![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/p1rUPBZ-Rug/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board December 12, 2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
C
D
A
A
D
A
Code
enforcement
board
hearing
procedures:
it
is
the
intention
of
this
board
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
safety.
The
health
and
the
welfare
of
the
citizens
of
Tarpon
Springs
by
providing
an
equitable,
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
various
codes
within
the
city
of
tarpon
springs.
Any
aggravated
party
may
appeal
a
final
administrative
order
of
this
board
to
the
circuit
court.
Such
an
appeal
shall
be
filed
in
30
days
of
the
execution
of
the
order
of
being
appealed
statute.
A
Two
eight
six
point:
zero
one:
zero
five
requires
any
party
appealing
a
decision
of
the
board
to
have
a
record
of
the
proceedings
to
support
such
an
appeal
procedure
of
the
board
is
as
follows:
first,
the
city
presents
its
witnesses
and
exhibits,
after
which
the
alleged
violator
is
able
to
ask
the
city's
witnesses
any
specific
questions
regarding
their
testimony.
Secondly,
the
alleged
violator
is
allowed
to
make
a
presentation
and
present
his
or
her
witnesses
and
exhibits.
A
Then
the
city
can
question
that
alleged
violators
witnesses,
after
both
rounds
of
testimony
both
by
the
city
and
by
the
alleged
violator
each
party
is
asked
to
give
a
closing
argument
first
by
the
city
and
then
by
the
alleged
violator
after
those
three
steps
have
been
taken.
This
board
will
close
the
puppet
portion
of
the
case
to
discuss
it
and
take
appropriate
action.
E
B
A
A
G
A
D
D
Those
in
favor,
okay,
we
got
two
motions
now
so
there's
a
couple
different
ways
that
we
can
do
this.
My
suggestion
is
that
we
do
a
written
ballot
vote
and
when
we
do
that,
that
basically
means
that
you're
picking
either
miss
Wade
or
miss
Archer
as
the
chairperson
for
the
upcoming
year
and
when
we
do
that,
we're
gonna
have
you
initial
or
sign
your
vote,
because
we
have
to
make
sure
that
that's
available
for
the
public.
So
do
we
have
some
pieces
of
paper
down
there.
H
D
A
D
D
I
D
D
D
A
F
D
E
Right
officer,
Steve
Goss
on
CD,
interpret
Springs
Police
Department
Code
Enforcement.
Madam
chairman,
this
is
case
number
812.
That
813
is
also
the
next
one
on
the
agenda.
It's
their
parcels
that
are
joining
each
other
owned
by
the
same
people.
So
my
case
is
basically
gonna,
be
the
same
for
both
of
them
and
then
how
you
guys
decide
to
go
from
there.
So,
starting
out
this
is
a
repeat
violator
case.
E
Both
of
these
are
repeat
violator
cases
from
seventeen
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
three
eight
zero,
which
is
a
violation
of
city
code,
840
and
852.
This
case
is
19-8:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
eight
one,
two
four
parcel
number:
eleven,
two:
seven
one:
five,
eight,
seven,
seven,
eight
six,
zero
one,
seven
one
zero
one,
two
zero
and
case
number
813.
The
parcel
number
is
the
same,
except
for
the
last
four
is
zero
one.
E
Three
zero,
basically
all
exhibit
exhibit
number
one
are
all
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two
are
all
of
my
notices,
including
a
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
number
three
administrative
documents.
Case.
Summary
previous
board
orders,
the
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
said
before
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five
is
a
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs.
All
of
my
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
is
what's
being
submitted
to
the
board.
All
my
notices
were
mailed.
E
The
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearing
or
sent
both
first
class,
as
well
as
a
return
receipt
certified
mail.
And,
madam
chairman,
please
accept
all
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
J
E
E
Right,
so
the
timelines
are
the
same
for
both
of
these
cases.
So
initial
the
initial
inspection
occurred
on
November
14th
of
this
year.
I
was
inspecting
property
directly.
The
East,
based
on
a
citizen,
complaint
and
observed
this
property
was
also
overgrown.
These
two
parcels
were
overgrown.
This
area
is
in
between
Castle
Terriers
Eunice,
Drive,
south
of
Sunset
Drive.
There's
some
vacant
lots
there.
We
have
had
contact
with
the
owner,
she's
contacted
the
office
via
phone
calls
on
November
14th,
the
repeat,
violator
notice.
E
A
hearing
was
mailed,
there
were
no
green
cards,
returned
I
conducted
a
reinfection
on
November
25th.
It
was
in
compliance.
