►
From YouTube: W29 0mega WG: WG proposal and wirking style
Description
The 0mega Working Group examines the ethos of and ethics in token engineering as well as the shared vision and diversity of its communities.
We gather every two weeks on Wednesday at 8pm CET.
Steward: Sebnem
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
B
B
A
A
About
what
the
weather
in
canada,
okay
and
the
difference
between
the
global
south
and
the
global
north,
and
if
you
migrate
from
the
south
to
the
north,
it's
just
very
difficult
to
adjust
to
that.
C
Yeah
like
in
in
germany,
we
don't
have
appropriate
adventures
anymore,
like
it
doesn't
even
appropriately
snow.
C
C
Okay,
okay,
so
shall
we
get
started,
and
the
topic
for
today
was
more
about.
C
How
are
we
going
to
structure
the
the
basis
of
the
working
group
or
the
groundwork,
as
we
said,
and
that
we
also
update
the
working
group
proposal,
because
definitely
we
have
seen
the
need
that
and
and
wish
that
there
can
be
interesting
research
groups,
interesting
research
topics
that
can
become
focus,
groups
or
not,
but
actually
definitely
would
definitely
would
provide
valuable
input
into
the
two
other
initiatives
right
so
marge
you,
you
had
definitely
brought
some
up,
so
I
would
ask,
maybe
for
you
to
start
and
also
juan
steph
unipath.
C
I
don't
know
sorry,
I
I
have
forgotten
your
your
name,
but
I
know
where
you're
from
and
your
interest.
So,
if
you
have
anything,
you
would
like
to
add
in
the
lines
that
mart
is
going
to
explain
a
bit
yeah.
C
I
would
quickly
make
around
like
what
do
you
see
in
terms
of
research
topics,
proposals
that
you'd
like
to
add
into
the
working
group
that
nurtures
the
initiatives
and
then
we
can
go
on
to
actually
updating
this
working
style
or
work
style
section
that
reflects
how
we
want
to
organize
and
the
way
I
see
it.
It's
another
work
topic
in
and
on
itself,
but
we
can
get
to
that
discussion
in
a
moment.
So
might
please
please
share
you.
You
had
some
ideas,
also
yeah.
Please
go
ahead.
B
So,
thank
you
so
as
a
research
research
question
for
our
learning
group.
What
I
have
in
my
mind
is
that
so,
while
we
are
talking
about
token
engineering,
we
are
always
referring
like
tokonomics,
etc.
We
are
always
referring
how
they
are
creating
incentivization
and
changing
incentivization
for
communities.
So,
for
example,
in
in
the
in
the
beginning
of
my
participation
in
omega,
we
were
discussing
bewearing
of
social
engineering,
etc.
B
B
Would
like
to
engage
is
that
so
how
those
changes
in
mechanisms
parameters
affects
how
we
behave
so,
for
example,
how
does
weighted
what
change
our
behavior
compared
to
unanimous
vote
or
how
does
like
inflationary
token
supply,
could
change
somebody's
actions
so
like,
for
example,
we
can
do
a
comparative
analysis
of
traditional
way
of
doing.
For
example,
central
banks
are
actually
doing
token
token.
B
So
how
does
that
reflect
in
communities,
behaviors,
etc?
Or
even
we
can
discuss
the
relationship
between
the
cultural,
build
and
the
parameters.
So,
even
with
the
conversation
that
okay,
you
guys
are
talking
about
how
those
parameters
are
creating
incentivization
and
behavior,
but
culture
is
also
the
important
part
of
that
behaviors
like
you,
cannot
assess
someone's
behavior
just
for
like
the
the
structure
that
you
are
in,
it's
the
agents
like
cultural
build
is
also
effective,
so
we're.
B
Kind
of
questions
within
this
learning
group,
so
what
I
was
thinking
about
that
we
can
create
at
the
initial
phase
we
can
collect
articles
like
thought
experiments
that
we
can
do
practice
that
action
like
assessing
the
relationship
between
parameters
and
behaviors.
In
the
second
part,
we
will
have
a
discussion
phase.
We
will
discuss
as
a
community
what
we
are
believing,
what
we
are
not
and
in
the
third
phase.
