►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board May 11, 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
To
see
the
invitation
named
her
father
and
son,
the
Holy
Spirit,
we
see
blessings
on
the
task
before
us
bless
our
efforts
with
clear
Insight,
our
deliberations
with
wisdom,
our
work
with
Clarity
and
accuracy
and
our
decisions
within
partiality.
We
pray
that
our
work
this
afternoon
will
find
favor
here
in
sight,
name
the
Father
and
Son
the
holy
spirit,
amen
and
please
rise
for
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance
I
pledge
allegiance
to
the
flag
of
the
United
States
of
America
and
to
the
Republic
for
which
it
stands.
A
It
is
the
intention
of
this
board
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
health,
safety
and
Welfare
of
the
citizens
of
Tarpon
Springs,
providing
an
equitable,
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
various
codes
within
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs.
Any
agreed
party
May
appeal
a
final
administrative
order
of
this
board
to
the
Circuit
Court.
Such
appeals
shall
be
filed
within
30
days
of
the
execution
of
the
order
to
be
appealed.
Florida
statute
286.0105
requires
any
party
appealing
a
decision
of
this
board
to
have
a
record
of
the
proceedings
to
support
such
an
appeal.
C
The
matters
before
the
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs
code
enforcement
board
are
quasi-judicial
in
nature
and
a
quasi-judicial
proceeding.
The
board's
function
is
to
make
findings
a
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
apply
those
findings
of
fact
to
previously
established
criteria
contained
in
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
code
of
ordinances.
This
is
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
alleged
violation
before
the
board.
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
that
the
law
considers
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues
arising
from
the
the
alleged
violation.
C
If
the
evidence
demonstrates
that
the
respondent
has
violated
the
code
of
ordinances,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
that
a
violation
exists.
If
the
evidence
demonstrates
that
the
respondent
has
not
violated
the
code,
then
the
board
is
required
to
find
that
no
violation
exists.
Any
and
all
persons
providing
testimony
at
this
hearing
are
required
to
do
so
under
oath.
All
persons
testifying
at
this
hearing
must
give
their
name
address
and
must
indicate
whether
or
not
they
have
been
sworn
for
the
record
prior
to
proceeding
with
their
testimony.
C
All
testimony
and
questioning
at
this
hearing
must
address
matters
that
are
relevant
and
material
to
the
alleged
violations
of
the
city's
code
of
ordinances.
Any
board
members
who
have
disclosures,
such
as
ex
parte
Communications,
are
conflict
of
interest.
Please
make
your
disclosures
at
the
beginning
of
the
hearing.
The
following
is
the
established
procedure
which
will
be
followed
at
this
quasi-judicial
hearing.
First,
if
it
is
established
that
proper
notice
of
a
hearing
has
been
provided
to
the
respondent,
a
hearing
May
proceed
in
the
absence
of
the
respondent.
C
The
chair,
May
request,
the
respondent
or
the
representative
or
attorney,
and
their
Witnesses
May
request
identification
of
the
respondent,
their
representative
or
attorney,
and
their
Witnesses.
Prior
to
the
case,
hearing
all
Witnesses
shall
be
sworn
in
by
the
secretary.
The
city
will
present
its
case
and
the
respondent
shall
present
their
case.
Both
parties
will
have
an
opportunity
to
cross-examine
all
Witnesses
the
board
or
its
attorney
May
question
any
witness.
It
feels
necessary.
C
The
right
of
parties
to
present
rebuttal
evidence
is
discretionary
with
the
board
the
board
May
and
its
discretion
a
journey
hearing
for
a
period
not
to
exceed
31
days.
At
any
time,
during
the
hearing
and
request
further
information
from
either
party
being
the
city
or
the
respondent,
if
a
hearing
is
adjourned
at
the
time,
the
hearing
is
reconvened.
Only
those
board
members
that
have
been
present
from
the
beginning
of
the
hearing
May
participate
in
the
deliberations
and
decision-making
process
upon
the
completion
of
all
the
evidence.
C
B
A
D
D
Kristen
Johnson,
my
husband,
Craig
Johnson,
is
here
I'm
going
to
speak.
If
you
need
his
testimony,
he
is
also
available
before
I
start.
We
might
have
a
conflict
of
interest
that
I
wanted
to
bring
up
to
your
attention.
We
noticed
that
Mr
rollinson
works
at
the
same
company
as
my
husband,
I,
don't
know.
If
that
is
a
problem.
E
G
C
One
two
three:
four
of
seven:
we
still
have
four
members
who
are
able
to
vote
on
it,
so
you'll
have
to
file
a
voting
conflict
of
interest
form.
H
I
This
is
not
a
not
a
huberty,
a
March
16th
16-3
I
inspected
the
property
locate
location
due
to
a
citizen
complaint.
The
residence
is
being
utilized
as
a
short-term
vacation,
rental
or
tourist
home
and
is
advertised
online.
As
such,
the
property
falls
into
the
single-family
residential
district
r-100,
which
does
not
allow
for
a
tourist
home.
Nor
does
it
allow
for
a
conditional
use
permit
to
apply
for
due
to
this,
the
tourist
home
would
need
to
cease.
I
The
property
was
posted
with
a
notice
of
violation
with
a
compliance
date
of
March
30th
2023,
a
copy
mailed
to
the
property
owner
via
certified
mail
and
posted
at
Tarpon
Springs
City
Hall
on
March
22
2023,
the
property
owner
Miss
Jarvis
Johnson
sent
an
email
to
the
division,
requesting
an
extension
until
April
30th
2023,
due
to
a
vacation
planned
from
April
4th
to
15th
and
having
to
work
from
March
27
to
31..
The
email
also
continued
to
state
that
she
requests
the
citation
be
removed.
I
As
there
is
a
misunderstanding
of
the
code
and
our
rights
as
homeowners,
she
stated
that
our
home
is
is
conforming
use
with
the
current
code
that
the
State
of
Florida
prohibits
any
city
ordinance
that
infringes
on
our
right
on
March
22nd
2023
I
spoke
with
the
property
owner
Miss
Jarvis
Johnson
via
telephone.
She
advised
that
she
was
an
attorney
and
was
well
aware
of
her
rights
which
are
being
violated
along
with
the
cities
violating
the
state
statute.
I
She
was
advised
of
the
ordinance
codes
that
were
in
violation
and
the
reason
for
the
violation
due
to
the
property
being
in
a
residential
zone
that
does
not
allow
for
tourist
homes.
The
property
owner
was
very
argumentative
and
stated
that
she
wanted
an
extension
as
she
will
be
traveling
next
month
for
a
family
vacation.
