![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5e7bj49racE/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: Planning & Zoning Board Meeting April 20, 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
C
B
A
F
E
You
mr.
Seamon,
here.
A
A
C
B
G
B
H
Is
a
quasi-judicial
proceeding
where
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Board
acts
in
a
quasi-judicial,
rather
than
a
legislative
capacity
at
a
quasi-judicial
hearing,
it
is
not
the
board's
function
to
make
law,
but
rather
to
apply
law
that
has
already
been
established
in
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
The
board
is
required
by
law
to
make
findings
of
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
apply
those
findings
of
fact
to
previously
established
criteria
contain
in
the
Code
of
Ordinances
in
order
to
make
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
it.
H
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
at
this
hearing
that
the
law
considers
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence,
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
met
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance.
Then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
in
favor
of
the
applicant.
By
the
same
token,
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
the
criteria
establishing
the
code
of
ordinate,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
against
the
applicant.
H
B
H
B
H
I
This
applicant
is
seeking
rezoning
of
a
point
for
seven
acre
parcel
located
at
one
six:
five
sixty
Beuys
Drive,
the
proposed
zoning
will
change
the
designation
of
the
property
from
our
one
hundred
to
our
one
hundred
a
as
we
explained
in
the
report.
These
the
parcel
was
at
one
time.
Two
lots
lots
fifty-seven,
and
this
was
a
1953
house,
was
subsequently
built
in
1963
unlock
57.
All
of
this
occurred
before
the
application
of
our
100th
owning
district
on
the
site.
I
The
applicants
are
at
this
time
seeking
to
divide
along
the
original
property
lines.
We
provided
in
the
report
a
comparison
of
the
existing
r100
zoning
district
and
they
proposed
our
108th
owning
district,
and
we've
indicated
that,
except
for
a
lot
with
differences
and
the
side,
yard
setback
differences,
the
house
built
on
the
the
adjoining
lot.
What
was
at
one
time
the
adjoining
lot
could
be
built.
I
So
this
is
sort
of
an
unusual
request,
but
there
are
a
unique
set
of
circumstances
that
would
allow
this
rezoning
to
meet
the
criteria
of
the
land,
development
code
and
I'll
briefly
go
through
the
criteria.
I
won't
touch
on
every
one,
but
basically,
as
we
explained
in
the
report,
the
are
100
and
the
are
100
a
uses
are
the
same,
so
there
would
not
be
an
introduction
of
a
new
use
on
the
property.
I
The
density
of
the
r108,
the
proposed
district
is
permitted
as
consistent
with
the
future
land
use
category
and
basically,
this
rezoning
will
result
in
the
development
of
a
single-family
dwelling
on
a
lot
that
is
in
an
existing
built
out,
single-family
subdivision
with
lots
of
similar
size.
So
again,
these
were
at
one
time
to
lots
that
were
combined.
The
applicant
would
like
to
rezone
and
divide
the
property
to
build
a
single-family
residence.
The
TRC
reviewed
this
on
February
20th
2020
and
their
their
comments
have
all
been
satisfactorily
addressed.
B
H
L
M
H
H
N
H
And
then
any
one
who
is
a
participant
in
this
meeting,
if
you
believe
you
are
an
effective
party,
if
you
could
please
raise
your
hand,
there
should
be
a
button
for
you
to
be
able
to
raise
your
hand.
These
would
be
people
that
are
have
addresses
in
the
immediate
area
or
otherwise
would
be
affected.
If
you
believe
you
are
an
affected
party,
if
you
could
please
raise
your
hand,
you
will
be
identified
individually.
I
will
inquire
to
you
to
ask
some
pointed
questions
to
determine.
H
H
H
Okay,
alright,
and
did
you
have
any
give
me
a
second
if
I
cannot
see
you,
so
if
you
could,
please
raise
your
right
hand,
I'm
gonna,
take
you
on
your
word
at
this,
raise
your
right
hand,
so
that
you
might
be
sworn
in
sure
all
right.
Do
you
swear
or
affirm
that
the
testimony
you're
about
to
give
us
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing,
but
the
truth.
O
O
M
O
Q
H
H
H
N
Just
the
question
I
have
for
this
city
is
basically
when
we
have
some
of
these
old
platted
properties
that
were
today,
they
would
be
deemed
non-conforming
correct
these
all
these
older
properties
that
were
platted
smaller
Lots.
You
know
that
are
all
scattered
all
over
the
city,
there's
a
lot
of
them
that
are
deemed
non-conforming.
Would
that
be
a
fair
statement.
N
I
I
G
G
M
M
M
Listen,
no
thank
you.
I
just
I
just
know
that
the
current
owner,
when
he
bought
that
parcel
I,
did
not
sell
it
to
him.
I
want
to
I
want
to
be
very
clear
about
that,
but
he
was
given
some
information
by
someone
that
was
not
accurate
and
I
truly
respect
any
favor.
You
can
show
him
because
those
folks
do
know
that
sewer
is
coming
and
they're
getting
prepared,
so
if
they
could
build
a
home
and
tap
into
that
city
sewer
next
year,
this.
M
F
F
F
L
I
Yes,
again:
Louis
Serna:
this
is
a
conditional
use
to
operate
a
bed-and-breakfast
out
of
an
existing
single-family
residence.
It
is
at
233,
Grand
Boulevard.
The
subject:
property
contains
a
single-family
home
as
well
as
a
detached
garage
that
has
another
unit.
The
applicant
has
indicated
that
four
bedrooms
are
available
for
lodging
as
a
bed
and
breakfast
and
as
required
by
the
Tarpon
Springs
land
development
code.
The
owner
will
be
required
to
live
on-site
and
operate
the
facility.
The
applicant
is
further
indicated
that
no
exterior
modifications
are
being
proposed
to
operate
the
bed-and-breakfast.
This
property
is
zoned.
I
It's
in
the
crm
7.5.
That's
conditional
residential
mixed
zoning.
District
Mostafa
has
reviewed
this
for
the
standards
for
conditional
use
of
section
209
point
o1
and
our
findings
are
as
follows:
conformance
with
the
land
development
code,
this
is
a
bed
and
breakfast
is
a
conditional
use
in
this
zoning
district.
The
lot
does
meet
the
minimum
minimum
dimensional
requirements
of
that
zoning
district.
The
structures
do
meet
standards,
with
the
exception
of
the
setback,
which
we've
indicated
it's
normally
seven,
seven
and
a
half
feet.
The
existing
residence
is
located
6.4
feet
from
the
side
property
line.
I
In
addition,
the
land
development
code
in
the
zoning
district
established
some
establishes
some
supplementary
regulations
for
the
operation
of
a
lodging
facility,
/
bed-and-breakfast.
The
first
is
that
the
they're
only
allowed
in
structures
that
are
listed
on
the
florida
master
side
file,
the
National
Register
of
Historic,
Places
or
contributing
structure
and
located
in
the
National,
Register
or
local.
This
local
historic
district
and
our
finding
is
that
this
site
is
located
is
listed
as
a
contributing
structure
within
the
tarpon
springs.
I
Historic
district
to
the
renovation
or
restoration
shall
preserve
the
historical
context
of
the
original
structure
and
shall
contribute
significantly
to
the
character
and
economic
revitalization
of
the
neighborhood.
Our
finding
is
that
the
applicant
is
not
proposing
any
exterior
modifications
and
the
use
can
be
operated
within
the
facility
without
altering
the
historic
character
of
the
building.
I
Individual
rooms
that
are
rented
shall
not
contain
cooking
facilities.
None
are
proposed
and
we
have
provided
a
condition
of
approval.
Should
you
decide
to
approve
it
requiring
that?
So,
with
the
exception
of
the
side,
lot
line
that
I'm
encroachment
that
I
mentioned,
this
request
does
comply
with
the
standards
of
the
land
development
code
based
on
our
finding.
The
second
criteria
is
that
the
use
the
use
to
which
the
property
may
be
put
is
appropriate
to
the
property
in
question
and
is
compatible
with
the
existing
and
planned
uses
in
the
area.
I
Our
concern
with
the
subject
site
is
that
there
are
single-family
residences
and
fairly
close
proximity
to
the
site,
so
that
does
propose
a
potential
compatibility
issues.
Therefore,
we've
recommended
some
conditions
of
approval
that
would
attempt
to
address
those
issues
of
compatibility.
Should
you
decide
to
recommend
approval?
I
The
third
criteria
is
that
the
use
is
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
all
elements
of
the
Comprehensive
Plan
and
our
finding
is
that
this
request
is,
it
is
in
the
it
is
in
the
historic
district
and
they're
not
expected
to
be
any
adverse
impacts
to
the
structure
because
of
the
use.
The
fourth
criteria
is
that
the
use
will
not
result
in
significant
adverse
impacts
to
the
environment
or
historical
resources.
I
There
are
no
significant
environmental
resources
on
the
property
and,
as
we
indicated,
the
use
can
be
operated
without
altering
the
historic
character
of
the
building.
The
fifth
criteria
is
that
the
conditional
use
will
not
adversely
affected
joining
property
values
and,
as
I
already
alluded
to,
there
are
proper.
It's
in
close
proximity
there
for
recommending
conditions
addressing
particularly
impacts
to
surrounding
properties.
The
sixth,
the
sixth
standard
is
that
the
conditional
use
will
not
adversely
impact
or
exceed
the
capacity
or
fiscal
ability
of
the
city
to
provide
public
facilities.
I
We
do
find
that
this
isn't
an
existing
vault
area
before
lodging
units.
If
you
will
will
not
effective
city's
ability
to
provide
services
to
the
area,
the
seventh
and
final
conditions,
or
the
seventh
and
final
standard
is
that
the
conditions
shall
provide
for
effective,
efficient
and
orderly
development,
considering
impacts
on
growth
patterns
and
the
cost
of
the
cities
providing
public
facilities.
This
isn't
a
devolved
area
developed
subdivisions,
so
we
do
not
find
that
operation
of
a
bed-and-breakfast
will
adversely
affect
the
efficient
or
orderly
development
patterns.
I
So,
as
staff
indicated,
our
only
concerns
are
a
primary
concerns.
With
this
are
two
adjacent
properties.
We
are,
however,
recommending
approval
of
this
subject
to
conditions
to
address
that
before
I
get
to
the
conditions.
We
did
receive
some
comments
from
the
public
on
this
that
are
in
your
packet
and
I'm
sure
we
can
go
through
those
quickly.
I'll
bet.
There
are
eight
conditions
that
we're
recommending.
The
first
is
that
the
applicant
shall
provide
documentation
that
the
owner
of
the
property
will
reside
on
site.
I
The
property
is
in
a
name
in
a
trust
right
now,
so
we
want
to
ensure
that
whoever
is
residing
on
the
property
is
is
a
person
that
can
speak
for
the
trust
they
are
in
effect
an
owner.
The
second
condition
is
the
owner
must
remain
on
site
during
overnight
hours,
while
guest
rooms
are
occupied.
This
is
a
condition
to
you
address
any
potential
complaints
that
may
occur
from
residents
or
from
people
who
are
renting
the
rooms.
I
The
third
is
that
amplified,
music
or
sound
systems
of
any
kind
shall
not
be
permitted
outside
of
the
existing
structure.
This
is
condition
to
address
impacts
to
adjacent
properties.
The
four
conditions,
similarly,
is
that
no
outdoor
activities
associated
with
the
lodging
facility
shall
be
permitted
between
the
hours
of
10:00
p.m.
and
9:00
a.m.
I
the
fifth
condition
is
that
the
use
will
require,
through
the
permitting
process,
to
comply
with
NFPA
1
fire
code,
2015
Edition
and
NFPA
101
Life,
Safety,
Code,
2015,
Edition
6
condition
is
that
individual
rooms
that
are
in
it
shall
not
contain
cooking
facilities.
That's
a
requirement
of
the
code.
Seventh
is
any
renovation
or
restorations
not
preserve
the
historical
context
of
the
original
structure.
B
I
A
I
B
I
mean
that
that
was
what
I
thought
would
be
normal,
but
some
somewhere
I
saw
mention
and
I
think
it
may
have
been
in
the
complaints
based
on
the
past
history,
that
there
were
fourteen
people
staying
there
and
that
was
causing
a
noise
in
parking
and
a
nuisance
for
neighbors.
I
B
I
Something
that
could
be
looked
at.
You
know
this
is
an
existing
site.
There
is
existing
landscaping,
so
perhaps
the
applicant
can
and
and
I
guess
we
could
address
that
through
the
site
for
enforcement.
Perhaps
the
applicant
could
speak
to
that,
but
yeah
screening.
It
would
be
an
appropriate
condition
to
consider
and.
B
I
N
L
N
The
applicant
is
233
grand
Land
Trust
Trinity
Management
Group
Trust
generally,
when
you
create
a
trust,
you're,
creating
an
entity
and
a
lot
of
people.
Do
these
things
as
part
of
their
estate
planning
tool.
They
would
create
a
revocable
living
trust,
but
this
seems
like
when
you
say
the
applicant
must
live
on
the
premises.
The
applicant
in
this
case
is
an
entity.
I,
don't
know
who
the
trustee
is
don't
know
who
the
beneficiaries
are
and
in
it
usually
it's
easier
to
tell
when,
when
it's
a
it's
a
family
trust.
N
So
I
don't
know
if,
when
you
say
the
required
that
the
owner
live
on
the
property
I,
you
know
it's
hard
to
say
who
the
owner
is,
because
we
have
an
entity,
and
we
don't
know
if
there's
multiple
beneficiaries
of
this
entity,
you
know
who's
vested,
you
could
have
a
trustee
who's,
not
even
a
beneficiary.
So
in
some
regards
I'm
looking
from
direction
from
our
attorney
to
even
a
you
know,
how
do
we
necessarily
enforce
an
owner
living
on
the
property?
H
I
think
one
of
the
conditions-
that's
underneath
the
Sacre
staff
recommendations-
is
that
the
applicant
has
to
provide
documentation,
one
of
the
conditions
that
you
can
probably
expand,
that
condition
if
there
were
B.
If
there
were
to
be
a
motion
to
recommend
passage
of
this
application
or
provoke
this
application,
you
may
wish
to
expand
that
condition
to
provide
documentation
and
periodic
updating.
H
You
could
say
an
annual
update
that
the
owner
is
still
living
there
or
specific
type
of
documentation
that
provides
that
the
owner
is
also
a
beneficiary
of
the
trust
or
is
a
trustee
as
you've
meant.
You
know
you
can
be
a
trustee
without
ever
having
to
be
a
beneficiary
of
the
trust.
So
I
understand
your
concerns.
There
I
think
that
the
way
that
you
can
approach
that,
like
I
said,
is
to
is
to
expound
on
the
condition
that
staff
has
placed
on
the
recommendation
or
to
formulate
your
own
condition.
Okay,.
N
G
G
G
I
G
F
I
ask
a
question
please:
yes,
this
is
a
gym
stavropoulos
speaking
and
typically
it
wouldn't
it
be
some
type
of
a
separation
between
the
owner
of
the
home
and
the
people
that
are
renting
the
B&B
or
renting
there
like
a
dwelling
place
where
they
could
sleep
and
then
do
their
whatever
their
they
wanted
to
do
is
shouldn't
there
be
some
kind
of
a
buffer
or
a
separation.
