►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Board January 28, 2019
Description
Description
A
C
C
A
E
G
A
H
C
D
C
C
H
I
A
I
Okay
and
I'm
gonna,
if
you
guys,
don't
mind
steel,
the
steel
show
here
I'd
like
to
introduce
and
welcome
our
to
our
bore
our
new
board
members.
This
is
Dave
pitcher
and
Tony
he's
our
regular
member,
and
we
have
a
new
alternate
member,
which
is
Melissa
original
she's
over
here,
so
they're,
both
new.
They
were
appointed
at
the
last
BOC
meeting,
I
believe,
and
so
they
were
lucky
enough
since
the
meeting
was
delayed
because
of
the
holidays
that
they
could
catch
up
with
us
for
the
first
meeting
of
the
year.
I
F
J
This
for
the
next
one,
if
y'all
like
me
enough
to
bring
me
back
that
would
be
like
my
bribe
I'm,
you
know,
like
I,
said
pretty
boring
I
like
public
policy
I
got
my
masters
in
that
field,
need
of
a
tarpon
and
I.
You
know
decided.
I
was
always
involved
like
theoretical
work.
I
never
did
any
actually
like
applied
like
this.
So
I
decided.
You
know
it's
time
to
get
some
good,
like
municipal
experience,
just
hands-on
stuff.
So
I
was
honoured
enough
to
be
accepted.
I
look
forward
to
see
Melissa.
I
I
A
I
We're
not
going
to
need
that
tonight
because
the
agenda
does
not
call
for
any
quasi
judicial
applications,
which
is
why
you
have
no
one
in
the
public,
because
we
don't
have
any
applications.
We
have
two
applet.
We
had
two
applications,
but
one
of
the
applications.
The
staff
is
actually
chosen,
which
is
18
149
to
pull
off
this
agenda.
You'll
see
that
in
February
at
your
next
meeting,
we
need
to
riad
ver
ties
that
there
was
a
change
that
we
decided
to
add
to
that
language.
I
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
get
that
riad
vert
eyes
and
we'll
put
it
back
on
your
agenda,
so
it'll
be
similar
to
the
language
that
is
actually
in
your
packet
here.
But
there's
been
some
added
language
to
that
to
that
stat
to
that
language
and
it's
actually
available
on
the
website,
but
you
will
have
in
a
packet
and
sent
to
you
with
the
next
agenda
once
the
agenda
closes
on
Friday.
I
Your
next
agenda
will
close
on
Friday
and
then
we'll
have
all
applications
sent
to
you
as
soon
as
that
agenda
is
prepared
and
with
that
application,
18
149
is
the
land
development
code
amendment
to
the
development
agreement
section
it's
a
fairly
straightforward
change.
The
change
basically
includes.
I
So
when
a
new
developer
agreement
comes
in,
currently
there's
a
maximum
time
frame
of
five
years,
the
board
can
then
extend
that
through
another
set
of
hearings
beyond
the
five
year
window,
so
they
would
have
to
come
back
we're
basically
giving
the
board
the
option
to
do
here
is
to
have
a
developer
agreement
initially
approved
for
ten
years.
The
state
statue
allows
for
develop
agreements
to
be
approved
for
up
to
thirty
years,
where
staffs,
not
comfortable.
Of
allowing
that
as
an
initial
review.
Thirty
years
is
a
long
time
window.
I
You
don't
have
projects
of
the
size
and
scale
that
most
other
communities
have.
They
have
timeframes
of
that
long,
but
ten
years
provides
an
additional
measure
that
the
board
can
go
anywhere
from
the
zero
to
five
year
mark
or
the
zero
to
ten
year
mark
or
seven
years,
whatever
they
want
within
that
window.
Well,
as
their
as
part
of
the
negotiation,
so
a
developer
agreements
a
little
bit
different
than
some
of
the
other
applications
that
you
see.
I
Most
of
the
provisions
in
the
developer
room,
including
the
duration
of
the
developer
agreement,
are
negotiated
between
staff
and
the
city
and
then
they're
brought
forward
to
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Board
for
recommendation,
and
then
they
come
back
to
the
BOC
for
a
final
approval.
It's
a
very
similar
process
to
what
you
see
in
most
of
your
other
applications,
but
it's
a
very
negotiated
in
different
process,
because
every
provision
within
that
agreement
is
actually
has
to
be
consistent
with
the
land
development
code.
But
it's
a
negotiation.
It's
not
you!
I
We
do
this
and
we
let
you
go.
