►
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Temperature check
18:07 - Github notifications
18:20 - Spotlight
27:05 - Bi-Weekly Blog Post
34:15 - One time change addresses
47:23 - 75% Give Back
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
C
Yeah,
I'm
excited
and
thankful
for
the
participation
on
the
graviton
training
and
there
are
a
lot
of
things
that
are
happening
like
well.
The
the
the
75
percent
governance
vote
also
happened
and
also
trying
to
pitch
the
nbc
book
club
that
starts
tomorrow
so
well.
This
has
been
like
a
moved
week,
but
yeah,
I
think,
like
things
are
going
well
and
yeah,
I
will
pass
to
libby.
D
I
think
things
are
going
well
too,
but
it
feels
like
a
lot
of
calls
all
of
a
sudden,
like,
oh
my
god,
how
did
so
many
just
jumped
into
my
calendar
and
then
having
to
focus
on
all
the
work,
but
I've
been
receiving
help
from
a
lot
of
people.
It
feels
really
good
and
mitch
and
christopher
just
killing
in
the
reward
systems
and
we've
been
having
good
sinks
and
feels
like
things
are
moving
forward.
D
Yeah
in
general,
very
grateful
for
the
participation
in
the
community.
It
never
stops
every
week
is
more
and
more
people
wanting
to
do
stuff
and,
of
course,
there's
the
challenge
that
mitch
brought
up
yesterday
soft
graph
of
like
how
can
we
make
sure
we're
not
getting
stuck
by
all
the
people
that
are
joining,
but
also
acknowledging
how
beautiful
it
is
that
our
community
is
very
welcoming
and
that
more
and
more
people
want
to
be
here
and
I'm
confident
we're
going
to
find
that
balance
so
and
I
will
pass
to
a
duet.
E
I
love
how
you
pronounce
my
name.
You
are
the
only
one
who
pronounced
my
name
like
that.
So
simple,
I
don't
know,
I'm
really
happy.
I
have
two
very
strong
emotions
right
now:
happy
and
confusing
confusion
because
of
the
forum
post
of
the
feedback
that
was
provided,
75
governance,
feedback
and
delayed
kind
of
comments
that
were
put
there
in
general.
E
So
when
we
do
the
outreach,
she
was
not
outreached
because
she
was
not
on
the
list.
So
there
is
this
question
of
how
do
we
add
contributors
to
the
list
of
when
we
for
rotations
or
not
like?
How
do
we
handle
this?
So
people
who
contribute
and
like
yeah?
So
that's
that
was
a
little
bit
kind
of
off,
because
there's
a
lot
of
people
who
fall
into
this
shuga
is
another
example.
F
Realistically
what
can
we
sustain
and
that
stuff's
probably
going
to
suck,
but
I
think
it
needs
to
be
dealt
with
before
we
start
making
any
assumptions
of
like
what
our
funding
stream
is
going
to
look
like
and
lots
of
stuff
with
the
reward
system.
Lots
of
stuff
with
this
like
pushback
on
the
governance
vote,
like
all
of
it,
seems
very
confusing,
and
it
needs
some
clarification
anyway
and
I
will
pass
it
to
chewie.
G
B
G
Okay,
I'm
just
so
so
anxious
for
the
comments
upgrade.
I
need
it
to
happen
most
of
the
stuff
and
the
ideas
that
we
come
up
with
in
a
way
already
applied
to
like
the
post
comments
upgrade
phase
so
so
yeah.
I
just
I'm
just
like
super
anxious
and
excited
for
it
to
happen.
I
guess
that
could
summarize
the
temperature
in
incomes
I'll
pass
it
back
to
you.
Tim.
H
Yeah,
I
think
everything
is
pretty
pretty
good.
You
know
I.
I
love
the
voter
turnout
on
the
75
vote.
I
think
this
is
a
really
important
moment
for
us,
because
while
I've
read
the
forum-
and
I
I
myself
voted
no-
and
I
I
agree
with
some
of
the
aspects
of
it,
but
I
I'm
afraid
that
you
know
if
we
get
into
this
habit
of
passing
a
proposal
and
then
you
know
a
small
minority
gig,
you
know
push
it
pushes
the
envelope
to
the
point
where
we
lose
legitimacy
in
the
process.