Maybe
we
can
produce
some
content
from
within,
like
articles
like
maybe
videos
or
even
like
it's
kind
of
like
very
ambitious,
but
just.
C
D
B
You
can
put
some
input
and
like
showing
the
greenness
of
the
community
etc
like
like
we
can.
We
can
play
it
around,
so
that
was
my
like
idea
for
research
like
we
can
put
this
on
a
working
group
proposal
as
one
of
the
research
ideas
that
we
would
like
to
engage
and
we
can
request
some
funding
for
funding
this
research.
C
C
C
Yeah
about
repair
of
social
engineering.
C
Definitely
at
the
very
least,
maybe
others
as
well,
so
I
would
ask
the
facilitators
also
to
to
look
and
and
support
yeah
with
the
need
of
such
a
research
group.
One
question
I
have
is
like:
if
we
get
the
funding
again,
how
do
we?
How
do
we
do
that?
C
Would
you
add
so
one
idea
is
to
have
a
focus
or
like
open
calls
for
research
that
can
then
be
taken
on
by
participants
of
this
working
group
who
know
best
basically
or
how
it
could
be
feed
in
or
reused
and
or
you
could
take
it
on
with
other
research
groups
that
you
know
that
might
help
you,
depending
on
how
big
or
small
it
should
be
etc.
So,
do
you
have
any
any
thoughts
there
or
would
that
be
something
to
go,
go
deeper
or.
B
A
B
A
Yeah,
I
think
that's
a
good
rational,
like
rewarding
loyalty,
because
maybe
and
with
the
params
we
have
been
framing,
there
is
some
kind
of
loyalty
that
was
framed
differently
before
the
hatch
or
in
the
heart,
and
sometimes
the
second
phase
is
different
and
we
need
to
reward
in
great
respect.
So
our
phase,
one
is
for
core
mammals.
A
Let's
see
and
phase
two
we
were
have
the
bounties
and
smart
is
saying
we
can
just
reward
people
as
as
as
per
basis
they
come
and
they
we
kind
of
fix
this
agreement,
and
I
see-
and
I
have
invited
well-
not
formally
invited,
but
I
just
standing
on
invitation
to
the
rxt
community,
the
radical
exchange
community-
if
they
want
to
come-
maybe
next
week
or
in
two
weeks
to
maybe
focus
on
an
agenda
or
do
a
designed
agenda
with
the
enlightened
philosophers
we
were
talking
two
weeks
ago.
So
that's
an
idea.
C
Okay,
so
I'm
just
adding
somewhat
about
so
I'm
just
adding
the
slot.
C
Is
it
radical
exchange?
I
remember
that
was
the
proposal
actually
right
about
the
vcs
and
so
on
how
they're
forming
or
how
they
are
participating
in
this
domain
right.
A
C
For
example,
and
if
I'm
not
right,
if
I'm
not
wrong,
he's
communicate,
and
basically,
if
I
hear
you
right,
that
would
be
a
topic
for
one
of
the
next.
D
Can
I
just
say
that
I
merit
I
really
like
this
idea
and
I
was
wondering
on
how
do
you
envision
it
being
practically
done?
I
was
not
really
that
sure
on
what
kind
of
research
it
will
be
where
they'll
be
con
kind
of
a
controlled
condition.
D
B
B
But
there's
always
dramas
like
we
have
sifu
drama
we
can
discuss
like
giving
multisig
to
one
person.
No,
it's
like,
like
you,
know,
there's
drama
going
on
and
we
can
discuss
this,
but
also
we
all
we.
We
always
can
produce
total
experiments
as
well
like
it.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
quote
unquote
real
world
like
we
can
say
age
when
you
do
this
agent,
one
will
do
that
and
we
can
prove
it
through,
not
maybe
in
crypto
space
but
like
human
behavior,
psychology
etc.
B
Like
so
what
I
was
thinking
about
going
up
case
by
case
case
by
case
analysis,
so
it
doesn't,
it
won't
probably
will
be
like
very
comprehensive,
like
controlled
variable
research,
but
it
will
produce
like
some.
B
D
Okay,
I
I
see
so
it
is
more
on
a
rather
than
on
empirical
level.
It's
it's
more
on
philosophical
kind
of
a
more
philosophical
scholarship,
just
to
show
them
the
more
the
moral
issues
that
arise
rather
than
rather
than
make
lawful
connections
between
certain
behaviors
and
certain
incentive
design.
