►
From YouTube: Decision Making & Road Mapping - TE Commons Sync
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
The
live
streaming
is
on,
so
I'm
going
to
share
the
link
in
the
te
commons
discord
channel
and
also
in
the
jitsi
chat
for
our
little
agenda.
A
And
we're
going
to
start
out
with
a
fun
like
you
know,
starter
just
to
get
everyone
talking,
and
we
did
this
values
exercise
last
week,
where
we
kind
of
tried
to
brainstorm
some
good
values
for
the
token
engineering
commons,
and
so
this
this
starter
is
actually
to
get
us
thinking
about
how
well
we're
following
these
values.
I
know
I
broke
some
values
this
week
and
also
upheld
some,
and
so
that's
that's.
The
question
is
to
share
one
value.
A
You've
lived
up
to
we'll
say
this
week
actually,
instead
of
today,
so
you
can
think
about
it.
A
little
bit
broader
and
one
that
you
haven't.
A
So
the
values
that
came
up
for
the
token
engineering
commons
were
that
we
operate
from
a
pro
social
human
centered
perspective
that
we
hold
ourselves
to
high
standards
of
safety,
resilience
and
integrity,
that
we
encourage
our
members
to
be
radically
open
source,
non-hierarchical,
creative,
transparent
in
their
intentions
and
accountable
for
their
actions,
and
that
we
are
value
driven,
not
profit,
driven
and
will
strive
to
support
token
engineering
projects
that
appreciate
the
value
of
public
goods
and
ethical
inclusive
economic
systems.
A
So
I
can
say,
and
so
to
model
this
actual
starter.
I
can
say
that
one
value
that
I
lived
up
to
this
week
was
just
kind
of
dreaming
about
token
engineering
for
a
pro
humans
center
perspective,
using
the
ample
rebase
method.
I
kind
of
had
a
couple
hours
of
ranting
with
nick
johnson
and
a
few
other
people
on
twitter
discussing
how
to
use
a
rebasement
type
cryptocurrency
as
a
ubi
project
and
trying
to
get
them
to
understand
it's,
not
about
making
money
for
ubi.
A
It's
about
spending
money
for
people
who
need
to
spend
money,
but
then
it
was
really
easy
to
share
one
value.
I
didn't
live
up
to
this
week,
which
was
being
value
driven,
not
profit,
driven
and
supporting
projects
that
appreciate
ethical
economic
systems.
I
was
all
over
those
yams
this
week
the
yam
thing
was
was
wild
and
I
was
all
about
it.
It
was
it
was
pretty
fun
and
it
definitely
wasn't
a
safe
situation.
A
So
I
don't
feel
like
that
was
fully
supporting
the
values
of
token
engineering
commons.
I
will
pass
it
to
olivia.
B
B
C
Do
we
have
that
list
of
values
where
it
is
again?
Oh
yeah,
it's
in
the
it's
in
the.
A
In
the
call
agenda,
I
actually
put
it
in
this
google
doc
that
I
put
is
a
link
in
the
chat
in
both
the
discord
chat
in
the
in
the
jitsi
chat.
But
we
can
pass
it
to
someone
else
if
you
need
to
think
about
it
for
a
sec.
D
All
right
got
it,
so
the
one
thing
I
did
right
was,
I
think,
being
transparent,
because
it
was
pretty
clear
that
I
was
not
going
to
reach
everything
that
I
said
I
was
going
to
do
so.
I
was
like
yeah
not
going
to
happen,
but
on
the
thing
that
I
think
I
could
do
better,
it's
yeah.
D
Actually
it's
a
question
that
I
have
it's
the
radically
open
source
thing
is
it
better
to
because
I'm
working
on
some
stuff
and
I'm
like,
should
I
open
source
them
even
if
they're
like
they're,
half-baked,
like
just
some
notions
of
that
always
better
to
come
up
with
some
full
idea
and
then
share
it,
and
what
is
the
best
way
to
do
it?
Because
people
don't
want
to
land
on
the
drafts
and
don't
understand
anything
just
some
rumblings
about
different
stuff.
They
kind
of
want
to
arrive
in
a
structured
environment,
yeah.
E
D
F
F
I
think
transparency
and
and
opening
opening
up
yeah-
and
let
me
check
like,
are
we
do?
Do
we
also
value?
Like
ins,
you
know
bringing
people
together.
F
I
try
to
do
this
more
or
put
more
effort
in
it.
I
don't
know
if
I
succeeded,
but
definitely
try
yeah.
I
encouraged
definitely
non-hierarchical
yeah.
That
happened.
That
just
happened,
and
I
have
a
question
of
course:
does
it
backfire
like
people
want
structure,
and
you
know
I
know
they
come
in
and
like
tell
me
what
to
do,
but
at
the
same
time
we
want
to
co-create
with
peers
right
and
then
getting
the
feedback
that
it
needs
more
structure,
but
maybe
also
people
helping
to
structure
it
better.
