![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OgMfTu7FIAE/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board June 11, 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
D
A
E
D
F
G
D
H
F
B
C
F
E
You
Heavenly
Father:
please
send
down
your
blessings
on
this
virtual
meeting
of
the
Turpin
Springs
code-enforcement
board
if
the
board
members
a
clear
sense
of
duty
and
lead
them
to
a
faithful
discharge
of
the
same
direct
them
in
their
deliberations
at
this
meeting
that
all
things
may
be
done
for
the
welfare
of
the
people
of
the
city
of
Turpan
Springs.
This
we
pray,
amen
in
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance
pledge
allegiance
to
the
flag
of
the
United
States.
D
Thank
you
very
much,
I'll,
explain
the
hearing
procedures
and
we'll
make
whatever
adaptations
we
need
to
to
do
this
virtually
it
is
the
intention
of
this
board
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
the
citizens
of
Tarpon
Springs
by
providing
an
equitable,
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
various
codes
within
the
city
of
Carson.
Any
aggrieved
party
may
appeal
a
final
administrative
order
of
this
four
to
the
circuit
court.
Such
appeal
shall
be
filed
within
30
days
of
the
execution
of
the
order
to
be
a
field.
D
Gorda
statute
to
86.0
105
requires
any
party
appealing
a
decision
of
this
board
to
have
a
record
of
the
proceedings
to
such
to
support
such
an
appeal.
The
procedure
of
this
board
is
as
follows.
First,
the
city
presents
its
witnesses
and
exhibits,
after
which
the
alleged
violator
is
able
to
ask
the
city
witnesses
any
specific
questions
regarding
their
testimony.
D
Second,
the
alleged
violator
is
allowed
to
make
a
presentation
and
present
his
or
her
witnesses
and
exhibits.
Then
the
city
can
question
the
alleged
violators
witnesses
after
both
rounds
of
testimony
both
on
the
part
of
the
city
and
on
the
part
of
the
alleged
violator.
Each
party
is
asked
to
give
a
closing
argument
first
by
the
city
and
then
by
the
alleged
violator
after
those
three
steps
are
taken,
the
board
will
close
the
public
hearing
portion
of
the
case
to
discuss
it
and
take
appropriate
action.
D
D
D
D
F
C
F
I
I
I
Thank
you.
This
is
a
I'm
officer,
Steve
Gaston
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs,
Police,
Department,
Code
Enforcement,
the
case
before
the
board
is
to
0-8
zero
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
five,
the
property
address
is
233
Grand
Boulevard,
it's
listed
is
owned
by
233
grande
Land,
Trust
or
Trinity
management.
Corporation
LLC,
which
is
also
a
trust,
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
or
all
of
the
photographs
and
I
also
have
them.
I
If
we
need
to
I
can
share
the
screen
and
you
can
see
them
if
you
don't
have
them
exhibit
number
two
or
all
of
my
notices
to
include
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice.
So
hearing
exhibit
number
three
administrative
documents
case:
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
and
exhibit
number
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
a
copy
of
the
sign.
All
of
my
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
are
exact
copies
of,
what's
being
presented,
the
board.
I
We
thought
they
were
going
to
be
here,
so
we're
kind
of
surprised,
they're,
not
all
of
our
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
I'll
notice
of
violations
and
noticing
hearings
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
as
well
as
first-class
mail
and,
madam
chairman,
please
accept
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
C
I
D
F
I
I
For
a
short
term
rental,
this
case
started
on
January,
8th
2020.
It
was
reported
us
and
we
found
an
Airbnb
short-term
rental
advertisement.
As
you
can
see
on
the
screen.
On
January
9th
of
this
year,
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed
to
them.
We
did
get
the
green
card
return
signed
on
January
29th
a
conducted
or
inspection,
and
we
realized
that
the
property
was
still
being
advertised.
However,
they
did
they
made
an
incorrect
reference
about
the
number
of
days
so
been
going
back
and
forth.
I
What
eventually
happened
is
we
referred
these
folks
over
to
Planning
and
Zoning,
and
they
went
through
a
unfortunately
a
failed
effort
to
modify
their
use
and
become
allowed
to
be
a
short-term
rental,
so
the
case
was
kind
of
put
on
hold.
That's
the
reason
why
it's
stemming
from
January
an
hour
in
June
we've
had
multiple
contacts
with
the
property
owner,
primarily
his
attorney
I'm
working
through
this,
and
up
until
recently,
there
were
still
some
advertisements
out
there.
I
Regarding
this
case,
they've
assured
us
that
they've
taken
down
everything
there's
one
of
them
that
they,
just
unfortunately
they
don't
control
so,
but
it
doesn't
allow
to
make
any
reservations
or
anything
like
that.
So
in
the
interest
of
just
making
sure
that
we
don't
have
any
future
problems
with
this,
that's
why
it's
before
the
board
so.
I
They
were,
they
were
trying
to
change.
It
had
a
conditional
use
to
a
bed-and-breakfast
and
that
was
denied
by
the
Board
of
Commissioners
on
April
28th,
and
then
you
know
the
case
got
brought
back
before
code
board.
So
if
you
want
to
see
the
rest
of
the
pictures,
basically
they're
advertisements
from
air
B&B
and
bookings,
comm
and
then
one
they
couldn't
control
sorry
about
the
sideways
I
can
flip
that
real,
quick.
I
These
were
all
these
and,
as
I
stated,
they
were
advertising
and
initially
for
a
period
of
time,
less
than
the
42
days
or
six
weeks
that
the
city
requires
otherwise
it's
considered
short
term
rental.
So
on
May
28th
we
conducted
the
Rhian
spectra
and
multiple
e-mails
back
and
forth
to
have
all
the
ads
removed.
They
stated
they
were.
Then
we
found
an
additional
one
later
on
that
same
day
and
we
had
personally
talked
to
them
and
told
them
all
the
ads
had
to
be
taken
down,
and
then
we
found
the
one
on
the
28th.
I
At
that
point.
In
time
we
sent
out
the
new
virtual
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
out
on
May
28th.
We
got
the
green
card
back
signed,
then
on
May
29th,
I
posted
the
property
and
the
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed
and
on
June
10th
we
conducted
a
final
instep
inspection
and
we
we
found
no
new
listings,
the
only
one
that
was
out
there
was
I.
Think
it's
the
booking.com
one
which
you
can't
manipulate.
You
can't
schedule
anything.
I
It's
just
out
there
so
basically
before
the
board
is
just
to
establish
them
for
a
violation
of
the
its
the
zoning
25.0
for
which
is
the
residential
mixed
use
district,
which
prevents
them
from
doing
short-term
rentals,
and
since
there
they
were
denied
by
the
Commission
to
change
their
conditional
use
to
a
bed-and-breakfast.
