►
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Temperature check
12:52 - Github notifications
13:27 - Stewards council
15:29 - 75% Governance back
28:32 - Burn/mint Change of address
37:00 - Steward nomination
37:57 - Retiring the Curate list
39:00 - Spotlight
40:11 - CCD defaults
44:34 - Transparency in collaboration as a goal
48:09 - Blog Post
50:10 - WG updates
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
I
was
a
little
bit
distracted,
but
I
feel
that
yeah.
I
am
super
excited
about
everything
that
is
coming
and
that
it's
a
good
time
so
yeah.
I
think
that
the
temperature
is
really
cool
and
I
am
super
happy
also
about
the
graviton
training
about
the
commons
upgrade
yeah
in
in
this
project,
as
as
as
I
was
in
the
start,
and
and
even
yeah
equally
motivated,
and
I
will
pass
to
edu.
C
I
was
in
the
orientation
call
and
it
was
nice
to
see
people
coming
join
the
community
with
clear
intentions
while
they
were
while
they
were
here.
I
felt
that
so
the
crew,
the
people
who
is
joining
also
comes
with
a
more
align,
very
clear
kind
of
sometimes
very
clear
intention.
So
that's
really
good,
and
in
general
I
just
like
how
everything
has
fall
into
action
again
and
how
everyone
is
like
sort
of
start.
You
know
being
productive
and
like
being
aligned,
and
you
know
it
feels
good.
D
D
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
like
sturdy
and
consistent
progress,
which
is
always
a
good
sign
and
people
getting
more
in-depth
about
different
topics,
and
I
think
we're
starting
to
mature
some
discussions
about
like
these
two
words
and
the
things
that
fall
under
each
person.
And
how
can
we
decentralize
the
power
always
more
and
more
so
I
think
it's
really
yeah
really
really
cool
and
chill.
In
my
perspective
and
I'll
pass
to
chewie.
E
Okay,
I
don't
think
I
can
add
a
lot
this
this
week.
I
I
I
do
feel
that
things
have.
I
don't
know,
maybe
like
taking
a
like
a
community
comfort
zone.
I
don't
know
if,
if
calling
it
that,
but
but
yeah
like
I,
I
I
feel
that
we
have
definitely
had
like
more
active
times,
which
is
also
giving
like
a
lot
of
chance
for
people
to
to
feel
good.
Maybe
like
take
some
time
off.
E
Also
like
everything
around
around
denver
is
getting
really
exciting
and
some
people
from
the
community
are
there.
So
it
also
reminds
me
of
of
hcc
a
little
bit
but
yeah.
I
I
I
feel
that
it's
a
it's
a
good
week,
even
though
it
it
has
like
a
different
base,
I'll
pass
it
back
to
you
tom,
because
I
don't
know
who
went
already.
F
They're
like
more
open
to
communicate
now,
and
when
I
check
the
forums
I
can
see
that
people
are
more,
people
are
expressing
their
it's
their
opinions
on
different
issues.
So
I
think
it's
a
good
thing,
because
that
shows
that
people
care
about
you
know
about
care
about
the
the
the
the
decisions
that
we're
making
as
you're
just
adele.
So
yeah.
That's
this!
That's
the
only
observation
today
and
I
pass
it
back
to
you
tom.
I
don't
know
who
already
went.
G
G
G
H
Thank
you,
suga.
I
want
to
watch
star
wars
at
the
community
yeah.
It's
great.
I
think
the
temperature
check
is
good.
I
think
that
we're
having
a
lot
more
engagement
on
a
lot
more
topics.
I
think
overall,
the
education
within
our
community
is
really
increasing,
which
is
you
know,
a
huge
huge
plus.
I
think
that
yeah,
if
we
keep
progressing
this
way,
we're
just
gonna
have
a
whole
community
of
token
engineers,
which
is
great
so
yeah,
but
outside
of
that
I
haven't
seen
any
problems.
H
I
Personally,
I
was
on
the
yeah
in
the
event
house
hanging
out
with
the
crew.