Let
you
go
it's
more
of
a
back
and
forth.
That's
decided
between
the
two
parties.
So
that's
really
what
the
the
crux
of
this
change
is
is
just
giving
the
board
the
the
the
additional
five
year
window
that
they
can
choose
from
when
they're
doing
their
negotiations
through
staff
for
a
developer
to
come
forward
with.
So
that's
the
crux
of
what's
included
in
this
change.
Is
there
any
questions?
Yes,.
A
I
The
particular
project
that
you're
alluding
to
does
not
have
a
developer
agreement
on
it.
It
was
not
subject
to
a
developer
agreement.
It
was
subject
to
a
different
mechanism
for
approval.
It
was
part
of
a
special
area
plan
and
then
there
were
multiple
other
approvals
that
were
done
after
that
at
no
time
was
there
a
developer
agreement
that
actually
survived
there
about
six
of
them
that
were
proposed
and
never
survived
scrutiny.
So
as
a
result
of
that
that
was
not
the
same
process
completely
different
process.
That
project
was
delayed.
There
were
multiple
approvals
to
reprove.
I
That
project
throughout
2015
and
again
in
2016
were
fighting
were
the
final
approvals
for
that
project,
so
that
project
received
more
scrutiny
than
most
projects
received
because
it
came
back
to
the
process
because
of
the
fact
that
they,
the
timeframes,
lapsed.
So
it's
a
different
mechanism
that
you're
dealing
with
in
that
particular
project.
The
reason
why
this
is
being
proposed
is
it's
to
give
developers
opportunities
to
have
at
least
the
opportunity
to
negotiate
a
longer
time
period
when
they
have
a
more
complicated
project.
I
That
requires
multiple
different
approvals,
including
rezoning
annexations
in
some
in
some
in
some
instances,
it
gives
them
the
board
the
opportunity
that
does
not
say
that
the
Board
of
Commissioners
are
going
to
give
a
10-year
approval,
that
is,
at
their
discretion
the
vocs
discretion.
How
long
of
a
time
frame
that
they're
going
to
give
they
can
give
anywhere
from
a
one
year
time
frame
to
a
ten
year
time
frame?
A
Just
I
look
I'm
I'm
very
concerned
about
what's
happening
with
development
today,
and
it's
the
rapid
expansion
of
things
and
I
think
a
lot
of
things
are
getting
approved
faster
than
they
should
be
without
consideration
of.
What's
going
on,
I'm
really
upset
about.
What's
happened
with
this
thing
by
winn-dixie
and
I,
see
I
Drive
54
I
see
all
these
apartments
going
up
and
land
that
you
know.
A
I'm
just
I,
just
think
that
I
think
as
a
ex
builder
in
this
area,
I
just
think
that
10
years
is
a
long
time
to
give
someone
chance
to
persuade
people
to.
Let
me
have
my
project
I'm
sure
that
there's
other
comments
on
the
board
here,
but
I
know
that
planning
and
zoning
and
zone
laws
and
revisions,
and
things
like
that.
Take
time
but
I'm
just
asking
questions
that
anybody
else
on
the
board
have
any
other
questions
about
that.
I.
D
E
I
Absolutely
have
examples
of
this
Bay
Shore
Heights
was
it
wasn't
an
example
of
that
that
that's
in
my
program
it
had
to
be
extended.
So
did
the
developer
agreement
with
Lowe's
have
to
be
extended
both
of
those
were
extended
as
a
result
of
the
change
and
the
economic
conditions,
money
became
very
difficult.
Capital
became
very
difficult
to
acquire
for
developers,
so
those
projects
stalled
as
a
result
of
them
stalling.
They
had
to
come
back
through
the
RIA
provable
process.
I
They
had
the
opportunity
to
negotiate
at
the
time
a
longer
time
period.
It
would
have
provided
for
an
additional
benefit
for
those
developers.
We
currently
have
a
developer
coming
in
who's,
looking
to
instruct
an
additional
hotel
next
to
the
hotel
out
on
19
there's
a
Holiday
Inn
Express,
going
there
he's
currently
working
through
the
negotiation
process
for
the
developer
agreement.
He
is
interested
in
having
a
longer
time
period
than
five
years.
I
Simply
because
he's
trying
to
negotiate
a
connection
behind
the
hotel,
they
actually
gets
him
an
additional
connection
into
the
mobile
home
park
behind
on
their
roadway,
which
would
provide
additional
access
and
that's
not
something.
