![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/0nnUzlvspoE/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board July 9, 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
E
C
G
E
G
G
B
I'd
be
happy
to
Heavenly
Father.
We
gather
together
here
today,
intent
on
doing
good
work.
We
seek
to
represent
fairly
and
well
those
who
have
given
us
this
task.
We
meet
to
serve
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
to
use
our
resources
wisely
and
well
to
represent
all
members
of
our
community
and
to
make
decisions
that
promote
the
common
good.
We
recognize
the
responsibility
to
the
past,
the
future
and
the
rights
and
needs
of
both
individuals
and
our
entity
as
trusted
servants.
We
seek
blessings
on
our
deliberations
and
on
our
efforts
here
today.
C
C
E
B
E
E
To
be
appealed,
Florida
Statute
to
86.0
105
requires
any
party
appealing.
A
decision
of
this
board
to
have
a
record
of
the
proceedings
supports
to
support
such
an
appeal.
The
procedure
of
the
board
is
as
follows:
first,
the
city
presents
its
with
witnesses
and
exhibits,
after
which
the
alleged
violator
is
able
to
ask
the
city
witnesses
any
specific
questions
regarding
their
testimony.
Secondly,
the
alleged
violator
is
allowed
to
make
a
presentation
and
present
his
or
her
witnesses
and
exhibits.
E
Then
the
city
can
question
the
alleged
violators
witnesses
after
both
rounds
of
testimony
both
on
the
card
of
the
city
and
on
the
part
of
the
alleged
violator.
Each
party
is
asked
to
give
a
closing
argument
first
by
the
city
and
then
by
the
alleged
violator
after
those
three
steps
are
taken.
This
board
will
close
the
public
hearing
portion
of
the
case
to
discuss
it
and
take
appropriate
action
before
we
begin
the
public
hearings
we'll
have
all
we
normally,
we
will
have
all
witnesses,
stand
up
and
be
sworn
in.
F
E
I
I
E
E
H
D
E
E
C
B
C
B
E
F
You
this
is
case
number
nineteen,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
six
six
four,
the
property
address
is
47
West,
tarpon
Avenue,
the
listed
property
owner
is
a
zoic
Ocoee
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
all
of
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two:
are
all
the
notices
to
include
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice.
A
hearing
exhibit
number
three
administrative
documents
case:
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
letters
from
the
fire
marshal
exhibit
number
four.
F
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign,
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
mailed
to
the
violator,
exact
copies?
What's
being
presented
to
this
board,
all
of
my
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
based
on
the
Pinellas,
County
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearing
or
Sampath
return
receipt
requested,
as
well
as
first
class
mail.
Madam
chair,
please
accept
all
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
F
Thanks,
we
haven't
contact
with
the
owner,
numerous
phone
calls
and
emails
with
the
property
management
company.
As
their
representative,
this
case
started
out.
September
17
to
2019
received
a
call
about
some
issues
with
the
building.
When
I
did
the
inspection,
there
was
a
vehicle
in
the
rear
parking
lot
that
had
expired
tags,
so
there
was
a
hole
in
the
front
wall
that
had
been
patched
with
plywood.
F
We
mailed
the
Notice
of
Violation
at
that
time,
and
the
first
class
Notice
of
Violation
was
returned
not
deliverable
as
addressed
on
October
2nd
of
2019
I
conducted
the
Rhian
spec
ssin.
At
that
time
the
vehicle
was
still
there
with
no
tags
on
October
9th
conducted
another
Rhian
spec
ssin.
There
was
no.
If
the
green
car
was
still
on
the
property
permits
for
the
work
had
not
been
final.
They
had
some
issues
with
air
conditioning
electrical
and
things
like
that.
So
they
had
pulled
some
city
permits,
but
they
hadn't
been
final.
F
Yet
so
the
inspector
final
inspection
hadn't
been
done
as
soon
as
that
occurs,
and
basically,
this
case
is
in
compliance
on
December
31st
2019.
The
final
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed.
The
green
card
was
returned
from
the
property
management
company
signed.
The
mail
to
the
owner
was
returned,
not
deliverable
is
addressed,
conducted.
Another
inspection
on
November,
8th
of
2019.
F
The
vehicle
is
gone
at
that
time,
so
that
section
of
the
code
was
in
compliance
and
is
no
longer
for
the
board's
consideration,
but
the
permits
were
still
not
signed
off
on
final,
yet
On
February,
2nd
of
2020.
Another
amended
note
of
a
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed.