F
F
Hey,
I
don't.
F
F
A
Nice
so
then,
then
you
can
call
on
someone
else.
F
Yeah
try
one
second
going
back
lorelai
or
lo
loi,
yeah.
G
G
Well,
I
actually
exhibited
some
some
rare
anti-social
behavior
for
myself
tried
to
like
be
center
from
humans
as
much
as
I
could
and
went
hiking
alone
in
the
woods
totally
anti-human
anti-social,
but
I
think
it'll
make
me
a
better
pro
social
person
in
the
long
run
and
and
then
I
think,
a
value
that
I
did
do
a
good
job
of
meeting
this
week
was
the
the
radically
open
source
and
transparent
value.
G
I
was
working
with
some
one,
five
folks
on
moving
our
common
stack
dow
to
xdi,
and
we
are
writing
up
a
little
guide
and
gonna
publish
it
so
that
it's
easier
for
other
people
who
are
dealing
with
expensive
gas
to
do
so.
Yeah
and
angela
have
you
gone.
H
Yes
thanks,
I
was
also
wondering
did
I
did
I
do
anything
bad
in
this
sense?
Okay,
I
think
I.
H
That
well
to
be
radically
open
source
or
encourage.
Others
was
a
big
topic
for
me
this
week,
because
I
was
wondering
what
open
source
means
for
the
token
engineering
academy
for
infrastructure
and
also
for
what
we
are
doing,
and
I
think
on
the
let's
say
I
had
a
similar
question
like
sharpness.
What
does
non-hierarchical
mean
and
what
does
structure
mean?
So
I
think
that's
actually
a
really
interesting
question
for
tea
commons,
perhaps
as
well.
H
H
E
Yeah
hi
guys
I'm
down
pretty
new
here
and
thanks
for
having
me
on
board
and
being
involved
at
this
early
stage
for
me,
but
you
guys
are
fully
more
into
this
and
have
been
engaged
in
this
in
a
much
longer
time.
So
as
a
beginner,
I
think,
coming
across
and
just
being
open
to
learning
like
open
to
the
values
and
to
absorbing
all
of
this
new
information.
That's
something
that
I
sort
of
upheld,
I
suppose,
and
on
the
other
side,
I
suppose
that
then
I've
been
there
yeah.
E
Just
one
side,
I
haven't
really
upheld
in
terms
of
the
values,
I
suppose
is
like
consistency
of
communication
across
all
the
rest
of
the
channels.
In
my
life
you
know
sometimes
you
get
involved
in
things
and
it
takes
quite
a
lot
of
heavy
heavy
load
and
a
heavy
burden
that
you
get
involved
and
then
other
parts
you
know
go
by
the
wayside.
E
I
suppose
that's
where
we're
at
at
the
moment
so
yeah
thanks
again
for
having
me
and
I
look
forward
to
carrying
on
learning
a
lot
from
you
guys
and
contributing
wherever
I
can.
A
Nice
thanks
dan
great
well,
it
looks
like
we
have
a
lot
of
very
value-oriented
people.
Well
done
guys.
So
just
to
start
this
off.
This
is
our
first
weekly
sync.
We're
probably
gonna
keep
it
on
this
time,
even
though
there's
like
three
token
engineering
events
right
after
each
other.
So
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
little
bit
of
a
marathon,
but
I
think
for
now
at
least,
unless
we
have
some
major
objections.
A
We'll
probably
just
keep
it
at
this
time
every
week
and
the
goal
is
to
have
some
have
a
road
map
of
what
we
are
trying
to
accomplish
each
week
during
and
then
that
this
weekly
sync
will
kind
of
be
the
the
place
where
we
present
what
we
accomplished
and
then
venture
onto
the
next
step,
and
then
we
kind
of
have
these
weekly
steps
that
we
move
one
at
a
time
closer
and
closer
to
actually
launching
this
bad
boy,
the
so
to
kind
of
recap
what
we
did
last
week
and
the
week
before
we
went
over
the
vision
and
values
and
mission,
and
actually
code
of
conduct
happened
as
well
as
cyprian
and
libya
went,
went
wild
with
it.
A
During
the
week,
so
we
made
a
lot
of
progress
and
we
also
made
some
decisions,
and
one
of
the
things
that
I
hope
to
talk
about
at
the
beginning
here
is:
how
do
we
make
decisions
in
this
in
this
group,
because
it's
it's
a
difficult
thing
group
decisions?
Usually
it's
almost
it's
almost
like
an
oxymoron
in
some
ways.
A
Right
group
decisions
are
very
difficult
to
have,
so
we
had
some
success
with
emoji
voting
a
little
bit
we
also
and
that
helped
it,
and
also
having
kind
of
an
appointed
person
who
made
decisions.
I
kind
of
ended
up
taking
it
on
for
the
vision
and
the
values.
Basically,
and
just
saying.
Okay,
it's
done
and
and
saying
that
it
was.