That's
going
to
be
worked
out
overnight,
simply
because
there
are
just
so
many
parties
involved
in
that
agreement,
so
he
recognizes
that
that's
going
to
take
some
time
to
do
as
a
result,
a
five-year
window
may
not
work
for
them
to
actually
get
through
the
construction.
I
They
also
need
to
get
some
additional
approvals
through
the
forum
pinellas,
which
is
also
going
to
delay
some
of
what
they
need
to
get
done
so
as
a
result
of
their
very
complicated
process.
They're
looking
to
this
is
something
that
would
help
them.
There
are
some
other
things
that
would
help
them,
but
we're
not
at
this
point
willing
to
give
the
concessions
that
they're
looking
for
on
those
additional
items.
This
is
something
that
statutorily
the
board
is
requires.
I
I,
don't
think
that
Hotel
er
needs
a
who
needs
that
long,
but
there
is
still
ripples
in
the
in
the
economy
as
a
result
of
those
ripples,
it
becomes
difficult
for
capital
to
be
secured
for
larger
projects
like
a
hotel
site
and
those
are
desirable
projects
for
this.
For
this
community.
This
community
is
looking
for
hotels.
I
It
just
recently
went
through
in
2017
and
adopted
the
additional
standards
in
the
countywide
rules
to
allow
for
us
to
rezone
and
change
the
land
use
on
properties
specifically
to
allow
for
larger
hotel
sites
so
that
we
can
attract
in
a
hotel
or
in
a
different
part
of
the
city.
It's
great
that
we're
getting
a
Holiday,
Inn
Express,
and
it's
great
that
it's
adjacent
to
the
existing
Hampton
Inn,
because
they
can
do
shared
services
and
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
they
can
do
together.
I
But
that
is
not
the
only
location
that
people
are
desiring
to
have
a
hotel
site.
So,
as
a
result,
in
order
to
attract
in
those
businesses,
we
need
to
provide
incentive
for
them
to
go
through
the
process.
Developer
agreements
are
not
an
easy
process
for
the
developer
to
go
through.
It
becomes
a
very,
very
complicated
process,
and
so
the
more
we
can
provide
them.
Some
guarantees
that
their
approval,
once
it's
once
it's
been
granted,
is
their
approval,
for
whatever
the
timeframe
is
the
more
they're
willing
to
rent
come
to
the
table
and
negotiate
with
us.
I
We
end
up
with
a
better
product
that
way
and
a
better
project,
because
we
can
get
things
that
are
not
currently
in
our
land
development
code.
We
can
secure
things
like
additional
funding
for
fire
trucks,
additional
funding
for
other
facilities
that
we
don't
necessarily
require
through
the
land
development
code
process.
The
way
the
land
development
code
regulations
are
written,
it's
a
different
process.
I
It's
not
a
easy
process
by
any
means
for
the
developers
perspective,
but
they
are
willing
to
go
through
those
because
they
get
a
guarantee,
or
at
least
a
more
guaranteed
solution,
because
essentially,
whatever
the
land
development
code
regulations
are
at
the
time
that
they
go
through
that
process.
That
is
what's
frozen
in
time.
For
that,
so
they
know
that
the
certainty,
that's
in
that
book
for
that
time,
is
a
certainty
that
they
have
now.
I
That
doesn't
mean
that
they
don't
have
to
meet
state
regulations
and
it
does
if
they
change,
and
it
doesn't
mean
that
they
don't
have
to
meet,
come
up
to
standards.
It
just
means
that
they
get
some.
They
get
some
guarantees,
they
wouldn't
otherwise
get
in
the
way
in
development.
So
that's
the
difference
between
developer
agreement
and
other
in.
I
It
depends
on
the
triggers
that
are
negotiated
into
the
actual
developer
agreement.
It
depends
on
what
the
board
stipulates
under
through
the
staff
and
negotiations
on
what
are
the?
What
are
the
triggers?
This
is
a
co
like
it
is
in
the
project
project
over
here
at
nears
crossing.
They
can't
pull
CEO
one
until
the
road
goes
through.
Is
it
something
like
that?
That's
that's
a
trigger.
All
of
those
things
again
are
up
for
negotiations
when
you're
using
a
developer
agreement.
F
I
That
depends
on
the
Florida
Building
Code,
because
again
the
Florida
Building
Code
requires
certain
certain
inspections
to
be
pulled
pulled
at
certain
times.
But
there
are,
there
are
again
extensions
allowed
under
Florida
Building
Code.
