►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board January 10, 2019
Description
Description
A
C
D
E
A
F
A
A
Florida
statute,
28,
six
point:
zero
one:
zero:
five:
we
priors
any
party
appealing
a
decision
of
this
board
to
have
record
of
the
proceedings
to
support
such
an
appeal.
The
procedure
of
the
board
is
as
follows:
first,
the
city
presents
witnesses
and
X
exhibitions,
after
which
the
alleged
violator
is
able
to
ask
the
city
witnesses
any
specific
questions
regarding
the
testimony.
Secondly,
the
alleged
violator
is
allowed
to
make
a
presentation
and
present
his
or
her
witness
as
an
X
of
exhibition
exhibitions.
A
Sorry,
then,
the
city
can
question
the
alleged
violators
witnesses
after
both
routes
of
testimony
both
the
part
of
the
city
and
on
the
part
of
the
alleged
violator.
Each
party
is
asked
to
give
a
closing
argument
first
by
the
city
and
then
by
the
alleged
violator
after
those
three
steps
are
taken.
This
board
will
close
the
public
hearing
portion
of
the
case
to
discuss
it
and
to
make
appropriate
action.
A
F
A
A
The
agenda
items
have
been
changed
to
the
following:
first,
we'll
see
on
the
agenda.
Item
number
18,
first
number,
12.
Second
number.
Seven.
Third
number.
Six.
Fourth
number,
two
fifth
number:
three,
six
number
17,
seven
number
seven
number
is
number
eight,
which
will
be
seen
and
number
13,
which
is
number
nine,
also
number
15
number
ten
and
number
four
is
number
11.
A
C
A
G
In
affidavit
of
non-compliance
case
number
18
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
one,
forty
one,
the
property
address
is
450
70s,
Morgan
Street.
This
was
relative
to
a
code
enforcement
border
from
June
14th
of
2018
for
violation
of
city
codes,
8
22,
8,
48-52,
36.0
3
conducted
the
final
inspection
based
on
the
board
order
that
was
December
14th
was
the
compliance
date.
I
conducted
the
final
inspection
on
or
around
December
18,
at
which
point
the
affidavit
of
non-compliance
was
signed
and
I
found
that
the
property
was
not
in
compliance
with
those
codes.
C
Of
possibly
either
bringing
the
property
everything
up
to
date
or
having
it
demolish
right
now,
I
have
seen
someone
they
wanted
to
file
for
the
city
to
give
them
a
permit
to
demolish
the
house.
They
say
that
it
could
be
brought
up
to
date,
but
have
been
more
expensive
than
to
just
take
it
down.
So
that's
the
owning
process,
the
other
hangout.
H
G
H
G
C
G
C
He
said
all
nothing
so
I
thought
that
that
was
these
are
in
compliance
except
for
the
basic,
the
house,
which
is
the
big
thing
and
that's
what
I'm
in
the
process
of
doing
as
far
as
trying
to
save
it,
it
was
costing
too
much
as
I
didn't
know.
It
was
so
expensive,
even
so
to
demolish
it,
but
I'm
getting
the
process
of
getting
that
done.
The
guy
told
me
it
could
vary
from
Forgetting
the
permit
from
X
number
of
days
to
seven
weeks.
C
So
hopefully
it
won't
be
that
long,
but
that
is
my
objective
is
to
get
it
done
and
he
said
once
they
give
the
permit.
You
could
be
able
to
do
it
in
three
days.
So
that's
what
I'm
asking
for
this
to
be
reduced
or
not
to
be
there,
because
the
following
and
I
thought
it
would
be
able
to
be
done
at
this
one.
C
C
G
I
I
mean
obviously
this
is
I,
don't
know
if
miss
Kraus
understands
that
the
finds
have
been
accruing
on
the
property
since
December
at
a
hundred
dollars
a
day.
That's
what
this
board
ordered
so
until
it's
brought
into
compliance
is
the
only
time
at
which
those
fines
will
cease.
I,
don't
know
if
you
understand
that
it's
currently
drawing
fines
at
$100
a
day.
Okay,.
C
G
C
G
H
E
Based
on
testimony
evidence
and
facts
presented
in
law
that
the
respondent
failed
to
timely
comply
with
this
board's
prior
order
within
the
time
prescribed
and
to
be
a
war
and
to
award
the
city,
one
hundred
and
sixty-seven
dollars
and
fifty
cents
for
the
costs
incurred.
In
prosecuting
this
case
and.
I
J
C
How
does
a
city
award
$100
a
date
when
you
cannot
afford
it?
That's
that
gonna
be
like
five
dollars
a
month,
the
ten
dollars
of
what
I
can't
afford
a
hundred
and
when
it
was
done
on
that
day,
it
was
someone
went
before
me.
I'll
get
$25
a
day,
and
then
you
did
me
a
hundred
I
have
a
child.
I
don't
have
as
many
hours
have
been
cut
and
then
I'm
now
I
gotta
pay
a
hundred
dollars
a
day
plus
missing.
G
All
of
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations
and
Notice
of
Hearing,
or
sent
both
return
receipt
requested
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and
mr.
chairman,
please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
G
F
F
G
This
case
initially
started
in
a
December
1st
to
2018
conducted
area
inspections.
I
noted
violations
on
the
property.
The
property
is
a
vacant
lot,
it
does
have
a
city
address,
but
it's
a
vacant
lot
behind
a
common
story.
Most
people
know
as
long
a
Shazz
right,
Neriah,
Lime,
Street
and
tinel's
between
Pinellas
and
Safford
vacant.
A
lot
on
the
north
side
of
the
road.
While
I
was
there
I
noticed
there
was
a
couple
of
avantage
abandoned
vehicles
on
the
property.
G
There
was
trash
and
debris
on
the
property
and
the
property
seems
to
be
used
as
generally
as
a
dump
and
it's
not
being
maintained.
The
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed
and
on
December
4th
and
it's
it
was
returned
to
us-
refused
acceptance
on
December
19th
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin.
Originally
the
two
vehicles
that
I
noted
have
been
removed.
G
Now
there
was
a
new
red
ford,
pickup
truck
with
no
tags
on
it,
replacing
the
other
two
and
there
was
still
trash
and
debris,
and
it
was
overgrown
in
areas
specifically
along
the
north
side,
which
is
an
alleyway
north
side
of
the
property,
has
a
chain-link
fence
and
that
right
away,
which
is
required
to
be
maintained,
was
not
being
maintained.
It
had
pretty
high
grass
on
December
19th,
the
notice
appearing
was
male.
We
did
get
back
a
return
receipt
from
that
on
December
29th
I
posted
the
property
On
January,
9th
I
conducted
a
final
inspection.
G
G
And
I
can
also
show
you.
This
is
the
north
side
fence
line
right
along.
There
is
an
alleyway,
and
also
on
the
north
side
of
that
alleyway,
it's
not
being
maintained,
but
it's
not
owned
by
Sanford
you'll.
Those
are
primarily
what's
left.
All
the
vehicles
have
been
removed,
the
Lots
been
mowed,
except
for
that
right
away
and
except
for
some
debris,
we've
missed
a
couple
of
meetings.
He's
had
contact
with
the
office,
but
we
just
haven't
been
able
to
meet
in
person
and,
like
I
said,
this
was
yesterday's
inspections.
G
So,
basically,
at
this
point
in
time,
the
violations
before
the
board
are
8
22,
which
is
the
accumulation
of
trash
8,
40
duty
and
maintain
property,
private
property
to
prevent
nuisance
conditions,
and
then
the
nuisance
prohibitions
themselves,
which
is
850
debris,
mowing
your
yard,
maintaining
the
right
away,
etc,
and
those
are
the
only
violations
I
have
before
the
board.
At
this
time,.
K
I'm
not
agree
is
a
dump
place
or
is
it
dumping
trash
there
and
it's
a
place
between
a
lot
of
house
and
they
are
like
sick
house.
Like
it's
closed
sometime,
you
see
people
living
some,
then
you
see
people
not
living
there,
so
people
living
in
their
house
they
trash
over.
There
is
no
way
like
from
my
side
or
my
aunt
or
my
imply,
dump
any
trash
because
we
have
a
dump.
You
can
check
with
the
dump.
K
People
I
had
a
four
time
pick
up
a
week,
so
there
is
no
reason,
take
a
trash
from
stall
and
dump
to
the
back
property
and,
as
officer
mentioned,
please
take
a
car.
We
took
a
car,
the
truck
he
mentioned,
we
replace
to
the
cars
and
we
bring
a
truck.
We
did
not
bring
no
no
trucks.
These
are
neighbors
been
parking
over
there
and
I've
been
have
issue.
You
can
check
with
the
police.
K
We
had
a
several
car
on
them,
but
finally
I
totally
it's
clear
and
a
more
the
yard
and
I
cleaned
up
this
morning,
the
one
he
just
you
know
they
show
you
picture
he's
been
gone.
The
the
bucket
and
a
little
bit
trash,
as
you
know,
if
somebody
can
see
same
place,
is
cleaned
up.
Okay,
now
the
only
thing
he's
talking
about
it's,
the
grass
coming
from
our
side
in
the
street,
so
I'm
not
paying
no
money
to
clean
street,
that's
I,
think
a
city
or
whoever
on
it.
K
K
To
you
know,
saying
again:
if
you
see
the
picture
cross,
the
street
is
a
so
far
there.
You
can
imagine
what
kind
of
you
know.
Neighborhood
I
met,
so
they
sleep
there.
This
sit
there.
You
know
it's
really.
Please
has
to
watch
them
to
not
making
people
property.
Look
like
a
mess,
but
I
do
agree.
Yes,
I
need
to
move
my
lot
at
least
twice
a
month
and
I
will
do
it
instead
of
you
know
doing
it
once
a
month,
I'm
gonna
do
twice
a
month
and
same
time.
K
G
So
that's
that
this
area
that
he's
speaking
of
basically
I
haven't
seen
I
hadn't
inspected
it.
Today
there
was
just
some
minor
items
left
to
clean
up,
which
shouldn't
take
very
long.
This
would
probably
be
the
only
thing
this
property's
been
before
this
board
before
numerous
times
has
just
changed
ownership.
So
unfortunately,
as
we
all
are
aware,
location
sometimes
can
affect
that,
but
it
can
coming
upon
the
property
owner
to
stay.
G
On
top
of
that,
and
that's
one
of
the
issues
with
the
city
and
a
nuisance,
8.40
specifically
covers
preventing
it
from
becoming
a
nuisance
condition,
so
nobody's
saying
that
necessarily
the
property
is
a
dump,
but
unfortunately
the
property
owners
have
to
become
responsible
to
maintain
it
and
keep
the
point,
and
that's
why
we're
here
so,
as
you
can
see
from
the
photographs,
two
minor
issues
still
left
with
it,
but
moving
forward.
We
want
to
continue
to
maintain
it
in
this
condition.
That's
all.
K
Yes,
sir,
we
do
try
and
we
will
try
our
best.
We
have
around
seventeen
properties
like
that
around
Tampa
Bay
area,
and
we
are
very
aware
with
that,
but
the
neighborhood
in
the
neighborhood
I'm
at
right
now,
it's
just
are
really
easy
to
pick
up
each
day.
Each
thing
every
day
you
know
and
like
I
say
you
guys
can
see
the
picture
he
had
is
already
clean.
Like
the
day
he
sent
it.
I
started
working
same
day.
K
Even
I
was
on
three
days
vacation
with
my
family,
so
you
know
I
start
working
on
the
same
day,
but
I
will
try.
My
best
to
you
know,
keep
it
maintained
and
make
sure
city
of
tarpon
or
any
any
city,
no
matter
where
it
has
to
be
clean
anyway,
so
I
will
make
sure
it's
clean.
By
the
same
time,
I
have
a
big
concern
on
the
neighborhood.
Like
can
see
the
picture
so
far
there
people
sleep
there.
People
eat
the
people
cook
there.
You
know
so
I
really
need
help
on
that
side
as
well.
E
J
L
J
E
L
E
He's
saying
that,
do
you
understand
that?
But
we
understand
that
you
have
issues
in
the
neighborhood
but
you're
the
property
owner,
so
it's
your
job
to
keep
that
maintained
all
the
time.
Otherwise
you
become
a
repeat
violator
and
the
fines
increase
and
the
problems
increase.
They're
not
going
to
cite
you
for
one
day,
somebody
dumping
trash,
but
somebody
has
to
regularly
check
this
property
to
keep
it
maintained.
Okay,.
F
We're
gonna
have
any
more
discussion
in
the
middle
of
a
motion.
We
need
to
go
ahead
and
vote
on
the
motion.
That's
on
the
table.
