►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Board Meeting May 21, 2018
Description
Description
A
C
D
A
E
This
is
a
quasi
judicial
proceeding
where
the
planning
of
Zoning
Board
acts
in
a
quasi
judicial
rather
than
a
legislative
capacity
or
how
to
quasi
judicial
hearing.
It
is
not
the
board's
function
to
make
law,
but
rather
to
apply
law
that
has
already
been
established
in
a
quasi
judicial
hearing.
The
board
is
required
by
law
to
make
findings
of
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
apply
those
findings
of
fact
to
previously
established
criteria
containing
the
Code
of
Ordinances
in
order
to
make
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
it.
E
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
at
this
hearing
that
the
law
considers
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues.
If
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
of
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
met
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
in
favor
of
the
applicant.
By
the
same
token,
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
that
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
fight
against
the
applicant.
E
F
Okay,
this
is
an
application
for
voluntary
annexation
of
approximately
a
little
over
half
an
acre
of
property
located
at
12:53
North
Pinellas
Avenue.
The
applicants
are
Frederick
and
Edith
Slater
and
the
Slater's
owned
the
property
to
the
north,
which
is
already
inside
the
city
limits
that
property
is
zoned
residential
office
under
the
under
the
city's
zoning.
The
subject
property
before
you
tonight
is
zoned
key
one
which
is
general
professional
office
district
under
the
Pinellas
County
zoning,
the
land
use
under
the
County
Comprehensive
Plan
is
residential
office
general.
F
The
applicant
has
asked
for
this
annexation
in
order
that
both
of
their
properties
be
within
the
city
limits
as
they
go
forward
with
their
plans
for
the
properties.
With
respect
to
the
review
criteria.
Again,
the
property
to
the
north
is
within
the
city.
The
property
to
the
east
is
also
within
this.
The
city
limits
and
a
fair
amount
of
property
around
Fairview
subdivision
is
also
within
the
city
limits,
so
it
will
not
create
an
enclave.
The
property
is
inside.
F
The
item
was
properly
noticed
and
we
have
not
received
any
comments
about
this
application.
Staff
recommends
approval
of
this
request
for
annexation
and
rezoning
from
P
1
Pinellas
County
zoning
district
to
our
city
of
Turpan
spring.
So
are
there
any
questions
in
the
applicant
is
present
here
tonight.
F
D
F
C
E
If
you
want
to
make
any
comments,
if
you
come
here,
I
also
I
didn't
see,
you
see
him
to
be
sworn
in
before.
So
let
me
just
swear
you
and
once
you
get
to
the
podium,
do
you
swear
affirm
that
the
testimony
you're
about
to
give
us
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing?
But
the
truth?
Thank
you
and
if
you
just
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record,
okay.
G
G
We
own
sunrise,
elevator
company,
we're
on
lemon
next
to
the
library
just
a
little
bit
to
the
west
of
the
library
there
it's
a
little
strip
center
and
that
to
us
it
just
makes
sense
that
you
know
we
purchase
that
property
to
bring
it
into
Tarpon,
annex
that
it
in
the
Tarpan,
because
we
own
the
property
right
adjacent
to
it
so
and
I
I
think
that
area
someday
is
going
to
is
going
to
open
up.
You
know,
I
can
see
that
there's.
G
E
H
A
A
A
A
I
Good
evening
everybody
I
don't
get
a
chance
to
come
and
see
you
very
often
so.
I
took
this
opportunity.
I'm
with
this
Lenox
land,
use,
change
or
land
development
code
change
to
stop
by
and
see
you
guys
and
see
how
everyone
was
doing.
This
is
essentially
a
code
amendment.
That's
a
very
specific
amendment.
I
There
is
a
section
of
your
land
development
code
dealing
with
stormwater
and
when
you
have
a
developed
site
and
already
develop
site
when
you
go
to
retrofit
the
stormwater
on
that
those
already
developed
sites,
we
have
one
particular
site
where
there
is
a
large
area
that
is
already
paved,
and
it
was
already
part
of
the
storm
water
management
plan.
The
applicant
now
wants
to
go
forward
and
propose
a
large
building
to
be
placed
on
that
existing
impervious
area.
Under
the
current
way.
I
The
code
reads:
he
has
to
do
a
full
stormwater
analysis
at
the
time
that
he
developed
his
property,
and
there
are
many
properties
that
this
applies
to.
He
had
to
do
a
full
stormwater
analysis.
He
got
a
swift
blood
permit.
He
went
through
the
proper,
permitting
process
and
established
the
pond
and
all
of
the
required
infrastructure
that
infrastructure
has
been
functioning
for
a
time
for
several
years
at
this
point
and
proved
to
work
sufficiently.
I
Adding
a
building
over
that
existing
impervious
surface
area
is
not
going
to
change
the
amount
of
water
that
goes
to
that
pond.
It
will
change
the
velocity.
However,
the
velocity
can
be
mitigated
with
guttering
systems
in
that
type
of
thing.
In
the
case,
when
we
have
a
situation
like
that,
where
someone
wants
to
redevelop
on
that
property,
we
do
not
currently
have
any
type
of
flexibility.
