►
From YouTube: House Cities & Counties Subcommittee - March 9, 2021
Description
House Cities & Counties Subcommittee - March 9, 2021 - House Hearing Room 3
A
It's
nine
o'clock
and
welcome
to
the
citizen
county
subcommittee
of
local
government.
The
committee
will
come
into
order
clerk.
Take
the
role
please
vice
chairman
calfi.
A
Vice
chairman,
right,
as
excuse
he's
being
inoculated,
chairman
moon
president,
mr
chairman,
you
have
a
quorum.
Thank
you
we'll
go
ahead
and
start
this
morning.
Our
first
bill
is
1097
by
representative
bond.
Do
I
have
a
motion
on
tonight?
We
have
motion
a
second
representative
bomb,
you're
recognized.
A
A
B
This
is
a
bill
that
would
allow
counties
to
self-insure
their
public
officials
originally
in
the
state
of
tennessee
counties
were
required
to
carry
surety
bonds
in
order
to
that
would
guarantee
that
public
officials
lawfully
perform
their
job
duties
in
a
legal
manner
after
a
period
of
time.
The
state
of
tennessee,
four
or
five
years
ago
decided
to
also
allow
counties
to
take
out
insurance
policies
under
essentially
the
exact
same
terms.
B
This
is
a
bill
that
would
allow
counties
to
have
a
third
option
if
those
counties
are
already
ensuring
self-insuring
their
liability
under
the
tennessee
government.
Tort
claims
act
if
a
county
is
already
self-insuring
liability
under
that
act,
this
bill
would
allow
them
to
also
self-insure
their
public
officials,
and
I
probably
should
take
a
moment
to
say
exactly
who
we're
referring
to.
When
I
say
public
officials.
These
are
constitutional
officers.
These
are
elected
officials.
B
These
are
fee
officers,
it's
anyone
who
handles
money
for
a
county
and
what
this
is
self-insurance
for
is
the
mishandling
or
mistakes
with
money
or
dishonesty
or
a
crime
invol
involving
money.
So
this
would
provide
counties
with
a
third
option.
Counties
don't
have
to
exercise
the
option,
but
if
they
choose
to
then
again,
according
to
the
amendment,
it
would
take
a
two-thirds
vote
majority
by
that
body.
Members.
A
Have
any
question
of
the
sponsor
seeing
knows
their
objections,
the
question
hearing,
no
objection,
we're
voting
on
house
bill,
1097,
all
in
favor,
say
aye,
both
say
no
house
bill.
1097
moves
the
next
available
calendar
of
local
government.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
All
next
bill
is
665
by
chairman
halford.
The
chair
does
have
an
original
resolution
of
the
gibson
county
school
district
requesting
this
action.
Is
there
a
motion
on
house
bill,
665.
A
C
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
and
and
for
the
motion.
As
most
everybody
knows,
I
have
most
all
the
special
school
districts
in
in
the
state.
Lucky
me,
I
guess,
but
this
is
one
of
them.
Gibson
county
special
school
district
is,
is
asking
permission
to
issue
and
sell
bonds
for
the
not
to
exceed
five
million
dollars.
Interest
rates
are
pretty
low
right
now,
so
they
feel
like
it's
a
good
time
to
do
this.
C
This,
of
course,
is
for
work
that
they
need
to
do,
whether
it
be
acquisitions
of
property
or
or
or
maintenance,
or
things
like
that.
So,
basically,
that's
it
they're
just
asking
permission
to
to
to
issue
and
sell
those
bonds.
Mr
chairman
members.
A
A
C
Mr
chairman,
and
I
was
a
little
bit,
I
guess
surprise-
the
bilge
that
mr
baum
just
had
is
very
very
similar
to
this
one.
It
does
basically
the
same
thing
several
years
ago.
It
was
realized
that
a
lot
of
people,
particularly
county
mayors
and
things
like
that
already
had
a
surety
bond.
So
what
this
does
working
with
the
comptrollers?
C
That's
a
an
issue
where
they
they
don't
have
to
have
that
surety
bond
anymore
if
they
already
have
one
and
but
it
does
allow
them
to
buy
an
insurance
policy.