I,
don't
have
any
paperwork
with
me,
so
I'm
just
kind
of
going
out
on
a
limb
on
this.
My.
B
I
My
understanding
as
well,
there
are
no
requirements
of
that
sort.
The
owner
could
live
downstairs
and
all
the
renters
upstairs
you
know
and
again
with
a
bed-and-breakfast,
the
renters
typically
don't
know
each
other.
It's
not
like
an
air
B&B
where
you're
renting
the
entire
house,
with
a
with
a
typical
bed-and-breakfast
you're,
just
renting
their
room
and
like
a
hotel,
you
may
not
know
who
else
will
stay
in
there
and
the
owner
could
be
nearby
or
or
in
an
adjacent
building.
Gotcha.
I
J
H
Yes,
I
believe
mr.
Jensen
is
now
with
us.
If
you
could
please
both
I
since
I
cannot
see
either
of
you.
If
you
could,
please
raise
your
right
hands
to
be
sworn
and
I
will
trust
that
you
have
do
you
swear
or
affirm
that
the
testimony
you
are
about
to
give
is
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth.
I
do
I,
do
Thank
You
mr.
Jensen
Thank
You
mr.
Allen.
Thank.
J
You
very
much
mr.
chair
city
attorney
and
board
members
and
staff.
First
I
greatly
appreciate
you
all
accommodating
this
very
unique
circumstance
in
terms
of
having
this
meeting
and
going
out
of
your
way
to
continue
the
developed
review
process.
That
is
greatly
appreciated.
I
want
to
point
out
that
the
staff
report
is
competent,
substantial
evidence.
The
testimony
of
mr.
J
Serna
is
competent,
substantial
evidence
and
the
application
itself
is
confident
substantial
evidence
that
all
of
the
conditional
use
criteria
required
by
the
land
development
code,
specifically
section
209
point
O
1,
have
been
met
in
this
case,
I'd
like
to
also
point
out
that
I
think
you've
got
unfortunately
a
little
bit
of
a
there's,
there's
a
certainly
a
disagreement
as
to
how
this
property
has
been
managed
and
operated.
There
have
been
five
letters
of
support
that
you've
received
from
Tarpon
Springs
residents,
including
the
neighbor
directly
to
the
south,
at
219
Grand
Boulevard.
Mr.
J
Jim's
fruity
I
know
that
the
city
clerk
will
be
reading
all
of
the
correspondence
into
the
record
shortly,
but
I
just
want
to
start
out
by
reading
a
portion
of
mr.
screw
DS
correspondence
where
he
says
that
he
is
in
support
of
the
proposed
change
requested
by
his
neighbor
mr.
Steve
Jensen
quote.
His
property
is
next
to
mine.
I'm
at
219,
Grand
Boulevard
I
have
no
issues
with
the
proposed
change.
Mr.
Jensen
has
been
a
good
neighbor.
I
have
had
no
problems
with
any
of
the
guests.
J
He
has
ran
into
you
as
a
vacation
rental
and
that's
just
a
portion
of
what
he
has
said
so
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
there
is
evidence
that
disputes
the
characterization
of
the
prior
use
of
the
property.
Additionally,
I
have
investigated
this,
and
I
have
come
to
find
that
there
was
a
genuine
misunderstanding
in
terms
of
the
weather
the
days
that
the
long-term
rentals
can
be
rented
were
consecutive
or
not,
and
that
as
soon
as
mr.
J
Jensen
was
told
by
code
enforcement
and
the
officer
that
he
cannot
rent
it
out
for
short-term
rental,
including
additional
terms
for
her
long
term
rental.
He
made
this
application.
So
the
the
code
complaint
was
made
in
January
and
this
application
was
immediately
filed
on
February
third,
and
we
worked
hand-in-hand
with
the
City
Planning
Department
and
code
enforcement
to
make
sure
the
property
is
in
compliance
and
comes
into
compliance
as
a
bed-and-breakfast.
And
we
really
appreciate
that
two-point
additional
point
that
I
think
is
extremely
important
to
recognize.
J
There
are
currently
no
restrictions
on
the
property
for
long
term
rental
or
for
the
private
property
in
terms
of
the
use
of
the
outdoor
area
in
terms
of
having
music
or
being
outside,
there's
also
been
no
complaints
that
have
been
processed
through
code
enforcement
or
law
enforcement
on
any
noise
issues.
So
the
only
complaint
that
was
formally
made
was
simply
that
it
was
being
rented
out
short
term.
J
It
wasn't
anything
related
to
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
concluding
that
there
was
any
issues
with
noise
in
the
past
and
the
applicant
disputes
any
any
suggestion
that
there
was
so
the
conditions
of
approval
that
go
above
and
beyond
the
land
development
codes
conditional
use
requirements
are
that
the
applicant
must
provide
documentation
that
an
owner
of
the
property
will
reside
on-site.
This
currently
the
beneficiary
of
the
trust,
Brittney
Jensen
she's
28
years
old,
she
resides
on
the
site.
She
will
comply
with
that
requirement.
J
If
you
want
us
to
make
her
a
co
trustee
of
the
trust,
we
were
happy
to
do
that.
She
is
fully
capable
of
managing
the
property
and
will
manage
it
going
forward
understanding
what
these
conditions
of
approval
are
and
the
importance
the
conditions
of
approval
the
owner
will
remain
on
site
during
overnight
hours,
while
guest
rooms
are
occupied,
we
are
agreeing
to
that
amplified,
music
or
sound
systems
of
any
kind.
J
That
includes
like
a
small
Bose
stereo
or
like
a
small
iPod
player,
are
not
permitted
outside
at
any
time,
so
there
will
be
no
noise
issue
in
terms
of
any
kind
of
music.
No
outdoor
activities
will
be
permitted
between
the
hours
of
10
p.m.
and
9
a.m.
the
proposed
use
shall
comply
with
all
the
fire
code
requirements
which
includes
sprinkling,
so
the
building
will
be
sprinkled.
Individual
rooms
that
are
rented
will
not
have
cooking
facilities.
Any
renovation
or
restoration
shall
preserve
the
historical
context
of
the
original
structures.
J
That's
important
to
note,
because
this
building
is
listed
both
nationally
and
locally
as
a
contributing
historical
structure.
The
purpose
of
allowing
these
historical
structures
to
operate
a
bed-and-breakfast
in
the
CRM
zoning
district
and
in
the
residential
urban
future
land-use
category
is
historical
preservation,
so
the
owner
this
building
is
immaculate.
J
It
is
going
to
be
preserved,
it
is
well
preserved
and
it
maintains
and
enhances
the
community
character
and
the
quality
of
the
community
character
of
this
neighborhood
and
of
the
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs
and
I
think
that's
important
to
recognize
and
then
finally,
the
applicant
shall
maintain
a
business
tax
receipt
for
use.
If
the
business
tax
receipt
is
not
renewed
for
a
period
of
6
months,
then
the
conditional
use
goes
away
if
the
applicant
violates
any
of
these
rules.
J
If
you
find
out,
there
is
noise
outside
that's
amplified,
music,
if
you
find
out
there
are
people
outside
of
11
p.m.
the
conditional
use
will
be
terminated.
So
this
gives
you
an
enforcement
tool
that
isn't
currently
in
place.
It
certainly
protects
and
I
think
mitigates
any
reasonable
concerns
of
any
of
the
neighbors
and,
as
I've
pointed
out
at
least
one
of
the
neighbors
directly
to
the
south.
Directly
adjacent
to
this
property
is
in
support
of
the
application
without
any
of
the
conditions.
J
Additionally,
based
on
the
conversation
that
that
we've
heard
and
the
questions
that
have
been
raised
so
far,
I've
been
able
to
text
with
mr.
Jensen
during
some
of
the
questions
so
in
terms
of
complying
with
the
owner
app
owner
occupancy,
we
would
agree
to
an
annual
affidavit
stating
that
a
co
trustee
or
a
beneficiary
is,
is
living
on
the
property
and
will
be
there
for
all
overnight
hours.
We
also
agree
to
limit
the
occupancy
to
twelve
and
mr.
J
J
Jensen
is
also
on
the
phone
he's
available
to
answer
any
questions
you
have
and
just
finally,
before
I
conclude
my
presentation
I'd
like
to
incorporate
for
the
record
the
staff
report
and
the
application
and
the
five
letters
of
support
from
Jim
screw
D
from
Andrew
Gordon
from
Chandra
Patel
from
Jimmy
Makris
and
from
pardon
me,
Cheong
dam,
all
of
which
are
either
residents
and
or
business
owners
in
the
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs
and
we'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
have
I'm,
not
sure.
If
mr.
Jensen
would
like
to
add
anything
I.
Q
The
thing
that
I
would
want
to
make
clear
is
that
you
know,
with
the
conditions
that
you
know
we
would
agree
to
amplified
music
and
no
outdoor.
This
makes
this
you
know
more
restrictive
than
if
you
were
to
sell
it
to
Joe
Smith
down
the
street
or
or
even
rent
it
long
term
for
somebody
they
wouldn't
have
any
of
those
restrictions
that
we're
gonna
have
and
plus
you
know,
with
my
daughter,
living
on
site.
There's.
Q
Q
Q
J
N
Yes,
it's
my
couscous.
Would
it
be
problematic,
obviously
I?
It's
not
our
I,
don't
think
it's
our
position
to
look
at
the
trust,
but
what
about
an
affidavit,
acknowledging
the
trustee
and
the
beneficiary?
So
so
that
that's
in
the
file?
So
we
know
that
there's
some
commonality
of
ownership
and
responsibility,
I,
don't.
J
B
E
I'll
do
them
in
chronological
order
with
the
newest
one.
First,
this
email
is
from
Christine
Weiss
regarding
application,
2023.
E
Peter
couth
son,
yes
owner
of
22
and
26
park
in
court,
Tarvin
rings
Laura
to
the
Tarpon
Springs
Zoning
Board
and
Board
of
Commissioners
I've
been
a
longtime
owner
on
Parkin
Court
for
over
16
years,
there's
a
very
quiet,
special
and
historical
Street.
It's
barely
a
block
long,
and
this
is
why
I
chose
to
buy
there.
As
you
know,
there
has
been
a
series
of
disruptions
this
past
year
on
our
little
neighborhood
and
that's
why
I
am
writing
to
you
today.
First
of
all,
I
have
nothing
personal
against
the
current
owner
of
233.
E
Grand
Boulevard
I
have
met
him
once
and
he
does
not
live
on
the
premises.
I
first
became
aware
of
this
house
was
operating
as
a
vacation
rental
last
year,
when
multiple
weekends
out
of
the
month
there
would
be
vehicles
spilling
out
of
the
driveway
and
down
the
tiny,
dead-end
street
and
parking
in
the
yard
lot
area
of
the
Saffir
house.
There
would
be
loud,
noise
and
music
until
very
late.
At
night
disturbing
the
residents
I
found
out
that
the
house
was
advertised
as
sleeping
10
to
15
people
had
a
hot
tub,
a
fire
pit,
etc.
E
Obviously,
this
attracted
not
a
couple
on
a
quiet
weekend:
getaway
partiers,
looking
for
a
venue
for
large
gatherings.
Unfortunately,
this
type
of
party
was
not
an
isolated
incident.
The
large
parties
continued
and
we
all
we
all
got
tired
of
hosting
these
loud
visitors
on
our
quiet
little
street.
We
kept
quiet
about
it,
hoping
it
would
go
away,
but
it
has
not.
We
have
no
interest
in
turning
our
lives
into
a
drama,
calling
the
police
with
noise
complaints
multiple
times
per
month.
E
It
is
the
owner
if
the
or
would
like
to
turn
this
house
into
the
remember,
but
let's
not
kid
ourselves,
he
does
not
even
live
on
a
property.
This
is
no
quaint
bed-and-breakfast.
His
daughter
lives
above
the
garage,
and
these
partygoers
come
and
go
with
little
accountability
to
her
or
anyone
else.
Out
of
respect
for
the
residents
of
Park
and
Court
and
Grand
Boulevard
I
ask
that
you
not
allow
this
property
to
be
approved
for
conditional
use
as
a
bed-and-breakfast.
E
It
is
absolutely
not
that
kind
of
business
and
the
owner
does
not
live
on
the
property.
A
requirement
of
this
type
of
designation.
It's
already
proven
that
he's
not
capable
of
managing
his
business
in
a
way
that
honors
a
culture
of
the
neighborhood
and
respect
the
privacy
of
his
residence
Peter
coasts
and
the
nests
he
lists
his
phone
number.
E
Next
one
is
from
bill
lunching,
let
jr.
wheel
it
across
the
street
from
this
house
and
we're
very
pleased
that
the
man
stood
up.
We
understood
that
he
and
his
family
were
going
to
live
there,
and
we
were
looking
forward
to
new
people
neighborhood,
we
wouldn't
mind
long-term
rentals,
but
the
number
of
cars
over
the
weekend
is
a
little
altering
of
the
neighborhood
turns
into
a
party
house.
I
know
the
neighbors
that
live
directly
around
them
have
trouble,
sleeping
because
of
the
congestion.
The
current
zoning
structure
seems
to
be
working
and
we
should
continue
it.
E
E
This
one
is
from
Andrew
Gordon
of
three
six
zero
Giroux
Boulevard,
to
whom
it
may
concern
I'm
writing
as
a
resident
of
tarpon
springs.
Three
six
zero
Giroux
blower
press,
my
support
for
the
continual
or
the
conditional
use
application
2023
for
the
property
located
at
233,
Grand
Boulevard
to
be
as
a
use
as
a
better
breakfast.
A
be
me
such
as
this
only
strengthens
our
community
in
small
business,
a
by
bringing
in
guests
and
tourist
dollars
and
to
intimately
experience
our
quaint
area.
E
Our
community
needs
to
do
everything
it
can
to
support
the
recovery
of
small
businesses
that
have
been
decimated
by
this
covered.
An
18,
and
this
BB
will
help.
This
was
needed
in
our
community
before
the
current
crisis,
but
even
more
important,
now
I've
reviewed
this
report,
conditional
use
restrictions
and
certain
that,
with
those
in
place,
the
set
of
breakfasts
can
operate
in
such
a
way
that
it
will
only
add
value
to
the
neighbor
neighbors
and
a
community
as
a
whole.
E
The
next
one
is
from
Demetrios
jimmy
Makris
conditional
use
application,
2023,
233,
Grand
Boulevard
would
appreciate
your
approval
of
the
above
referenced
application.
Tarpon
springs
known
as
a
Spanish
cattle
world
is
rich
in
let
Hellenic
culture
and
history.
It
is
a
major
trust
tourist
destination.
The
order
of
a
HEPA,
the
largest
rec
American
Association
in
the
world,
feels
that
anything
will
help
promote
tourism
in
Tarpon.
Springs
will
definitely
benefit
our
local
economy.
Please
contact
me
if
I
can
elaborate
on
these
on
the
many
benefits.
