►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board November 14th 2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
D
E
A
It
is
the
intention
of
the
board
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
the
citizens
of
Tarpon
Springs.
By
providing
an
equitable,
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
various
codes
within
the
city
of
tarpon
springs.
The
aggravated
party
may
appeal
a
final
administrative
order
of
the
board
to
the
circuit
court.
Such
appeals
shall
be
filed
within
30
days
of
the
execution
of
the
order
to
be
appealed.
A
A
First,
the
city
presents
its
witnesses
and
exhibits,
after
which
the
alleged
violator
is
able
to
ask
the
city
witnesses
any
specific
questions
regarding
their
testimony.
Secondly,
the
alleged
violator
is
allowed
to
make
a
presentation
and
present
his
or
her
witnesses
and
exhibits.
Then
the
city
can
question
the
alleged
violators
witnesses
after
both
rounds
of
testimony
both
on
the
part
of
the
city
and
on
the
part
of
the
alleged
violator.
Each
party
is
asked
to
give
a
closing
argument
first
by
the
city
and
then
by
the
alleged
violator
after
those
three
steps
are
taken.
A
E
A
F
G
Chairman
that
I
have
two
cases:
seven:
okay,
701
and
702
they're,
both
her
properties
they're,
both
adjacent,
it's
the
exact
same
story
for
both
properties.
So,
if
you'd
like
alright,
we
can
do
both
at
the
same
time
yeah
it's
just
rather
than
repeating
the
same
thing.
So
if
you'd,
like
I'd,
start
out
with
701,
just
because,
numerically,
it's
the
first
case
number:
okay,
all
right
officer,
Steve
gas
and
city
of
Turpan,
Springs,
Police,
Department,
Code
Enforcement.
G
This
is
case
before
the
board:
19-8
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
seven
zero
one-
it
was
formerly
had
a
house
on
it.
It
does
have
a
city
address
of
517
Ashland
Avenue,
but
for
the
record,
the
parcel
is
fourteen.
Twenty
seven
fifteen,
four:
three:
zero:
seven:
four:
zero:
zero:
six:
zero
zero
in
zero
and
reference
number
case
number
19.
Eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
seven,
zero,
it's
the
vacant
lot!
A
F
I,
don't
I
like
visiting
this
place.
As
my
former
school,
mrs.
archer
can
attest
to
I'm
a
retired
schoolteacher
I'm
a
scaredy
cat
I
do
like
that
to
follow
the
rules.
Mrs.
archer
didn't
even
like
to
bring
messages
to
my
room
because
she
she'd
know
that
I
would
panic,
and
so
all
of
this
is
very
embarrassing
to
me,
and
I
do
want
to
stay
out
of
its
clutches.
I
did
note
that
when.
F
F
E
G
You
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board,
for
both
cases
is
going
to
be.
The
photographs
exhibit
number
two
again
for
both
cases.
As
all
my
notices
to
include
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
administrative
documents,
including
the
case
summary
property.
Our
previous
board
orders,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign?
An
affidavit
prosecution
cost
for
each
case
is
exhibit
number
five
for
the
record.
G
All
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
this
board.
All
of
my
notices
are
mailed
to
the
property.
Owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
All
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
both
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
mail.
Mr.
chairman,
please
accept
all
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence
for
both
cases.
C
E
G
Right,
thank
you.
We
have
had
previous
contact
with
the
owner,
both
via
phone
calls
and
we've
also
talked
to
a
maintenance
manager,
who's
taking
care
of
the
property.
This
case
started
out
on
September
27th
of
this
year
was
a
complaint
of
I,
observed
the
property's
overgrown
and
not
being
maintained
on
September
27,
2009
teen,
the
repeat,
violator
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed.
Green
cards
were
returned
unclaimed
on
October
8
that
conducted
a
reinfection
at
the
time
was
not
in
compliance.
Only
one
part
of
the
lot
was
cleared.
G
This
is
a
situation
where
the
lot
is
less
than
ten
thousand
square
feet.
The
parcels
are
not
yet
combined,
so
there
are
two
individual
parcels
and
they're
each
less
than
ten
thousand
square
feet.
So
the
requirement
in
the
city
code
852
requires
a
lot
to
be
completely
clear
below
12
inches
and
don't
have
any
noxious
plants
weeds
things
like
that.
So
that's
in
effect,
for
this
property
also,
the
property
had
been
previously
cleared.
It
used
like
I,
said
it
used
to
have
a
house
on
it.
G
So
it's
been
developed
property
if
you
will
so
on
November
1st
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
of
posting
I
conducted
another
inspection
on
November
8th.
It
was
in
compliance.
This
is
another
situation
where
we
back
dated
the
compliance
to
11
4
because
they
had
contacted
us
said
they
believe
they
were
in,
but
I
wasn't
able
to
do
the
inspection
for
4
days
so.
G
I
hadn't
finished
reading
it,
so
we
changed
the
compliance
date
back
to
October
29th,
because
that
was
the
date
Ken's
Tree
Service
had
completed
the
work.
I
just
hadn't
had
an
opportunity
to
go
out
and
we
inspect
it.
So
the
compliance
date
for
the
record
on
both
of
these
cases
is
October
29th
of
2019.
The.
G
As
stated,
the
property
was
in
violation
from
the
date
of
inspection
on
September
27th
until
it
was
complied
on.
