►
From YouTube: W46 Commons Swarm WG: Gnosis chain, ABC and more!
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Intentions and distractions
09:02 - Gnosis chain
14:39 - Paulo updates
19:10 - ABC
36:26 - TEC convert
40:18 - Gardens front end
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
And
I
forget
what
it's
called
sorry.
A
Intentions,
yes,
intentions
and
distractions,
and
for
a
question
today,
let's
ask:
what
did
you
want
to
be
when
you
were
in
third
grade?
What
did
you
want
to
be
when
you
grew
up
so
I'll
get
started?
My
intentions
for
this
call
are
to
get
through
and
close
out
the
last
issues
for
the
abc
and
then
talk
about
what
we
need
to
get
done
in
order
to
have
the
the
whole
hatch
upgrade
successful,
then
yeah.
A
So
when
I
was
in
third
grade,
I
wanted
to
be
an
astronaut
or
an
inventor,
and
so
actually
you
know
we're
in
this
space
kind
of
satisfies
the
inventor
desire.
So
anyway,
I
will
pass
it
to
zepty.
B
Oh
thanks
bradley
when
I
was
a
child,
I
wanted
to
be
a
scientist,
but
then
I
just
stopped.
I
don't
know
intentions
for
the
call
yeah
just
to
sing
up
with
you
guys
see
how
common
swami
is
doing
and
I
do
not
have
any
distraction
I'll
pass
it
to
paulo.
C
Deploy
the
the
commons
down
and
distractions:
well,
it's
kind
of
freezing
my
house
right
now,
it's
really
cold,
but
apart
from
that
and
anything
else
and
well,
when
I
was
a
kid,
I
really
wanted
to
be
like
the
people
that
dream
with
the
dolphins.
D
So
intentions
for
today
think
maybe
find
out
what
the
whole
gnosis
thing
means
for
tt
common
swarm.
D
I
mean
if
it's
like
something
more
complicated
than
the
obvious,
but
yeah
just
to
be
able
to
catch
up
with
that
no
distractions.
Today,
and
when
I
was
a
kid
I
was
super
into
piano.
I
still
love
piano,
but
I
don't
practice
that
often-
and
I
wanted
to
be
a
professional
piano
player.
D
However,
I'm
very
thankful
in
life
because,
rather
than
being
one
I'm
finding
out
how
to
make
it
affordable
or
sustainable
so
yeah,
I
it's
music
is
it's
in
me
since
I
was
very
young
and
I'll
pass
it
to
cuanca.
E
Thanks
chewie,
when
I
was
a
kid
I
wanted
to
be
a
philosopher,
I
feel
that
I
really
like
philosophy
and
that
somehow
what
we're
doing
here,
it's
related
to
that.
So
I
am
happy
about
that
and
my
intention
is
yeah
to
sync
with
you
guys.
I
don't
have
any
instruction
and
I'll
pass
to
metaverte.
F
Yeah,
I
remember
my
intention
is
to
find
an
issue
I
can
do.
My
distraction
is
my
own
bad
self.
As
always,
and
when
I
was
in
the
third
grade,
I
wanted
to
be
a
jockey.
I
kid
you
not.
I
still
love
the
thoroughbred
horse,
maybe
not
so
crazy
about
racing
anymore,
and
everyone
told
me
I
would
be
too
big
and
I
am,
and
so
my
backup
plan
was
to
be.
F
G
Yeah
man,
I
honestly
have
no
idea
what
I
wanted
to
be
when
I
was
a
kid
I
don't
know.
If
I
wanted,
maybe
I
just
wanted
to
be
unemployed.
I
think
eventually,
I
wanted
to
be
a
basketball
coach
was
something
that
I
wanted
to
be,
but
not
in
third
grade
and
then
as
far
as
intentions
for
the
call
well
distractions,
I'm
I
have
a
bowl
of
soup
right
here,
so
I'm
definitely
gonna
be
feasting
and
intentions.
G
Man,
everyone
else's
ideas,
sound
great
to
me.
I'd
love
to
hear
the
the
latest
updates
on
what
paulo
is
working
on,
trying
to
get
this
dow
out
and,
of
course,
the
abc
market
buy
or
sell.
