►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board August 8, 2019
Description
Description
A
D
E
F
We
gathered
together
here
to
intend
on
doing
good
work.
We
seek
to
represent
fairly
and
well
those
who
have
given
us
this
task.
We
meet
to
serve
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
to
use
their
resources
wisely
and
well
to
represent
all
members
of
our
community
fairly
and
to
make
decisions
that
promote
the
common
good.
We
recognize
their
responsibilities
to
the
past,
the
future
and
the
rights
and
needs
of
both
individuals
and
our
community
as
trusted
servants.
We
seek
blessings
on
our
deliberations
and
our
efforts
here
today.
This.
D
B
B
B
After
an
alleged
by
a
violator
is
able
to
afterwards,
the
alleged
violator
is
able
to
ask
the
city
witnesses
any
specific
questions
regarding
their
testimony.
Secondly,
the
alleged
violator
is
allowed
to
make
a
presentation
and
present
his
or
her
witnesses
and
exhibits.
Then
the
city
can
question
the
alleged
violators
witnesses
after
both
parties
have
made
testimony
both
on
the
part
of
the
city
and
on
the
part
of
the
alleged
violator.
Each
party
is
asked
to
give
closing
arguments
first
by
the
city
and
then
by
the
alleged
violator
after
those
three
steps
are
taken.
B
F
B
B
B
A
City,
thank
you.
This
is
case
number
19.
Eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero.
Four
sixty
two,
the
property
address
is
one
seven
one.
One
Stonehaven
way
listed
owners,
Rob,
Lee,
Charles,
Munger,
I'm
officer,
Steve,
Gaston
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs,
Police,
Department,
Co,
Enforcement
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board.
Actually
I
guess
establish
whether
or
not
he
has
any
problems
with
the
exhibits,
photographs
and
exhibits.
B
A
Exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
is
all
the
photographs
exhibit
number
two
are
all
my
notices
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearings
exhibit
number
three
is
an
administrative
Docs
case
summary
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
an
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
is
exhibit
number
four
all
my
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
and
Zab
copies
of,
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
notices
are
mailed
the
property
owner
record,
based
on
as
determined
by
the
Pinellas,
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
A
A
The
city's
case
started:
July
18th
on
a
neighbor
complained
about
the
property
being
overgrown.
There's
trash
and
debris
in
front
of
the
house
bags
a
garbage
on
the
front
porch
trash
cans
not
stored
properly,
and
there
was
a
vehicle
motorcycle
which
appeared
inoperative
since
that
time,
I've
had
no
contact
with
the
owner.
Up
until
today,
on
July
19th,
the
notice
of
violation
and
a
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed.
A
A
July
19th
of
this
year
we
mailed
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice.
A
hearing
July
22nd,
the
the
there
was
a
notice
left
that
it
was
delivered
on
July,
26,
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
on
August
7th
I
conducted
a
final
inspection
and
I
noted
that
one
of
the
motorcycles
is
backed
up
and
I'm
unable
to
see
the
license
plate.
I
have
spoke
to
the
property
owner.
He
did
show
me
valid
registration
for
that
motorcycle,
so
I'll
be
moving
forward
with
that,
with,
with
the
motorcycle
being
valid
under
4000.
A
What's
before
the
board
is
the
accumulation
of
trash
which,
as
of
right
now,
he
would
be
in
compliance
of
8,
22,
Duty
maintained,
private
property
and
8
52
are
still
open
because
of
I'm
able
to
see
the
stuff
in
the
backyard
and
things
like
that
and
then
816,
which
covers
the
placement,
your
trash
cans
12
hours
before
12
hours
after
trash
pickup,
they
have
to
be
out
of
public
view.
That's
the
ordinance
40.00
for
inoperable
vehicles.
He
is
in
compliance.
A
H
B
D
D
B
H
E
H
H
B
F
B
A
A
I
E
J
H
B
E
B
C
F
F
H
F
H
Based
on
testimony
evidence,
facts
presented
in
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violation,
section,
8
22
of
the
Code
of
Ordinances
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
was
in
force.
In
effect,
at
the
time
of
the
notice
violation
and
respondents
were
in
violation
of
said
code
section.
However,
they
are
now
in
compliance.
J
K
E
F
Sir
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
summarize,
with
the
Cota
force
of
orders
accomplished
today,
they
found
you
in
violation
of
sections
8-16.
Eight
thousand
eight
thousand
52
you've
been
given
until
September
10th
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
as
you
fail
to
bring
the
property
and
compliance
by
that
time,
a
$50
a
day,
fine
will
be
instituted.
You
also
have
been
found
to
have
been
in
violation
of
section
8
22.
F
There
was
no
fine
associated
with
that
since
you're
now
in
compliance,
if
any
of
these
violations
occur
again
within
the
next
five
years
will
be
considered
a
repeat
violation
and
the
fine
could
be
placed
up
to
$500
per
day
for
every
day
that
the
property
remains
in
non-compliance.
The
code
enforcement
board
is
going
to
issue
an
order.
It
will
be
issued
within
about
the
next
10
days
and
you
get
that
by
mail.
F
A
Officer
Steve
Gaston
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs,
Police,
Department,
code
enforcement.
This
is
case
number
19,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero.
Four
fifty
two,
the
property
address,
is
one
four:
two:
zero
Silver
Oak
Drive
property
owner
listed
as
Charles
Savio,
Charles
J
Savio,
it's
a
repeat
violator
case.
For
a
period
of
four
days.
It
was
from
July
10th
of
2019
to
July
14th
of
2019.
B
B
B
A
You
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
boarder.
All
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two
might
notice
a
violation
notice,
a
hearing,
any
other
associated
notices,
exhibit
number
three
administrative
documents
case:
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax,
collector
database
records,
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy.
The
sign
is
exempt
number
four
and
exhibit
number
five
is
the
affidavit
of
project
prosecution
costs?
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
are
exact
copies
of,
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
A
All
my
notices
are
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax,
collector
databases
and
I'll
notice,
the
violations,
a
notice
of
hearing
or
sent
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
and
mr.
chairman,
you
already
asked
for
those
to
be
placed.
Thank
you
very
much.
We
have
had
contact
with
the
owner
via
our
office
via
phone
calls.
The
case
started
on
July
10th
of
this
year.
A
The
property
was
overgrown,
not
being
maintained
and
the
trees
were
not
providing
the
required
clearance
above
the
sidewalks
and
the
sidewalks
were
not
free
of
debris
and
overgrowth.
On
July
11th
2019,
the
repeat,
violent
violator,
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
and
we
did
obtain
a
return.
Receipt
signed
conducted
a
reinfection
on
July
18th
and
it
is
in
compliance.
We
were
contacted
by
our
office
on
July
14th
that
it
was
in
compliance.
A
Hence
the
compliance
date
of
July
14th
on
July,
26,
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit,
and
the
two
violations
before
the
board
were
violations
of
code,
8,
40
and
8
52,
which
has
stated,
are
both
in
compliance,
we're
out
of
compliance
for
a
period
of
four
days
and
the
city
has
nothing
further.
At
this
point.
A
K
A
L
B
L
B
H
Move
based
on
the
testimony
evidence,
facts
presented
in
law
that
the
respondent
Charles
Savio
was
in
violation
of
sections
8,
40
and
8.
52
of
the
city
of
the
tarpon
spring
city
code
from
710
to
714
and
a
fine
of
$50
per
day
had
been
established.
In
addition,
I
move
that
the
city
be
awarded
6950
for
the
cost
incurred
in
prosecuting
this
case.
D
E
F
Sir
you've
been
found
in
violation
of
those
two
code:
sections
8-14,
eight
Tests
52
for
the
days
of
July
10th
through
July
14th.
That's
four
days.
The
ACOTA
force
on
board
has
assessed
a
fine
of
$50
a
day
for
those
four
days,
a
total
of
$200.
This
city
has
also
been
awarded
its
prosecution
cost
of
$69.50.
The
total
for
the
order
will
be
two
hundred
sixty
nine
dollars
and
fifty
cents
that
or
will
be
sent
to
him
up
the
next
ten
days.
