►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board July 11, 2019
Description
Description
A
C
D
E
F
In
heaven,
we
seek
blessings
on
the
task
before
us
bless
our
efforts
with
clear
insight,
our
deliberations
with
wisdom
or
work
with
clarity
and
accuracy
and
in
our
decisions
with
impartiality,
but
gather
to
make
decisions
for
our
community.
May
we
use
only
our
best
skills
and
judgment,
keeping
ourselves
impartial
and
neutral,
as
we
consider
the
merits
and
pitfalls
of
each
matter
this
place
before
us
and
always
act
in
accordance
with
what
is
in
the
best
interest
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
and
our
fellow
citizen.
This
we
pray,
amen.
C
It
is
the
intention
of
this
board
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
health
safety
and
welfare.
The
citizens
of
Tarpon
Springs
by
providing
an
equitable,
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
various
codes
within
the
city
of
tarpon
springs.
Any
agitated
party
who
appeals
a
final
administrative
order
of
this
board
to
the
circuit
court
shall
appeal
such
a
filing
within
30
days
of
the
execution
of
the
order
to
be
appealed.
Florida
Statute
to
86.0
1:05
requires
any
party
appealing
a
decision
of
this
board
to
have
a
record
of
the
proceedings
such
to
support.
C
Such
an
appeal
procedure
of
the
board
is
as
follows.
First,
the
city
presents
its
witnesses
and
exhibits,
after
which
the
alleged
violator
is
able
to
ask
the
city's
witnesses
any
specific
questions
regarding
their
testimony
and,
secondly,
the
alleged
violator
is
allowed
to
make
a
presentation
and
present
his
or
her
witnesses
and
hexif
exhibits.
Then
the
city
can
question
the
alleged
violators
witnesses
after
both
rounds
of
testimony
both
on
the
part
of
the
city
and
on
the
part
of
the
alleged
violator.
C
C
B
Case
number
8
I'm
officer,
Steve,
Gaston
city
of
Turpan,
Springs,
Police,
Department
code
enforcement
been
so
employed
since
2015
in
that
position.
This
case
before
the
board
is
18:
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
nine
seven
five
properties
addressed
as
a
twenty
seven
Lincoln
Avenue.
It
is
a
vacant
lot
with
city
parcel
number
or
parcel
number
thirteen.
B
Twenty
seven
one,
five,
two
one:
three:
four:
eight:
zero:
zero
six
zero
one:
three
two
property
owner
listed
in
record
as
Michael
Ford
jr.,
the
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
all
of
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two
any
minute.
All
notices,
including
my
Notice
of
Violation
and
Notice
of
Hearing
Examiner.
Three
administrative
documents
include
case
so
many
case,
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
notices
were
mailed.
B
D
A
B
We've
had
contact
with
the
father
of
this
property.
Mr.
Ford
senior
case
started
out
December
5th
of
2018.
It's
overgrown,
it's
a
small
lot
less
than
ten
thousand
square
feet,
there's
trash
and
debris
that
were
dumped
on
the
property,
for
whatever
reason
it
I
think
it
fell
through
the
cracks
and
I
didn't
do
my
initial
inspection
until
May
of
2019
May
22nd,
we
did
the
we
sent
the
Notice
of
Violation
at
that
point
in
time
it
was
returned
signed
by
a
person
on
June
11th
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin.
B
The
lot
was
mowed,
but
unfortunately
there
was
a
large
pile
of
debris
at
the
front
of
the
property.
On
that
time
we
sent
the
notice
of
hearing.
We
did
give
back
the
mail
return
signed
on
July,
1st
I,
post,
the
property
and
I
noticed
there
were
still
debris
on
the
property
at
that
time,
it's
a
smaller
amount
and
it
continues
to
move
closer
and
closer
to
the
roadway
I
conducted
a
final
inspection
initially
I
conducted
yesterday.
There
was
still
a
little
bit
of
trash
or
debris
out
front
and
mr.
B
Ford
senior
met
me
at
the
police
department
and
said
that
wanted
to
make
sure
it
was
in
compliance
and
I
told
them
what
was
still
wrong.
And
this
morning
I
went
by
and
it's
all
cleaned
up.
So
the
property
as
of
right
now
is
in
compliance
with
all
the
violations
that
the
city
brought
forward
to
the
board.
So
the
purpose
here
is
just
to
establish
the
property
because
we
had
been
out
there
a
few
times
and
we
continue
to
get
complaints
on
that
and
I
and
I
enforce
that
with
mr.
B
Ford
that
the
purpose
of
doing
this
is
just
to
get
him
to
keep
track
of
that
property.
A
little
more
aggressively
than
he
had
in
the
past.
Unfortunately
he's
another
person
who
suffers
from
the
random
dumping
problem
that
occurs
when
you
own
a
vacant
lot,
but
he
understands
that
and
he
assures
the
board.
He'll,
take
care
of
that
so
before
the
board
were
violations.
The
city,
ordinance,
8,
22,
accumulation
of
trash
city,
ordinance,
8,
40
duty
maintained,
private
property
and
8
52,
with
deals
with
mowing
trimming,
edging
and
keeping
debris
off
of
the
property.
