►
Description
The 0mega Working Group examines the ethos of and ethics in token engineering as well as the shared vision and diversity of its communities.
We gather every two weeks on Wednesday at 8pm CET.
Steward: Sebnem 🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
B
I
haven't
updated
the
agenda
for
today
so
sorry
about
that,
but
I
think
we
have
a
good
plan
right.
Nick
with
the
value
flows
about
token
engineering,
consilience
library.
B
Would
you
like
to
first
give
and
give
an
update
and
maybe
share
the
the
file
with
everyone?
So
we
can
collect
our
thoughts
and
focus
on
what
everyone.
B
Contributes
to
token
engineering
coincidence,
library,
and
maybe
we
can
take
them
five
or
ten
minutes
to
really
go
into
the
document
again.
B
The
archipelago
and
visit
the
islands
and
really
take
some
time
to
look
around
what
everyone
is
contributing,
also
maybe
reconnect
what
we
want
to
contribute
each
and
then
we
could
do
this
little
value
flow
session.
Nick
has
been
gone
going
through
that
already
and
did
not
discuss
it,
but
I
was
hoping
that
you
would
best
honor
and
yeah
I'll
help,
try
and
facilitate,
and
basically
it's
a
co-creative
process.
B
C
So
yeah
I'd
say
so
I
I
shared
the
figma
file
on
the
omega
channel,
so
you'll
all
be
able
to
see
it
from
there.
I
can
also
share
my
screen
right
here,
so
you
said
you
wanted
it
to
be
focused
on
the
library
so
we'll
be
focusing
in
this
area
today.
Correct.
B
Yes,
so,
first
of
all,
maybe
just
I
don't
know
if
everyone
had
the
chance
to
do
the
session
with
you,
this
one-on-one
onboarding,
to
get
the
tour
of
the
archipelago.
C
A
plan
yeah
sure,
so
what
I
did
is.
I
asked
people
to
basically
here
we'll
look
at
a
more
recent
example,
because
that's
the
old
version,
okay,
unipop.
C
I
hope
you
don't
mind,
I'm
using
you
as
an
example,
but
I
had
people
basically
share
what
motivates
them
to
interact
with
token
engineering
commons
and
with
omega
and
basically
share
what
drains
them
of
energy
to
do
an
experience
and
what
trains
of
energy
to
or
what
gives
them
energy
to
do
or
experience
and
then
based
on
that
they
spend
some
time
looking
at
the
different
initiatives
and
like
how
the
whole
map
works
together.
C
For
example,
there's
descriptions
here
documents
we
can
chat
about
specific
topics,
there's
to-do
lists
and
they
were
able
to
take
a
look
at
the
sub-initiatives
as
well
related
to
the
the
main
one
and
they
can
come
up
with
their
own
initiative.
So,
for
example,
we
started
a
curation
group
for
the
consilience
library
and
then
they
can
connect
their
posted
answers
to
the
initiative
and
rate
out
of
10
how
much
they
estimate
it
will
energize
them
and
over
time
they
can
change
their
rating
as
well
as
they
actually
start
working
on
it.
C
So
you
can
be
like
a
more
accurate
representation
of
how
much
it
energizes
them
yeah.
The
idea
is
to
basically
like
encourage
people
to
contribute
in
a
way
that
energizes
them
and
show
them
that
they
have
complete
freedom.
I
guess
in
choosing
how
they
contribute
and
they
have
freedom
to
start
initiatives
as
well.
So
we
can
come
up
with
a
diversity
of
strategies
in
solving
the
main
problem,
which
is
the
consilience
library
like
making
it
a
success,
making
it
well.
C
That's
just
one
of
the
initiatives,
but
the
main
goal
is
to
move
token
engineering
forward
and
create
safe
resilient
systems.
But
the
main
focus
of
omega
are
these
initiatives
listed
here.
C
So
we
have
the
token
engineering
ceilings,
library,
the
ethics,
participatory
research
and
then
there's
other
initiatives
that
are
emerging
as
well
like,
for
example,
focusing
on
workflow
regenerative,
workflow
styles
and
satori
is
also
coming
with
imaginarium,
and
I
wanted
to
do
some
focus
on
the
onboarding
as
a
way
to
kind
of
like
dog
food,
while
we're
creating
everywhere
else
in
the
other
initiatives
too.
C
So
as
part
of
like
the
work
after
the
session,
I'm
sorry
by
the
way
for
taking
so
much
of
your
energy,
but
asking
for
a
lot.
I
asked
people
to
also
kind
of
think
about
these
questions
up
here
which
are
like
how
can
the
library
earn
tec
tokens?
How
can
the
library
bint
to
dec
tokens
so
like?
C
So
today,
we'll
be
doing,
I
guess,
like
a
value
flow
session,
where
we
kind
of
come
up
with
ideas
on
how
that
could
all
work
I'll
share.
This
stock,
as
well
in
the
omega
channel,
so
you
can
all
have
access,
and
this
is
maybe
where
we
can
map
out
our
ideas.
C
B
B
So
what
we
would
need
is
actually
the
people's
contributions
and
the
cards
so
either
we
make
a
copy
of
that
island
and
yeah
or
or
one
second.
Maybe
if
it's
okay
for
you
just
that
we
work
underneath
it
and
then
you
can
separate
it
again
in
a
sense,
but
it
would
be
cool
for
people
if
you
didn't
have
time
or
if
you
want
to
refresh
also
like
who's
contributing
and
so
on,
that
yeah
that
we
can
move
between
the
players
and
their
cards
or
their
contributions,
their
motivations
as
well
as
what
they
said.
B
They
want
to
contribute
to
to
the
t,
consistency,
library
so-
and
you
know
when
we
now
take.
Let's
say:
let's
take
10
good
minutes.
B
Go
into
the
mood
of
token
engineering,
consilient
library
and
yeah
refresh
again
your
contributions,
look
at
other
people's
contributions
and
try
to
make
connections,
but
one
number
one
ask
will
be
about
values,
you
know
I
always
they
don't
think
about
tokens.
Yet
you
know
they'll
come,
don't
worry,
but
first
think
about
values
like
these
actions
that
you
say
if
I
contribute
that
that's
going
to
give
me
energy
and
so
on.
When
you
look
at
all
of
the
contributions
of
the
people
and
what
values
do
you
see
this
library
to
have?