The
green
card
was
returned,
signed
by
the
property
management
company
and
again
the
property
owners
not
deliverable
is
addressed
on
June
30th
of
this
year
we
conducted
a
reinfection
primarily
with
the
fire
marshal.
F
He
was
called
in
because
this
is
an
apartment
building
and
we
found
some
violations
that
appeared
to
violate
the
fire
code.
He
did
some
basic
inspections
and
we
found
that
permits
number
19,
2
6
0
0
19
2
4,
7,
1,
&,
19,
2,
4,
7
0
still
had
not
been
final
by
the
building
department
and
at
that
point,
in
time
we
were
sending
a
notice
of
hearing
the
permit
number
19,
2,
6,
0
0
shows
that
it
will
be
expiring
on
August
19th
of
this
year,
I
don't
off
the
top
of
my
head.
F
I'll
have
to
look
in
the
computer
to
see
exactly
what
that
permits
for
the
property
management
company
might
be
able
to
explain
that
part
better.
On
June
30th,
the
Notice
of
Hearing
was
mailed
and
we
did
get
the
green
cards
back
from
the
property
management
company
on
July
or
June
26th
I
posted
the
property
and
an
affidavit
of
the
posting
was
signed.
We
conducted
a
final
inspection
on
the
property
yesterday
and
today
we
checked
those
3
permits
again.
They're
still
not
been
signed
off
its
final,
so
they're
still
open
permits.
F
We
don't
have
any
way
to
know
if
the
works
been
done
up
to
code,
because
the
permit
hasn't
been
final
as
far
as
any
of
the
fire
violations,
which
are
code,
7,
12,
captain
Katie,
was
here
just
before
the
meeting
and
he
advised
all
of
those
are
in
compliance.
So
section
7
12
is
not
for
the
board's
consideration
as
they
are
all
in
compliance.
F
So
at
this
point
in
time
the
only
violations
that
are
before
the
board's
consideration
is
city
code,
6
1,
which
allows
me
to
adopt
the
Florida
Building
Code
under
a
2017
Florida,
Building,
Code
and
105.1
Witcher
permits
are
required
in
the
city
requires
that
those
permits
be
completed
to
fruition
and
basically
signed
off
on,
and
that,
as
of
yesterday,
has
not
occurred.
So
at
this
point,
that's
all
the
city.
Has
you
guys
have
the
pictures,
but
I
can
put
him
up
if
you
want,
but
mainly
what
it
was
dealing
with.
F
E
E
H
F
E
H
E
L
E
F
You
just
my
part,
consists
of
having
the
final
inspection
signed
off
on
by
the
building
inspector
as
soon
as
all
of
your
open
permits
or
signed
off
on,
then
the
code
case
is
closed.
So
whatever
is
required
for
those
those
three
permits
to
be
finaled,
that's
and
it
could
be
different
things
because
I
believe
one
of
them
is
electrical
and
then
one
of
them
deals
with
the
air
conditioning
and
once
those
are
signed
off
on
the
code
case
would
be
compliant.
Okay,.
L
L
L
You
know,
giving
us
the
runaround,
or
you
know
we're
trying
as
hard
as
we
can
to
try
to
get
these
things
done,
but
I
think
it's
based
on
the
you
know,
coronavirus
things
have
just
kind
of
slowed
to
a
very
slow
pace,
we're
a
property
management
organization
and-
and
it's
just
getting
much
much
harder
to
get
things
done
quickly.
So
we
sincerely
apologize.
We
want
to
close
this
out
as
quickly
as
possible,
but
because
of
the
coronavirus,
it
has
slowed
a
lot
of
these
things
down,
but
I've
already
spoken
to
both
the
electrical
contractor.
L
I've
spoken
to
the
AC
contractor.
We
they've
already
promised
me
that
they'll
get
down
there
within
no
later
than
next
week.
From
that
point
on,
they
can't
give
me
an
exact
date
but
I'm
just
asking
for
an
additional.
You
know
30
days
to
close
out
the
remaining
permits
and
also
fix
the
side,
and
that
can
also
be
done
right
away.
I'm
gonna
have
somebody
probably
go
out
this
weekend,
just
to
finish
the
siding,
and
that
is
the
last
remaining
cut
out
in
the
building.
L
So
we
sincerely
apologize
for
the
delays,
but
we
would
like
to
get
this
closed
out
as
soon
as
possible,
but
I
need
an
additional
30
days
on
closing
the
permits
out
and
having
to
reinfection.