The
public
portion
of
the
meeting
has
been
closed,
so
you
have
a
motion
on
the
floor:
finding
him
in
compliance
fining
Stanford
fuel
uncle
LLC
in
violation
giving
them
until
January
30th
2019
to
come
into
compliance
or
suffer
a
$25
a
day.
Fine.
M
J
J
A
K
F
K
K
K
A
A
F
N
G
G
You
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are:
all
of
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two
or
all
my
notices
to
include
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearings
exhibit
number
three
or
administrative
Docs
to
include
the
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records,
as
well
as
any
officer
emails
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign,
all
my
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
of
this
board.
G
All
my
notices
were
mailed
the
property
owner
of
record
based
on
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
tax,
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
both
return,
receipt
requested
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and
mr.
chairman,
please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence
Bobby.
Yes,.
G
Case
started
September
6
2018.
Originally
the
original
complaint
was
the
grass
was
overgrown,
especially
in
the
rear
of
the
house,
trash
and
debris
on
the
property,
old
chairs,
etc,
and
there
was
trash
trash
cans
left
out
curbside
on
September
10th.
The
courtesy
letter
was
mailed
to
the
property
owner
on
September
26th
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin
and
fundamentally
there
was
no
change
to
the
original
violations
on
September
28,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed.
It
was
returned
to
our
office
signed
on
November
6,
the
20:18
conducted
another
rien
spec
ssin.
G
Fundamentally
again,
there
was
no
change
at
that
point.
I
did
add
the
vehicle
as
a
violation,
because
at
the
time
the
right
front
tire
flat,
but
the
yard
had
been
mowed
I
noticed
at
that
time.
So
we
sent
an
amended
Notice
of
Violation
on
November,
the
6th.
It
was
returned
to
our
office
as
well
conducted
another
rien
spec
ssin
on
November
28th.
It
was
still
in
violation,
basically
the
car
still
there
and
there
was
still
a
little
bit
of
trash
and
debris
around
the
property
on
September
28th.
G
The
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
that
return
receipt
had
not
been
received
into
the
office
on
September
29th
I
posted
the
property
I'm.
Sorry
December,
29th
I
posted
the
property
on
December
31st.
We
received
a
phone
call
from
the
property
owner
explained
why
the
sign
was
posted
in
the
yard
and
gave
him
information
about
this.
Code
Board
hearing
I
conducted
a
re-inspection
on
january
9th
and
the
vehicle
is
still
on
the
property.
There's
still
some
areas
that
it's
overgrown
I
didn't
significantly
see
any
trash
per
se.
G
There
were
some
things
out
front
of
the
house:
I
don't
have
any
pictures
more
recent
than
November
28th
I
didn't
take
any
on
yesterday,
when
I
drove
by
so
the
only
ones
I
have
are
what
the
board
has
in
front
of
them,
with
the
last
one
being
I
believe
November
28th,
and
some
of
that
some
of
those
items
had
been
cleaned
up.
So
basically,
what's
fairly
representative
at
this
point
is
the
vehicle?
That's
parked
out
front,
it's
still
there
and
it
appears
to
be
inoperable
and,
as
I
stated,
some
of
the
grass
in
the
backyard.
G
A
I
One
question:
mr.
chairman,
the
822
accumulation
of
trashed
I
was
only
able
to
view
the
photographs
that
you
presented,
and
you
indicated
in
your
testimony
that
11
28
is
the
last
state
of
photographed.
Is
there
any
significant
increase
decrease,
or
would
you
say
that
the
accumulation
of
trash
is
similar
today
as
it
was
or
is
similar
on
the
9th
as
it
was
on
the
28th?
It
would
be
decreased.
G
G
G
N
F
I
N
N
G
N
That
was
on
the
front.
I've,
you
know
put
those
in
the
back
those
the
chairs.
You
know
lawn
chairs.
As
far
as
the
car,
the
car.
The
tag
had
expired
on
that
car,
in
September
of
18,
2018
and
I'm
planning
on
getting
it
back
on
the
road,
but
I
haven't
been
able
to
of
them.
Had
some
financial
problems
getting
my
property
taxes
paid,
which
were
three
years
behind,
and
the
number
of
other
things
and
I
needed
to
get
some
extension
of
time.
N
But
I
need
to
give
you
know
nice
an
extension
in
time,
because
I
have
to
get
insurance.
I
have
to
get
my
tags.
I
have
to
get
my
license
reinstated
and
I
have
to
finds
that
in
over
eight
eight
hundred
and
some
change
that
I
have
to
pay.
You
know
before
I
can
do
any
of
this.
As
far
as
getting
my
license
at
AG
insurance
and
everything
on
the
car.
H
K
I
N
L
N
L
I
E
E
I
J
J
N
N
I
A
J
A
F
Mr.
Ayer
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
summarize
what
has
happened?
The
code
enforcement
board
has
found
you
in
violation
of
the
cited
code
sections
you've
been
given
until
February
27th
2019,
to
come
into
compliance
failed
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
within
that
time
period,
you'll
be
fined
$25
a
day.
If
you
don't
understand
what
you
need
to
do
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance,
you
can
talk
to
the
code
enforcement
officer
after
the
meeting
today,
you'll
get
the
oil
it'll
come
in
the
mail
to
you,
it'll
be
about
10
days
down
the
road.
N
H
H
F
Try
to
get
the
property
into
compliance
by
February
27th.
If
you
can't
get
the
car
in
in
operable
condition,
get
it
off
your
property
and
then
you
would
be
in
compliance
than
the
fine
would
not
run.
So
if
you
have
any
questions
like
I
said,
call
the
code
enforcement
department
after
the
meeting
today,
if
you
have
any
other
questions,
we
need
to
move
on
to
the
next
case,
I'll
be
along.
Thank
you.
G
All
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
based
on
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
All
my
notice
of
violations
in
noticing
earrings
are
sample
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and
mr.
chairman,
please
accept
all
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence
Bobby.
G
G
There
were
trees
over
growing
the
sidewalk
on
the
south
side
in
operable
vehicles
with
expired,
registration,
trash
and
debris
in
the
property
old
televisions,
pile
of
unknown
debris
in
the
rear
screens
were
damaged
and
not
a
intact
I'll
get
what's
kind
of
an
interesting
part
of
the
ordinance
about
insect
screens
here
in
a
second,
but
at
the
time
it
was
a
violation.
Insect
screens
are
required
under
city
code,
under
international
property
maintenance
code
between
May
and
October.
G
So
at
the
time
it
was
August
they're
required
we've
now
kind
of
passed
out
into
the
time
frame
where
insect
screens
aren't
necessarily
required
anymore.
There
was
a
number
of
windows
that
were
either
broken
or
missing
and
trees
and
vines
growing
into
the
into
the
building
around
the
patio
area,
and
there
was
a
rear
shed.
That
appeared
to
be
in
very
poor
condition
on
August
13th.
The
city
mailed
a
notice
of
violation
of
the
property
owner
which
we
received
the
return
receipt
signed
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin,
December
19th
noted
significant
changes.
G
The
vehicle
had
been
removed
from
the
rear.
There
was
still
some
trash
and
debris
in
the
property,
but
you
could
tell
some
work
had
been
in
progress.
Some
of
the
windows
were
both
were
still
broken
and
some
others
were
boarded
up
and
basically,
at
that
point
it
still
wasn't.
In
compliance
on
December
19th
of
2018,
the
Notice
of
Violation
Notice
of
Hearing
was
mailed.
G
We
did
not
return,
we
did
not
receive
a
return
receipt
at
that
point
in
time
on
December
29th,
I
posted
the
property
and
then
I
conducted
a
final
inspection
yesterday
on
January
9th,
basically,
there's
been
significant
improvements
to
the
property.
There
is
still
some
of
the
windows
boarded
up.
I
couldn't
tell
if
all
of
the
glass
had
been
fixed,
which
puts
it
into
the
glazing
issue.
I'd
have
to
probably
get
onto
the
property
and
actually
look
at
the
windows
to
see
if
they're,
all
intact.
G
Most
of
the
trash
have
been
cleaned
up.
We're
dealing
with
still
a
little
bit
on
the
north
side
of
the
shed
I
spoke
to
mr.
Jones
prior
to
the
meeting
and
there's
still
a
couple
of
things
left
to
be
cleaned
up,
I
would
probably
say
she's
about
90%
there,
but
unfortunately
she's
still
not
completely
in
compliance,
so
that
puts
before
the
violations
of
city
code,
8,
20,
the
accumulation
of
trash
8,
40
and
8
52,
which
were
familiar
with
the
duty
maintained
private
property
in
the
nuisance
prohibitions.
G
We
use
city,
ordinance,
6-1,
which
adopts
the
2018
international
property
maintenance
code,
and
that's
the
purpose
of
having
that
under
it.
I
have
304
13,
which
deals
with
windows
and
door
frames
requires
that
all
windows
and
door
frames
on
a
structure
be
intact
and
in
good
condition
and
and
safe,
3
or
4.1.
G
3.1
deals
with
glazing,
which
is
actually
the
glass
material
you
have
to
have
glass
approved
glass,
not
plastic
or
wood
in
your
windows,
3
or
4
13.2
continues
on
with
having
window
openings,
you
know
closed
off
and
then,
as
I
stated
earlier,
304
14
requires
in
any
window.
That's
open
has
insect
screens,
but
it's
only
required
between
the
months
of
May
and
October,
so
we
more
or
less
could
comply
it
because
she's
not
required
to
have
in
them
now
or
moving
forward
with
that,
and
that's
all
I
have
for
the
board.
At
this
point
time.
G
O
G
P
A
A
P
Would
like
to
mention
that
my
mother
owns
property
and
she's
90
and
she
has
dementia
I
live
there
and
take
care
of
her
I've
been
doing
the
work,
and
my
brother
had
his
leg
amputated,
he's
still
in
a
wheelchair.
He
normally
does
like
he
would
be
doing
the
windows
he
is
doing.
The
windows
he's
been
having
a
lot
of
complications.
P
P
P
E
Move
based
on
testimony
evidence
and
facts
presented
and
the
law
that,
at
a
time
of
the
alleged
violation,
sections
8,
22,
8
48-52
and
under
the
city
building
code,
6-1,
I,
PMC,
302,
seven,
three,
oh
four,
point
one:
three,
three,
oh
four
point
one
three
point:
one
and
three:
oh
four
point
one
three
point:
two
of
the
Code
of
Ordinances
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
was
in
force.
In
effect,
the
respondent
was
in
violation
thereof.
Mr.
I
M
A
J
G
G
E
That
the
respondent
shall
have
until
April
first
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
with
code
city
code,
8,
48-52,
Building
Code
adopted
6-1
sections,
3,
o
4
point
1,
3,
3,
o
4
point
1,
3,
point
1
and
3
o
4
point
1
3
point
2
or
suffer
a
fine
of
$25
per
day
for
each
day.
Thereafter
that
the
respondent
remains
in
violation.
There
are
second.
F
B
F
M
F
I'm
sorry
I
didn't
catch
her
name.
So
that's
why
I
wanted
to
make
sure
so
you've
been
given
until
April
1st
2018
to
come
into
compliance
for
those
code
sections.
Should
you
fail
to
come
into
compliance
by
that
time,
a
$25
a
day.
Fine
will
begin
to
run.
If
you
don't
understand
what
you
need
to
do,
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance.
The
officer
gasps
and
after
the
meeting
today
you'll
get
a
written
order.
It'll
come
to
you
in
about
ten
days
in
the
mail,
okay,
okay,
alright,
thank
you.
I
want.
F
G
Thank
you
thank
you
officer,
Steve
gas
and
city
of
Turpan,
Springs
Police
Department
code
enforcement
case
for
the
board.
18
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
for
21
the
property
address
is
58
Reed
Street,
the
listed
owners
to
vet
lar
shield,
Anastasia,
Conger
and
Ella
early
going
before
the
board
exhibit
number
one
or
all
of
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two.
G
All
my
notices
were
mailed
the
property
owner
property
owners
of
record
based
on
the
Pinellas,
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations,
a
notice
of
hearing
or
sent
both
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail.
And
mr.
chairman,
please
accept
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
G
Case
started
back
June
15
to
2008.
At
the
time
our
building
inspector
was
Bob
Welch.
We
received
a
complaint
about
the
property
and
some
say
and
some
issues
with
it.
So
the
property
and
the
building
inspector
Bob
Welsh
went
into
the
property
with
me
as
well
as
apparently,
there
was
a
neighborhood
to
the
east
who
allowed
us
onto
his
property
to
view
the
subject:
property
so
viewed
it
from
the
east.
Primarily
some
of
it
could
be
viewed
from
the
right
away.
E
G
There
were
numerous
violations
at
the
time
the
roof
was
becoming
separated
from
the
base.
Siding
is
in
poor
condition.
There
were
numerous
holes
in
it.
There
were
numerous
windows
that
had
broken
glass.