October
29th,
which
is
28
days,
I
think
according
to
my
math,
and
they
were
in
violation
of
section
8
40
duty
maintain
private
property
in
8
52.
Now,
as
far
as
case
number,
seven
zero
one,
it's
a
repeat
violator
for
case
number,
17-8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
five,
five
two,
which
was
a
violation
of
the
same
two
codes,
8-14
852
case
number.
G
H
H
I
I
G
Of
the
overgrowth
Harbor
snakes
rats
trash
people
hide
in
the
woods
it
backs
up
to
the
church,
their
property.
The
church
on
the
bayou
is
to
the
south
of
her
property.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
when
they
cleaned
it
out,
they
did
find
a
pretty
substantial
rattlesnake
in
there,
and
so
by
having
that
property
cleared,
you
don't
have
those
public
nuisances.
So
that's
why
it's
attached
with
it.
That
goes
along
with
it
specifically
defined
in
the
code
as
one
of
the
nuisances
under
8-30
88,
39
and
840.
F
Why,
when
I
purchase
from
the
city,
the
property
that
does
not
have
a
street
number
on
it,
it
was
heavily
wooded
for
a
very,
very
long
time
and
when
I
purchased
it
it
was
heavily
wooded
and
I
was
told
by
someone.
We
may
know
here
that
he
doesn't
mind
if
they
own
it
to
allow
it
to
grow
and
happy
woods
woods
like,
but
if
you
purchase
it
ma'am.
F
A
specified
can
the
city
be
okay
with
a
lot
that
was
for
many
years,
wooded
I
came
along
and
I
purchased
it
as
soon
as
I
did.
It
was
I
mean
I
came
to
discover
because
I'm
so
ignorant
and
innocent
about
these
things.
Oh
by
the
way
you
just
purchased
that
property.
My
question
is
the
city
doesn't
maintain.
It
is
that
okay
for
the
city
to
have
it
so
heavily
wooded
with
no
apparent.
Let's.
G
F
Just
I'm
going
to
have
that
property
cleared
I,
do
not
like
coming
here.
I,
don't
like
the
authoritative
feel
of
you
know
being
where
how
we're
situated
and
I
don't
want
to
come
back
here
again
and
I
Pete
there,
like
US,
has
wanted
to
be
a
witness
for
me
right
now,
but
he
can
affirm
that
that
lot
was
severely
heavily
wooded
and
I'm
saying
severely
not
in
a
like
severe
but
severely
heavily
wooded,
and
when
the
city
owned
it.
There
was
no
no
regard
so
I
assumed
that
continuation
so
Pete.
D
D
If
you
don't
know
the
area,
this
area
is
heavily
wooded
in
here.
There's
Hidden
Lake
back
here
behind
the
church,
there's
a
lot
of
wooded
area.
If
you
look
on
your
map
or
your
picture
there,
that
road
dead-ends
there
at
Ashland
and
all
behind
that,
if
you
is
all
wooded
and
behind
that
section,
there
is
legions
lake,
which
is
behind
the
Baptist
Church
and
behind
the
fire
station
and
behind
the
old
post
veterans
post
now.
D
Again
being
that
this
is
off
on
a
dead-end
Road
legally,
it
splatted
where
Ashland
is
on
the
other
side,
if
you
were
to
turn
down
by
right
by
Jimmy's
and
the
the
daycare
center,
you
go
straight
south
and
then
there's
another
extension
of
Ashland.
So
originally
years
and
years
and
years
ago,
this
was
plotted
to
go
through
and
there
are
planted
Lots
in
here,
but
none
of
them
are
developable.
G
E
D
E
Understand
the
Faculty
of
second.you
you've
responded
the
question
so
mr.
chairman,
you
neither
either
sustained
the
objection
that
the
conversation
about
homes
on
Whitcomb
Bayou
are
relevant
and
if
you
find
that's
relevant,
then
you
would
overrule
the
objection.
Otherwise
you
would
sustain
it
and
you
would
not
be
able
to
continue
on
mr.
de
lacus
about
other
properties
unrelated
to
this
one.
So
mr.
chairman.
D
E
D
G
J
D
J
D
A
C
E
E
C
G
Just
for
the
board's
satisfaction,
definition
of
a
nuisance
under
city
statute,
ordinance,
8
38,
it
states
a
nuisance.
The
conduct
specified
in
this
article
in
chapter
4
of
this
code,
any
continuing
condition
or
use
of
premise
or
of
building
exteriors
of
land
which
in
dangers
or
injures
the
comfort,
repose
health
and
safety
of
others.
That's
subsection,
1,
subsection,
2
unlawfully
interferes
with
obstructs
or
tends
to
obstruct
or
renders
dangerous
for
passage
any
public
or
private
street
highway.
G
Sidewalk
stream,
ditch
or
drainage
3
in
any
way
renders
other
persons
insecure
in
life
or
the
use
of
property,
or
essentially
interferes
with
the
comfortable
enjoyment
of
life
and
property,
or
tends
to
depreciate
the
value
of
properties
of
others.
I
can
go
through
the
definition,
a
person,
premise
and
vehicle,
but
I
think
they're,
fairly
common
sense.
Basically,
in
a
nutshell,
regardless
of
where
you
live
in
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
your
condition
of
being
a
quiet
street
versus
living
on
us,
19,
Wickham,
Boulevard
or
any
place
else,
I'll
follow
the
same
code.