I
can't
wait
to
hear
sims
ideas
there
and
for
sure
we
can
at
least
sink
on
like
if
gnosis
chain
has
any
impact
on
what
we're
planning
to
do,
and
I
don't
think
miguel
miguel
yeah.
Thank
you.
D
H
Okay,
let's
jump
over
to,
I
wonder
what
what's
that
sam,
I
want
to
go
as
well.
Do
we
skip
you?
Let's
go
to
set
yeah.
I
There
is
one
last
thing,
one
last
issue
that
remains
and
I'd
like
to
discuss
it
with
with
you
in,
in
order
to
see
what,
which
is
the
correct
answer,
I
guess
yeah
yeah
and
distractions-
none
I
I
am
in
the
in
the
house
yet
and
when
I
was
a
kid
I
think
third
grade
is
like
when
you
are
eight
years
old
right.
I
H
J
A
Fair
enough
any
intentions
or
distractions
for
the
call
today,
no
no.
A
Okay,
excellent
well
welcome.
We
go
all
right,
let's
start
with
something,
maybe
a
little
easier
first.
So
maybe
we
talk
about
gnosis
chain.
G
So
yeah
I
have
the
I
I
have
an
inside
scoop
here,
so
I
don't.
I
actually
haven't
read
what
the
blog
post
forum
post
said
that
chewie
sent
me.
So
I'm
not
sure,
but
I
saw
it
in
google
clock
form
which
is
cool.
Basically,
I
don't
think
it
will
have
any
impact
on
what
we're
doing.
I
don't
think
it'll
have
any
impact
on
the
x
die
token
or
rap
decks
die.
It
will
have
an
impact
on
steak.
G
Tokens
believe
that
they're
going
to
do
some
kind
of
like
turn
in
you
have
to
convert
your
steak
to
gnosis
tokens,
and
I
was
begging
them
not
to
put
a
time
time.
They
were
at
least
at
first.
When
I
saw
that
draft.
They
were
saying
that
it
was
going
to
be
like
a
time
thing
that
you
have
to
do
it
within
a
year.
I
don't
know
if
that's
still
the
case
or
not,
I
beg
them
not
to
make
it
make
it
just
like
you
convert
it
whenever
you
want,
you
know
forever,
but
but
yeah.
G
So
that's
that's
one
thing,
and
then
I
I
think
it
will.
The
what's
interesting
is
that
they're
making
a
push
for
the
ethereum
two
road
map,
and
this
idea
that
xdi
will
be
a
canary
chain,
and
I'm
really
excited
about
that
idea.
This
is
what
kusama
did
for
polka
dot,
where
it's
like.
First,
you
do
all
the
upgrades
on
a
test
net
and
then
you
do
the
upgrades
on
a
low,
a
lower
like
like
less
market
cap
and
chain.
G
You
know,
and
then
you
go
to
the
ethereum
main
net,
you
know,
and
so,
but
with
the
lower
with
the
real
money
chain,
you
can
test
the
economic
viability
of
some
of
the
choices
that
you
made
so
like.
G
If
people
can
find
a
way
to
hack
it
then
they'll
hack
it
when
there's
money
at
stake
and
what's
also
cool,
is
that
that
means
that
I
think
it'll
make
x
die
a
lot
more
valuable
to
people,
because
you'll
want
to
first
make
sure
your
app
works
on
xdi,
with
the
new
ethereum
two
upgrades
before
pushing
it
to
ethereum.
You
know
so
it's
like
all
of
a
sudden
xdi
becomes
the
bleeding
edge
of
ethereum
development,
so
my
understanding
is
that
xdi
will
have
will
be
the
same
x
die
for
a
long
time.
G
The
only
change
that
will
happen
is
that
we'll
have
to
you
know.
If
you
have
stake
tokens
you'll
want
to
switch
them
for
gnosis
tokens
and
then
the
if
you
have,
but
then
there
will
be
a
beacon
chain
and
that
beacon
chain
will
be
like
the
ethereum
two
beacon
chain
and
eventually
there
will
be
an
upgrade
to
make
an
emerger
of
the
beacon
chain
with
with
with
with
the
current
xti
network,
which
will
be
gnosis
chain,
and
then
it
will
continue
to
evolve
I'll
following
the
theorem
two
roadmap.