We
just
want
to
prevent
the
possibility
of
any
short-term
rentals
in
the
future,
and
that's
all
I
have
at
this
time.
J
I'll
make
a
motion
in
this
way.
Okay,
thank
you.
I
move,
based
on
the
testimony
evidence
and
facts
presented
in
the
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violations,
section,
25
no
4
of
the
city
code,
residential
mixed
district
of
the
club,
the
Code
of
Ordinances
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
was
and
were
in
full
effect.
At
the
time
of
the
Notice
of
Violation,
respondents
were
in
violation
of
said
code.
However,
they
are
now
in
compliance.
F
D
K
J
G
H
H
K
F
F
F
D
C
I
Right
case
number:
twenty
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
seven
for
the
property
address
is
134
North,
Spring
Boulevard
listed
property
owners
at
Deborah
de
Debra,
a
Mosely,
the
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
border,
or
my
photographs
exhibit
number
two
all
notices
to
include
the
Notice
of
Violation
notice.
A
hearing
exhibit
number
three
administrative
documents
case:
summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax,
collector
records,
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy.
The
sign
is
exhibit
number
four
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits.
They
were
given
to
the
violator
exact
copies
of,
what's
being
presented
to
the
board.
E
And
chair,
which
just
make
sure
that
yeah
that
there's
no
objection
to
the
exhibits
from
the
oh
I'm.
D
Sorry
miss
mostly
do
you
accept
that
these
exhibits
are
being
presented?
You
have
received
copies
of
those.
I
So
this
case
originally
started
February
13th
of
this
year.
One
of
the
other
police
officer
who
advised
me
there
was
a
vehicle
on
jack,
stands
on
the
property.
Any
property
appears
to
be
overgrown
when
I
conducted
my
inspection.
This
is
what
I
saw
on
that
date.
There
was
an
SUV
on
jack,
stands
with
no
wheels
on
it
and
then
also
the
silver
vehicle
right
here
had
tags
that
were
expired
in
December
of
2017
on
February
14th
of
this
year,
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mail
mailed.
I
It
was
returned
unclaimed
on
March
3rd
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin.
The
vehicle
that
was
on
jack
stands
has
since
been
moved.
So
I'll
get
past
that
there's
the
tag
and
that's
all
I
really
have.
As
far
as
pictures
go,
that
vehicle
was
moved
on
in
on
March
3rd.
There
was
still
some
debris
at
the
back
of
the
house,
which
you
can't
see
in
this
picture,
but
it's
behind
the
vehicles
and
it
didn't
appear
that
it
was
being
maintained
at
that
time.
I
On
March
3rd
of
this
year,
a
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
and
it
was
returned
signed
and
then,
due
to
our
current
pandemic
on
March
24th,
we
sent
a
deferral
notice
and
that
was
also
returned.
Sign
May
21st
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin
and
saw
that
the
silver
chevy
is
still
there
with
the
expired
tags.
I
There's
still
some
trash
and
debris
on
the
property
on
May
21st,
the
virtual
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed,
with
a
green
card
return
signed
on
May,
29th,
I
posted
the
property
and
signed
the
affidavit,
and
then
I
conducted
the
final
inspection
yesterday
and
noted.
The
only
violation
that
is
going
to
be
before
the
board
is
for
the
expired
tags.
On
the
Chevrolet.
Now
we
have
had
conversations
with
I
believe
it's
miss
Deborah
Mosely.
They
were
attempting
to
get
the
tags
squared
away,
but
I
ran
them
again
this
morning
and
they
were
still
showing
expired.
I
I
believe
she's,
probably
going
to
have
some
additional
information
for
that.
But
at
this
time
the
only
thing
that's
before
the
board
is
going
to
be
the
40.00
for
the
inoperable
vehicles,
because
8,
40
and
8
52
are
in
compliance
at
this
point.
So
just
40.00
for
the
inoperable
vehicle
for
the
silver
chevy
and
that's
all
the
city
has
at
this
point.
D
D
L
D
L
D
F
N
You
I
just
wanted
to
what
my
mom
covered.
Her
health
hasn't
been
well,
normally
we
take
pride
in
our
property
and
usually
everything's
taken
care
of,
but
when
she
was
in
the
hospital
in
a
coma
for
several
months,
things
to
get
behind
associates
been
out,
so
we
have
been
working
on
the
property.
Like
the
officer
said,
we
got
everything
in
compliance.
N
We
got
the
car
insured,
but
that's
the
only
reason
why
we
didn't
get
the
tag
as
of
yet
so
we're
supposed
to
have
a
check
from
our
tenant
today
and
I'm
hoping
to
go,
even
if
it's
this
afternoon,
if
not
tomorrow
morning,
to
get
the
tag,
because
we
definitely
want
to
be
in
compliance
with
everything.
So
we've
never
had
any
issues
like
this
or
anything
before
and
we
were
working
on
it.
We
just
we
haven't,
received
any
income
from
our
stores.
So
that's
that's
kind
of
put
us
a
little
behind
on
everything.
N
H
K
C
H
H
J
J
D
E
E
I
A
C
F
Can
you
hear
us
yes,
I
can
hear
you,
can
you
okay?
Yes,
can
you
raise
your
right
hand
ii
swear
you
in
please
do
you
swear
from
the
testimony
you're
about
to
give
in
this
proceeding
as
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth.
Yes,
thank
you,
and
can
you
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
melissa.
M
F
I
You
case
before
the
board
is
a
case
number
twenty
dash,
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
seven
eight,
the
property
address
is
612
South,
Grose,
Avenue
owned
by
Melissa
and
Salone,
and
Daniel
Abbott
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
all
the
photographs
exhibit
number
two
are
all
the
notices,
including
Notice
of
Violation
and
Notice
of
Hearing?
Exhibit
number
three
is
going
to
be
the
administrative
documents
case.
I
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases
records
exhibit
four:
is
you
have
a
David
a
posting
in
a
copy
of
the
sign,
all
the
photographs
and
exhibits
ever
given
to
the
violator
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
the
board?
All
notices
were
mailed.
The
property
owner
of
record
is
determined
by
the
Pinellas
County
property
appraiser
and
tax
collectors
database,
I'll
notice,
the
violations
and
notice
of
hearing
or
sent
return
receipt
requested
and
first-class
mail.
And,
madam
chairman,
please
accept
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
D
I
Phone
calls
and
emails
over
time
period.
This
case
started
back
at
February
19th
of
2020.
