![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/SD-QpMPRuVE/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board October 10, 2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
It's
not
fair
to
start
the
case
without
the
notices,
so
so
so
on.
September
26th
I
did
conduct
another
inspection
on
the
property
and
it
was
still
the
same
as
the
photographs
which
are
dated
8:12
and
the
back
corner.
The
property's
overgrown
with
we'd,
not
just
plants
and
vines.
It
was
causing
damage
to
the
fences
and
surrounding
trees.
There's
also
overgrowth
on
the
north
side,
which
is
closer
to
I,
think
it's
margarita
terrorists
as
the
North
Road
and
Seminole
of
Buda
West
Road
on
September
26,
the
repeat,
violator
notice.
A
The
hearing
was
mailed,
no
mail
was
returned
back
to
our
office,
I
posted
the
property
on
September
27th
and
on
October,
2nd
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin,
and
at
that
time
it
was
in
compliance.
So,
as
stated,
it
was
a
repeat
violator,
four
sections,
8
40
and
8
52
from
a
period
of
time
of
September
26th
until
it
was
complied
on.
October
1st
I
stated
I
conducted
the
re-inspection
on
the
second,
but
the
property
owner
called
in
the
day
before
stating
we're
ready
for
a
reinfection.
A
B
D
Yeah
I'm
23rd,
I
cut
the
grass
but
I
didn't
know.
I'd
have
to
cut
that
bushes
I
didn't
know,
it'd
been
like
this
for
years
and
never
get
violation
for
this.
So
on
23rd,
when
I
cut
the
grass
my
neighbor,
he
asked
me
very
nice.
Can
you
cut
this
I
said:
okay
when
I
come
back
next
time,
I
will
cut
it
because
I
don't
have
a
saw.
So
I
went
home
and
I
get
the
violation
mean
the
marijuana
at
the
mill
and
I
called
the
city.
D
They
told
me
because
this
and
I
didn't
know
I
have
to
cut
this
they've
been
there
for
years.
I
didn't
know
this
has
to
be
cleaned
up,
so
when
I
mean
under
200.
Second
I
went
there
and
I
clean
when
I
received
the
mill.
So
I
didn't
know.
That's
all
it's
my
butt's
I
know.
This
is
still
my
mistakes.
This.
A
A
So,
regardless
of
the
back
corner,
he
still
had
other
consistent
violations
with
those
city
codes,
so
they
yes,
he
did
mow
it,
but
he
left
a
couple
of
places
where
the
grass
was
still
very
tall
and
some
debris
that
was
cleaned
up
and
then
once
all
of
that
was
taken.
Care
of
it
was
in
compliance.
Thank.
C
E
F
So
you've
been
found
in
violation
of
the
code
sections
that
were
cited
from
September
26.
The
two
walked
over
the
first
code
enforcement
Ward
has
find
you
as
a
property
under
$25
a
day
for
those
days
that
was
in
violation.
The
code
enforcement
board
also
authorized
and
awarded
the
city,
its
costs
of
prosecution
and
the
case
no
$69.50
you'll
receive
an
order
in
the
next
ten
days.
It'll
come
in
the
mail
to
you,
it'll
be
sent
to
the
address
listed
at
the
tax
collector's
office.
Thank
you,
euphy
any
questions.
F
G
A
A
Twenty
seven
fifteen
eight
six,
eight:
five:
zero:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
two
eight
zero-
this
is
a
repeat
violator
case
in
it
stems
from
the
prior
case
of
eighteen,
eight:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
three
nine
one,
which
was
for
violation
of
city
codes,
8
48-52
and
one
33.0
to
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
or
all
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two.
All
my
notices
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
administrative
documents
case.
A
Summary
previous
board
orders,
the
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
number
four:
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five?
Is
an
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs.
All
the
up
photographs
and
exhibits
were
given
to
the
violator
exact
copies
of
what's
been
presented
to
this
board.
All
my
notices
are
mailed
to
the
property
owner
record
based
on
the
Pinellas,
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
All
my
notice
of
violations
and
notice
hearings
are
sent
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
mail
and
mr.
A
As
I
stated,
this
is
a
repeat
violator
case.
The
initial
inspection
was
on
September
6.
Then
it
was
complied
on.
October
4th,
so
September
6th
October
4th
was
a
period
of
time
as
in
violation
we
have
had
contact
with
the
representative,
the
owner
of
the
property,
mainly
in
the
office
September
6th
I
conducted
the
initial
inspection
of
the
property
based
on
a
phone
call.