B
Yeah
like
it
can
be
done
as
well,
but
I'm
thinking
about,
for
example,
like
there's
ongoing
discussion
about
these,
how
inflation
affect
unemployment
like
like
they
have.
A
B
D
C
No,
no,
that
that's
the
exact.
I
think.
That's
also
why
we
then
said
we're
going
to
do
focus
on
or
create
focus
groups
like
in
the
manifesto
you'll
see
also
this
started
with
who
owns
te
ethics
in
a
sense
like?
Are
we
going
to
have
some
commandments
and
everyone
is
going
to
have
ethical
conduct
in
such
a
complex
and
evolving
global
environment
without
well
precedent?
Yes,
but
we
all
believe
that
humans
are
moral
beings
and
we're
capable
of
actually
making
sound
decisions.
C
There
are
things
that
are
being
engineered
that
make
people
do
things
on
purpose,
that's
the
whole
concept
of
token
engineering,
incentive
mechanism,
design
and
if
that
is
done
only
through
simulations
and
data,
and
so
on
that
a
handful
of
people
are
putting
together
number
one,
we're
entirely
neglecting
our
reasoning
faculties
and
such
a
focus
group
or
again
like
how
how
might
puts
it
here
starts
with
a
learning
group
collect
materials,
literature
review
even
reason
about
what
we
have
experienced
here
in
tech
or
in
other
deployments,
or
when
you
are
trying
to
rescue
your
funds
from
some
d
fire
pools.
C
If,
if
you're
really
on
the
line,
or
how
do
you
react
when
you
know,
I
think
if
we
can
get,
I
think
there
will
be
materials
and
so
on,
and
starting
with,
that
is
great.
But
the
the
points
being
here
in
in
the
omega
working
group
is
definitely
starting
by
from
this
human
exchange
and
interrelationships
and
that
type
of
sense
making,
of
course,
for
example,
that
could
be
also
an
outcome
right
that
a
super
interesting
scenario
emerges,
and
I
don't
know
someone
who's.
C
Also
active
and
tech
lab,
for
example,
says
hey.
This
is
so
good.
I'm
going
to
run
a
simulation
on
this
and
use
all
of
this
material
that
the
focus
group
has
provided.
You
know
that
would
be
wonderful,
that's
exactly
how
these
these
you
know.
Engineering,
heavy
and
the
humanities
at
the
two
sides
of
the
crypto
economic
flower
represent
how
they
mesh
and
then
yeah.
C
So
should
be
here
so
basically,
sorry
that
I
always
waited
for
too
long
go
ahead.
Betty
I
just
wanted
to
make
a
point
that
this
is
spot
on.
A
C
C
Okay,
so
these
are
two
and
I
I
would
definitely
add
these
two
into
the
working
group
proposed
like
this
is
how
we
would
set
up
these
calls
for
research.
C
Again,
the
funding
question
arises
here:
we
need
to
find
a
way
there
that
that
works
and
I'm,
I
feel
like
I'm
the
worst
possible
person
to
lead
the
discussion
there,
just
because
yeah
because
of
time,
issues
etc.
C
One
one
thing
is
to
look
at
similarly
active
working
groups
and
have
a
similar
rate
or
solution.
Another
one
is
to
give
rough
budgets
because
also
well.
C
It
depends
right
how
big
these
things
can
get,
and
you
can
always
demand
follow-on
funding
if
this
research
is
growing
and
it
takes
more
shape
and
so
on
so
again
here
I
will
ask
for
coming
up
with
a
proposal
the
same
for
for
you,
letty
or
maybe
let
you
match
you
put
the
heads
together
and
and
come
up
with
with
a
proposal
or
baseline
there
or
any
other
suggestions.
B
C
Yes,
and
I
would
say
the
the
thing
is,
I
want
to
make
it
more
standard
in
a
way
that
we
say
okay,
this
is
our
working
group
and
our
baseline
is
actually
coming
up
with
this.
With
these
research
topics
or
research
groups
that
can
lead
into
focus
groups
or
directly
into
pe
ethics
practice
session,
and
we
request
a
rough
budget
like
this
and
yeah.
