►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board February 14, 2019
Description
Description
C
A
A
Florida
Statute
2
86.0
1:05
requires
any
party
appealing
a
decision
to
the
of
this
board
to
have
a
record
of
the
proceedings
to
support
their
appeal.
The
procedure
of
the
board
is
as
follows.
First,
the
city
presents
its
witnesses.
The
next
exhibitions
exum
exhibits,
after
which
the
alleged
violator
is
able
to
ask
the
city
witnesses
any
questions
regarding
the
testimony.
Secondly,
the
alleged
violator
is
allowed
to
make
a
presentation
and
present
his/her
own
witnesses
and
exhibits.
A
Then
the
city
can
question
the
alleged
violators
witnesses
after
both
rounds
of
testimony
by
the
part
of
the
city
and
on
the
part
of
the
alleged
violator,
each
party
is
asked
to
give
a
closing
argument
first
by
the
city
and
then
by
the
alleged
violator
after
those
three
steps
are
taken.
This
board
will
close
the
public
hearing
portion
of
the
case
to
discuss
it
and
to
make
appropriate
actions
before
we
again
that
begin
the
public
hearings,
we
will
have
all
potential
witnesses.
Please
stand
up
and
be
sworn
in
by
the
Secretary
of
the
board.
B
A
E
E
It's
a
vacant
property,
nobody
who's
residing
in
it
at
the
time
exhibit
number
1
going
before
the
board
are
all
the
photographs
exhibit
number
2
or
all
my
notices,
including
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice
of
hearing,
exhibit
number
3
administrative
documents
to
include
case
summaries,
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records,
as
well
as
any
related
emails,
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
representative
are
the
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
this
board.
E
All
my
notices
are
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
based
on
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
tax,
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
both
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and
mr.
chairman,
please
accept
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Thank.
D
A
E
Yes,
that's:
okay.
We've
had
numerous
contact
with
the
owner
throughout
this
case.
This
case
originally
started
November
16th
of
2018
with
the
property's
vacant.
It
was
in
poor
condition.
There's
boards
on
the
roof
to
hold
the
remnants
of
a
tarp,
the
porches
in
poor
condition.
The
stairs
appear,
unsafe,
Ashleigh
trees
are
growing
up
through
the
porch
on
the
would
be
I
guess
the
northwest
side
of
the
property
sightings
coming
off
the
building
the
front
windows,
don't
have
the
necessary
trim
around
it
and
they
appear
to
be
unfinished.
E
The
lot
was
overgrown
and
grass
is
growing
into
the
roadway
and
they're
Brazilian
pepper
trees
on
the
property
on
November
16th
of
2018,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed.
We
did
not
receive
a
green
card
back
from
that
mailing
on
January
18th
that
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin.
There
was
some
minor
cleanup
that
had
been
done
on
the
property,
but
the
property
is
still
not
in
compliance.
I
also
noted
on
that
date
and
no
permits
for
any
work
had
been
pulled
for
the
property.
E
Through
the
city
system,
On
January,
18th
of
2019,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed.
It
was
returned
not
deliverable
as
addressed
and
unable
to
forward
on
February
2nd
of
2019
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
of
posting
conducted
a
final
inspection
on
the
property
this
morning.
It's
still
not
in
compliance.
What's
before
the
border
violation
is
a
city
code,
8
40,
which
is
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property.
You
may
be
basically
upkeep
it
prevent
it
from
becoming
a
public
nuisance.
E
8
52,
which
are
the
nuisance
prohibitions,
would
deal
with
trimming
trimming
the
grass
making
sure
it's
in
shape,
not
allowing
debris
to
be
built
up
on
the
property
130
303,
which
is
a
tree
exemptions.
It
requires
any
property
that
has
a
certificate
of
occupancy
issued
at
any
point
in
time.
It's
not
allowed
to
have
any
Brazilian
pepper
trees
anywhere
on
that
property.
Then
we
get
into
city
ordinance
6-1,
which
is
the
adoption
of
the
2017
IP
I'm.
E
Sorry,
the
2017
Florida
Building
Code
in
the
2018
international
property
maintenance
code,
Austin,
was
IPM,
see
under
IPM,
see
the
violations
a30
1.3,
which
deal
with
vacant
structures
and
land.
In
summary,
the
IPM
si
states
of
vacant
structures
and
in
vacant
structures
and
premises
thereof
or
vacant
land
shall
be
maintained
in
a
clean,
safe
and
secure,
and
sanitary
condition
is
provided
here
in
so
as
not
to
cause
a
blighting
problem
or
adversely
affect
the
public
health
or
safety.
The
next
one
under
IPM
C
is
three
O
4.6,
which
deals
with
the
exterior
walls
and
structure.
E
They
have
to
be
basically
not
even
holes
in
them.
Three
O
4.10
deals
with
stairs
decks
and
balconies.
They
have
to
be
in
safe
condition
and
not
in
poor
condition.
Conditions.
Excuse
me,
IPM
c30,
4:13
deals
with
windows
and
door
frames.
It
requires
that
all
windows
be
properly
framed
as
well
as
all
doors,
as
you
can
see
in
the
photographs.
There's
some
pictures
of
the
window
frames
that
are
basically
absent
and,
lastly,
IPM
c30
4.7,
which
requires
the
roof
to
be
in
tact
and
have
proper
drainage.
E
D
D
F
A
G
D
Started
building
a
house
in
Turpin
Springs,
which
is
around
the
corner
and
unfortunately
that
is
taking
me
much
longer
than
I
had
anticipated.
So
basically,
I
was
trying
to
at
least
maintain
the
yard,
but
I've
had
some
personal
problems,
so
I
that's
been
a
little
lacks.
Unfortunately,
so
it's
a
it's
an
extensive
amount
of
work.
So
that's
why
I'm
asking
for
the
90
days,
Thank.
G
D
F
F
H
E
The
city
has
no
issue
with
ninety
days.
There
is
an
extensive
amount
of
work.
I
know
the
case
started
for
us
in
November,
but
there's
gonna
be
permitting
issues,
and
things
like
that,
so
I
do
think.
90
days
is
reasonable.
Anything
based
on
the
circumstances,
probably
a
hundred
dollars
a
day
to
make
sure
that
that
gets
taken
care
of
in
a
timely
manner.
F
H
C
Read
that
rule
certainly
okay,
thank
you.
So
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
read
the
rule
of
procedure
regarding
requests
for
rehearing,
so
the
board
knows
I'm.
Reading
from
your
rules
of
procedure,
then,
in
a
place
for
about
thirty
years,
rule
five
section
three
provides
any
aggrieved
party
may
petition
the
board
to
reconsider
or
rehear
any
board
order,
resulting
from
public
hearing.
