►
From YouTube: W72 Community Stewards: Tokenomics DAO, Spotlight for Community Call, Rewards Discussion & More!
Description
In the Stewards Working Group the Community Stewards come together to coordinate workstreams, share experiences and reflect on what is going well and what can be done better in order to achieve the mission of the TEC and best serve our community.
Find us on the #stewards channel on our Discord!
We gather every Wednesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Tamara
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
Well,
temperature
check
looks
good.
I've
just
been
kind
of
watching
from
the
outside
everything
looks
really
awesome.
I
really
enjoyed
mitch's
pitch
to
save
luna,
which
was
really
cool,
so
good,
good
pr,
regardless
so
just
kind
of
miss
everybody
and
looking
forward
to
get
back
into
the
swing
of
things
so
yeah
I'll
pass
it
over
to
this
epi.
C
Yeah
thanks
nate
yeah,
I'm
also
so
excited
like
I'm
so
excited
with.
You
know
not
what
happened
to
runa,
but
then
you
know
mitch
stepping
in
having
what
we
learn
and
applying
it,
and
I
see
like
the
potential
of
this
community
if
we
keep
growing-
and
you
know
having
all
these
token
engineering
tools-
and
you
know
like
the
community
itself-
is
building
resilience
on
other
communities
which
is
awesome
honestly,
it's
a
hero
and
and
and
yeah.
Another
thing
is
also
like.
The
transparency
example
of
things
are
going
smooth
and
yeah.
C
I'm
very
excited
for
see
what
it
looks
for
I'll
pass
it
to
gideon.
D
Thanks
zepty,
I
I'd
say:
things
are
going
well
like
I
I'm
really
feeling
the
collaboration
vibes
going
this
week,
like
some
some
good
conversations,
epi,
and
I
had
a
good
chat
like
yesterday
and
today
about
like
how
sampo
and
transparency
work
together,
and
I
think
we
came
up
with
like
a
really
good
way
of
working
together.
So
I'm
psyched
about
that.
I
had
a
good
call
with
angela
yesterday,
just
to
like
see
how
we
can
help
on
the
writers
I
mean
just
I
don't
know
it
just
feels
good.
Like
feels.
E
Thank
you
yeah,
like
this
week,
I'm
feeling
actually
very
active
because
in
omega
we've
been
working
about
the
library
as
grief
connect
with
us.
The
developers
also
we've
started
like
laid
out
what
we
called
research
groundwork,
where
we
will
explore
how
the
token
engineer
ring
parameters
will
affect
our
moral
behaviors.
So
I
believe
this
may
have
a
lot
of
attention
from
soft
go
as
well,
so
looking
forward
to
like
develop
those
research
groundwork
and
share
with
the
skewers,
so
in
general,
I'm
feeling
very
enthusiastic,
so
I'd
like
to
pass
it
on
lauren.
F
Thanks
for
yeah
temperature
check,
I'm
feeling
warm
it's
yeah.
It
feels
good
in
here.
It
feels
like
the
vibes
have
been
really
high
throughout
the
community
and
like
and
in
the
in
the
twitter
space.
It's
just
like
still
a
lot
of
hype
and
encouragement
about
the
augmented
bonding
curve,
protecting
the
tc
token
price
and
like,
and
I
was
really
excited
to
see,
also
mitch's
post,
about,
like
rescuing
the
entire
luna
ecosystem,
with
like
good
token
engineering,
and
it
just
like.
I
don't
know
honestly.
F
It
made
me
feel
so
proud
to
know
mitch
and
then
also
just
be
like
part
of
this
community,
where
we're
like
really
working
on
tooling
to
like
create
safe
resilient
economic
systems.
So
fives
are
high
and
I'll
pass
it
to
mitch.
G
I
was
on
half
vacay,
so
I
wasn't
really
super
around,
especially
on
the
proposal
inverter
side,
but
I'm
feeling,
I
would
say,
like
lauren,
you
know
got
that
got
those
rewards
out.
Everything's
rolling
we're
caught
up
on
praise.
So
it's
just
like
that
was
some
really
big
milestones
there
and
so
things
seem
to
be
flowing
yeah,
nothing
else
to
add
I'll
pass
it
to
chewie.
H
Thanks
mitch,
temperature
check
right,
okay,
great
it's!
I
feel
that
things
are
starting
to
move
on
with
with
communications,
I
I
would
say
warm,
maybe
a
little
bit
yeah.
H
It's
it's
it's
starting
to
to
gain
like
this,
this
warmth
after
like
amsterdam,
and
this
like
like
hiatus,
that
that
was
what's
in
there,
but
I
I
I
think
that
right
now
we
are
in
a
point
where
we
can
learn
from
like
our
mistakes
and
our
own,
like
experience
so
right
now
that
the
last
proposals
are
going
are
going
out
with
animation,
but
the
t
academy
team
like
ran
out
of
funds
already,
so
we
are
working
on
a
new
proposal
but
at
the
same
time
we're
confident,
but
at
the
same
time
we're
nervous
because
of
the
amount
of
time
that
took
to
pass
the
last
proposal.
H
So
it's
it's
it's
getting
there
it's
getting
there,
but
I
feel
that
there
are
much
much
just
better
ways
to
start
delivering
and
organizing
all
of
this,
and
just
like
be
more
agile
with
our
processes.
So
I
feel
that's
the
next
time
the
temperature
is
gonna,
go
hot
for
for
communications
again,
so
I
I
feel
good
because
that's
like
the
next
level
and
the
next
challenge
I'll
pass
it
to
nate.
H
H
I
Yeah
I'll
take
it
yeah.
I
also,
of
course
you
know
not
to
repeat
everybody,
but
to
repeat
everybody.