I
would
have
to
force
them
through
a
full
stormwater
analysis
that
can
be
a
very
expensive
proposition
and
essentially,
at
the
end
of
that
stormwater
process.
I
I
What
we
have
done
here
is
provided
a
exception,
essentially
in
those
situations
where
you
have
existing
impervious
surface
areas,
that
people
want
to
provide
additional
square
footage
of
building,
overgrowth
or
area
over
that
they
basically
have
to
provide
their
information
from
their
permit.
That
shows
that
they
are
in
compliance
that
they
have
to
have
an
inspection
of
their
stormwater
facility,
rather
than
forcing
them
through
a
full-on
analysis.
For
that
pond.
We
feel
that
that's
a
little
bit
fairer
of
a
process
to
have
somebody
go
through
rather
than
having
them
do
a
full
on
stormwater
analysis.
I
That's
already
been
accomplished
was
accomplished.
Originally,
when
you
did
the
impervious
surfaces,
there
are
the
impervious
surface
area.
It
was
all
included
in
that
stormwater
analysis,
and
so
that's
really.
The
crux
of
this
particular
regulation.
We've
sent
this
through
our
stormwater
folks
over
at
icon
to
get
their
take
on
it.
They
agree
that
this
is
a
better
opportunity
for
folks
that
are
in
that
type
of
situation,
there's
a
couple
of
different
parcels
in
town
that
would
benefit
from
this
over
time
and
as
a
result,
the
staff
is
looking
to
make.
J
Just
a
quick
question:
it
may
just
be
semantics,
but
so
with
the
additional.
So
in
part,
one
on
the
existing
stormwater
management
system
is
functioning
in
accordance
etcetera
and
capable
of
serving
the
additional
gross
floor
area
without
violating
existing
permitting
permit
conditions,
and
it
looks
like
part,
two
was
basically
explaining
the
evidence
and
how
are
you
in
evidence
that
I
was
just
wondering
there
was
a
reason
why
the
second
piece,
the
capable
of
serving
the
additional
gross
floor
area,
was
not,
but
least
in.
H
D
I
Sure
the
example
that
we're
looking
at
specifically
for
this
amendment
has
it
came
too
late
as
part
of
Furman's
update
of
his
site
to
add
an
additional
truck
service
center
arm
on
his
facility.
He
has
a
large
parking
lot,
a
very
large
parking
lot
that
was
established
for
his
overflow
vehicles
and
for
the
truck
business.
Originally
he's
now
ready
to
go
in
and
put
a
showroom,
a
sales
area
in
a
service
area
for
the
trucks
on
that
site.
It's
it's
a
very
good
improvement.
I
It's
going
to
drastically
improve
his
business
and
in
this
particular
case
it's
a
paved
area.
It
was
there's
a
pond
in
the
back.
It's
clearly
functioning
there's
clearly
no
issues
and
in
conjunction
with
on
the
the
city
going
through
doing
the
Spruce
Street
extension
through
that
area.
This
is
a
good
improvement.
So
that's
what
he's
looking
to
make
that
investment
now.
D
D
I
You
know
if
you're
dealing
with
swelling
it's
a
little
bit
different
if
it's
being
used
under
drains
and
that
type
of
thing,
so
it
just
depends
on
how
that
stormwater
management
system
was
was
created
originally
and
what
it
was
intended
for
on
whether
or
not
they
would
be
able
to
just
certify
their
improvements
with
their
compliance
of
their
permit.
If
you
don't
have
a
permit,
you're
gonna
have
to
get
a
permit
at
that
point.
I
D
As
like
another
example,
if
you
took
a
piece
of
property
on
lemon
street
and
it
was
totally
impervious,
it
was
just
a
couple
off
or
80
percent
90
percent,
whatever
what
I
mean
stormwater
is
already
factored
into
the
storm.
Water
retention
is
already
factored
into
the
way
that
lemon
street
was
developed,
or
you
have
to
retain
that
on
site.
You.
I
May
have
to
retain
on
site.
It
just
depends
on
that
particular
property
and
whether
or
not
it
was
accounted
for
into
the
storm
water
management
and
again
we
would
have
to
it's
so
site-specific
we'd
have
to
really
look
at
those
individual
sites
to
determine
that,
because
at
some
pond
again
remember
there
are
some
sites
that
actually
have
systems
that
are
vaulted
underneath
of
their
properties,
and
so
there
may
be
an
existing
stormwater
pond.
I
That's
on
that
property,
just
vaulting
or
anything
you
don't
see
it
I
mean
we
have
one
specifically,
that's
being
that's
going
in
on
lemons
tree.
That's
exactly
that
once
it
goes
once
it's
completely
completed
that
project
it'll
have
an
under
drain
system.
You
won't
see
the
pond.
The
pond
is
essentially
going
to
be
in
their
parking
lot.
So
as
a
result
of
as
a
result
of
that,
you
will
never
know
that
there
is
that
there
storm
water
management
occurring
on
that
law.
Other
than
there's
some
open
space
and
some
swelling
so
you'll
see
the
swelling.