►
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Temperature check
07:10 - Stewards offboarding
09:34 - Proposal for buy-in
23:44 - New call bot annoucement!
25:16 - Gravity cases & tracking and funding proposal
36:54 - Spotlight
38:10 - Retro action: conver 3 forum posts to medium articles
39:40 - Stewards council
40:22 - WG updates
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
For
the
ethereum
colombia
community-
and
we
want
it
to
be
like
presidential
so
yeah,
we
invited
mitch
to
come
here
to
to
to
barranquilla
and
talk
to
us
about
the
tc
and
give
it
and
yeah
so
yeah
we're
we're
polishing
the
the
the
details.
But
until
now
that
that's
a
great
news
and
yeah,
we
hope
to
to
have
this
in
the
frame
of
road
to
devcon
activities
and
I'll
pass
to
levy.
B
Temperature
check
yeah.
I
think
that
things
are
going
great.
It
was
really
cool
to
see
the
graviton
training
yesterday,
like
people
getting
engaged
and
listening
to
what
everyone
is
learning
about,
and
just
so
many
new
perspectives
and
yeah.
I
think
we're
closer
and
closer
to
the
upgrade,
and
that
feels
great.
D
D
F
F
G
C
Mitch
does
every
every
morning,
which
is
to
say
good
morning
in
a
general
channel
to
everyone,
and
this
is
such
a
simple
action,
but
no
one
else
does
it.
No
one
else
have
this.
Like
you
know,
let's
say
that
if
you
see
someone
on
the
street,
you
will
say
it.
You
will
say
good
morning
why?
Why
don't
we
do
it
on
this
card?
I
don't
know
it's
just.
It
makes
me
happy
to
see
it
every
week
at
the
beginning.
I
thought
he
was
crazy.
Now
I
understand
it
so
keep
going
and
keep
doing
it.
C
E
So
god
I
just
I
just
feel
like
things
are
on
fire,
there's
so
much
happening,
and
I
am,
I
think,
I'm
asking
lots
of
people
for
help
and
lots
of
people
are
helping
and
I
think
that's
pretty
amazing.
Actually
that's
been
really
nice
to
see
the
I
mean
from
the
working
groups.
We're
really
almost
done
with
our
with
our
funding.
I
will
do
an
update
in
a
minute
communitas,
the
orientation
call.
E
There
was
four
people
when
we
started
and
new
people,
not
the
stewards
and
then
like
two
or
three
joined
towards
the
end.
So
it's
and
it's
people
that
are
like.
I
just
launched
three
different
dows
and
I'm
here
for
a
token
economics-
and
you
know
it's
it's
it's
more
and
more
advanced
people.
Somebody
joined
us
from
dow
house
as
well.
It
just
it
seems
like
from
the
tahoe
style.
E
So
it
just
seems
like
there's
there's
a
lot
there's,
just
our
reputation
is
out
and
more
and
more
people
are
coming
and
communitas
is
like
gearing
up
for
this
really
well,
I
feel
like
yeah.
I
just
feel
like
there's
a
lot
of
things
going
on
at
the
same
time
and
it's
a
full
moon,
so
I
always
feel
a
little
maybe
like,
like.
I
just
wanted
to
hide
under
my
bed
today.
I
didn't
want
to
come
out.
E
So
that's
my
that's
my
feeling
right
now
to
be
honest
with
you
and
that's
not
often
okay,
so
we
got
everyone
I'll
move
on
to
so
steward's
stuff.
Okay,
so
I
put
some
numbers
in
the
fundings
that
we
have
so
far
they're
kind
of
ballparky
right,
so
these
numbers
can
probably
change
a
lot.
This
is
like
super
rough
estimate.
We're
still
don't
have
labs
or
omega,
but
those
are
in
progress
and
we're
looking
at
something
like.
E
The
other
thing
I
want
to
talk
about
in
this
group
is
I'm
going
to
nominate
some
steward
off-boardings
right
now,
so
we
don't
have
an
official
process,
but
it's
going
to
be
something
like
what
we
have
all
shared
together
in
the
stewards
council.