G
H
Move
that,
based
on
the
testimony,
evidence
facts
presented
in
the
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violation,
sections
8,
20,
8,
40
and
8
52
of
the
Code
of
Ordinances
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
was
in
force.
In
effect,
at
the
time
of
the
Notice
of
Violation,
the
respondents
were
in
violation
of
said
code
sections.
However,
they
are
now
in
compliance.
H
C
I
F
I
B
You
officer
Steve
gas
and
city
turban,
Springs
police
department
code
enforcement
case
before
the
board
is
19
8
0
0,
0
0,
3
3.
This
is
a
vacant
lot
west
of
an
established
address
of
540
West
Bruce
Street
property
owners
are
listed
as
John
and
Vicky
Naboo
lephant
this
and
a
manual
and
Alexia
reneus
parcel
number
is
one
to
two:
seven
one:
five,
three:
nine
eight
three:
four:
zero:
zero,
zero,
zero.
B
Three
four
zero
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
or
all
of
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two
or
my
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice
of
hearings
exhibit
number
three
administrative
documents
case:
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records,
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
is
exhibit
number
four
I
believe
the
photographs
have
been
presented
to
the
representative
and
those
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
them
are
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
this
board.
All
notices
were
mailed.
B
I
F
The
questions
so
do
you
are
you
here
representing
the
owners
of
this
property?
Okay,
so
you
can
have
a
seat
back
out
here:
ma'am
you're,
not
a
party
to
this
case.
If
the
city
wants
to
call
you
as
a
witness
they'll,
be
able
to
do
that.
I,
misunderstood
I
thought
you
were
here
on
behalf
of
the
owners
of
the
property:
okay,
you're,
not
you're
here
on
behalf
of
neighbors,
okay,.
B
Thank
you.
We
have
had
contact
with
the
one
of
the
owners
via
both
email
and
phone
call.
The
case
started:
May
13th
2019.
We
got
a
complaint,
I
believe
what
the
situation
is
is
looks
like
these
two
properties,
the
vacant
lot
and
then
the
adjoining
one
at
540,
West
Bruce,
not
sure
of
all
the
circumstances
behind
it,
but
I
believe
they're
both
being
sold,
but
during
the
process
they
figured
out
that
this
driveway
was
built
without
permits.
There
was
a
shed
put
up
without
permits.
B
The
fence
is
in
poor
condition,
so
code
enforcement
got
called
to
go
out
and
investigate
it,
found
that
the
driveway
was
installed
without
a
permit
and
just
to
make
the
little
easier
for
the
board.
We
since
found
out
that
the
city
no
longer
had
any
records
going
back
far
enough,
so
we
moved
away
from
the
driveway
issue.
So
just
telling
you
what
the
initial
case
was
for,
but
then,
additionally,
there
is
a
storage
said,
which
is
an
accessory
structure
and
there's
no
building
when
there's
no
building
on
the
property.
B
B
It
has
to
be
so
far
off
the
side,
we're
property
lines,
I
didn't
go
back
on
the
property
and
measure
it,
but
with
my
camera,
I
can
take
a
picture
and
see
there's
pretty
much
no
distance
between
the
rear
fence
and
the
back
of
the
shed.
So
I
made
an
educated
guess
that
it
wasn't
more
than
five
feet.
So
on
May
20th,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed.
B
It
was
returned,
marked
vacant
which
I'm
not
exactly
sure
what
the
post
office
terminology
is,
but
we
did
get
a
return
on
July
2nd
and
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin.
Basically,
there
was
no
change
I'm.
Sorry,
that's
supposed
to
be
June,
2nd.
On
June
4th,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
for
the
property
owner's
request.
They
actually
asked
to
be
scheduled
for
code
board,
but
they're
not
here
that
mail
was
returned,
marked
unclaimed
on
July
1st
I
posted
the
property.
There
was
no
change
on
July
10th
I
conducted
an
inspection.
Still
no
change.
B
I
know
that
there's
been
a
lot
of
going
back
and
forth
where
I
believe
my
clerks
had
contact
with
a
realtor
and
some
other
people
they're
trying
to
sell
this
property
and
so
they're
dealing
with
some
of
these
permit
issues
and
things
like
that.
It
sounds
like
it's
going
to
be
sold
in
fairly
short
order,
but
I
don't
have
a
you
know.
We
never
saw
the
sales
contract
or
anything
like
that
or
a
definitive
timeframe.
B
So
what's
before
the
board
at
this
point
in
time
is
city
ordinance
6-1,
which
adopts
the
2017
Florida
Building
Code
in
the
2018
international
property
maintenance
code,
section
105
point
1
of
the
Florida
Building
Code.
It
requires
permits
that
entails
that
structure
and
then
36.0
0.
The
city
code
has
additional
rules
on
that
accessory
structure
like
I
talked
about.
B
J
B
Figure
out
where
my
so,
if
you
notice
right
along
here,
this
fence
is
missing
a
section
here.
This
chain-link
fence
is
in
fairly
poor
condition.
