![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/WRbQ71UyNd0/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: Heritage Preservation Board April 3, 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
Okay,
okay,
public
comments:
now
these
are
just
general
public
comments
for
every
one
of
our
applications.
The
public
will
have
a
chance
to
speak
before
the
board.
So
if
you
just
have
any
general
thing,
you
can
go
now,
hearing
none
continue.
A
A
A
Any
discussions
nope
hearing
none
can
we
have
a
vote
on
that
Mr.
F
Springs
Heritage
preservation,
board
or
quasi-judicial
in
nature
in
a
quasi-judicial
proceeding.
The
board's
function
is
to
make
findings
a
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
apply
those
findings
of
fact
to
previously
established
criteria
contained
in
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
code
of
ordinances.
This
is
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
the
board.
F
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
that
the
law
considers
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues
arising
from
the
application
and
the
applicable
code
sections
any
and
all
persons
providing
testimony
at
this
hearing
are
required
to
do
so
under
oath.
All
persons
testifying
at
this
hearing
must
give
their
name
address
and
must
indicate
whether
or
not
they
have
been
sworn
for
the
record
prior
to
proceeding
with
their
testimony.
F
All
testimony
and
questioning
at
this
hearing
must
address
matters
that
are
relevant
and
material
to
the
issues
under
consideration,
based
on
the
criteria
established
in
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
code
of
ordinances.
If
any
board
member
has
disclosures
regarding
an
application,
please
make
your
disclosures
on
the
record
at
the
beginning
of
the
hearing.
This
would
include
ex
parte,
Communications
and
voting
conflicts
of
interest.
If
there
is
not
a
full
board
present
at
the
beginning
of
the
hearing,
the
applicant
May
request
a
continuation
to
the
next
regularly
scheduled
meeting
of
the
Heritage
preservation
board.
F
The
following
is
the
established
procedure
which
will
be
followed
at
this
quasi-judicial
hearing.
The
staff
will
present
its
testimony
and
evidence
regarding
the
application.
First,
the
applicant
will
have
an
opportunity
to
ask
questions
and
cross-examine
the
staff
and
any
staff
Witnesses.
The
applicant
will
then
have
the
opportunity
to
present
its
Witnesses
and
evidence.
The
city
will
have
the
opportunity
to
cross-examine
the
applicant
and
any
of
the
applicants.
F
Witnesses
members
of
the
public,
opposing
or
speaking
in
support
of
the
application,
will
then
be
given
the
opportunity
to
present
their
testimony
and
evidence
the
applicant
and
then
the
city
May
then
present
rebuttal,
testimony
and
evidence
in
a
closing
statement.
For
summary,
the
board
will
close
the
public
hearing
for
discussion
and
consideration
of
the
application
at
this
time
for
anyone
Desiring
to
speak
on
any
matter
before
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
Heritage
preservation
board.
Please
stand
to
receive
the
oath.
F
A
G
So
this
first
slide
shows
you
the
location
and
context
of
the
subject.
Property.
G
G
So
this
applicant
is
Seeking
a
certificate
of
approval
to
replace
an
existing
window
with
a
door
on
the
East
Elevation,
replace
the
existing
front
door
and
side
lights,
replace
existing
awnings
construct
an
addition
at
the
rear
of
the
home,
add
awnings
over
the
existing
West
or
and
window,
and
the
proposed
new
East
and
West
doors,
replace
existing
siding.
Add
a
casement
window
on
the
North
elevation
to
provide
egress
to
a
remodel
bedroom
and
replace
existing
porch
railings
at
the
contributing
structure
at
410,
West,
Lemon,
Street.
G
G
G
H
G
So
essentially,
one
of
the
largest
features
is
the
new
addition
to
the
rear
of
the
property,
and
this
is
showing
the
front
elevation
features.
There
are
adding
a
deck
over
on
the
east
side,
putting
up
the
new
Hardie
board,
siding
putting
in
a
new
railing
on
the
porch,
the
new
awnings
on
the
Edition
and
the
replacement
of
the
door
and
side
lights.
G
G
G
Because
of
the
addition,
we
need
to
look
at
new
construction
consistency,
we're
obviously
making
some
changes
to
Windows,
Doors
and
entries
I
need
to
consider
if
it
is
relevant
to
the
neighborhood
and
District
context.
The
roof
tape,
shape
and
texture
is
relevant.
With
respect
to
the
addition,
the
addition
would
change
the
the
size
and
massing
of
the
building
changes
to
architectural
features,
adherence
to
the
period
of
construction
and
adherence
with
the
secretary's
guideline
and
and
very
importantly,
in
this
one
conformance
with
other
city
code
requirements.
G
So
the
addition
is
proposed
at
the
rear
side
and
it
would
be
visible
from
Lemon
Street,
so
that
would
be
equal
in
Alteration
to
the
height
and
width
of
the
property.
The
roofline
proposed
for
the
addition
would
be
subordinate
to
the
existing
building,
but
it
would
be
visible
from
Lemon
Street
in
the
public
Alleyway.
This
is
not
necessarily
inconsistent
with
adjacent
contributing
structures,
however,
because
it's
at
the
same
Dimensions
as
the
house,
so
it
would
be
existing
off.
It
would
not
be
in
any
way
indented
in
in
the
rear
or
west.
G
G
So,
with
respect
to
the
facade,
also
on
Windows
and
Doors,
the
addition
to
of
the
new
casement
window
on
the
rear
elevation
to
provide
a
point
of
egress
for
the
proposed
new
bedroom,
it's
proposed
as
a
casement
window
Steph,
finds
that
a
one
over
one
would
probably
be
more
architecturally
appropriate.
G
And
then,
with
respect
to
the
facade,
the
applicant
is
proposing
changing
the
historic
railing
and
that
would
make
a
change
to
the
facade,
also
replacing
the
historic
windows
and
front
door,
although
they're
proposing
a
replacement.
That
would
be
somewhat
in
kind.
G
And
so,
although
overall
I
think
with
some
minor
alterations
and
conditions,
staff
would
recommend
approval
of
the
project,
but
with
regards
to
that
rear
setback.
The
addition
this
board
can
recommend
approval
for
that,
but
because
it
is
not
within
the
code,
it
would
need
to
go
to
the
board
of
adjustments
for
a
variance,
because
the
setback
is
20
feet
in
the
rear
and
they
have
8.1
at
their
lowest
point
now.
So
if
they
were
to
build
to
those
setbacks,
there
really
wouldn't
be
much
for
them
to
be
able
to
build.
G
So
staff
recommends
that
approval
be
conditioned
on
at
least
reducing
those
Dimensions
slightly
so
and
when
I
say
slightly,
it
could
be
as
little
as
half
a
foot,
but
so
that
it
is
subordinate
to
the
primary
structure.
G
Staff
recommends
retaining
the
historic
doors
and
side
lights
unless
sufficient
evidence
is
provided.
That
replacement
is
the
only
viable
option,
because
that
is
a
defining
characteristic
of
the
property
staff
recommends
that
the
historic
handrails
be
retained
or
sufficient
evidence
be
provided.
That
replacement
is
the
only
viable
option
for
that
staff
recommends
that
the
window
on
the
East
Elevation
not
be
converted
to
a
doorway.
They
do
have
an
existing
doorway
that
could
access
the
proposed
new
deck.
G
So
you
know
our
guidelines
state
that
we
should
not
be
changing
the
the
size
of
historic
openings
that
any
proposed
new
door
would
be
a
15
light,
French
door
consistent
with
the
existing
door.
