►
From YouTube: W3 TEC AMA - Welcome!
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Last
couple
months
on
giveth
with
a
couple
other
people
here,
mostly
with
griff
and
he
said
yeah
like
check
out
this
other
stuff
and
he
started
feeding
me
articles
to
read
up
on
and
then
it
just
kind
of
opened
my
mind,
and
I
was
really
really
curious
to
know
more
and
actively
help
out
with
the
project.
So
you
know
I'm
here:
I'm
learning
lots
every
day
I
spend
a
couple
hours
just
reading
all
these
amazing
articles
on
here
and
I'm
like
hey
like.
Where
do
I
start
pretty
much?
A
A
B
B
How
this
narrative
came
in
strong
with
the
tec,
so
we've
been
really
trying
to
separate
that
by
I'm
positive
that
most
of
the
the
token
engineering
community
also
loves
public
goods,
but
it's
also
the
focus
of
public
goods.
For
the
token
engineers,
for
the
token
engineering
community.
A
C
B
Right
yesterday,
we
had
a
call
with
marcus
he's,
he's
a
token
engineer,
and
he
said
something
so
brilliant.
That
was
how
how
the
the
how
the
crypto
environment
is
so
forgiving
of
mistakes
of
like
holding
mistakes,
and
then
we
were
reflecting
after
thinking
that
it's
probably
so
forgiving,
because
it's
so
privileged
right
now
right.
B
We
can
afford
making
those
mistakes,
but
when
we're
building
like
real
power
grids
or
like
when
people
are
using
this
to
build
roads
and
health
systems
for
themselves
and
really
using
these
economies
to
own
their
yeah
to
to
to
own
the
value
they
produce.
B
What
are
all
of
this
infrastructure
that
needs
to
exist
for
projects
to
be
more
responsible
for
engine
for
token
engineers
to
even
have
more
of
a
breath,
because
we
are
leaving
out
of
the
speculation
market
right
now.
So
it's
everything
in
an
insane
speed
and
it's
hard
to
work
with
a
lot
of
care.
If
you're
doing
everything
in
an
insane
speed.
B
Need
this,
the
the
speculative
variable
of
the
market,
now
to
succeed
so
when,
when
things
have
more
space,
when
when
models
exist,
when
templates
exist,
when
more
people
are
educated
about
this,
then
then
you
don't
need
to
be
in
the
speculation
anymore,
because
the
value
is
like
really
being
created
and
people
are
using
it
can.
I.
E
Jump
in
here,
olivia,
yeah,
and
also
something
to
you
to
think
about
mitch-
is
that
you
know
the
the
bridges
on
ethereum
are
going
to
take
hold
people.
I
mean
we're
we're
we're
big
on
xdi,
but
I
mean
there
are
others
of
course,
but
it
will.
I
know
I
mean
I
can't
tell
you
for
sure,
obviously,
but
I
am
very
confident
that
it
will
take
hold
more
people
are
going
to
jump
over
we're
we're
going
to
we're
going
to
I
mean
I
know
scaling
will
happen.
E
Right
now,
for
instance,
are
huge
catalysts
just
to
try
and
do
anything
and
when
those
when
we,
when
we,
when
we
take
those
away-
and
we
allow
people
to
just
make
something
again-
you
don't
even
have
to
worry
about
how
much
damn
money
you
gotta
have
just
to
start
your
thing,
you
know
what
I
mean
that,
like
the
network
will
is,
is
the
network
is
forgiving
and
then
we
want
to
make
sure
we
have
a
cornerstone
in
that
space
that
we're
already
ready
to
go
and
help
create
and
further
token
engineering.
E
E
A
B
C
B
B
You
otherwise,
otherwise
I
would
love
to
help
you
mitch
to
find
what
is
the
best
place
that
you
would
like
to
to
jump
in,
or
I.
E
Would
I
was
actually
going
to
try
and
recruit
him
right
now,
because
you
were
at
the
sunday
hack
session
and
you
were,
you
were
already
looking
for
other
things
to
get
involved
and
I'm
sure
griff
was
like
hey
come
check
this
out.
