weird
disease
that
covered
the
whole
body
from
top
to
the
bottom,
except
his
face.
This
place
is
the
only
place.
That's
clear.
Everything
else
is
covered
up.
P
Q
Q
P
Is
the
bathroom
that
we
use
all
in
the
house
that
day
after
my
son
left
and
that's
before
a
long,
sleep
I
tap
to
give
them?
Because
she
was
meeting
up
with
some
officers
to
talk,
became
about
us
some
something
that
happened
in
the
neighborhood?
You
know
years
ago,
I
matter
of
fact:
I
went
into
the
bathroom
after
he
laughed
because
I
was
getting
it
ready.
I
was
ready
for
people
to
come
to
shore
we
put
on
my
washer
and
I
said.
Let
me
go
into
the
bathroom
change,
my
robe.
P
This
wasn't
there
that
wasn't
there
you
know
and
I
was
waiting
for
people
to
come.
You
know
to
fix
my
washer
and
right
when
I
changed
my
robe
I
hear
the
door
knocking
and
I
go
up,
and
you
know
believe
in
was
the
people
for
the
washer
and
instead
of
was
to
talk
police
officers
telling
me
that
I
call
9-1-1
out
of
my
phone
if
it
was
work.
What
if
I'm
okay,
I,
say:
yeah
I'm,
okay
and
I'm
waiting
for
service
for
my
washer
and
he
goes
was
anybody?
Is
he
with
you
right
now?
P
P
I
said:
please
I
can't
do
that,
because
if
I
push
him
to
wake
up,
he's
gonna
start
vomiting
he's
sick,
isn't
he
you
know
he
has
to
wake
up
on
his
own,
but
they
persisted
so
I
had
to
wake
them
up
and
take
them
as
soon
as
he
was
up.
They
taught
us
to
step
outside
the
house,
and
at
that
point
you
know
they
told
me
we
have
a
search
born
and
we
come
before
you
fall
and
I
was
already
at
us
outside
the
house
and
then
the
f2
they
to
Walker.
C
C
P
C
C
P
C
Q
C
P
P
K
C
C
P
P
C
Who
uses
that
who
has
the
b12
prescription
Oh.
P
P
C
P
C
I
L
C
R
Can
you
repeat,
it's
a
nuisance.
I
just
wanted
to
know
it's
a
nuisance.
First
of
all,
thank
you
for
giving
me
the
opportunity
to
speak
I'm
a
little
distressed,
because
madam.
R
R
R
R
In
and
out
of
my
sister's
home
in
and
out
I
I'm,
not
gonna,
specify
dates,
I,
don't
know,
but
yes,
I'm
in
and
out
with
my
daughter
and
to
make
it
specific
since
you've
been
in
the
home.
Sir,
if
you
open
her
front
door,
it's
a
two-door.
If
you
open
it,
it's
opens
to
the
right.
The
living
room
is
on
the
right-hand
side.
If
you
actually
have
tunnel
vision,
you
won't
look
at
the
living
room,
you'll
go
straight
into
the
kitchen,
then
you
make
the
right
and
it's
the
dining
room.
R
Then
you
make
the
left
and
it's
the
family
room
and
then
in
the
right
hand,
side
are
the
two
bedrooms
and
then
it's
me
hallease
room
and
then
there's
a
little
kitchen
area,
so
any
individual
that
might
go
visit.
My
sister,
like
myself,
might
avoid
the
whole
right
side
of
the
house
and
go
straight
into
the
kitchen
and
sit
in
the
little
dining
room
or
in
the
back
as
I
have
before
so.
R
I
just
want
to
make
it
clear,
because
you
got
a
little
fixated
on
the
table
and
I
understand
where
you
were
going,
but
I
also
want
to
make
it
clear
to
you
or
like
me
who
walks
in
with
my
daughter
and
I,
am
very
comfortable
going
to
my
sister's
as
I
visited
my
nephew
plenty
of
times
and
I
have
visited
both
of
my
nephews
and
my
sister.
Now,
what
bothers
me
as
a
city
is
that
you're
trying
to
evict
my
nephews?