B
Okay?
And
what
else
could
we?
I
don't
want
to
overload?
I
think
if
we
just
collect
the
value
value
stock,
yes
go
ahead.
Please
sorry.
D
I
was
going
to
say
I
wanted
to
kind
of
put
my
little
spin
on
things.
I
think
all
of
this
is
is
in
the
workflow
that
we're
doing
and
the
way
we
think
about
it
and
the
way
we
talk
about
it
is
important.
So
the
onboarding
part
is
our
south.
D
Sorting
that
we're
doing
nick
is
kind
of
taking
the
initiative
to
help
us
to
sort
ourselves
and
see
where
we
fit
in
the
bigger
picture,
and
I
think
even
the
participatory
research
feeds
into
the
consumer's
library
so
like
for
my
own
self,
I'm
doing
my
own,
like
research
on
like
how
we
use
words
and
all
this
kind
of
weird
stuff
that
I
like
to
do
and.
D
To
to
the
task
at
hand,
which
is
the
nft
redux,
and
it's
it's
using
my
disembodied
poetics
to
read
the
over
cultures
like
narrative
of,
what's
happening
right
now,
and
we
see
there's
like
a
real
need
for
meaningful
using
of
these
tools,
whether
they're
tokens,
whether
they're,
nfts
or
whatever,
meaningfulness.
B
Take
10
minutes
choose,
you
know.
B
Reflect
on
the
words
or
or
what
you
want,
what
what
is
important
it
doesn't
have
to
be
excessive,
but
maybe
one
or
two
values
that
are
important
to
you,
that
you
see
the
library
having
just
take
10
minutes
also
try
to
connect
to
the
others
like,
because
we
had
the
sorting
session,
as
we
said
like
try
to
see
what
the
others
are
bringing
in.
B
Let's
take
this
10
minutes,
and
then
we
will
have
around
and
really
everyone
should
have
a
chance
to
try
and
describe
the
value
stock
and
value
stocks
that
they
see
growing
the
more
type
of
actions
and
contributions
they
see
coming
from
the
people
that
put
their
heads
into
the
ring
or
their
cards
onto
the
board.
Okay,
everyone
has
the
link,
and
I
will
wake
you
up
in
10
minutes
and
in
those
10
minutes
will
leave
you
in
peace,
okay,.
C
So
yeah
again
we're
gonna
be
looking
at
what
others
have
put
in
as
energizing
for
them
to
contribute
to
the
library
and
then
and
then
others
can
add
more
as
well,
depending
on
their
ideas
of
what
they
find
valuable
or
what
will
energize
them
and
then
we'll
come
up
with
value
stocks.
Based
on
that,
that's
what
you
said.
B
Yeah,
just
10
minutes
for
everyone
to
reflect
on
what
value
they
see
accruing.
Okay,
is
this
what
people
put
on
the
board
already
and
then
we
got
okay,
see
you
or
hear
you
back
in.
B
So
we
have
two
more
minutes
and
I'm
gonna
throw
him
actually
something.
Please
have
a
spank
for
two
minutes
about
what
is
the
purpose
of
token
engineering,
consilience
library?
What
is
the
purpose
of
this
library?
B
B
B
So
I
would,
I
would
say:
let's
have
a
round.
I
saw
that
a
few
people
are
are
super
active,
already
put
things
in
cards.
Maybe
some
of
you
just
made
some
notes,
or
some
of
you
will
have
additions
when
we
make
around
and
those
people
who
shared,
who
wrote
things
down,
share
it
in
one
round
and
if
there's
something
you'd
want
to
add.
B
F
F
D
Yeah
I
like
to
piggyback
on
that.
I
think
fun
is
really
important.
You
know
there's
like
things
that
I
say,
but
I
mean
stuff
by
it,
so
like
infinite
game,
if
it's
designed
right,
it
feels
a
lot
more
like
infinite
play,
and
then
you
won't
even
know
that
if
it's
the,
if
it's
a
game
or
play-
and
for
that
means
you
know
whatever
it
is-
that
like
motivates
you
to
to
do
stuff.
For
me,
you
know
just
just
thinking
about
this
stuff.
D
Energizes
me
thinking
about
combining
different
things
that
I've
used
like
before
I
came
in
here.
You
know
what
I
refer
to
my
howling.
I
was
like
how
am
I
gonna
prove
stuff
that
I
already
do.
I
was
like
okay.
Let
me
see
I
could
do
this.
I
could
do
that.
Oh
my
friends
are
actually
just
like
creating
based
off
of
like
our
ideas
like
I
don't
even
have
to
tell
them
like
eclipsing,
binary
bro
that
thing
on
the
the
joystream
dao
about
centering
creators
on
their
all
on
his
own.
D
You
know
days
when
I
started
talking
about
my
nft
redux,
curry.
Hobo
sends
me
his
plan
to
fund
his
clerk
truck,
which
is
like
a
food
truck.
That's
more
of
an
artist's
like
creative
thing.
It's
just
a
way
of
reframing
it
we're
like
we
we're
doing
stuff
that
doesn't
have
labels
for
it,
but
be
nice
to
people
we're
going
to
put
these
labels
and
we
always
like
try
to
like
expand
them
to
different
things.
G
G
Yes,
please
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
yes,
great
yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
say
when
I
was
reading
everybody's
comments
and
what
they
wanted
to
share.
There
was
this
huge
sense
of
connection,
and
I
thought
that
was
really
beautiful-
that
everyone
wanted
to
connect,
but
also,
not
only
did
they
want
to
share
their
skill
set.
G
They
were
so
open
to
learn,
and
I
thought
that's
just
such
a
beautiful
balance
of
community
right
there
when
we're
just
starting
from
such
a
beautiful
space
of
wanting
that
connection
and
wanting
to
share
and
grow,
and
so
for
me
that
is
a
beautiful
place
where
we
could
start
this
library
from
like
this
openness
that
you're
everyone's
welcome
and
we
want
to
get
to
know
everybody
and
we
want
to
learn
from
you,
but
we
also
have
ideas
and
thoughts
and
comments
to
share.
So
that
was
what
I.
I
I
can
go
so
I
just
wrote.
First
of
all,
I
think
this
experiment,
or
this
exercise
would
be
something
really
interesting
interesting
into
creating
how
libraries
could
look
in
the
future.