G
I
try
to
establish
that
same
non-biased
approach
to
wherever
the
property
happens.
To
be
that's
this
particular
case.
I.
Don't
know
the
history
of
this
property
I
started
to
deal
with
it
in
2017
that
property
was
demolished
and
that's
my
history
of
it,
but
by
the
photographs
that
went
before
the
board,
you
clearly
saw
that
on
the
data
I
inspected
it
it
did
not
meet
city
code,
8
52,
which
is
not
being
properly
maintained.
8
40
is
just
one
that
goes
along
with
it,
as
the
board
can
appreciate.
G
Even
if
8
40
wasn't
on
the
table,
8
52
is
so
it's
a
of
an
all-or-nothing
issue
with
are
they
in
violation?
I
would
tend,
and
the
city's
behalf
that
that
duty
of
maintenance
of
private
property
840
says
no
person
owning
leasing,
operating
occupying
or
having
control
of
any
premise
within
the
city
shall
maintain,
keep
or
permit
any
nuisance,
as
defined
in
838,
which
I
just
read
and
is
further
defined
in
8
41,
which
has
got
a
whole
nother
list
of
potential
new
senses
or
violations.
I.
G
Think
it's
fairly
clear
under
840
and
838
to
this
property
meets
that
condition
and
then
going
along
with
852.
It's
clearly
overgrown,
we've
seen
snakes
in
there.
That's
a
danger
to
people.
There's
a
house
next
door,
there's
house
cross
street
there's
a
house
on
both
sides
actually
and
a
church
behind
it.
As
you
can
see
by
the
picture
it's
substantially
residential
and
then
you
go
to
the
south
is
the
church.
So,
yes,
there
are
some
wooded
areas,
but
there
are
residential
areas
very
close
to
that
property.
So
that's
all
the
city
has
just
me.
E
K
C
G
H
H
F
F
F
I'll
jump
I'd,
rather
not
to
have
any
kind
of
government
interference,
but
if
someone
asks
me
I'll
jump
to
do
it,
but
Vince
is
working
out
where
I
can
have
regular
watch
and
maintenance
over
this
beautifully
wooded
area.
It
was
of
you.
It
is
a
beautifully
wooded
area,
but
an
oak
tree
that
didn't
have
any
signs
of
anything
happened
to
fall
on
the
rental
house,
so
that
was
demolished
and
I
was
not
able
with
enough
insurance
money
to
bring
it
back
to
where
it
was.
It
was
a
rent,
rental
house,
so
not
not
quite
enough.
F
Just
twiddling
my
thumbs
I
do
believe
I
had
correspondence
with
Beth
telling
her
that
I
want
to
rectify
this
situation,
because
I,
don't
like
my
name
to
be
in
public
record
or
anything
else,
I'd
like
to
be
squeaky
clean
that
the
that
time
frame
I
was
pretty
much
at
the
mercy
of
when
Vince
could
schedule
crew
to
come
out
and
then
the
disappointment.
The
question
is:
when
Vince
had
discussion
with
his
liaison
and
the
code
enforcement
he
did
for
$1,500,
he
did
what
he
believed
from
talking
to
the
front
office
there.
F
F
The
one
property
to
the
right,
I
believe
I
bought
in
2006
or
2007
and
the
property
to
the
left.
Maybe
three
years
ago
four
years
ago,
I
could
be
a
little
bit
longer,
but
I
haven't
owned.
It
long,
but
I
saw
it
all
the
time
because
of
my
rental
house
and
I
saw
what
it
was
like
and
I
liked
it.
It
was
very
pretty
I
didn't
see
anything
dangerous,
but
I
loved
the
foliage
very
much.
The
Florida
wooded.
G
C
G
The
other
caveat
to
that
is
it's
less
than
ten
thousand
square
feet.
The
other
caveat
to
that
is
she
didn't
have
to
clear
the
rear
of
the
property,
any
large
trees,
anything
over
four
to
six
inches.
You
know
diameter,
that's
not
what
we're
doing
we're
not
going
in
clearing
a
lot.
You
have
to
get
rid
of
the
undergrowth,
the
weeds,
the
plants
and
things
like
that,
but
the
trees
are
still
there.
It's
it's,
not
a
barren
landscape.
G
H
F
This
is
2019
my
house
burned
down
2018
and
the
year
before
that
the
oak
tree
fell
on
my
rental
house
and
crushed
it.
So
I'm
going
to
say
2017
is
when
and
I
had
mr.
Levinson
come
and
demolish
the
house
at
my
expense.
I
wasn't
insured
covered,
but
it
was
very.
It
was
a
very
beautiful
backyard.
The
one
to
the
left
that
property
to
the
left
was
always
wooded,
which
I
I
loved
dearly
and
so
did
the
tenant
the
tenant
loved.
It
wooded.
K
A
H
H
L
B
E
A
B
A
E
Hoffman
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
summarize
what
has
happened
so
the
code
enforcement
board
has
found
a
violation
on
both
properties
that
were
cited,
found
the
property
in
violation
of
sections
8
48-52
found
they're
in
violation
from
September
27th
until
October
29th
and
assessed
the
fine
of
$25
per
day
on
each
property,
plus
$69.50
for
cost
of
prosecuting
the
case.