She
was
advised
that
an
extension
could
not
be
granted
on
a
violation
that
has
no
remedy
except
cease
doing
it,
which
can
be
done
at
any
time.
I
She
was
also
advised
if
compliance
is
not
met,
that
the
case
would
be
referred
to
the
code
enforcement
board
for
consideration
of
daily
fines
and,
if
found
in
violation,
she
was
provided.
The
next
date
for
the
hearing,
which
would
be
April
13th,
the
property
owner
then
stated
she
wanted
to
go
to.
The
hearing,
however,
needed
an
extension
on
the
hearing
aid
as
she
would
be
traveling
out
of
town.
I
A
re-inspection
was
completed
on
March
30th
2023
and
found
that
no
efforts
had
been
taken
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
due
to
non-compliance
of
property
was
referred
to
the
code
enforcement
board.
Several
further
inspections
were
completed
on
April,
13,
21st
and
26,
and
found
that
no
efforts
had
been
taken
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance.
I
It
should
be
also
noted
that
on
April
21st
2023
I
spoke
with
a
neighbor
who
contacted
the
police
department
due
to
an
ongoing
noise
issue
at
the
residence.
She
stated
that
the
property
had
been
used
for
short-term
vacation
rental
and
she
has
had
to
contact
the
police
department
several
times
times
regarding
different
renters.
I
Compliance
can
only
be
achieved
by
ceasing
the
use
of
the
property
as
a
short-term
vacation,
rental
or
tourist
home
and
removing
the
advertisements.
A
hearing
notice
was
posted
on
the
property
on
April
26
2023,
the
copy
mailed
to
the
property
owner
via
certified
mail
and
posted
Tarpon
Springs
City
Hall.
The
division
recommends
giving
the
respondent
until
May
25th
2023
to
achieve
compliance.
If
compliance
is
not
achieved.
The
suggested
daily
fine
amount
adopted
by
the
board
would
impose
a
fine
of
75
dollars
per
day,
beginning
on
May
26
2023.
I
Exhibit
three
is
going
to
be
the
notice
of
violation,
the
certified
mail
receipt,
the
signed
signature
card
and
the
Affidavit
of
posting
for
that,
as
well
as
the
notice
of
hearing
the
certified
mail
receipt
and
the
Affidavit
of
posting.
That
would
be
for
the
first
hearing
that
we
came
to
and
the
board
agreed
to
give
an
extension
of
30
days.
I
The
next
notice
of
hearing
is
going
to
be
for
this
present
hearing
along
with
a
certified
mail
receipt
and
the
Affidavit
of
posting
exhibit
4
is
going
to
be
the
property
appraiser
and
the
tax
collector
exhibit.
Five
is
going
to
be
a
multitude
of
emails,
sent
back
and
forth
between
the
respondent
myself
and
Mr
Salzman,
along
with
attachments
from
the
respondent.
D
J
I
C
Bottom,
so
it
it
does,
I
can
see
it
correctly
in
my
binder,
but
that
one
is
different.
Can
I
see
your
binder.
G
D
I
think
that
the
first
page
of
attorney
general
bondi's
letter
that
I
had
included
as
attachment
page
two
of
that
I.
Don't
know
if
it's
the
same
in
yours.
C
C
G
D
No
I
mean
if
there
have
been
reported
issues.
We
would
like
to
know
what
they
are,
but
is
that
something
that's
available
to
us.
I
C
D
D
G
D
What
I
would
like
to
do
is
obviously
I'm
going
to
give
my
testimony.
I
took
the
oath,
so
anything
I'm
saying
is
affirming
the
facts
that
I'm
saying,
if
you
need
to
ask
questions
of
Craig,
you're,
obviously
free
to
do
that
as
well.
But
I
wanted
to
give
our
position
for
the
record
on
this
notice
of
violation
in
our
response
to
that.
D
D
C
D
Am
I
allowed
to
show
it
on
my
computer?
You.
C
D
I'm
not
sure
how
to
do
that.
They're,
the
ones
that
I
sent
to
you,
Mr
Salzman,
I,.
D
All
right
and
it's
a
set
PDF
document,
so
it's
pretty
easy.
D
Let
me
pull
that
up
really
quickly,
so
I
know
I
know
it
might
not
entirely
matter
on
the
decision
about
whether
there's
a
code
violation
but
I
I
do
think
it's
important
for
context
for
you
to
know
who
we
are
and
what
we've
done
with
this
particular
house.
So
you
understand
how
we've
how
we
have
reached
the
position
we've
reached
on
the
interpretation
of
the
zoning
codes
that
are
being
enforced
in
this
notice
of
violation,
and
so
just
with
your
permission
very
briefly,
I
just
want
to
show
you
this
house
it
we
bought
it.
D
It's
1410
poinsettia
was
a
single
family
home
when
we
bought
it.
The
owners
have
been
there
for
sorry,
Mr,
chairman.
D
I
think
our
our
understanding
of
the
of
the
code
and
how
how
we
read
it
when
we
bought
the
home
I
think
is,
is
important
because,
there's
you
know
the
code
is
supposed
to
be
interpreted
in
a
way
and
applied
to
individuals
of
common
understanding
and
how
we
would
understand
the
code.
I
can
skip
the
photos.
If
you
don't
want
to
see
what
we've
done
to
the
home.
D
My
understanding
was
part
of
the
part
of
the
reason
for
why
the
city
is
doing.
This
is
because
they're
concerned
about
the
health,
safety
and
Welfare
of
the
of
the
neighborhood
and
of
the
city,
and
so
one
of
the
things
that
we
did
with
the
home
I'll
skip
the
photos,
but
I
mean
the
home
was
was
very
much
in
disrepair.
The
backyard
was
overgrown
I
guess
there
were
actually
unlawful
plants
there.
D
If
you
look
on
Google
Maps,
it
looked
like
a
jungle
we
spent
a
year
and
a
half
cleaning
it,
because
we
actually
love
Tarpon
Springs
a
lot.
We've
spent
a
lot
of
time
here
we
live
in
Safety
Harbor,
so
we
come
back
and
forth
pretty
frequently
we
bring
our
kids
here
all
the
time,
and
so
we
wanted
to
do
something
to
beautify
the
city
and
when
we
bought
the
house,
we
reviewed
the
code
very
carefully
to
try
to
make
sure
we
were
doing
everything
in
full
compliance.
We've
gotten
all
the
permits,
as
required.
D
We've
been
very
open
with
the
city
about
our
plans,
and
so
it
did
come
to
come
as
a
shock
to
us
when
we
got
the
notice
of
violation
and
what
I
thought
was
really
interesting
about.
