►
From YouTube: Heritage Preservation Board October 3, 2016
Description
HPB Regular Session
A
B
D
D
E
E
If
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
met
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
in
favor
of
the
applicant.
By
the
same
token,
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
against
the
applicant.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
board?
Wissen
is
disclosed
at
the
ex
parte
communications
this
evening,
seeing
none.
E
E
G
D
B
B
B
B
B
G
B
That's
why
I
was
wondering
if
we
to
be
clarified
yeah
according
to
the
application
it
start
over
with
favors
and
replace
walkways
service
with
favors,
and
the
motion
by
mr.
Bolton
was
in
driveway
replacing
driveway
with
brick
pavers
and
replacing
internal
walkway
with
the
brick
pavers,
as
shown
on
the
survey.
B
E
I
J
Number
1692,
the
location
is
106
West,
Park,
Street,
the
owner
and
applicant
is
2027
Norfolk
LLC
property
is
located
within
the
w/d
I,
a
waterfront
commercial
fishing
development
district
and
within
the
commercial
general
future.
Land-Use
property
is
a
contributing
structure
of
Boulevard
and
West
Park
Street.
J
The
applicant
is
seeking
a
certificate
of
approval
for
the
replacement
of
a
fence
on
a
historic
property,
insisting
of
an
existing
two-story
structure,
which
was
originally
utilized
as
a
sponge,
processing,
factory
and
warehouse,
and
it
was
formerly
known
as
the
ER
Mears
sponge
pad
recently
come
before
the
HPB
for
renovation
and
restoration
approval.
However,
replacement
of
the
fence
was
not
addressed
at
that
time.
The
office,
the
previous
chain-link
fence
on
the
property,
the
city's
code
enforcement
division
became
involved
because
replacement
fence
was
not
opaque,
which
is
required
by
the
land
development
code.
J
Where
items
are
rubbing
between
the
links
for
opaqueness
in
review,
an
application
for
certificate
approval.
The
board
shall
considering
the
following
proposed
alteration
or
new
construction
shall
be
consistent
with
that
of
the
adjacent
contributing
structures
throughout
the
immediate
neighborhood
stas
findings
/,
actually
for
number
one
and
number
two
that
these
two
criteria
do
not
lie
under
number.
Three:
the
relationship
of
a
structure
within
a
preservation
district
to
the
open
space
between
it
and
other
buildings
or
scenic
views
shall
be
protected
through
a
site
plan
review
process.
J
Staffs
findings
are
the
design
guidelines
for
fencing
state
the
following.
Given
the
prominence
offenses
of
walls
in
the
front
yard,
it
is
critical
that
compatibility
with
the
architecture
and
the
structure
be
achieved.
This
can
be
accomplished
through
the
use
of
new
architectural
styles,
lend
themselves
to
certain
types
of
fencing.
Wood
bullet
on
board
and
picket
fences
are
compatible
with
the
frame
vernacular,
bungalow
and
colonial
revival.
J
Number
one
fencing
in
walls
shall
match
the
style
of
the
building
in
scale
material
and
color
white
plastic
fences
which
emulate
would
a
board
on
board
or
picket
is
an
acceptable
alternative.
Fencing
type
is
not
recommended,
however.
Vinyl
coated
chain
link
in
combination
with
landscaping
can
be
compatible
and
applicable.
J
Number
six
landscaping
shall
enhance
dark
the
architectural
character
and
appearance
of
the
structural
or
traditional
cultural
property
and
protectives
within
preservation
districts.
Staffs
findings
is
that
landscaping
is
being
recommended
by
staff
as
a
condition
of
approval
under
number
seven
other
than
replace
wherever
possible
and
architectural
detail
shall
be
treated
so
as
to
make
the
structure
or
property
consistent
with
the
property's
original
architectural
style
and
character.
J
New
material
should
replicate
the
material
being
replaced
in
composition,
design,
color
and
texture
stas
findings,
the
rich
character
of
the
structure
on
site,
but
it
is
permitted
in
the
w
dia
district
which
was
established
for
the
commercial
fishing
industry.
The
guidance
is
cincy
with
the
structure
that
also
allow
for
vinyl
coated
shane
link
fence
with
landscaping.
However,
this
would
not
provide
for
the
opaqueness
required
by
the
code.
Their
number
eight
all
structure
shall
be
recognized
as
products
of
the
runtime
and
shall
not
attempt
to
create
an
earlier
appearance
than
the
original
date
of
construction.