R
Q
R
Because
my
sister
and
I
have
been
taking
care
of
my
mother,
my
mother
has
been
in
that
was
in
the
hospital
from
February
the
7th
until
March
7th,
so
Maria
was
gone
from
the
house,
a
lot
okay
from
her
home
and
the
boys
were
there
a
lot
by
themselves
and
sometimes
I
would
go
and
be
like
okay,
she's
at
the
hospital
we're
just
all
helping
each
other
out
as
a
family
and
as
they
are
grown
adults,
yes,
they're
living
in
her
home.
But
sometimes
you
can't
control
your
own
children
and
you
don't
know.
R
Q
R
Q
R
If
I
make
you
a
comment
about
needles,
needles
are
not
just
for
drugs.
Needles
are
for
a
different
variety
of
things,
including
diabetics
and
other
types
of
diseases,
and
as
for
Baker
acting
Baker
acting
is
a
very
severe
mental
health
issue,
which
is
a
terrible
nuisance
to
neighbors.
So
I
am
very
concerned
as
being
a
special
needs
teacher
that
there's
a
not
a
lot
of
knowledge
about
mental
health
issues
going
on
around
here,
especially
with.
H
R
Q
Q
E
You
you're
not
testifying
today
Jerry,
so
the
questions
should
be
asked
of
the
witnesses
and
then
mr.
Theophilus
will
give
his
closing
argument
as
to
the
reasons
why
he
was
gonna
pull
all
of
his
evidence
together.
He'll
tell
you
what
he
was
doing
and
what
he
is
attempting
to
prove
and
that
will
be
in
a
summary.
Okay.
J
R
Mother,
it
was
in
the
hospital
Maria
would
leave
her
house
a
lot,
because
my
mother
has
a
doesn't
speak
English.
Okay.
So
during
that
a
lot
of
the
time
and
my
parents
they're
at
home,
but
my
dad
is
88
years
old
and
my
mom
is
84,
so
my
mom
was
hospitalized
on
February
7th
for
pneumonia
and
just
at
heart
fail
failure
and
a
fib.
So
during
the
day,
while
my
daughter
was
at
school,
I
would
take
care
of
my
mom
at
the
hospital.
Maria
would
leave
in
the
evenings
and
afternoons
to
go
visit.
R
L
C
Basically,
madam
chairman,
we
executed
a
search
warrant
on
the
house
that
search
warrant
was
based
on
whatever
information
was
given
to
a
judge
that
felt
it
was
reasonable
and
that
there
was
probable
cause
to
search
that
house
for
drugs
and
illegal
narcotics
and
in
fact,
that
search
warrant
was
executed.
I
was
inside
the
house,
I've
been
a
police
officer
for
24
years
and,
frankly,
I've
never
seen
more
evidence
inside
of
one
residence
of
drug
use
of
some
way
shape
or
form
numerous
bottles
spoons,
yes,
spoons
can
be
used
for
other
things.
C
Syringes
can
be
used
for
other
things,
but
the
fact
that
these
weren't
noticed
and
they're
out
in
the
open
and
then
the
mere
fact
that
the
drugs
were
found
inside
the
house.
Even
the
charging
document
that
Gerry
provides
is
for
Mohali.
It's
for
the
third
degree
felony
possession
of
marijuana,
so
there
was
in
fact
a
felony
crime
and
a
charging
document
out
of
it.
No
none
of
them
being
convicted
of
these
crimes.
We're
here.
Yes
as
a
nuisance
violation.
As
an
interesting
side.
C
Note
I
pulled
up
the
address
in
our
record
system,
which
we
converted
a
while
back,
and
this
isn't
everything
it
could
be.
You
know
there
were
witness
to
a
crime,
a
victim
to
a
crime,
but
the
police
department's
been
out
there
in
excess
of
20
times
in
15
years,
I
mean
for
various
things.
In
some
cases.
Q
E
Madam
chair
would
what
the
lawyer
is
basically
saying
is:
is
that
you
shouldn't
be
able
to
Brit
into
his
summary
things
that
he
did
not
testify
to
as
when
he
was
presenting
his
testimony
earlier,
so
either
need
to
sustain
the
objection
or
overrule
it.
My
advice
to
you
is
to
sustain
the
objection
that
was
not
testimony
that
officer
gas
and
gave
before
he
got
into
his
closing
argument.
So
are
you
gonna
sustain
yeah.
C
Okay,
so,
basically,
like
I,
said,
I
was
inside
of
the
house.
The
SWAT
team
was
inside
of
the
house.
Pinellas
County
narcotics
conducted
a
search
warrant
on
this
house.