The
notice
is
that
it
cites
the
zone,
the
r100
residential
Zone,
and
then
it
cites
the
definition
for
a
tourist
home
found
in
the
definition
section
of
the
code.
And
then
it
summarizes
at
the
bottom
of
the
notice
of
violation
that.
D
It
summarizes
at
on
the
notice
of
violation
that
the
residence
is
being
utilized
as
a
tourist
home,
and
then
it
puts
in
parentheses,
short-term
vacation
rental,
which
is
not
allowable
in
the
current
zoning
district,
and
so
it
was
surprising
to
us
because
it
took
the
current
Zone
r100
and
it
said
because
this
definition
exists
elsewhere
in
the
code.
D
The
way
that
you're
using
the
Zone,
which
is
defined
as
r100,
allowing
a
single-family
detached
dwelling,
which
is
what
we
bought
and
it's
what
we're
using
as
it
says
that
we're
basically
out
of
compliance
with
the
Zone,
because
this
definition
of
tourist
home
exists
within
the
code
and
I
have
a
couple
points
I'd
like
to
make
on
that.
First,
there's
nothing
in
the
r100
zone
itself.
When
you
look
at
the
statute
that
would
naturally
or
in
any
way
on
its
face,
prohibit
leasing
of
the
home
to
others.
D
The
generally
speaking,
you
know,
property
law
allows
owners
to
lease
their
homes
to
other
people.
I
think
the
concern
here
seems
to
be
that
it's
for
short
durations
of
time.
But
when
you
look
at
the
r100
Zone,
it
simply
says
that
it
needs
to
be
a
single
family,
detached
dwelling
and
it
defines
the
parameters
and
the
scope
of
that
dwelling
and
then
says
all
reasonable
uses
are
allowed
within
that
within
that
zone.
D
D
Looking
at
the
code,
there
was
nothing
on
the
face
of
the
code
in
r100
that
would
prohibit
us
from
doing
that
and
there's
nothing
in
the
law.
My
understanding,
I'm
I'm,
actually
a
lawyer
but
I'm,
not
a
I,
have
not
a
property
lawyer
at
all.
So
this
is
like
relatively
new
to
me,
but
I
did
think
that
we
tried
to
do
our
due
diligence
before
we
bought
the
home.
D
D
In
fact,
it's
an
expected
standard
use
of
the
of
the
property.
The
notice
of
violation
itself
doesn't
cite
any
standard
that
has
been
violated.
It
tells
me
what
the
zone
is
and
then
it
tells
me
there's
a
definition
of
a
tourist
home,
but
I
I
looked
at
that
violation
very
carefully.
The
notice
of
violation
and
I
have
to
ask
what
is
the
violation?
D
How
am
I
offending
the
r100
zone
that
were
allowed
to
be
in
and
and
I
couldn't
answer
the
question,
because
I
I
don't
see
anything
in
the
two
Provisions
cited
in
the
notice
to
tell
me
that
we
cannot
do
what
we're
doing
the
tourist
home
is
defined
in
the
definition
section.
D
By
interpreting
tourist
home
is
restricting
the
standard
use
of
our
100
single-family
detached
dwellings.
The
city
I
think
Alters
a
very
standard
use
of
residential
homes
without
clear
and
unambiguous
notice
to
ordinary
citizens
on
the
on
the
legal
bit
of
it.
Laws
restricting
property
rights
should
be
unambiguous
and
clear.
We
all
value
our
property
rights
very
much
and
zoning
ordinances
I
mean
I.
In
my
letter,
I
gave
you
the
case
citations.
D
If
you
want
to
see
them,
but
zoning
ordinances
should
not
be
interpreted
to
insert
words
or
phrases
that
don't
appear
in
in
the
code
itself,
and
even
the
notice
of
violation
had
to
explain
in
their
own
words
short-term
rentals.
They
had
to
use
that
word
and
the
notice,
but
that
word
doesn't
appear
anywhere
in
the
code.
D
All
the
codes
must
be
read
as
a
whole.
The
coexistence
of
the
r100
zone
and
the
definition
of
tourist
homes
does
not
connect
the
two.
So
it's
our
position
that
to
prohibit
us
from
renting
our
home
for
different
periods
of
time,
and
we
do
run
it
for
different
periods
of
time.
You
know
it
can
be
a
couple
weeks
can
be
a
couple
days.
D
Sometimes
it's
not
rented
out
at
all,
I
mean
if
there
is
going
to
be
a
fine
imposed.
You
know,
obviously,
the
days
that
we're
not
running
it
I,
don't
think
a
fine
should
be
imposed
because
at
that
point
we're
just
owning
the
home
and
not
doing
anything
with
it
on
those
days,
but
to
prohibit
short-term
rentals.
Something
more
needs
to
be
said.
It
can't
be
assumed
against
us
that
short-term
rentals
are
prohibited.
D
D
But
in
that
case
the
Property
Owners
Association
wanted
to
say
that
the
restrictive
covenant,
disallowed,
short-term
rentals
and
the
court
did
a
really
good
analysis.
Saying
number
one
that
that
restrictive
covenant,
restrictive
covenants
are
interpreted
the
same
in
the
same
manner
that
zoning
ordinances
are
interpreted
under
the
law,
but
that
restrictive
covenant
didn't
have
any
language
that
prohibited
short-term
rentals
and
to
impute
such
a
restriction
would
cut
against
the
principle.
D
The
such
restraints
are
not
favored
and
are
to
be
strictly
construed
in
favor
of
free
and
unrestricted
use
of
real
property
and
I
have
a
number
of
cases.
I
cite
in
the
letter
that
are
to
that
effect.
So
on
all
of
that,
I
really
ask
that
you
fairly
consider
the
way
that
the
ordinance
and
the
code
is
structured
and
that
you
remove
the
notice
of
violation,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions,
as
is
my
husband.
C
You
admitted
that
you
sometimes
rent
the
house
for
a
week
or
just
a
couple
days
at
a
time,
correct,
okay
and
you
cited
some
roles
of
statutory
construction,
but
you
didn't
cite
the
rule.
Expressio
Unis,
exclusio
alterus,
which
means
the
expression
of
one,
is
to
the
exclusion
of
the
other,
and
you
said
you
reviewed
the
code.
Can
you
show
me
where,
in
this
r100
District
it
says
that
you
can
have
a
tourist
house
well.
D
C
C
In
the
zoning
regulations
it
says
what
is
allowed
and
if
it's
not
provided
and
what
is
allowed,
then
it
is
not
allowed.
That
is
how
zoning
rules
and
regulations
work.