If
you
have
any
questions
about
what
has
happened
today
after
the
meeting,
you
can
contact
the
code
enforcement
staff
and
they'll
be
happy
to
answer.
E
There
will
be
an
order,
entered
it'll,
be
ordered,
it'll
be
entered
within
the
next
ten
days,
it'll
be
sent
to
you
at
the
address
listed
by
the
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector's
office.
If
you
have
a
different
address
that
you
wanted
to
give
the
the
code
enforcement
board
our
code
enforcement
staff,
you
can
do
that
during
this
meeting.
Okay,
all
right,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
A
G
Thank
You
mr.
chairman
officer,
Steve
gas
and
city
of
Turpan,
Springs
Police
Department
Code
Enforcement
case
before
the
board
19-8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
six
and
nine
one
property
address
is
6:01
East,
Martin,
Luther,
King
Drive,
the
property
owners
listed
as
Deanna
Ruth
Gorman
and
nobody's
president
ported
all
the
photographs
regarding
this
case,
or
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board.
G
All
my
notices,
a
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
or
exhibit
number
two
tip
number
three
administrative
documents
case:
summary
property,
appraiser
tax,
collector
records,
exhibit
number
fours
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
notices
were
mailed.
The
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations.
A
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
both
first
class
and
return
receipt,
and
please
accept
all
the
exhibits
into
the
record
is
evidence.
Mr.
chairman.
G
Moving
forward,
we've
had
no
contact
with
the
owner
reference.
This
case
this
case
started
on
September
25th
of
this
year.
There's
a
tarp
on
the
roof.
It's
been
there
for
quite
a
while.
There
were
other
violations
that
are
already
open
cases
that
are
currently
drawing
fines
on
September
26,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed,
returned
unclaimed
on
October
31st
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin,
and
there
was
no
change
to
the
property
same
day.
The
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed,
no
return.
G
No
mail
was
returned
to
our
office
on
November
1st
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
of
posting
on
November
13th
of
this
year.
I
conducted
another
inspection
and
again
there
was
no
changes
to
the
property
before
the
board
is
violation
of
section
8
40
duty
to
maintain
private
property.
6
1
adopts
the
2018
version
of
the
international
property
maintenance
code
and
under
the
international
property
maintenance
code,
section
3,
0,
4,
.
G
7
requires
that
you
basically
have
a
roof
intact
and
proper
drainage
and
typically
when
you
have
tarps
on
your
roof,
you're
indicating
there's
something
kind
of
not
working
correctly
with
your
roof.
So
and
we
passed
you
the
wrong
photos,
so
we
will
be
passing
the
correct
ones
down
to
you.
That's
one
photograph
of
the
of
the
front
of
the
property
which
you
will
see
here
in
a
second,
and
this
is
another
photograph.
G
Showing
the
tarp
and,
like
I,
said
it's
been
on
there
for
a
while
I
apologize
for
not
kind
of
making
it
on
the
previous
cases
I.
It
was
after
the
storm
and
a
lot
of
people
had
tarps
on
the
roof.
We
got
a
complaint
about
this
one
and
that's
why
it's
now,
before
the
board
other
than
that
the
city
has
nothing
else.
G
M
G
H
H
H
Move
based
on
the
testimony,
evidence
and
facts
presented
in
law
that
at
any
time
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violation,
sections
8s
46,
one
of
the
IPM
C
Building
Code
and
three.
Oh
four
point:
seven
of
the
IPM
C
Code
of
Ordinances,
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
was
in
force.
In
effect,
the
respondents
were
in
violation
thereof.
Second,.
L
L
A
H
K
L
L
A
C
A
A
A
B
A
A
N
E
N
N
G
You
officer
Steve
Gaston
city
of
Turpan,
Springs,
Police,
Department
Code
Enforcement
case
before
the
board
is,
at
nineteen
dash
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
six,
nine
nine.
It
is
a
vacant
lot,
that's
kind
of
surrounding
four
thirty,
nine
Lincoln
both
to
the
north
and
to
the
east,
and
it
is
a
repeat
violator
case.
The
case
was
nineteen
dash
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
three
one,
seven
that
established
it
for
violation
of
city
code.
Eight.
G
Fifty
two,
the
parcel
number
of
stated,
was
thirteen
twenty
seven
fifteen
six,
seven,
eight,
nine,
six,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
one,
one
zero
property
owners,
Craig
Fowler
junior,
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
boarder
any
photographs
that
I
took
exhibit
number
two
Notice
of
Violation
and
Notice
of
Hearing
administrative
documents.
Case
summary
previous
board:
orders,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records.
G
Our
exhibit
number
three
except
in
number
four,
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five
as
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs,
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what's
presented
to
this
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
the
property
owner
of
record
based
upon
the
Pinellas,
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations,
a
notice
of
hearing
or
sent
both
first
class
as
well
as
a
return
receipt.
And
mr.
chairman,
please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence
board.
E
G
Thank
you.
We
haven't
received
a
direct
call
from
the
owner.
We
have
received
calls
from
relatives
the
case
started
on
September
30th
2019
was
my
initial
inspection.
There
were
shopping
carts
and
trash
dumped
on
the
property
on
September
30th,
the
Notice
of
Violation,
the
repeat,
violator
notice.
The
hearing
was
mailed,
the
green
card
was
returned,
signed
we
just
couldn't.