H
I
think
it
becomes
a
huge,
huge,
huge
problem
for
our
community,
and
so
we
need
to.
We
need
to
figure
out
a
way
to
mitigate
these
types
of
things
and
have
responsible
discussions
around
these
topics,
because
while
there
are
very
good
points
to
these
these
aspects-
and
that
should
be
addressed,
I
do
think
that
what
what
is
worse
is
losing
legitimacy
of
our
entire
voting
process
in
general,
and
I
do
think
that
comes
to
a
threat.
H
I
I
I
So
their
voice
will
be
amplified
for
more
constructive
criticism
in
in
in
our
space,
but
I
would
say
that,
like
I'm
really
glad
that
we
had
the
88
percent
like
that
voter,
like
support
required,
I
thought
that
was
really
interesting
because
it
made
those
no
votes
really
matter
and
which
is
which
is
really
cool.
I
don't
think
any
other
dials
have
have
such
a
strong
support
required
and
I
think
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense
and
I
think
we
proved
it
with
this
last
vote.
I
Yeah
and
and
dave
man,
our
the
twitter,
analytics
that
dyor
put
out
there
in
the
comms
call
was
amazing.
It
was
such
a
nice
breakdown.
I
was
so
impressed
I
actually
recommended
to
like
lauren
and
a
bunch
of
other
people
that
run
twitter
accounts
in
the
space.
Just
to
like
check
out
that
breakdown,
you
know
because
it
was
really
valuable
yeah.
I
feel
like
we're
really
running
on
all
cylinders.
We
got
another
vote
out.
Tam,
tam,
zepp
and
sam
are
are
pushed
out.
I
I
J
Hi,
it's
interesting
the
desire
to
like
repeat
what
other
people
say,
but
I
guess
just
a
small
reflection
is:
I
just
feel
there's
so
much
like
care
and
stamina
and
praise
in
the
room
and
something
that
really
stuck
out
to
me
was.
I
need
to
go.
Look
at
the
name,
so
I
don't
get
his
name
wrong
mitch
right
mitch
was
the
new
is
the
new
yeah
there
you
are
you're
above
me.
J
I
just
really
appreciate
what
you
said
about
just
how
to
keep
the
ship
afloat,
because
it's
not
an
easy
thing
to
remind
people
of,
and
it
might
sound
kind
of
sour
people
don't
think
about
it.
But,
like
I
just
see
that,
as
like
foundational
financial
care
and
like
I
see
it
as
an
expression
of
love,
and
so
I
wanted
to
share
that.
That's
what
I
heard
and
I
just
I'm,
really
loving
engaging
this
community.
J
Sometimes
I
feel
a
little
bit
like
like
there's
blocks
to
doing
more,
but
you
know
what
that's
kind
of
good,
sometimes
because
I
need
to
learn
how
to
be
patient
and
and
I'm
a
part
of
other
communities
too.
You
know
it's
so
easy
to
take
on
too
much,
so
I'm
like
not
going
anywhere
and
I'm
excited
to
to
engage
more
and
in
doing
so
you
know
maybe
help
with
onboarding
in
the
future
as
well
and
I'm
not
sure
who
hasn't
gone
so
I'll.
Let
someone
else
pass
it
for
me.
K
K
I
M
M
B
A
Hey
yeah,
my
temperature,
I'm
just
checking
in
I
didn't
realize
until
a
few
days
ago
how
wild
things
have
been
getting
over
here
and
I'm
sorry.
I
was
gone
so
long
and
I'm
just
here
to
sink
and
I'll
pass.
I
don't
know
who's
gone
griff.
Did
you
go
yeah
yeah
griff
went
griff
went
one.
Okay,
did
you
go?
No
wonka
went
okay,
I
don't
know.
I
give
up.
H
B
No
problem,
so
I
want
to
say
I'm
feeling
a
little
mercury
being
retrograde
I'll,
admit
it.
