►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Board June 17, 2019
Description
Description
A
C
D
F
A
G
Is
a
quasi-judicial
proceeding
where
the
complaining
and
Zoning
Board
acts
in
a
quasi-judicial,
rather
than
a
legislative
capacity
at
a
quasi-judicial
here,
is
not
the
board's
function
to
make
law,
but
rather
to
apply
law
that
has
already
been
established
in
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
The
board
is
required
by
law
to
make
findings
of
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
apply
those
findings
of
fact
to
previously
establish
criteria
contained
in
the
Code
of
Ordinances
in
order
to
make
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
it.
G
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
at
this
hearing
that
the
law
considers
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
met
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance
and
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
in
favor
of
the
applicant.
By
the
same
token,
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
against
the
applicant.
G
A
A
H
Great,
so
this
is
a
proposal
for
conditional
use
approval
and
an
existing
mini
storage
warehouse
use
in
the
highway
business
district.
The
expansion
would
occur
by
converting
little
over
16
thousand
square
feet
of
existing
commercial
retail
space
on
the
property.
This
was
continued
from
last
month's
meeting
reason
being
what
we
have
is
an
existing
4.1
acre
piece
of
property
that
is
in
the
incorporated
area
of
the
city.
H
This
project
involves
a
mostly
interior
and
some
exterior
renovations
to
those
buildings,
and
then
some
minor
site
upgrades
that
the
applicants
proposed
to
bring
them
the
site
up
to
code
as
much
as
possible,
including
the
handicapped,
parking
dumpster
enclosure.
Loading
zones
landscaping
those
sorts
of
things
so,
with
respect
to
your
conditional
use,
review
criteria,
item
1,
the
Technical
Review
Committee
last
reviewed
this
project
at
their
meeting
of
April
4th
2019
and
found
that
the
site
and
technical
requirements
of
the
land
development
code
have
been
met.
H
Staff
feels
that
this
is
not
an
appropriate
expansion
for
this
property
or
this
area
based
on
two
main
reasons,
one
being
the
surrounding
land
use
and
land
use
context
in
the
area
and
the
South
Pinellas
Corridor
in
this
area
and
the
second
being
the
aesthetic
or
architectural.
If
you
will
proposed
look
at
the
property,
the
South
Pinellas
Avenue
corridor
is
a
main
arterial
corridor
that,
as
you
know,
extends
into
the
city's
downtown.
It's
an
area
diverse
uses
mix
of
uses,
including
retail
restaurants,
offices,
personal
services,
industrial
light,
industrial
and
high
of
density
residential,
including
condominiums.
H
Obviously,
this
corridor
will
not
be
widened
in
this
area,
they're
embracing
the
fact
that
it
is
a
busy
corridor,
but
looking
at
the
local
character
of
the
corridor,
all
the
way
down
into
other
jurisdictions
of
Palm
Harbor,
don't
even
and
in
those
areas
and
looking
to
and
hits
the
multimodal
experience.
As
you
know,
we
have
the
Pinellas
Trail
nearby
some
sidewalk
network
on
the
road
and
we're
looking
at
expanding
that
the
Jolly
trolley
transit
service
runs
this
corridor
and
VOT
is
looking
at
mostly
rain
repurposing.
To
enhance
that
pattern.
H
H
With
respect
to
the
second
kind
of
area
that
that
we
looked
at
was
the
compatibility
of
the
look
of
the
property
the
applicant
sought
to,
and
staff
did
discuss
with
the
applicant
sort
of
mitigating
the
change
to
a
storage
facility
by
trying
to
leave
the
building.
Look
like
retail
kind
of
as
a
short
summary.
The
applicant
has
proposed
to
leave
the
storefronts,
basically
as
they
are
and
has
supplied
you
with
a
set
of
elevation
views
and
those
elevation
views
include.
Obviously
the
locked
front
doors
would
be
required
because
the
interior
will
be
renovated.
H
So
there
will
be
no
access
from
the
front
black
out
film
on
the
windows.
I'm
repainting
the
coping
on
the
roof
to
the
orange
I
guess
to
tie
it
in
with
the
rest
of
the
the
property,
some
signage,
which
is
not
specified
and
the
rest
of
the
building
elements,
the
brick
and
stucco
would
be
retained.
And
again
this
is
an
area,
that's
that's
the
gateway
to
the
city's
downtown.
H
It's
an
area
that
forward
Pinellas
is
actively
developing
cultural
corridor
to
highlight
kind
of
the
local
character
of
each
area
on
South
Pinellas,
and
we
feel
like
this.