Tech
programs
is
really
fun,
but
something
I
I
need.
I
need
help
with
right
way.
E
If
you're,
if
you
are
interested
in
token
tokenized
bonding
curves,
we
need
to
actually
start
writing
forum
posts
again
in
a
very
objective
manner,
on
what
we're
doing
with
our
bonding
curve
for
the
upgrade
of
the
commons.
So
it's
just
that's
a
really
fancy
way
of
saying
we're
about
to
open
up
our
hatch
to
a
bonding
curve,
we're
going
to
initiate
this
process
and
we
need
the
community
to
understand
one.
What
bonding
curves
are
and
how
we
are
going
to
use
them.
A
E
E
And
actually
you
know
like
it's
just
it's
just
continuous
progress
and
it's
a
working
call,
but
during
during
I'd
really
like
to
also
potentially
on
friday,
because
we
always
have
our
sunday
sessions
but
friday
get
a
few
people
together,
you're,
hopefully
you're
one
of
them.
I
I
got
another
person
I
got
to
reach
out
to
and
then
we
just
get
together
and
actually
pick
specific
topics
of
the
abc.
E
E
Well,
this
this
one
yeah
we
would.
We
can
meet
in
discourse
right
right
here
or
I.
E
And
yeah
and
we're
really
I'm
also
like
I'm
keen
on
bringing
in
new
people
to
do
these
things,
because
it's
the
best
way
to
get
the
community
involved
because
we're
big
on
not
promoting
technocracy
and,
generally
speaking,
just
like
you've
learned
with
like
picking
hatch
parameters.
You
know
it's
always
the
devs,
and
if
people
had
to
write
these
things
about
abc's,
it
would
only
be
devs
and
it
would
only
be
four
dips
and
nobody
would
understand
anything.
They
were
writing
unless
you
were
the
dev
itself.
E
E
Okay,
okay,
so
yeah!
Okay,
I
think
this
yeah.
I
came
to
this
to
recruit
people.
I
will.
I
will
dm
you
what's
best.
This
is
it?
Is
this
quarter
telegram
better?
For
you,
I
mean.
E
And
I'll
dm
you
on
some
other
information
about
the
specific
post
and
then
you
can
actually
get
more
of
a
better
idea
on
what
you
may
want
to
target
and
then
I'll
try
and
set
something
up
for
friday.
And
hopefully
I
can
get
a
map
as
well
to
jump
in
yeah
and
you
can
start
participating
in
tech
params,
because
I
definitely
need
help
right
now.
A
Cool
yeah,
when
you
message
me
just
give
me
anything
that
I
should
read
beforehand,
to
get
up
to
speed,
absolutely
great
all
right
well,
this
is
very
productive
for
me,.
E
Yeah
dude
that
if
I
mean
there's
still
there's
a
lot
of
stuff
to
do
in
the
tec,
so
I
mean
you
don't
ever
have
to
feel
like
you
can't
get
involved
in
something.
There's
always
there's
something
everywhere
and
in
fact
I
think.
Just
today
we
maybe
even
created
a
new
working
group
for
our
source,
cred
thing.
But
that's
that
that's
that's
here.
Nor
now.
B
Yeah
so
yesterday
was
the
softgov
call
and
we've
one
of
the
paths
of
safkoff
is
figuring
out
how
the
reward
system
is
going
to
happen.
Post
hatch,
because
now
we've
been
only
using
praise,
so
we've
been
trying
to
implement
source
cred
since
november
is
quite
complicated
and
now
we're
in
this
phase
of
twitching
all
the
parameters
and
seeing
what
is
what
best
reflects
the
contributions
we've
been
having.
But
that's
probably
gonna
be
wrong
and
it's
just
like
a
test
phase
that
will
gather
the
data
analyze.
B
B
Yeah
I
mean
they.
They
they
get
in
a
subjective
sense
right
when
people
were
gaming,
something
they
have
subjective
intentions
rather
than
yeah
objectively
playing
with
the
system.
So
understanding
the
reasons
and
how
to
incorporate
like
how
to
hug
the
trolls
and.