G
The
proposed
new
windows
will
be
one
over
one
in
similar
Dimensions,
as
the
existing
windows
Hardy
plank
siding
is,
although
wood
would
be
the
most
appropriate
material
staff
finds
it
acceptable,
visual
replacement,
but
that
they
use
smooth
lap
finish
and
then
at
the
certificate
of
approval
would
expire
in
three
years.
If
a
building
permit
has
not
been
issued
about
that,
I
can
take
any
questions.
C
If
the
application
I
do
it's,
regarding
the
setbacks
that
you
mentioned,
that
this
is
not
our
decision
to
make
as
far
as
the
the
applicant
would
have
to
apply
for
a
variance
I
would
assume.
Yes,
with
your
with
the
staff
recommendation
of
making
the
addition
a
little
bit
smaller,
as
you
said,
to
be
subordinate
to
the
main
structure
that
wouldn't
help
them
with
the
setback.
Would
it
no.
G
G
F
F
You
said
the
architectural
type
was
what
minimal
traditional
okay
and
the
applicant
and
owner
name
was
not
filled
in
on
that
slide
either.
Do
you
have
those
handy
for
the
record
Thomas.
A
Okay,
applicant,
you
want
to
give
you
a
presentation.
I
Hello,
I'm
John,
Chef,
Chuck,
410,
West,
Lemon,
Street
and
I've
been
sworn
in
already
nice
to
be
here
and
nice
to
address
a
full
board.
I
I
I
just
want
to
say
about
the
I,
was
the
addition.
I
was
glad
to
hear
Carolyn
mentioned
that
there's
a
possibility
of
it
being
smaller,
because
in
my
reading,
originally
of
it
I
thought
that
it
that
wasn't
a
possibility
so
I'm
glad
that
it
it
it's
a
possibility
that
it
could
just
be
reduced
by
half
a
foot
if
we
can
get
by
that
20-foot
setback
limit
the
I
want
to
point
out.
If
Carolyn,
if
you
wouldn't
mind
scrolling
back
to
the
front
of
the
house,
that's
the
largest
vote.
I
I
think
it
was
the
last
photo.
You
had
right
well
there
you
might
be
able
to
see
it.
But
if
you
look
closely,
the
west
side
of
that
house
is
an
addition
itself
and
was
put
on
anything
west
of
the
chimney
or
on
the
photo
left
of
the
chimney
is
an
addition
that
was
added
to
the
house.
So
that's
not
the
original
structure
that
you're
looking
at
the
original
structure
was
a
door
with
three
windows
on
each
side
and
then
the
two
windows
were
put
on
the
other
side.
I
The
addition
that
we
are
asking
for
would
be
behind
that
addition.
The
addition
that's
in
front
right
now
is
visible
not
only
from
Lemon
Street
Bay
Street,
the
alleyway
across
the
street
and
the
alleyway
to
the
east
of
it,
but
also
spring
Boulevard.
You
can
see
it
all
right
there
and
historically
those
additions
were
important
because
historically,
families
grew
times
change.
Things
happened.
I
I
So
I
don't
think
that
adding
asking
for
a
small
addition
in
the
back
because
it
is-
and
we
can
make
it
smaller
if
that
in
case,
what
we
need
to
do,
but
I,
don't
think
that
it's
unusual
historically
for
that
to
happen
and
we're
not
asking
to
go
closer
to
the
property
line
than
we
already
are,
in
fact
we'll
move
it
back.
A
half
foot,
if
that's
what
we
have
to
do
and
then
it'll
be
even
further
back
we're
just
trying
to
make
the
more
the
house
more
comfortable
for
2023.
I
and
I.
Think
the
addition
will
not
impact
the
neighborhood
negatively
when
it's
finished
it
will
be
an
aesthetic
gem,
I
think
in
the
neighborhood,
when
it's
completed
and
talking
about
the
visibility
of
it,
it
there's
already
a
fence
there,
that's
going
to
be
replaced
to
the
same
height
and
on
the
side.
So
there's
not
going
to
be
a
lot
of
visibility
to
it.
I
If,
if
that's
a
concern,
the
other
thing
I'd
like
to
say
is
that
there's
several
things
like
the
handrails
that
to
code
should
be
changed,
but
that
is
overridden
by
the
historical
board.
If,
if
I'm
correct,
is
that
correct,
Carolyn.
G
I
And
the
same
with
the
egress
window,
that's
is
for
a
safe
health
safety
issue.
That's
why
the
Architects
put
it
in
the
plans
because
they
said
they
couldn't
do
an
egress
window
with
a
a
single
hung.
It
would
have
to
be
a
casement
window.
I
would
prefer
the
the
single
hundle
look
to
look
like
the
rest
of
them
as
well,
but
again
it
was.
It
can
be
overridden
and
I.
I
Just
think
that,
because
his
house
was
originally
a
rectangle,
if
you
take
off
the
addition
that
was
put
on
later,
it
was
a
rectangle
with
a
bump
out
on
the
east
side,
where
the
kitchen
bumps
out
a
little
bit
putting
this
addition
on
will
take
it
back
to
its
historical
shape,
a
rectangle
with
a
bump
out
and
I.
Think
if
we're
talking
about
historical
accuracy,
that
I
think
this
board
could
override
that,
with
the
same
as
their
override
the
other
coats.
I
As
far
as
the
French
doors
go
going
out
to
the
deck
I
understand,
we
don't
want
to
change
that
I'm.
Okay
with
that,
as
far
as
having
a
deck
there
I
know,
there
was
some
mention
in
the
recommendation
about
the
amount
of
deck
to
property.
There
was
a
deck
where
we
want
replace
the
deck.
It
was
an
old
wooden
deck
that
when
you
walked
on
it,
you
sometimes
fell
through
it.
We
had
to
pull
it
out
for
safety
reasons.
I
I
There
was
to
hide
all
that
and
I
would
hope
that
you
would
approve
that
debt
going
back
in
and
at
this
point,
because
we're
not
doing
the
French
doors
going
out,
we
wouldn't
be
adding
any
more
deck
than
originally.
Was
there
the
the
the
front
door,
we
love
the
front
door.
I
mean
we
like
the
whole
look.
In
fact,
if
you
noticed
on
the
plans
that
the
architect
Drew
up,
he
continued
to
put
the
same
type
of
door,
and
we
we
intend
to
to
try
and
get
a
appropriate
door
for
that.
I
The
problem
with
the
door
right
now
is
that
it
has
the
film
on
it
to
create
the
OPEC
effect
and
that
film
is
deteriorating
and
parts
have
cracked
off
and
coming
off,
and
if
it
continues
to
stay
there,
there's
more
is
going
to
crack
off
and
fall
off.
I
think
it
would
look
a
lot
better
to
put
a
new
door
that
is
approved
by
the
staff
here
then
to
to
leave
the
current
door
there
in
the
shape
that
it
is
the
labor
to
repair
the
door
would
be
astronomical.
I
At
this
point,
not
only
is
all
that
film
coming
off,
but
the
the
Jam
around
it
has
deteriorated.
I
Well,
I
think
I
think
that's
all
I
have
to
say
for
that.
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
for
your
listening.
Thank.
C
I,
do
you
hi
hi,
you,
you
mentioned
the
handrails.
So
are
you
saying
you're
willing
to
to
keep
these
handrails
just
move
them
or
are
you.
I
I
would
love
to
do
that
if
we
can
I
would
love
to
do
the
problem.
Is
they
curve
I,
actually
love
the
handrails?
We
asked
the
architect
about
the
handrails.
He
said
that
and
I
probably
need
to
get
more
clarification
from
him.
He
said
to
code.