This
look
that
it
that
we
need
some
more
work
on
on
that
or
maybe
I'm
not
sure
in
hits
landscaping
or
some
more
work
as
for
more
detail
or
information
about
what
the
building,
what
we
could
do
with
the
building.
What
is
the
signage
things
like
that?
In
order
to
try
to
have
it
not
detract
from
the
area?
It
just
look
like
anything.
H
And
the
applicant
has
proposed
to
bring
the
landscaping
up
to
code,
so
that
is
know.
The
city
feels
that
the
conditional
use
is
not
consistent
with
the
service
company.
That's
a
plan
and
I've
listed
several
policies
there,
some
of
which
we
beat
some
of
the
items.
I
just
mentioned
a
couple.
Other
things
I'll
highlight
on
page
five
under
objective
six
point:
two
highlighting
just
the
available
spaces
for
small
business
or
local
businesses.
H
H
H
H
You
know,
as
I
said,
this
corridor
is
being
managed
with
the
kind
of
acknowledgment
and
almost
embracing
the
the
traffic
pattern
that
we
see
there,
and
it
will
obviously
reduce
some
employment
on
this
property
anyway.
So
because
the
many
many
storage
will
not
require
I
think
the
applicant
can
speak
to
that,
but
more
than
two
or
three
employees
item
number
for
the
application
will
not
result
in
any
significant
adverse
impact
to
historical
resources
or
to
the
environment.
The
applicant
has
certified
that
the
existing
stormwater
system
is
operating
as
designed,
so
there
are
no
impacts.
H
There
item
number
five
difficult
to
say
the
whether
this
change
would
adversely
affect
the
joining
property
values
and
I'm
not
really
going
to
go
there.
I
would
say
the
removal
of
retail
just
removes
the
consumer
activity
from
that
site
other
than
for
the
storage
you
know
so.
I
would
just
just
note
that,
with
respect
to
item
number
six,
this
will
not
require
the
extension
of
additional
public
facilities.
The
site
has
already
served
with
public
facilities
and
item
number
seven
again.
H
Those
are
available
to
the
site
with
displacement
of
business
or
business
space.
It's
difficult
to
say
where
those
businesses
might
go
or
where
they
might
see,
if
it's
elsewhere
in
the
city
or
outside
the
city,
whether
there'd
be
any
indirect
impacts.
As
far
as
the
growth
pattern,
and
that
broader
issue
addressed
by
I
am
number
seven,
this
application
was
publicly
noticed.
We
did
not
receive
any
comments
and
staff
is
recommending.
Denial
of
resolution
2019.
Nineteen.
I
I
H
And
I
I
did
approximately
I'd
like
the
applicant
to
be
able
to
speak
to
how
much
space
is
there.
I
just
did
that,
based
on
counting
the
doors.
Obviously,
sometimes
spaces
are
combined
to
me,
so
it
might
be
that
many,
but
I
didn't
count
the
businesses
that
are
still
open
there.
There's
there's
a
few
with
signs
still
up,
but
yeah.
This
would
be
in
favor
of
one
occupant
of
the
entire
property.
J
Hi
good
evening
my
name
is
Matt
FEMA
with
kimly
horn
and
I'm,
located
at
six
five
five
North
Franklin
Street
in
Tampa,
Florida
I,
just
want
to
know.
If
there's
a
time
limit
today,
because
I'd
like
to
speak
and
I'ma
speak
briefly,
but
then
I
was
also
going
to
turn
it
over
to
public
stories
to
speak
as
well,
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
weren't
gonna
run
out
of
time.
I.
J
Probably
happen
I
play
I
have
two
minutes:
oh
yes,
we'll
be
we'll
be
short,
you're
good.
All
right!
Well,
I'm
gonna
talk
about
a
little
bit
about
the
engineering
and
then
I'ma
turn
it
over
to
Rick
McKeever
with
public
storage
and
he's
gonna
talk
about
the
business
uses
and
we
have
a
little
bit
of
a
different
analysis.
J
We
weren't
drove
around
and
we
talked
to
some
brokers
and
also
some
real
estate
owners
in
the
area,
and
we
came
up
with
a
little
bit
of
different
analysis
than
one
was
presented
before
you
today,
but
I'm,
an
engineer
of
record
for
public
storage
and
we're
here
today
to
request
a
conditional
use
approval
to
convert
five
square
feet
of
existing
commercial
retail
space.
Two
mini
warehouse,
poly
storage
is
currently
operating
268
storage
units
in
the
rear
of
the
property
and
we're
requesting
to
convert
the
existing
retail
space
to
164
additional
units.