Sincerely
Jimmy
Makris
Pepa
National
Education
Foundation.
E
The
next
one
is
from
Jim
skirty
good
afternoon.
I
am
contacting
you
in
your
Department
regarding
the
proposed
zoning
change
requested
by
my
neighbor
mr.
Steve
Jensen.
His
property
is
next
to
mine,
I'm
at
219
Grand
Boulevard,
my
neighbor
mr.
Steve's
Jensen
I
have
no
issues
with
the
proposed
change.
Mr.
Jensen
has
been
a
good
neighbor.
I
have
had
no
problems
with
any
of
his
guests.
He's
rented
two
as
a
vacation.
Rental
I
think
that
changing
his
status,
the
bed-and-breakfast,
would
only
add
value
and
attraction
to
our
neighborhood
and
Tarpon
Springs
in
general.
E
His
daughter
lives
on
the
property
often
claimed
some
cleans,
my
house
for
me
and
during
the
current
crisis
it's
even
offered
to
shop.
For
me,
I
am
over
71
I
appreciate
her
her
father
as
caring
responsible,
neighbors
I
hope
you
will
look
favorably
on
mr.
Jensen's
proposal.
Thank
you
sincerely.
Jim
Surrey.
E
The
next
one
is
from
chun
dumb
at
2985
kensington
tres
Tarpon,
Springs
Florida,
three,
four,
six,
eight
eight
I
am
sending
you
this
email
to
contribute
my
support
for
the
approval
of
conditionally
specification
2023
for
the
property
located
at
233
Grand
Boulevard
used
as
a
bed
and
breakfast
I'm
a
resident
of
Tarpon
Springs.
In
addition,
I
am
an
owner
of
real
estate.
Investment,
firm
I
believe
it
will
bring
new
money
to
our
community
and
provide
housing
with
character,
especially
now
when
our
city
is
ready
to
reopen
after
Kovan
18
pandemic
recovery
to
our
local
tourists.
E
Driven
business
is
vital
and
getting
back
on
our
feet.
It's
vital
to
getting
back
on
our
feet
with
the
conditional
use
restrictions
of
a
bed-and-breakfast
in
Tarpon
Springs.
It
is
far
less
likely
to
have
noise
and
other
issues
than
a
subsequently
private
residence.
In
all
reality,
I
have
and
will
further
consider
purchasing
more
investments
and
property
in
our
area
of
Tarpon
Springs,
I've
known
Stephen,
Jensen
and
his
family.
For
many
years
they
aren't
upstanding
a
faithful
family
who
have
been
an
asset
to
our
community
for
many
many
years.
I
appreciate
your
time
and
consideration.
T
H
H
L
A
L
It
looks
a
lot
better.
They
tore
down
the
front
of
that
garage,
put
up
new
stuff.
They
tore
a
room
out
in
the
back
of
the
house
that
the
reframes
that
they
put
in
a
screen
porch
they
put
in
new
decks,
but
interestingly
I've
never
received
the
postcard
from
the
Historic
Preservation
Board
because
they
never
asked
for
approvals
for
any
of
that
stuff
and
on
your
website
it
says
that
the
only
permit
that
was
ever
pulled
for
all
of
this
work
that
is
easily
seen
was
one
permit
to
fix
the
foundation.
L
J
H
H
U
H
A
H
R
Thanks
for
hearing
us
today,
the
the
first
thing
I
have
is
about.
We
did
send
in
an
email
quite
a
while
ago.
So
I
don't
know
what
happened
why
it
wasn't
read
in
two
minutes
here.
Maybe
it
was
sent
a
while
ago
and
you
didn't
get
it
or
something
I
miss
right.
What
was
your
first
name
Shannon
I
say
today.
Yes,
so
I'm
just
going
to
go
ahead
and
read
a
statement
that
I
have
written
here.
R
If
that's
okay,
okay,
good
evening
board
members,
thank
you
for
taking
the
time
to
hear
our
comments
regarding
this
application
to
turn
to
33
Grand
Boulevard
into
a
bed-and-breakfast,
as
you
can
see
from
the
detailed
information
that
I
previously
emailed
our
residents
at
1:01,
REE
Street
shares
a
property
line
with
233
Grand
Boulevard
and
according
to
the
street
compartments
under
Section,
two
zero.
Nine
point:
zero
one
standards
for
review
of
conditional
uses,
there's
P
our
district
requires
a
minimum
yard
of
7.5
feet.
R
As
noted
in
the
City
report,
the
structure
in
question
is
located
6.4
feet
from
our
cher
property
line.
I
believe
that
this
means
that
233
grande
does
not
comply
with
the
minimal
dimensional
regulations
of
the
zoning
district,
as
this
requirement
is
established
to
maintain
the
privacy
of
one's
neighbors.
It
is
a
particular
concern
in
light
of
what
we
have
experienced
with
noise
and
privacy
issues,
as
documented
in
the
email
that
was
sent
to
the
board.
R
R
Number
five,
the
conditional
use
will
not
adversely
affect
the
joining
property
values
again,
this
house
is,
does
not
meet
the
required
setback
7.5
feet,
and
since
we
have
moved
into
our
house
6
years
ago,
we
have
spent
close
to
150
thousand
dollars
in
improvements
and
cosmetic
upgrades.
If
we
were
to
eventually
sell
our
house,
we
feel
we
would
never
recoup
that
money
if
there
was
a
short-term
rental
next
door,
most
buyers
would
not
want
to
live
next
door
to
a
hotel,
short-term
rental
where
there
is
constant,
coming
and
going
of
strangers.
R
In
regards
to
understaffed
recommendations,
the
applicant
must
provide
documentation
that
an
owner
the
property
will
reside
on-site.
What
kind
of
documentation
will
be
provided
to
the
city
to
prove
that
the
actual
property
owner
and
not
a
member
of
the
trust
will
be
living
on
site?
The
owner
has
never
lived
at.
This
property
has
always
been
a
rental
for
them.
Although
there
is
a
member
of
the
trust
that
lives
on
the
property
in
the
adjacent
garage
suite
in
the
past,
this
is
not
proven
effective
in
keeping
down
the
noise
and
crowd
problems.
R
As
mentioned
in
the
code
enforcement
case,
there
have
been
numerous
complaints
from
which
there
has
been
no
personal
accountability
from
the
property
owner.
They
were
in
foreign.
The
property
did
not
imply
with
the
short-term
rental
laws
and
we're
told
to
take
their
own.
The
air
B&B
and
have
our
still
rented
out
after
this
citation
nor
to
an
owner
must
remain
on
site
during
overnight
hours.
Wife
guest
rooms
are
occupied.
This
should
mean
that
the
owner
lives
in
the
house
to
be
rented,
not
a
member
of
a
trust
living
in
the
adjacent
garage.
R
Suite
purge
section,
3
the
background,
as
required
by
the
Tarpon
Springs
land
development
code.
That
owner
will
be
required
to
live
on
site
and
operate
the
facility.
How
will
the
city
keep
track
of
whether
the
owner
is
actually
living
on
site?
If
this
proposal
is
approved?
Our
concern
is
that
the
property
owners
may
have
no
intention
of
operating
a
bed-and-breakfast
and
that
they
will
return
to
using
this
as
an
Airbnb
I
am
asking
the
board
to
take
into
consideration
the
issues
that
have
been
raised
with
this
property
being
used
as
a
rental.
R
There
have
been
numerous
complaints
throughout
the
neighborhood
due
to
noise
and
parking
problems.
This
is
a
quiet
residential
area
that
is
not
compatible
with
the
proposed
use.
As
a
B&B
and
in
regards
to
mr.
Jensen's
lawyers
saying
that
there
had
been
no
police
reports.
That
is
false,
because
I
had
to
cost
the
police
myself
one
night
due
to
noise
late
at
night.
In
the
middle
of
the
week,
a
very
large
group
of
young
men
outside
drinking
around
the
fire
pit.
My
husband
travels
a
lot
and
I
was
home
by
myself
and
I'm,
not
gonna.
U
Could
we
confirm
that
the
letter
that
was
sent
from
Shannon's
email
was
indeed
received?
I
know
that
a
couple
of
the
comments
reference
it
in
particular
the
Airbnb
listing
that
it
would
accommodate
up
to
fourteen
people,
but
did
do
we
have
that
on
clouds?
A
lot
of
Shannon's
statement
was
predicated
on
that
letter.
A
D
H
T
H
N
C
N
A
R
R
U
N
N
The
thing
is
we,
you
know
we
take
testimony,
we
take
people
at
their
word
when
they
make
an
application
and
we
look
at
the
veracity
of
the
applicant
when
the
applicant
is
given
testimony
and
a
presented
evidence.
You
have
to
look
at
the
veracity
of
the
applicant,
and
so
you
know
there's
been
allegations
with
regard
to
ignoring
or
not
adhering
to
two
city
ordinances
after
after
they
were
a
noticed
and
and
I
think
that
again,
that
goes
to
the
veracity
of
the
applicant.
N
H
N
N
Because
you
we
put
conditions
in
and
and
obviously
there's
no
there's,
not
a
somebody
standing
there
to
monitor
all
the
conditions.
So
we
we
take
the
applicant
or
work
that
and
most
of
the
time
that
they're
adhere
to
a
conditions
and-
and
you
know,
if
there's
been
an
ordinance
that
that
was
in
place
and
and
the
applicant
was
was
advised
by
the
city-
that
they
were
violation.
I
want
to
know
if,
in
fact,
they
continue
to
operate.
That
way,
because
again
no
one's
going
to
be.
H
J
N
J
Yes,
this
this
issue
was
brought
to
my
attention,
or
this
allegation
and
I'm
going
through
my
email,
because
I'm
trying
to
find
the
exact
date
for
you,
but
there
was
apparently
a
one
complaint
about
alleged
short-term
rentals
after
the
application
was
filed
and
I
spoke
with
I
believe
it
was
Kimberly
in
code
enforcement
and
code
enforcement
did
not
find
any
additional
violations.
I
spoke
to
mr.
Jenson,
and
he
told
me
that
during
that
time
period,
when
the
alleged
complaint
was
was
made
that
the
house
was
actually
vacant.
J
So
no,
we,
we
don't
agree
that
the
house
was
was
rented
on
a
short-term
basis.
After
the
fact,
I
do
know
that
the
allegation
was
made.
It
was
addressed
with
Kimberly
and
code
enforcement.
No,
no
additional
violations
were
determined
by
the
the
city
and
since
then,
you
know,
obviously
with
what's
going
on.
It's
been
completely
unattended
on
a
short-term
basis
after
the
application
was
made.
I
also
want
to
address
the
parking,
but
I
can
do
that
in
my
closing,
since
you
haven't
asked
about
that
directly.
N
J
Sir,
so
as
I
believe
you,
sir
pointed
out,
there
is
a
site
plan
that
is
part
of
the
application
that
you
have.
It
shows
three
park
spaces
on
the
west
side
of
the
parcel
and
it
shows
four
parking
spaces
on
the
east
side
of
the
parcel.
Both
of
these
parking
areas
are
significantly
set
back
from
the
rights
property
line,
they're.
In
fact,
on
the
other
side
of
the
parcel
and
again
this
isn't
a
site
plan
approval,
but
the
staff
will
have
to
approve
the
site
plan.
J
So
if
the
staff
looks
at
an
engineered
site
plan
and
says
these
parking
spaces
don't
fit
and
don't
work,
then
it's
not
going
to
be
approved
so
you're,
just
approving
the
use.
The
staff
will
have
to
approve
the
site
plan
based
on
the
conditions
that
you
in
part
and
one
of
those
conditions
would
be
compliance
with
the
parking
and
the
site
plan.
That's
been
laid
out,
it's
seven
total
proposed
spaces,
they
all
fit
on
site
and
the
parking
spaces
would
be
on
the
park
and
court
Parkins
court
side
of
the
property
I.
U
I
would
just
first
of
all
I'd
like
to
reiterate
that
we
are
saying
under
oath
that
the
incident
that
we
are
just
talking
about
and
that
they're
stating
the
property
was
vacant
when
that
happened,
we're
stating
under
oath
that
it
did
indeed
happen
in
the
letter
it
is
laid
out.
You
can
see
it
on
the
public
record,
but
that
was
after
the
cease
and
desist
operating
at
the
Airbnb
notice
was
sent
out.
It
was
several
days
after
that,
and
also
in
that
letter,
it's
it
wasn't
the
first
incident
the
first
time
this
happens.
U
It
was
so
loud
that
I'm
standing
in
we've
got
a
deck
coming
off
of
our
master
bedroom,
which
is
right
along
this
property
line
and
question
that
they're
building
is
six
and
a
half
feet
from
I
was
standing
out
there
screaming
and
I
can
be
very
loud
trust
me.
They
could
not
hear
me
at
all
until.
Finally,
somebody
saw
me
waiting
my
hand
at
that
point.
We
went
to
the
owners
rather
than
contacting
the
police.
U
We
have
included
the
email
reply
on
that
where
you
know
he
stated
this
is
all
going
on
while
leave
her
name
is
Britney.
Well,
while
the
daughter
is
living
in
the
detached
garage.
So
this
is,
you
know
they
already
had
that
in
place.
While
this
was
going
on-
and
you
know,
I
would
reply
back.
And/Or
ask
you
to
see
the
copy.
It
was
the
email
reply
where
basically
he
stated
we're
sorry.
U
R
H
W
We're
neighbors
as
well
so
we're
a
310
grand
about
four
doors
down:
okay,.
H
And
you,
but
if
you
could
please
raise
your
right
hand
to
be
sworn
it's
a.
Do.
You
swear
from
the
testimony
you're
about
to
give
us
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth.
Yes,
okay,
you
may
go
ahead
and
present
any
evidence
or
any
testimony
that
you
have
or
ask
any
questions
of
the
applicant
or
staff.
W
Yeah,
just
from
a
neighborhood
perspective,
so
we're
recently
about
just
within
the
last
year,
but
our
preference
is
to
keep
that
residential,
we're
we're
far
enough
to
where
the
noise
hasn't
been
a
direct
issue,
but
haven't
seen
the
parking
and
several
of
our
neighbors
are
those
who
have
written
then
such
as
Vance
and
Shannon
and
Peter
and
Bill
and
Karen
and
I
know
that
they,
their
experiences
I've
heard
about
those
as
they've
experienced
them,
and
so
just
for
what
it's
worth.
Our
echo
and
request
from
the
neighborhood
is
to
keep
that
residential.
H
H
H
And
if
you
could
raise
your
right
hand,
raise
your
right
hand
on
your
honor,
do
you
swear
or
affirm
the
testimony
you're
about
to
give
us
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth.
I
do.
K
H
K
You
know
they
pointed
out
all
kinds
of
things
that
are
important
to
point
out
and
the
experiences
that
they
have
experienced
are
similar
to
the
ones
that
I
have
so,
and
you
know,
I'm
on
one
side,
they're,
two
properties
of
parallel,
mr.
