►
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Temperature check
13:34 - Offboarding
18:30 - Quadratic vote
24:48 - Buy-in proposal
46:57 - Spotlight
50:07 - Discord bot call reminders
54:50 - Help writing out the voting process for the params
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
D
C
Yeah
temperature
check
is
good.
I
think
that
getting
a
lot
of
you
know,
newcomers
who
are
contributing
are
really
starting
to
focus
in
and
find
their
niche,
which
is
really
cool.
I
think
yeah.
I
just
I
feel,
like
a
lot
of
people
are
in
a
good
spot
right
now,
and
I
really
enjoyed
the
prams
party
yesterday
and
the
configuration
dashboard
looks
amazing
outside
of
that
there's
not
too
much
that
I've
witnessed,
but
I'll
pass
it
to
wonka.
E
Well,
yeah,
I
feel
that
a
lot
of
interesting
things
are
happening
and
I
feel
that
yeah
we
are,
we
are
getting
a
pace
today.
I
I
got
distracted
and
I
couldn't
go
to
to
the
forefront
event,
but
yeah,
I'm
talking
with
chewie
that
he
could
go
and
that
it
went
well
so
that
that's
a
relief
and
I'll
pass
to
levy.
B
Thanks
yeah
temperature
check,
I
think
I've
been
getting
a
a
sneak
peek
into
other
communities
and
and
every
time
I
feel
so
proud
of
us
and
of
like
all
of
the
processes
we've
been
upholding
and
how
things
are
flowing
here
in
in
the
complexity
we
have.
I
went
to
the
ocean
ocean
dao
tau
hall
meeting
today,
and
they
were.
They
are
starting
to
have
stewards
and
they
were
having
some
governance
talks.
B
But
it's
because
we're
putting
so
much
thinking
in
it
and
and
really
doing
things
like
in
a
pace
that
everyone
can
be
integrated
with
it,
and
I
think
it
really
shows-
and
I
do
think
that
we
have
a
very
distributed
decision
making
for
like
a
lot
of
small
things
that
happen.
A
lot
of
the
tasks
that
get
picked
up
and
again
sometimes
I
feel
like
it-
doesn't
show
from
the
things
that
I
hear
from
us
like,
I
think
you
can
get.
G
Yeah
I
mean
we
are
in
full
force
like
the
pram
parties
are
flowing.
I
feel
like
people
have
backups
like
like
wonka
is
saying
you
know
it's
really
cool.
I
I
feel
like
we're
just
like
a
really
good
team.
I
got
and
it's
so
it
feels
so
rewarding.
You
know
I
just
got
done
with
this
common
stock.
Ama
mitch,
marco
and
vitor
were
jumping
in
you
know
I
gave
I
gave
another
presentation
I
feel
like.
G
G
It
just
feels
rewarding
every
time
I
get
to
talk
about
it
to
people
and
and
the
response
is
always
so
positive,
so
it's
yeah,
I
feel
like
we're
just
in
a
great
place
and
and
the
community
is
really
kicking
up,
I'm
seeing
new
people
and
calls
like
every
time
basically-
and
I
can
imagine
that
it's
only
gonna
get
better
with
the
crown
parties
going
and
I
mean
gravity
is
just
killing
it.
So
many
people,
the
one
with
durgados
yesterday,
was
great,
so
yeah
I'll,
pass
it
to
gene.
G
H
Well,
I
I'd
say
the
the
vibes
are
very
good:
it's
empathetic
and
inclusive
and
yeah.
I
was
just
listening
in
to
chewie,
give
a
talk
to
the
forefront
and
they
did
a
just
a
brilliant
job
of
humanizing.
The
group-
and
you
know
just
describing
the
intentions-
and
you
know
the
purpose
and
breaking
it
down
based
on
everybody's
individual
questions.
It
was
really
impressive,
so
yeah
the
heat
check
is
hot.
At
the
moment,
very,
very
nice.