They
have
to
put
up
different
ones
in
that
they
couldn't
use
the
same
ones.
Why
I'm,
not
sure
I
just
took
him
at
his
work?
I
I
C
If
you
could
and
then
you
said,
you
were
okay
with
reducing
the
size
by
a
foot
or
a
half
a
foot
or
whatever.
So
that
was
number
one
number
two
was
the
railing
or
I'm.
Sorry,
it
was
the
door,
the
that's
the
front
door,
we're
talking
about
right
right.
A
A
C
I'm
I'm
talking
about
actually
number
two
here,
the
historic
door
and
side
lights
must
be
reached.
Oh
that's,
the
front.
That's.
I
C
Front
and
that's
the
door
that
you
said
is
in
pretty
poor
condition,
but
you'd
be
willing.
If
you,
if
we
did
approve
a
new
door,
you'd
be
willing
to
go
with
the
15.
I
C
Okay,
we
talked
about
the
handrails
and
you
also
I
think
said:
the
East
Elevation
window
you'd
be
okay
without
changing
that
to
a
French
door.
I
C
I
C
Okay,
all
right,
okay,
is
that
something
you'd
be
willing
again
to
talk
to
the
architect
about
not
using
a
casement
and
using.
I
H
G
J
G
I
think
if
the
board's,
okay
with
it
staff,
can
just
work
with
the
applicant.
J
I
E
I
I
have
a
question:
if
we
don't
get
the
French
door,
if
you're
not
going
to
put
the
French
door
in,
how
are
you
going
to
get
out
to
the
deck?
Well.
A
Okay,
questions.
I
I
had
one
question
sure
I
don't
know
who
to
direct
it
to
but
I'm
I'm
asking
because
of
these
code.
Things
with
you
know
the
handrails
and
and
egress
window.
What
about
hurricane
windows
is.
Is
that
something
that
you
like,
when
you
replace?
They
say
you
have
to
get
hurricane
windows,
but
is
that
a
necessity
if
it's
a
historical
building.
J
G
J
G
And
that
would
be
correct
in
general,
but
we're
going
back
to
the
Florida
building
code
gives
it's
a
I
believe
a
quoted
it
in
one
of
the
staff
reports
that.
G
Historic
structures
or
portions
of
such
structures
that
do
not
strictly
comply
with
this
code
shall
be
considered
to
be
in
compliance
if
it
can
be
shown
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
building
code
officials,
so
that
is
up
to
the
building
code
official
of
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
that
equivalent
protection
has
been
provided
or
that
no
Hazard
will
be
created
or
continued
through
non-compliance.
So
there's
a
bit
of
a
gray
area
there
with
historic
structures.
J
G
A
Okay,
any
rebuttals
or
anything
like
that,
any
more
questions.
G
I
guess
I
just
would
mention
that
I
did
provide
you
with
the
pictures
that
you
sent
over.
So
those
were
what
I
handed
out
that
shows
the
deck
and
the
doors.
Oh.
G
You
know
again,
the
preference
would
be
for
the
glass
to
be
replaced
and
the
wood
doors
to
be
fixed,
but
if
we
can
find
a
reasonable
replacement
that
replicates
the
the
look
and
feel
that's
that's
up
for
this
board
to
decide
and
I
just
want
to
clarify
again
the
distinction,
so
the
handrail
does
not
need
to
meet
current
code
because
that's
what
that's
the
original
handrail
that
was
there
in
1930,
something
that
when
it
was
built.
G
J
G
This
board
can
condition
their
approval
by
that
I
would
say
that
having
it
be
narrow
is
somewhat
of
its
historic
charm.
Maybe
we
didn't
need
to
carry
so
many
ginormous
things
into
our
homes
back
then,
especially
our
minimal
traditionalist
homes,
but
if
that's
something
the
board
wants
to
condition
with
that.
That
is
your
purview
to
do
so,.
A
Okay,
I
got
I'm,
not
kid
to
something
real
real
good
here
on
the
go
back
to
the
plans
on
the
west
side,.
J
G
So
it's
in
what
would
now
be
the
bedroom
if
you
look
over
to
the
left
side
of
the
screen
to
the
very
far
left,
that
is
the
proposed
new
edition,
which
would
be
a
new
master
bath
and
then
right
next
to
it
to
the
right
would
be
the
new
master
bedroom
and
because
it
is
a
bedroom,
it
does
require
a
second
secondary
point
of
egress
for
fire
safety.
A
G
If,
if
the
addition
is
approved
and
again,
it
would
require
a
variance
from
the
board
of
adjustments
I,
as
staff
recommended
that,
yes,
you
can,
you
can
have
a
door
just
left
to
make
it
a
French
door.
Okay,.
A
A
Boycott
well
we're
ready
for
now
is
this
going
to
the
board
now
so.
F
Everybody
else
before
before
you
bring
it
to
the
board.
You
have
to
entertain
comments
from
the.
H
F
Both
propose
and
in
opposition
and
those
proponents.
A
Of
this
project,
anybody
I
assume
we
do
have
some
public
wants
to
talk.
A
A
F
K
F
L
L
Ira
Crow
120,
pineapple
Street
and
for
all
the
discussion
about
the
view
of
the
new
deck
and
the
possible
French
doors
off
the
dining
room
and
I
think
the
only
person
who
can
see
that
is
me
as
I'm
in
the
building
on
the
other
side
of
the
alley.
Occasionally
the
mailman
drives
through.
But
it's
a
it's
a
very
small
alley
and
I'm
fully
in
support
of
what
they're
trying
to
do.
L
A
Okay,
I'm
gonna
kick
the
board
before
we
get
started
like
to
talk
to
you
about
a
couple
things.
One
is
the
way
we're
doing
this.
A
What
I'm
thinking
about
is
we're
getting
approval
with
conditions
a
lot
of
times
so
and
then,
if
we
okay
go
for
blanket
approval
or
if
you
vote
down
an
approval,
is
essentially
a
denial
right.
So
if
we're
approving
what
I'd
suggest
is
we
approve
it
as
written,
but
then
go
through
every
one
of
these
conditions
and
change
them
as
needed
and
talk
to
them
amongst
ourselves
and
who's
going
to
have
to
say
where
I
sit
down
is
the
guy.
A
Making
the
no
motion,
okay,
because
you're
gonna
have
whoever
makes
a
motion
will
have
to
you
know,
agree
with
the
agree
with,
what's
being
said,
how
we're
changing
it?
Okay,
see
what
I'm
saying.
C
D
A
A
A
If
we
do
change
those
when
we
vote,
it
will
be
with
those
changes,
but
we
got
to
agree
on
that
amongst
ourselves
and
particularly
the
guy
writing.
Okay,
you
right.
Okay,
yeah
I,
don't
know
if
I
want
to
give
you
that
power,
but
okay,
so
but.
A
Now
we
can
discuss
this
is
going
with
the
Edition
you
have
Dimensions
Edition
should
be
reduced
on
the
west
north
side
to
comply
with
land
code
and
reduce
visible
impact
of
the
structure.
Okay
and.
A
Let's
back
up
a
point
because
20
foot
six
inches
is
going
to
make
a
difference:
okay,
he's
gonna!
What
we
can
do
is
putting
a
thing
in
there
or
get
a
variant,
so
we
can
approve
it,
but
he's
got
to
get
a
variant.
Okay,.
A
Okay,
well
think
of
this.
It's
in
the
back
of
that
house.
It
has
a
roof
line
that
is
going
to
be
a
shed
type
roof.
Okay,
that's
subservient
right!
There.
C
A
A
Okay,
not
what
but
my
thing
was.