J
Staffs
findings-
this
is
a
secretary
of
interiors
standards,
does
not
specifically
address
fencing,
except
to
say
that
the
replacement
fencing
should
reflect
their
historic
period
of
the
structure
on
site
number
ten,
provided
that
the
opaque
fencing
remains
project
would
meet
the
requirements
of
the
LDC,
the
WD
I,
a
zoning
district
regulations
against
and
number
11
the
impact
upon
archaeological
sites,
or
shall
preserve
the
integrity
of
the
site
staff.
Hot
recommendations.
F
F
J
J
K
Good
evening
my
name
is
Matthew
house
address,
701
lanceton
court
tarpon
springs
the
only
comments.
I
haven't
just
making
myself
a
good
satisfy
that
code
enforcement
side
with
opaque
screen,
and
then
we
added
that
we're
planning
on
adding
additional
landscaping
around
the
front
inside
and
upon
the
final
assessment
and
of
the
next
phase
of
work
to
do
so,
really
just
that
was
it
and
just
making
myself
available.
If
there
was
any
questions.
A
I
Design
guidelines-
the
LDC
under
the
storage
section
for
outdoor
storage
requires
an
opaque
screening,
screened
fence
for
the
industrial,
just
if
you're
going
to
store
things
outside
in
this
particular
case.
That
is
not
consistent
with
your
guidelines
at
all
chain-link
fence,
with
the
vinyl
coating,
maybe,
but
that
doesn't
get
into
the
discussion
of
the
strapping
or
on
the
overcoats
they
put
over
top
of
them
the
black
overcoat
that
goes
over
top
of
them
to
screen.
None
of
that
is
consistent
with
your
design
guidelines.
Then.
K
F
J
The
existing
fence
that
was
there
at
the
fence
that
was
there
prior
to
that
was
just
a
regular
chain
link
fence
and
because
storage
outside
storage
is
something
that
is
permitted
in
this
district,
that
it
is
common,
so
to
be
able
to
find
something
to
marry
what
is
actually
required
by
the
LDC
and
try
to
be
find
something.
That's
aesthetic.
Historically,
it's
difficult
to
do
that
sometimes
so.
K
All
phases
of
work
we
would
do
landscaping
move
probably
do
it
make
sense
to
do
it
at
one
time,
so
we
wanted
to
kind
of
see,
make
sure
we
had
the
blessing
to
leave
as
is,
and
there
had
to
be
a
change
in
altercations.
So
once
we,
if
we
can
leave
intact
all
right
later
this
year,
first
of
the
year,
will
start
and
it
some
more
another
round
of
renovations,
whatnot
and
address
all
the
landscaping.
F
D
First
of
all,
congratulations
on
that
property
I!
Think
it's
a
really
lucky
that
we
have
who
got
in
there
and
they're
actually
going
through
the
effort
to
keep
it
functional
with
historic
property
that
probably
could
have
qualified.
You
have
been
torn
down.
If
anybody
taking
that
route,
there
was
a
chain-link
fence
there
before
the
building
is
actually
metal
which
I
dropped
past
it
multiple
times
every
day
and
I
breathe,
breathe
a
sigh
of
relief
when
I
saw
who
was
going
in
there
mm-hmm.
H
D
F
D
D
J
Okay,
this
property
is
a
non
contributing
historic
property
consisting
of
an
existing
single
story,
structure
constructed
in
1910
and
a
masonry
vernacular
style.
This
is
a
full
width.
There
is
a
full
width,
porch
front
porch,
which
appears
to
have
been
screened
at
some
time,
which
is
centrally
with
the
central
laws.
Entry
the
exterior
the
home
is
stuck
up.
The
roof
is
a
hip
style,
roof,
clad
it
with
I'm.
Sorry,
the
roof
is
a
hip
style,
roof
clad
it
with
composite
shingles.
The
home
has
been
extensively
altered
with
window
replacements
and
stucco
added
to
the
exterior.
J
There
is
no
driveway
for
this
home
said
the
instruction
of
a
new
driveway.
There
have
been
code
violations
assessed
against
the
applicant
by
the
Keth
city's
code
enforcement
Department
due
to
the
applicants
parking
on
the
front
lawn
number,
one,
the
height
and
width
of
any
proposed
alteration
or
new
construction
shall
be
consistent
with
that
of
adjacent
contributing
structures
throughout
the
immediate
neighborhood
staff
findings
are
that
the
requested
driveway
is
consistent
with
the
driveways
of
the
neighboring
property
number
two,
the
width
and
height
of
the
window
applicable
number
three.
J
The
relationship
of
a
structure
within
a
preservation
district
to
open
space
between
it
and
other
buildings
or
scenic
views
shall
be
protected
through
staff
findings.
