►
From YouTube: Stewards WG Special Edition: Params Party and xDao
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
This
x,
dou
and
x
die
steak.
Maybe
we
just
get
started
so
that
we
leave
of
45
minutes
for
lauren
to
do
the
params
party.
B
Yes,
of
course,
I
already
have
a
window
ready
that
I
would
like
to
share
so.
B
Okay,
perfect,
so
long
story
short,
I
don't
know
if
you've
heard
but
nos
is
safe
is
going
to
merge
with
with
the
exit
chain.
B
This
is
going
to
bring
a
a
number
of
opportunities
to
to
both
ecosystems,
and
there
are
some
real
things
and
and
ideas
on
the
table
for
this.
So
here
is
a
document
that
pretty
much
summarizes
what
this
is
gonna
consist
of,
regarding
how
much
of
of
like
how
much
money
is,
is
nazis,
gonna,
gonna
put
for
for
the
exact
ecosystem
grants.
B
There
are
approximately
80
000
gnosis
tokens
that
are
going
to
be
destined
for
this,
and
this
is
going
to
be
just
like
an
initial
phase.
So
right
now,
let's
see
how
what
the
price
is
for
gnosis,
okay,
so
it's
almost
like
450.
B
This
would
be
around
like
35
million
dollars
or
something
like
that,
if
I'm
not
mistaken
so
so
yeah,
it's
it's
a
pretty
big
deal,
because
this
xdao
multisig
is
going
to
be
taking
care
of
of
these
funds
and
and
what
brands
like
it
applies
to
also
so
I
I've
been
following
this
this
topic
for
a
while,
because
there
have
been
some
controversies,
especially
on
the
on
the
exact
steak
side,
but,
as
you
can
see
here,
it's
mostly
like
for
for
the
gnosis
community.
B
It's
yeah
mostly
happening
and
also
let
me
refresh
for
steak
yeah
there's
like
some
there's,
there's
like
a
12.5
percent
of
people
that
don't
think
that
it's
a
good
idea.
It's
mostly
because
of
the
ratio
in
which
gnosis
tokens
are
gonna,
I
mean
state
tokens
are
gonna,
become
gnosis,
but
yeah
like
in
the
end.
I
mean
it's
happening
like
nazis
wants
it.
I
feel
that
the
exit
team
wants
it.
B
I
feel
that
some
of
the
projects
that
live
in
the
exit
ecosystem
also
see
the
clear
benefits
on
this,
so
I
kind
of
like
raised
my
hand
to
participate
in
this
multisig
so
that
the
tc
can
also
have
like
a
voice
and
opinion
with
this,
but
yeah
like
as
soon
as
as
soon
as
they
started
discussing
the
the
amounts
and
everything-
and
I
was
like-
oh,
like
35
million
dollars-
is
probably
like
yeah,
I
mean
it's,
it's
a
big
deal
so
probably
by
now
like
if,
before
taking
any
more
action,
I
would
like
to
be
like
open
with
with
the
stewards
about
this
about
these
grants
that
are
gonna,
be
also
in
the
ecosystem.
B
Probably
keep
this
in
our
radar,
for
I
don't
know
some
stuff
that
we
have
that
we
want
to
do.
I
have
actually
some
ideas
that
maybe
we
can
discuss
later
on,
but
mostly
important.
I
feel
that,
regarding
a
next
step,
there
is
this
exile
community
list,
and
I
feel
that
well
xdi
presence.
I
added
that
the
tc,
augmented
bonding
curve
works
with
wrap
text.
I
in
the
xdi
native
tec
token,
but
regarding
commitment.
B
Most
projects
are
committed
to
the
ex
diagnosis
chain
success,
so
I
feel
that
this
could
be
a
good
use
of
the
stewards
council
to
maybe
discuss
what
our
position
is
here
and
yeah.
I
would
just
like
to
be
just
more
transparent
about
everything
that
goes
on
here,
because
I
feel
that
it's
a
it's
a
pretty
big
deal,
considering
that
we're
launching
like
a
1.5
million
dollar
economy,
but
there
are
grants
for
like
35
million
dollars
at
the
moment
for
expanding
the
exit
ecosystem
so
yeah
this.
B
Could
this
could
be
a
really
good
opportunity
and
I'll
just
yeah
I'll
I'll,
just
pass
it
around
to
listen
to
some
of
the
opinions,
and
if
you
have
any
ideas
of
what
our
commitment
would
be,
can
I.
A
Can
I
I
still
don't
understand
what
it
means
like?
What
does
it
mean
if
tec
is
committed
and
what
are
the
obligations
and
what
are
the
liabilities?
I
feel
like.
I
understand
that
this
is
happening.
I
understand
that
you
would
be
one
of
the
people
on
the
multisig
and
that's
super
cool,
and
I
personally
support
that.
But
what
does
it
mean
that
tec
supports
this?
B
Okay,
so,
for
example,
at
some
point,
onehive
was
talking
about
migrating
to
to
ethereum
mainnet.
This
is
mostly
because
the
honey
token
is
native
to
to
the
exit
chain,
and
there
were
some
security
concerns
about
this
so
some
months
ago,
this
idea
about
migrating.
The
governance
to
arvitrum
was
around.
However,
when
the,
when
the
exit
chain
started,
to
take
steps
to
implementing
the
beacon
chain
and
and
becoming
more
more
open
and
and
and
safer.
