►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board March 14, 2019
Description
Description
A
A
A
C
D
Father
in
Heaven,
we
seek
blessings
on
the
task
before
us
bless
our
efforts
with
clear
insight,
our
deliberations
with
wisdom,
our
work
with
clarity
and
accuracy.
In
our
decisions
with
impartiality,
we
gather
to
make
decisions
for
our
community.
May
we
use
only
our
best
skills
and
judgment,
keeping
ourselves
impartial
and
neutral,
as
we
consider
the
merits
and
pitfalls
of
each
matter
that
is
placed
before
us.
This
we
pray,
amen,
page.
B
D
D
E
Let
me
get
this
squared
away.
First
case
is
18
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero;
two
three
five:
the
addresses
Rainville
Park
Road.
It's
an
undeveloped
parcel
the
property
owners,
Pappas
Civil
Contractors
LLC,
going
before
the
board
exhibit
number
one
is
all
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two
all
my
notices
to
include
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice.
The
hearings
exhibit
number
three
of
my
administrative
Docs,
the
case
summary
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
associated
emails
with
this
case.
F
E
Number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
of
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations
and
Notice
of
Hearing,
or
sent
both
return
receipt
requested
as
long
as
first
as
well
as
first
class
mail
and
mr.
chairman,
would
you
please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
C
E
Guys
mean
some
of
you
may
be
familiar
with
this
case.
Previously.
It
was
a
tree
case
that
Janet
had
handled.
This
is
a
large
parcel.
That's
on
the
northwest
corner
of
alternate
19
in
Rainville
by
Dixie
Highway,
basically,
the
contractor
they
got
a
very,
they
got
a
change
in
their
zoning
and
they
immediately
cleared
the
property
and
they
cut
down
some
like
nine
hundred
trees
or
whatever.
That
was
all
dealt
with
as
a
separate
case,
but
the
case
that's
before
the
board
here
is:
they
didn't
submit
any
plans.
No
building
permits
no
site
plans.
E
Basically,
they
just
started
to
do
work.
They
cleared
out.
They
took
fill
dirt
and
added
it
to
the
property
to
change
the
level
of
it,
and
you
can
see
that
in
the
photographs,
if
you
can
kind
of
imagine,
this
property
was
all
covered
with
trees
and
you
can
clearly
see
where
it's
been
cleared
and
they
brought
in
asphalt
millings
and
they
were
going
to
begin
doing
a
building
project.
Now
this
started
back
in
April
of
2018
we've
gone
back
and
forth.
We've
had
a
lot
of
communications.
E
Needless
to
say,
it's
a
pretty
substantial
product
process
and
what
they're
trying
to
build
is
as
a
fairly
big
project,
so
they've
been
going
through
planning
and
zoning,
and
things
like
that.
The
reason
why
we're
here
before
the
board
is
that's
kind
of
stalled.
They've
been
given
some
the
notes
from
Planning
and
Zoning
four
months
ago,
and
they
haven't
done
their
end,
so
we're
at
a
standstill
so
because
of
that
we're
kind
of
leaning
a
little
bit
on
the
code
board.
E
If
you
find
them
in
violation
to
basically
set
a
deadline
and
get
this
project
done
or
back
or
reversed,
they
can't
put
the
trees
back
but
reversed.
So
that's
kind
of
the
back
history.
With
this,
as
I
stated,
the
case
started
in
April
of
2018
Derrick
silver
from
the
building
department
and
I
went
out
with
Shannon.
We
conducted
the
initial
inspection.
He
did
about
a
four-hour
inspection,
I
went
out
towards
the
end
of
it.
I
could
clearly
see
that
there
was
construction
being
done
at
that
time.
E
There
was
heavy
equipment
still
on
the
property
and
there
were
absolutely
no
permits
applied
for
no
site
plans.
Nothing
had
been
submitted
to
the
city,
the
other
added
to
this
whole
thing,
there's
an
eagle's
nest
within
300
feet,
and
so
they
actually
can't
do
any
construction
on
part
of
it
because
of
that
that
was
dealt
with
outside
with
FWC
that's
their
process.
So
it
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
board,
but
just
so
you
know
it
adds
a
whole
bunch
more
twists.
E
So
on
April,
12th,
I'm,
female,
the
or
mailed
the
first
Notice
of
Violation,
it
was
returned
unclaimed,
August
30th,
the
amended
Notice
of
Violation.
We
cleaned
up
the
the
violations
a
little
bit
and
send
an
amended
Notice
of
Violation
that
one
was
returned
to
our
office
signed.
The
green
card
was
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin
around
September.
Basically
that
was
kind
of
a
paper
inspection.
E
It
was
to
see
what
the
status
of
permitting
and
things
like
that
was
the
permit
was
obtained
and
in
on
Shannon's
case,
the
tree
case,
all
of
the
fees
and
everything
were
paid.