A
A
So
yeah
it
seemed
kind
of
complicated
because
source
cred
was
made,
for
you
know,
developers
working
on
github
and
I
was
seeing
tamara-
was
bringing
up
that
it's
like.
Well,
you
know,
that's
not
necessarily
how
we
always
use
it.
B
Yeah
we've
been
using
github
and
zenhub
for
project
management
and
it's
been
working
really
well
and
I
think
it's
a
functionality
of
of
github
that
maybe
not
many
people
use,
and
it's
mostly
focused
on
that
work
like
you
said,
but
how
to
also
like
bring
this
to
the
sort
to
the
attention
of
the
source
crowd
crew,
because
this
is
a
way
that,
like
we're,
managing
10
working
groups
simultaneously
with
with
github
and
it's
working
well,
so
we
should
be
able
to
measure
that
as
well.
A
D
D
B
No,
no
problem
we're
just
having
a
chat,
and
this
call
is,
is
like
an
ama
just
if
you
have
any
questions
on
the
top
of
your
mind
about
what
is
the
tc?
What
has
been
happening
here?
How
can
you
get
involved?
D
Yeah,
so
my
name
is
elias,
I'm
from
austria
and
yeah.
I
I
following
like
this
community
since
a
few
weeks
and
try
to
understand
like
where,
where
is
the,
what
is
the
consensus
of
the
community?
So
I'm
just
curious
about
the
perspectives
that
tc
has
to
offer
and
maybe
what
how
it
would
look
like
like
after
after
final
launch,
so.
B
So
for
the
last
six
months,
more
or
less
we've
been
working
on
the
cultural,
also,
the
technical,
but
mostly
the
cultural
foundation,
of
how
to
build
the
commons.
How
can
we
self-organize?
B
So
when,
when
the
commons
is
launched,
we
have
this
whole
structure
that
it's
mostly
ready
now
to
welcome
token
engineering
projects
and
also
the
token
engineering
community.
So
it's
not
only
a
place
for
projects
to
reach
out
for
grants,
but
also
for
for
token
engineers
to
communicate
with
each
other
and
for
education
to
be
shared
and
best
practices
should
be
shared.
B
So
so
we
have
10
different
working
groups
now
that
are
are
working
towards
this,
this
very
sturdy
foundation
for
this
economy
to
be
launched
and
the
lunch
is
going
to
happen
somewhere
in
april
end
of
march
or
april.
So
pretty
soon
we
are
welcoming
hatcher's.
Now
that
are
the
people
that
will
start
this
this
economy
and
also
contributors
to
any
of
the
working
groups
that
we
have
going
and
to
all
of
the
initiatives
around.
B
D
I
mean
yeah,
I
so
I
didn't
get
very
into
all
the
channels
you're
using
so
it
took.
I
think
it
takes
a
long
time
at
the
moment
to
really
to
really
get
the
deep
understanding
of
what
is
the
focus.
So
I
I'm
sure
this
will
improve
like
after
lunch
but
yeah
I
was.
D
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
figure
out
what
will
be
like
the
final
output.
I
mean
at
the
moment
I
saw
you
focus
a
lot
about,
like
the
the
culture
build
and
and
and
all
these
practices
which
are
relevant
for
for
collaborate,
collaboration
in
the
community,
and
I
mean
what
will
be
like
the
final
output
of
the
of
the
tc
after
after
the
hatch.
E
That's
actually
a
great
question
and
it's
there's
not
a
real.
E
We
are
creating
multiple
products
to
advance
token
engineering,
and
it
isn't
just
specifically
like
my
working
group
and
dealing
with
the
technical
side
on
how
to
more
proactively
efficiently
run
a
dab
or
tools
that
can
be
used
to
run
a
doubt
as
far
as
like
you
know
what
devs
might
actually
do.
For
instance,
we
have
a
product
that
is
gravity
that
is
using
a
new
way
of
communication.
E
Non-Violent
communication
to
properly
honestly
engage
its
community
better
in
a
more
adult,
proactive
manner
if
you're
familiar
with
other
dows
from
the
past
or
various
even
now
it
can
just
it
can
just
be
childish,
and
just
there
is
no
communication.