B
This
conversation
kind
of,
like,
like
started
being
on
on
standby,
so
there
are
some
communities
that
have
racing
concerns
about
the
security,
especially
because
this
hasn't
been
great
for
attracting
a
lot
of
liquidity
to
the
chain.
However,
taking
in
account
the
implementation
of
1559
in
in
the
exit
chain,
and
also
that
gnosis
is
really
interested
in
in
expanding
the
chain
and
growing
the
projects
in
it.
B
So
I
guess
this
is
where
this
question
comes
from,
like
what
the
commitment
of
the
project
is
to
the
exit
chain,
and
I
mean
if,
if
you
ask
me,
since
we
are
like
a
next
like
native
token,
and
the
augmented
bonding
curve
is
also
working
natively
and
in
in
the
exit
chain,
even
though
like
this
could
be
like
transferred
to
another
chain
or
or
or
anything
I
mean,
there's
like
a
general
idea
or
sense,
I
feel
of
how
we
feel
about
living
in
the
exit
chain
like
if
we
think
that
it's
safe,
that
it's
efficient,
that
it
is
what's
good
for
the
tec.
B
So
coming
from
this,
I
would
say
that
maybe
we
could
like
define
a
position
about
what
our
commitment
to
stay
in
the
exit
chain
is
and
how
much
do
we
want
to
grow
and
expand
the
tec
project,
as
as
in
being
part
of
of
of
the
exile
ecosystem.
A
A
So
I
I
mean
I
feel
like
from
what
I
understand
so
far.
I
would
100
support
your
involvement
in
this,
and
maybe
we
get
some
input
from
common
swarm,
since
they
are
the
technical
architects
of
and
probably
have
the
most
informed
opinion
on
x,
die
versus
the
possibility
of
a
different
chain
and
maybe
ask
if
there's
anyone
blocking
you
personally
moving
forward
representing
the
tec
in
this
initiative.
Does
that
sound
like
the
right
thing
to
do.
B
Yeah
definitely
and
yeah.
This
is
why
I
wanted
to
raise
a
topic
before
any
more
steps
were
taken
because
yeah
like
it
involves
commitment
not
like
as
an
individual
or
even
as
a
working
group,
but
the
community
as
a
whole,
so
so
yeah
I
I
would
just
I.
I
would
like
to
listen
to
everybody's
feedback
on
this
and
yeah.
I
mean
there
is
some
opportunity
here,
but
of
course
this
is
something
that
should
be
discussed.
B
The
thing
is
that
this
these
grants
are
meant
to
work
for
projects
that
live
in
the
exit
ecosystem.
For
you
know
for
like
expanding,
so
I
mean
I
can
I
can
imagine
how
this
could
be.
I
don't
know
like
for
agave.
B
This
could
mean
this
could
mean
I
don't
know
like
maybe
started
starting
taking
like
the
gnosis
token
as
collateral
or
something
like
that,
then
I
don't
know
like
that.
It,
it
might
work
differently
for
different
projects.
However,
the
idea
is
for
these
grants
to
help
grow
the
ecosystem.
B
So,
for
example,
I
feel
that
we're
probably
one
of
the
few
projects
that
live
in
nexday
that
are
focused
on
education,
so
maybe
we
could
get
a
grant
for
supporting
the
token
engineering
academy-
or
I
was
thinking
about-
maybe
asking
for
for
for
a
grant
for
helping
the
animation
team
incomes
to
be
able
to
finance
like
a
whole
course
in
animated
videos.
For
for
the
tea
academy.
B
I
don't
know
I'm
just
I'm
just
thinking
out
loud,
but
maybe
we
could
have
access
by
by
in
a
way
like
defining
our
commitment,
which
may
or
may
not
be
something
permanent
or
like.
B
If,
if
at
some
point,
we
can
define
like
what,
where
we
are
standing
regarding
this
like,
if
we
support
the
merge,
if
we
want
to
see
like
where
it
goes,
this
would
allow
us
to
have
let's
say,
like
some
participation
in
in
these
grants,
and
I
feel
that,
with
these
grants
we
could
really
be
thinking
compared
to
other
communities.
B
We
could
really
be
thinking
outside
of
the
box
regarding
what
what
we
can
do
right
like
I
don't
know
what,
if
we
ask
for
a
grant
for
maybe
providing
gravity
services
for
every
community
in
the
exit
chain,
I
don't
know
so
yeah,
so
so
this
this
is
more
likely.
What
I'm
thinking
about.
A
You're
already
sorry
we're
already
at
15
minutes
past.
I
do
want
to
give
lauren
time
to
do
the
params
parties,
but
I
think
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
to
know
exactly
what
question
we
need
to
answer
it.
You
need
answered
exactly
what
question
it's
like.
We
like
by
commitment.
Do
you
mean
the
community
votes
that
the
community
will
be
committed
to
the
chain
or
by
commitment?
The
stewards
agree
that
you're
a
great
representative
for
this,
and
we
all
got
your
back
on
it.
Go
ahead.
Edwardo
sir.
D
Yeah,
I
just
will
say
from
organizational
point
of
view
I
will
take.
I
will
wait
a
little
bit
until
see
how
this
merge
goes
because
the
consensus
is
not
necessarily.
This
is
more
of
an
acquisition
than
emerge
and
they
have
made.
There
is
some
mess
on
the
forum.
The
governance
and
exact
chain
is
not
clean
and
there
was
like
60
against
40
percent
voting
process.
So
it's
not
it's
not
a
full
consent
on
exit
chain.