There
will
be
a
nomination
of
the
for
off-boarding.
Actually
we
do.
E
But
I
don't
think
that
we
could
say
he's
in
the
know
anymore
as
much
as
before.
So
I
would
nominate
craig
for
off-boarding
jess
as
well.
I
would
nominate
for
off-boarding,
you
know
she
was
very
active
early
on
and
hasn't
been
as
active
the
last
few
months,
so
quite
a
long
time,
suga
itself
off-boarded.
But
I
think
that
when
we're
talking
about
funding
stewards
and
having
a
stipend
associated
with
being
with
stewards,
we
really
have
to
do
go
through
the
process
of
offboarding.
E
We
didn't
really
do
it
with
stem,
and
maybe
it
wouldn't
be
a
bad
idea
to
include
some
in
this
more
formal
ceremony
that
we
want
to
have.
And
then
marco
is
the
last
person
who
I'd
say
have
come
into
the
tc
is
still
around,
but
isn't
a
person
that
someone
could
go
to
on
our
discord,
see
the
role
steward
and
ask
him
a
question.
E
E
So
we'll
just
leave
it
for
a
week,
basically
for
anyone
to
raise
any
objection,
you
can
raise
an
objection
now
or
you
can
raise
an
objection
on
the
stewards
channel,
but
the
at
the
beginning
of
I
mean
next
week
after
this.
After
this
stewards
call,
it'll
be
official
and
I'll
formally
start
the
process
to
afford
these
stewards.
E
Okay
and
then
mitch,
do
you
wanna,
so
everyone
knows
this
amazing
work
piece
of
work,
of
getting
a
bunch
of
really
complex
ideas
together
and
putting
them
together
and
putting
a
proposal
on
the
forum
was
done.
I
I
can't
even
stress
enough
how
hard
this
was,
but
how
easy
mitch
made
it
look,
but
the
proposal
is
on
the
forum.
I'm
expecting
us
to
have
plenty
of
feedback
from
people
actually,
and
I
hope
that
that's
going
to
help
us
make
it
stronger
and
stronger.
E
G
G
Great
loading
okay,
so
we
worked
on
this
with
me:
tam
zapp,
griff,
lauren
walker,
threw
in
a
sweet
graph.
So
basically,
in
this
forum
proposal
we're
going
we're
outlining
how
much
we
want
to
buy
or
take
out
from
the
hot
the
hatch
funds
and
purchase
tec
on
our
bonding
curve
when
it
launches,
and
so
that
amount
came
out
to
250k
griff
lauren
and
I
sat
down
for
several
hours
ran.
The
numbers
like
this
is
just
like
a
little
fraction
of
the
stuff
that
we
did
in
that
afternoon.
G
G
There
was
a
lot
of
people
in
favor
of
200k
and
then
300k,
so
it's
nice
being
able
to
meet
in
the
middle
like
that
three
eligible
allocations,
which
was
based
on
an
older
forum
post
that
I
think
nate
started
or
tam,
but
basically
we
identified
three
different
allocations,
so
that
was
reward
system.
Strategic
partnerships
and
secondary
market
liquidity.
G
We
threw
out
some
numbers:
I'm
expecting
these
numbers
to
change
from
the
advice
process
honestly,
but
80k
to
the
reward
system.
So
32
percent
of
the
buy-in
amount,
strategic
partnerships
would
be
68k,
27
and
finally,
secondary
market
liquidity
would
be
102
k.
So
41
we're
trying
to
give
some
concrete
examples
of
like
what
these
things
would
actually
take
form
as
and
again
like
this
is
all
probably
going
to
be
debated
and
we'll
get
something
closer
to
custody.
G
We
identified
it
as
laser
tag,
which
would
be
the
acronym
for
the
token
holding
body
and
there
will
be
a
gnosis
multi-sig
that
will
be
four
to
seven.
The
only
requirement
on
the
multi
save
being
that
you
are
a
steward
and
that's
kind
of
the
gist
of
it.
There's
like
some
more
nitty
gritty
in
there,
but
you
know:
go
ahead,
read
it
yeah!
That's
it.
