►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Board March 18, 2019
Description
Description
A
A
C
D
B
E
Is
a
quasi
judicial
proceeding
where
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Board
acts
in
a
quasi
judicial
rather
than
a
legislative
capacity,
not
a
quasi
judicial
hearing?
It
is
not
the
board's
function
to
make
law,
but
rather
to
apply
law
that
has
already
been
established
in
a
quasi
judicial
hearing.
The
board
is
required
by
law
to
make
findings
of
fact,
based
on
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
apply
those
findings
of
fact
to
previously
establish
criteria
containing
the
Code
of
Ordinances
in
order
to
make
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
it.
E
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
at
this
hearing
that
the
law
considers
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues.
If
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
met
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
in
favor
of
the
applicant.
By
the
same
token,
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
its
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
against
the
applicant.
E
Are
there
any
members
of
the
board
which
Shinya
disclosed
in
the
ex
parte
or
conflict
ex
parte
communications
or
conflicts
of
interest
this
evening,
seeing
none
anyone
wishing
to
speak
this
evening?
If
you
could
please
stand
and
raise
your
right
hand
to
be
sworn
any
of
the
applicants,
anyone
wishing
to
speak
at
all
all
right.
Okay,
do
you
swear
or
affirm
that
the
testimony
you're
about
to
give
us
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth?
So
it's
Warren
thank.
A
You
and
now
we
move
on
to
number
four
application:
number
18,
108
and
18
109.
Additional
use
and
associated
site
plan
approval;
expansion
of
existing
cemetery;
cicada
cemetery
on
three
point:
three:
nine
one:
acres
of
land
located
in
the
residential
office;
ro
zoning
district
located
at
1201,
East,
Hartman,
Avenue,.
F
F
Just
to
hit
the
highlights
of
the
staff
report,
the
city
of
tarpon
springs,
acquired
this
property
in
April
of
2017
and
subsequently
demolished
an
existing
barbershop
building
that
was
on
site
and
the
the
city
proposes
to
expand
the
existing
cemetery
that
is
located
on
adjacent
property
to
the
west
and
that
expansion
will
include
traditional
burial
sites,
a
mausoleum,
committal
shelter,
the
vehicular
and
pedestrian
access
and
parking
that
you
see
on
the
proposed
plan.
The
cemetery
uses
a
conditional
use
in
a
residential
office
district.
F
Just
going
hitting
the
highlights
on
the
conditional
use
standards
for
review.
The
design
does
comply
with
the
standards
of
the
residential
office
district
and
the
land
development
code,
and
it
is
located
adjacent
to
other
like
uses,
including
existing
cemetery
to
the
west.
As
you
know,
Rose
Hill
Cemetery
is
located
to
the
north
of
this
property.
We
have
public
recreation
and
office
uses
to
the
north
and
northeast
and
east,
and
then
across
tarpon
Avenue.
We
have
single-family
residential
uses.
F
The
project
is
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
city's
Comprehensive
Plan
and
with
the
residential
office
general
beach
or
land
use
category
with
respect
to
adverse
impacts
to
environmental
resources.
The
property
does
have
a
Cypress
wetland
that
is
being
preserved
and
protected
with
a
25
foot
setback
buffer.
The
proper
the
proposed
use
will
not
adversely
affect
property
values
in
the
area
and
it
will
not
require
extension
of
additional
public
services
to
the
site.
It's
already
served
by
city,
water
and
sewer,
and
it
will
not
impact
the
city's
ability
to
provide
adequate
facilities.
F
Again,
this
this
proposed
use
is
consistent
with
the
uses
in
the
area
and
is
judged
to
be
inefficient
and
order.
The
use
of
the
land,
especially
considering
the
surrounding
uses,
sort
of
a
consolidation
of
the
cemetery
and
institutional
type
uses
that
are
in
the
area
with
respect
to
some
of
the
site
plan
standards.
I'll,
try
not
to
repeat
myself.
One
item
is
that
the
cemetery
and
committal
shelter
will
be
built
within
one
year
and
the
mausoleum
is
scheduled
to
be
built
within
the
next
five
years.
F
Access
is
via
north
Jasmine
Avenue.
As
we
mentioned,
there
are
utilities
available
to
the
site.
The
applicant
did
complete
an
environmental
and
engineering
report
for
the
site.
There
were
no
endangered
of
protected
species,
found
to
be
using
the
site
and
again
the
wetlands
are
being
buffered
and
preserved.
F
There
were
no
cultural
or
archaeological
resources
identified
either
the
adjacent,
cicada,
Cemetery
and
Rose
Hill
are
both
listed
on
designated
on
the
National
Register
as
historic
places.
This
is
consistent
with
that
and
will
probably
actually
enhance
that,
as
opposed
to
some
other
use
of
the
property.
F
The
mausoleum
was
approved
as
a
part
of
this
conditional
use
and
as
a
part
of
the
resolution,
20
1907
and
must
be
constructed
within
five
years
of
the
effective
date
of
the
resolution.
Number
two:
the
developers
responsible
for
acquiring
or
acquiring
not
jurisdictional
permits
and
for
meeting
the
land
development
code.