J
I
A
heads
up
and
yeah-
I
just
wanted,
like
I
feel
like
the
device
are
high
and
I
would
just
like
to
maybe
get
some
more
comments
on
the
how
this
proposal
like
like.
I
would
like
to
know
from
the
stores,
if
you
like,
the
it's
really
point.
Five
and
six
like
I,
I
see
some
likes,
but
I
don't
know
like
the
opinion,
so
yeah.
I
J
Thanks
empty,
hey,
guys,
good
stuff
yeah.
I
really
resonate
with
what's
been
said
nice
to
see
so
many
new
faces
around
the
community.
The
labs
are
popping
off.
We
had
like
six
new
people
in
there
last
friday,
which
was
crazy.
That
was
really
awesome
to
see
also
really
happy
that
metaverde
has
volunteered
to
run
the
labs
for
a
couple
months.
I
think
november,
to
february
she's
going
to
be
doing
solidity,
development,
training
courses
and
that
kind
of
stuff.
That's
super
cool
and
that's
good.
For
me.
J
I
worked
that
out
with
her
because
that's
the
same
time
that
I'm
going
to
be
teaching
with
the
rewards
research
group
with
the
governauts
so
works
out
really
well
for
me
and
yeah.
I
think
that
the
dust
has
long
settled
since
the
hatch
and
now
we've
had
time
to
really
stabilize
and
find
our
groove
with
things
and
just
in
time
for,
like
the
momentum
building
with
the
new
pram
parties
now
for
phase
two
so
really
really
interesting
time.
I
think
it's
really
good.
I
think
a
lot
of
everyone.
J
The
stewards
here
have
really
come
into
their
groove
and
you
know
a
lot
of
the.
We
have
a
lot
of
the
sort
of
rituals
that
have
settled
and
we're
we're
kind
of
refining
a
lot
of
the
details
of
the
community.
So
I
think
it's
like
really
good.
I
think
everyone's
feeling
pretty
good,
so
that's
yep
and
pass
it
back
to
tam.
F
Temperature
check,
I
feel,
really
great,
it's
cool
to
start
showing
off
the
dashboard
like
we
did
in
the
common
stack
earlier
today
and
hopefully
in
the
next
couple
days.
We
could
start
getting
some
legitimate
proposals
well
start
debating
on
some
legitimate
proposals
to
upgrade
this
comment,
so
I
think
temperature
check
is
hot
and
I'll
give
it
to
craig.
K
B
K
L
Thank
you,
tim,
the
forefront,
dao
presentation
went
so
well,
I'm
all
pumped
up
like
I
got
like
carlos
mata's
wives,
like
I'm,
I'm
so
pumped
for
that
presentation.
It
was
super
motivating
to
see
people
excited
about
the
tc
to
see
people
like
approach
confused
about
it,
and
you
know
it's
always
like
tough
to
have
everyone
like
be
able
to
explain
it
to
someone
else,
but
when
they
get
excited,
it's
super
cool.
L
L
I'm
finally
laying
down
the
advice
proposal
for
the
advice
process,
sorry
for
the
funding
proposal
for
the
comes
working
group,
and
and
oh
my
god,
like
I-
I
love
the
parents
parties
and
also
like
reaching
out
you
know
to
people
and
and
to
other
communities
and
and
to
put
out
there
the
message
that
parents
parties
are
back
like
people
get
it
like.
People
have
heard
of
this
stuff
and-
and
I'm
just
so
excited
to
see
the
results
of
people
approaching
the
new
commons
configuration
dashboard.
A
I
think
I'm
the
last
one
yeah,
I
think
it's
just
me
left
and
I'll
say
the
same
thing
I
just.
I
feel
a
lot
of
enthusiasm
and
excitement,
and
so
many
people
in
the
community
taking
initiative
and
doing
things,
and
it's
exactly
you
know
what
we
want
to
see
this
duocracy
people
just
doing
things
and
communitas
is
really
on
a
roll.
A
A
You
know
from
the
stuart
stewards
working
group
I
do
feel
like
going
through
this
first
off
boarding
process
is
something
new
for
us
and
it's
sort
of
something
that
we
should
welcome
with.