The
new
driveway
request
is
far
better
than
parking
on
the
front
lawn
of
a
property
which
would
also
detract
from
the
neighbouring
properties.
Acid.
The
building
after
alteration,
shall
be
reflective
of
the
building's
original
architectural
style
staffs
findings.
J
The
dimensions
of
the
proposed
driveway
are
consistent
with
what
is
permitted
by
the
city's
land
development
code,
number
skit,
six
Landscaping
shelter
or
the
traditional
cultural
property
and
protect
open
spaces
and
pedestrian
ways
within
preservation,
districts,
staffs
findings.
Additional
landscaping
is
not
being
proposed
by
step.
Ossible
architectural
details
shall
be
treated
as
to
make
the
structure
or
property
consistent
with
properties,
original
architectural
style
and
character.
New
materials
should
replicate
the
material
being
replaced
in
composition,
design,
color
and
texture.
J
Staffs
findings
are
that
the
new
driveway
will
and
will
replicate
what
is
in
the
surrounding
area
number.
Eight
all
structures
shall
be
recognized
as
products
of
their
own
time
and
shall
not
attempt
to
pass.
Findings
are
that
the
proposed
driveway
will
not
reflect
an
earlier
time
number
nine,
the
renovation
of
contributing
structures
in
the
historic
district
or
designate
for
rehabilitation
and
guidelines
for
rehabilitating
historic
structures,
staffs
findings,
Secretary
of
Interior
standards
prefer
a
side
driveway
leak.
There
is
no
rear
alley
access
and
no
garage
is
present
on
the
site
and
the
subject.
J
J
Sas
findings
are
that
the
plan
driveway
would
meet
the
requirements
at
the
relations
and
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
Number
11
impact
upon
archaeological
site
shall
preserve
the
integrity
of
the
cycle.
Sites
will
be
impacted.
Recommendations
are
that
the
staff
recommends
approval
of
the
applicants,
new
driveway
request,
any
questions
I
have.
F
Preferences
and
for
homes
to
be
historic
homes
not
to
have
cars,
parked
right
in
front
most
likely,
I.
Okay,
second
question:
pretty:
is
that
having
a
driveway
this?
This
would
be
similar
to
them,
or
you
said
that
it
would
be
consistent
with
neighboring
properties?
Are
there
pictures
of
those
neighboring
properties
in
our
packet
I.
F
J
J
H
F
And
then
I
guess
my
other
question
before
the
applicant
and
then
in
the
chill
buildings
having
vehicular
access
from
the
street
or
through
alleys.
These
development
patterns
should
be
preserved
and
reinforced
through
the
design
guidelines
of
the
city,
land
development
regulations,
and
then
you
also
stated
that
it
is
the
Secretary
of
Interior
standards
to
prefer
a
side
driveway
leading
to
the
front
loaded
garage
in
the
rear.
The
lot
that.
F
J
And
a
lot
of
places
that
we
even
consider
non-conforming
also,
you
have
to
keep
in
mind
that
the
standards
for
the
Secretary
of
Interior
standards
and
rehabilitation
and
guidelines
are
for
contributing
structures
in
the
structure
and
property
structure
is
not
attributing
structure,
so
I
was
trying
to
required
to
do
I
think
they're,
basically
doing
what
is
consistent
with
the
red,
the
neighboring
properties.
Thank.
H
H
E
D
I
have
a
question
about
the
entry
for
the
driveway
prior
to
the
sidewalk
coming
off
the
street.
What's
your
plan
for
the
blocks
that
are
recessed
into
the
street
and
the
actual
space
that
it
doesn't,
it
doesn't
really
go
the
about
a
six
foot:
five,
whatever
the
width
is
20
foot
right
and
removing
the
blocks.
Yes,.
H
H
F
K
B
J
Okay,
the
owner
and
applicant
is
Mary.
Elizabeth
Howard
structure
is
considered
a
kitchen,
a
certificate
of
approval
to
allow
for
the
renovation
of
the
historic
structure
consisting
of
two
stories
and
constructed
circa
1910.
In
the
craftsmen's
bungalow
style.
There
is
a
full
with
front
and
side
porch,
the
corner
of
which
was
partially
screened,
circa
nineteen
thirty.
There
is
a
centralized
French
door
under
the
main
porch
roof.
The
exterior
the
home
is
stucco
and
aluminum
siding,
which
was
added
over
the
existing
wood,
siding
on
some
parts
of
the
house
served
in
1970.
J
The
roof
is
a
steep
pitched
hit
style,
roof
with
wide
eaves
and
exposed
rafter
tails
and
is
clad
it
with
metal
tiles,
pebble
stone,
pier
columns,
support
the
roof.