It
doesn't
matter
if
they
have
to
do
with
token
engineering
or
with
any
other
field.
I
think
it's
a
good
opportunity
to
kind
of
re-imagine
how
libra
what
libraries
are
and
how
can
we
interact
with
them?
D
Yeah
during
during
one
of
the
well
yesterday,
when
I
was
talking
to
nick,
that
was
one
of
the
things
I
brought
up
is
like
you
know,
this
could
be
like
going
back
and
retrieving
like
the
library
of
alexandria,
like
it
wasn't
a
stagnant
place
where
you
house,
like
dead
books.
This
is
like
a
place
where
you
research
and
you
create,
and
you
you
have
whole
new
school
of
thoughts,
and
I
think
that's
like
the
potential
of
this.
D
That's
how
I'm
doing
it
and
you
know
everything
that
we
could
bring
to
the
table,
especially
with
the
new
new
little
tricks
and
and
stuff
that
we
have
to
to
really
see
if
we
can
make
it
sustainable
piggybacking
on
what
you
said,
because
you
know
everything
was
you
know.
Libraries
are
now
like.
You
know,
public
funding
and
it's
it's
hard
and
they're
stagnant
too,
and
they're
still
they're
good
for
the
community.
But,
like
you
know,
we
need
this
in
in
in
a
more
whole
and
rounded
place.
You
know,
especially
in
in
this
particular
space.
B
So
two
things,
don't
think
about
token:
don't
think
about
sustainability,
we're
getting
to
a
place
when
we
figure
out
the
value
flows
right
when
we
figure
out
the
appropriate
rewiring
of
those
flows
that
we
see
where
the
drains
are,
then
the
hawk
says
prophet
is
like
a
dog
barking
to
be
a
latin,
so
I
and
that
that
has
a
formula
meaning
if
you
create
value
this
technology
is
able
to
capture
value,
especially
if
it
is
a
digital
only
space,
and
with
that
we
can
create
sustainable
digital
economies.
So
that's
our
premise.
J
J
I'm
yes,
I'm
looking
at
this
stickiest
and
I
didn't
do
my
my
flows
or
whatever,
so
I
feel
like
I'm
a
stalker
here,
looking
at
everyone's
inner
workings.
So
what
I'm
seeing
and
what
I'm
feeling
here
is
that
I
select
the
primordial
needs
and
principles
and
emotions
of
the
human
beings
that
are
gathered
here.
So
I'm
I'm
looking
at.
I
want
to
play,
create
self-sustaining
spaces
of
creating
collaboration.
J
Experiment
reflection
I
want
to
this
is
knowledge
space.
So
I
really
see
this.
If
we
come
back
to
the
maslow's
pyramid,
I
think
that's
not
our
reference,
but
it's
like
very
related
to
so
we
are
creating
a
space
that
is
full
of
these
human
values
and
human
needs
really
and
we're
like
enabling
these
values
to
have
a
different
relationship
with
ourselves
with
the
world
and
with
everything
we
are
trying
to
create.
So
really
it's
like
this
indusception
space,
which
is
happening,
is
the
value.
J
So
we
were
thinking
about
this
dark
forest
or
this
dark
matter.
So
I
see
here,
like
the
values,
are
these
fundamental
human
needs
and
these
are
gonna
be
expressed
here,
and
so
that
has
an
intrinsic
value
in
itself
and
that's
what
we
are
trying
to?
Let's,
let's,
let's
merge
here,
realize
the
relationships
emerging,
that's
from
satori,
so
that's
like
a
value
in
itself.
K
Yeah,
I
would
like
to
pick
up
on
this
because
what
you
just
said
it
gave
me
this
kind
of
idea
of
thinking
about
this
kind
of
basic
needs.
What
happens
if
you're,
in
a
situation
where
we
are
not
in
meaning
like
we're
kind
of
connecting
here,
through
our
laptops
or
devices,
through
a
really
cool
internet
highways,
while
the
kind
of
knowledge
which
should
be
available
to
persons
that
could
really
benefit
from
token
economies
mostly
find
themselves
in
more
precarious
situations?
J
That
would
be
like
the
the
policies
and
the
accidents
that
are
in
the
abroad,
so
we'll
be
developing
those
referring
to
the
values
we're
trying
to
manage
here.
That
will
be
like
our
tools,
our
bucket
pool.
J
B
B
So
we
need
to
in
a
sense
free
ourselves
now
from
from
those
concerns,
but
really
look
at
the
value
and
in
a
sense,
trust
in
that
that,
if
this
transdisciplinary
knowledge
that
we
are
enabling
to
be
accessible
at
first,
even
to
those
who
have
laptops
and
everything,
it
is
not
accessible.
B
Okay,
so
number
one
get
that
that
adjacent
possibility.
We
can
we
can,
you
know
deal
or
we
can
enable
that
not
to
be
cut,
and
then
you
know
we
will
figure
out
actually
that
these
value
flow
assumptions
that
we're
having
actually
materialized,
that
we
then
can
create
those
token
models.
B
And
then
we
have
actually,
you
know,
created
a
value
add
in
this
in
the
space
and
then
the
next
adjacent
possible.
You
know
and
to
be
honest:
yes,
there
are
so
many
problems,
so
serious
problems
and
they
don't
go
away
if
you
throw
tokens
or
money
at
them,
there's
so
much
hundreds
of
millions.
Billions
of
eight
money
goes
around
the
world
and
we
still
have
seventy
percent
based
of
everything
like
people
still
don't
have
access
to
electricity.
We
don't
have
access
to
electricity
that
is
sustainable
and
then
like.
B
Money
has
not
solved
that,
hence
tokens
won't
solve
it
either,
but
we
have
actually
some
value-add
potential
here
that
we
can
collectively
create,
and
that
will
improve,
and
maybe
that
will
open
up
more
possibility.
So
that's
kind
of
the
mindset
we
need
to
get
into.
D
For
for
me,
just
inverting
kind
of
the
thought
process
and
all
this
kind
of
stuff
I've
been
talking
about,
like
my
fork
in
the
mindset
or
mind
flow
and
dancing
and
all
this
kind
of
stuff.
