►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board April 13, 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
D
E
A
A
Our
heavenly
father,
we
speak
blessings
seek
blessings
on
the
task
before
us
bless
our
efforts
with
clear
Insight,
our
deliberations
with
wisdom,
our
work
with
Clarity
and
accuracy
in
our
decisions
with
impartiality.
We
pray
that
our
work
this
afternoon
will
find
favor
in
your
sight,
amen,
I,
pledge
allegiance
to
the
flag
of
the
United
States
of
America
and
to
the
Republic
for
which
it
stands.
One
nation
under
God
indivisible
with
liberty
and
justice
for
all.
A
B
F
Good
afternoon,
everyone,
the
matters
before
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
code
enforcement
board
are
quasi-judicial
in
nature
and
a
quasi-judicial
proceeding.
The
board's
function
is
to
make
findings
a
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
apply
those
findings
of
fact
to
previously
established
criteria
contained
in
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
code
of
ordinances.
This
is
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
the
board.
F
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
that
the
law
considers
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues
arising
from
the
application
and
the
applicable
code
sections
any
and
all
persons
providing
testimony
at
this
hearing
are
required
to
do
so
under
oath.
All
persons
testifying
at
this
hearing
must
give
their
name
address
and
must
indicate
whether
or
not
they
have
been
sworn
for
the
record
prior
to
proceeding
with
their
testimony.
F
All
testimony
and
questioning
at
this
hearing
must
address
the
matters
that
are
relevant
and
material
to
the
issues
under
consideration
based
on
the
established
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
code
of
ordinances.
If
any
board
member
has
disclosures
or
regarding
an
application,
please
make
your
disclosures
on
the
record
at
the
beginning
of
the
hearing,
which
would
include
ex
parte
Communications
and
any
voting
conflicts
of
interest.
If
there
is
not
a
full
board
present.
F
A
Another
I'll
try
to
sum
up
with
we're
going
to
swear
people
in
that
are
going
to
testify
and
then,
when
it's
your
turn,
the
city
will
give
their
testimony
and
you'll
have
a
chance
to
ask
a
question
of
them.
Then
that's
followed
by
your
giving
your
testimony
and
they
can
ask
questions
of
you.
Then
there'll
be
a
summation
and
the
board
will
make
their
decision
time
if
you're
planning
on
testifying.
We
need
to
swear
you
in.
Please
stand
and
raise
your
right
hand.
B
A
C
G
As
a
companion
and
because
it
all
is
affected
by
the
same
case,
would
be
Mr
Lindy,
Madam,
German,
I,.
G
G
Yourself,
okay,
I'm,
sorry,
my
name
is
Michael
kuscus.
My
office
is
623
East,
Tarpon,
Avenue,
I'm,
also
the
owner
of
the
property
that
is
subject
of
this
case.
Thank.
G
Well,
as
I
represent
Mr
lindiakis,
who
is
on
your
because
it's
all
relative
to
the
same
facts
as
as
the
code
enforcement
officer
would
would
attest.
G
F
F
E
I
would
like
to
recuse
myself
from
this
one.
Mr
Goose
is
my
attorney
family
attorney,
but
another
part
of
his
family
is
also
I
contract
with
him
under
their
Association,
so
I'm
a
contractor
with
them.
G
C
G
C
F
23-800037,
to
the
extent
that
you
have
evidence
to
pres
to
that
is
applicable
and
presentable
on
both.
What
I
request
that
you
would
do
is
identify
that,
as
you
are
presenting
the
evidence
and
then
when
we
move
on
to
the
next
case,
then
request
the
board
to
consider
that
evidence
under
the
next
case,
as
we
present
that
and
with
that
I
would
ask
Madam
chair,
since
the
cases
are
related,
that
we
do
here
four
and
then
five.
If
there's
no
objection
from
the
city
on
that,
no.
I
F
G
I
This
is
not
a
homesteaded
property
on
February
24th,
2023,
I
inspected
the
property
located
at
parcel
number
12,
27,
15,
15,
26
4000280,
due
to
a
citizen
complaint.
This
is
a
vacant
residential
parcel
that
is
overgrown
with
grass
weeds
and
vegetation
in
excess
of
12
inches
in
height,
there's,
also
vehicles
and
trailers
being
stored
on
the
property
that
are
not
allowable.
There
are
two
work:
trucks,
a
commercial,
enclosed
vehicle,
a
boat
on
a
trailer
two
commercial
dump,
trailers,
a
smaller
trailer
and
an
empty
boat.
Trailer.
I
The
commercial
enclosed
vehicle
has
an
expired
tag
from
2006
and
the
rest
of
the
vehicles
and
trailers
do
not
appear
to
have
been
moved
regularly,
as
the
grass
is
growing
up
around
them.
The
property
was
posted
with
a
notice
of
violation
with
a
compliance
date
of
March
13
2023,
a
copy
mailed
to
the
property
owner
via
certified
mail
and
posted
at
Tarpon
Springs,
City
Hall,
a
re-inspection
was
completed
on
March,
13th
and
March
29th,
and
found
that
no
efforts
had
been
taken
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
due
to
non-compliance.
I
The
property
was
referred
to
the
code
enforcement
board.
Compliance
can
only
be
achieved
by
removing
all
vehicles
and
trailers
being
stored
on
the
property
and
Mowing
and
maintaining
all
grass
weeds
and
other
vegetation
below
12
inches
in
height
at
all
times.
It
should
be
noted
there
are
multiple
prior
cases
on
this
property
for
the
same
violations.
A
hearing
notice
was
posted
on
the
property
on
March
29
2023,
a
cop
email
to
the
property
owner
via
certified
mail
and
posted
at
Tarpon
Springs,
City
Hall.
I
The
division
recommends
giving
the
respondent
until
April
27
2023
to
achieve
compliance.
If
compliance
is
not
achieved,
staff
recommends
the
code
enforcement
board,
impose
a
fine
of
75
dollars
per
day,
beginning
on
April
28
2023
until
the
property
is
brought
into
compliance,
Exhibit
2
is
going
to
be
the
photographs
of
the
property
taken
on
February
24th.