It
was
fun
and
then
I'm
super
happy.
We
have
the
decision-making
forum
post
that
we
make
it
gives
a
lot
of
transparency
in
our
processes.
So
this
is
cool
and
yeah.
I'm
excited
about
prams.
I
don't
know
if
we're
going
slow
or
not,
but
I'm
excited
I
just
want
to
go.
J
And
then
mount
mono,
I
think
your
last
right,
so
the
big
right
yeah
anyway,
the
big
I'm
at
m
con
right
now
and
I'm
wearing
the
tc
swag.
You
know
and
man
people
love
it.
They
walk
up
to
me
and
they're
like
oh,
my
god,
the
tc
is
so
cool.
Can
you
explain
to
me
what
it
does?
That's
the
one
thing
like
they
still.
Don't
it's
like
what
is
it
exactly,
but
it's
like
it's
so
cool.
What
is
it
and
and
so
that's
like
a
common
question.
J
They
you
know
and-
and
I
you
know
I
try
to
say
well,
it's
it's
kind
of
like
a
public
goods
funding
economy
for
advancing
token
engineering,
and
you
know
I
talk
about
education
and
I
talk
about
the
ieee
and
being
like
a
whatever
you
know,
being
a
engineering
society
for
token
engineers
pulling
token
engineers
out
together.
So
they
can
share
ideas,
and
it's
still,
I
still
I
look
at
them
and
I
don't
I'm
not
doing
a
good
job.
You
know
I
can
see
it
in
their
face.
They're,
not
really
it's
not
like
clicking.
J
You
know
we
don't
have
this
like.
We
still
have
this
simple,
hey.
What
do
you
do?
You
know,
but
that's:
okay,
we'll
get
there.
Also
a
couple
people
are
talking
about
how
awesome
gravity
is
and
that
they're
like
very
excited
to
become
gravitons
and
how
important
it
is
for
the
space.
So
major
props
wonka.
J
That
was
the
other
major
thing
yeah
and
then,
let's
see
other
things,
the
common
swarm
is
feeling
really
good,
they're,
very
active
they're,
making
progress
and-
and
they
feel
much
more
motivated
right
now,
which
is
cool.
We're
hanging
like
zepty
was
saying
we're
all
sam
and
paulo,
and
I
were
all
hanging
out
and
I
think
they
feel
I
think
I
think
they're
they're
being
yeah.
G
J
Are
going
well
like
ever
since
brett's
review
of
the
code?
I
think
it
gave
them
a
lot
of
confidence
and
they
feel
like
they
really
want
to
produce
things,
especially
also
because
a
lot
of
the
things
we
need.
Other
groups
need
like
agave
and
so
they're
being
yeah,
that
that
helps,
engage
as
well
and
I'll
pass
it
to
mount
money.
K
Thanks
riff
yeah,
it's
awesome,
there's
a
lot
of
things
going
around
user
takes
testing
is
going
great,
miss
you
great!
You
missed
it
yesterday,
but
it
was.
It
was
good
there's
about
a
hundred
people
that
have
messaged
only
only
about
a
handful
left
actionable
feedback,
but
but
that's
fine
moving
forward
on
that
got
things
working
on
huanka
and
graviton
session
that
I'm
conducting
with
choi
too
with
nate.
K
I
missed
the
the
community
working
group
session
because
it
was
on
the
calendar
and
then
it
happened
but
yeah
eager
to
to
get
on
the
community's
working
group
action
as
well-
and
I
just
all
around
excited
to
to
to
do
the
work
that
that
that
I'm
doing
into
to
see
all
the
work
that
that
everyone's
been
doing
around
me.
So
that's
it.
I
think
I
think
that's
it
so
I'll
pass
it
back
to
you.
A
I
feel
it
thanks.
Somebody
said
the
word
maturity
and
that
really
resonated
for
me.
There's
so
much
progress
on
so
many
different
friends.