The
augmented
body
curve
post
is
is,
was
really
cool
to
see
and
and
just
you
know,
I
feel
like
that's
also
just
a
good
strategy
for
us.
I
I
know
I
don't
think
mitch
was
intending
it
to
be
a
calm
strategy
for
the
tec,
but
to
you
know
when
there
is-
and
this
is
kind
of
a
sad
thing,
but
when
there
is
a
token
engineering
mishap
you
know
the
tec's
name
should
get
spun
around
a
little
bit
because
hey
it's
like
this,
is
you
know,
let's
do
some
t
token
engineering,
guys
where's
the
model
of
usbt?
I
I
don't
see,
I
don't
see
the
cad
cad
model
did
you.
I
missed
it
anyway.
The
other
big
stuff
yeah
the
rewards
coming
out
is
so
cool.
You
know
it's
like
such
a
huge
project
and
it
hit
a
huge
milestone
and-
and
I
even
got
my
tec-
so
that's
great
and
you
know
I'm
I'm
a
little
lukewarm
on
the
coin.
Gecko
has
this
there's
this
one
pool,
I
don't
know
who
has
the
wrapped
x
die?
I
C
C
It
but
yeah
it's
three
days
ago:
it
gives
like
zero,
zero,
zero
on
the
volume
and
everything
when
you
go
to
info
dot
sony
swap,
I
already
contacted
them.
So,
oh
they
say
they
were
going
to
check
it
on
thursday.
Now
they
remember
so
yeah.
C
I
Yeah
yeah,
I
mean
it's
just
sad
to
see.
Coin
get
like
I
keep
wanting
to
say,
look
at
the
tc
price
holding
steady
and
it
is
but
coin
gecko
keeps
lying
about
it.
So
it's
like
damn
it
but
yeah,
so
that
that
that's
like,
because
I
really
feel
like
this
is
the
bear
market
is
the
tc's
moment
to
shine
because
we
were
robustly
built
for
the
bear
market
and
it's
working.
K
No
thank
you
happy
birthday
thanks,
I
feel
yeah.
I
think
I
feel
really
excited
about
the
collaborations
between
some
working
groups.
I
think
the
work
in
soft
gov
has
been
getting
more
like
body
and
maturity,
and
I
really
like
how
people
are
stepping
up-
and
I
think,
there's
some
interesting
collabs
with
omega
and
sample,
and
transparency
and
communities,
so
I'm
excited
for,
what's
coming
forward
from
there,
also
really
cool
to
see
the
rewards
being
paid
out.
K
Personally,
it's
been
a
little
difficult
of
a
week,
I'm
in
my
old
house
like
getting
my
things
to
move
out,
so
I'm
a
little
distracted
with
that
and
having
some
time
like
availability
issues
here,
just
to
pack
my
my
life
in
a
in
a
suitcase
again
and
and
move
on
and
yeah
yeah,
also
really
cool
to
see
how
the
tc
is
standing
strong,
and
I
think
this
would
be
a
great
opportunity
for
us
in
the
conferences
that
are
coming
up
to
speak
more
about
that
and
and
just
shill,
our
our
token
engineering
and
I'll
pass
to.
L
Thank
you
libby
and
happy
birthday,
so
the
tempest
check,
I
guess.
L
L
Okay,
sorry!
So
it's
it's
interesting!
I
I
feel
like
there
is
this.
The
situation
of
the
bear
market
has
been
said
before
and
today
we're
adjusting
community
does
working
group
budget.
So
it's
interesting
to
see
how
this
affects
and
make
us
make
us
to
try
to
be
more
concise,
because
we
now
see
that
there
is
no
so
much
money
around
and
it
needs
to
be
spent
wisely
if
it's
spent.
So
I
think
it's
a
nice
conversation
of
austerity.
I
don't
know
if
that's
the
right
word
in
english.
L
I
hope
it
is,
but
I
don't
know
I
feel
it's
just
you
know
like
I
mentioned
I
mentioned
a
while
ago,
like
it's
just
a
cycle
and
we
just
have
to
endure
and
keep
building
the
next
cycle,
and
you
know,
I
think
I
think
it
didn't
hit
us
hard
at
all,
and
we
just
have
to
you
know,
have
us
try
to
build
us,
try
to
keep
building
a
strong
community
in
order
to
be
better
and
back
to
you,
tom.
M
Well,
these
past
weeks
I've
been
feeling
a
little
bit
overwhelmed
because
of
the
growth
in
gravity,
but
at
the
same
time
like
being
in
the
tc
and
offering
a
service
to
aragon
and
participating
in
the
commons
prize,
and
I
think
I
need
more
support
from
like
a
project
manager,
because
I
am
finding
myself
like
lost
in
dates
and
carrying
like
so
many
things
from
so
many
fronts
that
I
feel
a
little
bit
lost.
M
But
at
the
same
time
I
love
this
kind
of
complexity
and
this
kind
of
chaos.
And
it's
where
I
show
some
of
my
virtues.
So
it's
like
okay,
it's
very
hot
but
okay.
I
I
will
try
to
resist
it
and
transform
it
and
transform
myself
but
yeah.
It's
been.
It's
been
hard
to
like
keep
up
with
with
so
many
strings
of
work,
because
the
argument,
the
graviton
training
will
start
next
week.
But
we
are
also
now
writing
the
proposal
for
a
tailored
gravity
sessions
for
aragon.
A
And
welcome
jason
to
the
stewards
weekly
in
the
beginning.