So
at
that
point
her
case
was
closed
out
for
the
tree
violations
and
we
had
separated
those
out
because
we
knew
that
the
building
process
was
going
to
take
a
lot
longer
than
dealing
with
the
after-the-fact
tree
permits.
E
So
that's
why
there
was
two
cases
so
at
that
time
confirmed
that
there
was
no
city
building
permits
issued
or
anything
like
that
for
the
property
so
January
3rd.
We
let
him
have
their
time
because,
as
I
said,
they
were
going
through,
they
were
going
through
TRC
planning
and
zoning
dealing
with
all
those
City
Department
issues
with
their
site
plans
and
what
who
they
had
two
contacts
with
mud
and
things
like
that
January
3rd,
we
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin
and
we
emailed
the
property
owners.
They
did
complete
a
site
plan
application.
E
However,
the
Technical
Review
Committee
needed
more
information
to
move
the
process
forward,
so
they
gave
them
comments
and
they're
supposed
to
respond
back.
You
need
to
fix
those
things
or
you
know
those
kind
of
things
so
Planning
and
Zoning
had
not
been
contacted
by
the
property
owner
with
any
further
information,
nor
have
they
requested
to
be
added
to
another.
Trc
agenda,
basically,
their
site
plan
that
was
submitted
was
required
to
be
completed
within
90
days
or
else
that
site
plan
would
expire
for
the
city
rules.
So
at
that
point
time,
On
January
3rd.
E
We
sent
out
a
notice
a
hearing.
We
had
originally
scheduled
this
for
a
previous
code
board
meeting,
but
we
deferred
that
to
this
month.
So
on
February
27th
we
sent
an
email
to
the
representative
from
Gulf
Coast,
consulting
incorporated
who's,
doing
a
lot
of
the
site
plan,
work
and
everything,
and
basically
this
is
an
excerpt
from
the
email
that
is
in
the
file,
but
it
says
I'm
preparing
for
the
March
14th
Code
board
and
I
wanted
to
reach
out
to
your
regarding
your
email
as
of
today.
E
There
are
no
permit
applications
for
this
property,
and
this
is
a
February
27th
on
October,
8th
of
2018,
you
were
sent
an
email
from
Planning
and
Zoning,
stating
that
application
was
deferred
pending
recent
middle
of
the
comments
address,
the
site
plan
expires
within
90
days,
if
not
resubmitted,
with
the
required
changes.
That
90
days
would
make
that
expiration
date.
January
8th
well
we're
already
past
that,
because
this
was
February
27th
we
gave
them
the
city
ordinances
again.
So
it's
almost
like.
We
had
to
start
this
whole
process
over
and
some
of
it
was
like.
E
Oh
I,
didn't
know
a
city's
problem.
Well,
we
confirmed
that
the
city
was
done.
They
they
had
given
it
back.
It
was
back
in
their
lap
basically
to
submit
the
site
plans
and
do
all
these
things
so
the
city's
not
to
hang
up
in
in
this
particular
case,
and
that's
why
I'm
bringing
it
before
the
board.
My
final
inspection
was
on
March
4th,
there's
still
no
permits
completed
and
the
work
hadn't
been
reversed
and
there
hadn't
been
any
other
work
done.
So
we're
kind
of
a
paperwork
standstill.
E
Last
thing
on
March
13th
was
that
purple
per
patent
Planning
and
Zoning
the
site
plan.
What
changes
was
turned
in
on
March
8th,
so
we
went
from
February
27th,
where
we
said
they
had
work
to
do
turned
in
a
new
one,
on
March
8th
they're
now
scheduled
for
TRC
on
April
4th
so
next
month
and
if
they're
approved,
they
will
be
scheduled
for
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Board
meeting
on
May
20th.
So,
lastly,
final
approval
will
then
be
scheduled
for
either
the
May
28th
or
June
11th
border
Commission
meeting.
E
So
after
BOC
approval,
the
permits
will
need
to
be
obtained,
work
completed
and
final
building
inspection
signed
off
as
approved.
So
as
we
sit
right
now,
I'm
asking
the
board
to
find
them
in
violation
of
city
code
6-1,
which
adopts
the
Florida
Building
Code
under
that
city
code.
Two
10.00
requires
the
site
plans
to
be
submitted
and
approved.
E
64.0
zero
do
deals
with
excavation
and
fill
and
I'm
gonna
get
into
the
definition
they
brought
in
a
large
amount
of
dirt
moved
around
a
large
amount
of
dirt
and
leveled
off
a
lot
of
ground.
So
I
think
we're
well
past
the,
but
we
anybody
would
consider
the
common-sense
rule
on
excavation
and
fill
as
far
as
this
property
goes
and
then
finally,
under
two
12.00
requires
building
permits
to
be
submitted
and
not
only
just
submitted
but
be
completed.