We
couldn't
find
any
permits
for
the
fence,
but
again
this
very
well
could
have
been
up
30
40
years
ago,
but
it
does
have
to
be
intact
and
well-maintained
and
that
that
fence
isn't
the
property
line.
For
this,
is
you
see
these
little
posts
that
are
in
the
ground?
There's.
E
B
A
concrete
slab
that
was
laid
on
both
of
it
almost
makes
you
think
at
one
point
in
time,
they're
owned
by
the
same
person,
but
there
are
two
separate
parcels.
This
is
540
West
Bruce
over
here,
and
this
is
the
vacant
lot
that
we're
talking
about.
So
it's
divided
by
this
little
line
right
here.
So
this
is
the
fence
I'm
talking
about
that's
the
structure
and
you
can
see
that's
the
back
fence
back
there
right
there
and
it's
pretty
much
right
on
top.
H
B
You
see
it
from
the
street.
It's
those
two
sheds
are
pretty
much
right
on
opposite
lines
of
that
property
line.
There
was
some
survey
marks
out
towards
the
street,
so
it
appears
that
somebody
went
ahead
and
put
that
those
little
stakes
in
to
kind
of
divide
that
property
actually
cored
them
into
the
cement
to
put
them
in,
but
it
is
to
the
south
side
of
those
little
stakes.
So
it
indicates
to
me
that
it's
on
that
property
and
I
believe
the
owners
when
they
contacted
us,
had
no
argument
about
the
shed
being
on
their
property.
B
H
I'm,
based
on
the
testimony
evidence,
impacts
presented
in
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violation,
section
6-1
of
the
building
code,
IP
MC
city
code,
105.1,
city
code,
36.0
and
city
code,
36
point:
oh
three
of
the
Code
of
Ordinances
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
was
in
force.
In
effect,
the
respondents
were
in
violation
thereof.
H
C
A
I
H
B
The
sale
is
gonna
occur
tomorrow,
I
mean
I,
say
a
month
would
be
reasonable
to
take
care
of
those,
because
it's
simple,
as
you
can
tear
the
shed
down
either
remove
the
fence.
Those
things
can
happen
fairly
expeditiously
and,
what's
weird,
is
that
fences
like
right
in
the
middle
of
that
parcel?
So
if
anybody
ever
did
want
to
do
anything
with
it,
they
take
fence
down
anyway.
So,
but
the
shed
is
not
going
to
be
allowed.
B
F
To
mr.
Trask,
so
the
answer
is
is
that
the
current
owner
has
a
legal
obligation
under
Florida
Statute
162
to
provide
the
information
to
the
new
owner
after
well,
frankly,
part
of
the
sale,
so
it
will
not
show
up
as
a
lien
on
the
property,
but
it
will
show
as
an
order
entered
and
it
needs
to
be
resolved.
You
know,
otherwise
it's
going
to
attach
to
any
other
property
that
these
four
individuals
own.
You
know
after
the
fact.
So
you
know.
F
H
D
A
K
F
K
K
B
Officer,
Steve
gas
and
city
interpret
Springs
Police,
Department,
Code
Enforcement.
As
stated,
this
is
a
repeat
violator
case,
starting
from
June
10th,
and
it's
currently
still
in
violation.
The
repeat
violator
case
had
made
this
case.
A
repeat
violator
case
was
18:
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
three
seven
five
that
was
violation
of
city
code,
8,
16,
8,
40
and
8
52.
B
That
previous
case
was
complied
before
the
deadline
that
the
code
board
established
for
it.
So
no
fines
were
assessed.
The
current
case
before
the
board
is
19
8,
0,
0,
0,
0,
3
6
property
address
is
stated
as
14
22
golfer
owed
it's
in
the
name
of
the
trust
of
Nicholas
Harris
Harris
exhibit
number
1
going
before
and
and
I'll.
B
Let
the
board
know,
there's
three
repeat
violator
violations
and
then
there's
two
new
ones
so
I'll
cover
all
those
exhibit
number
one
are
the
photographs
for
this
case
exhibit
number
two
or
all
the
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
the
administrative
documents
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
or
exhibit
number
three
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five?
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
cost?
B
C
K
B
F
F
B
Thank
you.
Obviously,
we've
had
no
contact
with
the
owner.
Miss
Paris
can
explain.
There
was
a
situation
with
her
father
he's
involved
in
an
accident.
Unfortunately,
he's
passed
since
then
during
the
process
of
this
case.
The
case
initially
started
on
June
10th
was
my
initial
inspection
complaint
from
I.
Believe
one
of
the
neighbors
trash
and
debris
being
stored
in
the
yard.
B
Trailer
was
within
two
feet
of
old
side
lot
line
trash
cans
in
public
view,
On
June,
10th
2019,
the
Notice
of
Violation
Notice
of
Hearing,
as
well
as
a
repeat
violator
notice
of
hearing
were
mailed.
They
did
return
to
the
office.
The
green
cards
did
return,
signed
on
July
1st
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
on
July
10th.
They
inspected
the
property,
it's
still
not
in
compliance.