It's
not
self-insured,
but
this
allows
them
to
buy
insurance
policy
to
do
the
same
thing.
So
basically,
we
have
a
similar.
A
For
there
are
questions
of
the
sponsor
by
the
members
question
call
on
the
bill,
so
objection
to
question
hearing
no
objection,
we're
voting
on
house
bill,
1019,
all
in
favor,
say
aye,
both
say
no.
The
ass
prevail
house
bill
1019
moves
the
next
available
calendar
local
government.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman
and
committee
members.
A
D
And
this
legislation
comes
from
the
comptroller's
office
and
it's
just
an
effort
to
bring
consistency
to
the
code.
We
have
in
different
places
in
code.
Different
entities
that
are
very
similar
have
different
rules,
so
this
would
just
make
all
of
those
consistent,
for
instance,
budgeting
and
utility
finance
laws.
D
Currently,
utility
districts
have
to
submit
cash
cash
basis
budgets
to
the
comptroller's
office
for
review,
but
these
are
cash
basis.
That's
the
only
thing
they're
produced
for
is
just
to
go
to
the
comptroller's
office,
because
now
everyone
has
to
use
accrual
accounting,
so
this
would
eliminate
the
need
for
providing
those
cash-based
budgets
and
again
it.
What
we're
doing
with
this
bill
is
just
making
a
consistent
operations
for
all
of
the
utility
districts
across
the
state
and
providing
comptrol
comptroller
approval
of
those
budgets
to
help
them
keep
from
getting
in
trouble.
A
A
Next
bill
is
house
bill
612
by
leader,
gant
leader
gant
is
presenting
two
bills
in
insurance
right
now,
we'll
roll
that
to
the
hills,
objection
we'll
roll
that
to
the
hill.
A
A
A
E
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
The
amendment
actually
firms
up
the
bill.
It's
up
to
you,
mr
chairman,
if
you
wanna,
if
we
can
entertain
a
motion
to
get
to
adopt
this
amendment,
then
I'll
explain.
E
E
E
Members
would
give
the
essential
service,
and
that's
in
quotations
designation
to
ambulance
services
like
it's
given
to
police
and
fire
again.
Police
and
fire.
Has
that
designation,
representative
miller
you're
very
familiar
with
that?
Of
course,
the
the
amendment
was
written.
It's
actually
written
to
address
the
concerns
of
our
county
mayor
associations
that
that's
present
here
today,
as
well
as
the
county
service
association
both
are
within
the
committee
this
morning.
This
morning
the
amendment
clarifies
that
the
bill
does
not
direct
the
method
for
providing
these
services
now
further.
E
It
states
that
this
service
can
be
provided
by
public,
private
or
non-profit
through
enter
interlock
agreement,
agreement
with
hospital
or
health
care
facility,
or
for
that
matter,
any
other
structure
suitable
to
provide
at
least
one
license
ambulance
service.
It
also
reiterates
that
a
county
is
not,
I
repeat,
not
required
to
appropriate
county
revenue
for
this
service.
If
it
can
be
provided
by
other
means,
and
lastly,
the
amendment
codifies
the
existing
relationship
between
counties
and
municipalities
in
regards
to
their
ability
to
provide
this
service
with
the
approval
of
their
governing
bodies.
E
Mr
chairman,
and
with
that,
that
concludes
my
my
talking
points
and
I'll
be
glad
to
entertain
any
questions.
Sir
members.
A
E
A
C
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
thank
you
chairman
keisling,
for
being
here
today
and
bringing
this
bill.
I
just
want
to
ask
a
few
questions
to
get
on
record
and
to
make
sure
that
we're
understanding
this
correctly,
this
bill
in
no
way
is
creating
a
franchise
for
any
kind
of
counties
or
anything
that.
C
A
E
You,
mr
chairman
and
committee
members,
and
again
I
turn
to
you
chairman
crawford.
Thank
you
for
those
those
two
questions
that
clarifies
this.
Thank
you
very.
A
A
The
next
bill
on
the
calendar
is
house
bill
154
by
chairman
heisten.
Is
there
a
motion
on
the
bill?
There's
a
motion.
Second,
on
the
bill,
chairman
hasten
you're,
recognized
on
house
bill
154
thank.