Jensen's
property
and
I
owned
one
and
Shannon
and
fans
from
the
other,
and
there
is
a
parking
problem
definitely
spilling
out
over
into
the
street
and
then
up
the
road
oftentimes.
K
We
do
the
separate
house
parking
lot
which
is
owned
by
city
of
torez
frames,
and
then
there
has
been
problem
with
noise,
and
you
know
it's
kind
of
an
event
space
more
than
it
is
a
you
know,
a
quaint,
B&B
lodge
at
least
that's
been
our
experience
thus
far
and
yeah.
It
might
sleep
only
14
people,
but
you
know
people
throw
parties
where
more
people
attend,
and
that
has
definitely
happened.
K
K
You
know,
she's
been
there.
The
whole
time
and
as
the
scene,
you
know
what
has
happened.
Mr.
Jensen
I'd
only
met
one
time
when
he
first
bought
the
house
and
he
seemed
like
a
nice
enough
person.
I
don't
have
any
problems
with
him
personally
I've
not
seen
him
since
he
bought
the
house
or
with
him
he
did
do
a
nice
job
of
fixing
the
place
up
and
restoring
it.
K
K
It
has
a
strange
zoning
category
that
a
very
small
part,
including
that
house,
is
in
and
does
not
allow
for
any
kind
of
seasonal
rental
or
tourist,
home
rental
or
Airbnb
rental.
It's
it
allows
I
believe
only
for
single-family
use
either
his
owner
occupied
or
his
long
term
rent,
so
it
was
operating
as
an
Airbnb
against
the
perhaps
illegally
against
the
current
code
system.
The
way
it
was
set
up.
K
Kind
of
been
voiced
in
terms
of
what
has
happened
up
until
this
point,
and
it
has
happened
with
these
particular
owners
and,
in
particular
young
lady,
the
daughter
that
lives
in
the
apartment
and
yeah.
You
know
we
probably
didn't
call
the
cops
as
often
as
we
could
have,
but
you
know
we're
also
not
the
type
of
people
that
are
interested
in
you
know
creating
a
mess
for
people,
and
you
know
causing
problems
for
our
neighbors.
We
kind
of
want
to
respect
them.
K
The
way
that
we
wish
that
we
were
respected,
and
you
know
I
believe
mr.
Jensen
lives
in
somewhere
around
Moon,
Lake
I
think
he
told
me,
and
you
know,
he's
nowhere.
He
doesn't
live
near
the
property
to
be
able
to
see
what's
going
on
or
hear
what's
going
on,
and
then,
of
course,
all
the
people
that
wrote
the
nice
letters,
everyone
except
mr.
security,
probably
doesn't
live
anywhere
around
there.
K
Based
on
the
addresses
that
you
guys,
you
know
rattle
off
so
yeah,
it's
if
you
think
about
what's
happened
so
far,
it
hasn't
been
the
most
pleasant
experience
and
the
most
neighborly
experience
and-
and
you
know,
I
also
would
like
to
say
under
oath
that
I
believe
and
that
I
witnessed
that
the
place
was
rented
after
the
code
enforcement
told
them
to
stop
doing
it.
So
I
think
that's
what
happened
and
I.
You
know
that
Shannon
advanced
agree
with
that,
and
you
know
I
I
want
to
take
that
as
well.
K
B
R
R
I,
just
in
regards
to
how
close
the
property
line
is
and
how
the
house
does
not
meet
the
minimum
side
yards.
Are
they
going
to
have
to
apply
for
variance
if
this
is
approved
in
regards
to
this?
If
they
don't
meet
that
required
setback
I'm,
just
not
sure
how
they
are
allowed
to
just
kind
of
ignore
the
fact
that
the
city
says
they
don't
meet
the
requirements
but
they're
just
going
to
approve
it
anyway.
U
J
Thank
You
mr.
chair
city,
attorney
members
of
the
staff
board
members
and
also
members
of
the
public
and
neighbors
who've,
called
in
again
I,
really
appreciate
you
accommodating
this
meeting.
Under
these
circumstances,
I
know
it
is
difficult.
I
know
that
it
will
be
a
long
meeting
with
additional
items.
So
I
would
like
to
try
to
keep
this
as
brief
as
possible,
while
still
responding
to
all
of
the
issues
and
highlighting
what
I
think
are
some
of
the
most
important
issues
that
you've
heard
tonight.
J
J
If
this
application
were
denied
because
it
gives
the
city
and
the
neighbors
and
the
applicant
very
clear
ground
rules
that,
if
violated
this
conditional
use
will
be
pulled,
I
would
like
to
also
say
that,
in
the
interim,
with
communicative
of
mr.
Jensen,
we've
also
agreed
to
a
condition
that
would
require
either
enhanced
landscaping,
buffering
walls
on
the
around
the
adjacent
properties,
including
the
rights
mr.
Koo
saunas
as
part
of
the
site
plan
approval.
J
So
in
other
words,
if
there
concerned
about
privacy,
if
they're
concerned
about
noise,
despite
all
the
other
conditions
that
prohibit
any
kind
of
amplified
music
that
prohibit
any
outdoor
activity
after
10
p.m.
or
before
9
a.m.
we
would
additionally
agree
to
some
kind
of
landscape
buffering
and/or
wall.
That
would
that
would
be
a
condition
of
approval.
Again.
We've
also
agreed
to
identify
the
trustee
and
the
beneficiaries
of
the
trust
provide
an
annual
affidavit,
confirming
compliance
with
that
and
again.
This
gives
the
neighbors
a
significant
enforcement
tool.
J
If
your
concern
is
trust,
which
again
I
would
respectfully
submit
that
the
record
shows
that
there's
a
difference
of
opinion,
even
amongst
some
of
the
neighbors
about
how
this
property
has
been
used.
But
again,
as
the
city
attorney
stated,
the
prior
use
of
the
property
is
an
arp
and
b
and
the
code
enforcement
issues
is
not
before
this
board.
Mr.
Jensen
also
informs
me
that
all
of
the
historical
preservation
work
he's
done
was
permitted,
but
again
that
issues
not
before
this
board
was
before
this
board
is.
Is
the
staff
correct
in
their
analysis?
J
Is
the
TRC
committee
correct
in
their
analysis,
do
these
conditions,
which
are
extremely
restrictive?
Do
these
conditions
respond
to
and
mitigate
the
reasonable
concerns
of
the
neighbors
and
I
would
submit
that
the
competent,
substantial
evidence
that
has
not
been
rebutted
by
any
counter
evidence
does
support
the
staff
recommendation
of
approval
with
the
additional
conditions
that
we've
outlined,
one
limiting
the
occupancy
to
no
more
than
12
at
a
time,
two
additional
landscape
or
wall
buffering,
and/or
wall
buffering
as
part
of
the
site
plan,
approval
and
three,
the
specific
affidavit
and
disclosure
of
the
trust
terms.
J
In
terms
of
the
trustee
and
the
beneficiaries,
again,
I
don't
want
to
waste
any
of
your
time.
I
appreciate
your
time
appreciate
all
the
neighbors
concerns,
but
again
I
believe
that
we've
acted
in
good
faith.
We've
acted
quickly.
There
was
only
ever
code
enforcement
complaint
that
was
processed
on
the
property
I'm,
not
saying
that
there
weren't
other
complaints,
but
only
one
that
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
took
up,
and
it
wasn't
about
noise.
It
wasn't
about
parking,
it
wasn't
about
traffic,
it
was
about
using
the
property
as
an
Airbnb.
J
The
staff
recommended
that
we
pursue
this
application.
We
have
worked
hand
in
hand
and
in
conjunction
with
them,
to
pursue
the
application
and
to
be
good,
neighbors
and
respond
to
the
concerns.
The
reasonable
concerns
raised
by
the
neighbors
and
again
I
respectfully
submit
that
we've
done
that
and
established
by
a
competent,
substantial
evidence
that
this
application
should
be
approved.
And
again
this
is
a
permitted
conditional
use
in
the
CRM
zoning
district,
the
residential
urban
future
land
use.
If
it
wasn't,
the
staff
wouldn't
be
recommending
approval.
Thank
you.
B
G
H
N
I'd
like
to
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion,
so
we
could
go
ahead
and
discuss
this
as
a
board
and
and
I
would
agree
with
with
the
mister
ank's
that,
as
far
as
the
neighbors
are
concerned,
if
they're
listening
that
that
their
ability
to
to
police
and
monitor
their
neighbor
actually
has
more
validity
to
to
enforce
on
a
conditional
use.
Because
you
know
violating
those
conditions
are
not
just
code
enforcement
issues.
N
But
could
the
city
could
in
fact
pull
their
conditional
permit
use
permit
so
I'm
gonna
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
applicant
petition
with
the
additional
conditions
I
think
they
offered
landscaping
and
which
was
an
additional
I
believe.
That's
an
additional
condition
and
I'm
having
a
hard
time
because
I'm
getting
a
lot
of
feedback,
but
as
well
as
the
the
affidavit
of
who,
in
fact
the
the
trustee
and
beneficiary
are
obviously
also
that
the
site
plan
be
approved
as
part
of
the
condition,
as
well
as
the
other
conditions
the
city
has
has
listed.
H
No
currently
there's
a
motion
in
a
second
that
we
can
certainly
just
you
guys,
can
discuss
the
motion
and
if
it
fails,
then
another
listing
can
be
made
if
the
initial
movement,
mr.
kusuda,
stood
like
to
amend
it.
Whatever
your
discussion
is,
he
can
certainly
do
so,
but
right
now
there's
a
motion
in
a
second
on
the
table.
Okay,.
V
Mr.
couscous
I'd
like
to
add
to
your
conditional
list
guests
I,
know
that
the
applicant
was
asking
for
12
I've,
actually
think
that
10
would
be
sufficient
and
then
also
the
number
of
cars
that
they're
allowed
to
have
overnight
would
also
be
a
condition.
I
know
that
they
only
have
parking
for
I,
think
7
and
I'm.
You
know
but
believe
that
one
of
them
would
be
for
the
owner.
Occupant,
that's
going
to
be
there,
so
that's
really
only
six
for
their
tenants,
they're
their
renters
for
the
night.
N
C
H
J
And
I
will
have
to
defer
to
mr.
Jenson
in
terms
of
specifically
how
many
beds
are
in
each
room
we
we'd
agreed
to
12
because
that's
three
per
room.
We
thought
that
was
a
reasonable
accommodation,
understanding
that
there
are
going
to
be
some
families.
You
know
with
small
children
that
may
you
know
that
may
occupy
one
of
the
rooms,
mr.
Jensen
I'm,
not
sure
if
you're
on
or
if
you
can
answer
that
question
in
terms
of
how
many
beds
per
room.
Q
Q
G
G
V
H
B
I
B
V
V
H
H
C
A
C
E
F
H
Survivalist
I
appreciate
that,
unfortunately,
you
are
present
at
the
meeting
we
next
time
that
that
happens.
If
you're
having
a
problem
hearing
we're
gonna
need
you
about
it
sooner.
You
are
required
to
vote
on
the
motion.
Do
you
have
you
been
able
to
hear
any
of
that's
been
presented
and
the
motion
that's
been
partially.
F
H
So
the
motion
that
has
been
made
is
a
motion
to
approve
the
application,
as
recommended
with
the
conditions
from
staff
and,
additionally,
a
condition
that
there
be
only
12
occupants
for
the
property.
Additional
landscape,
buffering,
I
believe,
is
what
the
applicant
and
then
a
specific
affidavit
and
disclosure
of
the
trustee
beneficiary
for
the
owner
residing
on
the
property.
Yes,.
F
E
Miss
McCumber,
yes,
mr.
Seamon,
yes,.
I
H
H
Have
typically
when
it's
dealing
with
one
property
but
three
applications
in
the
past,
you
have
typically
heard
them
all
at
once,
because
a
lot
of
the
information
is
applicable
to
all
three
applications.
However,
you
can
take
them
individually.
If
you
choose
to
hear
them
all
at
once,
you
will
have
to
make
three
individual
motions
and
have
three
individual
vote
for
each
of
the
applications.
It
is
completely
up
to
the
chair,
how
you
or
to
the
board
how
you
would
like
to
move
forward
with
that,
it's
easier
to
take
them
one
at
a
time.
H
You
can
certainly
do
that
too.
I
would
caution
that,
when
we're
talking
about
members
of
the
public
and
we're
talking
about
affected
parties,
the
if
we
take
them
as
a
hold,
then
at
that
time,
each
of
those
parties
will
have
to
speak
to
all
three
applications.
If
we
take
them
individually,
they
will
have
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
each
application,
but
it
their
comments
will
need
to
be
tailored
to
the
specific
application.
H
Then
keep
in
mind
that
we
will
have
the
entire
presentation
be
done
at
one
time
so
for
any
members
of
the
public
or
affected
parties.
When
you
are
raising
your
hand,
you
will
be
addressing
all
three
of
the
applications
at
once,
but
there
will
be
three
different
motions
to
be
made
after
any
board
discussion.
Once
the
public
hearing
has
been
closed.
I
Right
I'll
begin
with
the
future
land
use
amendment
and
rezoning
first
an
overview.
This
is
a
15-point
three
acre
site
located
at
the
northeast
corner
of
Klosterman
Road
and
distant
Avenue.
The
applicants
are
proposing
51
unit
single-family
residential,
planned
development.
The
proposed
lot
sizes
will
range
in
size
from
five
thousand
seven
hundred
and
fifty
square
feet
to
six
thousand
nine
hundred
square
feet
arranged
along
a
single
loop
road
that'll
have
a
gated
access.
I
The
Klosterman
Road
the
site
contains
an
area
of
wetlands
in
the
southeast
portion
that
the
applicants
are
proposing
for
preservation
they're
not
proposing
to
affect
those
wetlands.
The
site
contains
two
existing
single-family
residences
that
will
be
removed.
So
it's
really
a
40
net
increase
of
49
single-family
residences
on
the
property.
I
This
is
proposed
as
a
private
subdivision
with
the
water
and
wastewater
services
provided
by
the
city
on
the
roadway
and
utility
services
within
the
development
will
be
owned
and
maintained
by
the
homeowners.
There
will
be.
There
will
be
a
separate
item
regarding
the
annexation.
The
chill
here
tonight,
I'll
present
that
shortly
there
are
also,
as
I
mentioned.
There
are
wetlands
on
the
property,
the
future
Land
Use
I
covered.
The
plan
requires
that
a
future
land
use
map
amendment
to
peep
reservation
be
done
on
the
wetland
area.
I
However,
the
applicants
have
not
finalized
the
exact
boundaries
of
those
wetlands
right
now,
so
we
have
added
a
condition:
we've
included
a
condition
addressing
that
required
future
future
land
use
amendment,
starting
with
the
comprehensive
plan
amendment
they
are
proposing
to
go
from
residential,
suburban
in
Pinellas
County
to
residential
low
in
the
city.
The
page
3
of
the
report
provides
a
comparison
of
those
two
land-use
categories.
I
Maximum
density
under
in
the
county
right
now
is
currently
2.5
units
per
acre
under
the
city.
It
would
be
a
maximum
density
of
5
units
per
acre
we've.