It
was
good,
but
that's
not.
A
D
Done
should
we
all
agree
on
that
like
have
a
an
actual
kind
of
vote
with
all
the
people
in
the
t
discord
or
to
telegram
I
don't
like,
because
I
I
I
feel
like
we
are
all
working
on
a
lot
of
different
stuff
and
it's
very
good,
because
we
have
a
lot
of
creativity
going
on
and
I
think
we
are
going
very
fast
on
different
on
different
projects,
but
at
the
same
time,
I
guess
it's
kind
of
important
to
reach
kind
of
a
consensus
with
everyone
being
like.
D
Yes,
this
is,
we
are
all
on
the
same
page
and
there
is
no
not
someone
coming
in.
I
don't
know
like
in
two
weeks
coming
up
and
saying:
oh,
this
is
you
guys
did
you're.
I
mean
this
is
not
worth
it.
We
should
stop
this
experiment
right
now
and
I
don't
think
he
should
be
that
talk.
Engineering
is
a
different
beast
and
this
is
how
I
see
it,
and
then
we
are
kind
of
okay.
So
is
it?
Should
we
do
a
review?
Should
we
do
an
update?
D
F
Also
one
opinion,
so
definitely
one
thing
that
takes
off
the
pressure
or
took
off
the
pressure
is
when
grief
reminded
that,
actually
we
are
going
to
review
these
again
and
again
and
again
right
the
more
we
moved
right.
So
that's
something.
Nonetheless,
of
course
I
want
the
things
that
we
put
out
there
at
the
very
least
make
sense.
F
F
You
know
the
more
like
hacker
coder
culture
things
like
the
way
they
say
it,
rough
consensus
and
running
code.
We
could
have
something
similar
like
rough
consensus
and
actual
quality
content
that
we
said
we
want
to
put
out
there
and
we're
putting
out
there
and
rough
converses
means
you
don't
have
to
have
a
majority
vote.
But
if
someone
comes
in
and
says
I
oppose
this,
that
we
actually
make
room
to
be
able
to
listen
to
what
they
opposed
to
and
also
be
specific
about
and
then
and
then
the
rest.
F
I
don't
know
literally,
what
do
you
do
with
that
opposition?
Not
you
ask
whether
morphy
people
feel
like
this,
or
is
it
just
one
singular
voice
and
how
badly
they
are
affected
again?
This
is
going
towards
covington
and
convicts
and
vote
kind
of
ability
to
differentiate
the
problem.
As
long
as
we
don't
have
the
tools,
we
need
to
be
pragmatic
right
at
the
same
time,
trying
to
actually
make
those
differentiations.
Also
push
pushes
pressure
on
us
to
get
the
tooling
straight.
G
I,
like
the
I,
like
the
rough
rough
consensus
versus
running
code,
it's
an
interesting
distinction
and
it
was,
I
think,
it's
related
to
what
I
wanted
to
bring
up
is
using
using
like
a
I
love,
this
I'm
super
in
support
of
it,
I'm
okay,
with
this
proposal,
I
wouldn't
block
it,
and
I'm
blocking
this
as
kind
of
like
the
three
ways
to
to
like
signal
on
anything
and
really
like
making
sure
that
it's
like
a
proposal
based
decision
making
process
like
at
the
very
most
basic
like
we.
G
G
Is
it
safe
enough
to
try
questions
which,
I
think
is
kind
of
like
a
similar
distinction
between
rough
consensus
and
like
running
code
is
something
that
you
would
like
want
to
publish
and
push
out
to
the
world
right,
something
that
everybody's
super
in
support
of
versus,
like
we're?
Okay,
with
this.
A
Yeah
that
and
I
so
let's,
let's
take
a
a
good
like
practical
example,
we
have
to
decide
on
the
mission
and
and
like
sheldon
said
we
are
the
division
mission
and
well
we'll
talk
about
the
road
map
in
a
second,
but
we're
gonna
come
back
after
we've
done
some
actual
work
on
what
it
takes
to
pull
this
thing
thing
off
and
then
come
back
and
make
sure
that,
oh
the
you
know,
maybe
we
have
to
compromise
some
some
pieces
of
our
mission
that
we
just
can't
achieve,
or
maybe
maybe
now
that
more
people
are
involved
who
are
actually
working
on
it,
that
the
vision
is
somewhat
changing
and
so
nothing
that
we
set
in
stone,
especially
on
mission
vision
and
long-term
goals.
A
I
mean
it's,
it
is
what
will
attract
people
here,
but
we
have
a
specific
thing
like
we
have
two
versions
of
the
mission
right
now,
one
with
lots
of
pull-up
points
and
one
that's
short,
and
then
once
we
decide,
I
kind
of
feel
like
once
we
decide
between
one
of
those
strategies,
then
we're
going
to
want
to
tweak
the
the
the
innards
of
it
and
what
is
the
best
way
to
say
this
is
good
enough
to
be
done
like
and
and
okay,
maybe
the
blocking
neutral
versus
love
it
is
instead
of
having
one
or
two
options.