You
can't
have
something
in
a
zoning
regulation
or
in
a
zoning
District
that
isn't
allowed
pursuant
to
the
regulation
and
the
zoning
r100
does
not
have
tourist
homes
as
an
allowable
use
in
the
r100.
Yes,.
D
The
zoning
r100
is
for
single
family
includes
permitted
use
for
single-family
detached
dwellings,
and
then
it
states
that
single-family
residential
districts
are
established
to
provide
for
detached
dwellings
in
a
variety
of
districts,
with
a
full
range
of
dimensional
and
density
standards
compatible
with
the
established
development
of
the
area.
And
then
the
single
family,
detached
swelling
is
defined
as
a
dwelling
which
is
designed
for
and
occupied
by,
not
more
than
one
family
and
surrounded
by
Open,
Spaces
or
yards
and
which
is
not
attached
to
any
other
dwelling.
By
any
other
means.
A
Fine
is
that,
are
you
finished
with
your
case.
A
Your
impartiality,
any
question
from
the
board:
okay,
a
city
like
to
summarize
its
case.
Please.
G
A
A
J
B
A
B
A
C
A
I
Is
not
a
homesteaded
property
on
March
29,
2023
I
inspected
the
property
located
at
709
West,
Bay,
Shore
Drive,
due
to
a
citizen
complaint,
the
complaint
was
regarding
the
residents
being
utilized
as
a
short-term
vacation
rental
or
tourist
home,
and
that
it
was
remodeled
within
the
last
two
years
without
permits.
This
property
is
located
in
a
single-family
r-100
District,
which
does
not
allow
for
short-term
vacation
rentals.
Upon
further
investigation,
a
listing
was
found
on
booking.com
for
the
residents
which
allowed
for
nightly
rentals.
With
this
booking
were
multiple
photographs
of
the
inside
of
the
residence.
I
Another
listing
for
the
sale
of
the
residence
was
also
located
on
zillow.com
and
also
included
photographs
of
the
inside
of
the
residence.
The
residence
was
owned
by
the
same
property
owner
for
both
listings
as
the
phone
numbers
websites
and
language
were
the
same.
It
was
evident
by
the
photographs
that
the
inside
of
the
residence
had
been
remodeled
with
new
kitchen
cabinets,
countertops,
bathroom
showers,
flooring
and
windows.
However,
no
permits
had
been
applied
for
approved
or
issued
for
any
of
the
work
that
was
completed.
I
The
property
was
posted
with
a
notice
of
violation
with
a
compliance
date
of
April
14
2023,
a
copy
mailed
to
the
property
owner
via
certified
mail
and
posted
at
Tarpon
Springs
City
Hall
on
April
11
2023
I
received
a
phone
call
from
the
property
owner
Mr
Amir.
He
was
extremely
upset
that
he
received
the
violations
and
disputed
each
one.
He
stated
that
he
owns
multiple
properties
in
different
counties
and
that
all
of
these
allegations
are
stemming
from
a
neighbor
dispute
next
door
as
those
Property
Owners
do
not
like
him
nor
his
tenants.
I
He
also
disputed
that
the
residence
was
being
utilized
as
a
short-term
vacation
rental.
As
the
current
tenants
currently
have
a
year-long
lease
for
rent,
he
then
stated
that
the
tenants
reside
out
of
state
much
of
the
year
as
well
and
may
possibly
be
renting
it
out
on
their
own.
He
was
advised
that
if
this
was
the
case,
he
would
still
be
responsible
for
what
the
tenants
do
on
the
property
he
owns.
The
owner
also
disputed
the
property
being
remodeled
and
that
it
hasn't
been
since
he
has
owned
it.
I
I
I
received
a
phone
call
from
the
current
tenant
Stephen
hupfer
Mr
Huffer
stated
that
he
just
had
an
angry
call
from
the
property
owner
regarding
the
violations
that
he
does
reside
out
of
state
much
of
the
year
and
has
been
running
the
presidents
online
to
people
he
was
advised.
This
was
not
allowable
in
the
current
zoning
and
that
it
was
also
not
eligible
for
conditional
use
permit.
He
was
very
upset
by
this
and
stated
he
would
speak
with
the
property
owner
again.
Several
hours
later,
I
received
an
email
from
the
property
owner.
I
He
provided
a
copy
of
the
year
lease
for
the
current
tenants
and
apologized
for
being
frustrating
over
the
telephone
and
said
I'm.
Just
very
busy
and
I
do
not
have
time
or
patience
for
nonsense.
He
went
on
to
state
that
the
complaint
was
due
to
the
neighbors
next
door.
That
had
been
ongoing
for
over
years,
he
stated
you
mentioned
some
pictures.
I
You
saw
online
and
made
an
assumption
that
the
place
had
been
remodeled
to
my
knowledge,
no
remodeling
work
took
place
under
my
ownership
and
code
enforcement
do
not
operate
or
open
cases
based
on
pictures
or
assumptions.
I
remember
a
few
years
ago,
a
tenant
deducted
one
month,
rent
to
replace
kitchen
doors
or
paint
them
and
do
some
flooring
work.
But
at
that
time
he
said
he
he
asked
the
county
and
they
said
that
type
of
work
doesn't
require
a
permit.
This
happened
a
few
years
ago
and
honestly
I'm,
not
100
sure.
I
He
then
wanted
confirmation
that
the
case
would
be
closed.
I
responded
to
the
property
owner
and
again
advised
of
the
violations,
the
reason
for
the
violations
and
what
needed
to
be
done
in
order
to
come
into
compliance
shortly
after
I
received
an
email
from
the
tenant
again
Mr
hupfer.
He
advised
that
the
rental
booking
had
been
removed
from
online
right
after
I
received
another
email
from
the
property
owner.
I
He
advised
that
the
tenant
had
removed
the
listing
and
stating
I
found
your
approach
unreasonable,
and
it
appears
that
you
are
overreaching
your
Authority
making
the
scenario
bigger
than
it
actually
is.
There
is
no
legitimate
evidence
to
continue
with
the
violation.
The
pictures
you
are
referring
to
are
posted
online
with
no
dates.
There
is
no
way
of
telling
when
they
were
taken
regarding
the
alleged
free
model.
You
are
insisting
on
continuing
with
this
case
without
any
solid
facts
which
makes
me
feel
like
you
are
targeting
and
nitpicking
on
me
and
my
clients.
I
A
re-inspection
was
completed
on
April
14
2023
and
found
that
no
further
efforts
had
been
taken
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance.
Further
inspections
were
also
completed
on
April
20th
and
26
2023.
To
found
that
found
the
same
due
to
non-compliance.