There
was
a
fence
installed
and
over
with
over
six
feet,
the
front
setback
of
the
fence
was
installed
without
a
permit.
The
finish
side
of
the
fence
was
facing
the
wrong
direction
and
there
was
a
large
accessory
structure
in
the
front
yard,
which
is
also
a
trailer
february.
19Th,
a
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed.
It
was
returned
signed
conducted,
a
rien
spec
shown
on
march
18th
of
this
year.
I
The
shed
or
the
other
structure
is
in
fact
a
registered
RV
and
his
legally
parked
in
a
driveway,
so
that
issue
has
kind
of
been
taken
care
of.
As
far
as
that
city
ordinance,
the
fence
permitted
not
yet
been
obtained.
At
that
point,
moving
forward
into
April
April
20th
I
conducted
a
rien
spec
ssin
had
received
a
call
from
one
of
our
patrol
sergeants,
who
advised
he
was
contacted
by
I
believe
Melissa,
because
the
fence
person
she
hired
did
not
finish.
The
work
turns
out.
I
The
other
thing
it
turned
out
that
the
RV
for
lack
of
a
better
term
out
in
front
appeared
to
have
work
being
done
on
it
like
they
were
attempting
to
connect
to
the
sewer.
There
was
a
trench
dug
in
the
general
direction
of
where
then
I'll
show
you
one
of
the
pictures
of
where
the
RV,
if
you
will
was-
and
there
was
a
trench
being
dug
towards
the
house
and
then
the
the
trailer
in
the
building
at
that
time
had
no
tags
on.
I
It
was
also
on
jack
stands
and
the
fence
was
still
has
had
been
installed
backwards,
as
I'll
show
you
in
the
photographs
on
May
4th,
the
notice
of
hearing
was
male
per
the
owner
request.
She
requested
to
have
a
hearing
for
the
board
and
then
that
obviously
was
returned
signed
by
her
May
14th
I
conducted
a
reinfection.
I
She
did
get
a
fence
permit
issued
by
the
city,
but
the
fence
permit
has
not
had
its
final
inspection
done,
so
it
was
still
an
open
permit
and
the
fence
had
not
been
turned
around
now,
because
we
pulled
in
a
new
permit
for
the
fence.
There
was
an
affected
section
and
towards
the
back,
it's
also
going
to
need
to
be
corrected
because
they
pulled
a
new
building
permit
realizing
it's
not
necessarily
her
work.
I
That
may
have
been
done
and
it
was
done
in
years
past
because
of
the
case
and
the
new
violations
being
opened
on
the
fence.
That
affected
section
becomes
her
responsibility
to
take
care
of
and
get
turned
around
properly.
On,
May
29th
of
this
year,
I
posted
the
property.
An
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed
and
I
did
conduct
a
final
inspection.
Yesterday,
the
fence
was
still
backwards.
It's
still
no
final
on
any
of
the
permits.
The
permit
was
issued
on
April
10th
of
this
year.
So
what's
before
the
board.
I
Right
now
is
a
violation
of
city
ordinance,
36.0
3.
That
requires
that
this,
the
fence
these
these
are
the
stringers
and
what
some
people
kind
of
refer
to
as
the
ugly
side.
It's
the
unfinished
side
per
our
code.
The
unfinished
side
is
required
to
be
towards
the
owner
or
towards
the
property
offenses
being
installed,
and
in
this
particular
picture
you
can
see.
This
is
that
the
newer
appearing
fence
is
the
new
fence
that
was
being
installed.
I
Also,
the
the
6-foot
main
post
right
here
would
not
be
above
the
level
of
the
fence
if
it
was
installed
properly.
So
that's
still
an
issue
we're
going
to
move
past
the
structure,
because
none
of
these
codes
are
in
play
at
this
time
because
she
took
care
of
most
of
that.
So
let
me
get
past
these
and
basically.
I
There's
another
view
of
that
fence
going
farther
back
in
towards
the
backyard.
This
is
the
area
I
referred
to
as
being
existing
fencing
from
prior
to
her
purchasing
the
house,
but
because
the
building
permit
was
pulled
for
this
fence.
This
fencing
back
here
has
to
be
brought
up
to
code,
and
so
that's
what's
before
the
board.
Right
now
is
the
violation
of
36.0
3
and
because
the
fence
was
installed
technically
without
a
without
a
permit,
because
the
permit
hasn't
been
final.
I
6
1
of
the
city
code
was
used
because
I
used
I
needed
to
adopt
Florida
bill
in
code
and
the
Florida
Building
Code
that
was
used
was
105.1,
which
requires
building
permits
for
this
type
of
work.
So
36.0,
3,
6-1
and
105.1
are
the
violations
before
the
board
and
as
of
this
time,
they're
still
in
non-compliance,
and
that's
all
I
have
at
this
point.
I
D
M
Some
time
ago
and
I
I
was
just
replacing
a
few
panels.
I
didn't
understand
why
I
had
to
replace
the
whole
thing
and
turn
it
around,
since
it
was
built
21
years
ago,
but
I
since
I
at
right.
At
this
moment,
I
have
my
uncle
and
family
out
there,
bringing
the
fence
up
to
code
they're,
turning
all
the
panels
around
they're,
actually
putting
up
new
fence
the
whole
thing,
but
it'll
be
up
to
code.
It
should
be
completed
by
tomorrow.
M
That's
just
a
mobile
structure
that
I'm
parking
out
there
and
it's
that
I
understand
that
that
has
all
been.
That
matter
has
all
been
closed.
Okay,.
I
K
H
F
G
G
P
H
J
P
H
E
M
Q
It's
Jeremy
Keller
and
it's
150
East
Palmetto
Park
Road
Suite
704
at
Florida,
three,
three,
four,
three:
two:
okay.
F
F
D
E
D
Q
I
This
is
the
just
a
address,
I
believe
for
the
office,
but
it's
it's
dealing
with
mainly
the
dumpsters
which,
over
on
the
west
side
of
the
property
it's
owned
by
Riverside
partners,
limited
and
Alliance
tax
advisors
before
the
board
is
exhibit
number
one
which
is
all
of
the
photographs
exhibit
number
two
are
all
my
Notice
of
Violation
and
notice
of
hearings
exhibit
number
three.
Is
the
administrative
documents,
including
the
case
summary
property,
appraiser
tax,
collector
records
and
a
letter
from
the
property
owner
exhibit
number
four?
I
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign?
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
are
given
to
the
violator
or
the
exact
copies
of
what's
being
presented
to
this
board.
All
of
our
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record
based
on
the
Pinellas
County
property,
appraiser
tax,
collector
databases,
I'll
notice,
the
violations,
a
notice,
you're
hearing
or
sent
return
receipt
requested
as
well
as
first-class
mail.