You
know
it's
in
the
back
of
the
house
a
lot
of
times
it's
backing
out,
so
don't
worry
about
it
too
much.
But
if
everybody
agrees
with
the
six
inches,
that's
up
to
you
guys.
You
know:
okay,
okay,
okay,
six.
C
A
A
A
Apart
well,
if
you
can't
repair
it,
then
he's
going
to
have
to
replace
it
with
something
that
almost
exactly
like
it
definitely.
C
C
J
A
J
Would
say
if
he's
good
keeping
the
handrails
but
I
this
is
Tony.
This
is
we
live
in
a
different
age.
Things
are
bigger,
I'm
amazed.
You
can
get
a
refrigerator
through
that
door,
but
he
loses
half
his
porch.
So
he's
got
no
front
porch
the
way
it
looks
like
he
loses
half
the
size
of
it,
because
the
railing
is
basically
right
up
against
the
door.
So
if
he
you
use
the
same
lens
I,
don't
know
if
he
can
slide
them
out.
A
E
I
J
J
A
Okay
windows
on
the
east
side:
that
would
be
the
French
doors
if
I'm
not.
A
A
A
Well,
the
I'd
go
with
a
single
friend
a
single
door,
because
if
you
look
at
it
from
the
side
it
looks,
you
know
the
the
front
door
needs
to
be
dominant
and
with
a
double
side
door.
That's
easily
visible.
It's
not
well.
A
A
E
I
would
have
liked
to
seen
that
French
door
there,
and
this
still
doesn't
mind
I-
would
have
liked
to
have
seen
the
French
door
there.
M
A
J
J
A
H
G
G
A
G
F
Do
you
do
you
have
on
the
drawings
the
size
of
the
openings
on
those
slides
I
think
he
does.
J
J
Size
so,
but
like
a
standard
door,
six
foot,
but
they
do
make
a
five
foot
French
door.
So
I
don't
know
what
this
is.
If
this
is
six
foot,
then
you
got
no
issue.
It's
the
same
size.
If
this,
these
two
windows
are
five
and
change.
You
know,
then
you
kind
of
you'd
have
to
let
Carolyn
make
the
call
like
which
size
door
she
would
allow.
If
we
said
that
we
were
good
with
the
door.
Well,.
A
A
H
J
G
A
A
G
H
G
I
C
J
J
A
J
They're
just
fixed
windows
and
imagine
it's
probably
obscure
glass
I'm,
guessing
it's
a
secure
glass.
So
it's
just
it's
a
new
addition.
So
I
don't
know
how
we
can.
C
C
J
A
J
They've
got
single
hung,
the
two
other
are
that
are
in
the
bathroom,
are
single
hung
and
then
they
have
two
fixed
windows.
A
A
C
Five,
it
just
says
the
proposed
new
window
shall
be
one
over
one
in
similar
Dimensions
to
existing
Windows.
What
windows
are
we
talking
about.
J
Yeah
there
are
there's
all
the
windows
in
there
in
the
bathroom
there's
two
fixed
windows
in
the
shower.
On
the
other
side,
there
is
a
single
hung
window,
there's
a
door
and
then
another
single
hung
window.
So
the
bathroom
alone
has
four
windows,
and
then
you
have
two
egress
windows
in
the
master
bedroom,
okay,.
C
J
F
A
C
C
Correct,
but
if
we're
and
I'm
not
saying
we
are,
but
if
we
are
okay
with
the
windows
as
proposed
for
the
addition,
which
is
a
casement
window,
the
plate
corner
and
the
other
window
on
the
other
side
of
the
door,
those
are
the
only
Windows
we're
talking
about
in
number
five.
So
if
we
did
scratch
number
five
altogether,
we're
implying
that
we're
okay
as
the
applicant
as
far
as
the
application
goes
we're.
Okay
with
those
windows.
F
Okay,
so
that
is
not
what
number
five
is
doing?
What
number
five
is
doing
is
saying
that,
with
all
the
new
windows
he's
putting
in
in
that
Edition,
they
have
to
match
the
same
size
and
dimensions
as
the
historic
Windows,
all
around
the
other
side
of
the
property
so
with.
If
so,
if
you
don't
put
that
condition
in
there,
then
he
can
alter
the
size
of
the
windows.
So
do
you
want
the
windows
to
match
the
other
windows
in
the
house,
or
do
you
want
them
to
be
a
different
size?
J
Only
they
look
very
similar
I
can't
tell
because
we
don't
have
the
size
of
the
windows
in
the
rest
of
the
house.
So
she's
got
a
two
foot:
six
width
window,
there's
one
two
of
them
in
the
bathroom
and
two
foot.
Four
wide
windows
in
the
bedrooms,
so
I
assume
that
the
ones
in
the
bedrooms
are
the
same
size
or
and
they
didn't
change
them
or
they
would
have
been
single
hungs
that
are
wider
right,
Caroline.
I
I
Some
of
them
look
the
same
size,
but
when
we
ordered
blinds
for
them,
we
found
out
they
weren't
the
same
size
and
the
ones
in
the
addition,
which
is
the
the
West
Side
they're
much
larger,
well,
not
much,
but
they
are
larger
than
the
windows
in
the
house
that
was
originally
built,
so
they're
different
sizes.
I
just
want
you
to
be
aware
of
that.
H
C
C
I
B
G
You
withdraw
condition
number
five.
You
would
be
approving
the
windows
as
presented.
G
Windows
it
in
the
application,
so
if
you
would
withdrew,
can
condition
number
five,
you
would
be
approving
the
windows
as
presented
in
the
application,
or
you
could
come
up
with
a
new
condition.
F
G
Number
five
was
intended
to
alter
the
the
addition
windows
and
the
casement
the
replacement
I.
Guess
it
was
the
replacement
window
in
the
rear.
F
G
C
C
C
A
C
A
A
C
A
C
F
F
Two
would
be
the
historic
door
and
side
lights
must
be
retained
or
sufficient
evidence,
provided
that
the
replacement
is
the
only
viable
option
and
the
replacement
shall
be
with
the
same.
Look
as
the
existing
doors
number
three.
The
historic
handrails
must
be
retained
and
may
be
moved
out
from
their
current
location.
To
widen
the
entryway
number
four
would
be
that
the
French
doors
may
be
installed
where
the
current
windows
are
to
match
the
current
size.
Opening
of
the
windows.
Number
five
was
was
withdrawn
and
there
were
no
changes
to
numbers.
Six,
seven
or
eight.
C
The
motion-
it
is
number
or
two
mm-hmm,
we
actually
didn't,
say
the
to
retain
or
try
to
fix
I
believe
we
agreed
that
he
can
replace.
Okay
is
that
is
that
correct.
G
Sure
should
I
be
recognized.
Yes,
I
would
just
add
to
further
alter
condition.
Number
one
reducing
to
remove
the
phrase
to
comply
with
the
Land
Development
code.
As
reducing
by
six
inches
is
not
going
to
have
it
comply
with
the
Land
Development
code.
Just
for
clarity's
sake,
and
also
can
we
perhaps
come
to
some
language
on
condition
number
two,
that
the
historic
door
and
side
lights
may
be
replaced
with
materials
of
similar
visual
qualities
and
historic
configuration
so
needs
to
keep
the
same
number
of
Lights
correct.
A
H
F
Was
what
was
discussed?
I
don't
know
if
they
talked
at
the
original
condition,
talks
about
the
both
the
west
and
North
elevations.
Okay
and
whether
or
not
you
want
a
half
a
foot
on
each
side
was
not
discussed.