A
Having
like
the
third
option
is,
is
really
smart
for
the
votes,
but
then
how
do
we
even
get
to
the
point
of
a
vote
right
having
one
person
champ
hold
the
flag
or
maybe
are
there
other
strategies.
B
Ideas,
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
to
know
how
many
people
we
need
to
express
their
opinions
to
feel
like
it's
enough
and
and
also
the
rough
vote
is
very
helpful.
But
then
it
implies
that
everyone
is
paying
attention
to
what
is
happening
in
the
chat,
and
I
just
wanted
to
get
a
sense
if
this
is
what's
happening
or
if
there
is
other
grab
people
attention.
F
So
actually,
some
things
that
really
didn't
come
up
until
someone
else
said
again
that
there
wasn't
up
for
download
in
the
chat.
So
maybe
we
could
have
these
decisions
once
or
every
thursday,
or
something
like
this
or
say.
Okay,
these
are
the
things
that
we
need
to
vote
on
now
and
then
at
the
very
least
after
the
call
it's
done
you
know
and
that
you
know
once
a
week
at
the
very
least
we
get
to
that
rough
consensus.
H
Maybe
that's
really
a
good
idea,
because
I
think
the
major
problem
here
is
not
that
people
don't
want
to
vote.
It's
also
not
that
they
don't
have
any
opinion.
It's.
The
first
challenge
is
to
keep
everybody
posted
and
give
the
opportunity
to
process
all
information
required,
and
at
least,
if
you
know,
okay,
we
have,
let's
say
a
regular
structure
of
of
costing
votes.
Then
I
think
it's
making
people
who
are
interested
to
contribute
or
to
have
a
say,
it's
easier
and
more
accessible.
A
Yeah
so,
okay,
I
have
a.
I
have
a
proposal,
I
more
a
concrete
proposal
that
for
anything
that
needs
to
be
like
every
time
something
needs
to
be
decided
by
by
the
you
know
by
the
group
for
the
week.
You
know
that
like
because
it
kind
of
really
is
at
this
stage
just
making
decisions
right,
we're
not
calling
code
or
anything,
that's
really
how
we
move
the
whatever
move,
the
markers
in
football,
whatever
those
things
are
called.
A
I
should
know
this,
I'm
american
anyway
this
so
if
we
have
my
proposal
is
that
if
we
have
one
person,
that's
kind
of
appointed
to
be
kind
of
the
the
cat
herder
for
making
this
decision,
like,
I
would
just
say,
okay
you're
the
person
who
needs
to
go,
get
everyone's
advice
and
input
here
and
make
sure
that
we
have
a
well-rounded
result.
A
Every
week
we
just
kind
of
appoint
someone
to
any
decisions
that
need
to
be
made
and,
and
then
because,
like
I
had
a
lot
of
success
when
I
go
and
individually
ping
someone,
you
know
and
I'm
in
discord
a
vote
in
this
doodle
right
and
you
just
kind
of
gotta
go
out
there
and
just
posting
in
the
channel
doesn't
really
do
it.
So
maybe
appointing
one
person
making
sure
they
have.
A
F
That's
the
that's,
so
that's
my
problem,
for
example,
although
I
would
I
do
value
this
and
I
don't
know
how
you
do
it,
how
do
you
hurt
all
of
these
people,
but
wouldn't
it
so
you
know,
and
then
I'm
just
thinking,
okay,
what
it's?
If
it's
my
turn,
it's
like
the
the
turnout
will
be
four
people,
because
that's
how
much
I
could
run
after
stuff
like
this,
you
know.
So
if
someone
can
do
that,
this
is
so
valuable
and
you
know
keep
doing
it.
F
But
if
you
had
the
alternative
that
people
know,
it
is
a
protocol
like
we
are
doing
stuff
and
you
are
in
token
during
community.
You
are
vested
right
because
you're
going
to
get
the
stuff
out
of
it,
that
you
need,
as
a
token
engineer,
be
show
up
every
thursday
or
at
least
ask
what's
there
to
decide.
F
You
know
we
need
that
proactivity.
If
you
don't
have
proactivity
again.
That's
that's
what
I'm
saying!
Okay,
then,
if
you
don't
have
that
practice,
then
we
don't
have
the
community
yet
right,
then
maybe
we
need
to
go
and
then
fix
something
else
or
have
multiple
grips.
Or
you
tell
us
your
magic,
so
we
can
do
that
as
well
yeah,
but
that
would
be,
for
example,
if
we
had
such
if
that
was
on
our
only
strategy.
I
know
I
would
fail
utterly
at
it,
for
example,
just
being
very
truthful.
H
A
H
A
I
A
I
am
a
community
organizer.
I
I.
This
is
a
role
that
I
take
right.
