►
Description
In the Stewards Working Group the Community Stewards come together to coordinate workstreams, share experiences and reflect on what is going well and what can be done better in order to achieve the mission of the TEC and best serve our community.
Find us on the #stewards channel on our Discord!
We gather every Wednesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Tamara
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
For
sure,
do
you
want
to
start
leaving
for
the
attempt
to
check.
A
A
Yeah,
I
I,
the
the
the
temperature
checks,
have
been
harder
and
harder
for
me
to
make
sense
of
everything
in
a
week.
I
think
I
think
things
are
having
a
good
flow
of
yeah,
just
more
people
taking
ownership
of
stuff,
which
always
feels
good
new
contributors
jumping
in
the
working
groups
being
a
little
more
dynamic
with
including
new
contributors
in
the
in
the
leadership
of
it.
And
I
think
it's
awesome
that
there's
people
in
amsterdam,
representing
tc
and
yeah,
maybe
I'll,
have
more
to
share
soon
but
I'll
pass
to
bear.
C
Yeah
sure
temperature
check
lukewarm
praise,
quencher
moving
forward
praise
payments,
not
so
much
so
that's
something
I
want
to
work
on
this
week
and
proposal
inverter
same
old,
same
old
they're
working
with
prime
down
trying
to
move
it
forward.
So
I
can't
feel
like
I
felt
them
it
like.
I
made
a
lot
of
progress
this
sprint
and
I'll
pass
it
to
griff.
D
I'll
second,
the
lukewarm
I
was
looking
at
the
snapshot
proposal
from
well.
I
came
back
from
a
break
last
week
hanging
out
with
kirch
and
and
my
friends
out
here
in
in
ecuador,
but
and
I
was
a
little
disappointed
with
how
many
people
votes
we
got
in
the
snapshot
vote
for
water.
It
was
all
unanimous
but
like
is
there
a
quorum
on
our
snapshot
votes?
This
happened
to
giveth
too,
and
it
kind
of
like
throws
me
for
a
loop.
So
I
definitely
want
to
bring
that
up,
but
also
it's
like.
D
Oh
man,
where
are
these
big
token
holders
yeah?
What
do
we
got
to
do
to
corral
them
to
to
vote
on
things,
because
it's
like
it's
a
real
problem
and
if
we
just
had
a
couple
big
token
holders
that
would
be
willing
to
vote
on
things
once
in
a
while
to
make
sure
that
quorum
doesn't
fill
that
cluster.
That
would
help
a
lot,
and
I
think,
it'd
help
everyone's
morale
too
yeah
and
other
than
that
things
are
pretty
chill
yeah
I'll
pass
it
to
mount
monument.
E
Yeah
for
me,
it's
pretty
warm.
I've
been
working
on
content
for
the
next
newsletter,
which
will
launch
tomorrow
and
then
expanding
what
we're
doing
on
our
marketing
overall
in
the
community.
There's
not
a
lot
of
people
requesting
onboarding,
it's
the
other
way
around
me
chasing
them
see
if
they
want
to
be
on
board
it.
However,
two
important
developments
are
the
the
the
governance.
E
The
token
engineering
governance
guild,
I
believe,
is
the
name
something
like
that.
I'm
excited
for
that
and
getting
in
health
of
engineers
and
then
gideon-
and
I
are
are
talking
on
talking
with
clarity,
which
is
a
coordination
organization
and
management
platform,
see
if
that
can
add
some
value
on
the
way
we
get
things
done
around
here
and
also
a
platform
called
dial
exchange
which
might
or
might
not
take
the
place
of
dework.
E
F
Yeah,
so
in
this
couple
of
weeks
I
will
be
very
busy
due
to
school,
so
my
temperature
is
very
hot
and
busy,
but
regarding
work,
I,
the
primed
dog
proposal,
inverter
work-
is
actually
going
interesting,
like
wireframes
of
design
is
almost
done
for
the
first
draft,
like
I'm
super
pumped
up
to
see
how
the
real
action
will
look
like
the
second
one.
I'm
actually
very
excited
to
exact
about
discussions
regarding
tc
financial
working
group
or,
like
the
reputation
token
for
the
governance.
So
I'm
really
excited
to
see
how
these
things
moving
forward.
F
B
Thank
you.
I
was
muted,
so
it's
warm.
We
finished
the
outreach
to
everyone
who
didn't
have
a
activated
place
account
and
there
was
a
bunch
of
people
that
we
couldn't
find
around
40
people.
So
that
feels
weird
people
who
were
part
of
the
sort
of
praise
layer
and
then
they
are
not
anymore
our
discord
or
maybe
they
change
their
names.
B
So
that's
peculiar
on
the
other
side-
and
this
is
I
had
this
conversation
with
time
before-
I
feel
a
little
bit
tired
of
like
cut
hurting
people
towards
the
same
things
over
and
over
and
without
much
support
of
anything
else.