So
yes,
theoretically,
even
if
the
developer
agreement
says
a
five
year
window,
that
doesn't
mean
if
they've
actually
pulled
and
gotten
into
the
building
permit
section
that
they
can't
actually
get
extended
out.
But
there
is
no
guarantee
of
that.
So
from
a
developer's
perspective,
you're
not
giving
them
a
guarantee
and
the
Florida
Building
Code
is
a
moving
target.
So
are.
I
Not
necessarily
you
can
decide
as
a
board
to
not
even
recommend
denial
of
this
application,
and
all
that
happens
is
they
are
gonna,
come
back
forward
a
bit
come
back
to
the
process
after
their
five
year
window
and
request
another
five
years.
That's
the
difference
so
right
now
as
of
right
now
they
would.
They
have
to
request
the
five
year
they
can
get
up
to
five
years
through
the
negotiation
that
they
can
come
back
through
the
process
and
get
another
five
years.
C
I
C
I
I
I
Who's
brought
that
that
that
same
information
to
us,
that
this
is
that
this
is
an
issue
they
again
are
looking
for
they're
looking
for
the
ability
to
vest
at
least
somewhat
vest
into
a
community
so
that
they
know
that
they
have
the
guarantee
the
coat
every
time
they
come
to
before
the
board
that
reopens
their
project
to
scrutiny,
to
changes
in
the
code
that
have
occurred.
All
of
those
different
types
of
what's.
C
I
During
the
negotiation
project,
the
process
with
a
developer,
to
provide
an
additional
window
of
time
for
that
developer
to
complete
their
project.
That
is
the
that
is
the
benefit
to
all
in
this
in
this
option.
That
is
the
only
real
benefit
here,
because
that's
all
that
we're
talking
about
is
changing
the
window
of
time
and
it's
the
potential
window
of
time.
It's
not
a
guaranteed
you're
getting
10
years,
because
the
code
says
you're
getting
10
years
again,
you're
dealing
with
a
document
that
is
completely
negotiated.
It
is
not
something
that
you
just
get
blindly.
I
This
is
what
the
regulations
say,
so
you
can
have
that
you
can
request
that,
but
if
you're
not
going
to
prove
to
me
what
to
the
board
in
general
that
you
have
a
fees
and
schedule
or
something
that
justifies
that
again
right,
you're
going
to
want
some
type
of
justification.
As
for
what
as
to
why
they're
asking
for
that
10
years?
What
what
is
it
that
about
your
particular
project
that
makes
it
need
more
than
five
years
or
need
more
than
three
years
or
need
more
than
two
years?
What
is
the
fees
and
schedule?
I
C
A
A
C
There's
only
one
number
that
they're
gonna
ask
for
in
their
application.
No
one's
gonna
ask
for
one:
no
one's
gonna
for
two:
no
one's
gonna
ask
for
5
10
..
Well,
let's
just
be
honest
with
ourselves.
Is
that
shouldn't
we
decide?
This
is
the
right
thing.
Every
single
development
agreement
that
will
be
issued
heretofore
will
be
for
10
years
right.
Maybe
that
is
a
terrific
thing.
C
A
Like
to
say
that
five
years,
a
lot
changes
than
five
years,
especially
with
the
hurricanes
and
climate
change
and
economy
and
everything
else,
I
think
five
years
is
plenty.
If
they're
gonna
come
back
and
say:
hey
I
need
an
extension,
then,
at
that
time,
after
five
years
they
can
have
the
extension
I
I
don't
see
why
they
need
ten
years.
A
C
L
K
A
I
I
And
Zoning
meetings
remain
the
same.
All
of
the
other
boards
are
made
the
same
with
the
exception
of
the
TRC,
but
because
we
provide
an
entire
schedule
to
you,
we're
providing
you
the
revised
schedule
so
that
you
have
the
full
information
said
you
should
you
want
to
attend?
One
of
those
or
or
whatever
I
mean
they
are
open
to
the
public,
so
you
can
speak,
but
they
are
open
to
the
public
since
those
those
have
changed
so
the
second
and
fourth
Thursday.
We
wanted
to
make
that
you
aware
of
that.
I
I
We
send
them
out
to
you
in
December,
with
the
expressed
understanding
that
you
would
have
more
than
a
month
to
review
those
at
those
sections
of
code,
and
hopefully
you
guys
got
a
chance
to
go
through
them
with
the
holidays
and
that
type
of
thing
and
you've
had
most
of
January.
As
we
I
know,
we
resent
it
out.
So
as
a
result,
that's
what
we
have
here.