J
It's
part
of
the
proposed
development.
We
will
be
enhancing
the
corridor
by
installing
a
new
sidewalk
along
Pinellas
Avenue
and
installing
perimeter
buffer,
shrubs
and
trees,
along
with
landscape
Islands,
to
break
up
the
existing
parking
roads.
The
proposed
conversion
will
provide
the
look
and
feel
of
a
retail
storefront
which
meets
the
goals
and
objectives
of
the
corridor.
J
And
which
meets
objective
we've
we've
worked
with
staff
to
make
sure
that
we
have
met
these
objectives
by
providing
enhanced
landscaping
and
some
of
these
enhancements
that
we've
been
that
we've
been
providing
weather.
We've
worked
out
with
staff,
our
upgraded
ATA
spaces,
so
we've
looked
at
the
parking
lot
and
we've
updated
the
ATA
spaces.
We
provided
an
88
connection
to
the
pathway.
We've
provided
a
new
sidewalk
out
front
I,
don't
know
if
you've
driven
by
the
site,
but
the
sidewalk
out
front,
says
disrepair.
J
So
we
provide
in
the
new
sidewalk
we've
also
gone
through
and
we're
enhancing
the
curb
islands
in
the
front
of
it
this
site
to
provide
multi-lane
scape
and
to
keep
the
mulch
within
the
landscape
beds.
We
provided
a
dumpster
enclosure
so
that
we
can
properly
screen
the
dumpster
and
we're
going
to
be
adding
11
trees
to
development.
J
So
we've
worked
closely
with
staff
to
make
sure
that
we
are
meeting
those
there's
retail
needs
of
the
community,
we're
also
enhancing
the
store
front
of
the
building,
we're
painting
the
top
of
the
building
and
then
we're
also
leaving
the
retail
field.
Because
one
of
the
discussions
we've
had
with
staff
is
they
didn't
want
it
to
look
like
a
mini
warehouse?
They
wanted
to
look
like
a
retail
establishment,
so
we've
kept
that
retail
look
at
the
corridor.
You
know
the
place
has
been
I.
J
Think
for
about
eight
years
we've
had
the
the
use
of
that
area
and
they've,
you
know,
haven't,
had
full
occupancy
of
the
establishment.
So
what
we're
doing
is
we're
converting
to
use
that
is
a
market
driven
use
for
the
community
and
that
we're
also
providing
that
look
and
feel
of
the
retail
quarter,
so
that
this
time,
I'd
like
to
turn
it
over
to
Rick,
to
explain
a
little
bit
more
about
the
business
use
that
we're
proposing.
K
It
was
an
acquisition
property
that
I
was
a
part
of
and
that
the
the
commercial
real
estate
in
the
front
has
always
been
problematic
to
keeper
rented.
The
turnover
rate
is
high.
We
can
average
the
65%
occupancy
rate
and
it's
a
turnover
of
about
every
three
years
we
get
a
new
tenant.
We've
had
one
tenant
in
that
building.
K
That's
been
there
since
I've
been
there
and
he's
a
dentist
he's
at
one
of
our
lowest
rates:
72
cents,
a
square
foot,
so
the
the
the
use
in
that
hodge
pods
between
aldermen
and
mirrors
is
is
quite
diverse,
as
she'd
mentioned.
We
want
now
on
the
mini
storage
side,
we've
maintained
for
the
last
eight
years,
a
ninety-five
percent
occupancy.
That's
all
the
tenants
are
from
Tarpon
Springs.
K
So
there's
a
big
use
there,
where
we're
benefiting
the
community
with
Mini
Storage
we've
never
dropped
lower
than
95
percent
over
the
last
eight
years,
so
from
65
to
95
is
a
pretty
big
drop
in
occupancy.
The
other
portion
of
this
the
corridor
where
it
ends
at
the
hotel,
I
see
it
from
aldermen
to
the
the
hospital
again
is
quite
a
hodgepodge
of
different
businesses
and
and
and
mom-and-pop
shops.
There's
a
few
commercial
Real
Estate's
there
there's
a
lot
of
business
parks
where
they
have
open
businesses,
but
this
lends
itself
for
somebody
to
drive
up.
K
Do
a
retail
and
then
leave
the
Texaco
station
has
1700
square
feet
presently
available
to
rent
and
the
old
winn-dixie
market
is
at
seventeen
percent
occupancy,
where
they
move
when
Dixie
their
full
occupancy.