Madam
chairman,
please
accept
all
these
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Thank
you.
D
I
I
I
Obviously
the
dumpster
being
overflowed
now
normally
Riverside
Apartments
has
a
compactor
found
out
later
that
the
compactor
was
broken,
so
they
brought
in
a
roll-off.
Unfortunately,
they
were
not
able
to
keep
up
with
the
roll-off
and
it
ended
up
going
into
this
state,
and
let
me
just
set
this
up,
so
we
can
keep
going
so
there
was
basically
trash
piled
up
all
around
on
top
of
and
in
the
general
dumpster
area.
So
at
that
point
in
time
the
Notice
of
Violation
was
mailed.
It
was
returned
signed
I
then
conducted
another
inspection
on
May
15th.
I
It
appears
the
roll-off
was
gone.
They
were
still
having
some
problems,
I
believe
with
the
dumpster
or
for
whatever
reason
there
was
trash
outside
the
compactor
area,
which
is
what
you're
seeing
in
the
photographs.
At
that
point.
In
time,
a
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
and
none
was
returned,
but
the
property
manager
had
emailed
and
emailed
our
office
on
May
29th.
They
posted
the
property
inside
the
affidavit
of
posting
on
June
5th.
I
A
letter
is
received
from
Riverside
Apartments,
which
is
also
included
in
your
packet,
showing
photographs
of
the
condition
of
the
property
around
the
dumpster.
I
did
conduct
a
final
inspection
yesterday
and
saw
no
violations.
So
at
this
point
in
time
there
are
no
existing
violations.
They
are
in
compliance,
but
the
city
is
asking
the
board,
because
this
is
now
I
believe
the
third
or
fourth
time
this
has
occurred
in
the
last
couple
of
years
that
this
property
be
established
because
they
did
and
having
violations
after
the
notice
of
violations.
I
Time
span
had
expired,
so
the
city
is
asking
for
the
property
be
established
under
city
codes,
8
22,
which
is
the
accumulation
of
trash
city
codes,
840
and
852,
which
is
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property
and
the
nuisance
prohibitions,
which
basically
deals
with
debris,
and
things
like
that,
because
it's
and
like
some
of
the
pictures,
there's
furniture,
stacked
outside
and-
and
this
was
even
as
late
as
May
29th.
And
at
this
point
that's
all
the
city.
Q
Sorry
yeah
I'd,
like
yeah
so
officer
gasps,
enjoy
doing
Jeremy
Geller
just
wanted,
sir,
when
you
made
these
secondary
inspections.
Do
you
recall
what
time
that
was
which.
Q
I
Well,
on
May
11th
I
know
was
in
the
morning,
because
I
believe
I
can
go
back
to
the
picture
and
I
will
show
you
yeah,
basically
one
of
the
workers
that
there
was
actually
a
couple
workers.
You
just
couldn't
see
the
other
guy.
He
was
on
the
backside,
as
you
can
see
in
the
photograph.
This
is
one
of
the
workers.
I
want
to
say
was
probably
about
8
o'clock.
Ish
don't
hold
me
to
that,
but
it
was
in
the
morning
and
they
were
out
there
starting
to
clean
it
up
then,
on
May
15th.
I
Q
Thank
you
like
to
thank
the
board
and
thank
officer
gassin.
So
it's
a
lot
of
kind
of
touch,
base
and
kind
of
talk
about
a
little
bit
about
the
history.
We
took
over
management
in
late
July,
early
August
of
2018
and
since
then
I
believe,
there's
only
been
one
trash
complaint
there
may
have
been
prior
to
that,
but
we
weren't
we
weren't
on
the
property
at
that
point
and
then
also
additionally
I'd
like
to
discuss.
Q
You
know
the
the
steps
we've
taken
to
mitigate
this
issue
moving
forward,
but
before
we
do
that,
I
would
like
to
discuss
our
proven
track
record
and
willingness
to
work
for
the
city
in
less
than
two
years
since
we
took
the
property
over,
we
spent
in
Access
of
230,000
dollars
in
substantial
life,
safety
and
capital
improvements
to
the
property,
including
numerous
issues
that
you
know
had
been
not
addressed
by
the
previous
company.
That
was
in
there
and
whatnot,
and
you
know
we
had.
We
have
definitely
shown
a
willingness
to
work
with
the
city.
Q
So
since
we
got
this
violation,
we'd
actually
had
a
management
change
in
process
and
our
new
property
manager
started
on
May
11th,
so
she
wasn't
actually
even
out
the
property
when
it
when
it
happened,
and
she
has
a
very
good
proven
track
record
record
of
dealing
with
operational
matters
such
as
this
one
inexpensive
experience
locally
in
the
area.
Additionally,
just
this
week
we
hired
an
additional
maintenance
tech,
so
that
will
bring
our
maintenance
staff
from
three
to
four
people
and
in
part
of
his
scope
of
his
employment,
we'll
be
dealing
with
monitoring
the
trash
situation.
Q
We've
also
increased
the
trash
monitoring,
so
the
new
manager
has
implemented
a
paid
twice
daily
inspection
and
operation
of
the
compactor,
meaning
a
maintenance
man
will
go
out
there.
He'll
check
I
mean
it's
person.
Scuse
me
will
go
check,
the
compactor
run
it
and
make
sure
there's
room
and
whatnot
they're,
also
logging
when
they
go
out
there
and
taking
pictures
additionally,
she's
implemented
that
whenever
the
maintenance
texts
go
out
to
make
a
call
to
you
know
a
maintenance
call,
they
will
drive
by
and
check
the
compactor.
Q
Furthermore,
we
we
reached
out
to
the
vendor
that
we
rent
the
compactor
from,
and
we
have
the
largest
compactor
available,
a
34
yarder,
and
they
recommend
that
that's
good
for
a
property
that
its
size
up
to
400
units.
We
are
at
304
units
in
addition
to
that,
we've
also
brought
in
an
open-top
dumpster
to
help
alleviate
some
of
the
backup,
because
what
we
found
is
that
people
will
drive
by
and
just
throw
trash
and
if
they
don't
and
then
once
one
bag
is
there
additional.
Q
But
people
will
think
the
contactors
full
and
just
throw
more
trash
on
the
ground,
because
you
actually
have
to
go
up
open
the
door
and
drop
the
trash
in
the
compactor.
So
we're
trying
to
alleviate
that
issue
and
then
the
more
we
talk
I
know
it
was
brought
up
that
there
was
furniture
left
out
at
the
end
of
the
month.
So
at
the
end
of
the
month
is
when
we
generally
have
a
lot
of
our
move
out.