We
just
start
with
the
temperature
check,
so
you
can
share
something
about
yourself
personally
about
something
that
you
see
in
the
community
or
in
one
of
the
working
groups,
something
that
you
want
to
share
as
a
highlight
or
something
that
maybe
you
want
to
raise
to
the
attention
of
the
students,
and
you
have
a
minute
if
you'd
care
to
share.
N
Just
lurking
today,
but
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
I'm
having
trouble
being
distracted
from
being
in
the
garden
versus
being
in
front
of
the
computer
so
for
anybody,
the
profundity
of
distraction,
that's
my
current
problem
cheers
can't
you
have
both.
I
will
be
working
in
the
garden
soon,
because
I've
created
places
for
that,
but
it's
it's
still
currently
a
lot
of
effort
to
get.
A
There
all
right,
then
I
think
it's
just
me
left
and
I'll
say
the
first
thing
eduardo
mentioned.
He
and
I
really
took
a
hard
look
at
the
communities
budget
today
and
the
necessity
of
the
roles
or
not
necessity,
of
roles,
and
we
really
want
lean.
A
We
haven't
shared
it
with
the
rest
of
communitos
yet
so
we
still
need
to
do
a
little
working
group
advice
process
on
it,
but
I
think
we
are
going
to
try
to
be
a
very
lean
working
group
and
I
think
that's
the
right
way
forward
and
then
I
guess
I'm
a
little
sad.
I
was
supposed
to
do
some
work
with
zeptimus
for
the
cat
cat.
A
I'm
sorry
for
the
abc
dashboard
this
week
and
there
was
a
issue
of
the
commons
prize
and
it
just
took
all
the
way
all
my
extra
bandwidth.
So
I
didn't
do
that,
but
I
think
I
have
some
time
to
make
up
tomorrow
to
make
it
up
to
him.
I
had
a
really
good
conversation
with
chris
cotoya,
and
this
makes
me
really
happy
it's
around
cad
cat
and
he
see
community
coming
closer
together
and
some
potential
collaborations
we
could
have
in
the
short
term
future.
A
You
know
what
else
also
mitch's
post
like
that
was
really
cool
to
see.
I
sent
him
a
little
diy
that
was
like
yay.
A
A
I
knew
it,
but
I
didn't
you
know.
No,
if
he's
all
brains,
yeah,
okay,
cool
and
then
I
guess
yeah,
you
know
cv
proposals
are
getting
harder
to
pass
by
design.
So
yeah.
I
think
that's
on
my
mind
too,
and
the
stewards
working
through
proposals
like
fingers
crossed
if
we
can
pass
it
by
distribution
in
the
first
week
of
june.
A
So
I
hope
that
if
you
guys
agree
with
that
funding
proposal
for
the
stewards
you
will
hop
on
and
vote
for,
it
now
would
be
a
great
time
and
then
maybe
last
thing.
Speaking
of
the
commons
prize,
it's
a
real
treat
to
see
that
gravity
has
been
in
like
the
top
five
pretty
much
the
whole
time
and
they're
currently
at
number.
Three
and
grassroots
economics
and
precious
plastics
are
seem
to
be
separating
from
the
rest
in
the
lead,
but
everything
changes
not
like.
So
many
people
haven't
voted
yet
okay
cool.
A
So
if
you
guys
would
all
join
me
in
a
very
coordinated
version
of
happy
birthday
to
livia,
I
think
we
can
embarrass
ourselves
and
her
at
the
same
time.
A
A
Pitch
okay,
cool,
so
gardens
yeah,
we
have
some
things:
the
retroactive
funding
for
tec
at
east
denver,
even
though
it's
a
relatively
small
amount.
It
is
still
quite,
I
think,
quite
far
from
passing
right,
maybe
a
quarter
of
the
way
there.
A
The
funding
for
the
stewards
working
group
for
may
to
july
is
very
far
from
passing,
and
then
teams,
dow
animation
and
video
is
also
seems
to
be
pretty
far
from
passing,
still
so
yeah.
I
guess
we
need
to
yeah.
I
don't
know
what
we
need
to
do.
I
think
that
there's
a
lot
of
votes
on
abstain
and
that's
a
lot
of
people
are
sort
of
just
saying
no
more
spending,
and
so
it's
going
to
get
harder
and
harder
to
pass
working
group
votes.
A
There's
an
interesting.
I
know
that
sem
and
blossom
labs
has
talked
about
osmotic
funding
as
a
potential
model
for
operations
or
dow
operations
versus
conviction,
voting,
which
would
be
just
for
proposals,
and
that
could
be
something
that
we
could
look
into
when
it's
ready.
As
far
as
I
know,
it's
just
still
conception
phase.
A
So
we
had
this
retroaction
get
in
touch
with
token
get
in
contact
with
tokenomics
dao,
but
we
don't
have
a
champion
for
it.
So
is
there
somebody
who
put
this
on
the
retrospective?
A
Does
anyone
want
to
elaborate
the
the
person
who
added
this
to
our
retrospective
and
or
do
we
want
to
see
if
there's
somebody
who
wants
to
sort
of
champion
and
see
the
possibilities
of
relationships
with
token
nomic
style.
K
I
had
headed
there
to
I
added
that
to
the
retrospective,
just
because
it
feels
like
something
something
that
the
tc
could
be
doing.
You
know
they've
been
building
this
library
of
tokenomic
models
and
I
feel
like
it's
something
people
would
expect
that
the
tc
would
have,
and
since
they're
already
doing
that,
I
wonder
if
there
is
like
a
bridge
we
could
make
maybe
start
proposing
some
shared
talks.
K
L
Just
to
sense
or
not
I,
if
I'm
not
wrong,
I
cannot
recap
the
exact
words,
but
angela
mentioned
that
that's
this
this
this
tao
was
brought
to
her
by.