I'm
not
a
token
engineer,
I'm
a
fake
token
engineer,
that's
for
sure,
but
I'm
a
real
old
fake
took
engineers.
Well,
that's
encouraging,
but
I
am
a
real
community
organizer.
So
I
I
can
and
livia
is
as
well.
So
you
know
between
the
two
of
us
if,
but
we
might
not
be
the
best
persons
people
to
make
the
final
call
on
what
is
done.
You
know.
F
Yeah
so
one
one
suggestion
there
and
that
was
actually
from
this
again.
You
know
currency,
potluck
and
thinking
how
to
use
it
for
the
book
or
just
test
it
out
these
roles.
You
know
you
define
a
role
that
you're
going
to
take
over,
and
then
you
say
what
is
it
that
you
offer
in
that
role
and,
most
importantly,
what
you
need
right
now,
if
you
say:
okay,
I'm
gonna,
you
know,
hurt
the
people
and
you
can
count
on
me
for
doing
that.
But
then
I
need
every
third
day.
F
That's
actually
a
nice
list
to
have
also
for
us.
I
think.
A
Yeah
yeah
we
have,
and
so
that
this
brings
to.
A
Yeah,
exactly
rolls
rolls
is
on
the
road
map
and
you
know
I
feel
bad,
because
I
don't
really
want
to
move
on
until
we
have
a
clear
path
towards
how
we're
going
to
make
a
final
decision
or
a
temporary
final
decision
on
the
mission
and
code
of
conduct.
F
B
I
kind
of
oppose
that
idea
because
I
feel
like
it.
It's
like
shabnen
said
that
it
doesn't
incentivize
people
to
be
proactive
and
that
maybe
it
would
be
more
effective
to
have
one
day
that
everybody
can
commit
in
one
time
like
we
have.
This
calls
every
thursday,
maybe
friday
could
be
the
day
of
decision
and
they're
all
expected
to
have
a
vote
until
I
don't
know
friday
night
and
then
that's
the
the
decision,
and
if
there
is
any
opposition
to
the
decision
made,
then
we
can
have
another
round
or
something
like
that.
H
H
That
yeah,
I
think
that
okay,
basically
we
need
two
decisions.
One
is:
are
we
decision
ready?
This
is
the
first
one
and
the
second
one
is
then
taking
the
the
decision
for
whatever
is
on
the
table,
and
I
think
we
can
combine
both.
So
I
think
I
like
the
idea
of
having
let's
say
a
certain
day
in
a
week.
H
Perhaps
it's
good
to
have
it
on
friday,
so
that
if
people
have
questions,
they
can
ask
it
in
the
call,
but
then
have
a
certain
deadline
where
we
until
when
we
collect
votes-
and
the
first
vote
is
on
decision
ready
majority.
Yes,
then
we
go
to
the
next
step,
which
is
then
immediately
cost
your
vote
or
immediately
after
until
the
second
deadline
and
those
two
deadlines
are
always
same,
the
same
deadline.
H
So
if,
if
anybody
wants
to
take
part,
he
or
she
is
able
to
take
part,
I
think,
what's
what's
complicated
or
feels
complicated,
pretty
much
every
time
in
early
stages,
you
feel
like.
Oh,
you
don't
have
all
the
voices
hurt
or-
or
you
feel
like
not
there
aren't
that
many
people
contributing-
and
this
was
also
what
what
I
was
asking
you
griff
in
our
conversation,
but
then
actually
one
thing
was
really
important
to
me.
H
Okay,
it's
it's
an
ongoing
process
right,
it's
not
the
the
final
word
on
on
whatever
values,
mission
and
and
maybe
future
questions.
It's
not
the
final
word.
We
will
pick
it
up
again
and
we
will
refine
it
and
I
think
that
relieves
a
lot
of
the
pressure
on.
Oh
did
we
really
ask
everybody,
because
if
that's
the
deal
we
have
the
friday
votes.
A
Okay,
I
really
like
that
decision,
ready
vote
and
then
vote
like.
I
think
that
I
think
that
makes
it
a
lot
easier.
A
I
think
that
makes
sense.
I
mean
if
we
have
three
people,
then
it
might
be
like
the
neutrals,
just
don't
count
or
well.
I
don't
know
so.
There's
there's
this
is
the
debate
on
voting
right.
There's
is,
can
one
person
block
it
and
if
that's
the
case
you
know
then
it's
like.
It's
really
is.
Are
we
looking
for
rough
consensuses
and
no
one's
blocking,
or
are
we
looking
for
majority?
Yes,
now.
F
F
Yeah,
I
don't
know,
but
at
the
same
time
literally,
if
we
say
we
will
be
revisiting
these
and
then
also
we
will
have
at
some
point
better
tooling.
F
We
should
go
with
what
is
super
practical
at
the
moment
and
as
long
as
no
one
is
really
feeling
literally
hurt
by
by
a
word
or
something
or
they
say
hey,
I
would
be
ashamed
if
you
put
those
words
together
on
a
web
page.