This
is
basically
just
an
open
discussion
on
the
site
plan
and
other
sections
that
allow
for
public
notice.
I
A
A
I
asked
that
about
four
five
six
months
ago,
so
I
understand
now
why
somebody
wants
a
tenure
recommendation
I,
don't
understand
why
it
takes
so
long
to
just
ask
for
a
recommendation.
I
mean
I
want
this
recommend
I
want
this
recommendation
to
whoever
and
we
need
to
to
get
this
thing
changed.
How
do
we
do
that.
I
A
I
Once
again,
we
will
provide
your
recommendations,
all
of
your
recommendations
to
the
city
manager
or
him
to
make
a
determination
on
where
he
would
like
that,
in
that
information
to
go
whether
it's
going
to
the
Board
of
Commissioners
in
the
met
in
an
amendment
or
whether
he
wants
to
have
a
workshop
to
discuss
it,
whatever
his,
whatever
his
discretion,
is
that
he
would
like
to
do
we're
just
here
to
collect
the
information
to
provide
it
to
the
on
to
the
next
day.
Okay,.
A
I'm,
just
like
this
is
ridiculous.
I
just
find
this
absolutely
ridiculous
that
it
takes
no
wonder
some
developer
wants
a
ten-year
extension
to
get
something
done.
I'm
just
asking
to
someone
to
go
talk
to
them
and
say:
hey.
We
need
another
extension.
Why
does
it
take
so
long?
That's
why
I'm
trying
to
understand
we're.
I
We're
doing
the
best
we
can
with
the
staff
that
we
have
available
to
provide
all
of
the
all
of
the
necessary
documents
and
all
of
the
necessary
information
for
this
board
and
to
support
all
of
the
boards
we
are.
You
are
one
of
three
boards
that
we
are
staff
to.
We
have
other
applications
and
other
sections
of
code
that
we're
currently
working
on.
We
are
three
people.
F
I
We're
doing
the
best
that
we
can
to
provide
the
services
to
this
board
and
to
provide
the
information
we
have
just
recently
gone
through
the
budget
process
to
get
an
entire
land
development
code
rewrite
after
three
years
of
requesting
it.
We
have
now
gotten
the
opportunity
to
do
that.
We
are
in
the
we're
in
the
process
of
trying
to
go
out
and
get
a
consultant
to
do
that,
these
all
of
these
provisions
and
all
of
the
requests
that
everybody
has
been
asking
for
dark
skies
initiative.
I
This
initiative,
hbb
changes,
all
of
those
have
been
prioritized
on
a
list
to
be
included
with
the
consultants
documentation
to
be
provided
to
them,
so
that
a
holistic
approval
can
be
done
and
review
can
be
done
in
the
land
development
code.
So
we
don't
continually
keep
changing
section
after
section
after
section
and
leave
in
problem
areas
that
then
never
get
addressed
because
of
the
fact
that
we
didn't
think
about
that,
because
we
wanted
to
force
through
a
change
one
change.
There
are
all
kinds
of
different
notice
requirements
in
here
outside
of
a
500
foot
radius.
I
There
are
notice
requirements
to
go
in
the
paper.
There
is
a
different
process
for
site
plans,
there's
a
different
process
for
HPB.
This
is
giving
you
the
opportunity
to
go
through
all
of
those
different
sections
of
code
and
either
decide
which
ones
you
want
to
address
ballistic
lee
so
that
you're
dealing
with
it
all
at
once,
because
what's
gonna
happen
is
if
we
make
a
one
change
to
HB,
b's
and
change
to
500
foot
radius.
Okay,
we
make
that
one
change,
we're
gonna,
have
somebody
come
in
and
say:
I
want.
I
I
So,
as
result,
this
staff
is
doing
the
best
that
it
can
to
prioritize
all
of
the
different
changes
that
people
want
and
to
provide
it
holistically
to
a
consultant
so
that
we
can
get
it
on
the
docket
or
you
to
review
section
by
section
of
the
land
development
code
and
make
your
recommendations
to
the
BOC
and
then
the
BOC
can
go
through
it
forward
and
decide
if
they
want
to
make
those
change.
That
is
what
we
are
trying
to
do
as
a
staff.
It
is
not
an
easy
accomplishment,
so.
A
Let
me
be
clear
that
I
would
never
even
assume
that
you
guys
are
not
working
hard.