C
A
A
Is
there
objection
to
the
question
hearing?
No
objection,
we're
voting
on
house
bill
154,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye,
both
say
no
eyes
prevail.
Moves
the
next
available
calendar
of
local
government.
Thank
you.
Next
bill
is
house
bill
35
by
representative
ogles.
We
have
received
word.
He
would
like
to
roll
this
bill
one
week.
Is
there
objection
to
the
rolling
of
this
bill
for
one
week?
Hearing
no
objection.
This
bill
is
rolled
one
week
next
bill
on
the
counter
is
house
bill
634
by
representative
hakeem.
Is
there
a
motion
on
house
bill
634?
F
A
little
context
on
this
bill
in
the
city
of
chattanooga,
we
had
a
lieutenant
in
our
fire
department
who
posted
online
a
picture
of
a
clip
of
bullets,
and
it
had
names
on
the
bullets,
and
this
included
a
city
council
person
myself,
and
some
citizens,
and
both
the
fire
department
and
the
administration
of
the
city
had
knowledge
of
this
and
did
not
inform
any
of
us
as
to
what
you
know.
This
was
taking
place
now
as
an
individual.
F
I
have
interaction
with
police
and
fire,
and
all
that
kind
of
thing-
and
you
know,
could
this
put
elected
officials
in
particular,
and
citizens
in
general,
in
jeopardy
if
they
have
no
knowledge
of
someone
who
has
a
mindset
of
this
nature,
what
this
legislation
does
is
ask
the
city
to
have
on
put
on
their
website
the
guidelines
that
you
know
this
type
of
activity
is
not
accepted
or
appreciated,
and
that
this
reasonably
in
a
reasonable
manner.
F
It
be
it
by
email
or
personal
talking
with
persons
who
are
identifying
this
nature
to
let
them
know
of
something
of
this
nature,
and
it's
not
a
requirement
that
the
city
develop
a
community,
develop
a
a
new
website
or
anything
this
nature,
so
we're
asking
if
we
could
move
this
forward.
Mr
chairman,
okay,.
A
G
Mrs
okay,
thank
you,
obviously
the
circumstance
that
the
representative
hakeem
is
described
as
deplorable
and
and
shouldn't
be
condoned
in
any
way.
The
reason
I
requested
an
opportunity
to
speak
is
just
the
difficulty
we
see
with
how
the
legislation
will
be
enforceable.
G
As
I
understand
the
language,
it
requires
either
a
city
or
county
government
to
constantly
monitor
the
social
media
feeds
of
all
their
employees
and
and
to
identify
whether
these
threats
are
out
there
and
notify.
Folks,
I
just
in
the
day
and
age
when
somebody
can
pull
out
a
smartphone
and
create
a
social
media
account
in
about
30
seconds
and
counties
and
cities
sometimes
have
hundreds
or
thousands
of
employees.
I
don't
know
how.
Realistically
we
could
do
that.
So
there's
some
concern.
G
A
This
representative
miller,
you
recognize
thank
you,
mr.
G
I've
thought
through
that
type
of
a
scenario,
if
they're,
if
they
clearly
have
notice
of
the
fact
that
it
exists
that'd,
be
simple.
We
have
to
kind
of
look
at
the
details
as
to
how
something's
set
up-
and
I
said,
if
there's
a
serious
threat
out
there.
Obviously
people
should
be
protected.
It's
more
a
matter
of
the
monitoring
aspects
of
the
legislation
that
raise
concern
for
us.
Okay,.
A
Representative
miller,
thank
you,
mr
chairman,
he's
answered
any
other
questions.
Chairman
crawford
you're,
recognizing.
C
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Thank
you,
representative
akeem
for
being
here.
I
just
have
a
few
questions
once
is,
if
let's
say
this
went
into
effect
and
the
city
or
county,
whoever
was
monitoring,
this
missed,
missed
a
post
that
was
made
or
a
statement
that
was
made.
C
F
If
I
may,
firstly,
if
we
look
on
the
page
where
the
physical
note
is-
and
we
deal
with
the
assumptions
it,
it
says
that
the
city
is
not
required
to
monitor
the
face.