However,
we're
going
to
do
that.
That's
another
thing
to
is
the
counties
are
not
you
know,
so
it's
also
moving
slowly
on
that
side
too.
So.
D
Of
the
permits,
what
had
happened
was
with
19
2600.
It
was
initially
disapproved,
and
then
it
was
interior
that
they
also
had
to
go
in
and
because
of
the
floor
on
the
virus.
The
vendor
was
refusing
to
go
inside
of
the
building.
There's
I
think
six
tenants
living
in
there,
but
now
they
are
back
to
work
and
he
said
he
had
until
August
19th
to
close
it
out.
E
F
F
Do
actually
I
just
looked
at
the
permits
and
1924
71
is
actually
expired.
That
was
one
of
the
mechanical
permits,
so
it
looks
like
they
may
have
to
have
that
one
reopened
same
with
2470
and
2600
is
the
one
she
was
just
referencing
and
it
will
expire
on
August
19th,
so
those
permits
are
expired
as
it
right
now.
D
We
all
say
I'm,
sorry,
we
also
consulted
with
our
Aikens
Ollis,
which
is
the
general
contractor
who
actually
met
with
us
yesterday
and
told
us
he
would
step
in
if
we
had
any
further
pushback
from
the
vendors
that
we're
dealing
with.
So
we
got
another
general
contractor
is
out
just
to
help
us
along,
as
we
don't
understand,
a
lot
of
what
you
discussing
with
the
permits
and
what
is
needed.
J
E
E
C
C
J
E
J
J
D
B
I'm
sorry,
I
you're,
you
click
for
just
a
second,
so
the
property
owner
zoe
koey
at
47,
West
Hartford
Avenue,
has
been
found
in
violation
of
city
code,
section
6-1
in
the
Florida
Building
Code
section
105.1
and
given
until
August
9
2020
to
come
into
compliance
that,
should
it
not
be
brought
into
compliance
by
that
day
to
find
a
$50
a
day
will
be
levy.
An
order
will
be
entered
within
about
the
next
10
days
and
mail
to
the
property
owner
at
the
address
listed
with
the
property
appraiser's
address.
E
E
E
F
E
F
You
this
is
case
number
I'm
officer,
gas
and
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs
Police
Department
Code
Enforcement
case
number
20,
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
eight
the
address
is
626
units
drive,
the
property
owner
is
mr.
Ken
Sobel
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
or
all
my
photographs
and
one
caveat
to
that.
Madam
chair,
is
we
added
a
couple
of
photographs
today
and
can
we
confirm
that
mr.
F
B
F
Will
do
that?
Thank
you.
So
all
the
photographs
are
exhibit
number
one
exhibit
number
two.
All
of
our
notices
to
include
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice.
A
hearing
exhibit
three
administrative
documents
case
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records.
It's
the
incident
detail
report,
which
was
the
Associated
police
case
report
that
was
done
with
this.
F
We
have
had
contact
with
the
owner,
both
via
phone
calls
and
in
person.
This
case
originally
started
out
with
detective
Miller,
and
all
that
asked
him
some
questions
here
at
the
end
On
January
9th
of
this
year.
The
initial
inspection
was
done.
He
forwarded
me
a
case
through
our
system
I
believe
it
was
related
to
a
police
call
at
the
address.
He
also
sent
me
some
pictures
at
that
time
which
are
already
presented.
The
pool
is
being
not
sanitary
was
Green
not
being
maintained.
The
interior,
the
house
was
unsanitary,
the
property
is
not
being
maintained.
F
There
was
trash
and
debris
on
the
property
at
that
time
before
he
was
in
detectives
officer.
Miller
reported
that
case
under
ts,
20
865
I
had
since
been
out
to
the
property
and
seen
the
exterior
of
it.
Until
today,
I
had
not
been
inside
of
the
house,
so
on
January
13th
we
mailed
the
Notice
of
Violation.
It
was
returned
unclaimed
on
April
6th
of
this
year,
I
conducted
the
re-inspection,
the
the
I'm
sorry
I,
didn't
conduct
the
reinfection
officer.
Macisaac
had
gone
out
there
for
her.
F
F
They
have
to
be
enclosed,
304
point
one
general
exterior
the
structure
has
to
be
intact
ceiling,
can't
fall
down,
walls
can't
be
coming
apart,
304
point,
10
deals
with
the
stairs
the
decks
and
the
balconies,
and
the
staircase
is
basically
one
of
the
main
ones
on
the
southern
side
of
the
house
is
nearly
falling
off
of
the
house
kind
of
scary
to
walk
up.