C
This
petition
must
be
made
in
writing
and
filed
with
the
board
secretary
no
later
than
30
days
after
the
execution
of
the
order
and
prior
to
the
filing
of
any
appeal
upon
receipt
of
the
petition.
The
board
will
consider
whether
or
not
to
reconsider
or
rehear
the
case.
A
motion
to
approve
a
petition
to
reconsider
a
rehear
must
be
made
by
a
board
member
who
previously
voted
on
the
prevailing
side.
C
A
motion
to
approve
a
petition
to
reconsider
rehear
a
case
must
set
the
date
and
time
for
the
hearing
the
rehearing
may
be
held
at
the
time
of
the
consideration
of
the
petition.
If
the
petitioner
and
all
other
parties
agree,
the
board
will
not
hear
oral
argument
or
evidence
in
determining
whether
to
grant
the
petition
or
to
reconsider
or
rehear,
so
your
to
make
your
determination
based
solely
upon
the
written
petition.
That's
in
front
of
you
without
hearing
from
either
side.
A
I
F
In
this
letter,
I
feel
sorry
for
the
lady
in
question
that
she
needs
support
animals,
but
I
think
that
we
made
the
proper
decision
based
on
the
fact
that
we
represent
and
have
to
look
towards
the
entire
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs
and
I.
Think
our
neighbors,
either
now
or
potential
neighbors
should
have
the
same
protections
that
anybody
has
and
I
think
that
miss
Hinton
should
have
been
aware
of
what
the
situation
was
when
she
moved
to
that
particular
area
and
I,
don't
know
a
an
exemption
will
be
granted
by
the
Zoning,
Board
and
I.
F
J
K
K
C
L
E
You,
this
is
a
repeat
violator
case.
It
was
for
a
period
of
8
days
from
January
18th
of
2019
to
January
25th
of
2019.
The
repeat
violator
original
case
was
case:
number
17,
8,
0,
0,
0,
0,
4,
1
1,
and
that
was
for
a
violation
of
city
code,
8
48-52.
At
that
point,
in
time
the
property
was
established.
There
were
no
snow
fines
attached
to
that
previous
case,
the
property
like
I,
said
it
was
just
established.
This
is
case
number
19,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero.
E
Three
eight,
the
property's
addressed
as
401
East
Boyer,
but
it
is
a
vacant
lot
owned
by
foresight,
constructors,
with
a
parcel
number
of
13
27
15
zero.
Six
one:
three:
eight:
zero:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
six
zero
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
or
all
the
photographs
associated
with
this
case
exhibit
number
two:
do
we
establish
if
you
had
any
objection,
not.
A
E
As
stated,
my
photographs
are
exhibit
number
one
exhibit
number
two
or
the
notices
notice
of
I
elation,
a
notice
of
hearings,
administrative
documents
case
summaries,
tax,
collector
and
property
appraiser
records
and
any
associated
emails.
Our
exhibit
number
three
exhibit
number
four:
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
exhibit
number
fives
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs?
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
were
given
to
the
violator
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
this
board.
E
All
my
notices
are
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations,
a
notice
of
hearing
or
sent
both
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and
mr.
chairman,
please
accept
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
A
E
You
we've
had
email
contact
with
the
owner
of
this
property.
January
18th
was
of
this
year
was
the
initial
inspection
I
got
it
to
fold.
I
got
a
complaint
from
one
of
the
city
departments
about
concrete
part
of
the
brick
wall.
You
can
see
in
the
photographs
when
they
come
around,
had
fallen
into
the
sidewalk
and
then
I
also
was
flagged
down
by
a
pedestrian
in
the
area.
Actually,
honest
I
was
on
my
way,
based
on
the
city
complaint.
The
pedestrian
flagged
me
down
about
the
bricks
in
the
sidewalk.
E
What
I
got
there
I
noticed
numerous
pieces
of
the
the
very
short
brick
wall
that
there
was
an
existing
house
there.
Numerous
years
ago,
I
had
a
cinderblock
wall
around.
It
is
somewhat
of
a
retaining
wall.
Over
the
years
it's
become
extremely
dilapidated.
They
have
made
efforts
to
clean
it
up
in
the
past.
Unfortunately,
for
whatever
reason,
people
nature
combination
of
both
that
wall
is
getting
worse
and
pieces
of
the
brickwork
or
in
the
street,
they're
also
used
as
projectiles
a
lot
of
times
at
other
people
in
police
cars.
E
So
that's
kind
of
a
problem
as
well
on
January
18th.
They
notice
a
violation,
notice
of
hearing
the
repeat,
violation
notice:
a
hearing
were
mailed,
the
green
card
was
returned
unsigned.
The
envelope
was
returned,
not
deliverable
as
addressed
January
26th
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin,
and
it
was
in
compliance.
As
of
that
date,
we
have
January
25th
because
we
receive
phone
call
the
previous
day
for
the
re-inspection.
So
we
go
based
on
that
date,
February
2nd.
The
sign
was
posted
in
the
OP.
The
affidavit
of
postman
was
completed.
E
What
was
before
the
board,
as
I
stated,
was
8th,
14,
8,
52
or
the
prior
violations.
They
had
to
do
with
debris,
not
maintaining
private
property
before
the
board
to
be
established
with
this
case
are
8
22,
which
is
just
the
accumulation
of
trash
on
that
property.
Unfortunately,
it
gets
used
somewhat
as
a
dump.
It's
a
vacant
lot,
it's
not
secured
and
it
is
constantly
having
trash
dump
on.
It
is
constantly
becoming
a
problem.
E
That's
the
purpose
of
also
establishing
it
before
the
storm
for
the
accumulation
of
trash.
With
that
being
said,
3603
covers
fences,
walls
and
hedges
of
the
city
code.
That
says
all
fences,
walls
and
hedges
must
be
kept
in
a
non
dilapidated
condition,
a
non
poor
condition
and
be
kept
up.
So
I'd
also
like
to
establish
that
violation.
H
E
Of
right
now,
all
of
those
violations
are
in
compliance,
so
there's
nothing
outstanding
and,
as
I
stated,
it
is
a
repeat
violator
case
for
the
two
violations
of
a
42,
a
52
for
a
period
of
8
days
and
then
the
other
two
violations
of
822
and
36.0
3.
Our
new
violations
to
be
established
by
this
board
and
the
city
has
nothing
further.
A
K
Can
do
this
now?
Sorry,
yes,
as
I
saying
before,
we've
been
in
the
community
for
15
years,
we
built
many
homes
in
conjunction
with
the
neighborhoods
amount
of
north
of
West
Florida.
We
have
always
tried
to
comply
with
everything
that
the
code
here
we
have
been
cited
in
the
past
for
different
parcels
and
have
immediately
corrected
any
deficiencies
that
we
have
I
don't
live
here.
I
live
in
st.