E
So
initial
thoughts
feelings
anything
that
you
want
to
share.
I'm
gonna
pass
it
around,
because
this
is
actually
super
important.
It's
a
significant
amount
of
funds
that
we're
going
to
be
asking
for.
So
I
think
that
the
more
united,
the
more
united
the
stewards
are
and
the
ideas
of
what
we,
what
we
actually
what
the
value
is.
I
think
the
the
more
support
we
can
actually
garner
for
it.
E
F
Yeah,
I
I
think
it's
I
think
it's
pretty
good.
I
I
don't
necessarily
know
if
we
want
to
be
as
prescriptive
as
saying
this
percentage
goes
to
the
strategic
partners
in
this
percentage
goes
to
liquidity
mining.
I
think
it
depends
on
how
good
of
strategic
partners
we
get
and
whether
or
not
it's
worth
it
also.
F
I
think
we're
going
to
run
this
by
the
community
like
our
actions
and
maybe
the
community
will
say
yeah
we
we
want
those
strategic
partners
more
than
these
liquidity
mining
or
we
want
this
liquidity
money
more
than
the
strategic
partners.
So
I
feel
like
just
saying
a
pers
like
I
feel
like
it's
nice
to
have
an
estimate,
but
not
be
so
prescriptive
about
it,
but
other
than
that,
I
think
it
sounds
great.
F
I
think
80k
the
tc
feels
like
a
good
amount
for
the
reward
system
and
like
a
good
estimate
of
what
we
that
gives
more
than
enough
space,
because
it
will
end
up
being
worth
way
more
than
that,
and
so
that's
that's
a
good
chunk
of
change
to
start
off
the
rewards
system
and
yeah,
I
yeah.
I
guess
I
feel
like
I
helped
inspire
a
lot
of
this
stuff,
so
I
feel
very
aligned
I'll
pass
it
to
edvardo.
C
Thank
you.
I
I
didn't
dive
into
this
until
this
proposal
was
done
because
my
I'm
clueless
about
most
of
this
stuff,
but
I
actually
found
extremely
useful
this
document
and
I
highly
appreciate
the
way
you
write
it
mitch,
because
if
this
document
that
will
be
also
provided
to
to
members
of
the
community
in
general,
this
is
quite
useful
and
explanatory.
C
I
am
quite
curious
to
see
because
for
me
this
is,
I
think,
the
first
time
that
people
in
the
community
will
decide
what
we
do
with
our
money,
our
economy,
in
a
in
in
a
bigger
way.
That
is
tangible,
because
the
other
ways
we're
a
little
bit
more
abstract,
and
so
people
will
just
understandingly
abstractly.
C
D
I
need
to
get
more
a
better
understanding
of
the
secondary
liquidity
markets
in
terms
of
like
how
we're
going
to
approach
that
and
who's
making
those
types
of
decisions
and
there's
just
a
lot
of
choices
there.
So
I
assume
that
we'll
get
that
into
the
weeds
later
on,
but
yeah
overall,
it
looks
really
great
and
I
think
that's
250
sounds
like
a
good
amount
that
won't
affect
the
health
of
the
bonding
curve
long
term.
D
B
Yeah,
I
think
this
I'm
learning
a
lot
with
this
proposal,
and
I
think
it
was
a
great
example
of
like
the
collective
intelligence
acting
on
drafting
something
that
was
very
abstract
and
complex,
and
a
lot
of
people
were
debating
and
I
think
the
debates
were
held
in
a
way
where
information
was
really
being
taken
in
and
digested
and
put
it
out
in
the
best
form.
So
I
think,
like
it,
was
really
cool
to
see
the
development
of
this
proposal.
B
Until
this
point,
and
especially
the
things
we
were
talking
about
yesterday
on
the
governance
of
this
smaller
committee,
that
will
be
like
managing
this
fund
and
yeah
just
how
we
are
listening
to
many
points
and
finding
a
sweet
spot.
It
feels
like
we
thought
of
enough
problems
that
and
things
that
could
go
wrong
so
yeah.
I
think
it's
really
like
feels
like
a
mature
spot
now
that
can
continue
to
evolve
for
sure
and
about.