L
F
F
M
A
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violators
counsel
are
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
at
this
morgue.
All
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations,
a
notice
of
hearing
or
sent
both
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and
mr.
chairman,
please
accept
all
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
A
This
is
an
interesting
piece
of
property,
so
I'll
kind
of
give
you
a
little
bit
of
a
backstory
with
it.
It's
it's
been
before
the
board.
For
some
other
reasons.
Under
840,
there
was
a
legal
argument
from
my
understanding
going
back
many
many
years
about
where
the
actual
property
was
built
and
some
easement
issues
and
things
like
that.
At
one
point
in
time
the
city
had
been
a
party
to
a
legal
case.
We
had
been
removed.
A
The
city
had
been
removed
from
that
legal
case
and
that's
why
this
case
is
now
coming
before
the
board,
because
we're
not
a
party
to
a
civil
matter
or
legal
matter
from
this
I'm
sure
council
can
probably
give
you
the
and
you'll,
probably
present
some
of
the
pins
and
needles
as
to.
Why
there's
a
legal
case
I'm
not
going
to
try
to
stipulate
it
was.
It
was
where
the
property
was
placed,
basically
from
my
understanding,
but
substantially.
A
Unfortunately,
you
know
because
of
the
legal
matter
it
was,
it
was
kind
of
left
and
we
were
just
dealing
with
mowing
the
grass
and
taking
care
of
it.
It's
finally
come
to
a
point
where
the
city's
decided
to
move
forward
with
the
fact
that
it's
in
a
partial
state
of
construction
and
something
needs
to
be
done.
Kids
have
been
playing
in
the
building.
I've
actually
ran
some
kids
out
a
couple
of
times
in
the
partial
state
of
construction.
A
The
roofing
material
is
now
starting
to
come
off
the
building
which,
as
you
can
appreciate
during
this
particular
season,
those
are
potential
projectiles
during
hurricanes.
So,
as
I
stated,
it's
been
in
a
partial
state
of
construction
for
over
three
years
and
not
completed.
There
was
originally
a
permit
pulled
in
2013
that
permit
was
closed
out
in
2014,
as
I
stated,
it
was
subject
to
litigation.
There
is
no
interior.
The
roof
has
lost
areas
of
wood,
there's
no
windows,
doors
floors
other
than
the
concrete
foundation,
and
it
is
an
attractive
nuisance
to
children.
A
On
march
19th
of
this
year,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed
I,
also
emailed
a
couple
of
attorneys
that
I
had
four
that
I
had
spoke
to
previously.
Regarding
the
case,
I
never
got
any
response
back
from
any
of
those
attorneys
and
I.
Unfortunately,
can't
tell
you
who
I
emailed
at
the
time,
so
I
can't
help
you
out
with
that.
A
Is
that
house
it's
in
either
dilapidated
condition
or
has
not
had
construction
going
on
or
completed?
It's
basically
sat
in
a
state
of
not
being
completed
for
three
years
or
more
falls
under
8
40,
which
are
the
nuisance
conditions
and
that's
the
situation
with
this
house.
Obviously,
the
city
like
to
see
some
sort
of
resolution
either
completed.
We
move
forward
or
demolished,
and
it's
no
longer
a
hazard
at
this
point.
That's
all
the
city
has.
H
H
A
Building
permit
a
building
permit
was
issued
in
2013,
it
was
closed
out
in
2014,
I,
don't
know
the
house
and
what's
and
wise
other
than
by
nature
building
permits
are
only
good
for
six
months
unless
there
is
application
to
the
building
department
to
extend
them.
So
it
may
have
been
extended
one
time
and
that's
why
it
was
closed
on
2014,
but
I
don't
have
the
answer
to
that
question
in
front
of
me.
A
A
Gan
Keystone
is
missing
a
couple
of
full
sheets
of
plywood
I,
don't
know
if
they
existed
at
one
point
in
time
and
they
blown
off
or
what's
happened
with
them.
That's
kind
of
why
we're
now
wanting
to
at
least
get
to
some
sort
of
resolution
with
this
property
so
and
that
has
gone
on
for
years,
and
we've
understood
that,
but.
B
B
B
M
To
give
ladies
and
gentleman
on
the
board
a
little
bit
of
background
to
expound
on
what
officer
gaff
gasser
had
stated,
this
stems
back
from
I,
believe
2013,
or
shortly
there
before
there
initially
I
believe
there
were
three
connected
Lots,
essentially
we're
all
purchased
by
one
development
group
that
development
group
went
ahead
and
hired
a
certified
and
licensed
surveyor
to
come
in
and
redefine
the
boundaries
of
the
properties
that
surveyor
went
ahead,
conducted
its
surveys
thereafter,
once
the
three
Lots
were
now
rezone
door,
I
guess
redefined.
My
client
mr.
M
Ulloa
went
ahead
and
purchased
one
of
the
Lots,
the
one
that
is
the
subject
of
this
matter,
I
believe
located
at
1404,
Mayer
Lane
mr.
eloia
purchased
that
property
from
the
development
company
under
a
contingency
that
they
he
allowed
the
development
companies
contractor
who
they
associate
with
to
develop
the
property.
So
based
on
the
survey
that
the
development
company
had
solicited,
they
went
ahead
and
took
that
survey
and
began
construction
on
the
home
sometime
through
mid
construction.
A
dispute
arose
as
to
the
location
of
the
actual
structure
within
the
boundaries
of
that
lot
line.
M
One
first
is
is
the
actual
structure,
as
it
sits
currently
here
today
in
the
wrong
wrong
location
on
the
property,
and,
if
so,
the
second
you
know,
determination
that
needs
to
be
made
is
who's
at
fault.
It's
either
one
of
three
parties,
the
contractor,
who
may
have
misinterpreted
the
survey
and
began
construction
of
the
structure
in
the
wrong
location.
M
Conversely,
we
are
the
position
that
the
home
cannot
be
demolished
either
to
be
come
into
compliance
because
there's
a
necessity
for
preservation
of
evidence
for
the
pending
circuit
court
case,
in
that,
if
we
destroy
the
structure,
you
know
how
are
we
going
to
determine
where
it
was
originally
located
and
further?
You
know
whether
it's
in
the
wrong
location
or
what
party
is
theoretically
at
fault
at
the
end
of
the
day.
M
We
most
recently
filed
a
motion
for
preservation
of
evidence
and
that
we
are
asking
the
circuit
court
to
issue
a
ruling
to
preserve
the
structure
in
its
state,
as
it
is
for
the
furtherance
of
determine
making
determinations
of
the
underlying
litigious
matter
again
in
kind
of
coinciding
with
filing
this
motion,
we're
also
seeking
conferring,
with
the
other
two
parties
the
defendants.
In
this
case
or
excuse
me,
three
parties.
M
J
H
Not
asking
you
to
tear
it
down,
we're
just
asking
you
to
make
it
safe
for
the
neighborhood
and
photographs
should
suffice
to
show
what's
there
right
now,
we
just
want
you
to
make
put
you
sheets
plywood
on
that
roof
and
secure
the
entrances
and
exits
which
doesn't
preclude
any
of
the
things
that
you've
asked
for.
Yes,.
M
Ma'am,
based
on
the
Notice
of
Violation
that
I
had
received
from
officer
gas
and
the
city,
its
Hartman
Springs,
and
also
based
on
the
violation
that
was
enumerated
therein.
The
fact
of
it
being
in
a
partial
state
of
construction
led
me
to
believe
either
one
they
were
seeking
to
level
it
and
destroy
it
or
to
complete,
said
construction.
However,
securing
the
property
I
believe
would
be
a
tenable
solution
that
I
can
offer
to
my
client
and
I'm
sure
that
he
would
be
agreeable
to
same
okay.
J
F
B
E
M
Hopefully,
no
not
that
long
again,
I
don't
want
to
give
you
any
misinformation
here,
given
the
fact
late,
tedious
matters,
given
their
very
nature,
with
two
parties
alone.
Take
a
very
long
time.
However,
with
multiple
parties,
including
this
one,
three
defendants,
I
can't
say,
but
we
are
actively
pursuing
getting
a
trial
date
and
so
most
likely
courts
now
I
believe,
are
probably
setting
trials
in
spring
of
2020.