I
mean
the
social
media
platforms,
but
when
an
instance
happens,
then
they're
asked
to
notify
people
of
of
the
of
the
concern
and
also
it
says
that
it's
not
necessary
for
the
city
to
establish
a
new
website.
Anything
in
this
nature
and
by
reasonable
measures.
F
You
know
like
calling
the
individual
or
you
know
the
normal
things,
a
method
of
contacting
people
we're
not
asking
anything
out
of
the
ordinary.
I
apologize.
If
I
didn't.
C
A
Out
of
session
represent
gary
with
legal
services.
Thank.
G
G
E
And
didn't
report
it
then
that
could
be
problematic.
Chairman.
A
C
A
C
Mr
chairman,
and
I
guess
my
second
question
would
be
you
spoke
of
social
media
and,
and
there
was
no
place
there-
that
they
were
going
to
actually
monitor
that
correct.
But
if
this
bill
passes
would
they
be
able
to
go
and
monitor
social
media
if
somebody
posted
something
on
their
own
media,
not
what
they
are
given
to
given
by
the
county
or
their
county
email
address
or
whatever?
If
they
did
this
on
their
personal,
would
they
be?
Would
the
city
have
the
ability
to
then
prosecute,
or
I
guess
go
after
that
individual
punish
them?
C
If
they
did
this
on
their
own
personal,
personal,
social
media?
Would
that
not
affect
their
first
amendment
right
for.
F
You,
sir,
to
we'll,
probably
have
to
defer
to
the
attorney,
but
the
city
is
not
required.
F
Government
is
not
required
to,
we
say,
monitor
the
social
media,
the
instance
that
we're
talking
about
in
the
instance
that
we're
dealing
with
is
is
where
this
individual
did
put
it
on
this
social
media
and
so
forth,
and
it
came
out
the
the
media
is
what
brought
it
to
the
attention
of
of
those
of
us
who
were
on
there
and
so
to
my.
If
I
understand
you
correctly
this,
this
does
not
permit
or
the
city
to
start
monitoring
everyone's
social
media.
This
was
an
instance
where
it
was
done.
F
C
Chairman
crawford
sorry,
mr
chairman,
if
you
this,
this
will
be
my
last
question.
Well,
it
really
brings
concern
to
me
because,
basically,
from
that
statement,
you're
basically
telling
me
that
it
was
not
monitored.
The
city
did
not
see
this
on
social
media
and
you're
going
by
something
that
was
printed
in
the
newspaper
or
come
from
the
media.
F
F
C
Chairman
crawford
that
that
brings
real
concern
to
me.
I
I
do
not
condone
this
action
in
any
way
and
and
don't
want
anybody
to
think
so.
But
this
really
concerns
me.
The
avenue
that's
going,
there's
surely
got
to
be
a
better
way
that
this
could
be
handled,
but
it
does
concern
me.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
Yes,
sir.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
A
F
No
sir,
as
a
result
of
what
transpired
in
my
own
involvement
in
it,
and
you
know
just
citizens,
I
guess
you
could
say
I'm
carrying
it
for
the
citizens
and
myself.
F
Now
I
did
this
in
the
interests
of
chattanooga,
but
you
know
if
it's
the
will
of
the
body
to
go
beyond
that.
You
know
I
don't
have
a
problem
representative.
A
Calf,
he
just
went,
I
believe
the
bill
is
statewide
bill
stay.
Well,
it's
a
statewide
bill,
representative
calf.
You
recognize
my
last
question
and
what
disciplinary
action
was
taken.
You
said
both
this
guy
was
a
city
fireman
and
both
the
fire
department,
administration
and
the
city
administration
knew
about
it
and
you're
sure
that
they
knew
about
it.
Representative
became
going
and
what
correct?
What
was
the
corrective
action
they
took
was
their
disciplinary
action
or
what
did
they
do?
Representative
kim.
F
This
happened,
I
guess
we
said
right
at
the
beginning
of
the
covet
epidemic
and
he
was
put
on
leave,
saw,
gave
him
medical
treatment
and
it
was
determined
within
the
fire
department,
not
from
a
medical
person
but
from
within
the
fire
department
that
you
know
he's
okay,.