The
property's
overgrown
30
feet
from
the
right
away
and
15
free
permit,
joining
property.
A
G
G
Renard
OHS
name.
He
went
to
the
neighbor
next
door
and
said:
here's
my
phone
number.
Please
don't
call
code
enforcement.
If
you
have
any
problems,
call
me
and
I'll
take
care
of
it.
He
laughed
in
his
face
and
said
I'll
call
it
any
time
I
want.
Then
mr.
Renard
Oh
went
and
spoke
to
you
and
said:
what's
going
on
over,
there
is
not
right
and
what
happened
to
mr.
Renard.
G
Oh,
he
was
taken
off
the
list
and
he
never
received
another
recommendation
from
the
city
of
a
tarpon
springs,
even
though
he
was
an
employee
and
was
the
street
sweeper.
He
took
him
off
the
referral
list.
I
feel
sorry
for
the
man
now
mr.
Bernardo
was
sick
and
passed
away
and
I
have
a
new
group
of
guys
that
are
doing
it.
The
only
thing
I
could
I.
G
He
told
me
that
he
told
him
exactly
what
to
do,
but
evidently
they
weren't
following
it,
but
I
have
a
new
guys
and
now
they
know
exactly
what's
supposed
to
be
done
and
hopefully
they'll
do
it.
It's
not
that
I'm
not
trying
to
do
it.
I'm
trying
to
but
and
I'll
tell
you
another
example.
He
didn't
have
anything
to
call
okay,
so
he
cleaned
out
his
whole
yard
and
walked
over
and
threw
their
trash
into
my
lot
right
over
the
fence.
G
He
came
and
inspected
it
and
said:
that's
fine
I'll
put
her
up
for
violation,
but
everything
that
was
in
that
pile,
Hibiscus
Queen
am
fig.
That
was
all
in
his
yard.
I,
don't
have
him
in
my
yard,
but
I
got
called
on
that
too,
and
I
had
to
take
care
of
it.
Now
he
sends
me
a
letter
and
he
states
that
I
have
noxious
weeds,
I,
have
vines
and
the
end
grass.
Okay,
it's
overgrown,
I
get
the
letter
at
the
13th.
It's
a
Wednesday
I
called
my
guys.
G
They
said
they
would
go
out
Thursday,
they
went
out
Thursday
and
did
it
I
called
him
Friday.
He
went
and
inspected
it
Monday
and
he
said.
Oh
no.
This
isn't
good
enough.
You
have
to
have
30
feet
from
the
road.
You
have
to
have
15
feet
on
the
lot.
You
have
to
have
their
debris.
Well,
that
should
have
been
stated
that
should
so,
then
then
he
caught
they
called
and
said.
We
want
you
to
have
the
guys
go
out
to
the
property,
so
we
can
tell
him
exactly
what
they
want
now.
G
B
B
B
G
A
G
A
C
Based
on
the
testimony
evidence
backs
presented
in
law
that
the
respondent
was
in
violation
of
sections
8
48-52
130
3.02
of
the
tarpon
springs
code
from
September
6th
to
October
4th
in
a
fine
of
through
the
previous
spine,
was
$20
per
day,
so
the
spine
is
$40
per
day
or
I.
Believe
that's
28
days.
In
addition,
I'm
going
to
move
that
the
city
be
awarded
$69.50,
where
the
costed
incurred
in
prosecuting
the
case.
I
J
J
F
Yes
John,
so
this
is
Miller.
The
code
enforcement
Ward
has
found
the
property
owner
to
be
in
violation
of
the
three
code,
sections
that
were
cited.
Eight
Tests,
48-52
and
130
3.02
found
the
property,
a
violation
from
September,
the
sixth,
until
October
the
4th
and
assessed
a
forty
dollar
per
day.
Fine,
the
city
was
also
awarded
its
cost
of
prosecution
of
the
case
of
$69.50.
An
order
will
be
entered
and
sent
to
the
property
owner
at
the
address
listed
with
the
tax
collector.
That
will
happen
in
approximately
ten
days.
F
F
Under
the
law,
an
under
the
Florida
Statute
chapter,
162,
you're,
deemed
to
be
a
repeat
violator,
because
you
have
been
in
violation
before
and
under
the
statute
and
under
the
city's
code.
