![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/twWGhs4ozrc/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: Sustainability Committee March 18, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
C
D
E
F
D
B
I
F
F
Next
to
the
the
microphone
button,
there's
a
little
up
arrow
if
you
click
that
you
should
have
an
option
for
leave.
Computer
audio.
F
Yes,
on
on
the
zoom
down
in
the
bottom,
left-hand
side
is
a
microphone
button
and
we
there's
a
little
arrow
just
next
to
the
microphone
button.
You'll
click
that
and
one
of
the
options
is
leave
computer
audio.
C
A
J
B
A
B
I
A
K
B
All
right,
moving
on
to
item
number
one,
the
approval
of
the
january
21st
2001
minutes.
Can
I
get
a
motion
to
approve
that
or
a
motion
to
amend
the
minutes.
L
Dory
I'd
like
to
make
a
actually
question
and
then
make
an
amendment
if
we
need
to
on
page
three
when
the
land
land
development
code
is
abbreviated,
I
believe
further
down
it's
abbreviated
incorrectly.
The
c
and
d
are
transposed
unless
we're
talking
about
something
completely
different
on
that
portion,
not
in
the
third
paragraph,
I
believe
so.
L
B
So
then,
I'd
like
to
entertain
a
motion
to
approve
the
minutes
with
that
correction.
E
E
B
B
Alright,
thank
you
moving
on
to
our
next
item
on
the
agenda.
It
is
the
discussion
about
the
land
development
code,
looking
at
an
updated
approach
for
providing
input
and
I'm
going
to
hand
it
off
to
paul
smith
to
talk
about
that.
G
G
G
I've
spoken
with
the
planet
and
zoning
director
renee
vincent
about
an
approach
that
we
can
get
your
input
on
this
land
development
code,
comprehensive
plan,
strategic
plan
all
of
this
together
in
a
way
that
I
think
we
can
all
get
there
more
efficiently
and
what
I'm
going
to
suggest
to
you
for
your
consideration
is
to
keep
a
running
list
each
member
as
you're,
going
through
particularly
this
framework
of
areas
of
land,
development
code,
etc.
That
you
want
addressed-
and
this
can
be
as
simple
or
as
detailed
as
you
want
it
to
be
I'll.
G
Give
you
an
example
say
we're
working
through
natural
systems
and
you
come
across
wetlands,
and
you
say
you
know
what
this
is
important
to
this
community.
I
think
that
this
needs
to
be
represented
in
the
land
development
code.
You
could
just
put
it
on
your
list
as
wetlands.
If
you
want
to
get
in
more
detail
that
and
then
that
and
say
I
want
a
50
foot
buffer
around
all
wetlands,
I'm
just
giving
you
examples,
then
you
put
that
level
of
detail.
The
idea
would
be
that
you
each
have
a
running
list
at
some
point.
G
Perhaps
when
we've
worked
through
all
of
these
goal,
areas
of
the
framework
we'd
get
together
and
try
to
do
a
consensus.
Type
of
you
know
narrow
that
thing
down,
so
the
final
product
might
be
a
memorandum
from
this
committee
to
planning
zoning
city
manager
board
of
commissioners
if
you'd
like,
but
it
gives
them
your
thoughts,
your
direction,
recommendations
on
the
areas
that
need
to
be
addressed
in
the
land
development
code.
G
G
And
and
working
on,
it's
very
complicated
the
way
it's
all
put
together-
and
I
don't
know
if
it
can
be
simplified
much
more
than
it
is
just
by
the
nature
of
this
code-
evolves
with
time
chapters
get
added
taken
away.
It's
not
necessarily
in
any
logical
order.
So
those
are
my
thoughts
for
you
on
that.
H
I
have
a
question
for
paul,
so
you're
talking
about
each
of
us
looks
at
the
land
development
code
and
whatever
aligns
with
our
sustainability
action
plan
that
we
feel
needs
to
be
addressed.
We
just
keep
a
running
tab
of
all
those
things
as
we
go
through
the
land
development
code.
Is
that
correct?
That's.
G
H
Is
there
a
time
frame
or
how
quickly
we're
going
to
be
going
through
this
or
what
are
you?
What
are
we
thinking
there.
G
I
recommend
it
be
in
parallel
with
the
framework
that
the
chair,
larson
is,
is
working
through
with
you.
You
know
we're
on
a
pace
here
about
one
of
these
frameworks
per
meeting.
G
I
think
we
tried
to
push
two
in
and
I
don't
think
we're
quite
getting
that
rapid
of
a
feedback
yet
so
whatever
that
timeline
is,
it
might
be
five
to
six
months
before
we
get
through
all
this,
but
I
think
the
important
thing
is
you
all
have
already
communicated
well
with
planning
and
zoning
about
what
your
interests
are
and
that
you
want
to
be
involved,
and
they
know
that
and
this
process
for
them
is
going
to
be
taking
some
time
to
get
through.
So
I
think
it's
all
going
to
work.
J
Do
you
think
that
it
is
appropriate
to
make
suggestions
of
or
go
into
any
spec
specificity?
At
this
point,
or
just
say,
these
are
the
areas
that
I
think
we
should
attend
to.
G
G
No,
just
the
opposite:
I'm
trying
to
save
you
from
that.
What
I'm
suggesting
is
as
you're
working
through
these
frameworks-
natural
systems,
for
example-
we're
getting
ready
to
talk
about
tonight.
It
has
a
lot
of
recommended
either
actions
or
objectives
right
and,
as
you
read
these
things,
I
think
it's
going
to
give
you
ideas
and
you're
going
to
say
you
know
what
I
think
this
should
be
addressed
in
the
land
development
code,
and
maybe
it
already
is,
but
you
could
leave
that
to
staff
to
look
through
that
and
come
back
with.
A
That
that's
perfect
actually
because
I
did
start
reading
through
some
of
the
relevant
areas
of
the
land
development
code,
and
I
was
thinking
well.
How
are
we
going
to
marry
the
two
you
know
effectively
so.
K
G
B
G
If
I
may
add
to
planning
and
zoning
director
renee
vincent
she
also,
her
suggestion
to
us
is
that
we
get
back
to
focusing
on
the
sustainability
action
plan
and
she
feels
that
that
shaping
of
that
is
going
to
help
guide
the
strategic
plan,
comp
plan
and
land
development
code
as
well.
So
I
think
it
all
is
heading
in
that
direction.
G
I
also
want
to
add,
I
think,
there's
been
some
important
communication
already
from
this
committee
to
the
planning
zoning
department.
You
know
the
fact
that
they
made
that
spreadsheet,
with
all
the
green
shading,
just
the
process
of
doing
that,
forced
that
staff
to
think
about
how
sustainability
relates
to
the
land
development
codes.
I
think
it
was
a
very
important
step
already
made
before
you
put
your
first
list
together.
H
J
To
whom
do
we
direct
these
opinions,
items
etc?.
B
So
I
think
the
idea
is
that
once
we're
done
with
going
through
all
of
the
different
the
framework,
then
we
would
go
through
an
activity
where
we,
as
a
group
kind
of
prioritize
and
and
see
where
we
align
and.
J
B
G
Yes,
I'm
picturing
for
now
that
you
would
keep
your
own
list
on
whether
on
a
computer
file
or
a
piece
of
paper,
whatever
you're
comfortable
with,
and
then
when
we
reach
this
point.
As
we
get
through
the
last
of
these
seven
goal
areas,
it
would
be
time
for
us
to
get
together
as
a
group
and
figure
out
a
consensus.
K
G
B
The
in
the
framework.
I
A
And
then
hopefully
the
they
will
take
that
and
and
try
to
align
it
with
the
land
development
code
or
add
to
the
land
development
code
as
needed.
Right.
G
A
Yes,
one
more
question
is:
are
we
still
ranking
so
that
we
know
what
we're
working
on
like
what
would
be
an
agreed
priority?
Amongst
us?
We
did.
We
did
the
natural
systems
and
we
were
ranking
for
outcomes
and
for
actions,
and
we
were
trying
to
at
least
anticipate
what
we
all
feel
is
a
priority.
Are
we
still
still
going
to
pursue
that
so
that
we
know
you
know
primarily
what
we
agree,
that
we
should
be
working
on.
B
So
we're
going
to
do
we're
going
to
look
at
the
ranking
for
natural
systems
tonight
and
we're
going
to
review
that
as
a
group
and
try
to
get
consensus
on
priorities
for
for
that.
Okay.
But
then,
in
addition
to
that,
when
we're
as
you're
going
through
this-
and
you
think
like
green
infrastructure-
is
my
top
thing
that
the
city
needs
to
do.
B
B
B
I
don't
I
don't
know,
I
have
been
just
because
I've
been
trying
to
see
where
it
aligns
and
what
I'm
finding
is
like,
for
example,
like
preserving
habitat,
is
in
the
comp
plan,
but
it
may
not
be
spelled
out
with
enough
specificity
in
the
land
development
code
that
it's
maybe
having
the
desired
effect.
B
A
You
know
I'm
just
going
to
throw
this
thought
out
here,
because
it
it
seems
to
me
I
mean
we
were
we
talked
a
long
time
ago
about
the
importance
of
of
the
direction
of
the
city
having
sustainability,
just
woven
into
all
aspects
of
our.