The
grass
is
overgrown.
B
There's
a
truck
in
the
driveway
with
the
left
front
flat
tire
there's
many
other
items,
a
debris
on
the
side
of
the
house,
particularly
on
the
north
side.
You
can
see
in
one
of
the
last
two
pictures
so
for
the
repeat:
violator
sections,
which
are
8
16,
you
can
see
in
the
photographs
city
code
requires
trash
cans
to
be
stored
out
of
public
view.
B
I
took
these
photographs
from
Anclote
Drive,
which
is
the
roadway
and
clearly
they're
in
public
view,
so
they're
still
in
violation
of
city
ordinance,
8
16,
which
was
established
on
the
previous
case,
mentioned
375
of
2018.
That's
one
of
the
repeat,
violator
ones.
Second,
one
is
accumulation
of
trash,
that's
just
generally
having
trash
and
whatever
in
your
property,
that's
a
new
violation
and
then
another
repeat:
violation
is
8:
48-52,
8,
40
duty
maintained
private
property,
not
taking
care
of
the
yard
and
other
things
like
that.
B
Fifty-Two
is
not
taking
care
of
the
yard,
storing
debris
unused
equipment.
Things
like
that
on
your
property,
which
seems
fairly
apparent
on
that
North
Side
and
then
the
last
one,
which
is
a
new
violation,
is
42.00,
which
is
parking.
Recreational
vehicles
under
the
ordinance
itself
or
recreational
vehicles
also
considered
a
utility
trailer
part
of
the
city
code.
42.00
states
that
it
can't
be
parked
within
two
feet
of
a
side
or
rear
lot
line
again,
there's
a
trailer
parked
on
this
property.
B
It's
the
blue
one
in
the
photographs,
and
it
pretty
much-
is
right
up
against
the
fence
on
the
north
side
of
the
property,
to
the
point
where
I
could
barely
see
anything
between
it,
a
good
guess
is
less
than
two
feet.
So
that's
the
reason
why
that
code
is
on
this
so
again
for
the
board.
The
two
new
ones
are
8
22
accumulation
of
trash
and
42.00,
the
three
repeat
violator
ones,
since
June
10th
are
8
16,
8
48-52,
and
at
this
point
the
city
has
nothing
further.
K
Everything
that
I
wanted
to
see
from
the
first
time
around
which
I
was
here
with
my
father
I,
come
down
that
was
June
18th
and
my
brother,
who
normally
lives
there
was
in
the
hospital
he
still
it.
Normally
he
will
do
the
grass
and
all
that
I,
don't
know
anybody
at
all,
except
my
neighbor
George,
his
wife
and
their
son
Brett,
which
then
I
don't
know
any
of
the
neighbors
on
the
northbound
Northside.
K
K
It's
a
Richardson
vehicle,
so
why
would
that
make
any
difference
if
it's
on
my
driveway,
because
it
has
a
flat
tire
people
get
slashed
or
something
can
happen?
Why
would
that
be
a
violation
on
my
private?
The
other
thing
is
the
trailer
that
trailer
was
registered
at
one
point
that
blue
trailer,
and
that
is
in
the
back.
K
I
clean
just
about
every
area
outside
of
that
number
one
number
two
there's
some
nut
cake.
Who
decides
he
wants
to
continue
doing
the
same
thing
and
I
found
wrappers
that
weren't
anywhere
from
stores
further
up
or
anywhere.
They
would
deliberately
put
it
just
like
the
trash
when
I
had
it
out
from
late
Sunday
night
and
get
up
Monday
morning
and
sees
the
trash
on
the
on
the
ground
which
I
had
to
and
the
third
which
really
bothers
me.
I
looked
for
somebody
to
cut
the
grass
I
called
Moo.
K
Bro
I
actually
met
the
son
and
took
his
card.
He
said
call
I
did
I
spoke
to
somebody
who
runs
the
business,
but
apparently
I
left
him
a
voicemail.
He
told
me
what
to
do.
Monday
comes,
Tuesday
comes
I,
finally
fall,
he
said.
Well,
we
left
you
a
voicemail
and
a
message.
I
gave
my
drink
nothing.
My
phone
tells
me
everything
I'm
about
that.
By
the
way
were
three
weeks
out,
you
should
have
at
least
called
me
so
I
could
have
somebody
else
do
it.
K
The
one
that
has
a
cover
over
is
a
lot
more
again,
a
writable
type
that
needs
to
need
something
and
that's
why
it
was
covered.
But
again,
that's
all
I
can
tell
you.
I
have
no
idea,
as
as
the
woman
coming
to
a
house,
this
big,
suddenly
what
happened,
which
I
was
here
for
it
by
the
way
trying
to
make
contact.
So
they
don't
know
anybody,
but
I
did
talk
to
George.
K
And
the
funny
part
is
here:
he
is
doing
his
own
lawn
mowing,
and
you
know
questions
me
about
things
and
this
and
that
you
know
I'm
I,
don't
know
well
enough
to
even
talk
to
him
enough
to
tell
him
anything.
He
could
often
he's
done
some
things
for
my
father.