I
The
notice
of
hearing
certified
mail
receipt
and
Affidavit
of
posting
exhibit
4
is
going
to
be
the
property
appraiser,
as
well
as
the
tax
collector
and
for
follow-up
after
I
had
sent
out.
The
notice
of
hearing
I
did
have
contact
from
this
gentleman
who
did
request
an
extension
due
to
everything
already
being
said
on
the
agenda.
I
told
him
that
we
could
give
him
more
time.
I
The
vehicles
that
are
on
the
property
actually
belong
to
the
neighbor,
which
is
the
other
case
that
he's
speaking
of
who
has
been
very
ill
and
has
not
had
ample
time
to
get
the
vehicles
off.
They
have
been
there
for
a
very
long
time,
but
since
the
notice
went
out,
he
didn't
get
it
and
he
wasn't
able
to
remove
them.
So
the
city
does
not
have
an
issue
at
this
time,
granting
more
of
an
extension
than
the
27th.
If
the
board
sees
fit.
G
G
Yeah
so
just
bear
with
me:
I'll
ask
the
questions,
and,
and
today
your
testimony
was
that
you
received
a
complaint.
Can
you
give
me
the
name
of
the
complaintant.
I
G
G
G
G
But
it's
incumbent
that
that,
if
that
ever
is
at
issue
this,
the
terminology,
that
a
prior
violator
is
not
really
evidence
per
se
because
of
not
being
able
to
provide
the
information
on
on
dates
or
times
or
prior
violations,
because
a
violation
could
be
something
other
than
any
of
these
violations.
Would
that
be
a
first
date.
G
G
Okay,
because
I've
only
owned
the
property
for
a
certain
period
of
time.
If
there
are
violations
prior
to
my
ownership,
I
I,
you
know
no
problem,
I
don't
want
I,
don't
want
the
I.
Don't
want
this
board
to
suspect
or
or
be
of
the
notion
that
that
you
know
we
ignore
the
ordinances
of
the
city,
if,
if
that
was
something
that
was
prior
to
because
you
look
at
you,
look
at
the
you
look
at
the
the
parcel
ID
number
when
you,
when
you
code,
these
things
is
that
correct.
I
G
Sir
okay,
so
I'm
I'm,
actually
and
I,
spoke
with
with
the
attorney
for
the
city
as
as
as
a
the
witnessed
testified,
the
the
and
this
is
also
I'm
bringing
the
same
testimony
or
the
evidence
with
regards
to
the
next
cited
case.
Mr
lindiakis,
who
is
the
is
my
neighbor
on
this
property,
those
that's
his
those
that
all
that
property,
all
that
equipment
belongs
to
him.
G
He
was
getting
at
the
time
of
the
first
notice.
He
was
going
through
a
kidney
transplant
and
he's
been
going
through
dialysis,
so
his
opportunity
to
correct
the
violation.
Even
though
it's
on
my
property,
it's
his
equipment
and
as
a
neighbor
I
was
not
gonna,
just
grab
a
tow
truck
and
have
these
things
removed,
I,
don't
think
it
would
have
been
fair
to
him
and
so
prior
to
at
this
more
this
a
little
while
ago,
I
had
asked
for
an
extension
30
days.
G
I
know:
Mr
lindiakis
has
been
diligent
in
trying
to
get
some
of
the
stuff
taken
care
of
the
the
the
the
trailers
I
think
the
truck
has
been
plated.
The
box
truck
will
be
removed.
The
dumpsters
he's
got
a
permit
because
he's
doing
some
construction
on
his
house,
some
renovation,
so
we've
provided
copies
of
the
permits,
so
I
think
the
only
issue
at
this
point
may
be
the
box
truck,
but
so
I'm
asking
for
30
days
to
this
be
deferred.
G
Give
Mr
lindiakis
the
opportunity
to
have
his
stuff
removed
from
the
from
our
property
and
I
can
continue
defending
this
matter,
but
but
before
we
move
forward
and
waste
this
board's
time,
I'm
asking
for
a
deferment
for
30
days.
J
F
Aspect
of
it
is
separate,
except
for
the
pieces
of
evidence
that
overlap.
So
the
first
issue
that
the
board
has
to
resolve
is
whether
or
not
you're
going
to
Grant
the
deferment
for
30
days.
He
has
asked
for
a
deferment,
so
you
have
to
rule
on
whether
or
not
you
want
to
defer
this
first
case
for
30
days,
and
then
you
can
decide
if
you
want
to
move
forward.
Can.
F
He
he
has
a
what
he's
quotational
evidence
to
present
to
the
board
regarding
the
the
facts
and
substance
of
the
actual
violations.
D
K
K
D
F
F
F
I
Proceed,
this
is
a
homesteaded
property
on
February
24,
2023
I,
inspected
the
property
located
at
113
West
Cedar
Street,
due
to
self-initiated
activity.
Upon
arrival
to
the
property,
it
appeared
that
much
of
the
large
two-story
house
was
under
construction.
The
roof
was
covered
in
polyglass
sheeting.
There
were
no
soffits,
facial
or
gutters,
and
a
large
scaffolding
was
by
the
front
of
the
residence
most
of
the
windows
were
covered
with
metal
sheeting
and
were
unable
to
be
open
and
the
front
two
windows
were
covered
in
metallic
sheeting.
I
The
site
of
the
residents
had
rotted
areas
missing
areas
that
were
covered
with
wood
boards
and
the
protective
treatment
was
peeling
off.
A
large
section
of
the
protective
treatment
on
the
front
of
the
residence
was
covered
in
green
algae
with
other
sections
covered
in
Tyvek.
Shooting
the
upper
balcony
has
sinks,
buckets
garbage
and
other
items
piled
up,
while
the
downstairs
had
garbage
construction,
materials
and
tools,
a
pile
of
metal,
tubing
and
piles
of
other
debris.
There
was
also
a
vehicle
in
the
driveway
under
a
car
cover
on
Jacks
with
two
tires
off.
I
There
are
no
active
and
open
permits
for
any
of
the
work
that
is
currently
being
done
on
the
residence
a
roofing
permit
was
applied
for
in
2021,
however,
has
since
expired,
and
no
further
permits
have
been
applied
for
Approved
or
issued.