At
the
same
time
and
yeah,
I
think
that
really
resonated
going
last,
it's
sort
of
like
I
have
this
list
of
things
I
want
to
say,
but
then
I
get
I
want
to
sort
of
riff
on
what
other
people
said
to
and
what
griff
was
explaining
about
people,
not
really
understanding,
there's
just
so
many
different
layers
of
what
the
tec
is.
A
First,
you
sort
of
have
to
understand
what
token
engineering
is
and
then
what
a
commons
is,
and
maybe
even
what
public
goods
is.
So
I
feel
like
there's
just
these
there's
like
these
steps
to
understanding
that,
maybe
most
people
don't
don't
already
have,
and
but
I
it
got
me
thinking
about
a
lot
of
ideas
too
and
I'd
say
it
feels
like
there's
so
much
progress
and
there's
a
lot
of
maturity.
A
One
thing
I
noticed
is
that
our
goal
to
move
a
lot
of
our
conversations
in
this
sort
of
fast
moving
discourse
discord
to
the
forums
which
moves
a
little
slower
and
is
open
to
many
more
eyes.
I
feel
like
we've
really
succeeded
there.
We
have
so
many
so
much
engagement
on
the
forums
now
and
there's
less
engagement
on
discord,
but
it's
really
like
when
it
needs.
A
A
It
is
7
15
pm
in
cet
and
have
you
checked
your
github
notifications,
because
if
you
haven't
and
you're
sitting
in
front
of
a
computer
right
now,
please
do
just
open
up
github
click
on
the
commons,
build
repository
and
see
who's
tagged
you
in
an
issue
and
get
back
to
them.
Let
them
know
that
you've
seen
the
issue
that
they've
taken
the
time
to
tag
you
in
and
yeah
so
cool
I'll.
Do
that
every
week,
so
the
stewards
council
starts
next
thursday,
so
tomorrow
we
have
our
retrospective.
A
The
steward
council
is
going
to
be
the
following
thursday
and
we're
going
to
have
a
little
stewards
challenge.
The
stewards
challenge
is:
please
bring
your
shitty
first
draft
of
your
funding
for
your
working
group.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
final.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
great,
but
just
put
something
on
paper
about
how
you're
thinking
about
funding
the
working
group
and
then
the
council
will
be
dedicated
entirely
to
that
subject.
A
The
the
hopeful
output
is
that
we
will
all
have
more
clarity
about
what
to
do
and
use
the
collective
intelligence
of
the
stewards
to
get
there.
There
are
two
links
that
I
thought
were
really
useful
for
me.
I
don't
know
if
other
people
have
links
that
they
want
to
share,
but
there's
a
link
here
for
food
for
thought.
A
For
this
topic,
the
one
was
there's
a
really
interesting
conversation
on
tulips
more
on
one
hive
tulip
swarm
compensation
stock
discussion
and
it
they
there's
also
they
there's
the
community
pulled
in
dx
dow
compensation
and
the
threat
is
actually
really
interesting.
So,
if
you're
thinking
about
looking
for
what's
happening
in
the
space,
now
it's
a
good
thread
and
then
negan
made
this
amazing
overview
and
analysis
of
coordinate
and
it's
just
another
way
to
start
thinking
about
it.
A
I
Well,
yeah,
basically,
we
were
last
week
we
did
a
brainstorm
with
one
iv
and
libya
and
myself
and
yeah
we
went
on
on,
went
to
use
every
well.
We
first
talked
about
every
boat,
and
then
we
every
one
of
us,
take
like
some,
and
today
we
explained
in
a
little
bit
where
we
were
thinking
what's
good
for
and
then
also
today
we
also
watch
manual,
nato.
There
we
yeah,
we
everyone
says
what
they
think
this
boat
would
be
good
for
and
today
would
be
like
myself
and
ivy.
G
I
D
A
Good,
okay,
cool,
thank
you
ivy
for
that.
So
question
is:
is
this
final?
I
guess
the
75
I
don't
want.