You've
done
an
excellent
job
always,
but
it
just
seems
to
me
that
you
know
when
you'd
say
you
bring
this
up
and
that
every
time
it's
it's
like
it
takes
more
time
more
time
more
time,
and
that
also
makes
us
understand
why
a
developer
wants
10
years
for
something
like
that,
so
I'm,
just
asking
it
in
your
opinion,
in
your
opinion,
for
anything
else.
When
do
you
think
this
change
might.
I
Happen
because
I
have
control
over
what
goes
to
BOC
when
it
goes
to
BOC.
We
make
a
recommendation
to
the
city
manager
and
the
city
manager
decides
on
what
gets
prioritized
first
to
go
to
BOC.
Ok,
so
when
that
happens,
when
he
makes
a
decision
based
on
your
recommendations,
whether
he
wants
to
roll
these
into
the
land
development,
food
changes
holistically
or
deal
with
them
separately,
that
is
gonna,
be
at
his
discretion.
Ok
I
have.
I
H
C
That's
what
I
suspected
and
now
this
is
total
humor.
If
I
were
a
developer
that
lived
in
Utah
and
wanted
to
change
my
land
development
agreement
from
five
to
ten
years.
I
could
probably
have
gotten
that
done,
but
if
I
sat
your
on
this
board
and
asked
for
a
change
several
times,
we'd
be
in
the
mud,
yeah.
G
C
This
is
total.
This
is
just
between
us,
but
if
I
were
on
the
outside
asking
in
some
how
they
can
get
this
drawn
up
put
in
and
it's
a
topic,
we
get
a
vote
on,
but
should
the
Chairman
ask
month
after
month
after
month,
or
a
change
of
a
500-foot
million
rule
and
I
remember
distinctly
the
day
that
you
asked
for
it.
I
guess:
I
would
just
question
where
the
priorities
are
so.
C
I
F
A
H
H
A
C
C
There's
a
leap
of
faith:
sorry
chairman
have
and
did,
and
since
your
request
or
the
I
concept
is
very
concrete
and
very
specific,
although
there
is
a
lot
of
highlighted
items,
there
is
only
one
number
that
is
listed.
It
is
only
two
hundred
feet.
Your
request
and
our
idea
of
consensus
is
specifically
500
feet.
I
think
it
would
be
fair
to
say
that
we
could
ask
for
that.
Consensus
on
that
agenda
item
to
move
that
forward.
I
would.
I
I
A
I
I
Conditional
uses
require
200-foot
hbb
applications
require
200-foot.
Your
variances
applications
require
200-foot
plus
an
advertisement
in
the
newspaper
plus
they
require
a
sign
on
the
property.
Your
conditional
use
is
required,
additionally,
a
sign
on
the
property,
as
well
as
the
200
feet.
Site
plans
require
no
notice.
Your
annexations
require
notice
200
feet.
They
require
an
ad
the
newspaper.
They
require
notice
on
the
property.
Your
land
development
code
changes
your
zoning
changes.
They
require
a
200-foot
notice.
They
require
a
sign
on
the
property.
They
require
advertising
in
the
newspaper,
your
land,
your
land
use
changes.
I
A
I
K
F
I
Which
particular
applications
you
want
to
deal
with
if
you
want
to
deal
with
all
of
the
applications
that
currently
have
little
to
have
200-foot
radius,
then
that
is
what
you
need
to
say
in
your
and
you
need
to
direct
the
staff.
To
do
you
need
to
be
very
specific.
I
am
asking
for
specific,
detailed
recommendation
on
what
you're,
looking
for
all
that
that's
what
we
are
asking
for
here.
Anything.
C
H
A
I
A
Question
what
about
other
forms?
You
know
the
world
is
changing.
There's
Facebook,
there's
this
there's
that
I
mean
have
we
thought
about.
You
know
newspaper
costs
money,
but
is
there
some
other
ways?
I
mean
I'm.
Sure
that
news,
you'll
newspaper
circulation
is
drop
tremendously.
I
mean
we
need
to
think
about
the
future
a
little
bit
and
think
about
other
forms
of
informing
people.
Okay,.
I
I
A
To
tell
you,
since
I've
been
on
this
board
is
probably
the
only
time
I've
ever
started,
looking
at
those
stupid
ads
and
the
paper
most
the
time,
I'm
like.
What's
that
I
just
like
I,
don't
think
that
I
bet,
if
you
took
consensus
of
people
who
get
a
newspaper
there's
probably
maybe
one
or
two
percent
that
actually
look
at
that
stuff
in
the
newspaper
we've
got
to
think
about
just
I'm.
Just
this
is
comments.
We've
got
to
think
about
other
forms
of
informing
the
public.