But
it's
a
brand
new
building.
That's
where
the
retail
is
headed.
They
want
to
be
into
the
nice
new
brand
new
building
with
an
anchor
store,
and
that's
why
everybody
down
the
way
they
kind
of
struggle.
You
get
a
lot
of
turnover
in
in
your
commercial
real
estate.
So
that's
why
you
know
we
we
propose
to
just
make
us
many
stores.
K
Let
us
do
what
we
do
best
and
provide
the
community
a
good
service
of
mini-storage.
So
that's
my
kind
of
spiel
on
why
we
want
to
do
this.
We
are
better
at
providing
mini-storage
again,
as
Matt
pointed
out,
we're
going
to
we're
going
to
plant
trees,
we're
going
to
enhance
the
front
of
this
property.
It's
still
going
to
have
the
commercial
look.
A
K
Have
done
and
in
the
past
we've
we've
planted
grass
there
it's
hard
to
keep
systems
operational
in
that
area.
But
if
you
look
at
that
that
corridor
between
aldermen
and
mirrors
were
probably
one
of
the
best-looking
properties
out
there,
so
I
don't
think
that
the
enhancements
will
make
a
big
difference
to
a
potential
customer.
We
a
retail
customer,
it's
it's
the
use,
its
we're
one
of
the
nicest
ones
in
that
corridor.
Okay,.
K
F
K
K
K
K
F
K
A
C
D
C
K
E
F
K
A
A
C
Have
a
question:
it's
a
simple
one:
I
just
I
want
to
make
sure
that
I'm
reading
all
this
right.
It
appears
that
the
staff
feels
that
this
is
a
yes
or
no
answer
is
that
it
appears
that
the
staff
feels
that
this
conditional
use
is
is
not
in
the
best
interest
or
compliant
with
our
current
code.
That's.
H
A
H
It
may
I
can't
tell
you
that
we've
had
several
conversations
with
Wells
Fargo
that
owns
the
winn-dixie
and
I'm,
not
sure
what
the
status
of
leasing
space
is.
There
they're
actively
looking
at
different
options
for
the
property,
so
if
and
to
sell
the
property,
so
if
they,
when
they
do
lease
space,
if
something
come,
comes
about
they're
actively.
D
A
A
A
E
C
D
A
A
H
Yes-
and
this
is
at
721,
South
distant
Avenue,
that's
on
the
northeast
corner
of
mango
street
and
distant
Avenue,
and
basically
the
applicant
with
this
proposal
would
like
to
construct
us
a
second
single-family
residence
on
this
property.
It
appears
that
the
property
best
of
my
knowledge
had
an
office
on
it.
Originally,
that
was
converted
to
a
single-family
home
and
the
applicant
would
like
to
construct
a
second
detached
single-family
home.
H
H
H
Basically,
the
property
does
not
have
sufficient
area,
as
I
mentioned,
to
accommodate,
but
two
single-family
detached
dwellings
unless
it
is
zoned
rezone
to
the
r60
zoning
district.
The
nearest
r60
zoning
is
about
two
blocks
to
the
north
of
this
property.
The
general
area
here
is
higher
density,
residential
with
a
mix
of
housing
types,
including
single-family,
multi-family
and
there's
a
mobile
home
park
to
the
east.
H
Obviously,
as
you
know,
mango
Street
will
be
connecting
two
mirrors
boulevards,
so
this
will
be
a
through
corridor
with
within
approximately
a
year
so
and
that,
as
another
item
for
the
context
of
this
rezoning,
the
residential
medium
future
land
use
categories
requested,
because
that
would
make
the
r60
zoning
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan.
So
that's
what's
what's
driving
and
it's
kind
of
all,
driven
by
the
rezoning
that
would
accommodate
two
single-family
detached
dwellings
on
two
separate
Lots,
the
properties
combined
into
one
lot
at
this
time.
H
The
area
around
this,
this
property
is
in
the
future
land
use
residential
urban
category.
Now,
a
change
to
residential
medium
for
this,
this
property
would
not
be
compatible
with
with
that
kind
of
surrounding
area.
Would
it
would
limit
the
property
substantially,
but
compared
to
what
could
be
built
on
it
now
and
what
the
area
is
trending
toward,
which
is
the
higher
density
in
this
area
and
the
different
types
of
housing?
H
H
For
the
reasons
just
stayed
at
the
are
sixties,
zoning
designation
is
not
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
The
are
sixty
is
really
kind
of
a
neighborhood
conservation.
Zoning
district
meant
to
kind
of
memorialize
the
older
some
of
the
older
plants.