A
judge
agreed
there
was
probable
cause
to
believe
there
were
drugs
inside
that
house.
Drugs
were
in
fact
found
inside
that
house.
There
were
statements
made
by
Miss
Coolio's
regarding,
as
I
testified
that
he
smokes
marijuana
all
day,
she's
in
constant
fear
of
her
boys.
So
the
thing
about
it
is.
Is
she
stated
that
the
syringes
appeared
at
some
point
in
time?
C
I
don't
know
when,
but
they
were
in
the
house
when
it
was
searched.
I
didn't
see
that
particular
bathroom.
Those
pictures
were
provided
to
me
by
the
detectives.
You
know.
Basically,
the
house
is
a
nuisance
and
the
fact
that
the
two
boys
inside
of
the
house
are
primarily
the
reason
why
that
nuisance
occurs.
I
just
asked
the
board
simply
to
find
them
in
violation
of
city
ordinance,
8
40
and
establish
them,
as
I
stated
at
this
point
in
time.
Q
When
we
look
at
what
we're
charged
under
it's
the
duty
of
maintenance
of
private
property
840
of
our
food-
and
it
refers
to
838
and
is
further
defined
in
841,
which
does
what
and
gassin
testified
earlier
and
I
asked
him.
The
subsection
4
of
841
under
the
nuisance
conditions
is
the
subsection
that
he
proceeded
on
the
problem
with
the
argument
here
today
and
the
evidence
presented
is
you
must
have,
and
these
are
the
words
of
our
food
here
in
Tarpon
Springs.
J
Q
Excuse
me
or
disorderly
conduct
or
through
repeated
disturbances,
the
peace
or
through
violation
of
any
law
of
the
state,
county
or
city,
adversely
affect
ordinary,
reasonable
and
reasonably
behaved
persons
in
the
employment
and
use
of
their
property.
If
you
consider
everything
that
officer
gassin
has
stated
here
as
true
and
you
find
that
that
are,
that
is
the
facts
of
this
case.
Then
you
have
one
incident.
You
do
not
have
a
repeated
attraction
to
repeat
as
your
own,
our
own,
the
city
says
you
have
to
have
more
than
one
of
them.
Q
You
have
two
incidences
that
have
occurred.
Drug-Related
in
that
house
bol.
You
have
a
repeated
attract,
though
we're
missing
one
instance
here:
do
we
have
what's
alleged
here?
Were
there
drugs
in
the
house?
Well,
obviously,
it's
quite
apparent.
There
were
drugs
in
the
house,
but
it
doesn't
rise
the
nuisance
until
as
as
the
states,
the
repeated
attraction
you
have
to
have
more
than
one
event,
though,
at
best
he's
presented
one
event
here
today
and
therefore
you
must
find
in
favor
of
mrs.
Yost
and
her
property.
Thank
you.
H
J
Meant
that,
based
on
the
testimony
evidence,
facts
presented
in
the
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violations,
sections
844,
the
Code
of
Ordinances,
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
was
in
full
force
and
effect
and
at
the
time
of
the
violation.
At
the
time
of
the
notice
of
the
violation,
the
respondents
were
in
violation,
said
Coates.
However,
they
are
now
in
complying.
K
B
E
E
K
I
I
J
C
E
C
Alright
and
I'll
discuss
that
officer.
Steve
gas
and
city
turbine
Springs,
Police
Department
code
enforcement
case
number,
18,
8,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
9
property
address,
126,
East,
Boyer,
Street
properties
owned
by
a
company
in
LLC,
Sierra
wholesale
exhibit
number
one
or
all
of
my
photographs
to
include
my
inspection
photographs
exhibit
number
two
is
all
the
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
Notice
of
Hearing
exhibit
number
three
of
my
administrative
Docs,
the
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
emails.
An
exhibit
number
four.
C
Is
the
affidavit
copy,
the
sign
all
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
based
on
the
PALS
county,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
All
my
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearings
were
sent
via
certified
mail
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail,
and,
madam
chairman,
if
you
would
please
accept
those
exhibits,
any
of
the
record
is
evident
initially
conducted.
C
My
first
inspection
on
January
17th
of
this
year
upon
inspection,
I
found
debris
and
trash
being
stored
on
the
property,
including
old,
tires,
pallets,
trailer,
full
of
trash
trash
bags
and
various
other
debris
and
trash
items.