E
You
know
people,
people
just
end
up,
spitting
hate
at
each
other
and
it's
just
a
mess,
and
the
project
really
is
is
what
it
does.
Nothing.
The
devs
just
do
what
they
want
and
the
community
is
either
just
buying
or
selling
and
there's
nothing
really.
There
gravity
really
alleviates
those
kinds
of
early
problems.
E
I
don't
like
to
say
company,
because
we're
decentralized,
but
I'm
just
trying
to
help
relay
this
idea
better,
do
to
help
manage
in
a
more
healthy,
proactive
manner.
E
We
have
transparency,
which
is
another
separate
working
group
in
itself
to
actually
help
hold
us
accountable
us
individual
working
groups
and
the
people
involved,
so
the
community
again
can
really
actually
see
what
we
are
doing
and
why
we
are
doing
it
and
again,
with
with
gravity
too.
Everything
can
be.
You
know,
communicated
in
a
healthy
manner.
So,
instead
of
just
yelling
at
somebody
or
pointing
fingers,
we
can
we
can
keep
track
on
everybody
with
transparency
and
then
we
can
relay
in
a
healthy
manner.
E
What
we
think
should
be
or
shouldn't
be
we're
creating
different
tool,
sets
to
then
decide
how
we
would
vote,
maybe
with
the
dow,
in
a
different
way,
in
a
different
direction
and
making
sure
that
people
can
see
how
these
things
work.
Those
are
just
three
specific
products
that
we
have,
that
we
can
help
other
dows.
E
So,
in
the
end,
advancing
token
engineering
isn't
just
creating
new
tools
for
token
engineers,
you
know
of
the
future,
or
you
know
just
more
more
deep
dive
digital.
You
know
devs,
but
that
we're
creating
new
tools
for
this
brand
new
field
on
how
dows
should
really
think
about
operating
in
a
far
more
sustainable
holistic
manner.
D
Yeah
thanks
thanks
a
lot.
Yes,
that's
a
good
good
summary
and
it
kind
of
describes
what
what
what
is
now
visible
on
the
on
the
cultural
building
work
like
we,
you
are
doing
now,
and
I
guess
so
so
my
assumption
is
that
you
that
this
is
the
kind
of
knowledge
also
you
you
want
to
to
make
accessible
for
other
communities,
this
cultural
build.
What
you
are
now
doing
for
yourself
is
maybe
then
the
base
for
for
different
house
right.
B
Yeah,
I
I
think
like
economies,
an
economy
is
a
social
science,
and
I
think
this,
the
social
side,
the
the
the
people
side,
gets
very
easily
neglected
in
many
of
our
interactions
with
economies,
and
so
yeah
we've
been
building
this
relational
fabric
to
help
to
help
communication,
to
help
information
to
be
spread
to
help
collaboration.
B
So
I
think
also
to
answer
your
question
of
how
is
it
gonna
look
at
post
hatch
we
have
here
if
you
can
see
my
screen
a
few
of
the
proposals
that
are
already
submitted
kind
of
submitted,
because
they
will
still
go
to
the
dow
once
is
launched.
But
then
here
you
can
see
what
is
that
we're
looking
at
now
what
projects
are
applying
to
receive
funding?
What
types
of
proposals
the
dao
are
willing
to
fund
and
then
also
in
this
session,
you
can
see
there
is
a
post
of
what
kinds
of
projects
should
apply.
B
So
here
you
you
can
see
what
is
like
token
engineering
about
what
is
the
token
engineering
commons
wants
to
fund.
So
it's
mostly
open
source
tools
and
research,
education
and
token
engineering,
narratives
and
outreach,
and
then
there's
examples
and
explanations
of
this,
and
this
in
this
post.
You've
been
feeling
a
bit
overwhelmed
with
information,
and
I
understand.
D
I
already
read
through
through
this
through
these
proposals
and
the
so
the
direction
you,
but
it's
it's
not
that
clear
which
which
shape
it
will
take
like
after
after
this
project
is
really
alive.
So
I
mean
I
it's
kind
of
visible.