This
was
and
is
part
of
an
older
plant,
but
this
area
a
lot
too
lots
were
combined
and
this
area
is
in
particular,
is
trending
toward
multi-family
residential
and
some
non
residential
use.
H
As
far
as
the
the
this,
this
area
is
an
older
plat,
but
it's
really
starting
to
to
change
to
more
of
a
multifamily
pattern
with
respect
to
number
four,
the
amendment,
if
granted,
would
not
adversely
impact
or
exceed
the
capacity
of
the
city
to
provide
facilities.
The
TRC
did
review
this
application
at
its
May,
2nd
2019
meeting,
and
the
comments
are
included
there.
C
I'm
trying
to
wrap
my
head
around
how
the
division
in
the
construction
of
two
individual
homes
is
at
an
r60
is
not
consistent
with
multi-family.
I
was
just
listening
and
reading
at
the
same
time,
and
I
wasn't
quite
grasping
how
it's
not
consistent,
and
then
we
throw
in
the
old
plat
or
say
and
that
it
had
been
combined
into
one
and
back.
So,
if
you
would
help
me
understand
how
this
request
is
not
consistent,
I
think
you
said,
with
the
movement
or
the
direction
of
that
area.
Just.
H
One
thing
about
this
property:
it's
a
little
bit
unique
because
it's
one
piece
of
property
with
a
countywide
designation,
a
future
land-use
destination
and
a
zoning.
That's
just
on
that
property.
Now,
if
you're
gonna
ask
me
what
the
history
of
that
was
I,
don't
know
I'm
guessing
it
had
to
do
with,
and
maybe
the
applicant
can
speak
to
this-
that
it
apparently
was
an
office
to
start
out
with
usually
zonings
and
especially
future
land
use
and
countywide.
Don't
don't
cover
such
a
small
piece
of
property
right
you,
you
guys
have
seen
that
before.
H
So
the
the
question
is:
if
we
go
to
our
sixty
part
of
the
thing,
the
part
of
the
context
that
staff
has
to
look
at
is
just
because
this
small
piece
of
property
has
its
own
kind
of
Zoning
in
this
area.
Do
we
do
that
again
and
if
we
do
it
again,
you
know
we
have
to
review
it
in
the
context
of
the
land,
future
land
use
map-
and
that's
probably
more
the
driving
issue
here.
H
So
we're
going
to
drop
the
density
a
little
bit
on
future
land
use
we're
going
to
limit
the
types
of
housing
on
a
future
land
use
and
comprehensive
plan
context
kind
of
continuing.
What's
going
on
there,
it
kind
of
its
own
special
zoning.
Is
it's
tough
for
us
to
recommend
approval
of
that,
because
it's
really
not
consistent
with
what
we're
supposed
to
be
looking
at
on
a
future
land
use.
The
area
of
surrounding
is
residential
urban
and
then
across
the
street
is
institutional
and
you'd
really
don't
get
to
the
single-family
kind
of
Memorial?
H
C
D
H
A
duplex
could
be
built
right
now,
yeah
and
and
could
be
in
multifamily,
but
he
he
did
not
yes,
so
we
looked
at
multifamily
to
do.
You
know
whatever
might
fit
on
it,
but
but
that
wasn't
really
something
that
he
was
interested
in
reason
being
what's
happening
here
is
when
you're
proposing
single-family
a
multi-family
district
residential
office.
A
lot
of
these
districts
revert
back
to
this
is
gonna.
Make
you
confused
the
are
seventy
dimensional
standards
if
you're
building
a
single-family
detached
dwelling,
that's
what
the
applicant
ran
into.
Is
those
zonings?
H
Don't
really
contemplate
a
lot
of
single-family
right,
so
they
just
say:
if
you
want
a
single-family
detached,
you
have
to
use
our
seventy
dimensional
just
district
standards,
the
Lots
he
couldn't
get
the
lot
sizes,
big
enough
and
I-
believe
the
lot
widths
big
enough
on
the
property.
That's
there
to
do
that
with
our
sixty.
He
could,
which
is
why
he's
requesting
and
he
might
be
able
to
elaborate
more
but
yeah,
so
so
those
discussions
of
changing,
maybe
to
RM
or
leaving
it
ro,
didn't
didn't
really
serve
his
needs.
H
C
A
H
I
mean
there's
a
single-family
I
think
there's
some
a
couple
of
duplexes
but
yeah,
there's
multifamily,
there's.