The
property
was
posted
with
a
notice
of
violation
with
a
compliance
date
of
March
13
2023,
a
cop
email
to
the
property
owner
via
certified
mail
and
posted
at
Tarpon
Springs
City
Hall,
a
re-inspection
was
completed
on
March
13
2023
and
found
that
no
efforts
had
been
taken
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance.
I
I
Compliance
can
only
be
achieved
by
properly
removing
all
of
the
junk
trash
debris
and
Outdoor
Storage
from
the
property
or
storing
it
in
a
fully
enclosed
structure
having
all
vehicles
on
the
property
be
in
operable
condition,
with
valid
and
current
tag
and
registration
and
with
the
use
of
a
licensed
contractor
and
proper
permits,
the
roof,
soffit
and
fascia
protective
treatment,
windows
and
doors
are
all
to
be
repaired
or
replaced
to
building
code.
All
permits
are
to
be
applied
for
Approved,
issued
and
finalized.
I
The
hearing
notice
was
posted
on
the
property
on
March
29
2023,
a
copy
mail
to
the
property
owner
via
certified
mail
posted
at
Tarpon,
Springs,
City
Hall.
The
division
recommends
giving
the
respondent
until
May
11
2023
to
achieve
compliance.
If
compliance
is
not
achieved,
staff
recommends
the
code
enforcement
board,
impose
a
fine
of
250
dollars
per
day,
beginning
on
May
12
2023,
until
the
property
is
brought
into
compliance,
exhibit
two
are
going
to
be
photographs.
This
first
one
is
of
the
downstairs
area.
I
The
notice
of
hearing
the
certified
mail
receipt,
the
signature
card
that
it
was
received
and
Affidavit
of
posting
and
exhibit
four-
is
going
to
be
the
property
appraiser,
as
well
as
the
tax
collector,
exhibit
five
is
going
to
be
the
prior
Roofing
permit
that
was
applied
for
in
2021,
and
that
was
expired
after
the
notice
of
hearing
went
out.
I
did
hear
from
the
property
owner
who
again
stated
that
he
has
had
some
pretty
substantial
medical
issues
over
the
past
month
and
did
not
receive
the
notice
of
violation.
I
He
was
going
to
get
with
his
contractors
to
reapply
for
the
permits.
Two
days
ago,
the
permits
were
reapplied
for
the
roofing
permit
was
reinstated
and
the
windows
and
doors
permit
was
applied,
for
they
still
have
not
been
approved
or
issued,
or
anything
like
that
and
the
rest
of
the
property
Remains.
The
Same.
G
Yeah
I,
just
I
I
would
like
to
ask,
because
you
know,
when
you
look
at
the
and
you
look
at
the
evidence,
that's
presented.
Obviously,
if
you
look
at
the
house,
the
house
is,
it
has
been
insignificant,
need
of
repair.
I
just
would
like
to
ask
the
city
if
it
takes
into
consideration
somebody's
Financial
ability
when
it
comes
to
making
repairs
on
their
house.
Is
that
a
consideration
or
health
issues,
because
when
you
say
health
issues,
he
had
a
major,
he
had
a
transplant,
but
he's
been
suffering
from
health
issues
for
years.
G
That
has
culminated
and
was
allowed
him
to
get
a
transplant,
and
and
that's
why
work
was
not
done
from
2021-
is
because
your
health
comes
first
and
then
you
have
to
have
the
ability
to
make
improvements.
You
know
he
applied
to
21
for
a
permit
to
get
this
stuff
done
and
and
when
you
can't
afford
it,
I
I,
just
don't
my
biggest
concern,
maybe
I'm
getting
on
a
soapbox
here
is
when
we
look
at
siding
residents
or
taxpayers
of
this
community.
G
If,
if
a
house
is
in
disrepair,
is
it
a
disrepair
because
they
can't
afford
it
and
then
now
we
are
getting
them
with
a
heavy
hammer
on
top
of
it
and
and
I
apologize?
That's
that's
not
why
I
was
I'm
here
today,
but
but
you
know
this,
we
just
have
to
make
sure
that
with
the
direction
that
we're
going
as
a
board,
that
being
said,
I'd
I'd
like
to
ask
for
the
things
that
we
are
cited
for
other
than
the
this
repair
of
the
home.
G
We
have
are
the
the
equipment
or
the
the
stuff
that
is
on
our
property,
which
I'm
asking
the
same
I
guess
it
would
be
30
days
if
it's
the
11th
to
get
the
the
balance
of
that
that
that
material
off
of
our
off
of
the
our
property,
so
I,
think
you're
I
think
you
might
be
correct
and
not
necessarily
needing
to
deferment
for
that.
But
I
just
want
to
be
cautionary
to
this
board.
G
A
G
F
A
G
K
C
D
Right
now,
yeah
I
move
I
like
to
make
a
motion
I'm
moving
case
number
23;
eight,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero;
three
seven
to
find
the
respondents,
Elias
C,
miakos,
Marvel
and
lindiakos
and
Maria
a
onesies
in
violation
of
the
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs
code
of
ordinances,
section
6-1,
8-40,
8-52,
9-1
and
140.00
FBC
105.1
ipmc,
304.7,
ipmc,
304.13.2,
ipmc,
304.13
and
ipmc
304.2
for
the
property
located
at
113,
West
Cedar,
Street,
Tarpon,
Springs
Florida
34689,
and
to
assess
a
fine
of
100
per
day,
beginning
on
May
12
2023.
D
F
This
so,
yes,
you
do
have
to
open
this
up
for
board
discussion.
Also,
two,
the
I
just
wanted
to
make
clear
so
you're,
finding
it
in
violation
and
and
you're
giving
them
until
the
11th
to
comply.
Is
that
my
understanding,
yeah
and
then
after
the
that,
then
the
12th?
You
would
be
starting
a
100
a
day,
fine
right.
L
J
D
G
F
Those
items
that
have
come
into
compliance
will
be
addressed
when
the
property
is
reinspected
following
the
set
compliance
date.
So
anything
that
is
already
currently
in
compliance
would
not
be,
would
not
be
continuing
at
that
point
in
time,
and
only
those
items
that
are
no
longer
in
compliance
would
be
moving
forward
after
the
11th.