I
think
it
was
sargeant
and
I
think
she's
in
contact
with
them,
but
I
think
it
would
be
just
nice
to
check
in
with
angela
just
in
case
and
then
sort
of
make
it
make
it
more
coordinated
because
she
has.
K
Yeah,
we
briefly
talked
about
it
in
the
in
the
in
the
governance
guild,
but
I
didn't
understand.
I
didn't
understand
that
there
was
an
active
like
something
happening
already
but
yeah.
It
would
be
great
to
talk
to
her
and
and
have
something
integrated
from
all
these
groups.
K
A
Okay,
okay,.
A
A
So,
just
if
anyone
wants
to
add
anything
to
the
agenda
as
usual,
please
add
anything
you
want
to
talk
about
to
the
agenda.
The
next
thing
I
have
is
labs.
Ygg
has
expressed
the
need
to
take
some.
You
know
some
distance,
but
he's
looking
for
in
his
words,
someone
that
just
loves
to
code
and
explore
systems.
Another
data
scientist
would
be
great.
So
if
you
have
anyone,
you
could
think
of
that
could
provide
labs.
Some
support
that
sort
of
matches
that
role
please
reach
out
to
him.
A
Another
idea,
that's
just
starting
to
percolate,
but
we
don't
know
if
it'll
get
any
traction.
Yet
is
this
closer
collaboration
with
cad
cad
community
and
tec,
which
may
come
in
the
forms
of
kinds
of
you
know
specific
questions?
The
tec
has
and
then
a
a
focused
session
or
series
of
sessions
in
the
tec
labs
from
the
cad
cat
community
modeling
out
that
question,
so
there's
sort
of
been
some
suggestions.
Griff
made
two
great
suggestions
about
possible
questions.
A
We
turn
it
off
publicly
and
then
only
the
tec
can
arbitrage
between
the
secondary
market
and
primary
and
then
another
idea
is
if
we
pay
everyone
in
tec
tokens
all
of
the
proposals
we
find
in
tec
tokens
maybe
see
some
scenarios
of
what
that
would
look
like
we
they'll
see
if
ygg
and
cad
cat
are
really
into
this
idea
as
well,
and
we
might
have
some
more
information
for
next
week
or
if
you
look
like
you're
about
to
jump
in.
Do
you
want
to
say
something.
L
So,
on
the
note
sorry
on
the
note
of
lapse
like
this
is
just
out
of
the
blue,
because
this
first
name
that
came
to
my
mind
what
happened
to
octopus-
maybe
he
is
somehow
interested
on
maybe
taking
on
his
side
of
the
of
the
equation,
but
I
remember
he
was
like
he
was
amazing
and
he
was
doing
work
with
him
and-
and
I
think
octopus
maybe
bring
him
over
to
just
re-sing
with
him-
could
be
nice.
A
Pretty
I
think
octopus
is
still
pretty
active,
with
ygg
more
on
a
daily
basis,
actually
at
long
tail-
financial-
I'm
not-
maybe
I'm
mistaken
about
that,
but
I
think
also
octo
yeah
I,
but
it
could
be
worth
reaching
out
to
him
too
for
sure,
but
I
would
have
I
would
have
assumed,
but
it's
never
safe
to
assume.
A
I
guess
this
who
makes
an
ass
of
you
and
me
right
that
he
has
already
reached
out
to
it's
octopus,
but
octopus
is
a
full-time
professor.
You
know
like
he
does
this
in
his
fun
time
like
he
does.
He
does
this
in
his
fun
time,
but
I
think
he
also
has
a
very
demanding
job
outside
of
the
fun
that
he
has
in
the
tec,
but
it
it
can't
hurt
to
ask.
Is
that.
C
I
I
was
just
since
we
were
talking
about
this
cut
cut
thing.
I
was
thinking
what
of
the
you
know.
The
objective
of
this
research
should
be
like
how
much
liquidity
do
we
need
to
to
that
be
a
babble
thing
just
because
like
if
you
go
to
honey,
swap
right
now
and
buy
20k
worth
of
diet
into
dc,
you
only
get
6k
of
cc,
so
I
think
at
this
point
it's
not
viable,
but
in
this
research
like
I
would
focus
on.
A
Yeah,
I
think,
probably
the
right
way
forward
if
they
even
agree
to
do
this.
If
this
turns
out
to
be
what
we
do,
would
would
be
to
have
a
forum
post
for
like
suggestions
and
then
probably
let
the
modelers
choose
the
question
that
they
feel
they
can
have
the
best
results
from
the
most
meaningful
results.
A
A
But
I
I
like
that
suggestion
too,
thanks
for
sharing
that
okay,
anything
else
about
either
tec
labs,
maybe
anyone
that's
been
through
onboarding
that
could
be
potentially
a
good
fit
for
tec
labs,
maybe
just
that
we
can
keep
our
eye
out
for
that
and
okay
stewart's
counsel
this
week
is
going
to
be
gideon
and
sampo,
so
gideon's
going
to
do
a
short
presentation
and
then
maybe
facilitate
the
conversation
to
get
some
advice
process
to
get
some
thoughts
to
get
some
different
perspectives
and
it'll
all
be
about
sort
of
the
financial
health
of
the
tec.
A
So
yay
another
council,
but
this
time
with
with
more
I'd,
say
concreteness
to
it
than
our
previous
councils
about
financial,
health
and
future.
A
I
don't
think
we
have
any
spotlight
for
the
community
call
and
I
think
manu
has
the
issue
to
help
reimagine
the
community
call.
I
don't
think
there
there's
anything
going
to
be
in
these
anything's
gonna
happen
either
of
these
any
suggestions
for
the
community.