You
know,
I
don't,
I
think,
we're
okay.
H
And
also
sorry-
and
also
I
guess
the
question
of
is,
is
anybody
blocking
it
might
be
raised
in
in
the
first
decision?
Are
we
decision
ready
and
once
somebody
is
blocking
the
decision,
then?
Obviously
we
are
not
decision
ready
and
but
the
final,
but
once
it's
good
yeah
voted
on.
We
are
decision
ready.
Then
it's
yes
and
no
that's
good.
That.
F
Would
make
things
clearer
and
that
then
we
wouldn't
have
these
going
back
and
forth
and
so.
D
Because
I
I
think
people
are
going
to
get
tired
of
like
having
to
make
decisions
and
stuff
that
are
not
very
following,
so
I
guess
it's
better
to
reach
a
point
where
we're
like.
Oh,
we,
you
just
have
to
take
one
decision
right
now.
You
just
please
read
that
make
sure
that
you
understand
we
can
spend
a
full
week
or
more
answering
your
questions,
your
doubts,
responding
to
feedbacks
and
comments,
etc.
D
But
then
we
are
like
kind
of
we
all
vote
on
that,
and
we
all
agree
on
that
and
we
can
move
on
because
if
we
start
doing
that
iterative
process,
then
maybe
the
first
time
everyone
will
be
available
to
vote
and
to
read
etc,
but
on
the
next
iteration,
we'll
already
lose
like
half
of
the
people,
at
least
so,
and
I
think
it's
a
good
point
to
ask:
are
we
decision
ready?
D
And
I
think
I
don't
think
we
are
currently
because
what
we
should
have
is
like
this
body
of
documents
and
with
all
the
different
stuff
that
is
very
clear
and
very
well
mapped
out,
and
we
I
mean
at
least
in
kind
of
this
working
group.
We
all
agree
on
that
and
then
we're
like
okay.
This
is
really
to
be
kind
of
public
in
a
sense,
even
if
it's
all
like
open
source
and
public,
but
to
be
pushed
towards.
D
Everyone
saying
like
this
is
what
we
think
now
is
the
time
to
give
us
your
feedback,
your
honest
feedback,
and
it
would
just
happen
once
and
of
course,
as
as
we've
said
like
the
reality,
is
that
it's
an
ongoing
process.
It's
never
going
to
be
finished,
it's
never
set
in
stone.
We
are
going
to
do
like
an
infinite
number
of
iterations,
but
the
reality
is
that
at
one
point
we
need
to
have
a
version
zero
and
and
to
land
at
version.
D
D
H
H
What
I
now
realize
listening
is
what
we
are
not
having
at
the
moment
is
that
we
know
what's
the
consequence
of
a
voting
right,
so
this
should
be
also
included,
for
example,
no
worries.
We
will
come
back
to
that.
I
don't
know
every
second
month
or
every
month
whatever
and
any
refinements
we
need
can
be
made.
So
this
is
not
set
in
stone
would
be
one
thing
to
to
then
add
to
to
the
the
the
values
and
whatever
is
to
vote
on.
The
second
one
is
because
you
say:
okay,
we
will
publish
it.
H
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
be
transparent
on
what
we
are
doing
with
it.
For
example,
is
this
kind
of
a
working
document
or
are
are
we?
Are
we
already
taking
decisions
at
the
moment
or
based
on
the
vision
and
the
mission,
or
are
we
going
to
publish
the
website,
or
are
we
going
to
raise
funds
based
on
that?
I
think
that's
also
an
important
part
to
have
this
full
perspective,
to
be
able
to
vote
and
also
to
yeah,
provide
all
information
necessary.
A
Yeah
yeah-
and
this
is
this:
that's
the
part
where
I
feel
like
there
needs
to
be
a
a
champion
of
a
vote
or
a
champion
of
a
push.
Someone
who's
gonna
like
make
sure
that
it
goes
from
this
this
stage
to
like
done
and
voted
on,
you
know
and
and
there's
feedback
on
on
there,
but
I'm
gonna.
I
think
we're
gonna
have
to
continue
this
discussion
or
go
ahead.
G
H
H
G
I
think
it's
a
strong,
you
know
this
is
a
very
like
strong.
That's
that's
the
main
part
of
like
the
decision
process
right
is
like
do
we
integrate
people's
dissonances
or
if
they
are
smaller
than
the
majority?
Do
we
just
ignore
them?
So
it's
good
to
have
that
clear
and
from
what
I
can
see
with
the
emoji
voting
in
the
chat
it
looks
like
majority
rule
is
the
is
what's
being
used
here,
but
that
should
just
be
clear,
and
you
know
like
totally.
A
Yeah
and
I
yeah
okay,
so
we
only
have
15
minutes
left,
so
I
want
to
I'm
going
to
have
to
figure
out
the
mission
stuff
a
little
bit
later
and
we
got
to
dive
into
the
roadmap,
because
I
want
to
take
like
five
minutes
to
for
everyone
to
kind
of
quietly
make
comments
in
the
roadmap
about
things
that
can
change
and
things
that
can
get
better.