We
reviewed
this
for
consistency
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
I
won't
go
through
all
the
policies,
but
I
will
note
that
the
proposed
residential
low
is
the
predominant
land-use
category
in
the
area
in
the
city.
So
we
do
see
this
as
matching
the
existing
future
land-use
categories
in
the
area.
I
Moving
to
the
conservation
element
of
the
comp
plan
policy,
1.1.1
references,
no
net
loss
of
wetlands
and
this
proposal
is
consistent
with
that
policy.
1
point
6
point:
1
of
the
comp
plan
of
the
conservation
element
do
mention
developing
as
planned
development
zoning
in
order
to
preserve
open
space,
open
space
and
natural
habitat,
which
the
applicants
applicants
are
proposing,
basically
they're
their
concentrate
development
on
the
upland
portion
on
the
side
and
doing
smaller
Lots
that
are
allowed
under
the
plan.
Development
category
or
plan
development.
I
Zoning
district,
as
I
mentioned
there
is
approximately
2.3
9
acres
of
wetlands,
which
will
need
to
be.
The
comp
plan
will
be
amended
to
recognize
this
area
eventually,
once
the
that
exact
boundaries
are
determined
and
make
that
preservation
and
are
finding
in
regard
to
the
future
land
use
amendment
is
that
is,
as
indicated
in
the
report.
It
is
consistent
with
those
policies
and
goals
that
I
did
mention.
I
Next
I'll
I'll
move
over
to
the
rezoning
action
and
there
are
standards
that
are
mentioned
in
section
2.0
7.03,
aid
of
the
of
the
code
and
I'll
go
through
those
findings.
Briefly,
the
proposed
rezoning
to
our
PD
is
consistent
with
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
Comprehensive
Plan
I
went
through
those
policies
that
we
found
to
be
consistent
with
so
our
finding
is.
I
It
does
meet
the
criteria
to
the
available
uses
to
which
a
property
may
be
put,
are
appropriate
on
the
property
in
question
and
are
compatible
with
the
existing
and
planned
uses
in
the
area.
As
I
mentioned,
the
most
of
the
surrounding
property
that
is
in
the
city
is
zoned,
r70
a
which
has
a
minimum
lot
size
of
6500
square
feet.
The
applicants
are
proposing
lot
sizes
that
are
fairly
comparable.
I
The
applicant
has
demonstrated,
through
the
process
and
through
the
applicant
application,
that
the
public
utilities
and
transportation
services
are
available
to
serve
the
site
as
proposed.
Fourth
is
the
amendment
will
not
adversely
impact
or
exceed
the
capacity
or
the
fiscal
ability
of
the
city
to
provide
public
facilities?
Public
facilities,
including
credible
water,
wastewater,
solid
waste
and
transfers
transportation
facilities
are
available
to
serve
this
site.
It's
not.
I
It
is
adjacent
to
the
city
limits
where
these
services
are
available
and
the
applicant
has
indicated
it
has
provided
information
showing
that
the
level
of
service
standards
can
be
met
for
the
proposed
development.
In
addition
to
those
criteria
there,
there
are
waivers
that
are
addressed
in
section
83
of
the
land
development
code.
In
this
case,
the
applicant
has
requested
six
waivers
and
I'll
go
through
those
briefly.
I
The
RPD
district
requires
a
minimum
lot
size
of
ten
thousand
square
feet.
As
I
indicated,
the
applicants
are
proposing
minimum
lot
size
of
five
thousand
seven
hundred
and
forty
square
feet
and
six
thousand
nine
hundred
square
feet.
There's
also
a
minimum
lot
width
of
seventy-five
feet.
The
applicants
are
proposing
minimum
lot
width
of
50
feet
and
sixty
feet.
I
The
applicant
has
also
provided
information
showing
that,
by
providing
the
smaller
lot
sizes,
they're
able
to
concentrate
development
on
the
upland
portion
of
the
site,
the
applicant
has
also
through
the
design
they've
located
the
smaller
of
the
minimum
lot
sizes
in
interior
to
the
property
into
the
east
of
the
property
which
is
come
is
compatible
and
with
the
uses
to
the
east
of
the
property
and
the
second
waiver
the
requesting
is
in
regard
to
a
lot
setbacks.
The
front
required
front
step
back
is
25
feet.
The
applicant
is
proposing
15
side
yard
required.
I
Setback
is
10
feet.
The
applicant
is
proposing
five
rear
yards.
The
setback
is
20
feet
required
at
the
applicants
proposing
15
to
20
feet,
and
we
find
that
the
those
setbacks
are
consistent
with
the
smaller
lot
sizes
that
they
requested.
A
waiver
for
they've
also
chosen
to
provide
the
20-foot
rear
setback,
which
is
the
minimum
required
around
the
perimeter
of
the
site,
so
they
will
be
compatible
with
the
adjacent
single-family
loss
in
that
area.
I
I
They
have
provided
as
an
alternative
design
to
provide
utility
easements
10
feet
along
either
side
of
the
roadway,
so
they
are
able
to
accommodate
the
this
right-of-way
with
and
additionally
as
required
by
the
farmer,
so
they
are
going
to
be
prohibited
from
providing
on
street
parking
because
of
the
reduced
right-of-way
with
the
fourth
waiver
requests.
As
that
regard
to
sidewalks,
the
requirement
normally
is
a
to
sidewalks
be
provided
on
both
sides
of
the
street.
The
applicants
have
provided
a
sidewalk
only
along
one
side
of
the
street.
I
They
provided
an
alternative
design
to
address
this
they've
provided
the
sidewalk
on
one
side
of
the
street
and
they
provide
in
a
wider
than
the
normal
side
way
with
six
feet
as
opposed
to
four
feet.
Minimum
and
they've
also
pointed
out
the
sidewalk
will
only
serve
the
development
as
you
cannot
access
any
other
sites
through
the
development.
I
The
fifth
requested
waiver
is
for
a
reduction
in
wetland
setbacks
for
the
stormwater
pond.
The
PD
zoning
requires
a
50-foot
buffer
between
the
wetlands
and
the
stormwater
ponds.
Yep
we're
gonna
has
requested
to
go
with
the
minimum
Southwest
Florida
Water
Management
District
setback
of
a
minimum
of
15
feet
with
25
feet
average
for
the
area
along
the
stormwater
pond
and
they've
also
committed
to
enhancing
the
buffer
in
that
area
as
an
alternative
to
the
normal
50
feet
required.
I
The
sixth
and
final
waiver
is
a
lack
of
secondary
access
into
the
development.
The
code
states
that
for
residential
developments
in
excess
of
50
units
that
they
have
a
secondary
means
of
access,
this
subdivision
will
ultimately
have
51
units,
but
the
code
states
that
they
shall
provide
a
secondary
means
of
access
where
feasible.
Our
opinion
is.
I
The
applicant
is
demonstrated
that
a
secondary
access
is
not
feasible
because
there's
only
one
one
roadway
frontage
along
Klosterman
Road
for
the
development
and
the
wetlands
on
the
side
will
pro
will
prevent
the
provision
of
a
secondary
access
along
Klosterman
Road.
So
those
are
our
findings
in
regards
to
the
waiver
requirement,
as
well
as
the
other
criteria
for
the
rezoning.
The
Technical
Review
Committee
did
view
this
application
on
February
20th
and
their
comments
are
in
the
report.
I
Approval
of
the
future
land
use
amendment
from
residential,
suburban
to
residential
low
we're
recommending
approval
of
the
rezoning
from
rural
residential
in
the
county
to
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs,
our
PD
subject
to
twenty
conditions
of
approval.
These
are
on
your
in
your
report,
but
I
would
like
to
go
through
them
briefly.
The
first
condition
is
the
annexation
of
the
property,
and
you
will
be
I
will
we
will
be
discussing
that
as
well
this
evening.
I
Second
condition
is
that
the
applicant
shall
demonstrate
at
a
minimum
open
space
area
of
25%
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
of
the
code.
That
condition
is
in
there
just
to
address
that
the
wetland
buffer
has
not
been
completely
finalized
at
this
time,
but
we
believe
that
they
can
comply
with
this
requirement,
but
we
just
want
to
ensure
that
this
is
a
condition
of
approval
once
that
wetland
buffer
line
is
finalized.
I
The
third
deals
with
the
on-site
well
and
the
property
that
it
be
removed
and
capped
the
condition
States
prior
to
final
development
approval
I
think
the
applicant
has
pointed
out
that
that
somebody
will
remain
living
in
that's
on
that
house
that
the
well
serves
until
that
house
is
ultimately
demolished.
So
we
can
and
we're
okay
with
removing
the
part
about
prior
to
final
development
approval.
Our
concern
is
just
that
the
on-site
will
be
removed
and
capped
by
the
time
that
that
house
is
removed
to
the
existing
home
is
removed
from
the
site.
I
Fourth
condition
deals
with
the
access
to
Klosterman
road
that
Pinellas
County
will
ultimately
approve
the
location
of
design
and
operation
of
that
we're
comfortable
that
they
have
been
a
appraised
of
this
and
have
commented
on
it
and
we're
comfortable
at
this
point.
But
we
do
want
to
make
sure
that
they
do
have
final
say
before
final
development
plan.
Approval
of
that
access
and
the
design
v
deals
with
the
building
setbacks.
I
I
The
applicant
has
provided
a
detail
showing
that
there
is
20
feet
between
the
garage
and
the
property
line,
but
we
just
wanted
to
formalize
that
in
by
way
of
condition,
the
six
condition
deals
with
the
proposed
plan
for
lighting
I
will
be
required
as
a
part,
as
far
as
a
part
of
the
final
development
plan,
standard
condition
with
these
sorts
of
developments,
seventh,
is
it
on-site
signs
sign,
poles
and
lighting
will
be
designed
to
match
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
specifications
for
the
CRA.
These
are
these.
I
This
references,
the
signs
and
lighting
street
signs
and
lighting
in
the
right-of-way,
not
the
project
sign.
So
we
just
want
to
make
that
clear.
Eight
condition
deals
with
the
final
development
plan
complying
with
all
tree
preservation
requirements
and
landscape
requirements,
including
mechanism
for
xeriscape
night
condition,
deals
with
be
the
ignominy
utilities
shall
remain
privately
owned
and
maintained,
and
the
final
development
and
subdivision
plans
shall
include
documentation
of
the
mechanisms
for
implementing
the
private
utilities.
10Th
is
the
acknowledgment
the
applicant
acknowledges
as
a
proposed
private
community.
I
All
remaining
infrastructure,
such
as,
but
not
limited
to
roads,
sidewalks,
must
be
privately
maintained.
11
deals
with
the
applicant
acknowledging
that,
as
a
proposed
private
community
law
enforcement
activities,
maybe
limit,
it
may
be
limited
to
life.
Safety
in
the
city
coat
and
city
code
enforcement.
I
Final
plan,
development
and
subdivision
site
plan
submittals
shall
include
documentation
of
mechanisms
for
implementation
of
private
law
enforcement
activities
within
the
development.
12
is
at
a
future
land
use
amendment
to
preservation.
This
deals
with
the
wetland
will
need
to
be
done
prior
to
application
for
building
permit
or
site
work
from
the
city.
The
applicant
has
asked
and
I'm
sure
they
can
expand
on
this.
If
that
could
just
be
a
condition
of
building
permitting,
which
we
do
not
object
to.
So
we
could
possibly
remove
site
work
permits
if
the
board
is
okay.
With
that
thirteenth
condition.
I
Deals
with
the
city
will
require
the
part
of
the
final
plan
development,
the
clear
and
prominent
declaration
of
minimum
fire
access.
This
deals
with
the
road
right-of-way
reduction
and
acknowledgement
and
by
all
people
buying
in
the
in
the
community
that
they
cannot
park
on
site.
The
fourteenth
condition
deals
with
the
gopher
tortoise
impacts.
I
There
are
gopher
tortoise
identified,
burrows
identified
on
the
site
and
the
applicant
will
need
to
address
those
impacts
and
and
obtain
all
permits.
15
is
similar
that
the
construction
man
struck.
Ssin
management
plan
will
need
to
be
submitted,
addressing
potential
impacts
to
listed
species
that
were
identified
in
the
wildlife
assessment
report
that
was
included
with
the
application.
I
16Th
condition
deals
with
management
and
future
maintenance
plans
for
the
wetlands
shall
be
required
as
part
of
the
final
plan,
development
and
subdivision
approval,
17
deals
with
public
art
that
system
requirement
of
the
code
standard
requirement,
18
deals
with
the
developers
responsible
for
obtaining
ethical,
applicable
permits
from
other
agencies.
This
is
another
often
seen
condition
with
projects
of
the
size.
19
is
the
applicant
shall
complete
the
process
forward
about
development
plan
pursuant
to
the
requirements
of
the
code.
I
Again,
that
is
a
requirement
of
the
code
that
needs
to
be
done
and
that,
and
the
final
condition
is
that
this
will
be
completed
within
one
year
of
the
preliminary
plan
development
approval.
So
that
was
a
long
recitation
of
the
conditions,
but
we
we
do
did
believe
it
was
important
to
go
over
that
I
can
pause
for
questions
or
I
can
move
into
the
annexation
report.
I
I
N
N
Alright,
because
there's
there's
I
know,
there's
a
buffer,
there's
a
there's,
a
buffering
requirement
every
time,
there's
an
eagle's
nest
and
it
would
be
helpful
on
their
plans
if
they
showed
that
that
wherever
the
development
is
it's
outside
that
buffering
of
the
eagle's
nest.
And
if
that
makes
any
sense
to
you,
yeah.
I
N
Emini
yeah,
if,
if
it
was,
if
it
was
reflected
in
their
in
their
in
their
site,
plan,
it'd,
be
easier
to
say:
okay,
that's
odd,
whatever
buffering
requirements
there
were
so
I
will
just
a
disaster
if
the
city
had
a
requirement
that
they
provide.
You
know
evidence
on
their
site
plan
that
that
the
eagle's
nest
is
out
is
outside
of
the
buffering
work
or
the
construction
is
not
within
the
buffering
requirement,
so
y'all
y'all,
I,
guess
that
would
have
them
now.
Let
me
ask
you
another
question.
N
N
I
N
I
N
I
N
B
Sort
of
questions
sort
of
become
Anton
I'm,
not
sure.
Maybe
you
can
can
help
address
and
clarify
it.
It
seems
like
we're
making
an
awful
lot
of
concessions
here
to
get
this
done.
I
mean
I,
understand
the
need
to
fit
as
much
as
you
can
in
limited
space
and
work
with
limited
resources,
but
I
mean
at
a
glance.
O
I
Yeah
I'm,
assuming
you're,
referring
to
the
the
six
waivers
we
have
provided
the
criteria
for
consideration.
I
didn't
I
didn't
go
through
those
completely,
but
you
know
our
findings
are,
as
we've
indicated
they
in
a
lot
of
cases,
they
provided
an
alternative
design.
You
know
it's
up
to
it's
up
to
the
board
and
up
to
the
Commission
ultimately
to
determine
whether
or
not
they
meet
those
criteria,
but
we
did
provide
findings
in
regard
to
those
waivers.