What
what
is?
What
is
the?
What
is
the
purpose
and
what
is
the
direction
you're
going,
but
but
how?
E
And
it
is
very
difficult
because
we're
still
in
we're
we're
still
in
that
early
stage
ourselves
about
creating
this
thing.
The
core
of
us
know,
and
it's
it's
a
little
bit
harder
right
now.
Did
he
leave.
E
Oh,
okay,
I'm
sorry
I
saw
I'm
sorry
I
apologize.
We,
we
have
a
we,
the
core
knows
where
we're
going.
So
that's
that's
important,
but
we're
really
trying
to
create
a
space
for
devs
and
people
in
general
that
that
want
to
make
something
worthwhile
again
and
support
token
engineering
without
all
of
the
former
that
has
really
really
polluted
the
space.
E
I
don't
want
to
get
too
too
much
too
big
a
picture
thing,
because
right
now
it's
important
just
to
concentrate
on
what
we
are
doing.
We
are
encouraging
proposals
that
want
to
basically
promote
token
engineering
or
in
their
own
way,
promote
token
engineering
and
keep
it
at
that
right.
We're
we're
not
trying
to
save
the
world,
we're
we're
advancing
token
engineering.
E
Okay,
so
whether
you
have
a
great
proposal
on
a
new
way
to
make
you
know
for
nfts
and
say
you
want
to
make
an
nft
new
database
that
supports
audio,
which
is
kind
of
a
you
know.
It's
just
now
popping
up
that!
That's
that's!
That's
something!
That's
really
cool!
E
D
So
so,
you're
mainly
looking
for
accumulating
like
a
lot
of
tools
which
enable
like
knowledge,
creation
and
knowledge
transfer
frameworks.
E
D
E
And
it's
not,
and
I
I
said
nfts
but
that's
just
an
example.
The
the
real
the
real
hope
dude
is
that
if
you
really
get
into
it
that
you
can
let
your
imagination
run
wild
again
and
you
can
think
of
what
can
you
tokenize?
D
Yeah
go
ahead,
I
mean
because
you
you
are,
you
are
so
much
focused
on
like
common
common
goods
building,
so
I
always
wonder
like
what.
So
what
are
the
main
fields
where
common
goods
really
make
sense?
I
mean
now
it's
quite
focused
on
like
open
source
software
building
and
stuff,
but
so
is
there
a
focus
on
on
which
common
goods
or
which
common
tools
should
should
arise?
Out
of
this
platform.
B
Yeah,
this
is
a
common,
an
easy
thing
to
confuse
that.
It's
common
goods
for
the
token
engineering
field,
so
it's
not
necessarily
common
goods
for
the
planet
that
it
could
eventually
be,
and
it
probably
will
because
having
all
of
those
economies
being
made
in
an
ethical
way.
B
It
is
eventually
going
to
be
good
for
the
planet
and
for
the
people,
but
the
tec
wants
to
advance
token
engineering
as
a
discipline,
so
it's
public
goods
for
this
community,
and
that
means
like
open
source
models.
Education
templates,
graphics,
simulation
tools,
this
everything
that
feeds
token
engineers
in
their
environment.
D
D
And,
like
the
I
mean
you,
you
have
a
lot
of
partnerships
like
you
arise
from
the
common
stack
and
your
your
partner
with
block
science
and
you're
using
different
communities
already,
and
are
you
is
it
is?
Is
this
where,
where
your
focus
is,
or
what
do
you
plan
to
to
do,
you
have
a
different
vision.
B
It's
a
multidisciplinary
field,
so
there's
even
a
flower
of
all
of
the
disciplines
that
cross
that
exist
all
together
to
form
token
engineering,
because
there
is
this
complexity
of
being
a
an
economy
of
having
all
the
technological
tools,
all
the
anthropological
tools,
the
social
tools,
the
so
there,
but
the
the
the
research
the
academic
part
of
it.
B
B
D
I
I
don't
know
how
to
explain
that
it
is
quite
hard
to
like
to
separate
like
the
different
visions
of
the
of
these
projects.