Q
So
our
new
property
manager
is
in
the
process
of
securing
a
another
roll-off
that
would
be
at
the
property.
You
know
whether
it
be
the
25th
through
the
fifth
or
whatever,
that
will
enable
tenants
that
are
moving
out
to
put
their
large
bulk
items
directly
into
a
roll-off
it
either
have
low
size
or
I'll
have
an
open
doors
to
facilitate
that.
So
we
won't
have
these
kind
of
eye
sores.
Q
Additionally,
we've
done
the
following
site
improvement,
since
this
happened,
we've
installed
additional
traffic
signs.
There
is
some
concern
that
there's
a
possibility
of
non-resident
dumping
trash
as
well.
So
we've
put
up
some
signs
to
help
with
that,
as
well
as
we're
in
the
process
of
having
the
rear
gate
fixed,
which
has
been
delayed
you
to
Cove
it
as
well
as
repairs
from
the
security
system.
So
the
cameras
can
monitor
the
area
and
then
we
can
issue
or
enforce.
Q
You
know
the
fines
against
the
residents
that
are
not
complying
because
obviously
the
under
their
lease
they're
supposed
to
be
complying
with
putting
the
trash
in
the
compactor.
We
also
issued
compliance
notices
to
all
the
residents,
reminding
them
of
their
responsibility
to
put
the
trash
in
the
trash
compactor
and
to
not
just
throw
trash
I.
D
C
Q
Spent
two
hundred
and
seventy
thousand
dollars
the
owner
has
rather
but
in
improvements
that
have
been
either
requested
by
the
city,
the
fire
department,
the
utility
companies
and/or,
just
general
maintenance.
You
know,
we've
done
the
erosion
repairs,
there's
been
retaining
walls,
we've
done
trip
hazard
and
concrete
repairs.
This
year
we
had
a
substantial.
You
know:
maintenance,
landscape
maintenance,
I'm
out
there
in
terms
of
lots
of
tree
trimming,
so
we're
very
proactive
when
we
take
it
very
seriously.
As.
D
Q
All
right,
I
guess,
there's
one
other
thing:
I
could
I
guess
I'd
like
to
say
it.
This
is
a
difficult
issue
because
it
is
not
something
that
is.
You
know
stationary.
It
is
fluid.
You
know
we
could
go
by
one
minute,
it's
clean
somebody
throws
trash
and
then
you
know
the
inspector
or
officer
shows
up,
but
you
know
we're
doing
as
much
as
we
can
and
within
the
budgets
that
we
have
to
address
this
issue
as
timely
as
long
as
we're.
H
I'll
make
the
motion
I
move,
based
on
the
testimony
evidence,
facts
presented
in
the
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violation,
sections
8,
20,
8,
40
and
8
52
of
the
Code
of
Ordinances,
the
city
of
Turpan
Springs,
were
in
full
force
and
effect
at
the
time
of
the
Notice
of
Violation.
The
respondents
were
in
violation
of
said
code.
However,
they
are
now
in
compliance.
C
O
F
J
C
G
G
Q
I
Ma'am
thank
you
officer,
steve
johnson
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs
police
department,
code
enforcement.
The
case
before
the
board
is
20.
Eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
two
three
one,
the
property
address,
is
466
East,
Orange
Street
and
it's
owned
by
the
nexi
group
LLC.
This
is
a
repeat
violator
case
I'm,
going
to
cite
the
prior
case
numbers
for
the
record
city
code.
I
8
40
was
established
under
case
number,
17
8
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
4,
8
1,
also
in
2017
under
case
number,
8
17
8,
0,
0,
0,
0,
6,
1,
8,
violations
of
city
code,
8,
40
and
8
52
were
established
for
the
new
violation.
There
were
fines
levied
$25
per
day
and
the
repeat
violator
in
that
case
was
$50
per
day.
Those
fines
have
been
paid
moving
forward.
I
Another
repeat
violator
case
in
2017:
eight:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
seven;
seven,
those
again
were
violations
of
city
code,
eight
40
and
eight
52
fines
of
$100
per
day
were
levied
and
those
fines
were
also
paid
in
2018.
There
was
another
repeat
violator
case
under
case
18:
eight
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
32,
which
was
four
eight
52-
that
was
also
$100
per
day,
and
those
fines
have
been
paid.
I
Moving
forward
exhibit
number
one
going
before
the
board
are
all
the
photographs
exhibit
number
two
are
all
notices
of
violation
and
Notice
of
Hearing
exhibit
three
administrative
documents
case
summary
previous
board
orders
and
the
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
number
four.
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
number
five?
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs?
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property.
B
F
F
F
D
D
F
F
R
D
I
You
moving
on.
We
have
that
contact
with
the
owner
via
phone
call
on
May
18th
of
this
year
conducted
the
initial
inspection
received
an
email
from
the
major
of
operations
at
the
police
department
regarding
possible
criminal
activity.
At
the
address,
when
I
arrived
there
I
noticed
the
west
side
of
the
fence
was
open.
There
was
trash
and
debris
clearly
visible
inside
the
rear
yard.
Also
there
were
some
trash
cans
still
out
on
the
curb,
based
on
the
fact
that
we'd
had
prior
violations
for
the
same
codes,
a
48-52.
I
It
was
determined
that
she
was
a
repeat
violator
and
on
May
19th
of
2020,
a
notice
of
violation
and
a
repeat
violator
notice.
A
hearing
was
mailed,
none
of
the
green
tower.
None
of
the
green
cars
were
returned
to
our
office
on
May
21st
of
2020,
the
repeat,
violin
notice,
a
hearing
for
the
virtual
hearing.
Information
was
mailed
to
the
property
owner
and
that
green
card
was
returned
signed
by
Mary
and
XE
on
May
27th
I
conducted
a
rien,
spec
ssin
and
the
property
was
in
compliance.
I
The
trash
had
been
removed
from
the
rear
yard
on
May
29th
of
this
year.
The
property
was
posted
and
an
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed.
The
property
was
in
violation
from
the
date
of
the
initial
inspection
on
May
18th
until
it
was
complied
on.
May
21st
and
I'll
share
the
pictures
with
you
now
so
this
is
the
street
view
that
I
was
presented
with
the
trash
and
debris
in
particular.
I
B
R
Has
asked
questions
right
now
you
have
any
questions
for
mr.
Gaston
on
basically
what
I,
what
I
would
bring
to
the
table
at
this
point
is
what
criminal
activity
seemed
to
have
been
I
mean.
Was
there?
Was
there
a
call
to
the
police
department?