Petersburg,
we
do
have
through
the
years
we
have
had
different
people
handling
our
maintenance
of
the
properties.
K
Okay,
we
have
hired
a
company
called
Moo
go
brothers
and
they
have
done
an
excellent
job.
In
my
opinion,
for
me,
and
back
in
2017,
we
were
cited
with
a
violation
and
we
with
the
Moo
girl
brothers,
that's
when
we
contracted
with
them
and
a
letter
was
sent,
and
this
is
just
to
show
that
we
care
and
that
we
want
to
comply
with
everything
that
has
ever
done
up
here,
and
this
was
from
Karen
from
Moo
grows
off.
As
it
says,
this
is
Karen
from
Muro
brothers.
We
are
a
landscaping
company.
C
K
Just
a
copy
of
an
email:
this
is
Karen
from
Moo
grow
brothers.
We
are
a
landscaping
company
and
that
will
be
taking
care
of
the
various
violations.
At
that
time,
I
called
and
left
a
message
for
you
earlier
I
would
like
to
talk
to
you
regarding
the
above-mentioned
violations
and
implement
a
schedule
to
maintain
the
properties
so
that
no
more
violations
will
occur
and
will
make
your
job
much
easier.
We
want
to
make
your
job
easier,
and
then
that
was
in
2004
2017.
K
We
had
another
issue
in
March
of
2018
and
a
mic
Moog
row
and
myself
and
officer
Gaston
met
at
the
property
and
I
pledged
to
him
that
we
would
do
anything
and
everything
to
comply
with
all
the
code.
My
problem
is,
is
that
we
can't
we
can
clear
the
property
today
and
there's
mattresses
and
chairs
and
everything
else
on
the
property
tomorrow.
This
particular
case
I
mean
it's
obvious
that
we
have
been
in
compliance
until
it
was
obvious
to
me
that
there
was
a
vandalism
to
the
wall.
K
Did
it
need
to
be
torn
down
absolutely,
but
there
was
vandalism
that
caused
all
of
this
debris
and
it
was
a
mess
I
totally
agree.
All
we
want
to
do
is
stay
in
compliance.
We
want
to
keep
our
properties
clean.
We
want
to
stay
in
this
community
and
we
want
to
build
additional
properties,
particularly
for
nonprofits,
and
we
want
to
be
a
good
corporate
citizen
or
a
good
community
citizen
I
asked
for
your
guidance
and
offers
Ferguson's
guidance
to
figure
out
how
we
can
stay
in
compliance
did
not
get
repeat
violator.
K
A
E
Briefly,
I
mean
we
did
meet
out
there.
We've
we've
tried
to
discuss
some
things
that
has
been
before
this
board
numerous
times,
you're.
Well
aware,
the
mere
fact
that
you
own
a
piece
of
property-
and
you
do
the
best
you
can
part
of
the
reason
why
I
establish
properties
is
because
more
needs
to
be
done.
That's
whether
the
city
decides
what
you
need
to
do
isn't
necessarily
up
to
us.
I
mean
I,
have
suggestions,
but
I
can't
mandate
any
of
those
things.
Unfortunately,
more
effort
needs
to
be
put
into
it.
E
There
were
numerous
times
where
there's
property,
where
he
didn't
get
written
up
for
it,
phone
calls
were
made
phone
calls
were
made
to
Mike
Moog
row,
and
you
know
he
said:
hey
I'm,
coming
by
to
take
care
of
something
I
found
something
I
hadn't
seen
it
yet
by
the
time
I
went
by.
It
was
all
taken
care
of.
So
yes,
but
apparently
more
effort
needs
to
be
taken,
and
hence
the
reason
why
we're
here
there
probably
could
have
been
two
or
three
previous
repeat
violators
on
this
property
that
were
never
brought
before
this
board.
E
So
you
know
I
understand,
he's
a
corporate
citizen
he's
trying
to
the
best
he
can
more
needs
to
be
done.
Those
things
have
been
discussed
outside
of
this.
This
boards
position.
Isn't
it
decide
that
necessarily,
but
it
continues
to
be
a
problem.
It's
a
problem
to
the
point
where
things
like
that
brick
wall
become
projectiles
that
are
thrown
at
police
they're,
throwing
at
other
people,
they're
used
as
weapons
and
it's
their
property,
and
that's
why
we're
here
for
them
to
maintain
and
take
care
of
their
property?
E
F
F
I'd
like
to
justify
my
motion,
or
at
least
explain
it
in
that
I
would
have
done
much
less
because
it
appears
that
there's
something
senior
sincerity
on
the
part
of
the
person
representing
foresight,
contractors
or
constructors.
However,
based
on
the
testimony
of
the
inspector,
it
appears
that
there
were
reported
so
I
think
that
any
any
thought
on
my
part
to
have
a
smaller.
F
C
Yeah,
so
sir
foresight
constructors
has
been
found
in
violation
of
the
four
code
sections
that
were
cited.
As
for
the
fine,
there
is
a
fine
for
the
repeat
violations
that
have
occurred
in
the
amount
of
$50
a
day
for
eight
days,
total
fine,
it's
$400,
the
the
city,
has
also
been
awarded.
Ninety
nine
dollars
and
cost
of
prosecuting
case
four
total
of
four
hundred.
Ninety
nine
dollars
she'll
be
receiving
an
order
in
the
mail
within
about
the
next
ten
days.
Okay,.
K
A
A
E
Officer
Steve,
Goss
and
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs
Police,
Department
code
enforcement.
This
case
before
the
boards
to
be
established.
It's
currently
in
compliance
property
case
number
19,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero.
Three
nine,
the
property
address
is
226
South
gross
Avenue.
It
is
a
vacant
lot
owned
by
mr.
Ricketts.
The
parcel
number
is
13
27
15,
five,
seven,
two:
zero:
zero,
zero,
zero
one,
one
zero
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
all
the
photographs
exhibit
number
two
or
my
notices
of
violation.
E
A
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
administrative
documents
case:
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
database
and
any
related
emails
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
were
given
to
the
violator
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
this
board.
E
All
my
notices
are
mailed
the
property
owner
of
record
based
on
the
Pinellas
County
property
Iraq,
or
a
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax,
collector
databases
and
my
notice
of
violations,
a
notice
of
hearing
or
sent
both
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and
mr.
chairman,
please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Thank.
E
You
this
case
started
January
18,
2019,
coincidentally,
it
had
to
do
with
the
last
case,
because
it's
directly
across
the
street
same
citizen
who
flagged
me
down
about
the
previous
case,
brought
it
to
my
attention.
Mr.
Ricketts
property.
You
can
see
in
the
photographs
it's
overgrown,
it's
a
vacant
lot.
It
also,
unfortunately,
is
used
somewhat
as
a
dump
by
various
people
for
whatever
reason,
which
unfortunately
seems
to
happen
with
vacant
lots
at
that
time.