So
that's
probably
the
closest
trial
date.
M
A
Regarding
the
and
I
know,
the
fact
that
it
was
built
in
2013,
the
building
codes
changed
a
couple
of
times
since
then,
which
would
require
I
believe
significant
changes
to
the
walls
themselves.
Is
it
unreasonable
and
I
know
and
I'm
only
asking
this,
because
we've
done
in
other
cases
where
the
foundation
is
left
situated,
but
everything
above
has
been
removed?
A
Is
that
a
possibility
and
and
it
preserves
the
placement,
because
there
is
enough
photographic
evidence
and
I'm
sure
there
was
blueprints
drawn
of
the
structure
itself,
so
would
that
be
a
possibility
leaving
the
foundation
because
it
would
satisfy
the
city's
issue?
Those
are
that's
done
frequently,
because,
obviously,
a
concrete
slab
is
not
a
hazard
to
anybody
and
I'm
reading
your
motion
right
now
and
I
I
saw
what
was
filed
yesterday,
correct
sir.
So
is
it?
A
Is
that
a
possibility
and
I'm
asking
on
the
city
side
to
be
able
to
take
it
down
to
a
foundation,
because
I
believe
there's
going
to
be
a
good
chance
that
it's
going
to
be
brought
to
current
hurricane
standards,
which
may
change
structurally?
How
it's
done
the
trusses
and
things
like
that
I'm
just
wondering?
Yes,.
M
F
M
Lawsuit
was
filed,
I
believe
in
2013
or
short,
no
excuse
me
2014
and
it's
been
set
for
mediation
and
trial.
Previously,
however,
after
the
city
kind
of
was
dismissed
from
that
case
for
the
resolution
of
the
right
away,
it
kind
of
stalled
things
out,
but
the
parties
are
actively
moving
on
forward
onto
it
and
again
we
are
trying
to
get
to
such
a
trial
as
soon
as
possible.
So.
F
M
M
Sir,
we've
explored
other
options
through
mediation,
otherwise,
again
consideration
would
potentially
be
granting
a
variance
for
both
Lots
I
know.
That
would
be
more
before
the
the
land
use
section
and
not
necessarily
code
enforcement,
so
I'm
going
to
table
that
kind
of
idea.
For
now,
however,
we
are
actively
trying
to
comply
with
code
enforcement
and
move
forward
on
this
case.
H
B
D
E
B
A
A
I,
don't
know
if
it's
possible
to
ask
the
board
to
have
two
parts
to
that,
because
they
can
be
in
compliance
in
a
very
short
period
of
time,
if
they're
able
to
demolish
the
structure
and
leave
the
foundation
and
that
satisfies
their
legal
request
or
otherwise
at
least
begin
the
building
rebuilding
process
spring
of
data
about
the
time
of
their
case.
As
mr.
A
B
A
To
secure
that
building,
I
think
we'd
actually
have
to
have
building
permits,
because
you
have
to
put
doors
on
it.
The
city
code
doesn't
allow
boarding
up
of
a
building
per
se,
so
in
order
to
make
it
enough
secured
you'd
have
to
have
a
building
permit.
Well,
we
kind
of
issues
with
a
legal
case
of
getting
a
building
permit
to
secure
it.
It's
a
weird
catch-22:
I
think
counsel,
probably
agree
we're
in
a
weird
situation
with
that,
because
he's
not
going
to
get
a
permit,
because
the
legal
case.
A
Nine
more
months
is
not
in
the
city's
opinion,
unreasonable
if
they
can
take
steps
to
try
to
do
their
best
to
secure
it,
even
if
that
consists
of
opening
it
up
a
little
bit
where
it's.
You
know
it's
easier
to
see
inside
of
it
or
take
it
down
to
the
foundation
and
then
they're
simply
in
compliance.
They
can
take
as
long
as
they
want
and
they're
on
their
civil
case
and
the
city
doesn't
have
a
problem
with
that.
So
those
are
kind
of
our
position
if
you
will
to
solve
it
as
quickly
as
possible.
H
A
H
F
B
H
E
F
So,
sir,
your
your
clients
been
found
in
violation
of
section
8.
40
has
been
given
until
March
1st
2020
to
come
into
compliance,
so
the
property
not
be
brought
into
compliance
by
that
date
at
$200
a
day,
fine
will
be
instituted.
Hopefully
that
will
give
some
leverage
to
you
in
your
case
to
get
it
completed.
The
order
will
be
entered
within
the
next
ten
days
and
sent
to
your
client
at
his
address.
F
1404
Meier
Lane,
as
that
is
what
is
listed
by
the
property
appraiser's
records.
If
you
want
a
copy
of
that
to
be
going
to
you,
you
can
provide
your
card
to
city
staff
here
and
they'll
be
happy
to
send
a
copy
of
it
to
you
as
well.
If
you
have
any
questions
as
to
what
happened,
you
can
call
me
after
the
meeting,
since
you
are
an
attorney
or
city
staff,
if
you
want
to
do
that,
I'll
be
happy
to
respond.
Yes,.
M
G
G
All
this
evidence
was
obtained
illegally
by
trespassing
on
the
property
failing
to
get
the
tennis
permission
to
enter
the
property
entering
the
curtilage
of
the
property
behind
a
brick
wall,
there
was
no
authority
for
him
to
enter
a
backyard
that
was
fully
fenced
with
a
six-foot
fence
all
the
way
around
it
without
permission
from
the
tenant.
Mr.
barkis
did
officer.
Gaston
get
your
permission
to
enter
the
yard,
hold.
G
B
A
The
granddaughter
of
the
MS
Voorhees
I
knocked
on
the
door.
She
answered
the
door
of
the
house.
I
said:
do
you
live
here?
She
says
yes,
I
do
I
said
as
it
was
suggested
by
your
landlord.
Mr.
Pat
selita's
I
should
come
knock
on
the
door
and
do
you
mind
if
I
take
a
look
at
the
yard
to
try?
Because
we
were
here
last
month
for
a
lawn
mowing
issue
to
see
if
the
violations
were
in
compliance,
she
said.
Yes,
she
could.
A
Yes,
I
could
and
we
I
went
around
back,
took
photographs
of
additional
evidence
that
I
wasn't
privy
to
from
the
roadway.
So
all
of
these
photographs
were
obtained
and
the
tenant
there
did
advise
that
the
granddaughter
lives
there.
So
she
is
a
tenant.
She
may
may
or
may
not
be
on
the
lease
I,
don't
know,
but
she's
a
resident,
and
she
gave
me
consent
to
go
into
the
backyard
and
take
photographs.
So
the
city's
position
is
they
were
illegally
obtained.
B
G
This
lady
gave
him
permission
and
I've
got
an
affidavit
from
her
saying
she
was
visiting
her
grandmother
and
she
did
not
give
him
permission.
In
fact,
she
asked
him
to
wait
while
she
went
to
get
her
grandmother
and
he
also
alleged
to
her
that
he
knocked
on
the
front
door
where
her
grandmother
was
and
nobody
answered
and
then
had
to
go
to
the
side,
patio
door
crossing
the
property
and
going
to
the
back
of
the
house
to
knock
on
this
other
door
to
get
permission
from
a
lady
who
was
visiting
her
grandmother.
F
F
A
Done
if
you're
taking
a
break
for
another
reason,
that's
fine,
but
I'm
gonna
do
I
just
needed
to
find
my
notes
where
I
wanted
to
compare
names.
The
only
thing
I
can
tell
you
is
I
put
in
my
notes.
Immediately
afterwards
and
I
said:
I
was
a
lot
on
the
property
to
conduct
my
rien
spectrum
for
another
case
by
Olivia.
The
resident
granddaughter
of
the
tenant
I
spoke
to
mrs.
A
Voorhees
at
length
probably
did
half
an
hour
outside
of
the
front
of
the
door
after
her
I
did
the
inspection
with
the
granddaughter
she
did
go
back
inside.
She
came
back
out
and
said:
yeah.
That's
fine.
I
have
no
problem
with
that.