Actually,
the
304
0.12
of
IPM
C
deals
with
the
handrails
and
the
guardrails
three
or
four
point.
Six
again.
F
The
exterior
walls
in
particular
have
to
be
painted
coated
and
watertight
the
general
interior.
The
house
was
in
disarray
and
very
uncapped,
which
is
305
point
one
of
the
IPM
c300
8.1
just
deals
with
the
accumulation
of
rubbish
and
garbage,
and
then
at
the
time
the
trash
cans
were
still
out
on
the
curb
I
honestly
didn't
notice
that
today,
I
wasn't
looking
for
that
at
the
time.
E
E
F
F
D
F
Hang
on,
let
me
stop
sharing,
so
you
guys
can
see
circum
or
detective
Miller
detective
Miller,
these
photographs
dated
January
9th
of
2020.
These
are
taken
by
you.
Correct!
Does
their
work
to
the
best
of
your
knowledge?
Do
they
accurately
represent
the
the
condition
of
the
house
and
the
property
at
the
time
you
took
those
photographs?
Yes,
they
do.
Okay,
thank
you.
Let
me
go
back
to
screen
sharing
on
those,
so
this
is.
This
is
the
pool
area,
as
you
can
see,
it's
a
fairly
bad
shape.
F
It's
green
obviously,
and
it's
not
sanitary
and
the
pump
is
not
functioning
matter
of
fact.
When
I
went
out
there
today
there
was
some
wildlife
swimming
around
inside
the
pool,
fish
and
tadpoles.
This
is
the
exterior
the
house
there's
a
lower
portion
of
it
here,
showing
some
of
the
trash
and
debris.
It's
kind
of
differ
deceive
it
in
this
carport
area,
some
of
the
ceiling
is
falling
down.
You'll
see
some
better
pictures
of
that
here
in
a
minute,
as
we
scroll
through
the
photographs,
another
picture
of
the
patio
area
in
the
pool.
E
F
So
these
are
still
the
ones
that
were
taken
at
January,
9th
by
detective
Miller.
This
is
the
inside
of
the
carport
and,
as
you
can
see
here
and
as
a
matter
of
fact,
you'll
see
I
think
I
have
some
more
recent
pictures
of
this.
These
holes
have
gotten
significantly
larger,
because
I
believe
mr.
sovel
even
told
me
today
that
there's
a
leak,
so
it's
causing
it
and
above
this
is
living
area.
F
This
is
a
staircase,
it's
very
hard
to
depict
this
in
pictures,
but
this
is
at
a
significant
angle
and
you
can
see
this
is
actually
not
attached
anymore
up
in
the
area
up
here
and
a
couple
of
those
I
think
this
board.
Actually,
if
you
step
on
this
end,
the
board
flips
up
and
cantilevers
on
you
I
mean
it's,
it's
an
interesting
staircase
to
go
up
at
best
and
that's
the
main
the
primary
living
area
is
upstairs.
Mr.
F
sovel
was
staying
downstairs
when
we
met
with
him
exterior
the
house
again,
these
were
I,
don't
have
corporal
MacIsaac
here.
This
was
an
April
photograph
that
he
took
and
was
forwarded
to
me
of
the
pool
of
just
basically
showing
it
still
was
uncapped.
These
photographs
were
taken
again
by
Detective
Miller
when
he
went
out
there
on
one
of
the
recovered
juvenile
runaway
calls
at
the
house.
Just
some
brief
picture
for
the
interior,
the
house
large
hole
in
the
wall
over
here.
F
F
So
this
is
the
I
believe
that
northern
side
of
the
house,
showing
the
debris,
the
pool,
pump,
filter,
there's
a
filter
laying
on
the
ground
right
here
and
some
other
trash
and
debris
earlier
I
said
I
would
show
you
some
pictures
or
these
small
holes
have
become
bigger.
Well,
these
are
the
big
hole
and
then
again
the
pool-
and
at
this
point
that's
all
the
photographs
that
I
have
from
the
city.
E
M
M
Most
of
the
garbage
has
been
picked
up
as
a
matter
of
fact.
I
filled
four
cans
of
garbage
last
night
and
put
them
out
we
collected,
and
there
is
some
more
around,
but
that's
relatively
easy
to
pick
up.
I
also
repaired.
The
screening
of
the
of
the
pool
that
was
broken
and
but
the
staircase
is
a
big
one.