Of
course
the
RV
park
is,
if
it's
tire
density,
residential,
sorry
mobile
home
park,
higher
density,
Yuliya
news.
So
if
that's
ever
redeveloped
that
will
be
higher
density.
You
know
property
as
well.
G
A
L
M
Name
is
Annie
Deb's
in
I
reside
at
803,
South
distance
Avenue
I
am
just
across
the
street
from
the
applicant's
property
their
on
distance.
Avenue
I
just
need
this
clarification,
because
I
keep
hearing
that
there
are
multi-family
homes
in
the
neighborhood.
There
are
more
single-family
homes
in
the
neighborhood
on
my
present
blog
and
the
next
block,
and
then
over
on
North,
Street
and,
of
course,
I'm
sure
that
can't
be
related
to
mango
cervicals.
M
That's
another
area
because
those
are
attached
homes,
but
it's
not
out
on
distance
and
I
just
needed
the
clarification
as
to
how
you
can
say
there
are
more
multifamily
dwellings.
There.
Then
there
are
single
their
most
single-family
dwellings
there
and
across
the
street
is
on
one
whole
block
is
just
well
this
Mount
Moriah,
AME
Church,
plus
the
part
of
the
cops
and
kids
center
on
Harrison
Street.
H
M
E
J
E
H
Under
the
current
zoning,
the
two
Lots,
the
the
property,
cannot
be
split
in
two.
Let
me
start
with
us
to
build
a
second
single-family
detached
home.
It's
got
to
be
on
its
own
lot
that
meet
that
meets
the
lot
dimension
requirements,
there's
the
existing
home.
So
the
applicant
has
to
split
the
property
such
that
that
home
has
a
conforming
setback.
That's
not
really
a
problem!
It's
it's!
H
Some,
not
not
that,
but
also
so
that
that
lot,
that
the
existing
home
is
on
plus
the
new
lot
as
the
minimum
square
foot
footage
of
the
area
and
a
minimum
width
and
I'd
have
to
look
back
but
I,
think
the
minimum
square
foot
square
feet
was
not
met.
I
can't
remember
with
the
width,
but
I
can
look
that
up,
but
we
did.
The
applicant
did
work
hard.
H
N
H
It
was
told
to
separate
Lots
you've
got
two
lots
in
common
ownership.
It
would
be
illegal,
non-conforming
lot
under
our
current
code.
They
would
have
to
go
for
a
variance
because
of
the
common
ownership,
but
I
can
tell
you
that
the
Lots
would
have
met
the
variance
criteria.
That's
all
I
can
say
you
know
they
would
have
had
to
go
to
the
Board
of
Adjustment,
but
the
two
separate
Lots
would
have
met
the
criteria
for
them
not
build
on
a
non-conforming
lot.
H
D
H
I
did
not
research.
What
these
rezoning
was
before
ro,
but
I
would
just
I
would
just
say
that
the
non-conforming
existing
non-conforming
planted
lot
kind
of
standard
in
our
code,
but
the
basic
idea
is
to
recognize
existing
single-family
non-conforming
lot.
So
I
would
say
whether
it
was
you
know
our
I
don't
know
what
it
would
have
been
prior
to
the
RO,
but
probably
yeah
I
would
say
that
it
could
have
been.
A
A
I
C
H
This
is
anity
for
a
residential
plus
retail
office
district
in
the
downtown
gateway
character.
District
of
the
special
area
point
with
respect
to
your
conditional
use
criteria.
The
property
can
accommodate
a
second
dwelling
and
conformance
with
the
density
standards
of
the
t4a
district,
and
it
is
subject
to
conditional
use
because
it's
a
detached
single
door.
D
H
Had
a
couple
of
these,
this
is
that
area
where
the
special
area
plan
infill
plan,
wants
to
see
higher
density
and
different
kind
of
housing
types
apartments
or
you
know
mixed-use
or
live
work,
or
something
like
that.
So
when
you
propose
single-family
detached
it
makes
it
conditional.
Even
though,
on
this
property
we
have
a
property,
that's
large
enough
to
accommodate
the
second
dwelling
unit.
It's
got
the
density,
so
we
really
are
kind
of
in
filling
here
and
the
codes
not
kind
of
recognizing
that.
So
this
is
some
still
technically
a
conditional
use.
H
The
city's
technical
review
committee
reviewed
the
project
at
their
meeting
of
May,
2nd
2019
and
determined
that
it
complies
with
the
land
development
code
and
with
respect
to
item
2.
This
is
located
adjacent
to
other
residential
and
low-intensity
office
type
uses
that
are
proposed
for
this
transect
district
and
will
be
built
in
conformance
with
the
district.