I
I
So
in
our
review
of
this
subject
under
Section
208
of
the
code,
there
are
criteria
there
for
consideration,
factors
to
be
considered,
and
the
first
is
that
it
will
not
create
an
enclave
and,
as
I've
indicated,
it's
surrounded
on
three
sides.
So
really
in
that
regard,
it
makes
sense
to
do
the
annexation,
the
impacts
to
the
property
on
question
on
the
ability
to
the
city
to
provide
services.
We've
already
touched
that
that
the
applicant
has
addressed
capacity
for
public
facilities
in
the
area.
I
I
The
subject
property
is
within
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
planning
area,
as
identified
in
the
comprehensive
plan
the
owner
has
voluntarily
agreed
to
annex
and
has
is
requesting
the
future
Landis
amendment
that
we've
talked
about
to
to
the
residential
low
category,
and
it
this
will
require
approval
at
the
state
level
for
this
amendment.
So
that
those
are
our
findings
in
regard
to
the
the
annexation
and
again,
this
was
also
reviewed
by
the
TRC,
with
the
same
TRC.
D
complements
as
the
other
report
and
our
staff
recommendation
is
to
approve
the
annexation.
N
N
Currently,
water
is
not.
The
county
is
not
providing
any
water
there
they're,
basically
on
a
well.
I
N
N
C
L
A
H
Y
All
right,
thank
you.
This
is
Ed
Armstrong
I'm,
an
attorney
with
the
law
firm
of
billboard
Henderson
located
at
600,
Cleveland,
Street,
Suite,
800
and
Clearwater
and
I
represent
the
applicant
David
Weekley
Homes.
They
are
the
contract,
purchase
or
subject
property.
I
have
other
consultants
working
with
me
on
this
case
and
you'll
hear
from
them
later
during
our
presentation.
Y
Y
There
was
a
lot
of
time
spent
by
your
staff
and
the
applicant
working
through
the
issues
that
result
in
the
conditions
of
approval,
that's
adjusted
by
the
staff
and
a
lot
of
time,
a
lot
of
energy
to
come
up
with
a
presentation
here
that
does
have
the
support
of
your
staff.
My
land
use
plan.
The
expert
tonight
is
Cindy
Tara
Penney
and
she
will
address
the
land
use
map
amendment
the
proposed
rezoning
and
proposed
eliminating
plan
development.
Y
P
H
Y
H
A
P
Good
evening,
mr.
chairman
and
board
members-
and
thank
you
for
hearing
this,
these
cases
tonight
I
know
it's
a
little
unusual
format
for
you
and
I
appreciate
your
time
in
hearing
the
cases
if
I
might
start
with
the
annexation,
we
go
in
a
little
opposite
direction.
Then
loui
just
addressed
the
last
part
that
he
just
talked
about.
P
First
of
all,
this
site
is
adjacent
to
city
property,
on
three
sides,
to
the
north,
to
the
west,
across
distant
and
to
the
south
across
kosterman,
for
the
college,
which
is
in
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
boundary,
and
that's
not
the
only
reason
we
would
like
to
annex
we'd
like
to
ask
because
it
want
to
be
a
part
of
the
Tarpon
Springs
community,
David
Weekley
Homes
has
as
a
national
home
builder.
They
built
another
project
in
the
city
of
Tarpon,
Springs
and
I.
P
Think
this
is
a
great
opportunity
to
build
single-family
detached
homes
on
this
site
and
as
the
staff
mentioned,
all
utilities,
all
services
are
available
and
the
city
can
provide
them.
So
the
application
for
annexation
meets
all
the
criteria
for
Hynix.
Well,
it's
been
a
few
a
little
longer
minutes.
Talking
about
the
plan
amendment
and
the
rezoning
also
talked
about
the
conditions
and
the
waivers
as
I
know,
you
do
have
some
of
those
and
it's
a
fairly
complicated
project.
P
P
We're
also
asking
for
the
zoning
we're
asking
for
the
art
PD
zoning
district,
which
is
a
kind
of
a
make-your-own
plant
zoning
district.
It's
not
something
you
use
very
often
just
recently
the
city
made
it
more
interesting
to
developers
because
it
allows
for
waivers
and
those
waivers
allow
you
to
customize
a
project
to
the
particular
neighborhood,
and
that's
exactly
what
we're
doing
here
today
we
are
asking
for
an
RPD
zoning
to
build
single-family
detached
homes.
P
Stable
fairway
detached
homes
are
what
are
existing
to
the
site,
to
the
north,
to
the
immediate
west,
on
distant
and
across
distant
on
the
west
side
of
distance.
So
our
project
of
single-family
detached
homes
is
the
same
land
east
on
to
the
sides
adjacent
to
the
property,
of
course,
to
the
south
is
the
college,
which
is
obviously
non-residential.
Yes,
all
those
properties
that
I
just
spoke
about
to
the
north
and
I'll.
Actually,
all
the
way
up
this
then
and
then
on
the
west
side
of
distant
are
zoned.
P
Ours
70a,
which
has
a
minimum
lot
size
of
sixty-five
hundred
square
feet,
and
we're
able
to
do
in
the
RPD
districts
is
locate
our
larger
Lots,
which
are
69
900
square
feet,
in
other
words
greater
than
the
Lots
adjacent
to
them
on
the
nor
and
the
West.
All
of
our
Lots
on
those
edges
will
be
69
hundred
square
feet,
which
is
larger
than
theirs
only
district.
Today,
a
but
that's
a
commitment
in
it's
a
commitment
in
the
RPD
site
plan
that
you
are
looking
at
tonight
night,
and
so
we
are
obligated
to
meet
that.
P
The
smaller
Lots
that
we
are
proposing
are
all
internal
I
mean
they
do
not
abut
the
residential
neighborhoods
to
the
north
in
the
West
I
think.
That's
a
really
good
point
sometimes
well,
what's
the
what's
the
benefit
to
the
city?
Clearly
the
benefit
to
the
city
for
annexation
as
it
grows
their
tax
base.
So
that's
obviously
a
good
benefit,
but
the
other
benefit
to
the
city
and
to
you
all
is
that
through
the
our
PD
district?
P
P
We
cannot
deviate
from
that
plan
set
without
coming
back
to
you
for
re-approve,
so
all
of
the
elements
of
the
project
at
the
number
of
the
units,
the
size
of
the
Lots
that
I
just
talked
about
the
layout
of
the
street
of
the
internal
street
system.
All
of
those
the
setbacks,
everything
that's
in
that
plan.
Handset
is
exactly
what
we
have
to
present
and
when
we
come
back
from
final
development
plan
approval.
That
project
has
to
be
exactly
consistent
with
this
preliminary
plants
that
you
see
here
today.
P
The
other
thing
we've
done
to
ensure
compatibility.
In
addition
to
increasing
the
lot
sizes
on
the
west
and
the
north
adjacent
to
the
existing
Lots
is
we
made
the
rear
lot
line
of
our
houses,
the
exact
same
rear
scuse
me,
the
rear
setback
of
our
houses,
they're,
the
same
20
foot
setback
as
the
zoning
district
to
the
north
and
the
west.
So
again,
another
way
that
we're
ensuring
that
compatibility,
I
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
traffic
and
the
circulation
on
the
project.
We
only
have
access
and
frontage
on
Klosterman
Road.
P
We
do
not
front
distant.
There
will
be
no
driveways
and
no
access
on
distance
to
this
project.
There
will
only
be
one
driveway,
all
Klosterman
and
that
it
is
a
county
line.
A
county
road
and
we've
already
met
with
Pinellas
County
and
in
their
pack
in
our
pockets
contained
contain
in
our
traffic
study,
which
starts
on
page
206.
P
If
you're,
looking
at
the
digital
set,
is
our
traffic
study
prepared
by
Mike
raiser,
in
which
he
met
with
the
county
traffic
engineer
and
the
county
traffic
engineer,
indicated
that
the
location
of
the
driveway
and
the
the
location
of
the
call
box
and
the
gate,
because
this
will
be
a
private
subdivision-
is
acceptable
to
the
county
subject
to
final
design
approval
which
of
course,
we
will
provide,
as
I
mentioned
before,
and
you
can
see
clearly
on
the
plan
set
that
we
have.
There
is
there's
a
road
that
goes
through
and
loops
through
the
subdivision.
P
It
does
not
connect
off-site.
There
is
no
right
right
away
to
the
any
direction
that
we
can
connect
to
and
we
don't
and
we're
not
intending
to
make
any
connections
at
all
off-site
of
the
property.
I
wanted
to
mention
a
couple
things
that
were
brought
up
about
the
environmental
issues.
Number
one
was
the
first
issue
that
was
brought
up
with
the
Eagle
Nest
and
we
submitted.
P
The
wildlife
assessment
prepared
by
Florida
land
design
and
permitting
is
in
your
packets,
turning
it
page,
193
digitally
its
193
that
was
prepared
by
Florida
land
design
and
permitting,
which
is
an
engineering
firm
that
has
a
qualified
environment
analyst
that
prepared
the
study.
The
Eagle
that
was
discussed
is
not
on
our
property.
Let
me
repeat
that
it
is
not
on
our
property,
it
is
located
off-site
to
the
west
of
the
property
to
the
northwest
and
it's
within
the
Duke
power
easement.
It's
actually
on
one
of
Jake's
poles.
P
P
Narrative,
which
and
I
just
want
to
turn
to
that
it's
a
letter
from
Audubon
Center
for
birds
of
prey,
which
is
writing
to
confirm
what
we
Florida
land
design
and
permitting
that
firm
has
committed
on
behalf
of
David
Weekley
and
their,
and
they
ought
about
are
in
agreement
with
that.
So
I
would
refer
you
to
that.
We've
committed
that
all
trucks
will
enter
the
site
from
Klosterman,
which
of
course,
we
just
talked
about.
No
trucks
will
be
parked
anywhere
near
the
nest.
P
There,
our
gopher
tortoises
on
the
site
and
we
will
be
required
to
relocate
them
subject
to
a
Florida
Wildlife
Commission
permit.
It
requires
an
authorized
person,
who's
been
approved
by
the
FD
C
to
relocate
those
outside
off-site.
We
will
comply
with
all
of
that
and,
of
course,
we
won't
get
any
building
permits
from
the
city
until
that
is
met.
P
P
The
first
two
have
to
do
with
the
lot
size,
lot,
width
and
lot
setbacks
and
that's
kind
of
all
go
together.
The
city's
our
PD
district
for
single-family
homes
has
a
minimum
lot
size
of
10,000
square
feet,
but
they
have
zoning
districts
that
range
from
6,000
square
feet
up
to
that
10,000.
So
clearly,
the
the
waiver
process
allows
you
to
customize
that
development
to
what's
happening
in
the
neighborhood
and
that's
exactly
what
we've
done
again
in
the
larger
Lots.
P
P
The
the
house
will
be
15
feet,
that'll
be
20
feet
to
the
garage,
so
that
clearly
can
get
a
car
in
that
driveway
side
here,
except
backs
reduced
to
five
feet:
the
corner
side
on
a
corner
lot,
there's
no
variance
requested
and
their
rear
Lots
are
15
in
the
rear,
except
for
those
those
type
B
lights
that
are
on
the
north
and
west
side.
The
larger
Lots
they'll
have
a
20-foot
rear
yard
setback.
P
The
same
setback
is
what
will
be
adjacent
to
them:
they're
right
away
with
this
being
reduced
to
40
from
50
feet
to
40
feet,
but
we're
also
imposing
a
10-foot
easement
on
either
side
for
utilities,
so
in
actuality
it
will
function
as
a
60
foot,
a
road
area
but
10
20
of
those
feet
10
feet
on
either
side
will
be
where
the
utilities
are
located
within
private
property.
So
again
and
I
should
have
mentioned
earlier
in
the
process.
This
will
be
a
private
subdivision.
We
have
committed
to
that
in
our
all
of
our
narratives.
P
We
have
committed
that
we
will
also
have
a
homeowners
association
that
will
be
mandatory
and
in
fact
the
city
will
require
us
to
show
our
homeowners
association
documents
during
the
final
development
plan
review.
So
you
are,
you
should
be
comforted
by
the
fact
that
not
only
are
we
committing
to
do
it
in
this
application,
but
the
city
will
make
sure
that
we
do
it
when
we
come
back
for
our
final
development
plan.
Approval.
P
We
were
asking
to
put
the
sidewalks
on
only
one
side
of
the
road
for
two
major
reasons:
one
we're
increasing
the
width
of
it
from
four
feet
to
six
feet,
so
we
think
that
helps
mitigate
it,
but,
more
importantly,
this
road-
the
internal
road
again,
is
a
loop
road.
It
does
not
continue
off
site,
so
there
won't
be
anybody
using
that
sidewalk
except
the
residents
that
live
there.
P
P
We
are
complying
totally
and
the
only
will
be
the
stormwater
pond
which,
as
you
all
know,
is
a
very
passive
use
and
generally
developers
try
to
locate
their
stormwater
ponds
adjacent
to
the
wetlands
for
a
variety
of
biological
reasons,
then
the
last
request,
I
think,
is
pretty
obvious.
When
you've
looked
at
the
maps
that
attached
to
the
project,
since
we
only
have
frontage
on
Klosterman
Road,
we
have
no
furniture
on
any
other,
a
right-of-way
we
are.
P
We
are
asking
for
a
waiver
of
the
two
entrances,
but
what
we
have
done
to
mitigate
that
and
the
fire
marshal
has
agreed,
he's
reviewed
it
and
he
has
agreed-
and
there
is
a
detail
of
it
on
page
four
of
our
plan
set.
It
shows
that
entryway
and
what
we
have
done
is
have
two
lanes
entering
the
project
and
one
lane
exiting
the
project
as
a
resident
comes
in.
P
He
or
she
will
be
able
to
go
on
the
outside
lane
and
use
his
keycard
or
whatever
electronic
digital
equipment
that
he
has
for
the
raise
the
gate
automatically
to
enter
the
subdivision.
If
they're,
a
visitor
they'll
have
to
stop
at
the
call
box
and
call
the
person
that
they
intend
to
visit,
so
residents
will
be
able
to
go
through
easily,
visitors
will
have
to
stop,
and
then
there
also
be
a
third
lane
exiting
the
project
course.
Everyone
will
be
able
to
exit
without
any
issue.
P
But
the
reason
for
the
three
lanes
is
to
allow
that,
if,
if
for
some
reason,
there's
an
accident
right
at
the
intersection
that
of
the
three
lanes,
there
will
still
be
two
other
lanes
available
for
emergency
equipment,
fire
ambulance,
police.
Whoever
might
need
to
come
into
the
development
to
be
able
to
enter
the
project
and
again
the
far
Marshall
has
reviewed
this,
and
he
has
agreed
that
it's
acceptable
to
him
and
the
last
thing
I
want
to
mention
and
then
be
happy
to
answer.
P
Your
questions
is
we
are
in
agreement
with
the
conditions
and
with
the
minor
revisions
that
mr.
Serna
discussed
again.