D
Therefore,
I
foresee
probably
that
this
grants
will
become
a
mess
if
the
merge
is
not
clean
and
I
will
not
see-
I
wouldn't
like
to
be
dc-
be
part
of
that
mess,
so
just
as
a
suggestion
for
that
part
just
to
take
some
distance
and
wait
for
see
if
the
processor
merge
comes
clean
and
if
it
comes
clean,
then
probably
it
could
be
a
good
call,
but
I
don't
seem
clear
consensus
on
xa
community
about
this.
Merge.
B
Okay,
I
I
agree
with
edu
just
summarizing
it
in
two
questions
that
we
can
answer.
So
if
we
did
like
participate
in
this
multisig,
would
the
stewards
be
okay
with
me
being
kind
of
like
the
representative
for
for
that
vote?
Of
course,
I
would.
I
would
never
take
decisions
as
an
individual,
but
yeah
like.
B
I
feel
that
the
second
question
that
we
should
answer
is
not
being
committed
to
the
x
diagnosis
chain,
which
is
what
what
but
more
likely
like
most
most
projects,
are
saying
committed
to
the
ex
diagnosis
chain
success.
B
So
if,
in
a
way
we
are
committed
to
the
success
of
the
chain,
I
feel
that
it's
a
very
different
position
than
saying
we're
staying
here
and
we're
not
moving
anywhere
so
yeah.
Those
are
the
two
questions
that
we
could
probably
answer
and
yeah.
I
guess
well
yeah
I'll
pass
it
to
you.
Sorry,
actually.
A
No,
just
as
one
of
the
people
close
like
closely
involved
with
common
swarm,
I'd
love
to
hear
griff's
input
on
forget
about
the
like,
who
is
we
like?
Is
the
tec
community
committed
or
are?
Are
the
stewards
of
the
did?
The
stewards
of
the
tec
decide
that
we're
gonna.
I
mean,
of
course,
we're
gonna
be
committed
to
their
success,
their
success
and
our
success,
which
somehow
entwined
right
it
would
suck
if
they
fail.
A
E
Well,
it
would
be
a
pain
in
these
if
we
had
to
move
chains,
because
we're
gonna
have
a
token
freeze
and
that's
like
being
released.
Every
second
and
it'd
just
be
really
a
lot
of
work
to
change
chains.
So
if
we
wanted
to
change
chains,
we
would
want
to
do
it
now.
However,
honestly
I'm
very
biased,
I'm
extremely
biased
giveth
is
one
of
the
first
four.
We
helped
start
xdi
and
I've
been
validating
xdi
since
block
number
one.
E
Basically
so,
and
in
fact
I
even
get
1
20th
of
all
the
like
me
personally,
I
get
1
20th
of
all
the
gas
paid
on
x
die,
so
I
am
very
biased
I
so
I
don't
know
that
my
opinion
matters
and
I
I
I'm
gonna-
have
to
bow
out
of
this,
but
from
a
technical
stand
point
it
would
be
a
pain
in
the
ass,
considering
that
we
don't
have
like
a
really
solid
core
of
devs,
especially
that
we
can
that
that
are
committed
to
enhancing
our
community
forward.
E
E
I
will
say
that
chris
is
trying
to
get
on
polygon,
but
the
celeste,
the
thing
big
thing,
that's
slowing
that
down
would
be
celeste
dependability
and
building
a
network
of
celeste.
You
know
judges
that
could
be
counted
on
and
that
I
would
say
that
would
not
there's
no
way.
I
could
trust
that
after
just
a
month
of
you
know
like
if
we
started
now
and
we
launched
in
jan
well
anyway,
I
just
couldn't
trust
lust
on
polygon,
so.
A
Okay,
I
feel
a
little.
I
don't
know
reservation
that
we're
eating
into
lauren's
presentation
time,
but
I
don't.
I
want
to
make
sure
everyone
else
who
wants
to
speak
on
this
gets
hurt
so
before
before
we
get
that
started.
Are
there
any
other
thoughts
I
think
might
yeah?
Is
there
any
other
thoughts.
A
Then
maybe
I'm
going
to
say,
I
think
what
would
be
useful
is
like
the
advantages
and
disadvantages
and
then
what
it
means
by
commitment.
You
know
we
can
we
commit
on
behalf
of
the
tec,
or
can
we
say
the
stewards
aren't,
don't
want
to
block
this
and
would
very
much
be
happy
with
the
success
of
the
gnosis
x
die
if
it
goes
through
when
it
goes
through.
B
Lauren's
time
probably
we
we
should
talk
about
this
again
before
defining
a
a
clear
position.
I
also
would
be
in
favor
of
presenting
this
position
as
the
position
from
the
stewards
so
that
it
isn't
like
us
as
a
whole,
but
but
yeah
we
can.
B
We
can
further
discuss
this
and
also
if
anyone
would
like
to
be
like
more
engaged
with
this
topic
and
and
would
like
to
catch
up
with
a
more
like
general
call
that
gets
more
like
into
the
politics
of
it
and
everything
we
could
also
do
that.
Like
I,
I
know
that
nate
is
also
like
interested
in
the
topic
as
like
for
the
chain,
but
not
really
like
like
like
it.
B
A
C
No,
no,
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
think
a
non-response
to
that
question
of
support
is
is
the
right
way.
I
mean
yeah,
there's
no
benefit
or
detriment
to
to
having
a
position
on
this.
I
just
think
that
if
we
do
commit
and
then
we
back
out-
it's
like-
I
don't
know
it's
of
no
consequence
to
us,
but
really
like
I
don't
know,
I
just
don't
see
any.