I
can't
cross-examine
her
and
ask
her
why
suddenly
her
informations
different,
but
as
far
as
that
goes
I
have
a
long-standing
history
coz
every
single
time
we
have
code
board.
Mr.
Pat's
ELISA
and
Pat
Salinas
allege
as
a
trespassing
violation.
I
don't
do
that
it's
I
can
get
the
information
just
fine.
A
As
a
matter
of
fact,
I
would
like
to
submit
into
evidence
mr.
Pat
salinas's
photographs,
because
if
there
is
some
doubt
about
mine,
he
basically
took
the
same
pictures
of
his
own
backyard,
so
I'd
like
to
submit
those
to
evidence
if
he
wants
to
evaluate
his
own
pictures,
I'll
submit
them
as
well
as
city's
evidence.
Okay,.
F
A
I
I
asked
her
specifically
one:
does
she
live
here
because
you
know
even
a
non-listed
tenant
on
a
lease
is
allowed
to
give
permission
to
enter
the
property
with
the
long-standing
history.
If
she
would've
said
no,
if
she
would
have
said
I
have
talked
somebody
else,
I
would
have
gone
around
to
the
other
door
and
talked
to
her.
I
ended
up
talking
to
her
at
length
and
she
never
revoked
my
privilege
to
come
onto
the
property.
We
had
a
long
standing,
a
long
conversation
about
how
her
landlord
is
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
A
There
was
never
a
mention
of
I'd
like
you
to
leave
like
you
off
the
property
or
any
of
those
things.
So
as
far
as
what
convinced
her
to
write,
false
affidavit,
I,
don't
know,
but
I
will
flatly
say
that,
because
she
did
100%,
give
me
permission
to
go
on
the
property
and
she
did
stage
she
lived
there.
So
I,
don't
know
what
else
to
say:
I
mean
that's.
The
information
I
was
provided
at
the
time.
I
do
know
one.
J
F
G
G
I'm
to
pattern,
he
did
not
knock
on
the
door
to
notify
the
tenant
of
the
violation.
He
didn't
send
the
tenant
a
letter,
but
this
time
all
he
had
to
do
was
go
back
and
observe
from
the
outside
that
the
grass
was
cut.
There
was
no
reason
for
him
to
knock
on
a
door
to
ask
permission
to
go
in
a
back
yard
other
than
to
try
to
find
another
violation,
and
he
did
it
illegally.
There
was
no
reason
for
him
to
knock
on
the
door
so.
J
G
F
Mr.
chairman,
needing
to
make
a
decision
based
upon
the
testimony
that
you've
heard
from
the
the
city's
witness
and
these
two
affidavits,
of
course
mr.
Petts
ladies
wasn't
present
so
he's
making
arguments,
but
his
testimony
should
not
be
given
as
much
weight
as
these
two
affidavits
and
the
testimony
of
mr.
gauss
and
but
you
are
to
make
it
at
Sue's
now
as
to
whether
or
not
you
want
to
overrule
the
objection
as
to
the
photographs
coming
in
or
you
want
to
sustain
it.
So
if
you
overrule
it,
the
photographs
come
in.
A
F
A
Steve
Gaston
city
Tarpon,
Springs,
Police,
Department,
Code
Enforcement.
This
is
a
repeat
violator
case
from
July
15th
2019,
it's
a
present
and
we
have
not
been
notified
that
he's
in
compliance
to
numerous
repeat
violator
cases,
one
that
this
board
heard
the
previous
month,
19-8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
three
nine
six
mile,
a
ssin
of
city
code,
eight
dash
48-52
a
fine
of
$75
per
day
for
a
total
of
two
thousand
five
hundred.
Eighty
four
dollars
has
yet
to
be
paid
repeat:
violator
for
case
number.
A
Eighteen
dash,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
six,
nine
two,
which
a
violation
of
city
code,
eight
46,
130,
6.03,
130,
302
and
3207
$25
per
day,
total
of
366
dollars,
also
not
paid
repeat
violator
for
K
16,
8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
three,
eight,
seven,
a
violation
of
8
49,
one
in
three,
oh
3.1,
that
one
was
established.
There
was
no
fines
assessed
at
that
time.
A
This
is
case:
19-8,
zero,
zero,
zero,
four
eight
four,
the
property
address
is
385
Wickham,
Boulevard,
Harry
and
Anna
Anna
Pat's
elitists
are
the
listed
owners,
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
is
a
my
photographs,
exhibit
to
our
notice,
violations
and
notice
of
hearing
the
exhibit
number
three
administrative
documents
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
avid
a
van
number
exhibit
number
five?
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs?
A
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
were
given
the
violator,
exact
copies,
what's
being
presented
to
the
board?
All
my
notices
were
mailed.
The
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
property,
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax,
collector
databases
and
I'll
notice.
The
violations
and
notice
hearings
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
as
well
first-class
mail
and
mr.
chairman,
please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
A
So
we
have
had
some
sporadic
contact
with
the
owner
via
email,
the
initially
the
inspection
was
conducted
on
July
15th,
as
I
stated
earlier,
I
was
conducting
the
Rhian
spec
ssin
on
last
month's
case,
which
was
for
overgrown
grass,
as
mr.
Pat
salinas
has
stated.
He
didn't
want,
doesn't
want
me
to
trespass.
So
at
this
point
in
time,
I
decided
to
take
mr.
A
Pat
Salinas
advice
knock
on
the
door
and
see
if
the
tenant
would
allow
me
to
reenact
Lowe's
that
case
out
in
the
process
of
the
re-inspection
I
discovered
a
large
amount
of
debris,
a
dead
tree,
some
other
material
in
the
backyard
that
would
be
considered
debris,
there's
a
discarded
wood
plastic
bins,
discarded,
metal
drain
pipes,
plastic
bags,
vegetative
debris,
PVC
pipes,
discarded,
screens
etc.
As
noted
in
the
photographs,
so
on
July
16th
of
2019,
the
repeat
violator
Notice
of
Violation,
was
mailed.
A
It
was
returned,
signed,
I
posted
the
property
on
July
26th
and
signed
the
affidavit.
What's
before.
The
board
is
violations
of
8,
40
and
8
52,
which
are
still
active.
The
office
has
not
been
notified
that
those
violations
are
in
compliance.
So,
as
stated
it's
from
July
15th
to
present
for
the
board's
information
I
mean
mr.
Pat.
Salinas
has
been
here
quite
a
few
times.
He's
raised
some
issues
about
trespassing
and
things
of
that
nature.
A
A
Unfortunately,
in
doing
so,
the
photographs
that
mr.
Pat's
elitest
presented
to
the
board
didn't
exactly
show
everything
so
I
asked
they
have
the
opportunity
to
say
no
I
couldn't
see
anything
from
the
there's
two
doors
on
the
house.
There's
one
kind
of
what
would
be
the
southwestern
side
and
then
there's
a
kind
of
a
main
door.
I
went
to
the
first
door
that
was
closer
to
the
driveway
and
that
granddaughter
answered
grandson
was
there
he's
very
pleasant?
He
actually
likes
the
police
and
I
conducted
the
inspection
in
the
back
yard.
A
So
as
far
as
the
city
goes
I'm
not
going
to
expose
the
city
to
to
potential
legalities,
but
trespassing
on
somebody's
property.
In
this
particular
case
and
we'll
see
here
in
a
few
minutes,
his
own
photographs
show
the
violation
so
regardless
of
mine,
where
I
was
standing,
how
I
got
them,
which
was
legal.
His
own
photographs
show
the
violations
as
well,
which
the
board
will
have
an
opportunity
is
here
in
a
little
bit.
A
This
is
hopefully
not
going
to
be
some
long,
drawn-out
thing
which
I
have
the
fear
that
it
may
become.
But
it's
a
simple
matter
of
mr.pat
selita's
just
doesn't
seem
to
want
to
take
care
of
his
properties
and
that's
why
we're
here.
So
as
of
this
point,
the
city
has
no
further,
nothing
to
say,
but
I'd
like
to
reserve
my
right,
obviously
for
questions
and
I'm
closing.
B
A
She's
our
30s
had
maybe
about
a
six-year-old
son.