Anyone
else,
besides
stem
and
gene
and
costa
this
time.
So
it
feels
a
little
bit
repetitive
because
for
the
past
two
years
I've
been
down
outreach
non-stop.
So
I
feel
like
there
should
be
more
support
on
that
end.
So
yeah,
that's
it
and
I
will
pass
it
on
to
lauren.
G
Yeah,
so
I'm
feeling
warm,
but
I'm
feeling
warm,
but
it's
like
you
know
it's
getting
chilly
with
everybody's,
like
temperature
check
check-ins,
I
feel
like
I'm
like.
Oh
man
like
I
wish
eddie
had
more
support
with
cat
hurting
like
I
wish.
People
were
voting,
it
was
like
you
know:
should
people
not
enough
people
voting
in
the
snapshot?
It's
like,
we
need
more
cat
hurting
and
then
it's
like.
We
need
more
cat
herders
so
anyway.
G
Just
from
this
call,
I'm
feeling
like
a
little
chillier,
but
before
that
I
was
feeling
quite
warm,
because
I've
been
trying
to
keep
a
good
eye
on
the
things
happening
in
amsterdam,
and
it's
like
we've
got
just
great
token.
Engineering
representation
there
like
angela,
was
on
a
panel
just
today
and
then
also
like
giving
us
workshop
and
then
tam
had
her
presentation
and
wonka
had
a
presentation
at
the
taoist,
and
it's
like
we're
getting
lots
of
support
from
all
of
our
engagement
there,
and
it's
like.
G
I
saw
a
great
picture
with
like
chewie
and
zephy
and
han
and
heather,
and
I
think
that,
like
our
crew
is
just
like
really
holding
things
down
there,
and
I
made
a
tweet
today
from
the
tc
that
was
like
kind
of
a
generic
tweet
like
about
like
tc's
in
amsterdam,
and
it
got
like
29
likes
and
like
10
retweets
and
like
a
few
quote
tweets
and
it's
like
people
are
really
excited
about
the
things
that
we're
doing.
G
I
mean
I
did
mention
a
lot
of
stuff
that
we
were
doing
like
the
reward
system
and
the
discord
box
and
working
on
dows
and
conflict
resolution.
Just
different
elements
of
the
tc
in
the
in
the
tweet
and
it
was
kind
of
like
come
find
us
if
you
want
to
talk
about
this
stuff
and
got
a
ton
of
engagement.
So
I
think
that
there's
like
a
lot
of
support
for
the
tc
coming
through
from
amsterdam,
and
that
makes
me
feel
really
excited
and
also
like
lots
of
action
with,
like
people
being
tagged
in
photos.
G
I
think
these
conferences
are
like
really
great
for
our
networking
but
yeah.
It's
chilly
in
this
call
and
I'll
pass
it
to
durgados.
H
Yeah
so
yeah,
I
guess
I
didn't
hear
you
know
the
other
chili
stuff,
but
I'm
a
little
chilly
myself,
just
because
my
personal
life
and
and
yeah
it's
just
the
the
evolution
of
of
token
engineering
comments
and
some
of
the
other
stuff
is,
is
a
little
bit
on
the
fringes
of
my
awareness
right
now.
I
I've
you
know,
created
some
things
recently,
but
yeah.
I
don't
have
much
energy
to
distribute
them
or
anything
at
the
moment.
H
So
it's
a
little
bit
a
little
bit
of
a
challenge
for
me
to
to
really
be
engaged,
so
I'm
a
little
bit
more
in
spectator
mode
than
I
would
normally
be
when
I'm
on.
One
of
these
calls.
C
Yeah
did
jean
go.
I
Nicer
not
yet
hello,
everybody
yeah
temperature
check
is
getting
warmer.
Actually
I
apologize
for
not
being
around
in
the
last
couple
of
months,
but
I'm
starting
a
new
medication,
so
I'm
feeling
more
consistent
and
yeah,
not
not
as
down
as
before.
So,
ideally,
that's
going
to
continue
yeah.
I'm
reading
awesome
governing
the
comments
which
is
cool
because
I
hadn't
hadn't
really
had
an
idea
as
to
what
the
intellectual
foundation
was
precisely
but
yeah
getting
getting
some
more
information
and
feeling
good
about
it.
I
So
pass
to
oh
great.
J
Hi
how's
everybody
doing
nice
to
see
all
of
your
shining
faces.
It's
been
a
while,
like
durgados,
largely
spectator
mode.
I
just
was
on
a
family
holiday
which
was
great
to
recharge.
J
I
don't
do
any
work
for
you
guys
anymore.
I
just
tag
along
and
vote
and
read
stuff
and
oh
some
praise
quanting,
although
I'm
sure
poorly
mitch,
I'm
looking
at
you.