Was
there
an
officer
that
came
to
the
scene
to
investigate,
or
was
it
you
yourself
personally
and.
I
R
D
K
D
R
R
You
know
it
had
been
overrun,
we're
in
the
process
of
cleaning
everything
out
as
soon
as
I
moved
in
me
personally
me
and
my
fiance,
we
moved
everything
out
of
the
apartment.
The
previous
tenant
left
all
kinds
of
things.
That
was
just
absolutely.
It
was
just
absolutely
disgusting,
you
know,
and
compared
to
now
you
know
we
have
redone
in
the
entire
department.
On
that
side,
we
painted
the
entire
house.
We
we
cut
everything
out
of
that
back
lot.
R
That
was
absolutely
overgrown
like
immensely
and
we're
continuously
doing
these
things,
our
junk
removal
guy,
the
only
guy
we
had
to
that
had
a
trailer
and
the
ability
did
to
remove
those
items.
His
wife
was
in
the
hospital
due
to
again
this
pandemic
was
just
so
hard
on
everybody
and
and
because
of
the
pandemic,
we
really
couldn't
have
I
mean
we.
We
really
didn't.
Have
anyone
else
to
call
I
mean
I.
R
We
made
phone
calls
for
two
days
trying
to
get
somebody
to
get
this
stuff
out
of
here,
and
we
had
no
way
to
move
it
whatsoever.
But
as
soon
as
we,
we
were
able
to
get
somebody
we
over
paid
on
purpose,
just
to
make
sure
that
it
was
done
immediately
and
that
very
same
day
was
the
day.
We
actually
got
the
violation.
R
B
D
I
Basically,
I
think
the
tenant
kind
of
covered
my
case
pretty
well.
For
me
how
disgusting
the
property
is.
This
seems
to
be
an
ongoing
theme
with
the
nexi
group
and
the
properties
with
all
these
repeat
violators
at
numerous
different
addresses
in
the
city,
so
I
think,
based
on
that
moving
forward.
The
board
should
consider
that
thought
process
when
they
establish
the
fine,
if
they
do
find
the
case
to
be
a
repeat
violator
case
and
that's
all
I
have.
In
summary,
thank.
B
R
R
B
R
D
I
J
I'll
make
a
motion.
Miss
Wade
I,
think
that,
based
on
the
testimony
evidence,
facts
presented
and
the
law
that
the
respondent,
the
nxe
group
was
in
violation
of
sections
8
48-52
of
the
top
and
spring
city
code,
from
518
to
521,
until
until
521
and
fine
of
$500
per
day
for
the
three
days
of
$1500.
In
addition,
I
moods
of
the
city
be
awarded
$1,800
a
once
at
118,
no
118
50
50
cents
for
cost
it
occurred
in
prosecuting
the
case.
J
P
F
E
Ma'am,
the
board
has
found
the
you,
in
violation
of
the
section
codes
for
the
three
days
between
5:18
and
5:21
and
$5.00
per
day,
plus
the
prosecution
cost
for
a
total
of
1
600
$18.50
you'll
be
receiving
an
order
with
and
within
10
days,
and
you
yet
need
give
him
or
questions.
You
can
speak
to
the
code
enforcement
after
the
meeting.
Thank
you.
P
F
F
D
F
D
I
I
This
case
19-8
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
one,
seven
six
1404
Meier
Lane.
This
was
a
case
that
the
board
has
already
heard
they
established
the
deadline
for
the
case
to
be
in
compliance
to
look
for
the
data
I
believe
it
was
March
1st
of
this
year
and
on
my
inspection,
the
property
was
not
in
compliance.
I
know
this.
This
property
has
been
an
issue
numerous
times
and
I
have
the
feeling
council
is
going
to
discuss
with
us
the
legal
case.
I
That's
behind
this
I
know
that
previously
the
city
was
party
to
a
lawsuit
involving
this
property,
and
then
we,
the
city,
was
removed
from
that
lawsuit
and
at
that
point
in
time,
city's
counsel
advised
we
could
move
forward
with
the
code
case
for
the
dilapidated
structure
and
as
we're
going
through
here.
I
can
pull
up
some
pictures.
If
you
guys
want
to
see
what
the
structure
looks
like,
albeit
those
are
from
March
of
2019
but
they're,
still
fairly
representative
of
the
property.
If
you'd
like
me
to
do
that,
I
think.
B
I
D
I
P
S
S
S
Yes,
thank
you
so
as
it
was
laid
out,
yes,
I'm,
pretty
sure
that
the
board
is
very
familiar
with
this
property.
It's
been
the
bane
of
my
clients,
existence
on
my
clients,
neighbors,
who
are
also
according
to
this
lawsuit
on
the
Warner's
existence
and
I'm
sure
everybody
that
lives
around
the
corner
as
well.
S
S
We
are
attempting
to
get
a
new
trial
date,
but
in
light
of
the
Cova
19
situation,
that
is
not
possible
right
now,
despite
all
efforts
in
interim,
I
am
working
vigorously
to
try
and
get
this
case
resolved
short
of
trial,
which
is
always
the
goal,
but
basically
my
clients
purchased
them
a
lot
and
attempted
to
build
a
property.
They
retained
a
surveyor
mr.
Beach
to
perform
a
survey
as
to
the
location
that
the
property
should
be
built
upon.
That
survey.
S
S
Part
of
the
dwelling
was
built
on
their
property.
It
turns
out
that
part
of
the
dwelling
was
also
built
on
property
belonging
to
the
city
of
tarpon,
which
is
why
the
city
of
Carbon
was
previously
a
party
to
this
lawsuit.
They
wisely
relinquished
their
claim
to
the
to
the
alley
and
easement,
so
they
are
no
longer
involved
in
this.
However,
that
is
the
central
point
of
this.
Litigation
is
the
location
of
the
structure
whose
responsibility
it
is
my
surveyor
mr.
Shemp.
S
It
has
a
report
that
that
says
that
this
house
is
built
at
least
a
foot
and
a
third
over
into
the
warners
property.
The
warners
are
also
in
agreement
with
mr.
shrimps
report
so
of
this
structure.
When
you
look
at
it,
I
mean
it's
not.
It
is
not
entirely
on
my
clients
that
lot
at
least
a
foot
and
a
third
is
over
onto
the
warners
property.
S
At
this
point
you
know
it
is.
It
is
the
central
evidence,
in
the
case,
location
of
it,
where
it's
being
built,
whether
or
not
we
are
able
to
complete
construction
on
the
property
as
it
stands,
or
we
have
to
demolish
the
entire
property,
the
entire
building
and
move
it
over
to
another
location.
These
are
all
central
points
at
the
case
at
issue.