The
properties
referred
to
code
enforcement
board
over
May,
2nd
and
May
3rd
2023,
the
property
owner
emailed
several
times
with
a
City
attorney,
Mr
Salzman,
the
property
owner
continued
to
dispute
the
violations.
He
also
stated
that
I
have
owned
this
property
since
2014
and
I
must
inform
you
that
I'm
not
interested
intending
any
hearings.
I
Compliance
can
only
be
achieved
by
not
utilizing
the
residence
as
a
tourist
home
and
with
the
use
of
a
licensed
contractor
and
proper
permits
permits
are
to
be
applied
for
approved
and
issued
for
all
work
that
has
been
completed
inside
the
residence.
A
hearing
notice
was
posted
on
the
property
on
April
26
2023,
a
copy
mailed
to
the
property
owner
via
certified
mail
and
posted
at
Tarpon
Springs,
City
Hall.
The
division
recommends
giving
the
respondent
until
June
2nd
2023
to
achieve
compliance
if
compliance
is
not
achieved.
I
I
Posting
for
the
short-term
rental
or
the
tourist
home,
the
next
page
is
going
to
be
a
listing
that
is
current
that
just
went
up
About
a
Week
Ago
by
the
respondent
listing
the
house
for
rent
for
twenty
four
hundred
dollars
a
month
along
with
a
photograph
of
the
inside
of
the
house.
If
you
notice
the
photograph
is
the
same
as
the
one
for
the
booking.com.
I
I
I
Exhibit
three
is
going
to
be
the
notice
of
violation,
the
certified
mail
receipt,
the
signed
green
card
signature
card
and
the
Affidavit
of
posting,
along
with
the
notice
of
hearing
for
this
hearing,
the
certified
mail
receipt
and
the
Affidavit
of
posting
debit.
Four
is
going
to
be
the
property
appraiser
tax
collector,
as
well
as
sunbiz,
and
exhibit
five
is
going
to
be
all
of
the
emails
that
had
gone
back
and
forth
between
myself
and
the
respondent,
his
tenant
and
other
members
of
the
city.
As
of
today,
the
listing
has
been
removed.
C
I
H
Could
I
ask
a
quick
question
in
your
research
on
this
property?
Were
there
any
building
permits
issued
within,
say
the
since
2014
there's.
A
N
It's
my
daughter,
Nadia,
her
name,
graduation
party
and
I
have
to
be
here
when
I
did
everything
I
can
to
communicate
with
the
code
enforcement
to
achieve
what
she
asked
for
in
the
beginning,
she
asked
me
to
provide
the
lease
for
Mr
Steve,
which
I
ask
him,
and
thank
you
for
him
being
here
that
the
person
that
leads
the
Blessed
from
me
I
did
provide
the
lease
and
I
can
immediately
feel
that
is
way
more
to
it
than
I
thought.
My
point
is
yes:
okay,.
N
It
just
I
have
to
own
many
homes
in
Central,
Florida
I
don't
have
much
in
tarbon
Spring.
It's
the
only
one,
and
this
is
a
result
of
foreclosure
I
used
to
buy
bull
mortgages.
He's
got
four
clothes
on
in
2014
approximately,
and
we
took
over
the
reason
I
am
here
today:
I
try
everything
I
can
to
even
get
an
address.
What
is
the
hearing,
as
I
have
not
have
a
decent
communication
with
the
code
enforcement
I
reach
to
Mr
Andrew,
and
we
spoke
yesterday.
I
was
hoping
to
receive
an
email
from
him.
N
A
N
N
N
Okay,
he
is
no
longer
in
position
like
she
indicate
the
property
on
online
for
sale
or
lease
the
other
issue
she
raising
after
this
become
to
the
light
because
of
the
listing
online
or
their
short
rentals
I'm,
not
here
to
defend
that
this
for
Airbnb
and
some
other
people
I
out
of
courtesy
to
my
time
and
everybody
else
time,
and
this
more
important
of
all
of
our
use.
I
terminate
the
tenet
this
something
is
no
longer
there.
N
J
G
I
Address
they
popped
right
off,
it
has
since
been
removed,
but
it
was
readily
available
for
anybody
online.
Okay,.
J
H
I
do
have
a
question:
do
you
have
any
photos
or
evidence
of
the
condition
of
your
the
interior
of
your
house
when
you
purchased
it,
you
said
you
purchased
it
out
of
foreclosure.
It.
N
N
H
N
This
is
that
on
my
my
younger
brother
Tarik,
which
you
can
see
that
on
Sundays
I
own
livable,
Solutions
and
ideal
houses
and
no
sir
I-
have
no
pictures
for
this
property
from
before,
and
neither
nor
the
code
enforcement
provide
any
pictures
shown
where
they've
been
taken
other
than
oh
I,
see
it
somewhere
online
I,
don't
think
it's
efficient
and
for
my
phone
number
anybody
can
post
anything
online
and
anything
can
show
like
somebody
number
or
somebody
picture
is
no
real
evidence.
I
am
seeing
here
that
there
is
work.
C
Do
have
a
quick
question
for
Miss
stoner
I'm,
looking
at
the
property
appraisers
records,
and
it
shows
that
there's
no
recent
sales
on
record,
so
that
would
cover
quite
a
number
of
years
and
that
there's
no
deed
for
this
house
recorded
no
ma'am.
Okay,.
I
F
N
Reason
I
am
a
little
bit
sensitive
to
this
matter.
I
am
from
Jerusalem
and
when
I
came
here,
I
came
in
2002
as
a
young
one
thing,
I,
don't
understand
and
I'm
saying
this
on
record.
What
the
sergeant
was
telling
me
yesterday,
he
tried
to
create
a
ground
which
I
only
see
this
in
Middle
East
to
enter
my
my
home,
without
my
permission
and
no
reason
for
it.
My
issue
with
this.
N
A
A
With
that
I'd
like
to
entertain
a
motion,
please.
J
25.02
and
6.1
or
6-1,
and
the
Florida
building
code,
section
105.1
for
the
property
located
at
709,
West
Bayshore,
Drive
Tarpon
Springs,
and
to
assess
a
fine
of
150
dollars
per
day,
beginning
June
3rd.
Until
compliance
is
achieved
and
to
autorespondent
to
contact
code
enforcement
division,
to
arrange
for
a
re-inspection
of
the
property
to
verify
compliance
with
the
board's
order.
B
G
B
H
E
A
A
C
C
C
N
C
A
I
G
I
Exhibit
one
will
be
the
Affidavit
of
non-compliance,
exhibit
two
is
going
to
be.
The
prior
board
order,
exhibit
three
is
going
to
be.