E
As
you
can
see
in
the
pictures,
it
was
overgrown,
especially
along
that
western
side
along
a
fence
line,
and
then
there
was
furniture
and
other
debris
dumped
on
the
property.
On
January
18th,
a
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
were
mailed
and
returned
signed
conducted
a
rien
spec
Chinon
february
12th.
The
property
was
in
compliance
on
that
date,
On
January,
I'm,
sorry,
February,
2nd,
I
posted
the
property
before
the
board
I've
had
so
far
with
this
owner
since
2017.
E
This
would
be
the
third
case.
That's
the
reason
why
I'm
just
presenting
it
to
be
established
just
almost
the
same
effort
as
before
it
got
to
get
more
attention
on
taking
care
of
the
property.
It's
unfortunate
where
it's
located,
maybe
some
other
steps
need
to
be
taken,
but
it
is
a
nuisance
property
at
this
point.
A
M
Understand
that
it's
there
and
it
has
trash
down
in
the
one,
but
it's
really
difficult
to
get
all
that
stuff
off
of
it
constantly
and
to
keep
and
get
it
move
and
move
it
today,
tomorrow
or
next
day,
there's
more
stuff
there,
no
constant,
even
the
guy,
that
I
hate
to
remove
the
stuff.
Other
gentleman
that
was
just
here,
he
said
he
moved
a
lot
of
the
bricks
from
the
other
gentleman
that
was
here,
property
mm-hmm,
so
I
haven't
paid
him
to
move
some
of
that
as
well.
A
M
Like
I
said
as
soon
as
I'm
I
got
the
notice
they
all
the
guy
up
in
heaven
moving,
he
isn't
from
Tarpon
either.
So
he
thought
he
could
put
the
stuff
right
on.
He
cleaned
up
everything,
but
he
put
it
on
the
outside.
He's
thought
the
city
would
have
moved
all
that
within
went
on
my
call
back
foot
and
he
said
I
know
I
had
him
go
back
out
there
right
away,
I'm
always
trying
to
be
in
compliant
with.
K
I
A
B
C
Mr.
Ricketts,
the
board
has
found
that
there
was
a
violation
of
those
three
code
sections
that
were
cited,
but
the
property
is
now
in
compliance.
There's
no
affine
associated
with
this
case.
However,
what
it
does
is,
it
puts
the
case
and
the
possibility
of
a
repeat
violation
mode.
So
if
the
case
comes
back
to
the
code
enforcement
board
within
the
next
five
years,
it'll
be
considered
a
repeat
violation
and
the
fines
could
be
doubled
up
to
$500
a
day.
C
M
M
M
Like
I
said
in
the
summer
times
every
two
weeks
they
go
down
and
we
get
at
least
five
over
six
trash
bags
off,
though,
if
he
goes
by
there
one
time
and
they
see
it,
it
might
be
clean
today
and
then
go
by
there
tomorrow
and
they're
all
that
trash
back
on
there
it's
really
hard
to,
and
then,
if
I'm
gonna
get
fined.
For
that
you
know,
I
mean
it's.
M
A
K
A
N
A
O
A
E
This
property's
been
before
this
board
previously,
but
somehow
it
was
deeded
to
a
new
property.
In
the
absence
of
that
other
case,
so
a
new
case
was
opened
for
the
continuing
violations
on
the
property
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
border.
My
photographs
exhibit
number
two.
My
notices,
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
administrative
docks
includes
a
case
summary
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
related
emails
tip.
Number
four
is
an
affidavit
of
the
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign,
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits.
E
They
were
given
to
the
violator
exact
copies
of,
what's
being
presented
to
this
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
based
on
Pinellas,
County,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
All
my
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
both
first
class
and
return
receipt
requested.
And,
mr.
chairman,
please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
A
E
E
You
can
see
the
fire
damage
as
I
stated,
I,
don't
believe
anybody's
living
in
it,
but
I
think
there
may
be
a
possibility,
somebody's
living
in
that
last
unit,
which
is
more
than
likely
not
safe
to
be
housing.
Somebody
all
those
conditions
we
decided
to
as
I
stated
create
a
new
case,
because
we
found
out
the
property
had
been
quick
claimed.
The
prior
owners
are
in
fine
status
for
it,
then
the
quitclaim
occurred.
So
we
a
new
case
on
the
property.
The
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed
out.
November
21st
was
returned
unclaimed.
E
The
re-inspection
was
conducted
on
December
29th,
the
2018.
There
was
no
change
in
the
property
if
anything
that
had
gotten
worse
January
18
of
2019,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed.
The
green
card
was
signed
by
the
registered
agent
for
the
company
to
the
February,
2nd
of
2019
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
of
posting
I
conducted
a
final
inspection
on
January
13th,
which
was
commensurate
with
the
police
call
at
the
property
of
the
disturbance
and
some
people
under
the
influence
of
drugs.
E
So
what's
before,
the
board
at
this
point
in
time
is
city
code
822,
the
accumulation
of
trash
there's
trash
all
over.
That
property
continues
to
be
covered
in
trash,
and
it's
ongoing
issue.
8
40,
which
is
a
duty
to
maintain
private
property,
causing
the
public
nuisances
that
are
have
mentioned
previously.
8
52
having
to
do
a
debris,
maintaining
the
property
of
the
vegetation
so
on
and
so
forth.
E
6
1
is
the
adoption
of
the
Florida
Building
Code
in
the
International
property
maintenance
code,
which
then
allows
me
to
cite
under
IPM
c30
2
1,
which
is
sanitation
of
the
exterior
this
building
it's
in
poor
condition.
It's
not
kept
very
clean,
there's
trash
everywhere
and
it's
simply
not
being
maintained.
3
0,
4
point
7
talks
about
the
roof
and
drainage.
It's
clear,
as
you
see
in
the
picture,
although
I'm,
not
a
building
inspector
I
can
usually
tell
when
there's
holes
in
the
roof
that
it's
probably
not
in
good
shape.
E
3-0
4.10
deals
with
the
stairs
deck
and
balconies
there's
a
deck
out
front,
and
also
the
overhang,
which
is
important,
very
poor
condition.
You
can
also
see
that,
in
the
photographs
of
how
poor
of
a
condition
and
I
would
almost
be
very
close
to
considering
it
a
health
hazard
and
potentially
possibly
to
be
condemned
as
an
unsafe
structure
or
uninhabitable,
so
those
are
the
violations
that
I
have
before
the
board
at
this
time,
and
that's
all
the
city
has
at
this
moment
this.
A
J
N
This
is
not
the
first
time
we
came
to
this
board
in
my
previous
experience
with
the
same
office
had
taught
me
that
he
comes
about
a
week
before
the
inspection
before
the
hearing
and
regardless
what
happens
that
particular
week.