Oh
uncle,
you
had
a
suggestion.
M
He
has
a
proposal
in
the
forum
and
he
would
like
to
to
talk
about
it.
F
A
Do
you
think
you
could
coordinate
with
him
to
do
this?
The
spotlight.
A
Okay,
and
just
maybe
also
give
him
some
like
set
his
expectations
that
he'll
probably
have
about
five
minutes
at
the
end,
and
he
can
do
a
presentation
if
he
wants
or
talk
off
the
cuff,
but
it's
probably
going
to
be
about
five
minutes
at
the
end
of
the
the
call
cool.
Thank
you
thanks
for
that.
K
I
also
have
a
suggestion,
maybe
for
next
week,
they're
called
active
interference
lab.
D
And
one
more
idea
for
like
the
week
after
that
would
be
the
writer's
guild
it'd,
be
great
to
we're
still
kind
of
working
through
a
few
things
right
now,
but
we're
we
set
up
a
channel
for
it
and
we're
now
trying
to
kind
of
ramp
things
up
to
get
some
more
writers
in
so
it'd
be
great
to
bounce
some
ideas
around
with
folks,
and
maybe
one
of
like
two
or
three
weeks
from
now.
A
Cool
all
fantastic
suggestions-
okay,
I
guess,
if
there's
nothing
else
on
this
topic,
we
can
move
on
to
rewards
updates.
I
feel
like
we've
gotten.
The
rewards
updates
is
there
anything
else
that
you
want
to
add
mitch.
G
I
mean
I
could
look
at
the
notes
from
last
week,
but
the
highlights
will
be
yeah.
We're
caught
up,
rewards
are
going
out,
we'll
have
to
think
of
how
we're
gonna
request
more
funds.
G
So
once
we
get
up
to
like
august,
I
think
we'll
run
out
of
funds
in
the
reward
board,
and
so
we'll
have
to
make
another
request
for
funding
after
that.
G
We're
going
to
open
the
next
round
on
friday
for
the
30th
of
april,
until
the
14th
of
may
and
we'll
just
keep
doing
it
in
bi-weekly
periods.
From
now
on.
A
Okay,
can
I
raise,
since
we
have
so
much
time
left
just
the
question
around
publishing
handles
versus
publishing
ethereum
addresses.
I
know
I
I
post
on
the
forum
when
you
post
it
back.
I
wonder
so
my
feeling
is
we're
probably
going
to
get
into
more
trouble
by
not
just
publishing
handles,
because
eventually
everyone
will
know,
but
more
importantly,
I
feel
like
it
creates
this
separate
classes
of
people,
those
who
know
who's
whose
names
are
attached
to
those
addresses
and
those
who
don't,
which
is
a
information,
asymmetry
that
I
think
we're
introducing
unnecessarily.
A
So
I
wonder,
is
there
been
any
more
talk
about
that
in
the
rewards
and
how
they
maybe
want
to
is
this?
Do
we
want
to
continue
not
publishing
any
handles,
or
is
that
I
guess
I
want
to
hear
like
what
has
the
discussions
been
so
far.
E
D
About
so
zeptimus,
and
I
and
some
of
the
folks
in
sampo
were
talking
about
just
like
the
treasury,
like
in
the
multisigs
for
the
working
groups.
Like
you
know,
what
are
the
what's?
The
amounts
that's
been
spent,
and
you
know
like
that.
D
Kind
of
stuff
and
kind
of
the
next
level
is
looking
at
like
how
much
has
been
spent
and
and
maybe
even
like
how
much
has
been
spent
in
the
working
groups
by
role
right,
and
so
there
is
this
question
that
was
raised
in
the
forum
about
like
well:
should
those
also
have
names
attached
or
should
those
just
be
roles
right
so
that
that's
kind
of
a
related
question
I'll
throw
into
the
mix.
I
I
also
want
to
remind
us
of
the
praise,
debates
and
armageddon
and
how
that
all
started,
and
it
was
based
off
of
like
people
feeling
the
praise.
Distribution
wasn't
fair
and
there
wasn't
a
big
issue
until
all
of
a
sudden.
We
added
tokens,
you
know,
but
it
was
all
impact
hours
and
there
was
a
ranking
and
no
one
cared,
but
it
was
being
submitted.
This
person
got
this
many
tokens
every
you
know
two
weeks,
but
then
all
of
a
sudden
you
add
money
to
the
mix
with
names
and
things
get
a
little
weird.
A
A
So
being
being
aware
of
that,
it
still
creates
a
group
of
people
who
know
everyone
who's
in
the
list
and
a
group
of
most
of
the
community
who
don't
and
I
feel
like
that's
that's
or
most
of
the
people
on
the
list
right.
I
feel
like
that's
the
kind
of
that's
that's
the
la
that
lacks
the
transparency
that
I
think
is
foundational
to
our
ethos,
but
I
do
think
we
have
to
address
that
there
will
be
some
contention
from
that
will
arise
from
it.
I
don't.
A
C
I
also
think
it's
going
to
to
you
know
if
we
don't
don't
share.
It
also
goes
against
mutual
monitoring.
How
are
we
supposed
to
go
in
the
community
to
analyze
this
data
if
it's
being
hired
by
a
group
of
people
like,
I
feel
it
goes
against
our
itos
and
we
were
sharing
the
impact
ours,
and
I
feel
you
know
the
problem.
You
know
people,
I
don't.
I
think
the
price
magazine
thing
went
crazy
just
because
it
was
like
a
year
of
work.
C
K
Yeah,
I
also
think
it's
important
to
show
names.
I
don't
I
don't
remember
this
being
discussed
on
the
board.
Actually,
I
just
saw
it
posted
in
the
forum.