I
don't
know
I
feel
like
we
should
like
gracefully,
welcome
the
offboarding
process,
so
it
should
be
something
that
we
just
should
be
constant
actually,
and
so
with
that
I'll
move
to
the
next
thing,
which
is
okay,
our
public
service
announcement.
Have
you
checked
your
github
notifications?
A
A
But
the
idea
is
that
the
onboarding
process
is
what
we
know
right:
you're
nominated
by
another
steward
there's
a
week
for
the
nomination
to
be
challenged
and
the
nominee
either
accepts
or
refuses
the
nomination
if
they
do
accept
it.
There's
an
onboarding
st
onboarding
ceremony
and
then
there's
like
this
stewards
like
now,
you're
a
steward
and
you're
sort
of
sorry,
when
I
think
about
the
the
responsibilities
that
we
have
from
from
our
stewards.
A
Every
six
months.
All
of
the
stewards
would
renew
our
commitment
to
being
a
steward,
and
if
we
don't
do
that,
our
stewardship
just
expires.
So
the
off-boarding
process
is
really
three-fold.
Either
your
stewardship
just
expires
because
you
haven't
renewed
your
commitment
or
you've
decided
you
want
to
self
off
board.
You
have
a
new
focus
in
your
life.
A
So
the
new
things
here
really
is
the
stewardship
is
six
months
and
rather
than
keep
track
of
when
everyone
starts
and
stops
the
stewardship
we'll
follow
the
fall
and
spring
equinox.
So
there
will
be
a
time
in
march
and
a
time
in
september,
where
all
of
the
stewards
will
in
a
place
on
the
forum,
which
makes
sense,
is
to
be
determined
we'll
just
say,
I'm
tamara,
I'm
the
steward
of
this
I've
been
doing
these
things.
I
would
like
to
continue.
A
A
A
So
jean
was
brought
to
my
radar
like
the
11th
hour.
I
think
actually
it
might
have
even
closed
by
the
time
you
brought
it
to
my
radar,
but
there
is
an
I'm
gonna
really
screw
this
up,
because
I
still
don't
even
know
what
it
is.
But
there
is
a
group
optimism
and
there's
a
quadratic
vote
for
retroactive
public
funding
and
he
submitted
a
submission
for
the
tec.
A
So
I
I
actually
wrote
to
them
asking
if
they
could
withdraw
our
submission,
because
I
I
think
it
the
wording
was,
I
think,
gene.
The
wording
was
like
there
was
common
stack
and
tec
and
then
my
name
was
on
it.
Instead
of
I
don't
know,
maybe
a
group
of
stewards
or
something,
but
they
didn't
so
we're
on
here
now.
So
I
don't
actually
know
what
to
do
with
this.
I
feel
like
now
that
we're
on
here
we
should
probably
do
something.
G
My
understanding
is
that
there's
a
param
I
mean
we
could
try
to
hold
a
param
party
in
the
optimism
discord.
But
basically
optimism
is
a
it's
a
roll-up.
You
know
it's
a
layer,
two
solution
run
by
carl
flourish
and
who's
like
really
good
buddy
buddy
with
vitalik,
and
they
have
this
idea
of
retroactive
goods
funding.
G
I
honestly
don't
know
how
retroactive
the
tec
is
yet,
but
we
can
try
and
we
can
show
them
what
we're
doing
with
param
parties.
But
the
idea
is
to
like
reward
people
who
have
put
in
a
lot
of
work
in
the
past
and
then
you
know
like
yeah
and
that's
basically
it
and
their
version
of
public
goods
is,
like
you
know,
ethereum
publicates.
G
So
that's
why
gurley
is
like
a
test
net
he's
getting
a
lot
of
support.
So
I
don't
know.
Oh
and
the
other
thing
is
that
there's
only
I
think,
there's
like
a
hundred
badge
holders
gene
you
might
know
more
than
I
do,
but
there's
these
bad
p
only
a
hundred
there's
only
a
certain
number
of
groups
of
people
that
can
vote.