Trees
along
the
sidewalk
on
the
north
side
needed
to
be
trimmed,
so
they
were
incurred
were
not
encroaching
on
the
sidewalk
On
January
17th.
The
courtesy
letter
was
mailed
first
class
to
the
property
owner
On
February
6
of
this
year
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin.
C
Basically,
a
lot
of
the
debris
and
trash
had
been
cleaned
up,
but
the
trailer
is
still
full
and
still
on
the
property
in
violation.
At
that
point,
in
time,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
sent
on
February
8th
on
March
6th
I
returned
for
another
inspection
and
the
debris
had
been
cleaned
up,
and
basically
the
only
violation
at
the
time
is
that
the
trailer
is
still
falling
on
the
property
on
March
6.
The
final
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed
on
March
21st.
C
They
conducted
another
Rhian
spec
ssin
and,
as
I
stated,
the
trailer
still
loaded
on
the
property.
But
now
I
went
around
to
the
back
side
via
the
alley
and
there's
a
stack
of
tires
in
the
rear
on
the
east
side,
and
at
that
point,
I
decided
to
send
a
notice
of
hearing
or
bringing
at
cobourg
March
22nd.
The
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed.
First-Class
rumor
and
return
receipt
requested
March
31st,
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
on
April
11th
I
did
conduct
a
final
inspection.
C
You
can
have
a
trailer,
but
it
has
to
be
empty,
so
their
violation
is
that
it's
still
full
now
going
along
with
I
did
finally
get
an
email
and
I
want
to
say,
I
think
it
was
last
night
possibly
the
day
before
from
some
representatives
of
the
company
and
due
to
some
hardships,
they
were
asking
for
extensions,
and
things
like
that
and
I
can
get
into
them
more
significantly.
If
you
want,
after
the
board,
decides
whether
there's
a
violation
or
not.
But
at
this
point
that's
all
I
have.
H
B
B
K
E
K
J
C
In
a
she's
she's,
the
property
owner
sent
a
couple
of
emails,
and
initially
she
asked
for
eight
weeks,
but
we
were
already
and
we're
going
to
code
board
the
next
day,
so
I
thought
I'd
just
simply
presented
to
the
board.
She
goes
on
with
the
myriad
of
issues
going
on
potential
foreclosure
they're,
trying
to
evict
working
on
a
divorce,
and
she
has
medical
problems.
I
think
that
summarizes
it.
She's
asked
for
eight
weeks,
she's
the
property
we
haven't
had
any
issues
with
it
before
so.
C
I
I
certainly
have
no
problem
with
a
full
trailer,
giving
him
60
days
to
move
the
trailer
out
and
$25
a
day
to
take
care
of
that,
even
barring
all
the
circumstances.
I
think
that's
reasonable
anyway,
and
she
did
ask
for
the
eight
weeks
they're
trying
to
evict
them.
They
said
it's
four
to
six
weeks
for
the
eviction,
so
that
gives
them
a
couple
weeks
after
that
to
clean
the
property
up.
So
that's
the
city's
position
is
60
days
or
eight
weeks
and
$25.00
day.
J
L
K
J
I
H
K
A
A
B
S
None
of
those
records
were
produced
and
a
lawsuit
has
been
filed.
A
hearing
has
been
scheduled
for
I
think
the
25th
of
this
month
concerning
what
the
city
has
to
produce,
which
will
in
in
large
part,
involve
some
of
the
defenses
one
of
the
defenses
that
we
have
is
the
defense
of
specific
performance,
specific
enforcement,
which
the
second
District
Court
of
Appeal
in
Sarasota
versus
Powell
versus
city
of
Sarasota,
I'm,
sure
mr.
Trask
is
probably
familiar
with
it.
I
also
have
a
copy
of
it.
S
I
can
provide
it
to
this
to
this
board
if
it
likes
to
see
it
well.
I've
asked
for
a
one-month
continuance
based
upon
that
I
have
since
learned
this
afternoon
that
one
of
the
witnesses
who
will
testify
mr.
Chris
Conrad,
who
made
cleaned
up
the
property
back
in
December,
is
add
something
fall
on
him.
He
is
in
the
hospital
and
cannot
testify
today,
but
I
would
assume
he
will
be
able
to
testify
either
at
the
May
meeting
or
at
the
June
meeting.