Kind
of
so
and
and
that's
what
what
I
try
to
figure
out.
So,
what's
really
the
the
main
different
vision
between
like,
for
example,
the
common
stack
and
dc
and
one
hive.
D
A
B
Yeah,
I
feel
you
that
has
been
a
challenge
for
us
and
the
internal
communications
in
the
communications
of
common
stack
and
what
all
of
the
one
hive
crew
we're
working
on.
Also
so
yeah,
that's
a
good
question.
B
So
the
main
purpose
of
the
tc
is
advancing
token
engineering
and
that's
it
is
that's
the
purpose
of
the
token
engineering
commons,
but
common
stack
has
a
different
purpose
that
is
to
improve
the
tooling,
including
the
the
deployment,
the
development
of
a
commons.
That
is,
the
conviction,
voting
the
bonding
curve,
the
cultural
build
having
all
of
this
tested
deployed
functioning
and
how
to
create
these
templates.
So
other
communities
can
also
deploy
their
comments.
So
in
the
in
the
end
of
this
process,
we're
also
gonna
make
a
handbook,
a
cultural
handbook
for
building
this
community.
B
So
also
people
will
be
able
to
see
from
our
best
practices,
because
we're
also
doing
a
research.
A
tc
case
study
based
on
everything,
that's
happening
on
this
process,
to
launch
those
comments,
so
other
people
will
be
able
to
learn
from
the
steps
that
we
took
and
use
what
serves
and
what
not
and
also
the
technical
components
will
be
their
open
source
available,
so
yeah,
so
others
can
build
on
them
as
well.
D
So
you
try
to
you
will
publish
the
this
when
you
start
launch
or
or
or
where,
where
do
you
accumulate
all
this
knowledge.
B
In
the
onehive
community,
there's
a
lot
of
information
of
how
they've
been
using
those
components
in
the
in
the
tec
side,
we
have
the
forum,
mostly,
we
have
the
forum,
the
medium
publications
and
the
discord.
So
that's
the
three
places
that
you're
going
to
find
most
of
the
information
and
and
then
on
the
comments
tax
side.
B
We
are
working
on
this
documentation
of
the
tc
case
study
and
the
handbook
that
it's
going
to
come
a
little
bit
post
hatch,
because
we
also
have
to
understand
to
test
our
assumptions
to
see
if
they
actually
worked
when,
when
we
launched.
B
Yeah,
so
this
is
a
deliverable
from
the
common
stack,
but
it
will
be
available
for
for
anyone,
including
the
tac
community,
for
sure.
A
I
saw
this
ends
in
four
minutes.
I
had
some
other
questions
because,
like
elias,
I'm
getting
really
mixed
up
between
common
stack
and
tc,
and
one
hive
yeah,
so
you
guys
are
collecting
impact
hours.
B
B
No
that's
the
tac,
so
we
have.
We
have
a
parade
system
that
everyone,
multiple
people,
have
the
praise
powers.
So
we
can
teach
people,
praise
and
all
the
praise
that
you
receive.
That
is
for
your
contributions.
So
anything
you
anything
you
do
like.
For
example,
I
would
issue
praise
to
you
for
coming
to
this
call.
B
All
of
this
phrase
goes
to
a
spreadsheet
and
this
spreadsheet
goes
through
a
quantification
process
every
two
weeks,
so
two
people
from
the
community,
usually
the
people
that
have
high
impact
hours
scores.
They
are
invited
to
quantify
the
praise.
So
we
go
and.
B
B
B
Oh
yeah,
so
so
the
praise
quantification
is
this.
Qualitative
process
is
like
putting
a
number
to
a
qualitative
contribution
right.
So
we
do
that
in
form
of
impact
hours,
because
it's
not
necessarily
the
time
you
spent
there,
but
the
impact
that
your
contribution
had
so
so
the
impact
hours
and
why
impact
hours,
because
it's
an
easier
measure
of
how
to
turn
this
into
tokens.
C
A
B
B
D
B
He
can
distribute
automatically,
depending
on
the
parameters
that
we
decide
that
are
being
worked
on
now
we
have
we've
been
working
on
that
in
the
in
the
soft
gov
calls
every
tuesday
at
8pm
ct
and
also
we
had
a
work
session
today
and
if
you're
interested,
we
can.
