►
From YouTube: Planning & Zoning Board March 19, 2018
Description
Description
A
A
A
C
D
C
D
C
Is
a
quasi-judicial
proceeding
where
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Board
acts
in
a
quasi-judicial
rather
than
a
legislative
capacity?
Not
a
quasi-judicial
hearing
is
not
the
board's
function
to
make
law,
but
rather
to
apply
law
that
has
already
been
established
in
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
The
board
is
required
by
law
to
make
findings
of
fact
days,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
apply
those
findings
of
fact
to
previously
established
criteria
contained
in
the
Code
of
Ordinances,
in
order
to
make
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
it.
C
By
the
same
token,
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance
and
the
board
is
by
required
by
a
law
to
fight
against
the
applicant.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
board
wishing
disclosing
the
ex
parte
communications
or
conflicts
of
interest
this
evening,
seeing
none
anyone
wishing
to
speak
this
evening?
If
you
could
please
stand
and
raise
your
right
hand
to
be
sworn
in.
C
A
C
E
This
is
in
the
t4c
residential
hyde
district
of
our
transacting
FL
code
and
I'll.
Just
quickly
summarize
the
standards
for
review
the
first
one
with
respect
to
the
land
development
code.
This
does
meet
the
standards
of
the
t4c
district.
With
respect
to
access
to
Ali's.
There
is
a
requirement
that
parking
be
accessed
from
an
alley
when
it's
available.
This
property
has
a
rear
in
the
side
alley
and
staff
has
determined
that
neither
of
those
are
available.
E
The
driveway
that's
proposed
is
conforming
with
other
driveways
on
the
street
and
in
the
area,
so
number
one
is
met.
Number
two:
this
proposal
is
adjacent
to
other,
like
uses
in
the
district
number
three.
The
proposal
is
consistent
with
the
city's
comprehensive
plan
number
four:
this
is
not
in
a
historic
district
or
an
environmentally
sensitive
area.
Number
five.
This
use
will
fit
in
with
the
character
of
the
district
in
the
existing
uses.
E
I'm
sorry
did
I
skip
on
No
number
five
number:
six.
There
are
public
services
extended
to
the
site
currently,
so
there
will
be
no
need
to
provide
new
public
facilities
number
seven.
This
project
will
promote
orderly
and
efficient
growth
in
the
city
and
staff
recommends
approval
of
resolution,
20
1803
with
the
following
conditions
that
the
conditional
use
will
expire
within
one
year
of
approval.
If
the
building
permit
is
not
issued
for
the
property,
a
building
permit
has
been
applied
for
for
your
information.
Are
there
any
questions
and
the
applicant
is
present.
D
D
E
Code,
that
is
slated
for
mixed
use,
primarily
residential
urban
fabric,
as
the
transit
states,
so
a
single.
So
it's
really
geared
to
sort
of
transition
to
mix
use
different
housing
types,
but
the
single-family
proposal
is
the
style
of.
It
is
consistent
with
the
styles
that
are
recommended.
It's
like
a
steep
style
home
close
to
the
to
the
road,
so
the
district
itself
encourages
other
types
of
residential
over
single
families.
So
that's
why
the
single-family
is
conditional
to
ensure
that
if
it's
proposed
it,
it
carries
out
the
character
of
the
district.
E
There
front
step,
which
has
to
be
a
maximum
of
10
feet
which
the
applicant
meets.
The
building
architecture
has
to
meet
the
style.
This
is
a
stoop
with
the
landing
type
style
which
would
to
the
first
floor,
which
meets
the
district.
The
landscaping
proposed
and
the
furniture
the
street
screened
and
coverage
meets
the
district.
That's
a
requirement.
D
E
D
E
All
those
details
were
reviewed
in
a
building
application.
The
reason
there
are
two
items
in
your
packet
that
were
submitted
later
on
as
a
conditional
as
part
of
the
conditional
use
application.
So
we
had
to
include
those,
but
those
were
those
are
actually
two
items
that
complete
the
building
permit.
C
B
A
A
A
A
A
E
Yes,
this
lot
is
right.
Next
to
the
one
you
just
the
item
you
just
had,
and
the
proposal
is
the
same.
The
only
difference
is
that
there's
only
an
alley
behind
the
property
at
this
slot.
Again,
the
condition
of
the
alley
is
the
same:
it's
not
usable,
it's
blocked,
and
it's
not
not
usable
for
access.
So
this
project.
E
It
is
compatible
with
the
existing
area
and
neighborhood.
It
does
comply
with
the
city's
comprehensive
plan.
It
will
not.
It
is
not
in
a
historic
or
environmental
area.
It
will
not
adversely
affect
the
joining
properties,
because
it's
a
similar
to
you
used
to
what
is
there
and
fits
with
the
character
of
the
area.
E
It
will
not
adversely
affect
our
the
city's
ability
to
supply
public
facilities
and
it
promotes
orderly
and
efficient
development
in
the
city.
Staff
is
recommending
approval
of
the
resolution
resolution
20
1804
with
the
following
conditions
that
the
conditional
use
will
expire
within
one
year
of
approval
if
a
building
permit
is
not
issued
for
the
property
and
again
and
building
permit
has
been
applied
for
on
this
property
as
well.
A
D
A
E
Yes,
there
is
a
staff
report
in
the
beginning
of
this
item
that
she
could
refer
to.
Basically,
there
are
three
primary
reasons
for
this
comprehensive
plan
text
amendment
coming
before
you.
The
first
is
that
we
are
required
to
be
consistent
with
the
countywide
plan,
with
respect
to
certain
requirements
on
density
and
intensity
in
the
coastal
high
hazard
area,
and
we
have
to
have
that
completely
adopted
by
this
summer,
so
we're
starting
that
process.
E
So
we've
we've
reformatted
that
and
updated
the
objectives
to
categorize
each
of
the
land,
use
types
like
residential,
commercial
and
so
on
and
provide
for
those
policies
and
we've
added
a
golden
objective
for
the
future
land
use
map
itself
to
set
the
stage
for
what
the
map
is,
what
it's
for,
how
it's
used
and
that
sort
of
thing.
So
that's
the
second
reason.
The
third
is
script:
nurtures
errors
updates
like
outdated
references
like
state
rules,
state
agency
names,
things
like
that.
Those
are
the
primary
three
reasons
for
this
amendment.
E
A
E
E
The
the
thrust
of
the
countywide
requirements
are
that
you
cannot
raise
density
and
intensity
in
the
coastal
high
hazard
area
unless
certain
criteria
are
met.
Some
of
that's
already
in
well
we're
already
restricted
on
doing
it
because
of
the
countywide
plan.
They
require
us
to
put
it
in
our
plan,
but
things
like
shelter
back
uation
those
types
of
things
we're
just
required
to
say
that
in
our
plan.
So
it's
not
really
a
new
action.
It's
more
of
you
know
kind
of
memorializing
it
in
our
document
as
well.
That's
required.
B
A
A
A
D
Had
a
I
have
a
comment:
that's
right
with
you,
mr.
chairman,
just
to
follow
up
with
staff
and
looking
at
the
the
meat
or
the
minutes
of
mm-hmm
I
guess
it
would
be
January
22nd.
There
was
a
an
item,
an
action
item.
It
was
similar
to
what
we
just
voted
on
as
far
as
ordinance,
some
new
language
for
an
ordinance
and
it
had
to
do
with
the
land
development
code.