S
Well,
he
indicated
that
his
answer
was
no,
but
I
could
make
the
same
request
before
the
board
and
that's
what
I
am
doing
to
to
these
two
cases
I'm
requesting
another
continuance,
preferably
to
June,
but
if
you
want
to
put
it
on
the
main
calendar,
it's
just
as
convenient
inconvenient
for
me
to
be
here
at
4
o'clock
in
Mays.
It
is
4
o'clock
in
April.
S
I
still
don't
have
the
information,
the
information
that
I'm
asking-
and
you
should
probably
be
aware
of
this
I
requested
from
the
city
attorney
to
take
officer,
Gaston's
deposition
for
a
two-hour
session.
They
indicated
they
politely
declined,
saying,
there's
no
authority
for
deposition.
Under
the
statute,
therefore,
I
made
had
to
make
the
public
records
request,
so
I
have
been
forced
into
this
situation
step.
S
One
step
two
step
three
and
now
all
of
a
sudden
when
I
am
as
prepared
as
I
can
be,
with
the
limited
information
that
I
have
I,
find
out
that
my
witness
is
one
of
my
witnesses
who
will
testify
as
to
when
he
cleaned
up
the
property,
because
that's
really
going
to
be
in
big
dispute
is
also
hospitalized.
So
my
request
is
my
suggestion
is:
go
ahead
and
continue
to
the
June
calendar
by
the
document
on
the
agenda
itself.
There's
no
irreparable
harm.
The
properties
have
been
cleaned
up
that
the
the
compliance
has
taken
place.
S
T
E
So
the
board
understands
that
the
Chairman
is
the
person
is
going
to
be
making
the
ruling
as
to
whether
the
continuance
is
going
to
be
granted
now,
to
also
tell
the
board
that
officer
gas
and
does
not
have
the
ability
to
overrule
an
order
of
this
board.
This
board
continued
the
hearing
to
today
and
therefore
he
doesn't
have
the
right,
a
legal
ability
to
grant
a
continuance.
It
had
to
come
to
you
for
decision
today,
madam
chair.
E
He
did
not
have
the
ability
to
continue
it
as
he
would
have
had
prior
to
now,
because
there
has
now
been
of
bored
order
entered
saying
there
will
be
a
hearing
today
so
with
that
I
would
ask
if
mr.
Gaston
has
any
testimony
and
then
you
need
to
decide
whether
or
not
that
you
want
to
grant
these
continuance
and
it's
on
both
cases
you're
asking
for
the
continuance.
He
only
mentioned
that
one,
but
it's
both
cases.
Okay,.
H
C
Ma'am,
thank
you
as
mr.
Trask
dated
we
were
here
a
couple
months
ago
and
we
specifically
gave
the
continuance.
This
board
gave
the
continuance
that
mr.
Rock
and
Miss
and
XE
asked
for
the
city
was
prepared
at
that
point
in
time
to
go
forward
with
this
case.
We're
still
prepared
at
this
point
in
time.
It's
also
my
understanding.
As
far
as
the
lawsuit
goes,
I
guess,
there's
been
a
couple
of
continuances
filed
by
mr.
Rock
in
that
lawsuit,
also
in
Circuit
Court,
so
I
don't
know
what
the
issue
is
with
giving
this
case.
C
For
it,
it
does
seem
incredibly
convenient
at
a
person
that
was
cleaning
the
yard
up
as
a
star.
Witness
is
unavailable
to
be
here
today
when
it's
on
the
heels
of
requesting
a
continuance.
Previously,
as
I
stated,
the
city
is
ready
to
go
forward
and,
and
that
basically
is
all
I
have
at
this
point
in
time.
I
would
object
to
any
further
continuances
of
this
case
and,
let's
just
move
on,
may.
S
C
What
was
asked
for
was
what
I've
been
told.
The
largest
public
records
request
that
the
city
has
ever
been
asked
for.
Ultimately,
the
city
was
asked
for
the
largest
public
records
request.
That's
ever
been
asked
for
up
to
and
including
about
a
quarter
of
a
million
emails.
Those
emails
have
to
be.
Every
single
email
has
to
be
gone
through
because
it
I
am
a
police
officer
and
some
of
the
people
that
were
subpoenaed.