E
So
one
of
the
things
I'm
asking
the
board
additionally
is
then
the
last
part
was
6-6,
which
requires
the
permit
prerequisites
to
be
met
which
deals
with
your
site
plans,
and
things
like
that.
So
what's
before
the
board
is
6-1
6-2,
6-2,
10.00
6400
and
to
12.00
of
the
city
code
and
then,
like
I,
said
I.
Basically,
we
just
want
to
get
this
project
done
and
over
with
we're
pushing
a
year
now
so
and
that's
all
I
have
at
this
point.
A
E
A
C
F
C
C
E
On
everything,
that's
going
on
I'm
looking
at
six
months,
that
should
give
them
enough
time
to
clear
through
boc
and
everything
else
and
get
it
done
for
the
work
they
want
to
do.
We
can
approach
that
as
their
work
is
commencing,
but
at
least
it
gives
them
a
furtive
deadline.
I
put
on
my
notes,
October
1st
2019.
That
actually
gives
them
a
couple
extra
weeks
and
it
just
makes
it
an
easy
date.
E
A
F
C
E
E
My
notices
to
include
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
3
administrative
documents
case
summary
property,
appraiser
tax,
collector
records
and
any
associated
emails
and
exhibit
number
4
is
a
copy
of
the
posting
and
an
affidavit
of
the
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
All
my
notice
of
violations
had
notice.
The
hearings
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
as
well
as
first
class
and
mr.
chairman.
B
E
Have
had
contact
with
the
owner
in
this
case,
both
via
email
and
phone
calls.
The
case
originally
started
on
October
24th
of
2018
I
think
I
got
a
complaint
from
the
Planning
and
Zoning.
They
had
installed
a
new
sign
on
the
eastern
side
of
the
building.
If
you
look
at
the
photographs
that
are
coming
around
originally
that
sign,
it's
a
little
triangular
sign
and
it
had
a
television
screen
in
it.
Well,
there's
a
couple
of
things
they
didn't
get
any
permits
for
the
electric
or
television
screens
aren't
allowed
under
our
city
code.
E
They
were
at
that
time
sent
a
Notice
of
Violation
on
October
24th
on
December
12th.
We
did
that
they
did
apply
for
a
permit.
It's
a
building.
Permit
application,
number
18,
3,
1,
1
6.
It
was
sent
back
for
revisions
primarily
because
they
couldn't
have
the
television.
So
if
you
look
in
the
second
photograph,
they
did
get
rid
of
the
television
and
they
just
installed.
Basically
a
plastic
sign
that
was
backlit.
It
does
have
electrical
go
into
it.
E
On
February
22nd
I
conducted
a
reinstruct
inspection
notice.
The
fine
was
fuller.
The
sign
was
fully
installed
as
I
stated,
but
the
building
permit
had
not
been
completed
so
they
applied
for
it,
but
the
whole
process
also
is
final
inspection
and
signing
off
on
it.
Then
it's
done
and
it's
for
lack
of
a
better
term
legal
at
that
point
in
time,
that's
what's
not
occurred
as
of
yet
it
still,
as
the
electrical
I
think
is
still
had
to
be
submitted
to
the
building
department.
So,
although
they
obtained
a
permit,
it
has
not
been
approved.
E
If
you
will
so
March
4th
I
posted
the
property.
At
that
time,
I
met
with
the
manager
kind
of
explained
to
him
what
was
going
on
with
the
sign
and
what
needed
to
be
done.
On
March
6th,
we
got
a
phone
call
from
the
contractor
Tony
from
excuse
me
at
your
service,
electric
LLC.
A
permit
was
originally
applied
for
about
a
month
ago
for
a
TV
sign.
They
discovered
it
wasn't
allowed
had
to
redo
the
sign.
Another
sign
was
installed
without
a
permit.
E
He's
modifying
the
sign,
permit
and
hopes
to
have
it
done
within
the
next
few
weeks
as
of
March.
13Th
permits
still
open
and
there's
no
final
been
done
on
it,
and
the
permit
has
not
been
closed.
So
it's
still
in
violation
and
what's
before
the
board
is
a
violation
of
city
code,
one
seven,
nine
zero
one,
which
requires
all
signs
to
be
permitted
and
the
permit
obviously
to
be
completed,
and
that's
all
I
have
at.
G
C
G
C
E
G
G
F
E
E
My
exhibits
going
before
the
board
the
first
one
is
the
photographs
for
this
case
exhibit
number
two.
My
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
administrative
docs
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
any
associated
email
and
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
my
notices
are
mailed.
A
copy
would
record
based
on
the
Pinellas,
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
my
notice
of
violations
and
notice,
adhering
or
set
forth
first
class,
as
well
as
a
return
receipt
requested.
And
mr.