If
you've
been
found
in
violation
before
the
fine
can
be
retro
actively
applied
to
the
date
of
the
inspection
and
that's
the
reason
why
it'll
happen
again
next
time,
if
your,
if
the
property
goes
into
violation
again,
it'll
be
from
the
date
of
the
inspection,
so
he
has
testified
under
oath
today
that
he
inspected
the
property
on
September
the
6th.
C
A
A
F
K
K
A
At
that
time,
a
fine
was
assessed
250
dollars
per
day,
but
they
came
into
compliance
before
any
flying
fines
a
recruit
and
they
did
pay
their
prosecution
costs.
The
address
is
five
20s
lime
street,
although
it
is
a
vacant
lot.
The
parcel
number
is
thirteen.
Twenty
seven
one:
five,
four,
six:
six:
three:
eight:
zero:
zero:
three:
zero:
zero,
nine
zero.
All
the
exhibit
number
one
of
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two,
my
Notice
of
Violation
notice
and
hearings.
The
exhibit
number
three
administrative
documents
case.
A
Summary
previous
board:
orders,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
number
four:
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign?
An
exhibit
number
five
is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs.
All
my
photographs
and
exhibits
are
given
to
the
violator
exact
copies
of
its
presented
to
this
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
of
pays,
our
appraiser
and
tax,
collector
databases
and
all
notice
of
violations.
A
notice
of
hearing
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
as
well
as
first
class
mail
and
mr.
A
Thank
you.
We
did
have
contact
with
the
owner.
An
office
employee
named
Diane
Hill.
The
initial
inspection
was
on
September
16th
2019
I
was
expecting.
I
was
inspecting
the
neighboring
property
to
the
east
of
a
518
East
Lime,
Street
and
I
observed
that
this
lot
was
grossly
overgrown
well,
over
12
inches
on
September
16th
of
2019,
the
repeat,
violator
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed.
The
green
cards
were
signed
by
both
the
property
owner
and
the
registered
agent
September
27th
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
of
posting.
A
K
Why
didn't
he
call
the
office
to?
Let
us
know,
there's
the
problem.
The
moment
we
got
a
phone
call
from
Vegas
same
day.
We
went
and
got
it
in
clients,
and
nobody
called
us
from
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
now
I
know
that
he
doesn't
have
to
call
us
I'm
aware
of
it,
but
it
would
be
nice.
You
know
we
we
dealt
with
him
in
the
past
and
I
think
we
established
fairly
good
rapport
the
last
time
that
we
had
back
last
year.
K
We
did
well
and
above
what
he
asked
us
to
do.
We
put
gate
to
prevent
an
additional
fencing
on
the
front
to
prevent
people
from
dumping.
My
IRA's
there,
the
property
next
door,
has
been
a
nuisance
for
a
while.
So
you
know
there
was
issues
of
them,
throwing
stuff
to
this
property,
and
that's
probably
happened
there
too,
and
we
got
we
signed
a
contract
with
the
company
to
come
and
maintain
the
property
on
a
regular
monthly
base
and
obviously
the
last
few
months
were
not
done
properly.
K
A
Well,
you
kind
of
stated
it
when
we're
not
required
to
by
law.
You
were
here
previously
in
2018
when
you
were
established
as
a
repeat
violator,
so
the
onus
is
on
you
to
take
care
of
your
property,
similar
to
the
other
two
people
that
were
here
before
you
they're
in
the
same
situation.
It's
not
our
responsibility
to
be
your
lawn
maintenance
company,
your
responsibility
to
take
care
of
your
property,
and
then
state
statute
says
that
we
basically
start
to
provide
the
legal
notices.
A
I'm
sure
everybody
would
love
a
phone
call
from
us
before
we
take
any
enforcement
action.
Unfortunately,
I'd
probably
have
to
have
a
significantly
larger
staff
to
do
that,
so
we,
this
is
how
we
handle
it,
and
you
were
made
aware
at
the
last
Code
Board
hearing
that
you're
kind
of
on
notice
for
lack
of
a
better
term
for
the
next
five
years
to
take
care
of
the
property,
and
we
have
been
taking.
K
Care
of
it
clearly
it
just
that
you
know
the
last
couple
of
months:
I
guess
the
guy
in
the
grass
goes
fairly
quick,
it's
this
time
of
year,
but
you
know
we
kept
up
with
it.
Up
to
this
point,
I
mean
there
was
no
complaints
or
issues
the
place
was
cut
on
a
regular
basis,
again
I
I
think
at
one
phone.