G
The
signature
was
ineligible
on
October
18th
and
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin,
and
it
was
in
compliance
for
part
of
it
because
there
was
two
separate
violations:
there's
a
repeat
violator,
an
or
852,
which
was
debris,
and
things
like
that.
Then
the
other
part
which
was
trash
was
in
compliance.
So
it's
kind
of
a
partial
in
compliance.
G
N
N
C
N
A
N
N
N
N
A
G
A
H
A
H
H
B
A
L
L
E
So
mr.
Fowler
you've
been
found
in
violation
of
section
8
52
of
the
code,
you're
considered
a
repeat
violator
because
it
has
happened
before
you've
been
found,
a
violation
from
September
30th
until
October,
18th
and
fined
$25
a
day.
The
code
enforcement
board
is
also
off
awarded
the
city
of
tarpon
springs,
$72.50
for
prosecution
costs
and
prosecuting
the
case.
There
will
be
an
order,
entered
it'll,
be
ordered,
it'll,
be
entered
within
the
next
10
days
and
mailed
to
you
at
the
address
listed
by
the
tax,
collector
and
property
appraiser.
N
E
C
G
Thank
You
officer,
Steve,
Gaston
city
of
Turpan,
Springs,
Police,
Department,
Code,
Enforcement,
repeat
violator
case
current
cases,
19-8
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
seven,
zero,
five,
four
property
addressed
as
211.
He
salons
treated
as
a
vacant,
lot
parcel
number
thirteen
twenty
seven
fifteen
zero
one;
six,
nine:
two:
zero:
zero,
two
zero
one:
eight
zero,
mister
repeat:
violator
four
three
previous
cases
case
number
17-8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
four,
eight
six,
so
violation
of
city
code,
814
852
that
fine
was
$25
per
day
and
totaled.
G
G
One
repeat:
violator
four
case:
18:
eight:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
nine,
nine
again
for
840
and
852
that
one
was
also
fine
of
$25
per
day
and
it's
not
complied
as
of
yet
exhibit
number
1
going
before
the
board
or
all
the
photographs
exhibit
number
2
Notice
of
Violation
and
Notice
of
Hearing
exhibit
number
3
administrative
documents.
Case
summary
previous
board
orders
and
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign?
Is
it
but
number
five
is
an
affidavit
of
the
prosecution
cost.
G
All
the
notices
were
mailed
the
property
owner
of
record
based
upon
the
Pinellas,
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
the
notice
of
violations
and
notice
a
hearing
or
sent
both
the
first-class
mail
as
well
as
return
is
heat.
And
mr.
chairman,
please
accept
all
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
G
Office
has
had
contact
with
the
owner,
he's
come
into
the
office
a
few
times
regarding
his
properties
on
September
30th.
They
conducted
the
initial
inspection
discovered.
There
was
violations,
I
was
actually
inspecting
neighboring
properties
on
Lincoln
yeah
then
noticed
some
violations
over
here.
There's
trash
in
the
breeds
overgrown.
The
property
is
less
than
10,000
square
feet
so,
as
discussed
before
it
needs
to
be
cleared
of
all
undergrowth,
weeds
small
triggers
things
like
that.
G
There's
also
some
shopping
carts
dumped
on
the
property
on
September
30th,
the
Notice
of
Violation,
repeat,
violator
notice,
a
hearing
was
mailed
and
the
mail
was
returned,
attempted
not
known
I'm,
not
sure
what
in
Post
Office
lingo.
That
means,
but
moving
forward
on
November
1st
I
posted
the
property
and
I
also
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin
and
I
noticed
that
on
November
1st,
it
was
in
compliance
when
I
posted
the
property,
so
the
property
was
in
violation
from
the
date
of
the
initial
inspection
of
September
30th
until
it
was
complied
on.
G
I'll,
go
by
my
notes
because
I
don't
remember
everything.
So
that's
why
taking
good
notes
is
important
and
I
put
it
in
compliance
on
October
18th.
So
our
date
of
our
period
of
time
was
some
temper
thirtieth
of
2019
until
October
18th
of
2019,
and
this
again
was
a
violation
of
city
codes,
8
warranty
duty
to
maintain
private
property,
as
well
as
8
52,
which
deals
with
debris
and
over
earth,
and
that's
all
the
city
has
at
this
point.
This.
L
I
E
You
know
there
are
certain
cases
that
are
brought
to
the
city
attorney's
office
for
collection.
Other
cases
aren't
the
small
dollar
amounts,
even
though
this
seems
like
a
lot
of
money.
The
small
dollar
amounts
are
normally
not
pursue
they're,
just
they
just
wait
until
the
property
is
conveyed,
and
then
you
know
pick
up
the
fine
amount
at
that
time.
The
the
thing
about
code
enforcement,
liens,
though,
is,
is
that
any
one
of
these
liens
attaching
to
any
property
that
mr.
Burrowes
owns
is
cross-collateralized
by
the
other
property.
So
he
tries
to
sell
one.
E
You
have
to
pay
all
the
liens
and
all
the
properties
if
this
was
over
$3,500
I
think
that
each
case
was
over.
$3,500
I
think
that
we
may
be
doing
something
a
little
bit
different,
but
these
we
consider
small
dollar
amounts,
because
the
city
takes
into
consideration
tourney's
fees
and
costs,
and
it
doesn't
make
economic
sense
to
spend
that
kind
of
money
on
small
cases
like
this,
so
eventually
it
will
be
paid.