H
Oh
sorry,
it
got
out
in
the
end.
I
wasn't
sure
if
it
was
me,
I
I
read
this
the
post.
It
looks
like
it
has
like
a
lot
of
of
work
put
into
it.
I
don't
feel
I'm
yet
prepared
to
give
like
an
opinion
that
would
contribute,
but
I'll,
keep
starting
this
and
make
sure
to
include
some
thoughts
in
the
in
the
forum,
but
yeah.
Congratulations
to
everyone
that
was
involved
and
I'll
transfer
to
deputy.
I
A
J
Next
one
I
haven't
read
it
yet,
but
it's
in
the
top
of
my
pile
of
sticky
notes
somewhere,
I'm
looking
forward
to
it
and
just
first
glance
and
listening
to
everybody's
initial
comments,
I'm
even
more
excited
to
get
to
it.
So
I'll
do
that
today
and
maybe
engage
on
the
forum
thanks.
I
think
I'm
last
time.
G
But
I
mean
we
threw
out
some
numbers
and
there's
like
a
bit
of
rationale,
because
you
know
the
strategic
partnerships
aren't
very
well
thought
of
right
now,
and
the
secondary
liquidity
will
probably
need
a
higher
amount
in
order
to
be
actually
effective
for
trading
and
like
that
they
seem
a
little
bit
more
fleshed
out
right
now.
But
I
agree
like
it
really.
We
can't
put
a
hard
number
to
some
of
these
right
now.
E
E
What
are
what
are
the
voting
requirements
and
is
it
I
mean
I
would
have
guessed
it
would
be
something
similar
to
what
we're
using
now,
but
it's
not
a
bad
idea
to
revisit
those
assumptions
and
then
the
last
thing
I
felt
like
the
section.
It's
my
own
fault.
This
is
the
section
I
added,
but
I
feel
like
in
the
event,
the
terms
are
not
executable,
I
mean.
Maybe
we
can
have
a
little
bit
more
clarity
around
that
and,
in
the
event,
the
proposal
would
cause
serious
interior
loss
to
the
holdings.
E
E
Then,
let's
move
along
so
the
the
call
announcement
that
bot
that
we've
been
using-
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
have
noticed,
but
there's
been
like
issues
piling
up
in
zenhub
around
adding
changing
the
omega
and
legal
to
bi-weekly
or
adding
this
image
or
updating
this
time
and
it's
a
it's
a
tool
that
vi
has.
You
know
built
himself
and
in
order
to
accommodate
those
like
allowing
people
to
make
changes
to
it
or
to
change
it
to
a
bi-weekly.
E
A
lot
more
development
would
need
to
go
into
it
rather
than
spending
that
time
and
effort
on
developmenting
a
custom
solution
vi
found
this
bot
called
fyi.
It's
you
probably
have
seen
it
on
dallas
and
a
number
of
other
dows,
it's
quite
simple.
All
it
would
be
is
about
a
bot
and
it
will
create
an
event
you
can.
You
include
an
image.
A
A
Right
now
you
can
see
like
there
are
no
open
cases
in
gravity
in
this
moment,
and
there
are
four
cases
in
observation:
they
all
are
named
gravity
ticket.
I
don't
know
if
there
would
be
like
another,
better
way
to
differentiate
one
from
another
but
yeah.
This
is
like
our
the
first
interaction,
and
here
are
the
cases
in
observation.
A
Most
of
these
cases
are
cases
from
other
communities
like
giveth,
one
hive
or
source
grid,
where
additional
to
the
to
the
first
conversation
we
had
with
them
we
proposed
to
to,
and
we
invited
them
to
join
to
the
graviton
trainings
and
make
some
some
activities
in
their
community
regarding
the
cultural
understanding
of
conflict.
So
that's
why
these
cases
are
in
observation,
because
we
are
like
having
the
follow-up
of
the
graviton
training
and
maybe
what
will
happen
after
the
graviton
training
with
these
gravitons
in
these
communities.