The
shed
in
the
back
is
an
extremely
poor
conditions.
Dilapidated
and
falling
apart.
Leaning
over
fencing
is
in
poor
condition.
G
There
was
missing
pickets,
falling
door
generally,
poor,
upkeep
and
/
the
neighbor,
which
I
did
not
witness,
but
there
were
raccoons
and
rats
which
frequent
the
interior
of
the
house
and
the
rear
structure
on
June
19th
of
2018
that
Notice
of
Violation
and
a
notice
of
hearing
were
both
mailed.
They
were
both
returned
to
our
office
signed
on
July
20th.
They
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin
spoke
to
Planning
and
Zoning.
The
house
is
in
a
historic
district
and
possibly
contributing
so
they
need
to
go
before
the
Historic
Preservation
Board.
G
G
As
you
can
see
from
the
photographs
again,
I'll
establish
this
with
the
board
and
with
the
other
side,
I'm,
not
a
building
inspector,
but
I
was
able
to
clearly
tell
that
the
shed
in
the
rear
is
leaning,
which
primarily
in
most
cases,
a
structural
engineer
would
agree
that
if
they
leaned
they're
not
in
good
shape
top,
you
can
tell
from
the
pictures
the
sheds
not
in
good
shape.
That
seems
to
be
I
believe
and
they
can
enlighten
us
a
little
bit
more.
G
G
We
did
send
deferral,
notices
for
the
code
board
hearings
at
the
time
on
December
4th
HPB
continued
the
application
because
they
still
needed
some
basic
information
that
the
board
requested
in
the
October
HPV
meeting,
which
was
a
cost
estimate
for
the
repair
of
the
outbuilding
and
a
cost
estimate
for
the
demolition
of
the
out
building
on
December
10th.
An
email
was
sent
to
the
property
owners,
letting
them
know
that
this
code
case
was
moving
forward
and
we're
here
and
then
December
29th
I
posted
the
property
I
did
conduct
a
reinfection.
G
G
Basically,
the
outbuilding
is
still
there
and
as
a
problem,
I
can't
testify
to
any
of
the
insect
harborage
and
I
was
actually
going
to
pose
that
as
a
question
when
we
got
to
that
point
and
it'll
determine
whether
or
not
that
violation
still
exists
and
I
did
notice
that
as
I
stated,
the
the
roof
or
the
house
appears
to
be
in
pretty
good
condition.
So
some
of
those
violations
are
kind
of
off
the
table
and
the
shed
is
still
there
still
an
issue.
G
There
were
still
some
issues
with
a
chain-link
fence
on
the
north
side,
but
it
look
alike,
a
lot
of
the
wooden
fence.
It
had
been
removed
and
then
I
wasn't
privy
to
be
able
to
go
into
the
backyard
I
did
notice.
There
was
some
tree
to
bring
in
some
minor
debris
in
the
backyard
that's
from
trees
and
such
so
of
the
list
of
violations.
8
40
duty
maintained
private
property,
36.0
3,
which
deals
with
fences,
walls
and
hedges,
the
chain-link
fence
not
being
repaired
and
some
other
minor
issues.
G
At
the
time
we
were
using
9-1
to
adopt
IPM
C
IPM
C
hadn't
changed,
so
the
codes
were
basically
the
same,
but
9-1
was
the
city
code.
We
used
to
adopt
the
following:
IPM
C
codes,
which
deals
with
301
3,
which
was
vacant,
lands
and
structures
which
deals
with
the
shed
has
to
be
kept
in
good
shape
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
8
40
also
deals
with
buildings
in
poor
condition,
so
the
two
of
them
kind
of
deal
with
that
shed
I've
removed
three
or
four
thirteen
and
three
or
four
thirteen.
G
One
and
I
don't
know
if
the
board
got
the
updated
information,
but
those
are
in
compliance.
Those
deal
with
the
windows,
so
we're
not
going
to
be
discussing
those
they'd
seem
to
take
care
of
those
three
or
four
point.
Seven
is
roofs
and
drainage
and
I
may
not
be
going
forward
with
the
board
once
again,
I
get
some
questions
answered
because
I'm
not
an
engineer,
but
it
looks
like
there
was
roof
work
done
so
I'd
like
to
ask
them
about
it
and
then,
as
I
already
stated,
three,
oh
nine
one
is
pest
infestation.
G
302
five
is
a
rodent
harborage
that
we
may
not
be
considering,
and
the
last
one
is
a
50
nuisance
prohibitions
that
deals
with
the
debris
and
things
like
that
in
the
backyard.
So
that's
what
I
have
before
the
board
when
I
get
the
opportunity,
ask
a
couple
of
questions
of
the
violators.
We
might
have
thinned
that
list
down
a
little
bit
and
that's
all
I
have
at
this
point.
A
A
Q
F
Q
Q
R
Also
in
the
in
the
original
complaint
and
the
pictures
that
were
given
to
us,
it
talks
about
only
the
wooden
fence
and
we
did
have
that
removed
that
we
knew
nothing
about
a
chain-link
fence
and
as
far
as
we
were
concerned,
it
wasn't
so
today,
I
did
go
back
there
and
look
at
it
and
the
only
damage
to
that
fence.
It
looks
like
the
people
who
live
behind
us,
free
that
had
fallen,
that
we
ended
up
having
to
get
rid
of
and
it
must
have
landed
on
the
chain-link
fence
and
it's
indented
other
than
that.
R
Q
And
as
far
as
the
shed,
we
did
have
a
contractor
come
out
and
give
us
an
estimate
on
repairs
as
well
as
demolition.
We
do
have
a
letter
here
from
them
saying
that
we
cannot
renovate
that
shed.
We
are
going
back
and
forth
right
now
with
the
Historical
Society,
because
they
don't
want
us
to
tear
it
down.
However,
it's
not
it,
it
can't
be
fixed.
We
need
to
tear
it
down.
So
that's
why
that
the
shed
hasn't
been
touched
yet
as
we're
still
working
with
them
to
figure
out.
What
we
need
to
do.
Q
I
do
want
to
say
that
when
we
did
go
over
there
before
this
meeting,
there
is
branches
in
the
yard
and
a
pile
that
looked
like
it
was
cut
from
the
neighbor's
yard
and
thrown
the
one
that
complains
and
thrown
on
our
property
because
and
there's
also
palm
tree
branches.
That
was
in
that
pile,
there's
no
palm
tree
back
there,
but
the
neighbor
has
palm
tree
so.
R
G
G
G
Know
it's
not
a
question,
but
just
so
you
guys
kind
understand
when
they
say
inside
I
think
he
was
talking
about
him
running
underneath
the
lattice
part
underneath
the
house.
That's
I'm
gonna.
Take
that
off
anyway.
So
it's
kind
of
a
moot
point.
We
don't
have
to
really
go
into
it
any
more
now.
Did
you
guys
have
any
roof
work
done
to.
H
G
Based
on
you
know,
the
additional
information
before
the
board
I
am
gonna,
go
ahead
and
ask
the
board
not
to
consider
three
or
four
point:
seven:
roofs
and
drainage.
Three,
oh
nine
point
one:
the
pest
infestation
302
point:
five,
the
rodent,
harborage
I'm
sure
they
can
appreciate,
even
though
tree
branches
might
have
come
from
a
neighbor,
unfortunately,
you're
still
kind
of
responsible,
so
the
8:52
still
kinda
on
the
board
as
far
as
I.
G
As
far
as
the
city
is
concerned,
I
would
normally
ask
you
guys
to
present
a
survey
for
the
chain-link
fence,
but
based
on
the
fact
that
the
rest
of
the
fencing
was
would
it
get
fencing
I
think
it's
probably
reasonable
to
assume
that
that
fence
doesn't
belong
to
them
and
I.
Think
in
the
interest
of
just
making
it
a
little
easier,
I'll
loss
a
board
not
to
consider
36.0
three
we
can
deal
with
it.
G
E
G
R
Q
A
G
Chairman
I
just
for
what
it
might
help
HPV
is
Monday
and
that's
their
their
next
HPV
meeting
is
Monday
I
know
the
city's
put
together.
Recommendations
can't
talk
about
them
now,
but
I
think
they're
all
set
as
far
as
the
demolition
or
remodeling
goes
based
on
what
the
board
says.
So,
if
that
makes
it
any
easier,
we
should
probably
have
an
answer
within
about
a
week
as
far
as
that
goes.
R
R
E
E
A
H
H
A
B
G
On
the
testimony,
60
days
is
reasonable.
We
we
seem
to
had
a
little
bit
of
an
issue.
I've
had
three
prior
cases
out
there,
since
2017
just
dealing
with
the
yard
and
stuff
they
contend.
They
have
a
lawn
maintenance
company.
So
we'll
give
him
the
benefit
of
the
doubt
on
that
one
and
I'll
say
25
dollars
a
day
with
this
one
as
well
so
60
days
and
$25
a
day
would
be
the
city's
recommendation.
I.
H
E
J
F
So
the
three
of
you
have
been
a
found:
a
violation
of
the
mentioned
code
sections
you've
been
given
until
March
31st
2019
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance.
Should
you
fail
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
by
that
date?
You'll
be
fined
$25
a
day
until
compliance
has
been
met,
an
order
will
be
entered,
you'll
get
it
in
the
mail
within
about
10
days.
Any
questions.
R
E
S
F
A
G
You
officer
Steve
gas
and
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs
Police
Department
Code
Enforcement
case
before
the
board
18
8
0
0,
0,
0,
479
list
of
property,
addressed
650
East,
tarpon,
Avenue
property
owners
list
as
an
and
Holdings
LLC
for
the
board's
information.
This
is
a
rehearing
of
a
case
that
this
boards
already
heard
last
year.
So
moving
forward
with
that
exhibit
number
1
going
before
the
board
are
all
the
photographs
to
include
the
inspections
exhibit
number
2
are
all
my
notices
to
include
a
notice
of
violation
and
notice.
G
The
hearings
and
the
administrative
documents
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
in
any
officer.
Emails
here
exhibit
number
3
and
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign,
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies?
What's
presented
to
this
board,
all
my
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
via
certified
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail.
All
notices
are
mail.
The
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
Mr.
A
G
G
Basically,
if
the,
if
the
property
owner
goes
our
short-term
tourist
rental,
she
must
complete
application
with
planning
and
zoning
for
conditional
use
and
get
approval
of
a
site
plan.
We've
been
going
back
and
forth
with
us
for
a
significant
period
of
time.
Up
to
and
including
I
know,
I've
been
to
TRC
to
the
Technical
Review
Committee,
with
with
the
owners
about
the
property,
so
we
mailed
a
Notice
of
Violation
back
in
July,
July,
9th
and
then
I
conducted
a
rien
spectrin
on
September
14th.
G
Basically,
the
application
to
change
the
permitted
use
had
not
been
changed
at
that
point
in
time.
Back
in
September
and
amended
notice,
a
violation,
a
notice
of
hearing
were
mailed
certified
in
first
class.
They
were
returned
signed
by
the
registered
agent
on
September
29th,
that
posted
the
property.
That
was
for
the
first
code,
the
first
code
board
back
in
October.
G
So
on
October
3rd.
We
had
conversations
with
the
property
owners
side
to
submit
or
change
if
you
use
as
a
multi-family,
where
the
conditional
use
isn't
required.
She
needs
to
submit
a
site
survey
and
floor
plans
to
Planning
and
Zoning
and
get
building
permits
and
fire
inspection
before
she's
placed
into
compliance
on.
So
on
October
10th.
The
permits
had
not
been
obtained
to
make
the
necessary
changes
and
move
forward.
G
December
29th
I
posted
the
property
and
completed
the
affidavit
of
posting
I
did
conduct
a
rien,
spec
ssin
on
the
property
yesterday,
and
it
appears
that
the
property
still
being
rented
out
I
saw
a
couple
of
vehicles
there.
So
it's
not
vacant.
So
it's
still
in
use
the
zoning
hasn't
changed.
There's
been
no
other
applications
with
the
city.
There.
G
What's
before
the
board
at
this
time
is
a
violation
of
city
code.
Twenty
five
point:
eight
zero,
eight,
which
deals
with
a
residential
office
district
and
they
allowed
uses
and
permitted
uses
in
the
zoning
code.
Two
zero.
Nine
zero
zero,
which
is
applying
for
a
conditional
use
based
on
or
zoning
she'd,
have
to
apply
for
a
conditional
use
which
hasn't
been
done
and
then
one
2702
is
the
applicability
of
those
zoning
issues
and
submitting
a
site
plan
under
two
1000,
because
she
wants
to
make
the
conditional
use
change.
G
He
has
to
submit
a
site
plan
showing
what
changes
will
be
made
to
the
structure.