The
whole
lot
was
cleared
and
at
that
time
we
used
the
compliance
date
of
November
22nd
of
2019,
because
that's
the
date
they
advised
that
it
was
taken
care
of
I
posted
the
property
on
November
27th,
so
the
property
was
in
violation
from
the
date
of
the
initial
inspection
on
November
14th
until
November
22nd
and
those
were
for
being
overgrown.
The
property
was
not
being
maintained.
E
The
grass
was
overgrown
for
that
period
of
time
and
the
same
for
case
number,
813,
the
same
time
frame,
November
14th
to
November
22nd,
the
same
two
code,
violations
of
eight
48-52,
which
is
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property
and
the
requirements
to
mow
and
maintain
it.
And
at
this
point
that's
all
the
city
has.
F
E
J
D
F
J
J
Unbeknownst
to
us,
the
yard
man
didn't
go
by
when
I
returned
home
on
November
11th
I
received
this
notice
on
the
20th
and
I
called
when
I
called
him,
the
22nd
to
say,
hey,
we're
we're
fine,
but
you
know:
I
didn't
get
this
until
the
20th,
so
my
husband
was
arriving
back
home
on
the
20th.
That
evening
he
came
home.
J
My
husband
was
tired.
It
was
a
long
trip,
I
didn't
say
anything.
He
went
to
sleep
the
next
morning.
I
said:
look,
we
got
this,
so
he
made
arrangements
to
rent
some
equipment
after
he
tried
calling
the
long
person
when
we
found
out
he
wasn't
home.
He
wasn't
here
and
he,
my
son,
went
with
him
on
the
22nd
and
they
took
care
of.
J
I
called
Beth
advised
her
on
the
22nd
hey.
We
took
care
of
the
lots,
but
I
didn't
get
this
until
the
20th,
so
I
was
really
concerned
about
being
in
violation
from
the
14th
to
the
22nd,
at
possibly
$500
a
day
and
so
anyway.
So,
basically
that's
my
story.
We
have
somebody
who
takes
care
of
the
lots
he
went
out
of
town
cuz.
He
occasionally
goes
out
on
salvage
ships
and
does
Salvage
and
I'm
assuming
that's
where
he's
at.
J
We
know
he's
not
here
his
wife
hasn't
said
anything
so
I
would
ask
also
that
would
not
be
charged.
Those
fines,
because
they'd
be
an
extreme
hardship
and
as
far
as
we
didn't
receive
the
certified
mail
at
all,
I
just
reserved
these
two
I
didn't
get
it
and
not
sign
it,
and
he
didn't
come
to
the
door
to
ask
me
to
sign
anything
so
that
cost
baby
can
be
taken
off.
Maybe
the
city
should
get
a
credit
from
the
post
office
16
dollars,
since
the
post
office
never
did
what
they
were
supposed
to
do.
J
We
took
care
of
it
as
soon
as
we
could
and
as
soon
as
I
could
do.
It
was
when
my
husband
got
home.
Cuz
I
came
home
early
because
my
dog
was
in
kidney
failure,
so
I
had
to
put
her
down
on
the
13th,
and
after
that
you
know
my
concern
or
I.
Never
even
thought
of.
Let
me
go
by
the
lots
and
see
how
they're
doing
I
don't.
F
E
E
As
I
stated,
and
we've
discussed
this
numerous
times
before
in
Cobourg,
regardless
of
especially
the
repeat
violator,
doesn't
matter
when
they
get
to
notice
it's
their
responsibility
to
take
care
of
the
property.
I
did
the
inspection
on
the
fourteenth.
Just
because
I
had
another
complaint
on
another
property
so
and
we
did
comply
it
as
soon
as
the
property
owners
advised
us.
It
was
so
the
14th
it
was
the
beginning
of
it,
and
the
22nd
was
the
compliance
date
for
that
repeat
violator
a
period
of
time.
F
J
I
understand
that
it
was
in
violation
on
the
14th
I
had
to
use
a
euthanize.
My
pup
on
the
13th
I
was
a
bit
of
a
mess
after
that,
not
that
I
probably
would
have
gone
by
the
Lots
anyway,
because
I
know
we
have
a
yard
man
and
I've
assumed
he
had
taken
care
of
it.
I
only
I
was
only
made
aware
of
it.
When
I
got
this
in
the
mail
on
the
20th,
and
then
we
took
care
of
the
22nd.
G
D
A
Make
a
motion
based
on
the
testimony
evidence
and
presented,
and
the
law
that
the
respondent
was
in
violation
of
section
8
40
in
8,
52
of
the
Turpin
Spring
City
code
from
1114
until
11
27,
and
to
find
50
dollars
a
day
per
day
for
13
days
is
650
dollars.