It
may
be
some
time
before
it
gets
paid.
Okay,.
G
I
K
K
K
H
J
J
B
K
A
A
G
C
G
Oscar
Steve
Gaston
city,
Tarpon,
Springs,
Police,
Department
code
enforcement
case
before
the
board
is
case:
number
19,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
seven
nine
property
address
is
608,
North,
Avenue,
the
property
owner,
sir
Robert,
when
Wright
and
Henry
night.
This
is
a
repeat
violator
case.
The
case
for
the
previous
one
was
17:
8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
six,
four,
seven
violation
of
city
codes,
8
22,
8,
48,
52
and
6-1.
G
The
previous
fines
on
that
case
for
$50
per
day
they
totaled
three
thousand
one
hundred
and
sixteen
dollars
and
fifty
cents
which
are
currently
unpaid,
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are.
All
of
my
photos
exhibit
number
two
is
all
of
my
notices
to
include
Notice
of
Violation
and
Notice
of
Hearing
exhibit
number
three
administrative
documents
case.
Summary
previous
board
orders
and
copy
the
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
database
records
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five?
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs?
G
All
of
my
photographs
and
exhibits
given
to
the
violator
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
this
board?
All
notices
were
mailed,
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
I'll
notice,
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
or
sent
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail.
Mr.
gentleman,
please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
B
G
Thank
you.
We
had,
we
did
have
contact
with
the
owner
via
phone.
The
case
started
on
October
9th
of
2019.
There
was
a
pile
of
trash
and
debris
the
front
curb,
as
you
can
see,
in
the
photographs,
as
mr.
Winn
writes
more
than
likely
in
his
state,
there
was
a
fall
cleanup
time.
The
issue
is
the
city
of
tarpon
springs.
Doesn't
allow
you
to
put
your
trash
out
more
than
12
hours
before,
even
if
you
do
have
fall
cleanup
and
when
your
repeat
violator,
you're
not
allowed
to
violate
that.
I
I
G
I
A
A
J
Question:
okay,
the
last
time
they
gave
us
two
weeks
to
put
the
trash
out
just
up
to
the
curb,
but
now
he
says
twelve
hours,
but
this
is
a
matter
of
a
few
hours
of
what
the
time
is.
We
put
the
trash
out
to
the
curb,
which
is
pickup
day.
Everybody
has
stuff
going
out
to
you,
curb,
there's
more
people
on
the
Block,
just
getting
ready
to
put
the
stuff
on
the
curb.
No.
G
Well,
it
even
says
in
the
notice
that
was
sent
out
place
items
by
the
curb
by
7:00
a.m.
to
be
picked
up,
there's
nothing
in
the
notice
that
was
sent
out.
That
gives
you
up
to
two
weeks.
Unfortunately,
mr.
Winn
rights
property
is
a
repeat:
violator.
I
received
a
complaint
about
debris
being
out
at
the
curb
about
ten
days
before
it
was
fall
cleanup.
So
that's
I
handle
the
complaint
and
you
know
that's
where
we
are
basically.
J
A
A
J
Basically,
we
was
just
right
here
and
she
can
tell
with
the
trashes
that's
owned
property
that
was
actually
grandfather
to
us
to
use
again,
but
the
same
thing
that
goes
again.
We
have
any.
We
don't
have
any
room
to
into
anything
because
they
put
a
fence
there
when
we
was
grandfathered
in
for
the
property,
so
we
can't
hide
the
prior
technically
take
that
we
have
no
room
to
take
it
back
and
hide
it
because
they
close
off
our
gates.
I
mean
off
our
back
yard
and
stuff.
J
C
A
J
J
To
live
in
our
own
house
yeah,
you
know,
and
then
this
city,
housing
stuff,
is
getting
more
didn't
house
users
to
use
it
over
house
who
you
know
I
mean
our
household.
Is
warehouse
owners
we're
getting
a
lot
of
property
problems
with
this
housing
authority
here
next
to
it,
which
is
obviously
when
they
call
you,
and
he
give
us
a
lot
of
problems
with
household.
It's
not
that
the
housing
people
from
the
housing
people
which
we
shouldn't
be
getting.
A
H
J
J
G
A
J
G
J
A
I
Robert
one
right
and
Henry
Knight
was
in
violation
of
sections
822
accumulation
of
trash
and
city
code,
852
produces
prohibitions
of
the
tarpon
springs
city
code
from
October,
9th
2019
until
October
12,
2009
teen
and
a
fine
of
$25
per
day
for
three
days
or
a
fine
of
$75.
In
addition,
I
move
that
the
city
be
awarded
$69.50
for
the
cost
it
occurred
in
prosecuting
the
case.
Second,.
B
E
Sir
you've
been
found
in
violation
of
code
sections,
eight
twenty-two
and
eight
52
from
October
the
9th
through
October
the
12th,
the
total
of
three
days
code
enforcement
board
has
entered
a
fine
of
25
dollars
a
day
and
also
has
awarded
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
$69.50
and
prosecuting
the
case.
There
will
be
an
order
entered,
it
will
be
done
in
writing.
It'll
be
sent
to
you
within
the
next
10
days.
E
E
J
G
G
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five?
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
cost?
As
you're
aware?