He
could
often
nicely
and
say
you
know,
I
got
my
note.
Let
me
do
yours,
I
would
have
paid
him,
but
his
son
Chris
who's
a
52
year
old.
Is
the
one
that's
doing
this,
because
that
contraction.
C
K
K
B
K
B
K
K
K
K
B
D
D
H
I'm
gonna
go
for
the
new
violations
first
and
I'll
make
a
motion.
I
move
based
on
testimony
evidence,
impacts
presented
in
law
that
I'm
the
alleged
violation,
sections
42,
0.00
and
city
code.
8
22
of
the
Code
of
Ordinances
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
was
in
force.
In
effect,
the
respondents
were
in
violation
they're
up.
Second.
H
B
She
stated
August,
11th
I.
Think
two
weeks
is
reasonable:
well,
actually,
we're
a
month
away
from
that,
but
what
that
is
encompassing
is
basically
store.
Cleaning
up
some
trash
and
taking
care
of
the
two
trailers.
I.
Think
two
weeks
is
reasonable
for
that
their
previous
fine
for
the
other
violations,
which
are
not
these
was
$25
a
day
and
I
would
mimic
that
again,
because
these
are
new
at
$25
a
day.
I.
D
H
H
H
C
L
D
K
F
Well,
you
can
talk
to
the
code
enforcement
officer
after
the
hearing
today
and
and
get
the
ear
specific
questions
answered.
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
tell
you
what
has
happened
here
at
the
code
enforcement
board.
The
code
enforcement
board
has
found
a
repeat
violation
of
a
tes
1680s
48-52.
The
fine
began
to
run
on
that
property,
On
June
10th
and
is
running
at
25
dollars
a
day.
In
addition,
the
code
enforcement
board
has
ordered
that
you
bring
the
property
into
compliance
with
section,
42.00
and
8
22.
F
You
have
until
July
29
to
do
that,
and
should
you
fail
to
do
it
by
that
date,
then
there'll
be
a
$25
a
day
for
each
day
that
it
remains
in
non-compliance.
In
addition,
the
board
has
awarded
the
city
$99
for
the
prosecution
cost
of
this
case.
An
order
will
be
entered,
it
will
be
mailed
to
the
address
listed
by
the
property
appraisers
records,
and
that
will
be
done
within
about
the
next
ten
days.
Should
you
have
any
questions
relative
to
what
happened
today?.
K
F
M
B
B
At
that
time
it
was
a
fine
of
$25
a
day
in
a
prosecution
cost
of
366
dollars.
So
far,
those
fines
have
not
been
paid
repeat.
Violator
case
also
case.
Sixteen
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero;
three
eight
seven
of
eight
49
one
and
three.
Oh
three
point
one
that
was
when
the
property
was
established.
There
was
no
fines.
The
case
before
the
board
is
19-8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
three
nine
six
property
address
is
385
Wickham,
Boulevard
owned
by
Harry
and
Anna
pets.
B
ËletÃs
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
all
of
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two
are
all
of
my
notices
to
include
Notice
of
Violation
and
Notice
of
Hearing.
Seven
number
three
administrative
documents
case,
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
related
emails
exhibit
number
four
is
off
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five
is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs?
B
The
photographs
and
exhibits
were
given
to
the
violator
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
this
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations
of
notice
of
hearing
or
sent
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and
mr.
chairman,
please
accept
these
exhibits
under
the
record
as
evidence.
B
This
case
stemmed
from
a
complaint
in
to
the
code
enforcement
department
and
just
for
the
record,
we've
had
no
contact
with
the
owner.
Up
until
today,
in
our
department
started
on
June
10th.
The
initial
complaint
was
the
arbors
overgrown.
When
I
did
the
inspection
I
found
the
arbors
overgrown,
there
was
a
rear
fence
gate
open.
B
The
final
inspection
was
conducted
and
I
took
photographs.
From
that
date,
part
of
the
front
yard
had
been
mowed,
it
appeared,
the
rear
yard
had
been
mowed,
it
was
hard
to
see
and
then
the
right-of-way
out
front
has
still
not
been
taken
care
of
and
basically
the
board.
This
was
on
the
wrong
monitor.
So
hang
on
this
was
June
10th.
This
is
part
of
the
front
yard.
This
is
a
neighboring
property.
B
So
this
is
looking
towards
golf
road
Whitcomb
and
we
can
buy
use
to
the
right.
You
can
see
the
sidewalks
overgrown
city
code
requires
it.
It's
not
more
than
four
inches
I.
Think
all
of
us
can
reasonably
assume
that's
more
than
four
inches,
and
this
is
the
right
away
this
section
here
and
you
can
see
it's
grossly
overgrown
on
June
10th
and
then
the
photograph
from
yesterday
depicting
that
same
general
area
shows
basically
has
not
been
maintained.
B
B
8-14
duty
maintained,
private
property
was
a
previous
repeat
violator
and
that's
been
ongoing
since
June
10th
and
then
the
new
violation
is
8
52,
which
specifically
addresses
maintaining
your
yard,
maintaining
the
right
away
and
someone
and
so
forth,
and
then
I
have
additional
information
after
the
fact
for
other
cases
related
to
this
property
owner.