So
you
know
we'd
have
to.
H
Lobby
them
basically
yeah
yeah.
It's
it's
split
between
the
optimism
and
ethereum
badge
holders,
so
yeah
it's
a
classification
based
on
their
community.
I
guess,
but
I'm
going
through
the
process
of
their
their
batch
holder
manual
but
yeah.
I
obviously
that's
very
true
that
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
potential
track
record,
but
it
is
yeah.
So
it's
not.
I
guess
not
super
great
for
retroactive,
but
this
is
the
first
iteration
of
this
process.
H
Like
a
token
token,
is
a
symbolic
token
single
vote
or
something
like
that.
You
know
signal
that
you
know
we're
this
is
you
know
something
that's
central
to
the
community,
even
if
we
don't
hope
to
you
know,
draw
any
funds,
maybe
to
just
lobby,
for
you
know
that
to
watch
watch
this
space
in
the
future
would
be
a
good
good
idea.
G
J
H
Yeah
the
process
is,
is
for
lobbying.
Is
you
know
inside
the
rules?
It's
just
fine,
it's
just
as
long
as
in
a
public
forum.
You
can
communicate
with
the
badge
holders
and
they
can
there's
26
that
are
able
to
vote
as
it
is
right
now.
I
think
it's
12
for
one
group
and
14
for
the
other,
so
they
can
there's
only
six
that
have
voted
up
to
this
moment
and
they're
allowed
to
change
their
votes
and
they
they
don't
have
to
vote
for
just
one.
H
J
A
G
G
A
A
Okay,
all
right,
so
unless,
unless
there's
anything
else
on
that
we'll
move
into
the
buy-in
proposal
on
the
forum,
so
I
think
that
it's
good
that
the
params
team
have
their
idea,
have
some
number
in
mind
for
for
what
this,
this
figure
should
be
as
we're
configuring.
Our
params,
however
it'd,
be
great
even
better
if
it
was
like
community
approved
and
on
lock.
So
in
order
to
move
it
forward.
A
I
proposed
a
group
of
seven
people
for
the
to
be
the
multi-sig
holders.
It's
everyone
I
checked
with
to
see
if
they
would
want
to
do
it,
because
it's
kind
of
a
responsibility
to
do
to
make
sure
that
you
can
be
available
for
these
and
zep.
And
I
had
some
conversations.
He'd
also
like
to
nominate
some
other
people
and
as
well
as,
if
I
understand
to
do
a
rank.
Voting.
I
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
make
the
process
more
open,
like
anyone
who
wants
to
volunteer
to
be
there
like
they
should
if
they
want,
they
should
be
there
and
I'm
really
concerned
like.
I
really
think
we
should
at
least
like
the
least
we
could
do
is
like
to
the
top
holders.
Just
ask
them:
hey
dude,
like
do
you
want
to
get
involved
in
that?
Maybe
they
don't
want
to
and
that's
fine,
but
I
feel
like
we
should
at
least
ask
them
and
if
they
want,
then
we
just
put
them
into
the
wrong
choice.
A
Okay,
my
initial
reaction
about
token
holders
is
that
I
mean
if
we
go
back
to
this
idea
of
the
stewards
and
those
three
core
things.
It's
active
and
present
servant
leaders
in
the
know,
and
I
feel
like
people
that
should
be
responsible
for
you
know
having
the
keys
to
the
tec
that
we're
holding
for
ourselves
should
fit
that
as
well.
So
I
I
I'm
not
a
big
fan
of
saying
any
token
holder
or
like
there's
some
a
number
of
tokens
that
you
have
to
have
before
you
become
eligible
for
this.
A
I
I
This
is
gone
like
and
even
if
you
know
like
every
part
of
the
system,
it's
important,
so
we
don't
need
to
like,
and
a
multisig
actually
should
be
like
to
make
sure
like
all
these
parts
are
agreed
and
yeah
it's
for
me.
It's
very
important
like
like
I
I
I
again
like.