J
E
Yeah,
okay,
I'm
trying
to
share
my
screen,
like
only
the
google
document,
so
it
doesn't
look
like
it's
looking.
So
if
someone
else
can
share
the
rule
doc
of
the
notes
that
we're
taking
because
it
doesn't
show
for
some
reason,
I
can't
do
it
but
yeah
for
now.
E
Yeah,
okay,
so
again
the
newsletter
that
I've
been
working
on
for
the
past
two
weeks.
Also
andy
gene
has
provided
some
help,
he's
gonna
launch
tomorrow.
If
you
click
there
on
the
document,
we
have
a
lot
of
content
that
we've
been
curating
both
last
week
and
this
week.
If
you
don't
see
something
that
you'd
like
to
be
added
there,
something
regarding
your
working
group
or
some
event-
please
add
it
there
so
that
I
can
put
on
the
newsletter,
send
it
out
tomorrow.
E
I
don't
know:
are
there
any
any
boats
on
gardens
or
towel
that
we
need
to
discuss?
I
would
like
to
say
that
I
reached
out
to
heater
and
jessica,
and
they
will
be
doing
they
will
be
coming
to
a
spotlight
of
our
community.
Call
this
thursday
and
they'll
be
presenting
something
about
the
cat
cat
community
funding
that
implies
and
what
they
intend
to
do
with
it
once
that
passes
right
now.
Last
I
checked,
which
was
maybe
an
hour
ago.
E
It's
looking
like
it's
gonna
pass
in
about
a
month
and
14
days,
so
about
five
weeks
and
it'll
pass
other
than
that.
There's
a
there's,
a
marketing
team
down
funny
proposal,
doubt
that
is
gonna
pass
in
two
weeks
by
the
time
may
starts
and
yeah
other
than
that.
I'm
not
aware
of
any.
I
mean,
of
course,
the
the
retractive
funding
for
east
denver,
which
is
less
than
one
grand
other
than
that.
D
Yeah
the
snapshot
it
passed,
it
was
unanimous,
but
it
only
had
5.7
percent
purim
and
I'm
not
sure
if
we
have
in
our
documentation
somewhere
what
the
quorum
requirements
are
for
snapshot.
And
then,
if
olivia,
you
shake.
C
D
Well,
I
I
would
say
maybe
we
should
play
it
on
the
safe
side
and
make
make
the
proposal
again
and
try
to
get
a
whale
to
vote
with
us.
G
Yeah,
I
totally
agree
with
that.
I
think
we
should
maybe
just
make
it
again
and
do
a
little
bit
more
directed
cat
hurting
like
dming
it
to
people.
D
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think,
the
laser
tag
multisig
the
people
who
are
in
the
laser
tag,
multisig
probably
alone,
have
no,
no,
in
fact,
no
doubt
in
my
mind
they
have
twice
the
quorum
just
in
that
multi-sig,
so
you
know
it
would
be
good
to
just
get
them
to
vote
on.
If
we
got
one
person
to
vote
for
two
people
to
vote
for
the
laser
tag,
multisig,
then
it
would
even
make
forum.
A
D
So
then
should
we
should
we
ask?
Does
anyone
want
to
make
a
snapshot
vote?
D
B
I
will
just
say
I
would
just
say
it
for
the
sake
of
this.
That
was
a
funny
one,
the
lazy
attack.
I
would
I
will
just
say
for
the
sake
of
this,
I
mean
we
can.
We
can
try
to
do
this
every
time
there
is
a
quorum
needed,
but
I
don't
think
it's
efficient
in
the
mid
to
long
term
and
every
time
we
need
to
pass
things.
B
We
will
need
to
do
this,
so
I
would
just
suggest
we
find
a
way
to
sort
of
not
rely
on
caught
hurting
so
much,
but
to
actually
like
we
we
had,
I
feel
like
we
had
a
huge,
not
a
huge.
B
We
have
an
interesting
quorum,
mainly
based
on
the
debates,
oh
because
we
have
some
kind
of
space
where
people
will
were
reminded
or
people
were
sort
of
kept
active,
but
there
are
a
lot
of
people
here
that
are
not
voting
and
they're,
not
an
active
part
of
the
community
just
because
they
have
their
own
thing.
So
I
think
it
would
be
interesting
to
have
a
discussion
to
see
how
we
can
mature
this
into
something
that
will
sort
of
prevent
this
kind
of
lack
of
quorum
in
the
midterm.
B
I
don't
think
we
are
going
to
solve
in
the
short
term,
but
in
the
midterm
we
can
solve
it,
so
we
are
not
needing
to
do
this
every
time
we
need
to
pass
or
duplicate
our
also
just
to
pass
it
because
we
don't
have
curb
enough.
I
don't
know
if
I
made
sense
sorry.
A
No,
I
I
I
just
think
we
should.