A
C
For
representative
hakeem,
I'm
looking
I'm
looking
here
at
some
of
the
assumptions
in
the
bill.
Yes,
sir,
so
the
assumption
is
that
they
that
a
local
government
post
policies
on
their
website
not
create
a
new
one
but
put
policies
in
on
the
website.
Yes,
sir,
okay
and
it
does
not
require
that
they
search
employees,
social
media,
right,
correct
representatives,
so
pretty
much.
This
bill
just
ensures
that
a
a
government
entity
puts
their
policies
on
on
the
website.
A
F
Putting
it
putting
it
on
the
website
that
you
know
how
we
say
here,
the
government
provides
to
put
the
policies
to
their
website
and
provide
a
copy
of
the
policy
to
all
employees.
G
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
all
right,
I'm
I'm
confused
now
and
it
doesn't
take
a
whole
lot
to
do
that.
To
begin
with.
So
with
your
indulgence,
give
me
a
quick
summary
of
what
the
bill
is
doing
one
more
time.
I
know
you've
explained
it
and
I'm
sorry
to
ask
you
to
do
this
again,
but
help
me
understand
it.
Just
a
quick
summary
representative.
F
You,
sir,
for
the
entity,
the
governmental
entity
to
put
on
their
website
the
policy
in
regards
to.
I
guess
essentially
saying
this
is
behavior
that
is
not
acceptable
and
to
notify
persons
who
are
identified
as
potential
targets
to
be
notified
using
where
practical,
using
general
methods.
You
know
phone
email,
something
like
that,
and
this
is
not
to
monitor
their
website
online
posts
or
anything
of
that
nature.
But
when
an
event
of
this
nature
happens,
then
you
know
there
should
be
some
intervention
on
the
part
of
the
governmental
entity.
F
Me
say
again:
this
bill
does
not
ask
a
request
that
the
governmental
entity
surf
the
social
media
of
anyone,
but
if,
if
a
person
puts
it
on
their
social
media
and
it's
known
by
their
department
and
by
the
city
and
by
the
government,
then
that
person
in
my
mind,
should
be
informed
of
that
you're
not
going
out
looking
for
these
things,
but
when
it
happens,
or
as
I
said
in
this
instance,
the
only
way
we
knew
about
it
was
that
the
media
got
a
hold
of
it
and
it
brought
it
forward.
G
F
Okay,
I
don't
know
if
my
example
would
be
different,
but
what
happened?
Was
this
individual
put
on
his
social
media?
What
appeared
to
be?
It
was
an
ar-15
clip
of
bullets
and
had
people's
names
on
there
and
you
know
with
it
threatening
people,
and
I
mean
I
think
that
makes
it
different
from
what
you
say
and
what
you
see
in
the
grocery
store.
G
G
I'm
just
trying
to
rationalize
this.
I
mean
we've
all
if
you
stay
up
here
in
the
position
that
we're
in
sooner
or
later,
we're
all
going
to
have
a
death
threat
or
or
something
upon
one
of
us,
but
I
I
guess,
is
what
the
legislation
asking
the
local
city
municipality
to
do
is.
If
this
is
brought
to
them,
or
is
it?
Are
you
asking
them
to
post
something
on
their
policy
and
procedures?
F
Okay,
when
we
say
post
something
we're
saying
to
post
on
the
website,
essentially
this
act.
Action
of
this
nature
does
not
tolerate
it,
something
that
nature
and
that,
if
you
know
about
it,
governmental
entity
that
you
notify
people
who
have
been
identified
and
as
you
say,
you
know
if,
if
you're
in
government
or
not
in
this
instance,
it
was
not
just
elected
officials,
but
citizens
also-
and
you
know,
when
you
deal
with
the
death
threats,
you
know,
I
know
about
that-
all
my
life,
okay,
all
right.
Yes,
sir.
G
F
F
Now,
when
I
talk
to
both
entities,
you
know
the
the
fire
department
says:
you
know,
we
told
administration
administration
said
they
didn't
know
about
it:
okay,
but
it
was.
It
gets
essentially
what
I'm
getting
at
it
was
held
within
the
department
and
it
could
have
been
dangerous
to
citizens
as
well
as
elected
officials,.