G
So
if
I
have
the
permit
that
the
renewed
permit
and
the
license,
the
licensing,
the
plating
of
the
vehicle
in.
G
F
I
F
A
We're
doing
out
of
order
because
there
are
folks
here
for
this
other
case.
Okay,
sorry,
thank
you.
So
the
next
case
we
have
is
is
number
11,
Rosen,
Allen
and
foward
cozzella.
If
someone
is
here
for
that
case,
if
you'll
come
to
the
microphone
please,
this
is
case
number
two:
two
dash
eight:
zero:
zero,
zero,
zero.
Four
two
eight.
L
I
Studio
present
yes
ma'am.
This
is
a
second
hearing
for
an
Affidavit
of
non-compliance.
The
compliance
date
was
on
March,
16
2023,
and
there
has
not
been
compliance.
Exhibit
one
is
going
to
be
the
Affidavit
of
non-compliance.
Exhibit
2
is
going
to
be
the
board
order
that
ordered
that
date
for
compliance
exhibit.
Three
is
a
photograph
taken
on
the
date
that
was
supposed
to
be
compliance
that
there
had
been
no
changes.
I
Exhibit
four
is
the
notice
of
hearing
certified
mail
receipt
Affidavit
of
posting
exhibit
five
is
going
to
be
the
Affidavit
of
Code,
Enforcement
prosecution
and
investigative
costs
that
we
are
asking
the
board
except
and
then
exhibit
6
is
going
to
be
a
letter
from
the
respondents
attorney.
They
are
actually
requesting
the
board
for
a
re-hearing
of
this
case,
and
there
are
also
two
people
here
that
would
like
to
speak
on
behalf
of
this
case
as
well
on
behalf
of
the
city
as
well,
and
not
their
residents
that
live
next
door.
A
L
Yeah
I'm
familiar
with
that
I'd
like
to
reserve
my
cross-examination
for
a
later
time,
if
I
could
later
on
today
to
save
some
time.
L
You
first
of
all
thank
you
for
allowing
the
applicants
to
consult
with
me
about
their
Homestead
Property
and
just
to
resolve
any
issues.
This
is,
in
fact
their
Homestead.
Under
the
Florida
Constitution
there's
been
some
question
about
whether
it's
homesteaded
or
not.
We
have
to
distinguish
between
the
homestead
exemption,
which
the
city
typically
uses
to
determine
whether
a
property
is
Homestead,
and
that
is
not
the
determination
of
whether
property
is
Homestead
or
not
under
the
Constitution.
It
is
in
fact
my
clients
Homestead.
L
You
can
get
the
homestead.
You
cannot
get
the
homestead
exemption
unless
it
is
your
homestead,
but
the
converse
is
not
true:
I'm
not
going
to
pursue
this
issue
anymore,
other
than
to
say
that
they
do
qualify
under
the
definition
of
a
constitutional
Homestead
and
they
did
apply
for
the
homestead
exemption
for
next
year,
but
just
because
they
didn't
get
it
yet.
For
this
year
doesn't
mean
it's
not
their
Homestead.
J
C
L
Think
the
board
has
probably
hurt
enough,
and
I
would
prefer
to
get
to
the
remedies
to
cure
this
violation.
It's
not
right
for
someone
to
cause
any
drainage
problems
on
a
neighbor.
However,
slight
and
I've
been
involved
with
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
code
enforcement
board
since
the
beginning,
and
the
board
has
always
been
primarily
concerned
with
the
end
goal
to
fix
the
problem.
L
L
L
Her
last
name
rang
a
bell
with
me
and
it
turned
out
her
father.
Carl
montecki
was
the
principal
designer
of
our
sewer
plant
across
the
streets
and
40
years
ago
we
worked
together
when
I
was
City
Attorney
at
that
time,
and
they'd
done
a
very
fine
job.
Just
a
little
passing
inference
might
be
of
some
benefit
to
the
city
at
any
rate
before
you
as
a
plan
to
correct
the
problem,
if
I
could
have.
A
This
we
need
to
decide
whether
to
accept
those
in
or
not.
Has
the
city
been.
L
L
J
F
J
Well,
I
understand
Mr
Elliott's
position
again
it's
the
city's
position.
This
Affidavit
of
non-compliance
I
understand
that
there
is
some
potential
compliance
that
they
that
Mr
Elliott
believes
his
client
can
reach.
However,
again
we're
here
on
whether
to
accept
an
Affidavit
of
compliance
or
non-compliance.
I
think
the
only
question
would
be
whether
or
not
this
board
wants
to
extend
the
time
period
or
accept
the
Affidavit
of
non-compliance.
F
Hold
on
hold
on
just
one
second,
you
entered
the
Affidavit
of
non-compliance
into
evidence,
correct
as
part
of
your
presentation.
Yes,
ma'am,
okay,
and
is
that
to
all
of
the
charges
from
the
original
case
or
yes,
ma'am
just
wanted
that
to
be
clear
for
the
record.
A
F
I
Chair
may
I
State
something
for,
on
behalf
of
the
city,
just
to
remind
the
board
that
we
did
hear
this
for
almost
two
hours.
Our
principal
planner
has
done
extensive
work
on
this,
and
the
only
solution
that
the
city
is
willing
to
take
for
compliance
is
removal
of
the
pavers
completely
and
putting
it
back
to
where
it
was.
That
is
the
only
way
for
compliance
on
this
case.
L
F
So
we
kind
of
got
a
little
far
afield
from
the
way
that
the
hearing
is
supposed
to
proceed.
The
city
presented
their
testimony
and
evidence
regarding
whether
the
property
is
currently
in
compliance
stating
that
it's
not
so
now
we
I'd
like
to
bring
it
back
into
where
we
were
supposed
to
be
to
whether
or
not
you
have
any
questions
regarding
the
city's
evidence
and
then,
if
not,
if
you
would
like
to
present
evidence
regarding
whether
or
not
the
property
is
in
compliance.
F
F
D
No,
this
is
not.
This
is
not
the
venue
for
that
right
now,
we're
determining
whether
or
not
was
the
it's
the
property
in
compliance,
yes
or
no.
The
hard
cut
answer
is
no,
it's
not
in
compliance.
You've
even
said
it
too,
so
we're
not
here
to
determine
how
to
fix
it.