A
driveway
and
parking
spaces
span
the
adjacent
lot,
which
is
also
on
by
the
applicant
and
is
paved
with
a
rear
access
alley
behind
the
home.
The
applicant
is
reconstructing
the
structure
structure
to
open
a
new
bed-and-breakfast
Inn.
J
In
addition
to
the
complete
renovation
of
the
interior
of
the
structure,
the
following
renovations,
reconstruct
gaaray
facade
improvement,
grant
with
the
replaces
for
the
replacement
of
all
the
windows
in
the
structure.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
utilize
white
vinyl
single
various
sizes,
but
all
the
same
model
through
staffs
research.
It
seems
generally
acceptable
to
utilize
single
hung
windows
on
those
walls
and
stories
not
visible
from
a
frontage
street.
J
It
was
only
on
a
new
craftsman
homes
and
those
built
in
the
southwest
in
the
Prairie
bungalow
style
that
single
entered
window
pink
configuration
for
an
historic
Craftsman
home
is
the
three
four
six
or
nine
over
one
pane
configuration
proposes
to
replace
the
front,
porch
and
front
garden,
walk
with
pewter
brick
pavers
new
alley.
Access,
stabilization
and
partial
interior
drive
connection
access
point
into
the
rear
of
the
property,
and
the
parking
area
will
be
restriped
and
include
a
new,
accessible
parking
stall
landscaping.
J
Vegetation
on
site
note
tree
removal
is
proposed
and
potential
sighting
of
the
back
lawn
and
a
few
florida-friendly
plants
added.
Neither
from
proposed
on
the
front
lawn
fencing.
The
applicant
proposes
to
install
a
new
6
foot
pine
board
on
board
pressure
to
read
offense
along
the
perimeter
sign.
A
new
light
at
blue
and
white
18
square
foot
freestanding
sign,
consisting
a
metal
and
plastic
will
be
added
to
the
front
lawn,
requiring
approval
by
the
board,
consisting
of
the
finishing
of
doors
in
their
original
state.
J
Number
two,
the
width
and
height
of
Windows
and
entries,
shall
be
consistent
with
the
character
of
the
building's
original
architectural
style,
substantiated
by
historic,
physical
or
pictorial
evidence
staffs
findings.
It
is
possible
that
the
existing
single
hung
one
over
one
pane
windows
that
currently
exists
within
the
structure
were
also
wonders
that
were
replaced
at
a
later
time,
based
on
the
few
craftsman
homes
on
this
portion
of
East
harpin
avenue.
The
predominant
windowpane
configurations
are
the
three
over
one
and
six
over
one.
J
Stiles
staff
finds
that
the
other
proposed
improvements
for
landscaping,
fencing
the
new
sign,
the
porch
and
walk
pavers
and
the
new
alley
access
for
all
improvements
that
will
enhance
the
proposed
use
structure
under
number
three.
The
relationship
of
the
structure
within
a
preservation
district
to
the
open
space
between
it
and
other
buildings
or
scenic
views
shall
be
protected
through
the
site
plan
review
prints.
J
All
of
the
improvements
proposed
have
been
reviewed
through
the
city's
Technical
Review
Committee
and
through
the
conceptual
site
plan
review
process
to
ensure
compliance
with
the
city's
land
development
code
number
for
the
shape
and
texture
of
the
roof
shall
replicate
the
shape,
texture
and
roof
a
type
of
roof
on
the
structures,
a
similar
style
and
age,
with
inter
preservation
district.
We
did
not
find
this
one
applicable
number
five,
the
size,
the
mass
of
the
building
after
alteration
shall
be
reflective
of
the
building's
original
architectural
style,
staffs
findings.
J
The
size
and
massing
of
the
structure
will
not
be
affected.
Architectural
elements
of
the
neighborhood
and
neighbouring
properties
have
been
reviewed
and
considered
by
staff
number
six
or
traditional
cultural
property
and
protect
open
spaces
and
pedestrian
ways
within
a
reservation.
District
staffs
findings,
the
proposed
landscaping
and
papers
will
enhance
the
parents
of
the
structure
and
the
pedestrian
walks
on
the
property
number.
Seven
distinctive
architectural
features
shall
be
repaired
rather
than
go
is
to
make
the
structure
or
property
consistent
with
the
property's
original
architectural
style
and
character.
J
New
materials
should
replicate
the
material
being
replaced
in
composition,
designing
for
the
restoration
of
most
of
the
historical
elements
on
site.