Maybe
we
could
have
a
label
for
some
types
of
proposals,
for
example
personally,
for
me,
I
didn't
feel
so
the
impulse
to
go
there
and
vote
because
it
felt
like
I
needed
to
understand
a
lot
of
things
that
weren't
immediately
clear
for
me,
and
maybe
a
lot
of
people
have
that
feeling
too.
So
perhaps
we
could
have
labels
of
like
this
is
a
easy
proposal,
easy
in
terms
of
like
commitment.
A
You
need
to
have
to
vote
easy
proposal,
medium
proposal
like
a
more
elaborate
proposal
and
then
for
the
more
elaborate
ones.
We
could
have
debates
and
promote
the
debates
and
then
start
a
discussion.
So
people
have
other
ways
of
engagement
that
I
think
that's
what
you're
saying
and
do
understand
right
now,.
B
B
I
don't
know
if
this
is
something
that
can
be
done
our
website,
but
I
think
it's
a
very
interesting
way
because
it's
like
tied
it
to
their
to
I'm
gonna
share
it
on
the
store,
so
you
can
see
it,
but
it's
tied
to
their
website
side
to
the
platform.
B
So
it's
a
really
nice
way
for
people
to
know
that
that
exists
and
just
to
have
it
clickable,
because
what
I
think
what
happens
with
a
lot
of
people
is
that
we
can
create
the
tags
that
would
be
really
helpful
actually
to
have
like
low,
mid
high
level
of
proposals
or
whatever
kind
of
tax
similar
to
that
one,
but
also
it's.
B
How
do
you
keep
the
tension
or
the
attention
span
from
people
from
proposal
to
proposal,
which
is
the
thing
that
is
missing
like
we
can
have
tax,
but
there
is
no
way
to
keep
people's
attention
through
proposals,
because
people
forget-
or
people
don't
have
time
to
do
so.
So
we
need
to
sort
of
create
this
social
or
any
kind
of
layer
that
keep
this
tension
going
in
a
way.
C
Didn't
we
yeah,
I
feel
like
this
is
a
lot
of
problems
that
delegate
voting
solved,
and
so
this
is
already
being
employed
somewhere
because,
like
our
biggest
token,
holders
are
probably
the
least
active
which
is
like
really
screwing
with
us,
because
they
like
they
got
their
own
stuff
going
on
and
so
like
they're,
not
really
paying
attention
and
other
than
that
trying
to
get
quorum
is
really
hard
through
this,
like
token
weighted
system,
so
having
our
whales
being
able
to
delegate
votes
would
be
super
useful.
C
D
Yeah,
and
so
I
think
we
just-
I
don't
think
we
need
to
do
mass
cat
hurting,
but
until
there
is
a
lot
large
token
holders
engaged
any
vote.
Any
vote
that
I
put
up.
I
go
like
you
know,
because
I'm
putting
up
these
tribute
votes
all
the
time
I
go,
and
I
ask
the
people
who
have
a
bunch
of
money
to
vote
on
it
so
that
we
can
pass
it
and
that's
just
what
it
takes.
D
You
know
if
you
and
sadly
I
was
not
around
last
week,
so
I
didn't
cat
hurt
on
this
one
at
all
and
we
failed
so
I
mean,
but
it's
asking
like
five
people,
it's
not
asking
50
people,
it's
like
going
to
z,
yeah
and
paul,
and
you
know
I
mean
we
can
see
who
votes
heavily
in
the
gardens
and
find
their
names
and
be
like.
Oh
yeah,
these
guys,
the
thing
the
thing
is
and.
B
So
I
feel
it's
like
against
our
own
culture
to
have
this
for
this
kind
of
approach
to
it,
because,
even
even
if
it's
not
five
people,
we
cannot
depend
on
you,
you
grave
to
be
present
or
if
you,
if
you
got
sick
or
if
you
have
holidays,
you
know
it
gets
tricky.
So
I
feel
like
we
should
not
rely
on
this
kind
of
low
key
centralization
on
you
or
in
these
five
people.
From
the
laser
tag.
D
It
in
an
ideal
world,
it
wouldn't
be
plutocratic,
but
we
don't
live
in
that
ideal
world.
We
have
a
plutocracy.
So
like
it's,
not
a
it's,
it's
just
the
reality
so
like.
If
we're.
Unless
we
want
to
lower
the
quorum,
you
know
we
need
10
percent
of
all
token
holders
voting,
which
is
about
240
000
tec
right
now,
and
that's
what
is
that?
That's
like
half
a
million
dollars
over?
Oh,
like
700,
000
worth
of
tokens,
to
vote
to
pass
to
pass
these
proposals.
D
So
unless,
unless
we
go
in
this
room
and
we
go
buy
up
700k
with
the
tokens,
you
know
we're
gonna
need
to
talk
to
the
people
who
did.
H
D
No,
the
the
vote,
the
vote,
I
mean
we,
we
instigated
it,
I
mean
plutocracy,
isn't
always
bad.