M
E
E
F
This
isn't
a
new
case
with
mr.
sovel
we've
had
prior
ones,
with
the
property
not
being
maintained
and
as
a
public
nuisance.
It's
kind
of
an
ongoing
issue,
I'm
looking
at
a
case
from
February
of
2019,
primarily
at
that
time
it
was
exterior
issues
for
the
most
part
they
were
taken.
Care
of
I've
had
numerous
neighbor
complaints
about
the
pool.
Unfortunately,
I
can't
go
into
the
backyard
without
someones
permission,
so
it
wasn't
until
the
officers
went
out
and
conducted
a
welfare
check
on
mr.
F
sovel
was
the
primary
reason
why
detective
Miller
was
out
there
to
check
his
status
that
we
were
able
to
see
the
condition
of
the
pool.
So
it's
not
just
something:
that's
been
the
last
month.
This
has
been
significant
and,
as
a
matter
of
fact,
I
believe,
but
detective
Miller
would
have
to
answer
this.
Did
you
have
any
contact
with
him
in
January
January.
I
I
Did
make
a
comment
about
the
just
the
condition
of
the
pool
the
upkeep
of
the
property,
because
I
did
have
to
go?
I
was
escorted
by
attendant
at
the
time
up
those
stairs.
He
south
side
of
the
house
and
I
noticed
that
as
I
was
walking
up,
they
were
a
canted
to
the
right
hand.
Side
though
I
had
to
stay
on
the
left
hand
side.
So
you
know
I
was
worried
about
this.
There
was
collapsing
that
was
a
primary
means
of
entrance
and
egress
up
to
the
living
quarters.
Up.
I
G
A
E
F
Actually
I
mean
the
other
caveat
to
this,
because
there's
a
few
of
them
with
us
he's
renting
out
this
property,
which
is
unfortunately
going
to
become
another
code
case
that
we
discovered
through
our
investigations,
and
so
this
house
is
bordering
on
one
unsanitary.
I'm
gonna
have
to
get
the
building
department
involved,
possibly
for
structural
issues.
So
I
referred
him
today
to
Beth
to
try
to
see
if
there's
some
senior
help
places
that
might
be
able
to
help
him
get
this
taken
care
of.
F
But
it's
rapidly
approaching
the
possibility
of
becoming
condemnable
because
it
is
in
pretty
serious
shape.
So
I,
don't
necessarily
know
if
there's
a
lot
of
time
or
it's.
You
know
large
fines
that
are
gonna,
motivate
that
because
of
a
situation
but
I
think
that
he's
got
to
start
dealing
with
this
within
the
next
30
to
45
days
and
as
far
as
the
fine
goes
I'll
leave
that
strictly
to
the
board
for
their
thoughts
on
that.
A
H
H
E
B
Silva
you've
been
found
in
violation
of
the
cited
code
sections
you've
been
given
until
September
2nd
of
this
year
to
bring
the
property
and
compliance.
Should
you
fail
to
do
it
by
September,
2nd,
there's
going
to
be
a
$25
a
day?
Fine,
the
board
will
enter
an
order
that
a
work
will
be
issued
within
the
next
10
days
and
sent
to
you
at
your
home
address
at
6:20.
Six
units
drive.
If
you
have
any
questions
about
what
has
happened
today
feel
free
to
call
the
code
enforcement
department
now
for
the
hearing.
E
K
E
K
B
Gonna
be
fine,
I,
don't
have
the
paperwork
but
he's
testifying
under
oath
that
he
has
the
he
has
the
consent.
So
that's
fine,
yeah
I
just
need
to
swear
him
in
on
that,
so
District
orpheus.
If
you
could
raise
your
right
hand,
I'm
gonna
swear
you're
under
oath,
where
the
customer
is
gonna,
be
the
truth.
The
truth.
B
E
E
E
F
You
officer
Steve
Gaston
city
of
Turpan,
Springs,
Police,
Department,
code
enforcement-
this
is
a
repeat
violator
case
number
20,
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
nine
eight.
It
stems
from
the
case
he
was
established,
which
was
18,
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
five
five
seven.
That
case
was
a
violation
of
a
48-52
and,
as
we
stated
in
that
case,
they
were
simply
established.
There
were
no
fines
assessed.
F
It
was
in
compliance
by
the
time
of
the
board
airing
or
tearing
the
address
is
a
vacant
lot
of
Maragos
with
parcel
number
12
27:15
four
one:
two:
two:
zero:
zero:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
five
zero
listed
owner,
george
and
antonio
core
feeis,
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
all
of
the
photographs
exhibit
number
two
all
the
notices
to
include
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice.