That's
beyond
this
board
right
here.
L
I
know
your
first
name
is
Sherry.
Is
that
right,
Cindy,
Cindy,
Cindy?
Okay,
you
have
the
documents
I
supplied
to
the
board,
there's
a
picture
of
a
dove
of
a
property
at
145
North
ring.
A
L
I
F
F
L
F
Where,
where
we
are
we're
looking
to
determine
whether
or
not
you're
going
to
impose
the
fine
for
failure
to
be
in
compliance
by
the
date
that
was
set,
when
you
determine
the
fine
amount,
the
code
provides
that
you're
to
consider
three
factors:
the
gravity
of
the
violation,
any
actions
by
The
Violator
to
correct
the
violation
and
any
previous
violations
committed
by
The
Violator.
Those
are
the
three
criteria
that
you
use
to
evaluate:
how
much
of
a
fine
you
can
impose
pursuant
to
your
code
and
state
law
on
a
first-time
violation.
F
The
most
amount
of
the
co
of
of
a
fine
that
you
can
impose
is
250
dollars
per
day
on
a
first-time
violation
per
violation.
Okay,
the
city
is
requesting
lower
than
the
highest
fine
amount,
which
was
is
a
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
so
right
now
it
would
be
permissible
for
him
to
present
evidence
that
goes
to
these
three
factors,
which
again
are
the
gravity
of
the
violation
actions
taken
by
the
Violator
to
correct
to
the
violation
and
any
previous
violations
committed
by
The
Violator.
F
L
L
I
H
A
F
N
Yes,
I
have
been
sworn,
my
name
is
Roger
green
I
live
at
133,
North
ring
Tarpon,
Springs
and
I
am
the
neighbor
of
Mr
Fred,
and
we
lived
there
for
approximately
a
year
went
through
the
wet
season,
never
had
any
flooding,
no
issues
when
I
bought
this
property.
It
had
proper
fall
away
from
my
structure.
The
water
was
being
directed
away
from
my
property
when
I
came
back
from
being
out
of
town
in
October,
I
came
back
and
all
along
the
side
of
my
garage
was
pavers
and
I'm,
a
general
engineering
contractor.
N
N
They
said
well
we're
going
to
change
we're
going
to
rectify
it
it
so
after
a
month
or
so
they
finally
came
back
in
and
they
finished
the
rest
of
the
papers
that
came
in
and
it's
even
worse
because
they
built
it
up.
The
drainage
goes
around
the
side
of
my
house.
Now
it's
built
up
where
it
can't
drain.
It
created
a
dam.
So
now
the
water
is
flooding
on
the
back
side
of
my
garage,
the
water,
that's
on
the
other
side
of
the
garage
is
all
coming
down
being
directed
all
into
my
garage
I.
N
When
I
I
noticed
that
we'd
had
flooding
in
the
garage,
because
I
could
see
where
water
washed,
underneath
my
garage
prior
to
the
main
event
rain
that
we
had,
and
it
flooded
my
garage
this
next
one,
the
big
storm
that
came
through
and
I'm,
not
quite
sure
of
the
date
that
it
was,
but
that
rain
came
through
and
the
little
drains
and
all
the
drains
she
had
was
overwhelmed.
Nothing
was
draining
the
water
was
all
being
directed
to
my
house.
I
went
into
the
garage.
N
Water
is
Flowing
under
my
floor,
I'm
having
to
remove
stuff
and
put
on
boxes
and
trying
to
preserve
everything
and
then
once
the
rain
subsided,
then
I
had
the
task
of
drying
and
cleaning
everything
I
have
a
brand
new
fan,
a
ceiling
fan
that
was
damaged
because
it
was
in
the
rain.
It
got
wet
and
my
biggest
concern
is
if
this
has
been
going
on
since
October.
This
has
been
extended
in
December.
N
N
My
property
values
have
plummeted
because
of
the
fact
that
now
that
I
have
to
disclose
that
my
property
has
been
flooded
and
if
it's
not
resolved
the
issues
it's
going
to
flood
again
and
how
can
I
sell
a
property
and
and
not
sign
a
the?
You
know
saying
that
it's
it's
not
going
to
flood
again
and
so
I,
you
know
I
just
I
feel
like
this
is
wrong
and
I
I
apologize
to
vent
on
you
and
I.
N
F
I
don't
know
if
the
city
had
any
questions
for
the
witness.
Okay.
C
D
D
To
find
the
respondents,
Roseanne
hollun
and
faud
kazala
as
a
repeat
violator
and
violation
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
codes,.
D
D
To
find
the
respondents
rosenie
howloon
and
food
kazila
did
not
correct
the
violations
on
or
before
16
March
2023
for
the
property
located
at
131.
North
ring
Avenue,
Tarpon,
Springs
Florida
34689,
and
to
accept
the
Affidavit
of
non-compliance.
B
P
H
O
P
D
F
The
property
has
been
found
still
not
to
be
in
compliance.
A
fine
has
been
imposed,
retroactive
to
March,
16
2023,
the
date
that
was
set
for
compliance
and
a
lien
will
be
recorded
on
this
property
on
the
date
that
you
do
bring
the
property
into
compliance.
You
may
call
and
request
a
re-inspection
from
the
city.
F
L
F
L
I
A
F
Q
At
last
month's
code
enforcement,
Board
hearing
attorney
Salzman
stated
that
the
case
would
be
placed
on
status
for
this
this
today's
hearing,
and
at
that
time
we
would
work
together
with
the
city
to
obtain
compliance
and
I
want
to
State.
For
the
record
that,
with
that
statement
being
made,
we
we
reached
out
directly
to
the
city
to
determine
what
what
would
be
required
to
obtain
compliance.
At
no
point
did
the
city
work
with
us,
as
was
stated
by
attorney
Salzman.
We
submitted
documentation,
we
submitted
emails.
Q
We
submitted
reports
so
we're
here
today
to
resolve
this
to
to
come
into
compliance.
However,
we
were
never
given
that
opportunity
and
that's
what
was
heard
at
last
month's
hearing
before
the
board.
D
I
Regarding
last
hearing,
they
did
request
a
re-hearing.
It
was
before
the
board.