So
if
you
want
half
a
foot,
total
or
half
a
foot
on
each
side,
you
need
to
clear
that
up.
A
Let's
go
on
with
number
two:
this
is
23
24.
A
and
it's
four
304
find
pineapple
Street
and
it's
for
a
new
roof.
So
we
can
have
staff
talk
to
us.
G
Second
slide
is
showing
you
the
the
subject,
properties,
location
and
context
in
the
local,
historic
district,
and
the
third
slide
here
is
showing
you
the
context
within
zoning
in
the
surrounding
zoning.
G
Some
other
architectural
details
include
a
full
width,
pore,
Square
columns
and
a
wood
deck
Center
entry
with
a
craftsman
style,
French
door.
The
roof
includes
wide
overhanging
rules.
G
The
Florida
Master
site
file
for
the
property
notes
that
it's
been
previously
altered.
A
one-story
rear,
Gable
Edition
was
added
in
the
1940s,
Windows
have
been
replaced
and
it's
unclear
whether
or
not
the
stucco
exterior
is
original.
The
soffits
have
been
covered
with
aluminum
panels
and,
most
recently
the
size
of
the
Dormer
was
altered
in
2013..
However,
the
structure
is
still
considered
a
contributing
structure
to
the
historic
Local
District,
the
local
historic
district.
G
So
here
we
can
see
the
subject
property
on
the
1926
Sanborn
map
and
it's
a
little
difficult
to
tell.
But
there
is
a
black
dot
in
the
corner,
indicating
that
in
1926
it
was
a
composition.
Roof
here
is
the
photograph
from
the
Florida
Master
site
file.
G
G
And
this
is
just
some
product
information
I
was
able
to
find
on
the
proposed
metal
roof,
and
this,
fortunately,
is
a
lot
simpler
than
the
last
one.
We
only
have
a
few
standards
of
review
that
we
need
to
look
at
the
neighborhood
District
in
context,
the
roof,
shape
and
texture,
architectural
features
and
adherence
with
the
secretary's
guidelines.
G
G
The
let's
see
so
the
HPV
would
need
to
consider
the
impact
to
the
historic
Street
escape.
The
proposed
project
would
alter
the
texture
and
type
of
the
existing
roof
with
respect
to
Craftsman
style
roofs.
The
design
review
guideline
manual
notes
that
roofs
are
often
covered
in
asphalt,
shingles
currently,
but
historically
they've
had
some
sort
of
shingle
roof.
Metal
is
not
typical
for
a
craftsman
style
with
respect
to
roost
further
with
respect
to
the
roof,
shape
and
texture.
G
Our
guidelines
state
that
to
retain
and
repair
the
historic
roof
materials
where
feasible
and
that
the
new
material
shall
match
the
existing
or
be
characteristic
of
the
architectural
style
in
terms
of
material
size
and
pattern.
When
the
roof
needs
to
be
replaced,
the
applicant
has
been
informed
at
replacing
the
existing
shingle
roof
with
a
new
shingle
roof
could
be
approved
at
a
staff
level.
This
option
was
rejected
and
the
HPV
should
satisfy
themselves
that
the
conditions
of
the
guidelines
have
been
met.
G
G
So
staff
is
recommending
denial
for
the
project
as
presented
based
on
inconsistency
with
the
review
criteria.
However,
should
the
hbb
approve
the
application
staff
would
recommend
the
following
conditions
that
the
historic
roofline
be
maintained.
The
exterior
of
the
historic
chimney
must
not
be
altered
and
the
historic
Dormer
must
not
be
altered
in
addition
that
the
certificate
of
approval
would
expire
in
three
years
if
a
building
permit
has
not
been
issued
and
with
that
I
can
answer
any
questions.
C
No
go
ahead
in
your
conditions.
If,
if
we
were
to
approve
this
historic
roof
line
must
be
maintained
in
in
the
application,
are
they
proposing
changing
the
roof.
C
O
O
And
then
it
is
like
a
like
a
mill
finish
should
be
the
color,
a
mill
finish:
silver
like
a
Key
West,
Style,
Key
Largo.
O
J
O
We're
not
changing
any
of
the
Dormer
size
or
anything
as
far
as
the
shape
of
the
roof
or
we're
not
doing
anything
of
that
nature.
Just
removing
the
existing
roof
down
to
the
plank
deck
I
believe
is
possibly
one
by
eight,
maybe
one
by
six
plank
decking
and
then
we're
gonna
go
over
top
of
that
with
a
fully
huge
underlayment
and
then
follow
that
with
the
metal
installation.
O
A
A
O
C
F
A
F
O
A
Okay,
okay,
we're
gonna
have
this.
J
About
the
Dormer
and
Germany,
no
changes,
no
change
on.
A
J
I'll
make
a
motion
to
deny
to
add,
as
it
was
as
Caroline
presented,
didn't.
E
F
You've
already
taken
evidence
on
this
right
if
you're
going
to
postpone,
because
an
applicant
is
not
here
and
then
you
have
to
do
that
at
the
beginning
of
the
hearing
right
and
not
only
that
they
have
an
affidavit
stating
that
Eris
Roofing
Services
can
represent
them
in
this
application.
So
they
they
are
sworn
to
be
bound
by
the
representations
of
the
gentleman
that
was
here
on
their
behalf.
H
A
Granted
it's
not
for
Craftsman,
but
on
the
other
you
know
on
the
street,
there
are
three
or
four
others
that
are.
H
A
D
A
D
C
Talking
about
it
can
can
you
step
back
up,
I,
don't
know
if
you
have
to
give
your
name
again,
it's
it's
about
the
again.
The
way
the
roof
is
going
to
be
attached.
Yes,
ma'am
I've
I
have
seen
in
the
past
when
metal
roof
is
put
over
an
existing
roof.
It's
just
there's
furring
strips
or
something
added
it's
taller,
and
then
there's
always
kind
of
a
very
funny
edge
around
the
eaves
that
are
is
totally
inappropriate.
How
how
are
you
going
to
be
doing
this
roof?
We.
O
Don't
do
a
recover
so
we're
going
to
be
physically
taken
off
the
existing
shingle
roof,
we're
moving
it
down
to
the
plank
decking
and
then,
after
that,
installing
the
underlayment
mechanically
attach
that
to
the
plank
decking
and
then
install
the
fully
here,
underlayment
and
Then,
followed
by
the
metal
system.
Okay,.
O
It's
actually
like
the
thickness
of
a
paper
so
by
two
minutes
materials.
So
back
in
the
day
they
use
like
a
felt
paper
organic
and
now
it's
like
a
bituminous
material.
So
it's
a
more
better
way
to
waterproof
a
house
and
then
the
metal
panels
go
over
top
of
that
and
it's
a
concealed
Fastener
too
I
will
add
that
so
there's
two
types
of
installations
on
a
metal.
You
have
an
exposed
system
which,
when
you
look
at
the
metal
panels,
the
roof
itself,
you
actually
see
the
Fasteners.
O
You
see
the
screws
every
about
12
inches
on
up.
This
is
what
they
call
it:
a
conceal
Fastener.
So
you
put
the
panel
down
you
install
your
stainless
steel
screws
and
then
the
preceding
panel,
where
the
following
panel
comes
over
top
of
that
and
snaps
and
covers
those.
So
there
is
no
exposed
Fasteners.
It.
C
O
Whatever
yes
ma'am
and
it
will
match
the
the
color
of
the
metal,
so
it'd
be
like
a
silver
Mill
finish.
So
if
they
were
a
hypothetically
go
with
the
beige,
then
the
drip
edge
would
be
beige.
So
that
way,
it's
all
compatible.