Okay,
yes,
and,
as
a
matter
of
fact,
miss
var
he's
explained
to
me
the
situation
with
her
husband.
You
know,
handicaps
all
the
kind
of
things
that
the
family's
been
going
through.
Lately
we
had
a
pretty
significant
discussion
for
a
rather
long
period
of
time
and
there
was
never
any
discussion
about
matter
of
fact.
I
said
your
landlord
has
a
tendency
to
not
to
want
me
to
trespass
on
your
property
chose.
A
I'm
aware
he
says
that
so
I
mean
we,
we
talked
quite
a
bit,
it
wasn't
get
off
my
property
or
anything
to
that
effect.
It
was
quite
the
opposite
as
a
matter
of
fact
and
I'm
a
little
bit
astonished
by
both
of
the
affidavits
that
represent
at
how
glaring
they
are
at
being
false.
From
the
conversations
I
had
again
I've
been
doing
this
for
22
years,
I'm
not
going
to
risk
my
career
over
overgrown
grass
or
pile
the
debris
in
a
backyard.
It's
not
worth
it
and
contrary
to
whatever
mr.
A
B
A
B
G
G
G
Got
a
whole
bunch
of
questions.
First
of
all
object
to
these
pictures
that
you
gave
me
because
your
pictures
and
my
pictures
are
mixed
in
together.
These
are
not
all
my
pictures
and
clearly
this
picture
here
with
mrs.
war
he's
sitting
there
and
no
branch
in
the
back
cannot
be
the
same
picture
as
you
submitted
with
a
branch
in
the
back.
Do
we
have
an
email?
They
can't
be
the
same
because
it's
the
same
scene
and
there's
no
branch
well.
F
A
G
G
G
A
A
G
J
G
A
I
went
on
July
15th,
the
original
852
for
overgrown
grass,
because
that's
all
I
was
privy
to
at
the
time
was
in
violation.
It
did
not
seem
fair
that,
once
the
new
violations
were
discovered
to
continue
those
on
because
they
were
not
discussed
in
the
notice
of
violation.
Although
8:52
has
that
definition,
we
felt
it
would
be
more
appropriate
because
the
board
said
come
into
compliance
by
mowing
the
grass
that
kind
of
stuff
those
were
the
violations
discussed
that
that
violation
was
complied
on.
A
H
G
A
Would
you
have
to
go
when
it's
not
true?
As
you
stated,
it
was
also
in
the
backyard
correct.
No,
it
wasn't
it.
You
had
no
violations
previous
on
the
backyard,
okay!
Well,
here's
the
reason
why,
because
of
you,
mr.
Pat's,
elitist
I,
decided
to
actually
get
my
tape
measure
out
and
ask
because
in
the
first
exhibit
of
exhibit
number
one
that's
been
entered.
There
is
a
trailer
in
your
backyard
photograph
taken
from
the
streets.
Yes,.
G
A
Pretty
long
grass
underneath
of
it,
but
because
mr.
Pat's
elitist
questions
everything
I
do
I
decided
to
see
if
I
could
actually
measure
it
in
all
fairness
to
you,
sir.
So
for
that
reason,
this
picture
here,
sir,
does
that
not
appear
to
have
long
grass
at
the
back
of
that
trailer?
Are
you
able
to
tell
it's
more
than
12
inches
from
that
photograph?
It's.
A
It
okay,
mr.
Pat,
selita's
I,
don't
know
what
else
to
say:
okay,
I
I
decided
to
take
a
bit
of
your
advice
and
do
two
things
knock
on
your
tenants
door
and
take
a
tape
measure,
because
those
are
the
two
things
that
you
seem
to
bring
to
this
board
consistently
that
you
allege
that
I
don't
do
where's
the
tape
measure
here.
I
didn't.
G
G
A
Witness
if
she
was
here
could
testify
that
I
used
it
okay.
Maybe
she
should
have
put
that
in
her
affidavit,
but
she
didn't
okay.
So
here's
the
deal
I
measured
it
because
you
frequently
suggest
I,
don't
know
how
tall
grasses
so
I
decided
in
all
fairness
to
you
measure
it,
and
you
know
what
the
cool
part
was.
It
was
under
12
inches,
so
I
put
you
in
compliance
for
it.
So
I
did
exactly
what
you
asked
me
to
do.
Unfortunately,
while
I
was
in
your
backyard,
I
noticed
all
the
other
violations.
A
A
G
G
A
G
A
G
G
J
A
G
G
A
G
A
A
A
A
G
G
A
J
B
B
B
J
J
G
A
G
A
A
G
G
B
A
B
F
F
G
G
G
L
G
G
G
J
A
A
F
G
F
J
F
F
G
Okay,
I'd
like
to
introduce
another,
exhibit
hired
a
lawn
service
to
cut
the
grass
and
remove
the
branch
and
they
sent
me
the
bill.
The
invoice
and
it
shows
the
dates
that
they
provided
the
service
and
did
the
job
which
says
July,
13,
2019
I.
Don't
know
that
pertains
to
this
case
or
the
next
case,
but
I
want
to
introduce
that
I
object.
J
A
B
E
N
N
That
day
was
I'm
in
my
bedroom,
which
is
the
very
first
door
from
the
front
door.
The
door
was
open.
The
first
I
heard
anything
my
daughter,
my
granddaughter
who's
temporarily.
Staying
with
me
came
down
the
hall
from
the
back,
where
it's
mine
and
she
says
Grammy,
there's
a
police
officer
who
said
he
wants
to
go
in
the
backyard
and
I
told
him
talk
to
you.
I
went
to
the
door,
takes
me
a
while
to
get
to
the
door
and
at
that
time
opposite,
is
it
gassen?
B
N
A
N
N
A
N
A
D
N
A
N
A
J
A
A
N
A
I've
taken
in
the
backyard
is
that
your
backyard
at
the
place
you
live
at
yes,
okay
is
those
things
that
are
in
your
backyard.
They're,
the
pipes,
the
white
PVC
pipes,
the
screen,
leaning
up
against
the
back
of
the
building.
All
the
items
behind
the
shed
in
between
the
shed
and
the
back
fence
are
all
those
things
there.
A.
N
N
A
N
B
N
N
A
Mr.
Pat
Salinas
is
your
email
address,
Harry
Pat
Salinas.
It
was
at
gmail.com
or
email
com.
I
can't
read
it
is
this
your
email
you
sent
or
you
received
from
Beth
and
you
sent
on
July
14th
from
Harry
Pat
Salinas
at
gmail.com
code
enforcement.
You
sent
some
pictures.
Is
this
yours,
but
these
pictures
you
took
of
your
backyard
at
385.
Wickham
are
those
yours.
G
D
A
J
A
G
A
G
A
Fine
I,
just
those
were
those
were
the
pictures
that
we
presented
to
you
earlier
that
you
alleged
you
that
I
they
were
my
pictures.
Those
were
all
came
from
your
email
that
you
sent
us
so
I
just
wanted
to
establish
with
the
board
that
those
were
all
your
photographs
that
you
sent
to
us
regarding
your
property.
G
B
G
J
F
G
G
Okay,
mister,
our
officer,
gassen
mm-hmm,
has
basically
systematically
gone
from
property
to
property
and
I've
provided
a
prior
complaint
to
his
supervisor,
with
the
video
showing
he
trespassed
on
the
property.
He
said
he
got
permission
from
one
of
the
tenants
I
got
it
submitted
affidavits
from
all
the
tenants
stating
that
they
didn't
give
him
permission.
I
haven't
heard
anything
from
his
supervisor
sergeant,
Fogg.
No,
the
last
time
I
asked
him.
He
said
he
sent
it
up
the
chain,
but
I
haven't
got
a
response
back
to
that
complaint.
G
So
he's
got
a
history
of
trespassing
on
my
properties
and
that's
why
I
presented
before
this
board
a
directive
to
him
not
to
trespass
on
the
properties.
Clearly
from
those
pictures
he
trespassed
on
the
property,
there's
a
front
door
with
a
driveway
and
a
walkway
to
the
front
door.
Miss
Voorhees
was
right
next
to
the
front
door.