I
know
that
I
threw
a
question
up
that
I'm
afraid
blocked
juan
carlos
and
I
don't
want
to
block
him
so,
but
I
was
just
considering
how
we
set
precedent
for
making
the
criteria
for
what
can
be
a
snapshot
and
what
shouldn't-
and
I
didn't
see
this
update
yet
so
this
decision
made
the
copy
and
upgrade
itself
so
there's
some
different
ways.
It
looks
like
that
we
can
put
this
to
vote.
A
One
is,
and
this
is
the
returning
the
75
up
to
75,
of
the
governance
that
was
deleted
and
part
of
it
is
one
of
it
was
snapshot
the
original
proposal,
and
then
I
posted
sort
of
I
don't
know
like
what
is
our
criteria
for
snapshot
versus
hatchdow?
Maybe
it's
not
clear
for
me.
I
don't
know
if
it's
clear
for
for
anyone
else,
I'd
love
to
ask
for
if
it.
A
If
there
is
something
clear
that
we
could
put
on
paper,
I
didn't
see
it
in
this
decision-making
forum,
post,
libya
and
that's
why
I
raised
it.
But
it
also
seems
that
sem
is
proposing
that
it
can
also
be
part
of
the
commons
great
upgrade
vote
itself.
So
now
we
have
three
ways
to
vote
for
this.
I
can
definitely
see
that
snapshot
would
be
the
fast
and
easy
approach
to
do
this
and
also
no
cost
option.
J
Yeah,
I
don't,
I
don't
think
it
because
it's
part
of
the
commons
upgrade
no
matter
what
it's
kind
of
looped
into
that
as
an
on-chain
discussion.
So
technically
anyone
could
veto
it
with
like
it's
like
the
commons
upgrade
is
gonna
have
a
lot
of
pieces
to
it,
including
this
75
give
back
assuming
it
passes
the
snapshot,
validation.
J
So
like
no
matter
what,
whatever
choice
we
use
to
vote
on
it,
the
hatchdow
will
vote
on
it
right
or
if
it
passes.
So
it's
kind
of
gonna
have
two
votes,
no
matter
what,
because
it's
part
of
the
commons
upgrade,
because
if
there's
something
that's
part
of
the
commons
upgrade
that
anyone
doesn't
like,
they
can
just
stop
it
right,
or
at
least,
if
12
percent
of
the
voters
don't
like
it,
they
can
stop
it.
J
B
Yeah,
I
I
think
that
snapshot
would
be
interesting,
and
I
also
think
that
that
the
the
discussion
around
this
proposal
have
been
like
in
the
advice
process
and
right
now,
like
I
feel
like
the
advice
process,
is,
is
very
mature
and
it's
just
like
the
technicalities
but
yeah.
I
I
think
that
the
snapshot
boat
could
be
good.
Maybe
this
thing
of
requesting
some
dye
from
the
hatch
down
would
be
the
only
thing
that
maybe
should
be
included
in
the
snapshot
boat
like.
A
H
I
think
that
if,
if
you
like,
I,
I
look
at
snapchat
as
being
like
the
the
precursor
to
a
hatched
out
vote
like
if
it
passes
the
snapshot,
then
you
can
allow
it
to
be
voted
on
in
the
hatched
out.
But
if
it
does
not
pass
snapshot,
then
there's
no
reason
to
include
it
because
then
you're
sacrificing
the
entire
proposal.
J
J
J
A
That's
the
way
to
go
okay,
I
guess
the
question
is
how
the
mechanism
for
us
to
actually
release
the
funds
from
the
hatchday
would
be
another
proposal
that
then
we
would
have
to
have
the
hatched
out
to
release
funds
for
this
to
happen
before
the
commons
upgrade.
I
just
feel,
like
that's
quite
maybe
complicated,
so
maybe
there's
a
way
to
facil
to
make
that
simpler.
By
agreeing
that
these
funds
will
be
released
with
a
commons
upgrade.