The
notice
of
hearing
along
with
the
certified
mail
receipt
and
the
Affidavit
of
posting
exhibit
four
is
an
email
that
I
sent
over
to
the
building
department,
just
to
verify
that
the
permits
had
not
been
submitted.
I
The
worker,
I
guess,
did
submit
an
attempt
at
an
approval
process.
However,
no
attachments
were
sent,
the
wrong
information
was
sent
and
the
permitting
Tech
did
speak
to
the
contractor.
Let
them
know
what
else
was
required
and
since
that
time
there's
been
no
further
contact
back,
they
actually
did
start
doing
some
demo
on
the
units.
However,
without
permits,
so
our
building
inspector
had
to
go
over
and
post
a
stop
work
order.
J
I
J
I
C
E
P
Keith
Mead
Deputy,
building
official
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
I,
have
been
sworn
yes,
they
did
attempt
to
apply
for
a
permit,
but
it
was
very
insufficient.
All
they
did
was
upload
a
a
document
with
an
estimate
for
the
construction.
That
was
it.
There
was
no
application.
There
were
no
follow-up
documents,
we
emailed
them
immediately
and
said
this
is
insufficient.
If
you
can
give
us
more
information,
here's
what
we
need-
and
we
never
heard
back
from
them-
do.
P
This
has
been
since
April
19th,
okay,.
G
P
P
Person
who
uploaded
the
the
permit
application,
it
wasn't
even
a
permit
application.
Like
I
said
it
was
just
an
estimate
for
the
job
that
was
all
we
received
so
Michelle
de
Nuno,
the
permit
Tech
emailed
them
immediately,
who.
O
O
Because
in
preparation
with
this
hearing,
I
went
over
there
and
I
said:
look:
we've
got
an
application
that
went
in
on
April
17th.
Obviously
it
hasn't
been
approved
yet
we're
here
almost
a
month
in,
what's
going
on
me,
trying
to
figure
out
why
it
hasn't
been
approved
and
the
response
that
I
got
is
that
there's
a
separation
between
the
Departments
and
that
they
had
to?
As
of
this,
as
of
today,
send
a
request
to
the
other
department
for
the
documentation
that
they
hadn't
received
it
yet
that
hadn't
been
sent.
P
I'm
not
aware
of
the
conversation
you
had
with
this
person,
but
I
I,
don't
know
they
they
sent
us
and
they
they
attempted
to
apply
for
a
permit.
It
was
insufficient,
we
notified
them,
it
was
insufficient
and
email
correspondence.
There
has
been
none
since
then.
O
Okay,
so
they're
in
there's
been
an
application.
At
least
we
can
agree
to
that
and
it
hasn't
been
approved
because
in
in
your
expert
opinion,
it's
insufficient
I
have
no
reason
to
Discount
that
I'm
just
confused,
because
my
my
most
recent
interaction
with
your
department
was
that
they
were.
Basically,
the
ball
was
in
their
Court
to
submit
a
email
request
for
additional
documentation
that
hadn't
been
done
yet
because
there
was
protocol
between
zoning
and
the
building
departments
where
and
what
they
communicate
to
one
another.
They
have
to
make
separate
requests
for
documentation.
O
This
is
just
what
I'm
being
told
in
preparation
for
this
hearing
in
advance
of
the
same,
because
I,
like
you
and
the
rest
of
this
board,
want
nothing
more
than
this
to
be
done,
and
so
here
I
am
showing
up
thinking.
You
guys
are
dragging
your
feet
and
you're
telling
us
we're
dragging
our
feet
and
I
have
no
reason
to
Discount
you
on
that
fact.
O
But
that's
where
we
are
so
I
can
tell
you
the
board
and
and
thank
you
I,
have
no
further
questions
on
that,
although
I
think
perhaps
I
can
request
documentation
relative
to
what's
been
submitted
after
the
fact,
because
I
think
at
least
according
to
this
binder,
it
ends
with
your
last
guy
I.
Don't
know
if
you
put
all
the
documentation
for
our
Hearing
in
here
or
not,
but
it
ends
at
three.
I
I
In
the
stock
with
the
clerk
it
was
about
100
pages
and
I
wasn't
going
to
put
that
in
everybody's
binder.
It
was
just
the
assessment.
Okay.
O
If
we
can't
review
it,
I,
don't
know
how
we
can
cross
on
it
or
question
it,
but
suffice
to
say
the
documentation
hasn't
been
provided
for
our
review
for
for
questions.
I
can
say
this
that
the
and
I
have
no
further
questions
for
the
city
about
what's
been
submitted
at
this
time,
either.
B
O
O
O
Sure
absolutely
please,
because
we
haven't
received
any
of
the
documentation
in
a
written
form,
I'd
love
to
at
least
have
it
on
the
record.
If
it's
available.
P
P
So
for
the
demo
work
it
would
be
one
permit
listing
all
the
addresses
once
they've
finished
the
demo,
then
they
would
go
into
the
rebuild
or
the
build
outs
which
would
require
a
permit
for
each
address:
okay,
okay
and
in
the
permit
application,
there's
actually
an
application,
and
you
put
down
there
the
company
scope
of
work.
Everything
like
that
and
you
also
submit
the
contractors
you're
going
to
be
using
all
their
licensing
information
and
so
on
and
so
forth
and
at
a
minimum.
That's
what
we
and.
P
O
Yes,
and
it
is
publicly
available
as
well-
it's
it's
it's
applied
as
of
April,
17th
and
I
believe
that's
what
they
were
referring
to
when
they
were
saying
that
there
was
missing
components
that
there
had
been
an
application,
but
that
there
had
been
correspondence
which
we
don't
have
here,
but
just
trusting
you
at
your
word.
If.
P
I
may
I'm,
sorry
to
inter
I
can
have
Michelle
denino
the
permit
Tech
she's
in
the
office
right
now,
she's
going
to
come
in
here
and
because
she,
oh
I'm,
sorry
she's
here.
If
she
can
just
be
sworn
in
and
she
can
vouch
for
when
and
what
was
received
because
she
gets
it
first
and
then
disperses
it.
So
she
would
have
better
knowledge
of
that
information.
Okay,.
B
G
B
G
L
An
online
submittal,
okay,
great
for
17
I,
think
it
was
all
they
uploaded
was.
It
looks
like
an
estimate
for
all
the
units
to
be
repaired.
L
L
O
O
L
O
O
Getting
there
so,
the
fact
of
the
matter
is,
though,
is
that,
when
we're
dealing
with
the
demo
permit,
which
is
the
first
permit
to
be
submitted,
that's
what's
already
been
applied
for
and
that's
what's
for
you
and
it
would
be
premature
to
be
seeking
an
application
for
the
individual
units.