You
know
our
goals
for
the
future.
A
There
might
not
be
a
future.
So
as
we're
as
we're
doing
this,
I
you
know,
I'm
I'm
envisioning
and
hoping
that
that's
going
to
be
the
priority
is
that
is
that
it
is
going
to
be
a
sustainability
plan
that
drives
for
sustainability
that
drives
the
comprehensive
plan
and
land
development
in.
I
am
I
off
and
and
thinking
that
that
is
not
the
goal.
B
I
don't
think
you're
off,
but
I
also
want
to
explain
and
we're
going
to
get
into
it
in
one
of
the
other
items
when
I
mentioned
the
presentation
to
the
board
of
commissioners,
but
the
city
is
also
going
to
be
doing
a
strategic
plan
process,
so
that's
where
they,
as
a
commission
and
with
staff
and
feedback
from
the
community
are
going
to
be
looking
at
the
comp
plan
and
then
prioritizing
that
with
with
action
items
attached
to
it.
B
So
my
hope
is
that
our
sustainability
action
plan
will
be
feeding
into
that
strategic
plan
process.
Strategic
cleaning
process,
which
will
kind
of
it'll
basically
set
up
a
prioritization
of
the
comp
plan,
is
my
understanding
and
correct
me
paul.
If
I'm
off
in
what
I'm
my
understanding
is.
But
that's
that's
kind
of
my
thought
is
that
we're
feeding
into
the
the
strategic
plan,
the
strategic
plan
is
going
to
be
looking
at
the
comp
plan,
land
development
code,
all
of
the
different
plans
that
the
city
has
to
kind
of
create
a
list
of
priorities.
G
I
would
agree
with
that.
I
would
also
say
I
think
we
need
to
focus
on
our
our
areas
that
we're
doing
in
our
framework
and
press
on
with
our
sap
and
not
be
too
sidetracked,
with
comp
plan
type
things.
I
think
the
idea
is
to
have
our
plan
together
so
that
it
can
be
referred
to
or
utilized
in
this
strategic
planning,
so
we're
going
to
be
working
on
this,
that's
also
going
to
be
happening
in
parallel.
I
don't
think
we
want
to
wait
to
do
anything
for
anything
to
be
fleshed
out.
G
So
I
think
that
the
good
advice
I
got
from
the
planning
director
was
you
all-
should
really
focus
on
your
sustainability
action
plan
and
get
that
out
there
as
early
as
possible,
so
that
that
all
can
be
considered
in
these
other
plans
and
keep
in
mind
it's
not
our
only
chance
ever
to
be
in
the
comp
plan
or
the
land
development
code
or
strategic
plan.
G
These
are
living
documents,
so
I
think
that
that's
the
the
direction
that
I
got
out
of
this
is
that
we
really
need
to
get
back
to
this
sustainability
action
plan
and
that
that
is
what
we're
working
on
by
the
way
when
we're
doing
these
natural
systems,
climate
and
energy.
This
is
really
all
the
sustainability
action
plan.
I
want
to
make
sure
people
understand
that
this
is
actually
going
to
work
its
way
into
chapter
5
of
our
plan.
As
we've
outlined
it
all
those
focus
areas.
K
J
Discuss
natural
systems
and
the
climate
and
energy
cautions
of
the
star
code,
I
thought
that
that
was
what
we
were
charged
with
and
after
hearing
renee
vincent's
presentation
to
us,
I
clearly
thought
we
were
being
asked
to
be
partners
in
in
writing
some
revisions
to
the
land
development
code
as
a
first
step
now
it
sounds
as
though
we're
being
told
to
stay
in
our
lane,
and
you
know
we
can
maybe
have
something
to
do
with
the
land
development
code
later
or
maybe,
a
strategic
plan
which
that's.
J
J
J
J
B
L
May
I
make
a
comment:
erin
paul,
I
I
agree
with
you
on
that.
I
do
see
how
they
go
hand
in
hand,
and
I
appreciate
that
we
are
looking
at
at
these.
I
did
kind
of
re,
refocus
and
think
to
myself
wow.
L
We
our
charge
was
really
to
write
a
sustainability
action
plan,
and-
and
so
I
I
do
think-
we
need
to
make
sure
that
that
becomes
our
focus
and
the
fact
that
paul
smith
mentions
that
all
those
documents,
whether
it's
the
land
development
code
or
the
comprehensive
plan,
strategic
planning
et
cetera,
it's
all
living
and
working
documents.
L
So
I
think
that
it
can
only
help
us
to
be
knowledgeable
about
the
areas
of
the
land
development
code,
but
I
don't
think
we're
in
a
position
to
write
or
recommend
rather
things
at
this
point,
so
going
back
to
the
very
first
item
on
this
agenda
in
kind
of
keeping
your
running
list
on
items
from
the
land
development
code
that
are
important,
I
think,
can
only
help
us
to
write
that
sustainability
action
plan,
so
they
are
going
hand
in
hand,
but
I
really
do
I
you
know.
I
really
do
think.
L
One
of
our
biggest
charges
going
when
we
first
started
this
was
to
write
a
sustainability
action
plan
and
the
sooner
we
can
kind
of
have
that
focus
I
feel
like.
Then
we
can
also
add
in
those
meat
and
potatoes
as
we're
looking
at
the
land
development
code,
and
you
know
so.
I
I
kind
of
appreciate
the
way
that
this
is
going.
I
read
that
land
development
code
and
thought
wow.
I
am
in
way
over
my
head
on
this
because
I
don't
know
what
I'm
supposed
to
be
doing
with
it.
L
J
It
started
out
as
our
our
charge
and,
as
paul
has
said
in
the
past,
our
charge
has
led
to
other
things,
developing
as
we
go
along
and
and
some
enthusiasm
for
certain
areas
and
members
of
the
staff.
Your
comments
could
be
interpreted
in
in
both
directions.
Karen,
if
you
realize
that.
L
Well,
I
do,
I
think
that
it's
important,
I
think
it's
important,
that
we
use
the
the
the
language
or
the
the
codes
that
are
already
there
or
looking
you
know
just
keeping
that
running
list.
L
I
think
it's
important,
because
I
think
it
does
run
parallel
with
what
we're
trying
to
do
writing
this
sustainability
action
plan,
but
if
we
get
so
far
away
from
actually
trying
to
write
the
sustainability
action
plan,
it's
going
to
be
five
years
before
that
comes
out.
You
know
I
feel
like
we've.
We
we
have
to
be
very
careful
not
to
go
down
too
many
of
the
rabbit
holes
that
are
pulling
us
away
from
one
of
our
main
tasks.
E
E
You
know
these
are
things
that
where
we
can
improve
and
like
saying
things
we
can
improve
on,
but
you
know
just
I've
seen
a
few
things
and
obviously
I'm
not
like
an
engineer
or
a
lawyer
or
anything
like
that,
but
I
have
spotted
a
few
things
that
I
would
like
to
see
change.
E
B
So
to
kind
of
move
us
move
us
forward.
I
think
that
we,
my
my
preference,
is
to
focus
on
the
sustainability
action
plan,
be
cognizant
of
the
fact
that
there
are
other
documents
like
the
land
development
code
and
the
comp
plan
and
each
make
that
running
list
of
priorities
and
then
be
as
specific
as
you'd
like.
B
So
if
you
would
like
to
be
really
prescriptive
about
what
your
recommendation
is,
then
make
sure
that
you're
doing
that,
and
if
you
would
just
like
to
make
a
general,
I
think
that
wetlands
need
to
be
preserved
and
I
think
that
that's
fair
as
well.
I
think
that
we
just
need
to
be
moving
forward
with
the
sustainability
action
plan,
and
you
know
using
what
the
tools
that
we
have
to
help
as
we
are
feeding
into
those
land
development
code
and
then
other
you
know,
plans
as
well
as
we're
being.
D
I'd
make
the
comment.
Okay,
I
think
just
for
the
psychology
of
the
committee.
It
would
be
good
to
get
some
things
done.
D
You
know
and
do
little
bits
at
a
time
get
it
done,
and-
and
I
agree
that
the
land
development
code
is
really
a
helpful
thing
to
read,
but
it
does
seem
as
though
we're
like
going
this
way.
D
Rather
than
focusing
and
getting
a
plan
written
and
then
once
we
have
certain
things,
written
one
can
expand
upon
them.
At
least
when
I
work
that
seems
to
help
to
have
smaller
goals
and
feel
like
I've
accomplished
something
and
then
move
on.
Instead
of
adding
tasks
and
not
feeling
like
we've
gotten
anywhere.
B
Thank
you,
okay.
So,
in
that
spirit,
moving
on
to
item
number
three
natural
systems
and
climate
and
energy,
I
would
like
to
be
able
to
get
our
priorities
set
so
that
we
can
hand
it
off
to
paul
smith
so
that
he
can
start
compiling
that
and
actually
writing
that
first
section
of
the
sustainability
action
plan
based
on
what
we've
got
so
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen
so
that
we
are
all
looking
at
the
same
thing.
C
C
F
K
K
K
E
E
B
I
think
that
that's
an
excellent
point,
and
also
what
I
noticed
on
st
pete's
plan,
is
there's
a
time
frame,
so
some
of
we're
good.