D
I
mean
not
not
regarding
like
any
like
functional
stuff.
It's
just
some
of
the
details
in
the
proposal
that
some
people
in
the
community
have
been
thinking
that
it's
like
uneven
in
some
way
yeah
but
like
regarding.
Like
the
proposal
details,
I
don't.
I
don't
think
that
there's
anything
like
related
or
that
it
may
affect
directly
everything
that
is
happening,
which
is
why
I.
F
D
Also
wanted
to
bring
this
topic
up,
because
I
might
learn
something
from
it,
but
yeah
so
far
it
looks
interesting
and
and
yeah
they.
They
mentioned
some
of
the
communities
that
we're
close
to
in
their
proposals.
So
it's
it's
interesting
that
some
of
these
are
gaining
a
major
exposure
because
of
this,
so
it
might
actually
be
a
great
momentum
for
the
comments
upgrades
but
yeah,
who
knows
it's
still
a
proposal,
so
hopefully
it
can
come
together
in
a
nice
way.
G
D
I'm
following
the
london
fork
part
I
was.
I
was
into
that
that's
supposed
to
happen
on
november
11th
and
yeah.
I
feel
that
I'll
I'll
be
aware
of
some
other
stuff
as
well
so
yeah,
if
there's
anything
relevant
to
the
common
storm
I'll
bring
it
up.
A
Fantastic,
all
right
sounds
good
all
right,
so
that's
one
thing
off
the
list:
maybe
we
go
to
what
paulo
is
working
on
and
what
he
wants
to
discuss
and
we'll
save
the
best
for
last.
C
Sure,
and
so
last
week
I
didn't
have
time
to
actually
work
on
anything.
I
was
on
a
and
like
an
immersion
course
right.
A
C
Basically,
last
the
whole
week
so
didn't
have
time
to
actually
not
even
to
open
this
court
so
yeah.
I
started
the
work
I
started
working
today.
I
actually
talked
with
sam
in
the
afternoon
to
see
the
progress
and
how
are
we
go?
We
were
going
regarding
the
abc
and
the
in
the
comments
upgrade
and
basically
start
to
work
on
the
testing
to
test,
like
the
the
migration
part,
specifically
like
the
the
migration
regarding
passing
all
the
tokens
from
the
hatch
to
the
gardens
style
so
specific
on
excite.
Basically
so.
C
I
also
discussed
with
them
that
the
best
approach
was
to
basically
create
a
garden
song
next
day.
That
later
would
be
updated,
like
had
some
initial
garden
that
we
can
work
on
the
local
test
on
the
local
blockchain
test,
I
mean
so.
I
also
spent
some
time
looking
at
the
latest
updates
on
the
gardens
site,
because
they
change
a
lot
of
the
scripts
that
I
was
working
a
few
months
ago.
So
I
also
was
like
catching
up
with
everything
there.
So,
but
anyway,
I
am
basically
ready
to
start
testing
the
the
actual
migration.
C
That,
basically,
was
my
latest
work
today.
I
hope
that
for
tomorrow
I
can
have
like
the
proper
unit
testing
to
see
that
the
token
transfers
are
made
correctly,
that
we're
not
leaving
behind
any
tokens
and
that
the
the
guardian's
agent
will
receive
the
money
and
all
that
anyway,
that
that's
everything
on
my
site
for
now
and
yeah.
I
Then
we
do
the
the
tests
on
the
things
that
tc
has
to
do
for
them,
but
not
tests
on
the
things
that
we
can
change
at
any
moment
if
they
break,
we
just
create
a
new
dow
and
we
go
on,
but
the
most
important
thing
is
the
things
that
we
cannot
afford
to
fail,
such
as
moving
the
funds
and
not
checking
that
everything
goes
fine.
I
We
still
have
one
of
an
issue,
so
we
have
to
finish
that
one
and
we
have
to
deploy
it
because
it
is
changing
so
some
things
we
also
have
to
update
the
the
front
end
for
it
and
the
commands
upgrade
because
the
the
permissions
are
different.