Maybe
they
don't
want
to
and
again
this
is
fine,
but
I
think
we
should
at
least
ask
them
and
I
actually
volunteer
to
them
all
of
them.
Explain
them
a
little
bit.
What's
going
on
like
because
right
now,
okay,
it's
200k
and
who
cares.
I
C
So
I
I
just
want
to
kind
of
ask
these
questions
about
this.
Is
that
you
know,
do
we
have
an
agreement
on
like
the
amount
of
of
signatures
that
we
want
on
there?
So
I
think
there's
what
seven
you
said
tam
and
so
depending
on
that
threshold
do
do
we
want
to
have
like.
Is
there
going
to
be
a
process
involved?
Where
say
hey
you
know,
I,
maybe
I
don't
want
to
to
be
a
signature
anymore.
A
So
the
process
we
came
up
with
is
basically,
you
have
to
be
nominated
to
be
by
a
community
vote
on
snapchat
and
I
guess
if
somebody
wants
to
be
forcibly
removed,
you
know
somebody
could
step
down
at
any
time
of
course,
but
if
somebody
should
be
removed
who
doesn't
want
to
step
down?
That
would
probably
also
require
a
community
vote
for
that,
and
I
don't
know
if
there's
like,
I
don't
necessarily.
I
don't
necessarily
know,
there's
like
there's
seven
people
who
are
accepting
this
responsibility
and
then
a
list
of
other
people.
A
I
There
I
mean
it's
like
I
need,
I
think,
like
the
power
should
be
distributed
in
different
groups
like
it's
like
yeah
like.
Maybe
there
is
not
a
conflict
now,
but
what
about
in
the
future
like
you,
cannot
grant
it
like
it's
not
going
to
happen
or
anything
like,
especially
when
money
starts
to
play
in
the
game,
like
I
feel
like
conflict
will
be
huge
and
yeah
yeah
and
yeah.
That's
it.
C
I
will
say
after
we
allocate
those
funds,
the
the
amount
of
funds
that
these
these
people
will
be
in
charge
of,
is
going
to
be
a
lot
less
than
you
know
the
200
000
that
we
have
in
there
at
the
very
beginning.
So
I
think
the
risk
is
distributed
at
the
end
of
the
end
of
the
day,
once
we
start
distributing
it
to
different
working
groups
and
so
on.
A
G
I
J
A
Yeah
we
are
and
we're
talking
about,
basically
the
people
who
would
have
the
initial
multi-sig,
so
the
seven
people
who
would
be
the
seven
people
of
who
would
have
the
four
of
seven
multisig
to
basically
execute
the
will
of
the
for
the
proposals
that
have
passed
by
community
vote.
These
would
be
the
people
who
are
just
responsible
for
making
sure
that
happens,
and
it's
sort
of
the
original
proposal
was.
It
has
to
be
a
steward,
the
idea
being
that
stewards
are
active.
J
Yeah
yeah,
okay.
I
think
it
should
just
be
stewards.
I
think
that's
really
simple
as
long
and
then,
but
that
kind
of
delegates
to
another
ish
like
as
long
as
the
whole
process
of
becoming
a
steward
and
who
the
stewards
are
is
really
transparent,
which
it
totally
is
because
I
mean
this
call
is
open
to
everyone
every
week
and
yeah.
I
think
it's
just
really
simple
to
have
it
be
the
stewards.
A
B
I
think
this
is
a
case
of
an
advice
process
that
might
need
to
vote
right
because
it's
one
of
the
scenarios
that
we've
been
talking
about,
like
that
it
could
be
solved
only
through
advice
process,
but
then
there
was
a
push
back
and
there
are
controversial
opinions.
So
maybe
the
next
step
would
be
doing
a
vote.
B
Okay,
so
let's
do
that:
let's
do
a
snapshot
rank
choice
with
all
the
names
that
were
nominated
I
mean
first
step
is
just
asking
all
of
the
people
that
were
nominated
if
they
agree.