E
C
A
A
F
F
I
don't
know
if
you
have
the
groovy
bot
muted,
but
I
don't
okay
cool
well
great
awesome.
Okay,
since
most
of
you
have
already
played
with
the
dashboard,
I
was
thinking.
Actually
I
don't
know
if
everybody
has
there's
a
couple
people
here.
I
don't
even
know
session
acc,
I
don't
know
and
shpak
b.
I
don't
know
you
guys
have
you
guys
played
with
the
dashboard,
because
this
is
now
a
param
party.
F
D
The
live
flap
is
having
hasn't
played.
I
think
the
dashboard
he's
just
joining
no.
F
Hi
delightful
of
us
is
this:
your
first
parent
party.
F
It's
okay,
cool,
it's,
okay,
cool!
What
I
want
to
do
in
this
call
is
have
a
stewards
for
ram
party
debate,
so
I'm
gonna.
Well,
I
guess
yeah.
Do
we
have
any
people
here
who
are
willing
to
champion
some
proposals?
I
mean
we've
got.
We've
got
wonka
and
zephy
and
mitch
and
griff,
who
are
all
like
making
proposals
like
left
right
and
center
all
over
the
place
and
we've
got
nate
the
original
creator
of
erogeny.
F
So
I'm
willing
to
do
one
too,
but
we
already
have
four
hands
raised.
First,
one
to
open
their
mic
is
the
first
one.
Oh
person
open
their
mic.
D
F
All
right,
okay,
we'll
have
griff,
then
mitch,
then
wonka,
then
zefty,
yeah,
cool,
okay,
and
actually
it's
confusing
to
me.
We
have
35
minutes,
so
we
have
8.75
minutes.
We
have
about
four
minutes
per
per
presentation
and
four
minutes
for
questions
and
we'll
try
to
speed
through.
Maybe
we'll
do
three
and
a
half
minutes,
because
there's
always
in
between
time
so
grif
you
have
the
floor,
you
have
three
and
a
half
minutes.
E
Okay,
okay,
let's
go
so.
This
is
a
million
one
goldilocks
faster
erogeny,
so
I
really
love
the
orogeny
template.
However,
I
I
was
convinced
by
wonka
and
angela's
thoughts
that
actually
faster
conviction.
Growth
might
actually
be
a
better
solution
than
than
a
really
long
conviction,
growth
and
I'll.
Show
you
why?
But
I
guess
I'll
start
from
the
top.
This
is
this
is
a
this
is
a
very
important
play.
The
idea
of
this
play
is
to
say,
there's
a
few
there's
a
few
concepts
that
are
coming
in.
E
First,
the
one
dollar
opening
price
and
a
relatively
moderate
token
freeze
in
tokentha.
So
with
the
one
dollar
price
and
a
75
commons
tribute,
we
can
pull
in
a
million
dollars
into
the
common
pool
at
launch
and
also
cement
our
focus
on
being
focused
on
advancing
token
engineering
and
saying
we
are
donating
a
million
dollars
to
the
purpose
of
you
know
advancing
token
engineering
and
from
the
get-go
and
in
the
end
of
this
this
follows
the:
what
is
it
the
the
I
don't
know
what
this
is.
E
This
pattern
needs
a
name
but,
like
we
start
with
a
really
high
entry
tribute
so
that
we
can
get
from
the
from
the
initial
buy.
We
end
up
with
a
large
amount
of
money,
percentage
of
it
going
to
the
common
pool
and
also
because
the
commons
attribute
is
so
high
and
it's
75,
a
22
entry
tribute
for
the
next
round
is
not
so
big
of
a
deal
in
my
opinion,
because
we
can
really
sell
it
on
this
idea
that,
like
hey,
it
was
75
to
be
part
of
the
hatch.
E
Now
it's
only
22
and
you're
getting
the
same
price
as
hatcher's,
although
they
won't
be
they're
getting
a
dollar
fifty,
but
that's
a
better
deal
honestly
in
some
ways
right,
but
we
that
that
could
be
marketed.
The
other
idea
is
like
having
a
lower
reserve
ratio
not
as
much
as
dell
casino
but
but
pushing
it
pretty
low
so
that
we
still
have
a
decent
advancement
of
like
when
people
pay
for
buy
tokens
like
the
price
is
going
up
a
decent
chunk
and
not
worrying
about
the
slippage.
E
So
much
because,
with
such
a
high
entry
tribute
at
the
get-go,
it's
not
going
to
be
that
big
of
a
like
the
slippage
isn't
going
to
compete
so
and
and
the
idea
with
the
entry
tribute
exit
tribute
is
that
every
month
for
five
months,
we
will
reduce
the
entry
tribute
four
percent
and
raise
the
exit
tribute
two
percent,
so
that
it
ends
up
with
two
percent
entry
tribute
and
a
twelve
percent
exit
tribute
at
the
end.
E
Support
required
a
little
bit
lower
since
we're
opening
up
token
holders
to
non-trusted
seed
members.
I
think
we
can
lower
the
support
required
and
since
we
have
delegation
we
can
raise
the
minimum
quorum
and
I
really
like
the
vote
duration
of
five
days,
but
with
a
quiet
ending
period
of
three
days,
so
that
if
it's
controversial
at
all
two
days
are
added
and
it's
a
week-long
vote.
E
But
this
is
the
real.
The
real
interesting
part
is
this
conviction
voting
and
soon
there
will
be
buttons
for
eight
days
and
one
day
and
three
days.