So
right
as
of
now,
that's
all
the
city
has.
F
N
Right
regarding
these
pictures
here
that
you've
shown
the
ODE
board
I
agree
that
the
the
part
between
the
sidewalk
and
the
street
is
overgrown,
but
the
part
of
the
actual
property
address,
the
grass
that
belongs
to
the
house
has
been
cut
and
it's
less
than
12
inches,
as
shown
in
those
pictures.
I'm,
not
questioning
the
other
part
and
I'm,
not
questioning
the
responsibility
of
doing
that.
However,
I've
been
informed
so.
N
B
B
N
B
Well,
this
is
your
front
yard
on
June,
10th,
there's
a
lot
all
of
this
area
and
I'm
pretty
confident,
that's
more
than
12
inches.
This
is
your
neighbor's
yard.
That's
a
property
line,
I'm
guessing
because
this
is
maintained.
This
is
not.
This
is
the
right
of
way
out
front.
This
is
your
front
yard.
Yeah.
C
N
N
B
B
J
B
B
J
B
B
N
N
N
B
N
N
B
N
B
B
N
B
N
G
G
N
B
F
G
G
G
B
D
N
N
N
N
B
B
B
Yes
or
no,
is
it
your
property?
Yes,
okay!
Thank
you!
So
July
10th,
the
white
Mercedes
picture,
July
10th
same
property,
so
I'm
really
super
curious.
How
seven
days
afterwards
that
got
shaved
down
to
nothing.
But
yet
these
two
pictures
appear
to
be
pretty
much
unkept
for
a
month,
so
I'm,
just
I
would
object
to
the
relevance
of
these
photos
and
I
bring
into
question
the
dates
that
they
were
taken.
D
B
F
J
N
N
N
F
Not
gonna
do
that,
because
I
need
to
keep
the
evidence
for
the
purposes
of
Appeal
and
I
can't
keep
your
phone
and
that,
and
the
chairman
is
already
acted
upon.
These
particular
exhibits
if
they're
the
same
ones
in
your
phone
he's
already
responded
and
he's
sustained
the
objection.
So
I
am
NOT
going
to
let
the
board
look
at
the
phone
and
then
you
not
have
that
in
evidence.
For
the
purposes
of.
N
J
N
C
N
F
N
N
G
B
G
G
G
G
H
F
F
H
D
N
H
B
B
J
B
Recourse
for
that
he
was
fine,
so
he
hasn't
complied
moving
forward
for
this
particular
one.
The
prior
case
was
$25
per
day.
I
think
we're
still
moving
up
with
this
he's
got
a
prior
case
that
was
$50
per
day,
so
I
think
for
this
particular
one.
It's
reasonable
to
go
$75
a
day,
and
it's
already
the
two
kind
of
go
hand-in-hand
once
he
complies
the
other
case.
The
repeat
violator
case
will
cease
at
that
point
in
time.
So
I
would
say
two
weeks
for
the
852
and
that'll
you.
H
H
C
E
A
H
H
D
D
L
D
F
Mr.
Pat's
elitists
you've
been
found
in
violation
of
code
section
8
52
you've
been
given
until
July
18th
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance.
If
you
don't
bring
the
property
in
compliance,
they
touch
52.
There
was
going
to
be
a
$75
a
day,
fine
for
every
day
after
July
18th.
In
addition
to
that,
the
code
enforcement
board
has
found
you
in
violation
of
section
8
40.
As
a
repeat
violator.
The
fine
began
to
run
on
June
the
10th
at
$75
a
day.
F
It'll
continue
to
run
until
the
property
is
brought
into
compliance
with
that
code
section,
the
the
code
enforcement
board
also
awarded
$99
to
the
city
for
a
for
prosecution
costs.
In
prosecuting
the
case.
The
order
will
be
entered
within
about
10
days
and
will
be
mailed
to
the
address
listed
by
the
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector.
You
have
any
other
questions
you
can
ask
and
talk
to
the
code
enforcement
department
after
this
meeting.
F
C
B
B
Officer,
Steve,
gasps
and
Sadie
interpreter
Springs,
Police
Department,
code
enforcement.
This
is
a
repeat
violation
from
June
18th
til,
it's
still
ongoing,
repeat,
repeat
violator
four
case:
18
18:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
four
one
two,
which
was
a
violation
of
city
code;
eight
22,
eight
48-52,
36.0,
three
40.00
6-1,
I,
PMC,
301,
point
two
and
three
or
four
point:
six:
that
previous
case,
the
fines
and
prosecution
cost
totalled
ten
thousand,
eight
hundred
twenty
three
dollars
and
fifty
cents.
As
of
this
date,
they're
still
not
paid.
This
is
case.
B
Number
19,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
four
one,
eight
the
address
is
seven
one:
zero
Penn,
Street
owned
by
the
long
Wang,
exhibit
number
one
before
the
border.
All
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two.