With
respect
to
item
3,
the
conditional
use
is
consistent
with
the
city's
comprehensive
plan
and
with
respect
to
item
4.
This
is
in
a
historic
district
and
the
applicant
has
received
approval
from
the
Heritage
Preservation
Board
for
this
project.
H
There
are
no
environmental
issues
here
with
respect
to
item
5.
This
will
project
will
fit
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
and
is
not
expected
to
affect
adversely
affect
property
values.
Item
6.
The
development
will
not
require
the
extension
of
public
services.
There
are
public
services
already
available
at
this
site
in
item
seven
again
this.
This
does
encourage
and
follow
the
patterns
anticipated
or
basically
encouraged
by
the
special
area
plan
of
higher
density
infill
in
this
area
of
the
city,
so
it
will
not
adversely
affect
the
city's
growth
patterns.
L
A
H
A
E
H
N
A
G
A
G
A
H
We
that
discussion
was
had
at
TRC
as
I
think
I
heard
you
all
mentioning.
This
is
kind
of
a
gravel
kind
of
mixed.
You
know
service
alley
if,
if
you
do
require
that
the
applicant
would
be
responsible
for
paving
the
portion
adjacent
to
his
property,
public
works
at
this
time
doesn't
have
a
plan
to
pave
that.
Apparently
they
are
satisfied
with
the
surface
as
far
as
some
that
it
can
support
and
accommodate
vehicles.
H
One
thing
I
will
say
is
the
special
area
plan
once
util
use
alleys
more,
and
so
that
is
something
that
we're
running
into
more
and
more.
The
city
always
looks
very
carefully
at
paving
alleys,
just
because
of
the
stormwater
issues.
If
it's
not,
you
know
if
there
aren't,
if
it's
not
lower
flooding,
there's
a
hesitancy
to
pave
all
the
alleys
without
really
carefully
looking
at
it.
H
H
Mean
if,
if
you
wanted
to
to
ask
that
the
applicant
work
with
the
city
to
to
maybe
improve
the
surface
adjacent
to
their
property,
consistent
with
city
standards,
you
could
certainly,
which
might
be
something
like
lycra
gravel
in
that
portion.
But
the
applicant
could
not
ask
the
applicant
to
do
anything
other
than
I.
C
Have
a
question
in
regards
to
use
of
the
proposed
construction,
although
it
says
residents,
it
appears
to
me
that
this
it
just
appears
that
perhaps
the
intent
is
transient
use,
like
short
term
Airbnb,
does
that
in
any
way
of
fact,
the
T
or
a
district
of
the
special
area
plan?
In
other
words,
are
we
if
we
were
to
approve?
Are
we
given
the
green
light
for
a
short
term
rental
at
this
location,
and
would
that
adversely
affect
the
existing
nature
of
the
neighborhood?
C
H
It's
not
the
applicant
just
personally
in
a
conversation
in
the
course
of
TRC
is
that
this
was
intended
to
be
a
house
for
his
mother
or
mother-in-law.
Just
looking
it
up,
short-term
rental
is
a
conditional
use
in
his
district.
If
the
applicant
wanted
to
do
a
seasonal
or
short
term,
they
would
have
to
come
back
with
a
conditional
use
of
proposal
right
now,
it's
for
permanent
resident.
That's.
I
C
Would
just
follow
on
that
comment
right
there
you're
correct
in
fact
that
you
couldn't
park
in
the
alley
and
I,
don't
know
if
you've
gone
down
I
think
it's
called
gross
Street,
that's
the
adjacent
street,
of
which
this
is
on
the
corner.
I,
don't
I,
don't
recall
if
there's
actual
street
parking
there
I
think
the
parking
might
be
as
staff
mentioned.
Lenient
might
be
too
generous
award
that
there
is
in
fact
no
parking
at
all
available
at
that
corner.
I.
A
Okay,
then
I
would
last
for
a
motion
to
approve
or
deny
application
number
19,
14,
no
I'm,
sorry,
19
36
conditional
use
approval,
allow
construction
of
a
second
single-family
detached
dwelling
on
property
located
at
410
/
412
East
tarpon
Avenue
in
the
tee
for
a
residential
retail
office
of
the
special
area
plan.
I
would.
N
Move
to
approve,
with
the
condition
worded
something
to
the
effect
that
the
applicant
work
with
city
staff
to
determine
appropriate
improvement
to
the
alley,
not
necessarily
paving,
certainly
just
something
to
make
the
surface
improved
a
little
more
permanent.