There's
certain
requirements,
potentially
fire
sprinkler
systems,
exits
walls,
those
kind
of
things
and
then
finally,
6-1
was
added
for
2018
and
the
international
property
maintenance
code
and
the
building
code,
because
part
of
that
falls
underneath
of
the
building
code.
So
that's
all
I
have
before
the
board
at
this
time.
G
As
far
as
it's
still
being
listed
for
rental
on
any
of
the
short-term
rental
sites,
it
kind
of
doesn't
matter
because
the
property's
still
being
lived
in,
it's
still
being
lived
in
outside
of
its
its
permitted
use
and
none
of
the
other
conditional
uses
have
been
applied
for
so
I.
Don't
if
air
B&B
doesn't
list
it,
it
doesn't
change
the
fact
that
it's
currently
being
used
outside
of
its
usage
for
the
zoning.
So
that's
all
the
city
has
at
this
point.
G
Little
I
know
at
one
point
time:
she
was
attempting
to
sell
it
in
that
sale,
filter
and,
as
I
stated,
we
went
to
TRC
the
Technical
Review
Committee
I
believe
she
brought
an
architect
with
her
presented
some
plans,
but
then
it
never
went
any
farther
than
that.
That's
maybe
she
can
add
I,
don't
think,
there's
any
other
significant
changes.
So
basically
it
still
sits
as
it
did
back
in
July,
it's
still
being
granted,
it's
still
violating
its
usage
and
its
zoning,
because
none
of
that
has
changed.
S
Was
going
to
partner
with
mr.
condos?
That's
why
we
started
the
process
and
I
went
to
the
meeting
PLC
meeting
and
we
went
to
mr.
Hoffman's
office
and
we
had
the
site
plan
the
floor
plan
and
everything
the
parking
plan.
I
have
all
that
and
sir
condos
paid
for
that,
and
but
then
I
saw
that
it
was
too
much
too
much
money
to
do
like
turn
it
into
a
boarding
house,
etcetera
and
in
talking
with
mr.
condos.
So
we
said
why
don't
you
buy
it
and
he
says
okay,
then
he
gave
me
enough.
S
I
had
some
buyers,
it
fell
through
there.
Mr.
condos
has
made
me
an
offer
now
and
we
were
sort
of
going
back
and
forth
about
about
the
offer
I'd
like
to
submit.
There's
two
offers
here
to
show
you
I
just
want
to
vacate
everything,
I
told
others,
two
people
in
there
two
tenants
and
I
told
them
they
need
to
leave
whether
the
sale
goes
through
or
not
I'm
going
to
relist
it
if
it
doesn't
go
through
and
it's
just
gonna
be
vacant
downstairs
and
nobody's
gonna
be
living
there
if
I
can
live
there.
S
S
R
A
S
S
Told
them
like
when
the
offer
started
like
last
month
and
then
he
didn't
fall
through
and
I
go.
Okay,
look!
It's
it's
the
the
finances
that
are,
you
know
driving
me
to
stall.
We
were
going
to
close
on
the
30th
of
December,
so
what
I
would
have
been
clear?
That's
it
states
it
clear
clearly
on
the
offer,
so
we're
just
going
back
and
forth
and
I
will
vacate
and
get
everybody.
S
O
S
S
O
O
S
A
E
At
the
time
of
the
alleged
violation,
section
city
code,
6-1,
two,
oh
nine
point:
zero.
Twenty
five
point:
zero,
eight
one,
twenty
seven
point,
O
two
and
two
ten
point
oo
are
the
Code
of
Ordinances
of
the
city
of
Parpan.
Springs
was
in
force
and
effect.
The
respondent
was
in
violation
thereof.
Second,.
J
A
G
Of
the
one
of
the
biggest
issues
was
this
property
as
it's
unsafe
that
was
deemed
that
way
by
the
fire
marshal
and
that's
one
of
the
biggest
problems.
I
can't
hear
me,
one
of
the
biggest
issues
with
the
properties
are
deemed
unsafe
by
the
fire
marshal.
So
we
had
a
hearing
last
year
where
one
of
the
recommendations
was
to
evict
attendants
and
then
technically
she'd
be
in
compliance
with
an
empty
building.
She
continued
to
rent
it
and
drawing
profits
from
that
that
period
of
time
in
an
unsafe
building.
G
T
G
E
February
15
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
with
code,
section
6,
once
Oh
9.00,
twenty
five
point:
zero,
eight
one!
Twenty
seven
point:
oh
two
and
two
ten
point:
oh
oh,
or
suffer
a
fine
of
two
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
per
day
for
each
day.
Thereafter
that
the
respondents
remain
in
violation
of
said
code.
Six
second.
J
J
F
Yeah,
okay,
so
you've
been
found
in
violation
again:
you've
been
given
until
February
15th
2019
to
bring
the
property
and
compliance
or
you'll
suffer
a
$250
a
day.
Fine
you'll
receive
a
written
order
within
10
days.
You
don't
understand
what
you
need
to
do
to
come
into
compliance
and
contact
officer
Gaston
after
the
meeting
all
right.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
B
H
F
G
Thank
you.
This
is
case
number
18,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
nine
one,
nine
the
property
address
is
5/10
Triplett
Street,
the
property
owners,
Charles
Burroughs
senior.
There's
a
couple
aspects
to
this:
there's
some
new
violations
and
there's
a
repeat
violator
violations.
The
first
repeat:
violator
violation
stems
from
that
goes
from
November
15th
to
2018
until
January
9th
of
2019
for
a
total
of
56
days.
That
was
a
repeat
violator
for
case
number:
18:
eight:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
nine
nine,
which
was
eight
48-52
of
the
city
code.
G
G
It's
also
a
repeat
violator
for
case
number,
17:
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
four,
eight
six
again,
violations
of
city
code,
eight
48-52
and
six
one
that
was
a
code
board
case
on
October
12th
of
2017.
Its
deadline
was
December
12th
of
2017
or
pay
a
fine
of
$25
per
day.
Those
fines
are
still
currently
accruing
from
December
13th
of
2017
and
they
stopped
accruing
on
March
29th
of
2018
for
total
of
approximately
$2,800.
Those
fines
are
still
unpaid,
so
moving
forward
with
this
case,
that's
the
back
history
that
got
us
all.
G
The
repeat
violators
to
where
we're
at
now
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
or
all
the
photographs
exhibit
number
two
are
all
the
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
Civet
number
three
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
associated
emails
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
in
exhibit
number
five?
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs
all
my
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what
was
presented
at
this
board?
G
All
notices
were
mailed.
The
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
tax,
collector
databases,
whole
notice,
violations,
a
notice
of
hearing
or
sent
return
receipt
requested
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and
mr.
chairman,
please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
G
G
Athens
is
the
north
border
over
to
triplet
and
it
has
a
large
vacant
lot.
This
board
had
previously
heard
a
case
on
a
structure
that
was
there
that
had
been
since
demolished
and
then
there's
also
I
believe
it's
a
duplex
on
the
southern
end
of
that
parcel.
So
it's
a
very,
very
large
parcel
at
the
time.
The
lot
was
overgrown,
particularly
along
the
east
side.
There
were
Brazilian
pepper
trees
on
the
property
trash
and
debris
on
the
lot
there
were
trash
cans
in
public
view
that
was
related
to
the
residential
area.
G
On
the
southwest
side,
the
trees
are
not
being
trimmed
to
provide
sidewalk
and
Street
clearance.
That
was
along
the
eastern
side,
which
is
along
Safford
cross
the
street
from
the
trail,
the
Pinellas
Trail
their
pile
of
cinder
blocks.
There
was
an
old
washing
machine
and
some
other
furniture
on
the
property.
Also,
at
the
time
there
was
a
vehicle
on
the
south
side
of
the
property
expired
tags.
That
vehicle
since
been
removed
on
November
16th
of
2018,
the
Nova
Notice
of
Violation,
the
notice
of
hearing
the
repeat,
violator
notice
of
hearing
we're
all
mailed.
G
They
were
returned
unclaimed,
although
mr.
burrows
has
been
into
the
office
at
least
once
to
discuss
the
violations
and
how
to
come
into
compliance.
I
posted
the
property
on
December
29th
signed
the
affidavit
same
date.
I
did
conduct
a
re-inspection
yesterday
and
found
the
property
to
be
in
compliance
of
all
the
violations.
G
G
U
Contest
contest,
my
money:
this
is
$15,100
t
he
never
finished
the
job.
He
never
finished
the
job
I
hire
another
man.
You
were
one
day
he
never
came,
but
I
heard
three
boys.
There
were
a
half
a
day.
They
wanted
the
money,
I
paid
them,
they
never
came
back.
I
do
all
the
rest
myself
and
my
wife
and
a
daughter
I'm
doing
it
myself,
because
I
taken
my
money
and
then
doing
what
they're
supposed
to
do.
U
E
M
U
M
A
A
A
A
M
L
O
O
J
A
K
I
I
J
F
Go
ahead
and
summarize
so
mr.
burrows
you've
been
found
in
violation,
repeat:
violation,
Code
sections,
eight
Tests
48-52:
the
board
has
assessed
a
fine
of
twenty
five
dollars
a
day
for
56
days.
They've
also
assessed
prosecution,
costs
of
one
hundred
and
six
dollars.
You'll
receive
an
order
in
the
mail
within
about
10
days,
reflecting
those
dollar
amounts
in
those
number
of
days.
If
you
don't
understand
what
has
happened
today,
you
can
contact
the
code
enforcement
office
after
today's
meeting
for
further
information.
A
F
M
T
A
G
All
my
notice
of
violations,
our
notice
of
hearing
are
sent
both
return
receipt
requested
as
well
as
first-class
mail.
All
notices
are
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
Mr.
chairman,
please
accept
all
these
items
into
the
record
as
evidence
Bobby.
B
G
Starting
off
this
case
started
back
in
February,
but
I
want
to
let
the
board
know.
We've
had
we've
had
a
lot
of
contact
with
the
property
owner.
Mr.
Hoffman
mr.
Hoffman's
group
and
a
myriad
of
other
people
related
to
this
case
back
in
February
of
2018.
It
was
a
two
thousand
seventeen
case,
but
I
wasn't
able
to.
K
G
Had
to
get
the
building
department
involved
and
stuff,
and
that's
why
I
didn't
end
up
getting
initially
inspected
until
February
the
property
had
been
vacant,
we
inspected,
it
found
numerous
violations.
There
was
trash
and
debris
on
the
south
side
of
the
building,
the
fence
on
the
properties
in
poor
condition.
The
building
department
observed
a
sagging
section
in
the
front
of
it,
which
was
the
porch,
and
some
of
the
posts
were
leaning.
There
is
damage
to
the
soffits.
G
There
was
a
fire
inside
I
believe
the
southern
half
of
the
duplex,
and
there
was
some
significant
smoke
damage.
The
building
inspectors
in
the
fire
inspector
noted
some
smoke
damage
that
appeared.
It
would
have
traveled
through
the
attic
space
even
to
the
north
side,
which
was
the
non-affected
unit,
I
believe
the
property,
as
I
stated,
the
property
suffered
a
fire
many
years
ago
and
it
hadn't
been
restored.
G
As
of
yet,
there
were
exposed
electrical
outlets
in
the
front
of
the
house
at
the
time
is
keith
meade
and
robert
simone
from
the
building
department
have
insisted
in
the
inspection
and
they
gave
me
specific
information
about
violations
of
the
code
and
what
they
saw
from
a
building
aspect.
On
February
23rd
of
2018,
the
Notice
of
Violation,
was
mailed.
It
was
returned
to
us,
it
was
vacated.
Basically,
nothing
happened
with
it.
G
April
11th
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin,
and
there
was
no
change.
We
fast
forward
quite
a
few
months,
because
we
had
conversations
about
things
being
done
so
on
and
so
forth
to
November
16th,
at
which
point
a
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed.
It
was
returned
to
our
office
unclaimed
on
December
21st.
We
received
an
email
and
send
an
email
to
mr.
Hoffman,
his
group
basically
kind
of
summarizing
the
case.
It's
we
advising
in
the
city
still
going
to
bring
the
case
to
code
board.
I.
G
Think
at
this
juncture
would
be
best
to
have
a
definitive
time
frame
for
completion.
That's
part
of
the
reason
why
I'm
bringing
this
case
before
she
can
appreciate
we're
almost
a
year
into
this
case.
The
structure
is
not
safe.
I
know
mr.
Hoffman's
going
to
present
some
alternative
solutions
for
the
property
and
probably
the
explanation
of
why
this
has
taken
so
long
I'm
presenting
a
case
to
the
board
to
hope
that
we
can
at
least
narrow
down
that
timeframe
and
get
to
a
point
I've
explained
to
them.
G
G
Even
the
demolition
doesn't
necessarily
include
removal
of
the
foundation
which
I
know
in
some
cases
causes
issues
to
architects,
and
it
also
causes
issues
to
the
city
as
far
as
zoning
variances
lot
sizes
and
things
like
that
and
I
think
mr.