Last
month,
however,
we
extended
the
request
for
hearing
only
to
this
month,
because
their
attorney
had
stated
they
were
going
to
come
into
compliance.
The
only
any
kind
of
communication
we
have
had
from
their
attorney
was
only
the
request
for
a
re-hearing
which
is
on
this
agenda,
so
they
do
have
a
request
for
a
reheat.
L
J
J
F
F
Move
all
right
this
here
hearing
is
over.
As
to
the
compliance,
the
board
has
already
voted,
that
it
is
out
of
compliance
and
they
have
the
impose
defined
to
316..
Last
month's
hearing
was
on
3-9,
which
was
still
prior
to
the
date.
That
was
in
the
original
order.
There
was
nothing
that
happened
at
the
last
hearing
that
abrogated
the
original
order
of
the
board,
which
set
a
compliance
state
of
316..
F
D
F
B
F
A
A
I
This
is
going
to
be
a
follow-up
hearing,
a
second
hearing
for
an
Affidavit
of
compliance.
The
board
gave
two
different
orders
when
you
heard
this
last
time,
one
order
was
to
make
sure
that
the
property
was
boarded
up
securely
and
have
the
building
inspector
inspect
it.
That
is
what
we
are
hearing
today.
I
I
A
R
My
understanding
on
the
bifurcation
of
the
issue
remains
that
there
were
two
items,
one
being
a
safety
concern
which
the
association
was
given
the
the
minimum
time
frame
to
comply
with
which
the
Affidavit
of
compliance
is
to
be
entered
today
and
I
don't
have
any
questions
or
concerns.
Regarding
that
the
code
enforcement
case
I
understand
is
not
a
separate
numbered
case.
R
The
same
case
same
case
number
same
everything.
It.
F
Is
under
the
same
case
number,
but
there
were
several
things
that
they
had
to
do:
Under
the
previous
order,
so
they
already
have
the
affidavit
as
to
the
the
one
specific
issue:
the
safety
correct,
the
life
health
safety
issue
that
they've
come
into
compliance
with
that
particular
aspect.
What
they're
asking
to
do
is
to
present
evidence
of
compliance
as
to
the
second
issue,
in
the
hopes
that
that
they
don't
have
to
pay
essentially
to
have
their
attorney
return
to
next
month's
hearing.
To
present
on
that
second
issue
and.
I
Their
date
of
compliance
for
the
second
set
of
the
orders
was
April
10th
several
days
ago.
They
are
not
in
compliance
per
statute.
162
I
have
to
give
them
a
10-day
notice
for
a
hearing
when
they
are
not
in
compliance
due
to
it
only
being
three
days
ago.
That
does
not
give
you
10
days.
So
that's
why
it
has
to
be
on
the
next
Board
hearing,
but
as
of
today,
they
are
not
in
compliance
with
that.
Okay,.
E
I
moved
to
pardon
me:
I
moved
that
case
number
23-8000019.
O
A
I
F
Right
since
that
was
not
set
today,
we,
you
know
we'll,
go
ahead
and
hear
evidence
as
to
that
and
the
the
criteria
from
the
code
at
the
next
month's
hearing.
F
A
R
R
To
the
extent
that
we've
received
of
having
received
a
notice
yet
would
this
would
the
city
be
willing
to
accept
submission
of
the
document
today,
as
a
stipulation
related
to
the
association's
attempts
at
compliance
at
the
case
that
has
currently
been
called
there?
Having
been
no
bifurcation
of
the
case
numbers,
we
are
submitting
evidence
relative
to
a
case
number,
that's
currently
before
the
committee,
but.
R
We
are
here
on
that
code
issue.
I
would
like
to
submit
that
evidence
to
the
board
for
consideration
that
at
this
time,
not
only
have
we
executed
a
contract
for
full
remediation
of
the
issue,
but
that
we
have-
and
we
can
have
testimony
to
this
effect,
that
promises
from
the
contractor
for
full
submission
and
compliance
with
the
request,
which
is
permit
submission
I'd,
be
happy
to
have
that
read
into
the
record
to
show
that
our
attempts
to
comply.
F
J
J
A
F
You
are
ready
to
vote
on
that.
No
you
already
voted.
Your
vote
would
be
to
accept
just
accept
the
evidence
that
he
has
presented.
R
You,
madam
chairman,
I,
believe
we
have
extra
copies.
If
not
I
can
I.
R
C
A
F
A
I
K
I
moved
to
accept
the
Affidavit
of
non-compliance
second
and
to
award
the
city
146.78.
A
A
F
A
I
736-74-00070
due
to
a
citizen
complaint,
this
is
a
vacant
residential
property,
that's
not
being
maintained
and
has
a
history
of
such
there's,
a
large
dead
tree
in
the
middle
of
the
property,
that's
dropping
branches
and
could
be
a
hazard
should
it
fall
on
the
neighboring
properties,
there's
also
a
concrete
block
wall.
That's
in
disrepair,
cracked,
broken
and
missing
bricks.
I
The
property
was
posted
with
a
notice
of
violation
with
a
compliance
date
of
March,
2nd
2023,
a
copy
mailed
to
the
property
owner
via
certified
mail
and
posted
at
Tarpon
Springs
City
Hall,
a
re-inspection
was
completed
on
March,
2nd
2023
and
found
that
no
efforts
had
been
taken
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance.
Several
further
inspections
were
also
completed
on
March,
13th,
20th
and
29th,
and
found
the
same,
and
no
contact
has
been
made
from
the
property
owners
due
to
non-compliance.
The
property
was
referred
to
the
code
enforcement
board.
I
Compliance
can
only
be
achieved
by
utilizing
a
licensed
contractor
with
proper
permits
to
remove
the
dead
tree
and
repair
or
replace
the
brick
wall.
All
permits
are
to
be
applied
for
Approved,
issued
and
finalized.
A
hearing
notice
was
posted
on
the
property
on
March
29
2023
I
copy
mailed
to
the
property
owner
via
certified
mail
and
posted
at
Tarpon
Springs,
City
Hall.
The
division
recommends
giving
the
respondent
until
April
27
2023
to
achieve
compliance.