If
he
even
knocked
on
the
front
door,
he
would
have
talked
to
the
tenant.
G
He
tried
to
circumvent
that
by
going
to
the
back
door
to
the
side,
patio
door,
that
was
behind
a
wall
where
he
had
to
cross
the
grass.
He
didn't
walk
on
the
front
steps
or
the
driveway,
like
any
normal
person.
Would
that
to
me
does
not
sound
like
somebody
who's
just
trying
to
create
compliance.
It
sounds
like
somebody
who's
trying
to
find
me
and
and
has
targeted
me
for
all
these
violations.
G
I've
told
you
in
the
past
that
I'm
compliant,
all
somebody
has
to
do
is
tell
me
what
to
do
and
I'd
do
it,
but
once
he
made
me
a
repeat
violator,
it
continued
after
that
to
get
fine
after
fine
after
fine
I
think
I've
presented
sufficient
evidence
to
show
that
he
trespassed
on
the
property,
even
though
you
did
not
sustain
my
objection.
The
evidence
that
I
submitted
clearly
shows
his
intentions
that
he
wasn't
intending
to
monitor.
G
Go
back
to
view
what
needed
to
be
done,
because
that
was
all
on
the
outside.
There
was
no
reason
for
him
to
go
back
in
the
back
yard.
He
could
see
everything
from
the
outside.
He
went
there
strictly
to
create
a
new
violation
and
to
continue
this.
Basically,
what
I
think
is
harassment
bringing
me
to
the
code
border
I?
Like
you
all,
you
know
you
all
seem
to
be
nice
people,
but
I
don't
want
to
see
you
every
month.
Yet
that's
what
appears
to
be
happening.
Mr.
barkis
was
here
before
you
knew
who
she
was.
G
He
knew
she
was
the
tenant.
He
didn't
knock
on
the
front
door.
He
purposely
knocked
on
a
patio
side
door
behind
a
brick
wall
that
he
had
access
through
the
grass
in
order
to
try
to
circumvent
the
process
and
I
I
do
not
believe
that
I
should
get
fined
on
this
property.
The
property
is
in
compliance.
Now,
the
lawn
maintenance
service
has
done
everything
that
that
that
that's
pictured,
I
guess
here
everything
is
in
compliance.
B
G
Well,
she
has
testified
that
she
did
not
give
him
permission
to
go
on
the
property
she
submitted,
an
affidavit
under
oath
before
a
notary
and,
if
I'm
presumed
innocent
until
proven
guilty
like
I'm
supposed
to
be.
The
evidence
clearly
weighs
in
my
favor
of
dismissing
this
case
or
not
finding
me
in
violation
based
on
improperly
obtaining
the
evidence.
M
A
B
H
Move
that,
based
on
the
testimony,
evidence,
packs,
present
and
law
that
the
respondent
eerie
pet
Salinas
was
a
violation
of
sections.
840
and
852
of
the
tarpon
springs
city
code
from
July
15
as
to
such
time
as
this
property
is
brought
into
compliance,
compliance
and
a
fine
of
$75
per
day
shall
be
imposed
until
compliance
has
met.
In
addition,
I
move
that
the
city
be
awarded
6950
for
the
costs
incurred
in
prosecuting
this
case.
C
F
J
F
B
Okay,
I
want
to
tell
you
that
I
appreciate
you
coming
every
time
and
I
appreciate
your
bringing
witnesses
and
and
having
the
go
to
take
all
the
time
to
be
able.
I
also
want
to
suggest
that
perhaps
you
have
something
that
Officer
gassin
has
done
to
you.
That
is
really
anger
and
I'm.
Sorry
that
happened
think.
B
H
F
B
E
D
F
L
J
G
J
G
A
F
G
F
So
I
want
to
back
this
up
just
a
little
bit
if
there
is
evidence
that
it
came
into
compliance
prior
to
the
date
that
officer
gasps
and
has
determined
to
be
in
compliance.
That's
something
that
you
need
to
consider
because
there
is
a
fine
associated
with
it.
So
we
need
to
address
that
right
now.
So
if
you
have
additional
evidence,
I'm
gonna
provide
these
two
affidavits
to
officer
gas,
and
let
him
take
a
look
at
that.
You
said
you
would
had
another
piece
of
evidence.
Yes,.
G
J
H
A
G
K
F
Petzäll
is
previous
testify,
those
in
compliances
of
July
13th,
the
affidavit
of
compliance,
says
it's
in
compliance
as
of
July,
13th,
yes,
and
so
you've
you've
considered
the
appropriate
testimony
and
evidence
you've
already
accepted
the
affidavit
of
compliance
at
this
point.
I
think
that
we
can
go
ahead
and
move
on
is
you
know?
Is
there
something
else
you
wanted
to
submit.
F
C
J
F
Just
to
finish
up
from
the
last
hearing,
you
won't
let
you
know
that
that
I
have
provided
the
the
Kota
for
support
clerk,
the
documents
that
have
been
presented
by
mr.
Pat
selita's.
The
board
has
considered
and
approve
the
affidavit
of
compliance.
There's
nothing
else
that
you
need
to
do
on
that
particular
case.
So
we
can
move
on
to
your
next
case.
J
B
B
A
You
officer
Steve
gas
and
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs
Police
Department
code
enforcement
case
number,
19,
8,
0,
0,
0,
0,
4,
3,
5
property
address
is
1,
3,
1,
3,
golfy,
woods,
Lane,
faith
Sedaris
is
the
listed
property
owner
exhibit
number
1
going
before
the
board.
Are
all
the
photographs
exhibit
number
2
notices,
a
violation
and
Notice
of
Hearing
and
exhibit
number
3
is
administrative
documents
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign?
A
All
the
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations
and
notice
hearing
or
sent
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail,
and
please
accept
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Mister
Bobby.
C
A
This
case
started
on
July
1st
of
this
year.
There
was
a
complaint
from
a
neighbor
about
a
vehicle
under
a
car
cover
that
appeared
in
operable
no
right
front
tire,
there's
a
pile
of
wood
and
bricks
in
front
of
the
garage
on
the
west
side
fence.
On
the
east
side,
gate
was
damaged
in
in
poor
condition.
On
July,
2nd
and
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed.
It
was
returned
unclaimed
on
July
18th
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin.
There
was
no
change
at
that
point.
A
We
determined
to
send
it
to
the
board
on
July
29th,
the
Notice
of
Hearing
was
mail,
it
was
returned,
signed,
property
was
posted
on
July
29th
and
the
affidavit
was
signed
on
August
7th
I
conducted
the
final
inspection
there's
actually
an
included
photograph
for
August
7th.
They
were
not
in
compliance,
they
had
done
some
work
and
obviously
it
was
a
work
in
progress
at
the
time.
A
So
at
this
point
the
board
or
the
city
would
like
the
board
to
consider
violation
of
4000
parking
storage
of
abandoned
vehicles,
the
silver
PT
Cruiser
when
I
conducted
the
rien
spec
ssin.
Initially
it
was
under
the
cover.
You
could
see
the
right
front,
tire
was
missing
and
then
on
one
of
my
photographs
from
87
there's
no
license
plate
on
the
vehicle,
so
I
didn't
have
anything
to
run
so
it
in
violation
of
a
4000
for
both
inoperability
and
it's
not
registered.
A
Also
city
codes,
8,
22,
accumulation
of
trash
and
then
36.0
3,
which
are
fences,
walls
and
hedges
which
require
them
to
be
maintained
and
kept
in
good
condition.
I
will
add,
I,
guess
the
property
owner
was
here
and
he
just
couldn't
stay,
so
he
he
had
a
request
and
if
you'd
like
it
has
to
do
with
his
time
frame
and
I
can
give
that
to
you
at
the
end
or
if
you
want
to
hear
it
now
sure
choice.
A
Sorry
he
he
said
he
he
should
have
everything
done.
He
if
he
could
just
have
three
weeks
he'll.
He
should
have
everything
done
before
that
so,
but
he
doesn't
argue
he's
like
I
said
when
I
drove
by
yesterday,
the
mower
was
out
in
the
yard.