Let
me
just
say
that
right,
because,
if
you
put,
if
you
have
a
pot
of
funds
with
a
million
dollars
in
it,
one
person
put
in
20
another
person
put
in
half
a
million
dollars
person
with
half
that
put
a
half
a
million
dollars
in
should
have
a
larger
say
over
how
that
money
is
spent
right
like
I
don't
think
I
don't.
I
don't
think
that
that
that
argument
is
not
to
be
held.
D
You
know
and
that's
exactly
what
we
did.
Some
people
put
in
a
bunch
of
money
into
the
pot,
some
people
putting
less
money
into
the
pot.
The
people
who
put
in
a
bunch
of
money
have
more
say
than
people
who
have
less
money
now
in
an
ideal
world,
it
would
be
quadratic
and
be
mitigated
because
it
is
right
to
be
plutocratic,
but
ideally
it
would
be
mitigated
pluto
plutocracy.
D
You
know
with
like
divide
everyone's
skin
in
the
game,
but
like
square
root
it
and
call
it
good
so
that
people
who
put
in
more
money
still
have
more
say,
but
there
is
like
some
acknowledgement
of
everybody's
perspective
having
value
as
well,
but
we
don't
have
that
right.
Now
we
used
to
have
that,
but
now
that
anyone
can
just
buy
tc,
it
could
be
games.
So
until
we
get
the
reward
system
up
with
a
reputation
token
of
some
sort,
then
we
can
actually
start
including
more
identity
management
and
and
mitigate
plutocracy
plutocracy
in
itself.
A
What
about
we
move
this
conversation
to
soft
gov
tomorrow
to
find
if
we're
gonna
lower
the
quorum?
What
are
what
can
we
do
about
this
next
vote
and
then
continue
with
the
agenda,
because
I
think,
there's
still
quite
a
lot
to
cover
today.
E
Okay,
cool
moving
on
then
yeah,
so
yeah
the
check-in
on
spotlight
for
the
community
call.
I
believe
I
already
mentioned
that
I've
been
in
contact
with
jess
and
chris
catoya
chris
is,
I
believe,
the
lead
for
the
community
from
catacad,
so
he'll
be
the
one
who
knows
best
about
will
come
out
from
the
funding
that
they
receive
once
the
proposal
passes,
they'll
be
coming
to
our
spotlight
this
thursday
to
explain
that
it's
pretty
self-explanatory,
we'll
wait
until
thursday
to
see
how
that
develops.
Now
for
the
reward
system
stewardship.
E
I
know
I
completed
I
I
served.
I
did
my
duty
as
a
quantifier,
but
perhaps
mitch
would
like
to
talk
about
this
more
at
length,
so
mitch.
A
So
it's
been
a
very
beautiful
collaborative
work
in
this
working
group.
I
think
a
lot
of
people
are
really
taking
like
their
own
space
to
collaborate
with
the
things
they
feel
like
they're
inspired
by,
and
it's
been
a
very
yeah,
very
nice
and
flat
work.
I
feel
in
in
this
working
group
and
of
course
christopher
is
like
in
the
forefront,
keeping
us
all
on
track
and
really
having
a
lot
of
the
vision
for
what
is
happening
so
yeah.
A
C
Yeah
well,
I
just
want
to
say
that
libya
does
tons
of
stuff
with
so
many
different
working
groups
and
it's
like
I
was
super
resistant
because
then
it's
like,
oh
god,
I
feel
like
I
have
to
show
up
to
all
the
sprint
calls
and
everything
and
I'm
like,
but
I
mean
I
really
just
need
to
step
up
and
participate
more
in
these
things,
because
I
can
see
that
we're
kind
of
sharing
this
role
but
olivia's
got
a
lot
on
her
plate.
C
C
Yeah
yeah
sure
we're
just
about
to
close
seven
on
wednesday
that'll
be
for
january
and
then
we'll
be
starting
up
for
feb,
so
we're
almost
done
with
the
quantification
development
is
slow.
I
think
it's
a
bandwidth
issue
and
I
would
really
like
to
get
some
development
support
on
that.
Somehow,
because
there's
lots
of
improvements
that
need
to
be
made.
C
The
main
blocker
right
now
for
getting
the
reward
payments
out
is
we're
still
debating
how
much
tec
to
distribute
for
the
subsequent
rounds,
and
a
lot
of
that
has
to
do
with
how
we've
integrated
source
cred,
whether
in
source
code,
should
be
integrated
at
all,
like
we're
kind
of
going
back
and
forth
on
these
issues,
and
so
we're
looking
to
get
the
forum
post
out,
that's
going
to
have
all
the
details
for
the
amount
of
tc
we
want
to
distribute
for
each
round
who's
getting
how
much
and
why
and
the
parameters
used
in
the
reward
system,
and
so
once
that
form
post
is
out,
we
can
get
the
rubber
stamp
on
the
parameters
from
the
community.