G
A
He
also
said
that
it
could
be
made
in
the
comments
upgrade
vote
itself.
I
guess
the
the
the
one
sort
of
if
I
was
gonna
raise
a
cautionary
flag
would
be
yeah.
I
don't
know
I
get
like
yeah.
I
guess
that's
why
we're
doing
snapshots
so
that
we
can
actually
have
the
the
real
signal
on
including
it
in
the
common
step.
Like
I
don't
mind,
I'm
going
to
stop
my
own
train
of
thought
before
it
gets
out
of
my
mouth
cool.
B
Yeah,
I
will
post
the
again
the
question
like
and
also
I
think,
that
maybe
quadratic,
voting
or
or
single
choice
voting
are
the
best
options
and
I
will
rewrite
the
question,
maybe
including
some
aspect
of
a
retroactive
to
see
like.
If
there
is
an
agreement
or
there
is
a
signaling
of
the
question.
Maybe
we
can
do
it
this
same
friday,
starting
the
17th.
A
A
Let's
vote
on
snapchat,
sorry
on
snapchat,
okay,
cool,
excellent
and
there's
the
another
proposal.
That's
probably
is
ready
to
be
posted
to
the
hatchdale,
so
I
just
want
to
check
with
griff.
Is
this?
This
is
the
burn
mint.
We
have
three
confirmed
addresses
of
three
people
who
no
longer
have
access
to
the
keys
and
zepp.
You
have
anything
to
add.
I
G
A
Oh
cool,
juan
carlos-
I
just
want
to
say,
if
we're
starting
the
the
17th
so
two
days
so
we're
talking
about
starting
about
in
two
days
and
ending
it
in
five
days
and
it's
a
kind
of
vote
that
impacts
quite
a
lot
of
people
who
would
be
interested
in
it.
So,
along
with
proposing
this
as
a
vote,
I
think
we
should
make
sure
that
we
have
some
sort
of
outreach
in
place
to
make
sure
that
people
that
are
interested
in
this
are
informed
that
the
vote
is
happening.
B
A
H
H
I
A
I
have
some
thoughts
I'd
like
to
share.
I
I
really
like
the
idea.
Actually,
I
think
that
it
makes
this
proposal
more
complicated
than
it
probably
should
be,
though,
because
now
we
need
to
create
a
dao
and
have
some
sort
of
invite.
Only
you
know
a
consortium
or
like
a
committee
to
agree
on
who
gets
invited
to
the
multisig.
A
H
A
J
This
this
is
another
thing
with
this
vote
that
I'm
a
little
concerned,
or
that
I
am
questioning
I
mean
I
guess
we
have
the
vote
and
just
do
it
simple.
Yes,
no
and
then,
but
maybe
afterwards,
like
let's
say
it's
a
no,
I
would
probably
propose
that
we
still
try
to
get
sem
to
include
the
ability
to
have
governance
tokens
for
later
use
cases.
B
I
I
have
only
one
question
and
maybe
grief
if
you
want.
We
can
have
a
sink
about
this,
but
it's
on
the
thoughts
from
the
group
conversation
like
people
who
chose
to
who
choose
to
and
like
what.
If
some
people
of
this
rage
quit
yeah
that,
if
they
will,
they
will
still
have
their
tokens
to
vote
and
people
who
chose
to
is
you
say
that
maybe
there
would
be
people
in
the
list
that
is
not
interested
in
receiving
the
75
governance
gift.
J
Yeah
but
then
they
just
have
those
tokens
locked.
If
they
don't
want
to
vote,
they
don't
vote
if
they
misbehave
and
vote.
We
can
always
vote
to
burn
their
tokens
through
graduated
sanctions
and
that's
already
in
place.
So
I
don't
see
any
concerns
with.
Like
I
rage
quit.
You
know
I
still
have
these
tokens,
damn
you
yeah.
I
don't
know
like
this.
It's
like
they're
just
sitting
there
on
your
address.