You
can
see
that
one
of
the
pictures
he's
cleaning
stuff
up
and
he's
working
on
it.
So
it's
it's
obvious
he's
intending
to
get
it
done.
K
A
K
H
I
moved
based
on
the
testimony
evidence
and
facts
presented
in
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violation,
sections
eight
twenty
to
thirty
six
point:
zero.
Three
and
forty
point:
zero
of
the
code
of
ordinance
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
was
enforcement
of
there.
In
effect,
the
respondent
was
in
violation
thereof,.
E
E
H
That
the
respondent
shall
have
until
September
fourth
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
with
code
sections,
eight
dash
twenty
to
thirty
six
point:
oh
three
and
forty
point:
oh
oh,
or
suffer
a
fine
of
$25
per
day
for
each
day.
Thereafter,
the
respondent
remains
in
violation
of
said
code,
section
second,.
E
B
A
There's
nobody
here
on
that
case
either
officer
Steve
gas
and
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs
Police
Department
code
enforcement
case
19-8,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
four
thirty
nine!
The
listed
address
is
649
Kenneth's
away.
It
is
a
vacant
lot
owned
by
Nikita
sand.
Nicoletta
calves
achlys
the
parcel
is
1020
715,
three
142
zero,
zero,
five,
zero,
zero:
two
zero
we've
had
no
contact
with
the
owner,
all
exhibits
or
I'm.
Sorry,
all
the
photographs
are
exhibit
number
one.
A
All
my
notice
is
a
violation,
a
notice
of
hearing
or
exhibit
number
two
exhibit
number
three
or
administrative
documents
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign?
All
my
notice
is
remanded.
The
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations
and
notice
and
earrings
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
as
well
as
first-class
mail,
and
please
accept
all
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Mr.
chairman,
thank.
B
B
A
I
stated
you've
had
no
contact
with
the
owner.
I
started
my
inspection
on
July,
2nd
of
this
year.
The
property
was
overgrown,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed,
there
was
no
mail
returned
and
the
United
States
Postal
Service
tracking
shows
that
it
was
unclaimed
on
July
18th
I
conducted
a
rien,
sprek
inspection.
The
property
was
still
overgrown
and
not
been
maintained.
At
that
point,
the
decision
was
made
to
send
a
code
board
on
July
19th.
A
The
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed,
no
mail
return
and
the
United
States
Postal
Service
tracking
shows
that
the
delivery
was
attempted
on
July
26
Prost
property
in
an
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed
on
August
7th
I
conducted
the
final
inspection
you
can
see
in
the
photographs.
It's
still
not
in
compliance,
the
grass
wasn't
primo
sley
mode,
there's
cement
pieces
on
the
property.
There
was
some
garbage
in
bags
on
the
property
grass
around
some
of
the
tree
stands,
hadn't
been
mowed
and
was
still
grossly
overgrown
and
there's
other
debris
still
towards
the
back
of
the
property.
K
A
A
They
got
the
property
cleaned
up.
That's
we've
found
that
sending
it
also
by
first-class
mail
and
not
return
receive.
Some
people
are
just
a
little
bit
freaked
out
about
signing
for
a
certified
letter
so
but
they
have
a
tendency
to
read
the
first-class
mail
and
they
figure
it
out
or
they
could
have
noticed
the
posting
as
well,
when
we
stuck
the
sign
in
the
yard.
So
I
can't
tell
you
how
they
figured
it
out,
but
they
seem
to.
K
K
E
E
J
B
K
K
E
E
B
B
A
For
me
officer,
Steve,
Gaston
city
of
Turpan,
Springs
Police,
Department
code
enforcement
case
19-8,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
four,
forty
eight.
This
is
a
vacant
lot
south
of
five
ten
wide
view
it
doesn't
have
a
city
address
it's
owned
by
Jonathan
and
Olga
Pappas.
The
parcel
number
is
one
one:
two,
seven
one:
five,
eight
seven,
eight
seven,
six
zero
one:
five
zero
100
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
border.
A
All
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two
all
notices
to
include
Notice
of
Violation
and
Notice
of
Hearing
exhibit
number
three
administrative
docs
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records.
Affidavit
of
the
posting
is
exhibit
number
for
all.
My
notices
are
mailed
the
property
owner
of
record
based
upon
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
I'll
notice,
the
violations,
a
notice
of
hearing
or
sent
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
and
mr.
chairman.
Please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
A
This
case
started
July
2nd.
We
have
had
contact
with
the
owner,
both
via
phone
call
and
email
they've
been
fairly
respondent,
while
I
was
conducting
inspections
in
the
area.
I
noted
this
property
was
overgrown
and
there
is
debris
dumped
on
it
in
the
form
of
tree
branches.
On
July
3rd,
the
Notice
of
Violation
notice,
a
hearing
was
mailed,
it
was
returned
signed
to
our
office
on
July,
9th
I
conducted
a
respek
ssin
and
the
property
was
in
compliance
on
July
26th,
I
posted
the
property
and
an
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed.
A
I
B
I
B
K
E
A
Officer
Steve
gas
and
city
of
Turpan
Springs
Police,
Department,
Code
Enforcement.
This
is
case:
19-8,
zero,
zero,
zero,
four,
seven
zero.
The
property
address
is
715
West,
Bayshore
Drive,
it's
owned
by
business,
Avex
LLC
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
all
my
photographs.
Exhibit
2
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice
of
hearings,
exhibit
3
administrative
documents
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign.
A
All
my
notices
are
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearing
or
sent
return
receipt
requested
as
well
as
first
class.
Mr.
chairman,
please
accept
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
A
This
case
started
on
July
12th.
We
got
a
citizen
complaint
regarding
the
property
being
overgrown.
There
was
also
a
pile
of
debris,
tree
debris
that
was
curbside,
partial
pallet
of
bags
of
sand
or
cement.
At
the
end
of
the
driveway,
we
have
had
some
contact
with
the
owner,
both
the
office
visits
and
emails
owner
being
a
business
on
July
12th,
the
Notice
of
Violation
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed.
A
The
mail
was
returned
under
liver
Abel
from
the
registered
agent,
but
it
was
deliver
and
mail
returned
vacant
for
the
owner
on
July
26,
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
of
posting,
also
on
July
26
I
conducted
the
final
inspection
and
I
had
originally
it
emailed
the
office
and
the
property
is
in
compliance
as
of
now.
So
that's
why
it's
before
the
board
to
be
established,
so
it
is
in
compliance
of
8,
22,
8,
forty
and
eight
fifty
to
the
city
city
codes.
A
One
of
the
reasons
why
I
brought
it
before
the
board
to
be
established.
Just
so
you
understand
is
a
few
months
ago
we
had
a
code
board
case
on
this
exact
same
property
for
permits.
In
that
case
is
still
open
and
ongoing.
So
that
was
the
reason
why,
if
they're
being
established
because
I
kind
of
don't
know
what
the
status
with
this
owner
is,
so
if
they
go
into
violation
again,
there'll
be
a
repeat
violator
at
that
point,
and
hopefully
I'll
be
able
to
keep
it
in
inline.
A
I
K
E
A
There's
nobody
here
for
that
address
either.
This
is
a
repeat
violator
from
July
24th
of
this
year
and
it's
still
in
repeat
violator
status.
It
is
not
in
compliance,
it's
a
repeat
violator
for
case
number,
18,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
three
eight
six,
which
is
a
violation
of
city
code,
eight
48-52
that
one
was
a
prosecution
only
case.
There
was
no
fines
into
compliance.
A
All
the
notice
are
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
it's
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
in
tax,
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations,
a
notice
hearing
or
sent
both
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and
mr.
chairman,
please
accept
all
these
exhibits
into
the
record.
A
We've
had
no
contact
with
the
owner.
This
case
started
as
I
stated
on
July
24th,
there's
a
large
amount
of
trash
and
debris
outside
of
the
house,
and
it
is
a
repeat
violator
on
July
25th,
the
notice
of
violation,
notice
of
hearing
and
a
repeat
violator
notice
of
hearing
were
mail
and
the
mail
was
returned
signed
just
for
the
board's
information.