My
notices
are
mailed
to
the
property
order
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
prone
or
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations,
a
notice
of
hearing
or
sent
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
semester.
Gentleman.
Please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence
when.
A
G
You
this
is
an
occupied
residence
from
my
understanding,
mr.
Bauer
does
live
there.
We've
had
no
contact
with
the
owner.
The
case
began
on
October
31st.
With
the
initial
inspection.
The
property
was
overgrown.
There
were
some
other
parts
of
the
complaint
that
weren't
really
a
code
issue.
So
I
was
just
strictly
dealing
with
the
overgrown
property
on
October
31st,
to
repeat
violator
notice.
A
hearing
was
mailed
and
we
received
nothing
back.
G
November
1st
I
posted
the
property
and
an
affidavit
of
posting
was
also
signed,
so
it's
currently
not
in
compliance,
so
it
is
still
in
violation
from
October
31st
for
sections.
A
4d
duty
maintained
private
property,
an
8
52.
If
the
board
didn't
see
it,
I
have
the
photographs
up
on
the
board
or
they'll
come
up
here
in
a
second.
Basically,
the
property
is
here
on
the
left.
It's
grossly
overgrown
and
there's
another
view.
G
H
H
H
L
I
E
O
Initially,
when
there
was
a
non
compliance
meeting,
six
months
was
given
during
I
was
not
present
and
I
think
the
client
also
was
not
present.
So
there
was
nobody
really
to
have
a
conversation.
The
six
months
was
provided
as
a
date
to
complete
the
site
planning.
Just
as
a
little
background.
The
the
project
has
also
had
some
code
violations
with
the
Southwest
Florida
Water
Management
District,
which
at
this
time
has
been
closed,
so
that's
been
resolved
and,
as
of
yesterday,
we
did
make
us
a
middle
for
site
plan.
O
The
site
plan
did
change
based
off
of
the
information
we
got
with
Swift
mud,
the
site
previously
was
permitted
with
Swift
mud,
and
so
the
initial
drawings
that
were
provided
were
based
off
of
that
permit,
which
has
since
expired.
So
Swift
Mont
had
come
back
and
read
the
linee
a
today
well
and
limits,
and
because
of
that,
the
whole
site
plan
changed.
So
we
provided
a
new
site
plan
and
made
it
a
noose
of
metal
which
we
just
submitted
yesterday.
E
G
A
previous
tree
case
that
I
think
we
used
to
have
was
like
96
trees
or
unlawfully
removed.
That
was
part
of
my
code
case
because
they
also
in
clearing
that
leveled
the
ground
brought
in
Phil,
brought
in
to
asphalt
millings
created
a
parking
lot,
we're
beginning
to
use
it
for
its
use
and
had
not
contacted
the
city
in
any
way,
shape
or
form.
My
case
was
relating
not
only
to
site
planning,
but
the
building
permit
requirements
obtaining
building
permits
prior
to
doing
any
work.
G
We
went
back
and
forth
for
a
significant
period
of
time
prior
to
coming
to
code
board.
I
think
there
I
want
to
say
there
was
upwards
of
six
to
eight
months,
and
then
we
gave
them
another
six
months
on
code
board
and
now
we're
revamping
the
whole
plan.
I
think
the
city
is
at
a
point
where
you
know
that
I
don't
know
if
three
months
to
be
in
compliance
is
the
building
permits
have
to
be
finaled,
I
mean
we
have
to
be
done,
not
just
submit
a
site
plan.
G
That's
only
one
aspect
of
the
case:
there's
the
site
plan
dealing
with
the
excavation
and
fill
the
property
hasn't
been
put
back
into
its
state
and
they
have
obtained
no
permits
for
the
fill
that
they
did
do
there.
As
I
stated,
the
building
permits
need
to
be
finaled
and
then
well.
Six
one
is
just
us
adopting
the
building
code,
but
that's
it's
a
it's
a
significant.
It
was
a.
It
was
a
large
piece
of
land
that
was
affected
yeah
and
the
trees
were
the
beginning
of
that,
but
that
was
dealt
with
separately
so.
G
Began
to-
and
we
obviously
wouldn't
allow
them,
they
wanted
to
park
vehicles
on
the
property
and
nothing
had
been
asked,
obviously
and
I
think
he
got
brought
in
second
I.
Don't
know
if
he
was
the
second
developer.
How
that
whole
process
worked,
but
we
sat
down
had
a
meeting
upstairs
with
everybody
involved
and
gave
them
a
significant
amount
of
time
to
work
through
this
nothing
occurred.
Hence
we
came
to
code
board
and
I.
Think
I
even
asked
for
giving
them
another
six
months,
just
because
it
is
an
expansive
kind
of
a
thing.
G
Obviously
it's
not
the
Board's
decision.
The
city's
position
would
be
I.
Think
we've
run
our
course
and
we'd
like
to
you
know,
move
forward
with
that
and
I
don't
think
another
three
months
of
site
planning
is
going
to
fix
it.
You
know
they
can
reverse
everything
they've
done
out
of
it
and
then
the
case
would
be
closed.
Then
they
can
go
through
the
process
at
their
own
timeframe,
but
they
have
to
undo
what
they've
done.
G
Undoes
everything
they
brought
in
I'm,
you
can't
undo
the
trees.
That
was
a
different
case.