Now
they
are
very
little
changes
it
doesn't
make.
It
is
not
going
to
be
a
a
lot
of
things,
but
still
it's
important.
It's
it's
a
kind
of
blocker.
We
cannot
have
the
common
upgrade.
I
Basically,
what
is
what
is
going
on
is
that
the
last
issue
in
which
we
have
the
the
order
of
burning
the
tokens
before
or
after
doing
the
calculations
actually
paolo,
did
a
pull
request.
That
looks
very
good
because
it
changes
some
of
it
changes
it
and
also
the
tests
in
order
to
make
it
work
again.
I
But
right
now
I
don't
know
I
am
like
shokai
99
percent
or
ninety
percent
sure
that
this
is
the
way
to
go.
Pablo
is
as
well
right
pablo
and
still
the
two
options
are
half
passing
tests,
and
how
do
you
know,
which
is
the
one
that
how
how
you
make
sure
that
this
total
supply
less
the
amount
is
not
the
way
to
go?
I
can
share
the
screen
if
you
want.
C
Yeah
because,
basically,
the
change
that
I
did
was
the
one
that
sockeye
suggested
that
was
like
making
calling
the
banker
formula
with
the
the
total
supply,
like
the
original
total
supply.
Before,
like
subtracting
the
the
amount
of
tokens
that
you
wanted
to
sell.
C
I
I
Which
is
something
that
is
this,
this
soup,
this
subtraction
here
is
not
in
the
formula,
so
this
is
why
we
are
more
confident
that
this
should
not
be
here,
and
then
it
works.
If
this
change
of
order
is,
is
operating.
I
I
G
I
It
it
doesn't
change
because
it
it
goes
to
zero
in
a
way
so
buying
and
selling
the
same
amount.
I
What
do
you
think
pablo
have
you
had
the
chance
to
when
you
were
writing
this
book
request?
Did
you
have
the
chance
to
think
why
it
was
going
to
work?
One
of
the
things
that
I
don't
really
understand
is:
why
are
we
calling
this
this
function
here,
because
it's
it's
checking
with
the
sale
return
function
that
it's
at
the
same
time
an
internal
function?
That
is
calling
the
formula
of
the
bonding
curve
directly.
C
C
I
still
don't
know.
I
thought
that
when
you
try
to
do
the
sale
using
like
like
using
the
the
previous
abc
contract,
the
one
that
burned
the
tokens
first
and
then
do
the
sale
calculation.
I
thought
that
that
case
was
going
to
give
something
different
than
zero.
You
know,
but
I
still
don't
know
why
both
cases.
I
I
What
what
I
am
referring
to
is
that
you
are
doing
a
buy
make
by
order
here,
yeah
off
as
a
certain
amount
that
you
hardcode
here.
C
C
I
I
It
is
not
going
through
the
expected
sale
return
for
amount
that
we
are
modifying,
so
even
if
we
were
not
modifying
it,
we
will
still
get
the
same
balance
before
that
we
are
doing
the
make
order
the
the
make
cell
order-
and
this
goes
to
zero
this
this
goes
to
the
expected
value.
I
C
Like
sell
a
lesser
amount
than
the
original
buy
like.
C
G
C
Weird,
really,
I
mean
yeah,
because
the
way
it
was
working
on
the
batch
abc
was
like
when
you
do
a
sale.
They
like
catch
the
the
total
supply
like
the
way
sokai
was
mentioning
on
the
notes.
So
that's
why
it
doesn't
matter
if
you
burn
after
or
before,
because
you
have
like
a
catch
value
that
you
would
use
for,
calculating
the
sale
return
using
the
bank
or
formula.
C
So
that's
why
I
I'm
still
a
bit
impressed
that
it
was
working
both
way,
but
anyway
we
have
to
take
a
deeper
look
into
it
and
say
test
with
different
cases.
C
That's
why
I
was
testing
the
the
migration
first,
because
the
idea
was
to
test
like
the
migration
using
an
already
common
garden
style
instead
of
a
garden
style.
But
until
we
have
this
issue
solved,
I
think
it's
best
to
use
a
normal
gardens
to
check
the
migration.
And
then
we
do
the
test
for
the
already
updated
common
style.