I'm
not
a
big
astrologist
or
pay
attention
to
my
astrology
so
much
but
like
sometimes
things
are
going
on
and
I'm
like,
I'm
just
gonna
check
and
sure
enough
god,
damn
it
it's
mercury
retrograde.
So
I'm
feeling
that
a
little
bit.
But
aside
from
that,
I
would
say
I
feel
definitely
the
same
concern
that
was
brought
up
before
about
budget
and
focus.
B
I'm
gonna
propose
in
the
next
stewards
council
we
bring
hard
numbers.
You
know.
Last
year's
council.
We
brought
drafts
of
our
working
group
funding,
but
I
think
this
next
one
which
will
be
not
this
week
but
the
following
thursday.
We
bring
hard
numbers
for
each
working
group
and
look
at
the
totality
of
that
and
then
really
have
some
some
discussions
around
that
and
then
for
focus.
B
E
H
All
right,
thank
you,
edward
mission,
is
our
goal
is
to
become
a
shelling
point
for
the
token
engineering
community.
Should
I
do
the
whole
mission,
or
should
I
pass
it?
Okay,
our
economic
layer
will
projects
that
discover,
develop
and
proliferate
the
best
practices
for
engineering,
safe
tokenized
economies,
while
aligning
our
collective
success
with
the
individual
benefit
of
token
holders.
C
Our
co
values
our
commons
operates
from
a
pro-social
human-centered
perspective
and
prioritizes
the
advancement
of
token
engineering
over
short-term
profits,
integrity,
curiosity,
constructive
inquiry,
inquiry
presence
and
gratitude
are
foundational
for
maintaining
mutual
respect
within
our
growing
community.
We
encourage
our
members
to
be
radically
open
source,
non-hierarchical,
transparent
in
their
intentions
and
a
control
for
their
actions.
B
Cool
thanks
for
doing
that,
I
keep
thinking
that
we
need
to
keep
going
back
to
that
when
we're
deciding
what
we're
doing
and
why
we're
doing
it
and
if
it
is
aligned
with
our
mission,
vision
and
values.
So
maybe
we'll
make
this
a
little
tradition
to
revisit
this
public
service
announcement.
Have
you
checked
your
github
notifications?
B
H
K
K
K
There
were
many
parcel,
I
don't
know
they
were
money
and
ivy
was
saying
like.
Maybe
it
would
be
interesting
to
if
they
could
talk
in
the
in
the
community
called
like
the
spotlight,
so
maybe
reach
out
to
them
would
be
would
be
cool,
so
you
know
like
we
have
like
the
the
forum
boss,
but
also
these
people
explaining
how
their
app
works.
So
it
would
give
the
community
a
better
understanding.
E
B
H
Sounds
wonderful.
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
you
know
the
last.
I
think
three
times
we've
been
cutting
it
really
close
in
our
our
community
call
in
terms
of
giving
enough
time
for
the
spotlight.
If
this
does
become
more
of
a
problem,
we
are
going
to
have
to
make
some
changes,
but
we
could
also
be
a
little
bit
more
disciplined
about
our
presentation.
So
when
we're
doing
our
community
updates
to
make
sure
that
we're
very
precise
and
succinct
and
and
keep
keep
the
ball
moving
quickly,.
I
I
K
I
J
I
I
J
So
the
suggestion,
I
think
that
adding
meetings
is
like
a
really
hard
thing
to
do,
and
I
can't
even
begin
to
like
see
how
another
community
would
do
that
with
their
complicated
schedules
and
time
zones.
So
it
makes
me
want
to
be
like
every
community
hall
has
a
theme
and
so
like
a
spotlight
could
be
a
theme
so
like
folks,
like
data
aren't
cut
off
like
they
like.
When
I
saw
dada
go,
and
I
was
like.
J
Oh
man
like
they
barely
have
any
time
you
know
and
like
maybe
like
focusing
on
new
people
and
onboarding
and
really
just
like
having
a
chance
to
hear
people
out
a
little
bit
more
and
like
being
like
not
like
diluting
everybody
so
that
we
can
fit
everything
into
one
meeting
but
having
like
topical
or
categorical
meetings.