D
For
me,
it's
like
okay,
the
problem,
as
simply
as
I
could
say,
is
that
everybody
started
off
on
number
one
instead
of
starting
off
at
zero
and
they
started
off
with
a
bad
premise
of
logic
and
not
sound
gel
logic
and
there's
a
there's
basic
principles
behind
that
as
well,
and
that
I
want
to
introduce
into
this
developing
game
that
I
have
thinking
about
and
using
nfts
in
a
different
way.
D
I
think
too,
you
know
as
we
for
for
me,
it's
starting
off
with
that
beginner's
mind:
okay,
swipe
the
thing
clean
okay,
so
a
beginner's
mind
is
is
about
is
like
not
having
pre
assumptions
about
stuff
and
just
going
for
what
what's
in
this
moment,
which
is
emerging
in
in
these
patterns,
and
I
think,
if
we
start
from
from
ground
zero,
what
we
have
right
here
is
a
lot
of
convergence
of
what
we
initially
feel
within
us
that
we
could
start
to
build
upon
and
when
we
start
for
me,
when
I
started
looking
at
nfts
differently
is
like
okay.
D
This
is
about
like
a
shared
journey
that
we're
gonna
be
all
doing
together,
but
also
two.
We
could
record
it
via
these
different
little
steps,
and
that's
for
me
it's
to,
like
you
know,
as
we
progress
with
it
within
this
structure
and
developing
new
ways
of
going
about
researching
in
token
engineering
or
making
collaborations
with
different
projects
and
and
doing
alignments
of
how
we
go
about
doing
stuff.
D
You
soon
realize,
as
if
you
keep
on
pushing
this
forward,
is
that?
Okay,
that's
what
the
the
group
my
mind
share.
My
mandala
really
is
it's
like
this
is
how
we
got
this
far,
and
you
give
it
to
to
your
friend
who,
who,
who,
like
you,
can't
explain
everything
you're
doing
to
them.
You're
just
like
well
just
look
at
this
like
just
go
just
go
on
that
site
like
it
just
makes
sense
after
a
while
you'll
just
look
at
it
like
here
here.
Here's
my
here's,
my
mandala
energy,
like
please,
engage
with
it.
D
It's
like
I
used
to
give
books
to
people
and,
I
would
say,
hey,
I
don't
care
if
I
get
this
back,
but
I
just
really
appreciate
it.
If
you
read
it
like.
That's
all
that
matters
to
me
like
you
know,
and
it's
like
the
same
thing
with
these
mandalas,
the
same
thing
with
the
library
and
same
thing
that
we're
going
to
start
creating
it's
like
we
do
it,
because
this
is
what's
meaningful
to
us
and
by
by
sharing
our
own
shared
values
and
the
process
of
of
doing
this.
D
Oh,
this
was
helpful
on
our
journey
to
this
way
like.
Oh,
you
might
want
to
engage
with
this
particular
dick.
It
helped
me
on
my
first
journey
to
figure
out
that
I
wanted
to
teach
bots
how
to
dance
so
you
know,
and
then
I
went
into
the
bot
class,
and
I
learned
about
you-
know
working
with
bots
and
stuff,
like
that.
That's
how
I've
been
viewing
and
thinking
about
things
recently.
A
B
B
Okay,
so
so
sorry,
but
so
I
have
a
job
and
that
is
kind
of
keeping
us
on
track,
especially
what
we
don't
want
to
do
is
go
into
implementation.
Yet
you
know
you're
free
after
the
next
10
15
minutes
to
stay
on,
and
we
can
jam
about
all
these
ideas
and
capture
them.
But
I
just
want
to
keep
you
focused
just
50
more
minutes
not
to
go
into
the
solution,
space,
nothing
about
tokens
and.
B
C
Sure
I've
noticed
that
well,
the
stuff
I
list
is
just
like
common
things
from
what
energized
people
around
the
library
so
getting
to
experience
a
transdisciplinary
nature
of
work
like
working
with
different
types
of
people,
like
kind
of
like
what
junior
was
saying
about
working
with
scientists
and
creatives
at
the
same
time
and
merging
the
art
and
science.
J
C
J
C
Being
able
to
gain
gain
insights
and
support
and
therefore
important
problems
will
be
solved.
People
seem
motivated
to
solve
big
problems
here
and
generate
different,
like
innovative
ideas
and
innovating
in
sustainable
regenerative
systems.
Keyword.
C
And
growth,
in
tandem
with
other
people,
so
being
able
to
experience
like
yeah
again
that
organic
and
collaborative
growth,
I
guess
like
experiencing
with
peers,
it's
nice,
the
receiving
of
knowledge
and
then
being
able
to
share
knowledge
to
bring
others
up,
because
I
feel
like
the
people
who
are
wanting
to
contribute
to
the
library
they
yeah.
They
want
to
help
others
they're
they're,
intrinsically
motivated
to
help
others
succeed
and
make
the
world
a
better
place.
J
I
just
an
actual
primordial
thing:
everyone
is
saying
and
that's
the
first
need
of
every
human
being,
and
I
see
connection
in
everything
like
in
values
in
needs
in
forms
of
collaboration.
So
I
see
like
connection
and
in
relationship,
I
see
connection
as
our
bigger
first
principle
value
in
this
matter.
B
G
Yeah,
so
I
think
that
it's
amazing
that
everyone
said
the
connection.
So
if,
when
I
was
like
looking
into
how
what
else
we
could
add
to
this
when
nick
and
I
were
going,
onboarding
is
how
we
can
almost
connect
each
green
square
with
other
green
squares,
so
we
can
find
ways
to
kind
of
work
together
on
these
ideas,
because
a
lot
of
them
are
the
same.
G
When
I
was
reading
them.
I
was
like
all
of
the
everybody's
a
lot
of
answers
to
the
exact
same.
So
it's
like.
How
can
you
connect
further,
and
I
know
you
said
you
don't
want
to
go
into
the
planning
of
it,
but
you
know
if
we're
trying
to
create
connections,
that's
the
easiest
way.
It
makes
sense
to
me
exactly
you're.
Looking
for
this,
I'm
looking
for
this.
That's
connect.
G
B
Exactly
like
this,
you
know
how
alignment
can
happen
if
you
know
the
leader
says
this
is
the
way
to
go,
and
this
is
the
way
to
align,
and
these
are
the
rules
to
follow.