I
think
I
think
we'll
have
the
graphs
anyways
from
the
rad
dashboard
and
when
we
come
to
the
review
calls
we
can
already
see
the
names,
so
I
agree
with
them
that
it
creates
some
type
of
information
asymmetry,
because
the
people
who
come
and
see
the
graphs
from
red.
Now
they
have
access
to
this
information.
K
And
I
think
we'll
start
to
to
have
more
clarity
on
all
the
expenditure,
from
the
audits
that
zaptimize
is
doing
and
a
lot
of
the
problems
we
had
this
past
sprint
was
because
there
was
some
type
of
weirdness
of
people
feeling
like
oh,
but
this
person
is
receiving
so
much
more
than
this
person
and
some
like
offline
talks
started
to
happen,
and
we
don't
really
want
that
to
happen.
It's
better
that
these
conversations
happen
in
the
open,
even
if
they
feel
hard
to
have.
G
Cool
wow,
so
the
yeah,
the
main
thing
behind
not
putting
handles
on.
There
is
just
like
not
inviting
the
contention,
because
when
you
put
everybody's
names
on
there,
it's
just
like
it,
it
becomes
more
open,
and
so
it's
like
there's
a
fine
line
between
like
transparency
and
then
like
like
putting
too
much
information
like
right
there
for
people
to
basically
like
feel
feel
heard
about,
and
so
maybe
there's
an
information.
G
Asymmetry
like
you're,
saying
about,
like
only
certain
people,
know
each
other's
addresses
but
like
what
would
be
the
benefit
or
the
disadvantage
to
other
people,
not
knowing
how
much
the
other
person
gets
in
rewards
like
if
you're,
in
the
dark
about
how
much
other
people.
But
you
know
what
you're
getting
like.
G
Are
you
inviting
an
argument
by
like
giving
everyone
all
the
information
at
the
second
part
is
that
the
information
is
all
there
anyway,
like
you
go
on
the
full
report
analysis
and
then
it's
like
you
can
see
the
praise
scores.
You
can
see
the
stuff
in
there,
but
it's
like
if
you
want
to
dig
a
little
bit
deeper,
it's
there,
but
I
just
think,
like
I
mean
I've
seen
these
conversations
happen
before
and
we
kind
of
had
the
same
stuff
happen
in
another
dow,
where
it's
like.
K
But
that
just
exposes
some
fragility
that
we
have
as
a
community
like
if
having
names
there
and
having
the
compensation
in
the
open
is
the
cause
of
comparison
and
fear,
and-
and
I
don't
know
some
type
of
argument,
because
we
have
to
look
why
that's
happening
like.
Why
are
people
feeling
unsatisfied.
G
Well,
if
you
I
don't
know,
what's
going
on
with
this
yeah,
I
mean,
if
you
guys,
feel
like
opening
up
and
taking
that
risk,
and
you
have
the
resources
to
deal
with
it,
then
by
all
means,
but
I
mean
I
figured
it
was
like
this
would
be
the
safest
thing
to
start
with
and
not
not
invite
that
you
know
it's
kind
of
like
like
pandora's
box,
it's
like
okay,
if
you
want
to
do
it,
you
better
be
ready
to
deal
with
it.
So
that's
my
thoughts.
D
This
is
I
I
don't
know
this
may
be
an
ignorant
thing
to
say
because-
and
I
just
haven't
been
as
close
to
all
this,
but
you
know
when
I
look
at
the
actual
numbers
I
mean
for
a
few
people.
These
are
significant
numbers,
but
for
the
vast
majority
of
people,
like
the
actual
amount
of
money
that's
flowing
out
through
this
is
not
great
right.
D
It's
not
huge,
and
I'm
just
wondering
whether,
like
you
know,
tam
your
point
about
like
when
this
was
like
video
game
credits
like
when
it
was
just
numbers
like
no
problem
right.
It's
like
it's
not
controversial
at
all,
and
so
I
guess
I'm
just
thinking
longer
term.
Like
you
know,
if
this
was
like
reputation,
credits
that
didn't
translate
directly
into
money-
I
I
don't
think
we'd
be
you
know,
I
don't
think
there
would
be
an
issue.
D
You
know,
maybe
that
even
like
multiplies
your
governance,
I
mean
who
knows
what
that
would
what
that
would
do?
But
I
guess
I'm
just
questioning
this,
like
the
actual
amount
of
money
for
most
of
the
people
is
not
huge,
so
you
know
we
may
be
introducing
friction.
That
is
not
necessary.
C
C
Okay,
you
know
it's
like
it's
been
tested
that
it's,
but
if
we
hide
the
numbers
like,
how
is
the
community
going
to
share
feedback
and
stuff
like
I
feel
like
if
we
consider
this
like
a
testing
ground
and
not
necessarily
not
expecting
a
salary
from
that,
so
we
should
not
worry
so
much
and
and
yeah.
If
we
make
it
open,
it's
you
know
open
source
culture
and
more
people
can
argument
and
give
feedback.
I
mean.
G
L
I
think
that
the
chaos,
not
the
chaos,
but
the
conflict
that
will
bring
this
comparison
doesn't
outweigh
the
transparency
aspect
of
it.
I
don't
think
there.
I
don't
think
that
we
actually
gain
the
transparency
is
already
there.
L
I
don't
think
we
gain
much
more
by
just
changing
that
lit
that
aspect
of
it,
because
if
you
want
to
dig
in
just
look
for
it
and
you
will
find
it
as
mitch
mentioned,
so
I'm
I'm
on
mention
this
mainly
because
I
feel
we
do
not
have
the
resources
to
go
through
appraised
armageddon
again
at
this
stage
and
at
this
moment-
and
I
don't
think
it's
healthy
for
the
community
and
at
the
same
time
the
thing
about
salaries
and
stuff.