A
A
Here,
there's
a
mistake:
it
should
say,
like
type
form,
it
says
who
who
were
the
graviton
in
charge
here
it
was
just
me
and
like
the
transformational
action
considered,
helping
to
visualize
work
done
and,
like
notes,
advice,
process,
organizational
guiding
to
meet,
needs
and
additional
actions.
Some
of
these
cases
they
don't
have
actually
a
mediation
process,
so
they
don't
have
evidence.
But
when
there
are
like
a
mediation
case,
there
there's
a
link
with
the
evidence
and
obviously
the
link
is
private.
A
So
only
like
the
parts
who
were
involved
in
the
case
can
see
what
is
the
evidence
or
the
agreement
that
that
you
promoted
within
within
the
mediation
so
yeah.
This
is
like
the
idea,
and
here
is
another
column
of
organizational
development
where
yeah
it's
it's
not
like
proper
to
case
but
like
proper
to
the
things
of
the
development
of
gravities
and
organizations.
A
E
A
No,
like
okay,
the
the
type
form
had
like
30
entries,
but
like
some
of
them
were
tests,
and
also
there
are
sometimes
that
one
case
have
like
two
entries
in
the
type
form.
So
I
just
like,
like
like
I
get
the
information
from
the
type
form,
and
I
and
I
build
the
tickets
but
yeah
there's
not
like
much
engineering
other
than
that.
E
A
E
I
don't
mean
to
yeah,
I
mean
just
in
terms
of
like
it's
something
that
later
can
be
used
to
share
more
transparency
about
the
organist,
the
working
group
overall,
how
many
gravity
ponds
were
involved?
You
know
in
the
last
six
months
how
many
gravitons
were
involved
in
cases.
You
know
it
doesn't
need
to
have
names.
Just
statistics.
K
A
B
Yeah,
this
is
really
great
and
I
think
you
could
an
easy
solution
could
be
just
assigning
issues
to
different
gravitons,
and
then
you
know
that
the
gravitons
that
are
assigned
to
this
issue
are
the
ones
that
are
participating
in
the
in
the
process.
Maybe
this
could
be
an
exception
of
putting
more
than
one
person
to.
A
Okay,
yeah,
we
we,
we
will
continue
improving
from
from
this,
and
I
I
am
going
to
be
thinking
on
what
dvd
and
time
suggested
to
have
like
even
more
coordination
between
gravitons,
and
I
also
wanted
to
show
the
the
gravity
funding
draft
that
tam-
and
I
worked
on
this
on
on
the
monday
and
yeah.
It's
like
the
the
funding
proposal
and
the
assumptions
is
that
the
goal
of
gravity
is
to
be
self-funding
in
a
timeline
to
be
described.
A
So
we,
the
numbers
and
also
another
pool
for
like
making
some
bounties
and
small
bounties
like
leading
a
book
club,
a
session
of
a
book
club
or
promoting
safe
spaces
within
certain
environments,
so
yeah
the
the
for
three
months.
It
would
be
an
almost
20
okay
and
for
six
months
it
would
be
42
k
but
yeah
it
it's
divided
between
the
service,
that
is
a
thousand
die.
A
The
graviton
training
is
only
cha.
It's
only
charged
per
six
months,
the
three
working
group
roles
and
the
bounties
that
we
are
also
asking
so
yeah.
This
is
this
is
the
the
funding
proposal
for
gravity
but
yeah.
It
still
needs
also
a
lot
of
like
polish
polishing
and
like
when
we
share
all
of
our
different
proposals.
It
can
be
like
upgraded,
but
I
think
it's
more
it
more
or
less
yeah.
It's
quite
accurate.
D
D
E
D
You
know,
I'm
always
I
would
always
stress
for
15,
but
I
know
that
it's
you
know
it's
five
now.
So
that's
fine
too.
I
think
when
we
take
a
hiatus,
I
think
we're
going
to
see
exactly
how
it
works
with
just
the
praise
and
the
working
groups
going
into
it.
But
keeping
that
in
mind
is
just
make
sure
that
we're
all
aware
of
timing
not
to
rush
anything,
but
you
know
just
keep
your
eye
out
when
we
do
the
community
call.