There
are
many
many
litigants
and
at
this
point
in
time,
I
completely.
We
have
no
argument
that
the
structure
itself
is
not
in
compliance.
Clearly,
it
is.
D
E
I
S
And
I'd
like
to
point
out
that
if
there
were
any
such
things,
they
should
have
been
sent
upon
me.
I
I
have
not
received
any
of
them,
and
you
know
the
city
of
Tarpon
mr.
Gaston,
and
everyone
is
well
aware
that
my
firm
has
been
representing
his
client
in
this
matter.
So
I
respectfully
I
have
not
received
the
affidavit
I
received
the
notice
of
this
virtual
hearing
for
my
client
and
otherwise
I
would
have
been
able
to
to
make
some
some
efforts
to
get
judgment.
S
S
I
Pfizer,
your
client
was
sent
the
orders
and
everything
and
we
actually
have
a
green
card
signed
by
them.
So
unfortunately
it
sounds
like
they
failed
to
give
you
the
paperwork,
we're
required
by
law,
to
send
it
to
the
property
owner,
no
disrespect
to
you
and
your
position,
but
we
have
to
by
law,
send
it
to
them,
and
so
it
look.
Here's
that
they
may
have
failed
to
give
you
that
board
order,
because
it
would
have
been
sent
to
the
same
place
on
trumpet
vine
loop
at
their
address
in
Trinity,
I.
S
I
S
Appreciate
that,
because
I
would
I
would
have
loved
to
avoid
all
of
this
and
kind
of
giving
you
an
update
about
where
we
stand
and
what
the
situation
is,
because
no
one
more
than
my
clients
would
love
to
see
their
dream
home
being
completed.
You
know,
they've.
They
basically
been
paying
a
mortgage
on
a
house
that
they
can't
live
in
on
a
property
that
they
don't
own,
or
at
least
you
know,
foot
and
a
third
of
it.
For
you
know
the
past
five
years.
So
that's
therein
lies
the
situation,
even
if
the.
S
If
the
city
wants
to
fine
us
or
put
something
in
place
that
requires
us
to
take
this
building
down,
then
I'm
going
to
be
forced
to
to
have
to
appeal
it
up
before
Judge
Minkoff
and
you
know,
go
through
certain
steps
to
ensure
that
you
know
we
protect
our
interest
because,
quite
frankly,
my
client
there's
a
foot
and
a
third
of
the
building
that
my
client
doesn't
even
doesn't
even
know,
and
it's
not
on
their
property.
So
it's
impossible
for
them
to
even
to
even
tear
that
down.
S
Another
file,
but
you
know
like
I,
said
there
is
no
need
for
the
prosecution
of
this
case.
You
know
we're
taking
steps
to
remedy
the
situation.
You
know,
we've
worked
in
compliance,
I've
been
in
communication
with
the
city
departments
pranks
and
we're
we're
in
active
in
litigation
of
this.
In
fact,
tarpon
springs
was
a
party
to
this
lawsuit.
So
we.
D
C
S
We
could
get
another
six-month
extension
that
would
be
very
helpful.
There's
I
was
told
by
a
circuit
court
judge
candidly
last
week
at
a
hearing
that
they
would
not
set
my
case
for
trial
for
three
years.
It
wasn't
this
file,
which
is
a
little
bit
older
and
it
was
already
set
for
trial
and
got
kicked
so
I'm
hopeful
that
judge
Minkoff
will
finding
his
good
graces
to
find
it
some
some
time
on
the
docket
much
sooner
than
that.
But
that
being
said,
the
court
systems
as
a
result
of
koba
19
have
completely
ceased
jury
trials.
S
You
know
been
an
expert
witness
in
trials
against
this
survey
or
several
times
before,
and
they
know
each
other
and
they
have
a
good
relationship.
So
in
the
event
that
we're
able
to
do
that
and
come
to
an
early
resolution,
my
hope
is
that
we're
able
able
to
get
get
that
done
much
much
sooner
and
not
have
to
take
this
to
trial,
in
which
case
six
months
would
be
more
than
sufficient.
But
that
being
said,
our
pleadings
were
just
amended
to
include
the
Warner's
to
file
a
cause
of
action
against
this.
S
I
Know
this
was
this
was
just
an
affidavit
of
non-compliance
by
this
board,
as
the
clerk
stated
March
1st
was
their
compliance
date
as
far
as
extending
any
dates.
Mr.
parez
I
think
you
might
need
to
weigh
in
on
this
there's
a
different
process
for
that.
At
this
point,
they've
already
been
drawing
daily
fines
since
at
least
March
3rd,
when
I
signed
the
affidavit,
and
that's
the
only
thing
basically
before
the
board
at
this
time.
Stars
extensions
and
things
like
we've
lost
our
appeal
option
as
well.
E
Believe
so
I
didn't
like,
like
the
other
counsel
spoke-
and
you
know
this
is
kind
of
a
different
situation
and
I
assume
this
board.
Isn't
here
too
often
so,
yeah
I
mean
according
everything
on
Ferguson
is
said.
Is
it
correct
that
this
is
this?
Is
now
the
part
where
we
are
as
an
athlete
of
non-compliance,
and
it's
not
the
hearing
anymore,
so
I'm
really
not
sure.
If
we
can
kick
the
can
six
months
back
well,
especially.
S
I'm
sorry
I
mean
interrupts
no
go
ahead.
Well,
it
respectfully.
That
was
why
I
didn't
make
any
I
said:
I
couldn't
I
couldn't
make
any
evidentiary
objections,
because
I
hadn't
seen
any
evidence.
That's
why,
when
somebody's
represented
by
counsel,
you
have
to
propound
that
upon
them,
so
that
I
would
have
been
able
to
do
that.
Otherwise,
I
would
have
been
on
notice.
Of
this,
I
would
have
been
able
to
make
objections.
That's
kind
of
that's
kind
of
the
line
and
I
could
have
heard
these
things
are
filed
these
things
ahead
of
time
or
like.
D
P
H
G
H
E
Brandon,
yes,
a
brand:
this
is
Patrick
Perez.
If
you
have
any
questions
about
this
post
meeting,
if
you'd
like
to
speak
with
that,
we
or
the
city
attorney.
E
E
S
F
L
P
D
P
D
J
H
P
H
H
D
P
D
D
P
D
F
J
F
J
J
P
H
K
H
F
H
P
K
D
J
H
J
P
H
K
P
D
D
G
L
H
H
P
F
J
P
H
D
D
K
P
D
D
Were
a
couple
there
were
a
couple
of
rules
in
here
that
I
did
not
feel
like
these
properties
adhere
to
so
want
to
make
sure
that
was
taken
into
consideration.