A
hearing
exhibit
number
three
are
administrative
documents,
case
summary
and
previous
board:
orders,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records.
Citizens.
F
Four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five.
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs
all
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
they
were
given
to
the
violator
exact
copies
of?
What's
being
presented
to
the
board,
all
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax,
collector
databases
and
I'll
notice.
The
violations
of
notice
and
hearing
or
sent
return
receipt
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and
I
believe
you've
already
accepted
them.
But
please
accept
these
into
the
record
as
evidence.
F
The
city
has
had
contact
with
the
son
and
his
attorney.
The
case
initially
started
out
on
March
2nd.
We
got
a
complaint
about
a
small
trailer
wood
debris
in
it,
and
also
some
vegetarian
vegetative
debris
dumped
on
the
property
and
the
formas
of
compliments
on
March
or
March,
2nd,
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
the
repeat
violator
notice.
A
hearing
were
mailed,
no
green
cards
were
returned
on
March
5th
conducted
re-inspection
in
the
property
was
in
compliance
on
March
24th.
We
did
a
deferral
to
move
it
out.
F
Request
of
the
attorney
on
a
21st.
The
virtual
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
on
May
29th
close
to
the
property
in
the
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed
on
June
12th
of
this
year.
The
deferral
notice
was
mailed
to
the
property
owner
and
to
the
attorney
for
the
record.
The
property
was
in
violation
for
a
period
of
three
days
from
March,
2nd
to
compliance
date
of
March
5th,
and
now,
if
you'd,
like
I,
could
present
I
have
one
photo
and
I
believe
mr.
F
F
This
is
the
property
in
question.
This
was
the
utility
trailer,
the
vegetative
debris
tree
branches
and
then
some
of
this
other
palm
front
type
thing.
This
was
taken
on
March,
2nd
and
then,
as
I
stated,
it
was
rien
spected
on
March
5th
and
it
was
in
compliance.
So
it
was
a
period
of
three
days.
Where
is
out
of
compliance?
Those
are
all
of
the
city's
pictures
and
basically
that's
the
city's
case
at
this
point
in
time.
C
N
E
E
N
There's
one
photograph:
it
shows
both
the
trailer,
which
is
back
at
the
back
section
of
the
of
the
empty
lot
and
also
some
palm
fronds
in
the
front.
That
was
the
only
visual
debris
that
was
available
at
that
time.
Is
that
right
there
wasn't
any
other
piles
or
anything
else.
It
was
located
on
the
property
just.
F
N
N
F
N
N
C
N
N
F
F
N
N
F
Because,
again,
I
didn't
go
up
onto
the
property
and
for
all
so
just
so
you
understand.
Seamos
4300
was
a
separate
violation.
That's
not
before
the
board's
consideration,
because
it
was
brought
into
compliance
so
kind
of
it's
a
moot
point.
The
4300
and
we're
just
dealing
with
the
tree
branches
more
or
less.
N
F
Don't
have
any
idea
it
could
have
been
dumped,
it
could
have
been
regular
maintenance,
they
appeared
fairly,
dried
up,
I,
don't
I,
don't
see
in
the
picture
where
the
other
tree
is
because
even
the
picture
that
we
haven't
presented
yet
but
I've
been
privy
to
it
from
your
client
only
shows
palm
trees.
It
doesn't
show
any
other
trees
in
the
area,
so
I
don't
know
how
it
got
there.
Oh
I
know
it
was
there.
We
got
a
complaint
about
it
and
it
was
there.
N
F
N
F
N
N
F
N
Sir,
but
on
those
on
those
three
story,
townhouses.
F
N
E
N
The
there's
three
buildings
depicted
on
the
backside
is
the
trailer.
Would
it
have
been
positioned
right
in
this,
where
the
center
building
is
yes,
okay
in
the
upper
right
hand,
corner
of
the
photograph
where
you
see
a
palm
tree
appears
on
the
edge
of
the
screen.
Is
that
the
palm
tree
that's
located
on
the
parcel
which
contains
your
house?
Yes,.
N
N
K
N
K
K
N
E
F
F
The
city
code
doesn't
have
any
provisions
that,
if
you're
doing
landscape
maintenance,
I
don't
know
at
which
point
this
was
done.
Unfortunately,
the
property
has
been
established,
and
so
the
rules
are
slightly
different,
because
the
reason
why
it
was
called
in
I
can't
help
I,
don't
understand
all
those
dynamics,
although
I
I
get
it.
