►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Board April 18, 2016
Description
Description
A
C
B
A
C
E
C
E
This
was
a
previously
done
actually
last
year,
amendment
to
your
future
land-use
element
that
created
this
category
few
residential,
very
low
during
the
process.
At
the
same
time,
the
countywide
plan
was
going
through
and
being
updated,
as
well
as
the
countywide
rules.
They
made
a
change
to
those
rules
while
they
were
through
their
hearing
process.
We
had
already
finished
our
hearing
process
on
this
information,
and
so,
as
a
result,
they've
asked
us
now
to
go
back
and
add
the
language
to
make
our
category
consistent
with
the
catalog
category
at
the
county
level.
E
That's
the
same
way
in
use
category,
so
the
changes
are
outlined
here
and
I
can
go
over
them.
So
you
can
see
the
changes
in
the
language
in
the
ordinance
under
exhibit
1
I
think
it
is
here
essentially
they're
asking
for
to
change
the
secondary
uses
to
no
longer
allow
public
semi-public,
however,
to
allow
transportation,
utility
institutional
uses
and
recreational
and
open
space
uses,
then
under
the
acreage
limits
they
would
like
to
change
the
language
or
any
such
uses.
E
E
So
that's,
essentially
what
that
language
is
trying
to
trying
to
convey
again
this
is
we
adopted
this
category
as
a
result
of
a
request
by
an
applicant
out
in
off
of
Keystone
for
a
project
that
actually
never
has
come
to
fruition,
but
they're
still
actively
pursuing
that
property
and
they
want
to
come
forward.
So
we
need
to
make
this
correction
to
make
this
available
in
our
comprehensive
plan
as
the
land
use
designation,
because
this
is
the
land
use
designation,
that's
most
appropriate.
E
That
project
coming
forward
when
it
comes
forward
is
not
going
to
be
above
one
unit
per
acre
and
then
in
this
area
the
county
has
decided
that
the
most
appropriate
or
I
wasn't
really
the
county.
It's
PPC
as
its
decided
that
the
most
appropriate
threshold
for
density
is
one
unit
per
acre.
So
we
need
a
land-use
category,
that's
consistent
because
we
currently
don't
have
one.
Even
our
agricultural
category
even
allows
more
than
one
unit
per
acre
when
you
get
into
the
housing.
F
F
That's
the
only
area
in
Tarpon
Springs
that
this
would
be
a
would
affect
correct.
My
concern
was
recreational
because
we
have
a
lot
of
parts.
People
don't
realize
how
much
recreation
area
we
have
in
Tarpon
spring
and
the
future
is
going
to
hold
that
you're
not
gonna
have
anymore,
because
it's
not
gonna
be
safe
and
that's
what
I
was
concerned
about,
though,
within
our
city
limits
right
now
there
isn't
any
property.
E
There
is
because
one
of
those
properties
that
are
part
of
that
have
actually
been
annexed
in
and
they
were
annexed
in
a
towaway
and
use
category
that
truly
doesn't
exist
in
your
plan
any
longer.
So
it
has
a
odd
there's,
an
odd
history
there,
but
there's
an
adjacent
piece
that
they
want
to
bring
in,
and
those
two
pieces
together
would
become
that
project
out
on
the
Keystone
yeah
it's
between
Keystone
and
Highland
or
Highland
goes
up.
It's
that
parcel.
F
F
E
We
have
two
different
maps
that
you
guys
are
that
you
guys
administer
essentially
there's
the
one
associated
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan
and
then
there's
the
one
associated
with
the
land
development
code,
which
is
the
zoning
map.
This
is
our
amendment
to
the
Comprehensive
Plan,
to
add
a
category
that
then
people
can
come
in
and
ask
for
this
particular
land-use
category,
where
it's,
where
it's
appropriate
and
request
to
be
read
to
have
their
future
land
use,
which
is
the
comprehensive
planning
map
associated
with
this
language.
E
A
E
Pinellas
County,
it's
actually
the
PPC,
which
is
the
point
Pinellas
Planning
Council.
You
have
an
extra
layer
government
here
where
they
have
a
countywide
plan.
The
county
has
their
own
plan.
We
have
our
own
plan
where
the
local
municipal
jurisdictions
and
then
there's
an
extra
governmental
layer
here
where
you're
dealing
with
a
countywide
plan,
and
that's
mostly
because
you
have
so
many
municipalities
in
Pinellas
County.
E
It's
trying
to
bring
all
those
municipalities
under
the
same
type
of
umbrella
so
that
they
have
more
consistent
land
use
and
we
as
a
local
community,
can
choose
to
be
more
restrictive
or
less,
but
not
less
restrictive
that
in
that
plan.
This
in
this
case,
since
this
is
a
brand-new
land-use
category,
we
don't
currently
have
anything
actually,
with
this
land-use
on
it,
we've
chosen
as
a
community
to
adopt
something.
That's
consistent
with
that
countywide
plan.
We
may,
in
the
future,
decide
to
again
amend
this
language
to
make
it
more
restrictive
than
what's.
What's
here,.
A
E
E
Not
right
now,
there's
no
nobody's
come
to
me
with
applications
for
the
for
those
areas.
This
would
be
available
for
anybody
to
request
it,
but
again,
Anita
we're
gonna
have
to
only
allow
this
land
use
where
it's
appropriate,
because
you
have
a
lot
of
different
land
uses
in
the
city
that
will
not
be
compatible
with
such
a
low-density
land
use.
E
You
need
to
have
this
needs
to
be
appropriate
to
certain
areas,
so
you'll
determine
those
areas
as
applicants
become
come
forward
and
will
make
the
recommendation
to
you
as
to
if
this
is
appropriate
or
if
it's
not
make
half
right
to
ask,
but
you
don't
necessarily
have
to
approve
those
individual
things
because
we're
not
actually
designating
a
specific
area.
We
are
just
creating
that
land
use
category.