The
proposed
sign
lighting
will
need
to
be
taken
into
consideration
to
ensure
that
there
is
no
bleed
/
or
/.
Never
6.
All
structures
shall
be
recognized
as
products
of
their
own
time
and
shall
not
attempt
to
create
an
early
appearance
than
original
date.
Of
additional
modifications
and
alterations
are
not
expected
to
create,
create
an
earlier
pearance.
J
Staffs
findings
are
the
local
design
guidelines,
recommend
the
for
everyone,
or
three
projects
shall
conform
to
the
requirements
of
the
land
development
code
and
be
in
compliance
with
the
political,
cliff
global
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
Comprehensive
Plan.
Stash
findings
are
that
all
of
the
proposed
and
prevents
would
meet
the
requirements
of
the
LDC
zoning
district
regulations
and
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
Comprehensive
Plan.
J
One
replacement
windows
for
the
front
and
sides
of
the
structures
should
be
three
over
one
pane
styles,
since
these
walls
are
visible
from
Tarpon
avenue
and
the
B&B
use
of
the
structure
was
not
only
a
commercial
use
of
the
structure,
but
a
use
that
emphasizes
the
historical
nature
of
the
structure.
The
three
over
one
pane
style
would
be
consistent
with
the
same
craftsman
style
home
located
across
the
street
number
2
sine
lighting
may
require
shielding
from
light
overflow
or
glare,
depending
on
what
type
is
used.
Staff
recommends
ground
lighting
for
up
lighting
of
the
sign.
B
J
Applicant
was
instructed
that
by
code,
and
especially
within
this,
the
zoning
district,
it's
within
one
of
the
t
zones,
the
transact
zones
that
fall
under
the
special
area
plan.
It
requires
that
the
fan
defense
cannot
come
for
anything
forward
of
15
feet
from
the
front
property
line
has
to
be
four
feet
or
less
so
well,
as
long
as
they
go
back
by
four
feet,
they
can
have
a
taller
fence
of
of
six
feet
and
possibly
even
eight
feet
and
the
point.
B
B
E
L
The
landscaping,
for
example.
Also,
I
am
a
leed-certified
architect,
2
and
in
the
landscaping
the
little
addition
that
we
do
above
are
beyond
trimming
and
cutting
and
species.
So
we
do
not
require
extra
watering.
Our
unusual
conditions
to
the
climate
where
we
are
those
are
the
only
two
things
that
at
this
moment,
I
would
like
to
add
to
what
has
been
said.
A
F
G
L
Issue
I
like
that
question
very
much,
and
I
would
like
to
something
that
I
have
not
seen
in
the
HPD
reviews
that
I
again
as
a
lead
architect
lead
the
windows
and
the
door
replacement.
Also
obey
an
energy
consideration
to
replace
single
decisions
had
to
be
made
thinking
with
a
better
load
or
a
lower
load
of
cooling
by
having
a
double
pay
from
the
outside
of
the
same
window.
So
that
consideration
is
not,
let's
say
historical
in
the
terms
of
modern
times.
I
think
item
and
I'll
mention
another
point
on
that
respect.
L
Instead,
if
we
have
insulation
underneath
treating
that
like
an
exterior
wall
which
energy
wise
it
is,
then
we
have
less
demand
of
the
cooling
in
the
building.
Plus
also,
I
have
suggested,
and
we
are
doing
it.
The
initial
building
had
the
air
handler
up
in
the
attic,
which
is
also
an
insane
thing
to
do,
and
also
had
the
air
handlers
underneath
the
crawlspace.
Those
two
areas
a
month
ago
were
easily
a
hundred
now
inside
we're
asking
for
74
solution
inside
the
building.
L
On
the
second
floor,
we
have
a
space
for
the
air
handler
now
in
a
temperature
say
on
an
ambience
of,
say:
80
75
not
140,
base
inside
the
building,
plus
the
cooling
between
the
floor
and
the
crawlspace
conclusion.
We
not
only
have
a
historically
elegant
and
respected
building,
but
also
in
terms
of
today's
standards,
a
very
well
insulated,
and
so
in
terms
of
energy
consumption.
For
cooling
loads.
D
D
L
G
B
D
A
L
They
see
that
sightings,
that
is
there,
it's
about
1
foot,
wide
planks
and
yes,
they're
in
the
front
in
a
limited
amount,
because
the
big
windows
and
the
doors
covered
most
of
the
front,
and
it
goes
on
the
side
and
then
aluminum
is
not
an
aluminum
in
the
form
of
let's
say
sighting
like
planks.
It
is
just
sheets
of
aluminum.
I
was
changing
the
aluminum
for
some
reason,
but
so
the
idea
is
to
now
bring
those
planks
exposed.