C
Then
we
can
start
paying
out
for
the
rounds
that
have
already
been
quantified.
B
I
have
a
question:
does
this
pad
up?
Does
these
parameters
of
the
reward
system
goes
to
voting
for
the
community
or
they
are
just
assumed
and
and
plainly
just
decided
sorry,
I
I
that
sound
that
sounds
harsh,
but
that
didn't
mean
to
sound
hard,
I'm
just
asking.
If
we
are
going
to
vote
on
that
or
that's
just
something.
C
Yeah,
I
mean
the
reward.
The
reward
board
is
going
to
choose
the
parameters
just
because
expertise,
knowledge,
you
know
in
the
loop
and
we'll
explain,
be
like
these
are
the
parameters.
What
they
do
looks
good
like
we'll
have
like
regular
advice
process
on
it
and
then
send
it
up
to
probably
a
snapshot.
To
be
honest,
so
we'll
we'll
pick
them
we'll
get
advice
on
it
and
then
we'll
send
it
for
a
vote.
B
We
can
match,
I
think
we
can.
I
feel
it
will
be
interesting
to
match
this
momentum
of
the
praise
allocation
with
a
little
bit
of
maybe
some
kind
of
I'm
not
going
to
say
a
party
but
some
kind
of
context
where
we
can
bring
some
teas
over
to
just
see
the
parameters
and
just
have
a
small
conversation
about
it
and
then
launch
the
boat
and
then
have
have
this
smaller,
because
it's
it's
quite
relevant.
What
we're
doing
actually
the
launch
of
the
of
the
allocations.
B
So
I
feel
we
should
build
something
around
that
and
build
a
small
narrative
around
that
since
there's
has
been
so
much
effort
so
much
time
quantifying
so
on.
We
can
take
advantage
of
that
and
invite
people
who
has
been
interested
in
the
praise
or
talking
engineers
who
has
been
out
of
the
loop
out
of
the
tc
as
a
way
to
re-engage
with
the
tc
just
to
take
a
look
to
the
the
prey
system.
C
I'd
have
to
disagree,
because
this
is
taking
a
super
long
time
and
you're
adding
a
lot
of
scope
and
discussion
and
people
are
like.
When
do
we
get
paid
for
all
this
like
praise
from
almost
a
year
ago.
So
we're
on
the
final
steps,
there's
been
a
huge
like
six
or
seven
months
for
token
engineers
to
get
involved
and
livy
has
been
leading
the
reward
system
group
and
the
governance.
C
So
I
mean,
like
people,
know
that
this
exists
and
trying
to
get
token
engineer.
Bandwidth
is
a
struggle.
Creating
parties
just
creates
a
whole
mess
of
can
of
worms
of
decisions
that
get
questioned
and
so
like
I'm
in
favor
of
the
celebration
being
the
moment
where
we
actually
send
tc
to
people
rather
than
spending
more
time
debating
things
or
decomposing
yeah.
B
Oh
yeah,
sorry,
I
didn't
mean
to
to
think
that
we
were
gonna.
Do
debates
and
stuff
like
I
don't
I
don't
mean
to
challenge
the
parameters
at
all.
I
just
mean
to
have
like
a
small
presentation
like
an
hour
call
or
something
where
we
can
just
tell
you.
But
hey.
Do
you
wanna
know
about
the
praise?
This
is
gonna
about
to
happen,
whether
you
like
it
or
not
and
join.
If
you
want,
you
know
that
kind
of
approach.
C
Yeah
well,
there
is
there's
stuff
that
we're
doing
at
the
rad
dashboard
analysis
and
I
think
that'll
be
like
like
a
separate
stream
like
nugget
and
z-way
are
doing
a
crazy
job
at
just
like
cross-referencing
data,
and
so
I
think,
that'll
be
another
work
stream
that
runs
along
with
the
reward
system
is,
is
doing
this
analysis.
A
No
yeah,
I
think
it
would
be
cool
to
have
just
tonight
and
kill
the
party
vibes
to
have
like
hey
we're.
Finally
doing
this,
you
know
and
then
create
momentum
for
the
voting
more
than
like
questioning
the
process
too
much
just
for
the
sake
of
time,
but
like
explaining
everything
we
have
and
and
then
open.
As
soon
as
we
open
the
votes
you
know.
So
we
also
touch
on
this,
like
voter
apathy
that
we
were
talking
about,
and
maybe
that
helps
people
to
jump
in
snapshot.
C
Happy
great
well,
I
guess
I
mean
chewie
is
working
on
the
proposal
right
now
for
the
params,
so
I
guess
once
we
get
that
up
for
advice
process,
we
can
choose
how
we
want
to
communicate
this.