Yes,
so
you're
not
denying
on
the
basis.
L
O
L
O
P
We
got
notification
on
May
4th,
which
is
one
week
ago,
that
they
were
doing
the
demolition
work
and
we
checked
in
the
system.
There
were
no
permits
issued,
so
myself
and
another
inspector
went
out
there
and
put
a
place
to
stop
work
order
on
the
project
and
we
actually
spoke
to
the
owner
of
the
company
and
advised
him
with
the
same.
P
K
P
G
O
Okay-
okay
back
at
it,
so
I
did
go
ahead
and
get
an
opportunity
to
look
at
what
was
submitted
through
the
portal
and
I.
Think
I
see
an
agreement
with
building
that
there
was
a
large
amount
of
documentation
that
was
submitted.
There
is
apportionment
for
demolition
in
there
throughout
the
document
as
it
relates
to
each
and
individual
category,
but
of
course
it's
not
submitted
with
its
own
application,
so
the
documentation
necessary
to
perform
the
permitting
on
both
fronts.
O
Both
the
demolition
permit
and
the
ladder
building
permit
are
here
they're,
just
not
in
the
appropriate
form
for
approval
so
and
as
much
as
I
would
love
to
fall
on
a
sword
that
isn't
mine.
We
have
a
contractor
that
I
need
to
hit
with
a
ballywick.
O
That
being
said,
we
have
attempted
compliance
in
having
our
contractors
submit,
although
after
the
April
10th
date
by
April
17th
that
documentation
being
already
prepared
and
more
or
less
just
needing
to
be
populated
into
the
permit
application
in
order
for
permitting
to
provide
the
appropriate
permits,
there
is
not
an
attempt
to
drag
our
feet
or
otherwise
slow
this
process
down.
It's
literally
all
right
here.
O
A
Q
C
Q
Thank
you
hi.
My
name
is
Jennifer
McCormick
I'm
owner
of
unit
718,
one
of
the
units
that
was
burnt
down
I
do
not
live
at
the
property,
but
I
I'm
trying
to
attempt
to
help
this
process.
The
president
Rachel
spingler,
told
me
the
name
of
the
contractor.
Q
I
have
been
in
contact
with
the
city
to
try
to
figure
out
what
the
issue
is
exactly
I've
spoken
to
Bobby
and
Paul
today
and
Bobby
is
in
charge
of
applying
for
the
permits
he's
the
contractors
okay
he's
in
charge
of
applying
for
the
permits
they're,
both
Texas
boys
I'm
from
Texas,
okay,
so
Bobby.
Yes,
he
did
apply.
He
basically
made
a
profile
to
apply
for
a
permit.
The
city
is
telling
me
that
and
I
completely
understand
he
has
not
given
he
hasn't
put.
Q
Q
Q
Yes,
I
am
going
to
be
helping
Bobby
with
that
because
it
seems
like
he
needs
a
secretary,
because
it's
in
my
best
interest
to
make
sure
that
this
gets
done
quickly,
because
it's
costing
me
a
lot
of
money,
so
I
will
make
sure
that
Bobby
that
information
is
going
to
be
uploaded
to
the
system
I
as
a
homeowner,
because
I'm
not
the
contractor,
cannot
pay
for
the
permit.
But
I
will
call
Paul
because
I
have
him
on
speed
dial
and
have
him
pay
over.
The
phone
I
am
asking
for.
Q
Q
A
C
So
I
will
let
the
board
know
that
you
do
have
the
ability
to
consider,
as
as
one
of
your
factors,
the
efforts
of
the
respondents
to
come
into
compliance.
That
is
one
of
the
three
things
that
that
you
can
consider
with
respect
to
this
situation.
I
Just
remind
the
board
that
this
has
been
a
process
for
over
a
year.
We
gave
them
an
extended
amount
of
time
just
to
apply
for
a
permit
and
we're
still
not
in
compliance
at
this
time.
O
Well,
and
to
address
it
from
the
association's
final
standpoint
from
the
association's
perspective
and
the
perspective
of
the
board
of
directors,
the
information
that's
receiving
is
that
the
permits
were
applied
for
paid
for
and
submitted
by,
our
contractor
no
later
than
April
17th
they're,
not
showing
an
indication
of
intent
to
avoid
compliance
with
the
board.
We're
dealing
with
a
situation
where
all
of
documentation
that
was
submitted
in
that
large
packet
is
what
will
eventually
be
the
permit.
O
It's
just
not
appropriately
earmarked
in
the
way
that
will
allow
the
permit
application
process
to
be
approved
for
I
can
tell
you
coming
into
this
hearing.
I
was
under
the
impression
that
the
one
million
and
seventy
three
thousand
dollar
permit
application
had
been
applied
for
on
April
17th
by
virtue
of
the
communications
from
the
contractor.
Obviously,
the
extent
of
it
necessary
to
obtain
approval
hasn't
been
received,
but
that
wasn't
the
original
order
of
this
board.
O
The
original
order
of
the
board
was
to
submit
for
the
application
for
approval,
because
there
is
no
basis
by
which
we
can
time
the
approval
from
the
Department
any
fine
or
penalty
levied
at
this
point
in
time.
I
understand
the
board's
position
and
feeling
that
it
has
to
do
something.
Those
fines
and
penalties
are
going
to
be
subject
to
dissolving
amongst
the
members
of
the
association
as
a
common
element,
expense
that
they're
going
to
have
to
pay
from
their
assessments.
O
There
is
nothing
further
that
a
fine
or
or
punitive
action
at
this
time
will
do
to
expedite
the
process.
We
have
submitted
everything
that
we
believe
necessary
at
the
time
and
at
this
point
in
time,
all
that's
necessary
is
to
properly
separate
the
documents
into
a
demo
permit
and
a
building
permit,
and
it's
all
before
you,
okay,.
J
J
So
basically
before
you,
you
say
what
you're
going
to
do.
What
we'd
rather
see
is
that
you're
really
understand
that
some
urgency
has
to
be
applied
to
this,
because
these
people
have
really
you
know,
suffered
a
lot.
O
J
O
J
A
A
M
Please
excuse
my
speech,
but
I
had
surgery
on
my
top
lip.
You
tested
your
name
and
your
address
for
the
record.
Please,
okay,
my
name
is
jakisha
Williams
and
my
address
is
720
Haven
place,
I'm
just
here
to
say:
I've
been
homeless
since
March
14
to
2022.
M
the
first
action
I
took
was
going
to
a
shelter,
but
that
didn't
work
for
me
being
that
people
was
still
my
belongings
at
night,
when
I
went
to
work
complaining
to
staff
didn't
help,
they
said
that
it
was
out
of
their
hands,
so
I
left
that
shelter
and
erased
shelters
as
an
option
to
stay.