It
will
cover
for
regulars
if
they're,
interested
or
slots
will
be
open
for
other
researchers
or
other
researchers
who
might
be
more
more
interested
or
more.
C
How
do
you
call
it
as
skilled
or
have
more
complementary
skills
that
we
need?
That
is
how
I
would
propose
it,
and
I
would
ask
you
to
basically
come
up
with
a
rough
rough,
baseline
or
or
maybe
the
three
of
us
or
more
people
who
want
to
yeah
shape
that
proposal
that
we
discuss
some
numbers
there.
Also
after
looking
at
other
working
groups,
so
we
don't
yeah,
we
we
have
a
regular
base
that
covers
this
activity,
a
research-based
activity.
B
B
A
B
So
we
don't
want
first
iteration,
but
just
to
keep
note
keep
you
know
that
we
want
funding
for
our
library
maintenance
to
make
it
something
a
working
product.
So
let's
say
if
we
are
giving
if
we
are
requesting
three
months
funding
for
the
first
month,
we
are,
we
don't
include
library,
we
will
say
okay,
we
already
want
to
do
15k,
it's
it's
part
of
the
library.
B
B
Other
groups
like
how
they
are
paying
for
researchers
like
how
much
they
are
paying
for
I
don't
know
we
can
include
our
teams,
like,
let's
say
like
this
core
omega
group,
like
regular
participants,
make
10k
10k
to
10
000,
but
in
general
let's
say
groups
are
getting
20k,
so
we
have
10k
gap.
So
we
can.
E
B
Okay,
in
general,
you,
you
are
giving
30k
to
groups
we,
but
we
are.
We
now
have
20k,
but
we
need
more
people
into
research
to
make
it
better
and
make
it
publicly
known
and
increased
awareness
about
token
engineering
ethics.
So
we
will
request
10k
for
the
additional
hires,
but
we
will
have
already
20k.
So
I
was
envisioning
working
proposals.
Something
like
this.
Please,
like
give
your
comments.
If
this
is
not
good
or
bad,
like.
A
Well,
this
has
sense
right
if
we
do
this
sense
making,
because
you
have
the
agent-based
role,
maybe
having
this
researcher
that
I
just
put
here
in
the
update
of
the
proposal.
So
you
can
come
as
a
researcher
from
other
working
groups
or
maybe
other
communities,
and
you
are
quote
unquote
in
charge
of
asking
for
funds
to
your
treasures,
your
common
pool
or
to
your
dao
or
your
whatever
institution
you
come
from
or
community,
and
you
can
come.
C
A
C
Yes,
yes,
so
what
I
would
and
then
I
think
we
should
take
this
to
a
working
session,
but
the
one
thing
is,
for
example,
especially
with
the
library,
it's
a
very
practical
initiative
right
what
research
would
be
needed,
but
for
that,
what
I
understand
is
you
know,
whatever
is
not
covered
by
the
funding
proposal
already
for,
for
that
needs
to
be
covered
in
the
working
group.
But
what?
What
that?
What
would
that
be?
C
Have
we
missed
something
that
is
not
part
of
the
initiative
proposal
that
we're
doing,
for
example,
in
the
tea
ethics
we
just
requested
for
the
participants
focus
group
participants,
but
we
have,
and
then
we
just
said
and
now
actually
for
creating
those
practice
sessions.
We
take
budget,
but
we
have
not
taken
care
of
okay.
How
are
we
going
to
replicate
this?
What
are
the
next
focused
research
groups
and
so
on
or
or
research
topics?
That's
what
I
thought
can
become
the
working
group
basis.
A
I
get
what
you're
saying
I
think
we
miss
the
role
of
the
agent
base
or
the
or
the
facilitator
or
many
roles
in
one.
That
is
the
convenience
keeper
that
can
weave
this
kind
of
workflow
between
the
library
and
the
focus
groups
and
the
the
agenda.
And
that
can
be.
I
don't
know
that
can
be
a
person.
I
hope-
and
it's
like
this
consilience
keeper-
and
this
is
like
a
role
or
a
task
or.