I
will
paste
the
roadmap
here
and.
A
There
and
so
just
read
the
road
map
and
where
we
are
now
and
where
we're
planning
on
going,
I
actually
already
made
a
suggestion
for
changing
what
we
do
next
week
then
compared
to
what
was
planned-
and
I
bet
that
there's
a
lot
more
suggestions,
so
please
just
kind
of
read
through
this.
A
The
one
thing
I
want
to,
I
guess
preface
is
that
working
groups
is
kind
of
general,
we'll
need
to
identify
all
the
different
working
groups-
legal
financial,
you
know-
maybe
maybe
like
actually
deploying
like
the
technical
requirements
and
defining
the
spec
like
we
will
define
these
different
working
groups
and
then
set
them
off
on
to
do
their
work,
but
so,
like
there's,
no
mention
of
legal
there's,
no
mention
of
these
things,
but
those
will
be
topics
of
working
groups.
A
F
I
have
a
question
with
respect
to,
for
example,
so
from
source
cred.
Basically,
we
picked
up
this
initiative
thing
just
to
put
a
name
on
what
you're
doing
right,
and
I
don't
see
that
in
the
road
map
is
it.
Is
it
something
like
because,
okay,
we're
gonna,
you
know
retry
retire
this
way
of
working
once
we
have
the
working
groups
and
then
obviously
I'm
more
of
the
democracy
kind
of
thing
like.
F
If
people
want
to
have
an
initiative,
because
they
you
know,
want
to
put
their
heart
and
blood
and
sweat
into
it,
I
would
always
say
that
let
them
do
and
then
and
if
others
can
support,
they
shall
support,
and
that
can
happen
anytime,
and
that
should
happen
anytime,
because
you
know
yeah,
okay,
cool
okay,
that
was
it
then.
A
Yeah,
well
I
mean
I
feel
like
that's.
These
initiatives
might
be.
That
might
be
something
part
of
the
agreements
and
documented
on,
like.
A
F
No
yes,
now
I
see
it's
two
one,
two
yeah,
it's
not
next
step.
I
H
Just
wondering
how
you
envision
this
might
work,
because
at
the
moment
I
think
that
the
the
challenge
is
that
we
have
roughly
10-ish
people
taking
part
in
the
process
so
far,
and
I
personally
couldn't
provide
any
additional
time
to
working
groups
apart
from
if
it
has
a
strong
overlap
to
the
academy
and
and
so,
but
maybe
there
there
is
a
different
plan.
A
This
was
this
is
actually
exactly.
I
made
a
comment
on
creating
something
for
next
week.
Along
those
same
lines,
I
was
thinking
very
similar
that
we
should
probably
figure
out
some
sort
of
incentive
alignment
for
the
people
who
put
in
the
work
to
make
this
to
make
this
a
reality
and
have
that
defined
before
we
say:
hey
working
groups
go
start
doing
stuff,
and
I
think
that
there's
lots
of
different
solutions
to
doing
that.
A
I
was
thinking,
maybe
basically
just
giving
people
a
percentage
of
the
hatch
tokens
that
are
made
like
you
know,
but
I
think
that
there's
an
opportunity
to
debate
a
few,
a
few
different
options,
and
I
was
hoping
that
maybe
we
do
that
next
week.
H
Got
it
yeah?
I
think
this
makes
perfect
sense.
I
think
I
think
we
have
a
similar
challenge
in
the
reviews
group
at
least
some
room
for
maneuvering
for
the
academy,
but
I
think
without
also
yeah
providing
information.
Okay,
that's!
What's
in
it!
For
you,
it's
hard
to
just
convince
people
to
to
take
part
in
and
contribute
in
working
groups.
I
A
So
next
week
my
proposal
was
to
move
roles
to
after
agreements
and
basically
push
the
working
groups
back
a
week
and
add
an
incentive
alignment.
E
H
Next
week
but
yeah,
perhaps
it's
not
only
about
me.
A
A
Do
we
have
all
thumbs
up
on
the
roadmap
or
other
than
maybe
this
one
change
of
adding
an
incentive
alignment
call
next
week.
G
Can
can
you
remember,
say
again
in
a
sentence
like
what
the
incentive
alignment
call
is
gonna
entail.
A
Figuring
out
a
way
that
we
can
reward
the
people
who
are
putting
in
time
and
effort
into
this
into
this
I
mean.
Basically,
there
are
lots
of
options
we
could
just
go,
do
a
bitcoin
grant
and
raise
funds
which
I
I
hope
that
we
do,
but
we
could
also
decide
to
take
a
percentage
of
the
hatch
and
give
everyone
vested
tokens.
We
could
decide
to
have
a
first
proposal
that
pays
people
out
some
salary
that
we
are
track
of.