Okay,
thank
you.
So
some
of
the
items
are,
you
know
short-term
goals,
and
some
of
them
are
longer-term
goals
and
then
there's
some
that
are
intermediate.
So
I
think
that
that's
something
to
consider
and
then
also
I
just
want
to
really
reiterate
two
things.
We
don't
have
to
write
the
plan
where
it's
like,
if,
if
one
of
the
things
is
to
create
a
well,
for
example,.
B
B
I
see
that
as
a
recommendation
that
the
city
takes
up
and
then
city
staff
starts
to
work
on
the
plan
and
then
as
we're
going
on.
We
can
you
know
once
we
have
the
plan
written
then,
when
we
move
on
to
our
next
phase
of
work,
it
may
be
feeding
into
if
we
decide
to
select
a
green
infrastructure
plan,
you
know
and
giving
input
into
that.
But
I
don't
think
that
we
have
to
have
all
of
the
answers
tonight
for
what
that's
going
to
look
like
it's
just.
B
We
would
like
for
that
to
be
an
item
in
the
plan
that
and
then
I
also
before
we
get
any
further.
We
did
not
get
enough
feedback
from
enough
members
to
have
a
conversation
tonight
about
climate
and
was
it
energy
and
climate.
B
So
so
we're
just
gonna
have
this
conversation
about
natural
systems
tonight,
because
you
know,
I
don't
think
it
would
be
right
to
only
have
two
or
three
of
us
having
an
opinion
going
forward
with
with
the
rest
of
it.
So
so
that's
just
another
limiter
of
our
you
know
ability
to
get
the
plan
written
as
quickly
as
we
can.
B
Is
everybody
each
month
being
able
to
give
feedback
to
you
know
for
each
of
the
items,
so
I
I
will
kind
of
give
some
food
for
thought
about
the
climate
and
energy
piece
at
the
end,
but
just
for
it's
6
45
right
now,
so
I'm
just
trying
to
make
sure
that
we're
using
our
time
wisely
tonight
and
just
you
know,
setting
expectations.
B
So
so,
let's
start
going
through
natural
systems,
I'm
going
to
minimize
that
okay,
so
everybody
can
see
the
results
and
you
guys
all
had
the
results
that
were
provided
as
part
of
the
backup
for
tonight.
So
thank
you
to
ashley
for
getting
all
of
that
work
compiled.
B
I
printed
it
and,
like
I
said
I
kind
of
just.
I
just
took
the
items
that
had
seven
votes
and
put
that
at
the
top
and
made
a
running
list,
so
what
I
propose
is
that
we
just
go
through
each
of
them
first
or
just
go
through
the
list
first
and
then
kind
of
circle
back
and
see
what
we
might
want
to
focus
on
for
actually
adding
into
the
plan
and
then
also
keep
in
mind
that
this
is
going
to
then
require
some
community
feedback
as
well.
You
know
this.
B
B
Is
natural
systems
ii,
which
is
biodiversity
and
invasive
species?
And
so
the.
B
Community
level
outcomes
for
natural
systems
number
two
is
habitat
conservation
and
connectivity,
so
achieve
no
net
loss
of
habitat
areas
for
threatened
species
or
increase
the
connectivity
between
habitats
needed
for
threatened
species.
All
seven
of
us
said
that
that
is
one
of
the
outcomes
that
the
outcome
that
we
would
like
to
prioritize
most
then.
The
next
item
is
natural
systems,
one
which
is
looking
at
green
infrastructure
outcome
number
one
green
storm
water
infrastructure,
and
I
think
that
probably
that's
because
a
lot
of
us
are
concerned
with
the
flooding
so
option
a
is
demonstrate.
B
So
I
think
we
need
to
have
a
conversation
about
a
or
b,
if,
if
I'm
reading
that
correctly,
that
we
would
want
to
focus
on
one
or
the
other
or
thoughts
about
that.
A
J
It's
interesting
that
saint
pete
in
in
their
isap
shows
outcome
number
two
rather
than
outcome
number
one,
but
if
you
think
about
the
density
of
the
population
in
a
city
the
size
of
saint
pete,
that
makes
more
sense,
whereas
with
our
city
I
think
outcome
number
one
makes
more
sense
for
us,
but
I
don't
know
that
we
need
to
to
decide
option
a
versus
option
b.
Do
you.
G
B
Yeah,
okay,
so
I'm
going
to
denote
that
the
next
item
is
natural
systems
number
three
and
there
is
a.
Could
you.
B
I
to
me,
because
I
don't
think
that
we're
anywhere
near,
like
some
cities,
are
very
heavily
built
out
and
have
a
whole
lot
of
impervious
surfaces.
I
don't
think
that
our
city
is
anywhere
near.
B
D
And
do
you
think
we
meet
option
a
this?
Is
this
demonstrate
that
brother,
if
we.
B
B
H
H
D
B
B
H
You
know
it's
the
same
thing
as
far
as
the
baseline,
with
option
b.
I
don't
know
if
we
have
any
not
in
I
mean
I
guess
we
have
some
parking
lots
and
things
like
the
gravel
parking
lot
that
are
perfect,
not
impervious
surfaces.
H
G
G
So
the
reason
I
would
hesitate
to
make
the
option
be.
The
goal
is
that
now
you're
talking
about
changing
existing
development,
roads
infrastructure
to
possibly
reduce
that
number?
G
As
far
as
the
number
itself,
I'd
like
to
remind
everybody,
this
framework
was
based
on
four
years
of
work
with,
I
think
50
different
local
governments
that
implemented
it,
and
there
was
a
whole
team
of
people
that
worked
on
these
numbers.
So
I
think
these
aren't
arbitrary
these
percentages.
I
think
these
are
based
on
achievable
standards
for
cities
across
the
country,
so
they're
really
benchmarks.
G
G
I,
like
that
type
of
metric,
let's
utilize
the
recommended
number
for
now,
that's
going
to
drive
us
towards
starting
to
do
these
baselines
and
see
where
we
stand,
that
step
itself
is
very
important
and
then,
as
we
gain
more
knowledge
and
with
time
we
can
adjust
these
numbers
to
match
what
would
best
meet
our
needs.
J
I
A
Well,
let's
look
into
that
because
I
one
of
the
things
that
comes
to
mind
as
we're
reading
all
of
the
material
is,
we
can
have
a
influence
or
in
the
decisions
that
the
city
makes
on
for
city
property,
but
until
we
get
the
public
engaged
we're
not
going
to
be.
I
love
the
ecological
literacy.
A
We
can't
really
tell
people
what
they
can
do
with
their
own
property.
I
mean
we
can
start
to
educate.
You
know
the
the
reasons
and
the
value
of
in
making
particular
improvements,
but
the
only
thing
I
think
initially
that
there's
any
control
or
influence
over
is
what
the
city
owns
and
what
city
cares
for
that's
a
good
point,
denise,
and
so
I'm
kind
of
waiting
to
think
about.
A
You
know
how
how
we
can
present
and
and
invite
people
to
participate
in
the
vision
that
we
have
for
the
city,
because
I
think
a
lot
of
people
will
really
will
really
grasp
it
and
embrace
it,
but
that's
a
lot
inviting
them
to
do
that.
It's
a
whole
lot
better
than
than
mandating
business
is.
My
you
know,
is
a
big
concern.
I
think,
because
I
think
that
they
have
a
lot
of
influence
in
the
city
and
a
lot
of
manufacture,
a
lot
of
waste
and
the
biggest
parking
lots
are
probably
business
parking
lot.
A
So
that
is
that's
it's
still
private,
and
yet
that's
those
are
partners
that
I
really
hope
that
we
can
get
as
champions
in
this
vision
that
we
have
down
the
road.
A
But
at
this
point
I
think
all
we're
going
to
be
able
to
think
about
is
what
we
will
actually
be
able
to
make
recommendations
on
that.
We
have
some
control
over
through
the
city,
rewriting
the
code
or
or
modifying
the
code
and
working
on
the
grand
vision
within
properties
that
are
actually
influenced
by
the
government.
Here.
J
It's
interesting
that
by
action
items
six
and
seven,
you
know
and
kind
of
speak
to
what
you
just
said:
denise,
and
yet
they
were
at
the
bottom
of
the
list.
H
H
Seattle-
and
you
know,
seattle
and
portland
are
known
the
culture.
That's
of
those
cities
are
very
strong
and
people
know
what's
what's
how
they're
expected
to
contribute
and
participate
and
so
forth.
I
think
we're
in
the
very
very
early
stages
of
that,
so
I
think
your
your
idea
to
invite
people
to
participate
as
we
create.
H
D
I
do
think,
though,
if
so,
for
example,
if
the
city
took
on
the
policy
of,
if
they
built
a
parking
lot
or
something,
they
use,
that
material
that
water
seeps
through.
I
D
If
they
could
then
have
it
so
that
they
could
make
that
material
available
to
businesses
and
private
people
at
a
good
cost,
then
you
know
if
they
bought
lots
of
it
in
bulk
and
the
people
could
buy
it
then
from
the
city,
and
it
would
be
cost
effective
for
them
to
put
that
in
rather
than
to
put
the
other
things
in
and
then
they
meet
the
environmental
goal.