L
We
cannot
assume
everyone
thought
this
was
not
a
huge
compensation,
how
much
they
were
going
to
receive.
That's
a
dangerous
assumption
to
make,
because
people
have
been
contributing
under
the
assumption
of
rewards,
but
there
was
never
a
clarification
about
how
much
how
many-
and
I
think
some
people
may
have
got
offended.
So
I
think
there
is.
There
is
a
labor
that
we
have
to
do.
That
is
greater
than
just
changing
the
names
on
on
that
post
or
putting
or
putting
the
ethereum
address.
L
I
think
there
is
a
there
is
a
labor
of
transparency,
but
community-wide
and
on
expectations
regarding
words,
rather
than
just
focusing
on
this
aspect
of
transparency
on
this
post,
because
it's
a
test
and
we
could
amend
the
next
time
when
we
have
had
this
talk
in
advance.
So
that's
my
two
cents
on
that
mert.
E
Yeah,
I
I
just
I
I
my
thoughts
are
more
aligned
with
what
zaptimus
actually
said
like
in
terms
of
hiding
transparency.
It
should
show
some
handles.
This
is
because,
for
example,
I
think
wolves
doesn't
mean
anything
because,
like
how
do
I
know
anybody's
wallet
and
also
this
will
be
a
good
opportunity.
I
I
also
I
agree
the
fact
that,
like
we
don't
want
to
get
into
this
praise
wars
again,
but
I
mean
this
will
be
a
good
opportunity
for
other
people
to
understand,
like
what
kind
of
agents
are
getting
praised.
E
For
example,
like
I'm
wondering,
for
example,
nick
has
been
doing
a
lot
of
work
in
omega,
but
she's
not
the
kind
of
person
that
is
very
vocal.
So,
for
example,
I
was
just
wondering
nick's
praise
and
if
it
is
law
like,
I
will
just
want
to
contribute
on
that
side,
etc.
So,
if
it
is
show,
I
think
it
will
be
much
transparent
and
democratic.
I
believe,
but.
I
I
want
to
add
to
what
mitch
is
saying
here
in
that
the
information
has
is,
is
presented
with
context,
and
I
think
that's
that's
pretty
valuable.
You
know
if
you
want
to
see
who
the
people
are,
then
you
dig
into
the
report
and
then
you
can
see
now
you're
getting
the
names
but
you're
also
getting
the
context
with
the
names,
and
I
think
that
I
don't
actually
have
a
horse
in
this
race.
I'm
not
sure
which
is
better.
Both
are
fun
and
interesting
experiments.
I
I
don't
think
there
is
a
wrong
way
here,
but
I
just
I'm
taking
the
underdog
side
just
to
just
to
say,
like
it's
not
hidden,
it's
just.
What
do
we
promote?
You
know
do
do
what
user
experience
do
we
want?
Do
we
want
people
to
get
names
with
the
context
or
do
we
want
to
just
deliver
the
names
as
easy
as
possible
without
the
context,
and
I
think
that's
the
decision,
because
they're
going.
A
G
There's
a
there's,
a
link
there
published
with
each
distribution,
and
so
that's
actually
the
the
analysis
from
the
rad
dashboard.
So
you
can
see
who
was
praised
the
most
who
got
the
highest
praise
score.
G
So
I
mean,
even
if
you
go
tam
right
now
into
the
one
for
august
I
just
put
up
and
then
you
go
into
full
repo
period
analysis
here
and
then
it
should
output.
A
file
that
is
interactive.
G
G
Yeah
zep's
the
winner,
so
I
mean
you
have
you
have
it
there
you're
like
who
got
praised
the
most
this
round?
It's
like
zepty,
and
then
you
can
find
your
name
on
there.
The
discord
handles
are
there
and
then,
if
like
from
there,
there's
just
more
and
more
analysis
like
if
you
want
to
get
more
context
on
it.
E
N
I
had
an
interesting
observation
if
we
tell
people
that
this
is
here
as
we're
gonna
do
because
that's
the
answer
to
how
do
I
know
the
the
answer
of
who
voteless
belongs
to
and
folks
are
telling.
Excuse
me
a
second
a
little
pollen
in
my
throat.
Damn
isn't
the
same
conversation
gonna
ensue.
N
Aren't
folks
gonna
come
to
the
same
conclusions
once
they
hover
over
this
and
aren't
they
going
to
lob
the
same
comments
at
the
same
post
in
the
forum
because
they
found
out
the
answer
to
whatever
their
concern
was
wasn't
just
what
the
data
was,
but
they
had
an
interest
in
seeing
that
name,
because
somehow
that
means
something
to
them.
I
think
libby
said
it
best.
The
reason
that
that
means
something
to
them
is
something
we
have
to
understand,
because
you
can't
avoid
the
conversation.
A
I
love
this,
I'm
just
going
to
say
that,
but
the
second
thing
I'll
say
is
that
it
it.
Actually
I
don't
know,
maybe
it
actually
makes
the
case
stronger
here
is
the
list
by
handles.
You
can
also
see
it
in
the
graph
like
you
can
go
and
see
the
context
like
it
already
the
the
questions
already
answered.
So
then,
why
not
just
use
the
handle,
since
it's
already
displayed.
N
So
narrative
this
is,
this
is
narrative.
What's
the
story,
the
conversation's
going
to
happen,
no
matter
which
side
of
the
story
you're
on,
though
you
can't
avoid
it
so
telling
the
story
actually
creates
a
vulnerability,
because
do
people
believe
you're
hiding
something
by
telling
a
story
when
the
truth
is
right
there
out
in
the
open
and
you're
going
to
lead
people
to
it
and
they're
going
to
conclude
the
same
thing.