All
notices
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
administrative
docs
case,
summary
property,
appraiser
tax,
collector
records
and
any
associated
emails.
The
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy,
the
sign
is
exhibit
number
four
and
exhibit
number
five
is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs?
B
All
my
notices
were
mail,
the
property
owner
of
record
based
on
the
Pinellas,
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations,
a
notice
of
hearing
or
sent
both
return
receipt
requested
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and
mr.
chairman,
please
accept
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
B
We've
had
no
contact
with
the
owner
previously.
On
previous
cases,
we
were
receiving
emails
from
the
owner.
In
this
particular
case,
we've
had
no
communication
with
him
whatsoever.
So
not
exactly
sure.
The
circumstances
behind
that
case
started
out.
June
18th
of
this
year
received
a
complaint
from
one
of
the
neighbors
about
their
cement
and
other
debris.
In
the
rear
yard.
The
rear
yard
was
overgrown.
B
Pretty
much
makes
the
vehicle
not
operable
8
22
accumulation
of
trash
fairly
self-explanatory
in
the
picture,
8
40
duty
to
maintain
private
property
and
8
52.
Largely
this
one
is
doing
some
maintenance
on
the
property,
but
it
has
to
do
with
debris.
Debris
is
defined,
it's
a
very
broad
definition,
but
unused
equipment,
old
pieces
of
cement
building
equipment.
That's
not
being
used,
there's
no
active
building
permits
on
the
property,
so
the
reason
to
store
any
building
supplies
would
be
irrelevant
and
that's
all
the
city
has
at
this
point.
B
Were
in
compliance
well
actually
I.
Take
that
back.
As
you
guys
are
well
aware,
there's
you
have
seven
violations.
You
have
to
comply
all
seven
violations
for
the
case
to
be
compliant.
He
still
has
one
hanging
out
there.
It's
like
a
fence
violation
which
isn't
this
one,
so
that
previous
one
is
still
accruing
and
has
not
been
paid
and
then
we're
dealing
with
a
whole
bunch
of
unrelated
ones,
but
they
were
the
same
as
the
repeat
violator
case.
If
that
makes
any
sense.
H
B
H
G
A
M
D
F
J
F
Okay,
so
you've
got
before
you
today
a
request
for
foreclosure
of
this
property.
518
East
Lime
Street.
The
property
is
not
in
compliance
with
the
2017
code
enforcement
case.
There
are
approximately
110,000
dollars
outstanding.
This
property
is
non
homesteaded.
The
fine
is
continuing
to
run
at
250
dollars
a
day
for
each
day
that
it's
not
in
compliance.
B
This
this
this
case,
obviously
I-
think
most.
This
board
was
well
aware
of
it.
580
nice
line
Street
is
a
quad
Plex
level
for
apartment
building.
It's
been
a
significant
crime
problem
for
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
Police,
Department
I've
been
employed
here
for
20-plus
years.
The
whole
time
I've
worked
here
that
apartment
complex
has
been
a
source
of
calls.
I
actually
have
in
front
of
me
just
from
2016
385
police
calls
that
occurred
related
somehow
to
that
address
are
all
because
of
a
crime
that
occurred
there.
B
It's
either
people
coming
and
going
car
stopped
there
or
whatever,
with
that
address,
we
recently
March
21st
of
this
year,
condemned
the
building
the
building
inspector
mr.
Powell,
deemed
it
uninhabitable
because
of
the
significant
poor
condition
that
it
was
in.
So
this
is
a
significant
nuisance
to
the
city
and
that's
why
we're
requesting
to
move
forward
with
the
foreclosure
process.
So
we
can
eventually
abate
problem
at
that
address.
O
Right,
this
property
was
purchased
on
last
June
21st
by
group,
open
vessel
and
in
order
to
comply
and
rebuild
this
place
and
put
tremendous
amount
of
money,
we
were
not
a
word
that
things
like
that
happening
and
we
want
to
do.
There
is
a
lot
of
money
we
purchased
two
weeks
ago
and
we're
willing
to
put
more
money
in
order
to
make
it
I,
don't
know
why
it
needs
to
be.
You
know
the
Molly
store,
whatever
you
want
to
do
it
it's
a
block
structure.
This
is
as
a
that's
why
we
got
into.
O
G
O
Permit
we
have
all
what
we
need
to
do
it.
There
is
no
reason
to
take
it
down.
There
are
no
people
living
there.
That's
the
time
to
do
everything.
I
know,
maybe
the
people
from
before
we
when
we
went
over
that
we
didn't
see
that
there
are
any
any
violations
or
anything.
You
know
any
liens
or
something
like
that,
but
we're
willing
to
go
forward
and
do
whatever
give
us
the
chance
to
do
it.
We
have
the
experience
of
30
years.
Why
not
to
do
it?
We
have
a
broker.
O
O
We
do
it
and
we
know
that
we
came
to
not
to
leave
it
as
it
is.
That's
not
our
point.
The
point
is
renovate
making
really
nice
fence
it
all
and
probably
the
different
kind
of
people.
This
is
gonna,
be
nice.