So
those
sort
of
private
public
things
you
know,
projects
can
work
here
and
so
that's
a
way
of
approaching
it.
D
So
it's
a
project
that
just
hasn't
has
the
incentives
built
in
but
can
reach
people
cost
effectively
again.
I
think
that
that
cost-effective
things
are
very,
very
important.
So
if
we
can
make
things
affordable
for
people
and
they're
and
they're
good
for
the
environment
and
the
city,
then
it's
a
win-win
situation.
B
B
Is
water
in
the
environment
and
that
received
five
votes
outcome
number
one.
So
watershed
health
index
demonstrate
a
local
watershed,
health
index
greater
or
equal
to
70,
or
demonstrate
that
the
water
withdrawn
from
the
system
for
human
use
does
not
exceed
the
amount
of
fresh
water
entering
the
system
through
precipitation,
river
flow
and
other
sources.
B
So
just
for
item
number
one
there's
a
option
a
or
b
and
I'm
not
sure
that
we
have
a
need
for,
like
the
watershed
health
to
be
really
scrutinized.
I
think
that
the
city
is
is
doing
that
with
our
wells,
but
I
would
like
to
ensure
that
the
water
that
we're
pumping
out
is
not
greater
than
what's
being
replenished
so
that
we're
staying
sustainable
with
with
future
water
needs.
So
my
my
preference
would
be
option
b
on
that
discussion.
H
B
The
next
item
with
five
votes
is
natural
systems,
three,
so
going
back
to
natural
resource
protection.
So
obviously
that's
weighing
on
us
goal
outcome
number
four.
B
Is
restoration
so
that,
like
I
said,
received
five
votes
as
well?
So
there's
two
options:
there
reduce
the
difference
between
the
actual
acreage
restored
and
targeted
acreage
established
in
the
natural
systems
plan
or
land
conservation
plan
or
b
restore
degraded,
natural
resource
areas
at
a
ratio
greater
than
one
percent
of
developed
land
area
and
the
jurisdiction.
J
B
H
And
what
would
that
mean
in
real
time
a
ratio
greater
than
one
percent
of
developed
land
area?
What
is
that
equal
to
of
our
total
land
area?
It's
like
it's
hard
for
me
to
know
the
scope
that
what
we're
talking
about,
but
I
know
that
the
numbers
have
been
vetted,
and
this
is
what
people
say,
but
it
would
be
helpful
for
me
to
know
what
that
means
in
tarpon
springs.
A
B
And
then
moving
on
with
four
votes
natural
systems,
one
so
we're
going
back
to
green
infrastructure
outcome
number
two
demonstrate
85
of
the
population
lives
within
a
third
mile
distance
from
green
infrastructure
features
that
provide
localized
cooling
through
a
tree
canopy
or
vegetative
surfaces.
B
B
The
next
one
is
natural
systems.
Three,
so
I'm
scrolling
back
down
to
natural
resource
protection
outcome.
Number
three
is
connectivity
so
that
received
four
votes
as
well,
so
increase
the
amount
of
natural
or
restored
areas
directly
connected
to
regional
natural
systems
in
order
to
improve
ecological
service
or
ecosystem
services.
B
And
then
the
last
item
that
received
four
votes
is
natural
systems.
Four,
so
I'm
not
sure
everybody's
thoughts
on
this
outdoor
air
quality.
Looking
at
that
entire.
B
Objective
area
only
received
four
votes
as
well
as
working
lands
only
received.
I
think
two
votes,
my
inclination,
I
mean
I
don't
know
that
tarpon
has
I've,
I
mean
from.
I
have
some
cursory
understanding
and
I
don't
think
that
we
have
particularly
bad
air
quality
compared
to
the
rest
of
the
country
or
contest
compared
to
the
rest
of
the
region.
B
So
my
my
preference
would
be
to
not
include
a
a
goal
for
outdoor
air
quality
or
for
working
lands.
I
wanted
to
throw
that
out
there
and
see
what
you
guys
thought
of
that.
J
I
I
don't
know
the
answer
to
your
question
regarding
the
quality
of
the
air
in
tarpon
springs.
I
would
love
to
see
that
I
will
tell
you
from
the
perspective
of
public
health,
that
outdoor
air
quality
is
the
greatest
concern
right
now
among
a
majority
of
specialists
in
medicine,
because
that
is
the
area
that
we
see
the
greatest
impact
from
climate
change
on
human
health
right
now.
H
G
D
We
also
know
that
air
quality
varies
in
different
parts
of
the
city,
so
we
know
that
in
often
times
in
low-income
areas,
where
there's
manufacturing
or
anything
like
that,
the
air
quality
is
worse.
We
know
that
that
population
also
has
often
has
higher
asthma,
and
things
like
that,
so
one
would
have
to
look
at
the
city.
D
You
know
different
parts
of
the
city
to
address
this
issue
of
air
quality,
and
I
agree
with
you
that
that
is
a
major
issue
in
climate
change,
that
the
quality
is
bad
and
we
know
that
if
the
quality
could
be
improved,
things
like
asthma
would
go
away
or
at
least
be
minimized.
So
I
think
it'd
be
good
to
find
out
those
those
statistics.
B
So,
let's
put
a
pin
in
this
one
as
well
ask
staff
if
they
could
do
some
research
on
where
we
are
with
for
outcome
number,
one:
it's
concentration
and
emissions
of
criteria,
air
pollutants,
so
it's
real
specific
nox
and
sulfur
dioxide
levels,
particulate
of
certain
sizes.
So
it's
it's!
B
It's
not
just
air
quality.
It's
looking
at
specific
these
criteria,
air
pollutants
and
see
if
we're
in
attainment,
I
would
suspect
we
are
based
on
the
knowledge
that
I
have
looking
at
that
kind
of
data
with,
with
dep
in
the
state.
B
D
To
fry,
but
wouldn't
people
who
live
or
businesses
that
are
near
19
have
less
air
quality
than
let's
say
myself,
who
lives
in
a
bayou
I
mean
my
air
quality
is
probably
a
lot
better
than
that.
So
how
do
you
make
those
generalizations.
B
Well,
I
don't
know
that
they
have
data
at
the
the
level
of
granularity
that
you're
wanting
specificity
for,
like
I
don't
even
know
if
that
data
is
being
collected
by
any
agency.
So-
and
I
also
my
understanding
of
just
the
geography-
is
that
we're
not?
We
don't
have
a
valley
where
that
air
is
being
held
in
a
bowl,
that,
as
the
sea
breeze
blows
even
along
19,
which
I
suspect
you're
correct,
but
those
levels
are
higher
along
19.
B
A
And
so
there
were,
there
was
definite
motivation
to
change
that.
I
think
that
when
you
live
in
such
a
small
area
where
there
is
not
a
lot
of
industry
that
causes
pollution,
it's
a
different
perspective
altogether,
but
it
would
be
nice
just
to
get
the
baseline
on
what
our
air
quality
is
like.
If
it's
something
that
we
can
brag
about,
that's
great
right.
J
G
G
B
B
No,
it's
it's!
We
didn't
have
any
priorities
in
working
lands
because
only
two
people.
A
B
And
based
on
that,
there
are
still
two
okay,
so
I
don't
you
know,
I
don't
think
we
need
to
really
address
that.
So
then
that
would
leave
us
with
one
two,
three,
four,
five,
six,
seven
8.
If
we
include
the
the
outdoor
air
quality
or
7,
without
which
I
think
is
a
great
start,
we've
got
some
outcomes
that
we've
agreed
upon.
B
So
now
the
the
local
actions
are
kind
of
how
to
implement
the
outcomes
or
how
to
get
what
are
the
the
nitty
gritty
steps
to
get
to
those
outcomes.
So
this
is
where
it's
going
to
be
a
little
tricky,
because
when
you
look,
I
think
I'm
going
to
go
through
it.
This
way,
starting
with
natural
systems,
one
just
because
they're
together
and
we'll
go
through
one,
two,
three,
four
five
but
like
I
said
there
are
20.
B
I
think
I
added
up
local
actions
and
I
think
we
need
to
get
that
down
closer
to
10.
realistically,
so
the
first
one
natural
systems,
one,
let
me
go
back
up
so
that
we're
all
on
the
same
page
oops
went
too
far.
B
Nine
actions
that
could
be
taken
and
the
ones
with
the
highest
votes
are
action,
one
which
is
assess
the
state
of
the
jurisdiction's
urban
forest
action.
Two
create
a
community-wide
green
infrastructure
plan
that
is
integrated
with
other
relevant
local
plans
and
item
number
or
action
number
four,
which
is
include
evaluation
of
green
infrastructure
potential
during
early
site
reviews
of
proposed
developments
and
subdivisions.
B
So
that
goes
to,
I
think,
denise.
What
you're
saying
wanting
to
have
like
impervious
roadways
or
parking
lots
all
of
those
kind
of
things
and,
like
I
said
it's
not
for
us
to
necessarily
have
to
identify
what
those
what
the
wording
of
those
codes
would
be.
But
certainly,
if
that's
a
you
know-
and
it
is
six
of
us
agreed
to
that-
this
is
a
priority-
maybe
start
to
plan
some
feedback
of
what
you'd,
like
in
the
land
development
code,
how
you
would
want
to
improve
that
so
that
we
would
have
more.