Number
three
construction
plan
shall
be
consistent
with
the
site
plan
and
all
fees
shall
be
paid
in
accordance
with
the
land
development
code.
F
A
F
C
F
C
G
F
The
applicant
will
be
required
to
mitigate
tree
impacts
in
accordance
with
the
the
tree
preservation,
ordinance
and
the
applicant,
or
the
the
site
plan
does
accommodate
areas
for
trees.
I'm,
not
sure
it's
been
exactly
decided
if
any
of
the
larger
trees
can
be
preserved
on
site.
Given
the
number
the
layout
and
a
number
of
burial
sites
proposed,
but
there
are,
there
is
a
buffer
all
the
way
around
the
site
not
required,
but
it's
there's
tree
planting
provided
all
the
way
around
a
site.
F
A
E
E
H
H
H
What's
gonna
happen
to
the
abutting
area?
Next
to
me,
because
I
know,
there's
been
a
bunch
of
guys
in
there
with
putting
orange
ribbons
around
the
trees
and
I'm
just
wanting
to
know
what
the
plan
is
for
you
no
I
mean
it's
a
cemetery,
a
budding
my
property
like
is
there
gonna
be
trees.
There
gonna
be
a
fence.
F
G
F
H
F
G
H
The
concern
is,
is
it
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
there
is
some
barrier
between
me
and
my
clientele
coming
in
that
there's,
not
a
funeral
service
going
on.
You
know
that
they
can
plainly
see.
I
mean
we're
in
like
a
setback
area
with
people
in
and
out
so
yeah.
That's
my
biggest
concern
is
that
it's
just
you
know
and.
F
H
H
A
A
A
G
A
D
A
All
right,
thank
you.
Now
we
move
on
to
number
five
application:
Det
number
19,
o8
site
plan,
approval,
expansion
of
existing
recreational
facilities
and
the
existing
54
point.
11
acre
mobile
home
park
meadows
mobile
home
park
located
in
the
mobile
home
park,
MHP
zoning
district
located
at
505
and
boulevard.
F
Okay,
and
as
mentioned,
this
is
a
proposal
to
a
site
plan
proposal
to
expand
existing
community
amenities,
recreational
amenities,
including
770
square
foot,
expansion
of
the
existing
one-story
clubhouse,
the
addition
of
a
912
square
foot,
health
club.
You
did
which
those
items
are,
what
put
it
into
the
site,
plan,
approval
process
and
then
also
addition
of
an
834
but
830
square
foot
pool
and
that
is
located
at
five.
Five
and
clean
Boulevard
in
a
mobile
home
district.
The
mobile
home
park
being
about
54
acres
in
size
and.
F
Just
try
to
hit
the
highlights
without
too
much.
This
is
also
in
a
residential
urban
future
land-use
category.
The
project
is
consistent
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan
and
it
is
consistent
with
the
permitted
uses
in
the
mobile
home
park
district.
The
district
actually
permits
mobile
home
parks
and
requires
recreational
amenities.
The
applicant
is
expanding
those
amenities
within
the
area
that's
already
designated
residential,
so
I'm,
sorry
already
designated
recreation.
F
The
project
does
not
propose
new
impacts
to
facilities
and
therefore
meets
the
city's
concurrency
standards.
It
is
expected
to
be
able
to
comply
with
building
codes
has
been
reviewed
for
that
again.
Won't
impact
public
facilities,
because
there's
no
expansion
of
the
park
itself,
just
the
recreational
amenities.
The
TRC
reviewed
this
project,
most
recently
at
its
February
7
2019
meeting
and
staff,
finds
that
the
applications
for
site
approval
is
consistent
with
the
applicable
review
criteria
and
recommends
approval
for
the
site
plan.
Subject
to
the
following.
F
The
developers
responsible
for
meeting
the
minimum
criteria,
the
land
development
code
and
for
acquiring
all
are
their
jurisdictional
permits.
The
construction
plans
shall
be
consistent
with
the
approved
site
plan
and
all
fees
shall
be
paid
in
accordance
with
the
land
of
the
haunting
code
and
the
site
plan
shall
expire
one
year
from
the
effective
date
unless
an
application
has
been
filed
for
building
permit.
Are
there
any
questions.
F
F
E
A
G
C
A
D
C
A
F
F
It
was
realized,
I,
guess
some.
They
did
not
anticipate
paying
a
roadway
vacation
fee
which
is
charged
by
the
city,
and
that
is
a
section
of
code
that
we're
looking
to
amend
just
for
general
purposes.
In
addition
to
this,
this
situation
providing
the
impetus
for
doing
it
now,
so
that
Code
section
will
be
coming
before
you
on
the
8th
to
look
at
revising
the
street
vacation.
F
Know
that
the
language
has
been
drafted,
I
do
not
No
if
a
schedule
has
been
set
for
it,
so
I
do
know
that
language
has
been
drafted,
sent
up
to
the
city
manager
and,
of
course
you
all
know.
With
with
changing
the
Board
of
Commissioners
and
elections,
things
tend
to
slow
down
a
bit.
You
know
so
I.
This
is
just
me
talking.
I
suspect
it
may
be
delayed
a
little
bit
being
delayed
just
because
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
agenda
items
on
tomorrow,
night
and
last
board.