In
addition,
I
move
that
the
city
be
awarded.
We
will
awarded.
F
H
J
D
F
A
I
D
I
D
D
C
C
D
F
M
F
E
An
exhibit
number
5
is
an
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs.
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
are
given
to
the
violator
exact
copies
of
what's
been
presented
to
the
board.
All
of
my
notices
are
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
based
on
the
Pinellas
County
property.
Appraiser
tax,
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations
and
notice
hearings
are
sent
both
first
class
as
well
as
return
receipt
requested.
Madam
chair,
will
you
please
accept
these
records
into
the
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Thank.
F
D
E
The
case
started
on
November
15th.
You
have
to
understand
the
turbine
would
Lake.
Apartments
is
directly
on
the
north
side
of
the
police
department,
so
it's
very
visible.
They
have
a
chain-link
fence
surrounding
it
and
their
dumpster
area
dumpster
areas
back
up
to
Walton
and
Lime
Street,
so
every
police
officer
in
the
city
sees
their
property
on
a
daily
basis.
That
happened
to
be
the
case
on
November
15th
I
drove
by
our
lodge
a
large
amount
of
furniture
stacked
out
by
the
dumpster
that
would
be
on
the
southwest
corner.
E
That's
what
started
the
whole
case
on
November
15th.
We
mailed
out
the
repeat
violator
notice
of
hearing
that
we
received
the
green
cards
and,
as
I
stated,
we
have
had
contact
with
the
folks
from
the
property
owner
conducted
the
re-inspection
on
November
27th.
At
the
or
November
22nd-
and
it
was
in
compliance,
gladiola
I
think
had
contacted
our
office
on
November
20th,
so
same
as
before.
E
We
used
November
20th
as
our
compliance
date
on
November
27th,
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit
and,
as
I
stated
they're
in
violation
of
the
city
codes,
8,
22,
accumulation
of
trash
8
40
of
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property
and
8
52
in
this
case
not
has
to
do
with
lawn
mowing,
but
debris
old
furniture.
Things
like
that
kind
of
classify
as
such,
and
that
was
a
period
of
time
of
5
days.
November,
15th,
November,
20th
and
that's
all
the
city
has
at
this
point.
E
F
E
And
I'm
sorry
add
one
last
thing:
I
said
in
the
conversations
we've
had
with
them:
their
situations
a
little
unique
they
are
fenced
in,
but
the
whole
world
seems
to
like
to
use
their
properties
of
dumping.
I
know
where
we
all
stand
on
those
things
they
had
on
this
particular
instance:
I
guess
what
they
investigating
they'll,
probably
discuss.
E
I
guess
one
of
the
rental
furniture
places
actually
decided
to
dump
their
furniture
at
their
dumpster,
which
was
a
little
unique,
although
they
had
been
pretty
good
about
maintaining
the
property,
but
it
seemed
like
there
was
a
period
in
the
last
few
weeks
and
I
actually
kind
of
let
this
one
ride
a
little
bit
before.
I
did
the
notice
to
kind
of
hope
that
they
maybe
would
take
care
of
it.
C
Was
buddies,
a
company
that
dropped
we
kind
of
our
tenants
so
saw
them,
do
it
so
I
contacted
their
manager.
I
said
you
cannot
do
this.
This
is
you
know,
pleasing
that's
pretty
much
in
trouble.
Our
dumpsters
are
full,
so
we
had
to
take
well
that
furniture
and
put
it
actually
in
an
vacant
apartment
just
to
take
it
out
of
his
sight.
C
Let's
put
it
that
way,
but
at
that
time
it
just
happened,
one
maintenance
guy
and
he
spends
two
or
three
hours
every
day,
cutting
this
mattress
and
this
furnitures
that
not
even
ours
so
having
one
guy.
We
cannot
spend
eight
hours
cutting
every
day.
Now
what
we
do,
the
first
thing
we
do,
we
put
it
in
an
empty
apartment
and
little
by
little,
we
cut
it
and
thank
you.
F
E
C
C
To
put
it
in
the
dumpster,
because
that
we
would
have
garbage
around
I
couldn't
put
it
in
an
empty
apartment,
so
I
went
to
talk
to
the
officer
and
he
was
very
helpful
I'm
like
what
do
you
suggest
I,
don't
know
what
else
to
do
if
the
police
will
help
me
and
he
recommended
you
guys,
can
put
cameras
other
than
that
they
cannot
stop
everybody,
because
they
don't
have
no
way
of
knowing
that
they
don't
live
there.