But
it's
unfortunate
because
we
have
been
to
code
board
before
on
this
property
before
and
I
got
the
complaint,
I
went
out,
I
get
that
there's
palm
fronds
that
may
or
may
not
be
from
an
adjoining
tree.
F
So
there's
been
no
qualifying
testimony
as
to
when
the
trimming
was
done
and
how
long
they'd
actually
been
out
there
and
not
that
it's
relevant
anyway,
based
on
the
code
case,
so
I
believe
the
city
has
proven
its
case
and
as
stated,
he
was
not
in
compliance
for
those
three
days
because,
unfortunately,
did
have
the
tree
debris
on
his
property,
and
that's
all
the
city
has
at
this
point.
Thank.
N
I
think
that
that
would
be
considered
normal
maintenance
on
the
property.
Now
I
understand
that
the
city
has
indicated
that
they
have
previously
established
the
property,
but
the
prior
violation
was
for
not
cutting
a
lot,
as
you
can
see,
and
all
the
photos,
including
the
photos
of
the
violation.
None
of
that
exists
here
anymore.
N
The
purpose
of
making
that
argument
is
to
say
that
I
don't
believe
that
what
is
shown
in
the
photograph
amounts
to
a
nuisance
violation,
because
in
the
statute
itself,
that's
what
he
was
charged
with
being
a
repeat
violator
of,
and
it
has
to
establish
that
somehow
diminishes
the
value
or
creates
a
threat
to
health
or
safety.
I
would
argue
that
that
it's
no
difference
than
the
maintenance
that
would
be
done
by
any
other
property
owner
now.
Having
said
that,
I
want
to
confine
the
rest
of
my
argument
to
ask
the
court
mr.
N
cor
feeis
is
fully
prepared
to
pay
the
cost
of
the
prostitution,
which
I
believe
is
approximately
eighty
nine
dollars.
I,
don't
know
if
in
resetting
it,
there
was
additional
fees,
but
if
that
is
the
case,
he'd
be
glad
to
pay
that
I
am
going
to
ask
the
board
to
at
least
not
find
him
as
far
as
these
violations
or
to
make
it
a
minimal
fine
to
speak
to
the.
N
As
my
my
understanding,
you've
been
looking
at
the
documentation,
the
letter
went
out
on
the
second
and
I
understand
how
the
repeat
violators
code
is
interpreted,
but
my
understanding
is
George
corphish,
which
is
the
defendants
father
who
doesn't
live
or
reside
on
the
property
received
it
on
and
opened
it
up
on.
Believe
the
evening
of
the
third
the
morning
of
the
fourth,
he
contacted
feel
right
away.
N
The
property
was
brought
into
compliance
the
very
next
day,
and
then
he
contacted
mr.
Gaston
or
I'm
sorry
officer
Gaston
on
the
morning
of
the
fifth.
So
technically,
the
property
was
out
of
compliance.
As
far
as
the
oak
Orpheus
was
for
the
24
hours,
be
all
of
the
items
that
you
see
and
I
wanted
to
point
out
that
to
the
board
that
all
of
the
items
that
were
on
the
property
were
properly
disposed
of,
they
were
taken
to
the
city's
waste
management
center.
N
Everything
was
properly
disposed
of
with
receipts,
and
it
was
done
on
the
afternoon
of
the
fourth,
which
is
the
day
that
he
received
notice
from
his
father
that
they
was
there.
So
I
say
that
only
again,
not
to
say
that
the
letter
didn't
go
out
on
the
second,
but
I
want
you
to
understand
that
this
is
not
an
individual
that
was,
oh,
you
know
taking
his
time
or
doing
anything.
To
avoid
the
issue
the
minute
he
was
told
that
it
was
a
problem,
then
he
took
care
of.
N
It
asked
the
board
to
consider
if
you
find
him
in
violation
to
allow
him
to
pay
the
outstanding
cars
repaired
to
do
and
not
to
find
him
under
the
circumstances.
I
would
also
make
the
argument,
as
I
indicated
before,
that
I
do
not
believe
that
this
rises
to
the
level
of
a
violation.
Simply
because
you
have
some
palm
fronds
I
mean
it
did
not
impact
anywhere
in
the
neighborhood
or
impact
the
values
of
any
of
the
other
properties
around,
and
it
wasn't
a
large
amount
of
debris
swear.
N
It
was
drawing
rodents
or
causing
any
kind
of
nuisance.