B
Then
we're
all
aligned-
and
this
is
also
a
way
and
what
you're
doing
here
is
the
way
to
align
just
by
exposing
your
mental
models,
what
you
value,
what
you
can
contribute
and
then
also
listening
to
others
intently
asking
and
actually
then
taking
some
more
time
to
make
those
connections
and
maybe
even
reaching
out
and
then
next
week
we
will
have
this
workflow
like
during
the
week.
We
can
continue
work
on
those
value
flows
and
I'm
happy
to
share.
B
You
know
what
how
it
is
done
more
or
we
can
have
another
session
to
go
deeper
if
people
are
interested,
so
that
could
be
part
of
yeah
a
little
ritual
a
bit
of
a
toe
tipping
into
a
token
engineering
process.
B
But
next
week
definitely
is
about
workflows,
meaning
how
do
we
actually
get
to
work
and
they're
working
in
safe,
collective
space
that
encourages
others
and
supports
growth?
B
Can
you
because
I
don't
think
we
had
the
chance
to
speak,
but
can
you
share
a
bit
where
that
comes
from
because
that's
exactly
something
that
is
resonating
a
lot
currently.
G
Yeah,
well,
I
think
when
nick
initially
went
over
this
with
me-
and
I
just
thought
you
know-
no
one
asked
these
questions
like
we
don't
ask
each
other
these
questions,
it's
a
great
opportunity
to
really
reflect
first
on
myself,
but
then
you
know
like
how
will
other
people
react
with
you
and
ask
questions
and
just
based
on
this
call,
so
there's
just
so
much
joy
and
enthusiasm,
and
I
I
feel
it
through
the
call
like
we're
excited
about
the
possibilities
and
and
even
though
there
are
some
things
that
some
people
are
saying.
G
I'm
still
excited
rather
than
checking
out,
and
I
think
that
are
the
kind
of
spaces
I
would
like
to
be
a
part
of
and
to
feel
safe
in
those
spaces,
to
ask
those
questions
and
to
learn
from
others
and
obviously
there's
a
extreme
wealth
of
knowledge
here
that
people
seem
to
be
very
open
to
share
and
I'm
I'm
all
for
it
and
if
there's
anything
that
I
can
share
and
that
I
can
help
provide
for
others
as
well.
G
I'm
I
would
like
that
very
much
so
so
that's
kind
of
why
I
wrote
that
down.
That's
what
I
felt
when
I
was
reading
everybody's
comments
and
what
I
personally
felt
when
I
was
doing
this
exercise
that
I
just
felt
very
safe,
and
you
know
I
wouldn't
maybe
typically
share
all
of
the
things
that
energize
me,
but
also
all
the
things
that
take
energy
from
me.
It
can
be
quite
vulnerable
to
like.
Oh
this
stuff.
C
C
Here
and
then
what
they
shared
here
and
then
so
that
next
week
we
can,
we
can
have
better
ideas
on
how
to
do
this.
It's
kind
of
like
in
that
book
that
you
lent
me
andrea
the
power
of
attachment
it's
about
holding
space
for
other
people's
perspective,
without
just
focusing
on
giving
on
talking
back
at
someone
you're,
actually
listening.
So
our
way
of
listening
would
be
to
look
at
what
energizes
and
what
drains
other
people
in
omega,
and
then
we
can
ideate
on
this
next
week.
F
Just
I
want
to
say
two
things
which
is
kind
of
irrelevant
to
this
I'd
like
to
ask.
B
F
F
B
B
I
don't
think
it's
it's
an
issue
of.
Maybe
it's
an
issue
of
time.
Maybe
it's
really
like.
Oh,
where
do
we
start
so
one
aspect
I
really
want
us
to
figure
out
is
also:
how
do
we
make
this
experience
for
the
curators
right,
meaningful,
yeah.
F
F
F
I
can
work
on
it
like
next
week,
but
I
know
it's
not
urgent
yet,
but
I
can
work
on
it
asynchronously
and
we'll
share
when
the
time
comes,
so
we
can
move
faster
and
one
thing
that
that's
super
cool
that
we
have
trend
and
the
other
thing,
as
you
said,
curlaps,
maybe
will
be
interested
to
do.
A
creation
jam
is
like
very
interesting
guy.
B
Okay,
so
we
have
these
little
rules
that
we're
trying
to
get
feedback
on,
as
in
like
we
made
these
little
rules,
but
maybe
they're
not
helping,
but
maybe
they
are
and
why
those
rules
are.
You
know
at
least
start
with
two
people
curating
just
to
show
this
transdisciplinarity
and
so
on,
and
maybe
it's
also
a
way
for
them
to
bond
over
yeah
over
topics
etc
and
for
the
og
seed
creations
and
so
on,
yeah
like
if
you
can
follow
up
with
them.
B
If
you
can
help
them
also
asking
like
what
is
it
that
we
could
do
differently
for
them
to
be
able
to
share
better
faster?
We
can
do
that
so
that
that's
a
perfect
life,
please
yeah.
F
L
Also
question:
do
we
do
the
curators
have
total
freedom
over
the
content
that
they
pick
over
the
book?
The
research
paper
I
mean
I
I
would
assume
they
would,
but
are
there
any
do
we
want
to
help
them,
maybe
limit
the
scope
a
little
bit
like
that.
B
L
Yeah,
because
I
I
I
mean
I've
seen
that
that
sometimes
stops
people
or
people
that
I've
offered
it's
like
like
whether
they
it's
like
they
don't
know
where
to
begin
like.
B
Okay
yeah,
so
let's
try
different
things
and
with
the
people
that
we
reach
out,
you
know,
let's
say:
okay,
start
with
three
like:
let's
try
different
things
and
come
back
with
the
feedback
and
also
do
it
yourself
with
people
you
want
to
create
with
and
then
figure
out.
Okay,
if
I
have
this
constraint
of
limits,
I
work
better.
That's
an
instead,
let's
get
those
insights.
B
Okay
and
now
I
have
to
gain
some
more
time
for
we're
almost
finishing
wrapping
up
for
this
value
flow
session.
If
that's
okay
and
we
can
continue
with
the
implementation,
I
have
some
more
time,
but
maybe
some
people
need
to
go.
So
that's
why
I
want
to
value
flows
so
values
so
steph.
You
added
a
few.