C
E
Have
had
contact
with
the
property
owner
this
address
mostly
via
phone
calls
on
January
11th
I
conducted
the
initial
inspection
based
on
a
neighbor
complained.
I
was
actually
conducting
an
inspection
on
a
house
to
the
west
of
it
about
a
fence
problem
in
a
shed
problem
when
this
person
complained
about
their
fence
and
their
shed.
E
So
I
opened
up
a
case
for
this
address
and
there
were
violations
related
to
the
fence
on
the
west
side
of
the
property
falling
over
and
need
a
repair
there's
also
a
large
pile
of
tree
debris
and
yard
waste
out
in
the
front
yard.
There
was
a
shadow
which
has
been
taken
care
of,
but
that
was
part
of
the
original
on
January
14th
of
this
year,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed.
E
We
received
no
return
mail
from
that
mailing
on
February
21st,
the
Notice
of
Hearing
was
mailed
again
no
return
receipt
from
that
mailing
on
March
4th
I
posted
the
property
in
an
affidavit
of
the
posting
was
signed
on
February
March
11th.
If
we
did
receive
a
phone
call
and
they
stated
that
the
property
been
in
compliance
was
ready
for
a
rien
spec
ssin.
So
yesterday,
I
went
out
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin
and
I
noticed
that
the
fence
and
the
shed
are
in
compliance.
E
There's
still
numerous
bags
of
trash
in
front
of
the
garage
and
the
sidewalks
had
not
been
cleared.
So
I
asked
the
board
to
consider
violations
of
to
city
codes,
8-14
852.
Your
notes
may
reflect
a
36.0
3
and
a
36.0
1
which
are
in
compliance
and
not
for
the
board
to
consider.
So
that's
all
I
have
at
this
time.
Mr.
chairman.
G
G
G
F
C
C
D
A
C
E
C
F
G
A
A
D
C
C
D
And
I'm
handling
that
you've
got
in
your
package,
a
memorandum
that
I
had
issued
on
March
11th.
This
is
the
property
that's
located
on
the
corner
of
Mirrors
and
Pinellas
Avenue.
It's
been
before
you
a
couple
of
different
times.
The
last
time
the
case
was
before
you
was
for
a
petition
for
reconsideration
to
find
that
the
property
owner
had
made
this
board
denied
that
fine
reduction
request.
D
Since
July
of
last
year,
I
have
been
in
negotiations
with
the
property
owner
trying
to
get
the
case.
Resolved
I've
been
unsuccessful
in
convincing
the
property
owner
to
settle
the
matter
and
so
I'm
asking
for
your
authority
to
begin
foreclosure
process.
This
is
a
vacant
lot.
It
is
not
owned
by
an
individual,
it's
owned
by
a
company.
It
is
not
homesteaded
and
we
need
to
begin
the
foreclosure
process.
The
next
step.
D
Just
so,
you
would
know
how
it
work
is
that
I
would
notify
the
property
owner
that
the
lien
needs
to
be
paid
or
the
fine.
The
fine
foreclosure
action
would
begin
if
I
didn't
get
a
response.
I
would
bring
it
to
the
City
Commission.
The
board
of
commissioners
then
wouldn't
get
the
same
basic
memo.
I'd
be
asking
for
authority
from
them
to
foreclose.
D
I
would
send
the
property
owner
another
letter
asking
them
to
settle
the
matter,
and
if
we
couldn't
get
it
settled,
then
I
would
actually
file
the
foreclosure
action
I'm,
hoping
somewhere
in
the
next
three
to
four
weeks.
You
know
that
will
prompt
the
property
owner
to
take
a
more
serious
look
at
the
case,
so
we
can
avoid
the
litigation,
but
if
not
I
need
your
permission.
Based
upon
your
your
code
to
bring
the
foreclosure
action,
the
dollar
amount
of
the
fine.
D
D
C
A
F
D
What
happens
is
is
that
we
would
bring
the
foreclosure
action
and
there
would
be
a
judgment
entered
if
we're
successful
in
the
dollar
amount
of
the
city
is.
Oh,
then
the
property
would
be
put
up
for
auction.
Okay
and
it's
a
no
it's
done
electronically
online
and
anybody
can
bid
on
the
property.
The
city
would
be
bidding
its
judgment
amount
because
it
doesn't
cost
anything
out
of
pocket.
D
There
is
a
high
likelihood
because
of
the
value
of
the
property
being
under
the
a
dollar
amount
of
the
lien,
that
the
city
would
be
the
successful
bidder
and
then,
if
the
city
is
a
successful
bidder,
the
Commission
will
then
get
give
direction
to
the
city
manager
as
to
what
would
be
done
with
the
property.
Would
it
be
deemed
surplus
whether
the
city
make
a
park
out
of
it
I'm
not
really
sure,
but
that
that's
the
process
more
than
likely
it
would
be
foreclosed
and
sold.
Thank.