L
B
G
F
So
admit,
I've
moved
to
approve
the
application,
as
presented
by
staff,
with
the
addition
that
there's
an
approval
for
the
removal
of
aluminum,
siding
and
respiration
of
cedar
shake
siding
period.
Question.
Is
there
some
trigger
point
with
the
deterioration
of
citing
that
the
material
changes,
though
we
have
to
prove
that
or
can
they
do?
They
have
carte
blanche
on
it
sounds
like
I
mean
intent
is
to
do
an
incredible
job
of
restoration,
and
but
do
we
the.
I
Removal
is
not
an
issue
but
I
think
until
they
remove
it
and
actually
see
the
quality
they're
not
or
the
quality
of.
What's
actually
underneath
they're,
probably
not
going
to
know
the
answer
to
that
question.
If
it's
going
to
be
something
that
they're
going
to
have
to
come
back,
they
may
have
to
come
back
if
they're
going
to
have
to
do
some
type
of
large
change.
If
they're
changing
individual
bill,
you
know
individual
boards
out.
That's
a
different
story.
That's
something
that
staff
we
can
work
with
them
on.
I
Obviously,
we
want
them
to
try
to
whatever
they're
going
to
replicate,
to
replicate
it
as
closely
as
possible,
but
again
until
they
get
off
whatever's
on
the
whatever
metal
or
whatever
is
on
there
to
really
get
an
idea
of
the
whole
structure.
What
it's
going
to
be
like
they're,
not
gonna,
be
able
to
really
know
that's
the
case,
but
obviously
we'll
work
with
them
as
much
as
possible
when
they're
in
that
process
to
just
make
them
aware.
I
B
B
D
D
J
Okay,
this
case
is
on
and
after
the
fact
application,
the
property
is
considered
a
contributing
historic
structure
and
the
applicant
is
seeking
a
certificate
of
approval
for
the
windows
that
were
replaced
on
the
first
and
second
floors
of
the
historic
structure
constructed
circa
1894
from
the
masonry
vernacular
style.
The
structural
system
and
exterior
of
the
structure
consists
of
you,
narrow
wood
doors
that
have
been
reconditioned
in
stained
and
awning
covers
a
sidewalk
for
the
entire
width
of
the
structure.
J
The
brick
facade
was
painted
and
Hardy
board
and
hard
board
was
applied
to
the
structure,
circa
nineteen.
Ninety
there
is
a
corbel
plaque
with
the
words
GW
Fernald
1894
is
centered
in
the
parapet.
This
was
the
first
commercial
building
constructed
after
a
fire
edition
on
the
site.
The
new
store
was
located
on
the
first
floor
and
stocked,
hey
cattle
and
horse
feed
and
household
goods
and
groceries.
The
second
floor
was
at
was
a
community
meeting
space.
The
original
second-story
windows
were
would
double
hung
one
over
one
arch,
two
panes
with
orange
hoods
over
the
windows.
J
The
applicant
received
approval
for
the
from
the
Technical
Review
Committee
for
the
first
and
second
story:
mirror
glass
window
glass
panels
on
August
twenty-eighth
of
2016.
The
applicant
installed
the
new
windows
without
going
through
the
HPP
review
process,
triggering
action
by
the
city's
code
enforcement
division.
At
this
time,
only
the
windows
are
being
reviewed
by
this
board
for
the
certificate
of
approval,
height
and
width.
The
proposed
alteration
or
new
construction
shall
be
consistent
with
that
of
the
adjacent
contributing
structures
throughout
the
immediate
neighborhood.
Staffs
findings
is
the
replacement
window
number
two.
J
The
width
and
height
of
the
windows
and
entry
shall
be
consistent
with
the
character
of
the
building's
original
architectural
style,
repair
or
replacement
of
missing
architectural
features
should
be
based
on
accurate
duplication,
substantiated
by
historic,
physical
or
pictorial
evidence
staffs
finding
those,
so
the
mirrored
single
pane
windows
would
not
be
considered
consistent
with
the
original
windows.
However,
other
architectural
features
have
been
retained,
Marge
hoods
and
the
wooden
blinds
stops
and
sills.
The
original
first
story,
the
original
first
story
windows-
were
also
single
pane
windows,
but
they
were
not
mirrored.
J
Unfortunately,
the
casing
of
the
first
story
windows
were
completely
dry,
rotted
and
termite
damage.