So
that's
my
suggestion.
H
I
mean
it's
a
really
good
suggestion.
I
appreciate
that.
I
think
the
a
bigger
concern
for
me
is
that
you
know
we're
growing
as
a
community
and
that
growing
means
more
praise,
and
that
means
more
work
groups.
That
means
more
things
to
fill
in
with
working
groups
and
so
yeah.
I
just
I.
I
would
like
to
open
up
like
a
kind
of
an
idea
on
the
forum
and
just
get
as
much
feedback
as
we
can
and
try
to
try
to
see
what
we
can
do
about
this.
J
J
A
community
called
that's
separate
from
the
weekly
update
and
it's
like
super
useful
to
have
those
two
separate,
so
it's
hard
for
for
me
to
conceive
of
them
being
together.
I'm
like
whoa
like
like
there's
no
time
just
for
those
two
things
alone,
let
alone
spotlights
and
other
things.
So
that's
my
perspective
from
a
different
community
server.
C
C
Maybe
if
you
don't
have
like
a
lot
of
of
like
news
from
your
working
group
in
a
week,
maybe
we
can
do
like
bi-weekly
updates
from
certain
working
groups
or
or
like
take,
turns
and
divide
the
the
call
like
today
we're
going
to
have
five
groups,
and
then
we
and
next
call
we're
gonna
have
five
groups.
I
don't
know
it's
just
a
suggestion.
B
I
think
it's,
these
are
all
really
super
good
ideas
and
I
like
the
idea
of
posting
on
the
forum,
because
mathematically
we
just
run
out
of
time.
I
mean
we,
you
know
if
there's
55
seconds
of
praise
times,
25
people,
sometimes
we
get
over
30,
that's
already
22
minutes.
Three
minutes
per
working
group
is
33
minutes.
So
that's
55
minutes
and
we
don't
include
the
intro.
So
I
think
we
need
to
reimagine
what
this
community
call
should
be,
how
it
should
be
structured
and
it's
a
great
opportunity
to
actually
do
that.
B
J
I'd
like
to
add
that
I've
never
made
a
forum
post
and
if
somebody
wanted
to
work
with
me
to
make
that
happen,
I
would
do
it
if
someone
else
who's
already
established
here
just
ends
up
doing
it.
That's
fine,
but
you
can
reach
for
me
in
my
dms.
If
you
want
to
have
a
perspective
from
another
community.
B
B
B
H
No,
I
just
wanted
to
you
know
it's
my
first
time
back
with
this,
so
I
was
going
to
just
hop
into
suga's
process
which
seem
to
be
working
out
really
well,
and
so,
if
you
guys
have
updates,
please
put
them
there.
Otherwise
I
will
reach
out
to
you
and
search
for
some,
so
something
will
be
written.
That's
all.
I
know.
C
B
E
B
F
I
Maybe
like,
let's
see
how
it
goes
in
the
community
call
tomorrow
they
had
a
they.
They
have
a
huge
hack
sesh
today,
where
they're
doing
a
lot
of
work
to
try
to
get
it
out,
so
we
can
actually
start
proposing
parameters,
at
least
in
the
alpha
stage.
If
that
happens,
highlighting
if
it's
bad,
it's
not.
I
Dashboard
go
ahead,
grab
it.
I
think
I
think
the
dashboard
is
awesome,
but
like
every
other,
every
other
round,
if
it's
ready
it's
ready,
I
don't
want
to
necessarily
bring
like
people,
keep
doing
user
testing
on
it,
and
it's
just
like
well
yeah.
We
know
we're
going
to
fix
all
that.
You
know
so.
I'm
like
I'm
not
necessarily
excited
about
gearing
people
towards
it,
rather
than
just
like.
I
B
J
B
To
be
honest,
this
is
also
an
opportunity
to
completely
reimagine
the
what
this
is.
This
had
originally
been
tied
to
praise.