C
Okay
and
what
if
we
had
the
working
group
lead,
because
that's
a
role
that
is
that
exists
in
the
token
entering
commons
is
defined,
etc,
and
it's
basically
more
more
hands-on
than
the
steward,
especially
like
the
steward
of
or
omega
and
tech
labs
are
more
hands-on
or
more
from
the
life
from
the
life
of
a
token
engineer,
if
you
will
and
basically
stewarding
the
topic
is
more
important
than
how
do
you
call
it
delivering
a
product
or
or
like
implementing
software
and
so
on.
C
So,
but
still,
I
feel
like
we,
we
have.
This
working
group
lead
that
we
can
fill
and
that
could
be
well
not
only
for
one
of
the
initiatives
but
actually
for
both
or
any
and
as
well
as
if
there
are
any
weaving.
C
That
needs
to
be
done
or
do
you
think,
because
we
have
the
initiatives
we
have.
The
initiative
leads
and
all
of
them
are
always
in
working
group,
but
in
between
initiatives
and
so
on,
especially
when
I
as
a
steward
at
this
moment.
I'm
really
stuck
so
sorry
about
that.
But
the
real
world
projects
are
tagging
tagging
at
me,
which
is
also
good
for
for
token
engineering
community,
to
be
honest
because
those
are
incoming
anyways,
but
we
have
this
role
and
I
think
if
someone
who
is
practical,
who
is
a
beaver
who's
been
doing
it?
C
Anyways
kind
of
wants
to
yeah
wants
to
fill
it.
You
can
say
it
out
loud
here
or
there
can
be
multiples
if
you
want
to
have
a
do
it
in
in
tandem
or
if
you
want
to
first
discuss.
You
know
in
peace,
what
that
would
mean
with
respect
to
like
whatever
you
want
to
know,
but
you
want
to
speak
in
person.
Please
don't
hesitate
to
to
reach
out
to
me.
C
I
have
not
reached
out
yet
to
anyone,
but
I
can
also
try
and
do,
but
I
don't
want
to
impose,
of
course,
on
anyone,
but
that's
definitely
a
role
that
can
be
filled.
We
can
also
get
a
budget
for
that
or
that's
typical.
We
can
look
around
what
the
other
working
groups
have
asked,
and
that
could
be
maybe
that
practical
link
between
the
initiatives
and
towards
them.
F
C
Thank
you
for
for
putting
putting
that
in,
and
I
think
that's
also
validation.
G
C
G
C
C
Your
input
we
want
to
even
into
practical
sessions
and
so
on
again,
if
you
feel
like
the
the
acknowledgement
there
is
not
sufficient
to
cover,
please
come
and
and
don't
hesitate
to
discuss
this.
C
C
Not
not
acknowledged
or
not
sufficiently
taken
taken
back
care
of,
although
they
give
so
much
care
into
this
working
group
again,
the
the
research
groundwork,
that's
a
new,
that's
something
we
had
missed
and
that
will
also
cover
bring
additional
coverage,
especially
for
those
people
who
would
have
more
time
to
do
research
and
also
have
the
motivation
and
skills
and
yeah
everything
that
needs
to
actually
get
these
things
off
the
ground.
It's
not
yeah.
It's
a
lot
of
work
as,
as
you
know,
but.
G
What
I've
been
noticing
is-
and
I'm
gonna
do
this
with
the
comms
group
a
little
bit
focused
on
comms,
but
I
do
feel
like
there
is
a
kind
of
meta
skill
which
I
I
think
our
group
coms
group
gravity
group,
some
of
the
higher
level
groups,
soft
go
and
other
things
just
need
to
maybe
talk
about
or
have
some
training
in,
like
narrative
construction
like
there
are
a
bunch
of
people
who
are
good
writers
right,
but
then
constructing
coherent
narratives
is
not
always
the
same
thing
as
sort
of
writing
to
a
particular
topic.
A
G
I
don't
know
how
to
like
ask
about
that,
but
I
I've
just
been
observing
that
yeah
narrative
construction
seems
to
be
good
for
some
people
and
then
completely
lacking
for
others,
and
so
I'm
not
sure
how
to
sort
of
advance
that
from
so
that
that
sort
of
narrative
construction
competence,
kind
of
exists,
because
what
we're
talking
about
is
creating
a
library
that
library
needs
to
have
some
kind
of
coherent
narrative
behind
it.