I
invite
you
to
the
next
ones
as
well.
C
If
I
may
say
something
briefly,
well
levy
also
is
mentioning
it's
it's,
I
think,
sorry
to
be
late
in
this
call.
C
My
name
is
eduardo
and
I'm
a
few
minutes
to
work
for
the
world
working
group
and
basically,
what's
not
what
she
mentioned
it
it's
very
relevant
because
it's
part
of
the
cultural
build
and
basically
this
impact
hour-
and
this
can
leave
you
or
jay-
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
this
impact
hours
is
what
will
give
you
eventually
the
access
to
choose
parameters,
and
so
we
basically
are
giving
a
horizontal
approach
to
to
every
person
who
is
part
of
the
community
and
the
capacity
for
everyone
to
decide
on
how
this
project
goes
on
as
a
community.
C
So
this
is
really
relevant.
That's
why
the
impact
hours
process
and
the
pay
system
work
for
that,
because
it's
a
very
interesting
way
to
articulate
something
that
usually
at
least
I
have
never
seen
before,
and
I
think
it's
pretty
useful
because
you
acknowledge
people,
but
you
not
only
acknowledge
them,
but
you're,
also
giving
talking
to
that
acknowledgement.
So
yeah.
D
And
and
and
after
the
hatch,
you
will
continue
using
this
subjective
mechanism
of
like
of
this
just
phrase
giving
or
you
want
to
transfer
it
mainly
to
autumn
automatic
source,
create
data.
B
Yeah
we
want
to
continue
using
praise.
I
think
it's
very
important
to
have
a
subjective
measure,
because
it's
way
less
gameable
and
we've,
we
we've
been
building
this
gratitude.
Gratitude
culture
that
it's
really
important
is
like
a
a
very
big
part
of
our
culture,
and
this
ties
with
other
cultural
processes
as
well
like
transparency,
like
accountability,
sorry.
B
D
B
D
And
you
said:
there's
there's
always
a
few
persons
like
distributing
them
right
so
and
they
they're
collecting
all
the
the
contributions
kind
of
and
try
to
to
distribute
them
in
a
fair
way.
E
E
It
has
collectively
be
been
interesting
to
see
that
humanly
we,
we
have
actually
been
very
objective
and
consistent,
but
regardless
there
are
still,
it
still
becomes
difficult,
given
the
fact
that
every
time
we
do
it,
we
have
that
much
more
praise
to
distribute
so
with
the
implementation
of
source
cred
it
will.
E
This
really
will
be
a
very
interesting
aspect
of
the
tec
moving
forward
because
but
go
ahead.
D
E
It
is
because
we
we
manually
have
to
go
through
every
one
and
we
we
sit
down
and
we
do
it
and
it's
it's
gone
well
and
we're.
Actually,
some
of
us
are
actually
getting
pretty
decent
at
getting
through
it,
but
yeah
as
we
as
we
grow
and
we're
actually
live
and
we're
going.
We
will
depend
heavily
on
source
cred
because
it
just
won't
really
be
possible
for
us
to
do
it
in
a
in
a
more
proficient
manner.
A
Eventually,
you
can
always
break
it
down
into
like
sociocratic
circles,
and
you
know
distributed.
A
Mm-Hmm,
I'm
gonna
have
to
dip
out
here.
I've
got
another
call.
I
have
to
get
ready
for
jake.
I
guess
just
hit
me
up
with
a
message
there
and
I
can
jump
in
and.
B
Bye
mitch,
thank
you
bye.
I
think
we
can
close
the
session.
That
is
40
minutes
long,
but
I'm
happy
to
take
any
other
questions
elias.
If
you
write
to
us
and
you're
also
welcome
to
any
of
our
calls.
B
D
Yeah,
I
will
try
to
come
more
often
so
once
I
have
a
like
kind
of
a
overview
what's
going
on,
then
I
can.
I
can
focus
on
the
things
which
seem
interesting
to
me
again.