G
I
The
other,
so
what
is
doing
is
do
the
migration
without
the
bonding
curve.
Just
in
order
to
advance
the
immigration,
then
we
add
the
abundant
curve.
I
A
C
I
The
money
is
there
and
everything
so
this,
because
this
is
taking
a
little
bit
of
time,
then
adding
the
first
doing
it
for
the
garden
and
then
doing
it
for
the
the
upgraded
garden.
G
G
I
C
A
C
C
C
A
A
I
So
maybe
that
also
helps
doing
okay
using
the
what
I,
what
I'm
going
to
do
is
using
those
formulas
to
have
to
do
the
calculations
by
hand
and
then
see
how
why
it
is
giving
zero
in
both
cases
right
and.
I
I
And-
and
that's
it
I
think,
okay,
we
we
do
not
have
so
much
more
to
share
today,.
G
Any
any
updates
from
well
sorry:
well,
maybe,
is
there
anything
else
on
this
bonding
curve
topic,
all
the
other
issues
are
solved
and
yes,.
I
I
I
I
Operation,
but
we
are
adding
a
delegate
call,
so
I
just
wanted
to
know
if
he
was
thinking
on
that
or
not.
He
was
suggesting
to
remove
the
assessor
operation,
and
this
is
the
only
one.
The
only
shoe
that
I
am
not
sure
about,
if
it
is
better
now
than
it
was
before
the
rest
are,
are
quite
good.
That's,
okay,
look
I
mean
the
code
right
now
is
it
has
less
lines?
C
I
Also,
there
are
some
changes
in
order
to
install
the
bonding
curve.
They
are
important.
There
is
right
now
a
managed
collateral
token,
so
there
were
three
permissions.
Add
collateral,
token,
remove
collateral
token
and
update
that
now
they
are
just
one
and
that's
collateral
token.
C
I
I
I
Yeah
I
know
that
fabric
has
been
working
on
that
he
I
think
that
it's
not
yet
ready,
but
because
he
was
working
on
that
and
different
other
issues
at
the
same
time,
in
order
to
have
a
an
upgraded
frontend
for
everything.
G
Where
did
I
cut
some
screenshots
or
something
like
that?
Okay,.
I
I
A
I
G
I
Yeah
totally,
the
thing
is
that
maybe
what
we
can,
what
we
can
do
with
the
user
testing
is
we
when
we
already
have
the
funds
migrated
to
the
net
to
the
new
place,
if
it's
user
testing,
with
the
with
the
front
end
or
with
the
yeah,
with
the
front
end
with
the
bonding
curve
or
the
or
the
completion
voting
or
or
whatever,
I
think
that
they
are
separated
things
one.
Is
that
the
the
there
is
no,
not
not
user
testing
with
the
contracts
it's
if
a
contract
is,
is
working.
It's
it's
working.
I
G
I
I
We
want
to
do
it
when
I
I
was
talking
that,
with
with
paolo
today,
we
if
we
are
doing
one
car
is
different
than
doing
a
factory
that
makes
cars
so
having
a
car.
That
is
working
perfectly.
I
I
I
G
I
I
Tests
with
with
the
forks
right
I
mean
the
problem
that
the
forks
have
is
that
they
are,
they
don't
have
the
front
end.
That's
the
point,
that's
the
point.
I
I
I
would
prefer
to
do
the
the
forking
and
testing
it
than
doing
something
that
is
going
to
be
on
another
chain
or
in
the
same
chain,
but
at
the
same
time
not
exactly
exactly
the
same
and.
G
And
I
mean:
can
we
do
the
best
of
both
worlds
and
just
like
have
a
permission
to
basically
like
destroy
all
the
tokens
or
burn
tokens
or
something
like
that
and
so
that
we
can
reset
the
exact
same
garden?
You
know
like
use
the
same
garden,
so
you
don't
have
to
deploy
it
and
everything
over
and
over
again,
but
then,
like
you
know,
give
give
up.
G
You
know.