B
You
know
it
would
help
meet
the
goal
which
is
having
that
35
right
being
having
green
infrastructure.
B
So
I
think
that
all
five
of
those
should
remain
for
now
and
then
let's
go
on
to
natural
systems.
Excuse
me
what
was
what
was
the
action
item
number
eight?
Oh
I'm
sorry,
action
item
number
eight
is
dedicate
a
percentage
of
funding
invested
in
green
infrastructure.
J
J
If
you
look
at
action
six,
it's
exactly
what
carol
was
talking
about,
creating
incentives
to
encourage
landowners
to
adopt
green
infrastructure
practices?
She
was,
I
mean,
that's
exactly
what
she
said
that
came
in
dead
last,
but
in
light
of
what
she
just
suggested,
I
would
put
it
more
near
the
top
of
the
list.
I
B
D
B
Okay,
so
for
natural
systems,
two
receiving
seven
votes
is
one
two
and
nine
so
action.
One
under
ns2
is
biodiversity
and
invasive
species,
action
plan
or
action.
Local
action
one
is
to
create
a
plan
for
management
of
local
species
that
minimizes
damage
from
invasive
species
and
enhances
biodiversity
and
ecosystem
services.
B
So
this
is
what
I
was
talking
about,
where
that's
that's,
a
big
undertaking
to
to
create
a
plan
of
management
for
local
species.
B
Also,
item
number
two
is
received,
seven
votes
and
that
is
under
policy
and
code
adjustment
adopt
or
enforce
an
ordinance
requiring
control
of
listed
priority
invasive
species,
or
an
act
of
preferred
plant
ordinance
for
private
and
public
landscaping.
My
understanding
is
that
we
actually
already
have
that.
B
So
I
don't
know
that
that
that's
part
of
the
land
development
code
update
is
that
they
are
reviewing
the
plants
that
are
on
the
invasive
list
and
also
reviewing
plants
that
we
want
to
include
on
the
preferred
plant
list.
So.
H
B
B
B
F
B
And
then
actually
you're
right,
local
action.
Nine
is
facility
and
infrastructure
improvements
ensure
that
all
local
government-owned
buildings
use,
native
and
or
sustainable
and
site-appropriate
species
in
landscaping.
B
So
that's
something
like
going
back
to
what
the
city
can
control
and
not
have
to
have.
You
know.
That's
not
a
heavy
lift
either,
because
the
city
can
manage
that.
My
own
so
like
where
I'm
at
with
this
is,
is
number
one.
I
I
I'm
thinking
that
that
may
be.
B
Well,
I
guess
I'll
just
put
a
pin
in
it
and
just
because,
as
we're
looking
through
creating
a
plan,
this
is
one
of
the
ones
that
we're
asking
for
four
plants
to
be
created
here
with
this.
Just
in
this
one
item
or
when
this
one
natural
systems,
so
I
would
like
to
maybe
reconsider
keeping
what
that
one
on.
D
D
The
thing
is
is
the
way
this
is
written,
it's
like
it's
that
it
makes
it
sound
like
it's
discrete.
Well,
one
of
the
things
about
using
native
plants.
Is
it
saves
water
right?
You
don't
really
have
to
irrigate
right
and
somehow
it
would
be
really
good
to
have
a
plan
that
sort
of
shows
the
relationship
between
it
that
there's
a
network,
an
echo
system
or
whatever,
instead
of
this
alert,
they're
just
discrete
items.
K
B
B
Of
course
it's
not
going
to
put
me
right
back
on
the
page
that
I
was
on,
but
here
let
me
just
get
to
the
first.
It's
got
a
crosswalk.
B
D
D
Like
it's
a
matrix
rather
than
a
scrape-
and
I
think
that's
really
important,
because
when
you
read
these
things,
it's
it
doesn't
make
much
sense.
We
have
to
show
how
everything's
connected
and
why
one
thing
leads
to
another
one:
thing's
important
to
the
other
yep.
K
B
Perfect,
okay,
so
moving
on
to
natural
systems,
three
natural
resource
protection,
local
actions
that
received
seven
votes
were
items
one
two
and
five
so
item.
One
is
planned
development
again,
develop
a
plan
to
protect
and
restore
natural
resources
through
land
conservation,
corridor,
connectivity
and
restoration
of
biological
integrity
and
function.
B
That's
another
big
plan
that
we
would
be
asking
for
so
just
keep
that
in
the
back.
Your
eye
item
number
two
that
receives
seven
votes,
is
action;
action,
two
policy
and
code
enforcement,
adopt
land
use,
regulations
that
establish
appropriate
wetland
stream
and
shoreline
buffer
widths
and
adjacent
land
uses.
So
again
we
have
that
in
the
land
development
code.
B
I
would
like
to
see
those
buffers
getting
bigger
mm-hmm
and
I
and
obviously
we
all
do
because
we
got.
D
B
Right
and
that's
part
of
that,
I
sent
around
that
one
document:
that's
from
epa,
it's
like
a
federal
guidelines
for
planners
and
it
has,
and
it
has
some
outline
guidelines
and
then
I
also
looked
at
alachua
county.
I
think
I
shared
that
resource
as
well
and
they've
just
got
much
wider
buffers,
so
I
think
that
we
should
you
know
we
should
be
setting
model
policy.
For
I
mean
we
live
on
a
bayou
system,
we're
flooding,
we
have
daytime
flooding.
B
B
Okay
and
then
item
number
five
education
and
outreach
sponsor
activities
to
increase
ecological
literacy
and
knowledge
about
natural
resource
protection.
So
that's
what
I
was
referring
to
so
there's
that
and
then
we
have
it
in
natural
systems,
five
for
the
water
quality,
so
I
think
we
could
lump
those
together
and
just
say,
increase
ecological
literacy
and
list
all
of
the
different
items
that
we
want
to
create
an
educational
plan
around
okay.
The
next
item
is
natural
systems.
Three
still
staying
with
natural
systems.
B
Three,
these
received
six
votes,
each
and
they're
items,
seven
and
eight
so
action
item.
Seven.
Is
enforcement
and
incentives
implement
local
and
market-based
financing
strategies
to
acquire
land
or
development,
easements
or
fund
restoration
and
maintenance
activities
and
then
item
action
item
eight
is
facility
and
infrastructure
improvements,
restore
maintain
and
monitor,
conserve
natural
lands
to
increase
natural
resource
resilience
at
adaptability
and
biological
integrity.
B
Natural
systems,
three
okay
items,
number
action:
item:
seven
and
eight:
each
received
six
votes.
D
So
a
city
is
going
to
want
there
to
be
development.
D
I
take
it
and
but
if
you
have
and
that,
if
you
have
buffers
that
are
so
big
that
they
prevent
development,
so
I'm
thinking
of
you
know
certain
developments
on
private
land,
where
you
know
someone
owns
a
piece
of
land
and
they
want
to
develop
it,
but
they
can't
now
because
there's
all
these
buffers,
so
how
I
guess
I
want
to
know
how
these
these
things
that
we're
suggesting-
which
I
think
are
wonderful,
inter
interact
with
issues
of
development,
and
you
know,
economic
development.
D
B
I
mean,
I
think
it's
it's
all
connected,
because
part
of
sustainability
is
that
economic
viability
of
the
city
as
well,
but
I
I
guess
my
way
of
thinking
is
we
can
just
propose
what
we
feel
comfortable
with
and
they
can
do
with
it.
These
are
just
recommendations.
It's
not
like
we're
proving
anything
anyway.
H
Well,
and
that
already
exists
with
you-
know:
utility
easements
and
setbacks,
and
I
mean
you
know
it.
That
already
is
in
there
to
some
degree
already
and
in
other
words,
if
you
want
to
develop
all
of
your
property,
but
you
have
a
utility
easement
of
40
feet.
You
just
can't
do
it,
it's
not
like.
Well,
that's
my
right
to
do
it.
It's
what
the
the
code
of
the
city
says
you
can
and
can't
do.
H
So.
That's
that's
where
you
know
this.
I
don't
know
how
much
push
back
there
would
be
or
not,
but
I
don't
know
I
guess
we
have
to
wait
and
see
see
what
we
suggest
and.
G
G
I
would
recommend
that
this
group
come
through
with
the
most
reasonable,
defensible
recommendations
that
you
can
and
if
you
don't
feel
comfortable
getting
into
that
detail,
that's
what
I
said
before
you
just
say:
I'd
like
the
wetland
buffers
to
be
revisited
in
the
land
development
code
and
leave
it
at
that.
So,
but
yes,
I
think
there
is
going
to
be
a
balancing
act
between
property
rights
and
protecting
the
environment.
There
always
has
been.
There
always
will
be,
and
I
think
the
right
answer
will
be
a
balance
that
works
for
everyone.
A
And
there
might
be
varying
degrees
as
well
for
setting
standards
for
new
development
versus
grant,
grandfathering
old
ways
or
properties
that
exist.
I
mean
historical
properties.
Let's
say
it's
not
going
to
make
a
lot
of
changes
for
the
properties
as
much
as
let's,
let's
look
at
what
can
be
changed.