The
rents
gonna,
be
these
people
rounded
right
now
there,
where
there
won't
be
able
to
rent
over
there.
Sir.
B
O
O
B
E
B
B
O
F
So
they've
made
their
presentation.
The
city
has
made
their
presentation
now
you
need
to
decide
whether
or
not
that
you
want
to
move
forward
by
giving
author
is
a
into
the
city
to
begin
its
foreclosure
process.
So
the
the
two
motions
would
be
either
to
approve
or
authorize
the
foreclosure
process
to
start
or
to
not
approve
their
foreclosure
process.
D
P
F
O
L
F
D
F
M
A
C
F
Also
is
a
request
for
foreclosure
of
this
property.
This
is
a
property
that
is
non
homesteaded
property.
There
is
a
small
building
located
on
it.
There
is
an
outstanding
fine
of
approximately
102
thousand
dollars.
The
fine
continues
to
accrue
at
the
rate
of
two
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
a
day.
The
property
is
in
very
poor
condition
and
the
source
of
numerous
complaints.
If
you
have
any
specific
information
about
the
property,
I
would
suggest
that
we
have
officer
gauss
and
speak
to
those
issues,
but
the
City
Attorney's
Office
is
requesting
authority
to
foreclose
this
property.
B
I,
don't
have
anything
substantial
dad.
This
was
a
small
building
that
is
operated
as
a
church
many
years
ago
and
it's
become
rundown
in
a
very
poor
condition.
The
roof
is
coming
off.
It's
a
metal
roof,
there's
actually
pieces
of
it
that
flew
off.
It
got
significantly
damaged
back
in
the
hurricane
in
2017
pieces
of
that
roof
and
the
building
ended
up
in
neighbors
yards.
So
we
opened
a
code
case
for
it.
We've
been
moving
forward
with
it.
B
M
B
H
F
M
A
A
F
I'm
not
following
your
question:
you
have
the
ability
to
find
for
an
initial
violation:
zero
to
$250
a
day
the
board
had
found
the
$25
a
day
was
appropriate
in
that
case,
on
Gulf,
Road
I.
Think
that's.
When
you're
referred
to
on
a
repeat
violation:
it
could
be
up
to
$500
a
day
and
again
you
remember.
The
three
things
that
you
look
at
is:
is
the
gravity
of
the
violation?
How
serious
is
it?
F
What
is
the
property
owner
done
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance,
and
you
know,
has
the
the
property
owner
been
found
in
violation
in
the
past?
Those
are
the
types
of
things
you
look
at
in
determining
the
dollar
amount
of
the
fine,
but
each
case
needs
to
ride
in
its
own
facts.
Some
are
more
serious
than
others.
So
I
don't
have
any
particular
answer
for
you,
but
you
know:
that's
that's
what
you're
supposed
to
do
determining
the
dollar
amount
of
the
fine.
M
B
C
P
C
B
B
The
now,
for
almost
going
on
five
years,
I've
been
doing
this,
we've
managed
to
actually
do
some
really
good
things
in
one
of
the
cases
we
heard
today
is
a
perfect
example
of
kind
of
the
whole
reason
I
got
into
this
position
was
to
try
to
take
care
of
some
of
these
nuisances,
make
the
area
better
for
the
city
living,
and
it
largely
hinges
on
you
guys
to
start
that
process.
So
for
that
reason
you
know
unless
a
I
appreciate
your
work,
couldn't
do
it
without
you
literally.
L
B
You
know
we
do
try.
If
people
communicate
with
us,
we
send
them
letters,
they
contact
us.
We
do
everything
we
possibly
can,
so
they
do
not
come
here.
I
would
prefer
to
have
zero
cases
come
to
code
work.
Ultimately,
that's
my
goal.
When
people
communicate
with
us
she's.
These
two
are
amazing
at
communicating
with
people
sometimes
I'm,
but
they're,
the
ones
that
do
all
of
it
and
and
they
do
a
wonderful
job
at
it
and
we
do
strive.
B
L
B
Is
but
ultimately,
my
job
is
to
find
violations,
site
violations
and
get
people
to
comply
with
those
violations
if
you
go
to
the
mean
and
dirty
of
it,
but
with
that
being
said,
there's
50,000
other
things.
I
do
in
the
process,
but
my
job
is
find
violations,
site
violations
or
notify
somebody
of
a
violation
and
try
to
gain
compliance
of
those
violations
and
I
do
notify
them.
There's
certain
things
legally,
I
can't
do,
especially
with
repeat
violators.
I
I
have
no
choice.
I
have
a
legal
requirement
to
do
certain
notifications
a
certain
way.
B
So
in
that
particular
case,
generally
speaking,
I
don't
same
thing:
ID,
courtesy,
letter
door,
hanger,
somehow
communicate
to
you
there's
a
violation.
You
know
I,
don't
know.
Sara
Lee
have
to
be
warm
and
fuzzy.
We
try,
but
there's
a
point
in
time
where
I
also
have
a
legal
requirement
that
things
have
to
be
done
a
particular
way.
So
mr.
Trask
job
is
much
easier
if
it
goes
to
appeal
and.