So
then,
you
can
really
see
also
how
these,
how
fast
you
can
pass
votes,
but
it
doesn't
have
my
votes
here
but
like
it's.
It's
really
interesting
to
see
like
this
idea
that
if
a
vote
sits
there
for
three
months,
would
we
really
want
it
to
pass?
You
know
someone?
E
Might
people
might
accidentally
just
leave
their
votes
behind
something
and
walk
away
and
it
could
actually
pass
and
votes
get
stale
like
proposals
will
get
stale
after
a
month
or
two.
So
there's
no
real
point
in
having
such
a
long
conviction
growth,
because
the
votes
that
sit
there
for
a
month
or
two
months
just
won't,
have
any
value.
E
So
I
I
kind
of
played
with
these
parameters,
but
I
think
they
can
still
be
played
with
a
little
bit
better
yeah,
and
so
that's
this
is
you
know:
million
dollar
gambit,
sorry,
one
dollar
gambit
for
a
million
dollar
goldilocks,
faster
herogeny.
F
E
H
E
The
main
thing
is
the
question
of:
is
the
proposer
still
going
to
be
committed,
and
do
we
want
to
make
the
proposer
like
like
what
happens
if
a
proposer,
someone
is
like
hey,
I
want
to
do
this
cad
cad
model
or
hey.
I
want
to
you
know
you
know,
do
this
project
with
with
the
token
engineering
commons
and
then
three
months
you
know,
go
by
and
they
didn't
get
the
funding
after
a
month
and
they're
like
it's.
E
Not
it's
gonna
take
this
much
time
to
pass,
I'm
just
not
gonna,
do
it
anymore
and
they
go
get
another
job
and
they
get
busy.
You
know
so
like
having
it
go
for
too
long.
I
I'm
not
totally
against
the
orogeny.
I
I
really
like
it,
but
I
was
blown
away
at
how
similar
you
can
get
with
for,
like
with
smaller
spending
limits
and
raising
playing
with
the
minimum
conviction
and
conviction.
Growth.
E
So,
like
this,
this
these
settings
ensure
that
we
can
still
fund
like
40,
to
70k
proposals
with
26
vote
weeks
to
pass
like
40
48k
proposal.
That's
assuming
that
we
have
800k
in
the
conviction
in
the
common
pool
and
yeah.
A
E
Well,
the
the
what
what
it
really
prevents
is,
like
smaller
token
holders
than
four
percent
so
like
with
conviction,
growth
at
seven
days.
That
means,
after
seven
days,
fifty
percent
of
the
conviction
power
is
built
up
and
then,
after
three
weeks,
it's
like
87.5
percent
and
after,
like
five
weeks,
you're,
basically
maxed
out
like
there's
very
little.
Whereas
if
you
have
a
larger
conviction
growth,
then
you
can
kind
of
tweak
the
parameters
so
that
the
really
the
span
of
time
that
conviction
grows
can
be
three
months
or
six
months.
E
And
where
is
it
here
and
like
you
know,
you
can
see
like
these
numbers
start
at
122
in
seven
days,
two
weeks
it
goes
to
81
in
a
month.
It
goes
to
64.
in
three
months.
It
goes
to
61.
in
six
months.
It
goes
to
61.,
it
doesn't
get
cheaper,
it
doesn't
take
fewer
tokens,
it
kind
of
caps
out
really
at
about
a
month.
E
You
know
64
to
61.,
but
then,
if,
if
you
make
this
conviction
growth
longer,
then
the
cap
out
happens
much
later,
and
so
it
just
gets
like
cheaper
and
cheaper
to
pass
proposals.
F
So
much
yeah,
that's
your
time.
Thanks
so
much
chris
awesome
proposal.
I
think
wonka
you're
up
next
right.
I
Yeah,
I
am
going
to
share
a
proposal
that
we
did
yesterday
between
libby
mitch
and
I
and
it's
called
ostrom's
one
million
dollar
baby.
So
yeah
we
tried
to
make
a
proposal
to
have
one
million
dollars
in
the
common
pool,
while
taking
into
account
ostrom's
principles.
I
So
this
is
the
proposal
we
start
with
a
initial
price
of
of
0.63.
I
And
why?
Because
after
the
initial
buy,
then
the
price
goes
to
one
so
actually
yeah
the
the
starting
price
will
be
one
because
we
raised
it
after
the
initial
buy
from
0.63,
and
we
will
have
40
weeks
of
freeze
and
40
weeks
of
though
this
being
the
time
of
of
a
baby
of
making
a
baby.
So
that's
why
it's
ostrom's
baby-
and
we
have
here
78
percent
of
commons
tribute
that
will
leave
us
980k
in
the
common
pool.
I
But
with
the
attribute
of
the
initial
buy,
we
will
have
1
million
dollars
because
it's
90
980,
plus
20k,
so
it's
1
million
and
because
the
the
opening
price
is
really
low,
the
reserve
ratio
goes
higher
and
it's
22.5
so
yeah
after
the
initial
buy
the
buy
the
the
the
price
goes
to
one,
and
here
from
for
the
entry
and
exit
tribute,
we
have
a
similar
strategy
to
the
one
that
grief
proposed
to
have
like
an
initial
high
entry
tribute
but
swapping
it
it
every
two
months.
I
So
the
idea
is
that
in
six
months
we
will
pass
fro
from
having
an
entry
tribute
of
eight
and
an
execute
of
two
to
have
an
entry
tribute
of
two
and
an
extribute
of
eight
in
six
months.