C
C
Do
you
do
you
think,
and
let
me
ask
letty,
because
she
was
just
talking
about
the
updating
the
roles,
this
narrative
construction
competence?
Would
that
fit
into
the
library
design
or
was
the
design
a
visual
design
betty.
A
G
Yeah,
it's
my
concern
is
less
that
who's
responsible
for
the
narrative
more
that
we
all
collectively
know
not
only
what
the
narrative
is,
but
also
how
that
narrative
was
constructed,
how
to
construct
narratives
or
look
at
any
one
thing
and
understand
how
that
narrative
was
constructed.
So
the
process
that
I
go
through
is
like
a
deconstruction
thing
and
then
then
sort
of
reconstruct
it
to
see
in
comparison
to
our
current
needs.
G
So
I've
got
a
bunch
of
examples,
but
you
know-
and
I
can
do
that
pretty
much
on
the
fly
with
almost
anyone,
but
I
just
I
just
thought
it
should
be
a
an
additional
skill,
because
I've
noticed
so
far
in
the
way
we
the
way
we
communicate
we're
we're
not
as
a
group
all
that
skilled
in
narrative
construction.
We
may
have
people,
you
know
like
livy,
for
example.
I
was
saying
to
her
that
I
wanted
her
to
participate
in
that
because
she's
an
actress
and
it's
literally
her
job
to
figure.
G
Do
you
know
what
I'm
saying,
but
but
there
is
a
kind
of
artfulness
in
that
which
I'm
not
sure.
A
Yeah,
maybe
it's
not
resistance
per
se,
but
it's
sometimes
like
finding
the
the
right
moment
or
the
just
right
moment
to
do
so,
and
you
have.
C
A
Need
to
yeah
yeah
if
someone
just
points
himself
herself
to
do
this
in
the
same
kind
of
writing
fashion,
because
I
see
this
more
in
writing
than
in
this
world.
For
for
the
the
continuation
of
the
innovative,
I
see
this
is
like
more
enough
for
writing
skill,
so.
G
Well,
I
mean
like
the
thing
is:
is
that
you
know
like
if
I'm
creating
a
graphic
design
project
for
somebody
right?
It
doesn't
matter
how,
if
it's
one
page
or
an
entire
book,
there
has
to
be
an
arc
to
it.
Do
what
I
mean
and
even.
G
A
A
C
So
I
would
suggest
also
either
the
keepers
have
that
skill,
or
literally
the
keepers,
are
the
ones
okay
who
say:
okay,
I'm
gonna
pick
up
the
slack,
but
I
heard
durga
does
talk
about
this
narrative
construction
thing
and
I
feel
like
while
doing
this
keepers
thing.
I
can
really
benefit
if
I
could
get
get
some
support
there.
The
question
is,
like
you
know,
how
can
you
then
help
someone
who
says
okay,
I
need
some
help
with
this.
G
A
G
G
I
see
that
I'm
like,
oh
my
god,
so
you
know
there's.
Maybe
we
should
just
address
that
somehow
or
maybe
we
should
make
that
a
thing
that
is
on
our
agenda
about
people
who
come
into
the
tec
and
people
who
are
stewards
or
people
who
are
in
positions
of
responsibility,
that
it
is
some
fundamental
expectation
that
there
is
a
basic
competence
at
narratives.
So
I
don't
want
to
just
say
that
that
the
solution
is
only
personal.
We
need
the
solution
for
the
the
group
too,
but
it's
also
just
true
that
it.
G
It
takes
a
certain
amount
of
skill
for
that.
It's
almost
like
we.
We
almost
need
like
a
working
group
of
our
artists
and
writers,
who
could
kind
of
come
together
and,
and
you
know,
correspond
on
how
to
best
create
a
pedagogy
for
narrative
construction
for
for
people
in
the.
In
the
token
engineering
commons.
F
I
had
a
question
also
about
simply
like
with
working
on
these
graphics
and
these
icons
and
putting
them
on
this
notion.
I
started
just
to
think
about
if,
if
there
is
like
an
idea
that
someone
is
building
a
website
with
a
specific
database
for
it
or
they
could
kind
of
visit
this
kind
of
library
not
in
an
ocean,
but
that
I
think,
is
a
way
also
to
create
a
narrative.