So
those
are
the
arguments
that
I'd
make
and
the
only
other
thing
that
I
wanted
to
point
out
and
I
know
that
the
court,
the
board,
has
indicated
that
you
know
it's
not
relevant
to
this
case.
But
mr.
core
feeis
is
in
a
position
where
he
has
a
neighbor
that
is
quite
I,
don't
want,
say,
litigious,
but
has
made
numerous
complaints
against
property
owners
throughout
the
neighborhood.
N
I
I
want
to
point
that
out
only
to
show
that
he's
making
an
extra
effort
to
try
to
comply
and
that's
why
I
tried
to
point
out
in
my
questioning
of
officer
gassen,
not
that
those
things
weren't
there,
but
so
that
you
can
understand.
You
know
the
size
of
the
piles
and
what
was
actually
being
done
was
maintenance
on
the
property.
It
wasn't
like
he's,
running
up
a
yard
service
and
he's
bringing
trash
home
and
keeping
it
here
so
respectfully.
That's
all
I
would
have
to
argue
today.
N
I
would
ask
the
board
if
you
do
find
him
in
violation.
Obviously
you
will
pay
the
outstanding
cost.
I
would
ask
the
court
but
I'm
starting
the
board
to
to
limit
any
fines
to
a
minimal
fine,
because
he
did
react
immediately
and
he
has
been
taken
in
effort
to
maintain
his
property
in
accordance
with
what
the
codes
call
for.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
J
J
G
E
C
E
B
You
very
much
so
mr.
core
feeis
Georgian
antoniak
Orpheus
have
been
found
in
violation
of
the
cited
Code
sections
for
three
days
and
and
the
board
ordered
a
fine
of
$25
a
day.
In
addition
to
that,
there's
an
87
dollar
affidavit
of
prosecution,
cost
that
has
been
received
and
the
board
has
awarded
those
caught
as
well.
There
will
be
an
order
entered,
it
will
be
provided
to
the
property
owner
at
the
address
listed
by
the
property
appraisers
address
and
it
will
be
sent
within
about
ten
days.
B
E
Now
I'll
try
not
to
get
a
little
bit
ahead
of
myself.
We
have
two
affidavits
of
compliance.
One
does
have
a
prosecution
cost
with
it
and
one
does
not.
So,
let's
hear
them
separately,
please
could
I
have
a
motion
to
accept
item
number
7,
which
is
19
800
439
649,
Kenneth,
Way,
Kenneth,
Lloyd
developers,
I
move.
C
E
B
B
E
B
B
C
B
B
So
a
rule
five
Section,
four
of
your
rules
of
proceeds
that
have
been
affected
over
for
over
twenty
years.
So
the
rule
reads
after
a
fine
has
been
imposed
by
the
board
and
within
60
days
after
the
violation
is
brought
into
compliance.
The
violator
may
petition
for
reconsideration
of
a
fine.
The
petition
must
be
in
writing
signed
by
the
violator
and
include
a
copy
of
the
affidavit
of
compliance
executed
by
the
code
inspector.
B
The
petition
must
include
conclusive
evidence
showing
extreme
or
undue
hardship
in
the
payment
of
the
fine
or
preventing
the
violator
from
coming
into
compliance
within
the
time
period
established
by
the
board's
order.
The
board
secretary
shall
schedule
the
petition
to
be
considered
in
the
board
shall
make
its
determination
based
solely
upon
the
written
petition.
The
board
may
request
information
from
the
code
inspector.
B
The
board's
secretary
shall
notify
the
violator
by
regular
mail
of
the
determination
made
by
the
board
no
petition
for
the
reduction
of
a
fine
will
be
considered
prior
to
the
board's
acceptance
of
an
affidavit
of
compliance.
Under
no
circumstances
may
the
amount
of
the
fine
be
reduced
below
the
costs
of
the
action.
Under
no
circumstances
may
the
amount
of
the
fine
be
reduced
once
a
foreclosure
action
is
instituted.
B
Additionally,
under
no
circumstances
made,
the
amount
of
the
fine
for
repeat,
violation
be
reduced.
That
was
the
reading
of
the
rule
of
four
petitions
for
reconsideration,
and
you
would
now
review
the
petition
for
reconsideration
was
filed,
and
I
would
remind
you
that
there
was
additional
information
or
exhibits
that
were
provided
to
the
board
just
recently.
That
should
also
be
included
in
your
consideration,
as
well
as
City
staffs
response
to
it.
Well,.