It's
irrelevant
to
the
hearing.
So
what
I
did
was
I
hired
the
company
to
come
in
and
clean
the
property
that
came
in
on
Monday
I
came
myself
there
on
Friday
last
Friday
to
the
property
and
I
went
over
with
the
people.
N
So
I
can
say
that
the
two
issues
here,
one
just
the
the
structure
I
mean
somehow
a
commingled,
the
two
issues
together:
sanitation
and
structure
and
the
two
different
issues.
As
far
as
the
Sanitation
we
are
trying
to
stay
on
top
of
it.
We
send
people
there
at
least
twice
three
times
a
month
to
clean
the
property
up,
there's
a
property
right
next
door.
That
I
think
there
was
a
building.
There
was
a
structure
which
was
demolished
and
they've
been
throwing
a
lot
of
stuff
into
this
property.
N
N
You
know
when
compliance
several
times
and
and
I
I
sent
people
to
clean
the
property
this
week
and
for
the
specific
reason
that
it
will
be
in
compliance
in
front
of
this
hearing.
As
far
the
condition
of
the
structure,
you
know
he's
talking
about
condemnation,
people
leaving
the
property,
there's
no
roof
leaks.
We
respond
to
every
call
that
we
have
to
the
property.
It's
a
block,
construction
construction,
so
the
building
is
very
slowly,
there's
no
stress
crack
cracks
or
things
of
that
nature.
N
E
N
E
E
N
N
E
O
E
Was
like
a
new
issue
if
the
reason
I
got
called
out
there,
which
four
of
us
officers
went
out
there
because
of
a
disturbance
and
one
of
your
apartments
related
to
two
extremely
drunk
individuals
having
a
fight
out
in
the
common
area
of
your
property?
That's
why
I
got
called
out
there
on
the
13th.
I
was
unavailable
on
the
12th
I.
Don't
do
my
inspections
necessarily
based
on
the
calendar?
E
That's
approximately
when
I'll
do
it
and
the
thing
about
it
is,
is
you
should
be
in
compliance
period,
not
just
on
that
day
at
that
time
that
I
might
come
by
it's?
You
should
be
in
compliance
the
next
day.
If
the
inspections
on
the
12th
well,
a
reasonable
person
would
be
led
to
believe
that
you
would
be
in
compliance
on
the
13th
and
unfortunately,
it
wasn't
anywhere
near
that.
E
There's
trash
all
over
the
property,
as
I
stated,
there's
trash
cans
visible.
The
vehicle
is
a
moot
point,
because
it's
not
before
this
board
for
consideration
the
building
still
hasn't
been
touched.
All
of
the
international
property
maintenance
code
cited
earlier
are
still
an
issue.
There's
debris
on
the
property
I
mean
it's,
it's
grossly
obvious.
I
think
there's
a
couple
of
shopping
carts
out
front
with
trash
in
them.
I,
don't.
E
The
interesting
thing
is
is
just
so:
the
board
kind
understands
the
property
next
door.
One
of
the
pictures
had
a
structure.
It
has
since
been
demolished
that
property
owner
dealt
with
us
he's
still
somewhat
in
violation
and
I've,
been
keeping
very
close
track
of
those
two
properties
to
see
if
magically
trash
from
a
ends
up
on
B,
and
it
doesn't
seem
to
be
the
case.
The
interesting
thing
is
is
when
I
was
on
that
property
just
on
the
13th.
E
A
large
amount
of
trash
that
was
not
on
the
vacant
lot
suddenly
was
on
the
vacant
lot,
and
some
of
it
I
had
recalled
being
on
518
was
now
on
the
lot
that
no
longer
had
the
structure,
because
the
section
of
the
fence
had
been
removed,
dividing
the
two
properties
which
made
it
extremely
easy
for
stuff
to
go
back
and
forth.
So
it
is
an
ongoing
problem.
It
continues
to
be
an
ongoing
problem.
Folks
here
well
aware
of
that.
Ongoing
problem
in
this
case
is
why
we're
here.
J
N
The
12th
of
this
month
at
5
p.m.
the
property
was
in
compliance.
You
can
argue
that
some
of
the
debris
went
to
the
property
next
door
most
likely,
because
this
debris
came
from
next
door.
I
saw
myself,
items
that
came
from
building
was
just
nearly
demolished
and
they
couldn't
have
come
from
this
property.
N
F
I
moved
based
on
the
testimony
evidence
and
facts
presented
in
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violations,
sections
8,
22,
8,
48-52,
6.1,
IM,
pc,
rio,
2.1
IM,
pc,
rio
4.7,
I
pmc
304
point
10,
the
Code
of
Ordinances
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
were
in
force
and
effect
and
that
the
respondent
was
in
violation.
There.
H
A
A
E
E
The
the
property
is
a
significant
nuisance.
I've
been
here
as
a
police
officer
for
21
years,
I've
been
familiar
with
that
property,
since
I
was
in
training
here
in
1997,
it
will
continue
to
be
a
proper
problem
until
it
is
significantly
dealt
with.
I
would
simply
ask
that
in
as
long
as
the
folks
here
understand
that
everything
has
to
be
complied
with.
There's
no
separation
of
the
sanitation
versus
the
structure,
I
would
say
30
days,
because
somehow
I
magically
have
the
odd
feeling.
E
There's
gonna
be
another
quitclaim
deed
for
this
property
and
$250
a
day
and
that's
what
the
city
would
recommend
and
that's
solely
based
on
its.
We
continue
to
chase
our
tail
on
this
property
and
right
now.
This
is
the
only
Avenue
we
have
to
try
to
deal
with
this
property.
That's
the
city's
recommendation.
A
A
I
18
to
bring
the
property
in
compliance
with
Code
sections,
8
22,
8,
48-52
and
under
the
building,
I
am
I
PMC,
building
code,
6.1
items,
302
point
one:
three:
oh
four
point:
seven
three:
oh
four
point
one
Oh
or
suffer
a
fine
of
$250
per
day
for
each
day.
Thereafter
that
the
respondent
remain
in
violation
of
said,
Code
sections
I.
A
H
B
C
So
the
property
has
been
found
in
violation
of
the
code.
Sections
that
were
listed,
property
has
been
given.
Property
owner
has
been
given
until
March
18th
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance.
Should
you
fail
to
bring
the
property
and
compliance
with
every
Code
section
cited
there'll,
be
a
fine
of
$250
a
day
levied
for
every
day
of
thereafter
it
will
be
written
to
order
it'll
be
issued
within
about
10
days
and
it'll
be
sent
to
the
address
listed
by
the
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
records.
Any
questions.
N
N
J
N
A
J
E
Case
18
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
109,
the
property
address
is
710
North
Avenue,
the
current
property
owner
is
Attila
and
Nino.
It's
a
vacant
structure.