G
Well,
I
will
say
part
of
the
part
of
the
thing
about
you.
Putting
in
you
know
the
graphics
in
in
the
top
of
everyone's
thing
is,
I
think
the
I
received
that
a
little
bit
like,
oh,
that
guy
just
went
and
did
that
because
it
wasn't
part
of
the
the
coherent
narrative
that
had
been
maybe
thought
of
by
that
individual
person
or
by
us.
As
a
group.
G
F
F
C
Yes,
but
that's
phase,
two
like
phase
one
and
let's
recollect
that
phase
one
is
a
prototype
and
the
the
only
thing
was
that
to
be
useful,
seen
useful
even
as
a
prototype,
so
that
there
is
demand
and
then
we
can
go
into
phase
two
with
its
own.
You
know,
and
then
it
becomes
even
a
product
on
its
own
exit
community.
What
have
you
sure.
G
C
More
value
to
to
to
the
art,
so
the
thing
is
we
can't
you
know
be
so
I
think
that's
that's
great.
That
makes
the
prototype
still
more
exciting
than
a
normal
prototype
would
do,
which
is
great,
but
then
you
know
try
to
bring
in
faith
too
before
we
even
have
the
funding
and
even
the
use
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
It's
just.
I.
C
F
F
A
F
And
in
that
sense
I
would
like
to
contribute
but
another
person
that
wants
to
put
like
a
structure
there
for
others,
but
they
are
just
kind
of
improvised
with
giving
some
graphics
and
if
people
like
it
or
not,
and
very
open
and
like
willing
to
actually
hear
from
someone
that
has
a
solid
base
and
wants
to
say
like
okay,
here
we're
thinking
of
this
or
that
like.
Can
you
help
with
this,
or
we
know
someone
else
that
maybe
replaces
this.
So
that's
kind
of
how
I'm
participating
here.
C
Yeah
and
definitely
I
I
thought-
or
I
had
a
feeling
that
you
know
nick
has
taken
it
up-
also
merits
have
communicated.
C
C
C
Okay,
so
that
narrative
construction
again
like
how
can
number
one
if
it's
really
big
for
tech
and
if
it's
about
communication
competence,
we
have
the
working
group,
com,
communications
and
so
on.
Nonetheless,
I
think
it
fits
here
with
respect
to
well.
There
is
a
narrative
around
this
token
entering
consilience.
Jumping
knowledge
together,
really
bring
it
that
on
again,
maybe
for
the
prototype.
C
You
don't
need
it
yet,
but
if
keepers
are
interested
or
are
able
or
maybe
are
competent
in
narrative
construction,
that
would
be
even
great
right
and
the
second
thing
where
I
could
see
that
this
is
helpful.
You
know
if
you
can
really
get
practical
support.
I'd
be,
for
example,
interested
in
improving
my
communication,
always
yeah,
because
that's
definitely
something
that
techies.
Let's
say:
yeah
have
a
hard
time
with.
G
C
Consideration
big
pictures,
things
literally
number
one
is
nurturing
the
diverse
backgrounds,
knowledge,
cohesion,
that's
important,
and
I
think
again
there,
this
narrative,
if
we're
lacking
it,
certainly
we
can
improve
but
like
how
is
the
question
as
always
how
if
we
can
discuss
this
in
one
of
those
sessions,
if
you
can
take
this.
G
C
C
And
that's
the
last
point
actually
radical,
integral
approach,
that's
from
letty
right,
so
the
work
style,
that's
one
thing
that
needs
or
definitely
will
be
updated
in
our
manifesto.
Is
we
started
with
hey
we're
gonna?
Let
this
emerge
because
that's
literally
the
the
type
of
contextual
ethics
in
a
sense
that
we
wanna
roll
with.
C
C
So
now
we
could,
and-
and
what
I
found
is
also
this
radical
agile,
agile
manifesto
to
the
right
and
radical
agile
really
brings
it
to
the
point
what
we
actually
need
to
top
in
the
centralized
organization.
Everyone
talks
about
self-organization.
No
one
knows
what
that
even
is
let
alone
whether
the
tools
that
we
use
for
daily
project
or
business
as
usual
project
management,
which
already
are
hijacked
and
are
dark,
agile,
whether
it
makes
sense
to
continue
using
them
in
that
co-opted
manner.