G
H
So
instead
I
guess
if
people
would
be
able
to
curate
other
people
would
be
able
to
review
in
a
decentralized
way
right
and
we'll
be
able
to
communicate
and
comment
on
the
content
that
is
being
there
and
offer
suggestions,
so
so
so
that
it
won't
be
there
in
a
monolithic
way
so
that
it
will
be
able
to
be
updated
right.
So
I
don't
so,
if
that's
the
case-
and
we
find
a
good
system
to
actually
do
this,
then
I
don't
think
it
would
be
an
issue.
B
We
will
have
them
also
as
early
alpha
testers,
if
you
will
like,
if
you
have
any
design
ideas
and
so
on
once
they
started
contributing
having
stake
skin
in
the
game
right
then
this
will
flow.
B
But
before
we
have
content
before
we
have
I'm
very
going
into
implementation
before
we
have
any
users
so
that
that's
now
values
can
we
try
and
get
at
least
one
that
have
put
like.
I
see
death
you
edit
some
values
and
but
that
that's
it
actually.
K
K
Like
how
to
make
common
sense
because
often
like
the
bifurcation
is
between
public,
private
or
private
public
partnerships,
so
the
commons
as
a
discourse
is
this
kind
of
interesting.
So
what
is
the
making
of
common
sense?
It's
not
kind
of
a
given
so
yeah.
That's
something
that
I
think
is
quite
important.
K
If
I
think
about
like
a
new
field,
rethinking
what
belongs
to
property
like
what's
the
comments,
what
is
a
private
property,
so
this
kind
of
language
or
this
kind
of
common
space
that
needs
to
exist.
In
this
token
economics,
engineering,
so
yeah,
that's
I
thought
of
the
research
of
the
commons,
what
it
is
a
comment
or
what
it
could
be
and
then
distributed
knowledge,
so
yeah.
That's
again,
this
kind
of
same
question
of
what
they're
doing
with
like
copying
wikipedia
when
a
certain
country
is
kind
of
like
blocking
it.
K
So
all
these
kind
of
questions
of
having
a
censorship
is
censorship,
resistant
and
then,
of
course,
also
peer-reviewed.
So
to
always
have
this
kind
of
interaction
person
to
person?
Is
this
person
spamming?
Is
it
relevant
to
the
kind
of
work
that
is
the
consilience
library
and
then
the
decentralized
database,
so
to
have
it
as
a
kind
of
a
mycelium
mushroom
kind
of
thing
that
pops
up
everywhere
so
that
it
doesn't
matter
where
it's
based,
but
that
it's
very
difficult
to
shut
it
down?
K
B
Okay,
that
technical
values,
nice,
okay,
any
editions
anything
anyone
wants
to
add
as
value
something
that
just
came
up
and
needs
to.
I
I
You
have
like
a
more
clear
and
kind
of
uniform
idea
of
where
is
this
going
and
what's
the
mission
of
it
behind
it
and
that
we
can
all
create
together?
I
don't
know.
J
I
think
that's
like
a
new
index
or
metric
to
be
able
to
value
these
kind
of
value
flows
which
are
emerging
in
these
spaces,
so
they
like
creating
new,
metrics
and
vocabulary
in
with
this
creation.
So
we
can
share
it
with
the
whether
it's
it's
a
value
in
itself
like
being
able
to
value
this
kind
of
intangibles
and
that's
exactly
yeah.
B
B
B
I
Let's
just
state
that
that
it
should
stay
like
one
way
forever.
You
know
but
like
I
think
it
just
yeah.
It's
really
helpful
for
a
group
of
people
to
have
like
a
collective
goal
or
collective
guide
that
we
can
all
follow
right.
So
we
don't
have
like
work
and,
for
example,
if
you
have
a
newcomer
and
they
ask
you
what
is
this
considering
library
about?
Well,
we
have
this
in
mind,
and
this
is
what
we're
trying
to
do.
This
is
why
I'm
not
saying
that
couldn't
change
right.
I
B
Totally
with
you
all,
I'm
asking
is
to
give
it
a
chance
that
maybe
purpose
will
be
sufficient
to
allow
for
that
play
around.
B
What
we
can
come
up
with
is
maybe,
in
addition
principles
and
in
the
template,
for
example.
Maybe
some
principles
are
there.
We
can
have
also
in
the
chat
exchange
on
these
topics.
I
really
want
to
see
like
we're
just
used
to
vision
mission.
We
used
to
do
things
one
one
way,
and
here
it's
just.
B
Doing
a
little
bit
different
and
I
also
shared
that
the
background
input
to
it
and
so
on
and
so
forth,
where
it
comes
from,
it's
called
chaotic
organizations
and
it's
just
an
invitation
to
give
it
a
try
and
literally,
if
you
know
if
people
want
to
come
up
with
a
vision,
and
I
think
you
need
that
we
need
that
for
coming
up
with
visuals
and
everything
and
no
not
not
holding
you
back
or
anything.
B
But
what
I
want
to
say
is
for
the
value
flows.
This
is
sufficient.
We
don't
need
to
try
and
find
more
like
this.
This
is
already
quite
quite
sufficient.
I.
I
Just
want
you
to
open
yeah,
I'm
referring
more
like
to
new
people
that
don't
really
have
this
kind
of
understanding,
or
this
philosophical
background,
like
what
you're
saying
you
know
like
these
are
more
like
traditional
ideas,
but
that
most
that,
like
the
majority
of
people,
they
know
know
about
that.
You
know
so
I
think
that
could
help
or
to
explain
to
others
what
this
is
about,
but
like
personally,
like
I'm
open
to
trying
new
things.
Absolutely
that's
one
of
the
reasons
why
I'm
here.
B
Cool
cool
and,
and
what
we
could
also
do
is
like
really
okay,
how
explain?
How
did
we
get
get
get
here
like?
Why
do
we
ask
for
purpose
and
values
and
also,
for
example,
we
have
not
yet
figured
out
this,
we
say
transdisciplinary
and
novelty,
but
I
would
ask
us
to
go
a
bit
deeper
and
come
up
with
what
is
the
value
of
novelty
knowledge?
It
could
be
an
experience
for
example,
and
so
on.
B
B
Maybe
those
can
be
solved
through
these
insights
and
supports
in
an
environment
that
fosters
novelty
or
that
values,
novelty
or
actually
is
designed
for
transdisciplinary
exchange,
and
you
know
how
novelty
and
getting
new
impulses
actually
can.