O
It's
all
matching
okay
and
then,
as
far
as
the
chimneys,
there
again
I
didn't
mention
that,
but
we're
not
changing
anything
with
the
chimneys,
but
we
will
be
installing
base
flashing,
because
the
flashings
that
are
there
currently
now
are
for
shingle
installation,
and
you
can't
they're
not
compatible
to
put
a
metal
roof
using
an
existing
shingle
flashing.
You
have
to
use
metal
flashing
for
a
metal
roof
to
make
it
watertight,
but
it
won't
change
the
appearance
as
far
as
location,
height
width.
Anything
like
that.
Okay.
C
C
B
A
A
A
Yeah,
let's
take
a
break:
okay.
Okay,
take
a
break
for
about
five
ten
minutes
about
10
minutes.
Five.
J
A
A
J
A
G
Okay,
so
this
first
slide
is
showing
the
context
and
location
of
the
subject:
property.
G
G
And
as
the
Scotia
Hotel
in
the
1926
Sanborn
map,
significant
architectural
features
of
the
property
include
quarter
coins
exposed,
rafter,
Tails
tie
rods
and
anchor
plates
concrete
Sills
two
brick
chimneys
with
Corbell
brick
caps.
A
dental
block
at
the
top
of
the
parapet,
dress,
block
wood
frame,
double
hung
windows,
a
recessed
for
an
entry,
wood
framed
double
door
with
side
lights
and
transoms,
and
an
entry
Alcove
with
a
wood
frame
side.
Light
windows
with
bulkheads.
G
The
1913
sanward
map
is
the
first
to
show
this
Edition
and
by
1919.
The
Sanborn
map
indicates
that
the
addition
on
the
North
Northeast
quadrant
of
the
building
is
enclosed,
while
the
southeast
quadrant
remains
an
open
balcony
similar
to,
as
you
can
see
here,
so
the
historic
rear
Edition
in
that
same
configuration
that
appeared
in
the
1919
Sanborn
map
can
be
document
is
extant
until
at
least
2021
on
Google
Maps.
G
G
It
certainly
tells
us
about
the
it's,
an
artifact
of
the
lifestyle
of
the
late
19th
and
early
20th
century,
and
the
history
of
the
city's
founding
the
building's
use
has
adapted
over
time,
but
its
structural
components
with
accepting
the
rear
Edition,
have
been
little
altered
for
over
a
century,
so
staff
would
find
that
this
is
a
significant
structure
regarding
Criterion,
three
repairs
to
the
rear
wood
frame.
Edition
have
occurred
over
time
and
continued
repair,
Land
or
replacement
of
the
structure
would
not
have
been
constrained
by
Design,
texture,
material,
detail
or
unique
location.
G
The
structure
is
the
only
remaining
masonry
Livery
from
the
time
period
accident
in
the
city.
Maintaining
the
historic
configuration
of
the
rear
Edition
would
not
have
affected
the
future.
Use
of
the
property
staff
and
HPV
were
denied
an
examination
of
evidence
to
make
sure
findings
as
to
whether
reasonable
measures
could
have
been
taken
to
maintain
the
structure
and
the
projected
expense
of
the
proposed
Rehabilitation
of
the
addition
would
have
been
economically
feasible
so
giving
the
preceding
findings
staff
would
have
recommended
denial
for
Demolition
and
would
have
offered
Rehabilitation
or
sensitive
replacement
as
an
alternative.
G
G
G
Then
just
for
context,
this
is
actually
a
historic
structure
that
had
been
moved
so
that
the
structured
neighboring
was
not
originally
there.
It
was
moved
next
door.
G
G
G
G
So
with
respect
to
the
heightened
width.
The
staircase,
that's
proposed
at
the
rear
balcony
would
extend
approximately
12
feet
to
the
north.
Beyond
the
principal
building
the
lower
floor
of
the
addition
would
house,
in
approximately
8,
by
12
utility
room,
a
rear,
porch
area,
the
Ada
ramp,
a
concrete
low
wall
with
a
planter
on
the
southern
elevation,
and
the
planter
is
the
only
item
that
is
proposed
to
extend
to
the
property
line.
G
G
G
Actually,
next
to
the
neighborhood
District
in
context,
the
proposed
project
would
slightly
alter
the
relationship
of
the
structure
to
the
ocean,
to
open
space,
the
street
and
other
buildings
through
the
Improvement
expansion
of
the
existing
parking
area
and
the
exterior
staircase
on
the
North
elevation
as
as
depicted
in
the
renderings.
Some
screening
to
the
parking
area
would
be
provided
by
landscaping
and
the
board
should
satisfy
themselves
that
these
impacts
are
not
significantly
adverse
with
respect
to
shape
and
texture
of
the
roof.
G
G
However,
the
front
balcony
roof
should
utilize
the
original
hip
roof
shape
and
maintain
dimensions,
sizing
and
massing
again.
The
exterior
stereo
would
slightly
alter
that,
but
it's
consistent
with
the
contributing
buildings
in
in
the
in
the
immediate
vicinity.
G
Respect
to
architectural
features,
the
application
appears
to
propose
the
encasement
of
the
two
brick
Chimneys
in
painted
steel
and
removal
of
the
Corbell
brick
caps
staff
would
recommend
that
any
approval
would
be
conditioned
to
specify
the
preservation
of
concrete
Sills,
the
decorative
brick
chimneys
and
their
brick
caps.
The
exposed
rafter
tails
on
the
front
balcony
and
the
tie
rod
anchor
plates.
G
So
the
exterior
lighting
that's
proposed
appears
to
be
simple
and
consistent
with
our
guidelines.
G
However,
staff
would
note
that
per
guideline
74
lighting
fixtures
proposed
for
masonry
buildings
should
be
attached
to
the
mortar
and
not
the
masonry
unit
itself,
adherence
to
the
period
of
construction,
so
the
the
demolished
rear
frame
Edition
is
a
change
to
the
original
building
that
occurred
in
1919
and
may
have
been
significant
in
his
own
right
as
evidence
of
the
evolution
of
the
property.
So
the
Board
needs
to
determine
if
the
original
rear
Edition
achieved
enough
significance
toward
reconstruction.
G
And
conformance
with
other
city
code
requirements,
staff
finds
that
the
project
complies
with
the
Land
Development
code
and
can
be
interpreted
as
balancing
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
comprehensive
plan
and
with
respect
to
the
secretary's
guidelines.
The
Board
needs
to
determine
if
the
project
as
proposed
is
the
most
feasible
and
best
way
to
preserve
the
overall
historic
character
and
longevity
of
the
property
to
meet
the
intent
of
the
secretary's
standards.
G
And
just
some
highlights
from
the
Secretary
of
standard
we're
going
to
require
minimal
change
to
distinctive
materials,
features,
spaces
and
spatial
relationships,
retain
the
historic
character
of
the
property
and
distinctive
materials.
G
Changes
to
the
property
that
have
acquired
significance
so
in
their
own
right
will
be
retained
and
preserved.
Distinctive
materials
finishes
that
characterize
the
property
will
be
preserved.
We
always
prefer
to
repair
rather
than
replace,
and
that
new
additions,
exterior
alterations
and
related
new
construction
will
not
destroy
historic
materials,
features
and
spatial
relationships
that
characterize
the
property
and
that
any
new
construction
that
occurs
will
be
undertaken
in
a
manner
that,
if
removed
in
the
future,
the
essential
form
and
integrity
of
the
historic
property
will
be
unimpaired.
G
G
G
G
G
So
overall
staff
recommends
approval
of
the
project
with
the
following
conditions.