These
casings
were
not
a
ver
within
a
preservation
district
to
the
open
space
between
eight
and
other
buildings
or
scenic
views
shall
be
protected
through
the
site
plan
review
process,
the
neighboring
structures,
the
structures
and
windows
on
the
same
block
or
obviously
varied
in
style
and
can
be
considered
eclectic
and
in
the
uses
that
end
in
the
uses
that
are
several
frontages
with
varying
degrees
of
mirror
glazing.
J
Staff
is
of
the
opinion
that
the
replacement
windows,
although
more
tinted
than
the
original
windows,
serve
the
use
of
a
nightclub
since
and
since
alcohol
will
be
served
on
both
floors
of
the
building.
The
second-story
single
pane,
wind
up
windows
versus
a
single
hung
winter
for
the
use
and
for
the
public
number
four.
We
did
not
find
applicable
number
five.
The
size
amass.
The
building
after
alteration
shall
be
reflective
of
the
building's
original
architectural
style
staffs
finding
and
remains
this
the
same.
The
number
and
size
of
the
windows
were
not
increased
or
decreased
number.
J
Six
landscaping
shall
enhance
the
architectural
character
and
appearance
of
the
structural
or
traditional
cultural
property
and
protect
open
spaces
and
pedestrian
ways
within
preservation,
districts,
SAS
findings.
The
structure
serves
the
Main
Street
and
sits
on
the
bill
to
line
landscaping
is
not
expected
or
required
for
this
property
number.
Seven
distinctive
architectural
features
shall
be
repaired
rather
than
replace
wherever
possible.
An
architectural
detail
shall
be
treated
estimate
with
the
property's
original
architectural
style
and
character.
J
New
materials
should
replicate
the
material
being
replaced
in
composition,
design,
color
and
texture
status,
findings
damage
to
the
wood,
muntins
and
casings
on
several
of
the
windows.
In
accordance
with
the
design
guidelines,
the
replacement
of
all
the
windows
is
permitted
shall
be
recognized
as
products
at
their
own
time,
as
shall
not
attempt
to
create
an
earlier
appearance
than
the
original
date
of
construction
stats
findings.
Unfortunately,
this
structure
was
already
altered
extensively
in
the
past.
J
The
brick
facade
was
painted
in
the
past
and
the
applicant
proposes
to
we
paint
the
brick,
which
is
this,
which
is
not
reviewed
by
this
board.
In
a
lighter,
more
neutral
tone,
number
nine,
the
renovation
of
contributing
structures
in
a
historic
district
shall
meet
the
Secretary
of
Interior
standards
for
rehabilitation
and
guidelines
for
rehabilitating
historic
buildings.
Staffs
findings
are
that
the
Secretary
of
Interior
standards
allow
for
the
replacement
of
compatible
windows
when
the
original
materials
are
not
technically
or
economically
feasible.
J
There
was
a
lot
of
termite
damage
to
the
wood
caissons
in
and
finding
and
finding
arched
windows
to
fit
the
dimensions
of
the
existing
window.
Openings
was
difficult.
Number
ten
proposed
project
shall
conform
to
the
requirements
of
this
code
and
be
in
compliance
with
applicable
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
windows
do
meet
the
requirements
of
the
LDC,
the
zoning
district
regulations
and
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
comprehensive
plan
number
eleven,
the
site,
and
there
were
no
archaeological
sites
that
were
going
to
be
impacted
recommendations.
G
G
J
F
I
Heard
that
the
windows
were
incorrectly
changed
out
without
approval
by
this
board,
they
then
were
cited
by
code
enforcement.
Come
to
you
and
have
you
guys
determine
whether
or
not
you
feel
that
the
replacement
windows
that
they
have
put
in
our
worthy
just
look
into
something
out?
So
that's
what
we're
here
for
today
so.
I
I
It's
in
a
historic
building,
especially
when
it's
a
contributing
structure
that
they
are
to
come
before
this
board
prior
to
starting
construction,
because
they
need
to
get
approval
for
those
CRA
grants
ahead
of
when
they
actually
start
the
stuff,
so
that
we
know
what
their
itemized
list
of
things
that
they're
going
to
do
so
that
when
we
go
back
and
get
through
the
reimbursement,
we
have
something
to
go
against.
So
that's
why
it
goes
to
TRC.
F
G
F
F
M
Are
my
VIP
rooms,
that's
martini,
lounge
that
we're
placing
up
on
the
second
floor
and
those
are
actually
Marty
VIP
or
that
are
going
to
be
privately
with
a
code
for
the
clients
to
enjoy
themselves
in
a
private
session.
But
my
biggest
concern
was
those
are
high
impact
windows
that
we
placed
in
that
on
those
windows,
because
we
don't
want
nobody
in
khane
access
and
open
up
the
window
and
tossed
out
the
window.