I
Yeah.
The
this.
This
was
the
strategy
to
have
one
million
dollars
in
the
common
pool
and
and
to
actually
have
a
high
reserve
ratio,
lowering
the
price,
the
the
opening
price
on
the
tao
boating.
We
left
things
mostly
default.
We
only
reduced
one
day
in
the
delegated
voting
period
so
that
you
can
have
three
days
to
change
your
decision
from
the
your
delegate
gate
and
to
request
funds.
Here
we
were
looking
at
some
of
the
proposals
that
we
have
already
like
the
steroids
proposal.
I
I
also
looked
at
the
community
at
the
team's
proposal
and
gravity's
proposal
and
community
test
proposal,
and
I
see-
and
we
saw
that
we
are
going
to
be
requesting
for
like
from
20k
to
50k
in
in
three
months
for
three
months
of
operations,
so
yeah.
If
we
have
one
million
dollars
like
the
at
ten
percent
of
one
million
dollars,
would
be
a
hundred
k.
I
So
we
lowered
the
spending
limit
so
that
the
maximum
proposal
could
be
around
like
80k,
but
that
it's
easy
to
pass
proposals
that
ask
between
25k
and
and
50k
and
as
as
the
same
thing
that
grief
said.
There's
like
a
cap
that
happens
so
yeah
the
the
cap
is
reached,
and
it's
the
same
for
three
and
for
six
months.
I
So
our
idea
is
to
have
like
a
fast
moving
capacity
to
approve
proposals.
So
so
that
proposals
don't
stack
and
they
compete
between
each
other
for
conviction.
H
Yeah,
I
have
one
question
and
what's
the
reason
like
like
this
proposal,
you
wanna
like
give
like
a
second
opportunity
to
people
who
miss
out
in
the
heights
and
or
is
that
an
economical
decision
of
having
the
same
price
as
the
hatch.
I
Okay,
that's
very
interesting,
and
we
were
talking
that
actually,
a
lot
of
us
will
be
interested
in
buying
tc
tokens
at
the
start
of
the
bonding
curve.
So
it's
actually
also
a
good
opportunity
for
us
to
buy
and
to
gain
more
governance
and
also,
at
the
same
time,
we,
the
price
of
the
token,
will
rise
eventually
and
very
fastly,
because
I
anticipate
that
there
are
some
whales
that
are
like
wandering
around
and
they
are
just
like
waiting
for
their
moment
and
yeah.
I
I
I
I
think
that
it
would
be
good.
That's
why
it
would
be
good
to
start
with
a
high
moderately
high
entry
tribute
and
then
start
lowering
it
and
start
making
much
more
higher.
They
exit
tribute.
F
I
have
a
question
a
rebuttal
I
feel
uncomfortable
with
the
lower
with
the
opening
price,
starting
out
less
than
less
than
a
wrap
one
wrap
next
day.
As
I
I
get
that
it's
like
okay,
with
the
initial
buy,
we'll
have
these
cc
tokens
and
then
theoretically,
it's
kind
of
like
we're,
maintaining
this
price
floor
because
we
probably
won't
be
selling.
But
what,
if
we
start,
then
paying
people
with
tc
tokens
and
then
they
start
selling
them
and
then
it'll
be
really
upsetting
for
the
hatchers
with
those
nine
months
of
their
tokens,
all
wrapped
up.
F
I
That's
also
why
we
have.
We
have
here
a
high
reserve
ratio,
because
this
makes
the
the
lower
limit
more
difficult
to
reach.
I
think
it's
it's
in
this
graph.
Yeah
like
here,
like
the
price
of
the
floor
of
the
token,
is
the
gap
between
the
pla
price
floor
of
the
token
is,
is
smaller,
so
it
will
also
make
it
a
little
bit
like
more
secure
on
on.
Can
you
go
to
the
next?
Can.
E
E
And
it
kind
of
yeah,
so
after
the
initial
buy,
I
mean
one
thing
I
like
about
this
is
the
initial:
buy,
creates
a
lot
of
tokens
for
the
reward
system
and
for
the
you
know,
the
laser
tag
multisig
to
play
with,
but
when
they
sell
those
tokens
so
like
at
a
dollar,
there's
223
000
tokens
or
two
2
million
233
000
tokens
yeah
that
one,
and
so
if
we
sell
like
half
of
the
tokens
that
are
minted,
the
price
goes
to
84
cents.
E
If,
if
those
tokens,
if
more
tokens
are
sold
than
bought
at
the
initial
out
the
gate
and
then
also
the
nine
months,
so
it's
the
reserve
ratio
of
22
percent
definitely
protects
it
a
little
bit.
But
it's
still
like
it's
always
something.
We
have
to
worry
about.
E
F
Okay,
well,
awesome!
That's
that's
the
time.
Are
you
ready
to
queue
up?
Thank
you
so
much
lanka,
great
proposal.
J
Yeah,
I'm
gonna
I'm
gonna
present.
Now
I
have
a
question
for
everybody.
What
do
you
guys
think
about
communism.
J
So
this
is
so.
This
is
a
fork
of
one
that
I've
forked
many
times,
because
I
think
it's
just
it's
just
it's
gonna
be
huge.
It's
gonna
be
big,
so
I'll
get
right
into
it
with
the
guts
of
it
here.