E
Cool
I'm
gonna
play
edu
here
and
do
a
five
four
three
two
one:
no
more
questions:
okay,
moving
on
yeah,
so
when
you're
in
governance
guild,
I'm
excited
about
that
that
initiative
and
it's
amazing,
all
the
I
mean
the
document
just
looking
at
it.
It's
looking
pretty
solid
right
now,
libby,
I
don't
know
if
there
are
any
updates
that
you
would
like
to
give
during
that.
A
I
would
just
love
to
have
people's
eyes
on
it.
Just
a
quick
oops
wrong,
one
yeah,
just
a
quick
advice
process.
A
I
think
it
has
a
lot
of
the
things
we
were
talking
about
recently
about
bringing
more
teas
to
the
tc,
creating
space
for
some
hard
skills
to
be
developed
like
modeling
and
simulation,
and
and
also
using
this
to
create
a
grounding
for
a
funding
working
group
that
can
already
exist,
and
that
was
the
talk
with
mertz
and
bear
who
are
going
to
take
more
ownership
of
the
discussions.
We've
been
having
over
services
working
group
services,
tc
utility
token-
and
that
was
the
retrospective
action
from
this
print
to
create
a
financial
working
group.
A
And
then
this
will
come
in
probably
three
months.
I
mean
in
a
few
months.
In
november,
we
were
thinking
to
kick
off
this
working
group,
this
financial
working
group
bringing
all
of
the
insights
that
came
from
this
three
phases.
That
would
be
first
understand
how
people-
how
is
this
guild
gonna
work
together
and
what
are
some
of
the
projects
and
case
studies
that
we
want
to
look
at
and
then
second
phase
starting
activities
having
some
requests
for
teams
who
want
to
be
working
on
those
models
on
reward
models
on
governance.
A
A
So
the
focus
is
very
much
on
modeling
and
simulation
and
we
don't
get
too
abstract
and
we
focus
on
the
deliverables
for
this
three
phases
and
then
having
something
more
solid
to
start
this
fourth
phase
in
november,
so
the
team
that
is
down
for
starting
this
already
is
angela
and
I
and
thomas
from
prime
dao
and
emmerich,
who
has
a
project.
A
His
project
would
be
the
first
one
would
be
using
as
a
case
study
and
z-way
invented
chill
who
made
those
graphics
that
we're
using
now
in
the
analysis
of
who's
praising
and
who's
being
praised.
And
he
made
a
few
other
graphs
in
the
in
the
research
group
that
were
amazing
and
also
trying
to
integrate
more
the
students
from
tea
academy
and
a
lot
of
the
people
who
will
be
coming
from
the
bachelor
course.
A
Now
that
there
is
a
lot
of
people
with
these
hard
skills
already,
and
that
would
be
great
to
have
them
coming
to
the
tc.
So
yeah
we're
expecting
to
have
a
few
of
this
topics
that
we've
been
discussing
included
in
it
and
in
major
praise
of
this
proposal
to
angela,
who
envisioned
and
wrote
most
of
it.
A
So
the
idea
is
that
this
day
is
an
advice
process
for
the
next
three
or
four
days,
and
if
you
want
to
leave
comments,
ask
questions
that
would
be
the
best
time
for
it
and
we're
planning
to
kick
off
next
week.
E
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you
olivia.
If
no
one
would
like
to
add
anything,
then
we're
gonna
move
on
to
the
next
topic
on
the
agenda,
which
is
related
to
communitas
and
the
engagement
process
draft
and
the
figma
file
that
edu
and
gideon
crafted
eru.
B
Thank
you
man,
so
the
idea
is
that,
since
we
are
talking
the
scope
of
the
community,
this
is
not
an
easy
task,
so
we
want
to
prevent
a
collision
and
what
happened
with
the
original
document
that
gideon
created.
So
we
are
trying
to
bring
this
to
everyone's
attention
as
often
as
we
can
in
the
process
that
we
are
making
it.
B
The
idealist
scenario
is
that
we
are
probably
going
to
make
a
proposal
for
advice
process
on
the
forum
in
two
weeks,
approximately
by
the
end
of
the
month,
so
the
entire
process
will
be
sort
of
detailed
there.
But
basically
this
is
a
draft
of
the
rough
part
that
we
have
developed
and
how
we
expect
the
community
tasks
role
to
play
and
how
we
can
create
basically,
a
smoother
evolution
of
the
onboarding
process
that
we
have
right
now
we
have
sort
of
identify.
B
What
were
the
parts
that
we
have
missed
and
things
that
we
can
improve
and
overall
there
is
this
sense
of
the
culture
of
gratitude
that
we
want
to
sort
of
embrace
in
a
in
a
process
way
rather
than
just
you
know,
actions
that
are
separated
from
one
another,
but
to
create
a
sort
of
a
narrative
around
a
member's
journey
through
the
tc
and
these
graphics
that
were
made
by
gideon's.
It's
way
they
explained
way
better
than
I
can
so.