I
If
compliance
is
not
achieved,
staff
recommends
the
code
enforcement
board,
impose
a
fine
of
125
dollars
per
day,
beginning
on
April
28
2023
until
the
property
is
brought
into
compliance,
exhibit
two
is
going
to
be
a
photograph
of
the
tree
in
question,
as
well
as
the
broken
brick
wall
exhibit.
Three
is
going
to
be
the
notice
of
violation,
certified
mail,
receipt,
The,
Returned
mail
that
it
was
not
picked
up
from
the
post
office
and
the
Affidavit
of
posting.
F
K
I
It's
located
over
cross
between
Hope
Street
and
West
Cedar.
If
you
were
to
go
West
on
West
Cedar
right
before
you
get
to
Hope
Street,
it's
going
to
be
on
the
right
hand,.
K
O
F
I
would
just
request
that
the
written
order
reflect
the
appropriate
parcel
number
as
identified
in
the
Property
Appraiser's
office.
Thank
you
thank.
E
P
O
A
C
I
This
is
not
a
homestead
of
property
on
February
24th,
2023,
I
inspected
the
property
located
at
parcel
12
27
15
21078,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
three
zero
due
to
self-initiated
activity.
Upon
arrival
to
the
property,
it
was
observed
that
this
is
a
vacant
residential
parcel
that
is
very
overgrown
with
grass
weeds
and
other
vegetation
in
excess
of
12
inches
in
height,
there's,
also
scattered
junk
trash
debris,
sand,
piles
and
piles
of
broken
fins.
Several
trailers
were
also
on
the
property
that
were
not
permissible
to
be
stored
due
to
being
a
vacant
parcel
it's
unknown.
I
If
they
have
valentaga
registration,
however,
they
do
have
flat
tires.
The
property
was
posted
with
a
notice
of
violation
with
a
compliance
date
of
March
13
2023,
a
copy
mailed
to
the
property
owner
via
certified
mail
and
posted
at
Tarpon
Springs
City
Hall,
a
reinspection
was
completed
on
March
13
2023
and
found
that
no
efforts
had
been
taken
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance.
I
Several
further
inspections
were
also
completed
on
March,
20th
and
29th,
and
found
the
same,
and
no
contact
had
been
made
from
the
property
owners
due
to
non-compliance.
The
property
was
referred
to
the
code
enforcement
board.
Compliance
can
only
be
achieved
by
Mowing
and
maintaining
the
property
of
all
grass
weeds
and
other
vegetation
below
12
inches
in
height
at
all
times,
properly,
removing
all
junk
trash
debris
and
other
items
from
the
property
and
removing
the
trailers.
I
The
hearing
notice
was
posted
on
the
property
on
March
29
2023,
a
cop
email
to
the
property
owner
via
certified
mail
and
posted
a
Tarpon
Springs
City
Hall.
The
division
recommends
giving
the
respondent
until
April
27
2023
to
achieve
compliance.
If
compliance
is
not
achieved,
staff
recommends
giving
the
code
enforcement
recommends
the
code
enforcement
board
and
propose
a
fine
of
75
dollars
per
day,
beginning
on
April
28
2023.
Until
the
property
is
brought
into
compliance,
exhibit
two
is
going
to
be
photographs
of
the
property.
You
can
see
all
of
the
overgrowth.
I
I
The
notice
of
hearing
certified
mail
receipt
signature
card
that
it
was
received
in
Affidavit
of
posting
and
exhibit
four
is
going
to
be
the
Pinellas
County
Property
Appraiser,
and
the
tax
collector
I
did
finally
hear
from
the
property
owner
this
morning.
He
has
mode
95
percent
of
the
property.
The
trailers
are
gone,
however,
there's
now
a
boat
there,
that's
not
supposed
to
be
there
and
the
tree
debris
is
still
there.
I
told
him
that
I
was
going
to
recommend
another
two
weeks
at
the
hearing,
and
he
said
he
was
fine
with
that
within
two
weeks.
F
C
I
F
No,
no
with
respect
to
the
lien,
so
you
can't
foreclose
on
Homestead
Property.
So,
regardless
of
whether
or
not
it's
Homestead,
the
city
codes
still
apply
and
the
maintenance
code
still
applies,
there's
no
exemption
from
the
maintenance
codes
just
because
it's
not
Homestead
Property
and
somebody
may
or
may
not
be
living
there.
But
if
it
is
Homestead
Property
and
we
place
a
lien
on
it,
then
we
cannot
foreclose
on
that
lien
pursuant
to
law.
P
E
K
D
B
D
A
I
47610-0000440
due
to
self-initiated
activity
upon
arrival
of
the
property,
it
was
observed
that
this
is
a
vacant
residential
parcel
that
is
very
overgrown
with
grass
weeds
and
other
vegetation
in
excess
of
12
inches
in
height,
there's,
also
scattered
junk
trash
debris
and
tree
debris.
The
property
also
has
Brazilian
pepper
trees,
as
well
as
dead
dying
and
disease
trees
that
could
pose
a
hazard
should
they
fall
in
a
neighboring
property.
I
Another
inspection
was
also
completed
on
March
29th
and
found
the
same,
and
no
contact
has
been
made
from
the
property
owners
due
to
non-compliance.
The
property
was
referred
to
the
code
enforcement
board.
Compliance
can
only
be
achieved
by
Mowing
and
maintaining
the
property
of
all
grass
weeds
and
other
vegetation
below
12
inches
in
height
at
all
times
properly,
removing
all
junk
trash
debris
from
the
property
and
with
the
use
of
a
licensed
contractor
and
proper
permits,
remove
the
Brazilian,
pepper
trees
and
dead
dying
and
disease
trees.
I
All
permits
are
to
be
applied
for
Approved,
issued
and
finalized.
A
hearing
notice
was
posted
on
the
property
on
March
29
2023,
a
copy
mail
to
the
property
owner
via
certified
mail
and
posted
at
Tarpon
Springs,
City
Hall.
The
division
recommends
giving
the
respondent
until
April
27
2023
to
achieve
compliance.
If
compliance
is
not
achieved,
staff
recommends
the
code
enforcement
board,
impose
a
fine
of
75
dollars
per
day,
beginning
on
April
28
2023.
Until
the
property
is
brought
into
compliance
and
Exhibit
2
is
going
to
be
pitchers
of
the
parcel.