Dow
voting
has
the
same
permissions
as
sem's
address
you
know
or
for
like
you
know
the
testing
period,
and
then
we
just
you
know
when
testings
and
we
actually
meant
tc
tokens
and
we
even
have
the
same
token
address
and
all
those
things
are
are
sorted
and
known
and
we're
playing,
but
it's
but
we
everyone
knows,
this
is
like
it'd,
be
kind
of
weird,
it's
the
real
tc
token.
But
it's
also
the
sem
tc
token.
That
sem
has
the
power
all
the
tokens
or
something,
and
then
we
do
it
for
real.
C
There's
a
third
option
where
basically
is
connecting
the
local
fork
blockchain
with
a
front
end.
So
we
could
like
do
a
demo
using
the
ford
blockchain
instead.
But
I
don't
know
how
much
time
we
will
take
to
connect
a
front
end
with
the
with
that
without
local
blockchain.
So
but
that's
another
option,
maybe
to
take
into
account,
but
I'm
not
sure.
I
Cut
it
in
pretty
pretty
rise,
the
having
the
the
common
grade
ready
for
prime
time.
I
I
I
think
that
the
the
first
things
to
do
is
having
it
done.
I
The
second
is
having
it
very
tested
in
the
fork,
and
the
third
is
if
we
have
time-
and
there
is
a
very
good
reason
for
that-
I
mean
I
think
that
there
are
some
things
that
could
have
a
a
good
reason
to
test,
but
the
tests
are
already
there.
If
you
go
to
rinkaby.org.
G
G
The
community
I
mean
it's
also
with
us
right
like
we-
can
make
sure
that
the
permissions
are
correct.
We
can
try
to
buy.
We
can
try
to.
You
know,
make
some
proposals
use
downloading
to
change
entry
tributes.
G
G
I
Yeah,
but
it's
it's
not
like
it's
an
open.
It's
not
an
open
universe.
It's
what
you
can
do
now.
It's
it's
not
going
to
be
that
different.
I
So
with
an
enough
testing,
it's
it's
going
to
be
okay,
and
still
we
can
it's
it's
open
to
the
community
to
the
community.
There
is
no
front
end
by
the
way
for
changing
the
support
or
any
kind
of
any.
C
L
A
Yeah,
maybe
here's,
maybe
the
delta,
between
what
you
two
are
talking
about.
So
user
testing
is
a
great
way
to
find,
like
just
random
random
stuff,
that
we
could
not
predict
as
developers
that
might
break
things,
but
most
user
testing
I've
seen
still
winds
up
following
a
script
very
similar
to
the
unit
testing.
That
sam
is
talking
about
so
like.
A
Maybe
we
write
down
the
cases
that
we
want,
maybe
maybe
I
can
I'll
do
this.
This
will
be
a
good
thing
for
me
to
do,
although
I'll
need
some
help
putting
it
together,
because
I
don't
fully
understand
the
entire
flow.
But
if
I
can
get
some
help,
I
can
put
together
a
test
case
list
of
what
the
user
experience
path
end
to
end
should
be,
and
on
that
list
I
can
make
two
columns.
One
will
be
like
unit
test
coverage
second
test.
A
The
second
column
will
be
like
front
end,
slash
user
test
coverage
right
and
then
having
that
like
test
case
script
will
help
both
guide
requirements
for
for
what
unit
tests.
We
want
to
write
out
as
well
as
help
our
community
with
testing
efficiently
and
quickly,
and
then
we
can
just
maybe
have
like
three
to
five
different
people
run
through
those
user
test
cases
and
just
report
back
anything
that
they
find
that's
out
of
the
ordinary
in
that
path.
I
I
think
that
these
these
cases
are
very
good
to
start
with,
and
we
can
open
this
test
these
cases
for
the
community
to
to
say,
okay,
what
happens
when
I
do
something
or
something
else
or.
A
A
Yeah,
this
is
how
this
is
how
we
approach
like
we're,
trying
to
test
the
hulu
apps
on
a
bunch
of
different
devices
like
mobile
and
living
room
devices
like
we
would
write
test
cases
out
like
this.
So
I
think
I
think
this
will
help
us
get
some
more
confidence
around
our
test
battery
as
we
move
toward
deploy.
K
I
I
I
I
I
don't
know
how
it's
going
to
work,
maybe
metamask
can
make
it
can
connect
with
the.