Anything
that's
being
developed
now
being
built
now
need
you
know,
definitely
take
into
consideration
the
optimal
path,
but
there's
got
to
be
some
forgiveness
on
historical
properties
and
things
that
have
been
here
for
a
long
time
that
have
functioned
okay.
A
Yes,
they
may
have
times
of
the
year
where
there's
that
lack
of
buffer
is
going
to
affect
them
greatly.
But
you
know
it
might
not
be
something
that's
within
our
control.
We
can
only
make
recommendations
for
new
development,
I
think
and
and
then
invite
people
to
participate
in
as
much
as
they
can
to
protect
property
through
their
what
they're
doing
their
own
land.
I
H
H
So
that's
that
that
balancing
act,
but
someone
who
comes
in
no
our
water
table
can't
sustain
this.
We
can't
have
every
person
a
homeowner
dig
their
own.
Well,
it's
not
going
to
work
so,
as
as
part
of
you
know
where
we're
trying
to
land
is
somewhere.
That
makes
sense
for
the
long-term
future
too,
as
we
know
that
sea
level
is
rising
and
you
know
we're
going
to
we're
kind
of
looking
down
the
road.
I
H
Seeing
what
what's
you
know
signs
might
be
ahead
and
trying
to
at
least
provide
cautionary
guidance
to
that
and
input?
At
some
point
it
might
be
just
the
way
it
is.
I
mean
people
might
say
yes,
yes,
I've
had
this
property.
I'd
wanted
to
do
x,
y
and
z
with
it
for
30
years,
but
guess
what
you
can't,
because
the
water's
up
too
high
now
you
know
I
mean
it's
going
to
get
to
that
point,
but
we're
we're.
I
mean
we're
in
the
early
phases
of
that,
but
at
some
point
it
will
be.
H
J
To
give
you
a
very
personal
example,
I
built
a
trellis.
J
You
know
at
the
edge
of
my
property
between
mine
and
my
next
door
neighbors
and
tried
to
get
some
vines
to
grow.
These
various
kinds
of
native
florida
vines
to
grow
on
my
trellis
and
everything
died.
J
Even
though
I
used
people
from
wilcox
who
who
know
I
should
know
you
know,
what's
going
to
survive
and
come
to
find
out,
my
neighbor
has
had
salt
intrusion
into
the
well,
that
is
on
his
property
that
he
uses
for
irrigation.
That's
been
there
for
decades.
His
grandfather
in
law
dug
the
well
he's,
got
salt
intrusion
into
the
well
he's
killing
his
plants
and
killing
my
vines.
J
B
Paul
so
we're
at
7,
37
and
I'd
like
to
try
to
get
through
natural
systems
tonight,
okay
and
get
through
the
presentation
so
move
us
along.
Okay.
Naturals
is
the
next
item
so,
like
I
said,
some
of
these
are
six
and
some
of
their
seven,
because
I'm
just
going
through
an
order
this
this
time
natural
systems,
four
is
the
outdoor
air
quality
and
the
only
action
item
in
this
that
received
six
or
seven
votes
is
action.
Item
number
five,
which
is
enforce
anti-idling
regulations
or
burning
restrictions.
B
D
No,
they
don't
burn
trash,
but
they
burn
like
fire
pit.
No,
they
well.
They
some
do
that,
but
they
burn
you
know
stuff.
They
cut.
Sometimes
I
mean.
G
B
I
mean
the
anti-idling
we
can,
but
I
think
the
city
already
has
an
anti-idling
policy
in
place
for
staff
vehicles
while
there
so
I
mean-
maybe
some
education
around
that.
But
my
inclination
would
be
to
to
not
include
this
item,
I'm
just
going
to
throw
that
out
there
and
also
putting
a
pin
in
the
fact
that
we
were
going
to
go
back
and
look
and
see
if
we're
going
to
include
an
outcome
from
item
number
four
about
air
quality
anyway.
So
maybe
just
hold
on
that.
Okay,.
K
B
B
B
B
So,
let's
look
at
those
natural
systems.
Five
is
the
water
again,
one
is
conduct
a
watershed.
Health
and
vulnerability,
assessment
of
local
waterways.
B
B
G
B
B
Number
seven
is
engage
in
restoring
and
maintaining
critical
water
bodies
and
the
buffer
zones
that
protect
those
water
bodies,
which
I
think
works
kind
of
what
we're
doing
with
the
creating
the
buffers
along
the
waterways
and
then
eight
is
routinely
inventory
and
monitor
natural
water
bodies
for
biological,
chemical
and
hydrological
integrity.
Oh.
D
G
G
B
So
if
we
include
all
of
the
items,
besides
the
ones
that
we've
kind
of
put
a
pin
in
in
terms
of
like
the
plans-
which
is
there
a
plan
that
we,
when
I
say
plan,
I'm
talking
about
action
item
number
one
on
a
lot
of
these,
that
say
like
conduct
a
plan
or
create
a
plan
that
we
may
look
at
keeping
in
or
leaving
out.
B
My
preference
is
for
natural
systems,
one
where
it
says
green
infrastructure
assess.
I
guess
the
second
one
create
a
community-wide
green
infrastructure
plan,
that's
integrated
with
other
relevant
local
plans.
B
That
would
be
my
plan
that
I
would
prefer
to
keep
in
if
we're
going
to
keep
one
of
the
four
the
the
second
major
plan
or
the
that
requires.
A
lot
of
action
is
in
natural
systems.
B
D
D
So
because
going
back
and
forth
like
this
sure,
I
can't
see
it
but
it'd
be
good
to
see
if
we
have
a
plan
and
which
are
the
big
items
and
which
are
the
smaller
items
and
because
I,
for
me,
the
discussion
we've
been
having
is
very
helpful
sure
in
terms
of
seeing
what
the
priorities
should
be
and
and
we
can
also
see
how
they're
interconnected
and
what
what
ones
we
may
want
to
eliminate
or
combine.
D
And
think
about
costs
and
how
big
a
plan
it
is,
but
I
think
looking
at
it
together
would
help
okay.
B
Thoughts
on
that,
are
we
okay
with
that?
Okay,
so
I've
taken
some
notes
I'll
share,
I'm
sure
that
ashley
and
paul
have
been
taking
good
notes
over
there
to
get
to
y'all
the
whittle
down
list
and
then
maybe
what
we
still
kind
of
want
to
talk
through
for
next
time.
But
at
least
we've
got
pretty
much
natural
systems
done.
K
B
G
G
It's
really
going
to
be
this.
These
items
we're
working
on
tonight,
they'll
actually
show
up
in
that
section
of
the
plan
almost
verbatim
to
what
we're
talking
about
now.
So
that's
the
good
part
is.
This
is
a
lot
of
heavy
lifting
now,
but
the
payoff
is.
We
don't
have
to
come
up
with
brand
new
language
for
our
focus
areas,
it's
already
been
developed
and
it's
based
on
a
workable
working
demonstrated
system
so
talking
with
dory
she
suggested.
G
Perhaps
we
do
the
first
focus
area
of
the
report
just
to
show
you
all
what
it's
going
to
look
like,
so
you
can
kind
of
see
this
gets
back
to
dr
mickett's
suggestion.
Let's
take
some
small
steps
of
success
to
help
motivate
us,
so
I
think
dory's
guided
us
through
getting
a
lot
done
tonight
on
natural
systems.
So
I
recommend
that
that's
what
we'll
do
we'll
take
this
natural
systems
with
these
outcomes
and
actions
that
have
been
slimmed
down
and
list
these
and
show
you
how
it
would
look
in
the
plan.
G
B
K
B
Okay,
so
our
next
item
is
the
presentation
to
the
board
of
commissioners,
so
I
started
this
past
month,
putting
together
a
presentation
that
was
part
of
the
backup.
B
J
B
Between
paul
and
I
hopefully
we've
got
enough
to
be
able
to
to
answer
that,
so
I'm
gonna
share
my
screen
again,
so
that
we
can
just
look
at
it
together:
okay,
so
the
we're
starting
off,
similarly
to
what
we
did
last
year
with
just
explaining
who
the
committee
members
are
and
how
kovid
kind
of
interrupted
our
work,
but
that
we're
back
at
it
and
that
we
meet
monthly
and
then
start
talking
about
the
work
that
we
have
finished
to
date.
B
So
we've
got
the
sustainability
webpage
that
has
all
of
the
additions
to
it
and
then
the
bang,
the
table
that
they,
you
know
are
aware
of.
We
also
have
started
working
on
our
action
plan,
so
we're
going
to
share
that
with
them.
Oh,
that
was
one
other
thing
paul.
We
talked
about
also
that
introduction
and
trying
to
rework.
That
is
that
something
that
you
think,
maybe
by
next
month
or
not
yet.
L
G
And
this
is
something
that's,
hopefully
not
surprising
to
everyone,
but
I
think
we've
developed
a
great
deal
of
knowledge
in
the
last
six
months.
G
I
think
we
drafted
that
about
six
months
ago,
and
so
I
really
think
we're
going
to
want
to
make
that
introduction
match
up
more
with
the
focus
areas
that
we
end
up
with.
So
it's
probably
going
to
have
more
star
references
because
back
when
we
wrote
that
we
didn't
really
have
a
framework.