C
They
go
through
the
police
department,
I'm
privy
to
confidential
information,
which
is
not
allowed
to
be
released
under
the
sunshine
law,
public
records
laws,
so
every
single
email
in
that
group
has
to
be
redacted
in
some
way,
shape
or
form
at
best
reviewed
that
a
significant
period
of
time
along
those
lines
they
were
provided
with
a
quote
of
an
estimate
of
what
it
would
cost
to
do
this
in
a
time
frame.
They
need
a
chose
not
to
pay
that
quote
and
instead
chose
to
file
a
lawsuit
to
circumvent
whatever
I.
C
Don't
know
all
the
details
behind
it.
That's
attorney
stuff.
I
do
simply
know
that
there
was
an
amount
of
money
that
they
were
asked
to
pay.
As
a
down
payment
as
an
estimate
of
what
the
public
records
request
would
be,
and
then
we
would
need
time
to
do
that,
mr.
Rock
states
he
just
wants
to
review
the
records,
that's
physically
impossible
when
all
of
our
emails
are
contained
on
a
computer
server.
We
can't
we
still
have
to
look
at
each
one
before
we
allow
them
to
be
reviewed.
C
C
It
was
substantial
and
the
hundreds
of
thousands
of
dollars,
because
the
amount
of
time
and
personnel
that
it
would
take,
which
were
legally
allowed
to
ask
for
under
Florida
Statute
to
make
sure
the
information
we're
giving
him
is
legally
allowed
to
be
given
out
then
like
that
answer,
and
if
a
lawsuit
I'm,
whatever
the
case
may
be
we're
still
going
through
that
lawsuit
I,
believe
it
I
won't
get
into
the
reasonings
behind
it.
But
that
was
the
public
records
request
that
was
made.
C
That's
the
lawsuit
he's
referring
to,
and
he
also
makes
a
comment
about
a
deposition.
I,
don't
know
all
the
legal
ins
and
outs,
but
for
my
understanding
in
this
type
of
circumstance,
code
enforcement
boards
me
as
the
depositions
aren't
allowed.
That's
what
I've
been
informed
in
that's
part
of
that
lawsuit
as
well.
So
should.
S
You
number
one
miss
or
the
nexi
group
has
done
absolutely
nothing
to
delay
a
Circuit
Court
case.
That
is
a
misstatement
of
fact.
Number
two.
The
public
records
request
came
back
from
the
city
attorney
requesting
$80,000
just
to
look
at
the
records.
I
responded
by
an
email,
I
didn't
ask
you
for
copies.
I
just
wanted
to
look
at
the
records.
I
went
to
the
the
Koloff
Asst
at
the
time
that
I
listed
in
my
request
and
I
can
provide
a
copy.
I'm.
S
Sorry
I
have
to
get
a
copy
made
because
I
must
have
left
them
at
the
office.
I
requested
time
laughs
I
appeared
at
this
code
enforcement
board
to
look
at
the
records
no
records
the
following
day,
probably
the
sixth
day
since
they
have
a
five-day
requirement.
I
notify
them.
I'm
gonna
set
up
the
time
to
do
that.
I
showed
up
no
records
the
following
day:
I
get
a
bill
for
approximately
eighty
thousand
dollars
just
to
take
a
look
at
the
records.
The
public
records
that
I
requested.
Then
I
filed
a
lawsuit
for
mr.
S
officer
gasps
and
to
say
that
I
have
continued.
That
case
is
a
bold
state.
Misstatement
of
fact,
I
have
done
nothing.
In
fact,
the
earliest
I
could
get
before
the
court
on
a
motion.
For
summary
judgment,
for
my
point
of
view,
is
April
25th
and
I
would
have
to
probably
see
the
information
that
the
courts
probably
going
to
be
required
to
disclose.
I
would
also
point
out
to
this
board
that
the
statute
119
provides
for
a
system
where,
if
they
don't
want
to
produce
a
document,
they
claim
it
as
exempt
and
list
it.
S
They've
done
nothing,
nothing
at
all,
they're,
just
in
my
opinion,
trying
to
intimidate
the
request.
That's
been
made
for
the
records.
I
am
trying
to
go
forward,
get
the
records
prepare
for
a
defense.
The
city
of
Sarasota,
Powell
versus
city
of
Sarasota
clearly
states
that
when
you
have
a
claim
of
specific
enforcement,
you
are
entitled
to
present
that
information
to
the
to
the
board
in
full
I
did
not
know.