K
Just
not
even
an
opinion
on
that
on
the
names
just
I
think
we
don't
really
have
that
much
context
now
like
to
be
honest.
The
analysis
we
have
now
doesn't
really
offer
any
context
for
how
people
were
praised.
The
context
we're
receiving
is
more
about
quantification
than
about
like
the
act
of
praise
and
what
we
are
rewarding.
K
C
I
have
another
question:
can
that
be
download,
like
you
know
the
people's
names
with
the
tokens
that
they
get,
that
can
that
be
like
a
cvv
file
or
something
like
for
the?
If
we
end
up
tracking
like
what
people's
making
I
like,
it
feels
very
you
know
hard
to
get.
You
know
everybody
like.
I
know
the
information
is
here,
but
if
I
have
to
type
it
manually
it
could
be
so
much
work
and
if
we
can
get
that.
A
Maybe
can
I
just
say
one
more
thing
like
I
just
pulled
some
ideas
together,
you
know.
I
agree
that
so
this
isn't
salary.
This
isn't
compensation.
This
is
like
a
small
amount
of
tokens
for,
for
I
mean
I
think
that
the
largest
is
you
know.
It
goes
from
like
250
to
whatever
a
few
a
few
tokens
for
praise
and
I
feel
like
the
there's
a
few
things.
Maybe
one
is
that
also
what
mert
said
around
like?
Oh,
if
I
see
nick
you
know,
doesn't
I
feel
like
she
hasn't
appraised
enough.
A
That
encourages
me
to
use
the
prey
system
more
to
to
surface
the
work
that
hasn't
been
seen,
because
we
can
see
so
clearly
that
it
hasn't.
You
know
there
was
something
about
the
leaderboards
that
we
did
that
actually
made.
People
want
to
praise
more
because
you
could
see
the
results
and
you
could
see.
Okay,
if
I
put
in
more
effort
here
or
I
you
know,
see
somebody
who's
doing
work
and
isn't
getting
praised,
I'm
gonna
now
make
an
effort
to
praise
them
because
I
can
see
it
so
visibly.
A
I
think
if
our
narrative
is
like
these
are
the
praise.
This
week
and
we
we
shouldn't
be
afraid
of
the
results.
We
shouldn't
be
fearful
that
our
community
is
going
to
freak
out.
We
should
expect
there
to
be
some
contention
and
expect
us
to
have
a
maturity
that
we
can
handle
this
contention
by
discussing
this,
like
okay
in
two
more
weeks
like
first
of
all,
this
is
a
this
is
really
still
a
pilot
right
and,
second
of
all,
every
two
weeks
there's
there's
a
new
phrase
coming
out.
A
So
what
we're
sharing
now
is
like
history
right,
what's
going
to
actually
matter
is
forward
like
forward
looking
like
what
what
we
praise
now
and
going
forward,
so
we
can
even
we
even
sort
of
have
the
like.
Well,
this
is
historical
praise
that
we're
sharing
now,
so
maybe
people
like
maybe
it's
the
best
opportunity
for
people
not
to
be
so
concerned
about
the
results
as
they
would
be
when
this
is.
You
know
present
present
day,
not
august
2021,
but
like
may
2022.
A
I
G
You
know
I
did
I
even
post
this
in
here.
I
think
I
posted
it
in
there.
Sorry,
I
gotta
look
at
my
thread
right
now.
Yeah
I
mean
I
put
something
in
the
reward
board
saying
I'm
gonna.
Do
it
like
this
and
invite
the
discussion,
but
nobody
really
commented
on
it
in
the
last
day,
so
I'm
telling
them
like
hey
guys,
I'm
going
to
post
it
like
this
again
and
I'm
like
okay,
nobody
says:
no,
I'm
just
going
to
do
it
because
I
mean
you.
A
Know
think
it
was
a
safest
decision
just
to
you
know,
but
I
also
think
that
maybe
long
term
it's,
I
think,
I
think
longer
term.
We
would
benefit
from
having
more
openness
than
having
less
openness,
and
I
love
this
analysis
by
the
way
thanks.
I
didn't
look
at
it
before
so,
thanks
for
sharing
that
to
me
could.
B
Could
I
ask
a
question
real
quick?
I
just
want
to
say:
is
there
a
strategy
for
the
distribution
process
and
is
there
any
like
concerns
in
terms
of
like
cell
pressure?
On
the
token
and
all
that
good
stuff.
B
G
K
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
sorry
mitch,
that
I
didn't
see
that
happening
in
the
reward
wordport
before
too
many
messages
there,
that
one
passed
by
unnoticed.
M
I
am
also
learning
so
much
about
token
engineering
and
if
I
would
go
back
in
time,
I
would
have
like
promoted
with
even
more
force
ostrom's
baby.
I
think
that
design
was
really
cool
and
we
would
have
like
more
tokens
to
distribute,
but
it's
just
a
learning
opportunity.
Everything
is
just
a
sand
castle.
A
A
Daughter
just
hurt
herself,
the
other
one,
the
vote
to
adjust
tributes
just
got
dropped
on
the
agenda
griff.
I
believe
this
is
something
you
want
to
advocate
for
yep.
I
It's
just
every
every
two
weeks
go
vote,
and
especially
now
it's
nice
to
raise
that
exit
tribute
and
generate
funds
for
for
the
commons.
So
exit
tribute
we'll
go
to
nine
percent
entry.
Tribute
will
go
down
to
eight
percent,
making
things
better.
Go
rock!
That
vote.