We
are
well
aware
that
this
is
just
a
preliminary
development
plan
and,
if
approve,
we
will
have
to
come
back
with
a
final
develop
plan
which
will
be
include
full
construction
plans,
the
homeowners
association
documents
to
show
that
we
do
indeed
have
a
homeowner's
association
and
then,
if
a
preliminary
plat
to
lay
out
the
Lots
very
similar
to
the
plan
that
you
have,
but
with
all
the
platform
documentation.
P
So
again,
we
are
in
agreement
with
all
the
conditions
that
are
proposed
with
the
minor
revisions
that
mr.
Serna
identified
today
and
I.
Think
I
should
probably
stop
there
I'm
sure
you
might
have
some
questions
for
us
either
for
me
or
for
other
members
of
our
team
and
I
will
stop
and
see.
If
you
have
any
questions.
Thank
you
so
much.
C
C
P
Well,
yes,
this
is
Cindy
cemetery,
panting
I,
see
I
just
had
to
find
this
section.
You
were
talking
about.
Thank
you,
yeah
in
the
first
paragraph,
what
I
said
was
that
the
project
is
located
at
the
northeast
intersection
of
klostermann
Road
and
distant
Avenue
and
I
put
in
parentheses
behind
this
to
nominee
Belcher
Road
extension,
because
south
of
Klosterman
the
road
is
called
Belcher
Road
north
of
Klosterman
when
we
get
into
the
city
its
distance.
So
just
in
case
there
was
any
confusion
about
what
what
road
it
is.
P
C
P
N
Cindy,
this
is
mica
screw
this
first
of
all,
I
want
to
thank
you.
Some
of
the
questions
I
had
listed
I
think
you've
addressed
with
regard
to
your
comments.
Mike
one
of
my
biggest
you
know
concerns
it
always
has
been,
is,
and
one
of
the
reasons
I
look
for
for
restrictive
covenants
that
run
with
the
property.
Is
you
know,
you're
familiar
with
harp
and
and
I
don't
want.
You
know
a
high
density
development
end
up
like
trailered
manor,
where
there's
there's
you
know
we
eat
embrace.
N
P
P
They
built
a
project
in
Tarpon
Springs
prior
to
this,
so
they
they
certainly
understand
homeowners
associations
and
how
to
manage
them
and
how
to
structure
them
and
they're
very
understanding
and
and
totally
agree
with
the
requirement
to
have
the
homeowners
association,
because
they
have
absolutely
no
intent
of
allowing
any
of
the
improvements
to
decline.
It
wouldn't
be
in
their
best
interest
and
certainly
not
in
any
the
homeowners
Festivus.
N
My
biggest
concerns
with
the
whole
way
when
the
development
is
sold
out.
You
know,
what's
left
well,
they're
still
building
houses.
Obviously
you
know
so
their
benefit
to
keep
everything
nice
and
pristine.
But
when
your
developer
is
gone
well,
it's
the
documents
that
you
have
in
place.
They
give
it
the
teeth
to
enforce,
hopefully
enforce
you
know,
quality
of
living
in
a
neighborhood.
E
Have
a
couple:
are
you
ready
for
me
to
read
yeah,
so
this
one's
from
Jennifer
Keller?
She
says
Thank,
You
Kim
for
the
record
I'd
like
to
submit
the
following:
I'm,
the
owner
of
the
home
of
a
home
on
South
distant
Avenue,
on
a
property
that
is
adjacent
to
the
two
sides
of
the
land
proposing
to
be
developed,
though
I
am
fully
aware
of
proper
building
and
development
codes.
I
am
also
not
naive
enough
to
believe
that
rules
are
always
followed
and
loopholes
aren't
found.
E
Ultimately,
our
property
value
and
safety
of
the
residents
are
a
great
concern,
followed
closely
by
a
need
to
care
for
existing
wildlife
and
environment
after
reading
through
the
documentation
associated
with
the
proposal.
I
have
a
major
concern
about
the
minimums,
minimal
square
footage
of
each
proposed
home
1,200
square
feet
is
smaller
than
the
surrounding
homes.
This
is
not
creating
comparables
that
will
increase
our
property
value,
though
I
understand
that
the
home
the
Builder
intends
to
build,
may
now
be
planned
to
be
larger.
E
This
smaller
square
footage
minimum
allows
the
plan
to
change
without
additional
consult,
smaller
square
footage.
Homes
in
a
cramped
neighborhood
will
lower
our
property
values.
Ultimately,
it
is
a
simple
truth
of
real
estate
value.
Increased
traffic
is
a
major
concern,
both
east
Klosterman
and
southeast,
and
are
already
rife
with
spears
and
numerous
car
accidents,
especially
when
you
consider
the
intersection
of
two
streets,
an
entrance
on
Klosterman
or
on
South
distant
will
only
increase
the
traffic
flow
to
do
nothing
to
improve
the
quality
of
either
street
for
us
residents.
E
E
The
last
and
very
important
concern,
of
course,
is
the
wildlife
and
habitat
assessment
report
which
states
potentially
occupied
gopher,
tortoise
burrows
were
observed
in
the
project
area.
It
is
inaccurate
to
say
that
these
are
potentially
occupied.
There
are
vast
amounts
of
tortoises
in
this
area,
including
babies
each
year
as
the
grounds
are
used
for
breeding.
The
report
is
also
grossly
inaccurate
when
it
states
indicated
that
the
property
provides
minimal,
habitat
port
or
listed
wildlife
species.
The
gopher
tortoises
are
obviously
prevalent
on
this
property.
E
One
needs
only
to
look
a
few
to
see
one
eating
and
bald
eagles,
literally
forage
on
that
property
for
food
and
next
materials
every
day
and
nests.
Well,
it
says
next,
but
I
think
they
mean
nests.
I.
Do
not
think
that
the
details
provided
in
this
report
have
provided,
adapt
the
town,
an
accurate
assessment
of
the
environmental
impact
that
the
development
of
this
property
will
have
I'm.
E
E
One
from
carand
robit
I
am
property
owner
which
abuts
the
currently
zoned
rural
property,
685
and
687
Klosterman
Road
I
am
opposed
to
the
rezoning
for
many
reasons,
but
the
most
important
reason
is
the
gopher
tortoises.
Gopher
tortoises
are
keystone
species
in
Florida
and
are
therefore
protected.
These
animals
have
these
animals
will
need
a
specialist
from
the
Florida
Wildlife
to
property,
relocate
them
also
being
a
keystone
species.
Their
burrows
are
used
by
multitude
of
different
species
and
animal
dens
I
do
not
believe
this
is
legal
to
pave
over
these
burrows.
B
X
Hello,
thank
you
for
taking
the
time
to
listen
to
our
concerns.
We
we
live
directly
behind
the
property.
Okay,.
X
H
X
H
X
So
again,
thank
you
very
much
for
listening
to
us,
so
we
have
some
concerns
that
I
think
we're
also
voiced
by
other
resident
pool
area
and
one
being
the
colostrum
in
lis.
I
mean
it's
already
clogs
already
and
very
dangerous
intersection.
So
our
concern
is
how
how
will
that
be
address,
so
this
is
towards
the
applicant
that
it
could
also
be
towards
the
township
as
well.
X
Is
it
possible
that
I'd
like
it
in
there
at
turn,
arrow
something
of
that
nature,
so
we're
concerned
about
that?
We're
also
concerned
well
a
question
regarding
the
barrier,
a
wall
that
we
read
on
the
plans
is
that
going
to
be
around
the
entire
property
and
if
so,
what
impact
will
that
have
on
water,
drainage
and
then
our
other
question
would
be
regarding
how
many
stories
will
these
houses
have.
P
Actually
I
can
address
a
couple
of
them
and
then
I
would
like
to
defer
to
Paul
Skidmore
who's,
the
project
engineer
and
the
number
of
stories
we
have
elevations
included
in
the
plan.
Sats
and
they're
shown
as
one
story,
but
we
have
the
ability
to
go
to
35
feet,
that's
the
maximum
and
that's
the
same
height
as
is
allowed
in
the
zoning
around
us.
With
regard
to
traffic.
We
have
done
a
traffic
study,
it's
included
in
the
package.
Also,
it
shows
that
customer
is
actually
operating.
P
A
level
of
service
see
like
see
is
in
cat,
that's
a
grade
scale
from
A
to
F,
with
F,
obviously
being
failing
a
B
and
absolutely
perfect.
So
it's
operating
well
at
a
level
of
service
C
and
then
with
regard
to
the
barrier
wall
and
the
drainage
issue.
If
I
might
defer,
please
Paul
Skidmore
to
answer
that
question.
H
C
L
H
T
S
Addressing
the
retaining
walls,
those
are
to
be
able
to
grade
the
site
and
then
match
the
existing
grades
along
the
west
and
the
north
boundaries
without
you
know
having
to
have
steep
slopes
from
the
rear
yards.
So
the
retaining
walls
are
only
there
to
protect
the
Lots
from
draining
onto
the
adjacent
property.
X
Thank
You
mrs.
mr.
Skidmore
I'm,
sorry
I
do
have
a
follow-up
question.
This
is
Sarah
hire
again.
We
are
approximately
six
feet
below
grade
so
where
our
property
is
actually
below
the
level
of
this
new
property.
So
by
having
a
retaining
wall,
are
you
going?
How
are
you
going
to
be
directing
the
water
flow.
S
All
of
the
Lots,
the
building
pads
and
everything
will
be
directed
to
the
streets,
but
the
rear
yards
have
to
come
down
to
match
existing
grade,
and
if
we
get
steeper
than
ten
to
one
slopes,
then
the
backyards
are
unusable.
So
that's
why
we're
putting
these
retaining
walls
in
so
the
only
flow
that
will
be
coming
in
your
direction
would
be
the
rear
yards
which,
in
the
pre
developed
condition,
there's
much
more
coming
at
you.
S
Well,
presently,
there's
you
have
quite
a
bit
of
flow
coming
towards
you
to
the
north,
and
so
we
are
taking
that
flow
away
from
what's
discharging
onto
your
property
and
directing
it
to
our
stormwater
pond
in
the
southeast
corner
of
the
property.
The
retaining
wall
is
only
there
to
get
us
back
to
grade
without
having
a
steeper
slope
than
ten
to
one.
A
X
You
be
putting
fill
in
to
raise
the
yards
to
direct
the
water
in
that
direction,
because
I
do
believe
that
if
it's,
if
you're
directing
it
up
and
filling
the
backyard,
then
yes
you're
right.
That
I
can
see
what
you're
saying,
but
if
you're
not
and
you're
having
the
drainage
of
the
backyard
and
you're
not
elevating
it
up
and
the
the
water
is
going
to
run
backwards,
and
especially
right
into
our
yard.
X
A
A
Z
H
X
Z
My
question
is
this:
originally,
you
were
talking
about
fifty-one
homes
on
15.3
acres,
but
you
said
over
two
of
those
acres
are
wetlands
and
there's
going
to
be
a
50-foot
buffer
around
that
so
you're
putting
51
homes
looks
to
me
like
on
12
or
13
acres.
You
had
said
the
maximum
lot
size
was
going
to
be
69
hundred
square
feet.
Z
Z
If
you're
going
to
be
having
houses
on
69
hundred
foot
Lots.
These
are
you
know
the
it's
gonna
look
like
one
house
right
on
top
of
the
other
right
on
top
of
the
other,
and
that's
not
the
way
this
development
looks.
My
other
concern
is
this
field.
That's
going
to
be
developed,
has
many
many
very
old
big
trees
on
it.
You're
gonna
have
to
cut
down
all
those
treaties,
aren't
you
and
when
you
have
to
cut
down
all
the
trees
and
dig
up
all
the
ground
in
order
to
lay
foundations
and
stuff.
Z
AA
Z
AA
AA
Progress
is
good.
You
know,
but
I
think
that
the
city
of
Tarpon
Springs
is
looking
at
giving
in
an
awful
lot.
Akins
concessions
in
this
housing
development
project
to
get
a
few
more
tax
payers
in
the
city,
I
think
that
maybe,
if
you
cut
out
a
few
of
the
homes
that
you'd
be
able
to
get
a
little
a
little
bit
better,
looking
community.
Thank
you
for
listening
to
me
and
have
a
good
night.
Thank.
Y
Z
A
Y
AA
Y
Y
If
I
could,
before
I
transition
over
to
mr.
apini,
to
answer
the
questions,
the
objections
of
the
drove
but
seemed
to
be
directed
to
the
to
the
wavers
and
Cindy,
do
you
want
to
address
that?
There's
the
criteria
and
how
they
are
applied?
You
know
I,
guess,
question
the
waivers
to
determine
whether
or
not
the
waivers
justified.
P
Thank
you,
I
wanted
to
clarify
before
I
talk
about
the
waivers.
What
I
said
was
that
are
lots
along
the
north
edge
and
the
west
edge,
and
the
court
the
north
edge,
is
where
I
understand
the
drill
bits
to
live
on
green
leaf
Court.
Our
lot
sizes
along
that
edge
are
the
are
actually
larger
than
the
lot
size
required
by
the
zoning
district
that
their
subdivision
is
located
in.
P
The
other
question
I
wanted
to
answer
is
state
and
I
and
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
an
engineer,
but
I
have
been
around
engineers
an
awfully
long
time
and
I
understand
very
well
all
the
regulations
with
regard
to
development
in
the
state
of
Florida.
This
project,
like
every
other
project
of
development,
will
have
to
get
a
swift
mud.
Permit
it's
a
Southwest,
Florida
Water
Management
District
permit
and
should
get
that
permit.
Swift
mine
will
require.
Mr.
P
Skidmore,
to
show-
and
he
is
not
discharging
water
or
off
the
site,
so
that
is
the
protection
that
the
property
owners
have.
It's
not
just
our
word,
its
Swift
mine
as
the
regulatory
agency,
then
the
last
thing
I
wanted
arm
story
asked
me
to
touch
on
was
the
waivers
and
the
reason
the
waivers
are
there
is
because
again
and
the
our
PD
zoning
district
allows
you
to
customize
a
project
to
fit
in
the
best.
P
With
the
neighborhood
I
mean
we
have
in
our
narrative
that
we've
submitted,
we
have
shown
that
all
all
the
waivers
we've
requested
being
at
least
one
and
most
of
them
meet
two
other
criteria,
one
of
which
is
superior
alternatives.
In
other
words,
we
propose
something
that
is
better
than
on
what
the
district
is,
for
example,
on
the
sidewalk,
we're
proposing
a
six
foot
wide
sidewalk,
where
only
four
foot
is
required.
The
other
criteria
that
we
meet
on
all
the
waivers
requested
is
what
the
city
calls
deprivation
of
reasonable
use.
P
Where
you
apply
those
strict
requirements,
you
would,
it
would
prevent
you
from
getting
a
reasonable
use
of
the
land.
Well,
for
example,
apply
it
to
the
lot
size,
10,000
square
foot,
lot
sizes
the
minimum
lot
size
where
that's,
not
not
the
zoning
district
requirement
adjacent
to
the
site
and
is
definitely
not
the
predominant
category
in
the
vicinity
of
the
property.