That's
done,
but
all
of
the
fill
the
millings,
the
creation,
is
a
parking
lot.
All
of
that
can
be
undone
clean.
Slate
case
is
closed.
They
can
take
ten
years
to
the
site
plan
it
and
develop
whatever
they
want
to
develop
at
that
point.
So
that's
the
city's
position.
G
I
E
Okay,
so
your
options
are
reversal
or
you
have
motion
on
the
floor
to
accept
the
affidavit
of
non-compliance.
So
if
you
want
to
do
something
other
than
that,
the
maker
of
the
motion
needs
to
withdraw
the
motion.
The
other
option
would
be
a
motion
to
extend
the
compliance
date
and
you
would
set
that
again
by
by
motion
today.
If
that's
what
you
wanted
to
do
so,
for
example,
extend
the
prior
the
compliance
date
until
three
months
from
now
I
think
you're
thinking
you
know
whatever
February,
and
then
that
would
be
the
motion.
E
E
O
The
project
was
designed
so
there's
some
warehouses
to
be
built.
The
site,
the
property
itself,
is
in
a
flood
zone.
It's
a
flood
zone
elevation.
Ten,
the
ground
itself
right
now
is
at
three.
So
that
means
it
would
be
like
six
or
seven
feet
of
fill.
That
would
be
required
to
bring
this
to
build
a
building
in
our
initial
design.
So
there
would
be
tremendous
amount
of
field.
O
There
would
be
some
ponds
that
would
have
to
be
put
into
place
after
meeting
with
swift
mud,
and
we
went
back
and
forth
was
worth
months
for
several
months.
Until
the
gentlemen,
the
science
scientists
got
to
the
site
to
help
establish
the
line
and
then
finally
confirmed
that
that's
the
line
that
he
wants.
So
the
wetland
line
moved
into
the
site
significantly
made
the
small
the
site
less
developable
than
what
we
had
initially
thought
of.
So
we
went,
he
went
back
and
he
looked
and
we
did
a
new
design.
O
A
new
design
is
looking
at
an
RV
boat
storage
facility,
so
there
is
no
buildings
per
se.
It's
basically
cover
over
parking
spaces,
so
the
new
site
plan
is
does
not
need
the
fill
that
it
needs
before
again
with
wetlands
and
some
floodplain
areas
there's
some
compensation
that
needs
to
be
done
so
in
efforts
with
Swift
mud
and
with
their
guidelines.
A
lot
more
trees
are
going
to
be
taken
down
because
of
the
fact
that
we
have
to
provide
for
floodplain
compensation
that
we're
impacting
with
with
a
little
bit
of
fill.
O
I
L
E
L
C
L
A
L
A
G
A
I
G
B
K
C
C
A
G
H
H
A
B
A
G
Crack
there
was
changes
with
the
property,
or
there
was
issues
with
the
property
owner
of
record
at
the
time
the
board
order
and
everything
was
established.
So
the
city
requests
that
the
board
quash
their
previous
order,
because
it
was
basically
attached
to
owners
that
the
record
wasn't
correct
for
so
it's
a
kind
of
a
invalid
board
order
per
se.
H
E
Company
began
a
foreclosure
process,
it
went
all
the
way
to
trial
at
the
trial.
The
court
entered
a
final
judgment
of
foreclosure
awarded
the
bank.
What
it
was
entitled
to
order
the
property
to
be
sold.
The
property
was
sold,
the
bank
took
title
and
once
the
bank
took
title
of
the
property
of
the
judicial
sale,
there
was
a
motion
made
by
someone,
probably
the
owner
of
the
property,
to
rescind
and
remove
the
final
judgment.
E
And
so
what
happened
is
the
judge
went
back
and
he
said:
ok,
I'm,
removing
the
sale
date,
I'm,
removing
the
final
judgment,
and
so
now
it's
back
in
the
hands
of
the
property
owner
again
and
then
the
process
went
a
different
direction.
It
just
so
happened
that
the
code
enforcement
case
hit
right
after
the
bank
got
title
to
the
property.
C
C
H
A
A
A
A
J
B
H
M
G
A
2016
case
we
just
heard
for
the
fine
reduction
request
and
she's
in
the
process
of
selling
the
property.
The
new
buyers
are
attempting
to
acquire
that
property
out,
but
obviously
can't
with
four
hundred
and
thirty
thousand
dollars
worth
of
fines,
so
they're
looking
to
develop
that
area
and
that
property
and
that's
there.
Why
were
in
the
situation?
But
she
that
case
was
started
in
2016,
then
the
other
cases
came
after
that.
G
D
A
M
G
Referenced
this
last
case,
like
I,
said
this
is
an
opportunity
for
the
city
to
develop
some
property
that
probably
would
have
just
ended
up
remaining
stagnant
for
an
unknown
period
of
time.
Some
developers
came
in
express
their
desire
to
put
new
housing
in
that
area
and
for,
like
whatever
term
spruce
it
up,
make
it
habitable.
G
So
this
was
a
unique
opportunity
for
us,
and
that
was
the
reason
why
we
had
recommended
the
reduction
in
fine
what
it
was
so
that
the
sale
could
go
through
and
the
property
could
be
developed
so
and
I'm,
hoping
that
we
may
have
some
more
of
these
coming
up
in
the
future.
So
in
an
effort
to
do
exactly
what
this
code
word
was
designed
to
do,
I.