This
has
been
before
the
board
before
the
previous
owner
died
properties
been
sold,
so
we
have
a
new
case
before
the
board
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
or
my
photographs.
All
my
notices,
violation
notice,
your
hearing
or
exhibit
number
two
administrative
documents
case,
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
associated
emails
or
exhibit
number
three.
An
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting.
E
E
Starting
off,
we
have
we've
had
significant
contact
with
the
current
owner
of
the
property
matter.
Of
fact,
we
had
contact
with
the
owner
of
the
property
before
they
bought
the
property,
so
they
were
kind
of
aware
of
what
was
going
on
with
the
property
they've
been
in
the
office.
We've
had
phone
calls
and
emails
from
them
on
December
4th.
In
the
midst
of
an
ongoing
open,
fine
drawing
case,
the
property
was
sold,
the
happy
homes
represented
by
Attila-
and
you
know,
before
the
code
word
compliance
deadline.
E
Therefore
we
had
to
start
the
whole
case
over
so
I
was
incorrect
about
it
being
in
fine
status.
It
hadn't
hit
the
deadline
of
the
code
board,
yet
it
was
sold
just
before
the
previous
code
board
deadline,
so
on
January,
2nd
I
conducted
another
inspection
after
we
sent
a
courtesy
letter
to
take
care
of
the
property,
one
of
the
biggest
things
was
whether
or
not
permits
were
issued
to
rebuild
this
structure.
It's
in
significantly
poor
condition.
The
roofs
got
giant
holes
in
it.
The
walls
were
never
completed
inside.
E
But
what
stemmed
the
previous
case
was
a
fire
department
call
on
the
gentleman
who
unfortunately
had
had
passed
away
sense
inside
of
the
structure.
The
walls
aren't
complete
electrical
is
all
showing
there's
numerous
building
code
violations,
but
I
simply
went
based
on
needs
to
have
a
permit
that'll
get
the
building
department
in
there
and
they'll
decide
what
all
he
needs
to
do,
so
it
kind
of
gets
them
in
the
door
same
thing
with
the
current
owner.
E
Moving
on
as
I
stated,
January
22nd
to
click
the
quitclaim
deed
change,
the
ownership
of
it
On
January
22nd.
At
that
point,
notice,
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
were
sent.
No
green
cards
were
returned
to
our
office
or
returned
receipts
on
February
2nd.
We
posted
the
property
I
conducted
a
final
inspection
on
the
13th
and
no
permits
had
been
issued.
Permit
19
289
has
been
applied
for
by
the
current
owner,
but
it
has
not
yet
been
approved,
so
it
is
simply
just
an
application.
E
It's
basically
going
through
the
process
of
determining
what
their
plans
are
and
I
know.
After
talking
to
the
building
director
here,
there's
some
significant
structural
issues,
I
guess
inside
of
the
property,
and
that's
why
the
permits
are
still
ongoing
before
approval.
So
part
of
the
reason
to
bring
this
before
the
board
is
also
to
establish
more
or
less
a
firm
timeline
to
get
that
permit
process
and
get
the
rebuild
process
going
on
it
or
the
demolition
of
the
building
and
starting
from
scratch.
But
along
those
lines,
there's
still
a
little
bit
of
trash
issue.
E
They
were
cited
for
it
because
I
had
previously
cited
the
people
that
live
to
the
west
of
it
or
the
property
owners
to
the
west
of
you
to
claim
the
fence
wasn't
theirs.
So
now
a
survey
was
produced
in
December
I'm,
sorry
in
2018,
which
pretty
much
shows
that
fences
on
this
property
line,
so
that
fence
is
basically
this
property
owners
issue
and
it's
important
to
lappa
dated
condition.
Some
of
it.
E
You
can't
even
see
because
it's
so
overgrown
by
all
kinds
of
vegetation,
so
what's
before
the
board
at
this
point
in
time,
is
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property,
the
nuisance,
prohibitions
of
8,
52
and
fences
walls
and
hedges
under
36.0
3.
There
are
no
building
code
violations
as
of
yet
because,
like
I
said,
the
permit
process
is
ongoing,
but
the
other
violation
still
exists,
but
they
deal
with
that
structure
being
in
poor
condition
under
840.
So
840
is
not
in
compliance
until
the
building
is
either
removed
or
fixed.
E
F
E
Know
how
the
building
that
whole
process,
what
I
kind
of
do,
generally
speaking
as
I
work
with
folks
and
if
they
get
their
permit,
approved
and
they're
currently
in
the
construction
process,
a
building
permit
in
the
state
of
Florida
expires
after
six
months,
if
you're
not
working
on
it
and
at
that
point
time
basically,
either
the
fines
can
become
retroactive.
Based
on
and
say.
If
the
board
gave
somebody
90
days
and
as
I
stated,
I
want
to
establish
a
firm
timeline
for
progress
to
occur
on
it.
E
They
are
in
the
process
of
a
remodel
permit,
but
there
are
some
significant
plan
issues
with
the
structure
itself
and
things
that
have
to
be
done
before
the
city
will
approve
those
so
kind
of
a
roundabout
answer,
because
I'm
not
into
construction
but
as
I
stated,
the
amount
of
cases
I
have
somebody
goes
look.
I've
got
my
construction
company
out
there
I'm
working
with
them
to
deal
with
that
case,
and
it
would
probably
never
come
before
the
board
again.
E
E
E
E
Well,
yes,
but
the
issue
with
the
permit
is
it's
an
application
phase,
which
means
anybody
can
walk
across
the
hall.
Go
I
want
to
get
a
building
permit
and
then
you
have
to
submit
your
plans.
So
it's
not
always
the
city's
issue,
because
if
the
city
comes
back
and
says
well
wait
a
minute,
you
have
to
rebuild
all
the
trusses
they're,
not
in
your
plan,
so
you
need
to
submit
plans
to
us
again
showing
that
you're
gonna
rebuild
all
the
trusses
at
that
point
time
then
it's
on
you.
E
You
then
show
the
plans
that
they're
aged,
so
they
go
back
and
forth
with
that,
and
then
the
plans
approved
and
then,
like
I,
said
once
it's
approved.
They
have
60
days
to
finalize
that
permit
when
the
building
inspector
goes
out
signs
off
on
it.
So
yeah
demolition
is
the
absolute
quickest
and
most
finite
way
to
solve
that
problem.
Otherwise,
as
I
stated,
if
they
get
their
permit,
approved
and
they're
in
the
process
of
construction
and
following
through
with
that
you're,
never
gonna
see
them
again.
E
F
I
move
based
on
the
testimony,
evidence
and
facts
presented
and
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violations,
sections
city
code,
eight
dash
forty
city
code,
eight
52
city
code,
brief
6.03,
the
Code
of
Ordinances
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
were
in
force
and
effect
and
that
the
respondent
was
in
violation.