Absolutely
rule
5,
section
4
of
the
code
enforcement
board
rules
of
procedure
States
within
60
working
days
after
the
affidavit
of
compliance
is
accepted
by
the
CEB.
You
may
submit
a
written
request
to
the
CEB
for
complete
consideration
of
a
fine
address
the
letter
to
the
CB
and
sign
it
include
a
copy
of
the
affidavit
of
compliance.
Excuse
goodbye
the
code
inspector.
D
The
letter
must
include
conclusive
evidence
showing
extreme
or
undue
hardship
in
the
payment
of
the
fine
or
a
situation
which
prevented
you
from
bringing
the
property
into
compliance
within
the
time
period
established
by
the
board's
order
to
prove
hardship
is
recommended
that
you
include
the
last
two
years
ex
returns
and
a
personal
financial
statement,
including
assets
and
liabilities.
The
code
enforcement
clerk
will
add
your
request
to
the
agenda.
The
board
shall
make
its
determination
based
solely
upon
your
letter.
D
You
may
hear
it
appear
at
the
meeting
or
hearing
as
the
code
board
members
some
additional
questions
for
you,
but
you
will
not
be
able
to
make
a
statement
in
your
defense.
The
code
enforcement
inspector
Mason
in
writing
information
regarding
the
case
that
he
or
she
feels
is
important
in
order
for
the
board
to
make
decisions,
including,
but
not
limited
to
the
cost
incurred
by
the
city,
the
Secretary
will
notify
the
violator
by
mail.
D
The
board
will
not
consider
a
request
for
a
reduction
of
fines
until
the
affidavit
of
its
compliance
is
expected,
and
then
this
one
is
in
the
last
two
are
important.
Under
no
circumstance
may
the
amount
of
the
fine
be
reduced
below
the
city's
costs
of
the
action
and
under
no
circumstances
may
the
amount
of
the
fine
for
a
repeat
violation
be
reduced.
O
G
O
F
O
F
D
I
K
P
D
J
P
J
Make
a
motion
to
accept
the
city's
recommendation
to
reduce
the
fine,
as
listed
here
from
in
making
the
dates
from
12
1919
to
three
twelve
twenty
at
$84
at
484
days
at
a
hundred
dollars
a
day
for
eighty
four
hundred
dollars
at
prosecution
costs
of
one
hundred
and
fifty
two
dollars
for
a
total
of
eight
thousand
five
hundred
and
fifty-two
dollars.
I'll.
P
D
H
F
That
no
I'm,
sorry,
that's.
H
C
A
D
F
Where
are
you
in
okay,
it's
very
populous?
Can
you
raise
your
right
hand?
Do
you
swear
from
the
testimony
you're
about
to
give
in
this?
Proceeding
is
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing,
but
the
truth.
I
do
okay,
I
believe
Miss.
Is
it
Elena
Harris?
Yes,
okay?
She
was
here
earlier,
but
I
don't
know
if
she
was
still
on
the
line.
So
she
was
here
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting.
So
I
have
no
choice
along
the
line
she's
out
there
somewhere
I'm,
not
sure
why
she's
not
answering
okay.
D
E
D
E
F
J
I
just
have
a
question
in
this
way,
and
that
is
according
to
the
information
we
were
provided
about,
what
would
constitute
fine
reduction.
There
are
very
specific
things
that
should
have
been
provided
in
order
for
us
to
even
consider
this.
For
example,
tax
returns
or
one
of
the
items
listed.
Can
we
take
it
up?
Even
if
those
items
are
not
listed.
E
P
D
T
O
T
Right
well,
my
father
passed
away.
July
1st
I
was
there
during
the
hospital
stays
and
during
his
death
and
I
did
attend
one
meeting
and
when
I
attended
a
meeting
there
was
Beth
and
another
woman
that
had
given
me
what
the
rundown
was.
I
personally,
don't
live
in
Tarpon
Springs
I
live
in
Boston,
Framingham,
Massachusetts
and
I
have
no
idea
about
house
or
whatever,
and
and
then
she
wrote
down
this
amount,
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
right
away,
the
next
literally
the
next
night
or
within
that
time
I.
Had
someone
come
to
cut
the
grass?
T
T
Well,
I
I
called
right
after
that
July
he
passed
away.
I
was
there
in
July
and
I
spoke
to
Beth
and
another
woman.
That
was
there
and
she
even
circled
the
amount
of
money
that
was
to
find
two
hundred
something
dollars.
What
I'm
trying
to
tell
you
is
I'm,
not
a
resident
of
top
and
Springs,
but
I
did
call
and
Beth
took
that
phone
call
and
said:
yes,
we'll
have
mr.
Sweeney
gas
and
go
out
there
and
look
at
the
property,
because
the
grass
was
cut.
O
G
J
D
G
H
F
T
F
All
that
okay,
maybe
I,
can
clarify
this.
For
you,
the
repeat
violation:
fine
amount
is
eight
thousand
six
hundred
twenty-five
dollars.
The
new
violation.
Fine
amount
is
seven
thousand
seventy
five
dollars.
Okay,
I
think
that's
what
mr.
Robinson
was
asking,
plus
the
prosecution
cost
some
ninety
nine
dollars
the
total
for
all.
That
is
sixteen
thousand.
Ninety
nine
dollars
do.
K
L
F
J
C
P
F
H
E
The
your
request
for
fine
reduction
has
been
denied
I'm,
not
sure
if
the
board
sons
will
send
an
order
for
this.
But
if
you
have
any
further
questions,
you
can
contact
the
code
enforcement
Department
after
the
meeting.
Thank
you.
D
D
C
E
A
D
P
P
I
F
Board
of
Commissioners
will
be
meeting
for
this
first
time,
June
23rd
at
their
next
meeting.
It
will
be
a
hybrid,
it
will
be
both
virtual
and
the
Commission
will
be
seated
at
the
dais,
but
there
is
limited
access
because
they
only
have
up
to
50
in
the
room,
so
they
would
have
to
be.
You
know
six
feet
apart
and
all
that,
so
we're
gonna
try
a
hybrid,
both
virtual
and
you
know,
sitting
real
time.
Would
you
have
been.
F
E
Could
absolutely
I
could
just
quickly
add
the
governor
or
the
order
that
allows
us
to
do
the
zoom
meetings.
It
expires
on
June
29th,
so
unless
the
governor
extends
it
basically
everybody's
going
to
be
going
back
to
him
personal
meetings,
starting
July
1
so
like
they
said
the
governor
could
extend
it,
but
basically
we're
only
operating
under
this
order,
because
otherwise
you're
not
allowed
so
I.