If
they
want
to
be
in
and
then
if
everyone
said
yes,
then
then
we
do.
This
rank
choice
for
picking
seven
people
is
that
the
final
no
number
we're
looking
for.
B
I
I
would
I
don't
know
if,
regarding
the
because
you
know
like,
I
also
do
not
know
the
the
top
whales,
and
I
don't
know
I
I
don't
know
like,
but
I
feel
like
they
should
get
contact.
So
I
don't
know
if
I
could
do
it,
but
if
someone
who
has
more
contact
with
them,
when
I
do
it,
I
feel
it
would
be
also
better.
But
if
no
one
I
could
do
it.
F
A
Okay,
yeah
yeah,
cool,
okay,
excellent,
so
we're
out
of
that
good
luck,
the
the
the
list
that
I
nominated
everyone
did
agree.
It
was.
It
wasn't
always
easy.
Actually,
because
there
were
some
questions
about.
It
is
a
responsibility.
Actually,
it's
not
like
an
easy,
yes,
actually,
but
yeah.
Let's,
let's
check
with
the
other
people
and
the
token
holders
too.
A
G
I
think
when
they're
on
they're
on
I
mean
I
mean
it's
not
a
committee,
it's
a
multi-sig
right,
seven
people
and
there
will
be
the
token
freeze
and
token
thaw,
so
they
won't
just
like
be
able
to
exit.
Probably
so
it'll
be
more
like
you
know.
I
imagine
that
most
of
our
work
in
this
multi-sig
will
be
done
after
a
few
months.
G
G
I
G
A
Okay,
it's
in
zepty's
hands
cool
anything
else.
Before
we
move
on
maybe
I'll
we
can
see
if
there's
any
last
minute,
thoughts
about
that
or
okay
param
party
outreach
and
comms.
I
know
that
there
was
going
to
be
a
conversation
today.
I
don't
think
it
happens
around
crafting
a
message
for
comms
and
also
for
the
hatcher
outreach
team
to
sort
of
reach
out
to
personal
outreach
to
all
the
hatcheries
again.
A
Okay,
okay,
so
we'll
keep
on
the
channel.
Looking
for
another
time,
I
asked
eduardo
if
he
was
interested
in
drafting
a
proposal
or
drafting
a
message
to
hatchers
that,
then
we
can
do
the
same
thing
that
we've
done.
You
know
a
number
of
times
before
of
having
a
message
ready
and
then
getting
everyone
taking
a
list
and
reaching
out
to
hatcher's
individually
again,
I
think
that's
probably
right.
D
Yeah-
and
I
think
we
also
have
to
consider
now
not
only
the
hatches
but
the
community
in
general,
what
will
be
the
because
we
will
have
the
message
in
twitter
and
so
on
and
email
and
so
on,
but
what
will
be
the
message
for
the
community
in
general
or
amplify
or
like?
Besides
the
announcement
of
the
call,
if
there
will
be
any
other
kind
of
descriptions
we
got
in
the
boarding,
call
that
we
just
left
a
bunch
of
people
who
were
interested
in
params,
but
they
are
they
at
the
beginning.
D
They
thought.
Oh
params,
you
mean
inclusivity,
you
mean
city,
woman
for
the
men.
You
know
so
it's
nice
to
have
this
clarification
for
for
the
community
in
general,
while
the
parents
party
are
about
even
if
it
sounds
silly,
because
we're
so
familiar
with
that.
That's
also
that
could
be
helpful
for
in
general
to
share
so
people
can
have
an
understanding
of
what
it
would
be
and
I
think
also
sharing.
G
So
two
things
on
that
number
one:
the
we
will
make
a
video,
but
probably
not
till
next
week,
because
the
the
there's
like
we
really
want
to
add
this
feature
of
like
so
you
can
add
a
scenario
for
conviction,
voting
and
we're
going
to
change
the
table.
So
it's
proposals
and
there's.
Unfortunately,
it's
still
an
active
development.