We
can
there's
there's
a
there's,
a
lot
of
option.
F
Okay,
but
I'm
not
there,
the
next
two
weeks,
but
the
thing
is
like
just
you
know.
I
think
it
is
enough
to
keep
track
of
the
contributions
first,
let's
not
try
to,
or
even
if
you
try.
You
know,
I
think,
just
a
few
bucks
here
and
there
is
going
to
rather
muddy
the
waters.
In
a
sense
you
know,
maybe
people
are
like
what
just
a
few
bugs
or
you
know.
F
Instead,
if
we
could
focus
on
how
are
we
going
to
keep
track
of
contributions
in
a
way
that
everyone
feels
you
know
motivated
to
just
contribute,
what
they
want
and
can
and
can
actually
be?
They
know
that
their
contributions
being
kept
track
of
would
be
the
utmost
decision.
I
would
I
would
like
us
to
take
and
not
you
know.
G
I
mean,
however,
however,
incentive
alignment
works
out
like
I
hope
that
it
works
out.
Well,
because,
like
man,
I
mean
in
my
position,
I'm
just
seeing
that,
like
the
tec,
has
such
an
amazing
opportunity
right
now
like
this
is
the
timing
for
it,
and
I've
just
been
shocked
with
the
past
couple
weeks
like
in
the
common
stack
like
I
manage
kind
of
people
who
are
coming
in
for
potential
donations,
and
it
would
it
like
was
like
pulling
teeth
for
a
long
time
to
where
I
was
like.
G
I
don't
know
it
was
gonna
work
and
then
like
dude
as
soon
as
we
started,
hitting
that
like
generous
feeling
market,
it's
like,
oh,
my
god
I
had
like
so
many
people
that
I
didn't
even
have
time
to
deal
with,
who
are
like
wanna.
Be
token
holders
want
to
help
launch
commons
want
to
give
like
tens
of
thousands
of
dollars.
I'm
like
where,
were
you
guys,
like
a
month
ago,
everybody's
all
of
a
sudden
feeling
generous
and
so
like?
G
F
Okay,
yeah,
so
okay,
that's
super
cool
to
hear,
but
they
said
I
think
yeah
like
in
any
case
we
would
need
to
keep
track
of
the
contributions
and
when
we
start
with
that
and
then
you
know,
if
you
have
or
or
let
me
put
it
that
way-
yeah.
I
F
A
F
About
how
do
we
going
to
fundraise
by
a
git
con
or
this
or
that,
but
the
truly?
First,
we
are
keeping
track
of
your
contributions.
You
know
and
then,
and
then
next
thing
is
well
it's
great.
If
you
can
open
it
up
and
people
see
the
value,
especially
because
the
concepts
are
already
tracked
and
visible,
then
I'm
totally
in
line
that
it's
it's
a
good
timing
and
what
we
have
to
offer
here
is
also
badly
needed.
F
A
Nice,
okay,
so
in
the
last
four
minutes,
what
I'd
say
is
that
for
this
week
the
the
road
map
is
still
kind
of
under
discussion,
and
so
is
mission
and
code
of
conduct.
I
I'm
hoping
that
we
can
have
all
three
kind
of
solidified
enough.
Well,
the
I
mean
the
road
map
actually
pretty
solidified.
A
The
other
three
other
two
can
will
definitely
be
revised
as
we
go
by
you
know
by
like
tuesday,
so
that
we
have
time
to
at
least
for
the
until
next
week's
call
that's
got
to
be
defined
before
thursday,
right
so
yeah.
So
do
you
guys
think
that's
reasonable
that
we
can?
A
A
F
I
A
F
And
then
so,
and
from
the
people
here
like
does
anyone
has
doesn't
say
it
should
go
to
decision?
I
think
we're
decisions
right.
H
H
Yeah,
but
I
think
for
those
things
I
I
would
also
say
we
are
ready
to
have
a
vote
on
our
decision
ready,
and
I
would
expect
that
we
are
ready
and
then
have
a
vote
tomorrow.
F
F
A
Okay,
cool
well,
I
will
just
be
passing
the
road
map
around
next
week
and
and
and
see
if
we
can
get
some
feedback
and
it's
it's
probably
not
something
that
needs
to
be
voted
on
or
whatever
it's
it's
a
working
document.
Yeah
and
I
can.
I
can
manage
the
the
roadmap.
I
guess
as
like
just
a
facilitator
right
and
then,
but
for
the
mission
and
coded
conduct
yeah,
we
vote
tomorrow.
A
B
A
Okay,
sweet,
okay!
Well,
thank
you,
guys
we're
right
on
time
and
I'm
excited.
I
really
appreciate
the
that
we
spent
some
time
talking
about
decision
making.
I
don't
know
we
didn't
come
to
a
decision.
I
don't
or
we
did
come
to
a
decision.
I
guess
so.
Are
you.
A
Yeah
we
did
so
that's
cool.
That's
pretty
amazing.