As
I
said,
the
drill
bits
may
live
on
a
larger
lot,
but
they
are
not
the
lots
in
the
area.
P
AA
Excuse
me
you're
talking
about
lot
sizes
that
somebody
made
the
mistake
meant
before
about.
Was
there
another
development
similar
to
this,
and
it
was
compared
to
a
mobile
home
part
I.
Think
you're,
comparing
your
apples
to
oranges.
There
is
no
other
housing
development.
Even
Harbor
Oaks
does
not
have
the
houses
jammed
in
like
you're
planning
on
damming
them
in
here
on
this
line,
I've
walked
through
Harbor
Oaks.
There
took
their
clothes
but
they're.
AA
Nothing
like
what
you're
jamming
in
the
middle
of
this
development
granted
the
ones
along
the
perimeter
a
little
bit
farther
spaced
out
but
you're
putting
them
as
close
as
you
could
possibly
put
them
in
the
inside.
So
don't
say
that
there's
another
housing
development
like
that
around
here,
because
I
really
don't
think
that
they're
damned
in
that
close
like.
Z
I
said
none
of
the
houses
in
Oakley
for,
like
that
and
I
understand,
you
may
be
within
the
zoning
rules,
but
it
doesn't
III,
don't
know
any
other
way
to
say
it,
except
it
will
not
fit
back
up
that
development
is
going
to
look
really
weird
up
against
Oakley
with
teeny
tiny.
You
know
postage
stamp,
Lots
and
then
reasonable
yards
anyway.
Matt
well.
P
P
The
last
thing
I
was
just
going
to
say,
since
there
might
be
a
question
in
some
people's
mind.
Perhaps
the
the
residents
to
the
north
is
that
this
is
an
issue
of
compatibility
and
they
seem
to
be
raising
the
issue
that,
just
because
a
lot
size
is
smaller
than
their
Lots
I
said
somehow
there
it
is
incompatible.
First
way,
you
look
at
compatibility.
You
look
at
this.
P
What
is
the
yeast
on
the
property
and
the
use
on
both
our
property
is
proposed
and
the
property
is
immediately
adjacent
to
us
on
the
north
and
the
West
is
single-family
detached
homes
again
David
Weekley
Homes
is
a
national
builder.
These
homes
are
going
to
be
a
very
nicely
done
with
the
homeowners
association
to
require
the
maintenance
and
I
think
that
they
clearly
single-family
detached
homes
adjacent
to
other
single-family
detached
homes
is
a
compatible
land
use
and
again.
P
H
T
H
N
Y
You
do
this
is
a
darn
strong
again
with
respect
to
some
of
the
objections
from
the
drove
us,
it
seemed
directed
towards
the
site
plan
and
the
reason
why
I'm
noting
that
is
that's
a
quasi-judicial
component
of
your
who.
Now
you
have
some
elements
that
are
legislative,
such
as
D
annexation.
Then
you've
got
others
that
are
quasi
judicial.
Y
There
are,
we
are
requesting
waivers.
There
are
very
specific
criteria
in
your
code
that
help
you
determine
whether
the
waivers
are
justified
or
not.
The
fact
of
the
matter
is
the
Dro
buts
offered
no
compa
substantial
evidence
as
to
why
this
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
the
criteria
we
had
the
testimony
of
mr.
apini
who's.
An
expert
in
field
way
he's
planning
that
the
criteria
have
been
that.
Moreover,
we
have
the
testimony
of
your
own
planning
staff.
Y
Y
You
know
we
know
that
folks
aren't
happy.
I
would
note
the
information
that
we
have
is
that
Harbour
Oaks,
which
was
cited
as
a
wonderful
subdivision,
has
lost
their
52
by
110
and
that's
5720
square
feet,
whereas
the
minimum
loss
size
for
this
project
is
in
fact
larger
at
five
thousand
seven
hundred
and
fifty
and
again,
that's
a
minimum
lot
size.
So
again,
that's
just
that
testimony.
We
don't
believe
it
was
credible.
Y
In
our
view,
we
think
we've
met
our
burden
tonight
there
were
emails,
entered
that
were
read
into
the
record
and
I,
don't
know
if
they're
considered
evidence
or
not
at
the
city
attorney
material
pine,
that's
fine!
If
you
prefer
not
to
them,
but
okay
anyway,
we
think
we've
met
our
burden.
We
think
through
the
annexation
should
be
recommended
for
approval.
Y
H
H
We
did
have
a
brief
conversation
about
this
via
email
earlier.
That
typically
allows
for
public
comment
with
regard
to
quasi
judicial
proceedings,
even
though
public
comment
is
not
necessarily
considered
evidence,
the
emails
that
were
read
into
the
record
because
they
are
not
foreign
testimony
of
those
who
some
of
the
people
who
submitted
the
emails
and
had
that
be
part
of
the
record-
did
attend
the
meeting
this
evening
and
were
sworn
and
that
was
considered
sworn
testimony.
E
I
speak
for
a
second,
yes,
miss
Keller
said
that
dialed
back
in
and
she
was
like
to
speak.
D
L
D
R
AB
T
H
AB
We
have
kind
of
a
unique
situation:
I'm
sorry,
my
husband
Damon
and
we
are
property,
actually
a
bus
up
not
only
to
the
properties
in
question,
but
also
to
the
adjacent
property,
that's
owned
by
the
same
party
that
are
vacant
next
door.
So
we
put
up
the
purpose:
the
potential
development
land
on
Two
side,
okay,.
H
And
then
are
you
in
both
you
and
your
husband
going
to
be
speaking
this
evening,
not.
H
L
H
AB
Thank
you
so
much
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
I'm
going
to
have
a
few
points
to
make.
After
listening
to
to
all
of
all
of
everyone's
concerns
and
the
presentation
that
Miss
Hannigan,
my
number
one
topic
I
wanted
to
bring
up
was
something
that
was
raised
too,
but
I
think
the
Vice
Chair
and
in
this
chair,
honey,
is
the
Eagles
Nest.
Well,
it's
true
that
is
not
located
on
the
exact
property
in
question.
It
is,
in
fact
not
within
the
bosom
I
mean
it's
it's
within
violation,
I,
guess
a
of
the
buffer
zone.
AB
So
the
document
that
has
been
submitted
by
the
applicant,
the
centre
for
birds
of
prey
document,
mentions
that
buildings
shouldn't
occur
within
330
feet
of
the
nest
and,
while
that
may
be
true,
miss
Tara
panayo
stated
that
the
building
edge
is
actually
215
feet
away
from
the
nest.
So
that's
closer
than
the
minimum
recommendation
from
the
Audubon
Society.
The
actual
recommendation
is
660
feet.
AB
That
said,
I
just
wanted
to
add
that,
on
the
plans
for
the
site,
I
noticed
that,
on
two
of
the
South
distant
properties
that
butt
up
against
these
particular
Klosterman
property,
is
there
a
lot
number
13
and
lot
number
14.
We
are
a
lot
number
12.
That's
why
I
paid
attention
to
it
lot
number
14
south!
This
consistent
actually
looks
like
it's
going
to
be
used
for
the
sewers
sewage
easement.
AB
If
I'm
correctly,
reading
your
site
plan,
so
I
guess
my
concern
is
that
your
Center
for
Audubon
life
raids,
often
that
states
that
all
trucks
will
enter
the
work
site
from
the
back
off
of
Klosterman.
No
trucks
will
be
parked
anywhere
near
the
night
and
work
will
be
done
on
homes
which
are
behind
existing
homes.
So
I'm
not
quite
sure
how
you
plan
to
put
in
a
sewerage
easement
on
that
property,
that's
going
to
service
all
of
these
homes
and
not
park
a
truck
they're.
AB
Not
that
mentioned
the
fact
that
that
particular
lot
that
you're
using
for
your
sewage
easement,
is
about
50
feet
away
from
the
Eagle
Pass.
So
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out
and
ask
for
comment
on
that.
I
guess
another
thing
that
iseman
brought
up
a
number
of
times
is
the
number
of
units
per
acre.
I
did
some
math
and
if
you're
averaging
three
points,
three
homes
per
acre
you'd
end
up
at
max
45
homes.
It's
not
51,
so
I'm
concerned
that
the
51
is
what
you're
coming
in
as
and
and
to
be
clear.
AB
You
keep
mentioning
that
the
homes
are
sixty
nine
hundred
square
feet,
but
that's
not
actually
accurate.
Half
of
the
home
opposing
our
57-54
only
5750
square-foot
homes
that
you're
proposing
to
put
in
there.
That
is
my
definition
of
a
cramped.
Neighborhood
I
looked
at
the
plan
in
detail,
none
of
the
homes
that
but
up
against
it,
so
it
might
be
smaller
than
the
drove
it
home
of
10,000
square
feet
their
property.
AB
None
of
them
are
that
small,
not
even
a
sixty
nine
hundred
square
feet
all
over
7,000,
so
that's
inaccurate
to
say
that
they're
comparable
because
they're
not
and
the
other
thing
I
mentioned
I
her
mentioned
from
mr.
Kearney
during
her
presentation
with
that.
There's
a
commitment
and
saying
that
they
have
to
comply.
AB
You
know
with
what's
in
the
plan
and
that's
fine,
but
what
I
noticed
was
obviously
vacant
in
the
plan
was
the
size
of
the
homes
that
are
being
intended
to
be
built
and
I
did
read
in
the
plans
at
the
minimum
solicitation
1,200
square
feet
I
understand
fully
that
that
might
not
be
able
to
plan
on
sitting
there.
But
what
scares
me
is
is
that,
once
this
is
approved,
you've
got
an
approval
to
put
homes
there,
a
minimum
of
twelve
hundred
square
feet.
AB
What's
to
stop
you
from
doing
so,
and
making
that
change
without
the
neighborhood
being,
you
know
considered
or
consulted,
because
in
real
estate
this
is
a
fact.
Comparables
around
your
area
need
to
be
of
similar
size,
similar
lot
size,
solar
home
size,
similar
bedrooms,
bathrooms,
and
if
you
are
going
to
put
a
cramp
neighborhood
full
of
many
many
small
allotted
1,200
foot
square
foot
home
behind
our
homes.
That
is
not
going
to
bring
up
the
property
value,
no
matter
how
wide
sidewalks
that
you
put
in
and
no
matter
how
many
pretty
trees
your
plants.
T
Y
I
think
we've
covered
them
before
with
all
due
respect
and
we're
back
to
waivers
and
criteria
and
I
don't
want
to
be
redundant
at
this
hour.
I
don't
want
to
do
that
to
the
board,
so
I,
don't
think
there's
been
any
new
information
here
that
you
know
should
change
the
board's
analysis
very
respectfully.
So
we
have
nothing
to
add
at
this
point.
N
Iii
do
have
a
question
for
for
the
board
chair,
because
these
they're
these
applications
are
piggyback.
You
know,
are
we
we
don't
have
to
go
through
this
process.
All
for
the
next.
N
Yeah
there's,
obviously
they
have
to
Matt
items
on
the
agenda.
You
know
I
know
if
we've
sort
of
gone
through
both
these
these
things
sort
of
hand
in
hand.
So
I,
don't
know.
If
we're
going
to
be
required
or
maybe
the
attorney
can
tell
us,
we
have
to
go
through
the
process
again
with
the
reading
and
everything.
H
B
N
V
L
V
N
P
A
P
N
L
Y
F
E
R
B
I
Chairman
before
you
take
a
motion,
I
didn't
want
to
clarify
and
there
were
two
conditions
that
Athlon
modify.
That's
condition
number
three
and
condition
number
12
three.
We
would
just
like
to
strike
the
last
part
of
that
prior
to
the
final
development
plan.
Approval
I
just
requires
the
on-site
well
to
be
capped
and
then
number
12.
We
just
wanted
to
strike
for
site
work
permit.
This
would
require
the
future
land
use
amendment
prior
to
building
permitting.
N
N
N
P
N
N
F
F
N
N
You
know
giving
giving
us
a
little
bit
more
time
to
digest
all
the
information,
because
this
was
what
a
hundred
and
something
pages
of
information
and
and-
and
so
you
know,
a
lot
of
y'all
and
staff
are
real
familiar
with
some
of
the
code
and
in
the
ordinances
and
stuff
like
that.
But
every
time
I
look
at
this
stuff
is
I
sort
of
have
to
re-educate
myself
and
go
through
this
stuff.
N
B
Agree
completely:
it's
it's
a
to
have
to
take
on
in
in
one
sitting.
I
would
much
rather
see
some
sort
of
pre
review
meeting
and
then
a
final
review
meeting
on
something
as
complicated.
Is
this
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
way
to
facilitate
that,
but
I
think
it
would
get
us
all
a
better
level
of
comfort
on
some
of
these
complicated
projects
come
before
us.
N
He
get
allow
us
to
narrow
down
our
questions
and
our
thoughts
and
and
and
you
know
some
of
this
is
do
doop
doop
Lissa
T
is
what
I
do
Bob
to
do.
Publicity
people
duplication
because
going
through
some
of
this
stuff
and
and
in
allowing
us
to
narrow
down
and
be
more
precise
at
our
in
our
questions.
When
help
and
a
few
go
to
move
the
process,
a
lot
smoother
I.
G
H
Like
to
address
that
just
briefly,
and
because
you
all
don't
actually
you
all
make
recommendations
to
the
Commission,
the
boredom
you
and
I
don't
have
a
problem.
That's
why
we
said
at
the
outset.
You
can
take
these
as
three
separate
applications
and
have
them
hurt
each
individually.
That's
completely
up
to
you.
This
is
just
how
it's
been
done
in
the
past
and
just
because
it's
been
done
like
that
doesn't
mean
you
have
to
continue
to
do
it
that
way,
but
for
your
purposes,
you're,
making
recommendations
to
the
Board
of
Commissioners.
H
So
if
you
recommend
that
the
annexation
not
go
through,
you
know
and
you
recommend
the
plan
to
fund
development
do
and
then
future
land
use
do
the
Commission
ultimately
is
going
to
make
whatever
determination
they
make
based
on
the
information
that
they
have.
So
you
make
a
recommendation,
but
their
determination
may
be
different
from
yours.
So
that's
why?
If
you
say
no
to
the
annexation,
you're
still
required
to
go
through
the
other
two.
H
If
the
Commission
says
no
to
the
annexation,
the
other
two
might
fall
away,
but
because
you're,
an
advisory
board
you're
required
to
hear
all
three
so
that
you
can
make
them
a
recommendation
to
the
Board
of
Commissioners
on
all
three,
which
is
quite
what
happened
in
the
last
one.
There
were
some
that
passed
some
that
didn't
those
recommendations
all
still
went
to
the
Board
of
Commissioners
and
ultimately,
it
ended
up
fleshing
out
how
it
did
so
in
the
future.
H
Of
course,
this
board
always
has
the
ability,
if
you
don't
want
to
hear
all
of
them
together.
You
don't
have
to
we
discussed
that
earlier,
but
you
do
have
to
hear
all
three
of
them,
regardless
because
you're
an
advisory
board
to
the
Board
of
Commissioners,
because
you
are
the
local
planning
agency,
I.