So
it's
kind
of
I
understand
that
point
as
well,
but
it's
nothing
you
can
do
specially
on
Mondays.
M
Because
they
have
the
whole
weekend
and
they
drop
the
stuff
in,
like
you
say
we
trained
since
our
company
for
the
property,
it
looks
better,
you
can
ride
there
and
you
can
see
the
different
every
day
and,
like
she
say,
we
was
short
of
a
staff.
We
only
have
one
maintenance
that
we
use
like
two
to
three
hours,
trying
to
current
little
by
little
to
put
an
endorser,
because
we
don't
want
to
have
in
any
problem
with
the
city
and
we're
trying
to
keep
our
property
clean.
C
He
goes
next
time;
they
don't
pick
it
up.
You
call
me
that
will
be
my
next.
Walmart
did
pick
theirs,
but
on
the
side
it's
actually
kind
of
illegal,
but
we're
close
to
outer
zone
and
every
shopping
cart
is
there
and
then
we
push
it
on
that
side
and
I
told
him
by
that
either
put
it
to
the
police
station
or
I
pushed
it
there,
but
I
don't
know.
C
I
said
you're
gonna
caught
catch
me
every
morning
pushing
those
cards
so
I'm
like
I.
Did
it
but
I
don't
know
what
to
do
with
the
shopping.
Cart,
it's
illegal
to
throw
them
away.
They
will
take
so
much
time
and
Publix
will
not
pick
them
up.
Walmart
has
been
better
since
I've
talked
to
him.
Walmart
has
become
but
Publix.
It's
still
10
I.
A
Based
on
the
testimony
evidence,
facts
presented
and
the
law
that
the
respondent
was
in
violation
of
8,
20,
8,
40
and
8
52
of
the
tarpon
springs
city
code
from
the
date
of
November,
the
15th
until
the
date
of
November,
the
20th
and
a
fine
of
$50
a
day
for
five
days
for
two
hundred
and
fifty
dollars.
In
addition,
I
move
that
the
city
be
able
to
be
awarded.
The
prosecution
cost
was
sixty
one
dollars
and
fifty
cents
further.
The
cost
incurred.
A
M
I
F
K
A
D
So
the
property
owner
has
been
found
in
violation
of
sections
8
22
8
48-52.
The
code
enforcement
board
has
levy
defined
at
$50
a
day
for
the
five
days
it
was
in
non-compliance
as
well
as
awarded
the
city,
prosecution,
cost
of
seventy
seven
dollars
and
fifty
cents
there'll
be
an
order
entered
within
the
next
ten
days.
It'll
be
mailed
to
the
property
owner
at
the
address
listed
by
the
tax
collector.
If
you
have
any
questions
after
tonight,
today's
meeting
you
can
talk
with
code
enforcement
officer
out
for
the
meeting
or
call
tomorrow.
E
F
E
Officer
Steve
Gaston
city
of
Turin,
Springs
police
department,
code
enforcement-
this
is
another
repeat
violator
case.
The
cases
stem
from
18
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
four
nine
one
which
were
violations
city
code,
eight,
twenty
to
eight
forty,
eight.
Fifty
two,
the
current
cases
19-8
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
seven.
Eighty
eight,
the
property's
addressed
as
four
two
five
zero
one
US
highway
19,
although
it
is
an
eighty
five
acre
vacant
lot,
it's
known
as
the
Walmart
property
between
the
bridges
on
the
east
side
of
us
nineteen.
The
parcel
number
is
zero.
E
Six,
two,
seven
one,
six,
eight
nine
three:
eight
eight:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero.
Four
two
zero
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
border.
All
of
my
photographs
exhibit
number
to
notice
a
violation
and
Notice
of
Hearing
exhibit
number
three
or
administrative
documents.
The
case
summary
the
previous
board
orders
opera
and
the
property
appraiser
in
tax
collector
records,
an
affidavit
of
the
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
or
exhibit
number
four.
An
exhibit
number
five
is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
cause.
E
All
of
my
notices
are
sent
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property.
Appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations
and
Notice
of
Hearing
or
sent
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and
you've
already
accepted
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
So
thank
you.
We
have
had
contact
with
the
owners.
The
representatives
from
Walmart,
as
well
as
their
property
management
company
company,
called
dent
Co.
My
initial
inspection
was
on
November
1st
2019.
E
There
was
a
large
amounts
of
trash
debris,
human
waste,
etc
on
the
property
as
a
result
of
trespassers.
This
was
on
the
southern
side
of
the
property.
There
is
not
a
fence
there.
It's
this
particular
area.