A
G
Gab,
it
sounds
like
something
that
needs
to
be
handled
internally
there
with
the
municipality
that
you're
referring
to
and
not
really
through
this
channel.
I
see
what
you're
doing
and
I
respect
what
you're
doing.
I
I
think
it's
going
to
create
more
of
a
bureaucratic
response
to
it
than
if
internally,
that
municipality
or
deal
with
it
in
a
different
manner,
but
but
you
know
thank
you,
I
didn't
mean
to
put
you
in
the
spot.
No,
no
thank
you.
C
Yeah
leader
gant
basically
touched
on
what
my
question
was
going
to
be
is,
instead
of
us
legislating
from
the
state.
This
seems
to
me
that
this
could
be
put
in
your
policies
and
procedures
in
your
local
government,
because
what
your
bill
does
is
it
takes
it
statewide.
I
think
this
needs
to
be
addressed
in
your
community
and
not
pushed
so
much
statewide,
because
I
see
some
real
issues
here.
C
As
far
as
you
say,
it
does
not
give
them
the
authority
to
go
out
and
monitor
social
media
and
these
kind
of
things,
but
yeah,
that's
basically
what
the
bill
does.
Is
it's
giving
them
the
right
to
go?
Do
that
if
they
find
something
on
there
and
come
back
and
punish
that
person?
For
that,
so
I
think
this
could
probably
be
handled
a
little
better
from
your
local
standpoint,
representative.
F
Based
on
what
I'm
hearing,
mr
chairman,
I'm
inclined
to
withdraw
the
bill.
A
C
A
G
Let
me
apologize
to
you,
mr
chairman.
I
was
in
insurance
committee
and
let
me
apologize
to
our
treasurer
for
my
tardiness
as
I
was
presenting
two
bills
in
there.
So
I
apologize
to
the
committee
as
well
what
this
bill
does
is
it
authorizes
the
state
treasurer
to
inquire
with
local
governments
and
volunteer
fire
departments
about
establishing
a
length
of
service
award
program,
which
is
also
known
as
low
sap,
pursuant
to
section
457
of
the
internal
revenue
code,
based
on
the
results
of
the
inquiry,
the
treasurer
is
authorized
to
establish
a
low
sap
program.
G
A
low
sap
is
a
type
of
retirement
plan
for
volunteers,
providing
firefighting
and
prevention
services,
emergency
medical
services
and
ambulance
services
to
be
eligible
to
receive
benefits
from
the
low
sap.
An
individual
must
be
a
bona
fide
volunteer
who
receives
no
compensation
for
the
services
and
instead
of
instead
receives
only
reimbursement
for
reasonable
expenses
or
reasonable
benefits
and
nominal
fees,
customarily
paid
in
connection
with
the
performance
of
such
services.
G
Lowsapps
may
be
defined.
Contribution
plan
similar
to
a
401k
or
defined
benefit
plan
like
a
pension
plan,
a
low
sap
is
a
funded,
is
funded
by
contributions
from
local
governments
and
or
non-profit
entities
that
utilize
the
services
of
eligible
volunteers.
The
volunteers
themselves
would
not
contribute
and
the
state
would
not
bear
the
cost
of
the
program.
Volunteers
would
have
to
meet
eligibility
criteria
established
under
the
terms
of
the
low
sap
plan
to
receive
benefits.
G
A
A
C
That
question,
mr
chairman,
just
for
verifications,
local
governments.
A
A
Moves
on
the
next
next
available
calendar
in
local
government.
This
completes
our
calendar.
For
today
the
chair
would
like
to
express
gratitude
for
the
staff
for
preparing
for
the
day's
meeting.
We've
been
short
one,
valuable
team
member,
and
that
is
chairman
crawford's
la
and
assistant
and
she's.
A
valuable
part
of
this
team
she's
had
a
lot
of
adversity,
but
I
want
to
say
thank
you
to
everyone
that
has
stepped
up
and
filled
and
filled
that
gap.
So
thank
you
very
much.
A
A
That's
that'll
be
looked
at
and
considered
without
objection.
We'll
stand
adjourned,
hearing,
no
objection.
We
are
adjourned
good
job
jeffree.