So
every
two
weeks
there
was
a
praise
quant
and
then
we
would
publish
the
praise
quote
so
we
started
adding
some
highlights
from
what's
going
on,
but
now
that
dependencies
just
so
this
can
be
a
few
short
blog
posts
a
week.
It
can
be
one
big
blog
post
every
two
weeks
it
can
really
like.
Now
we
can.
We
can
apply
some
different
strategy
to
this
in
terms
of
using
medium
as
a
communication
channel.
B
H
B
H
Preferably
I'd
rather
I'd
rather
instead
of
just
like
I
mean
I
know
we
want
to
get
the
news
out
there,
but
I
would
like
to
see
like
deeper
dives
into
some
of
these
things,
like
the
tec
lounge,
which
is
something
that
I
feel
like
people
don't
really
understand
yet,
but
has
a
lot
of
potential
to
be
understood
and
participated
with.
So
I
don't
know
just
you.
B
B
Cool
yeah,
it's
a
it's
a
great
opportunity
to
to
find
new
things
that
may
work
better
than
what
we
have
been
doing
in
the
past
cool
all
right.
So
there
is
the
official,
very
first
hatched
out
vote.
Huge
cred
goes
to
sem,
of
course,
and
septimus,
and
dan
and
griff
and
I'll
include
myself,
but
please
go
vote.
This
is
a
very
non-controversial
vote.
B
This
is,
should
we
burn
and
mint
addresses
for
people
who
have
lost
access
to
their
token,
I
mean
to
their
yeah
to
their
address,
access
to
their
address
and
are
requesting
a
different
address.
So
yeah
two
things.
This
is
the
time
remaining
is
not
accurate,
so
yeah.
Please
ignore
that.
I
sent
a
communication
to
the
stewards
channel
into
the
amplified
channel,
essentially
so
that
the
correct
termination
date
of
this
vote
is
available.
B
I
want
to
say
it's:
what
was
it?
The
third
at
2
25
a.m,
cet
time
so
chewy.
I'm
not
sure
that
this
is
a
hundred
percent
on
comms
radar.
Yet,
but
there's
a
few
things,
one
it's
officially
the
first
hashtag,
which
is
very
exciting.
The
second
thing
is
it:
we
will
probably
receive
the
necessary
approval,
eight
percent
pretty
quickly
to
to
have
this
pass
so
yeah.
The
question
is
like
I
don't
know
that
we
need
to.
You
know
read
like
do
a
personal
outreach
to
every
every
hatcher.
B
B
D
G
G
D
G
B
I
G
I
B
I
G
F
B
I
dropped
the
magic
link
in
the
agenda.
Sorry
about
that
guys.
I
hope
that
works.
So
there
is
something
I
wanted
to
us
to
address
today,
but
maybe
in
because
I
also
like
us
to
do
some
working
group
updates
and
we
have
15
minutes
left.
I
just
want
to
have
this
on
everyone's
radar
when
we
did
the
when
I
drafted
the
stewards
working
group
funding,
the
question
came
up
about
how
to
determine
active
versus
non-active
stewards.
B
It
would
just
require,
like
a
forum
post
with
a
motivation,
you
know
for
being
a
steward
or
something
like
that,
so
that
if
there
does
seem
to
be
a
dwindling
motivation
for
participation
in
the
tec
as
a
steward,
there
would
be
a
natural
evolution
to
it.
Ending.
So
there's
that's
one
idea:
there
could
be
some
other
ideas,
but
I'd
love
for
us
as
the
stewards
to
figure
out
how
we
can
keep
stewardship
active,
since
there
will
be
some
sort
of
remuneration
for
the
role
in
a
healthy
and
positive
way.
B
B
B
You're
saying
my
thinking
is
we
do
it
in
a
way?
That's
not
over
over.
You
know,
that's
not
policing.
If
that
makes
sense
like
not
not
how
many
meetings
have
you
gone
to,
how
much
more
time
have
you
spent
it's
more
like
the
spirit
of
it,
and
this
idea
that
it
being
time-bound
could
be
natural.
You
know
like
okay,
after
three
months,
it
just
sort
of
doesn't
you're,
not
a
steward
unless
you
sort
of
re.