Hoffman,
it's
probably
going
to
explain
some
of
those
intricacies
to
this
property
to
the
board,
which
I'm
not
even
going
to
begin
to
try
to
explain
so.
The
long
and
short
of
that
is,
we've
gone
back
and
forth
for
a
long
period
of
time
about
getting
something
done
with
this
property.
G
Nobody
is
living
in
it,
which
is
a
good
thing,
but
it
does
stand
vacant.
Miss
Saunders
has
managed
to
do
a
pretty
good
job
of
keeping
anybody
out
of
there.
So
it's
not
other
than
the
unsafe
aspect
of
the
structure
become
a
nuisance.
She's
kept
it
in
fairly
good
condition
as
far
as
the
exterior
goes,
but
there's
something
that
needs
to
be
done
with
that
building
and
we
need
to
kind
of
get
a
definitive
timeframe
on
it
basically
get
moving
along
with
it.
G
K
G
Conducted
another
Rhian,
spec
ssin
and
it's
still
basically
the
same
as
it
has
been
for
the
last
year,
the
city
code
6-1,
which
is
adopting
the
older
building
code,
because
we
had
a
change
in
2018
to
6-1
and
adopted
a
new
building
code.
Eight
dash
forty,
which
is
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property,
8
52
nuisance
prohibitions,
basically
keeping
some
of
the
debris
and
everything
cleaned
up
off
the
property
and
the
fences,
walls
and
hedges
and
I'd
probably
have
to
specifically
ask
miss
Saunders
about
the
fence
in
the
back.
G
I
wasn't
able
to
see
it,
but
I
believe
there
was
still
some
sections
missing
from
that
wooden
fence
on
the
east
side
of
it.
So
when
I
got
to
that
opportunity,
I
was
gonna,
ask
her
about
the
fence
and
that
would
determine
where
we
went
from
there
with
tents.
So,
basically,
that's
all
I
have
at
this
point
time
board.
I
I
T
Adder
I'll
be
I'll,
try
to
speak
more
clearly
as
well.
I
was
saying
that
I
will
be
doing
the
the
first
introductions
and
lay
out
a
program
here
and
then
miss
Saunders
will
Sanders
will
plead
her
case
more
or
less,
and
then
this
kiss
will
be
back
up
and
filling
in
blanks
for
me,
because
she's
actually
been
more
involved
in
this
for
for
more
time
than
I
have
as
you
as
you
know,
that
case
history
that
that
we've
been
given
exhibit
3
is
pretty
impressive.
T
T
Where
one
thing
you
know,
you
can't
do
one
thing
without
the
other
and
and
different
agencies.
This
has
been
a
very
complex
thing,
I'm
going
to
give
you
just
a
brief
outline
of
some
of
the
things
that
have
that
have
happened,
that
and
to
miss
Saunders
Sanders
grew
up
in
the
house,
her
father
built
it
grandfather,
and
so
she
has
sentimental
connections
to
it.
T
She
was
also
living
there
for
quite
some
time
with
her
two
children
when
the
in
2010
the
the
property
across
the
street,
they
filled
in
the
wetland
there
so
that
they
could
build
on
it
as
a
construction
site.
That's
when
she
furry
the
first
time
she
started
noticing
that
they
were
getting
water
in
their
yard
and
starting
to
have
flooding
issues
in.
T
2011
the
apartments
that
are
on
the
south
of
the
property
up
the
hill
is
a
is
a
fairly
large
complex
and
when
that
was
under
construction,
there
was
a
very
significant
flooding.
There
was
flooding
to
the
point
that
it
was
being
knee-deep,
particularly
when
the
hurricane
well
tropical
storm.
Technically
tropical
storm
Debby
came
through
the
water
was
knee-deep
in
her
house.
So
and
then
the
city
did
a
report.
T
Mr.
Robertson,
along
with
American
and
from
the
city
and
American
engineering
I
believe
it
was,
who
is
a
consultant
to
the
city,
did
an
analysis
of
it
and
it's
very
fairly
thorough.
But
it's
a
summary
that
that
the
that
the
Upstate
up
upstream
up
the
hill
problems
of
the
water
coming
off
of
these
apartments
is
a
significant
contributor
to
the
problem
that
miss
Andrews
is
dealing
with
because
she's
at
the
bottom
of
the
hill.
Unfortunately,
so
they
are
not
actually
containing
the
water
that
they
need
to
is
is
what
it
seems
to
be.
T
Unfortunately,
in
2013
you
know
the
Sanders
lost
both
her
four
children
separately
when
in
June
and
one
in
December,
that's
been
a
extreme
hardship
and
so
there's
been
some
some
time
passed
by.
She
had
the
property
repaired
from
the
Debbie
storm,
but
then
came
hurricane
Irma
and
then
that
ended
up
taking
off,
making
a
big
mess
out
of
her
roof
and
making
the
place
of
getting
unlivable
and
that's
when
she
moved
out
so
from
there.
T
We
end
up
with
you
know
what
to
do
about
this,
because
you
have
a
piece
of
property
that
needs
all
these
repairs
and
and
I,
just
as
a
lay
person
that
would
agree
with
Miss
Casson
is
a
an
architect.
I
agree
with
a
lot
of
what
mr.
Casten
says
in
terms
of
needing
a
lot
of
repairs.
The
problem
is,
is:
do
you
repair
something?
T
You
have
a
50%
rule
issue
going
on
with
FEMA
that
you
can
only
fix
50%
without
complying
so
without
complying
to
the
FEMA
rules,
bringing
the
whole
thing
up
two
to
go,
which
in
her
case,
because
the
the
property
is
slow,
it
needs
to
be
brought
up
about
six
feet.
I
believe
I,
don't
remember
the
exact
number
anyway,
so
they've
been
dealing
with
money
issues,
the
hardship
of
that
so
but
she's
been
establishing
loans.
As
you
know,
you
heard
that
she
gave
you
know
$3,000
to
mr.
T
cantos
to
do
to
do
the
roof
which
he
wears.
This
pointed
out,
he
pulled
a
permit
earlier.
The
question
arises,
though,
as
to
how
much
money
do
you
want
to
spend
on
a
building
your
your
building,
which
is
also
part
of
your
livelihood,
because
you
rent
out
the
other
side
of
the
duplex
because
she
was
living
there?
T
How
much
do
you
spend
on
a
project
that
you
know
that
the
next
time
it
it's
a
significant
rain,
you're
going
to
be
in
knee-deep
water
again
needing
to
you
know,
rebuild
the
whole
thing
so
so,
ideally
you
want
to
raise.
Do
try
to
make
the
team
of
people
happy
and
do
what's
reasonable,
even
though
it's
a
hardship
not
caused
by
you
to
bring
it
up
to
FEMA
and
bring
the
house
up
out
of
the
flood
area
so
that
she
won't
have
to
be
dealing
with
that
again.
She
hired
us
in.
T
There
there's
a
lot
of
back
and
forth
with
a
fimo
and
all
that
and
and
FEMA
money,
disaster
relief,
money
and
that
kind
of
thing,
but
resulting
from
the
hurricane.
But
we
were
hired
in
August
to
look
as
architects
Hoffman
architects
to
look
at
bringing
the
house.
You
know
raising
the
house,
and
there
was
a
lot
of
discussion
about
how
to
how
to
do
that.
T
On
top
of
the
existing
structure,
basically
take
her
same
square
footage
and
elevate
it
to
the
so
it's
out
of
the
floodplain
with
steps
up
to
it
and
that
kind
of
a
thing.
So
then
the
first
thought
and
I've
spoken
with
Gaston
about
this
is
that
we
would
just
demolish
the
whole
thing.
Have
that
problem
go
away
and
then
start
our
construction
process.
Well
process
is
a
operative
word
here,
because
there
is.
T
There
are
so
many
parts
and
pieces
to
this
because,
as
it
turns
out-
and
we
were
dealing
with
setback
issues
because
the
the
structure
was
no
longer
going
to
comply
with
setbacks,
so
then,
then
we
found
that
okay,
we
can
make
a
jog
in
it
and
deal
with
the
setback
issue
and
we're
we're
okay,
but
then
in
October
we
were.
It
was
pointed
out
to
us
that,
even
though
we
could
deal
with
the
setbacks,
we
were
grandfathered
with
the
setbacks
that
she
simply
could
not
build
another
raised
the
building
and
build
the
duplex.
T
T
Another
from
zoning
finally
made
a
final
determination
that
it
was
going
to
be
that
there
was
no
way
for
the
code
to
allow
her
to
build
this
duplex
on
this
property.
The
only
our
only
alternative
is
to
add
more
additional
property.
Well,
this
is
a
problem.
It's
with
the
adjacent
owners
to
the
north
I
mean
to
the
east,
but
more
recently
she
was
able
to
work
out
a
deal
for
buying
purchasing
20
feet
on
the
east
side
of
the
property,
and
that
would
be
enough
to
bring
her
into
compliance.
V
T
T
So
so
we're
dealing
with
that-
and
hopefully
that's
going
to
happen
in
the
next
few
days,
if
not
a
week,
so
it
should
supposedly
it
should
be
a
very
simple
case,
so
she
will
take
ownership
of
that
extra
20
feet
that
allows
us
to
go
ahead
and
complete
the
design
and
drawings
of
what
we
need
to
do
not
for
the
building
permit.
So.
T
Where
we
go
from
here
is:
that's
that's
the
history
and
what
I
would
refer
to
as
hardship
history
so
from
here
in
terms
of
what
is
going
to
what
we
would
like
to
take
place.
What
should
take
place,
and
our
request
from
from
this
board-
is
that
through
January
will
we
fall
I've
already
been
trying,
although
I'm
not
a
contractor
I've
been
trying
to
help
as
Sanders
and
that
trying
to
find
a
demolition.
T
I've
talked
to
three
different
demolition
companies
and
everybody's
all
excited
because
they
have
a
guy
in
a
bulldozer
in
a
dump
truck
to
to
demolish
things.
In
this
case,
we
are
asking
them
to
demolish.
It.
Do
a
partial
demolition
where
we
remove
everything
from
the
building,
except
for
the
walls,
the
masonry
walls.
We
take
out
all
the
interior
walls,
all
the
plumbing
bla
bla
bla,
because
none
of
that
complies
with
the
FEMA,
the
new
FEMA
rule.
Okay,
so
we're
trying
to
bring
it
into
compliance.
T
K
T
T
Let's
go
one
more
sheet,
one
more
after
that.
That's
us
that's
the
survey.
This
is
the
existing
building
here,
and
this
is
the
additional
20
feet,
we're
having
she's
having
to
purchase
and
then
I
come
to
this.
Drawing
and
I
show
you
this,
because
this
is
the
existing
footprint
of
the
existing
building.
T
So
the
idea
is
that
we'd
be
using
all
of
the
the
masonry
walls
as
part
of
the
structure,
we're
going
to
have
to
add
to
that
too
for
the
second
storey,
but
we're
using
the
existing
structure,
and
so
that
doesn't
make
any
sense
at
all
for
us
to
tear
all
those
walls
down
wait
through
two
months,
while
we
get
our
building
permit
and
then
build
all
new
walls
back.
So
you
know
from
an
economic
point
thanks
so
from.
H
T
So
we
take
so
what
we're
asking
to
do
and
what
we're
anticipating
is
that
we're
trying
to
get
the
demolition
going
right
away.
We
were
actually
I
was
hoping
that
that
would
have
been
done
by
the
time
we
had
this
meeting,
but
unfortunately
it
hasn't
because
when
they
find
out
that
we're
asking
for
them
to
take
off
all
these
different
pieces,
it's
this
more
labor-intensive
takes
a
bigger
crew,
and
so.
T
So
anyway,
but
we're
still,
we
have
some
other
people
from
the
disaster
relief.
You
know
that
might
be
able
to
deal
with
it
so
hopefully
in
the
next
two
or
three
weeks,
certainly
by
the
end
of
February,
it
should
be
taken
care
of
and
the
have
the
roof
off,
have
everything
down
to
just
the
masonry
so
and
then
we're
we
anticipate
having
we'll
be
doing
in
February,
we'll
be
doing
all
the
finishing
up
the
architectural
permit
and
construction
documents.
T
So
by
in
March
we
should
be
able
to
be
bidding
and
permitting
we'll
do
those
simultaneously
trying
to
get
our
numbers
together
and
then,
hopefully,
by
the
end
of
March,
we
would
have
a
building
permit
and
start
construction
in
April.
That's
that's
our
that's
our
hopeful
plan.
So
what
we're
asking
for
is
you
know
which
I
know
you'll
be
asking
me
that
if
I
didn't
tell
you
right
now.