So
we
put
high
impact
just
in
case
of
anything
ever
occurred
in
in
that
room.
G
M
G
M
G
F
Like
to
just
for
discussion,
just
in
review
of
the
applicator
what's
been
presented
to
us
as
an
after-the-fact
Appling
safety
off
of
the
board,
because
that's
not
in
the
purview
of
this
board,
so
a
person
safety
on
the
second
floor
isn't
something
we
can
making
a
decision.
I,
don't
see
how
we
would
have
ever
approved
the
types
of
windows
that
are
that
were
installed
to
replace
what
was
there,
even
if
they
were
rotted.
We
would
still
have
asked
for
something
and
have
consistently
and
our
guidelines
dictate
that
we
should
ask
for
similar
style
windows.
F
F
G
B
G
D
B
B
I
As
we
mentioned
before,
we're
not
going
to
hear
the
one
application
is
going
to
come
back
to
you
what's
up
Ryan
application.
Just
is
it
for
informational
purposes,
we'll
bring
it
back
to
you
once
it's
been
updated,
there's
a
couple
updates
that
are
going
to
go.
Go
forward
with
that
other.
That
staff
does
not
have
any
direct
comments
at
this
point.
We
only
have
one
application
for
your
next
meeting,
so
you
will
have
a
meeting
in
November
right
now.
F
J
J
Don't
care
what
I
look
at
it
from
desert
aspect
and
from
the
comprehensive
plan,
and
we
do
have
a
lot
of
new
uses
coming
in
into
the
area
within
the
historic
district.
These
uses
from
residential
to
commercial
and
a
lot
of
these
new
businesses
that
are
coming
in
are
big
economic
note
that
economic
development,
at
the
same
time
try
to
keep
our
historical.
F
I
will
in
response
to
that
for
the
guidelines
so
that
we
could
better
serve
the
business
owners
and
residents
of
this
community
and,
for
instance,
the
bed
and
breakfast.
What
happens
you
bored
again?
Our
guidelines,
don't
even
you
know,
mention
Hardie
board,
so
we're
I
just
think.
It
again
exposes
this
board
that
if
all
these
changes
are
coming
and
I
don't
know,
we
haven't
gotten
an
update
from
the
city
about
our
review
of
our
guideline.
So
it
would
be
great
if
somebody
would
give
us
a
report
or
let
us
know
how
that's
coming
along
I.
J
Did
have
the
opportunity
and
many
times
woods
easiest
to
do-
is
to
present
different
codes
from
other
cities
that
I'm
compatible,
instead
of
starting
it
from
the
very
ground
floor,
because
that
could
take
that
ends
up
taking
a
lot
longer
to
be
able
to
do
instance
and
send
some
to
you
from
time
to
time.
And
you
all
take
a
look
at
them
and
see.
Maybe
even
go
through
a
discussion.
Have
a
meeting
go
through
with
our
area
with
a
cup
with
a
couple
of
tweaks.
J
J
B
E
Can
I
just
make
a
comment
on
from
a
legal
perspective,
while
I
appreciate
that
y'all
are
trying
to
move
forward
with
your
guidelines
and
I
think
that
would
likely
be
important
for
this
board.
Your
standards
of
review
do
not
reference
your
guy
you're
talking
about
if
someone
comes
before
this
board
and
they
want
to
use
some
sort
of
material,
that's
not
referenced
in
your
your
guidelines.
You
know
the
purview
of
this
board
of
review
that
are
set
forth
in
the
code
to
make
that
determination.
E
Your
guidelines,
while
helpful,
are
just
that
there
are
guidelines,
they're,
not
a
requirement
for
you
to
meet
every
single
one
of
those.
You
know
you
are
required
to
meet
the
standards
for
review
that
are
within
your
code,
not
one
of
those
items
and
and
staff
lists
them
in
every
single
application
that
comes
before
this
board.
Not
one
of
those
items
says
that
you
have
to
adhere
to
the
historic
guidelines
that
you
have
for
this
board.
That
is
just
a
very
helpful
tool,
while
understanding
that
it
would
be
more
helpful
if
it
was
up
to
date.
E
You
know
that
is
not
a
requirement
for
you
guys
to
to
go
outside
of
those
and
make
the
recommendations
based
on
what
those
standards
of
review
or
your
criteria
for
this
board
are,
so
that
may
give
a
little
bit
more
flexibility,
while
I
understand
where
you're
coming
from.
As
far
as
you
know
what
the
code
says,
you
have
a
little
bit
more
flexibility
than
adhering
specifically
to
those
guidelines.