G
So
until
that
is
solid
and
there's
there's
no
bugs
or
features
that
we
feel
compelled
to
add,
we
don't
want
to
do
the
video
necessarily
so
we're
like
a
week
away
from
having
a
video,
but
the
other
thing
is
that
for
the
twitter
or
for
all
the
hatchery
outreach.
I
think
that
we
can
really
also
use
that
as
an
opportunity
to
say
hey.
Would
you
like
us
to
do
a
program
party
in
your
disco
discord
and
I
feel
like
that
kind
of
outreach
would
be
huge
for
the
tec.
D
I
agree,
I
think,
there's
a
possibility
on
that.
What
would
be?
Who
is
just
to
have
like
a
framing
of
how
that
could
happen?
You
know
and
the
point
of
contact
for
that.
So
I,
for
example,
if
I
just
what
just
happened
with
forefront
so
who
is
the
point
of
contact
after
they
have
been
outreach?
Me
graves
like
it's
just
nice
to
identify
this
path,
so
we
can
be
clear
at
the
moment.
We
do
the
outreach.
A
B
A
Next
one,
just
in
terms
of
timing,
I
would
think
we
start
at
least
the
individual
outreach
at
the
end
of
this
week.
So,
like
friday,
saturday
start
sending
messages
so
that
people
can
start
looking
at
params
over
the
weekend
when
they're
not
head
down
in
their
own
work
and
through
next
week.
Does
that
sound
right
in
terms
of
like
the
params
parties?
We
want
to
to
send
people
to
next
week.
A
B
C
D
Of
cool,
I
would
suggest,
if
possible,
to
also
consider
certain
dolls
or
projects
that
are
referring
to
us
back,
I'm
not
going
to
say
for
front
but
like
dao
house
or
this
courses
are
like,
because
it's
a
dockers
and
it's
relevant
for
us
also,
but
I
think
kind
of
paying
back
for
the
fee
that
they
are
giving.
It
could
be
interesting
to
consider
some
of
these
people
that
are
referral
that
are
referring
to
us
to
just
have
them
every
now
and
then.
D
Sorry,
I'm
not
this
little
yeah.
So
basically
it's
about
it's
just
like
there's
people
who
are
showing
up
in
our
discord
and
in
general
sense
there
are
other
communities
who
are
mentioning
us,
and
some
of
them
are
could
be
interesting
for
the
community
to
understand
like,
for
example,
dao
house.
So
my
my
chain
of
thought
was
like:
oh,
it
could
be
nice
to
every
now
and
then
and
have
one
of
these
people
this
community.
A
Yeah,
it's
I
mean
it's
interesting,
the
the
idea
that
it
can
evolve
into
something
beyond
what
it
was
meant
to
be,
which
is
the
projects
that
are
applying
for
funding
to
give
them
a
chance
to
give
the
community
a
chance
to
understand
those
projects
better
before
they're
voting
on
them,
which
was
the
original
intention,
I
think,
and
that
could
still
be.
Maybe
we
could
expand
beyond
that
or
experiment
with
things
until
we
have
conviction
voting
up
and
we
have
proposals
and
can
spotlight
and
can
highlight
those
proposals.
A
Okay,
cool.
I
guess
the
important
piece
here
is
definitely
that
tomorrow,
on
tomorrow's
call,
we
will
have
a
few
extra
minutes
at
the
end
or
we
we,
you
may
have
a
few
extra
minutes
at
the
end,
so
vai
and
I
were
playing
with
this
new
discord
bot
to
announce
calls
on
our
channels
before
they
before
the
calls
it's
a
little
bit
clunky.
But
there
are
some
yeah,
it's
a
little
clunky
and
we
tested
it.
A
We've
been
testing
it
on
a
setup
channel
and
yesterday
or
the
day
before
we
tested
it
in
two
working
groups
in
comms
and
soft.
So
yesterday
and
there's
this
strange
feature,
there's
a
strange
pattern
that
it
after
it
announces
the
call
it
also
at
the
end
of
the
call
it
sends
an
announcement
for
the
call
that's
going
to
happen
in
seven
days.