H
T
H
T
V
Okay
and
his
staff
I
know
Beth
heels.
They
have
been
working
with
us
all
year,
but
I
want
you
all
to
know
that
by
time
they
came
out
to
work
with
me,
I'm
disabled,
physically,
but
I
worked
and
I
did
I
took
out
a
loan
before
any
violations
came,
I
have
owned
the
property
since
I
was
19
and
I'm
I'll
be
47
this
month.
So
the
last
27
years
I
have
been
a
responsible
law.
Abiding
and
607
was
more
than
a
duplex.
It's
been
a
ministry
to
my
community.
V
Yes,
my
two
boys
past
six
months
apart
so
2013
I,
was
in
a
place
of
mourning.
I
didn't
do
anything.
My
brother
didn't
make
sure
that
y'all
was
cut.
You
know
and
family
made
sure
people
stayed
out,
but
it
wasn't
able
I
wasn't
emotionally
able
to
do
anything.
Not
even
you
know
to
try
to
work
towards
getting
back
to
my
home,
but
that
being
said,
I
have
housed
multiple
people,
not
in
just
harping,
but
throughout
Pinellas,
County
and
I,
say
people,
teenagers
and
I
thank
God.
V
Someone
was
foster
kids,
some
just
come
from
troubled
home
I.
Want
you
all
to
know
that,
because
the
reason
I'm
fighting
so
hard
to
be
so
easy
just
to
move
on,
especially
after
losing
your
only
two
children,
but
the
reason
I'm
fighting
so
hard.
But
my
home
is
because
my
grandfather,
which
I
considered
my
father,
no
one
did
he
build
this.
It
was
built.
Yeah
I
was
born
in
72
I
guess
it
wasn't
actually
the
to
move
in
into
73.
V
So
those
court
records
said
73
1973
we
have
I
have
always
my
grandfather
taught
me
and
I've
been
and
I've
been
in
compliance
with
that
in
the
loving
the
neighbors
and
help
and
I'm
a
Christian
woman,
so
I've
helped
the
community.
There's
people
in
my
community
and
I've
never
changed
my
address.
I
love
type
of
Springs
I
come
from
the
community,
but
sometimes
people
fall
between
the
cracks
where
they
don't
qualify.
For
housing,
but
they
can't
afford
to
pay
1800
dollars
for
rent.
V
Those
are
the
people
that
my
family
have
helped
along
with
I
told
you
2009
and
2011
whoever's
on
the
footballing
strike
team
that
needed
help
rather
than
mothers
were
evicted
or
they
got
hurt,
whatever
I've
housed
them
and
thank
God.
Most
of
them
are
very
successful
and
I
would
like
to
continue
to
do
so.
So
I
kind
of
told
you
my
past,
because
I
do
I
have
a
passion.
My
grandfather
had
a
dream
and
he
made
sure
that
was
passed
on
to
his
second
generation
and
I
know
my
children
are
deceased,
I
have
four
grandchildren.
V
F
Need
to
focus
on
the
case
in
front
of
us.
We
have
to
complete
this
in
another
40
minutes
and
we
have
like
ten
more
cases
to
go
so
I
think
that
they've
heard
the
direction
that
you're
asking
for
mr.
Hoffman
did
an
excellent
job
in
explaining
it,
and
so
it's
my
understanding,
you
just
want
some
time
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance.
Mr.
Hoffman
is
asking
for
word
through
the
end
of
February
and
then
as
for
what
is
compliance
and
what
does
not
compliance
mr.
gas
and
can
deal
with
that.
F
C
F
E
J
J
G
G
I'd,
come
back
to
work
that
day,
March
5th
and
there's
a
lot
of
history
with
the
house
and
I.
Think
I
think
we're
gonna
have
a
resolution.
If
they're
able
to
get
it
demolished
by
Martha,
March
5th
leave
the
walls
up.
You
can
deal
with
the
building
permits,
but
it
will
comply
this
case
and
then
$50
a
day
just
because
of
the
safety
aspect
of
it
as
it
stands
right
now
and
that's
what
the
city
would
recommend.
G
E
O
L
F
So
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
summarize
the
saunders
you
need
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
by
March
6
2009
teen.
If
you
fail
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
within
those
four
code,
sections
within
that
period
of
time,
just
suffer
$50
a
day.
Fine,
you
don't
understand
what
you
need
to
do.
You
can
contact
officer
gas
and,
after
the
meeting
today,
you'd
be
a
written
order
that
we
provided
to
you.
We
see
that
within
about
ten
days,
you
basically
got
what
you
requested.
G
I
left
you
love
okay,
yeah.
They
were
here.
Okay,
the
this
a
repeat
violator
case
for
21
days
is
stated.
It
also
has
new
codes
in
it.
So
there's
two
parts
to
this:
the
repeat:
violator
codes
are
eight
forty
and
then
there's
some
additional
ones.
Case
number
18,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
seven
one
three
331
north
stafford
avenue,
which
is
now
a
vacant,
lot,
exhibit
number
one
before
the
border.
All
the
photographs.
Civil
number
two
are
all
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice.
G
A
hearing
number
three
administrative
documents
case:
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign
in
exhibit
number
five?
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs?
All
the
notices
were
mailed.
The
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
notice
of
violations
and
notice.
They're
hearing
you're
sent
both
return
receipt
as
well
as
first
class
and
mr.
chairman.
Please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
B
G
Have
had
significant
contact
with
the
owner,
he
was
here.
I
spoke
to
him
earlier
and
kind
of
told
him
what
was
going
on
in
the
position
whirring
at
this
point,
the
case
started
back
September
5th.
The
20:18
was
conducting
inspections
directly
next
door
and
I
observed
a
number
of
violations
on
this
property
fence
was
broken
in
numerous
places
and
in
poor
condition.
There
were
multiple
piles
of
turns
out
to
be
mulch
piled
on
the
dumped
on
the
property.
There
was
a
semi-trailer
part
of
a
pontoon
boat
and
some
other
construction
equipment
stored
on
the
lot.
G
G
The
fence
was
repaired,
but
in
the
process
he
added
a
new
fence,
which
is
a
different
case
so
and
he's
dealing
with
his
new
fence
that
he
added
so
what's
before.
The
board
today
is
the
repeat:
violator
aspect
of
8
40
for
a
period
of
21
days,
because
I
did
give
him
compliance
back
to
the
9th
only
because
there
that
was
the
date
they
said
they
finished
it
and
I
didn't
check
in
until
today,
so
21
days
for
the
8
40,
then
before
the
board.
Right
now
is
I'm.
G
Gonna
take
3603
off
of
it
because
he
repaired
that
fence,
so
60
4.00,
which
deals
with
excavation
and
fill
because
it's
either
mulch
or
dirt,
and
it's
gonna
change
the
elevation
of
that
property.
There's
about
10
large
dump,
truck
loads
on
the
property.
The
property
owner
says
it
was
illegally
dumped
on
his
property.
So
he's
now
stuck
dealing
with
it.
G
That's
why
took
it
off
of
the
52,
so
he
wasn't
being
fine
for
it
anymore,
but
if,
in
fact
he
chooses
to
use
it
he's
going
to
have
to
submit
a
site
plan
and
get
it
changed
for
his
conditional
use
to
do
that,
so
it
kind
of
covers
that
base
and
gives
him
some
time
to
take
care
of
it,
which
is
primarily
what
he
needed.
He
understands
he's
a
repeat
violator.
He
was
out
of
town.
G
So,
as
I
stated
before,
the
board
is
64.0
zero
to
1000
and
209
the
conditional
use,
because
if
he
tries
to
use
it
to
store
dirt,
he
has
to
have
a
conditional
use
for
that
property,
and
then
I
stated
that
we
will
not
be
considering
36.0
3
for
the
fence
because
it
was
repaired
and
that's
all
I
have
it
this
time
and
one
last
thing
he
was
previously
fined
$50
a
day
when
he
was
a
repeat
violator
and
he
had
paid
his
fines.
So
he
owes
nothing
to
the
city.
G
A
E
G
Not
this
one
is
what
made
him
a
repeat
violator
previous
violation,
but
it
was
because
of
it.
The
structure
was,
it
was
in
very
poor
condition
and
he
got
it
demolished.
That's
what
established
him
under
840,
but
unfortunately
the
trash
and
the
debris
and
everything
else
made
him
repeat
violator,
even
though
they're
not
necessarily
Same
Same,
so
to
speak,
but
they
fall
under
the
same
code.
G
F
Repeat,
violation
will
be
too
difficult
to
create
a
motion
so
if
we
could
treat
them
separately.
So
my
understanding
is
is
that
under
the
initial
violations,
it's
sixty
four
point:
zero,
zero,
two
ten
point:
zero,
zero,
two
and
nine
point:
zero
zero
for
the
initial
violation
and
eight
forty
is
the
repeat,
and
it
was
in
violation
from
December
20th
through
January.
Ninth
total
of
21
days.
So
do
separate
motion.
E
J
W
G
E
A
B
H
F
I
F
Get
a
motion
going
so
right
now
you
need
to
finish
your
motion,
so
your
motion
is
so
far
that
find
that
it
is
a
repeat
violation
of
8
40
was
in
violation
from
December
20th
to
January,
9th
I
told
her
21
days.
Your
motion
also
included
awarding
a
fatigue,
prosecution
cost
of
90
150,
but
we
need
to
know
the
dollar
amount
for
the
days
that
he
wasn't
violation
for.
The
repeat:
did
you
want
to
use
that
$50
a
day
that
had
been
on
the
previous
case?
Yes,
okay!
So
that's
the
motion
on
the
table.
A
I
F
Needed
to
do
that
in
this
motion.
In
the
previous
case,
it
was
$50
a
day.
So
this
is
the
second
time
around
the
reason
that
they
tell
you,
the
code
enforcement
officer
tells
you
what
he'd
been
fined
in
the
past.
Maybe
give
you
an
idea
that
maybe
you
should
be
a
little
bit
more
than
the
last
time,
but
the
recommendation
from
officer
Gauss
and
was
that
remain
the
same.
Okay.
I
I
B
M
J
E
W
F
F
G
Administrative
documents
to
include
a
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
associated
emails
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five?
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
this
board?
All
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases
and
I'll
notice.
G
G
Case,
sorry,
that's
okay.
This
case
started
November
16th
to
2018
and,
as
I
stated,
I
was
conducting
expection
in
the
early
morning.
Hours
and
I
was
clearly
able
to
hear
roosters
on
the
property.
I
now
understand
and
I'll
put
a
picture
up
of
the
property
on
the
board.
This
is
a
vacant
lot
that
is
across
the
street
from
the
violators
home.
Let
me
put
it
up
here,
for
you
guys.
G
It's
the
property
outlined
in
green
right
there.
It
does
have
a
fence
around
it
and
it
looks
like
it's
used
generally
for
storage,
but
there's
no
structures
on
it
as
far
as
residential
structures,
so
I
go
out
to
the
property.
I
could
hear
roosters
on
the
property
actually
have
a
video
of
it.
If
you
really
want
to
hear
it,
I
can
pull
it
up
and
you
can
play
it,
but
rooster
sound
like
roosters
I
met
with
Miss
Hinton.
She
approached
me
and
she
advised
that
she
had
pot-bellied
pigs,
three
roosters.
G
She
stated
she
was
trying
to
get
a
permit.
The
land
does
not
have
a
dwelling
on
it
and
it
is
zoned
residential,
so
that
piece
of
property
is
zoned
residential,
but
it
does
not
have
a
dwelling
on
it.
That
becomes
important,
because
the
code
does
have
certain
aspects
that
require
there
be
a
residential
unit
on
the
property
to
do
certain
things.
So
the
code
does
not
allow
any
farm
animals
on
the
property.
It
does
only
allow
for
hens
on
the
property,
with
a
detached
residential
dwelling.
G
G
That's
it
it's
probably
too
small
for
any
of
us
to
read
the
long
and
short
of
it
is
you
have
to
have
residential
property
which
it
is?
You
have
to
have
a
residential
structure
on
the
property,
and
you
can't
obtain
a
permit
from
the
city
to
have
four
hens.
They
have
to
be
in
a
coop.
You
have
to
submit
a
site
plan,
etc,
etc.
Farm
animals
are
specifically
defined.
Basically,
as
ducks
pigs,
goats
roosters
are
not
there
specifically
in
there
is
not
permitted.
G
Basically,
the
only
thing
that
is
permitted
is
domestic
animals,
cats
and
dogs,
parrots
and
fish
and
birds,
and
things
like
that.
So
that's
the
nature
of
the
violation
she
had
been
before
this
board
before
for
violation
of
that
code
because
of
the
animal
she
had
on
that
property
and,
as
I
stated
with
the
Roosters,
she
was
in
violation
again
so
on
November
16th,
the
repeat,
violator
notice,
the
hearing
was
mailed,
it
was
returned
to
us
unclaimed.