D
J
G
J
A
A
A
A
It
has
a
few
things
in
there
and
now
that
we're
using
the
spotlight
at
least
now,
as
this
sort
of
this
dock
is
a
tracker,
we
created
this
new,
just
the
spotlight
tracker,
so
we
pulled
it
out
of
the
curate
and
I've
locked
down
the
curate
to
just
a
bunch
of
people
that
participated
in
hatch
outreach.
So
I
think
olivia
eduardo
myself,
craig
of
course,
a
few
other
people
actually
who
still
have
access
to
that
sheet
in
case
we
need
it
for
any
reason.
A
A
J
Can
can
I
just
inject
something
before
I
forget
chevnan
reached
out?
I
don't
know
if
she
reached
out
to
others
in
for
participation
in
omega's
call
today,
I'm
not
going
to
be
able
to
make
it,
but
if
anyone
has
ethical
dilemmas
in
the
token
engineering
space
or
knows
of
anyone
that
had
ethical
dilemmas
in
the
token
engineering
space,
their
attendance
would
be
incredible.
A
A
J
Sure,
okay,
so
the
these
are
the
questions
we
have
to
decide
on.
There
is
one
extra
that
I
added
called
the
initial
buy
into
the
bonding
curve.
I
think
that
that
can
be
also
like
something
that
we
change
at
the
last
minute,
but
it'd
be
really
great
to
hear
your
signals,
but
because
we
need
it
for
the
dashboard
asap.
J
So
whatever
the
default
is
like,
we
gotta
pick
a
default
and
then
what's
the
other
thing,
yeah
there's
all
these
other
questions
that
are
there.
It's
mostly
around
like
the
proposals,
the
proposal
cost
within
conviction,
voting
and
and
sorry.
The
proposal,
deposit,
cost
and
challenge
deposit
cost
for
disputables,
disputable,
voting
within
dial
voting
and
conviction,
voting
they're
the
same
so
and
the
settlement
time,
and
so
if
there
is
and
then
what's
the
other
one
there's
one
more
tam,
can
you
flip
back?
J
Oh
yeah,
whether
or
not
the
token
should
be
transferable
and
your
email,
but
but
yeah?
I
can't
so.
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
have
any
questions
about
this.
It
would
be
great
if
you
did,
but
I
really
just
want
everyone
to
signal.
You
can't
change
your
vote
right
now
and
you
just
have
to
edit
your
response,
but
it
is
in
one
person,
one
vote
and
then
I'll
aggregate,
the
responses
for
the
parameter
thing
and
I'll
I'll
report
them
to
the
stewards
call
and
just
get.
You
know,
make
sure.
J
A
A
J
J
A
J
A
Just
I
feel,
like
you
know,
when
we're
not
like
there
are
ways
that
we
have
a
lot
of
transparency
in
our
working
together
and
zen
hub
and
discord
are
really
great
ways
and
I
think
a
lot
of
our
com
collaboration
with
each
other
happens
sometimes,
even
though
it
impacts
wider
groups.
Sometimes
it
happens
in
smaller
circles,
and
I
just
want
to
maybe
say
like
we
should.
A
I
don't
know
if
anyone
else
wants
to.
I
think
it's
really
about
like
transparency
and
collaboration
is
ends
up
being
beneficial.
I
know
that
I
tout
zen
hub
and
using
issues
to
communicate
with
each
other,
because
it
makes
it
so
easy
for
people
to
follow
everything
on
on
in
one
space
on
one
particular
piece
of
work.
But-
and
maybe
it's
also
a
call
to
be
like-
let's
use
then
have
more-
let's
use
it.
What
it's
designed
for
to
keep
everyone
informed
of
what's
happening
on
different
pieces
of
work.
D
Yeah-
and
I
think
also
the
chats
on
it
happens
quite
frequently
of
like.
Oh,
let's
make
a
discord
group
to
coordinate
on
a
call
time
or
something
while
this
could
be
done
in
the
chat
of
the
like,
for
example,
this
call
we
had
today
for
the
voting
for
looking
into
the
voting
types
that
we
talked
about
it
in
a
separate
group.