E
Yeah,
I
think
it's
for
it
to
be
for
it
to
work.
We
need
like
it
is
a
natural
need
of
evolving
the
acknowledgement
system
that
we
have,
and
not
necessarily
with
incentives
and
so
on,
but
I
think
this
sense
of
belonging
that
is
developed
through
pertinence
and
in
the
space,
and
it
is
part
of
the
cultural
field.
E
K
K
To
be
above-
and
you
also
have
to
want
to
be
it's
like
you-
have
these
two
requirements,
and
this
also
would
decentralize
the
thing
like
yeah,
it's
a
crazy
idea,
but
I
think
it
could
be
fun
and
people
could
grind
more.
I
don't
know
it
makes
yeah.
It
makes
like
this
gamification
thing
to
be
more
fun.
I
don't
know.
E
B
B
So
for
someone
that
hasn't
come
to
a
meeting
for
two
months
and
isn't
participating
in
the
forums
it
isn't
on
our
discord,
there
should
be
some
graceful
way
to
off-board
that
steward
and
I
guess
that's
what
we're
seeking
like
a
graceful
way
for
people
who
are
no
longer
energizing.
The
role
to
to
you
know
gracefully
off-board.
B
D
C
Are
we
going
to
decide,
but
the
boat
also
was
to
let
the
common
swarm
like
deep
dive
on
this
on
these
technical
solutions
to
to
propose
the
the
best
implementation
that
they
could
think
at.
So
yes,
like,
I
think,
like
the
the
confusion,
is
more
on.
How
are
we
going
to
implement
the
technical
solution
rather
than?
Why
did,
or
are
we
proposing
to
have
a
give
back
of
governance
to
core
contributors.
H
Sorry,
I
just
think
there's
a
lot
to
unwrap
and
that's
why
I
think,
especially
when
it
comes
to
informal
votes
that
are
meant
for
signaling.
The
discretion
of
implementing
that
vote
is
on
someone
and
knowing
who
that
person
is
and
who's
going
to
make.
That
decision
at
the
end
of
the
day
is
really
important
to
know,
and
so,
when
I
see
the
the
proposal
as
it
is
right
now,
it's
it's
a
question
of
okay.
Do
we
want
to
explore
developing
this?
You
know
digital
primitive.
H
My
answer
is
yes,
absolutely
do
we
want
to
spend
five
thousand
dollars
on
it,
not
sure
do
we
want
to
incorporate
this
as
a
method
for
the
75
government
back?
These
are
three
different
questions,
all
wrapped
into
one,
and
so
when
we
have
a
vote
like
this,
and
the
first
problem
I
see
is
that
people
we.
E
E
I
don't
know
the
space
for
signaling
before
it's
too
late.
If
that
ever
happens,
because
then
we
will
have
people
from
the
community
with
many
strong
opinions.
Probably
I
don't
know
they
represent
a
lot
of
people
like
sorry,
for
I
don't
know,
it
just
gave
me
a
feeling
of
confusion.
This
late
signaling,
because
I
didn't
see
on
the
on
the
forum
post,
but
I
didn't
understand
at
least
to
my
knowledge
what
then,
what
we
do
with
that
later
now.
B
D
I
think
I
think
what
happened
is
that
is.
Is
it's
supernatural
that
when
people
are
looking
into
something
that
they're
gonna
vote
in
that
moment
of
voting,
they
have
an
opinion
about
it,
and
maybe
they
didn't
share
that
opinion
earlier
earlier,
but
they're
sharing
in
that
moment,
and
still
with
those
opinions
being
shared,
we
had
a
92
percent
majority
voting
yes
for
this
proposal,
and
maybe
there
is
a
confusion
of
what
was
posted
on
snapchat
and
what
is
in
the
forum
and
that's
something
I
chatted
with
one
about
that,
maybe
moving
forward.
D
We
need
to
like
really
incorporate
the
feedback
process
into
the
proposal
and
then
post
something
clean
to
the
forum
without
all
of
the
comments,
but
having
the
comments
available
there.