There.
B
F
B
A
A
E
You
officer
steve
gas
and
city
turbine
Springs
police
code
enforcement
case
18,
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero.
Six
four
four
property
addresses
one
zero,
one,
seven
Beaver
Drive
listed
owners
is
Richard
and
Laurie
McCleary
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
my
photographs,
all
my
notices,
a
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
or
exhibit
to
exhibit
three
administrative
documents
case
summary
property,
appraiser
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
E
All
my
notice
is
to
mill
the
property
owner
of
record
based
on
the
Pinellas,
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
my
notice
of
violations
and
notice.
The
hearings
are
sent
both
first
class
as
well
as
return
receipt
requested
certified
mail
and
mr.
chairman,
please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
A
E
You
we
have
had
some
contact
with
the
owner
via
a
letter.
This
case
did
start
August
21st
of
last
year.
I
got
assist
and
complain
about
a
tarp
on
the
roof
and
lieu
of
the
regular
roofing
tiles.
You
can
clearly
see
in
the
picture
there's
a
large
area
that
doesn't
have
any
roofing
tiles
on
November
20th,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed
and
it
was
returned
unclaimed,
January,
29th
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin.
E
The
reinfection
was
extended
three
months,
because
I
would
received
a
letter
into
the
office
asking
for
a
90-day
extension
so
that
90-day
extension
was
granted.
The
reinfection
was
January
29th,
you
can
see
from
the
January
29th
picture
looks
exactly
the
same.
We
then
mailed
the
notice
of
hearing
and
it
was
returned.
We
did
get
it
returned
to
us.
February
2nd,
the
sign
was
posted
and
an
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed.
I
did
conduct
a
final
inspection
on
February
13th
and
took
a
photograph,
and
it
looks
exactly
the
same.
E
I
did
have
some
contact
with
the
owner.
They
were
having
an
estate
sale
which
led
me
to
believe
there's
an
impending
sale
on
the
property
of
some
sort.
My
intuitive
part
of
me,
but
I
kind
of
thought
that
they
said
they
would
be
taking
care
of
it
and
that's
all
the
answer
I
got
or
my
husband
would
be
taking
care
of
it.
Who's
currently
out
of
town
before
the
board
is
a
violation
of
city
code
6-1,
which
adopts
the
Florida
Building
Code
and
an
international
property
maintenance
code,
which
then
under
three
zero.
E
F
L
E
As
I
stated,
we
started
this
back
in
August.
Absolutely
no
effort
for
permit.
There's
nothing
going
on
with
this
I
think
just
if
they
go
and
get
a
roofer
now
45
days
is
probably
a
reasonable
time
to
not
only
get
the
permits
and
get
the
roofing
section
completed
within
that
period
of
time
and
I.
We
have
no
real
prior
history
with
this
person
at
all,
so
$50
a
day
is
reasonable
for
that
we
are
coming
into
hurricane
season
and
that's
gonna
become
an
issue.
E
A
A
A
J
E
Thank
You
this-
this
is
a
repeat
violator
case.
It
started
January
24th
of
2019.
It's
currently
not
in
compliance.
So
it's
ongoing
at
this
point.
The
repeat
violator
case
that
stemmed
this
was
for
the
same
property
case
number
16:
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
five
six,
which
is
a
violation
of
city
code;
eight
22,
eight
52
12
one
and
three
69.2
51.
E
I
I
E
Were
in
violation
for
a
little
over
a
year,
August
2nd
of
16
August
19th
of
17
and
total
fines
of
nine
thousand
five
hundred
and
sixty
dollars
are
still
on
the
books.
The
case
before
this
board
now
is
case
number
19,
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
five
zero.
This
is
a
vacant
lot
that
would
be
the
south
west
corner
of
Pinellas
and
mirrors.
E
So
if
you
knew
where
the
winn-dixie
is
it's
directly
across
the
street
to
the
west
south
of
the
other
vacant
lot
on
the
north
side
of
Mirrors,
it's
a
rather
large
piece
of
property.
It's
owned
by
a
group
called
tarpon
springs,
retirement,
the
owner
or
the
care
of
is
a
James
mint
innopolis.
It's
parcel
number
thirteen.
Twenty
seven
one:
five:
zero:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero!
E
Three
one:
zero
zero
one,
zero
zero
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice
of
hearings,
amid
exhibit
number
three
administrative
documents
case:
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
a
letter
from
mr.
antonapoulos.
His
attorney
exhibit
number
four:
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five?
Is
an
affidavit
of
prosecution
cost
all
my
all.
The
notices
were
mailed
the
property
owner
record
based
on
the
Pinellas,
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
E
A
E
Had
no
contact
with
the
owner
as
I
stated
I
think
yesterday
we
received
a
letter
from
an
attorney.
It
sounds
like
he's
a
friend,
but
he
also
happens
to
be
an
attorney
because
it
didn't
sound
like
he
was
representing
him
per
se,
but
regardless
the
case
started:
January
24th
as
I
stated
officer
hollaby
is
our
new
homeless
outreach
officer
and
for
whatever
reason
he
ended
up
out
in
this
field.
E
Part
of
the
previous
case
a
long
time
ago,
was
to
clear
out
some
of
the
Brazilian
pepper
trees,
which
seem
to
have
a
significant
effect
on
opening
up
the
properties
and
then,
consequently,
they
don't
become
as
desirable
to
be
turned
in
to
all
the
debris
and
all
the
nuisance
conditions
that
occur
with
that
those
have
since
grown
back
because,
as
we
all
know,
they
instantly
reappear
in
Florida,
so
they've
grown
back.
The
camp
showed
up
there's
a
significant
amount
of
trash
in
there.
E
Hollaby
and
his
group
had
taken
our
photographs
because
we
had
a
call
for
service
out
there.
So
the
second
time
I
didn't
have
trespass.
They
didn't
give
me
any
authorization
to
be
on
the
property,
so
I
had
to
take
it
from
the
right
away.
So
it's
from
the
sidewalk
right
on
the
west
side
of
Pinellas
Avenue,
and
you
can
clearly
see
there's
still
that
green
tarp
indicating
there's
a
temp
back
there.
So
at
best
the
green
tarp
is
trash
or
debris.
E
Even
if
there's
no
people
living
under
it
so
before
the
board
are
the
repeat:
violations
of
8,
22
and
8
52
and
then
I,
just
like
the
board
to
consider
adding
8
40
the
public
nuisance
part
along
with
the
case.
But
as
I
stated,
the
repeat,
violator
is
822
and
850.
840
wasn't
part
of
the
previous
case,
but
I'd
like
to
add
it
to
this
case,
and
at
this
point
the
city
has
nothing
further.
The.
C
I
A
E
E
E
I
C
H
E
F
Okay,
I'll
make
a
motion.