J
Opening
price
one
dollar:
okay,
just
fair
and
equal,
like
minting
rate
straight
from
the
hatch
right
into
the
opening
price
of
the
commons,
upgrade
I
believe
in
having
a
short
vesting
period
and
wonka,
and
I
had
a
really
great
point
where
technically,
we've
already
been
in
a
vesting
period
for
like
five
or
six
months
now
so
out,
the
gate,
a
short
12-week,
token
freeze
and
then
after
that,
only
one
full
year
of
the
token
thought
so
that
we
can
have
all
of
the
tokens
liquid
before
a
year
and
a
half
after
the
commons
upgrade
after
that.
J
Looking
at
the
augmented
bonding
curve,
again
one
dollar
price
commons
tribute
of
70.
J
That
gives
us
well
over
800k,
almost
900k
in
the
comment
pool
to
start
finding
working
groups
and
token
engineering
projects
and
then
also
like
relatively
high,
not
as
high
as
like
griff's
crazy
stuff
over
there.
But
like
an
eight
percent
entry
tribute
and
a
ten
percent
exit
tribute
and
then
so
kind
of
like
what
he's
saying
is
like
I
kind
of
want
to
do
like
the
linear
tribute
swap
so
rather
than
actually
swapping
positions,
though
after
maybe
about
three
to
six
months.
J
We're
gonna
bring
this
right
down
to
about
two
to
three
percent
and
that's
to
keep
volume
high
between
arbitrage
between
secondary
markets
and
the
primary
market,
and
I
think,
really
having
those
that
strong
incentive.
There
will
keep
people
coming
back
to
the
augmented
bonding
curve.
J
But
then
we
want
to
capture
some
of
that
initial
hype
and
so
having
those
high,
like
you,
know,
relatively
high
to
enter
and
then
a
little
bit
higher
to
exit
at
the
beginning
will
keep
keep
the
token
price
slightly
incentivized
to
go
higher
because
people
will
be
less
incentivized
to
sell
the
token
rather
than
to
buy
it
yo
in
a
minute,
okay,
cool.
Well,
then,
let's
go
right
into
it.
J
This
is
the
dow
voting
settings
and
so
88.8
awesome
as
f
vote
duration,
six
days
execution
delay
of
one
day
so
that
we
can
get
proposals
wrapped
up
submitted.
Everything
within
one
week,
which
I
think
is
especially
important
to
keep
things
flowing
and
keep
us
agile
conviction
voting
here,
big
one,
eighteen
percent,
but
we
compensate
that
with
a
minimum
conviction
of
eight
percent.
So
it's
like
it's
still
like.
J
If
you
want
a
base
level
funding,
it's
still
like
relatively
tough,
but
people
are
able
to
ask
for
large
amounts
of
funds
up
front
and
a
lower
conviction.
Growth.
So,
like
grip,
was
at
seven
this
one's
at
eight,
so
it's
like
a
little
bit
slower,
but
still
we
can
get
through
proposals
relatively
quickly
and
I
think
I'll
I'll
leave
it
at
there
and
I'll
open
it
for
people
to
punch
holes
in
my
design.
J
Yes,
but
it
always
it's
always
going
to
be
relative
to
what's
in
our
comment
pool
so
like.
If
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
funds
in
the
common
pool,
we
probably
shouldn't
be
spending
a
lot
of
funds,
so
I
think
it's
all
it's
all
relative
in
that
sense
like
if
there's
only
if
there's
only
500
grand
left
like
we
really
need
to
be
sure
if
we're
going
to
spend
a
hundred
grand
on
a
project.
K
H
Tribute
planning
to
stay
the
whole
time
like
eight
and
ten
percent.
H
C
So
I
guess
my
only
criticism
is
that
when
you
have
such
a
low
conviction,
growth,
the
the
the
behavior
of
token
holders
is
what
I'm
concerned
with,
because
you
with
a
high
conviction,
growth,
the
amount
of
days.
If
it
takes
longer,
then
you
have
value-aligned
people
making
decisions
on
the
proposals
that
are
being
passed
rather
than
short-term
speculators.
Who
can
buy
up
tokens,
stake
them
and
then
pass
a
proposal
and
then
exit
the
economy.
C
J
J
No,
I
really
think
like
having
a
quick
conviction.
Growth
will
help
us
avoid
a
traffic
jam
at
some
point
where,
like
people
need
funding
like
projects
and
groups,
so
having
this
longer
conviction
just
makes
it
like
really
tiring
and
cumbersome
to
actually
like
get
funding
into
the
hands
of
people
who
are
gonna
use
it
effectively.
F
E
J
H
Let's
go:
let's
gamble
together:
okay,
I'm
sharing
my
screen:
yeah,
okay,
tc
casino
yeah.
H
The
first
thing
like
we
really
need
a
high
token
freeze
and
token,
though,
because
the
reset
ratio
is
going
to
be
very
low
but
yeah,
let's,
let's,
let's
go
to
the
fun
actually,
okay,
with
with
this
proposal
after
the
initial,
the
initial,
by
the
token
price
is
going
to
be
5.66,
which
means
like
the
rewards
now
is
going
to
have
a
lot
of
money
and
also
like
the
token
holders,
are
going
to
be
happy,
but
this
is
going
to
be
very
volatile
and
that's
the
the
good
thing
about
this.
H
This
proposal
and
like
the
intention
is,
like
you
know,
like
you,
give
to
the
market,
whatever
the
market
wants,
and
what
matters
is.
What
do
you
do
with
this
value?
You're,
capturing
and
yeah?