Instead
of
we
take
you
more
time
to
to
write
notices
than
pick
up
the
phone
and
say:
hey,
listen,
you
got
a
problem,
you
know
Diane
on
a
first-name
basis.
K
You
could
have
closed
a
day
and
you
got
a
issue
with
the
property
and
see
how
quick
will
react
and
we
react
quick.
You
know
the
moment.
I
know,
there's
a
problematic
care
of
it,
but
that
wasn't
aware
of
the
problem
and-
and
it
took
you,
you
had
to
fill
up
all
the
records
and
pictures
and
and
send
stuff
to
Vegas.
Now
I
know
you
guys
make
money
out
of
this,
but
I
think
it's
only
courtesy,
hole
I
think
would
be
a
nice
thing.
To
do.
I
mean
it's
not
again,
it's
not
something.
K
I
That,
based
on
the
testimony,
evidence
and
facts
presented
in
law,
the
respondent
was
in
violation
of
sections
8-14,
8
52
of
the
top
and
springs
code
from
the
dates
of
916
to
923
and
a
fine
of
$25
a
day.
Oh
excuse
me,
$50
per
day.
In
addition,
I
move
that
the
city
be
awarded
the
ninety
three
dollars
in
prosecution
costs
for
the
case.
F
So
the
property
owner
has
been
found
in
violation
of
the
code
sexes
that
were
cited
from
September,
the
16th,
those
September,
the
23rd.
The
coda
for
support
assess
the
$50
a
day,
fine
and
also
ordered
the
city
30.
Ninety
three
dollars
and
prosecution
cost
an
order
will
be
entered
within
the
next
ten
days,
they'll
be
sent
to
the
property
owner
listed
by
the
tax
collector's
office.
If
you
have
any
questions,
you
can
talk
to
the
code
enforcement
Department
after
the
meeting.
B
F
J
C
F
J
A
H
B
C
B
C
B
B
F
Mouna
read
it
worked
forward
after
a
fine
has
been
imposed
by
the
board
and
within
60
days
after
the
violation
is
brought
into
compliance,
a
violator
may
petition
for
reconsideration
of
a
fine.
The
petition
must
be
in
writing.
Signed
by
the
violator
include
a
copy
of
the
affidavit
of
compliance
executed
by
the
code
inspector.
The
petition
must
show
conclusive
evidence
showing
extreme
or
undue
hardship
in
the
payment
of
the
fine
or
preventing
the
violator
from
coming
into
compliance
within
a
time
period
established
by
the
board's
order.
F
The
board
secretary
should
schedule
the
petition
to
be
considered
and
the
board
shall
make
its
determination
based
solely
upon
the
written
petition.
The
board
may
request
information
from
the
code
inspector.
The
board's
secretary
shall
notify
the
violator
by
regular
mail
of
the
determination
made
by
the
board
no
petition
for
the
reduction
of
fine
will
be
considered
prior
to
the
board's
acceptance
of
an
affidavit
of
compliance.
Under
no
circumstances
may
the
amount
of
the
fine
be
reduced
below
the
costs
of
the
action.
F
A
Yeah,
it's
a
it's
a
long
one.
The
city's
code
case
started
out
in
2015
in
September,
I'm,
sorry,
November,
18th
of
2015
the
board
order.
This
board's
order
for
compliance
was
almost
three
years
for
the
date
November
eighth
of
2018,
the
date
of
the
code
board
compliance
deadline
was
February
6th
of
2019.
The
date
of
compliance
by
the
owner
was
June
25th
of
2019,
and
the
affidavit
of
compliance
was
accepted
by
this
board
on
August
8th
of
2019.
E
H
E
B
B
G
F
E
E
B
B
H
E
J
J
A
F
C
A
A
J
J
H
A
A
Primarily,
if
you
guys
have
noticed
are
the
city's
thrust
to
foreclose
on
these
properties
are
ones
that
are
severely
distressed.
Those
are
primarily
the
ones
that
were
seeking
foreclosure
on.
It
makes
it
easier
for
the
city
to
manage
that
property
in
most
of
those
cases
it's
demolished
them
and
then
what
happens
after
that,
but
we're
experiencing
one
that's
probably
at
least
a
year
in
from
the
time
mr.
Trask
has
filed
the
initial
court
paperwork,
it's
just
a
slow
process,
so
you
will
see
results.