My
one
of
my
witnesses
was
going
to
be
hospitalized
at
the
time.
S
I
repaid
the
request
to
officer
gasps
and
but
I
understand
that
the
city
is
ready
to
proceed.
They
were
ready
back
in
February,
but
we
are
given
half
an
apple
to
digest
and
say
how
did
the
whole
apple
taste
it's
not
possible
to
tell
you
how
the
whole
Apple
tastes,
I,
don't
have
all
the
information
and,
in
addition,
one
of
the
witnesses
hospitalized
so
certainly
I
can.
E
Okay,
so
your
options
Mountain
chair,
is
to
grant
the
continuance
or
not
to
grant
the
continuance
if
you
do
grant
the
continuance.
My
suggestion
is,
is
that
you
pick
a
day
that
that
it's
continued
to
so
that
when
everyone
leaves
here
today,
you
know
when
the
next
hearing
is
going
to
be,
if
you're
going
to
do
that.
H
E
Will
tell
you,
as
for
other
help,
there's
no
prejudice
to
the
city.
If
this
property
was
not
in
compliance,
I
would
say
there
is
prejudice
to
the
city,
because
the
the
violation
continues
to
exist.
There
is
no
prejudice
to
the
city,
because
the
property
is
in
compliance
right
now
and
you
can
determine
the
same
73
days
in
the
same
34
days
when
it
comes
back
and
may
or
june,
or
whenever
you
hear
it
again.
You're
gonna
hear
the
same
presentation
by
the
city
that
it's
the
same
number
of
days.
I.
E
E
F
S
S
S
C
Subject:
one
6205
subsection
2
without
reading
the
whole
thing,
as
mr.
Rock
stated
says,
whenever
possible,
I
think
that
in
currently
there's
a
case
where
it's
not
possible
to
have
the
requirements,
including
an
architect,
a
business
person
which
is
very
broad
if
anybody's
employed
I,
probably
would
think
their
business
person
an
engineer,
a
general
contractor
or
a
subcontractor
and
areolar
there's
no
provisions
in
this
statute.
That
says
that
if
you
can't
get
this
together,
this
is
what
you
have
to
do,
or
you
have
to
document
why
you
couldn't
get
this
to
there.
C
S
A
E
He's
responding
to
your
motion,
we're
not
going
to
take
evidence
on
it,
so
so,
madam
chair,
let
me
just
give
you
the
bottom
line
here.
Mr.
Rock
has
made
another
motion,
of
which
you
are
the
one
that
needs
to
make
the
determination
as
to
whether
or
not
this
board
is
disqualified.
From
hearing
this
code
enforcement
case
and,
frankly,
any
other
code
enforcement
case,
it's
a
direct
result
of
one
sentence
in
Section
162.
Oh
five
and
I'll.
Just
read
it
out
loud
again.
Mr.
Rock
has
read
it,
and
now
mr.
E
Gowan
has
read
it:
the
membership
of
each
enforcement
board
shall
comma,
whenever
possible,
comma
include
an
architect,
a
businessperson,
an
engineer,
a
general
contractor
or
subcontractor
and
a
realtor.
So
that
is
what
guides
the
selection
of
the
members
of
the
code
enforcement
board.
Obviously
you
don't
select
the
members
of
the
code
enforcement
board.
E
The
City
Commission
does
that
they've
obviously
made
a
determination
that
you
meet
the
qualifications
to
be
a
member
of
this
code
enforcement
board,
and
so
madam
chair
I
would
suggest
to
you
that
the
appropriate
way
to
handle
this
motion
would
be
to
deny
the
motion
and
mr.
Rock
do
you
wanna?
Did
you
want
to
proffer
these
into
evidence,
or
how
did
you
okay,
why
I
gave
them
to
the
clerk?
Okay.
S
E
So
my
suggestion,
madam
chair
is,
is
that
the
city
clerk
received
these
three
packets
of
information
as
being
proffered
into
evidence
and
received
into
evidence
so
Bobby.
If
you
could
mark
those
in
received
an
evidence
in
this
case.
So,
madam
chair,
you
need
to
make
the
determination
you
gonna
grant
this
motion
or
you're
gonna
deny
it.
H
E
S
E
I
was
lost,
okay,
I'm,
sorry,
yeah
apologize,
so
madam
chair
you've
already
made
these
another
motion
to
continue.