Yet
I
think
the
good
news
is
a
lot
of
those
areas.
If
you
remember
it
was
like
sea
level
rise,
shorelines
heat
index,
heat
islands,
public
health-
I
mean
all
these
areas
are
still
in
the
star
framework.
G
So
it's
not
like
that's
all
going
to
be
lost,
but
I
think
it's
going
to
be
reorganized
so
short
answer.
I
don't
think
I'll
be
quite
ready
to
give
you
a
new
section,
one
yet.
Okay,
I'd
say:
let's
focus
on
the
section:
five,
how
that's
gonna
look
and
usually
when
I
write
reports,
you
you
kind
of
work
on
the
meat
part,
and
then
you
end
up
working
on
the
introduction
executive
summary
last
because
it
really
needs
to
guide
you
towards
the
main
part
of
the
report.
B
B
So,
okay,
so
back
to
back
to
this
so
again
explaining
the
idea
of
what
a
sustainability
action
plan
is,
I'm
not
sure
if
all
of
the
commissioners
are
on
that
were
there
last
year,
but
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
doing
that
ongoing
education
and
then
explain
the
framework
and
what
it
is,
how
we're
using
it.
How
it's
you
know
a
guiding
document
and
what
the
different
goal
areas
are
and
then
also
explaining
the
work
completed
to
date
that
we've
done
as
a
committee,
so
we
sent
out
the
did.
B
You
know
mailer
in
the
utilities
we
sought
input
originally
with
the
with
the
c
grant
folks
and
the
ifas
to
help
get
some
community
input
initially
that
helped
kind
of
guide
where
we
were
going
with
the
sustainability
action
plan
and
those
initial
community
listening
sessions.
B
And
then
we
also
have
started
that
we
staff
have
started
collecting
a
lot
of
the
baseline
data
that
will
help
us
make
decisions
so
they've
and
they
presented
to
us
about
the
greenhouse
gas
data
and
about
water
trends
in
the
city.
B
B
We
also
had
the
fika
document
that
we
sent
that
the
board
of
commission
took
the
recommendation
and
sent
that
letter
to
the
public
service
commission
and
then
partnered
with
staff
for
the
tree.
Giveaway
and
that'll
have
happened
by
the
time.
We
do
that
presentation,
so
we've
I'm
kind
of
excited
about,
like
all
of
the
things
that
we
got
done
this
past
year.
I
mean
it
really
is
quite
a
quite
a
laundry
list
when
you
start
to
add
it
all
up
and
then
move
on
to
work
in
progress,
so
we're
completing
staff.
B
Is
that
vulnerability
assessment,
an
action
plan
that
paul
has
been
talking
about
so
also
providing
input
to
planning
and
zoning.
The
way
that
we
are
going
to
now
we're
giving
feedback
as
we
go
at
the
end
of
the
sustainability
action
plan,
as
as
we
are
finished
going
through
the
different
goal
areas
in
the
framework,
and
then
this
is
where
you're
asking
paul
about
aligning
the
sustainability
action
plan
with
the
comp
plan,
with
the
strategic
plan
with
the
and
with
the
and
completing
our
action
plan.
B
So
my
my
understanding
is
that
the
city
had
two
options
with
creating
a
strategic
plan.
One
was
to
go
through
st
pete
college.
It
was
more
of
a
self-paced
kind
of
activity.
The
other
is
to
go
through
the
university
of
south
florida,
where
they're
the
facilitator,
they're
the
ones
leading
the
conversation
pulling
stuff
in
with
gathering
baseline
data
kind
of
like
what
we're
doing,
with
our
action
plan,
going
through
a
series
of
exercises
with
them.
B
As
well
as
getting
feedback
from
key-
and
this
is
where
you'll
see
in
our
recommendations
but
getting
feedback
from
not
just
our
committee
but
other
committees
that
are
advisory
to
the
city,
about
their
priorities
for
for
the
city,
so
it's
going
to
be
this
whole.
How
I'm
not
sure
how
many
maybe
six-month
process
of
of
creating
a
strategic
plan
for
the
city?
It's
basically
taking
the
comp
plan
and
then
prioritizing.
B
What
are
the
action
items
that
we
want
to
do
most
so,
instead
of
working
on
like
18
different
things
all
at
the
same
time,
it'll
help
the
commission
to
align
with
what
the
highest
and
best
use
of
time
is
and
then
be
working
through.
Those
in
sequence
is
that
kind
of
correct
in
the
way
that
I've
characterized
it
and
is
that.
G
Yeah
I'll
also
add
the
commission
got
a
presentation
from
staff
on
this,
and
the
direction
so
far
is
they're
very
interested
in
the
usf
approach
and
they
wanted
more
information
on
cost
so
that
they
could
discuss
that
for
possible
direction
forward.
B
Okay,
so
moving
on
future
recommended
projects
and
goals.
So
this
is
what
now,
our
recommendations
to
to
the
commission
would
be
is
to
review
the
proposed
land
development
code
amendments
for
recommendations
relating
to
promoting
sustainability.
So
that's
what
we're
still
going
to
be
doing
and
then
aligning
the
comprehensive
plan
and
the
strategic
plan
with
sustainability
items.
B
So
moving
on
also
future
recommended
projects
and
goals
that
community
engagement,
that
we
know
and
want
is
going
to
be
really
valuable
to
putting
our
action
plan
together.
Looking
at
bang
the
table,
opportunities
to
solicit
feedback
and
then,
hopefully,
as
kovud,
starts
to
wane,
maybe
having
some
in-person
community
engagement
opportunities.
B
Also
recommendation
to
the
board
of
commissioners
to
fund
the
sustainability
efforts
that
we're
talking
about.
So
we
need
to
get
them
on
board
with
the
idea
that
some
of
these
things
are
not
going
to
be
free
and
that
they're
going
to
cost
money.
So
one
of
the
things
that
I've
included
in
here
is
also
creating
a
full-time
staff
position
to
fund
the
work
and,
like
I
said,
to
paul
and
ashley.
B
This
is
not
any
reflection
of
the
the
work
that
I
think
that
they've
been
doing
with
us,
because
I
think
they're
valuable,
like
partners
and
they're
the
ones
that
are
really
doing
a
lot
of
the
work.
That's
making
this
happen.
So
my
my
intent
with
this
is
to
like,
in
addition
to
that,
have
a
full-time
position
and
then
also
continuing
to
look
at
consultants
for
some
of
the
work.
B
J
J
Other
educational
institutions
in
in
south
florida,
which
is
where
she
trained
by
the
way
she
and
I
are
invited
to
duplicate
that
presentation
to
the
boc
april,
13th.
B
Okay,
good,
so
they'll
have
some
understanding
of
what
we're
talking
about
when
we
say
looking
at
consultants
for
some
of
the
work
and
then
also
continuing
to
look
for
university
assistance,
you
know
with
the
recovery
act,
there
are
dollars
that
are
being
allocated
for
local
governments,
so
you
know,
there's
money
to
be
doing
this
work
and
I
think
that
the
city
needs
to
be
funding
it
and
also
just
ensuring
that
their
skin
in
the
game,
so
that
when
we
go
to
apply
for
funding,
those
funders
understand
that
we're
serious
about
the
actions
that
we're
taking
as
a
city
around
sustainability.
D
Here
I
do,
you
know
the
word:
sustainability
has
become
a
sort
of
buzzword,
okay,
and
I
really
feel
like.
We
need
to
say
what
that
means.
Like
we
talk
about
a
sustainability
plan.
Well,
what
is
sustainability,
and
I
think
that
I
might
be
hard-pressed
to
actually
say
what
that
is
and
if
I'm
having
a
hard
time,
I
figure
other
people
are
having
a
hard
time
and
it
seems
like
we
should
be
really
clear
on
what
that
means.
B
So
that's
a
great
point,
and
last
year
we
had
the
same
conversation,
so
I
need
to
add
that
slide
back
in
sustainability
and
resiliency.
Both,
I
think.
B
B
D
C
Dory
while
you're
adding
that
I
did
get
that
paul
motion
to
extend
the
meeting
but
who
was
it
seconded
by,
is
it
denise
denise?
I
think
thank
you.
B
B
So
any
other
thoughts
about
that
any
of
this
okay
and
then
the
last
is
so
that
I
just
want
to
reiterate
that,
when
they're
looking
at
the
strategic
plan
that
they
actually
have
an
input
place
for
us
to
be
able
to
give
meaningful
input
and
and
for
them
to
be
thinking
that,
on
the
front
end,
that
we
would
like
to
be
able
to
to
interface
with
them
and
make
sure
that
there's
some
way
for
us
to
that.
That
we
would
like
the
opportunity
to
do.
That.
B
Is
that
consensus
amongst
the
group
that
we
would
like
to
be
able
to
okay
and
then
ensure
that
the
like,
you
were
saying
before
the
the
strategic
plan
would
be
prioritizing
sustainability
and
resiliency
that
we're
becoming
a
more
sustainable
community
by
enhancing
our
city's
environment
economy
and
equity.
Protecting
our
natural
resources
for
future
generations
to
grow
environmental
stewardship
across
the
community
prepare
for
the
impacts
of
climate
change
through
proactive
resiliency
planning
mitigation
adaptation.