If
you
go
where
Carl
from
Carl
flammer,
for
it
is
there's
the
little
Pinellas
Trail
and
it
goes
under
us
19.
So
basically,
at
that
turn
where
the
Pinellas
Trail
goes
to
the
west
under
us
19,
it's
the
property,
that's
north
of
the
trail
there
right
there.
E
The
interesting
thing
is:
is
we
contacted
a
number
of
trespassers
started
the
process
of
removing
them
based
on
a
police
complaint
that
night
there
was
a
brush
fire
in
which
our
district
Chiefs
fire
truck
was
hit.
The
Tahoe
was
hit
as
a
result
of
the
people
back
in
the
woods
setting
fire
to
the
to
the
trees
back
there,
so
that
case
started.
We
kicked
everybody
out
and
they
set
fire
to
the
woods
so
we're
dealing
with
that,
but
they
left
behind
a
large
amount
of
trash
and
debris.
E
We
sent
out
the
notices
on
November
4th
the
return
of
the
repeat
violator
notice.
That
hearing
was
mailed.
The
green
cards
were
returned
to
the
office
signed
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin
on
November
26th
and
put
it
into
compliance
using
the
date
of
November
25th
I
posted
the
property
on
November
27th
and,
as
I
stated,
the
property
was
in
violation
from
November
1st
of
2019
until
November
25th
of
2019
for
violations
of
city
codes,
8
20,
8,
40
and
8
52.
E
For
what
it's
worth.
The
folks
took
nearly
two
days
and
four
truckloads
to
remove
this
property.
This
is
the
second
time
that
Walmarts
removed
in
excess
of
I
think
two
tons
of
trash
dumped
on
their
property.
They
are
trying
as
a
little
bit
in
not
really
in
defense,
but
they
have
now
based
on
this
case,
they've
hired
a
company,
that's
going
to
monitor
their
property
just
once
a
week,
a
security
company
to
go
out
and
try
to
keep
the
litter
bugs
off
their
property.
This
is
also
the
second
time
and
they're.
E
Both
these
code
cases
have
resulted
in
a
fire
and
that's
why
we're
kind
of
on
this
so
much
with
that
property,
because,
as
you
can
appreciate
the
southern
side
of
their
property
borders,
a
mobile
home
park,
the
eastern
side
of
their
property
ends
up
with
County
property,
but
it's
Sale
Harbor
rather
large
houses,
north
sides,
the
river
and
the
west
side
is
us
19,
which
is
not
so
much
of
a
fire
hazard.
But
we've
had
two
significant
brush
fires
on
that
property.
E
F
F
F
G
F
F
G
G
F
C
M
F
H
D
D
E
I'm
just
gonna
say
one
thing
pay
very
close
attention
to
the
address.
This
was
a
long
process
for
this
one.
This
is
1422
Silver
Oak
and
it
finally
came
into
compliance.
So
it
was
a
lot
of
work
from
2000
and
well
before
I
started
here.
So
I
just
wanted
to
you
guys
to
note
that
that
was
the
culmination
of
this
board's
work.
F
G
F
F
A
K
F
H
E
Just
so,
you
guys
understand
the
prosecution
cost
because
it
seemed
like
there
was
some
confusion.
You
know
previously
reward
those
in
some
of
the
cases,
so
the
affidavits
of
compliance
and
non-compliance,
don't
necessarily
have
prosecution
costs
on
them
because
they
were
already
handled
previously.
The
silver
oak
case
was
prior
to
us
implementing
prosecution
costs
that
didn't
occur,
I
think
until
like
2018,
so
any
of
the
previous
cases.
We
didn't
do
that
with
so.
A
E
Did
enact
an
ordinance
shopping
ordinance
in
the
city?
It
took
a
period
of
time
to
implement.
We
are
in
the
process
now
getting
all
the
contact
information.
They
had
mark
their
carts.
They
had
to
do.
They
had
to
comply
with
certain
things
they
had
to
put
a
plan
together.
They
have
a
period
of
time
to
present
that
plan.
E
The
yes,
because
it's
not
the
property,
they
are
the
property
owner
of
the
cart,
although
that
might
not
be
the
property
that
the
card
is
on.
Yes,
that
makes
sense.
So,
yes
will
be.
We
will
be
violating
the
correct
folks
in
an
attempt
to
not
and
in
their
case
which
I
know
we've
talked
about,
but
they
didn't
get
violated
for
the
shopping
carts.
There
was
other
things,
so
the
shopping
carts
are
a
separate
issue.
I
can't
hold
them
to
that
at
this
point,
since
we
have
the
ordinance
in
place
so.