You've
already
ruled
on
the
first
one.
I
assume
that
you're
going
to
rule
the
same
on
the
second
one
deny
is
motion
to
continue
and
move
on
with
the
case
or
grant
the
motion
and
then
we'll
set
it
for
another
month.
Whatever
you
want
to
do,.
S
E
I
C
E
E
H
T
H
C
Basically,
on
K
17-8,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
six,
forty
seven
six,
eight
North
Avenue
was
violations
regarding
a
structure.
Some
debris
and
trash
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin
on
the
property.
There
was
still
at
the
time
like
a
truck
cover
in
the
back,
and
the
structure
that
was
in
question
under
the
building
code
was
still
standing.
There
had
been
attempts,
because
mr.
Wainwright
was
informed
at
code
board
to
communicate
with
us.
If
we
needed
time,
we
had
nothing
and
we've
made
multiple
attempts
to
calling
both
of
the
numbers.
C
Both
myself
and
my
clerk
and
we've
been
able
to
leave
a
message.
He
stated
that
he
had
an
architect
was
completing
a
drawing
for
the
porch
and
the
roof
during
an
office
visit
on
327.
As
of
today's
date,
there's
still
been
no
permit
pulled
with
the
city
and
the
structure
still
stood,
and
basically
that's
all
I
have
at
this
point
in
time
regarding
the
608
North
Avenue.
In
this
case,.
L
T
T
T
T
H
C
E
T
T
T
T
T
T
C
Mr.
chairman,
the
the
issue
left:
he
he
he's
talking
about
roof
issues
doing
in
additions.
It's
this
simple
he's
got
to
clean
up
some
debris
out
of
the
backyard
and
take
the
carport
down
and
he
will
be
in
compliant.
All
of
this
that
he's
presented
is
an
additional
shed
in
additional
bedroom,
looks
like
landscaping,
some
other
things.
That's
none
of
that
the
roofs,
not
an
issue.
The
issue
is:
take
the
carport
down
clean
up
trash.
That's
all
we're
dealing
with
everything
else
is
existential,
I
mean
I,
don't
the.
T
L
T
The
carport
down,
but
I
went
there
after
I
left
last
meeting,
I
talked
to
them
and
I
couldn't
get
it.
I
could
even
give
me
a
house
thrown
out
the
fact
to
being
there
for
it
to
even
get
people's
with
it.
So
I
just
found
out
yesterday
that
I
can
I
got
to
go
back
to
them
yeah
next
time
again.
Well,
the
papers
were
after
fact,
looking
to
get
the
paper
and
kid
his
own
give
there's
only
four
that
I'll
try
it
again.
I'd
left
but
they're
meeting
right
after
the
meeting
went
there.
E
Okay,
so
you've
heard
both
both
sides
of
the
case.
The
city
is
testifying
that
he's
not
in
compliance.
The
respondent
is
saying
he
agrees,
he's
not
in
compliance.
He
just
doesn't
know
when
he's
going
to
ever
get
it
into
compliance,
because
he's
relying
upon
the
the
architect
said
he
says,
doesn't
really
matter,
you
can
take
it
down
and
he
can
be
in
compliance
when
he
cleans
up
the
property.
So
the
appropriate
thing
to
do
is
is
to
consider
accepting
the
affidavit
of
compliance.
E
H
H
J
J
A
E
Summarize
service
to
win
right,
so
the
board
has
found
that
you
didn't
get
the
property
into
compliance
when
you're
supposed
to
and
that
they
assessed
a
hundred
and
fifty
six
hours
and
fifty
cents
for
prosecution
costs.
The
fine
is
running
now,
and
so
you
need
to
get
that
property
into
compliance
as
quickly
as
possible.
Once
you
do
that,
you
contact
officer,
gas
and
he'll
come
out
and
inspect,
and
then
you
can
ask
the
board
for
a
fine
reduction.
You'll
have
60
days
from
the
entry
of
that
order
to
ask
for
that.
Fine
reduction.
T
E
E
If
you
have
the
questions,
I'll
be
happy
to
answer
them
after
the
meeting.
Are
you
talking
to
Officer
gas
and
we've
got
a
lot
of
other
cases
that
we
need
to
finish
today?
But
my
suggestion
is
you
get
with
officer
gas
and
after
the
meeting,
and
he
can
explain
to
you
any
additional
options
that
he's
thinking
about.