B
The
idea
is
that
if
any
of
you
can
provide
feedback
to
it
now
or
by
the
time
the
advice
process,
it
will
be
highly
helpful.
We
have
sort
of
narrowed
the
path
that,
if
you
see
on
the
graphic
that
liv
is
showing
at
the
moment
it
doesn't
matter
what
kind
of
user
you
are
that
if
you
are
a
vc,
if
you
are
a
partnership
partner,
if
you
are,
I
don't
know
a
student
at
the
e,
you
will
go
through
the
same
process.
B
We
will
give
them
a
function,
a
bunch
of
questions
regarding
tec
or
te,
and
they
will
answer
that
question
by
any
form
or
shape
they
want.
It
could
be
a
poem,
it
could
be
a
song,
it
could
be
a
debate,
it
could
be
a
medium
article.
So
the
idea
is
that
we
have
this
culture
of
gratitude
shown
from
the
very
first
steps
you
take
into
ac.
B
So
there
is
a
bunch
of
other
processes
here
embedded
on
this
graphics.
The
idea
is
that,
at
the
end
of
the
day
we
will
have,
we
will
want
everyone
to
become
a
community
member.
That's
the
end
goal,
even
if
you
engage
or
not
with
the
working
group.
B
So
the
idea
is
to
do
this
and
we
will
see
how
it
goes
so
yeah.
So
if
anyone
has
any
feedback
regarding
this,
it
will
be
helpful
and
I
think
that's
pretty
much.
All
I
don't
know
if
anyone
has
any
questions
regarding
this,
if
not
that's.
Okay,
five,
four,
three,
two
one!
There
you
go!
Thank
you
back
to
you,
man.
E
J
E
Cool
thanks
thanks
to
them,
so
the
last
topic
on
the
agenda
is
the
the
financial
working
group.
Although
to
manage
expectations,
it's
it's
gonna
start
as
an
initiative
like
a
working
group.
Is
it's
it's
such
a
huge
amount
of
work
so
for
now
we're
looking
at
this
as
an
initiative,
we're
gonna,
see
if
a
champion
comes
along
right
now
bear
bear
is
bear
and
myself
are
going
to
start
getting
this
to
snowball
into
something
meaningful
and
valuable
for
the
community.
E
We're
gonna
have
a
we're.
Gonna
have
a
sink
later
today,
we'll
go
over
some
of
the
options
that
we
have
and
we'll
do
some
progress
on
that
I'll,
be
sure
to
update
the
the
document,
but
other
than
that.
That's
that's
pretty
much
it.
I'm
sure
there'll
be
more
updates
on
the
next
stewards
call
next
week
for
now
we're
barely
starting
on
to
work
on
that.
If
someone
would
like
to
say
something
about
that,
we
have
a
couple
minutes
left.
B
I
would
like
to
say
I
would
like
to
say
something
out
of
that,
and
it's
just
like.
If
anyone
wants
to
host
their
intention
call,
it
will
be
highly
appreciated,
also
from
any
understood
manu.
That
will
be
helpful
and
the
idea
is
that
we
try
to
hope
to
have
one
or
two
stewards.
Every
orientation
call,
for
example,
mitch.
B
It
will
be
nice
for
people
to
know
more
about
the
quantifier
role,
because
it's
kind
of
a
nice
thing
to
show
up
to
show
off
to
people,
and
so
I
don't
know
it's
a
hard
time
in
matching
agendas.
But
if
you
ever
find
a
time
slot
you
can
join,
it
could
be
half
of
the
hour
end
of
the
hour,
whatever
it
is,
but
it
would
be
highly
appreciated.
So
that's
it
in
the
community
task
call.
C
E
Turn
on
the
vive
iv
signal,
you
know
kind
of
thing
yeah.
Well
I
mean
that's,
that's
pretty
much
it
for
the
stewart's
weekly
call
we've
gone
through
all
the
points
in
the
agenda.
Is
there
any
closing
remarks
before
we
end
the
call
five
minutes
early?
D
Two
votes
are
up
praise
lauren
for
making
the
snapshot
vote
and
go
out
there
and
vote
on
it.
Also,
there's
the
update
tributes
vote
go
out
there
and
and
vote
on
it
and
then
also
edu.
We
have
a
call
about
gardens
right.
We
have
like
a
dial
call.
B
Yeah,
I
I
yeah
we
have
that
call,
I
don't
know
if
we
have
the
we
have
prepared,
I
mean
we
don't
we'll.
We
have
not
prepared
anything
about
it.
Do
you
want
to
sink
on
that,
or
what
do
you
want
to
do
about
it?.
D
B
Okay,
great
yeah
tomorrow,
so
my
suggestion
will
be
to
use
the
ping
of
hatchets
at
least,
and
if
you
can.
D
K
For
it,
it's
okay,
you
pick
the
time
at
the
end,
it's
okay.