Even
if
we're
doing
the
casino
like
the
invention
is
like
with
all
the
money
that
the
casino
is
doing
is
going
to
fund
the
ebola
goods
and
yeah,
like
the
intention
of
this
proposal,
is
having
a
very
high
volatility
and
actually
at
some
point,
like
you
know,
like
the
I
I
feel
like
the
hatches.
H
Most
of
them
are
not
going
to
sell,
so
you
know
we
are
going
to
find
some
price
discovery
pretty
fast
and
then,
after
that,
like
then,
you
know
like
some
rumors
or
stuff
happening
in
the
community,
are
going
to
pump
and
down
the
the
the
price
in
in
a
certain
range
which
gives
like
a
lot
of
momentum
and
a
lot
of
straight
volume
and
I'll
reduce
the
intention.
H
Then,
for
the
the
tower
voting
like
and
and
yeah,
the
intrinsic
tribute
are
low,
just
because
yeah
to
incentivize
this,
this
trade
volume
and
I'm
actually
thinking
like
we
could
fork
it
and
maybe
make
it.
So
this
also
lower
and
also
tweak
a
bit
the
conviction
voting.
But
that's
for
another
proposal,
then
towboating
towable
thing
yeah.
I
really
like
our
hatch
they're
working
good,
like
the
community
is
used
to
them.
So
why
change
like?
I
don't
feel
any
any
reason
to
change
like.
H
Even
if
you
know
people
who
come
outside,
you
know
they
have
to
embrace
our
culture
and
eighty-eight
percent
super
requirement,
yeah
it's
working.
So
why
shouldn't
in
the
future?
H
Through
the
voting
change
then,
and
then
yeah,
I
really
think
like
in
convict
like
having
this
big
conviction.
Growth
is,
is
good
and
healthy
because
it
it's
preparing,
like
you
know
like
in
this
proposal.
We
have
all
the
money
on
the
common
pool
and
our
reserve
is
very
low.
So,
in
order
that
economy
to
succeed,
what
we
do
with
the
money
in
the
in
the
common
pool
is
very
important.
So
that's
why,
like
especially
like
at
the
beginning,
proposals
are
very
hard
to
pass.
H
We
could
simulate
like
the
since
we're
in
this
two
hours.
Working
group
like
the
stores,
are
asking
like
around
like
40k
for
the
first
three
months,
and
then
it's
going
to
be
like
1.2
millions
in
the
common
pool
30
seconds
oh
yeah,
and
then
we
have
like
one
more
or
less
these
tokens
into
circulation
and
then
for
us.
The
store
working
group
like
passing
the
proposal
at
the
beginning
would
cost
us,
like
three
300
tokens
to
pass
it
in
seven
days,
which
probably
the.
H
Actually
have
they
have
it
and
we
could
pass
it
quickly,
but
you
know
like
yeah.
Probably
the
stores
is
like
the
work
group
with
more
token
holders.
I
don't
know
I
think,
and
then
you
know
like
also
like
it's
decreasing
over
time,
so
yeah,
you
know
like
after
six
months
like
the
stores,
it
would
be
very
easy
to
pass
this
proposal
if
we
take
enough,
but
we
could
also
pass
it
in
seven
days
and
the
intention
is
like
especially
like
when,
like
when
people
is
want
to
pass
something
fast.
F
Wild
and
crazy
okay
does
anyone
have
any
questions
over
bottles.
F
E
C
I
was
just
gonna
say
I
continue
to
love
this
proposal
and
I
just
I
love
the
dynamics
of
it
of
just
like
high
volume,
but
the
only
problem
I
have
with
this
is
such
a
high
spending
limit
when
we
have
the
common
pool
that
is
generating
a
lot
of
funds
as
well
as
a
million
dollars
to
start
with.
C
So
I
I
think
the
spending
limit
is
a
little
way
too
high
and
that's
the
the
initial
tribute
could
be
probably
lower
since
we're
going
to
be
generating
a
lot
of
funds
into
the
common
pool
through
this
strategy.
Anyway,.
H
Really
agree
with
you
like
for
this
purpose
of
the
world:
we
really
need
to
use
very
wise
or
common
pool
and
yeah.
I
agree
like
the
the
spending
limit
is
a
bit
high
and
yeah
yeah.
I
really
think
this
is
a
thing
which
we
could
change
and
we
can
change.
That's
the
good
thing.
H
I
feel
you
know,
like
you
know,
like
okay,
we
we
have
this
money
and
we
know
what
the
market
wants
like
the
market
is
very
decent
and
very
you
know
like
it's
incentivized
people
to
to
use
the
money
and
then
what
we
like
the
way
of
selling
it
like.
Okay,
we're
leaving
the
market
wherever
the
market
wants,
but
then
what
really
matters
is
what
we
are
doing
with
this
money
right.
E
E
I
I
just
think
it's
gonna
be
a
hard
sell
like
with
our
branding
and
the
way
that
we
positioned
ourselves
so
far
and
comes
to
the
casino,
that's
that
otherwise.
I
actually
think
it's
really
fun.
Bumble
3d
made
a
lot
of
money.
H
C
H
J
Yeah,
I
was
just
saying
like
what,
if
it
like,
with
a
wild
roller
coaster
of
price
action,
people
could
just
consistently
scoop
up
tokens
at
a
low
price,
and
then
that
would
like
they
would
gradually
build
up
governance
over
time
and
like
pay
very
little
for
it.
H
B
B
Yeah,
sorry,
I'm
on
I'm
on
my
phone.
I
don't
know
what
went
wrong,
but
I
I
agree
with
the
approach
that.