B
You
know,
create
aha
moments
and
so
on,
so
I
do
definitely
see
and
and
also
invite
you
just
to
look
at
it
a
bit
more.
What
is
the
value
of
connection?
These
are
things
that
we
feel
and
if
you
can
come
up
with
words.
D
D
I
tackle
what
for
me
why
I
think
novelty
is
important.
D
Meaningful
novelty,
I
think,
is
a
catalyst
for
culture
every
step
of
the
way.
When
you
view
how
culture
actually
develops.
It's
it's
an
artist
using
a
medium
in
a
novel,
meaningful
way.
Lily
miss
burls
used
some
techniques
from
surrealists
about
cutting
up
and
he
used
it
in
a
new
context.
He
used
it
in
film
the
first
time
he
did
cut
up
with
william
geisin.
D
It
was
out
of
context
that
everybody
in
the
theater,
like
50
of
them,
threw
up
because
they
they
couldn't
handle
it
and
they
went
too
far
with
it,
but
they
were
experimenting
with
novelty
in
a
in
a
different
medium
of
to
see
what
they
could
do
with
that
and
that
kicked
off
remix
culture,
we're
we're
still
in
this
cut
up
method,
yeah
and
every
step
of
the
way.
All
this
development
and
culture
and
art
happens
when,
when
people
use
different
mediums
in
a
novel,
meaningful
way
can.
A
I
say
something
I
I
wouldn't
you
know
I
wouldn't
look
at
novelty
this
way,
because
it's
it's
it
has
this
assumption
that
you
know
we
are
living
in
a
kind
of
linear
way.
That's
the
next
step,
you
know
bring
something
but
creativity
for
sure,
by
definition,
is
the
use
of
something
out
of
a
context
into
another
context
and
that
it
doesn't
mean
that
it's
novelty
and
what
I
would
you
know
suggest
that
we
can
explore
is
that
novelty
is
composed
by
different
aspects
and
definitely
in
novelty.
A
You
have,
for
example,
a
part
of
history.
You
know
you
you
can
use
something
from
that
is
an
ancestral
tradition
and
you're
going
to
use
it
in
a
different
way.
It's
always
connected
to
different
things
that
that's
what
I
would
like
to
say
that
that
it's
not
one
concept
that
is
unique.
It's
composed.
J
And
as
well,
it
connects
very
well
with
it's
a
novelty,
but
you
say
it's
like
infringing
in
many
realms,
so
you
have
the
data
is
which
came
with
philosophy
and
breaking
up
new
ground.
So
it's
connected
like
the
philosophy
with
literature
with
museums.
So
it's
like,
not
linear,
but
it's
interconnected
because
they
were
able
to
to
mix
up
a
lot
of
meanings
and
vocabulary
and
they
came
up
with
something
that
is
not
linearly
new
but
just
like
very
structurally
a
novelty
in
the
realm.
So
that's
also
in
relationship
to
other
artists
or
other
disciplines.
J
J
A
K
Example
between
modern
and
pre-modern:
it's
not
that
suddenly
there
is
modernity.
It's
just
a
moment
that
pre-modern
like
monarchy
reacts
to
like
modernity.
That
moment
modernity
becomes
the
new
with
this
kind
of
retroactive
movement.
So
it's
more
a
flow
than
than
a
stock.
The
novelty
cannot
be
seen
as
the
thing.
It's
always
a
relational
quality
which
becomes
new
the
moment.
The
old
response
to
it.
M
J
Yes,
and
if
we
have
our
matrix
right
and
our
new
vocabulary,
we
will
even
be
imagining
in
2016.
This
library
is
big
enough
to
have
all
these
creations
and
we
can
just
analyze
those
and
we
can
say,
look
with
this
neural
framework.
Oh
my
god.
This
is
the
pain
point
and
in
this
moment
in
time
they
realized
that
tokens
could
not
solve
everything
but
could
solve
this
specifics.
D
Synchronicity
that
happened
to
me
personally
when
I
was
like.
I
was
talking
about
blake,
right
and
and
I
go,
and
I
read
this
article
about
blake
and
is
talking
about
his
songs
of
experience
and
that
he
created
the
the
artwork
for
it.
He
also
painted
each
one
of
it
so
like
every
everyone
who
had
a
copy
of
that
songs
of
experience
that
he
made
were
unique,
each
each
one
was
different.
It
had
a
standard
design,
but
he
he
painted
it.
So
the
colors
were
different
and
I
was
just
like
damn.
A
D
That
guy
was
doing
the
nft's
legit,
like
that,
that's
what
he
was
doing
like
and
like
just
just
going
back
to
like
retrieving
different
stuff
like
I
want
to
go
back
to
the
getty,
because
I
see
these
stained
glass
windows
and
I
I
just
look
at
them,
and
you
know
they
were
doing
holograms
like
you.
Look
at
the
stained
glass
windows
up
close
and
it's
a
hologram.
D
B
I'm
just
noting
the
vision,
also
bloody,
so
yeah
again
what
I
wanted
us
to
constrain
ourselves
a
little
bit
to
come
up
with
this
few
little
bubbles
that
we
can
always
come
back
to
and
if
you
take
some
more
time
to
look
over
it
and
let's
see
if
we
are
already
hearing
reading
principles
that
are
important
to
us
and
also
you
know
to
the
purpose
of
the
coincidence,
library
and
then
also
feel
free
to
note
those.
B
But
the
goal
is
to
have
these
like
sign
posts,
not
even
like
a
few
things
that
we
can
always
come
back
to
and
know
like
this
was
you
know,
23rd
of
march
in
2022,
and
we
discussed
this
was
our
common
vision
that
we
had
formed
that
night
or
day
and
we
can
come
back
to
it
and
so
on
and
then
have
that
as
our
sink
point.
B
B
And
that's
the
kind
of
interesting,
in
my
view,
the
most
interesting
new
way
of
developing
experiences
like
we
don't
have
to
come
up
with
this
is
the
way
that
this
library
needs
to
be
experienced.
B
Imagine
all
of
a
sudden
people
join
in
half
a
year
or
somehow
we
meet
somewhere
and
a
group
of
3d
artists
actually
haven't
think
about
it
and
they
all
of
a
sudden,
creates
an
entire
different
interface
that
none
of
us
was
thinking
so
being
yeah.