G
Misson
has
gone
back
and
forth
attempting
to
obtain
a
permit
from
the
city
for
the
chickens,
but
unfortunately,
because
there's
no
residential
structure
on
it,
the
code
simply
won't
allow
that
I
believe
she's
going
to
present
some
evidence
to
the
extent
that
she's
trying
to
get
a
variance,
but
that
doesn't
necessarily
change
that
she
was
in
violation
starting
November,
16
she's,
still
in
violation
as
this
date.
As
long
as
those
animals
are
on
that
property,
it's
a
violation
of
the
city,
ordinance
4-3.
So
that's
basically,
what's
before
the
board.
G
H
A
O
G
O
G
G
G
There
was
no
fines
because
I
wasn't
able
to
go
on
to
the
property
and
she
wouldn't
allow
me
to
go
into
the
property
to
do
the
inspection,
so
I
basically
had
to
put
it
in
compliance
and
then,
when
I
went
out
a
different
day,
roosters
are
pretty
obvious.
So
at
that
point
done,
I
could
tell
she
was
in
viable.
W
I've
only
ever
had
one
pot-bellied,
pig
and
I
put
the
property
that
I
was
keeping
my
animals.
It
is
a
vacant
lot
when
I
bought
my
property,
my
home,
it
came
with
two
additional
vacant:
lots,
buildable,
Lots
I
chose
to
fence
it
in
and
turn
it
into
a
garden
area,
and
that's
where
I
was
keeping
my
animals.
W
My
animals
don't
run
loose
in
the
neighborhood,
they
do
have
runs
inside
the
Spence
tan
area.
I
do
let
them
out
my
neighbor.
Bob
has
the
same
situation.
He's
got
several
vacant
lots
in
front
of
his
house
and
he
just
likes
to
watch
them
from
his
kitchen
window.
So
at
that
time
is
when
officer
Gaston
came
down
my
street
on
another
issue
and
we
had
a
heated
debate.
W
W
W
Disability
I'm
asking
for
reasonable
accommodations
for
my
animals,
I've
submitted
all
the
documentation
necessary
with
code
enforcement,
but
then
also
with
with
cat's
office
with
zoning
and
planning
department.
My
understanding
is
that
my
next
step
is
to
make
application
for
a
variance
request
exemption,
and
so
that's
what
I
have
done
to
date.
So
I
aside
from
making
applications
on
on
my
hens,
which
was
approximately
two
months
ago,
I
just
restore
received
verbal,
a
verbal
answer
that
they
would
not
be
allowed
at
my
house.
W
The
way
my
house
is
set
up
on
my
own,
my
Lots,
where
my
house
sits:
I,
have
no
grass,
no
it's
all
pavers,
except
for
right
in
front
of
my
front
windows
and
either
side
of
my
house,
and
it
just
it.
I
mean
putting
the
coop
in
front
of
your
your
on
your
window.
I
mean
it
just
it's
not
I,
don't
even
think
it
meets
the
setbacks.
It's
just
it's
not
wouldn't
pass
according
to
their
requirements.
W
W
The
lots
are
I,
don't
have
any
adjoining
residential
houses,
it's
completely
buffered
by
a
road
or
other
vacant
lots,
but
outside
of
of
that
buffer
area.
I
do
have
neighbors
and
they
have
letters
that
I
sent
to
code
enforcement
office.
All
of
my
neighbors
are
in
support
of
me.
Keeping
my
animals
I
have
not
had
one
single
complaint.
I've
spoke
to
all
of
my
neighbors.
Not
one
neighbor
has
a
complaint
against
my
animals.
W
G
M
G
W
W
G
A
F
G
Sorry,
you
know:
we've
gone
back
and
forth
with
this,
and
there
was
some
issues
brought
up
she's
gone
through
the
permitting
process,
but
I
got
this
complaint
from
her
neighbors
about
the
farm
animals.
So
it's
a
little
contrary
to
her
statement.
As
far
as
that
goes
so
the
roosters
were
clearly
evident.
Like
I
said:
I
had
camera,
I
was
up
royal
drive
around
the
corner
when
I
used,
my
camera,
put
it
in
video
mode
and
recorded
the
Roosters,
whatever
I
can't
remember
the
sound
they
make,
but
making
rooster
sounds
early
in
the
morning.
G
So
it's
obvious
I
think
there's
there's
a
sanitation
there's
a
sanitary
issue
with
the
animals.
They
were
the
first
time.
I
saw
him
walking
up
the
street.
You
know
so
I
think
there
is
an
issue
with
that
and
as
far
as
the
simple
solution
is
to
basically
have
the
animals
someplace
else
in
a
properly
zoned
area
farm
or
whatever
the
case
may
be,
and
I
think
that
needs
to
be
done
as
expeditiously
as
possible
and
I
would
say
she
did.
File
for
variance
so
30
days
would
be
reasonable
to
do
that.
Well,
he.
G
E
L
F
Just
gonna
go
ahead
and
summarize,
where
we're
moving
to
that
so
miss
Hinton
you've
been
found
in
repeat
violation
of
the
code.
Section
4-3
there's
been
a
fine
of
$50
a
day
running
from
November
the
16th.
It
will
continue
to
run
until
you
remove
all
of
the
animals
from
the
property
or
otherwise
come
into
compliance.
If
you
don't
understand
what
you
need
to
do,
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance,
you
can
speak
to
officer
gas
and
after
the
meeting,
okay,
my.
G
Thank
you
case
number
18,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
five
one,
six,
the
property
dress
file
for
37
years,
Boyer,
Street,
Ricky,
Taylor
and
John
Conklin
estate.
Are
the
owners
exhibit
number
one
before
the
board?
Are
all
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two
are
all
my
notices
include
the
notes
violation
of
noticing.
Hearing
seven
number
three-year
administrative
docs
include
the
case.
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records,
as
well
as
any
emails
exhibit
number
four.
G
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign,
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
they
were
given
to
the
violator
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented,
the
board.
All
the
notices
were
mailed.
The
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
I'll
notice,
the
violations
are
noticing
hearing
or
sent
return
receipt
requested
as
well
as
first
class.
Mr.
chairman,
please
accept
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
G
U
G
This
case
started
July
18th
to
2018,
I
was
conducting
inspections
on
neighboring
property
and
I
observed.
Numerous
violations
on
this
property
primarily
was
overgrown.
There
was
a
large
amount
of
trash
and
debris.
There
were
appliances
dumped
on
the
property
and
there's
also
at
least
two
accessory
structures
on
the
property,
and
they
were
in
dilapidated,
poor
condition.
On
July
20th
of
2018,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed.
We
did
get
a
return
receipt
signed
by
the
property
owner
on
September
27th
I
conducted
Rhian
special
cause.
G
There
been
a
period
of
time
where
they
asked
for
some
time
take
care
of
the
issues.
The
sheds
still
need
to
be
addressed
with
the
building
department,
as
well
as
the
temporary
structure.
There's
still
some
piles
of
wood
and
other
debris
in
the
yard.
On
September
28
2018
sent
a
final
Notice
of
Violation,
which
was
also
returned
to
our
office,
signed
on
October
19
2018
I
conducted
another
inch
back
and
still
some
minor
debris
around
the
yard
and
the
structures
are
still
there.
G
It
also
appears
that
there's
too
many
sheds
on
the
property
and
at
that
point
in
time
we
send
an
amended
Notice
of
Violation
on
October
19th,
specifically
addressing
the
city
code
36.0
1,
which
is
how
many
accessory
structures
you
can
have
on
a
property
based
on
its
owning
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
On
November
6,
they
conducted
a
reinfection.
The
structures
were
still
there.
I
did
have
some
conversation
with
the
city
building
department.
They
did
come
in
initially
to
ask
questions
about
the
sheds.
G
Unfortunately
it
seems
they
left
some
of
the
details
out,
because
once
I
sent
the
building
Department
the
pictures
of
the
sheds,
they
did
advise
that
they
did.
They
did
need
to
go
through
a
permitting
process
for
the
buildings.
So
and
I
do
not
believe
that
had
ever
taken
place,
it
should
be
noted.
The
property
is
zoned
residential
I.
Don't
have
right
now,
whether
it's
our
60
or
70
or
our
100,
and
the
reason
why
that
becomes
an
issue
is
because,
based
on
the
city
code,
there
is
0-1.
G
It
has
requirements
for
the
maximum
amount
of
square
footage
you
can
have
for
detached
structures,
but
the
maximum
allowed
in
any
of
those
is
300
square
feet.
I
can
actually
show
you
an
aerial
image
and
you
can
see
two
of
the
accessory
structures
on
there,
as
you
can
see
in
the
pictures.
There's
basically
three
of
them
along
the
side.
G
Just
a
rough
estimate,
300
square
feet
is
going
to
put
you
at
what
ten
by
thirty
one
of
them
appears
to
be
in
a
minimum
of
about
twelve
to
fourteen
feet,
probably
about
eight
feet
wide
another
one
appears
to
be
about
a
six
by
six
or
an
eight
by
eight
metal
shed
and
then
there's
another
one.
That's
about
eight
by
ten.
G
My
math
puts
that
over
300
square
feet
and
as
I
stated
according
to
the
code
or
any
one
of
those
zoning
districts
are
sixty
or
seventy
seventy
a
you
have
to
stay
under
three
hundred
square
feet.
The
property
itself
is
only
seventy
nine
hundred
and
seventy
five
square
feet.
Part
of
the
code
says
you
can't
have
more
than
25%
of
that
I
didn't
get
into
the
math.
I
went
strictly
based
on
what
was
on
there
and
it
appears
that
it
is
over
three
hundred
square
feet.
G
Moving
forward
they're
still,
one
of
them
has
a
tarp
over
it
held
down
by
some
robes
still,
not
in
the
best
shape
or
condition.
We
did
receive
a
phone
call
from
mr.
Tyler.
He
explained
he
had
some
money
issues
and
he's
trying
to
get
some
things
done.
We
explained
to
him
that
it's
scheduled
for
the
code
board
and
basically
we
explained
to
him
that
the
how
the
kind
of
code
board
works
and
they
can
establish
a
final
deadline
as
far
as
coming
into
compliance
on
December
29th
I
posted
the
property
I
did
conduct
another
inspection.
G
A
X
Because
I,
the
conversation
you
were
talking
about
was
I,
went
to
the
city
and
explained
to
them.
I
had
a
can
of
in
the
backyard
with
pieces
of
fence
leaned
up
against
aside,
which
you
can
see.
If
you
look
at
the
picture
and
I
was
told
that
that
is
a
tent
no
permit
required.
I
can
erect
that
in
the
backyard
and
leave
it
for
as
long
as
I
want.
That
was
what
I
was
explained,
and
now
we
do
have
10
by
20
shed
next
to
it.
Y
X
At
a
time,
we're
not
going
to
rock
you
back
and
forth
and
we're
brothers
and
we
live
together,
so
that
should
explain
that,
but
we
have
a
canopy
in
the
backyard.
It's
a
temporary
structure,
I
put
up
after
the
hurricane
I
got
tools
and
stuff
sitting
in
there.
I
just
want
to
keep
him
out
of
the
rain.
I
was
told
by
the
city.
I
could
put
that
up
anytime,
I
want
anywhere
on
the
yard
and
leave
it
as
long
as
I
want.
X
Okay,
it's
a
10
by
20,
canopy
and
I,
put
pieces
of
stockade
fence,
leaning
against
the
side
and
I
tied
them
together
with
rope.
I
can
take
the
whole
thing
down
in
one
hour.
It's
a
temporary
structure.
It's
not
a
permanent
structure.
It's
just
a
canopy!
The
blue
is
the
top,
that's
the
that's
the
top
of
the
canopy.
If
you
look
real
close
on
the
corner
and
the
closest
corner,
you
can
see
the
metal
bar
that
goes
up.
That
holds
it
up.
X
It's
just
a
canopy
tent,
so
it
looks
deceptively
like
a
big
building
with
a
tarp
covering
a
damaged
roof.
I
mean
I
may
not
have
mentioned.
That's
why
I
wanted
to
say
did
I
mention
that
to
the
inspector
at
the
time
I
might
not
have,
but
it
deceptively
looks
like
a
building,
but
it's
not
so
canopy
tent.
That's
the
top
and
I
just
pulled
it
over
the
top
of
the
fence
pieces
that
are
leaning
against
the
side.
That's
it
so.
A
X
That
and
I
was
told
by
a
city,
and
they
said
they
sent
him
an
email
saying
that
that
was
perfectly
legal,
but
they
didn't
haven't
seen
pictures
of
it.
That
made
it
look
deceptively
like
it's
a
building
those
pieces
I
want
to
put
along
the
back
of
the
property
at
some
point.