C
Radikaja
says
no,
but
literally
leaves
that
part
open
as
well.
But
I
know
that
many
many
of
you
actually
are
active
in
this
exploration
and
I
believe
also
the
reason.
The
main
reason
why
you
all
came
here
is
actually
to
figure
this
out.
You
know
what
does
the
self
mean
in
the
and
what
type
of
capabilities
do
they
that
south
needs
to?
Actually
my
newest
word
and
live
in
right,
what
does
self-sovereign
even
mean
beyond
owning
some
keys,
and
then
we
got
there
already
self
knowledge
etc.
C
So
I
think
this
group
is
perfectly
suited
to
come
up
with
a
practical
and,
and
we
we
are
kind
of
living
it.
It
is
at
sometimes
complex,
sometimes
chaotic,
so
it
would
be
great
to
apply
some
of
those
methodologies
and
frameworks
that
have
surfaced
in
the
past
year
and
are
also
going
to
give
practice
session
sessions
on,
etc
that
we
actually
take
time,
maybe
even
in
preparation
of
those
practice
sessions,
to
apply
it
to
the
data
that
we
surfaced
from
our
past
year
of
emergent
practices
and
I'm
looking
at
you
look.
G
Out
that
I
had
a
couple
hour
meeting
with
jeremy,
his
I
think
naomi
is
like
jeremy
and
something
of
change
anyway.
He's
both
he's
an
agile
coach,
first
of
all
and
he's
engaged
professionally
and
working
with
liberating
structures,
all
of
which.
A
G
And
this
word,
you
use
practical
a
lot.
You
know
he's
he's
very
much
about
that,
so
I
just
I.
I
actually
just
asked
him
to
even
come
into
this
meeting,
just
because
I
was
amazed
by
his.
G
Skill
level
and
vision
for
that
so
yeah,
maybe
you
can
connect
with
him
kind
of
often,
and
I
don't
think
he's
aware
that
he
could
fit
in
that
well
in
here,
even
though
I've
kind
of
encouraged
him
so.
D
D
G
Yeah
he's
amazing,
so
yeah
he's
literally
an
agile
coach.
That's
his
that's
his
job,
so
you
know
and
how.
A
G
In
various
things
so
yeah,
so
maybe
you
know
we
can
just.
I
asked
him
to
show
up
in
this
meeting,
but
I
don't
see
him
in
here
yet
so
I.
E
G
Of
change-
maybe
I
can,
I
can
add
you
into
groups
that
we're
in
so
I
don't
know.
C
So
but
yeah
I
I'll
I'll,
try
I'll
do
my
best.
But
again
maybe
the
one
thing
missing
is
to
say:
okay,
baby,
I
have
this
on
the
agenda.
C
Okay,
I
kind
of
feel
confident.
C
Starting,
that's
one
thing,
so
work
style,
radical,
agile,.
E
Soul,
sister
are
we
on
contextual
next
week
we
had
talked
about
that
to
have
a
session
on
agent-based
modeling.
E
C
Okay,
okay
and
then
let
me
put
that
in
agent-based,
modeling,
okay,
30
main
session.
C
Can
you
give
me
a
hint
with
respect
to
where
do
we
fit
it
in?
That
was,
I
think,
in
the
with
the
tc
library.
E
E
We
have
a
cad
cad
model
that
we're
able
to
just
define
function
like
user
behavior
and.
A
C
Perfect
look:
this
is
where
it
fits
in,
not
even
not
so
sure
about
tech,
library,
contact
technically
definitely
but
march.
C
C
So,
okay,
so
I
would,
I
would
suggest
then,
next
week,
that
we
have
these
topics.
C
C
I've,
oh
yeah,
one
more
thing
on
friday
in
the
morning
europe
time
I'll,
try
and
have
a
session,
maybe
combine
it
so
latest
on
friday.
There
should
be
an
update
on
this,
if
not
drop
in
into
that
session,
that
in
the
tc
calendar
and
yep,
how
do
you
call
it
pull
my
put
my
arm,
not
my
leg.
That
means
something
else.
Okay,
so
I
think
these
are
the
topics
that
go
well
together
and
I'll
definitely
share.
So
please
go
in
into
the
manifesto
and
c.