The
property
wasn't
posted.
A
We
just
had
a
clerical
error
and
we
didn't
get
a
sign
in
the
yard,
but
we
did
get
back
to
green
card
signed
by
the
property
owner
that
they
received
the
notices
on
August
7th,
the
conducted
a
final
inspection,
and
there
was
no
change
to
the
property.
What's
before
the
board
is
a
violation
of
city
codes,
8
22,
8,
40
and
8
52.
It
should
be
noted
that
8
22
is
a
new
violation.
It
is
not
part
of
the
repeat
violator,
but
it
is
like
I
said.
A
A
That
was
the
previous
case
that
all
that,
basically,
is.
It
came
to
the
board.
They
came
into
compliance,
but
it
was
heard
by
the
board
to
be
established
and
this
board
found
prosecution
costs
and
those
have
been
paid
on
the
case,
but
there
was
no
fines
levied
on
that
previous
case
and,
as
you
can
see
by
the
photographs,
it's
you
know,
we
got
it
into
compliance
once
and
it's
just
developing
again
and
that's
all
the
city
has
it
this
time.
D
F
H
E
B
D
H
B
J
E
H
H
Okay,
I
moved
that,
based
on
the
testimony
evidence,
facts
presented
in
law
that
Emma
Scott
Murray
was
in
violation
of
sections
8,
40
and
8
52
of
the
Tarpon
Springs
city
code
from
July
24th
of
this
year.
Until
such
time,
it's
the
property
is
brought
into
a
compliance
or
a
fine
of
$50
per
day
shall
be
imposed
until
compliances
meant.
In
addition,
I
move
that
the
city
be
awarded
90
150
or
the
costs
incurred
in
prosecuting
the
case.
E
B
F
B
H
F
B
E
H
F
So
the
answer
the
question
is,
is
that
the
fine
would
remain
after
90
days
passes
from
the
date
of
the
recording
of
the
fine.
Then
the
city
could
begin
collection
procedures
if
it
wanted
to,
but
the
lien
would
remain
on
the
property
for
20
years
unless
the
city
decided
to
foreclose
the
property.
If
it
is
homesteaded
property,
it
would
not
be
foreclosed.
The
lien
would
just
sit
there
under
the
Florida
Constitution
and
under
Chapter
162,
the
Florida
Statutes.
The
city
is
prohibited
from
foreclosing
on
properties
that
are
homesteaded
properties.
I
F
So
it
still
could
be
considered
homesteaded
property,
even
though
someone's
not
living
there.
We
would
make
that
determination,
but
it
really
shouldn't
be
something
that
you
should
consider
in
what
you're
doing
here,
you're
to
determine
based
solely
upon
this
petition
and
the
response.
Does
it
meet
your
requirements
of
your
rule?
Rule
5,
section,
4
and
and
I
could
read
the
whole
thing,
but
basically
you're
defined
either
that
there
is
an
undue
hardship
or
there's
something
that
prevented
the
violator
from
coming
into
compliance
within
the
time
that
had
been
previously
ordered.
F
J
C
F
F
So
this
is
rule
5,
section
3
of
your
rules
of
procedure,
they've
been
in
effect
for
almost
30
years.
I
think
I'm
gonna
read
it
word
for
word.
Any
aggrieved
party
may
petition
the
board
to
reconsider
or
rehear
any
board
order,
resulting
from
public
hearing.
This
petition
must
be
made
in
writing
and
filed
with
the
board
secretary
no
later
than
30
days
after
the
execution
of
the
order
and
prior
to
the
filing
of
any
appeal
upon
receipt
of
the
petition.
The
board
will
consider
whether
or
not
to
reconsider
or
rehear
the
case.
F
A
motion
to
approve
a
petition
to
reconsider
rehear
must
be
made
by
a
board
member
who
previously
voted
on
the
prevailing
side.
A
motion
to
approve
a
petition
to
reconsider
case
must
set
the
date
and
time
for
the
rehearing.
The
rehearing
may
be
held
at
the
time
of
the
consideration
of
the
petition.
If
the
petitioner
and
all
other
parties
agree
and
the
board
will
not
hear
oral
argument
or
evidence
in
determining
whether
to
grant
the
petition
to
reconsider
or
rehear.
F
So,
having
read
that
rule,
your
options
are
to
grant
it
and
if
you
grant
it,
then
what
would
happen
is.
Is
you
would
determine
whether
you're
going
to
hear
the
case
today
or
you're
gonna
hear
it
sometime
in
the
future,
for
example,
next
meeting
your
second
option
would
be
to
deny
the
petition
to
reconsider.
J
F
K
F
It's
this
letter
that
actually
it's
an
email
from
Tina
Hinton,
it
was
dated
Monday
July,
the
8th
to
209
p.m.
it
was
directed
to
Beth
use.
The
subject
is
code
enforcement
board
petition
to
reconsider,
and
then
there
is
the
statement
and
the
email
does
everybody
have
that
are
so
I
just
read
it
out
loud
everybody
have
it.
E
F
Gonna
read
it
out
loud:
this
is
what
it
says.
Case
number
18,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
eight
six
nine.
This
is
a
request
for
time
to
comply
with
the
code
enforcement
orders
on
707
Chesapeake
Drive
Tarpon
Springs
Florida.
There
has
been
an
extensive
amount
of
work
completed
at
the
property.
There
is
two
more
dump
truck
loads
of
yard,
debris,
pepper,
trees
that
have
been
removed
and
will
be
hauled
off.
There
has
already
been
15
dump
truck
loads
removed.
The
house
has
been
sealed
and
is
ready
to
be
painted
after
the
roof
is
installed.
F
A
H
B
B
F
F
A
D
F
The
answer
to
the
question
is:
is
that
if
the
compliance
state
is
moved,
then,
basically
that
fine
goes
away
because
you've
reestablished
the
date,
so
anything
that
has
incurred
would
not
have
been
incurred,
so
change
the
date
30
days
down
the
road
and
she
does
and
she
comes
in
and
complies
in
the
next
30
days.
There's
no
fine.
H
F
D
F
D
B
E
E
K
E
E
H
F
J
E
E
C
E
G
Like
to
make
some
suggestions
to
the
to
the
process,
I
would
suggest
that
when
the
code
enforcement
officer
submits
the
Notice
of
Violation,
that
they
also
submit
the
evidence
along
with
that,
so
that
the
person
can
see
what
needs
to
be
done
normally
at
least
the
times
that
have
come
here.
The
only
time
I
see.
Those
pictures
is
right
before
the
code
board
and
you
really
don't
have
time
to
evaluate
them
or
look
at
all
the
evidence
and
the
the
documentation
to
evaluate
it.
G
It
appears
that,
when
violations
occur
for
the
same
thing,
there's
always
two
charges:
8
40
at
8
50,
that's
like
double
jeopardy
for
the
same
violation.
I,
don't
know
if
that's
proper
or
not
I
just
raised
that,
because
you're
gonna
violate
somebody,
you
Mazal
violate
them
or
the
right
or
the
right
violation.
G
Just
I
would
also
suggest
that,
as
part
of
the
equipment
of
the
code
enforcement
officer,
since
you
have
many
many
cases
that
have
observed
that
deal
with
overgrown
lawns
and
grass,
that
code
enforcement
officer
have
a
measuring
stick
of
some
type
to
be
able
to
put
it
down
next
to
the
sidewalk,
to
document
that
the
grass
is
over
12
inches.
Because
all
the
pictures
that
I've
seen
you
can't
tell
there's
no
way
to
tell
whether
it's
6,
inches,
8,
inches,
4,
inches,
10,
inches
or
more.
So
that
would
help
you
and
making
your
decisions.
D
F
A
F
A
And
that's
my
normally
sergeant
Fogg
know,
or
somebody
is
here
he
just
couldn't
make
it
we're,
there's
just
a
lot
of
stuff
going
on
and
the
police
department
right
now
so
we're
a
little
short
on
a
couple
of
things
so
and
then
other
than
me.
You
know
and
I
have
most
of
you
weren't
here
a
few
years
ago,
I
had
to
stand
up,
and
you
know
deal
with
somebody
in
here.