A
Yeah,
I
I
would
say
too
as
well
like
I.
I
know
that
I
have
a
lot
of
these
discord,
chats
happening
that
I
now
think
twice
and
like
should
this
be
in
one
of
the
channels
instead
of
a
private
group,
because
even
if
it's
like,
I
think
I
think
the
feeling
is
like
not
disturbing
the
whole
channel
with
with
sort
of
discussions.
But
there's
something
really
nice
about
that.
Transparency
too,
especially
if
you're
in
other
discords.
G
J
Me
I
I
just
think
people
won't
see
it
in
that
channel
very
like
promptly,
so
sometimes
it
might
get
slow.
So
I
I
totally
agree-
and
this
is
something
that
we've
talked
about
in
params-
trying
to
move
it
there.
But
then,
when
I
post
in
the
channel,
I
don't
expect
people
to
see
it
and
I
go
and
dm
everyone
anyway
or
you
know,
which
is
okay,
which
I
honestly,
I
think
is
a
better
approach
right.
A
G
A
G
A
A
J
Params
they're,
just
chugging
along
I
mean
you
know,
stuff
is
hard
and
the
the
goal
is
to
get
everything
out
there
and
dirty
and
then
go
back
once
once
people
can
start
proposing
with
it
in
some
way.
You
know
then
clean
everything
up
and
make
it
way
better,
but
have
it
like
start
start,
not
assume
that
we
know
what
all
the
problems
are
and
actually
just
start
making
it.
Our
our
big
milestone
that
we're
shooting
for
is
like
have
like
a
rough
cut.
J
That
is
feature
complete,
and
I
believe
that
should
be
done
by
next
thursday.
Not
this
not
tomorrow,
but
next
thursday,
because
the
the
last
one
is
the
the
bonding
curve
and
that's
that's
pretty
pretty
far
along
so
and
then
get
github
issue.
Creation
itself
is
the
other
thing
which
we
already
have
that
tested.
J
So
it's
a
lot
of
manual
work
left,
but
no
thought
work
and
no
blockers,
so
we
should
be
able
to
kick
it
out
this
week
like
like
all
the
blockers
have
been
run
into
so
that's
encouraging
and
then
for,
but
that
that
will
be
so.
That
means
that
next
thursday,
not
tomorrow
next
thursday,
we'll
have
a
rough,
we
should
have
a
rough
cut
where
people
could
actually
start
playing
with
parameters
and
proposing
it.
J
How
do
we
focus
on
us?
Getting
the
comments
upgrade
going?
We
ran
into
some
major
blockers
with
the
graph
and
evm
crispr
that
were
overcome
this
weekend,
and
so
we
we
should
have
an
internal
demo
of
doing
the
commons
upgrade
for
tomorrow,
like
in
a
in
a
dial,
and
I
believe,
we'll
demo
that
but
then
so
we
should,
and
then
we
have
to
test
the
migration
tools.
J
A
L
M
First,
discussion
on
the
draft
for
the
terms
on
the
on
the
bonding
curve
and
it'd
be
great.
If
any
of
you
guys
can
join,
there's
gonna,
we
sean
created
the
first
draft.
I
was
reviewing
it
there's
a
lot
of
information
there
and
it'd
be
great
as
many
anyone
who
joins
will
bring
and
we
lot.
So.
I
encourage
anyone
who
can
to
join
us
next
friday.
M
Works
with
yeah.
He
always
works
with
ford,
so
I
updated
it.
I
will
share
the
link
on
the
it's
a
it's
an
open
editable.
Anyone
can
edit
it.
So
I
will
share
it
on
the
legal
channel
right
now,
after
the
call
and
anyone
who
wants
to
jump
in
and
add
their
comments
if
they
can
come
on
friday
great
if
they
don't,
if
they
want
to
take
a
look
and
share
their
comments
and
be
great.