I
move
based,
I
moved
it
based
on
the
testimony
evidence,
facts
presented
law
that
the
respondent
was
in
violation
of
sections
8,
22
and
8.
52
of
the
tarpon
springs
city
code
from
January
18th
exceed
we
from
January
24th
2019
through
the
present
day
and
a
fine
of
$50
per
day.
A
A
C
H
F
J
F
A
F
F
B
P
A
I
C
I
H
B
A
A
F
A
A
F
L
H
F
A
F
I
C
I'll
read
the
rule
to
you.
This
is
rule
5,
section
4
after
fine
has
been
imposed
by
the
board
and
within
60
days
after
the
violation
is
brought
into
compliance.
A
violator
may
petition
for
reconsideration
of
a
fine.
The
petition
must
be
in
writing
signed
by
the
violate
or
include
a
copy
of
the
affidavit
of
compliance
executed
by
the
code
inspector.
The
petition
must
include
conclusive
evidence
showing
extreme
or
undue
hardship
and
the
payment
of
the
fine
or
preventing
the
violator
to
come
into
compliance
within
a
time
period
established
by
the
board's
order.
C
The
board
secretary
shall
schedule
a
petition
to
beacon,
considered
and
the
board
shall
make
its
determination
based
solely
upon
the
written
petition.
The
board
may
request
information
from
the
code
inspector.
The
board
secretary
shall
notify
the
violator
by
regular
mail
of
the
determination
made
by
the
board.
No
petition
for
reduction
of
fine
will
be
considered
prior
to
the
board's
acceptance
of
an
affidavit
of
compliance
under
no
circumstances
made
the
amount
of
the
fine
be
reduced
below
the
costs
of
the
action.
C
I
don't
know,
circumstances
made
the
amount
of
the
fine
be
reduced
once
a
foreclosure
action
is
instituted.
Additionally,
under
no
circumstances
may
the
amount
of
the
fine
for
a
repeat
violation
be
reduced.
That
was
the
reading
of
your
rule.
That's
been
in
effect
for
about
30
years
now.
So
to
answer
your
question,
the
petition
must
include
conclusive
evidence
showing
extreme
or
undue
hardship
in
the
payment
of
the
fine
of
preventing
the
violator
from
coming
into
alliance
within
the
time
period
established
by
the
board's
order.
I
think
that
that's
what
you
were
getting
to
at.
A
G
E
Thank
you.
The
city
came
to
this
conclusion.
We
had
conversation
with
the
daughter.
She
was
obviously
unaware
that
there
was
ever
any
problems
with
the
property
the
father
died.
He
lived
in
New
Jersey.
Obviously,
when
all
the
paperwork
and
everything
started
to
come
in
subsequent
to
his
death,
she
realized
that
there
was
issue.
She
immediately
got
the
property
into
compliance
I.
E
The
city
does
believe
that
there's
a
significant
hardship
in
that
and,
yes,
it
had
been
a
repeat
violator
before,
but
he
was
healthy
enough
to
take
care
of
his
property
and
we'd
been
dealing
with
him
in
the
prior
cases.
In
this
last
one
he
did
die
while
the
case
was
in
in
fine
status
and
as
I
stated,
she
did
from
the
time
she
contacted.
Our
office
was
8
days
until
she
was
in
compliance
from
out
of
state.
So
she
did
make
a
very
significant
effort
to
get
the
property
in
compliance.
E
E
The
current
fine
was
$200
a
day
for
the
eight
days
that
it
was
in
violation
while
she
was
aware
of
it
is
what
the
city
recommended
in
this
particular
case
of
the
fine,
be
and
that's
why
the
city's
recommendation,
including
the
prosecution
cost,
is
one
thousand
six
hundred
eighty
six
dollars
and
fifty
cents
to
satisfy
that
that
fine
and
potentially
not
have
any
other
problems
with
the
property,
because
I
believe
there
may
also
be
a
lien
on
it
as
well.
But
she's
gonna
have
to
deal
with
outside
of
this
whole
thing.
So
that's
our
position.
A
P
J
J
A
A
Q
In
compliance,
yes,
but
the
last
time
it's
in
compliance,
because
I
provided
a
structural
engineer
report
as
to
the
soundness
of
the
building.
Great
previously
I
had
a
contractor,
who
was
here
and
testified
with
20
years
experience
that
the
building
was
sound.
But
the
board
did
not
accept
his
testimony
and
continued
finding
me.
So
I
then
had
to
go
to
the
expense
of
getting
a
structural
engineer
and
he's
found
the
building
to
be
sound.
C
Mr.
Betts
elitists,
you
need
to
file
a
motion
for
petition
for
reconsideration
under
rule
5,
section
3.
The
board
can't
consider
a
motion
or
a
petition
without
it
being
in
writing
before
them
properly
agendized.
So
that
would
be
the
way
that
you
would
need
to
do
it
a
petition
for
rehearing
under
rule
5
section.
Yes,.
Q
Q
It
and
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
my
testimony,
the
first
time
at
the
board
of
hearing
that
mr.
Gaston
even
admitted
he
wasn't
a
structural
engineer,
didn't
know
about
structural
engineering.
But
yet
the
board
went
along
with
his
recommendation
to
find
me
because
he
said
that
the
structure
was
not
sound.
Q
So
the
following
month,
I
was
called
back
again
and
brought
a
construction
person
here
at
the
state
that
the
building
was
sound
and
the
board
still
didn't
accept
that,
and
so
I
had
to
go.
Get
a
structural
engineer
who
reinforced
the
same
conclusion
that
the
structure
was
sound
and
so
that's
been
the
testimony
all
along
and
the
board
chose
to
find
me
and
so
I
have
these
finds
that
have
been
running
since
August
29th
at
$100
wealth
since
November
26
at
$100
a
day
and
I
I've
been
in
compliance
the
whole
time.
C
5
section
3
of
the
rules
of
procedure
that
the
board
receives:
that's
the
rule,
mr.
Pat
Salinas,
it's
not,
and
so
you
need
to
follow
that
rule
and
that
will
give
then
due
process
to
both
you
and
to
the
city
and
bringing
a
case
before
the
code
enforcement
board.
So
it's
rule,
5,
section
3
petition
for
reconsideration
and
I'm
sure
that
Beth
or
Steve
will
get
a
copy
of
that
rule.
If
you'd
like
you.
Q
C
Q
C
E
Violator
fines
associated
with
the
accessory
structure,
but
he
sent
the
structural
engineers
report
and
in
the
city
said:
okay,
it
was
fine
back
then
so
we
went
back
to
that
date.
He
still
got
an
order
dated
by
the
board
as
normal,
but
there
were
no
fines
associated
with
the
accessory
structure,
so
I
did
back
date
it
back
to
the
day,
I.