So
that's
all
I
wanted
to
say.
Okay.
Y
Represent
John
Conklin's
estate
and
also
I'm
part
owner
of
the
home.
Let
me
set
the
scenario
a
little
bit,
because
that
picture
isn't
how
we
live.
That's
the
the
last
appliance
is
going
that
arc
that
the
hurricane
to
our
roof,
apart
toward
the
south
east
corner,
took
completely
out
on
the
four
panels
that
were
there
and
then
on
the
east
side.
It
tore
for
more
out
the
power
lines,
hit
the
roof
electrocuted
all
of
our
stuff
in
their
bus,
put
thousands
of
gallons
of
water.
Y
If
second
shed,
which
you
can't
see
beside
my
truck,
that
was
there
because
it
was
holding
tools,
we
had
to
buy
tools.
The
only
way
we
could
detent
to
do
this.
This
is
our
great-grandfather's
home.
Was
that
sponge
ID
from
Nikki
notes?
That
came
here,
so
we
were
restoring
it.
The
first
storm
Debby
lifted
the
metal
up,
dumped
a
bunch
of
water
in
ruined
floors,
ceilings
and
everything
we're
just
getting
by
that
when
armor
come
and
she
totally
destroyed
the
home.
The
back
of
the
home,
mr.
Gaston
will
tell
you,
looks
nothing
like
the
front.
Y
It's
very
nice
and
neat
up
front
with
the
vinyl
and
everything
in
place
that
storm
toward
the
back
of
our
house
out
so
I
did
add
the
other
structure.
The
two
sheds
together.
You
can
only
see
the
front
one
on
this
picture
and
there's
a
white
one
in
the
back
and
that
white
went
in
the
back.
It's
only
there
to
hold
materials,
there's
actually
about
six
thousand
dollars
worth
it
and
brand-new
air-conditioned
equipment.
Y
There
had
been
in
the
house
a
couple
months
when
armor
came
along,
so
I
know
that
structure
I
want
it
to
go
and
I
want.
I've
got
the
all
the
metal
for
the
new
roof
for
the
front,
one
so
I.
In
order
for
us
to
do
this
work,
we
have
to
stack
materials
and
put
them
somewhere,
and
so
we
stored
it
as
neat
as
we
could,
but
both
of
us
being
disabled
vets
and
our
finances
only
allows
us
to
do
so.
Much
I
have
pictures.
Y
My
phone
will
show
you
that
the
tools
that
we
have
bought
and
where
they
set
in
their
forth
the
construction
of
this
home
to
redo
it.
If
you
look
at
the
Google
the
picture
of
the
home,
that
you'll
get
up
on
Google
and
look
at
the
front
now,
if
which
I
don't
have
a
picture
of,
because
I
didn't
think
he
did,
but
even
the
roof
alone,
that
we've
put
together
pieces
at
a
time
and
did
it
ourselves
had
to
both
24
foot
panels
up
there
and
we're
disabled.
Y
But
we've
done
this
and
we're
steadily
moving
forward.
We
just
need
time.
I
don't
want
that
backyard
to
be
like
that,
that
mess
that
you
see
on
that
first
picture
in
mister,
Gaskin,
okay,
it
never
was
there
again.
It
was
the
point
of
piling
everything
up
getting
people
to
help
load
it
and
get
it
off.
X
Y
Months
at
least
a
minimum,
we
got
taxes
due
in
three
and
for
us
to
finish
the
back
of
the
house
and
to
rebuild
those
sheds.
Give
us
everything
you
can
I
don't
make
it
happen.
He's
made
us
build
the
house.
That
said
it
couldn't
be
done,
and
we've
done
that
my
great-grandfather
helps
start
this.
This
Talmud
being
a
sponge
it
over
there
good
choice,
of
course,
and
we've
been
here
a
family
forever.
So
what
this
is
going
to
get
taken
care
of
I,
don't
like
to
live
like
that.
Y
G
G
Y
I
Y
120
days
so
I
can
make
places
for
the
tools
and
the
materials
and
install
what
I
have
to
do.
Then
I'll
have
one
once
she
had
piled
up
till
I
can
finish
build
in
the
back
of
it
to
make
it
under
300
square
feet,
because
I
want
to
pull
on
in
and
enlarge
it
a
little
bit,
but
I've
got
all
the
materials
to
do
it.
It's
just
of
moving
something
around
to
be
able
to
install
something
so
I
have
more
room
I'm,
trying
to
just
push
it
all
forward.
I
just
got
out
of
the
hospital.
Y
I
was
in
there
from
Christmas
till
the
3rd
of
January.
So
I
push
myself
to
get
the
back
of
this
house
like
it
was
we
just
redid
it.
She
said
well,
the
back
porch
roofs
and
the
laundry
rooms
and
then
and
I'm
not
really
physically
able
to
do
it,
but
I'm
pushing
myself
to
do
it.
I'm
just
asking
y'all
baby.
Please
give
me
as
many
days
as
you
can
and
I
guarantee
you
that
you'll
see
a
huge
difference.
Ok,
thank
you
very
much.
You
very
much
for
your
time
and
it's
evening.
U
J
J
M
G
A
I
J
A
F
W
G
18
8
0
0
0
9,
21,
17,
Lincoln,
Avenue,
Sylvester,
Murray's
estate
care
of
John
Murray.
This
is
a
vacant
lot
in
the
city
exhibit
number
one.
During
my
photographs,
exhibit
number
2
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
administrative
dock
property.
Appraiser
tax
collector
records
in
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting.
All
my
notices
reveal
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector.
All
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
for
sent
returned
Reese.
G
G
This
is
a
vacant
lot
in
the
700
block
of
Lincoln
south
of
Martin
Luther
King
on
November
17th.
They
conducted
initial
inspection.
A
lot
was
overgrown
in
the
rear,
primarily
towards
the
back.
The
fence
was
in
poor
condition
and
there's
pepper
trees
on
the
property.
As
the
we're
under
130
303.
You
ever
had
a
certificate
of
occupancy.
There
used
to
be
a
structure
on
that
property,
so
a
certificate
of
occupancy
was
issued,
which
means
you
can
no
longer
have
any
Brazilian
pepper
trees
on
the
property
for
perpetuity
November
20th
I
mailed,
the
Notice
of
Violation.
G
It
was
a
return
signed
on
December
11th
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin.
At
that
time
there
was
no
change.
December
12th,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed.
We
did
not
receive
a
return
receipt.
I
posted
the
property,
December
29th
conducted
another
inspection
on
the
9th
of
January
of
2019.
Basically,
the
lot
was
cleared
and
the
only
thing
that
remained
was
a
pepper
tree.
So
the
only
thing
before
the
board
today
is
130
3.03,
and
I
have
nothing
further.
I
B
E
A
I
Make
a
motion
I
move
that
the
respondent
shall
have
until
March
15
2019
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
with
section
1.
Actually,
one
33.0,
three
of
the
Code
sections,
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
are
suffer
fine
of
$50
per
day
for
each
day.
Thereafter,
the
respondent
remains
in
violation
so
to
produce
a
second.
A
J
A
A
G
This
is
case
number,
as
you
stated,
18
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
eight,
seven,
nine,
the
property
dress,
is
14
20
solo
driver
operator,
Charles
Savio,
this
repeat
violator
case
from
November
9th
of
2018
to
November
17th
of
2018
for
a
total
of
nine
days.
The
case
that
spawned
this
was
18:
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
three
three
five
where's
established
under
violations
of
city
code,
eight
48-52
and
36.0
three.
Currently
there
were
fines
running
on
that
case
and
it
came
into
compliance.
There
are
unpaid
fines
on
this
property
or
on
that
owner.
G
It
is
actually
a
different
property
that
he
owns
and
totaling
thirteen
hundred
and
two
dollars.
So
moving
forward
exhibit
number
one
before
the
board
or
the
photographs
tip
number
two
or
all
my
notices,
notice,
violation,
notice
of
hearing
civil
number,
three
administrative
docks
case:
summary
property,
appraiser
tax,
collector
records
exhibit
number
four:
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
in
exhibit
number
five
or
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs.
G
All
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
or
mailed
the
property
owner
of
record
determined
by
Pinellas,
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax,
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations,
our
notice
of
hearing
or
sent
return
receipt,
Wells
first
class
mail
and
mr.
chairman,
please
accept
all
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Please.
G
You
the
case
started
November
9th.
There
was
tree
debris
in
the
front
yard,
November
14th,
the
Notice
of
Violation
notice,
a
hearing
repeat
violator
notice
of
hearing
we're
all
mailed.
They
were
returned,
signed,
November,
20th
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin,
still
not
in
compliance.
The
trash
and
debris
was
in
the
trash
cans
curbside
and
it's
not
trash
day
until
Thursday
and
unfortunately,
I
can't
remember
what
date
November
20th
is,
but
it
was
more
than
24
hours.
Otherwise,
I
wouldn't
have
put
that
in
there.
It
would
appear
that
the
trash
was
out
yesterday.
G
So
it
was
Friday
was
November
20th
and
it
would
have
been
picked
up
there.
Also
empty
cans
left
curbside,
November
28th.
They
were
still
debris
in
the
cans.
Curbside
December
29th,
I
posted
the
property
and
the
I
found
that
it
was
in
compliance
of
all
the
violations.
So
what's
before,
the
board
is
8.
22
accumulation
of
trash
actually
disregard
that
8
52
is
the
only
violation.
That's
before
the
board
is
a
repeat
violator.
It
was
just
8
52
per
period
of
9
days
and
I
have.
G
G
E
I
B
L
J
J
H
I
In
determining
what
I
felt
was
a
proper
flying,
I
try
to
take
each
pace
on
its
own
individual,
the
fact
that
one
might
be
25,
the
one
might
be
fifty
one
might
be
a
hundred
okay,
I.
Don't
necessarily
feel
that,
just
because
the
the
rule
violation
or
the
alleged
rule
violation
that
is
similar,
that
that
necessarily
negates
or
necessitates
the
same.
E
L
A
J
K
G
January
9th
I
believe
it
was
53
days
total.
The
repeat
violator
case
that
they
were
established
under
was
case,
18,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
five
and
though
it
was
a
violation
of
city
code,
8-14,
eight
52.
The
code
board
heard
that
case
on
March
8th
of
18
gave
him
a
deadline
of
April
15th
of
18
or
suffer
fine
of
$25
per
day.
They
complained
they
did
comply
by
the
deadline
so
there.
No.
There
were
no
fines
assessed
in
that
previous
case,
but
they
were
established
case
before
the
board
is
18.
G
A
B
G
G
A
I
J
H
E
A
J
M
E
J
E
G
A
E
E
G
G
H
G
A
I
A
D
G
Yeah
and
with
that
being
said,
I
think
we
should
probably
hear
this,
because
there
was
some
fraudulent
accusations
made
that
he
did
not
have
authority
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
property
owner.
So
rather
than
object
and
move
forward
with
accepting
the
affidavit
of
non-compliance.
I
think
it
would
be
reasonable
for
us
to
rehear.
This
I
would
actually
probably
suggest
that
mr.
Wang
have
a
rehearing
since
he's
alleging
that
the
person
that
came
in
here
wasn't
lawfully
allowed
to
testify
on
his
behalf
and
fraudulently
took
money
from
a
we.
G
B
D
D
G
B
A
B
I
G
Yeah
and
based
on
the
issues
that
we
had
with
that
I'd
really
kind
of
rather
consult
with
the
city
attorney
before
we
do
anything
with
the
case
and
as
far
as
rehearing,
if
this
was
an
affidavit
and
on
compliance
not
the
whole
case.
This
board's
already
heard
that
old
case
so
I
think
at
this
point
in
time.
If
we
could
table
it
and
then
we
can
deal
with
it
later,
it's
easy
enough.
A
H
A
A
D
G
E
D
I
M
I
E
I
move
based
on
the
testimony,
evidence
and
facts
presented
in
law,
the
time
of
the
alleged
violation,
sections
8,
22,
8,
48-52
40.0
times
to
6.1
of
the
building
code
and
under
that
I
p.m.
see
three.
Oh
one
point
two:
three:
oh
four
point:
six
and
thirty
six
point:
zero
three
of
the
Code
of
Ordinances
of
City
of
Tarpon
Springs,
was
in
force
in
effect
in
the
respondent,
was
in
violation
thereof,.
E
H
E
A
O
O
O
O
J
L
O
J
H
I
Mr.
Kramer
who's
got
ten
years
of
service
seems
that
the
proceedings
have
gotten
longer
and
longer
and
longer
that's
fine,
but
I
think
you
have
to
in
consideration
of
people
if
we
have
to
decide
that
there's
going
to
be
a
break
after
a
certain
amount
of
time,
I
don't
know
that
anybody
can
properly
sit
here.