A
little
more
stable
I
know.
That's
way
too
many
words.
So.
A
C
N
A
H
And
this
is
an
example
of
a
conditional
use
required
application
for
seasonal,
short-term
rental.
This
is
at
18
West
Orange
Street
in
the
t5d
district,
and
this
is
an
existing
single-family
residence,
basically
right
near
the
and
between
North
Pinellas
and
green
Boulevard.
So
right
near
north
Pinellas,
like
like
one
property
away
on
page
2,
you
have
the
vision
of
seasonal,
short-term
rental
there
for
your
review.
H
The
city's
technical
review
committee
reviewed
the
project
on
May,
2nd
2019
found
it
conforms
with
the
land
development
code.
With
respect
to
item
2
on
page
three
of
your
conditional
use
criteria,
this
property
is
in
the
downtown
character,
district
of
the
special
area
plan
and
this
area
encourages
activity
and
a
mix
of
uses
higher
densities,
including
the
operation
of
short
term
residential
rentals.
H
This
seasonal
rental
will
be
consistent
with
the
district
and
will
meet
the
spirit
of
the
downtown
character.
District
in
promoting
support
really
that
the
vision
statement
for
that
district
is
to
promote
or
the
support
of
businesses
downtown,
especially
on
Turpin
Avenue.
So
this
would
be
consistent
with
that.
With
respect
to
item
3,
it
would
be
consistent
with
the
city's
comprehensive
plan
and
item
4.
There
are
no
adverse
impacts
to
the
environment
or
historic
resources.
This
is
simply
a
change
of
use.
There's
no
development
really
being
proposed
on
the
property.
H
The
short-term
rental
is
adjacent
to
a
mix
of
residential
commercial
and
office
uses
in
this
district
and
all
the
other
city
ordinances
would
be
applied.
Noise
trash
all
those
types
of
property
maintenance,
so
those
would
always
apply
to
this
property
so
as
far
as
the
character,
the
neighbor
being
that
mix
and
with
those
ordinances
in
place,
it's
expected
to
not
affect
adversely
affected
joining
property.
H
Values
of
the
residence
has
already
served
by
city
facilities
and
again
it's
located
in
that
downtown
character
district
and
it's
not
expected
to
adversely
affect
growth
patterns
in
the
area
or
the
efficient
and
orderly
development
of
the
area.
So
this
application
was
publicly
noticed.
We
didn't
receive
any
responses
to
those
notices.
H
Staff
is
recommending
approval
of
resolution,
2019
17
with
the
following
conditions,
and
these
came
from
technical
review
committee
comments
number
one,
that
the
property
shall
remain
a
single-family
residence
rented
as
a
single
living
unit
that
would
meet
the
definition
number
two.
The
building
shall
be
maintained
with
one
smoke
detector
in
each
sleeping
area.
One
smoke
detector
in
the
common
Hobbit
wean
sleeping
areas,
smoke
detectors
having
a
ten
year,
let
the
lithium
battery
style
and
fire
extinguisher
provided
with
annual
inspections
item
three.
H
A
I
N
D
H
I
H
A
No,
that
portion
closed
and
is
open
to
public
discussion
or
ro
or
against
no
one
in
the
audience.
So
we'll
close
that
portion
as
well
move
on
to
discussion
between
the
board
any
questions
or
comments.
I
have
a
comment.
We
certainly
need
more
short-term
rental
space
here
in
Tarpon.
We
don't
have
enough
hotels,
as
it
is
so
just
a
comment,
any
other
questions
or
comments.
What.
C
E
A
E
E
E
A
A
C
C
N
H
You
know,
a
limited
selection
of
vacant
properties
and
in
order
to
accommodate
the
needed
parking,
they
are
having
to
go
go
up.
And
so
we
have
proposed
a
amendment
to
highway
business,
which
is
a
predominant
zoning
along
19
and
other
areas
of
the
city
where
there
might
be
some
properties
available
for
these
these
hotels
and
to
allow
the
the
height
to
go
to
70
feet
in
those
districts,
earn
that
particular
district
on
those
properties.
A
O
A
C
C
A
H
We
have
a
couple
of
minor
items
that
are
going
to
be
moving
through,
but
our
planning
director
will
be
on
vacation
and
we
won't
be
able
to
move
those
forward
to
the
Board
of
Commissioners,
and
so
it
was
decided
to
go
ahead
and
cancel
that
meeting.
So
hopefully
you
won't
have
a
huge
agenda
for
August,
but
that's.