A
So
it's
sort
of
like
announcements
with
the
banner
and
then
there's
you
know
the
call
is
starting
now
and
then
at
the
end
of
the
call
there's
the
banner
again.
So
it
looks
a
little
clunky,
it's
on
their
roadmap
to
fix
that.
But
it's
probably
like
a
small
team
or
a
one-person
team
who's
actually
working
on
it
and
the
there's.
So
we
have
two
options.
A
C
A
D
Yeah
same
here
I
really
like
that
fact
also
that
you
can
press
attending
to
the
call,
so
you
can
see
actually
who
is
going
to
show
up
and
then.
Secondly,
I
think
it's
just
something
aesthetical
the
the
second
notification
one
and
if
it
bothers
so
much
because
there
was
something
paused
and
whatever
we
can
just
deleted
the
message
and
that
will
be
gone.
So
I
will
go
towards
a
link
towards
productive
productivity
over
aesthetic.
A
Cool,
I
I
tend
to
agree
so
good
and
the
really
big
win
is
that
any
steward
can
there's
a
dashboard
and
you
could
change
the
image
you
could
change
the
time
you
could
change
anything.
You
want
about
your
working
group
announcement,
so
it's
just
so
much
easier
and
it
doesn't
end
up
getting
bottlenecked
in
our
issues
to
make
small
changes.
A
You
click
the
emoji,
so
I
think
I
set
one
up
with
attendance
call
and
one
without
and
so
with
the
one
that
has
with
and
you
could
change
those
in
the
dashboard
as
well.
You
just
click
on
this,
the
posit
the
the
check
box
and
that
automatically
adds
you
to
the
attending
this
list
and
you
can
customize
it.
So
you
get
dm
messages
that
remind
you.
You
can
add
it
to
your
calendar.
A
They
don't
have
integration
with
our
group
calendar,
but
anyone
can
add
it
to
their
own
calendar
so
that
it
stays
on
their
calendar
as
a
recurring
calendar
meeting.
If
somebody
wants
to
come
just
go
to
softgov
and
they
see
this
post,
they
can
add
it
to
their
personal
calendar
and
it'll
be
recurring
in
their
calendar.
So
there
is
some
nice
features.
It's
just
there's
just
some
some
constraints
that
we
have
to
work
with,
but
I'm
I'm
I'm
for
going
forward
with
it
too.
F
G
How
we're
choosing
parameters
and
put
it
on
the
forum?
I
don't
haven't
seen
that
up
yet
and
well
my
bad.
We
need
to
do
that
and
probably
even
have,
I
guess,
advice
process
around
it
or
like
deciding
how
to
decide
what
the
final
parameter
set
is,
and
I
think
we
have
a
general
like
vibe
of
how
it's
going,
but
I
haven't
seen
it
right
now
and
do
you
have
any
thoughts
olivia
specifically
or
is
there
anything
done
on
that?
Yet.
B
G
C
I
was
also
going
to
ask
about
the
the
param
votes,
because
looking
at
the
the
submissions
and
stuff,
it
seems
really
interesting
that
it
would
be
easy
to
vote
on
the
different
modules.
Like
you
know,
if
you
look
at
one
proposal
and
say
man,
I
really
like
their
bonding
curve
set
up
in
in
voting
on
that
specific
one
and
then
having
kind
of
these
custom
like
a
custom
thing
at
the
end.
But
I
don't
know
if
that's
possible.
G
G
You
know,
and
what
does
that
look
like
in
with
the
full
parameter
set
like
how
how
expensive
are
the
tokens
and
how
much
many
tokens
are
needed
to
pass
a
proposal
for
a
thousand
dollars
right,
like
those
two
things
are
working
together,
so
you
have
to
have
the
whole
thing
together
in
one
set
and
say
this
is
what
the
outcome
would
be.
So
it's
totally
you
can
you
can
do
that
through
forking,
but
through
voting
it
has
to
be
the
full
parameter
set
yeah,
it
makes
sense.
Thank
you.