I
Exhibit
3
is
going
to
be
the
notice
of
violation,
the
certified
mail
receipt
and
the
Affidavit
of
posting,
the
notice
of
hearing
certified
mail,
receipt
and
Affidavit
of
posting
and
exhibit
four
is
going
to
be
the
property
appraiser,
as
well
as
the
tax
collector
and,
as
of
today,
I
still
have
not
had
any
contact
from
the
property
owners,
nor
has
anything
been
done
on
the
property.
It
remains
in
the
same
state
as
it
did
before.
A
I
K
K
12-27-15-47610-000-0440
and
to
assess
a
fine
of
75
dollars
a
day,
beginning
on
April,
the
28th
2023
and
until
compliance
is
achieved
in
order
to
respond
it
to
contact
and
to
order
that
the
respondent
contact
this
the
code
enforcement
division
to
arrange
for
a
re-inspection
and
verify
compliance
for
the
board's
order.
Second,.
P
B
P
P
C
D
B
D
J
Before
we
present
any
evidence
in
this
case,
we
have
received
a
request
to
continue
this
case:
the
owners
of
the
property.
This
this
is
a
short-term
rental
case.
The
owners
of
the
property
are
out
of
the
country
or
on
vacation
from
April
5th
through
April
15th.
They
did
contact
us.
They
said
that
they
were
trying
to
find
an
attorney
to
represent
them.
They
were
unable
to
find
a
local
attorney.
J
The
one
property
owner
is
an
attorney
and
she
could
represent
them,
but
since
they're
out
of
town
they're
unable
to
do
so,
it
is
a
short-term
rental
case.
It's
not
something
that
you
know
has
a
an
impact
of
of
debris
or
some
health
or
safety
issue.
So
we
would
like
the
board
to
at
least
consider
that
before
we
present
our
case.
K
J
Areas
yeah.
Well,
let
me
put
it
this
way.
We
believe,
there's
a
violation
in
the
short-term
rentals.
In
this
case,
we
have
received
information
that
was
sent
by
the
parties
in
this
case
to
the
city
stating
that
they
believe
that
they're
allowed
to
use
it
the
way
they're
using
it,
and
they
have
some
legal
arguments
that
they
want
to
either
preserve
by
putting
on
the
record
or
present
to
you.
D
P
O
D
D
A
A
I
This
is
a
second
hearing
for
Affidavit
of
non-compliance
that
would
be
exhibit.
One
is
the
affidavit.
The
date
of
compliance
was
to
be
February,
28,
2023
and
as
of
today,
it's
still
not
in
compliance
exhibit
two
is
going
to
be.
The
board's
order
exhibit
three
is
the
notice
of
hearing
certified
mail
receipt
Affidavit
of
posting
exhibit
four
is
going
to
show
that
the
permit
is
not
finalized.
As
of
the
date
exhibit.
Five
is
the
Affidavit
of
Code
Enforcement
prosecution.
I
F
So
just
to
clarify
you
don't
consider,
is
it
when
the
permits
are
granted
or
is
it
when
the
permits
are
applied?
For
that
you
consider
it
to
be
in
compliance
when
they're
required
to
receive
a
permit.
I
C
B
E
A
I
I
Exhibit
three
is
going
to
be
the
notice
of
hearing
certified
mail
receipt,
the
certified
card
that
it
was
received
as
well
as
yes,
it
was
received
and
then
exhibit.
Four
is
going
to
be
an
email
from
the
city
stating
that
the
inspection
was
completing
and
at
the,
the
building
department
was
satisfied
with
it
being
in
compliance.
A
I'm
unclear
as
to
the
total
fee,
it's
going
to
be
183
plus
20
180,
Plus
25.
I
Well,
it
was
out
of
compliance
for
a
total
of
332
days
at
25
per
day
you
awarded
previous
prosecution
costs
of
a
hundred
and
eighty
dollars,
I'm,
not
sure
what
the
clerk's
office
charges
extra.
So
that's
why
I
did
not
give
you
a
final
price.
O
I
Was
the
Affidavit
of
prosecution
costs
that
were
accepted
at.
I
D
D
We're
looking
at
84.80
is
the
total
8480
prosecution
course
across
plus
eighty
three
hundred
dollars
in
Daily
fines.
D
D
Calculator,
it
was
eight
thousand
three
hundred
dollars.
D
D
22-8000020
to
refine
the
responded,
Betty
Nolan
did
correct
the
violations,
but
did
not
pay
the
fine
of
eight
thousand
four
hundred
and
eighty
dollars
and
two
to
accept
the
Affidavit
of
compliance.
A
O
D
A
We're
going
to
hear
items,
14,
15,
16,
17,
18
and
19
all
together,
I'll
read
the
case
numbers,
but
there
are
no
fines
associated
with
these,
so
we
can
do
them
as
a
lump
sum
case.
Number
14
is
item.
A
22-8000371
Gulf
Marine
ways
Incorporated.
These
are
all
in
compliance
case,
15.
A
23-800009
KPM
of
Tarpon
LLC
at
38,
954
USI,
Highway
19,
is
in
compliance
case,
19
number.
A
D
O
A
A
That's
the
end
of
our
agenda.
I
did
want
to
put
on
the
record
and
Steve
if
you'll
pass
this
along
officer.
Boone
was
so
kind
to
one
of
our
citizens.
Last
time
who
was
quite
upset
about
a
case
and
I
wanted
it
on
the
record,
how
kind
he
was
to
her
and
the
comfort
that
he
provided
her.
Please
pass
that
along
to
him.
F
Madam
chair,
before
you
adjourn
I,
do
have
a
quick
question.
When
you
take
the
cases
out
of
order,
do
you
have
a
sign
up
sheet
or
some
other
mechanism
of
knowing
who's
here?
For
these
cases,
the.
F
It's
currently
it's
not
in
your
rules
of
procedure
to
do
that,
and
we
can
change
that
and-
and
you
do
have
you
know
as
the
chairwoman-
the
ability
to
do
that.
But
then
it
gets
confusing
for
I.
Think
both
the
board
members
and
the
people
in
the
audience
by
continuing
to
take
the
cases
out
of
order
like
that.