If
people
want
to
see
it,
but
what
was
in
the
snapshot
is
very
clear,
a
very
clear
process
of
what
is
happening.
That
is,
this
was
a
signaling
for
either
the
common
swarm
is
going
to
start
looking
into
the
development
of
the
solution
or
not
so
look.
D
I
think
it's
important
for
us
to
pay
attention
on
the
language
that
would
raise
like
like
we
there.
There
shouldn't
be
confusion
in
the
result
of
the
vote,
because
it
clearly
passed
if
there
is
confusion.
There
is
like
oh,
how?
How
are
this
going
to
be
implemented?
Oh
maybe
we
should
talk
to
the
commons
form.
Maybe
we
should
go
to
a
comments
forum
call
who,
in
the
comments
forum,
we
need
to
speak
to
to
address
this
suggestions
that
were
being
made,
and
then
sam
also
was
chatting
there.
H
Using
that
mechanism
would
have
probably
been
a
more
beneficial
approach
just
because
I
think
that
if
I'm
signaling
that
I
want
five
thousand
dollars,
does
that
mean
it's
going
to
happen?
Does
that
mean
if
they
do
it
it's
going
to
be
implemented,
even
if
we
don't
want
the
75
governor's
back?
Like
I
don't
know,
there
are
a
lot
of
different
nuances
there.
So
I
think
simpler
is
better.
K
I'm
a
bit
confused
now
because
I
think
sam
was
saying,
like
you
guys,
are
saying
this
boot
was
signaling,
but
sam
was
saying
this
is
the
real
I
mean
to
make
this
thing
happen.
It's
like
same
going
to
implement
it
before
the
common
super
8.
So
we
are
going
to
choose
the
params,
including
that
decision
so
yeah
now
I'm
confused
like
sam
was
telling
like
this
decision
was
final
and
now
we're
saying
this
is
a
signaling,
so
maybe
grief,
you
know,
oh
yeah
go
ahead.
B
B
I
also
thought
of
this,
as
it
was
to
really
approve
that.
Yes,
we're
going
to
implement
this.
Yes,
it
will
cost.
This
is
how
much
it's
going
to
cost
and
then
it
will
be
ratified
in
the
commons
upgrade,
but
I
also
thought
this
was
like
yes
go
ahead.
Let's
do
it.
I
thought
this.
It
was
a.
It
was
a
signal
that
we're
going
to
go
ahead
with
this,
because
we
agree
with
it
in
principle
and
that
the
solution
would
be
designed
by
the
people
who
are
best
equipped
to
design
the
solution.
B
C
Yeah,
I
think
that
I'm
more
with
with
levy
on
this
side,
because
the
technical
solution
hasn't
been
developed
yet
so
we
are
not
sure
about
what
we
will
be
talking
about
and
what
this
boat
will
do
is
to
unblock
the
common
swarm
team
to
start
working
on
this
and
actually
in
in
last
call
they
they
had.
They
were
like
continuing
brainstorming
on
what
would
be
the
best
solutions
and
like
nougat
was
also
suggesting.
C
But
I
also
think
that
yeah
that
we
should
continue
engaging
in
in
this
process,
because
it's
it's
not
done,
it's
not
something
like
okay,
we
we,
this
is
done
and
we're
just
announcing
it
we're
just
we.
We
are
going
into
that
direction
and
we
are
saying
that
that
to
go
into
that
direction,
that
that
will
cost
some
funds
to
to
the
doubt.
E
There
is
a
reason
for
mapping
future
exactly
what
time
and
septus
mentioned
versus
exactly
what
levy
and
juan
can
mention
not
versus,
but
like
the
difference
between
the
and
because
it's
it's
a
different,
I
feel
there
are
different
visions
about
the
same
and
I
don't,
like
my
confusion,
came
from
the
idea
of
oh,
so
we
will
have
to
vote
again
when
they
come
up
with
a
solution,
so
there
will
be
another
process
for
this,
so
they
will
be
like
it
adds
on.
So
I
didn't
understand
yeah.
So
that's
where
it
come
from.