B
J
I
B
Okay.
Well,
then,
if
you
do
think
of
something
else,
happy
to
add
that
in
and
also
happy
to
add
in
more
images,
I
realize
that
it's
very
ugly
and
dialogue
heavy.
So
I
just,
for
example,
the
presentation
on
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
I
just
added
this
screenshot
from
one
of
the
slides,
but
if
you
have
other
other
ideas
for
to
make
this
visually
more
appealing,
I
was
just
trying
to
get
it
done
so,
but
you
know
pictures
worth
a
thousand
words,
so
ideas.
D
H
A
J
Would
it
be
useful
to
you
to
include
some
of
the
fema
interactive
map
information
about
projected
flooding
over
time?
Given
you
know,
one
foot,
two
foot
three
feet
of
sea
level
to
put
pictures
with
this.
B
Where
would
you
recommend
that
I
put
that
like
add
it
as
a
new
slide
or
okay.
B
B
Okay,
anything
else
all
right,
so
then,
moving
on
to
item
number
six
items
for
the
next
agenda,
so
I
would
love
to
be
able
to
just
everybody,
I'm
just
a
reminder
to
keep
your
running
list
of
priorities
for
land
development
code
updates
as
we're
going
through
these
and
then
also
next
month.
B
I
would
like
to
be
able
to
get
through
well
we'll
review
natural
systems
where
we're
at
with
that,
with
the
new
shortened
abbreviated
list
and
kind
of
try
to
decide
what
we
want
to
do
with
that
and
then
do
the
next
climate
and
energy
yeah,
climate
and
energy.
B
So
if
you
have
not
already
given
your
priorities
to
ashley,
please
center
your
climate
and
energy
and
then
now
that
you've
kind
of
we've
gone
through
this
together,
maybe
revise
some
of
your
thinking
about
some
of
this
with
like
thinking
through,
like
the
cost
factor-
and
you
know
trying
to
combine
this
with
other
things
that
we're
already
doing
so.
Climate
energy.
B
And
then
I
think
that
that's
probably
enough
honestly
to
get
us
to
be
able
to
talk
through
those
meaningfully
and
get
through
both
of
those
and
then
we'll
do
a
review
of
the
presentation
to
the
boc
with
those
edits
and
like
last
call
for
any
other
edits.
H
H
B
I
B
G
B
Thank
you
I'd
like
to
counter
that
with
a
thank
you
to
all
of
you
guys
for
really
being
engaged.
This
is
like
so
much
work
and
I
very
much
recognize
that.
So
thank
you
all
for
for
getting
your
input
and,
for
you
know,
having
a
great
conversation
tonight
and
very
thoughtful
and
very
much
appreciated,
and
I
also
really
want
to
thank
again
paul
and
ashley
for
all
of
their
work
that
they're
doing
so
much
behind
the
scenes
to
get
us
to
this
point.
That's
very
much
appreciated
and
yeah.
J
This
is,
this
is
gonna
sound
totally
off
the
wall.
Bear
with
me
on
sunday,
michael
league
and
the
band
snarky
puppy
won
their
fourth
grammy
award.
This
was
for
the
best
contemporary
instrumental
and
yesterday
on
national
public
radio.
J
Perceives
of
death
appropriate
to
our
pandemic,
not
as
the
grim
reaper
but
as
a
lifelong
companion,
and
the
final
friend
that
you
have
is
at
the
end
of
your
life.
Why
does
that
matter?
Because
michael's
grandfather,
henry
kelly,
was
the
first
really
well
recognized
band
director
of
the
city
of
tarpon
springs
and
he
and
his
bands
really
kind
of
put
music
scene
at
least
high
school
and
junior
high
school
level
on
the
map
nationally.
J
Mr
ford
has
continued
that
tradition
and
and
really
raised
it
so
that
now,
as
we
all
know,
tarpon
springs
bands
are
are
really
you
know,
nationally
known,
if
not
internationally
known.
You
know
in
the
top
five
all
the
time,
so
the
music
transferred
through
the
you
know,
the
daughter
to
the
grandson
and
michael
is
an
international
musician
and
his
band
is
internationally
renowned.
J
His
brother
patrick,
did
his
dissertation
at
harvard
in
musicology,
based
upon
music,
from
crete,
colomnos,
etc,
being
brought
to
this
country
through
this
city
and
that's
his
district.
He
is
now
a
assistant
professor
of
musicology
at
florida
state
it
speaks
to
the
richness
and
and
the
the
the
depth
just
one
aspect
of
tarpon
springs.
J
It
gets
music
from
lots
of
different
directions,
but
tarpon
really
punches
above
its
weight
in
terms
of
band
music,
but
not
just
fan
music,
bertie
higgins,
etc.
I
could
talk
and
talk
and
talk
about
that,
but
it
speaks
to.
I
think
you
know
the
depth
of
culture,
just
one
piece
of
the
depth
of
culture
of
our
city.
B
Very
interesting
and
also
part
of
sustainability,
I
mean
like
one
of
the
you
know:
outcomes
is
arts
and
culture,
so
being
able
to
keep
those
traditions
alive
is
really
important.
So
I
know
we've
been
thinking
a
lot
about
natural
systems
and
we're
going
to
talk
about
climate,
energy
and
and
climate,
but
keeping
that
thought
process
about
you
know
what
what
it
really
means
to
be
sustainable
as
all
of
those
things.
So
thank
you
for
bringing
that
up
any
other
comments.
B
Well,
I'd
just
like
to
also
thank
paul
and
ashley
for
their
work.
This
past
month,
the
electric
vehicles
came
up
for
the
board
approval
and
those
were
both
approved.
B
So
I
really
I
mean,
like
hats
off
to
paul,
because
he
you
know
heard
their
comments
in
december,
heard
the
concern
and
then
really
worked
hard
to
address
all
of
those
concerns,
and
now
we've
got
two
evs
coming
in
the
fleet.
Because
of
that.
So
thank
you
paul
for
that.
I
I
spoke,
but
not
on
behalf
of
the
of
our
sustainability
committee,
because
we
hadn't
discussed
that
ahead
of
time.
B
So
I
just
focus
like
a
professionally
as
an
ev
advocate,
but
but
just
so
that
you
guys
know
if
you
go
back
and
look
at
the
commission
meeting,
but
paul
did
a
really
exceptional
job
getting
that
worked
through.
So
thank
you
for
your
hard
work
on
that.
Thank.
G
G
To
get
that
done.
Dory
had
some
great
ideas
that
we
implemented,
and
one
of
them
was
you
can
capture
that
federal
tax
credit,
even
though
we're
a
governmental
entity
if
we
do
a
third
party
lease
so
that
we've
never
done
anything
like
that
before
we
got
with
the
finance
director
the
procurement
department,
the
city
attorney,
was
involved
fleet
from
public
works.
It
was
quite
a
concerted
effort
to
get
that
item
together,
but
in
the
end
we
recommended
something
to
save
thirteen
thousand
dollars.
G
If
we
hadn't
had
done
it
that
way,
and
we
just
tried
to
make
it
as
easy
for
the
commission
to
approve
as
possible
and
they
they
recognize
that.
So
it's
an
important
first
step
for
the
city
to
have
some
electric
vehicles
in
the
fleet,
two
nissan
leafs
and
we
are
planning
that
this
is
just
the
beginning
and
as
the
market
really
starts
to
rev
up
with
these
sorts
of
things,
you
know
pretty
soon.
It'll
be
pickup
trucks
and
you
know
we
can
really
make
a.
B
All
right,
if
there
aren't
any
other
comments,
then
I'd
like
to
entertain
a
motion
to
adjourn
at
8
17..
Well,.
D
At
the
creative
pinellas
and
we'll
be
having
three
signs
panels,
the
first
one
on
what's,
climate
change
and
sea
level
rise
and
then
the
second
on
what
you
and
I
can
do
and
libby's
going
to
be
on
it
about
electric
vehicles
and
the
last
one
is
about
what
a
green
society
looks
like,
and
these
are
all
with
well-known,
established
scientists
and
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
other
science
and
environmental
things
so
and
they're
all
listed
in
that
brochure
and
I'll
send
out
announcements
with
panelists
and
head
shots
and
bios,
and
all
of
that
as
we
get
them
ready.
B
Can
we
put
that
on
the
on
our
sustainability
page,
you
read
my
mind:
is
that
something
that
we
could
do?
I
mean
it's
in
conjunction
with
creative
pinellas?
So
if
we
can,
I
think
that
would
be
great
and
then
maybe
even
if
the
city,
who
does
the
social
media
for
the
city,
if
we
could
get
a
couple
tweets
or
facebook
posts
about
the
event,
I
think
that
that
would
help
to
amplify
the
event
and.
B
D
D
And
the
great
thing
about
going
to
creative
pinellas
is
it's
in
the
same
complex
as
the
botanical
gardens,
the
county
town,
which
is
really
wonderful
and
heritage
village.
So
it's
a
beautiful
place
just
to.
B
Be
okay!
Well
then,
with
that
is
there?
Is
there
any
other?
I
didn't
mean
to
cut
anybody
off.
I
feel
bad
okay.
So
then
it's
8
19.
If
I
could
entertain
a
motion
to
during
the
meeting.