D
E
And
sharing
the
working
group
news,
we
need
a
champion.
We
need
a
champion
for
this,
so
really
it's
reimagining,
the
the
medium
as
a
channel
actually,
and
maybe
writing
a
few
posts.
Oh,
I
forgot
our
retrospective
action,
our
retrospective
action
kind
of
falls
into
this
right
retro,
which
is
convert
three
forum
posts
to
medium
articles.
E
E
I
don't
know
that
there's
anything
else
to
say
on
this
other
than
if
you
have
an
idea
for
the
forums
I
haven't,
looked
through
the
forums
yet
and
selected
any
that
I
thought
were
eligible
or
would
make
good
candidates,
but
I
know
there's
tons
in
there.
If
anyone
has
ideas,
please
throw
them
in
the
stewart's
channel
retrospective
is
tomorrow
and
the
sprint
planning
is
friday
and
then
now
we'll
go
around
and
get
some
updates
from
working
groups.
E
Yeah
yeah
tomorrow
is
the
council
thanks,
and
did
I
even
talk
about
this?
Yet?
No,
I
totally
skipped
this
tomorrow.
Is
the
council?
Angela
is
going
to
be
joining
us
and
she'd
like
to
for
us
to
discuss
ways
that
we
can
bring
the
token
engineering
commons
community
and
took
an
engineering
commons
together.
E
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
already
have
some
thoughts
and
ideas,
but
it
would
be
nice
for
us
to
have
that
space
together
and
then
the
public
service
announcement
is.
Have
you
checked
your
github
notifications,
because
if
you
haven't
it's
a
really
good
time
to
do
it
now
would
be
a
great
time
to
check
your
github
notifications
and
see
if
there's
anyone
who's
tagged
you
and
needs
to
to
hear
something
from
you
before
they
can
finish
their
work.
H
H
H
H
So
they
are,
they
start
getting
new,
so
some
of
our
governance
tokens
so
that
they
can
start
like
involving
them
themselves
in
in
bounties
and
eventually
project
management.
So
this
is
oh
and
and
also-
and
I
wanted
to
ask
for
some
opinions
on
on
on
this.
I
wanted
to
keep
like,
contrary
to
what
I
presented
before.
I
wanted
to
keep
like
a
standard.
H
19
die
per
hour
rate
because
originally
we
proposed,
like
a
first,
let's
say
like
layer
of
basic
duties
in
the
in
the
working
group,
but
but
it's
like
it
raised
some
some
issues
about
it
being
like
not
not
fair.
So,
contrary
to
that,
like
these
basic
roles
are
gonna
have
like
a
cap
of
hours
per
week,
let's
say
and-
and
I
just
feel
that
it's
a
it's
a
better
idea,
so
that
people
can
come
back
to
this
to
a
more
fair
rate.
E
C
Sure
so
minor
things
were
closed.
Today
I
updated
the
welcome
to
the
dec
forum.
Section
I
closed
the
issue
too.
I
will
probably
I
was
going
to
request
this
to
mitch,
to
meet
or
or
to
nate,
if
possible,
take
a
look
at
the
section
that
says:
casey
hatchet
common
subgrade
that
was
used
to
be
the
article
how
to
become
a
hatcher.
C
C
Besides
that
we
are
on
finishing
the
onboarding
journey
kind
of
process
of
content
creation,
we
created
a
fake
server
to
test
it
out
the
onboarding
journey.
My
baby
has
been
rocking
with
the
bots,
so
tomorrow
we'll
have
a
session
with
ms
a
contributor
for
communities
working
group,
an
amazing
person,
so
he
will
lead
the
conversation
how
to
coordinate
the
content
creation
for
the
final
steps
of
the
morning
journey.
E
E
C
Correct
besides
that,
the
the
scanning
and
I'm
using
the
github
is
a
reference
for
this
conversation
so
scanning
for
members
and
reaching
out
to
them.
I've
been
doing
every
two
days
and
so
on
that
keeps
going.
It
keeps
happening
that
doesn't
change
much
copy
of
the
terms
and
condition
kind
of
conduct
I
presented
yesterday
on
softcuff,
so
it's
up
there
for
review
and
I
think
that's
pretty
much
all
on
the
tc
lounge.