The
historic
Alcove
entryway
should
be
preserved.
If
the
applicant
provides
documentation
that
preservation
is
not
possible,
then
the
applicant
May
submit
detailed
plans
to
replace
components
of
the
entry
in
the
exact
configuration,
materials,
composition
and
design
of
the
original
for
staff,
review
and
approval.
G
G
The
tie,
rod,
anchor
plates
are
also
known
as
washers
sometimes
be
preserved,
and
that
detailed
plans
for
the
window,
repair
or
replacement
would
be
provided
and
reviewed
and
approved
to
staff
prior
to
the
issuance
of
a
building
permit
and
again
that
they
submit
a
detailed
sign
plan
for
this
board
to
hear
at
a
later
hearing
and,
finally,
that
the
certificate
of
approval
would
expire
in
three
years.
If
a
building
permit
has
not
been
issued.
A
C
Just
some
clarification
on
that
addition
that
was
removed
without
a
permit
are,
are
we
dealing
with
any
of
that.
G
I
I
think
it's
your
charge.
It's
a
violation
of
the
code
and
we're
not
saying
that
violating
the
code
is
ever
okay
right.
C
G
A
F
G
F
N
I
guess
you
have
any
specific
questions
about
the
restoration
to
this
delivery
stable
from
the
early
1900s.
N
No
her
plan
for
the
windows
is,
we
have
had
some
vandalism
since
the
proper
has
been
owned
of
Windows,
breaking
and
so
forth.
So
the
plan
would
be
to
keep
the
openings
but
replace
with
wood
wood
windows
with
a
collided
aluminum
on
the
exterior
for
the
weather
resistant
to
meet
the
opening
sizes,
as
is
so
no
masonry,
work
would
be
done
to
those
openings.
J
And
then
the
masonry
details
on
the
exterior
in
your
rendering
it
shows
it
like
it's
like
clean
and
solid
like
they
went
over
it
I'm
guessing
that's
just
the
rendering.
N
Yeah,
just
the
rendering
software,
because
actually
from
our
understanding,
research,
those
the
stone
was
cast
on
site,
which
is
definitely
not
done
today.
And
if
you
look
at
the
pictures,
there
are
certain
sections
of
the
building
that
had
different
shapes
of
the
stone
So.
The
plan
would
be
to
just
tuck
point
which
would
repair
the
stone
for
structural,
and
you
know
water.
You
know
waterproof
it
and
repaint
it
to.
You
know.
J
N
The
entryway,
as
you
walk
in
you,
go
up
a
couple,
a
step
or
two,
and
then
it's
wood
frame
so
underneath
and
actually,
as
you
walk
through
the
door
to
the
beam
kind
of
bounces,
so
plan
would
be
to
bring
in
dirt
and
concrete
to
make
a
solid
floor
so
that,
instead
of
a
wood,
flooring,
it'd
probably
be
concrete.
But
there
still
would
be
that
recessed
Alcove,
as
currently
shown,
probably
just
replaced
with
modern
materials.
As
yeah
there's
been
some
glass
and
damage
vandalism
to
the
front
door
as
well.
N
N
A
Right
now,
they're
metal.
N
N
It's
plans
to
eight
room,
Boutique
Hotel.
N
Plan
is
just
a
tuck
point
and
you
know:
keep
the
chimneys
struckly
sound
as
possible.
Yo
call:
okay,.
N
A
C
A
Okay,
Caroline
I'm,
good,
no,
okay,
the.
F
A
Okay,
any
public
hearing,
none,
okay,
open
it
to
the
committee.
Thank
you
very
much
by
the
way.
Thank
you.
Okay,
do
you
have
a
motion
I.
J
C
Yeah,
we
talked
about
that
and
he
seems
to
be
keeping
that
the
size
the
same.
A
A
C
A
Possible
I
might
go
along
with
that.
Okay,
so
item
number
four:
we're
gonna
just
delete
that
one
well.
A
H
A
A
C
G
Number
eight
should
be
windows
and
number
nine
should
be
the
sign
plan.
F
H
F
G
G
B
G
G
If
you're,
okay
with
the
applicant,
stating
that
they're
going
to
be
wood
windows,
okay,
I
can
approve
them
at
a
staff
level.
If
you
want
to
see
them
again,
okay,.
C
Well,
I
have
to
amend
my
motion.
Don't
I.
C
A
A
Okay,
what
are
the
changes
so.
F
The
only
change
that
I
had
was
the
removal
of
or
the
change
of,
number
four
to
allow
the
metal
railing
and
then
all
other
conditions
remain
the
same.
Correct.
F
F
So
we're
going
to
handle
that
one
separately,
because
that's
not
contained
in
here-
is
that
what
you're
asking
for.
G
G
F
All
you
would
say
is
that
you
would
be
allowing
the
proposed
Edition
to
satisfy.
F
To
satisfy
any
potential
code,
well,
you
can't
do
that
so
I.
G
F
G
My
suggestion
would
be
that
this
board
would
not
be
recommending
to
the
building
official
enforcement
proceedings
to
the
building
official.
This
board
is
not
recommended.
F
Well,
they
can't
recommend
enforcement
proceedings.
Anyway,
is
the
issue,
so
they
they
don't
refer
enforcement
proceedings.
They
don't
have
any
Authority
or
jurisdiction
to
all
they
all
they
do
is
approve
the
plans
and
if
there's
anything
in
violation
of
their
plans,
then
it
becomes
an
issue.
So
what
all
you're
going
to
do
is
approve
the
addition
to
the
back
of
the
building.
That's
all
you
really
have
the
authority
to
do
you.
F
A
code
you
know,
and
and
whether
or
not
the
building
official
or
the
code
enforcement
official
considers
your
determination
that
you're
going
to
allow
the
addition
to
be
reconstructed
to
satisfy
the
code
requirement
is
in
their
discretion.
Your
discretion
is
whether
or
not
you're
going
to
allow
the
addition
to
be
rebuilt,
and
that's
what
you
would
make.
G
Right
I
think
they
they
do
have
I
think
they
would
be
providing
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
after
the
fact
sort
of
so
they
do.
They
are
going
to
be
stating
that
the
addition
is
appropriate
under
their
purview,
correct.
F
C
F
D
K
B
B
I,
have
you
want
me
to
say
what
I
have
yes,
okay,
the
and
to
add
the
condition
that
the
Border
proves
the
addition
to
the
rear
of
the
building
to
remedy
the
removal
of
the
previous
Edition?
There.
A
A
K
G
I
G
The
Florida
Master
site
file
for
the
structure
notes
a
large
Metal
Event
asbestos,
siding
on
the
North
Gable
and
concrete
Sills
rafter
Tails
jealousy
Windows
shed
roof
porch
on
the
Eastern
elevation
and
often
our
main
entry
with
metal
awning
as
architectural
details.
For
this
feature,
the
subject
structure
is
representative
of
the
modern
area:
I'm,
sorry,
modern
era,
residential
architecture
and
maintains
most
of
its
original
details.
G
G
G
G
C
Okay
is
staff
suggesting
any.
G
Couldn't
I
couldn't
really
get
there
with
this
one?
They
they
do
make
new
ones
that
look
like
the
old
ones
that
they
do.
They
do
make
impact
rated
ones,
but
I
don't
have
the
evidence.
I
didn't
have
any
evidence
that
they
could
not
be
repaired.
They
are
historic
materials
original
to
the
structure
and
they're,
very
characteristic
of
the
architectural
style
right.
P
A
P
Okay,
sorry
213
High,
Street
Tarpon.