I
think
these
are.
These
are
the
areas
that
we
can
keep
open
but
then
also,
as
andrea
mentioned,
also
focus
on.
How
can
we
actually.
B
Focus
or
overlap
our
collective
actions,
so
we
can
help
each
other,
develop
progress,
achieve
learn
in
implementing
this
library
and
then
also
help
us
see
if
there's
something
we
miss
and
how
can
we
yeah?
B
How
can
we
add
that
needs?
How
can
we
advertise
that
needs
in
in
this
network
and
so
on?
To
have
people
join,
who
might
be
filling
needs
that
we
see
and
that
can
be
closed
with
or
that
can
be
met
with
their
contributions
and
so
on
so
next
week,
if
your
game,
we
try
this
this
workflow
and,
to
be
honest,
I
have
never
done
something
like
a
workflow
design
and.
B
Question
anyone
of
you
have
else.
I
will
definitely
ask
jeremy
whether
he
has
some
ideas.
B
Then
there
is
some
information
here
already
like
people
saying
I
want
to
contribute-
and
this
is
my
my
number-
my
energy
flow
frequency-
maybe
like
those
of
you
who
are
interested
in
figuring
out
this
new
ways
of
working
or
regenerative
workflows
can
go
in
and
see
like
how
could
collaboration
happen
in
the
space
we
had
started.
B
Also,
uncovering
these
self
stocks,
as
nick
says
and
and
stocks
of
collaboration
like
how
energy
flows
between
collaborators
and
also
maybe
not,
maybe,
but
what
type
of
external
energy
meaning
funds
and
so
on
is
needed
for
a
collaboration.
B
So
these
are
the
things
that
I
would
ask
us
to
get
into
those
of
you
who
are
interested
in
and
have
a
look
again
and
to
our
mirror
board
that
had
captured
the
ideas
of
dynamic
energy
budget
and
living
self
and
living
relationships,
hence
in
living
systems.
So
there
lies
some.
There
are
some
insights
new
insights
covered.
I
believe
that
could
that
should
flow
into
our
next
session.
The
workflow
design.
B
No,
no
there
we
really
need
to.
As
I
mentioned
redesign,
and
with
that
I
mean.
B
Like
all
of
this
work
ground
work
that
we
said
we
could
be
doing
the
research,
some
researchers,
foundational
research
that
can
go
into
call
for
participation
for
those
topics
and
that
shall
go
into
actual
little
projects
of
pulling
up
these
focus
groups
getting
token
engineers
together
having
an
open
participatory
sessions
on
those
topics,
actual
analysis
of
those
topics
and
so
on.
We
should
really
have
that
defined,
because
I
also
found
actually
a
lot
of
interesting
people
doing
blockchain
ethics,
research
yeah.
B
So
I
was
thinking
we
need
to
open
it
up
way
more
like
it's,
not
enough
that
we
say
we
do
it
within
omega.
B
We
can't
prepare
the
ground
work
and
so
on,
and
that
should
be
part
of
working
group
proposal.
But
then
those
sessions
like
hey,
we're
doing
another
round
of
tea
ethics,
participatory
research.
That
would
be
like
a
call
for
participation,
including
the
budget
and
everything
needed
to
get
get
those
going.
F
F
B
Thank
you
for
sharing,
and
also
it
is
totally
okay
when
you,
when
you
say
hey,
okay,
can
you
take
this
over
and,
for
example,
I
could
just
ask
you
in
in
chat-
and
I
can
and
take
on
this
documentation,
for
example.
K
Technical
question
yeah
just
a
technical
thing
because,
like
I,
I
just
went
ahead
with
building
this
mock-up
of
this
site
for
just
having
an
idea
of
like
how
it
looks
like
when
it's
not
on
notion,
but
then
to
where
do
I
send
like
all
the
things,
because
I
made
like
a
little
email
account
or
some
login
infos
like?
Is
there
a
place
where
I
can
just
share
this?
That
others
can
also
access
it?
K
B
So
what
we
should
definitely
do
is
how
do
we
change
credentials
like
that
is
more
the
process
stuff
for
now?
If
you
can
keep
it
on
and
maybe
share
it
with
someone
else
who
or
two
others
who
definitely
have
it
for
yeah.
K
B
No
actually
like
the
t,
confidence
library-
maybe
if
you
can
hold
on
till
next
week,
that
we
figure
out
like
who
are
the
leads
or
who,
who
want
to
take
on
that
responsibility
and
sharing
things
between
three
people
should
always
work
like
if
to
somehow
english.
There
is
still
one
saying
hey.
B
I
need
to
share
this
with
two
others,
so
that
could
be
a
thing,
but
I
would
like
to
look
into
actual
management
of
those
credentials
and
and
so
on,
and
that's
part
of
the
workflow
documentation
that
we're
gonna
have
okay,
another
thing
and
question
also
to
make:
can
we
use
the
t,
conciliance
library,
this
board
to
actually
map
the
things
the
artifacts,
if
you
will,
that
are
that
have
been
already
created
so
that
people
see
where
they
could
continue
or
start
working.
C
Yes,
absolutely
that
would
probably
make
it
easier
for
newcomers
as
well
to
just
have
the
one
file
to
refer
to
yeah.
I
hope,
eventually,
we
can
make
it
so
that,
even
if
all
of
us
were
no
longer
an
omega
and
someone
else,
we're
carrying
on
this
file
will
help
them
continue.
So
yeah
that.
B
B
B
So
we
are
using
this
map,
like
our
dashboard,
imagine
and
t
consistence
library
bubble
box.
How
do
you
call
it?
The
box
that
says
t
considers
library
around
there
you
can
collect.
B
K
B
Cool
yeah,
exactly
like
the
dashboard,
the
cockpit
the
the
archipelago
map,
whatever
we
want
to
call
it,
and
next
we
would
continue
and
figure
out
the
the
the
workflows
as
well,
and
for
that
would
be
great
to
have
the
things
that
have
been
already
created
in
there
as
well,
and
anyone
who
is
into
figuring
out
these
new
ways
of
working
workflows,
who
has
resonated
with
dynamic
energy
budget
or
things
could
be
resonating,
we'll
share
all
the
links
again
and
can
assume
christy
get
creative
there.