Yes,
we
are
still
hosting
the
tc
lounge.
We
have
increased
people
joining
before.
C
It
was
only
two
or
three
people.
Now
it's
five
six
people,
seven
people,
so
that's
cool
and
and
then
we
will
have
a
tc
lounge
on
forefront
dao
on
the
27th
of
october,
we'll
be
joined
by
chewie
huanka
and
depending
on
tamiya
billy.
Really
I
will
join
or
someone
else
so
yeah.
That's
on
that
end,
that's
pretty
much
all!
C
C
Yeah,
because
so
far
since
the
information
of
people
who
is
joining
are
dropping
there,
for
example,
there
has
been
some
people
that
came
referred
by
grief,
and
probably
he
wants
to.
I
don't
know,
welcome
them
by
himself
he's
not
aware
that
the
people
join.
So
I
don't
know
it
could
be
interesting.
That
are
therefore.
E
Yeah,
just
quick
stewards
vote.
Is
there
any
one
that
would
object
from
allowing
all
stewards
to
also
see
the
onboarding
data?
Essentially,
what
it
is
is
when
somebody
joins.
They
receive
a
survey
that
asks
them
a
few
questions
and
right
now
that
data
just
goes
into
a
channel
called
orientation
data.
There
will
be
a
different
either
a
notion
or
an
error
table.
A
spreadsheet
will
be
something
else
that
it
goes
into
later.
E
F
Yeah,
we
are
on
pace
to
do
param
parties
on
friday.
This
is
that's
the
that's
the
deadline,
so
I'll
have
a
parent
party
on
friday
it'll
be
the
first
one
and
I'll
announce
that
tomorrow,
at
the
at
the
call
in
the
thursday
call.
That's
the
big
thing
it
won't
be
like
the
the
application
is
feature
complete.
We
prioritize
some
issues.
There
will
still
be
improvements
throughout
the
first
week,
but
the
issues
should
work
so
like
any
starting
on
friday.
Any
parameters
that
you
propose
will
be
able
to
be
voted
on.
D
So
I'm
I'm
having
flashbacks
to
the
hatch
vote
proposals
and-
and
I
I
wanted
to
ask-
because
I
remember
there
was
one
thing
that
we
ran
into
where
we
started
the
the
proposal
parties
and
we
submitted
proposals
and
some
people
voted
on
them
and
then
we
they
may
have
wanted
to
change
their
mind
and
couldn't
or
are
we
are
we
having
opening
voting
open
the
entire
time?
Are
we
going
to
wait.
F
F
Yep
for
sure
and
it'll
be
harder
to
close
issues
than
it
was
before,
because
it's
a
bot,
that's
making
the
issues
you
aren't
making
the
issue
so
yeah.
You
want
to
be
really
really
careful
with
your
votes.
We
probably
just
won't
talk
about.
I
mean
yeah.
We
probably
just
won't
talk
about
token
log
that
much
right
like
and
tell
people
to
vote
on
it
that
shouldn't
be
necessary.
E
F
F
No,
I
mean
that's,
that's
that's
that's
the
show
right
like
is
there
anything
else.
Is
there
anything
else
in
params?
All
I
know
is
that
I've
been
using
the
tool
for
bright
id.
I
showed
them
the
tool
and
used
it
to
analyze
what
they
chose
for
their
garden
and
also
mitch
and
lauren,
and
I
have
been
using
it.
So
it's
it's
very
useful,
just
for
regular
actual
design
and
understanding.
So
it's
really
nice.
E
F
F
Yes,
we
do
have
to
there's
still
one
permission
missing
to
execute
that
final
vote
so
this,
but
this
brought
up
a
really
nice
feature
that
we're
going
to
implement
into
evm
crispr,
which
is
that
it
will
tell
you
what
the
boat
will
pass
before
you
submit
it.
So
then
yeah
if
it
will
actually
be
able
to
execute
and
that'll
just
help.
People
create
votes
that
work.
Sorry
about
that
guys!