The
insurance
money
that
was
given
out
for
residency
was
short-lived
in
hotels,
so
I
started
sleeping
in
my
car
at
times,
I
couldn't
afford
a
room.
M
I
still
pay
my
mortgage
fees,
the
HOA
fees,
are
still
being
built
to
me
in
which
both
has
went
up
hundreds
of
dollars.
This
past
year,
I've
been
holding
I've
maintained
my
job
for
five
years
throughout
this
process,
so
I'm
paying
taxes.
Yet
still,
if
I
sit
in
a
park
too
long,
police
harass
me
and
follow
me
I
understand
that
my
situation
makes
them
investigate,
need
a
way
that
they
do
and
it's
very
annoying
and
traumatic,
be
intrigued.
M
It
like
I,
put
myself
in
this
situation
and
the
circumstances
I've
been
put
in,
puts
me
at
risk
for
numerous
mishaps,
rather
with
police
or
other
homeless
people.
That's
living
on
the
streets,
I
moved
to
Florida
in
2018,
from
Georgia
by
myself,
so
I
have
no
family
here
or
friends
to
help
me
with
anything.
M
It's
just
me
trying
to
take
care
of
myself
in
a
situation.
I
was
forced
into
the
sooner.
These
permits
are
granted,
there's
one
less
homeless
person
on
the
streets
at
times,
I
park
on
the
property
to
stay
overnight,
because
it's
safer
for
me,
there
and
I
like
to
remind
myself
that
I
do
have
a
that.
I
do
have
assets
and
that
I'm
not
a
bum
I'm,
just
temporarily
homeless.
C
If
you
were
going
to
treat
the
application
because
a
lot
of
times
when
you
get
like
the
building
permit
applications,
it's
not
unusual
for
them
to
be
incomplete
and
for
the
building
department
to
kick
them
back
and
need
additional
information
to
process
permits.
That's
something
that
happens
all
the
time.
Usually
you
get
30
days
or
so
to
respond
and
under
chapter
553.
C
When
you
look
at
buildings,
the
city
actually
has
an
obligation
to
respond
within
30
days
when
they
receive
these
types
of
applications,
so
from
the
April
10th
compliance
date
to
the
17th,
when
the
permit,
when
the
information
was
submitted
to
the
city
as
an
application
at
the
250
a
day
that
would
be
approximately
17
one
thousand
seven
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
of
a
fine
and
penalty.
H
The
unfortunate
thing
here
is
that
the
the
burden
of
this
compliance
is
really
lying
on
the
board,
but
it
affects
all
the
residents
and
the
owners.
Unfortunately,
the
they
can't
put
blame
back
onto
the
contractor,
because
ultimately
they're
responsible
for
the
contractor.
H
However,
when
it
comes
down
to
fines
and
paying
these
sometimes
very
large
penalties,
it
falls
on
the
homeowners,
even
though
it's
the
board
I
would
like
to
some
recommend
that
we
at
this
point
forego
the
fee
or
the
penalty,
but
we
need
to
ensure
that
this
board
reacts
because
it
has
been
a
very
long
time.
H
The
board
of
directors
for
the
Condominium
Association
they're,
the
ones
that
are
responsible
the
owner,
is
going
to
pay
the
burden
they're
going
to
pay
the
price.
So
I
would
like
to
set
the
feed
aside,
but
I
think
we
need
to
put
a
very
strong
message
to
this
board
that
they
have
got
to
get
this
done.
I
remember
in
the
very
first
meeting
that
they
had,
we
were
told
then
I
specifically
asked
if
the
engineering
was
ready
to
submit
a
a
permit.
H
C
That
is
essentially
what
you're
finding
finding
with
whether
or
not
you're
going
to
impose
this
fine
and
your
motion
has
to
sow
State
whether
you
are
finding
them
in
compliance
or
you
are
finding
them
at
not
in
compliance
now,
if
they
do
not
follow
up
with
the
order,
if
they
do
not
follow
up
with
what
was
requested
by
the
building
department,
then,
ultimately,
there
is
another
case.
It
would
be
a
second
case
and
then
at
that
point
it
would
constitute
a
repeat
violation
at
the
higher
fine
amounts.
C
H
H
I
move
that
the
the
intent
of
applying
for
the
permit
was
in
fact
there
and
that
that
they
made
every
effort
in
the
beginning
to
apply
for
the
permit.
And
then
it's
been
complicated
since
so.
I
would
make
that
motion
that
they
are.
They
are
in
compliance
with
the
intent
of
applying
for
a
permit
and
waive
any
fees
that
may
have
been
incurred.
J
C
A
There
are
no
affidavits
of
compliance.
The
next
thing
on
the
agenda
is
consent
and
it's
item
number
23-8.
I
G
I
A
Well
said:
aye
great
okay,
no
request
for
reduction
approval.
The
minutes
please.
A
M
E
A
Great,
it's
improved
limit
the
public
comments,
any
staff
for
board
comments.
J
Extremely
troubling,
when
we
have
a
case
like
that,
when
we
know
when
we
drop
a
fine
on
on
these
people,
that
it
would
be
paid
by
them
by
those
people
that
are
already
that
one
gal
was
struggling,
there's
another
gal
in
there.
That
is,
is
having
her
in
her
second
rental
there
it's
it's
too
bad.
We
don't
have
some
other
recourse
that
we
can
because
they're
just
going
to
turn
around
and
and
you
know,
but
they
don't
and
they
they
professed
a
sense
of
urgency.
The
last
time
that.
F
I
J
J
G
H
M
C
C
Ahead,
because
this
is
a
case
that
may
very
well
come
back.
C
I,
don't
want
to
encourage
additional
discussion
on
this
matter.
You
know
the
the
the
cases
closed
and
and
I
certainly
do
appreciate.
You
know
your
concerns
and
your
comments.
I
mean
I
I
do
understand
that
this
was
a
hard
one
so,
but
just
to
the
extent
that
it's
going
to
come
back.
Let's
keep
those
types
of
comments
within
the
context
of
the
hearings
that
we
have.
Okay,
one.
I
A
Here,
for
so
thank
you,
okay,
well
welcome
aboard.
Thank
you
and
I'd
like
to
say
thank
you
very
much
for
your
time
and
effort,
and
especially
the
board
with
my
my
pilot.
Caring
of
this
thing.
I
hope
I
didn't
do
too
bad,
but
oh
well,
we
made
through
it
okay,
but
thank
you
very
much.
Next
code
board
enforcement
hearing
will
be
held
on
8
June
at
2
p.m.