If
you've
I,
don't
know,
if
you
know
this
property
or
not,
but
it's
pretty
dilapidated,
it's
been,
let
go
for
many
many
years.
We
purchased
it
recently
and
it
needs
a
lot
of
work.
The
building
in
question
the
there's
two
or
three
different
style
windows
on
the
building.
Right
now
there
are
some
jealousy
there's
some
single
hung,
aluminum
windows
and
I
think
one
other
on
the
building
and
the
windows
that
are
that
are
there.
If
any
of
you
have
had
any
of
these
ones
are
very.
I
P
P
On
Canal,
Street
I
mean
it's
not
I
mean
someone's
standing
in
the
shower,
can't
see
them
directly,
but
you
see
their
Shadow
and
everything
in
the
shower
so
that
one
we
want
to
reduce
and
make,
and
oh
gosh,
you
know
like
frosted
glass,
so
you
can't
see
through
it
and
get
it
up
out
of
where
you
can
make.
You
know
see:
someone's
torso
went
up
standing
in
in
the
bathtub.
P
You
know
make
it
higher
so
that
maybe
you
see
their
head
or
something,
but
not
not
a
torso,
and
that's
all
we're
trying
to
do
we're
just
trying
to
improve
the
building
repair.
The
building-
and
you
know,
put
better
Windows
in.
They
may
still
make
those
windows,
but
I
wouldn't
buy
them.
I
mean
you
know
they
just
you
know:
they're,
not
I,
don't
know
how
they
can
make
them
weather
tight
and
last
yeah.
You
know
these
impact
Windows.
Now
they
last
forever
I
mean
you
know
so
I.
P
Just
that's
where
we're
at
yeah,
you
know
I
mean
fairly
basic,
but
that's
it.
I
have
the
gentleman
that
was
recently
passed
away.
That's
lived
there
he's
was
there
like
18
years
and
say
at
least
it's
a
mess
in
there,
and
so
we're
trying
to
go
through
them
and
do
some
repairs
and
cleaning?
And
what
have
you?
And
so
we
thought
this
would
be
a
great
opportunity
to
change
those
windows.
P
P
No
I
wouldn't
do
that.
Why,
if
I'm
gonna
do
that
I'll
leave
those
old
ones
that
are
in
there
they're
going
to
be
very
expensive
because
they're
not
that
commonly
used
anymore
I
promise
you
that
they've
been
very
expensive
and,
what's
the
benefit
of
it,
there
again,
there's
different
style
Windows
already
on
the
building.
So
I,
don't
you
know,
I,
don't
know
I.
G
Look
there's
there's
impact
resistant,
jealousy
Windows,
there's
also
some
that
replicate
the
look
to
be
honest.
They're
not
cheap,
but
I
would
encounter
that.
The
the
argument
is,
this
is
a
contributing
historic
structure.
These
are
existing
historic
materials
that
are
characteristic
of
the
architectural
style.
C
Have
you
have
you
thought
about
awning
windows?
Not
they
wouldn't.
Do
you
know
what
I'm
talking
about
I.
P
Know
exactly
what
you're
referring
to
Sir
it's
the
same
problem
have
I
mean
we
have.
H
P
Is
full
of
them?
You
know
the
cranks
break.
I
mean
they
just
they're
inherent
to
problems
now
they've
improved,
but
they
still
have
those
working
mechanisms
to
crank
them
in
and
out
right,
so
I
mean
we're
we're
local
here.
You
know
we're
born
raised
here
and
we're
buying
some
of
these
properties
to
improve
them
and
stuff
around
town,
so
I
mean
the
idea
is
to
try
and
put
something
in
it.
It's
going
to
be
aesthetically,
pleasing
I,
don't
think
it's
going
to
change
the
historical
value
of
the
property.
P
I
mean
the
roof
line
and
all
that's
going
to
stay
the
same
other
than
cleaning
it
up
and
painting
it
preparing
some
rotten
Lumber.
That's
sticking
out
on
some
of
the
Tails
of
the
rafters
are
pretty
much
rotted
away,
but
no
sir,
your
question.
No,
we
have
not
pardon
me
if
we
have
considered
any
of
the
other
type
of
Windows.
We
are
not.
Okay,.
H
F
Would
also
like
go.
P
A
P
P
You
know
I'm,
not
positive,
I
I
can't
say
for
sure.
That's
an
end
unit,
of
course,
now
with
the
church
or
whatever
we
call
the
corner
the
historic
church.
Well,
what
they've
done
is
they've
got
a
fence
up
on
the
south
side
of
the
building,
so
I
think
there's
four
windows
on
the
South
Side,
the
in
one
of
the
photographs.
You
could
see
him,
but
it's
a
it's
a
narrow
shot.
His
property
line
is
three
feet
from
our
building.
P
I
know
it's
one
or
two
of
the
Interior
units.
Maybe
on
the
end
there's
a
just
an
aluminum
window.
You
can
kind
of
see
there
I
said
four.
Maybe
it's
just
three
windows
on
the
side.
G
A
G
P
You
go
from
the
end
of
the
building
in
the
furthest
away
from
you
in
the
photograph.
I
think
the
next
two.
Maybe
three
windows
are
coming
back
and
I'm,
not
possible.
Let
me
put
my
glasses
on
I
might
help
yeah.
You
can
see
those
are
just
aluminum
windows
single
hung,
glass
yeah.
It
looks
like
coming
back
all
the
way
to
the
see
that
bathroom
window
to
the
left
of
the
electrical
meters.
P
Okay,
if
you
see
that
it's
a
short
window,
the
window,
that's
in
the
shower,
we're
on
the
south
end
see
where
it
looks.
Kind
of
white
y'all
can
y'all
see
that
that's
from
the
film
from
the
soap.
So
at
some
point
they
changed
that
small
window
and
I
guess
I
assume
that's
a
bathroom
there.
Also
some
of
these
I
haven't
even
been
in
it
because
the
tenants
have
been
there
since
we
purchased
the
property,
so
I
haven't
been
in
the
apartments,
but
that
gives
you
an
indication
of
I
was
talking
about.
P
P
Facing
the
ones
on
the
south
end
of
the
building
man,
if
you,
if
that
picture,
you
see
Canal
Street
the
church
is
to
the
left
of
the
photograph.
So.
P
F
So
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
something
sure
you
are
asking
today
for
those
windows
for
a
certificate
of
approval
for
those
windows.
So
if
they
issue
a
certificate
of
approval
for
those
windows,
those
are
the
ones
that
you
can
replace
and
then
you
have
to
come
back
to
replace
the
other
ones.
The
other
thing,
too,
that
you
mentioned,
was
that
you
said
that
you're
going
to
change
the
dimensions
of
one
of
the
windows,
you
said
you
were
going
to
make
the
shower
ones
you
were
going
to
fill
them
in.
F
Because
that's
not
in
your
application
materials
either,
it
doesn't
say
anywhere
in
your
application
materials
that
you're
changing
the
dimensions
of
any
of
the
windows.
And
if
you
get
an
approval,
you're
only
getting
the
approval
for
these
windows
you're
not
getting
a
blanket
approval,
because
that's
not
what
you
asked
for
so.
P
A
We
could
we
could,
how.
P
P
H
A
F
You
you
can,
if
you
wanted
to
do
a
conditional
approval,
you
can
condition
it
on
that.
The
the
change
in
the
dimension
of
the
windows
just
really
wasn't
addressed
at
all.
Well,.
A
F
G
A
I
A
M
A
A
H
A
D
I
move
that
we
can
accept
the
windows
to
be
replaced,
except
for
the
shower.
D
E
B
D
A
Change
it
to
keep.